Project Review PG BO Oe/# OOJWFSTBSZ 'VOE ...52470feb-ebd6-4fb3-9d14...Project Review PG BO Oe/#...
3
Project Review PG BO Oe/# "OOJWFSTBSZ 'VOE "QQMJDBUJPO Note: You may fill in and submit the peer review online (see link Review Procedure). 1 Alternatively, send the filled-in form by e-mail to: [email protected]. Reviewer: I herewith declare that I am IMPARTIAL and OBJECTIVE with respect to assessing this funding application. Priority of the research topic high priority medium priority low priority Scientific quality Points (0–100) Categories: 95–100 pts: &xcellent Special recommendation for funding 85–94 pts: 7ery good Application features minor deficiencies 75–84 pts: (ood Application features deficiencies that 50–74 pts: 1PPS Application features major deficiencies Less than 49 pts: *OBEFRVBUF Application features basic Explanation PG SFWJTJPO: I could give a revised application an excellent score. Revision of the application Yes No Financial aspects The requested funding amounts are ... appropriate too high (provide an explanation in the written statement of the peer review form) Proposal number: 1 You will find general information for peer reviewers under the link downloads. page 1/3 can be redressed Research institution:
Transcript of Project Review PG BO Oe/# OOJWFSTBSZ 'VOE ...52470feb-ebd6-4fb3-9d14...Project Review PG BO Oe/#...
Project Review of an OeNB Anniversary Fund Application Note: You may fill in and submit the peer review online (see link Review Procedure).1
Alternatively, send the filled-in form by e-mail to: [email protected].
Reviewer:
I herewith declare that I am IMPARTIAL and OBJECTIVE with respect to assessing this funding application.
Priority of the research topic
high priority medium priority low priority
Scientific quality
Points (0–100)Categories:
95–100 pts: ExcellentSpecial recommendation for funding
85–94 pts: Very good Application features minor deficiencies
75–84 pts: GoodApplication features deficiencies that
50–74 pts: PoorApplication features major deficiencies
Less than 49 pts: Inadequate Application features basic
Explanation of revision:
I could give a revised application an excellent score.
Revision of the application
Yes No
Financial aspects
The requested funding amounts are ...
appropriate too high (provide an explanation in the written statement of the peer review form)
Proposal number:
1 You will find general information for peer reviewers under the link downloads.
page 1/3
can be redressed
Research institution:
Peer Review of Anniversary Fund Application No.:Written Statement Explaining the Assessment2
page 2/3
Priority of the research topic: (1000 characters)
Scientif ic quality: (2500 characters)
2 Note: The written statements under “Priority of the research topic,” “Scientif ic quality” and “Financial aspects” are
transmitted to the applicants in anonymous form after the descision has been made. The score and statements under
“Other comments for the Anniversary Fund” are not transmitted to the applicants.
Place, date
page 3/3
Financial aspects: (500 characters)
Other comments for the Anniversary Fund (will not be transmitted to the applicants). 2500 characters)
Peer Review of Anniversary Fund Application No.:
