References - Springer978-3-642-40216-6/1.pdf · References Agrawal, A., & Henderson, R. ......

29
References Agrawal, A., & Henderson, R. (2002). Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT. Management Science, 48(1), 44–60. Alexander, J. (2012). Experimental philosophy. An introduction. Cambridge: Polit. Alston, W. (1996). A realist conception of truth. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Ancori, B., Bureth, A., & Cohendet, P. (2000). The economics of knowledge: The debate about codification and tacit knowledge. Industrial and Corporate Change, 9, 255–287. Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Anderson, J. R. (1987). Skill acquisition: Compilation of weak-method problem solutions. Psy- chological Review, 94, 192–210. Anderson, J. R. (1996). ACT: A simple theory of complex cognition. American Psychologist, 51, 355–365. Anderson, J. R., Bothell, D., Byrne, M. D., Douglass, S., Lebire, C., & Quin, Y. (2004). An integrated theory of the mind. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1036–1060. Anderson, J. A., & Rosenfeld, E. (Eds.). (1988). Neurocomputing: Foundations of research. Cambridge, MA: MIT. Andreasen, N. C. (2005). The creating brain: The neuroscience of genius. New York, NY: Dana. Arieti, S. (1963). Interpretazione della schizofrenia. Milano: Feltrinelli. Armstrong, D. (1968). A materialist theory of the mind. London: Routledge. Armstrong, D. (1973). Belief, truth and knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Armstrong, D. (1978). Universals and scientific realism. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Arora, A., & Gambardella, G. (1994). The changing technology of technological change: General and abstract knowledge and the division of innovative labour. Research Policy, 23, 523–532. Arrow, K. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for inventions. In R. R. Nelson (Ed.), The rate and direction of inventive activity economic and social factors (pp. 165–182). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Arthur, W. (1989). Competing technologies, increasing returns and lock-in by historical events. The Economic Journal, 394, 116–131. Arthur, W. B., Durlauff, S., & Lane, D. (Eds.). (1997). The economy as an evolving complex system. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley. Arundel, A., & Geuna, A. (2004). Proximity and the use of public science by innovative european firms. Economic Innovation and New technologies, 13(6), 559–580. Atkinson, A. P., Thomas, M. S. C., & Cleeremans, A. (2000). Consciousness: Mapping the theoretical landscape. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, 372–382. Azoulay, P., Ding, W., & Stuart, T. (2005). The determinants of faculty patenting behavior: Demographics or opportunities? (NBER Working Paper 11348). Paper presented at the NBER Conference on Academic Science and Entrepreneurship, Santa Fe, NM. Baillargeon, R., & Hanko-Summers, S. (1990). Is the object adequately supported by the bottom object? Young infants understanding of support relations. Cognitive Development, 5, 29–54. R. Viale, Methodological Cognitivism, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-40216-6, # Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013 417

Transcript of References - Springer978-3-642-40216-6/1.pdf · References Agrawal, A., & Henderson, R. ......

References

Agrawal, A., & Henderson, R. (2002). Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge transfer

from MIT. Management Science, 48(1), 44–60.Alexander, J. (2012). Experimental philosophy. An introduction. Cambridge: Polit.

Alston, W. (1996). A realist conception of truth. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Ancori, B., Bureth, A., & Cohendet, P. (2000). The economics of knowledge: The debate about

codification and tacit knowledge. Industrial and Corporate Change, 9, 255–287.Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Anderson, J. R. (1987). Skill acquisition: Compilation of weak-method problem solutions. Psy-chological Review, 94, 192–210.

Anderson, J. R. (1996). ACT: A simple theory of complex cognition. American Psychologist, 51,355–365.

Anderson, J. R., Bothell, D., Byrne, M. D., Douglass, S., Lebire, C., & Quin, Y. (2004). An

integrated theory of the mind. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1036–1060.Anderson, J. A., & Rosenfeld, E. (Eds.). (1988). Neurocomputing: Foundations of research.

Cambridge, MA: MIT.

Andreasen, N. C. (2005). The creating brain: The neuroscience of genius. New York, NY: Dana.

Arieti, S. (1963). Interpretazione della schizofrenia. Milano: Feltrinelli.

Armstrong, D. (1968). A materialist theory of the mind. London: Routledge.Armstrong, D. (1973). Belief, truth and knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Armstrong, D. (1978). Universals and scientific realism. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University

Press.

Arora, A., & Gambardella, G. (1994). The changing technology of technological change: General

and abstract knowledge and the division of innovative labour. Research Policy, 23, 523–532.Arrow, K. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for inventions. In R. R.

Nelson (Ed.), The rate and direction of inventive activity economic and social factors(pp. 165–182). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Arthur, W. (1989). Competing technologies, increasing returns and lock-in by historical events.

The Economic Journal, 394, 116–131.Arthur, W. B., Durlauff, S., & Lane, D. (Eds.). (1997). The economy as an evolving complex

system. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.

Arundel, A., & Geuna, A. (2004). Proximity and the use of public science by innovative european

firms. Economic Innovation and New technologies, 13(6), 559–580.Atkinson, A. P., Thomas, M. S. C., & Cleeremans, A. (2000). Consciousness: Mapping the

theoretical landscape. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, 372–382.Azoulay, P., Ding, W., & Stuart, T. (2005). The determinants of faculty patenting behavior:

Demographics or opportunities? (NBER Working Paper 11348). Paper presented at the

NBER Conference on Academic Science and Entrepreneurship, Santa Fe, NM.

Baillargeon, R., & Hanko-Summers, S. (1990). Is the object adequately supported by the bottom

object? Young infants understanding of support relations. Cognitive Development, 5, 29–54.

R. Viale, Methodological Cognitivism, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-40216-6,# Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

417

Baillargeon, R., Kotovsky, L., & Needham, A. (1995). The acquisition of physical knowledge in

infancy. In D. Sperber, D. Premack, & J. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition. Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press.

Balconi, M. (1999). Codification of technological knowledge, firm boundaries and ‘cognitive’barriers to entry, (Working Paper, Special Series no.16). Pisa: S. Anna School of Advanced

Studies.

Balconi, M. (2002). Tacitness, codification of technological knowledge and the organization of

industry. Research Policy, 31, 357–379.Balconi, M., & Passannanti, A. (2006). I Parchi Scientifici e Tecnologici nel Nord Italia. Milano:

Franco Angeli.

Balconi, M., Pozzali, A., & Viale, R. (2007). The ‘codification debate’ revisited: A conceptual

framework to analyze the role of tacit knowledge in economics. Industrial and CorporateChange, 16(5), 823–849.

Bar Hillel, M. (1980). The base-rate fallacy in probabilistic Judgements. Acta Psychologica, 44,211–233.

Barnes, B., & Bloor, D. (1982). Relativism, rationalism, and the sociology of knowledge. In

M. Hollis & S. Lukes (Eds.), Rationality and relativism. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

Barsalou, L. W. (2000). Concepts: Structure. In A. E. Kazdin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology(Vol. 2, pp. 245–248). New York: Oxford University Press (American Psychological

Association).

Baumard, P. (1999). Tacit knowledge in organizations. London: SAGE.Bealer, G. (1998). Intuition and the authonomy of philosophy. In M. De Paul &W. Ramsey (Eds.),

Rethinking intuitions (pp. 201–240). Rowman and Littlefield: Lanham, MD.

Bendor, J. B. (1985). Parallels systems-redundancy in government. Berkeley, CA: University of

California Press.

Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. A treatise in thesociology of knowledge. New York, NY: Doubleday.

Berry, D. C. (1987). The problem of implicit knowledge. Expert Systems: The InternationalJournal of Knowledge Engineering, 4, 144–151.

Berry, D. C., & Broadbent, D. E. (1988). Interactive tasks and the implicit-explicit distinction.

British Journal of Psychology, 79, 251–272.Berry, D. C., & Dienes, Z. (1991). The relationship between implicit memory and implicit

learning. British Journal of Psychology, 82, 359–373.Bessette, R. W. (2003). Measuring the economic impact of university-based research. Journal of

Technology Transfer, 28(3–4), 355–361.Beth, E., & Piaget, J. (1961). Etudes d’Epistemologie Genetique, XIV: Epistemologie

Mathematique et Psichologie, Paris: PUF.Bickel, W. K., & Johnson, M. W. (2003). Delay discounting: A fundamental behavioural process

of drug dependence. In G. Lowenstein, D. Read, & R. F. Baumeister (Eds.), Time and decision.New York, NY: Russell sage Foundation.

Blumenthal, D., Gluck, M., Lewis, K., Stoto, M., & Wise, D. (1986). University-industry relations

in biotechnology: Implications for the university. Science, 232(4756), 1361–1366.Boghossian, P. (1990). The status of content. Philosophical Review, 99, 157–184.Bonini, N., Osherson, D., Viale, R., & Williamson, T. (1999). On the psychology of vague

predicates. Mind and Language, 14(4), 377–393.Boudon, R. (1977). Effects Pervers et Ordre social. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Boudon, R. (1979). La logique du social. Paris: Hachette.Boudon, R. (1980). La logica del sociale. Milano: Arnoldo Mondadori Editore.

Boudon, R. (1981). The logic of social action. London: Routledge.Boudon, R. (1992). Subjective rationality and the explanation of social behaviour. In H. A. Simon

et al. (Eds.), Economics, bounded rationality and the cognitive revolution. Cheltenham: Elgar.

2nd ed. 2008.Boudon, R., & Viale, R. (2000). Reasons, cognition and society. Mind & Society, 1, 41–56.

418 References

Bower, G. H., & Glass, A. L. (1976). Structural units and the redintegrative power of picture

fragments. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2, 456–466.Boyer, P. (1995). Causal understandings in cultural representations: Cognitive constraints on

inferences from cultural input. In D. Sperber et al. (Eds.), Causal cognition. Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press.

Braczyk, H.-J., Cooke, P., & Heidenreich, M. (Eds.). (1998). Regional innovation systems. Therole of governances in a globalized world. London: UCL.

Braine, M. D. S. (1978). On the relation between the natural logic of reasoning and standard logic.

Psychological Review, 85, 1–21.Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., &Montobbio, F. (2007). The scientific productivity of academic inventors:

New evidence from Italian data. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 16(2),101–118.

Breton, A. (1928/1950). Le surrealisme et la peinture, Paris: N.R.F./Gallimard (It. Translation

(1966). Il surrealismo e la pittura. Firenze: Marchi).

Broadbent, D. E., Fitzgerald, P., & Broadbent, M. H. (1986). Implicit and explicit knowledge in

the control of complex systems. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 33–50.Broesterhuizen E., Rip A. (1984, August). No place for CUDOS, EASST Newsletter, 3.Bryson, M., Bereiter, C., Scarmadalia, M., & Joram, E. (1991). Going bejond the problem as a

given: Problem solving in expert and novice writers. In R. J. Sterneberg & P. A. Frensch (Eds.),

Complex problem solving. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Buchanan, J. (1997). La scelta individuale nei ruoli decisionali. In A. Petroni, & R. Viale (a cura

di). Individuale e Collettivo. Decisione e Razionalita. Milano: Raffaele Cortina Editore.

Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality & SocialPsychology, 42, 116–131.

Calderini, M., & Franzoni, C. (2004). Is Academic patenting detrimental to high quality research?An empirical analysis of the relationship between scientific careers and patent applications(CESPRI Working Paper no. 162). Milan: Universita Bocconi.

Cambrosio, A., & Keating, P. (1988). Going monoclonal: Art, science, and magic in the day-to-

day use of hybridoma technology. Social Problems, 35, 244–260.Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2005). Neuroeconomics: How neuroscience can

inform economics? Journal of Economic Literature, XLIII(1), 9–64.Campbell, E. G., Clarridge, B. R., Gokhale, M., Birenbaum, L., Hilgartner, S., Holtzman, N. A.,

et al. (2002). Data withholding in academic genetics. JAMA: The Journal of the AmericanMedical Association, 287(4), 473–480.

Campbell, D. T., & Cook, T. D. (1979). Quasi experimentation. Chicago, IL: Rand Mc-Nally.

Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multi-trait

multi-method matrix. Psychological Bullettin, 56.Carayol, N. (2003). Objectives, agreements and matching in science-industry collaborations:

Reassembling the pieces of the puzzle. Research Policy, 32(6), 887–908.Carey, S. (1991). Knowledge acquisition: Enrichment or conceptual change? In S. Carey & R.

