RETROFIT OF HISTORICAL MONUMENTS AND … · Behaviour and safety of masonry structures ... HENDRY -...
Transcript of RETROFIT OF HISTORICAL MONUMENTS AND … · Behaviour and safety of masonry structures ... HENDRY -...
Behaviour and safety of masonry structures
University of Naples "Federico II"Department of Structural Analysis and Design
Prof. Antonello De LucaProfessor of Structural Engineering
RETROFIT OF HISTORICAL MONUMENTS AND PRINCIPLES OF BASE ISOLATION (B.I.S.)
Lesson: 1
15 march 2006
STUDENT AND OTHER ADDRESSES
Antonello De Luca
Students
Other addresses
Giuseppe LUCIBELLOMaurizio TORENOFrancesco ONORIO
Antonio BRANCACCIOGiovanni CANDIDAMichal KRAL
Giovanni MONTUORI
OUTCOME FROM THE STUDY OF STRUCTURAL TYPES IN HISTORY OF ARCHITECTURE
• Historical monuments• Modern construction
5000 Years
• Before steel (1800)• Before concrete (1900)
• After steel (1800)• After concrete (1900)
• 1900 masonry construction?
Antonello De Luca
OUTCOME FROM THE STUDY OF STRUCTURAL TYPES IN HISTORY OF ARCHITECTURE
Before studies on the theory of elasticity and strength of materials
After studies on the theory of elasticity and strength of materials
Some keystones dates
Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)Jacques Bernoulli (1654-1705)Leonhard Euler (1707-1783)
Augustine Cauchy, Coulomb…
1700 - 1800
Antonello De Luca
OUTCOME FROM THE STUDY OF STRUCTURAL TYPES IN HISTORY OF ARCHITECTURE
Before having the tools for design and dimensioning with analytical tools (Numbers coming from theory and computation.
Books to use for designing
Bernard Forest e BelidorLa Science des Ingenieurs (1729-1830)
M. Navier (1807 ? - 1826)Resumé de Lecons sur l’application de la mecanique a l’etabilissement des constructions at des machines
Jean Baptiste Rondelet 1802Traité Tehorique et Pratique de l’art de Batir
Antonello De Luca
STRUCTURAL TYPES IN THE HISTORY OF ARCHITECTURE
Before Navier
Trilith 1+1 Columns2Columns +1 Lintel (beam ?)
Primitive idea of putting one stone on the top of the other:
PYRAMID
• Greek architecture
• Roman architecture
• Up to Navier
Antonello De Luca
STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS IN THE HISTORY OF ARCHITECTURE
Columns, Piers, Load Bearing Wall
Lintel, Architrave, Arch, Vault
Vertical Loads
Horizontal Loads
Antonello De Luca
STRUCTURAL TYPES IN THE HISTORY OF ARCHITECTURE
Vertical loads GREEK
Antonello De Luca
STRUCTURAL TYPES IN THE HISTORY OF ARCHITECTURE
Vertical loads PYRAMIDS
Antonello De Luca
STRUCTURAL TYPES IN THE HISTORY OF ARCHITECTURE
Horizontal loads: slender construction
Antonello De Luca
STRUCTURAL TYPES IN THE HISTORY OF ARCHITECTURE
Horizontal loads: stocky construction
Antonello De Luca
HENDRY - “DESIGN OF MASONRY STRUTURES” (pag. 3)
Typical wall arrangements in masonry buildings
Antonello De Luca
HENDRY - “DESIGN OF MASONRY STRUTURES” (pag. 5)
Liability of a simplecross-wall structure
to accidentaldamage
Antonello De Luca
NAVIER: RESUMÉ DES LECONS
Antonello De Luca
NAVIER: RESUMÉ DES LECONS
Antonello De Luca
NAVIER: RESUMÉ DES LECONS
Antonello De Luca
NAVIER: RESUMÉ DES LECONS
Antonello De Luca
HENDRY - “DESIGN OF MASONRY STRUTURES” (pag. 14)
Classification of clay bricks according to compressive strength and absorption
Antonello De Luca
HENDRY - “DESIGN OF MASONRY STRUTURES” (pag. 14)
Compressive strength classes anr requirements of calcium silicate bricks
Antonello De Luca
HENDRY - “DESIGN OF MASONRY STRUTURES” (pag. 14)
Compressive strength and thickness of concrete blocks
Antonello De Luca
HENDRY - “DESIGN OF MASONRY STRUTURES” (pag. 19)
Compressive strength for mortar (BS 5628)
Antonello De Luca
HENDRY - “DESIGN OF MASONRY STRUTURES” (pagg. 54 and 70)
Partial safety factors in BS 5628
Partial safety factors for material in EC6
HENDRY - “DESIGN OF MASONRY STRUTURES” (pag. 19)
Requirements for mortar (BS 5628)
Antonello De Luca
HENDRY - “DESIGN OF MASONRY STRUTURES” (pagg. 24 and 41)
Effect of water/cement ratio on the compressive strength of mortar of
grades I, II and III
Rlationsip between brick crushingstrength and brikwork strength
forvarious morta strengths. Basedontest results
HENDRY - “DESIGN OF MASONRY STRUTURES” (pag. 57)
Characteristic strength of brickwor and solid concrete blockor whereratio of height tothickness of unit is between2.0 and 4.0
Breymann (Dello spessore dei muri e delle volte Pag. 57)
The stone strength and the safety factor
Breymann reports the sandstone of keuper strength test from Brix for the construction of the Bietigheim viaduct.
1/2 Antonello De Luca
Breymann (Dello spessore dei muri e delle volte Pag. 57)
The stone strength and the safety factor
2/2
From the last table we have:
Type of sandstone
Ultimate stressMPa
Safety factor
Design stressMPa
Max project stressMPa
Brughiera 30.2 1.5Kornwestheim 27.6 1.38
Marbach 40.2 2Kleebronn 18.4 0.9Nordheim 31.1 1.55Heilbronn 46 2.3
220
Breymann report also the max stress for the Bietigheim viaduct. This max stress is 1.1 MPa.
Antonello De Luca
Breymann (Dello spessore dei muri e delle volte Pag. 57)
The stone strength and the safety factor from Cantalupi
Breymann also report the stone strength test from Cantalupi and give another safety factor for this to be assuming in the structure project.
Type of stone Ultimate stressMPa
Safety factor
Design stressMPa
Max project stressMPa
Lava Vesuvio 59 5.9
Liais stone Paris 44 4.4
Hard brick 15 1.5
210
Antonello De Luca
HENDRY - “DESIGN OF MASONRY STRUTURES” (pag. 47)
Typical stress-strain curve for brick masonry
Antonello De Luca
Rondelet (T.IV - Lib.IX - sez.IV - c.I - art.III)
Compression stress in some masonry structures of European Cultural Heritage
StressesStructure
MPa klb/ft2
The columns of Tutti i Santi Church - Angers 4.4 90
The dome pile of S. Pietro in Rome 1.6 35
The dome pile of S. Paolo in London 1.9 42
The Invalidi dome pile in Paris 1.5 32
The dome pile of Santa Genevieffa 3.0 63
The columns of S. Paolo fuori le Mura 2.0 43
The bell tower pile of Saint-Mery .Church 3.0 63
In next slides are reported some examples.
Antonello De Luca
Rondelet (T.IV - Lib.IX - sez.IV - c.I - art.III)
San Pietro in Rome
1,63 MPa35,2 lb/ft2
21103 m2
5511 m2 of masonry in plant(about 1/4 of total surface and about 1/3 of free surface)
Antonello De Luca
Rondelet (T.IV - Lib.IX - sez.IV - c.I - art.III)
Invalidi dome in Paris
1,93 MPa41,7 lb/ft2
2695 m2
724 m2 of masonry in plant(about 4/15 of total surface)
Antonello De Luca
Rondelet (T.IV - Lib.IX - sez.IV - c.I - art.III)
S. Paolo Fuori le Mura Church
1,97 MPa42,9 lb/ft2
9899 m2
1176 m2 of masonry in plant(about 2/17 of total surface and about 5/15 of free surface)
Antonello De Luca
Rondelet (T.IV - Lib.IX - sez.IV - c.II)
Ratio of the total surface represented by the masonry in some structures of European Cultural Heritage
In next slides are reported
some examples.
Antonello De Luca
Rondelet (T.IV - Lib.IX - sez.IV - c.II)
Panteon in Rome
3182 m2
739 m2 of masonry in plant (23% of the total surface)
Antonello De Luca
Rondelet (T.IV - Lib.IX - sez.IV - c.II)
S. Sofia di Costantinopoli
9591 m2
2097 m2 of masonry in plant (22% of the total surface)
Antonello De Luca
Rondelet (T.IV - Lib.IX - sez.IV - c.II)
S. Maria del Fiore in Florence
7881 m2
1582 m2 of masonry in plant (20% of the total surface)
Antonello De Luca
Rondelet (T.IV - Lib.IX - sez.IV - c.II)
Tempio della Concordia Agrigento (Italy)
636 m2
123 m2 of masonry in plant
(20% of the total surface)
Antonello De Luca
Rondelet (T.IV - Lib.IX - sez.IV - c.II)
Cathedral in Milan
11696 m2
1985 m2 of masonry in plant
(16% of the total surface)
Antonello De Luca
Rondelet (T.IV - Lib.IX - sez.IV - c.II)
Nôtre-Dame in Paris
6258 m2
816 m2 of masonry in plant
(14% of the total surface)
Antonello De Luca
Rondelet (T.IV - Lib.IX - sez.IV - c.II)
S. Filippo Neri Church in Naples
2121 m2
273 m2 of masonry in plant (13% of the total surface)
Antonello De Luca
Rondelet (T.IV - Lib.IX - sez.IV - c.II)
S. Sabina Church in Rome
1407 m2
143 m2 of masonry in plant
(10% of the total surface)
Antonello De Luca
Rondelet (T.IV - Lib.IX - sez.IV - c.II)
Rotunda of S. Stefano in Rome
3413 m2
190 m2 of masonry in plant
(6% of the total surface)
Antonello De Luca