Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) in OECD countries: a ...
Transcript of Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) in OECD countries: a ...
Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) in OECD countries: a policy tool to manage the flow of regulation
Building capacity for RIA in South Africa -Presentation to Officials 26 May 2009
Mr Gregory Bounds Administrator & Policy Analyst
Regulatory Policy Division
Directorate for Public Governance and Territorial Development
Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) : a policy tool to manage the flow of regulation
Presentation outline
I. The context for RIA: – What is RIA?
– Why is RIA important?
– Constitutive elements of RIA
– How does RIA fit into the policy-making process?
II. Making use of RIA – OECD good practices: – Common challenges
– Making use of RIA – OECD good practices
I. The context for RIA: a. Definition
Why RIA? – A tool to control the quality of regulation
Evidence based policy tool – Is regulation the best available means to address the policy objective?
b. Why is RIA important?
“RIA is a systematic policy tool used to examine and
measure the likely benefits, costs and effects of new or
existing regulation”
Elements of RIA:
• Identifying and defining the problem
• Spelling out the desired objective(s)
• Elaborating the different options, considering alternatives
• Consultation
• Analysing the options (assessment of the likely impacts)
• Recommending the policy option
• Communicating the results
• Monitoring (regulation) and reporting
c. RIA: A process of evidence based decision making
I. The context for RIA: c. Constitutive Elements of RIA
The process of Regulatory Impact Analysis Policy objectives Definition
Identification Regulatory Options
Assessment Costs
Consultation Involving Stakeholders
Design Enforcement, Compliance and monitoring mechanisms
After RIA is prepared: DECISION MAKING
Policy context
Benefits
Selection Best Option
Other impacts
I. The context for RIA: d. How does RIA fit into the policy-making process?
POLICY MAKING PROCESS
Consultation
Analysis
Information
Discussion
Agreement
Policy Implementation
RIA
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
Adoption of RIA in OECD countries
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Requirement to demonstrate that benefits of regulation justify the costs
Requirement to identify the benefits of new regulation
Requirement to identify the costs of new regulation
Requirement for draft subordinate regulations
Requirement for draft primary laws
Formal requirement by law
Number of jurisdictions
1998 2005 2008
31
RIA Requirements in OECD Countries
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Nu
mb
er
of
juri
sd
icti
on
s
Always Only for major regulations In other selected cases
31
Requirement to measure specific impacts
Related to the tool:
• Problem identification
• Consultation and data
• Considering alternatives
• “Proportionate analysis”
• Quantification
• Risk assessment
Common challenges in implementing RIA
Related to the structure/process • Scope of application / selection of proposals • Quality control (oversight) • Presentation / Communication • Integrate RIA up-stream (early in decision-making) • Integrate RIA down-stream (“closing the loop”) • Training • Multi-level context
1. Political commitment and endorsement at the highest levels
• Legal basis for RIA
• Clear ministerial accountability
2. Allocate responsibilities for the RIA programme
• Operational responsibilities with the services
• Inter-service coordination
• Central quality oversight
3. Target and prioritise RIA efforts
• Scope of application / thresholds for when to do RIAs
• Sectoral impacts
Making use of RIA: OECD good practices (I)
4. Develop comprehensive guidelines
• Mandatory
• Both on process and on technical aspects
5. Carry out sound analysis
• Strategies for data collection
• Consistent but flexible methodologies
6. Consultation / Transparency / Communication
7. Training, training, training
8. Apply RIA to both new and existing regulation
Making use of RIA: OECD good practices (II)
Thank you for your attention
Mr. Gregory Bounds Administrator & Policy analyst
Regulatory Policy Division
Directorate for Public Governance and Territorial Development