Gelman (Eds.), The epigenesis of mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Carey, S. (1995). On the origin of causal understanding. In D. Sperber et al. (Eds.), Causalcognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Carnap, R. (1947). Meaning and necessity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Carnap, R. (1950). Logical foundations of probability. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Carr, J. C., & Taplin, W. (1962). A history of British steel industry. Oxford: Blackwell.Carruthers, P., Stich, S., & Siegal, M. (Eds.). (2002). The cognitive basis of science. Cambridge,

MA: Cambridge University Press.

Castells, M., & Hall, P. (1994). Technopoles of the world: The making of 21st century industrialcomplexes. London: Routledge.

Catellani, P. (1992). il giudice esperto. Bologna: Il Mulino.

Cattaneo, C. (1972). Frammenti di sette prefazioni. In Opere scelte (Vol. 4). Torino: Einaudi.

References 419

Cerruti, L., & Rei, M. (1989). I chimici italiani nel contesto europeo. In V. Ancarani (a cura di). Lascienza accademica nell’Italia postunitaria. Milano: Franco Angeli.

Chandler, A. D. (1964).Giant enterprise: Ford, General Motors and automobile industry: Sourcesand readings. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace & World.

Chandler, A. D. (1977). The visible hand: The managerial revolution in American business.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. It. trans. La Mano Visibile, Milano: Franco Angeli,

1993.

Chandler, A. D. (1990). Scale and scope: The dynamics of industrial capitalism. Boston: HarvardUniversity Press. It. trans. Dimensione e Diversificazione, Bologna: Il Mulino, 1998.

Chapman, L. J., & Chapman, J. P. (1959). Atmoshpere effect re-examined. Journal of Experimen-tal Pshychology, 58, 220–226.

Chapman, L. J., & Chapman, J. P. (1975). The basis of illusory correlation. Journal of AbnormalPsychology, 84(5), 574–575.

Cheng, P. W., & Holyoak, K. J. (1985). Pragmatic reasoning schemas. Cognitive Psychology, 17,391–416.

Cheng, P. W., & Holyoak, K. J. (1989). On the natural selection of reasoning theories. Cognition,33, 285–313.

Cheng, P. W., & Nisbett, R. (1993). Pragmatic constraints on causal deduction. In R. Nisbett (Ed.),

Rules for reasoning. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Cheng, P. W., & Novick, L. R. (1991). Causes versus enabling conditions. Cognition, 40, 83–120.Cherniak, C. (1986). Minimal rationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Chi, M.T.H., Glaser, R., Farr, M.J. (Eds.) (1988). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Chomsky, N. (1976). Reflections on language. Glasgow: Fontana.Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language. New York, NY: Praeger.

Churchland, P. M. (1979). Scientific realism and the plasticity of mind. Cambridge, MA:

Cambridge University Press.

Churchland, P. M. (1981). Eliminative materialism and the propositional attitudes. Journal ofPhilosophy, 78, 67–90.

Churchland, P. M. (1986). Cognitive neurobiology: A computational hypothesis for laminar

cortex. Biology and Philosophy, 1, 25–51.Churchland, P. M. (1988). Perceptual plasticity and theoretical neutrality: A reply to Jerry Fodor.

Philosophy of Science, 55, 167–187.Churchland, P. M. (1989). A neurocomputational perspective. The nature of mind and the

structure of science. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

Churchland, P. S. (1986). Neurophilosophy. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

Churchland, P. S., & Sejnowski, T. (1992). The computational brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transfor-mation. Oxford: Pergamon-Elsevier Science.

Cleeremans A. (1995). Implicit learning in the presence of multiple cues. Proceedings of the 17thAnnual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Cleeremans, A., Destrebecqz, A., & Boyer, M. (1998). Implicit learning: News from the front.

Trends in Cognitive Science, 2, 406–416.Cleeremans, A., & Jimenez, L. (1999). Fishing with the wrong nets: How the implicit slips through

the representational theory of mind. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 771.Cohen, J. (1981). Can human irrationality be experimentally demonstrated. The Behavioural and

Brain Sciences, 4, 317–370.Cohen, J. (1992). Belief and acceptance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cohen, M. D., Burkhart, R., Dosi, G., Egidi, M., Marengo, L., Warglien, M., et al. (1996). Routines

and other recurrent action patterns of organizations: Contemporary research issues. Industrialand Corporate Change, 5, 653–698.

420 References

Cole, M. (1977). An ethnographic psychology of cognition. In P. Johnson-Laird & P. C. Wason

(Eds.), Thinking. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Coles, L. S. (1972). Syntax directed interpretation of natural language. In H. Simon & L. Siklossy

(Eds.), Representation and meaning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Collingridge, D., & Reeve, C. (1986). Science speaks to power: The role of experts in polocymaking. London: Frances Pinter.

Collins, H. M. (1974). The TEA set: Tacit knowledge and scientific networks. Science Studies, 4,165–185.

Collins, H. M. (1975). The seven sexes: A study in the sociology of a phenomenon or the

replication of experiment in physics. Sociology, 9, 205–224.Collins, H. M. (1981). Knowledge and controversy: Studies of modern natural science. Social

Studies of Science, 11, 3–158.Collins, H. M. (1985). Changing order: Replication and induction in scientific practice. London:

Sage.

Collins, H. M. (1992). Changing order. Replication and induction in scientific practice. Chicago,IL: University of Chicago Press.

Collins, H. M. (2001). Tacit knowledge, Trust, and the Q of Sapphire. Social Studies of Science,31, 71–85.

Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. E. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing.

Psychological Review, 82, 407–429.Collins, A. M., & Quillian, M. R. (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal

Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 8, 240–248.Cooke, P., Heidenreich, M., & Braczyk, H. (Eds.). (2004). Regional innovation systems: The role

of governance in a globalized world (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

Cooper, H. A. (1986). Winslow Homer Watercolors. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Corben, M. C., & De Benedetti, S. (1954). The ultimate atom. Scientific American, 191(6), 88–92.Cotec. (2008). Rapporto Annuale sull’Innovazione. Roma: Fondazione Cotec. Retrieved from

http://www.cotec.it

Cottrell, P. L. (1980). Industrial finance. New York, NY: Methuen.

Cowan, R., David, P., & Foray, D. (2000). The explicit economics of codification and tacitness.

Industrial and Corporate Change, 9, 211–253.Cox, J. R., & Griggs, R. A. (1982). The effects of experience on performance onWason’s selection

task. Memory and Cognition, 10, 496–502.Cozzens, S. E., Healey, P., Rip, A., & Ziman, J. (Eds.). (1990). The research system in transition.

Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York, NY:

Avon.

Damasio, A. R. (1999). The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making ofconsciousness. London: William Heinemann.

Dancy, J., & Sosa, E. (Eds.). (1992). A companion to epistemology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Daniels, N. (1979). Wide reflective equilibrium and theory acceptance in ethics. Journal of

Philosophy, 76, 256–282.Daniels, N. (1980). On some methods of ethics and linguistics. Philosophical Studies, 37, 21–36.Dasgupta, P., & David P. (1985). Information disclosure and the economics of science and

technology (CEPR Discussion Papers 73). London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.

Dasgupta, P., & David, P. A. (1994). Towards a new economics of science. Research Policy, 23,487–521.

David, P. A. (1975). Technical choice innovation and economic growth. Cambridge, MA:

Cambridge University Press.

David, P. A. (1998). Common agency contracting and the emergence of “open science”

institutions. The American Economic Review, 88(2), 15–21.Davidson, D. (1963). Actions, reasons and causes. Journal of Philosophy, 60.Davidson, D. (1966). The logical forms of action sentences. In N. Rescher (Ed.), The logic of

decision and action. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.

References 421

Davidson, D. (1990). The structure and content of truth. Journal of Philosophy, 87, 279–328.de Finetti, B. (1931). Sul significato soggettivo delle probabilita. Fundamenta Mathematica, 17,

298–329.

Dearborn, D. C., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Selective perception: A note on the departmental

identifications of executives. Sociometry, 21(June), 140–144.Dehaene, S., & Changeux, J. P. (2011). Experimental and theoretical approaches to conscious

processing. Neuron, 70(2), 200–227.Dennett, D. C. (1978). Brainstorms. Montgomery, VT: Bradford Books and Hassocks, Sussex:

Harvester.

Dennett, D. (1991). Consciousness explained. New York, NY: Little, Brown.

Derrida, J. (1976). Of grammatology. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.

Deutsch, D., & Feroe, J. (1981). The internal representation of pitch sequences in tonal music.

Psychological Review, 88, 503–522.Dewey, J., & Bentley, A. F. (1949). Knowing and the known. Boston, MA: Beacon.

Dienes, Z., & Berry, D. C. (1997). Implicit learning: Below the subjective threshold. PsychonomicBulletin Review, 4, 3–23.

Dijksterhuis, A. (2004). Think different: The merits of unconscious thought in preference devel-

opment and decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(5), 586–598.Donovan, A., Laudan, L., & Laudan, R. (Eds.). (1988). Scrutinizing science. Dordrecht: Kluwer

Academic.

Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. Research Policy, 11(3),147–162.

Dosi, G. (2005). L’interpretazione evolutiva delle dinamiche socio-economiche. In R. Viale (Ed.),

Le Nuove Economie. Milano: Il Sole 24 Ore.

Dummett, M. (1978). Truth and other enigmas. Oxford: Clarendon.Dummett, M. (1982). Realism. Synthese, 52, 55–112.Dunbar, K. (1995). How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real world laboratories. In

R. J. Sternberg & J. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

Durkheim, E. (1895). Le regole del metodo scientifico. Milano: Edizioni di Comunita. 1963.

Edelman, G. (1992). Bright light, brilliant fire: On the matter of the mind. New York, NY: Basic

Books.

Edwards, P. (Editor in Chief, 1972). The encyclopedia of philosophy. London: Mac Millan

Einhorn, H. J., & Hogarth, R. M. (1986). Judging probable cause. Psychological Bullettin, 99,1–19.

Elazar, D. J. (1995). Idee e Forme del Federalismo. Milano: Comunita.

Elster, J. (1979). Ulysses and the syrenes. Studies in rationality and irrationality. Cambridge, MA:

Cambridge University Press.

Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and psychodynamic unconscious. AmericanPsychologist, 49, 709–724.

Etzkowitz, H. (1990). The second academic revolution: The role of the research universities in

economic development. In S. E. Cozzens, P. Healey, A. Rip, & J. Ziman (Eds.), The researchsystem in transition. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Etzkowitz, H. (1997). The Triple Helix: Academy-industry-government relations and the growth

of neo-corporatist industrial policy in the U.S. In S. Campodall’Orto (Ed.).Managing Techno-logical Knowledge Transfer, EC Social Sciences COST A3, (Vol. 4). Brussels: EC Directorate

General, Science, Research and Development.

Etzkowitz, H. (1998). The norms of entrepreneurial science: Cognitive effects of the new

university-industry linkages. Research Policy, 27(8), 823–833.Etzkowitz, H. (2000). Bridging the gap: The evolution of industry-university links in the United

States. In L. Branscomb et al. (Eds.), Industrializing knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Innovation in innovation: The triple helix of university-industry government

relations. Social Science Information, 42(3), 293–338.

422 References

Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The triple helix: University-industry-government innovation in action.London: Routledge.

Etzkowitz, H., & Kemelgor, C. (1998). The role of research centres in the collectivization of

academic science. Minerva, 36, 271–288.Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (Eds.). (1997). Universities and the global knowledge economy.

London: Pinter.

Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and

“mode 2” to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29(2),109–123.

Etzkowitz, H., & Viale, R. (2010). Polyvalent knowledge and the entrepreneurial university: A

third academic revolution? Critical Sociology, 34(4), 595–609.Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., & Healey, P. (Eds.). (1998). Capitalizing knowledge. New

intersections of industry and academia. New York: SUNY.

Evans, J. (1982). The psychology of deductive reasoning. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Evans, J., Newstead, S. E., & Byrne, R. J. (1993). Human reasoning. The psychology of deduction.Hove, East Sussex: Erlbaum.

