Quantec

32UCbNW0106 2 16320 GARRISON 010

2. 163 20RESULTS

Of INDUCED POLARIZATION/RESISTIVITY SURVEYS

on the WINTEROAD RESOURCES PROPERTY, GARRISON TOWNSHIP

near MATHESON, ONTARIO, DISTRICT of COCHRANE

for WINTEROAD RESOURCES LTD., TIMMINS, ONTARIO

L: ,;V

Porcupine, Ontario October, 1996. OJP Project P-129

Quantec IP Inc. J.M. Legault G.R.J. Warne

32DC5N'.\0106 2 16320 GARRISON Q -j QC

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS ......................................................................................^

1. INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................1

2. GENERAL SURVEY DETAILS ...........................................................................................2

2.1 Location and Access.............................................................................................2

2.2 Claims Numbeis ...................................................................................................4

2.2 Survey lines.........................................................................................................^

3. SURVEY WORK UNDERTAKEN.......................................................................................^

3.1 Generalities..........................................................................................................4

3.2 Personnel .............................................................................................................7

3.3 Equipment and Survey Procedure ........................................................................7

3.5 Difficulties encountered and accuracy of measurement ........................................8

3.6 Data processing and Presentation of Resurts........................................................8

3.7 Digital Data Formats.............................................................................................12

4.0 SUMMARY INTERPRETATION .......................................................................................13

APPENDIX A: STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS

APPENDIX B: PRODUCTION LOG

APPENDIX C: INSTRUMENT SPECIFICATIONS

APPENDIX D: LIST OF MAPS

APPENDIX E: IP/RESISTIVITY MAPS (IN POCKET)

Quantec

1. INTRODUCTION

At the request of Winteroad Resources Ltd.. Toronto, ON. Quantec IP Inc. (QIP), of Waterdown ON. conducted a multiple gradient/RealSection IP/Resistivity geophysical surveys at the Winteroad Property, in September-October, 1995. The Winteroad Property is situated near the Town of Matheson, in Garrison Township ( See Figure 1 ). The project was carried out under the direction of Mr. John Moses, of Winteroad Resources Ltd.. The survey objectives were the following:

1. To locate and delineate sulphide concentrations hosted in subvertical structures (e.g. the Ludgate Lake shear and Bufforrta/Tumer Lake shear) at depths up to 1500 feet.

2. To further delineate sulphide concentrations hosted in shallow dipping structures occurring within these subvertical shear structures.

The RealSection technique was adopted based on its high resolution and deep penetration characteristics. The "RealSection* survey design uses multiple gradient arrays - with variable depths of investigation controlled by successive changes in array size/geometry. The method of data acquisition and the 'RealSection* presentation are based on the specifications developed by Dr. Perparim Alikaj, of the Polytechnic University of Tirana. Albania, over the course of 10 years of application. This technique has been further developed for application in Canada during the past four years, in association with Mr. Dennis Morrison, president of Quantec IP Inc.

This report outlines the survey technique used, the geophysical work undertaken and presents the final data results and plots. A summary interpretation is also include to satisfy ODM requirements for mining assessment credits. This assessment credits are intended to apply to claims held by Skeed Holdings Ltd.. of Sault-Ste-Marie, Ontario and Mr. RA. MacGregor.

Figure 1: General location map showing Winteroad Property.

Quantec

2. GENERAL SURVEY DETAILS

2.1 Location and Access

The Winteroad Property is located 40 km east of Matheson, ON, in Garrison Township, District of Cochrane (Figure 1). The survey grid is located 2.5 km south of highway 101, and lies east of Clermont, Halfway and Pothole Lakes, and is transected by Garrison creek. The Buffonta Open Pit, a small pyritiferous gold mine operated by Kerr Addison Mines in 1981, lies just east of the property. The property is -d km south of the Destor Porcupine Fault Zone, forming part of the Harker-Holloway-Garrison Belt gold camp.

The survey crew was camp-based on the property throughout the duration survey. The property was accessed from by traveling 4.5km south along a gravel road leading to the Buffonta Open Pit, from highway 101, at a point just east of Twin Lakes - approximately 35km east of the town of Matheson. The survey lines were easily reached using several 4wd and ATV roads which crosscut the property, and were then traveled on foot.

2.2 Claim Numbers

The survey encompassed the following claims1 , which form the Winteroad Resources Property in Garrison Township:

L522593 L522594 L522595 LL522596 L522597 L522598 L522599 L522600 L522601 L522602 L522602 L522603 L522604

Approximate, from Report on Garrison Twp. Gotd Property. Matheson ON. for Winteroad Res. Ltd.. Figure 2. page. 3, by Pearson, Hofrnan 4 Associates Ltd., Ref. 92-06 WRR-101, June, 1992.

2

Quantec

2.2 Survey lines

The survey control consisted of an imperial cut grid established prior to the survey by Winteroad Resources Ltd. The survey grid comprised 24 x 200ft spaced lines (N-0000 Azm.) extending from L32+OON to 8+OOS - with a base-line at 0+OON. The station interval was 100 feet, without secant corrections. The NS survey line coverage is described in Table l.

UNE

10+OOE8 1- GOE6+OOE4+OOE2+OOE0+00

2+OOW4+OOW6+OOW8+OOW10+OOW1 2+OOW14+00 W16+00 W1 8+OOW20+OOW22+OOW26+OOW30+OOW

SOUTH EXTENSION

800S900S1000S1000S1900S2000S2300S21 DOS21 DOS2100S2100S2200S21 DOS21 DOS2100S2100S1800S1200S1200S

NORTH EXTENSION

SOON1600N1700N1600N1600N1500N1500N1400N1400N1400N1500N1700N3300N3300N3300N3100N3000N2900N3000N

TOTAL

1 600ft2500ft2700ft2600ft3500ft3500ft3800ft3500ft3500ft3500ft3600ft3900ft5400ft5400ft5400ft5200ft4800ft4100ft4200ft72600ft

Table l: Survey Line Coverage on Winteroad Property.

Quantei

3. SURVEY WORK UNDERTAKEN

3.1 Generalities

The geophysical program was undertaken between September 21 ST to October 8™ 1995. A total of twenty seven miles and two tenths (27.20 miles; pot-to-pot coverage) of gradient array IP/Resistivity surveys were conducted over the survey area. Using two large (2200x4500ft) gradient rectangles (IP Block l and II, for east and west grid, respectively) the total coverage encompassed nineteen (19) lines, totaling 72,600 line-feet (Table l), and the remaining 70,900 ft combining RealSection coverage (4 lines), overlapping gradient rectangle (5 lines) measurements and cross-dipole measurements.

In order to provide the current-source field required for the multiple gradient array measurements, several grounded dipoles (referred to as *AB's") were established over the survey grid (Table II). The dipoles were centred over a specific survey area and measured with a roll-along receiver spread of seven electrodes (six collinear dipoles, see figure 2) with a dipole "a" spacing (MN) of 100 feet. Both the primary voltage and secondary voltage decay (chargeability) were acquired in the time-domain, using a square waveform transmitted either at a frequency of 0.125 Hz at SO/fc duty cycle (2-seconds ON, 2 seconds OFF) or 0.0625 Hz Dt.Cy. 4 ON/4 OFF), according to the Gradient Rectangle Block2 (i e l - East and II * West).

GRADIENT ARRAY 1i0oo - 10.000 n

up to 1,200 ft\

'/////./Ay//////

600-5.400n MN-10011

GRADIENT ARRAY COVERAGE AREA

Figure 2: Gradient array used on the Winteroad Property

IP Block 1 (L10 + OOE to 12 + OOW). including all Real Sections, read using 4*ec On/Off (0.0625 Hz) IP Block 2 (L4 + OOW to L30 + OOW), using 2 tec. On/Off, due to better signal-to-noise obtained.

4

Quantec

AB Line

raocfciiQffc aoow

eoow

eoow

eoow

eoow

eoow

aoow

400W

CI min.

Ifnfltft**43006

36006

3300S

2300S

1800S

2600S

100OS

2000S11006eoos

120OS2000S

500S17DOS

SUBTOTAL

C2 max.

16 Hz M ste. 0SCON

3400N

34008

28OON

1200S

eoos

1000N

1000S000

300N

200S1100S

SOON500S

AB length

*OFF19. TOO rt AB

7.000 n AB

6, 700 rt AB

4,900 n AB

3,000 n AB

2.000 tt AB

2,000 tt AB

i.oooftAB1,100 rt AB900 n AB

i.ooonAB1,100 tt AB

1.000ft AB1.200 ft AB

MN Line

1200W1000Waooweoow400W200W00020064006eooEaooE1000E

000200W400W400Weoowaoow1000W1200W

1200Waooweoow400W200W

eooweoow400W

eooweoow400W

eooweoow400W

eooweooweoow

aoowaoow

400W400W

P1 min.

2200S21 COS21 DOS2100S2100S2300S2000S190OS16DOS1000S900SBOOS

2000S23008200N2000S2000S2100S21 COS2000S

1200S1800S180OS180061800S

160OS1600Sleoos

1900S1900S1900S

800S800S800S

1900S1000SSODS

1100S1800S

400S1SOOS

P2max.

