Product Assurance Audit Checklist MSM-GP/27 APR 2001perondi/10.11.2008/GPQ-MAN-07-Issue1.pdf ·...
28
GPQ-MAN-07 MSM-GP/27 APR 2001 Product Assurance Audit Checklist GPQ-MAN-07
Transcript of Product Assurance Audit Checklist MSM-GP/27 APR 2001perondi/10.11.2008/GPQ-MAN-07-Issue1.pdf ·...
GPQ
-MA
N-0
7
MS
M-G
P/27 A
PR
2001
Pro
du
ct A
ssu
ran
ceA
udit
Ch
ecklist
GP
Q-M
AN
-07
C =
Com
plian
t
N
C =
Not
Com
plian
tPag
e 2 o
f 28
PC
= P
arti
al C
omplian
t
N/A
= N
ot A
pplica
ble
Item
No.
Au
dit
Ele
men
tC
PC
NC
N/A
Rem
ark
sI.
Gen
era
l P
rodu
ct
Ass
ura
nce
1.
Org
an
isati
on
an
d S
taff
1.1
Doe
s th
e co
ntr
act
or h
ave
a for
mally
esta
blish
ed P
Aor
gan
isati
on w
ith
th
e el
emen
ts o
f S
afe
ty, R
elia
bilit
y,M
ain
tain
abilit
y, S
/W
PA
, Q
uality
Part
s, M
ate
rials
an
dPro
cess
es, C
onfigu
rati
on M
an
age
men
t?1.2
Are
th
e Pro
du
ct A
ssu
ran
ce fu
nct
ion
s in
dep
enden
t of
Man
ufa
ctu
rin
g, E
ngi
nee
rin
g an
d o
ther
org
an
isati
on?
1.3
Are
th
ere
form
ula
ted o
bje
ctiv
es o
f th
e or
gan
isati
on?
1.4
Is m
an
age
men
t em
ph
asi
s on
“pre
ven
tion
” ra
ther
th
an
det
ecti
on o
f qu
ality
pro
ble
ms?
1.5
Are
th
e re
spon
sibilit
ies
of s
uper
viso
rs a
nd m
an
age
rs,
etc.
for
mally
def
ined
?1.6
Doe
s th
e per
son
res
pon
sible
for
Pro
du
ct A
ssu
ran
ce o
na p
roje
ct h
ave
acc
ess
to h
igh
er m
an
age
men
t fo
r th
efo
cuss
ing
on a
nd r
esol
uti
on o
f pro
ble
ms?
1.7
Are
th
e PA
fu
nct
ion
s st
affed
to
the
pro
per
com
ple
men
t?1.8
Doe
s th
e Pro
du
ct A
ssu
ran
ce o
rgan
isati
on h
ave
suffic
ien
t fa
ciliti
es, eq
uip
men
t an
d t
ools
for
appro
pri
ate
evalu
ati
on o
f m
ate
rials
an
d h
ard
ware
qu
ality
?2
.P
roced
ure
s2.1
Doe
s th
e co
ntr
act
or h
ave
a P
rodu
ct A
ssu
ran
ce M
an
ual
or a
set
of pro
cedu
res
cove
rin
g Pro
du
ct A
ssu
ran
ce?
2.2
Do
pro
cedu
res
iden
tify
“w
ho”
doe
s “w
hat”
, “w
hen
”,“h
ow”
an
d “
wh
ere”
?2.3
Are
PA
fu
nct
ion
s an
d r
espon
sibilit
ies
per
form
ed b
yot
her
gro
ups
iden
tified
?2.4
Do
pro
cedu
res
iden
tify
in
form
ati
on flo
w, fo
rms
an
din
stru
ctio
ns
for
com
ple
tin
g th
e fo
rms?
2.5
Do
pro
cedu
res
con
tain
man
age
men
t appro
val
sign
atu
res,
date
s of
iss
ue
an
d r
evis
ion
s an
d c
han
ge
C =
Com
plian
t
N
C =
Not
Com
plian
tPag
e 3 o
f 28
PC
= P
arti
al C
omplian
t
N/A
= N
ot A
pplica
ble
Item
No.
Au
dit
Ele
men
tC
PC
NC
N/A
Rem
ark
sdes
ign
ato
rs?
2.6
Is t
he
dis
trib
uti
on c
ontr
olle
d a
nd o
bso
lete
pro
cedu
res
rem
oved
fro
m u
se?
2.7
Are
pro
cedu
res
ava
ilable
at
the
appro
pri
ate
wor
kst
ati
ons?
2.8
Are
pro
cedu
res
kep
t u
pdate
d?
2.9
Do
det
ailed
pro
cedu
res
exis
t fo
r th
e per
form
an
ce o
fin
spec
tion
s an
d t
ests
?3
.Q
A a
udit
s3.1
Are
sys
tem
ati
c in
tern
al an
d e
xter
nal au
dit
s per
form
ed?
3.2
Are
au
dit
s per
form
ed?
a)
Acc
ordin
g to
an
est
ablish
ed p
lan
?b)
Usi
ng
chec
klist
s?3.3
Are
in
tern
al au
dit
s co
ndu
cted
on
an
im
part
ial basi
s by
qu
alified
per
son
nel
?4
.R
eceiv
ing I
nsp
ecti
on
4.1
Is t
he
con
tract
or's
rec
eivi
ng
insp
ecti
on flo
w a
nd
act
ivit
ies
doc
um
ente
d?
4.2
Are
faci
liti
es c
lean
, pro
per
lig
hti
ng
exis
t, a
nd s
tora
gean
d h
an
dlin
g pra
ctic
es fol
low
ed?
4.3
Are
all in
com
ing
supplies
in
spec
ted a
nd t
este
d p
rior
to
use
aga
inst
th
e re
qu
irem
ents
of pro
cure
men
tdoc
um
ents
? (a
ppro
pri
ate
dra
win
gs, sp
ecific
ati
ons
an
dte
chn
ical in
stru
ctio
ns)
4.4
Are
rec
eivi
ng
insp
ecti
ons
per
form
ed in
acc
ordan
ce w
ith
esta
blish
ed p
roce
du
res
an
d in
stru
ctio
ns?
4.5
Is t
he
follow
ing
veri
fied
?a)
Iden
tifica
tion
/ c
onfigu
rati
on?
b)
Su
pplier
’s d
ocu
men
tati
on?