Fabrizio, K. R., & Di Minin, A. (2008). Commercializing the laboratory: Faculty patenting and the

open science environment. Research Policy, 37(5), 914–931.Fales, E. (1990). Causation and universal. London: Routledge.Faulkner, W., Senker, J., & Velho, L. (1995). Knowledge frontiers. Public sector research and

industrial innovation in biotechnology, engineering ceramics and parallel computing. Oxford:Clarendon.

Ferguson, E. S. (1992). Engineering and the mind’s eye. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

Feyerabend, P. K. (1975). Against the method. London: New Left Books.

Feyerabend, P. K., & Thomas, C. (1984). Kunst undWissenschaft. Zurich: Verlag der Fachvereine

(It. Translation (1989). Arte e scienza, Roma, Armando Editore).

Field, H. (1973). Theory change and the indeterminacy of reference. The Journal of Philosophy,70, 462–481.

Field, H. (1977). Logic, meaning and conceptual role. The Journal of Philosophy, 74, 379–408.Fine, A. (1975). How to compare theories: Reference and change. Nous, 9, 17–32.Fischer, E., & Lipson, C. (1988). Thinking about science: Max Delbruck and the origins of

molecular biology. New York, NY: Norton.

Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., & Lichtenstein, S. (1977). Knowing with certainty: The appropriateness

of extreme confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 3, 552–564.Fleming, A. (1929). On the antibacterial action to cultures of a penicillium with special reference

to their use in the isolation of B. influenzae. British Journal of Experimental Pathology, 10,226–236.

Fodor, J. (1975). The language of thought. New York, NY: Cromwell.

Fodor, J. (1983). Modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

Fodor, J. (1998). Concepts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fodor, J., & Lepore, E. (1992). Holism: A shopper’s guide. Oxford: Blackwell.Fondazione Rosselli. (2008). Different cognitive styles between academic and industrial

researchers: A pilot study. Retrieved from http://www.fondazionerosselli.it

Fondazione Rosselli & Finlombarda. (2005). Scoreboard Regionale dell’Innovazione per laComparazione delle Performance del Sistema Innovativo Lombardo. Torino: Fondazione

Rosselli. Retrieved from http://www.fondazionerosselli.it

Foray, D. (2000). L’Economie de la Connaisance. Paris: La Decouverte (It. Translation (2006):

L’economia della conoscenza. Bologna: Il Mulino).

Foray, D., & Cowan, R. (1997). The economics of codification and the diffusion of knowledge.

Industrial and Corporate Change, 6, 595–622.Foray, D., & Steinmueller, W. E. (2003). The economics of knowledge reproduction by inscrip-

tion. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12, 299–319.

References 423

Foucault, M. (1969). L’archeologie du savoir. Paris: Gallimard. It. trans, L’archeologia del sapere.

Milano: Rizzoli, 1971.

Frankish, K. (2004). Mind and supermind. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Frankish, K., & Evans, J. (2009). The duality of mind: An historical perspective. In J. S. B. T.

Evans & K. Frankish (Eds.), In two minds: Dual processes and beyond (pp. 1–29). Oxford:

Oxford University Press.

Fransman, M. (1994). Information, knowledge, vision and theories of the firm. In G. Dosi, D. J.

Teece, & J. Chytry (Eds.), Technology, organization, and competitiveness. Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press.

Fraser, J. (1964). The new golden bough. New York, NY: Mentor.

Freedeman, C. E. (1967). The coming of free incorporation in France. Explorations in EconomicHistory, 4(3).

Friedman, M. (1953). Essays in positive economics. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

Fuhrer, B. (2003, December). Biotech clusters. A comparison of Genetown™ (U.S.). andGenopole®. Paper presented at the Medtech Perspectives Symposium in Paris.

Functowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1993). Science for the post-normal age. Futures, 25(7),739–775.

Gambardella, A. (2005). Imprese manageriali e nuovi sistemi imprenditoriali. In R. Viale (Ed.), LeNuove Economie. Milano: Il Sole 24 Ore.

Gardner, H. (1982). Arts, mind, and the brain: A cognitive approach to creativity. New York, NY:

Basic Books.

Gardner, H. (2006). Five minds for the future. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Garnsey, E. (1998). The genesis of the high technology milieu: A study in complexity. Interna-tional Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 22, 361–377.

Garnsey, E., & Hefferman, P. (2005). High-technology clustering through spin-out and attraction:

The Cambridge case. Regional Studies, 39, 1127–1144.Garnsey, E., & Lawton Smith, H. (1998). Proximity and complexity in the emergence of

hightechnology industry: The Oxbridge comparison. Geoforum, 29, 433–450.Gelman, R. (1990). First principles organizes attention to and learning about relevant data:

Number and the animate-inanimate distinction as examples. Cognitive Sciences, 14, 79–106.Gelman, R., Durgin, F., & Kaufman, L. (1995). Distinguishing between animates and inanimates:

Not not by motion alone. In D. Sperber et al. (Eds.), Causal cognition. Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press.

Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The Newproduction of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies.London: Sage.

Giere, R. N. (1988). Explaining science. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

Giere, R. (1994). The cognitive structure of scientific theories. Philosophy of Science, 61,276–296.

Giesen, B., & Schmidt, M. (1982). Introduzione alla Sociologia: premesse epistemologiche.Bologna: Il Mulino.

Gigerenzer, G. (2000). Adaptive thinking. Rationality in the real world. Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress.

Gigerenzer, G. (2007). Gut feelings. London: Viking.Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P., & the ABC Research Group. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us

smart. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Gigerenzer, G., Hell, W., & Blank, H. (1988). Presentation and content: The use of base rates as a

continuous variable. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Perfor-mance, 14, 513–525.

Gigerenzer, G., & Selten, R. (Eds.). (2001). Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox.Cambridge, MA: MIT.

Ginsberg, M. L. (1998). Computer, games and the real world. Scientific American Presents, 9(4),84–89.

424 References

Glaser, R., & Chi, M. T. H. (1988). Overview. In M. T. H. Chi, R. Glaser, & M. Farr (Eds.), Thenature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Gleitman, H. (1981). Psychology. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.

Glover, J. P. (1980). Revolutionary corporations: Engines of plenty, engines of growth, engines ofchange. Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin.

Godin, B., & Gingras, Y. (2000). The place of university in the system of knowledge production.

Research Policy, 29, 273–278.Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Goldberg, E., & Costa, L. D. (1981). Hemisphere differences in the acquisition and use of

descriptive systems. Brain Language, 14, 144–173.Goldman, A. I. (1986). Epistemology and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Goldman, A. I. (1992). Liasons: Philosophy meets the cognitive and social sciences. Cambridge,

MA: MIT.

Goldman, A. I. (1993). Philosophical application of cognitive science. Boulder, CO: Westview.

Goldman, A. I. (1999). Knowledge in a social world. Oxford: Clarendon.Gombrich, E. (1950). The story of art. London: Phaidon. It. Trans. La storia dell’arte. Torino:

Einaudi, 1989.

Gombrich, E. (1960). Art and illusion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Goodman, N. (1965). Fact, fiction, and forecast. Indianapolis, IN: The Bobbs-Merrill.

Goodman, N. (1966). The structure of appearances. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill (It. Transla-

tion (1985). La struttura dell’apparenza, Bologna, Il Mulino).

Goodman, N. (1968). The languages of art. New York, NY: Bobbs Merril (It. Translation (1991).

I linguaggi dell’arte, Milano: Il Saggiatore).

Goodman, N. (1978). Ways of worldmaking. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Gopnik, A. (1988). Conceptual and semantic development as theory change.Mind and Language,

3, 197–216.Gopnik, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (1997). Words, thoughts and theories. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

Gorman, M. E. (1992). Simulating science. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

Gorman, M. E. (2002). Types of knowledge and their roles in technology transfer. Journal ofTechnology Transfer, 27, 219–231.

Gourlay S., (2002, April). Tacit Knowledge, Tacit Knowing or Behaving. 3rd European Organiza-tional Knowledge, Learning and Capabilities Conference. Athens, Greece.

Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness.

American Journal of Sociology, 49, 323–334.Grant, R. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal,

17, 109–122.Greene, J. D. (2008). The secret joke of Kant’s Soul. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral

psychology (The neuroscience of morality: Emotion, brain disorders and development, Vol. 3,

pp. 35–80). Cambridge, MA: MIT.

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In D. Davidson & G. Harman (Eds.), The logic ofgrammar. Encino, CA: Dickenson.

Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Griffin, N. (1977). Relative identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Griggs, R. A., & Cox, J. R. (1982). The elusive thematic-materials effect in Wason’s selection

task. British Journal of Psychology, 73, 407–420.Grossman, M., Smith, E. E., Koenig, P., Glosser, G., Rhee, J., & Dennis, K. (2003). Categorization

of object descriptions in Alzheimer’s disease and frontal temporal demential: Limitation in

rule-based processing. Cognitive Affective and Behavioural Neuroscience, 3(2), 120–132.Hammond, K. R. (1996). Human judgement and social policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hanson, N. R. (1958). Patterns of discovery. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Harman, G. (1977). The nature of morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Harman, G. (1982). Metaphysical realism and the moral relativism: Reflections on Hilary

Putnam’s ‘reason truth and history’. Journal of Philosophy, 79.

References 425

Harman, G. (1999). Moral philosophy meets social psychology: Virtue ethics and the fundamental

attribution error. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 99, 315–331.Harris, J. (1992). Essays in industry and technology in the eighteenth century. Hampshire:

Variorum.

Hart, H. L. A., & Honore, A. M. (1959). Causation in law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hayashi, T. (2003). Effect of R&D programmes on the formation of university-industry govern-

ment networks: Comparative analysis of Japanese R&D programmes. Research Policy, 32(8),1421–1442.

Heider, F., & Simmel, M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behaviour. American Journalof Psychology, 57, 243–259.

Hejzlar, J. (1978). Chinese watercolors. Smithmark Publishers Incorporated, New York: Barnes &

Nobles.

Hempel, C. G. (1965). Aspects of scientific explanation and other essays in the philosophy ofscience. New York, NY: Free.

Henle, M. (1962). On the relation between logic and thinking. Psychological Review, 69, 366–378.Hilton, D. J. (1990). Conversational processes and causal explanation. Psychological Bulletin,

107, 65–81.Hilton, D. J. (1995). Logic and language in causal explanation. In D. Sperber et al. (Eds.), Causal

cognition (pp. 495–526). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hilton, D. J., & Slugoski, B. R. (1986). Knowledge-based causal attribution: The abnormal

conditions focus model. Psychological Review, 93, 75–88.Hinsz, V., Tindale, S., & Vollrath, D. (1997). The emerging conceptualization of groups as

information processors. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 43–64.Holland, J. M., Holyoak, K. J., Nisbett, R. E., & Thagard, P. R. (1986). Induction: Process of

inference, learning, and discovery. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

Horwich, P. G. (1990). Truth. Oxford: Blackwell.Howells, J. (1996). Tacit knowledge, innovation and technology transfer. Technology Analysis &

Strategic Management, 8, 91–106.Hume, D., & Selby-Bigge, L. A. (1888). A treatise on human nature. Oxford: Clarendon.Humphrey, N. (1998). Cave art, autism, and the evolution of the human mind. Cambridge

Archaeological Journal, 8(2), 165–191.Hyde, C. K. (1977). Technological change and the British iron industry, 1700–1870. Princeton,

NJ: Princeton University Press.

IMD. (2008). World competitiveness Yearbook.Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence.

New York, NY: Basic Books (It. Translation (1971). Dalla logica del fanciullo alla logicadell’adolescente. Firenze: Giunti-Barbera).

Jackendoff, R. (2007). Language, consciuosness, culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

Jackson, S. (1992). Team composition in organizational settings Issues in managing an increas-

ingly diverse work force. In S. Worchel, W. Wood, & J. Simpson (Eds.), Group process andproductivity. Newbury Park: Sage.

Janis, I. L., & Frick, E. (1943). The relationships between attitudes towards conclusions and errors

in judging logical validity of syllogisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33(1), 73–77.Jensen, R., & Thursby, M. (2003, May). The academic effects of patentable research. Paper

presented at the NBER Higher Education Meeting, Cambrigde, MA.

Johnson, B., Lorenz, E., & Lundvall, B.-A. (2002). Why all this fuss about codified and tacit

knowledge? Industrial and Corporate Change, 11, 245–262.Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press (It.

