Progress in the Application of Ultraviolet Germicidal Irradiation for Air Disinfection 35 th...
-
Upload
bryce-dominic-wilkins -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
3
Transcript of Progress in the Application of Ultraviolet Germicidal Irradiation for Air Disinfection 35 th...
Progress in the Application of Ultraviolet Germicidal Irradiation for Air Disinfection
35th Meeting: American Society for PhotobiologyProvidence, RI, 16 June, 2010
Edward A. Nardell, MDAssociate Professor, Harvard Medical School
Harvard School of Public HealthBrigham & Women’s Hospital
Division of Global Health Equity(Partners In Health)[email protected]
Ultraviolet Germicidal Irradiation(UVGI) – key concepts:
254 nm UV easily produced by mercury vapor lamps
Low skin/eye penetration because it is so reactive – absorbed by
outer layers – nucleic acids protected Microbes are vulnerable
because of their tiny size – nucleic acids are exposed
UVGI Occupational Exposure Limit
Bactericidal
Photokeratitis
Skin cancer
Skin erythema
Wave length (nm)
Rel
ativ
e ef
fect
iven
ess
UVGI is old but still underdeveloped technology Applications of Germicidal, Erythemal
and Infrared Energy, 1946 Matthew Luckiesh, DSc, DE, GE Laboratory
24 other books on light
Ultraviolet Irradiation: its properties, production, measurement, and applications, 1922
Why upper room UVGI? The challenge of airborne infections
What are airborne infections? Why are they so hard to control
with ventilation alone? What are the advantages of UVGI?
Why UV in ducts Why upper room UV?
Where should it be applied?
Current upper room UVGI usage Used in hospital
waiting rooms, clinics, emergency rooms, isolation and procedure rooms
Not considered a substitute for negative pressure isolation or for at least 6 ACH ventilation
Used in shelters, jails, prisons, homeless shelters
Current UVGI fixtures (louvered)
Narrow beam
UV in ventilation ducts or portable room air disinfection devices
Microbial Inactivation
Microbial inactivation characterized by survival curves, based on target theory. Number of survivors decreases by a
constant fractional amount for a given increment of exposure.
Holds for a single “hit”, but multiple “hits” leads to survival curves with a shoulder – commonly seen experimentally.
Limitation common to all air disinfection strategies Ventilation HEPA filtration
Limited by number of air turnovers
UV air disinfection In ducts – same
limitation Upper room –
disinfect large volume at once
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
Ventilation, CFM
p
Upper Room UV Air Disinfection uses the entire room as a duct
.
.
UV-C
7 ft. Warm contaminatedair risesDisinfected air
displaced
Paddle fans assure good air mixing
UVGI InvestigationsType: Source: Sample: Utilitiy:
1. Bench-scale
BCG aerosol
Mech. A.S. Culture
UV dose humidity
2. Room-scale
BCG aerosol
Mech. A.S. Culture
Fixtures, Vent/CFD
3. Hospital ward
Human M. tb
Guinea Pig/RFLP
Hospital room UV efficacy
4. Epi Human M. tb
Skin Test Real world UV efficacy
Air flow
c
c
defg
UV lighta
b h
i
k
l
m
o
n p
q
j
n
r
Bench-scale studies
Determination of UV susceptibility of various airborne organisms
Z value
ln N0/NuvµWatt x sec x cm-2Z =
Z is the slope of the plot of the natural logarithm of colony count against UV doseMtb at 50% humidity = 33 (23-42) Erdman
48 (44-55) 199RBM. bovis BCG 37 (33-39) Serratia marcescens 214 (183-245)
Humidity protects the organism
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
400 800
22-33%49-62%85-91%
% Survival
UV dose (uw.sec/cm2)
Determination of UV susceptibility of various airborne organisms
Z value
ln N0/NuvµWatt x sec x cm-2Z =
Z is the slope of the plot of the natural logarithm of colony count against UV doseMtb at 50% humidity = 33 (23-42) Erdman
48 (44-55) 199RBM. bovis BCG 37 (33-39) Serratia marcescens 214 (183-245)
1 µW/cm2
Permutt analysis - 1Z = 0.0041 = Eq ACH/UV dose = 15 Eq ACH/1 µW/cm2
= 15 ACH
Air Changes per Hour, ACH When a volume equivalent to the
volume of the room enters and is exhausted 1 ACH well-mixed air removes 63% of air
contaminants 2 ACH well-mixed air removes 84% of air
contaminants Any air disinfection method that is
63% effective produces 1 Equivalent ACH
Permutt analysis - 2Z = 0.0041 = Eq ACH/UV dose = 15 Eq ACH/1 µW/cm2
= 15 ACH or 15 AC/60 min =
1 Eq AC/4 min = conc. reducedby 63%
1 µW/cm2
Permutt analysis - 3Z = 0.0041 = Eq ACH/UV dose = 15 Eq ACH/1 µW/cm2
1 µW/cm2
1 Eq ACH = 20 min (5 x 4 min)
20%
Instantaneous mixing
Permutt analysis - 4Z = 0.0041 = Eq ACH/UV dose = 15 Eq ACH/1 µW/cm2
32 µW/cm2 avg.= 480 Eq AC 1 Eq ACH/7.2 sec.
1 Eq ACH = 36 secor 100 Eq ACH
20%
Instantaneous mixing
Permutt analysis - 5Z = 0.0041 = Eq ACH/UV dose = 15 Eq ACH/1 µW/cm2
100% air disinfection
= 25 Eq ACH
20%
25 ACH between upperand lower room
Permutt analysis - 6Z = 0.0041 = Eq ACH/UV dose = 15 Eq ACH/1 µW/cm2
32 µW/cm2 avg.= 480 Eq AC 1 Eq ACH/7.2 sec.
20 Eq ACH in the lower rm
25 ACH mixing
Permutt analysis - 7Z = 0.0041 = Eq ACH/UV dose = 15 Eq ACH/1 µW/cm2
32 µW/cm2 avg.= 480 Eq AC 1 Eq ACH/7.2 sec.
50 Eq ACH in the lower rm
100 ACH mixing
Room-scale studies: Riley-Middlebrook, 1976 - aerosolized BCG
A single 17 W UV lamp added the equivalent of 10 air changes to an unventilated room – air mixing by radiator only
Silent, safe, no drafts, low energy use, low maintenance
Established current dosage guideline 30 W fixture per 200 sq ft area.
Am Rev Resp Dis, 1976, 113:413-18.
Airborne Infection - exposure chamber:
HSPH
Aerosol generator: HSPH
Interior, Large exposure chamber, HSPH
Anderson air sampling, HSPH
Summary: efficacy of upper room UVGI
Riley (1976) Miller (1999) Ko (2000)Microorganism BCG Mycobacterium
parafortuitumBCG
Particle size ( m) 0.5-3 0.65-2.1 1.1-4.7Suspending medium 0.2% BSA DW 10% FCS
Temperature (°C) n/a n/a 15-35 4-26RH (%) 25 20, 40 50-90 41-69
Room size (m3) 61 90 46Mechanical ventilation No Yes Yes
ACH 2 2-4 0 6 6-8 6Mixing fan Yes
(during aerosolization) Yes No
UV output (W) 17 46 99(28) 99(28) 36(10) 59(15)UVoutput/Room size
(W/m3)0.28 0.75 1.1 1.1 0.78 1.3
UV fixture type C1 C1&W CN&C2 CN&C2 C2 C2&W
UV Effectiveness (%) 83 88, 89 98 95 52 64 10
UV effect (ACH) 10 18-19, 33 6-16, 19 9.8 6.4 11.7 7.1
Room Studies – Miller et al, 2002University of Colorado at Boulder, NIOSH contract #200-97-2602
Full scale room studies – 87 m2 test chamber
5 fixtures, tot. 216 W producing avg. 42 µW/cm2 in the irradiated upper zone, only 0.08 µW/cm2 at eye level
3 test organisms: B. subtilis, M. parafortuitum, and M. bovis.
2 types of experiments: constant generation – gives effectiveness decay – gives equivalent room air changes
Miller et al, 2002 (cont.) Results (50% humidity):
Constant generation (effectiveness): B. subtilis 46 – 80% @ 216 W M. parafortuitum 83 – 98% @ 216 W M. bovis 96 – 97% @ 216 W
Decay (release & mix): M. parafortuitum 16 ± 1.2 ACH @ 216 W
6.1 ± 0.8 ACH @ 108 W19% increase @ 509 W
Z value = 1.2 ± 0.15 x10-3 cm2 u.sec-1sec-1
Winter conditions (warm air from ceiling): 25% decrease Photoreactivation
none detected at 40% humidity inconclusive at 100% humidity
Upper room UVGI effect on measles in day schools, (Wells, Am J Hygiene, 35:97-121, 1942)
TUSS – TB UV Shelter Study
Prospective, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of upper room UVGI in homeless shelters
Phil Brickner, MD, PI 5 cities:
NYC Birmingham New Orleans Houston - two sites
Indeterminate results due to low infection rates and poor retention of homeless subjects
Lots of data obtained on engineering and safety Safe, reliable, low-maintenance
Experimental Hospital Ward
Riley (Wells) experimental TB wardBaltimore, 1958 - 1962
The Airborne Infections Research (AIR) Facility
Witbank, Mpumalanga Province, SA
Ventilation ducts in patient rooms
Paddle Fans Assure Good Air Mixing
UVGI Fixture Specifications – a test of UVGI, not specific fixtures
• Develop specifications• Advertise bid opportunity in the US and
S. Africa• Review all specifications submitted• Solicit fixtures for laboratory
measurements• Receive and install fixtures
AIR, Experimental Plan
A B
Odd days Even days
3 patient rooms
Plus common areas
Intervention on/off on alternative days
Guinea Pig Air Sampling
Pt. TB
RFLP
Guinea Pig
TB RFLP
UVGI or
other
intervention
Results
UV1 Intervention ControlTST-1 0 1TST-2 0 3TST-3 0 5TST-4 0 0TOTAL 0 9
UV2 TST-1 3
17TST-2 12 30TST3 0 1TOTAL* 15 48 *p<0.0005
Combined hazard ratio 4.9 (CI.95: 2.8, 8.6)
Haza
rd o
f b
eco
min
g in
fect
ed
Critical parameters determining upper-room UVGI effectiveness
• Good UV fixture design – Flood the upper room with
enough 254 nm – Low levels of UV in the
occupied space
• Good air mixing between the lower and upper room
– A slow paddle fan is essential
• Good maintenance of fixtures.
Not all fixtures being sold are well-designed for their application
New Fogarty Application under review – would start Sept, 2010
• $400K for 1 year, multi-institutional, multidisciplinary• Collaborators:
– MIT D-lab, Penn State, U. Colorado, Boulder
• 2 domestic, 1 international fellows• Engineers, architects, public health scientists, MDs• Proposal: “Sustainable Air Disinfection Technology
Innovations for Resource Limited Settings”– one year of intensive study and hands-on research further
developing through innovation and optimization the long-neglected technology of upper room germicidal ultraviolet air disinfection for use in poor settings.
Upper room UV light for the prevention of Upper room UV light for the prevention of airborne airborne
tuberculosis transmissiontuberculosis transmission
R Escombe1,2, R Ramirez3, RH Gilman2,4,6, M Navincopa5, E Ticona5, P Sheen6, C Noakes7, B Mitchell8, D Moore1,2, JS Friedland1, C Evans1,2,4,6.
1. Wellcome Centre for Clinical Tropical Medicine & Department of Infectious Diseases & Immunity, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, UK.2. Asociación Benéfica PRISMA, Lima, Perú. 3. Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria, Universidad Nacional Mayor San Marcos.4. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA. 5. Hospital Nacional Dos de Mayo, Lima, Perú.6. Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Perú.7. School of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds, UK 8. Agricultural Research Service, USA.
