Report on Community Involvement Plan - World...

~ � ~

Report on Community Involvement Plan

1.1 BackgroundofCommunityInvolvementPlanDevelopment

Planning has traditionally been done with a top-down approach, mostly by planners and government. By this exclusive approach, people – including local population - are least neither communicated nor included in planning processes. Local population often are only informed at the end of the process, thus having a small role in development planning and contribute least in decision making processes.

Participation is crucial both for the success of the project and for longer empowerment of people, since development does not end when a project ends. Success of the project depends on commitment of people towards achieving its goals, fulfilling its outputs, and sustaining for the future; therefore local involvement is an indispensable element of the planning process. Involvement largely depends on communication and exchange of information amongst stakeholders. Problems often occur if information should be exchanged between stakeholders at different levels or if community members are having rich social mixture, with different power, interests, and capacity; for example between local government and local community, or between culturally different groups in community. It certainly requires different approach based on specific targeted groups. It is understood that community can participate in planning processes in

various stages, so different community members can actually participate accordingly.

The Community Involvement Plan aims to clearly pave the path for participation opportunities for all possible stakeholders and to communicate project-related information in an adequate way to everyone who might be affected.

1.2 OverviewoftheDocumentThe Community Involvement Plan consists of 4(four) parts. The first chapter is an introduction to the document, which briefly describes the motivation of the Community Involvement Plan and the structure of the document. Chapter 2 describes the project site, current situation of tourism development and nature protection, which are the reasons for this Project. The next chapter discusses the situation analysis, which mainly covers the current situation of Community involvement, view of stakeholders on tourism development and nature protection, as well as experiences and needs assessed for Community involvement.

1.3 HowtoUsetheDocumentThe Community Involvement Plan is a specifically focused document, yet integrated with the Tourism Management Plan. The methodology and tools can be used individually, but in this context it is an indispensable part of a much larger plan.

Chapter 1

Introduction

~ 2 ~


~ � ~


2.1 DescriptionoftheSiteThe Project is conducted in Pangandaran, a tourism destination area in West Java. It was severely affected by Tsunami in 2004. The area now is gearing up for its recovery processes.

2.1.1 LocationPangandaran is located in the Southern part of Ciamis Regency, West Java; covering area of 584.81 square kilometer (Bapeda Ciamis, 2007). It comprises 6(six) sub-districts of Pangandaran, Parigi, Cijulang, Cimerak, Kalipucang, and Sidamulih. It is located about 60 kilometres from the nearest town, Kota Banjar. The area is highly accessible by land from various part of Java, including from Jakarta (8 hours drive), Bandung (5 hours drive), and Yogyakarta (6 hours drive). It is also accessibly by air via small airport, but at the moment it is no longer used for commercial flight.

2.1.2 GeographyPangandaran is located between 0-50 metres above sea level, with slope topography. Local temperature ranges from 29-30 °C with average rain fall of 3196 mm/year, creating humid and warm climate. The area is particularly interesting due to its peninsula, which spatially divides the beach into Western and Eastern beach. The peninsula comprises of a natural reserve (cagar alam) and a natural recreation park (taman wisata alam).

2.1.3 SocietyPangandaran was inhabited by 44,735 people in 2005 (Monograph Sub-district, 2005). Most people works in agriculture based and trade, then as labour, fisherman, civil servant, entrepreneur, handicraft. However, it is important to note that the data does not clearly explain the definition of each sector of livelihood; therefore it is sufficient only to estimate type of employment, but not sufficient to actually describe profile of employment and family livelihood.

Observation and discussions with community indicate that economic activities in Pangandaran mostly depend on cultivation of natural resources, i.e. farmer, fisherman, and palm sugar producer. Even those in service or trade sector depends from natural resources, i.e. sea food vendors.

2.1.4 HistoryHistory of Pangandaran can be traced back from stories, documents, and artefacts. The story of Pangandaran depends much on reconstruction of stories or experiences of resource persons, i.e. community leaders or researchers. History of Pangandaran is also closely related to historical sites in the Nature Reserve Pangandaran – Pananjung and legendary tale of local figures. Historical phase of Pangandaran covers (i) period of the Hindu kingdom of Galuh, (ii) period of Islam, (ii) period of Dutch colonial, and (iv) period of Japanese control. Most of this story still live in the customs and rituals; as well as physicals features such as grave or artefacts.