Translation (1993). Modelli mentali, Bologna: Il Mulino).

Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1985). Logical thinking: Does it occur in daily life? Can it be taught? In S. F.

Chipman, J. W. Segal, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills (Vol. 2). Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.

426 References

Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1988). The computer and the mind. London: William Collins (It. Translation

(1990). La mente e il computer, Il Mulino, Bologna).

Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1993). Human and machine thinking. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum

Associates (It. Translation (1994). Deduzione, Induzione, Creativita. Bologna, Italy: Il

Mulino).

Johnson-Laird, P. (2008). How we reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Johnson-Laird, P. N., Legrenzi, P., & Sonino Legrenzi, M. (1972). Reasoning and a sense of

reality. British Journal of Psychology, 63(3), 395–400.Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Steedman, M. J. (1978). The psychology of syllogisms. Cognitive

Psychology, 10, 64–99.Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Wason, P. C. (Eds.). (1977). Thinking. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge

University Press.

Jordan, K., & Lynch, M. (1992). The sociology of a genetic engineering technique: Ritual and

rationality in the performance of the “Plasmid Prep”. In A. Clark & J. Fujimura (Eds.), Theright tools for the job: At work in 20th century life sciences (pp. 77–114). Princeton, NJ:

Princeton University Press.

Jurdant, B., & Olff-Nathan, J. (1982). Socio-epistemologie des hautes energies (Dgrst Report No.FRT–78-7-0732). Strasbourg: Gersulp. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10068/14569

Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality. In T. Frangsmyr (Ed.), Nobel prizes 2002.Stockholm: Almquist and Wiksell.

Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics andbiases. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80.Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk.

Econometrica, 47, 263–291.Kahneman, D. A., & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives.

Psychological Review, 93, 136–153.Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1996). On the reality of cognitive illusions. Psychological Review,

103, 582–591.Kandel, E. (2012). The age of insight. New York, NY: Random House.

Kapur, N. (1996). Paradoxical functional facilitation in brain-behavior research. Brain, 119,1775–1790.

Karp, P. D. (1990). Hypothesis formation as design. In P. Langley & J. Shrager (Eds.), Computa-tional models of discovery and theory formation. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman.

Kauffman, S. (1995a). At home in the universe: The search for the laws of self-organization andcomplexity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Keil, F. C. (1995). The growth of causal understandings of natural kinds. In D. Sperber et al. (Eds.),

Causal cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kendrick, J. W. (1994). Total capital and economic growth. Atlantic Economic Journal, 22, 1.Kihlstrom, J. F. (2007). Consciousness in hypnosis. In P. D. Zelazo, M. Moscovitch, &

E. Thompson (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of consciousness (pp. 445–479). Cambridge,

MA: Cambridge University Press.

Kitcher, P. (1984). The nature of mathematical knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Klepper, S. (1996). Entry, exit, growth and innovation over the product life cycle. AmericanEconomic Review, 86, 562–583.

Kogut, B., & Zander, V. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities and the replica-

tion of technology. Organization Science, 3, 383–397.Kolmogorov, A. N. (1950). A foundation of probability. New York: Chelsea.Kornblith, H. (1985). Introduction: What is naturalistic epistemology? In H. Kornblith (Ed.),

Naturalizing epistemology. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Kornblith, H. (1998). The role of intuitions in philosophical inquiry: An account with no unnatural

ingredients. In M. De Paul &W. Ramsey (Eds.), Rethinking Intuitions (pp. 129–142). Lanham,

MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

References 427

Koskinen, K. U., & Vanharanta, H. (2002). The role of tacit knowledge in innovation processes of

small technology companies. International Journal of Production Economics, 80, 57–64.Kosslyn, S.M. (1981). Image and mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Kosslyn, S. M., & Miller, G. W. (2013). Top brain, bottom brain: Surprising insights into how youthink. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.

Kripke, S. (1972). Naming and necessity. Oxford: Blackwell.Kris, E. (1952). Psychoanalitic exploration in art. New York, NY: International University Press.

Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago

Press (2nd. ed. 1970).

Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago

Press.

Kuhn, T. S. (1977). The essential tension. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

Kuznets, S. (1965). Economic growth and structure. New York, NY: Norton.

Kyburg, H. E., Jr. (1965). Comments. Philosophy of Science, 32, 147–151.Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I.

Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge, MA:

Cambridge University Press.

Lakatos, I. (1978).Philosophical papers. Themethodology of scientific research programme (Vol. 1).Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Langer, E. J., Janis, I. L., & Wolfer, J. A. (1975). Reduction of psychological stress in surgical

patients. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 155–165.Langley, P., Simon, H. A., Bradshaw, G. L., & Zytkow, J. M. (1987). Scientific discovery.

Cambridge, MA: MIT.

Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: Social construction of scientific facts. London:Sage.

Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratoty life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton,NJ: Princeton University Press.

Laudan, L. (1981). A problem solving approach to scientific progress. In I. Hacking (Ed.),

Scientific revolutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Laudan, L. (1984). Science and values: The aims of science and their role in scientific debate.Berkeley: University of California Press.

Laudan, L. (1996). Beyond positivism and relativism. Boulder: Westview.

Laudan, L., Donovan, A., Laudan, R., Barker, P., Brown, H., Leplin, J., et al. (1986). Scientific

change: Philosophical models and historical research. Synthese, 69, 141–223.Lawson, C., & Lorenz, E. (1999). Collective learning, tacit knowledge and regional innovative

capacity. Regional Studies, 33, 305–317.Lazaric, N., Mangolte, P. A., & Massue, M. L. (2003). Articulation and codification of collective

know-how in the steel industry: Evidence from blast furnace control in France. ResearchPolicy, 32, 1829–1847.

Legrenzi, P., Girotto, V., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1993). Focussing in reasoning and decision

making. Cognition, 49, 37–66.Lehman, D. R., Lempert, R. O., & Nisbett, R. E. (1988). The effects of graduate training on

reasoning. American Psychologist, 43, 431–442.Lehrer, K. (1990). Theory of knowledge. London: Routledge.Lesgold, A. M. (1988). Problem solving. In R. J. Sternberg & E. E. Smith (Eds.), The psychology of

human thought. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Leslie, A. M. (1982). The perception of causality in infants. Perception, 11, 173–186.Leslie, A. M. (1987). Do infants perceive causality? Cognition, 22, 127–139.Leslie, A. M. (1988). The necessity of illusion: Perception and thought in infancy. In

L. Weizkrantz (Ed.), Thought without language. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Leslie, A. M. (1995). A theory of agency. In D. Sperber et al. (Eds.), Causal cognition. Oxford:Oxford University Press.

428 References

Lester, K. R. (2005). Universities, innovation, and the competiveness of local economies (IPC

working Paper series, MIT-IPC-05-010). Cambridge, MA: Industrial Performance Center,

MIT.Levins, R. (1968). Evolution in changing environment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Lewis, D. (1973). Counterfactuals. Oxford: Blackwell.Lewis, D. (1986). Philosophical Papers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Leydesdorff, L., & Etzkowitz, H. (1996). Emergence of a triple helix of university-industry-

government relations. Science and Public Policy, 23, 279–286.Leydesdorff, L., & Etzkowitz, H. (1998). The triple helix as a model for Innovation Studies.

Science and Public Policy, 25(3), 195–203.Libet, B. (1985). Unconscious cerebral initiative and the role of conscious will in voluntary action.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 529–566.Livesay, H. (1975). Andrew Carnegie. Boston: Little, Brown.Macchi, L. (1995). Pragmatic aspects of base-rate fallacy. Quarterly Journal of Experimental

Psychology, 48a(1), 188–207.Mach, E. (1976). Knowledge and error. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing (It. Translation (1982).

Conoscenza ed errore, Torino: Einaudi).MacKenzie, D., & Spinardi, G. (1995). Tacit knowledge, weapons design, and the uninvention of

nuclear weapons. American Journal of Sociology, 101, 44–99.Mackie, J. L. (1974). The cement of the universe. Oxford: Clarendon.Mackie, J. L. (1977). Ethics: Inventing right and wrong. New York, NY: Penguin.

Malerba, F. (2005). La teoria evolutiva: i contributi empirici. In R. Viale (Ed.), Le NuoveEconomie. Milano: Il Sole 24 Ore.

Mangematin, V., Lemarie, S., Boissin, J.-P., David, C., Corolleur, F., Coronini, R., et al. (2003).

Development of SMEs and heterogeneity of trajectories: The case of biotechnology in France.

Research Policy, 32(4), 639–658.Manktelow, K. I., & Evans, J. T. E. (1979). Facilitation of reasoning by realism: Effect or non-

effect? British Journal of Psychology, 70, 477–488.Mansfield, E. (1995). Academic research underlying industrial innovation: Sources,

characteristics, and financing. Review of Economics and Statistics, 77(1), 55–65.Manz, C. C., & Neck, C. P. (1995). Teamthink. Beyond the groupthink syndrome in self-managing

work teams. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 10, 7–15.March, J., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Organizations (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell

Publishers.

Marengo, L., Dosi, G., Legrenzi, P., & Pasquali, C. (2000). The structure of problem-solving

knowledge and the structure of organizations. Industrial and Corporate Change, 9, 757–788.Markman, A. B., & Gentner, D. (2001). Thinking. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 223–247.Martens, D. B. (1992). Knowledge by acquaintance/by description. In J. Dancy & E. Sosa (Eds.), A

companion to epistemology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Mason, M. F., Norton, M. I., Horn, V., John, D., Wegner, D. M., Grafton, S. T., et al. (2007).

Wandering minds: The default network and stimulus-independent thought. Science, 315(5810), 393–395.

Massey, C., & Gelman, R. (1988). Preschoolers’ ability to decide whether pictured unfamiliar

objects can move themselves. Developmental Psychology, 24, 307–317.Matte Blanco, I. (1981). L’inconscio come insiemi infiniti. Torino: Einaudi.Maynard-Smith, J., & Szathmary, E. (1999). The major transitions in evolution. London: Freeman.

McClelland, J. L., & Rogers, T. T. (2003). The parallel distributed processing approach to

semantic cognition. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience, 4, 1–14.McCloskey, D. (1985). The industrial revolution 1780–1860: A survey. In J. Mokyr (Ed.), The

economics of the industrial revolution. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld.

McKendrick, N. (1973). The role of science in the industrial revolution. In M. Teich & R. Young

(Eds.), Changing perspectives in the history of science. London: Heinemann.

Mellor, D. H. (1971). The matter of chance. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

References 429

Merton, R. K. (1942). The normative structure of science. In N. W. Storer (Ed.), The sociology ofscience (pp. 267–278). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Merton, R. (1973). The sociology of science. Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago,IL: University of Chicago Press.

Metcalfe, J. S. (1988). The diffusion of innovation: An interpretative survey. In G. Dosi, C.

Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. Soete (Eds.), Technical Change and EconomicTheory. London: Pinter.

Michael, G. (1992). Simulating science. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

Michotte, A. E. (1952). The perception of causality. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Mill, J. S. (1887). A system of logic. New York, NY: Harper & Brothers.

Mill, J. S. (1968). Sistema di Logica. Roma: Ubaldini Editore (It. Translation of A System of Logic(1843). 1st edn).

Miller, R. (1995). The Norms of Reason. Philosophical Review, 104, 205–245.Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual of

Review of Neuroscience, 24, 167–202.Miller, J. H., & Page, S. E. (2007). Complex adaptive systems. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University

Press.

Mitroff, I. I. (1974). The subject side of science. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Mitroff, I. I. (1981). Scientists and confirmation bias. In R. D. Tweney, M. E. Doherty, & C. R.

Mynatt (Eds.), On scientific thinking. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

Mokyr, J. (2002a). The gifts of Athena: Historical origins of the knowledge economy. Princeton,NJ: Princeton University Press (It. Translation (2004). I doni di Atena, Bologna: il Mulino).

Moore, G. E. (1922). The Nature of Moral Philosophy. Philosophical Studies. London: Routledge &Kegan Paul.

Morris, M. W., et al. (1995). Causal attribution across domains and cultures. In D. Sperber et al.