17OON1500N1400N1400N1400N1500N1500N1600N1000N17OON1600NaooN

1500N1500N1400N200N1400N140ON19DON1600N

4DON1400N1400N1400N1SOON

800N800NBOON

800S8006BOOS

TOONTOONTOON

1100S1008ICON

300612008

400N8008

MN length

3900ft3600ft3500ft3500ft3500ft3800ft3500ft

L 3500ft3800ft2TOOft2500ft1600ft

38200 FT3500ft3800ft1200ft2200ft3400ft3500ft3600ft3600ft

24800 FTieooft3200ft3200ft3200ft3300ft

14SOOFT2400ft2400ft2400ft

T200FT1100ft1100ft1100ft

3300 FT1500ft15OOR1500ft

4500 FT800ft900fteooft

2300 FT800 n600 n

1400 FT800ft900ft

1TOOFT97,900 FT

Table Ka: IP Block l (Grid Eastt Gradient and Real Section Coverage.

Quantec

g*Btocfcit 1800W

SUBTOTALTOTALS

iridWMtt 33QOS 4000N 7,300 tt AB 400W

600Weoow1000W1200W1400Wleoow1800W2000W2200W2600W3000W

16006160061800S180081800621006210082100821006180081300813008

SOON800NOOONeooN300N3300N3300N3300N3100N3000N2900N3000N

2400 tt2400ft1800ft2400ft2100ft5400ft5400ft5430ft5200ft4800ft4200ft4300ft

4C.MOFT27.20 mile*

Table Kb. Gradient and-ftaa/Section Survey Coverage over Block H (Grid West).

Quantec

3.2 Personnel

GR Jeff Wame Senior geophysicist/Supefvisor Porcupine, ON

Kevin Blackshaw Geophysical technician. Foreman Owen Sound, ON

Richard Chasse Geophysical technician, Crew chief Toronto. Ontario

Neil Maukonen Geophysical technician, Operator Orillia, Ontario

Paul Cassidy Field assistant Timmins. Ontario

Marc Sigouin Geophysical technician NorthBay, Ontario

3.3 Equipment and Survey Procedure

The survey was conductive with an IP6 time-domain induced polarization/resistivity receiver manufactured by IRIS Instruments, under license from BRGM Instruments of Orleans. France. The unit is a portable, microprocessor-controlled acquisition system capable of simultaneously measuring six dipoles. Geometric parameters, time parameters, intensity of current, array types and station numbers are fully programmable. For each dipole, the unit measures or calculates the self-potential (Sp - mV), primary voltage (Vp - mV), apparent resistivity (pa - 0-m), the secondary voltage decay over ten time slices, and the total apparent chargeability (M - mV/V). All programmed parameters, and measured and calculated values are stored in solid state memory. Its approximate weight, including rechargeable batteries, is 12 Ib.

The MK-4 variable frequency transmitter was employed (maximum output voltage 3200 volts, weight 90 Ib.) in conjunction with an MK-4 generator and powerplarrt, consisting of a Westinghouse 10 kVA, 3-phase, 400 Hz. alternator coupled to a 25 H.P. Kohler motor-generator (350 Ib.). Both units are manufactured by Huntec Systems, of Scarborough, Canada. The system provided a stable, regulated current (15 amps maximum) at either an 8 second or 16 second period, with a 50 percent (time domain pulse) duty cycle.

The E-fiekJ signal (AVsE.dl) is collected using end-on dipoles, consisting of 18-gauge copper wire connected to grounded stainless steel electrodes. Stainless steel electrodes connected via 10 gauge copper wire were used for current injection contacts. Electrode contacts were watered with saturated CaCI solution in order to improve the contact resistance. Transmitted currents between 1150 to 2900 milliamperes were achieved. UnkJen VHP-band radios provided communication links for the crew in the field.

All measured values were routinely stored in the receiver's solid state memory, and at the end of each survey day, the IP-6 was interfaced with an Ultinet Portable micro-computer (486DX-66) and the data transferred to disk for storage and processing. Report-quality field plots were generated on site, using a 24-pin colour printer, to monitor the data quality and to provide a preliminary interpretation capability.

Quantec

The induced polarization survey implemented the gradient electrode configuration, using a dipole "a" spacing (MN) of 100 feet and current diodes (AB) ranging from 900 to 9700 feet. The receiver array consisted 6 end-on dipoles, totaling 600 feet in length, and the profiles were surveyed using the roll-along technique. The 6 end-on dipoles consisted of 7 receiving porous pot electrode, filled with a saturated copper sulphate solution, that are in turn connected to the receiver (Rx) with copper wire. Up to nineteen thousand three hundred (19,300) line-feet of coverage were surveyed per field day.

3.5 Difficulties encountered and accuracy of measurement

The quality of measurements in the field was closely monitored during the course of the survey in order to detect any weaknesses, either technical or natural, which could have affected the quality of the data recorded. Overall, the survey progressed deliberately and efficiently, as evidenced in the high production levels.

Low signal strengths, resulting from poor current electrode contacts, forced the changing of AB lengths on September 27 - despite the loss of 1/2 day, this produced an increase of 1 2. to 2.9 amperes and better signal to noise. Low signal strengths at the onset of IP-Block II (10/4) resulted in the day's data being completely discarded, and repeated with a smaller AB and with a shorter (2 sec. versus 4 sec.) ON/OFF timing - thereby producing greatly reduced noise levels . Finally, as a result of negative chargeabilities, several profiles were surveyed using cross-dipotes to monitor current channeling effects, on Sept. 26, 29, 30, and Oct. 7, 1995 - however, no appreciable loss in productivity is noted.

Overall, a repeatability of approximately 1 'K for the primary voltage, and 0.5 mV/V for the chargeability were easily maintained throughout the course of the survey. In general, the excellent data quality is evidenced by the low standard errors of measurement and high repeatability -as well-shown in the smooth nature of the stacked profile plan presentation.

3.6 Data processing and Presentation of Results

Once the data have been collected in the field, the receiver is interfaced with a micro computer and the raw field data is transferred onto diskette for further reduction. Following this, the data sets are reduced, using the Geosoff^ program IPREO to apparent resistivity and total chargeability, as explained in the following figures and equations:

Using the following diagram (figure 3) for the gradient array electrode configuration and nomenclature:3

3 From Terraplue\BRGM. IP-6 Operating Manual. Toronto, 1987.

8

where:

Quantec

y-ax/9t

M i N

B•*- x-ax/a

Figure 3: Gradient array configuration

the origin O is selected at the center of AB the geometric parameters are in addition to a - AB/2 and b ^ MN/2 X is the abscissa of the mid-point of MN (positive or negative) Y is the ordinate of the mid-point of MN (positive or negative)

gives the gradient array apparent resistivity:

Gradient Array Apparent Resistivity*:

VP p. = K — ohm - metres

where: K ^ (AM* -AN* -BM* +BN*)

AM (a +X -b) 1

AN =<J(a+x

BM =

BN =

Using the following diagram (figure 4) for the Total Chargeability:2

Prom Tefraolu8\BRGM. IP-6 Qpafating Manual. Toronto. 1987.

Measured Voltage Line

* One half of Transmit Cycle

"Off Time-positive

Vs(t)

negative i e.

"OnTime" t(0) t delay tend

Quantec

Figure 4: The measurement of the time-domain IP effect

the total apparent chargeability is given by:

Total Apparent Chargeability:5

M.. = -J- ^ J*Vs (t)dt millivolts per volttpVp 1=1 IMW

where f/, 4+1 are the beginning and ending times for each of the chargeability slices, which can be programmed, in the IRIS IP-6 receiver, to ensure optimum anomaly resolution and noise suppression - according to the specific geotogic/geomorphotogic environment. Thechangeability time-gates chosen for Winteroad are given in Table III:

5 From Telford, ot at.. Applied Geophysics. Cambridge U Press, New York. 1983..

10

Quantec

Slice

2 sec. On/OnTdT,T,T3T4T5T6T7T8T9T10

Total TD

4 sec. On/OffTdT,T,T3T,TsT6T7T8T9T10

Total TD

Duration (msec)

4020303030180180180360360360

1690

6060606060360360360720720720

3540

Start (msec)

0406090

12015033051069010501410

0601201802403006601020138021002820

End (msec)

406090

120150330510690105014101770

6012018024030066010201380210028203540

Mid-Point (msec)

507510514024542560587512351595

801502102704808401200174024603180

Taft/e H: Programmed time-slices, and MI oates chosen, for Winteroad Survey.

Where the values T, to T10 represent the width, in milliseconds, of each IP time slice. Td represents the time delay before measunng the IP decay and Tp represent the total time after the induced field is shut off

As for the unique RealSection data presentation format, the derivation used convert the AB spacing to vertical depth is prospective to Quantec IP, Inc. More detailed descriptions on the theory and application of the IP/Resistivity method, and the gradient RealSection technique can be found in the following reference papers:

Cogan, H., 1973,

Langore, L, Alikaj, P. Gjovreku, D., 1989.

Comparison of IP electrode arrays, Geophysics, 38 737-761.

Achievements in copper sulphide exploration in Albania with IP and EM methods, Geophysical Prospecting, 37, p 925-941.

11

Quantec

4.0 SUMMARY INTERPRETATION

The multiple gradierrt/RealSection induced polarization/resistivity surveys at Winteroad Property provided a physical characterization of the geoetectric parameters of the grid area, from surface to approximately 1500 ft depths. The survey was designed to provide regional reconnaissance, and high-resolution IP/Resistivity coverage through the eastern and western portions of the property, using two large gradient rectangles (IP Block l and II, respectively), which were overlapped over the center for a total of nineteen profiles (19). Subsequent anomalous signatures were followed up using four (4) RealSection arrays.

