Project Report Edappally-Kuttippuram

1Project Description1.1 GeneralMinistry of Shipping, Road Transport and Highways, Government of India has decided to take up the development of various National Highways stretches/Corridors under NHDP Phase III program in the country concerning upgrading of capacity, safety, riding quality etc. to international standards by four/ six-laning of highway stretches/ Corridors together with major Port connectivity. NHAI has been entrusted to implement the development projects for few selected stretches/ corridors either through Public-Private Partnership (PPP) basis or its own budgetary sources or loans from ADB, World Bank etc. The NHAI has accordingly taken up project preparation of certain stretches/ corridors of existing National Highways passing through various states of the country. The stretch of 111.73 km from Kuttipuram to Edapally of NH 17 in the state of Kerala is a part of the NHDP-III projects. National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) will be the employer and executing agency for the consultancy services and the standards of output required from the appointed consultants are of international level both in terms of quality and adherence to the agreed time schedule. M/s Wilbur Smith Associates Inc. USA in joint venture (JV) with Wilbur Smith Associates Private Limited have been entrusted by NHAI the task of carrying out the Feasibility Studies and Environmental and Social Impact Assessment including preparation of Detailed Project Report for rehabilitation and upgrading to 4/6 lane divided highway. This report deals with essentially of Project Report for rehabilitation and upgrading of a stretch of 111.73 km on NH-17 in the state of Kerala to 4/6 lane divided highway.

1.2 Project OutlineThe project essentially consists of conducting Feasibility Studies and Environmental and Social Impact Assessment including preparation of Detailed Project Report for rehabilitation and upgrading of a stretch of 111.73km on NH-17 in the state of Kerala to 4/6 lane divided highway. Kodungallur bypass is excluded from the scope of work since it is executed by PWD, NH Division.

Wilbur Smith Associates Inc. USA In Joint Venture With Wilbur Smith Associates Pvt. Ltd.

1. 1

National Highways Authority of India

Four Laning of NH-17 from Kuttipuram-Edapally in the State of Kerala under NHDP Phase III on BOT Basis

Project Report

1.3 ObjectiveThe objectives of the present project covering the stretch of 111.73 km of NH-17 (Kuttipuram Edapally ) in the state of Kerala include the following: To establish the technical, economical, environmental, social, and financial feasibility of the project and prepare detailed project reports for rehabilitation and upgrading of the existing 2-lane National Highway (NH) sections to 4-lane divided carriageway configuration. The viability of the project designed as a partially access controlled facility shall be established taking into account the requirements with regard to rehabilitation, upgrading and improvement based on highway design, pavement design, provision of service roads wherever necessary, type of intersections, underpasses/flyovers/ROBs, rehabilitation and widening of existing and/or construction of new bridges and structures, road safety features, quantities of various items of works and cost estimates vis--vis the investment and financial return through toll and other revenue. The Detailed Project Report (DPR) would inter-alia include detailed highway design, design of pavement and overlay with options for flexible or rigid pavements, design of bridges and cross drainage structures, design of service roads, quantities of various items, detailed working drawings, detailed cost estimates, economic and financial viability analysis, environmental and social feasibility, environmental and social action plans as appropriate and documents required for tendering the project on commercial basis for international/Local competitive bidding. Detailed project preparation incorporating aspects of value engineering, quality audit and safety audit requirement in design and execution. Scope of Services The scope of services as per section 3 and 4 of the ToR, include the following: Collection of all secondary data & review of data and documents related to the project roads and project influence area. Detailed reconnaissance survey Inventory and condition surveys for existing road & pavement, cross drainage structures and bridges. Identification of possible improvement of the existing alignment, central widening/one side widening, by-pass, service roads, etc with alternatives and evaluation, shifting of utilities, trees to be felled and planted and land acquisition requirements on Strip Plan (Topo Maps/Satellite Images). Identification of problem areas, where widening may not physical/environmental/social constraints within the parameters of TOR. be possible for

Environmental and social studies and impact assessment including mitigation measures and resettlement studies. Traffic surveys, Toll Rate & Willingness to Pay Toll surveys & Axle Load surveys including demand forecasting for the next 30 years and assessment of Vehicle Damage Factor (VDF) as well as Capacity Assessment based on IRC 64-2001 and compare the Highway Capacity Manual and RUCS. Topography survey, pavement investigations, material and geotechnical investigations.Wilbur Smith Associates Inc. USA In Joint Venture With Wilbur Smith Associates Pvt. Ltd. National Highways Authority of India 1. 2


Project Report

Detailed design of horizontal and vertical alignment including cross sections, pavement structure, intersections, cross drainage structures and bridges, flyovers, interchanges, railway over bridges, user oriented facility along the road (road side amenities), road and other appurtenances. Detailed project preparation incorporating value engineering, quality audit and safety audit requirement in design and implementation. Obtain all necessary clearance required for implementation of the project on the ground from the concerned agencies. The client shall provide the necessary supporting letters and any official fees as per the demand note issued by the concerned agencies from whom the clearances are being sought to enable implementation. Rate analysis of non-schedule items, detailed quantity takeoff, BOQ and cost estimates. Economic and financial analysis with financing options like BOT, Annuity, SPV etc. Preparation of separate documents for BOT as well as EPC contracts for each DPR assignments.

1.4 ApproachThe Consultants approach to the project will be in accordance with the Description of Services given in the Contract Document, understanding of the project objectives and further discussions with the Client during progress of the project study. The main objective of this consultancy service comprise of the following:

1. The widening work shall be within the existing ROW avoiding land acquisition, and retaining the existing pavement, cross drainage structures and bridges as far as possible within the requirement of IRC/ MOSRT&H guidelines. 2. Evolve the most economical but sound proposals for the required roadwork and related bridge works. 3. Carry out engineering, economic, environmental and social feasibility studies of the proposed road improvements keeping in view the aspect of PublicPrivate Partnership (PPP) and BOT / Annuity. 4. Incorporate International best practices including use of state of the art and computer based survey and design techniques (e.g. GPS, Total Station Survey, computer aided designs (MX/MOSS/Equivalent, etc) for preparation of the technical proposal, development of designs, cost estimates, bid documents, etc. 5. Prepare preliminary designs of the agreed road and related bridge works as a basis for completing Environmental Assessment (EA) and Social Impact Assessments (SIA) of Project Affected Persons (PAP) as required, conforming to sound economic analysis. Also preparing land acquisition, social and environmental action plans such as Resettlement Action Plan (RAP), as appropriate.


National Highways Authority of India 1. 3


Project Report

6. Conduct detailed engineering design of the proposed road and bridge works and prepare suitable number of bid documents required for tendering through International Competitive Bidding (ICB). 7. Provide reports and analysis suitable for meeting the standards and specifications laid down according to MOSRT&H, MOEF, CPWD, Government of India and ADB requirements on environmental and social assessments.

1.5 Project RoadThe total project stretch(111.73 km) is located in the state of Kerala, an important state in the southern part of India between Latitudes of 750 55 & 760 20 and between Longitudes of 100 10 32 & 100 55. The State is bounded by Karnataka in the North and East; by the Arabian Sea in the West and by Tamilnadu in the East and South. Kerala State comprises of 14 districts extending over an area of 38864 sq.km. The project stretch connects Kuttipuram( km 318+000) on Northern side and Edapally km 438+600 (Design Ch. Km 428+940) in the southern side and passing through Malapuram ,Thrissur and Ernakulam districts. It also leads to Mangalore, Goa and Mumbai from Kuttipuram, forming an important link connecting northern districts of Kerala which includes Kozhicode, Kannur, Kasargod and Wayanad. NH-17 links to southern districts of Kerala via. NH-47. Kerala State is an important tourist destination due to its beaches along its coast and generates heavy tourist volume throughout the year. It is an important and picturesque state in the southern part of India. It traverses generally through plain terrain (98%) and about 2% through rolling terrain. Mixed land use of residential and agricultural can be seen through out the project road corridor. It also passes through many villages and towns. The unique feature of Kerala is its wide spread residential development and ribbon development along the Highway Corridor. The entire Kerala state can be termed as semi-urban. The location of the project stretch is illustrated in Figure 1.1. Kodungallur bypass is excluded from the scope of work since it is executed by PWD, NH Division




Project Report

Figure 1.1: Location Map of Project Road

1.5.1

Terrain and Land Use

The project road starts from km 318+000 at Kuttipuram , runs parallel to coastal line and ends at Edapally at km 438+600 (Design Ch. Km 428+940) where it joins NH 47. For a small section between Kuttipuram and Ponnani the project road runs towards the coast, parallel to Bharatapuzha river. In general terrain is plain for a short length near Kuttipuram (km 320+000 to km 323+000) where it is rolling terrain. Land use along the alignment is mixed with residential, commercial and agricultural. Many religious structures also exist on the project corridor., (Plate 1.1 & 1.2)




Project Report

Plate 1.1: Built-up Areas Plate 1.2: Agricultural Areas

1.5.2

Important Towns and Villages

The project road passes through nine major towns and many villages. The major towns along the project road are listed below in Table 1.1 Table 1.1 Major Towns along the project road Existing Chainage Sl No 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Name of Village Ponnani Chavakkad Vadanapally Triprayar Kaipamangalam Mathilakam Kodungallur Paravoor Edapally (km) 337+600 362+600 377+650 384+200 394+600 400+800 409+800 422+400 438+400 Design Chainage (km) 331+100 356+300 370+800 377+510 387+180 399+100 403+210 413+800 429+400

1.5.3

Carriage way and Formation

The existing road is an intermediate/two-lane carriageway of flexible pavement varying from 5.3 m to 7.5 m (except for a small stretch between Kuttipuram to Thavanur where the carriageway is having only single lane width). Gravel shoulder of 1.0 m to 2.0 m wide has been provided on either side for the entire length. The carriageway is generally in good condition with respect to the riding quality except for Kuttipuram Ponnani section where the condition of the road is bad.

