R Restitution Research. R Grady Brown Elementary School Hillsborough, NC Discipline incidents per...
-
Upload
noel-flowers -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of R Restitution Research. R Grady Brown Elementary School Hillsborough, NC Discipline incidents per...
R
Restitution Research
R
Grady Brown Elementary School
Hillsborough, NC
Discipline incidents per day referred to front office. 12-15 per day in 1990-91 5-7 per day in 1991-92 2-4 per day in 1992-93 0-2 per day in 1993-94
90-91 91-92 92-93 93-94
15
5
10
R
West Middle School Discipline Referrals, Rockford, ILSemi 94-95 Semi 95-96 Change +/ % Change +/-
TardyForgeryTruancyInsubordinationDisruptive BehaviorGamblingGroup ViolenceFightingVerbal/StudentVerbal/StaffGang IndicationExtortionAlcohol/DrugsSale/DrugsTobacco UsePossession StolenGoodsTheftFalse AlarmThreat/StudentThreat/StaffAssault/StudentAssault/StaffPossession WeaponWeapon UseVandalismOtherTotals
3275
18714561050
14
1654
99903065786
346322418
210
4076
35
291599394
217
1121
5270405793
1613
10520501
29
2438
-3240
-158143
-6561
13-53
3-47-2010
-122
-510
-2142-21
-1-7
-181
-1638
-99.10
-94.59.8
-62.5100325
-32.1-32.1-47.5-22.5
033.3
0-16.7
4028.69-62.5166.7-61.866.7-9.1
25-10087.5
-869.2
-40.2
SEX AND ETHNIC BREAKOUTTotal Majority Minority Male Female
Number 2438 781 1657 1731 707Percent 32 68 71 29
Eth1 Eth2 Eth3 Eth4 Eth5Number 1600 777 4 57Percent 65.6 31.9 .2 2.3
R
West Middle School Discipline Referral Totals – 1994-1998
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
1994-95 1995-96 1996-1997 1997-98
(4146)
(2454)
(1718)
(1475)
Drop of discipline referrals 2671 - 64%
R
West Middle School, Rockford, Illinois
Comparison of Percentage of Two Groups Achieving a GPA of 2.0 or Better
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Per
cen
tag
e
Group 1 Group 2
1st quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Total
R
Restitution Takes Hold ProjectIndividual Student Statistics
In ClassConsequence
Detention
In School Suspension
Out SchoolSuspension
Expulsion
Name:
Project Week(Frequency)
Number of Referrals 13
Number of Restitutions 2
Race/Ethnic M/AA
Team Number N
A
Legend
Discipline Referral
Restitution Done
Parent Contacted
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 1820 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36
R
Restitution Takes Hold ProjectIndividual Student Statistics
In ClassConsequence
Detention
In School Suspension
Out SchoolSuspension
Expulsion
Name:
Project Week(Frequency)
G
Number of Referrals
Number of Restitutions
Bottom Quartile
Race/Ethnic F/EA
Team Number
28
2
Y
1
Legend
Discipline Referral
Restitution Done
Parent Contacted
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 1618 2022 24 2628 30 32 3436
R
Restitution Takes Hold ProjectIndividual Student Statistics
In ClassConsequence
Detention
In School Suspension
Out SchoolSuspension
Expulsion
Name:
Project Week(Frequency)
Number of Referrals Number of Restitutions Bottom Quartile Race/Ethnic M/AATeam Number
M
82Y
1
Legend
Discipline Referral
Restitution Done
Parent Contacted
2 4 68 10 12 14 1618 2022 24 2628 30 32 3436
R
Restitution Takes Hold ProjectIndividual Student Statistics
In ClassConsequence
Detention
In School Suspension
Out SchoolSuspension
Expulsion
Name:
Project Week(Frequency)
Number of Referrals Number of Restitutions
Race/Ethnic Team Number
S
91Y
1
Legend
Discipline Referral
Restitution Done
Parent Contacted F/HA
2 4 68 10 12 14 1618 2022 24 2628 30 32 3436
R
Restitution is a process. Expect on an implementation dip. Sometimes we are going two steps forward and one step backwards as we attempt to get balance between the bottom lines and beliefs.
As you have noticed in the previous overheads the incidents for discipline drop down after the first restitution and rise again. It is as if the kids don’t believe we are serious about solving problems rather than punishing.
After the second restitution when incidents of discipline fail they tend to stay down, especially if the parents have been involved. In the following example you will see a dramatic drop in incidents of discipline followed by a return to a series of out of school suspension. If this pattern continues there is a good chance this boy is on the way to jail. This is a sad situation because we had him engaged at one point.
R
In ClassConsequence
Detention
In School Suspension
Out SchoolSuspension
Expulsion
Restitution Takes Hold Project
Name:
Project Week
J
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 1618 2022 24 2628 30 32 3436
(Frequency)
Number of Referrals
Number of Restitutions Bottom Quartile
Race/Ethnic M/AATeam Number
502Y
1
Where did we lose him?
R
Haskell ElementaryRockford, IL - Vicki Jacobson, Principal
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
Total Referrals
1995-961996-971997-981998-991999-00
1995-96 Only principal and two other staff trained in Restitution1996-97 All teachers from one grade level trained1997-98 Entire school trained in Restitution1998-99 Implementation of Restitution1999-00 Further implementation * - in the process of confirmation
Demographics - 97% Free & Reduced Lunch - Low socio-economic, high minority population - Have been on State Watch list for three years
R
LINCOLN CENTER ELEMENTARYSOUTH ST. PAUL, MNPrincipal - Paul Johnson
• Our first year we started with rules. • 1997-98 was a year of training for our staff in
Restitution.• In 1998 we started doing beliefs with staff and
students.• The second semester (January 1999) we had
firmed up our bottom line and this helped a lot.• We began the fall of 1999 year with teaching
needs, reviewing beliefs, and clear bottom lines in place.