The major ENE-WSW to NE-SW geoetectric grain observed in the plan-view apparent resistivity and chargeability maps agrees with the regional geologic strike, and the orientation of major structural components inferred geologically - notably the Ludgate Lake Shear and the Destor Porcupine Fault Zone (located north of Winteroad), respectively. To a lesser extent, a NW-SE grain is also visible in the northern halves of the IP/Resistivity plan maps, which is possibly related to the Buffonta-Tumer Shear. Variations in overburden appear to have little expression in the Real-Section results - even at small AB's.

The Winteroad IP/Resistivity signature is characterized by generally moderate to high resistivities (500-30R ohm-m) and low to moderate chargeabilities (3-15 mV/V) which are generally consistent with mafic to intermediate volcanic rocks, which are indicated to underlie the property - although the areas of unusually high resistivities to the SE suggest a possible quartz/silicic alteration component, locally. Most striking however, is the marked NW-to-SE trending increase in bulk resistivities and chargeabilities observed in the plan maps - with a sharp NE contact extending from 2000S/2000W and 1600N/0+OOE which has not, as yet, been identified in geologic compilations, but appears to mark the eastern extent of known mineralization. Although the IP and Resistivity trend is also in general agreement with the overall thinning of overburden to the SE, as a rule, the influence of geomorphology is not usually significant in Gradient IP results at largest AB spacings. Furthermore, the noticeable difference in the overall position of the break between Block l and II, is very unusual and characteristically denotes a bedrock effect. The IP/Resistivity results, therefore, appear to suggest that this structure defines a major geologic/compositional or geochemtcal/alteration boundary of significant interest.

Of greatest interest, in the Winteroad survey is the definition of a region of increased chargeability (s-IOmV/V) and increased resistivity (M Ok ohm-m) occumng in the south-eastern comer of the property - immediately east of the major break described above. This broad NE- SW trending anomalous zone appears opens towards the NE and SW, beyond the current survey coverage. Within this broad anomalous zone, several prominent polarizeabte ENE and SE lineaments are observed - some of which have been further characterized in the RealSections. Of particular interest, is the IP/Resistivity signature of the EW Ludgate Lake Shear, which cross-cuts the property near BLO+OON. This zone is characterized by a sharp decrease in the apparent resistivities and a broader increase in chargeability - suggesting an open fault-fracture zone with attendant increase in disseminated sulphides - as evidenced in diamond drilling information.

The RealSection coverage reveals the following:

* Along 8+OON, the RealSection identifies the Ludgate Lake Sheer (LLS) as a broad, subvertical to steeply south-dipping resistivity low and a sharper chargeability low - both centered at 100S. Also, across the LLS, an apparent block down-faulting occurs towards the north. Of interest, a 200 ft wide, subvertical deep seated chargeability high at 350N is identified at the 1000 ft level, just north of the LLS. A second, possibly associated feature at

13

Quanter

650S-550S appears to dip steeply northward along the contact and, despite its narrowing width with depth, the increasing chargeability suggests an increase in sulphide content. Additional chargeability high features south of the LLS (960S and 1460S) appear to be crosscut/offset by a shallow dipping (South) structure, yet remain depth-extensive.

* Along 6+OOW, the RealSection response is identical to 8+OOW - identifying a sharp decrease in resistivity and chargeability across the LLS (near 200S). and an apparent block down- faulting towards the north. As with 8+OON, a buried 200 ft wide subvertical chargeability high is identified below the 800ft level - this time near 100N, which suggests this lineament is SE- trending (\.e. parallel to the Buffonta-Tumer Shear trend). As well, a second, narrower subvertical chargeability high is also identified south of the LLS contact at 350S-400S - the NS position of this zone indicates a NE-SW lineament when correlated with the 8N anomaly. This feature is stronger and shallower (~400ft) than the northern zone, and appears to strengthen at depth - suggesting an increase in disseminated sulphides and good vertical extension. Similar depth-extensive chargeability features are also identified at 1350S and 1150S.

* The RealSection from 4+OOW also identifies a reststivity/chargeability contact associated with the Ludgate Lake Shear zone, near 200S - with a similar block down-faulting from south to north implied. A broad (500ft wide), buried anomaly (>600ft) appears to mark the intersection of the both obliquely-striking NE-SW and NW-SE chargeability highs identified in L8+OOW and L6+OOW - the maximum value of chargeability near the 1500ft level suggests it is also deep seated and/or depth-extensive. Narrow subvertical chargeability highs near 900S, 11 DOS and 14+50S appear to be depth-staggered - suggesting they extend from a moderately south-dipping feeder system ?

* Finally, the RealSection along L2+OOW again identifies the LLS as a resistivity/chargeability contact and zone of apparent block down-faulting near 200S. A weak, diffuse high at 1200ft level depths near 150S implies a deeply buried south-dipping feature. Two additional, buried chargeability highs are also identified near 600S and 1160S. A prominent decrease in bulk chargeability is noticeable south of 12+OOS - possibly demarcating the southern extent of the Winteroad mineralization.

In conclusion The Winteroad RealSection survey has highlighted the high resolution and deep penetration characteristics of the technique. In addition to better defining known geologic structures, it has also identified additional zones of interest - as yet undiscovered with conventional geophysical arrays and methods. It is recommended that the IP anomalies associated with the Ludgate Lake Shear zone be the first to be drilled and classed according to geologic interest. The remaining chargeability highs occurring to the south occur in zones of outcrop, and should be prioritized in accordance with more detailed geologic mapping. The cause of the major NE-SW break could also prove important in prioritizing anomalies in dose proximity. Prior to additional drilling, however, it may be beneficial to increase the RealSection coverage - particularly to the central southwest and to the central north-east.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, QUANTEC IP INC.

May25Th , 1995. Porcupine, ON

14

Jean M. Legault, P.Eng. (QC) senior geophysicist

Quantec

APPENDIX A

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS

l, Jean M. Legault, hereby declare that:

1. l am a consulting geophysicist with residence in Timmins. Ontario and am presently employed in this capacity with Quantec Consulting Inc. of Porcupine. Ontario.

2. l am a graduate of Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, in 1982, with a Bachelor's Degree with Honours, in geological engineering.

3. l am a member of the Ordre des Ingenieurs du Quebec, and am licensed to practice engineering in the province of Quebec, Canada.

4. l have practiced my profession continuously since graduation.

5. l am a member of the Prospectors and Developers Association, the Porcupine Prospectors and Developers Association and the Association des Prospecteurs du Quebec.

6. l have no interest nor do l expect to receive any interest, direct or indirect, in the properties or securities of Winteroad Resources Ltd.

7. The statements made by me in this report represent my best opinion and judgment based on the information available to me at the time of the writing of this report.

Porcupine, ON October, 1995.

Jean M. Legault, B.Se.. P.eng. Senior geophysicist

15

Quanter

APPENDIX B

PRODUCTION LOG

TDIP Survey

Garrison Twp. PropertyDistrict of Cochrane, ON

for

Wlnteroad Resource*Toronto, ON

by

Quantec IP. Inc.Waterdown. ON

Sept 21* to Oct1*. 1995

JeffWame Geophysicist, Supervisor Richard Chasse GeophysicalOperatorPorcupine. ON Oakvfle. ON

NedMaukonem Geophysical field assistant Paul Cassidy, Field assistant Severn Bridge. ON South Porcupine, ON

Kevin Blackshaw Geophysical Operator, Field foreman Owen Sound, ON

Sept. 21 st : Mob equipment to project ste (cabin on grid) from Timmins.

Sept. 22nd: Purchase supplies, mob equipment and personnel to protect site Set up camp. tP BLOCK 1. Electrode SetupBegan to established Tx dipole AB^.700 n Q 54N.6W-43S.6vV. Production: ni Total production: nil

Sept. 23rd r BLOCK 1. Electrode SetupCompleted Tx dipote AB^.TOOft Q 54N.6W-43S,6W. Test readings to monitor signalstrength, EM cooping, etc. on 6+OOW Tested pots and ttaintem steel Rx atectfuJeaPrimary voltage Q 40 - 50 mV, current 2.6 amps O 24COV. error in chergeabOly Q ±02

mV/V wth pots. 0.3 mV/V with rods Kevin Blackshaw mob to Matheson from Owen Sound, JW picked up and drove to camp.