1.5.4

Pavement condition

Pavement condition is generally fair to poor throughout the corridor except for a few section where condition of pavement is good. The occurrence of alligator cracks, shrinkage cracks, raveling and rutting are observed for entire stretch. Patching is observed about 10% of the total section. From the condition survey data, a subjective rating in the form of Condition Index (CI) values has been calculated on the basis of various surface distress measurements. CI values have been arrived at by summing each distress value and suitably subtracting it from 100. The lesser the CI value, more prominent are the effects of various surface distresses.Wilbur Smith Associates Inc. USA In Joint Venture With Wilbur Smith Associates Pvt. Ltd. National Highways Authority of India 1. 6


Project Report

1.5.5

Right of way

Existing right of way of 8m to 30m. ROW pillars are missing at many Places. Table 1.2: Details of existing ROW Existing Chainage (km) From 318.000 320.000 322.000 324.000 326.000 328.000 330.000 332.000 334.000 336.000 338.000 340.000 342.000 344.000 346.000 348.000 350.000 352.000 354.000 356.000 358.000 360.000 362.000 364.000 366.000 368.000 370.000 372.000 374.000 376.000 378.000 380.000 To 320.000 322.000 324.000 326.000 328.000 330.000 332.000 334.000 336.000 338.000 340.000 342.000 344.000 346.000 348.000 350.000 352.000 354.000 356.000 358.000 360.000 362.000 364.000 366.000 368.000 370.000 372.000 374.000 376.000 378.000 380.000 382.000 Length (m) 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 Average ROW (m) Left 16.86 5.00 4.50 4.82 4.55 4.47 5.42 4.28 5.32 4.87 6.83 12.02 13.88 8.73 7.39 7.41 6.40 6.05 6.78 6.66 7.51 6.50 6.94 5.56 7.62 13.74 11.46 8.78 8.48 8.35 10.27 10.70 Right 20.23 5.91 4.43 4.41 4.37 4.29 5.98 4.41 5.29 4.51 7.90 17.70 10.73 7.30 8.49 7.62 5.76 5.67 6.89 7.35 7.42 6.54 7.36 5.44 6.16 11.21 9.91 8.07 8.11 10.60 9.67 11.40 Total 38.01 13.03 10.63 10.03 8.92 8.76 13.99 8.68 11.37 10.73 17.26 32.49 24.87 16.03 15.88 15.03 12.15 11.72 13.67 14.01 14.94 13.05 15.03 12.06 15.20 27.57 21.37 16.85 16.58 18.94 19.94 24.55




Project Report

Existing Chainage (km) From 382.000 384.000 386.000 388.000 390.000 392.000 394.000 396.000 398.000 400.000 402.000 404.000 406.000 408.000 410.000 412.000 414.000 416.000 418.000 420.000 422.000 424.000 426.000 428.000 430.000 432.000 434.000 436.000 To 384.000 386.000 388.000 390.000 392.000 394.000 396.000 398.000 400.000 402.000 404.000 406.000 408.000 410.000 412.000 414.000 416.000 418.000 420.000 422.000 424.000 426.000 428.000 430.000 432.000 434.000 436.000 438.600

Length (m) 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000

Average ROW (m) Left 12.01 9.04 10.04 7.49 9.15 8.73 9.08 8.30 7.09 7.27 6.49 7.32 6.18 6.26 5.61 13.17 7.09 3.86 5.64 4.79 4.83 5.62 5.11 6.45 12.85 16.24 9.53 11.15 Right 11.20 9.51 8.77 7.74 7.93 8.38 7.18 8.21 6.78 6.44 8.05 6.51 6.04 6.50 5.58 13.87 6.82 3.88 4.90 4.73 4.34 5.53 4.44 6.33 12.40 11.92 10.50 4.74 Total 25.54 20.22 20.73 16.85 18.73 19.32 18.17 18.99 15.82 14.50 14.78 13.83 12.82 13.59 11.29 29.08 13.09 7.74 10.77 9.52 9.44 11.14 9.55 13.03 29.73 21.39 20.33 16.09

1.5.6

Horizontal and Vertical Geometry

Horizontal geometry of NH-17 is inferior mainly at seven stretches at km 320+000 - km 323+000, km 377+000 - km 378+000, km 385+000 km 393+000, km 404+000 km 411+000, km 414+500 km 424+000, km 426+000 km 428+000 and km 435+000 km 438+600. Geometric deficiencies at these stretches are due to the presence of number of reverse curves and single curves having insufficient radius and lack of sight distance due to the buildings and compound walls projecting on to the road. Presence of these stretches makes travel on NH17 unsafe, particularly due to the movement of over speeding of buses. There are 62 curvesWilbur Smith Associates Inc. USA In Joint Venture With Wilbur Smith Associates Pvt. Ltd. National Highways Authority of India 1. 8


Project Report

having design speed below the required standard. Some of those curves are shown in Plates 1.3 to 1.6. Vertical geometry of the entire length of the project is found satisfactory except for a small stretch of km 320+000 km 323+000 but this has no significance on the improvement proposal because of the Ponnani bypass.

Plate 1.3: Sharp Curve at km 377+700 Plate 1.4: Sharp Curve at km 389+900

Plate 1.5 :Sharp Curve at km 396+800

Plate 1.6: Sharp Curve at km 432+200

1.5.7

Drainage Condition

The project road falls on heavy rainfall area with average annual rain fall more than 1500mm The existing drainage condition along the project road is fair to poor. Details of drains available are given in Table 1-3

Table 1.3 Summary of Details of Existing Drains Sl No 1 2 3 4 Type of Drain Lined Drain Earthern Drain Stone Masonry Built-up Drain Length (m) 30.8 1.4 0.8 3 Width (m) 0.3-0.5 0.3-0.75 0.75-1 0.75




Project Report

Plate 1.7: Built up Drain

Plate 1.8: Lined Drain

1.5.8

Intersections

There are 17 numbers of major junctions and 33 other important junctions present on the project road. In addition to this, a large number minor crossroads are present along the project corridor which leads to intermediate villages. Plate 1.9 to 1.12 shows some of the intersections along the project road

Plate 1.9: Kuttipuram Junction at km 318+050

Plate 1.10: Chamravattom Junction km 334+800

Plate 1.11: Ponnani Bypass End Junction at km 340+600

Plate 1.12: Chavakkad Junction at 363+200

1.5.9 Utilities

The major utilities along the corridor are




Project Report

OFC cables of BSNL, Reliance Telephone cables, Cables of Bharathi Cellular Ltd, Cables of Asianet Satellite Communications etc Water Supply pipe lines of Kerala Water Authority, Government of Kerala Electric posts, overhead cables, transformers etc

Utilities are laid continuously through the entire length of corridors. Relocation of these utilities are a major issue.

1.5.10 Bridges and Cross Drainage StructuresThere are 15 Bridges and 124 culverts along the project stretch. Table 1.4 : Bridges and Culverts along the Project Stretch Particulars NH 17 (Existing Road) NH 17 (Existing Road Falling Within Project Stretch) Existing 5 3 91 189 Number of Bridges & Culverts along Bypasses/Realignment Proposed 4 4 82

Major bridges Minor bridges Culverts

8 7 124

Total number of Structures to be widened/constructed

1.5.11 Structures of Religious / Archeological ImportanceMany religious structures are seen on either side of the project road. Kodungallur temple, Cheraman mosque etc are major among them (Plate 1.13 & 1.14). The alignment at these locations has to be carefully decided with minimum disturbance. Guruvayur temple, a major religious centre in South India, is only 2 km away from the project corridor (near Chavakkad.

Plate 1.13 : Cheraman Mosque at 410+570

Plate 1.14: Kodungallur temple at 408+550

1.5.12 Existing facilitiesThe list of existing facilities along the project road are listed in Table 1.5 and Table 1.6 Table 1.5 :List of Existing facilitiesWilbur Smith Associates Inc. USA In Joint Venture With Wilbur Smith Associates Pvt. Ltd. National Highways Authority of India 1. 11


Project Report

Sl No 1 2 3 4 5 6

facilities Bus stops Petrol pump Truck lay bay Toll plaza Rest Area Service Road 20 (LHS) 17(Bothsides) 24 Nil

Nos

3(km 369+125, km 411+900, km 430+800) Nil 1. km 408+200 to km 408+400 Service road of 7.1 m on RHS, 1.2m median separating carriageway and service road 2. km 408+400 to km 408+600 Service road of 6.7m.

Table 1.6: Location of Petrol Pump SL No 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 420+450 423+000 427+600 435+400 407+860 408+800 415+700 420+280 420+425 408+800 395+635 397+550 404+830 388+600 394+950 383+450 384+300 384+750 363+200 373+975 376+800 378+200 LHS(km) 336+000 340+200 359+210 RHS(km)

1.5.13 Other Features Properly planned, wayside amenities are non-existent on the project stretch. Reasonable bus and truck traffic are observed along the project road. A detailed study has been conducted for various amenities like rest areas, parking buses, bus shelters, lay-byes for sick vehicles and other user related facilities.




Project Report

1.6 Improvement Proposals Detailed analysis of the deficiencies and the suggested improvements are discussed in detail in later Chapters. A brief description of the proposed improvements in given below.

1.6.1 Bypasses The necessity of bypass is considered at many places. The feasibility and viability of these has been assessed after collecting and analyzing the field data. The built up areas with crowded commercial activities with immediate demand for bypasses are at Ponnani, Chavakkad, Vadanapally, Trpirayar-Valappad, Chendrappinni, Moonnupeedika, Mathilakam Section 1 and 2, Kodungallur, Paravur, Edapally-Manjumelkkavala.. Summary of the proposed bypasses is listed in Table 1.7.

Table 1.7: Summary of Proposed Bypasses Name of bypass Existing Chainage (km) Start Chainage 319+450 363+200 377+000 383+850 390+000 395+300 398+700 405+500 407+700 414+450 435+000 End Chainage 340+350 365+400 380+200 387+200 391+900 397+250 403+000 406+060 411+800 426+160 438+600 Design Chainage (km) Start Chainage 319+060 356+300 370+200 377+310 383+280 388+350 391+850 398+750 401+100 406+890 425+300 End Chainage 333+715 358+800 373+600 380+510 385+230 390+490 396+335 399+220 404+135 417+400 428+620 Length

Ponnani Chavakkad Vadanapally Trpirayar-Valappad Chendrappinni Moonnupeedika Mathilakam Section 1 Mathilakam Section 2 Kodungallur Paravur, EdapallyManjumelkkavala

14.655 2.45 3.5 3.2 1.95 2.14 4.485 0.47 3.035 10.51 3.32

1.6.2 Widening ProposalsBased on traffic considerations, geometric standards and existing site conditions it is proposed to widen the project road into a 4 lane carriageway of the following configuration. Median : 4.5m/1.2m Median Shyaway : 0.25m Shyaway at divider : 0.25m Main Carriageway in each direction : 7m ( 2 x 3.5m Lane) Service Road: 5.5m or 7m Paved Shoulder : 1.5m Earthen Shoulder : 2.0m Earthen Drain of suitable dimension Proposed ROW: 45m

Typical Cross Sections The Consultants have proposed a ROW of 45m based on settlement pattern, Land-use, Nature of Built-up and Socially sensitive structures. Widening scheme for the proposed project road are arrived based on, Lane requirement based on traffic capacity analysis Requirement of service roads along built-up areasNational Highways Authority of India 1. 13



Project Report

Proposed widening / Cross section types are represented below in Table 1.8 respectively. Table 1.8: Proposed Widening Type / CSExisting Road Sl. No Widening Type/ CS Length in m

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9Bypass Sl. No

Concentric widening without Service Road(median 2m)-1A Eccentric widening without Service Road ( median 2m)-1B New Four lane without Service Road (median 2m)-1C Concentric widening with Service Road (median 2m)-2A Eccentric widening with 7m Service Road(median 2m)-2B New Four lane with 7m Service Road on both side(median 2m)-2C New Four lane with 7m Service Road on LHS (median 2m)-2D Underpass Approach with 4.5 median with 5.5m Slip Road-3B Underpass Approach at 318+090 with 5.5m Slip Road-3CWidening Type/ CS

14430.00 15820.00 6290.00 6080.00 7380.00 4690.00 1590.00 650.00 680.00Length in m

1 2 3 4 5

RHS widening without Service Road in bypass (median 4.5m)-1D New Four lane in bypass(4.5 m median)-1E New Four lane with 7m Service Road in bypass(4.5 m median )-2E Underpass Approach with 4.5m median and 5.5m Slip Road-3A ROB Approach (3D)

2255.00 22225.00 14635.00 8925.00 610.00

1.6.3 Pavement DesignPavement is designed based on MOSRTH/IRC standards. A Design life of 15 years is adopted for Flexible Pavement. Based on traffic analysis it is proposed to have design traffic as follows: Table 1.9: Design Traffic for main carriage waySections Design Traffic (MSA)

Section I: From km 317+710 To km 357+250 (From km 318+000 To km 363+000) Section II: From km 357+250 To km 402+940 (From km 363+000 To km 407+000) Section III: From km 402+940 To km 428+620 (From km 407+000 To km 438+600) For Service roads- 10.0 msa is adopted. Design of Flexible Pavement

20 35 45

Proposed pavement composition for pavement for the project road, as per IRC: 37 are given below in Table 1.10.

Due to the variations observed in the characteristic deflection values along the project road, different compositions of pavement layers have been designed for overlay as shown in the Table 1.10 as per IRC - 81.Table 1.10: Flexible Pavement Design for Overlay and New ConstructionSections Design Recommended Pavement Composition in mmNational Highways Authority of India 1. 14



Project Report

Traffic (MSA)

For Strengthening & Widening Overlay Existing Road on Widening Portion of Existing Road

For New Construction New 2/4 Lane Road New Service Road (If required)

Section I: From km 317+710 To 40 BC 40 BC 25 SDBC 40 BC km 357+250 + 85 DBM + 85 DBM + 50 BM 20 + 85 DBM (From km + 250 WMM + 250 WMM + 250 WMM + PCC 318+000 To km + 200 GSB + 200 GSB + 200 GSB 363+000) Section II: From km 357+250 To 40 BC 40 BC 25 SDBC 40 BC km 402+940 + 95 DBM + 95 DBM + 50 BM 35 + 95 DBM (From km + 250 WMM + 250 WMM + 250 WMM + PCC 363+000 To km + 200 GSB + 200 GSB + 200 GSB 407+000) Section III: From km 402+940 To 40 BC 40 BC 25 SDBC 40 BC km 428+620 + 105 DBM + 105 DBM + 50 BM 45 + 105 DBM (From km + 250 WMM + 250 WMM + 250 WMM + PCC 407+000 To km + 200 GSB + 200 GSB + 200 GSB 438+600) Remarks: Overlay thickness on existing road is suitably modified to match with widening thickness to avoid vertical joints in DBM layer. GSB- Granular Sub-base is provided over subgrade soil of CBR > 10%. 500 mm Subgrade of CBR > 10% is provided wherever the existing Subgrade soil CBR is < 10%. Pavement Composition is designed for 15 years life. However WMM & GSB layers are designed for 20 years life.

1.6.4 Service RoadsService roads are envisaged in congested towns / villages locations to segregate the slow moving local traffic from the high-speed highway traffic. This will also cater to the need of the local pedestrians and vehicles to travel without hindering the high-speed traffic along the highway. However heavily built-up locations where land acquisition will be a serious social issue are excluded from providing with service roads. In view of social aspects and density of population of Kerala, the entire built-up needs to be provided with service road. But when considering the economy of the project, proposal of service roads are restricted to unavoidable locations. Table 1.11 shows the location identified for the provision of service roads along the project road.

Table1.11:ProposedServiceRoadLocationsExisting Chainage (Km) Sl. No. From To Design Chainage (Km) From To

Side (LHS/RHS /Both)

Length (km)

Width (m)

1 2 3 4 5 6

318400 342000 342600 344460 349200 352200

318800 342300 343000 345400 350400 353090

318+440 335+570 336+100 338+100 342+740 345+770

318+670 335+900 336+600 338+930 343+940 346+6901. 15

Both Both Both Both Both LHS

230 330 500 830 1200 920

7 7 7 7 7 7




Project Report

Existing Chainage (Km) Sl. No. From To

Design Chainage (Km) From To

Side (LHS/RHS /Both)

Length (km)

Width (m)

7 353090 8 353390 9 354060 10 357000 11 359800 12 376400 13 382600 14 388600 15 16 17 407700 18 413100 19 414450 20 21 22 427000 23 427200 24 427700 25 432000 Total Length

353390 354060 354200 357600 363200 377000 383850 389920 392150 411800 414450 427000 427200 427700 431000 434200

346+690 346+990 347+660 350+610 353+420 369+670 375+930 382+010 383+900 385+060 401+000 406+450 406+900 410+650 417+160 418+220 418+420 418+920 423+370

346+990 347+660 347+800 351+210 356+370 370+580 377+520 383+290 384+280 385+340 404+020 406+900 410+580 416+250 418+220 418+420 418+920 422+100 424+500

Both LHS Both Both Both Both Both Both Both Both Both Both Both Both Both Both RHS Both Both

300 670 140 600 2950 910 1590 1280 380 280 3020 450 3680 5600 1060 200 500 3180 1130 61670

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

SlipRoadsareproposedalongwithvehicularunderpass.TheTable1.12belowgivesthelocationsof sliproads. Table1.12:ProposedSlipRoadExisting chainage Sl No From To Design chainage From To Both/LHS/RHS Side Length (m) Width (m)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Bypass Bypass 362740 Bypass Bypass Bypass Bypass Bypass Bypass 412490 412910 413160 425145 Bypass 433930

Bypass Bypass 363520 Bypass Bypass Bypass Bypass Bypass Bypass 412910 413160 413305 425960 Bypass 433858

321920 330010 356370 370585 377520 379060 384280 388595 392585 405640 406060 406310 416345 425630 428370

322700 330800 357150 371365 378300 379840 385060 389385 393375 406060 406310 406455 417160 428200 428442

Both Both Both Both Both Both Both Both Both Both RHS Both Both Both Both

780 790 780 780 780 780 780 790 790 420 250 145 815 2570 72

5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5

1.6.5 Geometric Improvements




Project Report

The IRC design standards have been followed, keeping the TOR in mind, while formulating the highway design standards for the project. The Project stretch of NH-17 in Kerala traverses through plain and rolling terrains. Hence, IRC guidelines (IRC 73, 1980) Geometric Design Standards for Rural (Non-urban) Highways have been used for formulating the design standards. The design speeds to be adopted for various categories of road are as follows: Ruling design speed of 100 kmph and minimum speed of 80 kmph for the NH-17 in plain terrain. Design speed of 60 kmph for entrance/ exist slip roads; Design speed of 40 kmph for service and other roads.

Improvements to horizontal Geometry The horizontal geometric design has been carried out using Highway Software Packages complying with the IRC / MORT&H requirements. There are 63 curves which does not satisfy the design speed 100 kmph. So geometric improvements are proposed at these curves . Improvements to Vertical Geometry Vertical geometry of the entire length of the project is found satisfactory except for a small stretch of km 320+000 km 323+000 but this has no significance on the improvement proposal because of the Ponnani bypass.

1.6.6 Improvement of Intersections23 major junctions and 33 minor junctions are proposed for improvements in the project stretch. 15 Vehicular Underpasses, are included in the improvement proposals which allow safe movement of cross road traffic. The lists of r junctions proposed for improvements are given in Table 1.13 Table 1.13: Details of Improvement of IntersectionsExisting Chainage (km) Design Chainage (km)

Sl. No.

Road Leads To

Junction

Proposed Improvements

Major Junctions

1 2 3 4 5 6

318+090 319+440 Ponnani bypass Ponnani bypass 340+160 365+590

318+090 319+060 330+400 332+420 333+715 358+800

Kuttipuram Ponnani Start Bypass

3 legged 3 legged 5 legged 4 legged 3 legged 3 legged

Vehicular Underpass At grade Junction Vehicular Underpass At grade Junction At grade Junction At grade Junction

Edappal,Ponnan i Ponnani Kolimpadi Ponnani End Bypass

Chavakkad Bypass End Vadanappilly Realignment Start

7

376+930

370+200

3 legged

At grade Junction




Project Report

Sl. No.

Existing Chainage (km)

Design Chainage (km)

Road Leads To

Junction


8

380+270

373+600

Vadanappilly Realignment End Triprayar Realignment Start Triprayar Realignment Ends Chendrapinni Realignment Start Chendrapinni Realignment Ends Moonnupeedika Bypass start Moonnupeedika Bypass Ends Mathilakam-1 Bypass Start Mathilakam-1 Bypass Ends Mathilakam-2 Bypass Ends Kodungallur Bypass Start Kodungallur Bypass End Paravur Start Bypass

3 legged

At grade Junction

9

380+980

377+310

3 legged

At grade Junction

10

387+100

380+510

3 legged

At grade Junction

11

389+885

383+285

3 legged

At grade Junction

12

392+040

385+230

3 legged

At grade Junction

13

395+170

388+350

3 legged

At grade Junction

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

397+250 398+610 403+030 406+020 407+970 411+780 414+410 Paravur Bypass 426+170

390+490 391+850 396+335 399+220 401+100 404+135 406+890 411+400 417+400

3 legged 3 legged 3 legged 3 legged 4 legged 3 legged 3 legged 4 legged 3 legged

At grade Junction At grade Junction At grade Junction At grade Junction At grade Junction At grade Junction At grade Junction Vehicular underpass At grade Junction

Ernakulam,Parav ur Paravur ends Bypass

23

438+670

428+940

Ernakulam City 438.800 Aluva

4 legged

Grade separator

Minor Junctions Ponnani Bypass Ponnani Bypass Crossing Vehicular Underpass

1

322+310

4 legged




Project Report

Sl. No.



Road Leads To

Junction


2 3 4 5 6

343+240 352+900 358+190 358+730 363+110

336+840 346+470 351+800 352+340 356+760

Kadavanadu Kunnamkulam, Beach Aviyoor,Beach Mallad,Beach Chavakkadu Pulikkakadavu, Benglamkadav u Pulikkakadavu, Mangalamkad avu Market,Polakkal Manappad, Pokkancheri Vadanappally Thrissur Road Triprayar Thrissur Road Valappad Village Road Murinathode Beach Kattoor, Kazhibram Chandrappinni Village Road Mathilakm Bypass start Pallivalavu Tippu Sulthan Road Iringalakkuda, -

3 legged 4 legged 3 legged 4 legged 3 legged

At grade Junction At grade Junction At grade Junction At grade Junction Vehicular Underpass

7

370+640

363+850

3 legged

At grade Junction

8 9 10

371+570 372+640 375+280 Vadanapall y Bypass TriprayarValappad Bypass TriprayarValappad Bypass 387+950 389+110 Chendrapin ni Bypass 405+420 Mathilakam I Bypass -

364+840 365+910 368+540

4 legged 3 legged 3 legged

At grade Junction At grade Junction At grade Junction Vehicular Underpass Vehicular Underpass Vehicular Underpass At grade Junction At grade Junction Vehicular Underpass At grade Junction Vehicular Underpass At grade Junction

11

370+975

4 legged

12

377+910

4 legged

13 14 15

379+450 381+350 382+510


16 17

384+670 398+750

4 legged 3legged

18 19

392+980 393+280

4 legged 4 legged




Project Report

Sl. No.



Road Leads To

Junction


20

413+560 Paravur Bypass

406+060

Moothakunnam Chungam, Bypass Crossing Karianthuruth, Kachanikode temple Koorikuzhi, Kottuvallikavu temple Koonammavu Hospital Aluva Olanad, Devaswom padam Puthenpalli, Varapuzha Mannamthuruth i, Varapuzha Njattuvetty ferry, Naduvilppadi Eloor, Cheranelloor Chitoor road Bypass Cross Edappally Cross Road -

3 legged

Vehicular Underpass Vehicular Underpass

21

416+755

4 legged

22

426+450

417+680

4 legged

At grade Junction

23 24 25

427+080 427+350 427+820

418+300 418+590 419+020


At grade Junction At grade Junction At grade Junction

26 27

429+200 430+020

420+400 421+220

4 legged 4 legged

At grade Junction At grade Junction

28

430+560

421+760

4 legged

At grade Junction

29 30 31 32 33

431+380 431+800 433+535 Paravur Bypass Edapally Bypass

422+580 423+000 424+735 426+020 426+620


At grade Junction At grade Junction At grade Junction Vehicular Underpass Vehicular Underpass

1.6.7 UnderpassUnderpasses is proposed at 15 locations for segregating local traffic and through traffic thus reducing the congestion at the intersection. Table 1.14: Proposal for Underpasses




Project Report

Sl. No

Existing Chainage (Km)

Design Chainage (Km)

Opening Size

Usage

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

318+090 Bypass Bypass 363+110 Bypass Bypass Bypass Bypass Bypass Bypass 413+560 Bypass Bypass Bypass Bypass

318+090 322+310 330+400 356+760 370+975 377+910 379+450 384+670 388+990 392+980 406+060 411+400 416+755 426+020 426+620

1 x 10.5m x 5m 1 x 10.5m x 5m 1 x 10.5m x 5m 1 x 10.5m x 5m 1 x 10.5m x 5m 1 x 10.5m x 5m 1 x 10.5m x 5m 1 x 10.5m x 5m 1 x 10.5m x 5m 1 x 10.5m x 5m 1 x 10.5m x 5m 1 x 10.5m x 5m 1 x 10.5m x 5m 1 x 10.5m x 5m 1 x 10.5m x 5m

Vehicular Underpass Vehicular Underpass Vehicular Underpass Vehicular Underpass Vehicular Underpass Vehicular Underpass Vehicular Underpass Vehicular Underpass Vehicular Underpass Vehicular Underpass Vehicular Underpass Vehicular Underpass Vehicular Underpass Vehicular Underpass Vehicular Underpass

1.6.8 FlyoverFlyover is proposed at km 438+600 (Design ch. 428+940) where project road meets NH-47.The Details of proposed flyover is given in Table 1.15 below. Table 1.15: Proposal for FlyoverSl. No Existing Chainage (Km) Design Chainage (Km) Span Foundation

1

438+600

428+940

5 x 35+1 x46+5x35-Second Tier 10 x 35+1 x46+10x35-Third Tier 10 x 21+1x 38+1x15-Arm

Pile

1.6.9 ROBA two lane ROB construction is in progress at km 437+700 (Design ch. 427+545) at Edappalli where the project road encounter with a level crossing. An additional 12m wide ROB is proposed at this location. Details of proposed ROB are given in Table 1.16 below Table 1.16: Details of Proposed ROBSl. No Existing Chainage (Km) Design Chainage (Km) Span Foundation

1

437+700

427+545

13 x 21.6+ 1 x 7.85+ 30+1 x 7.85+13 x 21.6

Pile

1.6.10 Bridges and Cross Drainage StructuresThe proposal for Bridges & Cross Drainage structures during widening and improvement is given in Table 1.17 & 1.18 respectively. All new structures are proposed with 3 lane configurationWilbur Smith Associates Inc. USA In Joint Venture With Wilbur Smith Associates Pvt. Ltd. National Highways Authority of India 1. 21

Four Laning of NH-17 from Kuttipuram - Edapally in the state of Kerala under NHDP Phase III on BOT Basis

Project Report

Table 1.17: Widening/Improvement proposal for BridgesSl. No Existing Chainage (Km) Design Chainage (Km) Proposed Scheme Span Arrangement Type of Super structure Type of Substructure Abutment Pier Type of Foundation

BRIDGES Existing NH17 falling in Project stretch

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

319+030 342+300 369+520 382+400 412+180 412+800 413+750 430+300 431+000

318+820 336+000 362+890 375+670 404+860 405+450 406+210 421+465 422+730

New Four lane Additional lane Additional lane Additional lane Additional lane Additional lane Additional lane Additional lane Additional lane Two Two Two Two Two Two Two Two

11x 32.5 1 x 16 .5+ 7 x 24.5 + 1 x 16.5 12 x 26.5 1 x 7.1 1 x 31.7 + 7 x 32.3 + 1 x 31.7 1 x 32.73 + 9 x 33.3 + 1 x 32.75 1 x 24 1 x 16.0 4 x 20 + 5 x 30+3 x 50+ 1x 83 + 1x 120+1 x 83+ 3 x 50+5 x 30+3 x 20 3 x 18 1x20 + 1x30 + 1x20 1 x 18 1 x 18

PSC I girder PSC I girder PSC I girder RCC Slab PSC I girder PSC I girder RCC T-beam RCC T-beam PSC box +RCC box + RCC voided slab

RCC Solid RCC RCC RCC RCC RCC RCC RCC RCC

RCC Rect. RCC Rect. RCC Rect. RCC circular RCC circular -

Circular Pier Pile Well Open Well Well Well Well Well

BRIDGES Bypasses

10 11 12 13

14+470-Ponnani 1+145Chavakkad 1+428 - Paravoor 1+716 - Paravoor

333+200Ponnani 357+740Chavakkad 407+215 Paravoor 407+770 Paravoor

New Four lane New Four lane New Four lane New Four lane

RCC T-beam RCC/PSC beam RCC T-beam RCC T-beam

RCC RCC Solid RCC RCC

RCC circular RCC circular -

Pile Pile Pile Pile



Four Laning of NH-17 from Kuttipuram - Edapally in the state of Kerala under NHDP Phase III on BOT Basis

Project Report

Sl. No

Existing Chainage (Km)

Design Chainage (Km)

Proposed Scheme

Span Arrangement

Type of Super structure

Type of Substructure Abutment Pier

Type of Foundation

14 15 16

2+244 - Paravoor 4+564 - Paravoor 9+080 Paravoor

408+085 Paravoor 410+620 Paravoor 416+300 Paravoor

-

New Four lane New Four lane New Four lane

1 x 18 3 x 25 3 x 30

RCC T-beam PSC I girder PSC I girder

RCC RCC RCC Solid

RCC Rect. RCC circular

Pile Pile Pile



Table 1.18: Culvert Proposal Particulars NH 17 (Existing Road) Culverts 124 NH 17 (Existing culverts Falling Within Project Stretch) Existing 91 173 Total number of Structures to be widened/constructed Number of Culverts along Bypasses/Realignment Proposed 82

Table1.19: List of Culverts proposed for improvements Sl no CD No. Exisitng Chianage Design Chianage Size of Opening Type of Structure Proposal

1 2 3 4

318/1 318/2 319/1 319/2

317+795 317+885 318+065 318+895

317+795 317+885 318+065 318+515

Exisitng Pipe 1X1.2 Pipe 1X1.2 Pipe 1X1.2 Pipe 1X1.2 Ponnani

Pipe Pipe pipe Pipe

Reconstruction Reconstruction Reconstruction Reconstruction

5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

320/1 320/2 320/3 320/4 321/1 321/2 321/3 322/1 323/1 323/2 324/1 324/2 324/3

bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass

319+090 319+468 319+510 319+825 320+020 320+510 320+910 321+602 322+612 322+935 323+238 323+535 323+910

Single cell 2x1.5 Single cell 2x2 Single cell 2x2 Single cell 2x2 Single cell 2x2 Single cell 2x 1.5 Single cell 2x2 Single cell 2x1.5 Pipe 1X1.2 Single cell 2x3 Single cell 2x3 Single cell4x3 Single cell 4x3

Box Box Box Box Box Box Box Box Pipe Box Box Box Box

Widening Widening Widening Widening Widening Widening Widening Widening Widening Widening Widening Widening Widening



Consultancy Services for Feasibility Study and Detailed Project Report for 4-6 laning of Kundapur - Surathkal Section of NH-17 in the State of Karnataka under NHDP phase III (Package No. NHDP-III/DL5/08)

Preliminary Project Report Volume V Resettlement Action Plan

Sl no

CD No.

Exisitng Chianage

Design Chianage

Size of Opening

Type of Structure

Proposal

18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39

325/1 325/2 326/1 326/2 327/1 328/1 328/2 329/1 329/2 330/1 330/2 330/3 331/1 331/2 331/3 332/1 332/2 332/3 333/1 333/2 334/2 334/3

bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass

324+360 324+713 325+030 325+380 326+675 327+080 327+500 328+000 328+410 329+000 329+410 329+730 330+420 330+565 330+805 331+161 331+410 331+707 332+244 332+430 333+350 333+533

Single cell 4x3 Single cell 5x2.8 Single cell 2x2 Single cell 2x2 Single cell 2x2 Single cell 2x2 Single cell 2x2 Single cell 2x2 Single cell 2x2 Single cell 2x2 Single cell 2x2 Single cell 1.5x 1.5 Single cell1.5x 2 Single cell 1.5x 2 Single cell 1.5x 2 Single cell 1.5x 2 Single cell 1.5x 2 Single cell 2x2 Single cell 2x2 Single cell 2x2 Pipe 1X1.2 Single cell 1.5x 2 Existing

Box Box Box Box Box Box Box Box Box Box Box Box Box Box Box Box Box Box Box Box Pipe Box

Widening Widening Widening Widening Reconstruction Reconstruction Reconstruction Reconstruction Reconstruction Reconstruction Reconstruction Widening Widening Widening Widening Widening Widening New Construction New Construction New Construction New Construction Widening

40 41 42

334/4 337/2 337/3

340+420 342+640 342+665

333+970 336+210 336+235

Single cell 1.5x1.5 Pipe 1X1.2 Pipe 1X1.2

Box Pipe Pipe

Reconstruction Reconstruction Reconstruction





Sl no

CD No.

Exisitng Chianage

Design Chianage

Size of Opening

Type of Structure

Proposal

43 44 45 46

337/4 345/1 353/1 355/1

342+690 350+905 358+728 361+208

336+260 344+325 352+348 354+838

Pipe 1X1.2 Single cell 1.5x1.5 Single cell 1.5x1.5 Single cell1.5x1.5 Chavakkadu

Pipe Box Box Box


47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56

357/1 358/1 358/2 358/4 358/5 359/1 359/2 359/3 359/4 359/5

bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass

356+930 357+410 357+488 357+820 357+965 358+108 358+360 358+450 358+520 358+580

Pipe 1X1.2 Pipe 2X1.2 Pipe 2X1.2 Pipe 1X1.2 Pipe 2X1.2 Pipe 1X1.2 Single cell 1.5x1.5 Single cell 1.5x1.5 Single cell 1.5x1.5 Single cell 1.5x1.5 Existing

Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Box Box Box Box

New construction New construction New construction New construction New construction New construction New construction New construction New construction New construction

57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65

359/6 361/1 362/1 362/2 362/3 363/1 363/2 364/1 366/1

365+610 367+625 367+810 368+045 368+150 368+905 369+390 370+360 372+505

358+920 360+835 361+020 361+255 361+360 362+115 362+600 363+625 365+770

Single cell 1.5x1.5 Single cell1.5x1.5 Single cell 1.5x1.5 Single cell 1.5x1.5 Single Cell 1.5x1.5 Single cell 1.5x1.5 Single cell 1.5x1.5 Single cell 1.5x1.5 Single cell 1.5x1.5 Vadanappilly

Box Box Box Box Box Box Box Box Box

Reconstruction Reconstruction Reconstruction Reconstruction Reconstruction Reconstruction Reconstruction Reconstruction Reconstruction





Sl no

CD No.

Exisitng Chianage

Design Chianage

Size of Opening

Type of Structure

Proposal

66 67 68 69

371/1 372/1 373/1 374/1

bypass bypass bypass bypass

370+550 371+110 372+700 373+410

Single cell 1.5x1.5 Pipe 1X1.2 Single cell 1.5x1.5 Single cell 1.5x1.5 Existing

Box Pipe Box Box

New Construction New Construction New Construction New construction

70 71

375/1 375/2

380+705 380+778

374+035 374+108

Single Cell 1.5x1.5 Single Cell 1.5x1.5 Triprayar

Box Box

Reconstruction Reconstruction

72 73

380/1 380/2

bypass bypass

379+000 379+600

Single Cell 1.5x1.5 Pipe 1X1.2 Existing

Box Pipe

New Construction New Construction

74 75

382/1 383/1

387+922 389+045

381+332 382+455

Single Cell 1.5x1.5 Single Cell 1.5x1.5 Chendrappinni

Box Box


76 77 78 79 80

384/1 384/2 385/1 385/2 385/3

bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass

383+422 383+845 384+240 384+752 384+915

Single Cell 1.5x1.5 Single Cell 1.5x1.5 Single Cell 2x1.5 Pipe 1X1.2 Pipe 1X1.2 Existing

Box Box Box Pipe pipe

New construction New construction New construction New construction New Construction

81 82 83 84

386/1 386/2 387/1 388/1

392+410 392+750 393+355 394+085

385+600 385+940 386+545 387+275

Single Cell 1.5x1.5 Single Cell 1.5x1.5 Single Cell 1.5x1.5 Single Cell 1.5x1.5 Moonnupeedika

Box Box Box Box


85

389/1

bypass

388+195

Single Cell 1.5x1.5

Box

New construction





Sl no

CD No.

Exisitng Chianage

Design Chianage

Size of Opening

Type of Structure

Proposal

86

391/1

bypass

390+682

Single Cell 1.5x1.5 Mathilakam 1

Box

Reconstruction

87 88 89 90 91 92 93

393/1 393/2 393/3 395/1 395/2 396/1 396/2

bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass

392+520 392+645 392+940 394+495 394+535 395+180 395+550

Single Cell 1.5x1.5 Pipe 1X1.2 Pipe 1X1.2 Single Cell 1.5x1.5 Single Cell 1.5x1.5 Single Cell 1.5x1.5 Single Cell 1.5x1.5 Existing

Box Pipe Pipe Box Box Box Box

New construction New construction New construction New Construction New Construction New Construction New construction

94 95 96 97

397/1 398/1 398/2 399/1

403+420 403+810 404+082 405+390

396+740 397+130 397+402 398+710

Single Cell 1.5x1.5 Single Cell 1.5x1.5 Twin Cell 3.0x2.5 Single Cell 1.5x1.5 Mathilakam 2

Box Box Box Box

Widening Reconstruction Widening Reconstruction

98

400/1

bypass

399+015

Pipe 1X1.2 Existing

Pipe

New Construction

99 100 101

400/2 401/1 401/2

406+450 406+885 407+280

399+880 400+315 400+710

Single Cell 3x2 Single Cell 1.5x1.5 Single Cell 1.5x1.5 Kodungallur

Box Box Box

Widening Reconstruction Reconstruction

102 103 104

402/1 404/1 404/2

bypass bypass bypass

401+900 403+120 403+580

Single Cell 3.5x2 Single Cell 1.5x1.5 Single Cell 1.5x1.5 Existing

Box Box Box

New Construction New Construction New Construction

105

406/2

413+290

405+770

Pipe 1X1.2

Pipe

Reconstruction





Sl no

CD No.

Exisitng Chianage

Design Chianage

Size of Opening

Type of Structure

Proposal

106 107 108

406/3 407/2 407/3

413+505 413+965 413+700

405+985 406+515 406+780

Pipe 1X1.2 Single Cell 1.5x1.5 Single Cell 1.5x1.5 Paravoor

Pipe Box Box

Reconstruction Reconstruction Reconstruction

109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130

407/4 408/1 408/3 408/5 409/2 409/3 409/4 409/5 410/1 410/2 410/3 410/4 410/5 410/6 410/7 410/8 411/1 411/2 411/3 411/4 411/5 411/7

bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass

406+950 407+150 407+480 407+820 408+305 408+435 408+745 408+800 409+000 409+390 409+500 409+605 409+715 409+770 409+815 409+960 410+070 410+115 410+180 410+225 410+400 410+865

Pipe 1x1.2 Pipe 5x1.2 Pipe 1x1.2 Pipe 1x1.2 Pipe 4X1.2 Pipe 1X1.2 Pipe 5x1.2 Pipe 1x1.2 Pipe 5x1.2 Single Cell 2.5x1.5 Single Cell 2.5x1.5 Pipe 1x1.2 Twin Cell 2.5x2.5 Pipe 4X1.2 Pipe 1x1.2 Pipe 4X1.2 Pipe 1x1.2 Pipe 1x1.2 Pipe 2x1.2 Pipe 2x1.2 Pipe 5x1.2 Pipe 1x1.2

Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Box Box Pipe Box Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe

New Construction New Construction New Construction New Construction New Construction New Construction New Construction New Construction New Construction New Construction New Construction New Construction New Construction New Construction New Construction New Construction New Construction New Construction New Construction New Construction New Construction New Construction





Sl no

CD No.

Exisitng Chianage

Design Chianage

Size of Opening

Type of Structure

Proposal

131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148

412/1 412/2 412/3 412/4 412/5 413/1 413/2 414/1 414/2 414/3 416/1 416/2 416/3 417/1 418/1 418/2 418/3 418/4

bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass

411+105 411+190 411+680 411+800 411+850 412+490 412+650 413+060 413+200 413+325 415+200 415+895 415+995 416+110 417+010 417+135 417+180 417+310

Pipe 1x1.2 Pipe 2x1.2 Pipe 5x1.2 Pipe 1x1.2 Pipe 1x1.2 Pipe 1x1.2 Pipe 1x1.2 Pipe 1x1.2 Pipe 1x1.2 Pipe 1x1.2 Pipe 4X1.2 Pipe 1x1.2 Pipe 1x1.2 Pipe 1X1.2 Pipe 1x1.2 Pipe 1x1.2 Pipe 1x1.2 Single Cell 1.5x1.5 Existing

Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Box

New Construction New Construction New Construction New Construction New Construction New Construction New Construction New Construction New Construction New Construction New Construction New Construction New Construction New Construction New Construction New Construction New Construction New Construction

149 150 151 152 153 154 155

421/1 422/1 422/2 422/3 422/4 422/5 422/7

429+600 429+810 429+925 430+015 430+045 430+125 430+365

420+800 421+010 421+125 421+215 421+245 421+325 421+565

Pipe 1x1.2 Pipe 1x1.2 Pipe 1x1.2 Pipe 1x1.2 Pipe 1X1.2 Pipe 1X1.2 Pipe 1X1.2

Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe

Reconstruction Reconstruction Reconstruction Reconstruction Reconstruction Reconstruction Reconstruction





Sl no

CD No.

Exisitng Chianage

Design Chianage

Size of Opening

Type of Structure

Proposal

156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166

422/8 422/9 423/1 424/1 424/2 424/3 424/4 424/5 424/6 425/1 425/2

430+480 430+655 430+945 432+085 432+235 432+375 432+460 432+590 432+750 432+940 433+160

421+680 421+855 422+145 423+285 423+435 423+575 423+660 423+790 423+950 424+140 424+360

Pipe 1X1.2 Pipe 1X1.2 Pipe 1X1.2 Pipe 1X1.2 Pipe 1X1.2 Pipe 1X1.2 Pipe 1X1.2 Single Cell 1.5x1.5 Single Cell 1.5x1.5 Single Cell 1.5x1.5 Single Cell 1.5x1.5 Edappally

Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Box Box Box Box

Reconstruction Reconstruction Reconstruction Reconstruction Reconstruction Reconstruction Reconstruction Reconstruction Reconstruction Reconstruction Reconstruction

167 168 169 170 171

426/1 427/2 427/3 427/4 428/1

bypass bypass bypass bypass bypass

425+875 426+240 426+500 426+800 428+160

Pipe 1x1.2 Pipe 1x1.2 Pipe 1x1.2 Pipe 1x1.2 Pipe 1x1.2 Existing

Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe

New Construction New Construction New Construction New Construction New Construction

172 173

429/1 429/2

bypass bypass

428+658 428+870

Pipe 1X1.2 Pipe 1X1.2

Pipe Pipe


1.6.11 Toll PlazasConsidering the traffic characteristics, two Toll Plazas are needed. It is recommended to construct the Toll Plazas at following locations: Toll Plaza I Km 344+160(Design Ch. km 337+700)

Toll Plaza II Bypass(Design Ch.413+700)

1.6.12 Truck Lay bays and Rest Area





On street parking of trucks were observed at many places in the project road and adequate number of truck lay byes shall be provided to segregate this from the through traffic. Proposed truck lay locations are given in Table 1.20.Table 1.20: Proposed Location of Truck Lay-Byes

1 2 3 4

Bypass 365+350 392+820 431+850

327+700 359+050 386+020 425+150

LHS RHS LHS LHS

Ponnani Bypass Thangalpadi Kaipamangalam Varapuzha

1.6.13 Bus Bays / Bus Shelters Considering the overall safety of traffic and minimum hindrance to through traffic, bus bays have been proposed at 70 locations along the project road stretch. 1.6.14 Road Furniture, Traffic signs, Road marking, & Landscaping Road markings and road signs standards are designed as per IRC: 35 -1997 and IRC: 67 - 2001 respectively. Road and traffic signs are proposed at appropriate places to give caution and to inform the traffic (vehicular and pedestrians) for safe and smooth movement and the provision are made based on the IRC guidelines. Normally signs are placed on the left side of the road; in certain cases however these may be placed overhead or on either side of the road depending upon the site condition, for clear uninterrupted visibility. Wherever the width of the median is less than 5m in rural section, glare Blockers / glare screens may be proposed for safe nighttime driving. All signs shall be of Retro-reflective grade, for undisturbed traffic movement in the night times. Wherever applicable, roadside landscaping will be planned. But care would be taken not to reduce the sight distance at any of the intersections. Street lighting are proposed in urban and semi urban sections of the project road, at major intersections, Truck lay bays and amenities as per the guidelines given in IS: 1944 (Part I & II) 1970. 1.6.15 Alternate Option for reducing the project cost for making the project viable





In order to reduce the overall cost to meet required financial viability to carry out the project under BOT Toll basis, consultants have restricted the bypasses to two lane and has excluded 14 underpasses, flyover which were part of original proposal.

1.6.15.1 BypassBypasses which aggregates to a length of 49.72 km are restricted to two lane with main carriageway 7m.

1.6.15.2 Widening SchemeModified widening scheme after restricting the bypasses to two lane and removal of underpasses and flyover. Earthern shoulder is reduced to 1m from the standard 2m mentioned in manual of Four laning. Table 1.21: Proposed Widening Type / CSExisting Road Sl. No Widening Type/ CS Length in m

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8Bypass Sl. No

Concentric widening without Service Road(median 2m)-1A Eccentric widening without Service Road ( median 2m)-1B New Four lane without Service Road (median 2m)-1C Concentric widening with Service Road (median 2m)-2A Eccentric widening with 7m Service Road(median 2m)-2B New Four lane with 7m Service Road on both side(median 2m)-2C New Four lane with 7m Service Road on LHS (median 2m)-2D Underpass Approach at 318+090 with 5.5m Slip Road-3CWidening Type/ CS

14430.00 15820.00 6290.00 6080.00 8030.00 4690.00 1590.00 680.00Length in m

1 2

RHS widening without Service Road in bypass (median 4.5m)-1D New two lane in bypass-1E

2255.00 46835.00

1.6.15.3 Service Roads Table1.22:ProposedServiceRoadLocations





Total Length

34340

1.6.15.4 Junction ImrprovementsTable 1.23: Details of Improvement of Intersections





1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

318+090 319+440 Ponnani bypass Ponnani bypass 340+160 365+590 376+930 380+270 380+980 387+100 389+885 392+040 395+170 397+250 398+610 403+030 406+020 407+970 411+780 414+410 Paravur Bypass

318+090 319+060 330+400 332+420 333+715 358+800 370+200 373+600 377+310 380+510 383+285 385+230 388+350 390+490 391+850 396+335 399+220 401+100 404+135 406+890 411+400

Kuttipuram Ponnani Start Bypass

3 legged 3 legged 5 legged Bypass 3 legged 3 legged 3 legged 3 legged 3 legged 3 legged 3 legged 3 legged 3 legged 3 legged 3 legged 3 legged 3 legged 4 legged 3 legged 3 legged 4 legged 4 legged

Vehicular Underpass At grade Junction At grade Junction At grade Junction At grade Junction At grade Junction At grade Junction At grade Junction At grade Junction At grade Junction At grade Junction At grade Junction At grade Junction At grade Junction At grade Junction At grade Junction At grade Junction At grade Junction At grade Junction At grade Junction At grade Junction

Edappal,Ponnani Ponnani Kolimpadi Ponnani End

Chavakkad Bypass End Vadanappilly Realignment Start Vadanappilly Realignment End Triprayar Realignment Start Triprayar Realignment Ends Chendrapinni Realignment Start Chendrapinni Realignment Ends Moonnupeedika Bypass start Moonnupeedika Bypass Ends Mathilakam-1 Bypass Start Mathilakam-1 Bypass Ends Mathilakam-2 Bypass Ends Kodungallur Bypass Start Kodungallur Bypass End Paravur Start Bypass

Ernakulam,Paravur





Paravur ends

Bypass

22

426+170

417+400

3 legged

At grade Junction

23

438+670

428+940

Ernakulam City 438.800 Aluva

4 legged

At grade Junction

Minor Junctions Ponnani Bypass 343+240 352+900 358+190 358+730 363+110 370+640 371+570 372+640 375+280 Vadanapally Bypass TriprayarValappad Bypass TriprayarValappad Bypass 387+950 389+110 Chendrapinni Bypass Ponnani Crossing Bypass 4 legged 3 legged 4 legged 3 legged 4 legged 3 legged 3 legged 4 legged 3 legged 3 legged 4 legged At grade Junction At grade Junction At grade Junction At grade Junction At grade Junction At grade Junction At grade Junction At grade Junction At grade Junction At grade Junction At grade Junction

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

322+310 336+840 346+470 351+800 352+340 356+760 363+850 364+840 365+910 368+540

Kadavanadu Kunnamkulam, Beach Aviyoor,Beach Mallad,Beach Chavakkadu Pulikkakadavu, Benglamkadavu Pulikkakadavu, Mangalamkadavu Market,Polakkal Manappad, Pokkancheri Vadanappally Thrissur Road

11

370+975

12

377+910

Triprayar - Thrissur Road Valappad Village Road Murinathode Beach Kattoor, Kazhibram Chandrappinni Village Road

4 legged

At grade Junction

13 14 15

379+450 381+350 382+510


At grade Junction At grade Junction At grade Junction

16

384+670

4 legged

At grade Junction





Mathilakm start

Bypass

17

405+420 Mathilakam I Bypass -

398+750

3legged

At grade Junction

18 19

392+980 393+280

Pallivalavu - Tippu Sulthan Road Iringalakkuda,

4 legged 4 legged

At grade Junction At grade Junction

20

413+560 Paravur Bypass

406+060

Moothakunnam Chungam, Bypass Crossing Karianthuruth, Kachanikode temple Koorikuzhi, Kottuvallikavu temple Koonammavu Hospital Aluva Olanad, Devaswom padam Puthenpalli, Varapuzha Mannamthuruthi, Varapuzha Njattuvetty ferry, Naduvilppadi Eloor, Cheranelloor Chitoor road Bypass Cross Edappally - Cross Road

3 legged

At grade Junction

21

416+755

4 legged

At grade Junction

22

426+450

417+680

4 legged

At grade Junction

23 24 25 26 27

427+080 427+350 427+820 429+200 430+020

418+300 418+590 419+020 420+400 421+220


At grade Junction At grade Junction At grade Junction At grade Junction At grade Junction

28

430+560

421+760

4 legged

At grade Junction

29 30 31 32 33

431+380 431+800 433+535 Paravur Bypass Edapally Bypass

422+580 423+000 424+735 426+020 426+620


At grade Junction At grade Junction At grade Junction At grade Junction At grade Junction

1.6.15.5 UnderpassWilbur Smith Associates Inc. USA In Joint Venture With Wilbur Smith Associates Pvt. Ltd.




Underpasses is proposed at one location for segregating local traffic and through traffic thus reducing the congestion at the intersection. Table 1.24: Proposal for UnderpassesSl. No Existing Chainage (Km) Design Chainage (Km) Opening Size Usage

1

318+090

318+090

1 x 10.5m x 5m

Vehicular Underpass

1.6.15.6 ROBA two lane ROB at km 437+700 (Design ch. 427+545) is already constructed in Edapally bypass which can cater for the proposed two laning.

1.6.15.7 Bridges and Cross Drainage StructuresThe proposal for Bridges & Cross Drainage structures during widening and improvement is given in Table 1.25 & 1.26 respectively. All new structures are proposed with 3/6 lane configuration. All bridges and culverts along the bypasses are of 3 lane configuration as the bypasses are restricted to two lane configuration. Table 1.25: Widening/Improvement proposal for Major Bridges

Sl. Existing No

Design

Chainage Chainage (Km) (Km)

Proposed Span Type of Type of Scheme Arrangement Super Substructure structure

Type of Foundation

Abutment Pier BRIDGES Existing NH17 falling in Project stretch1 319+030 318+820 New Four lane 11x 32.5 PSC I girder RCC Solid 2 342+300 336+000 Additional Two lane Additional Two lane Additional Two lane Additional Two lane 1 x 16 .5+ 7 x 24.5 + 1 x 16.5 12 x 26.5 PSC I girder PSC I girder PSC I girder PSC I girder RCC RCC Rect. RCC Rect. RCC circular RCC circular Pile RCC Rect. Circular Pier

3

369+520

362+890

RCC

Well

4

412+180

404+860

1 x 31.7 + 7 x 32.3 + 1 x 31.7 1 x 32.73 + 9 x 33.3 + 1 x 32.75

RCC

Well

5

412+800

405+450

RCC

Well





6

431+000

422+730

Additional Two lane

4 x 20 + 5 x 30+3 x 50+ 1x 83 + 1x 120+1 x 83+ 3 x 50+5 x 30+3 x 20

PSC box +RCC box + RCC voided slab

RCC

Well

BRIDGES Bypasses 7 1+145Chavakkad 357+740Chavakkad New Two lane 1x20 + 1x30 + 1x20 RCC/PSC beam PSC I girder 3 x 30 PSC I girder RCC S olid RCC Solid RCC RCC circular RCC Rect. RCC circular Pile Pile Pile

8

4+564 Paravoor

410+620 Paravoor

New Two lane

3 x 25

9

9+080 Paravoor

416+300 Paravoor

New Two lane

Table 1.26: Widening/Improvement proposal for Minor Bridges

Sl. Existing Design Proposed Span Type of Type of Type of No Chainage Chainage Scheme Arrangement Super Substructure Foundation (Km) (Km) structure1 382+400 375+670 Additional Two lane 2 413+750 406+210 Additional Two lane 3 430+300 421+465 Additional Two lane 1 x 16.0 RCC Tbeam RCC Well 1 x 24 RCC Tbeam RCC Well 1 x 7.1 RCC Slab RCC Open

BRIDGES Bypasses4 14+470Ponnani 1+428 Paravoor 333+200Ponnani 407+215 Paravoor New Two lane New Two lane 3 x 18 RCC Tbeam RCC Tbeam RCC RCC circular Pile