2.2 TourismDevelopmentandNatureProtection

2.2.1 DevelopmentofTourismattheSiteIn 1934, Peninsula Pangandaran was established as Wildlife Sanctuary covering an area of 497 hectare, due to the presence of distinct animals such as Banteng (Bos javanicus) and deer. When further exploration successfully found the Rafflesia flower in 1961, it became a Nature Reserve. A small part of the reserve - covering about 37.70 hectare of land – was transformed into a Natural Recreation Park in 1978, aiming to respond to the demand of fast growing tourism activities (Anonymous, 1999).

Since then tourism in Pangandaran developed largely without planning. The high number of tourists both domestic and international encourages development of accommodation in this area, often ignoring development standard. Transformation of houses

Chapter 2

BriefInformationonSite

~ 4 ~


~ 5 ~


In 1990, the Nature Reserve (covering ± 530 hectare) was added by Marine Nature Reserve (covering ± 470 hectare). However, high number of visits has forced change of status, especially for areas directly interface with tourism activities. Therefore out of 530 hectare, 37,70 hectare is converted into Nature Recreational Park. The whole area was previously under the management of BKSDA West Java II. In the next development, based on the Ministry of Forestry Decree No. 104/Kpts-II/1993, concession of Nature Recreational Park is transferred from Directorate General of Forest Protection and Nature Conservation to Perum Perhutani.

The overall condition of the nature reserve is relatively good, but weak management added by the impact of high number of visitors and high intrusion of tourism activities is apparent, especially during tourism high season. Animal hand feeding, entries into conservation areas, littering, and vandalism can be easily identified. Poor facilities and lack of interpretation media exacerbates it, the area does not give added value or education to its visitors regarding natural conservation.

2.2.4 TourismandSustainabilityLooking at the potentials, Pangandaran should be able to sustain its place as one of the key destinations in the Province. Nevertheless, the impacts of economy crisis and price increase are important factors to be considered, because they will influence tourism development in Pangandaran.

Recent conditions would have re-encouraged non sustainable activities; for example collecting fire wood, collecting coral reef for souvenirs, fishing with floating fish net within the sea conservation area. Tourism sustainability highly depends on involvement of local communities on a large scale, in order to reduce destruction as much as possible and to shift attitudes towards conservation. It is necessary to identify and campaign for sustainable use enterprises. Awareness raising campaign programs should also be developed continuously.

2.3 TheProjectIn South-East Asia, ecosystems suffered considerable damage from the 2004 tsunami. There were also areas that played an important role in the world that were severely affected. Thus, these countries have temporarily lost a significant source of income. At the same time there could be observed that tourism activities had damaged ecosystems by unregulated and inappropriate building activities in costal zones, by deforestation of mangroves, over-exploitation of coral reefs, etc., leading to reduced environmental functions. Therewith, the natural risk prevention potential of intact ecosystems became lost and allowed for more devastating impacts of the tsunami.

The World Tourism Organization (UNWTO) has been supporting the countries of Asia that were affected by the tsunami in December 2004. In order to continue and to strengthen the support to these

into modest accommodation is inevitable. This condition has also encouraged the local population into other informal sectors, such as small scale enterprises, handicraft, and tourism activities. Nature reserve is one of key attraction for tourists, both for forest trekking and coral reef exploration by boat. Weak management of high number of visits creates negative impacts. Solid waste, vandalism, coral reef poaching, land conversion, are some negative impacts directly suffered at the moment. Management and supervision of tourism activities are controlled by local government of Ciamis Regency, particularly Culture and Tourism Regional Office (Dinas Pariwisata).

2.2.2 CurrentStateofTourismPangandaran is one of many featured destinations in the West Java province. Number of visits increased, except during economy crisis (number of visits decreased from 1,167,296 in 1996 to 800.745 domestic tourist in 1998 and steadily increased up to 1.973.014 tourists in 2003); and momentarily after the Tsunami in 2004. At the moment the number of visitors in 2007 reached more than 2 million domestic tourists. The highest record of international tourists was reached in 1996, as many as 42.000 people, now it ranges around 12.000 people per year.