Production: nilTotal production: nil

Sept 24th : Surveyed line 12+O3W- 1 TOON to 2200S fine 1OOOW - 21 CDS to 1SOON line 6XXMV - 1400N to 21QOS Nne6*OOvV-21CDNto300N

Production: 13,4O3n^ 2.54 miles Total production: 2.54 miles

16

Quantec

Sept .25th : Surveyed ine 6+OOW-SOON to 1400Nine 4+OOW - 2100S to1400Nme 2+OOW - 2300S to 1500NIne 0*00-2DOOS to 1 SOONline 2+OOE -19006 to 1600Nine 4*006 - 2100N to 1000N

Dennis arrived in camp to mob Jeff to Timmins Production: 18,000 n = 3.41 mies Total production: 5.96 mies

Sept 26th Surveyed line 6*006-10008 to 1 TOONine8*OOE-90D8 tolflOONine 10+006-SOON to 800S

Surveyed cross dbote measurements for channeling effects Estabtshed Tx dipole AB^TDOOH O34N.36S ine 600W Production: 6.800 ft - 1.29 mie* Total production: 7.24 rritos

Sept.27ttl Surveyed ine0+OOW-2OOOSto 1900Nine 2+OOW - 2300S to 1400Nine 4+OOW - 14OON to 2100S

Estabished Tx dipole AB g 6700n Q34N.36S ine SCOW (increased current from 1.2 to 2.9A) Production: 8,500 ft = 1.66 mies Total production: 8.84 mies

Sept. 28th : Surveyed ine 4+OOW - 2OOOS to 200Nine 6+OOW -1400N to 2000Sine 8+OOW - 21 DOS to 1400Nine 10+OOW - 21 DOS to 1900Nine 12+OOW-2000S to 1 BOON

Jeff arnved in camp to drop off radk), and to ptrfriyi data Production: 16,300 ft z 3.08 mies Total production: 11 93 mie*

Sept.29tt1 : Surveyed cross dipole measurements for channeling effect on AB*6700ft Estabished Tx dipole AB - 4900ft O 26N. 23S ine 800W Surveyed ine 2+OOW - 1900N to 18006

ine 4+OOW-1400N to 1800Sine 6+OOW-14OON to 1800Sine 8+OOW - 600N to 18008

Jeff in camp, more cross dpoto measurements (locate highest Vp) Production: 12,10011 = 2.29 mie* Total production: 142 mies

Sept 30th Vpde(iwdoriertationnwaMjrernentline12W,amideirieated2v(90N.11508). Data coftactod at above stations conclude channeling Q 310 azimuth, vs. 350 azimuth for remaining stations. Phone Dennis, due to time restrictions, no further information can be ooiected at this tame. Surveyed Ine 12+OOW - 1200S to 400N

ine 8+OOW - BOON to 1400N Production: 2,400 ft * 0.45 mies Total production: 14 67 rratos

Oct. 1 st : Established Tx 0100^8 = 300011312^ l8Sine600W Surveyed ine 4+OOW-800N to 16006

ine 6+OOW-SOON to 1800Sine 8+OOW - SOON to 1600S

Established Tx dipole AB ^ 2000 ft Q 26S. 6S ine 600W Surveyed ine 4+OOW - 8006 to 19006

ine 6+OOW-8008 to 19006ine 8+OOW - 8006 to 19005

Estabished Tx dipole AB ^ 2000 ft Q 10N, 106 ine 600W Surveyed line 4+OOW - TOON to 8006

ine 6+OOW - TOON to BOOSine 8+OOW - TOON to 8006

Production: 15.000 ft = 2.84 mies Total production: 17.52 mies

17

Quantec

PRODUCTION JOB SUMMARY

Total Day* (11/09-QV10) - 11 J)minus Total Mob * 1.0minus Total Weather ^ 0.0minus Total Demob = 0.0minus Total Standby z 0.0minus Total Down s 0.0equals Total Production day*: 1**

Total Production 27.19 mie*equals Total Average production: 1.83 mflec/producUon day

19

Quantec

APPENDIX C

INSTRUMENT SPECIFICATIONS(from IRIS Instruments IP 6 Operating Manual)

Weather proof caseDimensions: 31 cm x 21 cm x 21 cmWeight 6 kg with dry cells

7.6 kg with rechargeable bat. Operating temperature: -200C to 70*0

(-400C to 70"C with optional screen heater) Storage: (-40"C to 70^) Power supply: 6 x 1.5 V dry cells (100 hr. @ 200C) or

2 x 6 V NiCad rechargeable (in series) (50 hr. @ 20*^) or

1 x 12V externalInput channels: 6 Input impedance: 10 Mohm Input overvottage protection: up to 1000 volts Input voltage range: 10V maximum on each dipole

15 V maximum sum over eh 2 to 6 SP compensation: automatic 10 V with linear drift correction

up to 1 mV/s Noise rejection: 50 to 60 Hz poweriine rejection

100 dB common mode rejection (for Rs^O) automatic stacking

Primary voltage resolution: 1 nV after stackingaccuracy: Q.3% typically; maximum 1 over whole

temperature range Secondary voltage windows: up to 10 windows; 3 preset window specs.

plus fully programmable sampling. Sampling rate: 10ms Synchronization accuracy: 10 ms, minimum 40 nV Chargeability resolution: 0.1 mV/V

accuracy: typically D.6%. maximum tt of reading 1mV/VforV^ 10 mV

Battery test manual and automatic before eachmeasurement

Grounding resistance: 0.1 to 467 kohm Memory capacity: 2505 records, 1 dipole/record Data transfer: serial link @ 300 to 19200 baud

remote control capability through serial link @ 19200 baud

20

Quantec

APPENDIX D

LIST OF MAPS

Realsection Mans: (contoured total chargeability or apparent resistivity versus depth (ft), mV/V and ohm-m, 1: 2400 map scale)

L2+OOW AB 900ft through 9700ftL4+OOW AB 900ft through 9700ftL6+OOW AB 900ft through 9700ftL8+OOW AB 900ft through 9700ft

L2+OOW AB 900ft through 9700ftL4+OOW AB 900ft through 9700ftL6+OOW AB 900ft through 9700ftL8+OOW AB 900ft through 9700ft

App.Resistrvity App. Resistivity App.Resistrvity App.Resistrvity

Tot.Chargeability Tot.Chargeability Tot.Chargeability Tot.Chargeability

P129-RS-RES-1 P129-RS-RES-2 P129-RS-RES-3 P129-RS-RES-4

P129-RS-CH-1 P129-RS-CH-2 P129-RS-CH-3 P129-RS-CH-4

Contoured Plan Maps: (contoured and posted total chargeability and gradient apparentresistivity, linear and logarithmic contours, mV/V and ohm-m, 1: 2400 horizontal scale)

East Grid East Grid West Grid West Grid

AB 9700 feet AB 9700 feet AB 6700 to 7300 ft AB 6700 to 7300 ft

App.Resistrvity. Tot.Chargeability App.Resistrvity. Tot.Chargeability

P129-PLAN-RES-1 P129-PLAN-CH-1 P129-PLAN- RES-2 P129-PLAN-CH-2

22

Quantec

16 October. 1995

Winteroad Resources . Project: P-129Island Shell AerocentreSuite 211, Hanger6Toronto Island AirportToronto, OntanoM5V1A1 Invoice:

ATTENTION: John Ross Moses G S.T Reg. No.: R104359724

Survey period: 21 September, to 8 October, 1995

RE: Garrison Twp. TDIP Survey

Survey charges:

Mobilization @ S1.000.00 flat rate 1.000 DOS

16 days IP survey @ S1,893.00/day 30,288.001

Execution Expenses (accomodation, food, fuel, field supplies, vehicle)

4x4 Truck @ S75.007day 1,350.00Sexpenses 1,823.573-t- 15% (expenses) 273 53S

Total:

Terms: Payable Upon Receipt

Subtotal:

Credit re prebilling 9,000.003

Subtotal:

G.ST. @7*

]fj'i tl t Z r ac, J ]\f. G n ts r c. f. f.

(ya.rr\ soh /u/a. O h t

Gr', J /;A,^ S f*" l*?-

e 1:10,000

RECEIVEDFEB 2 6 1996

MINING LANDS BRANCH

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Ontario

Report of Work Conducted After Recording Claim

Mining Act

Transaction Number

Personal information collected on this form is obtained under the authority of the Mining Act. This Information will be used lor correspondence. Questions about this collection should be directed to the Provincial Manager. Mining Lands. Ministry of Northern Development and Mines. Fourth Floor. 159 Cedar Street. Sudbury. Ontario. P3E 6A5. telephone (705) 870-7264.

Instructions: - fteaae type or print and submit In duplicate.- Refer to the Mining Act and Regulations for reqi

Recorder.- A separate copy of this form must be completed- Technical reports and maps must accompany th

the - wortr ia •assJoni

2.16320

32D05NW0106 2 16320 GARRISON 900AT-H-

Recorded Hok*er(s)Hok*er(s) /P

Vi// n^C r a a dfl K-t S

W/*

-^ 54* /V H**.*r i Tofc*t* Jf/.+

ft/.

Son/4 tt* fltertt V/tf

honeNo. 7* f-911

Mining DivisonDivision ~ft ro^ 4. t

A' a r ci e r Xet^M S~V /4I TownshD/Area

/M or Q Plan No.

Oates Work r. Performed

From: '•f- , . J. 1 If nt p-t.

To:Work Performed (Check One Work Group Only)

Work Group

Geotechnical Survey

Physical Work. Including Drilling

Rehabilitation

Other Authorized Work

Assays

Assignment from Reserve

Type

J. . r -) (s rv t yf

***e* ft H*. T ra /: *xo

DCTprrit,t ~

SECTION 18 ONLYDEu a 2 J995

MINING LANDS BHA^;,

Total Assessment Work Claimed on the Attached Statement of Costs /L 7Note: The Minister may reject for assessment work credit all or part of the assessment work submitted if the recorded

holder cannot verify expenditures claimed in the statement of costs within 30 days of a request for verification.

Persons and Survey Company Who Performed the Work (Give Name and Address of Author of Report)Name Address

Z T J, v\C /, s*i stf/i' n^J ne 101

*/ n t? ' /CO

(attach a schedule if necessary)

Certification of Beneficial Interest * See Note No. 1 on reverse sidel certify that at the time the work was performed, the claims covered in this work report were recorded In the current holder's name or held under a beneficial Interest by the current recorded holder.