(Eds.), Causal cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Mowery, D., & Rosenberg, N. (1989). Technology and the pursuit of economic growth.Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Mowery, D. C., & Rosenberg, N. (1998). Paths of innovation: Technological change in twentieth-century America. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Mulkay, M. (1979). Science and the sociology of knowledge. London: Allen & Unwin (It.

Translation 1981. La scienza e la sociologia della conoscenza, Milano: Edizioni di Comunita).

Mynatt, R., Doherty, M. E., & Tweney, R. D. (1977). Confirmation bias in a simulated research

environment: An experimental study of scientific inference. In P. N. Johnson Laird & P. C.

Wason (Eds.), Thinking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nagel, J. (2007). Epistemic intuitions. Philosophy Compass, 2, 792–819.National Science Foundation. (2002). Converging technologies for improving human perfor-

mance. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.

Navin, T. R., & Sears, M. V. (1955). The rise of a market for industrial securities 1897–1902.

Business History Review, 29(2), 105–138.Nelson, R. R. (Ed.). (1993). National innovations systems: A comparative study. Oxford: Oxford

University Press.

Nelson, R., & Rosenberg, N. (1993). The U.S. national innovation system. In R. Nelson (Ed.),

National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. New York, NY: Oxford University

Press.

Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA:

Harvard University Press.

Nersessian, N. (1992). How do scientists think? In R. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models of science.Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

Newell, A., Shaw, J. C., & Simon, H.A. (1962). The processes of creative thinking. In H.E. Gruber,

G. Terrell, & M. Wertheimer (Eds.). Contemporary approaches to creative thinking

(pp. 63–119). New York, NY: Atherton Press (It. Translation (1986). I processi del pensiero

430 References

creativo. In V. Somenzi e R. Cordeschi (a cura di). La filosofia degli automi, Torino:

Boringhieri).

Newman, M. (2003). The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review, 45, 167–256.Newstead, S. E., & Griggs, R. A. (1983). The language and thought of disjunction. In J. B. T.

Evans (Ed.), Thinking and reasoning. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Newton Smith, W. H. (1981). The rationality of science. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Nichols, S. (2004). Sentimental rules: On the natural foundations of moral judgment. Oxford:Oxford University Press.

Nietzsche, F. (1954). The anti-christ. London: Penguin.Nietzsche, F. (1967). The will to power. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.

Nightingale, P. (1998). A cognitive model of innovation. Research Policy, 27, 689–709.Nightingale, P. (2000). Economies of scale in experimentation: Knowledge and technology in

pharmaceutical R&D. Industrial and Corporate Change, 9, 315–359.Nightingale, P. (2003). If Nelson andWinter are only half right about tacit knowledge, which half?

A Searlean critique of ‘codification’. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12, 149–183.Nisbett, R. E. (2003). The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently and

why. New York, NY: The Free.

Nisbett, R. E., & Masuda, T. (2006). Culture and point of view. In R. Viale, D. Andler, &

L. Hirschfeld (Eds.), Biological and cultural bases of human inference. Mahwah, NJ:

Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought:

Holistic vs. analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108, 291–310.Nisbett, R., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment.

Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall (It. Translation (1989). L’inferenza umana. Strategiee lacune del giudizio sociale. Bologna: Il Mulino).

Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. New York, NY: Oxford

University Press.

Nooteboom, B., Van Haverbeke, W., Duysters, G., Gilsing, V., & Van den Oord, A. (2007).

Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 36, 1016–1034.Norenzayan, A. (2006). Cultural variation in reasoning. In R. Viale, D. Andler, & L. Hirschfeld

(Eds.), Biological and cultural bases of human inference. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum

Associates.

North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press. It. trans. Istituzioni, Cambiamento Istituzionale, Evoluzionedell’Economia, Bologna: Il Mulino, 1994.

North, D.C. (2005). Understanding the Process of Economic Change. Princeton, NJ: PrincetonUniversity Press (It. Translation (2006). Capire il processo di cambiamento economico,Bologna: il Mulino).

Nozick, R. (1990). Newcomb’s problem and two principles of choice. In P. K. Moser (Ed.),

Rationality in action. Contemporary approaches. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

OECD/Eurostat. (2005). Oslo manual – guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data(3rd ed.). Paris: OECD.

OECD. (2008). Open innovation in a global perspective. What do existing data tell us (STI

Working paper 2008/4). Paris: OECD.

Orsenigo, L. (2001). The (failed) development of a biotechnology cluster: The case of Lombardy.

Small Business Economics, 17(1–2), 77–92.Page, S. E. (2007). The difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Papineau, D. (1987). Reality and representasions. Oxford: Blackwell.Pareto, V. (1916). Trattato di Sociologia Generale. Milano: Edizioni di Comunita. 1964.

Passingham, R. (1997). Functional organisation of the motor system. In R. S. J. Frackowiak, K. J.

Friston, C. D. Frith, R. J. Dolan, & J. C. Mazziotta (Eds.), Human brain function. San Diego,

CA: Academic.

References 431

Peirce, C.S. (1931–58). The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. In C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss

(Vols. 1–6). & A. Burks (Vols. 7–8) (Eds.). Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

Peirce, C. S. (1932). Collected papers (Vol. 2–4). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Perrin, J. (1913). Les atomes. Paris: Alcan.Perrin, C. E. (1988). The chemical revolution: Shifts in guiding assumptions. In A. Donovan et al.

(Eds.), Scrutinizing science. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Petersen, S. E., van Mier, H., Fiez, J. A., & Raichle, M. A. (1998). The effects of practice on the

functional anatomy of task performance. Proceedings of the National Academy of ScienceUSA, 95(3), 853–860.

Petroni, A. M., & Viale, R. (1997). Razionalita e scelta pubblica. In A. M. Petroni, R. Viale (a cura

di). Individuale e Collettivo. Decisione e Razionalita. Milano: Raffaele Cortina Editore.

Petry, N. M., & Casarella, T. (1999). Excessive discounting of delayed rewards in substance

abusers with gambling problems. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 56, 25–32.Pheby, J. (1991). Economia e filosofia della scienza. Il Mulino: Bologna.

Pigou, A. C. (1932). The economics of welfare. London: Macmillan.

Pinch, T., Collins, H. M., & Carbone, L. (1996). Inside knowledge: Second order measures of skill.

Sociological Review, 44, 163–186.Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. London: Routledge &

Kegan Paul.

Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. New York: Doubleday.

Polanyi, M. (1969). Knowing and being. In M. Grene (Ed.), Knowing and being. Essays. London:Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Politzer, G. (1986). Laws of language use and formal logic. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,15, 47–92.

Politzer, G., & Nguyen-Xuan, A. (1992). Reasoning about promises and warnings: Darwinian

algorithms, mental models, relevance judgements or pragmatic schemas? Quarterly Journal ofExperimental Psychology, 44, 401–421.

Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.Popper, K. (1966). The open society and its enemies. London: Routledge.Porter, M. (1998). Competitive advantage. Creating and sustaining superior performance.

New York, NY: Free Press. It. Trans. Il Vantaggio Competitivo, Torino: Einaudi, 2004.Pozzali, A. (2007). Can tacit knowledge fit into a computer model of scientific cognitive pro-

cesses? The case of biotechnology. Mind & Society, 2(6), 211–224.Pozzali, A. (2008). Tacit knowledge, implicit learning and scientific reasoning.Mind & Society, 2

(7), 227–237.

Pozzali, A., & Viale, R. (2007). Cognition, Types of ‘Tacit Knowledge’ and Technology Transfer.

In R. Topol & B. Walliser (Eds.), Cognitive Economics. New Trends. Oxford: Elsevier.Prinz, J. J. (2007). The emotional construction of morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Putnam, H. (1978). Meaning and the moral sciences. London: Routledge.Putnam, H. (1981). Reasons, truth, and history. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Putnam, H. (1990). Realism with a human face. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

Quine, W. O. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Quine, W. O. (1969). Epistemology naturalized. Ontological relativity and other essays.New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

Quine, W. O. (1985). Epistemology naturalized. In H. Kornblith (Ed.), Naturalizing epistemology.Cambridg, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Quine, W. V. (1986). Reply to Morton White. In L. E. Hahn & P. A. Schilpp (Eds.), Thephilosophy of WV quine. La Salle: Open Court.

Quine, W. V. (1990). Pursuit of truth. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Raichle, M. E. (1998). The neural correlates of consciousness: An analysis of cognitive skill

learning [Review]. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Science, 353, 1889–1901.

432 References

Rajamoney, S. (1990). A computational approach to theory revision. In Shrager, J. & Langley,

P. (Eds.) Computational models of discovery and theory formation. San Mateo, CA: Morgan

Kaufman Publishers.

Ramachandran, V. S. (1999). The science of art: A neurological theory of aesthetic experience.

Journal of Consciousness Study, 6, 15–51.Ramachandran, V. S. (2004). The emerging mind. London: Profile Books.Ramsey, F. P. (1931). The foundations of mathematics. London: Routledge.Ranga, L. M., Debackere, K., & von Tunzelman, N. (2003). Entrepreneurial universities and the

dynamics of academic knowledge production: A case of basic vs. applied research in Belgium.

Scientometrics, 58(2), 301–320.Rappert, B. (1995). Shifting notions of accountability in public and private sector research in the

UK: some central concerns. Science and Public Policy, 22, 4.Rawls, J. (1972). A theory of justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Reber, A. S. (1993). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. An essay on the cognitive unconscious.Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Reichenbach, H. (1949). The theory of probability. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Reichenbach, H. (1956). The direction of time. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Reinhart, C. M., & Rogoff, K. S. (2009). This time it’s different: Eight centuries of financial folly.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Resnik, M. (1982). Mathematics as a science of patterns: Epistemology. Nous, 16, 95–105.Reyna, V. F. (2004). How people make decisions that involve risk: A dual-process approach.

Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 60–66.Rips, L. J., & Marcus, S. L. (1977). Supposition anf the analysis of conditional sentences.

Hillsdale, NY: Erlbaum.

Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (2001). Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the

understanding an imitation in action. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 2, 661–670.Roco, M.C., & Bainbridge, W.S., (Eds.) (2002). Converging Technologies for Improving Human

Performance. Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive Sci-ence, National Science Foundation Report, Arlington.

Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Rosch, E. (1973). On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories. In T. E. More

(Ed.), Cognitve development and aquisition of language. New York, NY: Academic.

Rosenberg, A. (1988). Philosophy of social scence. Oxford: Clarendon.Rosenberg, N., & Birdzell, L. E. (1986). How the west grew rich. the economic transformation of

the economic world. New York, NY: Basic Books (It. Translation (1988). Come l’Occidente ediventato ricco, Bologna: il Mulino).

Rosenberg, N., & Mowery, D. (1998). Paths of innovation. Technological change in 20th-centuryAmerica. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press (It. Translation (2001). Il Secolodell’Innovazione, Milano: EGEA).

Ross, B. H. (1996). Category learning as problem solving. In D. L. Medin (Ed.), The psychology oflearning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 35, pp. 165–192). New York,

NY: Academic Press.

Rumain, B., Connell, J., & Braine, M. D. S. (1983). Conversational comprehension processes are

responsible for fallacies in children as well as in adults: If is not the biconditional. Develop-mental Psychology, 19, 471–481.

Russell, B. (1919). Introduction to mathematical philosophy. London: Allen & Unwin (It. transla-

tion (1946). Introduzione alla filosofia matematica. Milano: Longanesi).

Russo, J. E., & Shoemaker, J. H. (2002). Winning decisions: Getting it right the first time.New York, NY: Currency/Doubleday Books.

Rust, J., Miller, J., & Palmer, R. (1994). Characterized effective trading strategies:insights from

computerized double auction tournament. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 18,61–96.

Ryle, G. (1949/1984). The concept of mind. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

References 433

Sacks, O. (1995). An anthropologist on mars. London: Picador.Salmon, W. C. (1963). Logic. Englewoods Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Salmon, W. C. (1970). Statistical explanation. In R. G. Colodny (Ed.), The nature and function of

scientific theories (pp. 172–231). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.

Salmon, W. C. (1984). Scientific explanation and the causal structure of the world. Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.

Salmon, W. C. (1996). Rationality and objectivity in science or Tom Kuhn meets Tom Bayes. In

D. Papineau (Ed.), The philosophy of science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Saxenian, A. L. (1994). Regional advantage: Culture and competition in silicon valley and route128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Schelling, T. (1978). Micromotives and macrobehavior. New York, NY: Norton.