2.2.3 CurrentSituationofNatureProtectionPangandaran is one of only few places along the south coast of Java where we can find the fringing reefs, for which its 470-hectare-water area was stated as Marine Nature Reserve by Ministry of Forestry in 1990. The long-tailed macaque is largely found in Pangandaran, as well as about 30 other mammal species such as banteng, deer, barking deer, leaf monkey, flying fox, and flying lemur. Other animals in addition to those are 85 species of birds, 5 amphibians, 17 reptiles, and 39 butterflies. Meanwhile the coastal ecosystem dominated by coastal vegetation includes Barringtonia formation, Barringtonia asiatica, Terminalia catappa, and Calophyllum inophyllum. The inner part is dominated by secondary forest and small remnant of dry evergreen forest, with Vitex pinnata, Dillenia excelsa, and Cratoxylon formosum. The rare Rafflesia padma plant is found in the flat area near the entrance (Whitten et al, 1996). More than 700 species can be found in this forest (Amasya, 2007), including planted trees of teak, mahogany and rosewood in the northern part near tourist gate. Mangrove is not largely found in this area due to limited suitable substrate for growing, only 31,80 hectare of mangrove was found here (Anonymous, 2006).

~ � ~


~ 7 ~


3.1 DevelopmentofthePlanThe Plan is developed using methodology as described in the Guideline, which includes data gathering, outline of implementation, workshop with stakeholders, analysis of result, and elaboration of plan.

Data gathering aims mainly to assess community structure. It is done by identifying stakeholders through community workshops. Implementation plan is drafted by grouping the stakeholders based on their interests towards project success and power, and then developing tools appropriate to communicate with them and to involve them in the project or planning process. The outline plan will need to be communicated with stakeholders via workshops, focus group discussions, as well as discussion with the government and UNWTO. Input and feedback will be incorporated to further elaborate and refine the outline plan into a final Community Involvement Plan.

3.2 CurrentSituationofCommunityInvolvementPublic communication means in Pangandaran are available but not yet effectively active. They are, for instance:• Printed materials: newsletter of two local

organizations, information boards, brochure• Audio materials: radio community, privately

owned radios• Electronic materials: websites on Pangandaran

Local involvement is conducted by various local initiatives, but not yet effective in influencing larger scale planning process. They are, for instance:• Replanting trees along the beach• Training for beach guard• Workshop

Chapter 3

SituationAnalysis

3.3 Stakeholders’ViewonTourismDevelopmentWorkshops with stakeholders, conducted during initiation stage, indicated stakeholders’ view on tourism development in Pangandaran. Pangandaran has great natural potentials: coastal ecosystem, forest, and culture; which can be developed into attractions with great competitiveness both in Province and national level. Popularity of Pangandaran as a tourism area has attracted people from various area – not only those closely located to Pangandaran to make a living in this area. Weak law enforcement has stimulated street vendors to flourish around tourism zones. Unfortunately not planned, not designed, and not organized, they make visitors often feel uncomfortable and reduce aesthetic view. Stakeholders also think that it is important to improve environmental management, such as solid waste management, sanitation, vendor management, and clean public toilet. Improvement of public facilities will improve product quality and services towards tourist.

Tourism management in Pangandaran requires human resources with good capacity; therefore it is necessary to have capacity building efforts in tourism. Another issue which is also important is to involve local the community in tourism development. In short, it is necessary to create synergy amongst stakeholders; both from private, community, and government to collectively develop Pangandaran.

3.4 Stakeholders’ViewonNatureProtectionMost of the stakeholders also regard Pananjung as a conservation and nursery area for fauna. Few stakeholders –including fisherman, vendors, PDAM and BPSDA - consider the area as a clean water reserve. Regarding the Tsunami, all stakeholders think that Pananjung is the protection area for Pangandaran people. When Tsunami hit two years ago, many fishermen also use the area as protection

countries, the UNWTO has joined forces with the Government of Germany to provide a range of consultancy and advisory support in the field of biodiversity and tourism development following the Guidelines on Biodiversity and Tourism Development of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD).

This collaboration provides consultation and assistance to national and local governments so as to contribute to the reconstruction in the tsunami hit countries by improving capacity, knowledge sharing and participation processes to develop sustainable tourism practices and to demonstrate that tourism development and biodiversity can be mutually supportive.