Date

fa*Agent (Signature)

Certification of Work Reportl certify that l have a personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this Work report, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and annexed report is true.

Name and Address of Pereon Certifying

Z B 57 S**/*

ii

r\*- * c.

31if li

^ r-Ci

L/0+9LN

CRi N)rv)

J?fc

N \Ci

ON

X) ox x

^JK.

Claim Numbe (see Note 2)

CQ l

53 1

iIsfa

J-*^i 1? is

^

c^

1

-o O

1

\

O

1

\0 G

1

\

0

1

\Cio

1

-o0

1

\Cio

1

^o o

1

\Cio

f

\Cio

1

^Ci O

1

^

Cio

1

V,o

1

\o

1

^o

\Cio

l

^o

Milr\ o S *fit*

Oo-o <

||||

1I a

-t

RECEIV|SM

rFINING LAf 21

OS

)95

^RA^

5 >

Irl1

Reserve: Work to be Claimed at a Future Date

Credits you are claiming in this report may be cut back. In order to minimize the adverse effects of such deletions, please indicate from which claJms you wish to priorize the deletion of credits. Please mark (^) one of the following:

1. G Credits are to be cut back starting with the claim listed last, working backwards.

2. G Credits are to be cut back equally over all claims contained in this report of work.3. G Credits are to be cut back as priorized on the attached appendix.

In the event that you have not specified your choice of priority, option one will be implemented.

Note 1: Examples of beneficial Interest are unrecorded transfers, option agreements, memorandum of agreements, etc., with respect to the mining claims.

Note 2: If work has been performed on patented or leased land, please complete the following:

l certify that the recorded holder had a beneficial interest in the patented or leased land at the time the work was performed.

Signal

sj

5*2?i|

c^~^-

v\

^x

^\

QO\Ofr

^

KX?

x,)00

"\\

^

N

!0toox

S

\

N

JOtoCNO0*

-^

V

^

^

\iOX

pto

-^

N

*bi\joxO

^~

N

totoCNO^

^-

^v

to/\JOs

X)

^-

'/^

i\ji\)G-jX*0^

-*-

B.?^fttaOsXJ)

N)

-v.

-N

to

o.vO(Tx

^

—— b*b

33K

fVj/ViO-.x^

^-^

2N

to^i^A

^^

0^rONi^o^o•^

If

f?•3

"

CO f3 M 0 3S3 g

\

t? <

soa-

o?

S-I s

Vi/s^

Ox

N?

aX)VT0

N,0^

o^

1

(TN.ut^

1

Ox

^x

1

\I\jOx

^^

,

\)OxVC^\

1

to^

\i

ox

^

*\

\,CX

c?

\

\

to^^\^

\

to^^S

i

\,is

ft

t

\i^Sx

h

l

(\J^x

^^

t

ON^\^

i

0^^

35So,

oil!!5l a

Oo-o •f

3 S * S

\

-*sfii

ri

Tb'^Po

V.tox^

1X

^

^

S

K^

\

IVoOx

IVjOx

^

IV.ox

to(JN

C?N

v^

N)

/v,w^

5\j(^-fc

l\l*fxc^^

K,Ox

*\

K\Qx.

C^

S

F

MIN

to6aA?E(

DE

m L

K,Q^

^

srrii

/CJ

S22

ANOJ

^c^^1^

,/crr

1395

i brV

IMOx

SS" '

r,UH

\

rv,Ox

V\*

5 >

o|'6

3 ^

-nQ^T, E" 0 * 53^8•ss!l fi -"

Yil Credits you are claiming in this report may be cut back. In order to minimize the adverse effects of such deletions, please indicate from

which claims you wish to priorize the deletion of credits. Please mark (^) one of the following:

; 1 . O Credits are to be cut back starting with the claim listed last, working backwards.l 2. Cj Credits are to be cut back equally over all claims contained In this report of work.

3. D Credits are to be cut back as priorized on the attached appendix.

: In the event that you have not specified your choice of priority, option one will be implemented.i

Note 1: Examples of beneficial Interest are unrecorded transfers, option agreements, memorandum of agreements, etc., with respect to the mining claims.

Note 2: If work has been performed on patented or leased land, please complete the following:( _______—————————————————————————————.——----^—

l certify i', :i ihe recorded Mder had a benoficial interest In the patented l s'9nalur

rx.'

\ x?

^

1x"

Vx

r^fs.NO

QOoJ\J

x^

V*

K

^

K

O^

^

^

Al

N

ON

xX

-x^

^^K

Al

^/Vi*\1Cs

G^

x^

s^\

AjA)

JN

^

ON

^

^

\ *^t\|N

Ai /O

Ncri

^

x~

x3U\

i '

N

(No

ON0^x.

•s^^

AJ

N

/Vi

X)

^

X

Uj

Jx

^r^ i\j^X)^

-x

o

^t

v0

i*AJ

^

Sv^^

^.

4

N.5

A

x.

^

/Vi

NOffx

J-l** * J. O i

?l!

liIf

fjK

l

f

\IOx..

Nj

h)

O

V

^

^1 \

r

^4ONh

^•b 1

^

^Jc?

i

K)*v

\

*Nx

KiON

— ~^

1

lv*

i

\

t\lON

\

|\vl

ONo\G^

^

7^

S

K\Ox

t

'

/l*\J\

*

\

KJOx.

^~

\

\^5

J^ V

K

i\!

xDO\

^.

—^Z?

3A^\rN

1xj^^

.^

—^^r\

Vx

C\jr\j^

^

\Z J

p*^^

^^ 1l x

CO i"li al

\

1A

\\

W

C\

\^

\

5-^JJ l

K.

N?^

V

^r

r\i i

^x

^.

1

-

\K;ON

OS

t

* I

fsi*

311

-x.

.5!NO

O

c^

5

f

RfeoiDEC

1ININ GLA

V

•f.?-?- ^

l* .

rviOx

Q~\

r

—

•:.'r

t" . r .

IV,Ox

^

\•L^ ^^^

hjON.

0\

xj

*^^ Vv

^

K,"

ON

G?"X-

N,)

-,

i

KON

-

K,(^Jv^•^

xj

1

*N

C/V^^\

^

KiOxOs(r*

- x.

tuONlr\^-X,

^ OX

C^^v

T*

-J

K,c^Cr^

V

•x,-^

KitrjON

\

~V

xx '

-

Ox^

-^

ONk\CA\

^

- ^of |f3 *

|||15

!^ S?

Credits you are claiming In this repornnay be cutback, in order to minimize the adverse effects of such deletions, please Indicate from which claims you wish to prtorize the deletion of credits. Please mark (^) one of the following:

1. D Credits are to be cut back starting with the claim listed last, working backwards.2. D Credits are to be cut back equally over afl claims contained In this report of work.3. D Credits are to be cut back as prtorlzed on the attached appendix.

In the event that you have not specified your choice of priority, option one win be Implemented.

\ ••\

VV

.

^^^

Note 1: Examples of beneficial Interest are unrecorded transfers, option agreements, memorandum of agreements, etc., w to the mining claims.

Note 2: If work has been performed on patented or leased land, please complete the following:

Ontario

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Mmistere du Developpement du Nord •t des mines

Statement of Costs for Assessment CreditEtat des couts aux fins du credit devaluation

Mining Act/Loi sur les mines

Transaction HoJH* de transaction

Personal inlormatkxi collected on this lorm is obtained under the authority of the Mining Act. This Information will be used to maintain a record and ongoing status of the mining claim(s). Questions about (his collection should be directed to the Provincial Manager, Minings Lands. Ministry ol Northern Development and Mines. 4th Floor, 159 Cedar Street, Sudbury, Ontario P3E 6A5. telephone (705) 670-7264.

Les renseignements personnels conlenus dans la presente formule son! recueillis en vertu de la Lo) sur let mines et servironl a tenir a jour un regis!re des concessions mlnleres. Adresser toute question sur la collece de ces renseignements au chef provincial des terrains miniers, ministers du Developpement du Nord et des Mines. 159. rue Cedar. 4* etage, Sudbury (Ontario) P3E 6A5. telephone (705) 670-7264.

1. Direct Costs/CoGts directs

Type

WagesSalalres

i*- f

Contractor's and Consultant's FeesDrolls de {'entrepreneur et de I'expert- consell

Supplies Used Foumituras utilise**

Equipment Rental Location de materiel

Description

Labour Main-d'oeuvreField Supervision Supervision sur le terrain

Type •l-* i S t"'* e y

/

Type

Typ.

Amount Montan!

l^ioB-JL

Total Direct Costs Total des coOts directs

Totals Total global

W-oe

3210Q

2. Indirect Costs/CoOts Indirects* * Note: When claiming Rehabilitation work Indirect costs are not

allowable as assessment work.Pour le remboursement des travaux de rehabilitation, les coOts Indirects ne sont pas admissibtes en tant que travaux d'evaluatkxi.

Type

Transportation Transport

REFood and Lodging Nourrlture et heberBement

ssnwNMobilisation et demoblllMtlon

Oescriptkxi

Type Tr*c/ 4X +

:CE!V")EC 2 2 139F

aLANDStihM •-•-

Amount Montanl

W44soy

UK-%

/0?0Sub Total of Indirect Costs

Total partlel des coOts IndirectsAmount Allowable (not greater than 20H of Direct Costs) Montant admissible (n'excedant pas 20 H des coOts directs)

Total Value of Assessment Credit Vateur total* du crfdrt (Total of Otr*et and ABowafato d'evahiaUon Indltact cocta) fTota! daa eaitti tflracte

Totals Total global

/f f

2Z + +

/o7e

17&4 7f?T7^7

Note: The recorded holder will be required to verify expenditures claimed in this statement of costs within 30 days of a request for verification. If verification is not made, the Minister may reject for assessment work all or part of the assessment work submitted.