HOSPITAL NACIONAL
“DOS DE MAYO”
Kaplan-Meier survival based on PPD conversionsKaplan-Meier survival based on PPD conversions
Days of study
6005004003002001000
Cum
ulat
ive
Sur
viva
l
1.0
.8
.6
.4
.2
0.0
UV vs. No intervention: Log rank 46 p<0.0001 UVGI reduced TB: 72%Ionizers vs. No intervention: Log rank 20 p<0.0001 Ionisers reduced TB: 58%
UV group
Ionizer group
No intervention group
UV killing and relative humidityUV killing and relative humidity
Relative humidity in Lima 50-95%
Upper room UVGI safety TLV for UVGI (UV-C, 254 nm)
6.0 mJ/cm2 for 8 hr. exposure Continuous staring for 8 hrs. at intensity
of > 0.2 µW/cm2 will cause photokeratitis and skin erythema
Will not cause lens cataracts or skin cancer because of limited penetration
Compare to 240 µW/cm2 for 2 hrs peak sunbathing outside.
Upper Air UVGI
ACGIH: 6.0 mJ/cm2 for 8-hour period
= 0.2 W/cm2 for 8-hour continuous eye-level exposure
10 10 >100 >100 W/cm2
After Bruls, Photochem Photobiol, 1984
% Skin Penetration of UV Depth, m
Skin Layer
254 nm UV-C
297 nm UV-B
365 nm UV-A
0 Surface 100 % 100 % 100 %
10 St. corneum 42 50 80
20 18 25 64
30 Viable layer 5 15 50
50 0.4 6 31
70 0.03 2 19
UVGI – poor design and installationMDR TB Hospital – South Africa
Monitoring Human Exposures to Upper-Room GermicidalUltraviolet IrradiationMelvin W. First, Robert A. Weker, Shojiro Yasui, and Edward A. Nardell
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 2005; 2: 285–292
Biofilm
Chemical photometer
Electronic UV meter
Prof. Melvin First
3 UV detectors:
Personal UVGI monitoring study
Study site: Hospital Room - UV Lamp
Old style fixtures- intensity 10 x 0.2 µW/cm2
Unventilated bldg.
Drug-resistant TB patients
No worker infections
Pt. B - always in bed
Pati ent B 11/ 30/ 01
0.00E+00
3.00E-02
6.00E-02
9.00E-02
1.20E-01
1.50E-01
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000
Time (sec)
Irrad
ianc
e (u
W/c
m2)
Peak 1. 49E- 01 uW/ cm2Mean 5. 69E- 02 uW/ cm2
Summary - UV exposure Peak
µW/cm2 Mean µW/cm2
Ratio P/M
Duration/8-hr
Exposure mJ/cm2
8-hr exp. mJ/cm2
% TLV (6 mJ/cm2)
Pt. A 0.124 0.0454 0.37 0.83 1.1 1.3 22
Pt. B 0.149 0.0569 0.38 0.54 0.9 1.6 27
Pt. C 0.190 0.0815 0.43 0.83 2.0 2.2 37
Pt. D 0.767 0.0356 0.05 0.87 0.9 1.0 17
Pt. D 0.847 0.0323 0.04 1.0 0.9 0.9 15
Pt. E 0.313 0.0282 0.09 0.75 0.6 0.8 13
R.N. 0.633 0.0141 0.02 0.60 0.2 0.4 7
Where are we going? UVGI needs:
Better, more efficient fixture designs Wider availability of expertise and UV
technology CAD to plan UVGI installations Greater understanding of human 254
nm exposure
New Guidelines NIOSH. Environmental Control of
Tuberculosis: Basic Upper-Room Ultraviolet Germicidal Irradiation Guidelines for Healthcare Settings . 2009
Recommendations: 30 – 50 µW/cm2 average irradiance 6.3 W total UVGI wattage per cubic
meter room volume treated
Conclusions: UVGI is an old technology with new applications Scientifically sound Safe for room occupants Clinical trials are difficult Applications
Poor countries – TB, influenza Rich countries – influenza, bioterrorism, future
airborne threats Research: air sampling, personal UV monitoring,
and improved fixture designs underway. CAD program under development