4.6
Wh
en s
upplies
are
acc
epte
d o
n t
he
basi
s of
cer
tifica
tion
or t
est
repor
t:a)
Are
tes
t re
por
ts c
hec
ked
100%
aga
inst
pro
cure
men
t
C =
Com
plian
t
N
C =
Not
Com
plian
tPag
e 4 o
f 28
PC
= P
arti
al C
omplian
t
N/A
= N
ot A
pplica
ble
Item
No.
Au
dit
Ele
men
tC
PC
NC
N/A
Rem
ark
sdoc
um
ents
req
uir
emen
ts?
b)
Are
rep
orts
an
d c
erti
fica
tion
ret
ain
ed?
4.7
Wh
en s
upplies
are
acc
epte
d o
n t
he
basi
s of
cer
tifica
tion
or t
est
repor
t, a
re c
hec
ks
per
form
ed t
o co
nfirm
con
form
an
ce?
4.8
Do
rece
ivin
g in
spec
tion
rec
ords
indic
ate
date
of re
ceip
t,in
spec
tion
s, t
ests
, doc
um
ents
uti
lise
d, n
um
ber
acc
epte
d/re
ject
ed?
4.9
Is t
race
abilit
y m
ain
tain
ed b
etw
een
mate
rials
an
dce
rtific
ate
s, r
epor
ts a
nd r
ecei
vin
g in
spec
tion
doc
um
ents
?4.1
0A
re t
her
e se
para
ted s
tora
ge a
reas
for
mate
rials
wait
ing
rece
ivin
g in
spec
tion
an
d m
ate
rials
alr
eady
insp
ecte
dan
d a
ccep
ted?
5.
Pack
agin
g a
nd H
an
dli
ng
Pack
agin
g5.1
Are
part
s, a
ssem
blies
an
d m
ate
rials
ver
ifie
d for
clea
nlin
ess
bef
ore
pack
agi
ng
an
d p
roper
ly p
ack
age
d?
5.2
Are
part
s h
avi
ng
crit
ical or
hig
hly
fin
ish
ed s
urf
ace
spro
tect
ed a
gain
st d
am
age
?5.3
Are
lea
ds
of e
lect
rica
l part
s pro
tect
ed fro
mco
nta
min
ati
on w
hic
h w
ill ef
fect
sol
der
abilit
y?5.4
Are
pack
agi
ng
oper
ati
ons
cove
red b
y w
ritt
enpro
cedu
res
/ in
stru
ctio
ns,
wh
ich
in
clu
de
at
least
th
efo
llow
ing:
a)
Sel
ecti
on o
f pack
agi
ng
mate
rials
?b)
Inn
er p
rote
ctio
n?
c)
Mec
han
ical pro
tect
ion
?d)
Cle
an
lin
ess
an
d c
onta
min
ati
on c
ontr
ol?
5.5
Are
pack
agi
ng
oper
ati
ons
insp
ecte
d a
nd a
re ite
ms
con
trol
led b
efor
e sh
ippin
g fo
r pro
per
pack
agi
ng,
mark
ing
an
d a
ccom
pan
yin
g doc
um
enta
tion
?
C =
Com
plian
t
N
C =
Not
Com
plian
tPag
e 5 o
f 28
PC
= P
arti
al C
omplian
t
N/A
= N
ot A
pplica
ble
Item
No.
Au
dit
Ele
men
tC
PC
NC
N/A
Rem
ark
sH
an
dli
ng
5.6
Do
han
dlin
g pro
cedu
res
an
d in
stru
ctio
ns
exis
t?5.7
Are
ite
ms
leavi
ng
a c
ontr
olle
d a
rea o
r bei
ng
tran
spor
ted
bet
wee
n w
ork/te
st a
reas
carr
ied in
appro
pri
ate
con
tain
ers
or fix
ture
s to
pro
vide
adeq
uate
pro
tect
ion
from
dam
age
or
con
tam
inati
on?
5.8
Do
the
oper
ato
rs h
ave
th
e pro
per
too
ls t
o su
ppor
t th
eass
embly
wh
ile
per
form
ing
wor
k/te
st o
n it?
6.
Cle
an
lin
ess
an
d C
on
tam
inati
on
Con
trol
6.1
Are
th
ere
pro
cedu
res
ava
ilable
sys
tem
ati
cally
cove
rin
gcl
ean
lin
ess
an
d c
onta
min
ati
on c
ontr
ol a
spec
ts?
6.2
Are
th
ere
spec
ific
in
stru
ctio
ns
for:
a)
En
teri
ng
an
d lea
vin
g cl
ean
roo
ms
(per
son
nel
an
deq
uip
men
t)?
b)
Cle
an
ing
of c
lean
roo
ms,
in
clu
din
g:1. C
lean
ing
mate
rials
?2. C
lean
ing
met
hod
s?c)
C
lean
ing
of e
qu
ipm
ent
to b
e en
tere
d in
th
e cl
ean
room
s?d)
Cle
an
roo
ms’
main
ten
an
ce?
e)
Con
trol
of cl
ean
roo
m p
ara
met
ers?
f)
Act
ion
s in
case
of ala
rm in
clu
din
g:1.
Sto
p w
ork?
2.
Sh
ield
cri
tica
l it
ems?
6.3
Are
ite
ms
test
ed a
nd in
spec
ted for
cle
an
lin
ess
such
as
(vis
ual ex
am
inati
ons,
wip
e te
sts,
ch
eck for
alk
alin
e an
daci
ds)
an
d a
re t
he
appro
pri
ate
met
hod
s u
sed?
6.4
Are
acc
ess
con
trol
in
stru
ctio
ns
pos
ted, vi
sito
rs s
ign
in
log
pro
per
ly d
ate
d a
nd e
nfo
rced
as
appro
pri
ate
?6.5
Are
sm
ock r
eten
tion
are
as
pro
vided
?6.6
Are
cle
an
sm
ocks
ava
ilable
?6.7
Are
flo
or m
ats
pla
ced a
t all e
ntr
an
ces?
C =
Com
plian
t
N
C =
Not
Com
plian
tPag
e 6 o
f 28
PC
= P
arti
al C
omplian
t
N/A
= N
ot A
pplica
ble
Item
No.