Note : Le titulaire enregistre sera tenu de verifier les depenses demandees dans le present etat des couts dans les 30 jours suivant une demands a eel eflet. SI la verification n'est pas enectuee, le ministre peut rejeier tout ou une partie des Iravaux devaluation presentes

Filing Discounts Remises pour depot

1. Work filed within two years of completion is claimed at lOO'to of the above Total Value of Assessment Credit.

Les travaux deposes dans les deux ans suivant leur achievement sort rembourses a 100 'to de la vateur totale susmentionnee du credit devaluation

2. Work filed three, four or five years after completion is claimed at 50*Vb of the above Total Value of Assessment Credit. See calculations below:

Total Value of Assessment Credit Total Assessment Claimed

x 0.50 -

2. Les travaux deposes trois, quatre ou cinq ans apres leur achievement sont rembourses a 50 H de la valour totale du credit devaluation susmentionne. Voir les calculs ci-dessous.

Vateur totale du credit devaluation Evaluation totale demandea

x 0.50 -

Certification Verifying Statement of Costs Attestation de I'etat des coOts

l hereby certify:that the amounts shown are as accurate as possible and these costs were incurred while conducting assessment work on the lands shown on the accompanying Report of Work form.

J'atteste par la presente :que les montants indiques sont le plus exact possible et que ces depenses ont ete engagees pour effectuer les travaux devaluation sur les terrains indiques dans la formule de rapport de travail ci-joint.

that as ________(Recorded Holder^ A

N——-

to make this certification

'osilKXi in Company)l am authorized Et qu'a litre de.

(litulaire eruegistre. represenlant. post* occupe

a faire cette attestation.

je suis autoris6

Signature

Nota ' Dans cette formule. lorsqu'il d*

Date

as. le mascu'in est au snrs nrutre

OntarioMinistry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Ministere duDeveloppement du Nord et des Mines

April 03, 1996

Geoscience Approvals Office 933 Ramsey Lake Road 6th Floor Sudbury, Ontario P3E 6B5

Telephone: (705) 670-5853 Fax: (705) 670-5863

Our File: 2.16320 Transaction /: W9580.00653

Mining RecorderMinistry of Northern Development S Mines4 Government Road EastKirkland Lake, OntarioP2N 1A2

Dear Mr. Spooner:

Subject: APPROVAL OF ASSESSMENT WORK CREDITS ON MINING CLAIMS 522604 et al. IN GARRISON TOWNSHIP

All deficiencies associated with this submission have been corrected. Accordingly, assessment credits have been approved as outlined on the attached report of work form. The credits have been approved under Section 14 (Geophysical) of the Mining Act Regulations.

The approval date is February 27, 1996.

If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please contact Steven Beneteau at (705) 670-5855.

Yours sincerely, ORIGINAL SIGNED BY:

Ron C. Gashinski Senior Manager, Mining Lands Section Mining and Land Management Branch Mines and Minerals Division

SBB/jl Enclosure:

cc: Resident GeologistKirkland Lake, Ontario

ssessment Files Library Sudbury, Ontario

VALUE OF ASSESSMENT WORK PERFORMED ON MINING CLAIMS

April 03, 1996 FILE NUMBER 2.16320 TRANSACTION NO. W9580.00653

CLAIM NUMBER VALUE OF ASSESSMENT WORKDONE ON THIS CLAIM

522604 S 550.00522603 S 421.00522598 S 2,331.00522599 S 1,894.00522600 ^ 4,662.00957801 S 1,716.00957802 S 3,561.00522595 ^ 6,443.00522596 ^ 3,254.00522597 ^ 2,930.00522593 $ 3,853.00522594 S 5,552.00

TOTAL $37,167.00

TW^rr ' *-*~ - ;*" lg' -f "K 1*1 J

o oCM

li IKli ii

01(D01

o

M.R O - MIMIN-j RIGHTS ON' * 8.R.O. - SURFACE RIGHTS O- M.+ Z. - MINING AND SURFACE

Ordw No. O*M DtawdtMr

cSNJIW ^3/83 RISCINDED MARCH 29/85. AS Of JANUARY 28. 1985 DECLARED A PROVINCIAL PARK

'u

00

CD 01

l C)rT-"-imr i'

\

* V

l

OD <X O

esr N rt

RAND TOWN' HIP lL IL V^ ^

\., , ' 386*-Sf~" S'- '6 ,

.—!

11298:52;

- ..^ \d1 ^ i i O t* i V.^

\/V) \ * 'V--;

^•Oi 997941 1 997946 J Jl f

-1-^-4-- — -^- •S V\L \ ^.X- x A , V.o-V"\

L. v****** f i s~^f

997939 y\, 997944 ' S l 9197949

* - l \ \ ~~*—————- -.-.h -J—————————— t .———.

li- .J l L 'L

G) V * Lftk^\co j| jr---~*T!

l!7 lV r \ ^;\ ^ \ - •js4

- ./^ \i ^ * L.. L, — — — —4-— — — -j— — - —

76590S 7*9914 | 650669

1201053

-.--- —— -——-1201056

12^7450 j 1201055 ^ ii ~~

1206704 L7375I5 j 737514. ! 737509

l - i - Ji^^..nl———h -—

l j l^, ' ___ ___ __' ___ ___ __ __l~

L B Halfw *^ i v. "JdJ 5226*09^ r^rTT; 1201053

l -' ' ^—\ U^--tr-r — — txT 9--" . l .^LIO4644S ', (1-982881 , P^.- .2 i ' "

—————— ———————f———fa-.L U i U \ l L

\I049639 \ 1049640

L..C f ————i ————, L K - i L

909 i 8005JO 800511^ 800048

^.-.i — - __ ___ a.. 1*5____ _ -T l L L

l l ^-^ j l—^ l-fc ^^.'—; —— ——: ——i— -v — -J —-- —L—* ,— HL 7 Jt t JL |L ^

i l ' ' \800517 J 800516 ^"800319 l 800004 J l 800074 \ J 600079 J 800076.n -x"! !

799802 795808

THACKERAY -TOWNSHIPCOPY OF THIS MYLAR ARCHIVED MAY 13/03 ARCHIVED MAY 17, 1995

m

— j

COx

*~(*jf

T"* *MM rt;~ LECLIC

• . >_

. B jt l 'iEc t T'.LOTS.

LO T UNFS. ,rl-- fi

Ml J'NO CI MV ""'-

•^,AI' A " A ;U hi( m t WAY"

•l ' , NES

NIC ". ' " - i .i-vi. ', i ^EAf ^O( NG ^A FL0OOINC

SU8t U i , . OR OOMPO TE PLAN

4iAu SHORELINE

r cw . j

M J i

OF DO* -T SI Hr /*CE 4

'Z '3 ON L Y

i iit:

: :CEN:ECJES IN r

SAN C . O' F'

•.OTf. MINING WIGHTS, IN "~RCtLS ^AttNTFo f-' 'O* 'o1913 VtCi(.r IK ORIGIN M- PAT^N^C'. 9V 1 '•'C

AIT R S C. 197t CHAr - " SEC o' SU8SEC 1

WXJ vuo

1C

300 Uf. l ^CEl-

10 .1

1000 200i

41 SO 60

400C SOOO

UCALc i:/. O 00

p-fr/.c

OEC 15 W

. j..-

en

THE INFORMATION THAT APPEARS ON THIS MAP HAS BEEN COMPILED FROM VARIOUS SOURCES. AND ACCURACY IS NOT GUARANTEED. THOSE WISHING TO STAKE MIN ING CLAIMS SHOULD CON SULT WITH THE MINING RECORDER. MINISTR' OF NORTHERN DEVELOP MENT AND MINES, FOR AD DITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE STATUS OF THE LANDS SHOWN HEREON

TOWNSHIP

GARRISONM N R ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT

K.'-KLAND LA"F RECEIVEbMINING DIVISION

LARDER LAK^LAND T.r fs/ *FGisiftv D : v. M W^ LANDS BRANCH

COCHRAM?-:

DEC 2 2 199!

Ministry ofiJaturalReso"rcea

Ontario

Ministry'Northern Develop ntot

v-5 Mines l QC

Ui t Q)

. 'o-obio r.1 * *'^

V

r-"., :v i

-t

t:

\

/

LINE 4+OOW APPARENT RESISTIVITY (ohm-metres)

oCM

2000S l

SOON 1000N 1200N

-200 —

-400

-600 —

F -800 —a.UJo

HOOD

-120D —

-1400 —

-160D

2000S 1800S 1600S 1400S 1200S 1000S 800S 6005 400S 200S 200N 400N 600N SOON 1000N 1200N

1400N

—-400

-ZOO

-600

6m -D

-BOO

— -1000

LINE 4+OOW

Gradient Array————AB————

MN~[

100

plot points

Scale 1:2400100 200 300

mSBS (feet)

400 500

RECEIVEDWIN1ERCKD RESOURCES LTD.

GARRISON "TOP. PROPERTY BH/V.CBARRISON TYfP..MATHESON.ONT.

