Psychster robert wilson_onfacebook_june2012_v2_updated
-
Upload
psychster -
Category
Technology
-
view
843 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Psychster robert wilson_onfacebook_june2012_v2_updated
Robert WilsonWashington University in St. Louis
Facebook in the Social Sciences: What do we know and where do we
go?
6.22.2012 webinar hosted by:David C. Evans Ph.D. [email protected] Psychster Inc.psychster.com@Psychster
Contact our speaker:Robert Wilson [email protected] facebookinthesocialsciences.org
Psychster Inc.Psychster Labs Presents
Psychster Inc.
901 million monthly active users125 billion friend connections 300 million photos uploaded per day80% of our monthly active users are outside the U.S. and Canada. 3500+ employeesValued at about $100 billion
face
book
.com
Psychster Inc.
What has empirical research in the social sciences discovered about Facebook?
Purpose of today’s talk…
“The biggest challenges Facebook has to solve are the same challenges [faced by] the social sciences” -Cameron Marlow Head of FB Data Team
MIT Technology Review
Psychster Inc.
REVIEW OF THE FACEBOOK LITERATURE
Conducted with Sam Gosling and Lindsay Graham
Wilson, R.E., Gosling, S.D., & Graham, L.T. (2012). A review of Facebook research in the social sciences. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 7(3), 203 - 220
This is the first major review of the Facebook literature
Psychster Inc.
To be included as relevant in our final review, a source must have:
1.specifically investigated Facebook
2.been published in a peer-reviewed academic journal or peer-reviewed conference proceedings
3.reported empirical findings
Psychster Inc.Cartoon by Randall Munroe
Psychster Inc.
Who studies Facebook?
• Scholars of law, economics, sociology, and psychology, to information technology, management, marketing, and computer-mediated communication.
• A large international presence• In short….everyone is trying to
better understand the impact of Facebook
Psychster Inc.
Why study Facebook?
1. Behavior residue leaves concrete, observable data.
2. To understand contemporary society, social scientists must study Facebook.
3. Necessary to carefully examine the positive and negative effects of Facebook on society.
Psychster Inc.
Psychster Inc.
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
0 19
22
70
138
226
412
Users and Articles: Totals by Year To
tal U
sers
(mill
ions
)
Tot
al #
of A
rticl
esusers
articles
22,000 commercial organizations allowed to join
Feb, 2004: FB founded at Harvard
LAUNCH DATE OF FEATURES:
FB Wall FB Photos FB Mobile, News Feed, and API
FB Platform and Video
FB in Spanish, French, and German.Launch of FB Connect
Introduction of the ‘Like’ button and FB Payments
Launch of FB Places
Launch of Timeline and video calling
800 college networks allowed to join
FB expands to Stanford, Columbia, and Yale
FB expands to add high school networks
Anyone over 13 yrs with an email allowed to join
Psychster Inc.
5 Key questions
1. Who is using Facebook and what are users doing while on Facebook?
2. Why do people use Facebook? 3. How are people presenting
themselves on Facebook?4. How is Facebook affecting
relationships among groups and individuals?
5. Why are people disclosing personal information on Facebook despite potential risks?
Psychster Inc.
Psychster Inc.
Facebook Stats: average user has 130 friends contributes 90 pieces of content per month connected to an average of 80 community pages, groups, and events
Who is using Facebook and what are users doing while on Facebook?
http://newsroom.fb.com/
Psychster Inc.
Facebook Data Team
• 12 person team of in-house researchers• Have full access to the anonymized web logs of all Facebook users• They plan on doubling their staff this year
MIT Technology Review, Facebook Data Team
Psychster Inc.
N = 721 million users, 69 billion friendships
(a) 92% of users were connected by only four degrees of separation
(b) researchers found a curvilinear, highly skewed distribution such that 20% of users had fewer than 25 friends, 50% of users had over 100 friends, and a small percentage of people had close to 5,000 friends
(c) the average number of Facebook friends in the United States was 214
Facebook Data Team 2 recent studies with the Universita degli Studi di Milano
Psychster Inc.
1)Recruitment of participants in offline contexts
2)Recruitment of participants via Facebook applications
3)Data crawling of public info
Research Methods
Ninety-seven (24%) of the 412 articles in our reviewfocused on descriptive analysis of Facebook users
Psychster Inc.
• n = 77,954 • In the U.S., the breakdown of ethnicities on Facebook has grown more diverse over time and currently mirrors the proportions represented in the U.S. population
Demographic Findings
Chang, Rosenn, Backstrom, & Marlow, 2010http://www.viewsoftheworld.net/?p=1011
Psychster Inc.
Top 5 countries- U.S. (155 million)- Indonesia (36.6 million)- U.K. (29.8 million)- India (25.5 million)- Turkey (28.4 million)
Demographic Findings
Carmichael, 2011For a breakdown of users by continent, see www.internetworldstats.com/facebook. htm).
Psychster Inc.
Seventy-eight (19%) articles examined what motivates peopleto use Facebook.
2. Why do people use Facebook?
Psychster Inc.
Weak verses strong tiesSocial grooming?
To keep in touch with friends?
= ?
Psychster Inc.
It’s complex Active verses passive FB use
Minimizing loneliness?
Burke et al., 2010Wise, Alhabash, & Park, 2010
Psychster Inc.
Facebook use remained high regardless of how busy people were
Relieve boredom?
Pempek, Yermolayeva, & Calvert, 2009
Psychster Inc.
Internal motives and external influence
54% of interactions between pairs of users who interact infrequently were directly attributable to Facebook’s birthday reminder feature
What motivates people to contribute content?
Viswanath et al., 2009
Psychster Inc.
Fifty (12%) of the articles in our review investigated identity presentation
Identity presentation centers on the user profile
3. How are people presenting themselves on Facebook?
Psychster Inc.
Researchers tested whether profiles represented idealized virtual identities or accurate portrayals of the users’ personalities
Are users presenting themselves accurately on Facebook?
Gosling, Gaddis, & Vazire, 2007Back et al., 2010
Strangers’ ratings of participants based solely on the participants’ user profiles were compared with an accuracy criterion and with participants’ ideal-self ratings.
Takeaway: Facebook profiles convey fairly accurate personality impressions of profile owners
Psychster Inc.
1)Friendships usually start offline2)People generally want to be
seen by others as they see themselves
3)Contributions by others is difficult to control
Why might people present themselves accurately?
Psychster Inc.
But might some people self-enhance? What about narcissists? Can you spot the self-enhancer?
Buffardi & Campbell, 2008
Psychster Inc.
A curvilinear relationship exists between a user’s number of friends and observers’ ratings of the user’s attractiveness and extraversion the attractiveness of the people leavingposts on a user’s wall affected impressions of the user
Content contribution by others
Walther, Van Der Heide, Hamel, & Shulman, 2009
Psychster Inc.
Research on social interactions was studied frequently, in 112 (27%) articles.
Positive and negative impacts between:Student-faculty; employee-management; business-customer; doctor-patient; ect.
How is Facebook affecting relationshipsamong groups and individuals?
Psychster Inc.
FB involvement shown to increase customer activity FB gives businesses instant customer feedback
Impact for business-customer relationship
Dholakia & Durham, 2010Pantano, Tavernise, & Viassone, 2010
Psychster Inc.
Students predicted a positive classroom environment and high motivation when a teacher shared more personal information on his or her Facebook profile page But other literature warns of being seen as “creepy” only 4% of users’ wall posting refer to education, and the vast majority of students report not contacting university staff for any reason A thorough review of this area exists (Hew, 2011)
Impact for student-faculty relationship
Lipka, 2007; Madge, Meek, Wellens, & Hooley, 2009 ; Mazer, Murphy, & Simonds, 2009; Selwyn, 2009
Psychster Inc.
Impact for business-employee relationship
Evaluating job candidates on Facebook?
Employers can inadvertently learn about a candidate’s marital status, age, and other off-limits info
These are topics that are not legal bases for hiring decisions according to equal opportunity laws in the United States
Karl, Peluchette, & Schlaegel, 2010a, 2010b; Kluemper & Rosen, 2009
Psychster Inc.
Some applicants are judged with disproportionate severity when they post inappropriate material.Ex. females typically judged more harshly
Takeaways: a)Don’t post inappropriate
material on FBb)Employers may be open to
discrimination lawsuits
Impact for business-employee relationship
Psychster Inc.
Users’ friends on Facebook often include overlapping social groups (e.g., family, friends, employers)Does this overlap cause tension? Users implement a number of strategies to mitigate tension
Tension across social spheres on FB?
Lampinen et al., 2009
Psychster Inc.
Research on privacy and personal information disclosure was the focus of 75 articles (18%) in our review.Facebook is only as good as the content that users shareMotivation to promote sharing Balanced with concern for privacy
5. Why are people disclosing personalinformation on Facebook despite potential risks?
Psychster Inc.
Over 50% of participants provided their current address and 40% of participants provided their phone number, but only a handful of individuals changed the highly permissive privacy settings
Awareness of privacy and security issues had increased over time But a disparity between users’ privacy concerns and behaviorEx. 16% of respondents who reported being “very worried” about the possibility that a stranger knew where they lived and the location of their classes still revealed both pieces of information on their Facebook profile
Privacy perception studies
Acquisti & Gross, 2006
Psychster Inc.
Privacy concerns were primarily determined by the perceived likelihood of a privacy violation and much less by the expected damage
Privacy concerns and disclosure were not negatively correlated, suggesting that they may not be two ends of the same spectrum but independent behaviors influenced by different aspects of personality
The privacy paradox
Krasnova, Kolesnikova, & Guenther, 2009; Christofides et al., 2009; McKnight, Lankton, & Tripp, 2011
Psychster Inc.
An influence of social learning on information disclosure
New members were closely monitoring and adapting to what their friends were doing and that the experiences in the first 2 weeks predicted long-term sharing.
The privacy paradox
Psychster Inc.
1. Who is using Facebook and what are users doing while on Facebook?
2. Why do people use Facebook? 3. How are people presenting
themselves on Facebook?4. How is Facebook affecting
relationships among groups and individuals?
5. Why are people disclosing personal information on Facebook despite potential risks?
CONCLUSIONS
Psychster Inc.
Facebook represents a fundamental shift in the role of the Internet in daily life
Research has been revealing but much remains to be discovered
We are maintaining a website that provides researchers with a rolling bibliography of Facebook articles. Facebookinthesocialsciences.org
Continuing Research
Psychster Inc.
Bibliography of social networking sites - maintained by danah boyd: http://www.danah.org/researchBibs/sns.php
Facebook Data Team website: http://www.facebook.com/data
FB Data Team’s most recent publications. http://www.facebook.com/data/app_190322544333196
The Facebook Project – A great general resource site http://www.thefacebookproject.com/about/index.html
Internet Research Ethics - A resource on best practice internet research methods and ethical considerations: http://internetresearchethics.org/
World distribution stats of Facebook users: http://www.internetworldstats.com/facebook.htm
Useful Links
Psychster Inc.
Thank you!
Info:http://facebookinthesocialsciences.org/
Paper:Your school library or
http://pps.sagepub.com/content/7/3/203
Recording:http://psychster.com
Psychster Labs:[email protected]
@Psychster
Robert WilsonWashington University in St. Louis