Report on Adults with Incapacity - SLC · PDF fileReport on Adults with Incapacity ... Other...

115
report (SCOT LAW COM No 240) Report on Adults with Incapacity

Transcript of Report on Adults with Incapacity - SLC · PDF fileReport on Adults with Incapacity ... Other...

  • report

    (SCOT LAW COM No 240)

    Report on Adults with Incapacity

  • Report on Adults with Incapacity

    Laid before the Scottish Parliament by the Scottish Ministers under section 3(2) of the Law Commissions Act 1965

    October 2014

    SCOT LAW COM No 240 SG/2014/180 The Stationery Office

  • Crown copyright 2014

    You may re-use this information (excluding logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the

    terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ or email: [email protected].

    Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned.

    Any copyright enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at [email protected].

    ii

    http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence

  • The Scottish Law Commission was set up by section 2 of the Law Commissions Act 19651 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law of Scotland. The Commissioners are:

    The Honourable Lord Pentland, Chairman Laura J Dunlop, QC Patrick Layden, QC TD Professor Hector L MacQueen Dr Andrew J M Steven.

    The Chief Executive of the Commission is Malcolm McMillan. Its offices are at 140 Causewayside, Edinburgh EH9 1PR.

    Tel: 0131 668 2131 Fax: 0131 662 4900 Email: [email protected]

    Or via our website at http://www.scotlawcom.gov.uk/contact-us

    NOTES

    1. For those wishing further copies of this paper it may be downloaded from our website or purchased from TSO (http://www.tsoshop.co.uk/).

    2. Please note that all hyperlinks in this document were checked for accuracy at the time of final draft.

    3. If you have any difficulty in reading this document, please contact us and we will do our best to assist. You may wish to note that the pdf version of this document available on our website has been tagged for accessibility.

    1 Amended by the Scotland Act 1998 (Consequential Modifications) (No 2) Order 1999 (SI 1999/1820).

    iii

    http:http://www.tsoshop.co.ukhttp://www.scotlawcom.gov.uk/contact-us

  • SCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION

    Item No 7 of our Eighth Programme of Law Reform

    Report on Adults with Incapacity

    To: Kenny MacAskill MSP, Cabinet Secretary for Justice

    We have the honour to submit to the Scottish Ministers our Report on Adults with Incapacity.

    (Signed) PAUL B CULLEN, Chairman

    LAURA J DUNLOP

    PATRICK LAYDEN

    HECTOR L MACQUEEN

    ANDREW J M STEVEN

    Malcolm McMillan, Chief Executive 12 September 2014

    v

  • Contents

    Paragraph Page

    Chapter 1 Introduction

    Background 1.1 1 Structure of the Report 1.3 1 Background to the Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000 1.5 1 Relevant parts of the Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000 1.8 2 Other relevant actors referred to in the Bill 1.11 3 Legislative competence and human rights 1.13 3 Impact Assessment 1.19 4 Advisory group; other meetings 1.24 5

    Chapter 2 Recent case law

    Introduction 2.1 7 Strasbourg 2.3 7

    General principles 2.3 7 Kedzior v Poland 2.9 9 Mihailovs v Latvia 2.13 9 Chosta v Ukraine 2.21 12

    England and Wales 2.25 13 Two key cases 2.25 13 The decision of the Supreme Court 2.29 14

    Scotland 2.36 15

    Chapter 3 Discussion Paper: Responses

    Introduction 3.1 16 Family care 3.2 16 Hospital admission 3.9 18 Definitions 3.22 20 Process for deprivation of liberty in community settings 3.39 23

    Authorisation by an attorney 3.41 24 Authorisation by a guardian 3.47 25 Intervention orders 3.49 26 Procedures and evidential requirements of new court order 3.52 26

    Consent by surrogate decision maker 3.56 27 Release provision 3.61 28

    vii

  • Contents (cont'd)

    Paragraph Page

    Chapter 4 Overview of proposed reforms

    Introduction 4.1 31 Hospitals 4.2 31

    Inpatient care 4.2 31 Taking people to hospital 4.9 33 Discharge from hospital 4.12 33 Duration of authorisation 4.30 37

    Community settings 4.39 39 Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards 4.42 39 Definition 4.45 40 Process: grant of authorisation 4.57 43 Process: evidence 4.65 45 Duration 4.68 46 Other necessary features 4.72 47 Release provision 4.75 48

    Chapter 5 Hospitals

    Introduction 5.1 49 Scope of the process 5.2 49 Assessment or medical treatment 5.8 51 Incapacity certified by medical practitioner primarily responsible for the 5.9 51 treatment Measures to prevent an adult going out of a hospital 5.13 52 Duration 5.19 53 Setting an end date 5.20 54 Duty to review and revocation 5.26 55 Right to appeal 5.28 55