Schiffer, M. (2003). Draw the lightening down: Benjamin Franklin and electrical technology inthe age of enlightenment. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Schooler, J. W., Smallwood, J., Christoff, K., Handy, T. C., Reichle, E. D., & Sayette, M. A.

(2011). Meta-awareness, perceptual decoupling and the wandering mind. Trends in CognitiveScience, 15, 319–326.

Schopenhauer, A. (1851, 1970). Essays and aphorisms. London: Penguin Books.

Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York, NY: Harper. It.

Trans. Capitalismo, Socialismo e Democrazia, Milano: Etas, 2001.

Scribner, S. (1977). Modes of thinking and ways of speaking: Culture and logic reconsidered. In P.

N. Johnson-Laird & P. C. Wason (Eds.), Thinking: Readings in cognitive science(pp. 483–500). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Searle, J. (1992). The rediscovery of the mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

Searle, J. (1995). The construction of social reality. New York, NY: Free.

Searle, J. (2008). Philosophy in a new century. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Senker, J. (1995). Tacit knowledge and models of innovation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 4,425–447.

Shahn, B. (1964). The biography of a painting. In V. Thomas (Ed.), Creativity in the arts.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Shanteau, J., Weiss, D. J., Thomas, R., & Pounds, J. (2003). Performance-based measures of

expertise. In S. L. Schneider & J. Shanteau (Eds.), Emerging perspectives on judgment anddecision research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Shepard, R. N. (1978). The mental image. American Psychologist, 33, 135.Shinn, T. (1982). Scientific disciplines and organisational specificity: The social and cognitive

configuration of laboratory activities. Sociology of the Sciences, IV, 239–264.Shinn, T. (2002). The triple helix and new production of knowledge: Prepackaged thinking

onscience and technology. Social Studies of Science, 32, 599–614.Shinn, T., & Cloitre, M. (1987). Matrici analitiche dell’organizzazione della scienza. Sociologia

e Ricerca Sociale, 24, 83–111.Shope, R. K. (1992). Propositional knowledge. In J. Dancy & E. Sosa (Eds.), A companion to

epistemology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Shweder, R. A. (1977). Likeness and likelihood in everyday thought: Magical thinking and

everyday judgments about personality. In P. N. Johnson-Laird & P. C. Wason (Eds.), Thinking.Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Siegel, D., Waldman, D., & Link, A. (1999). Assessing the impact of organizational practices onthe productivity of university technology transfer offices: An exploratory study (NBER Work-

ing Paper#7256). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Simon, H. A. (1979). Models of thought. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Simon, H. A. (1982). Models of bounded rationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

Simon, H. (1990). Invariants of human behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 1–19.Simon, H. A., & Barenfield, M. (1969). Information-processing analysis of perceptual-processes in

problem solving. Psychological Review, 76, 473–483.

434 References

Simon, A. H., Egidi, M., Viale, R., & Marris R. (2008 [1992]). Economics, bounded rationalityand the cognitive revolution. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Singer, C., Holmyard, E. J., Hall, A. R., & Williams, T. I. (Eds.). (1957). A history of technology.Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin,119, 3–22.

Slovic, P., Finucane, N., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2002). The Affect Heuristic. In

T. Gilovich, D. Griffith, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology ofintuitive thought. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Smart, J. J. C. (1982). Metaphysical realism. Analysis, 42, 1–3.Smith, E. E., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2007). Cognitive psychology. Mind and brain. Upper Saddle

River, NJ: Pearson-Prentice Hall.

Smith, E., & Medin, D. (1981). Categories and concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University

Press.

Sober, E. (1984). The nature of selection: Evolutionary theory in philosophical focus. Cambridge,

MA: MIT.

Solow, R. (1971). Technical change and the aggregate production function. In N. Rosenberg (Ed.),

The economics of technological change. London: Penguin.Sosa, E. (1980). Varieties of causation. In E. Sosa &M. Tooley (Eds.), Causation. Oxford: Oxford

University Press.

Sosa, A. (1991). Knowledge in perspective. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Sosa, E. (1998). Minimal intuition. In M. De Paul & W. Ramsey (Eds.), Rethinking intuitions(pp. 257–270). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

Spelke, E. S. (1990). Principles of object perception. Cognitive Science, 14, 29–56.Spelke, E. S., Phillips, A., & Woodward, A. L. (1995). Infants’ knowledge of object motion and

human action. In D. Sperber, D. Premack, & J. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition. Oxford:Oxford University Press.

Sperber, D. (1985). Anthropology and psychology: Towards an epidemiology of representations.

Man, 20, 73–90.Sperber, D. (1991). The epidemiology of belief. In C. Fraser (Ed.), Psychological studies of

widespread belief. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sperber, D., Premack, D., & Premack, A. J. (1995). Causal cognition. Oxford: Oxford University

Press.

Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Stanovich, K. E. (1999).Who is rational: Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Mahwah,

NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Stanovich, K. E. (2004). The Robot’s rebellion. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

Stephan, P. E., Gurmu, S., Sumell, A. J., & Black, G. (2007). Who’s patenting in the university?

Evidence from the survey of doctorate recipients. Economics of Innovation and New Technol-ogy, 16(2), 71–99.

Stephan, P. E., & Levin, S. G. (1996). Property rights and entrepreneurship in science. SmallBusiness Economics, 8(3), 177–188.

Sternberg, R. J. (2009). Cognitive psychology. Belmont: Wadsworth.

Stich, S. (1983). From folk psychology to cognitive science: The case against belief. Cambridge,

MA: MIT.

Stich, S. (1990a). The fragmentation of reason. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

Stich, S. (1990b). Rationality. In D. Osherson & E. Smith (Eds.), Thinking. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

Stich, S., & Nisbett, R. (1980). Justification and the psychology of human reasoning. Philosophy ofscience, 47, 188–202.

Stigler, G. J. (1968). Monopoly and oligopoly by merger. In G. J. Stigler (Ed.), The organization ofindustry. Homewood, IL: Irwin.

Stokes, D. E. (1997). Pasteur’s quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation.Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

References 435

Suppes, P. (1957). Introduction to logic. Amsterdam: van Nostrand.

Suppes, P. (1966). A bayesian approach to the paradoxes of confirmation. In J. Hintikka &

P. Suppes (Eds.), Aspects of inductive logic. Amsterdam: North Holland.

Suppes, P. (1970). A probabilistic theory of causality. Amsterdam: North Holland.

Swatez, G. M. (1970). The social organization of a university laboratory. Minerva, 8, 36–58.Terna, P. (2005). Economia e Sistemi Complessi. In R. Viale (Ed.), Le Nuove Economie

(pp. 255–274). Milano: IlSole24Ore.

Thagard, P. (1988). Computational philosophy of science. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

Thagard, P. (1989). Explanatory coherence. Bevavioral and Brain Science, 12, 435–467.Thagard, P. (1992). Conceptual revolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press (It. Transla-

tion (1994). Rivoluzioni concettuali. Milano: Guerini e Associati).

Thaler, R. (1999). Mental accounting matters. Journal of Behavioural Decision Making, 12,183–206.

Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge. Improving decisions about health, wealth, andhappiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Thomson, J. J. (1985). The trolley problem. The Yale Law Journal, 94(6), 1395–1415.Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64,

416–424.

Tilly, R. (1966). The financial institutions and industrialization in the Rhineland, 1815–1870.Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In J. Barkow, L.

Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generationof culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Tooley, M. (1990). Causation: Reductionism versus realism. Philosophy and PhenomenologicalResearch, 50, 215–236.

Turnbull, W. M., & Slugoski, B. (1988). Conversational and linguistic processes in causal

attribution. In D. J. Hilton (Ed.), Contemporary science and natural explanation: Commonsense conceptions of causality. Brighton: Harvester.

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1971). The belief in the ‘law of small numbers’. PsychologicalBulletin, 105–110.

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1980). Causal schemas in judgements under uncertainty. In

M. Fishbein (Ed.), Progress in social psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1982a). Judgements of and by representativeness. In D. Kahneman,

P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases.Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1982b). Evidential impact of base rate. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic,

& A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge, MA:

Cambridge University Press.

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in propspect theory: Cumulative representation of

uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 547–567.Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases.

Science, 185, 1124–1131.Tweney, R. D. (1991). Faraday’s notebooks: The active organization of creative science. Physical

Education, 26, 301–306.Ullman, S. (1979). The interpretation of visual motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

Umilta, M. A., Berchio, C., Sestito, M., Freedberg, D., & Gallese, V. (2012). Abstract art and

cortical motor activation: An EEG study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6(311), 1–9.van Fraassen, B. (1980). The scientific image. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Van Knippenberg, D., & Schippers, M. C. (2007). Work group diversity. Annual Review ofPsychology, 58, 515–541.

Van Looy, B., Ranga, L. M., Callaert, J., Debackere, K., & Zimmerman, E. (2004). Balancing

entrepreneurial and scientific activities: Feasible or mission impossible? An examination of the

436 References

performance of university research groups at K. U. Leuven, Belgium. Research Policy, 33(3),443–454.

Vasari, G. (1986). Le vite de’ piu eccellenti architetti, pittori, et scultori italiani, da Cimabueinsino a’ tempo nostri. Torino: Einaudi.

Velinowski, I. (1950). Worlds in collision. New York, NY: Doubleday.

Viale, R. (1982). Philosophy of mind and mental disease, the philosophy and methodology ofscience. Dubrovnik: Inter-University Centre of postgraduate studies.

Viale, R. (1986). Philosophie, physique de l’esprit et paradigme simonien. In A. Demailly & J. L.

Le Moigne (Eds.), Sciences de l’intelligence, sciences de l’artificiel. Lyon: Presses

Universitaires de Lyon.

Viale, R. (1989). Epistemologia, cognizione e razionalita deduttiva. In R. Viale (Ed.), Menteumana mente artificiale. Milano: Feltrinelli.

Viale, R. (1990). Lemmas: Analyse; predicat (observationnel, theorique).; critere d’empiricite;proposition empirique; rationalite scientifique; organicisme; entite theorique; propositiontheorique; langage theorique, (Vol. II dell’Encyclopedie Philosophique). Parigi: Presses

Universitaires de France.

Viale, R. (1991). Metodo e societa nella scienza. Milano: Franco Angeli.

Viale, R. (1993). Cognizione e razionalita delle credenze nelle scienze sociali. In D. Antiseri, R.

Boudon e R. Viale (Ed.). Teoria della razionalita, Roma: Borla.

Viale, R. (1994). Dans le boite noire: le mecanismes cognitifs de la decision scientifique. In R.

Boudon & M. Clavelin (Eds.). Le relativisme est-il resistible?France: Presses Universitaires de.Viale, R. (1997a). Causality: Epistemological questions and cognitive answers. In G. Costa, G.

Calucci, & M. Giorgi (Eds.), Conceptual tools for understanding nature. Singapore: World

Scientific.

Viale, R. (1997b). From neoclassic to cognitive economics: The epistemological constraints of

feasibility and realism. In R. Viale (Ed.), Cognitive economics (LASCOMES Series, 1).

Torino: La Rosa Editrice.

Viale, R. (1999a). Causal cognition and causal realism. International Studies of Philosophy ofScience, 13(2), 151–167.

Viale, R. (1999b). Causality: Cognition and reality. In R. Rossini Favretti, G. Sandri, &

R. Scazzieri (Eds.), Incommensurability and translation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Viale, R. (2000). The mind-society problem. Mind & Society, 1(1), 3–24.Viale, R. (2001a). Devoluting folk psychology: The case of acceptance. LASCOMES Series, 5.Viale, R. (2001b). Reasons and reasoning: What comes First. In R. Boudon, P. Demeleulenaere, &

R. Viale (Eds.), L’explication des normes sociales. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Viale, R. (2006). Local or universal principles of reasoning? In R. Viale, D. Andler, & L.

Hirschfeld (Eds.), Biological and cultural bases of human inferences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Viale, R. (2008a). Origini storiche dell’innovazione permanente. In R. Viale (a cura di). La culturadell’innovazione. Milano: Editrice Il Sole 24 Ore.

Viale, R. (2008b). La genesi storica del rapporto fra scienza e industria. Nuova civilta dellemacchine, 1, 24–38.