Au
dit
Ele
men
tC
PC
NC
N/A
Rem
ark
s6.8
Are
flo
or c
oati
ngs
pee
lin
g or
gen
erati
ng
du
st p
art
icle
savo
ided
?6.9
Is t
he
shed
din
g of
spon
ge, m
op o
f cl
oth
mate
rial
evid
ent?
6.1
0A
re s
moc
ks
bu
tton
ed a
nd w
orn
by
all p
erso
nn
elin
clu
din
g vi
sito
rs?
6.1
1Is
th
ere
food
, bev
erage
s or
sm
okin
g?6.1
2A
re p
erso
nal bel
ongi
ngs
ou
t of
sig
ht
an
d s
tore
dpro
per
ly?
6.1
3Is
th
e u
se o
f w
ooden
con
tain
ers
wit
h u
ntr
eate
d in
teri
oran
d e
xter
ior
surf
ace
s or
card
boa
rd b
oxes
min
imis
ed?
6.1
4A
re p
erio
dic
part
icle
cou
nts
per
form
ed t
o ve
rify
if
wit
hin
req
uir
ed lim
its?
6.1
5A
re g
love
s, c
aps,
boo
ties
an
d m
ask
s appro
pri
ate
to
the
are
a a
nd w
orn
by
all p
erso
nn
el?
6.1
6Is
th
e in
tegr
ity
of t
he
envi
ron
men
t an
d c
onta
min
ati
onco
ntr
ol m
ain
tain
ed in
rel
ati
on t
o th
e su
rrou
ndin
g are
as
or t
o m
ate
rial an
d m
obile
equ
ipm
ent
ente
rin
g th
e are
a?
6.1
7A
re o
ther
req
uir
emen
ts s
uch
as:
lam
inar
air
flow
,va
cuu
m s
hoe
cle
an
ers,
air
bath
en
tran
ces,
spec
ial
wast
e dis
pos
als
, et
c. e
nfo
rced
?6.1
8A
re c
lean
roo
m e
nvi
ron
men
t co
ndit
ion
s, t
emper
atu
re,
hu
mid
ity,
pre
ssu
re c
ontr
olle
d a
nd r
ecor
ded
?6.1
9Is
tem
per
atu
re m
ain
tain
ed n
omin
ally
at
20ºC
+/-2
ºC o
rm
eet
a s
pec
ific
pro
du
ct s
pec
ific
ati
on?
6.2
0A
re p
osit
ive
pre
ssu
re d
iffe
ren
tials
main
tain
ed b
etw
een
clea
n r
oom
an
d s
urr
oun
din
g are
a a
t 6m
m H
g an
dbet
wee
n c
lean
roo
m a
nd e
ntr
an
ce loc
k a
t 2m
m H
g w
ith
pre
ssu
re m
onit
ors?
6.2
1Is
hu
mid
ity
main
tain
ed, pre
fera
bly
at
30-5
0%
or
as
spec
ifie
d in
a p
rodu
ct s
pec
ific
ati
on a
nd m
onit
ored
wit
ha h
ygro
met
er p
erio
dic
ally
calibra
ted?
C =
Com
plian
t
N
C =
Not
Com
plian
tPag
e 7 o
f 28
PC
= P
arti
al C
omplian
t
N/A
= N
ot A
pplica
ble
Item
No.
Au
dit
Ele
men
tC
PC
NC
N/A
Rem
ark
s7
.M
an
ufa
ctu
rin
g a
nd
Test
ing
Man
ufa
ctu
rin
g a
nd
Test
ing
7.1
Are
man
ufa
ctu
rin
g op
erati
ons
an
d in
spec
tion
s pla
nn
edan
d d
escr
ibed
in
man
ufa
ctu
rin
g doc
um
ents
? (S
hop
trave
ller
s, w
ork o
rder
s)?
7.2
Do
shop
tra
veller
s in
clu
de:
a)
Rev
isio
n s
tatu
s / d
ate
, re
lease
date
?b)
Item
iden
tifica
tion
an
d c
onfigu
rati
on?
c)
Mate
rials
/ p
art
s to
be
use
d?
7.3
Are
sh
op t
rave
ller
s id
enti
fied
/ t
race
able
to
the
con
tract
no.
/ p
urc
hase
ord
er?
7.4
Are
su
ppor
t doc
um
ents
to
be
use
d r
efer
ence
d?
(e.g
.dra
win
gs, w
ork in
stru
ctio
ns)
?7.5
Are
rew
ork /
rep
air
pla
ns
use
d t
o doc
um
ent
rew
ork /
repair
man
ufa
ctu
rin
g / in
spec
tion
s op
erati
ons?
A
reth
ey a
deq
uate
? A
re t
hey
arc
hiv
ed?
Man
ufa
ctu
rin
g C
on
trol
7.6
Is s
hop
tra
veller
kep
t w
ith
pro
du
ct d
uri
ng
man
ufa
ctu
rin
g / in
spec
tion
oper
ati
ons?
7.7
Are
in
spec
tion
, fa
bri
cati
on a
nd a
ssem
bly
oper
ati
ons
trace
able
to
the
indiv
idu
al per
form
ing
the
oper
ati
on?
7.8
Are
all a
rtic
les
insp
ecte
d t
o applica
ble
/ c
ontr
olle
ddoc
um
ents
an
d a
re t
he
doc
um
ents
ava
ilable
at
the
insp
ecto
r’s
wor
kst
ati
on?
7.9
Are
un
au
thor
ised
, m
ark
ed-u
p, ille
gible
or
def
ace
ddra
win
gs o
r w
ork in
stru
ctio
ns
bei
ng
use
d?
7.1
0Is
th
e se
qu
ence
of op
erati
ons
bei
ng
follow
ed a
s def
ined
in t
he
pla
nn
ing?
7.1
1A
re a
ccep
ted a
nd r
ejec
ted ite
ms
pro
per
ly iden
tified
an
dta
gged
?7.1
2A
re p
art
lis
ts c
omple
te for
ass
embly
wor
k?
7.1
3A
re a
deq
uate
in
spec
tion
rec
ords
gen
erate
d a
nd
C =
Com
plian
t
N
C =
Not
Com
plian
tPag
e 8 o
f 28
PC
= P
arti
al C
omplian
t
N/A
= N
ot A
pplica
ble
Item
No.