    Chapter 6 Community process

    Introduction 6.1 57 Scope of process 6.2 57 Definition 6.6 58

    Types of restriction 6.8 58 Measuring the extent 6.15 60 Factors not included 6.17 60

    Process: evidential requirements 6.29 62 Short-term measures 6.29 62 Measures of longer duration 6.32 63

    Process: Authorisation of implementation 6.38 65 Surrogate decision maker 6.38 65

    viii

  • Contents (cont'd)

    Paragraph Page

    Authorisation by the Sheriff 6.40 65 Rights of challenge or appeal 6.41 66 Duration and renewal 6.44 66 Variation 6.46 66 Intimation and documentation 6.48 67

    Conclusion 6.49 67

    Chapter 7 Power to make an order for cessation of unlawful detention

    Introduction 7.1 71 Scope of the provision 7.2 71 Operation of the provision 7.4 71 Definitions 7.6 72 Interaction between the cessation of detention provision and section 7.7 72 291 of the Mental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Act 2003

    Chapter 8 Summary of recommendations 74

    Appendix A Draft Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Bill 80

    Appendix B List of respondents to the Discussion Paper 100

    ix

  • Abbreviated forms of reference

    Organisations and bodies

    The Association of Directors of Social Work in Scotland is referred to as "the Association of Directors of Social Work".

    The Mental Health and Disability Sub-committee of the Law Society of Scotland is referred to as "the Law Society".

    The Mental Health Tribunal for Scotland is referred to as "the Mental Health Tribunal".

    The Mental Welfare Commission for Scotland is referred to as "the Mental Welfare Commission".

    NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde Health Board Mental Health Clinical Governance Legislation Sub-group is referred to as "NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde".

    People First (Scotland) is referred to as People First.

    Royal College of Psychiatrists in Scotland: Faculty of Old Age Psychiatry is referred to as "RCPS (OAP)".

    Royal College of Psychiatrists in Scotland: Faculty of Psychiatry of Intellectual Disabilities and Faculty of Child and Adolescent Mental Health is referred to as: "RCPS (ID/CAMH)".

    Scottish Court Service and Office of the Public Guardian is referred to as "the Public Guardian".

    West Dunbartonshire Community Health & Care Partnership (a Strategic Partnership between NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde and West Dunbartonshire Council) is referred to as "West Dunbartonshire Partnership".

    Statutes and other instruments

    The Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000 is referred to as "the 2000 Act"

    The Mental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Act 2003 is referred to as "the 2003 Act".

    The European Convention on Human Rights is referred to as the ECHR or the Convention.

    The Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards provided for in the Mental Capacity Act 2005 are referred to as "DoLS".

    x

  • Publications

    The Scottish Law Commission Discussion Paper on Adults with Incapacity (Scot Law Com Discussion Paper No 156, 2012), available at: http://www.scotlawcom.gov.uk/law-reform-projects/adults-with-incapacity/ is referred to as the Discussion Paper or DP No 156.

    Cases

    The cases of P v Cheshire West and Chester Council; P and Q v Surrey County Council, [2014] UKSC 19 are, together, referred to as Cheshire West.

    Individuals referred to in the Report

    David Cobb is a member of the Faculty of Advocates.

    Professor Tom Guthrie is a Professor at the University of Glasgow, School of Law, who submitted a response in a personal capacity.

    Hilary Patrick is an Honorary Fellow at the University of Edinburgh, School of Law.

    Dr Lucy Series is a Research Associate at Cardiff Law School, Cardiff University. At the time of submitting her response she was a postgraduate researcher in the Department of Law at the University of Exeter.

    Dr Jill Stavert is a Reader in Law, Edinburgh Napier University, School of Accounting, Financial Services and Law.

    xi

    http://www.scotlawcom.gov.uk/law-reform

  • Chapter 1 Introduction

    Background

    1.1 This Report addresses a legal problem which has been evident in the United Kingdom since the Bournewood case, a decision involving the law of England and Wales.1

    The details of the case will be familiar to many readers, and are set out fully in our Discussion Paper.2 In summary, the case determined that the admission to a psychiatric hospital and continued residence there of a person with learning difficulties such that he could not consent to being where he was represented a deprivation of his liberty, could not be characterised as voluntary and needed to take place under a lawful process in order to comply with Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

    1.2 We included this issue in our Eighth Programme of Law Reform, after it had been suggested to us by the Mental Welfare Commission for Scotland, ENABLE Scotland and the Mental Health and D