Viale, R. (2009). Cognitive styles in academic and industrial research. New York, NY: Columbia

University. http://www.italianacademy.columbia.edu/publications_working.html#0809

Viale, R. (2010). Knowledge driven capitalization of knowledge. In R. Viale & H. Etzkowitz

(Eds.), The capitalization of knowledge: A triple helix of university-industry-government.Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Viale, R. (2012). Methodological cognitivism mind (Rationality, and society, Vol. 1). Heidelberg:

Springer.

Viale, R. (forthcoming). L’Iceberg della Conoscenza. Milano: Mondadori.

Viale, R. (forthcoming). Methodological cognitivism (Vol 2). Epistemology, science, and

innovation. Heidelberg: Springer.

Viale, R., Andler, D., & Hirschfeld, L. (Eds.). (2006). Biological and cultural bases of humaninference. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

References 437

Viale, R., & Campodall’Orto, S. (2002). An evolutionary triple helix to strengthen academy-

industry relations: Suggestions from european regions. Science and Public Policy, 29(3),154–168.

Viale R. & Cerroni A. (2002). Methodological criteria of choice in science: The case study of

Ispra’s Joint Research Center. Quaderni Lascomes 7/2002, Lascomes Series.Viale, R., & Etzkowitz, H. (Eds.). (2010a). The capitalization of knowledge: A triple helix of

university-industry-government. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Viale, R., & Etzkowitz, H. (2010b). Anticyclic triple helix. In R. Viale & H. Etzkowitz (Eds.), Thecapitalization of knowledge: A triple helix of university-industry-government (p. 2010).

Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Viale, R., Franzoni, C., Del Missier, R., & Rumiati R. (2012). Reflection in academia: A Reversalof the reflection effect in academics. Poster for the Congress of the Society of Judgement and

Decision Making.

Viale, R., & Osherson, D. (2000). The diversity principle and the little scientist hypothesis.

Foundations of Science, 5, 239–253.Viale, R., & Pozzali, A. (2003). Al di qua della razionalita: la conoscenza tacita. Sistemi

Intelligenti, XV(2), 325–346.Viale, R., & Pozzali, A. (2007). Cognitive aspects of tacit knowledge and cultural diversity. In L.

Magnani & P. Li (Eds.),Model-based reasoning in science, technology, and medicine. Berlin:Springer.

Viale, R., & Pozzali, A. (2010). Complex adaptive systems and the evolutionary triple helix.

Critical Sociology, 36(4), 575–594.Viale, R., Pozzali, A., & Passerini, G. (2003). Modelli socio-cognitivi nel sistema della ricerca

pubblica e nel mondo delle imprese (Socio-cognitive models in academic and industrialresearch) (Working Paper). Torino: Fondazione Rosselli.

Viale, R., Rumiati, R., Legrenzi, P., & Bonini, N. (1993). Il ruolo dell’expertise scientifica nelle

strategie di falsificazione e verifica. Quaderni di Sociologia, XXXVII(5), 137–147.Vincenti, W. (1990). What engineers know and how they know it: Analytical studies from

aeronautical history. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

von Domarus, E. (1925). Ueber die Besiehung des normalen zum schizoprenen Denken. Arch.Psychiatr, 74, 641–646.

von Domarus, E. (1944). The specific laws of logic in schizophrenia. Berkeley: University of

California Press.

von Hayek, F. (1949). Individualism: True and false. Hayek, 1949. London: Routledge & Kegan

Paul (It. Translation (1997). Individualismo: quello vero e quello falso. Soveria Mannelli:

Rubbettino Editore).

von Hayek, F. A. (1952). The counter-revolution of science: Studies on the abuse of reason.Glencoe, IL: The Free.

von Krogh, G., Nonaka, I., & Nichiguchi, T. (Eds.). (2000). Knowledge creation. A source ofvalue. London: Macmillan.

von Mises, R. (1957). Probability, statistics and truth. London: Allen & Unwin.

Von Wright, G. H. (1963). Norms and action. A logical enquiry. London: Routledge.Walker, D. B. (1981). Towards a functioning federalism. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.

Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quaterly Journalof Experimental Psychology, 12, 129–140.

Wason, P. C. (1966). Reasoning. In B. Foss (Ed.), New horizons in psychology. London: PenguinBooks.

Wason, P. C., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1972). The psychology of reasoning. Cambridge, MA:

Harvard University Press.

Weber, M. (1922). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Tubingen: Mohr. It. Trans. 1968. Economia

e Societa. Milano: Edizioni di Comunita.

Wegner, D. M. (2002). The illusion of conscious will. Cambridge MA: Mit Press.

438 References

Weinberg, J., Nichols, S., & Stich, S. (2006). Normativity and epistemic intuitions. In R. Viale,

D. Andler, & L. Hirschfeld (Eds.), Biological and cultural bases of human inference (pp. 1–31).Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Wertheimer, M. (1923). Principles of perceptual organization. Psychologische Forschungen, 4,301–350.

Whitley, R. (1984). The social and intellectual organization of the sciences. Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press.

Wilson, E. O. (1998). Consilience: The unity of knowledge. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.

Wimsatt, W. (1981). Robustness, reliability and multiple-determination in science. In M. Brewer &

B. Collins (Eds.), Knowing and validating in social sciences. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Wittgenstein, L. (1922). Tractatus logico-philosophicus. London: Routledge.Woodworth, R. S., & Sells, S. B. (1935). An atmosphere effect in formal syllogistic reasoning.

Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18(4), 451–460.Woolcock, M. (1998). Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis

and policy framework. Theory and Society, 27(2).Worral, J. (1976). Thomas Young and the “refutation” of Newtonian optics: A case study in the

interaction of philosophy of science and history of science. In C. Howson (Ed.), Method andappraisal in the physical sciences. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Yovel, G., & Kanwisher, N. (2004). Face perception: Domain specific, not process specific.

Neuron, 44(5), 889–898.Zellner, C. (2003). The economic effects of basic research: Evidence for embodied knowledge

transfer via scientists’ migration. Research Policy, 32, 1881–1895.Zeman, A. (2001). Consciousness [Invited Review]. Brain, 124, 1263–1289.Ziman, J. (1979). Reliable knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Ziman, J. (1987). L’individuo in una professione collettivizzata. Sociologia e ricerca sociale, 24,9–30.

Ziman, J. (1990). Research as a career. In S. E. Cozzens et al. (Eds.), The research system intransition. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Zollo, M., & Winter, S. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities.

Organization Science, 13, 339–351.

References 439

Index

AAffect heuristics, 379

Agency, 22, 26, 27, 219, 250, 252, 259–261,

374, 394, 397, 400, 403, 411, 414

Aha! moment, 20, 214

Analytic a priori, 71

Aphasia, 214

Art, 17–19, 21, 124, 274, 309, 373

Articulability, 332–334, 338

Artificial grammar, 31, 312, 337

Associationist psychology, 48, 71

Atmosphere effect, 109, 110

Autism, 209

Automation, 35, 339, 340, 342

BBackground knowledge, 19, 23, 29, 30, 32, 37,

39, 40, 123–125, 131, 132, 204, 205,

211, 226–228, 266, 268, 290, 298, 310,

311, 314, 315, 319, 322, 329, 330, 337,

338, 353, 357, 359–361, 369, 372, 373,

375–378, 398

Base rate neglect, 11, 122–124, 126, 382

Bayes theorem, 238, 382

Belief bias, 110

Bounded rationality, 37, 112, 136, 164, 189,

356, 395, 397, 403, 408

CCampus company, 36, 38, 283, 346, 360, 369,

371, 389

Capitalization of knowledge, 35–38, 345

CAS. See Complex adaptive systems (CAS)

Causal attribution, 2–4, 49, 61, 63–65, 67, 73,

81, 82, 88, 89, 132, 314, 315, 317

Causal cognition, 3, 56, 59–61, 65, 67, 69, 70,

72–74, 81, 384

Causal field, 4, 58, 61–63, 66, 67, 73, 131, 384

Causal laws, 2, 3, 49, 50, 58, 69, 70,

76, 129, 166

Causal mechanism, 3, 13, 54, 70, 143, 157,

272, 273, 276, 277, 298, 314, 349, 357

Causal realism, 3–5, 59, 69

Causal reasoning, 129–131, 384

Causal relation, 2–5, 14, 49–52, 54, 56, 58, 59,

61, 65, 66, 69–76, 82, 83, 86–89, 131,

145, 149–152, 157, 159, 191, 232–234,

236, 246, 272, 297, 318, 349, 384,

396, 405

Causality, 1–5, 47, 69–75, 83, 86, 89, 97, 131,

157, 166, 316, 355, 384

Codification, 30, 32–35, 306, 307, 319–321,

323, 325, 327–329, 331, 332, 338,

339, 342

Codified knowledge, 32, 325

Cognitive rationality, 6, 9–11, 111, 117, 119,

129, 131, 133, 162, 189

Cognitive realism, 1, 22, 24, 191, 192, 219,

231, 237, 242, 243

Cognitive rules, 31, 36, 38, 40, 239, 268, 311,

313, 314, 322

Cognitive unconscious, 213

Common sense, 4, 59, 73, 81, 82, 191, 206,

235, 236

Competential knowledge, 30, 32, 33, 35, 36,

281, 308, 310, 319–321, 323, 326, 327,

330, 333, 338, 346, 354

Complex adaptive systems (CAS), 41–44, 392,

396, 398, 405, 411, 415

Complexity, 27, 36, 37, 40, 42, 67, 81, 108,

112, 158, 183, 224, 250, 252, 346–349,

351, 352, 357–359, 369, 389

Conditional assertion, 227, 354

Confirmation bias, 10, 121, 123, 246, 383, 384

Consciousness, 19, 31, 154, 165, 168, 203, 205,

212, 309, 310, 333, 334

Context of discovery, 182

Context of justification, vi

R. Viale, Methodological Cognitivism, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-40216-6,# Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