DEC Z 2

MINING LANt

2.16

1995

—-1200

r--1400

K -1600

1400N

TIME DOMAIN IP SURVEY 2 O REALSECTION L4+OOW

APPARENT RESISTIVITYto 9700 feet

Transmitter Frequency 0.0625 Hz (50/S duty cycle) Transmitter Current 1 . 15 to 2.9 Amps Decay Curve: QIP IP-6 Custom Semilogarithmic Windows

10 Gates (60ms to 3540ms)Station Interval: 100ftResistivity Contour Interval: 20 levels/log decadeColour Scafe. Equal Area Zoning

Date: OCT/95Instrumentation: Rx = IRIS IP-6 (6 channels)

Tx ^ PHOENIX IPT-2B(15 kW) + MG-30(30 kVA)

Surveyed tic Processed byQUANTEC IP INC.DWG. f P-129-RSIP-RES-2

LINE 4+OOW TOTAL CHARGEABILITY (mV/V)

oCM

O —

-200 —

-400

-600

-800

CL UJ O

-1000 —

-1200 —

-1400 —

-1600^

2000Sl

18COS 1600Sl

1400S 12005 1000S 800S 600S 400S 200S l

200Nl

400Nl

SOON l

SOONl

1000Nl

1200N l

CO CO-f* -f*. O) Go Qi o ro -J

2000S 1&OOSl

1600S 1400S 1200S 1000S BOOS 600S 400S 200S 200N 400N 600N SOON 1000N 1200N

1400N

— O

os en

——200

——WO

——600

——800

——1000

——1200

——1400

——1600

1400N

r

^ DEC 2 2 1995

MINING

LINE 4+OOW

Gradient Array ———AB———

MN!

100

*c -.V~^r

plot points

Scale 1:2400100 200 300 400 500

WNTERCKD RESOURCES LTD.GARRISON TWP. PROPERTY

GARRISON TWP., MATHESON .ONT.

TIME DOMAIN IP SURVEY 16320 RESECTION L4+OOW

TOTAL CHARGEABILITYAB*1000 to 9700 feet

Transmitter Frequency O 0625 Hz (50/5 duty cycle) Transmitter Current 1 15 to 2 9 Amps Decay Curve QIP IP-6 Custom SemiloganthmiC Windows

10 Gates (60ms to 3540ms)Station Interval 100ftChargeability Contour Interval 05,25 mV/VColour Scale Equal Area Zoning

Date OCT/95Instrumentation Rx ^ IRIS IP-6 (6 channels)

Tx ~ PHOENIX IPT-2B(15 kW) + MG-30(30 kVA)

Surveyed A Processed byQUANTEC IP INC.

DWG f P-129-BSIP-CHG-2

LINE 6+OOW TOTAL CHARGEABILITY (mV/V)

O CO CN

2000S l

-200 —

-400

-600 —

-800 —

Q.UJo

-1000 —

-1200

-1400o00

-1600 —

1800S l

1600S 1400S l

1200S 1000Sl

800S 600S l

400Sl

200S 20QH 400N 600N l

SOON l

1000N l

1200N

Qtt

2000S 1800S 1600S 1400S 12005 1000S 800S 600S 400S 200S 200H 400N 600N SOON 1000N 1200N

1400N

-200

——400

-600

O m

—-800

-1000

——1200

-1400

——1600

1400N

LINE 6+OOW

Gradient Array—————AB —————

100

plot points

Scale 1:2400100 200 300 400 500

RECFIDEC 2

MINING LANC

WNTERQftD RESOURCES LTD.199E GARRISON TWP. PROPERTY

GARRISON TWP.,MATHESON.ONT.

TIME DOMAIN IP SURVEY REALSECTION L6+OOW

3 2 0)TAL CHARGEABILITY^900 to 9700 feet

Transmitter Frequency O 0625 Hz (5(^ duty cycle) Transmitter Current 1 15 to 2 9 Amps Decay Curve QIP IP-6 Custom Semilogarithmic Windows

10 Gates (60ms to 3540ms)Station Interval 100 ftChargeability Contour Interval 05,25 niV/VColour Scale Equal Area Zoning

Date OCT/95Instrumentation Rx = IRIS IP-6 (6 channels)

Tx - PHOENIX IPT-2B(15 kW) * MG-30(30 kVA)

Surveyed # Processed byQUANTBC IP INC.DWG f P-129-RSIP-CHG-3

LINE 6+OOW APPARENT RESISTIVITY (ohm-metres)

2000S

O —

-200

-400 —

-600

-800

Q-Lul Q

-1000

o •^CM

-1200

-1400

-1600 —

18005l

1600S 1400S l

1200S 10005 800S 600S l

400S l

200S J

200N l

400N l

GOON l

SOON 1000N 1200N

tn to

1400N

l l l l l l l2000S 180QS 1600S 1400S 1 ZOOS 10OOS 800S 600S 400S 200S 200N 400N 600N BOON

l 1000N

l 1200N

— O

— -200

——400

LINE 6+OOW

Gradient Array————AB————

J~MN"~MN~[

-600

m

plot points

Scale 1:2400100 O 100 200 300 400 500

——800

— -1000

RESOURCE LTD. GARRISON TWP. PROPERTY

DEC j: 9. fltK GARRISON TWP.,MATHESON. ONT.

——1200

TIME DOMAIN IP SURVEY MINING LANDS BRANCH REALSECTION L6+OOW

fc c f j APPARENT RESISTM1Y' J O ^ v AB:r900 to 9700 feet

——1400

— -1600

1400N

Transmitter Frequency O 0625 Hz (5Q5S duty cycle) Transmitter Current 1 15 to 2 9 Amps Decay Curve QIP IP-6 Custom Semi logo nth mie Windows

10 Gates (60ms to 3540ms)Station Interval 100ftResistivity Contour Interval 20 levels/log decadeColour Scale Equal Area Zoning

Date OCT/95Instrumentation Rx = IRIS IP-6 (6 channels)

Tx ^ PHOENIX IPT-2B(15 kW) + MG-30(30 kVA)

Surveyed Se Processed byQUANTEC IP INC.DWG t P-129-RSIP-RES-3

LINE 8+OOW TOTAL CHARGEABILITY (mV/V)

o in(N

O —

-200 —

-400

-600 —

-800 —

a.

-1000 —

-1200 —

-1400

-1600 —

2000S 18005l

1600Sl

1400Sl

1200Sl

1000Sl 800Sl

600Sl

400Sl

200Sl

200N 400N 600Nl

SOON 1000N 1200N l

1400N

CrJ

C-J

•s -so* o

L71 |S3

2000S :eoos 1600S 1400S 1200S 1000S 800S 600S 4005 2005 200N 400N GOON SOONl

1000N

— O

-200

——WO

-600

-800

——1000

-1200

——1400

——1600

1200N 1400N

LINE 8+OOW

Gradient Array ———AB———

FMN "MN! A. ^ jh

•omT)

100

plot points

Scale 1:2400100 200 300^K"i

(f86t)

400 500

RECEIVFJDEC 2 2 1995

RESOURCES LTD.GARRISON TWP. PROPERTY

GARRISON TWP.,MATHESON,ONT.

TIME DOMAIN IP SURVEYMINING LAND! i BRANCH

2.1332 OTOTAL CHARGEABILITY** J. vi V ^ v AB:z900 to 9700 feet

Transmitter Frequency O 0625 Hz (503S duty cycle) Transmitter Current 1 15 to 2 9 Amps Decay Curve QIP IP-6 Custom Semilogarithmic Windows

10 Gates (60ms to 3540ms)Station Interval 100 ftChargeability Contour Interval 05,25 mV/VColour Scale Equal Area Zoning

Date OCT/95Instrumentation Rx - IRIS IP-6 (6 channels)

Tx - PHOENIX IPT-2B(15 kW) * MG-30(30 kVA)

Surveyed & Processed by

QUANTEC IP INC.DWG f P-129-RSIP-CHG-4

LINE 8+OOW APPARENT RESISTIVITY (ohm-metres)

2000S l

1SOOS 1600S 14005 1200S 1000S BOOSl

600Sl

400Sl

200S 200Nl

400Nl

600N BOONl

100QNl

1200Nl

1400N

O —

-200

-400 —

-600

-800 —

O. LU o

-1000 —

o (O CM

-1200

-1400

-1600 —

— O

——200

——400

——600

LINE 8+OOW

Gradient Array———AB———

[MN "MN!

——800 100

RECEIVE

plot points

Scale 1:2400100 MO 300

(fwt)

400 500

——1000

——1200

DEC 22 M 95

MINING LANDS i W^iCH

2.1

-1400

-1600

2000S 1BOOS 1600S 1400S 12005 1000S BOOS 600S 400S 200S 200N 400N 600N 800N 1000N 1200N 1400N

WINTERCND RESOURCES LTD.GARRISON TWP. PROPERTY

GARRISON TWP. .MATHESON,ONT.