Indonesia is one of the target countries for these UNWTO activities. The Indonesian Government has agreed to cooperate with UNWTO in the framework of a project in the Regency of Ciamis (West Java Province). The project “Tourism Development supporting Biodiversity Conservation” aims to build sustainable tourism practices in the model site of Pangandaran. Targeted assistance from the UNWTO, the Ministry of Culture and Tourism (MoCT), INDECON and other partners shall provide these communities with the expertise to develop tourism in a sustainable manner giving special emphasis to the conservation of biodiversity and risk prevention through intact functioning ecosystems.

~ 8 ~


~ 9 ~


4.1 GoalsandObjectivesThe Goal of the Community Involvement Plan is an inclusive planning process, which will increase the success level of Project implementation in the short term and empower stakeholders in the long term.

The Objectives of Community Involvement Plan are: • To communicate project activities, plan, and

outputs to stakeholders at various level; each with appropriate means

• To increase awareness on strategic issues which are severely affecting tourism development and hampering biodiversity

• To involve and increase participation of stakeholders in various stages of planning process: data collection, data compilation, data analysis, scenario development, and tourism management plan development

• To get input from local population in order to increase appropriateness of scenario and recommendation to be developed in the project

• To increase ownership of local population and local authority both to the project and the project document

4.2 ActivitiesAdoptedintheCommunityInvolvementPlan

4.2.1 TargetGroupThe Community Involvement Plan is to be implemented in socially rich mixture community, it is identified as 4(four) different groups based on level of their interest towards project success and level of power (please refer to Annex of this document).

4.2.1.1 TargetGroup1(identifiedstakeholderslistedinQuadrant1)

This group has low interest towards project success and low power. Therefore they need to be informed about the project and planning process (output category); we also need to arouse their interest (outreach category)

Chapter 4

TheCommunityInvolvementPlan

Identified stakeholders :1. KTNA - Kelompok Tani Nelayan Indonesia (group

of farmers and fisherman)2. KT Lumbung Pangan Mekar (group of farmer)3. Minasari group4. PKK – women group5. Guide Pangauban6. Coconut shell craftsman7. Bicycle rental owners8. Becak drivers9. ATV rental owners10. Ojek (motorcycle rental) drivers11. Horse rental group12. Horse carriage group13. Prostitute

Output tools:• Brochure, Poster, and Newsletter• Broadcasting at local radio(s)• Website and Mailing list• Information board• Public meeting: community meeting

Outreach tools:• Newsletter• Radio broadcasting at local radio(s)• Video production• Community events: movie screening (film on

nature or tourism issues)• Community events: puppet show (wayang golek

show telling story about nature conservation)

4.2.1.2 TargetGroup2(identifiedstakeholderslistedinQuadrant2)

This group has high interest towards project success, but it has low power. They need to be informed about project and planning process (output category); yet we would need to receive their opinion (input category), also to motivate them to actively participate in the process (outreach category)

shelter; so people believe that without Pananjung there would have been more victims.

In terms of its relation with local economy, stakeholders think that Pananjung is a recreation or tourism destination. Local government considers it as a resource of local revenue. Vendors, tour guides, tourist boat owners consider it as a means of livelihood. For people who collect firewood or clam shell the nature reserve is a gift for those who are jobless because they can take out something out of this area for their daily living.

3.5 ExperiencesandNeedsoftheStakeholdersRegardingCommunityInvolvement

Workshops with stakeholders, conducted during initiation stage, have indicated experiences and actual condition on Community involvement. After Tsunami in 2004, there is a community radio which is managed by the community as a media to disseminate and cover activities or awareness raising program. One community organization has also started to issue newsletter. Community involvement has been taking place considerably, through meetings at village and at sub-districts; information boards, replanting program, and collective cleaning of public places.

Assessment on stakeholders shows that there is a need for several types of communication means; for instance newsletter, brochure, poster, video producing in order to increase awareness of local community on specific and strategic issues, interactive radio broadcasting, community events both casual (such as puppet show for education purposes) and formal (such as planning day. Workshops and FGDs are also considered important to increase participation level in planning and development.