441

Contrast model, 4, 73, 130

Conventionalism, 49, 191

Converging technology, 350, 352

Conversational criterion, 3, 63, 130

Conversational implicature, 378

Conversational maxims, 64

Copyright, 35, 36, 345, 346, 393

Counterfactual conditional, 63, 99

Co-variation, 130

Creativity, 17, 19–21, 81, 197, 198, 203, 204,

269, 369

Culture, 7, 15, 21, 22, 27, 28, 30, 52, 70, 96,

130–132, 173, 184, 197–199, 202, 207,

220, 253, 254, 267, 269, 270, 282, 283,

290, 296, 300, 315, 317, 328, 356, 369,

386, 393, 396, 398

DDecision making, 12, 14, 22, 27, 37, 39, 40,

161, 219, 224, 245, 251, 252, 254–256,

258, 260, 261, 337, 353–356, 369,

372–375, 379, 380, 414

Decoupling, 360, 376, 377

Deduction, 8, 99, 100, 104, 111, 156, 184, 186,

199, 224, 239, 355, 400

Deductive rationality, 6–8, 93, 184

Default realism, 5, 86, 87

Disciplinary matrix, 115, 378

Discovery, 1, 9, 10, 15, 17, 19, 24, 25, 76, 85,

117–119, 123, 128, 131, 150, 159, 160,

173, 177, 179, 181, 182, 189, 190, 204,

205, 233, 236, 237, 239, 240, 245–247,

270, 272, 273, 275, 276, 278, 280, 281,

297, 349, 350, 364, 395, 398, 400

Domain-generality of causality, 53, 56, 59

Domain-specificity of causality, 54, 56, 58,

75

Double helix, 400

Duality of mind, 379

Dyslexia, 157, 210

EEcological rationality, 190

Elitism, 22, 25, 224, 248, 260, 262, 265

Emotionism, 48

Empathy, 21, 209, 210, 215, 216

Empirical realism of causation (ERC), 2, 50, 52

Entrepreneurial University, 37, 41, 282, 283,

356, 364, 401, 406, 413, 416

Epistemological market, 24–27, 248–252,

260–262, 266

Evolutionary triple helix (ETH), 402, 409

Exemplar, 137, 232, 317

Experimental philosophy, 1, 2, 47–49, 82

Explicit knowledge, 230, 275, 298, 299, 308,

313, 319

FFalsificationism, 264

Feasibility, 5, 51, 83, 134, 136, 231

Feasibility criterion, 56, 59, 65, 83

First academic revolution, 368

First industrial revolution, 28, 35, 273, 275,

281, 282, 291, 322, 345, 348, 349, 351,

352, 354, 367, 399

Frame effect, 34, 183, 340

Fuzzy logic, 7, 98, 103, 185

GGestalt shift, 127

Government, 22, 26, 28, 36–38, 43, 44, 219,

250, 253, 255, 259–263, 278, 283, 287,

290, 292, 299, 346, 356, 360, 368, 370,

374, 377, 393, 398–402, 404, 407, 409,

411, 414, 415

Group, 12, 13, 22, 23, 26, 27, 39, 40, 53, 79,

110, 115, 123, 128, 140–142, 165, 175,

194, 195, 216, 220–222, 224, 225, 228,

230, 232, 239, 246, 248–252, 260, 262,

266, 269, 278, 284, 288, 297, 310, 316,

317, 329, 360, 365, 367, 370, 372, 373,

375, 387, 406

Group team, 378

Group think, 378

HHumean causality, 60, 87

IImplicit cognitive rules (ICR), 31, 32, 314,

318–322, 329, 330, 338, 356, 359, 371,

373, 375, 378

Implicit learning, 31, 32, 312, 313, 319, 321,

337, 338, 355

Incentive, 25, 27–29, 33, 36, 38, 41, 42, 44,

220, 225, 247, 255, 262, 278, 283,

288–290, 296–300, 333, 339, 341, 346,

362, 369, 370, 392–397, 403–407, 409,

411, 412, 414, 415

Incubation, 20, 213, 214, 382

442 Index

Induction, 205, 280, 281, 355

Industry, 28, 34, 36, 37, 39, 42–44, 171, 262,

263, 266, 271, 275–278, 280, 282, 289,

291–293, 295, 299, 340, 341, 346, 356,

359, 363, 371, 372, 387, 388, 398–402,

404, 406–410

Infant, 3, 5, 52, 54, 56, 69, 70, 72, 73, 76, 80,

84, 129, 232, 314

Informativeness criterion, 64

Innovation, 1, 19, 21, 27–30, 36, 37, 40–44,

164, 204, 205, 248, 254, 260, 262, 263,

265, 305, 309, 310, 320–323, 336, 346,

348, 349, 352, 353, 355–357, 359, 361,

363, 367–369, 388, 389, 391–393, 396,

397, 399, 401–406, 408–415

Innovation policy, 1, 368, 393

Insight, 20, 21, 211, 214, 327, 362, 365

Insufficient but Necessary part of an

Unnecessary but Sufficient (INUS), 4,

61, 73

Internalism, 78, 191

Intuition, 1–4, 7, 47, 48, 51, 54, 56, 59, 76, 82,

99, 100, 111, 185–188, 212, 236, 307,

314, 317, 355

Intuitive theories, 3, 4, 53, 54, 70, 74, 315

Invention, 15, 27, 35, 39, 88, 95, 159, 173, 207,

233, 267, 270, 271, 273–277, 281, 282,

284, 287, 288, 297, 317, 336, 345, 346,

348, 349, 352, 354, 357, 359, 367, 371,

398, 399, 401, 413

Irrational Escalation, 385, 386

JJanus scientist, 36, 346, 388, 402

KKalı scientist, 399

LLanguage, 6, 20, 31, 36, 40, 59, 65, 79, 80, 89,

94, 100, 102, 103, 111, 137, 156–158,

160, 161, 166, 167, 199, 200, 202,

208–210, 214, 233, 235, 311, 312,

326–331, 334–338, 342, 346, 350, 351,

353, 354, 375, 400

Left hemisphere, 20, 209, 210, 214

MMemory, 8, 13, 14, 40, 51, 77, 78, 80, 83, 106,

112, 113, 141, 156, 158, 159, 161, 167,

170, 174, 213, 236–238, 241, 313, 336,

337, 350, 351, 355, 375, 379, 381, 395

Mirror neurons, 21, 209, 215, 216

Mode 1, 362

Mode 2, 362

Modernism, 76, 78, 79, 228

Modularity of mind, 75

Modus ponens, 103, 104, 176, 355

Modus tollens, 103–105, 238, 355, 383

Moral reasoning, 48

Muller-Lyer illusion, 4, 74, 238

Myopia, 40, 374, 386

NNational Innovation System, 40, 391

Naturalized epistemology, 231, 233, 235

Naturalizing epistemology, 6, 50, 59, 65, 93,

188, 231

Neocorporatist triple helix, 402, 404

Neuroethics, 48

Nomological causality, 58

Norm theory, 63, 130

Normality criterion, 3, 4, 63, 64, 73

OObservable, 2, 5, 49, 83, 150, 151, 167, 194

Operational rules, 40, 376, 378–380, 384–390

PPaleologic thinking, 96

Patent, 28, 35, 36, 38, 39, 262, 263, 283, 288,

299, 345, 346, 352, 359, 360, 362–365,

367, 368, 370, 371, 374, 377, 393, 396,

400, 411

Perceptual modularity, 52

Physical causality, 52, 54, 60, 70, 87, 129

Polyvalent knowledge, 362

Pragmatism, 3, 77, 183, 193–196, 229–243, 269

Principle of common cause, 62, 149, 150, 157

Probabilistic contrast model, 3, 64, 65

Probability, 11, 29, 62, 77, 88, 120, 122–127,

134, 143, 144, 146, 147, 149, 151, 168,

184–187, 189, 227, 238, 264, 270, 296,

315, 355, 382, 385

Problem solving, 10, 14, 19, 36, 37, 39, 40,

118, 169, 174, 177, 181, 188, 190, 200,

241, 259, 264, 321, 331, 347, 354, 356,

358, 372, 375, 378, 380, 382, 387, 399

Propositional calculus, 95, 100, 110, 355

Prospect Theory, 385, 386

Psychological causality, 69, 70, 83, 97

Index 443

QQuasi firm, 27, 260, 262, 266

RRationality, 1, 50, 83, 93–137, 139, 162, 197,

219, 247, 290, 317, 356, 379, 395

Realism, 1, 50, 83–89, 114, 183, 203, 219,

245–266

Reasoning, 1, 2, 4, 6–8, 10–13, 17, 20, 36, 37,

39, 40, 47–49, 54, 56, 58, 59, 61, 63, 65,

71, 73, 76, 77, 82, 89, 95, 96, 98–103,

105, 107, 108, 110–113, 139–141, 158,

159, 161, 162, 164, 177, 184, 185, 187,

192, 198, 205, 220, 236–240, 245, 246,

268, 297, 314–317, 319, 347, 353–356,

358, 360, 369–375, 378–380, 390, 395

Reductionist conventionalism of causation

(RCC), 49

Reflective equilibrium, 10–12, 50, 82, 118,

121, 127, 128, 130, 133, 134, 187

Regional innovation system, 410

Regret theory, 383, 385

Relativism, 23, 226, 228, 269, 317

Relevance, 14, 27, 62, 64, 130, 147, 149, 150,

152, 252, 306, 336, 374, 382

Relevance theory, 62, 306

Reliabilism, 236

Right hemisphere, 20, 210, 214

Risk, 28, 29, 50, 77, 79, 135, 145, 154, 187,

267, 269, 284, 289, 292, 294–297, 300,

301, 355, 361, 369, 374,

385–387, 389

SSchizophrenic thinking, 97

Science Park, 342, 412, 415

Science policy, 1, 21, 24, 342

Scientific revolution, 322, 398

Screening-off, 62, 145, 149

Second academic revolution, 43, 364,

368, 407

Second industrial revolution, 35, 274, 289, 291,

323, 346, 349, 350, 352, 354, 398, 400

Selection task, 105, 355

Sentimentalism, 48

Single helix, 398

Situationism, 48

Skill, 18, 29–35, 43, 80, 81, 87, 95, 115, 129,

136, 140, 159, 164, 184, 187, 188, 200,

201, 207–210, 213, 222, 239, 245, 273,

290, 307–310, 312–314, 319, 320, 327,

330, 331, 338–342, 361, 371, 377, 397,

400, 408, 412

Social causality, 51, 52, 70

Social epistemology, 1, 21, 22, 24–26, 219,

245, 248, 250, 251, 253, 260, 261, 265

Social norms, 39, 161, 220, 225, 227, 241, 243,

353, 355, 359, 361, 380, 386

Social reliability, 24, 27, 242, 243, 245, 252,

253, 261

Spin-off(s), 4, 41, 44, 282, 287, 368, 395,

401, 405, 408, 409, 413

Start-up, 34, 341

Subjunctive conditional, 14, 62, 148, 149,

151, 152

Sunk cost, 386, 387

Supervenience, 3, 70

Syllogism, 8, 97, 108, 109, 112, 226

Synthetic a priori, 4, 69, 71, 72, 81

System 1 of Mind, 1, 47

System 2 of Mind, 1, 47

TTacit knowledge, 30, 38, 213, 230, 282, 299,

305–307, 329, 342, 354, 359, 360, 370,

371, 377, 396, 400, 401

Tacitness, 306, 335, 336, 341, 359

Technology transfer, 1, 38, 42, 260, 305, 307,

321, 348, 369, 371, 377, 387, 389, 403,

406, 412, 415

Theoretical realism of causation (TRC), 2,

50, 51

Thinking, 7, 20, 21, 36, 39, 40, 56, 61, 71, 74,

96, 120, 147, 207, 210–212, 214, 246,

251, 277, 315–317, 347, 354, 356, 361,

370, 372, 375, 384, 385, 390

Third industrial revolution, 322, 398–401

Time discounting, 40, 374, 386

TRC. See Theoretical realism of causation

(TRC)

Translatability, 331, 401

Triple helix, 37, 40, 41, 43, 44, 283, 356, 368,

388, 391

Truth, 1, 60, 75, 94, 119, 149, 163, 206, 219,

245, 276, 329, 353, 372, 401

UUncertainty, 258, 269, 385

University, 37–39, 41–44, 73, 104, 170, 221,

253, 262, 280, 283, 299, 301, 315, 317,

348, 356, 357, 359–362, 365, 368–370,

372, 374–377, 387, 389, 394–397,

399–402, 404–409, 412, 415, 416

444 Index

About the Author

Riccardo Viale is Professor of Epistemology of Social Sciences at the University

of Milano-Bicocca.

He is Editor in Chief of Mind & Society (Springer) and the author or editor of

many Books such as Modelling the Mind (with K.A. Moyeldin Said, H. Newton

Smith and K.V. Wilkes, Clarendon Press, 1990); Economics, Bounded Rationalityand the Cognitive Revolution (with H. Simon, M. Egidi and R. Marris, Elgar, 1992,

2008), Knowledge and Politics (Physica-Verlag, 2001), Biological and Culturalbases of Human Inferences (with D. Andler and L. Hirschfeld, Erlbaum, 2006), TheCapitalization of Knowledge (with H. Etzkowitz, Elgar, 2010), MethodologicalCognitivism vol 1 Mind, Rationality, and Society (Springer-Verlag, 2012).

His research Interests are the cognitive foundation of social action, the cognitive

theory of economic rationality, cognitive approaches in philosophy of science and

social epistemology, tacit knowledge and science policy.

R. Viale, Methodological Cognitivism, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-40216-6,# Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

445

Riccardo Viale

Methodological CognitivismVolume 1: Mind, Rationality, and Society

1. Introduction

Part I Cognitive Rationality and Society

2. Psychologism and Anti-Psychologism

3. The Mind-Society Problem

4. Cognition and Rationality of Beliefs in the Social Sciences

5. Brain, Mind and Social Action

Part II Cognitive Economics

6. Developing Simon’s Bounded Rationality

7. Feasibility and Realism in Cognitive Economics

8. Economic and Cognitive Rationality in Political Behaviour

9. Which Mind for Cognitive Economics?

10. Epistemological Pluralism and Economics

11. Neurocognition and Financial Behaviour

Part III Mind, Culture and Epistemological Universals

12. Subjective Rationality and Cultural Diversity

13. Biology and Culture of Human Inference

14. Cognitive Diversity in Western and Eastern Thinking

15. Adaptive Theory Change as Epistemological Universal

R. Viale, Methodological Cognitivism, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-40216-6,# Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

447