TIME DOMAIN IP SURVEY EALSECTION L8+OOW

RENT RESISTIVITYAB^QOO to 9700 feet

Transmitter Frequency O 0625 Hz (5035 duty cycle) Transmitter Current 1 15 to 2 9 Amps Decay Curve QIP IP-6 Custom Semilogarithmic Windows

10 Gates (60ms to 3540ms)Station Interval 100 ftResistivity Contour Interval 20 levels/log decadeColour Scale Equal Area Zoning

Date OCT/95Instrumentation Rx = IRIS IP-6 (6 channels)

Tx = PHOENIX IPT-2B(15 kW) * MG-30(30 kVA)

Surveyed A Processed by

QUAffTEC IP INC.DWG f P-129-RSIP-RES-4

32D

05N

W01

06 Z

163

20 G

AR

RIS

ON

270

^3

i^l

Z

to1

hlM

D

o Q

tx

(D

o m 55 ^ i K 3

0CD

x

u

"

^

iZ

CT

)O

__

ci,'S

? Q

o

CO

(O

O —

—

rn

o o

en

S ^Q

o

•^

rt

3oo

a —

o Q

. o rs

"

Q

Ci

2 o ^

,9

w w

^i i

C

i-*-

*-f

3 CD

CD

-l

-l

O c

w

O en en

II CO

O O > ^D

O 5 DO 3 T—

o

OD

CO

ro '

o CD

:d

m

0

w

o

to

c:

|2 •^a

o a

Oi*

A3

go

.3

2 .

Oa

m

o

20

co lo

to Q1

33 m

o

m

Ir

t/)

O S.

CD N)

-^

O

O

^i1" ft*.

?L;

tfl, l i t i l

> CD

O O Q-

^ l* O5

CO w

1600N

o00 CM

1200W l

3423

2911

1200N-

800N-

400N-

400S-

800S

1200S

1600S-

2000S-

42080

1200W

APPARENT RESISTIVITY (ohm-metres)

eoow 400W 400E 800E

4707

-1600N4754 4907 5959

7921

73

-1200N

-BOON

-400N

-O

-400S

-800S

-1200S

-1600S

-2000S12702

17609

16065

800W 400W 400E 8QOE

N

2.16320Gradient Array

-AB-

RECEIVEDDEC 2 2 1995

MINING LAfffi

-plot points

Scale 1:2400

(Tsrt)

WINTERQAD RESOURCES LID.GARRISON TWP. PROPERTY GARRISON TWP.MATHESON,ONT.

TIME DOMAIN IP SURVEY Gradient Array

APPARENT RESISTIVITYAB= 9700 feet

Transmitter Frequency O 0625 Hz (50?S duty cycle) Transmitter Current 2 6 amps Amps Decay Curve QIP IP-6 Custom Sem i toga nth mie Windows

10 Gates (60ms to 3540ms)Station Interval 100 feetResistivity Contour Interval 20 levels/log decadeColour Scale Equal Area Zoning

Date SER\95Instrumentation Rx = IRIS IP-6 (6 channels)

Tx = PHOENIX IPT-2B(15 kW) t MG-30(30 kVA)

Surveyed A Processed byQUANTEC IP INC.

DWG # P-129-PLAN-RES-1

3200N —

4 4

2BOON-

2400N —

20QON —

1600N-

1200N

800N-

400N

40QS —

800S-

1200S-

1600S-

2000S

32D05NW0106 2 16320 GARRISON

TOTAL CHARGEABILITY (mV/V)

2800W

l 2800W

2400W l

2000Vl

2 9

2 8 2 9

2 9

1600W l

2

2 6

2 7

2 6

1200W l

800W 400W

t z

2 6

2 8

2400W 2000W 1600W 1200W 800W 400W

290

6 7

6 7

3200N

—2BOON

— 2400N

— 2000N

—1600N

—1200N

-BOON

— 400N

— O

— 400S

-BOOS

—1200S

—1600S

-2000S

M

Gradient Array————AB ————

100

plot points

Scale 1:2400100 200 300

529 (feet)

400 500

1632

DEC 2 Z 1995

MINING LANbb eh

WINTERS RESOURCES LTD. GARRISON TWP. PROPERTY GARRISON 1W, MATHESON. ONT.

TIME DOMAIN IP SURVEY Gradient Array

TOTAL CHARGEABILITY^ 6700 to 7300 feet

Transmitter Frequency O 0625 Hz (50% duty cycle) Transmitter Current 2 6 amps Amps Decay Curve CUP IP-6 Custom Semilogarithmic Windows

10 Gates (60ms to 3540ms)itation Interval 100 feettiargeability Contour Interval O 5, 2 5 mV/V

Colour Scale Equal Area Zoning

Date Sept-Oct. 1995Instrumentation Rx ^ IRIS IP-6 (6 channels)

Tx = PHOENIX IPT-2B(15 kW) t MG-30(30 kVA)

Surveyed A Processed byQUANTEC IP INC.

DWG f P-129-PLAN-CHG-2

32QON-

1148

2800N-

2400N-

2000N-

1600N

120DN-

BOON-

400N-

0-

400S

80QS-

1200S-

1600S

20DOS-

32D05NW0106 2 16320 GARRISON

APPARENT RESISTIVITY (ohm-metres)

2800Wl

2400W l

2000W 1200W l

800W 400W

34727

31448

2800Wl

2400Wl

2000W 1600W 1200W 800W 400W

300

-3200N

—2800N

2400N

2000N

1600N

—120QN

— 800N

400N

-O

-400S

— BOOS

—1200S

—1600S

—2000S

N

Gradient Array ———AB———

100

~--X*/ N '--~" plot points

Scale 1:2400100 200 300 400 900

RECBVFHDEC 2 2 1995

WINTERQAD RESOURCES LTD.GARRISON TWP. PROPERTY GARRISON TWP.MATHESON,ONT.

TIME DOMAIN IP SURVEY Gradient Array

APPARENT RESISTIVriYAB= 6700 to 7300 feet

Transmitter Frequency O 0625 Hz (503E duty cycle) Transmitter Current 2 6 amps Amps Decay Curve QIP IP-6 Custom Semilogarithmic Windows

10 Gates (60ms to 3540ms)Station Interval 100 feetResistivity Contour Interval. 20 levels/log decadeColour Scale Equal Area Zoning

Date Sept-Oct, 1995Instrumentation Rx = IRIS IP-6 (6 channels)

Tx s PHOENIX IPT-2B(15 kW) t MG-30(30 kVA)

Surveyed A Processed byQVANTEC IP INC.

DWG iff P-129-PLAN-RES-2— *——^—..—.,.—

LINE 2+OOW APPARENT RESISTIVITY (ohm-metres)

2200S

-200 —

-400 —

-600

-800

a.

-1000 —

oCO

-1200 —

-1400 —

-1600 —

2000Sl

1800S 1600S l

1400S l

1200S 1000S l

BOOS 6005 400S-J—

200S -L-

200N—L,

400N -L-

600N-J—

SOON 1000N 1200N 1400N . l,

O1

2200Sl

2000Sl

1600S 1600S 1400S 12005 1000S BOOS 600S 400S 2005 200N 400N 600N SOON 1000Nl

1200N 1400N

— O

—-200

—-400

LINE 2+OOW

Gradient Array ———AB———

-600 [MN "MN!

m -a— -800 100

r

-x,

plot points

Scale 1:2400100 200 300

——Bmm (feet)

400 500

— -1000DEC 2 2 1^

MINING LANDb i SrIMiWri

2.1— -1200

—-1400

— -1600

WINTERRCKD RESOURCES LIDGARRISON TWP. PROPERTY

GARRISON TWP.,MATHESON.ONT.

632 flME DOMAIN IP SURVEY RCALSECTION L2+OOW

APPARENT RESISTIVI1YAB^900 to 9700 ft

Transmitter Frequency O 0625 Hz (5055 duty cycle) Transmitter Current 1 15 to 2 9 Amps Decay Curve QfP IP-6 Custom Semilogarithmic Windows

10 Gates (60ms to 3540ms)Station Interval 100ftResistivity Contour Interval 20 levels/log decadeColour Scale Equal Area Zoning

Date OCT/95Instrumentation Rx - IRIS IP-6 (6 channels)

Tx = PHOENIX IPT-2B(15 kW) * MG-30(30 kVA)

Surveyed A Processed byQUANTEC IP INC.DWG P-129-RSIP-RES-1

LINE 2+OOW TOTAL CHARGEABILITY (mV/V)

2200S 2000S 1800S l

-200 ——200

-400 —

-600

-800

O. UJa

-1000 —

o CMCO -1200 —

-1400

-1600 —

LINE 2+OOW

Gradient Array———AB——

o m -o-H IE 100

-*^^fm- — ^f'*'

—— ^-^--~~.f^——— V

plot points

Scale 1:2400100 200 300 400 500

RECEIVED

—-1200

DEC 2 21'

MINING LANDS

2.16

——1400

—-1600

2200S 2000S 1800S 1600S 1400S 1200S 100QS 800S 600S 400S 200S 200N 400N 600N 800N 1000N 1200N 1400N

WINTERRCW) RESOURCES LTDGARRISON TWP. PROPERTY

1RANCH GARRISON TWP.,MATHESON,ONT.

320TIME DOMAIN IP SURVEY

REALSECTION L2+OOWTOTAL CHARGEABILITY

AB^490G to 9700 ftTransmitter Frequency O 0625 Hz (5035 duty cycle) Transmitter Current 1 15 to 2 9 Amps Decay Curve QIP IP-6 Custom Semilogarithmic Windows

10 Gates (60ms to 3540ms)Station Interval 100 ftChargeability Contour Interval 05,25 mV/VColour Scale Equal Area Zoning

Date OCT/95Instrumentation Rx ~ IRIS IP-6 (6 channels)

Tx = PHOENIX IPT-2B(15 kW) + MG-30(30 kVA)

Surveyed A Processed byQUANTEC IP INC.DWG f P-129-RSIP-CHG-1