~ 10 ~


~ �� ~


23. Disbudpar Ciamis (local government office for tourism)

24. Bappeda Ciamis (local planning board)25. Perhutani (local company 26. BKSDA – Balai Konservasi Sumber Daya Alam

(Conservation and Nature Resources Agency Office)

27. Perhutani28. HNSI29. Rukun Nelayan (fisherman groups)30. Craftsman groups31. Police32. PGRI (Indonesian Teacher Associates)33. Mrs. Susi34. Ormas group35. HP2PW (association of vendors at tourist market)

Output tools:• Brochure, Poster, and Newsletter• Radio broadcasting at local radio(s)• Website and Mailing list• Press tour and Article as newspaper supplement • Information board• Public meeting: community meeting

Input tools:• Interactive radio broadcasting at local radio• Email and Frequently Asked Question Program• Survey: questionnaire• Public meeting: Focus Group Discussion• Individual consultation: interview

Involvement tools:• Public meeting: Focus Group Discussion• Planning Day• Project Centre• Prioritizing : public consultation on scenario

development• Photo surveys• Reconnaissance trips• Workshop

4.2.1.3 TargetGroup4:Quadrant4This group has low interest towards project success, but high power. They would need to be informed

about the project and planning process (output category), but we would also need to arouse their interest and motivate them to participate (outreach category).

Identified Stakeholders:1. PPBR2. Café at tourist market3. Fisherman

Output tools:• Brochure, Poster, and Newsletter• Radio broadcasting at local radio(s)• Website and Mailing list• Information board




4.2.2 TypeofOutputToolsAdopted

4.2.2.1 Brochure,Poster,andNewsletterBrochure will contain brief information about single issues, which are identified in planning process. It will be distributed at public places, such as on the beach and nature reserve; to locals, visitors, and media; and at events.

Newsletter will be issued on a regular basis (at least monthly) to the identified stakeholders. It will contain information on the project, local issues, agenda of events, and contact details (of project centre)

Posters will contain specific information such as issue propaganda, for example on sustainable use or sustainable tourism; or advertisement on project activities. It will be posted in public places, such as hotels and restaurants, entrance gate of the nature reserve, etc.

Identified stakeholders: 1. Mr. Rain 2. Mr. Wagiman3. Firewood picker; who collect firewood from

nature reserve 4. Photographer; who walk around and offer service

to make instant photograph of tourist5. Lokawisata6. Budaya Bahari7. Merpati Nusantara Airline8. Lingga (artist group)9. Fisherman kid group10. Association of seafood vendors11. Konsep – association of bikers12. Association of mobile street vendors13. Association of handicraft vendors14. Association of public toilet providers

Output tools:• Brochure, Poster, and Newsletter• Radio broadcasting at local radio(s)• Website and Mailing list• Article as newspaper supplement • Information board• Public meeting: community meeting

Input tools:• Interactive radio broadcasting at local radio• Email and Frequently Asked Question Program• Survey: questionnaire• Public meeting: Focus Group Discussion• Individual consultation: interview




4.2.1.3 TargetGroup3(identifiedstakeholdersarelistedinQuadrant3)

This group has high interest towards project success as well as high power. Therefore it would be

necessary to collaborate and actively involve them in the project. They would need to be informed about the project and planning process (output category), in the same time we have to obtain their feedback and opinion (input category), and enable active participation in elaboration and decision-making (involvement category).

Identified Stakeholders:1. P3C-Persatuan Pemuda-Pemudi Cikembulan

(youth groups in Cikembulan)2. Balawista (association of beach guard)3. BPSDA - Balai Pengelola Sumber Daya Air (office

who manage water resource)4. Tour operator5. MUI - Majelis Ulama Indonesia in Ciamis

(Indonesian association of muslim leaders) 6. Community radio7. Association of palm sugar producer8. Airud Rahman (marine police)9. HPI - Himpunan Pramuwisata Indonesia

(Indonesian association of tour guide)10. PPLP - Pusat Pendidikan Lingkungan Pesisir

(Education centre on Coastal Environment)11. Dinas Kelautan dan Perikanan (local government

office for marine and fishery)12. People who collect raw materials for handicraft13. KMPP - Kelompok Masyarakat Pecinta

Pangandaran (group of people who love Pangandaran)

14. Women group15. KPKP -Kantor Pelayanan Kebersihan dan

Pertamanan (local office for cleaness and landscape

16. Visitors17. APP - Asosiasi Perahu Pesiar (association of

tourism boat owners)18. Association of vendors 19. PHRI - Persatuan Hotel dan Restoran Indonesia in

Ciamis (Ciamis branch of Indonesian Association of Hotel and Restaurant)

20. PDAM (local water company)21. Distamben (local government office for mining

and energy)22. Aparat desa (local authority at village)

~ 12 ~


~ �� ~


EstimatedCostandFundingOpportunitiesFive boards, Rp 3.500.000 / board, which include design, printing, and structure; and Rp 500.000 / board / year, for advertisement tax.No funding is available from project budget.