• We now have a peaceful school.• There is an ongoing need to rebalance the
bottom lines with the beliefs.
R
Office Referrals for Behavior 1997-00Lincoln Center Elementary School
South St. Paul, MN - All staff trained in Restitution by end of summer 1998
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
240
1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000
Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May/June
X X
X
X
XX
X
X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
XX X
X
X
X
X
1998-99
1999-00
1997-98
X
X
X
X
X
XXX
X
X
2000-01
2000-01
R
Evergreen Teachers Use Restitution
Evergreen, WA - Number of Teachers Surveyed 695
I use the following strategies of RDM in my classroom. Mark all that apply.
My Job Your Job 652 (93%)
Behavior Car 177 (25%)
Classroom Beliefs 566 (81%)
Restitution 536 (77%)
Basic Needs 47 (78%)
Classroom Agreements 475 (68%)
What’s your plan? 549 (78%)
None 23 (0.03%)
R
My
Job
/Yo
ur
Job
-
93%
Cla
ss B
elie
fs -
81%
Res
titu
tio
n -
77%
Bas
ic N
eed
s -
78%
Wh
at’s
Yo
ur
Pla
n?
- 7
8%
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Per
cent
age
Strategies Used
My Job Class Beliefs Restitution
Basic Needs What's Your Plan
Implementation By Teachers After Training695 Surveyed - Evergreen School District, Vancouver, WA
My
Job
/Yo
ur
Job
– 9
3%
Cla
ss B
elie
fs –
81%
Res
titu
tio
n –
77%
Bas
ic N
eed
s –
78%
Wh
at’s
Yo
ur
Pla
n?
– 7
8%
R
RESTITUTION SCHOOLS SURVEY 1996
Identity Shift• Do you find the concepts/practice of restitution
leading to a success identity for yourself?
Yes-91% No-9%• Do you believe restitution leads students, staff
and parents to a success identity?
Yes -94% No-6%• Where would you rate restitution with regard
to locus of control on a scale of 1-10 with external locus of control being 1 and internal locus of control being 10?
Yes-100% (5 and above) No-0% (Under 5) Average - 8.4
R
Identity Shift Survey - 1996
0
20
40
60
80
100
Question 1 Question 2 Question 3
Yes
No
R
Inner city setting
Kindergarten to grade 8
peak enrollment 260 students
High transience
High level of poverty
98% of students AboriginalStaff, principal, parents and elders developed their beliefsstudents referred to the principal for counseling or bottom lineThe following graph represent information about the number of students sent to the office for discipline problemsThe data has been corrected to an enrollment of 241 students.December is often a difficult month for our students. The anticipation created in the media is not their reality. Christmas is a time of disappointment! February was a month of changes - staff away sick, lost of classrooms.Twenty five staff members, parents and our elder attended the 2 day workshop “Restitution 1”. After this workshop our incidents of discipline began to drop every month. In September with 150 new students we had to begin the process again realized the same decrease in discipline problems.
Princess Alexandra Community SchoolSaskatoon, SK
R
Princess Alexandra Community SchoolSeptember 1999 – June 2003
0
10
20
30
40
1999-2000
Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
2001-2002
2000-2001
Restitution WorkshopMarch 2000
2002-2003
R
Princess Alexandra Community School UpdateIn 1998, only 7 % of our students in grade 4 performed at the 50 percentile on the Canadian Achievement Test (CAT).In 2000, 40% of our students in grade 4 performed at the 50 percentile on the Canadian Achievement Test (CAT).In 2002, 55% of our grade 4 students are at or above the 50% percentile on the Canadian Achievement Test (CAT).
Princess Alexandra Community SchoolAchievement Results 1998-2002
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Per
cent
age
of S
tude
nt
50th Percentile
That means that over 50% our students are doing as well or better than the average Canadian grade 4 student.As of the spring 2002, we can say that all our grade 1 students can read, compare to 50% in 2000.We are on target for our goals;1. To have all grade 1 students read at grade level by 2004.2.To have all our students k – 4 performing at or above grade level by 2005.3.To close the gap in our senior students’ performance to less than 2 years behind grade level by 2005. (Now, a 5 years gap is common).
R
Jeannette Myhre Elementary SchoolBismarck, ND
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
96-97 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01
Year
No
. o
f In
cid
en
ts
Fighting Language Disrespect
Grades: K to 6 Average 410 to 430 students Urban school with high poverty - 55%.
R
1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-Apr 02
ÈcoleJ.H. Sissons, Yellowknife, NTOut of School Suspensions 1998-2002
49
33
27
3
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Year
Nu
mb
er o
f S
usp
en
sio
ns
R
Reindeer Lake School – Nursery–Gr. 12 – 375 students
Southend, SK (8 hours North of Saskatoon, SK)
Totals: Aug 2001-Mar 2002 = 262 (Year 336)Aug 2002-Mar 2003 = 89 (decrease of 66%)
Staff Training:Restitution I – Yves Bousquet – Aug 2002Restitution II – Ted Amendt - Mar 2003
01020304050607080
Months
Num
ber
of S
uspe
nsio
ns
2001/2002
2002/2003