5

1 x 18

RCC

Pile





6

1+716 Paravoor 2+244 Paravoor

407+770 Paravoor 408+085 Paravoor

New Two lane New Two lane

1 x 18

RCC Tbeam RCC Tbeam

RCC

-

Pile

7

1 x 18

RCC

-

Pile

2Summary of EIA and IEE2.1 Environmental Impacts and Environmental Management Plan (EMP) Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) report presents the Environmental Assessment of the proposed improvement for the 120.6 Km of NH 17 in the State of Kerala. The report has worked out with mitigation measures to minimise or mitigate the impacts identified during the course of project implementation. Guidelines formulated by Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF), Government of India were referred for preparing EIA. Apart from this various Indian Acts and regulations were reviewed such as, Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 (amended in 1978 and 1988), Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981, Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and EIA Notifications of 1994 and 2006. Field inspections at all the sensitive locations, collection of secondary information for all the environmental components, baseline environmental monitoring, and discussions with the officials, NGOs and local public were conducted to establish the baseline environmental status of the study area and to assess the impacts of the proposed improvements to the project road. The baseline environmental monitoring was conducted from September 2006 to October 2006. The ambient temperature during the monitoring period varied between 32.6 oC to 21.4 oC and relative humidity ranged between 96% and 88%. The solar radiation recorded ranged between 28.2 Watt hour/sq m and 0.20 Watt hour/sq m. Average rain fall during the study period was around 404.01 mm. Predominant winds were mostly from South-Southwest and South West directions with frequencies of 13.7% and 11.5 % respectively. Calm conditions prevailed for 0.7 % for the total time. The baseline status of ambient air quality has been established through a scientifically designed network of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring (AAQM) stations set up at 11 locations along the project road representing different conditions like rural, urban, residential and commercial areas. The monitoring was done for 24 hrs for two days in a week for four weeks. All the ambient air quality parameters were well within the NAAQ Standards at all the locations except an Increase in SPM level at KottappuramWilbur Smith Associates Inc. USA In Joint Venture With Wilbur Smith Associates Pvt. Ltd.




. Surface water samples were collected from seven locations along the project road. Important chemical parameters like Chlorides, Hardness and Total Dissolved Solids were observed to be very high at five locations due to the backwater influence. Biological Indicator total Coliforms is also found to be higher than the permissible limits at five locations. Faecal Coliforms were present at four locations. Ground water samples were collected from six locations. All the physical and chemical parameters of ground water at all the locations were within the IS:10500 standards. Total Coliforms were more than the permissible limits, but faecal Coliforms were absent Out of the 11 locations where ambient noise level monitoring was done along the project road, eight locations represented residential areas and three locations represented commercial areas. Among the eight locations representing residential areas, noise levels at four locations were below the permissible limit set by the CPCB during day time and night time. At two locations the noise levels during day time and night time were above the permissible limits. Out of the remaining two locations representing residential areas, day time noise level at one location and night time noise level at other location was above the permissible limit. Among the three locations representing commercial areas, noise level at one location was below the permissible limits for commercial areas during day time and night time. Day time noise level at the remaining two locations was above the permissible limit. The project road is not passing through any forest areas, wildlife sanctuaries and protected areas. However, the project road is passing through Vembanad-Kol wetland system, which is a Ramsar Site. Mangalavanam Bird Sanctuary is situated 5 Km away from the project road. No rare/threatened species of flora or fauna is present in the project area except the mangroves along the canals, rivers and estuaries crossing / abutting the project road. About 56,300 trees mainly coconut trees - are present in the proposed 45-m right of way of the project road since it is passing through agricultural areas. The cost of implementing above mitigation measures as estimated in Table 2.1, works out to Rs.15.315 Crores. The operational cost of the same is estimated at Rs. 1.5 lakhs per annum during the first three years and Rs. 27.93 lakhs per annum from 4th year onwards Table 2.1Cost Estimates for Environmental Management Plan

Item A. Total Cost During Construction Phase 1. Provision of Sewage and sanitation facilities for the construction camps, including maintenance for 3 years 2. Provision of Water Supply Facilities for the construction camps 3. Plantation of twice the number of trees to be cut (56300 x 2), and their

Assumptions

Cost in Rs

Lump Sum

1,000,000.00

Lump Sum

600,000.00

Rs.900/Tree x 112,600 Trees

101,340,000.0 0





Item fencing and maintenance for 3 years 4. Shrub plantation in the median for the entire corridor @ 500 saplings (single row) per kilometer for built-up areas with 1.5m of median and @1000 saplings (double row) for rural areas with 4.5 m of median, and their fencing and maintenance for 3 years 5. Transplantation of Mangroves and their maintenance for 3 years 6. Environmental Monitoring 6.1. Air Quality Monitoring

Assumptions

Cost in Rs

Rs. 500/Shrub x 80300 Shrubs (@ 500 shrubs/Km x 53.6 Km + 1000 shrubs/Km x 53.5 Km)

40,150,000.00

Lump Sum

2,500,000.00

Rs. 2000/location x 10 locations x 3 seasons x 3 years Rs. 2500/location x 4 locations x 2 seasons x 3 years Rs. 500/location x 10 locations x 3 seasons x 3 years Rs. 2000/location x 10 locations x 2 seasons x 3 years Rs. 35000/season x 3 seasons x 3 years Rs. 800/trip x 10 trips/day x 365 days x 2 years Lump sum

180,000.00

6.2. Water Quality Monitoring

60,000.00

6.3. Noise Monitoring

45,000.00

6.4. Soil Quality Monitoring

120,000.00

6.5. Mobilisation Charges

315,000.00

7. Dust Suppression at Site

5,840,000.00

8. Severances & Others (including training, workshops, awareness campaigning etc.) Total cost during construction phase

1,000,000.00

153,150,000.0 0

B. Annual Cost During Operational Phase during First Three Years





Item 1. Environmental Monitoring 1.1. Air Pollution Monitoring

Assumptions

Cost in Rs

Rs.2000/location x 5 locations for 3 seasons Rs.500/location x 10 locations for 3 seasons Rs. 35000/season x 3 seasons

30,000.00

1.2. Noise Monitoring

15,000.00

1.3. Mobilisation Charges

105,000.00

Total annual cost during operational phase during first three years C. Annual Cost During Operational Phase from 4th Year Onwards 1. Maintenance of trees and shrubs Rs.25000/km x 111.73 Km

150,000.00

2,793,250.00 2,793,250.00

Total annual cost during operational phase from 4th year onwardsSource: Analysis

UNITS

1 hectare 1 hectare 1 hectare 1 hectare 1 acre 1 cent 1 meter 1 sq. meter

= = = = = = = =

2.47 acres 10,000 sq. meter 11,959.90 sq. yards 2.5 Acres 100 cents 40.47 sq. mts. 3.28 foot 10.76 sq. foot

ABBREVIATIONSBPL SRMC CBO CPR DC DPR DRRO EA ESDU FGDs GoK GRC

: : : : : : : : : : : :

Below Poverty Line Schedule of Rates Mangalore Circle Community Based Organization Common Property Resources Deputy Commissioner Detailed Project Report District Resettlement and Rehabilitation Officer Executing Agency Environmental and Social Development Unit Focus Group Discussions Government of Karnataka Grievance Redress Committee





Ha IA LA LAA / LA Act R&R M&E NGO NH Act NHAI NHDP NPRR PAF PAP PC PIU RAP RoW Existing Milestone Chainage Proposed Design Chainage

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

Hectare Implementing Agency Land Acquisition Land Acquisition Act Resettlement and Rehabilitation Monitoring and Evaluation Non-Governmental Organisation National Highway Act National Highway Authority of India National Highway Development Programme National Policy on Resettlement and Rehabilitation Project Affected Family Project Affected Person Project Consultant Project Implementation Unit Resettlement Action Plan Right of Way 00/000 00+000



DEFINITIONSAssistance refers to the support provided to PAPs in the form of ex-gratia payments, loans, asset services, training and skills development, etc. in order to improve the standard of living and mitigate the negative impacts of the Project. Below Poverty Line (BPL) Households are households whose monthly income is less than a designated sum as determined by the Government of India. Compensation refers to the amount paid under the National Highways Act, 1956 for private property, structures and other assets acquired for the project. In this context, compensation refers to payments made by the Government when title of a property is transferred from a private entity to the government. Cut-off-Date. The date of notification under Subsection (1) of Section 3A, of National Highways Act, 1956 will be considered as cut-off date for PAPs who have legal title to the land/property, proposed for acquisition. In the case of Squatters, Encroachers and unauthorized occupants the date of census/socio-economic survey conducted by the Design DPR Consultants will be considered as the cut-off date for entitlements under the Project. Deputy Commissioner is the Administrative head of a District and overall in charge of any Land Acquisition for public purposes within the respective district. Encroachers are persons who have extended their building, agricultural lands, business premises or work places into government lands. Private Property Owners/ Titleholders are those who have legal title to land, structure and other assets. Project Affected Person (PAPs) are persons who have economic interests or residence within the project impact area and who may be adversely affected directly by the Project. Project Affected Persons include those displaced, those losing commercial or residential structures in whole or part, those losing agricultural land or homesteads in whole or part, and those losing income sources as a result of project action, or having losses as described in the Entitlement Matrix. PAPs include both titled and non-titled persons experiencing resettlement impacts due to the Project. Project Affected Family (PAFs) means consisting of such persons, his or her spouse, minor sons, unmarried daughters, minor brothers or unmarried sisters, father, mother and other members residing with him and dependent on him for their livelihood. Project Impact Area refers to the area proposed for the

Project Report Edappally-Kuttippuram

Documents

Transcript of Project Report Edappally-Kuttippuram