EvaluationMechanismPrinted, read by visitors, assessed in questionnaire

4.2.2.6 Publicmeeting:communitymeetingProject related information will be provided directly at community meeting, for example at village and to specific stakeholder groups. Detailed explanation will be provided in input and involvement tools.

4.2.3 TypeofInputToolsAdopted

4.2.3.1 InteractiveradiobroadcastingatlocalradioInteractive live broadcast is an effective way to obtain input from local population, although input is not always directly-associated with topics discussed during the broadcast. People can make phone calls or send text messages, which will be responded by the speakers.

EstimatedCostandFundingOpportunitiesRp 750.000 / broadcast , which includes resource person , equipment, and moderator. Funding is obtained from project budget.

4.2.2.4 PresstourandArticleasnewspapersupplement

Press tour aims to build good image of Pangandaran by testing new product development based on project intervention, as well as to build good relationship with local, province, and national media. Article at newspaper will be very attractive to disseminate comprehensive and detailed information about a range of specific topics to wide audience. Since newsletter supplement is quite cost-extensive, an article is more cost-friendly.

EstimatedCostandFundingOpportunitiesRp 18.000. 000, which include transportation, accommodation, meals, and guide for 8 participants from Jakarta, Bandung, and local. No funding is available from the project.

EvaluationMechanismArticle published by journalist(s) invited

4.2.2.5 InformationboardInformation board at the nature reserve, nature Recreation Park, and part of the beach mostly visited by tourists are effective on-site notification. It will contain basic information for education and tourism purposes.

4.2.2.2 Radiobroadcastingatlocalradio(s)Live broadcast will disburse information on project or specific issues, identified by Technical Assistance Team. It will be held on regular basis collaborating with community radio and other private-owned radios. It will be scheduled monthly.


EvaluationMechanismNumbers of people interacting with the show (see interactive broadcast)

Estimated Cost and Funding Opportunities• Brochure: 5.000 exemplars, Rp 3.000 / exemplar,

which include design and typeset, film, full color printing, editor.

Funding is obtained from project budget.• Poster: 1.000 exemplar, Rp 5.000 / exemplar,

which include design and typeset, film, full color printing.

No funding opportunities at the moment, the project will look for funding from government side.

• Newsletter: 3.000 exemplar, Rp 4.000 / exemplar, which include design and typeset, film, full color printing, editor.

Funding is obtained from project budget.

EvaluationMechanismPrinted and distributed into targeted groups

4.2.2.3 WebsiteandMailingListWebsite will contain general project information (project activities, time frame, expected output, contact details, etc.), project reports (weekly update, summary report), issues identified during planning process, profile of figure or activity related in sustainable use, and FAQ link. The website will be also a mean of publication for some of the Project’s outputs.

EstimatedCostandFundingOpportunitiesRp 10.000.000, only includes web design, hosting and monthly subscription. Funding is obtained from project budget.

EvaluationMechanismNumber of hit

~ 14 ~


~ 15 ~



4.2.4.3 VideoproductionVideo production will be focused on nature conservation areas, tourist attraction destinations (as well as sites potentials to be destinations), and/or local daily life.

EstimatedCostandFundingOpportunitiesRp 40.000.000, which include shooting, editing, and producingNo funding is available from the project budget

EvaluationMechanismProduced and screened, later produced in CDs.

4.2.4.4 Communityevents:moviescreeningThe video will be shown during movie screening for community. To gather interest of wider audience, it will be jointly screened with another movie – not necessarily related with nature and tourism issues.

EstimatedCostandFundingOpportunitiesRp 25.000.000/ screening (planned twice a year at different selected location related to the impact expected), which include renting equipment, venueNo funding is available from the project budget

EvaluationMechanismEvents conducted and report

4.2.4.5 Communityevents:puppetshowThis event will utilize one of the most attractive local events: wayang golek show; together with the wayang golek craftsman in the area. The show will tell story on nature conservation. It will be modestly organized.