Au
dit
Ele
men
tC
PC
NC
N/A
Rem
ark
sm
ain
tain
ed a
nd d
o th
ey in
dic
ate
th
e st
atu
s of
art
icle
san
d in
spec
tion
s per
form
ed?
7.1
4A
re a
ssem
bly
oper
ati
ons
per
form
ed in
seq
uen
ce w
ith
insp
ecti
on o
per
ati
ons?
7.1
5A
re t
orqu
ing
oper
ati
ons
sati
sfact
ory?
C
alibra
ted t
ools
?T
est
Docu
men
ts7.1
6D
oes
the
con
tract
or h
ave
sta
ndard
ised
pro
cedu
res
an
dm
eth
ods
for
the
pre
para
tion
, fo
rmat,
con
ten
t, r
evie
wan
d c
ontr
ol o
f te
st p
roce
du
res?
7.1
7A
re t
ext
pro
cedu
res
form
ally
rele
ase
d a
nd c
ontr
olle
dw
ith
ch
an
ge a
nd r
evis
ion
page
s?7.1
8D
o pro
cedu
res
incl
ude
as
applica
ble
th
e fo
llow
ing:
a)
Nom
encl
atu
re a
nd iden
tifica
tion
of th
e te
st a
rtic
le?
b)
Ch
ara
cter
isti
cs a
nd d
esig
n c
rite
ria t
o be
insp
ecte
d o
r te
sted
, in
clu
din
g va
lues
an
d t
oler
an
ces
for
a
ccep
tan
ce a
nd r
ejec
tion
?c)
D
etailed
ste
ps
an
d o
per
ati
ons
to b
e ta
ken
in
s
equ
ence
in
clu
din
g ve
rifica
tion
s to
be
made
bef
ore
p
roce
edin
g?d)
Cro
ss-r
efer
ence
of ch
ara
cter
isti
cs w
ith
mea
suri
ng
a
nd/or
ND
T e
qu
ipm
ent
to b
e u
sed, sp
ecifyi
ng
ran
ge a
nd t
ype?
e)
Det
ails
or in
stru
ctio
ns
for
oper
ati
on o
f sp
ecia
l data
r
ecor
din
g eq
uip
men
t of
oth
er a
uto
mate
d t
est
e
qu
ipm
ent?
f)
Layo
ut
an
d in
terc
onn
ecti
on o
f te
st e
qu
ipm
ent
an
d a
rtic
les?
g)
Iden
tifica
tion
of h
aza
rdou
s si
tuati
ons
or o
per
ati
ons?
h)
Pre
cau
tion
to
com
ply
wit
h e
stablish
ed s
afe
ty r
equ
irem
ents
, to
en
sure
safe
ty o
f per
son
nel
an
d t
o p
reve
nt
dam
age
or
deg
radati
on o
f art
icle
s an
d m
easu
rin
g eq
uip
men
t?
C =
Com
plian
t
N
C =
Not
Com
plian
tPag
e 9 o
f 28
PC
= P
arti
al C
omplian
t
N/A
= N
ot A
pplica
ble
Item
No.
Au
dit
Ele
men
tC
PC
NC
N/A
Rem
ark
si)
E
nvi
ron
men
ts a
nd o
ther
con
dit
ion
s to
be
m
ain
tain
ed?
j)
Con
stra
ints
?k)
Inst
ruct
ion
s fo
r re
por
tin
g n
on-c
onfo
rman
ce,
a
nom
alo
us
occu
rren
ces
or r
esu
lts?
7.1
9A
re t
est
pro
cedu
res
form
ally
appro
ved b
y PA
?T
est
Con
trol
7.2
0A
re p
rovi
sion
s m
ade
to p
rote
ct p
erso
nn
el a
nd ite
ms
from
ph
ysic
al dam
age
an
d e
nvi
ron
men
tal h
aza
rds?
7.2
1Is
th
e te
st ite
m in
spec
ted t
o det
erm
ine
evid
ence
of
dam
age
or
loos
e part
s?7.2
2A
re d
iscr
epan
cies
or
an
omalies
res
olve
d p
rior
to
test
ing?
7.2
3A
re t
he
follow
ing
act
ivit
ies
per
form
ed b
y PA
as
applica
ble
:a)
Wit
nes
s ea
ch t
est
an
d v
erify
test
per
form
an
ces?
b)
Obse
rvati
on?
Per
form
su
rvei
llan
ce o
r m
onit
orper
iodic
ally
the
test
bei
ng
per
form
ed a
s dir
ecte
d b
yex
plici
t in
stru
ctio
ns?
c)
Data
rev
iew
? R
evie
w t
he
pro
cedu
re a
nd r
ecor
ded
data
at
the
con
clu
sion
of th
e te
st c
ycle
ver
ifyi
ng
requ
irem
ents
an
d d
ata
en
trie
s are
com
pati
ble
?7.2
4D
o all d
ocu
men
ts b
ear
nec
essa
ry a
ppro
val si
gnatu
res
insp
ecti
on s
tam
ps?
7.2
5Is
rew
ork, re
pair
or
mod
ific
ati
on o
ccu
rrin
g to
th
ete
stin
g pro
per
ly d
ocu
men
ted?
7.2
6A
re t
est
dis
crep
an
cies
, fa
ilu
res
an
d n
on-c
onfo
rman
ce’s
repor
ted, an
aly
sed a
nd c
orre
ctiv
e act
ion
im
ple
men
ted?
8.
Measu
rem
en
ts a
nd
Test
Equ
ipm
en
t8.1
Doe
s th
e co
ntr
act
or h
ave
up-t
o-date
wri
tten
pro
cedu
res
def
inin
g h
is c
alibra
tion
sys
tem
en
com
pass
ing
mea
suri
ng
an
d t
est
equ
ipm
ent,
sta
ndard
s, c
alibra
tion
C =
Com
plian
t
N
C =
Not
Com
plian
tPag
e 10 o
f 28
PC
= P
arti
al C
omplian
t
N/A
= N
ot A
pplica
ble
Item
No.
Au
dit
Ele
men
tC
PC
NC
N/A
Rem
ark
san
d m
ain
ten
an
ce p
resc
ribed
in
terv
als
an
d m
etro
logy
labor
ato
ry e
nvi
ron
men
tal co
ntr
ols
8.2
Doe
s th
e ca
libra
tion
sys
tem
in
clu
de
all e
qu
ipm
ent
use
dto
ver
ify
the
qu
ality
of th
e pro
cess
es a
nd p
rodu
cts
bei
ng
man
ufa
ctu
red?
8.3
Do
calibra
tion
pro
cedu
res
exis
t fo
r ea
ch e
qu
ipm
ent
type
an
d in
clu
de:
a)
Equ
ipm
ent
chara
cter
isti
cs a
nd iden
tifica
tion
?b)
Loc
ati
on?
c)
Fre
qu
ency
of per
iodic
ch
ecks?
d)
Acc
epta
nce
cri
teri
a?
8.4
Is a
ll m
easu
rem
ent
an
d t
est
equ
ipm
ent
subje
cted
to
avi
sual, d
imen
sion
al an
d o
per
ati
onal in
spec
tion
upon
rece
ipt
an
d a
t per
iodic
in
terv
als
th
erea
fter
?8.5
Are
calibra
tion
label
s u
sed a
nd d
o th
ey in
clu
de
at
least
the
follow
ing:
a)
Iden
tifier
?b)
Du
e date
for
re-
calibra
tion
?c)
C
ontr
ol s
tam
p?
8.6
Is t
he
nec
essi
ty for
an
d/or
fre
qu
ency
of per
iodic
insp
ecti
ons
base
d o
n o
bje
ctiv
e ev
iden
ce o
f th
e st
abilit
yan
d c
onti
nu
ed a
ccu
racy
of th
e eq
uip
men
t? Is
th
ere
an
y in
terv
al ex
ceed
ing
1 y
ear
of v
alidit
y?8.7
Is a
ll m
easu
rem
ent
an
d t
est
equ
ipm
ent
chec
ked
aga
inst
a s
tan
dard
of gr
eate
r acc
ura
cy?
8.8
Are
tem
per
atu
re, h
um
idit
y, v
ibra
tion
an
d c
lean
lin
ess
con
trol
led t
o th
e ex
ten
t n
eces
sary
to
ass
ure
calibra
tion
an
d c
onti
nu
ed p
rodu
ct m
easu
rem
ents
of th
e re
qu
ired
acc
ura
cy?
8.9
Is it
ensu
red t
hat
erro
rs o
f m
easu
rin
g an
d t
est
equ
ipm
ent
do
not
exc
eed 1
0%
of th
e h
igh
est
tole
ran
ceof
an
y it
ems
to b
e ch
ecked
wit
h t
hat
equ
ipm
ent?
C =
Com
plian
t
N
C =
Not
Com
plian
tPag
e 11 o
f 28
PC
= P
arti
al C
omplian
t
N/A
= N
ot A
pplica
ble
Item
No.
Au
dit
Ele
men
tC
PC
NC
N/A
Rem
ark
s8.1
0A
re s
tan
dard
s aga
inst
wh
ich
tes
t an
d m
easu
rem
ent
equ
ipm
ent
are
per
iodic
ally
chec
ked
tra
ceable
to
Nati
onal or
In
tern
ati
onal S
tan
dard
s?8.1
1A
re s
tan
dard
s su
ppor
ted b
y ce
rtific
ate
s, r
epor
t,va
riable
s data
sh
eets
att
esti
ng
to t
he
date
, acc
ura
cyan
d c
ondit
ion
s u
nder
wh
ich
th
e re
sult
s w
ere
obta
ined
?8.1
2Is
th
e ca
libra
tion
org
an
isati
on s
taffed
wit
h s
uffic
ien
tqu
alified
tec
hn
ical per
son
nel
?8.1
3A
re t
ri-d
imen
sion
al m
easu
rin
g m
ach
ines
an
dla
bor
ato
ry t
esti
ng
mach
ines
per
iodic
ally
calibra
ted b
y a
qu
alified
org
an
isati
on?
9.
Non
-Con
form
an
ce C
on
trol
9.1
Is a
pro
cedu
re a
vailable
wh
ich
des
crib
es t
he
non
-co
nfo
rman
ce s
yste
m?
9.2
Are
non
-con
form
an
ces
init
ially
repor
ted o
n loc
al
reco
rds
(dis
crep
an
cy n
otes
)? W
ho
takes
dec
isio
n for
furt
her
pro
cess
ing?
Is
PA
in
volv
ed?
9.3
Do
NC
R r
ecor
ds
reflec
t ca
use
s an
d r
espon
sibilit
ies
for
the
dis
crep
an
cies
an
d s
how
cor
rect
ive
an
d p
reve
nti
veact
ion
s ta
ken
?9.4
Is t
he
inte
rnal or
gan
isati
on r
espon
sible
for
cau
sin
g th
edis
crep
an
cy in
form
ed?
An
d d
oes
it c
oncu
r to
iden
tify
pre
ven
tive
act
ion
s?9.5
Are
log
s an
d r
ecor
ds
main
tain
ed o
f all N
CR
iss
ued
an
dM
RB
mee
tin
gs?
9.6
Are
th
ere
adeq
uate
pro
visi
ons
for
segr
egati
on, re
mov
al
an
d iden
tifica
tion
of n
on-c
onfo
rmin
g m
ate
rials
? I
s th
eacc
ess
to h
oldin
g are
as
con
trol
led?
9.7
Are
NC
Rs
iden
tified
on
rel
evan
t sh
op t
rave
ller
s an
dqu
ality
rec
ords?
9.8
Are
NC
Rs
pro
per
ly fille
d o
ut
an
d c
omple
te?
9.9
Are
NC
Rs
clos
ed b
y PA
aft
er v
erific
ati
on o
f su
cces
sfu
l
C =
Com
plian
t
N
C =
Not
Com
plian
tPag
e 12 o
f 28
PC
= P
arti
al C
omplian
t
N/A
= N
ot A
pplica
ble
Item
No.
Au
dit
Ele
men
tC
PC
NC
N/A
Rem
ark
sre
med
ial act
ion
s im
ple
men
tati
on?
9.1
0A
re p
reve
nti
ve a
ctio
ns
imple
men
tati
on t
rack
ed?
(Cor
rect
ion
of te
chn
ical doc
um
ents
, m
odific
ati
on o
fto
ols
an
d w
ork in
stru
ctio
n?)
9.1
1A
re n
on-c
onfo
rman
ces
class
ifie
d a
ccor
din
g to
applica
ble
pro
ject
ru
les?
9.1
2A
re t
he
follow
ing
dis
pos
itio
ns
applied
?a)
Use
-as-
is?
b)
Rew
ork?
c)
Rep
air
?d)
Scr
ap?
e)
Ret
urn
to
supplier
?9.1
3A
re m
ajo
r n
on-c
onfo
rman
ces
not
ifie
d t
o E
SA
wit
hin
1w
orkin
g day
aft
er t
he
revi
ew b
y th
e lo
cal M
RB
?9.1
4Is
a R
FW
iss
ued
if th
e n
on-c
onfo
rman
ce d
ispos
itio
naffec
ts t
he
pro
du
ct c
onfigu
rati
on?
10
Pro
cess
Con
trol
10.1
Are
sta
ndard
/ e
stablish
ed p
roce
sses
cla
ssifie
d in
acc
ordan
ce t
o Pro
ject
ru
les?
10.2
Is e
ach
pro
cess
cov
ered
by
a s
pec
ific
ati
on?
10.3
Do
pro
cess
spec
ific
ati
ons
incl
ude
QA
pro
visi
ons,
met
hod
s fo
r in
spec
tion
an
d t
est,
nu
mber
of sa
mple
s,acc
ept
/ r
ejec
t cr
iter
ia?
10.4
Doe
s th
e co
mpan
y m
ain
tain
doc
um
ente
d e
viden
ce o
fpro
cess
es v
alidati
on s
tatu
s?10.5
Are
ch
an
ges
to p
roce
ss im
ple
men
ted t
hro
ugh
esta
blish
ed C
onfigu
rati
on C
ontr
ol p
roce
du
res?
10.6
Are
th
e per
son
nel
wh
o per
form
cri
tica
l pro
cess
es o
rev
alu
ate
pro
cess
per
form
an
ce n
um
eric
ally
adeq
uate
,tr
ain
ed a
nd c
erti
fied
?10.7
Are
mate
rials
, eq
uip
men
t, c
ompu
ter
syst
ems
an
dso
ftw
are
an
d p
roce
du
res
invo
lved
in
th
e per
form
an
ce o
f
C =
Com
plian
t
N
C =
Not
Com
plian
tPag
e 13 o
f 28
PC
= P
arti
al C
omplian
t
N/A
= N
ot A
pplica
ble
Item
No.
Au
dit
Ele
men
tC
PC
NC
N/A
Rem
ark
scr
itic
al pro
cess
es v
alidate
d?
10.8
Are
non
-des
tru
ctiv
e-in
spec
tion
s (N
DI)
tre
ate
d in
th
esa
me
way
of c
riti
cal pro
cess
es?
10.9
Are
rep
rese
nta
tive
ND
I st
an
dard
s ava
ilable
for
equ
ipm
ent
calibra
tion
an
d t
o m
onit
or e
qu
ipm
ent
per
form
an
ce?
10.1
0A
re N
DI
insp
ecti
on r
ecor
ds
main
tain
ed?
10.1
1A
re p
roce
ss e
qu
ipm
ent
per
iodic
ally
chec
ked
(as
applica
ble
) fo
r:a)
Tem
per
atu
re u
nifor
mit
y?b)
Inte
grit
y / p
reci
sion
of
ther
mo-
cou
ple
lin
es?
c)
Inte
grit
y of
vacu
um
rel
ate
d fea
ture
s (lin
es, et
c.)?
d)
En
d-t
o-en
d in
stru
men
ts c
alibra
tion
?e)
E
ffec
tive
nes
s of
con
tam
inati
on c
ontr
ol m
ean
s?10.1
2F
or e
ach
pro
cess
per
form
ed a
re r
ecor
ds
main
tain
ed o
fm
ain
pro
cess
para
met
ers
an
d o
f re
late
d labor
ato
rysa
mple
s te
sts
resu
lts?
10.1
3A
re t
her
e pro
visi
ons
in c
ase
of in
terr
upti
on o
f m
ain
pow
er s
upply
du
rin
g op
erati
on?
11
Pro
cu
rem
en
t C
on
trol
11.1
Doe
s th
e co
ntr
act
or m
ain
tain
a lis
t of
appro
ved
subco
ntr
act
ors
an
d s
upplier
s su
ppor
ted w
ith
qu
alita
tive
an
d q
uan
tita
tive
data
?11.2
Has
form
al ass
essm
ent
incl
udin
g per
iodic
fol
low
-up
bee
n a
ccom
plish
ed o
n s
ubco
ntr
act
ors
an
d s
upplier
s?11.3
Doe
s th
e co
ntr
act
or c
onti
nu
ally
evalu
ate
su
bco
ntr
act
or/ s
upplier
’s h
isto
ry /
res
ult
s an
d im
ple
men
t co
rrec
tive
act
ion
s w
hen
appro
pri
ate
?11.4
Are
pro
ject
pec
uliar
requ
irem
ents
iden
tified
in
ord
erth
at
qu
ality
per
son
nel
rev
iew
ing
pu
rch
ase
doc
um
ents
have
adeq
uate
pro
ject
an
d t
ech
nic
al data
to
per
form
the
revi
ew?
C =
Com
plian
t
N
C =
Not
Com
plian
tPag
e 14 o
f 28
PC
= P
arti
al C
omplian
t
N/A
= N
ot A
pplica
ble
Item
No.
Au
dit
Ele
men
tC
PC
NC
N/A
Rem
ark
s11.5
Doe
s th
e co
ntr
act
or m
ain
tain
an
d im
ple
men
t a s
yste
mof
effec
tive
ly p
ass
ing
on c
ontr
act
/ p
roje
ct q
uality
requ
irem
ents
to
the
subco
ntr
act
ors
an
d s
upplier
s?11.6
Do
pro
cure
men
t doc
um
ents
con
tain
Pro
du
ct A
ssu
ran
cepro
visi
ons
for
the
follow
ing
as
appro
pri
ate
:a)
Applica
ble
ES
A c
ontr
act
or P
A s
pec
ific
ati
ons?
b)
Ch
emic
al an
d/or
ph
ysic
al te
st r
esu
lts
(raw
mat.
)?c)
A
ccom
pan
yin
g sp
ecim
en for
in
com
ing
test
s?d)
Age
con
trol
of lim
ited
life
pro
du
cts?
e)
Ch
ara
cter
isti
cs t
o be
insp
ecte
d o
r te
sted
?f)
R
equ
irem
ents
for
in
spec
tion
an
d t
est
reco
rds?
g)
Pro
cess
ing
of n
on-c
onfo
rmin
g m
ate
rials
?h
) R
equ
irem
ents
for
sou
rce
insp
ecti
on a
nd M
IPs?
i)
Rig
ht
of a
cces
s an
d p
lan
ned
su
rvei
llan
ce a
ctiv
itie
s?j)
C
lean
lin
ess
an
d c
onta
min
ati
on c
ontr
ol?
k)
Acc
epta
nce
data
pack
age
an
d d
eliv
ery?
l)
Pre
serv
ati
on, pack
agi
ng
an
d s
hip
pin
g?m
) C
riti
cal pro
cess
req
uir
emen
ts?
11.7
Are
pu
rch
ase
doc
um
ents
rev
iew
ed a
nd a
ppro
ved b
yPA
?11.8
Doe
s th
e co
ntr
act
or h
ave
a p
olic
y or
ru
les
for
sou
rce
insp
ecti
on?
11.9
Are
adeq
uate
ly t
rain
ed p
erso
nn
el a
vailable
for
sou
rce
insp
ecti
on?
11.1
0D
oes
the
con
tract
or m
ain
tain
rec
ords
of s
ourc
eact
ivit
ies,
sta
tus
def
icie
nci
es a
nd a
ctio
n ite
ms?
12
Tra
inin
g a
nd
Cert
ific
ati
on
12.1
Are
per
son
nel
per
form
ing
crit
ical pro
cess
es a
nd n
on-
des
tru
ctiv
e te
stin
g tr
ain
ed a
nd c
erti
fied
acc
ordin
g to
adoc
um
ente
d t
rain
ing
pro
gram
me?
12.2
Are
nati
onal or
in
tern
ati
onal tr
ain
ing
pro
gram
mes
an
dst
an
dard
s applied
?
C =
Com
plian
t
N
C =
Not
Com
plian
tPag
e 15 o
f 28
PC
= P
arti
al C
omplian
t
N/A
= N
ot A
pplica
ble
Item
No.
Au
dit
Ele
men
tC
PC
NC
N/A
Rem
ark
s12.3
Are
ND
T p
erso
nn
el t
rain
ed a
nd c
erti
fied
acc
ordin
g to
MIL
-STD
-410 o
r eq
uiv
ale
nt?
12.4
Is r
e-ce
rtific
ati
on p
erfo
rmed
per
iodic
ally
acc
ordin
g to
an
est
ablish
ed p
rogr
am
me
or fol
low
ing
exte
nsi
vein
terr
upti
on o
f w
ork o
r u
nsa
tisf
act
ory
per
form
an
ce?
12.5
Are
qu
an
tita
tive
tes
ts u
sed t
o ve
rify
th
e pro
fici
ency
of
the
train
ed p
erso
nn
el?
12.6
Are
rec
ords
doc
um
enti
ng
per
son
nel
tra
inin
gm
ain
tain
ed?
13
Sta
mp
Con
trol
13.1
Doe
s a d
ocu
men
ted s
yste
m e
xist
for
th
e u
sage
of
stam
ps?
(in
spec
tion
, fa
bri
cati
on, te
st, et
c.)
13.2
Do
reco
rds
exis
t allow
ing
trace
abilit
y to
th
e re
spon
sible
indiv
idu
als
an
d d
efin
ing
the
au
thor
ity
/ lim
itati
ons
inu
se?
14
Desi
gn
Con
trol
14.1
Are
th
ere
stan
dard
s an
d p
roce
du
res
ava
ilable
for
pre
para
tion
an
d m
ain
ten
an
ce o
f en
gin
eeri
ng
dra
win
gsan
d s
pec
ific
ati
ons?
14.2
Are
th
ere
pro
cedu
res
for
track
ing
an
d d
ocu
men
tati
on o
fre
qu
irem
ents
ver
ific
ati
on?
14.3
Do
QA
per
son
nel
part
icip
ate
in
in
tern
al des
ign
rev
iew
sto
en
sure
th
at:
a)
Tec
hn
ical doc
um
ents
com
ply
wit
h p
roce
du
res
an
dst
an
dard
s?b)
Req
uir
ed in
spec
tion
s an
d t
ests
are
appro
pri
ate
an
dfe
asi
ble
?14.4
Is Q
A p
art
icip
ati
on t
o in
tern
al des
ign
rev
iew
sdoc
um
ente
d?
14.5
In s
uppor
t of
for
mal des
ign
rev
iew
s w
ith
th
e cu
stom
erdoe
s th
e PA
fu
nct
ion
en
sure
th
at:
a)
Doc
um
ents
are
com
ple
te a
nd c
onsi
sten
t?
C =
Com
plian
t
N
C =
Not
Com
plian
tPag
e 16 o
f 28
PC
= P
arti
al C
omplian
t
N/A
= N
ot A
pplica
ble
Item
No.
Au
dit
Ele
men
tC
PC
NC
N/A
Rem
ark
sb)
An
aly
ses
clea
rly
iden
tify
th
e re
late
d b
ase
lin
e?c)
S
afe
ty, re
liabilit
y an
d m
ain
tain
abilit
y are
fact
ored
into
th
e des
ign
?d)
Th
e des
ign
is
pro
du
cible
, in
spec
table
, te
stable
?
II.
Reli
abil
ity
1.
Reli
abil
ity
1.1
Doe
s a s
yste
m e
xist
for
en
suri
ng
that
des
ign
ers
are
aw
are
of part
der
ati
ng
crit
eria
wit
h w
hic
h t
hey
are
expec
ted t
o co
mply
?1.2
Doe
s a p
roce
du
re e
xist
des
crib
ing
the
FM
EC
A a
ppro
ach
of t
he
con
tract
or?
1.3
Doe
s th
e FM
EC
A a
ppro
ach
foc
us
on:
a.