EstimatedCostandFundingOpportunitiesRp 15.000.000/ screening (planned twice a year at different selected location related to the impact expected), which include renting equipment, venueNo funding is available from the project budget

EvaluationMechanismEvents conducted and report

4.2.5 TypeofInvolvementToolsAdopted

4.2.5.1 Publicmeeting:FocusGroupDiscussionFocus Group Discussion will be organized on specific issues with various stakeholder groups, including – but not limited to - village community, tour guides, nature reserve rangers, and craftsman. In such community where community is socially mixed, FGD is a good way for two-way communication with stakeholders.

EstimatedCostandFundingOpportunitiesPlanned 5 FGDs, Rp.8.000.000/ events, which includes venue, meals, and materials.Funding is available from project budget.

EvaluationMechanismActivity report, number of participants, and issues covered


4.2.3.2 EmailandFrequentlyAskedQuestionProgram

Email address will be provided and needs to be distributed widely. Frequently Asked Question link will be provided in the website; and question posed will be responded by project coordinators, or technical assistance team, or if necessary forwarded to appropriate resource person.

EstimatedCostandFundingOpportunitiesIncluded in website budget

EvaluationMechanismNumber of incoming emails and questions

4.2.3.3 Survey:questionnaireQuestionnaire will be used to gather input from various stakeholder groups, including – but not limited to - visitors, tour operators, hotel and restaurant owners, vendors, and local product producers.

EstimatedCostandFundingOpportunitiesApprox. 1.500 questionnaire in various context, approx. cost Rp 10.000/ questionnaire, including photocopy, surveyor. Cost for data inputting is approx. Rp 8.000 / questionnaire.Funding is available from project budget.

EvaluationMechanismData tabulation is completed

4.2.3.4 Publicmeeting:FocusGroupDiscussionFocus Group Discussion will be organized on specific issues with various stakeholder groups, including – but not limited to - village community, tour guides, nature reserve rangers, and craftsman. In such community where community is socially mixed, FGD is a good way for two-way communication with stakeholders.

EstimatedCostandFundingOpportunitiesPlanned 5 FGDs, Rp. 5.000.000/ events, which includes venue, meals, and materials.

Funding is available from project budget.


4.2.3.5 Individualconsultation:interviewIndividual consultation will be conducted with local prominent figures, government officers at Ciamis, Bandung, or Jakarta; and key stakeholders, including – but not limited to - head of local planning board, head of local office for nature reserve conservation.

EstimatedCostandFundingOpportunitiesApprox. Rp 5.000.000, to cover possible transportation or meals

EvaluationMechanismReport

4.2.4 TypeofOutreachToolsAdopted

4.2.4.1 NewsletterNewsletter will be issued on regular basis (at least monthly) to identified stakeholders. It will contain information on project, local issues, agenda of events, and contact details (of project centre)

EstimatedCostandFundingOpportunitiesNewsletter: 3.000 exemplar, Rp 4.000 / exemplar, which include design and typeset, film, full color printing, editor. Funding is obtained from project budget.

EvaluationMechanismPrinted and distributed to targeted stakeholders

4.2.4.2 Radiobroadcastingatlocalradio(s)Live broadcast will disburse information on project or specific issues, identified by Technical Assistance Team. It will be held on regular basis (scheduled for two weekly) at community radio and other private-owned radios.


~ �� ~


~ 17 ~


EstimatedCostandFundingOpportunitiesRp 23.000.000/events, which includes resource person, venue, meals, and materials.Funding is available from project budget.

EvaluationMechanismActivity report

4.3 ImplementationPlanThe Community Involvement Plan first needs to be disseminated to all possible stakeholders, mainly to inform them about these activities, to obtain feedback (for example on feasibility of the project, better targeted stakeholders, suitable time frame, etc). Project coordinator then will develop a schedule for implementation with the stakeholders. It is important to highlight that due to some technical issues, the Project has been delayed for about 3(three) months. Therefore, some of the activities described in this Plan will have already been communicated, discussed, and implemented even before the final document is released.

The refined version of the Community Involvement Plan will be disseminated via workshop and individual consultation (particularly to community leaders or other prominent figures in the community to get them to support distribution and implementation processes).

EstimatedCostandFundingOpportunitiesRp. 30.000.000/ events, which includes venue, meals, and materials.Funding is available from project budget.

EvaluationMechanismActivity report

4.2.5.5 PhotosurveysPhoto surveys will be conducted to develop planning ideas, especially on tourism, environment, culture, and economic issues. Photos will be sorted, grouped, laid out, and published in brochures, newsletters, or websites.

EstimatedCostandFundingOpportunitiesApprox. Rp 15.000.000 to cover all important or potential attractionFunding is available from project budget

EvaluationMechanismPublished in printing products

4.2.5.6 ReconnaissancetripsReconnaissance trip will directly inspect areas of interests or areas requiring certain attention by a mixed team of local stakeholders, technical assistance team, and international supervisor. Collected information is compiled into a trip report useful for the next stage of the planning process.

EstimatedCostandFundingOpportunitiesApprox. Rp 8.000.000 to cover all important or potential attractionFunding is available from project budget

EvaluationMechanismTrip report

4.2.5.7 WorkshopThere will be workshops on different issues for local stakeholders. They will include different training modules depending on the target groups and needs indicated by them, including – but not limited to - sustainable tourism, preserving lost traditions, small scale enterprises.

4.2.5.2 PlanningDayPlanning Day will be used to gather specific information with different stakeholders groups in one particular event, including on tourist attraction directory, supply and demand, service and infrastructure, and institutional capacity. This event aims to reach a common understanding or collective assessment. It will generate ideas and create interaction between different interest groups.

EstimatedCostandFundingOpportunitiesPlanned 5 times Rp. 8.000.000/ events, which includes venue, meals, and materials.Funding is available from project budget.


4.2.5.3 ProjectCentreThe project centre will be useful as a fixed venue, as a centre of information, and as place for local community to actively participate in the project. It will also provide space for meetings, social activities, or other activities to stimulate interest, start initiatives and provide educational experiences; or even any other Community involvement activities. Few project offices in important sites – for example nature reserve or public beach – will be great complimentary centre.

EstimatedCostandFundingOpportunitiesRp 16.000.000, which include households, computers, and basic stationeries. Venue is provided in-kind from Provincial government.

EvaluationMechanismOffice runs and recognized by local community.

4.2.5.4 Prioritizing:publicconsultationonscenariodevelopment

Public consultation will be conducted during scenario development process. First it will discussed proposed scenarios developed, then it aims to take decisions on which scenario can be better accepted by local population.

~ 18 ~

Report on Community Involvement PlanApp

endix.1M

atrixofStakeho

lderQua

dran

t

inte

rest

12

34

5

power

1

Min

asar

i gro

upK

ids

Oje

k dr

iver

ATV

rent

alM

assa

seur

gro

upC

ocon

ut sh

ell

craf

tman

PKK

Loka

wis

ata

Bud

aya

baha

riM

NA

Ling

ga

2

Fish

erm

an k

id g

roup

Asc

.of

seaf

ood

vend

ors

Fire

woo

d pi

cker

Bik

e re

ntal

ow

ners

Bec

ak d

river

Gui

de P

anga

uban

Hor

se re

ntal

gro

upH

orse

car

riage

gr

oup

Mr.

Rai

nM

r. W

agim

anPh

otog

raph

erK

ON

SEP

Asc

. of m

obile

stre

et

vend

ors

Asc

.of h

andi

cfra

t ve

ndor

Asc

. of p

ublic

toile

t pr

ovid

er

3

Pros

titut

eK

TNA

Kt L

umbu

ng

Pang

an M

ekar

P3C

Bal

awis

taP5

BL

BPS

DA

Tour

Ope

rato

rR

aw m

ater

ials

co

llect

or fo

r ha

ndic

raft

HP2

PWA

sc. o

f cra

ftsm

an

4

PPB

RM

UI

Rad

io c

omm

unity

Asc

. of p

alm

suga

r pr

oduc

er

PPLP

Din

as K

elau

tan

Perik

anan

KM

PPW

omen

gro

up

Caf

é at

Tou

rist

Mar

ket

Fish

erm

anA

irud

Rah

man

Polic

ePG

RI

HPI

APP

Asc

. Of V

endo

rsM

rs. S

usi

Orm

asgr

oup

KPK

PV

isito

rs

5

HN

SIPH

RI

PDA

MD

ista

mbe

n

Vill

age

auth

ority

Dis

budp

ar C

iam

isB

aped

a C

iam

isB

KSD

APe

rhut

ani

Pres

idum

Pan

gand

aran

Dis

pend

a C

iam

is

Report on Community Involvement Plan - World...

Documents

Transcript of Report on Community Involvement Plan - World...