Iden
tifica
tion
an
d c
ontr
ol o
f si
ngl
e poi
nt
failu
re?
b.
Cri
tica
l in
terf
ace
s?c.
M
eth
ods
by
wh
ich
red
un
dan
cy is
imple
men
ted?
d.
Pro
du
ct d
esig
n (e.
g. layo
ut
of P
CB
s, t
race
wid
th, pad
size
s an
d o
ther
failu
re c
au
ses
rela
ted t
o m
ech
an
ical
con
figu
rati
on?)
1.4
Is a
fu
nct
ion
al FM
EC
A p
erfo
rmed
at
syst
em (payl
oad)
leve
l?1.5
Doe
s th
e FM
EC
A in
clu
de
the
iden
tifica
tion
of m
eth
ods
by
wh
ich
th
e ex
iste
nce
of fa
ilu
re m
odes
can
be
det
erm
ined
du
rin
g op
erati
ons?
1.6
Doe
s th
e FM
EC
A a
deq
uate
ly r
efer
ence
basi
c des
ign
doc
um
enta
tion
su
ch a
s sp
ecific
ati
ons,
des
ign
rep
orts
,dra
win
gs, ci
rcu
it d
iagr
am
s, p
art
lis
ts a
nd o
per
ati
ng
pro
cedu
res?
III.
Main
tain
abil
ity
1.
Main
tain
abil
ity
1.1
Is t
he
con
tract
or a
ware
of basi
c m
ain
tain
abilit
y
C =
Com
plian
t
N
C =
Not
Com
plian
tPag
e 17 o
f 28
PC
= P
arti
al C
omplian
t
N/A
= N
ot A
pplica
ble
Item
No.
Au
dit
Ele
men
tC
PC
NC
N/A
Rem
ark
spri
nci
ple
s an
d t
ech
niq
ues
?1.2
Is t
he
con
tract
or fam
ilia
r w
ith
main
ten
an
ce c
once
pts
,pla
nn
ing
an
d s
uppor
tin
g el
emen
ts?
1.3
Do
pro
cedu
res
exis
t to
per
form
main
tain
abilit
y st
udie
san
d m
ain
tain
abilit
y pre
dic
tion
s?1.4
Is m
ain
tain
abilit
y a d
esig
n p
ara
met
er m
onit
ored
for
com
plian
ce t
hro
ugh
out
the
des
ign
pro
cess
?
IV.
Safe
ty1
.S
afe
ty1.1
Are
NA
SA
an
d E
SA
safe
ty r
elate
d d
ocu
men
ts(s
pec
ific
ati
ons,
sta
ndard
s, h
an
dboo
ks)
ava
ilable
?1.2
Has
an
adeq
uate
pro
gram
of tr
ain
ing,
safe
ty m
otiv
ati
onan
d a
ware
nes
s bee
n in
stit
ute
d?
1.3
Is t
he
con
tract
or a
ble
to
suppor
t h
is s
ubco
ntr
act
ors
for
safe
ty r
elate
d iss
ues
?1.4
Are
th
ere
adeq
uate
safe
ty p
lan
s pro
du
ced c
over
ing:
a.
Sco
pe
of s
afe
ty e
ffor
t?b.
Em
ph
asi
s on
safe
ty a
naly
ses
an
d r
evie
ws?
c.
Haza
rd c
ontr
ol p
roce
du
res?
d.
Invo
lvem
ent
of P
A a
nd s
afe
ty p
erso
nn
el t
hro
ugh
out
des
ign
an
d d
evel
opm
ent?
e.
Safe
ty d
esig
n c
rite
ria?
f.
Safe
ty v
erific
ati
on p
rogr
am
?1.5
Doe
s a d
etailed
pro
cedu
re e
xist
to
esta
blish
an
dm
ain
tain
a s
afe
ty v
erific
ati
on p
rogr
am
? A
nd d
oes
itallow
for
coo
rdin
ati
on o
f all in
tere
sted
con
tract
or's
fun
ctio
ns
so t
o pro
vide
pro
mpt
feed
back
to
ES
A?
1.6
Are
safe
ty r
elate
d in
spec
tion
s an
d t
ests
per
form
ed b
y or
un
der
dir
ect
surv
eillan
ce o
f th
e PA
an
d S
afe
tyfu
nct
ion
?1.7
Doe
s th
e PA
an
d S
afe
ty fu
nct
ion
have
rev
iew
au
thor
ity
C =
Com
plian
t
N
C =
Not
Com
plian
tPag
e 18 o
f 28
PC
= P
arti
al C
omplian
t
N/A
= N
ot A
pplica
ble
Item
No.
Au
dit
Ele
men
tC
PC
NC
N/A
Rem
ark
sov
er a
ll t
est
pla
ns
wit
h a
deq
uate
lea
d t
ime
to iden
tify
an
d c
ontr
ol a
ssoc
iate
d h
aza
rds?
1.8
Is t
he
gen
erati
on o
f sa
fety
doc
um
ents
for
a p
roje
ct w
ell
def
ined
an
d s
ched
ule
d?
1.9
Do
the
safe
ty a
naly
ses
make
maxi
mu
m u
se o
f FM
EC
Are
sult
s?
V.
Soft
ware
PA
1.
Org
an
isati
on
al
Str
uctu
re1.1
For
each
pro
ject
in
volv
ing
soft
ware
dev
elop
men
t, is
ther
e a d
esig
nate
d s
oftw
are
man
age
r?1.2
Doe
s th
e pro
ject
sof
tware
man
age
r re
por
t dir
ectl
y to
th
epro
ject
man
age
r?1.3
Is t
her
e a s
oftw
are
PA
fu
nct
ion
for
each
pro
ject
th
at
invo
lves
sof
tware
dev
elop
men
t?1.4
Is t
her
e a s
oftw
are
con
figu
rati
on c
ontr
ol fu
nct
ion
for
pro
ject
s th
at
invo
lve
soft
ware
dev
elop
men
t?1.5
Wh
ich
res
pon
sibilit
ies
are
ass
ign
ed t
o th
e so
ftw
are
PA
fun
ctio
n in
th
e va
riou
s ph
ase
s of
th
e so
ftw
are
life
cycl
e?1.6
How
is
the
indep
enden
ce o
f th
e so
ftw
are
PA
fu
nct
ion
ass
ure
d?
1.7
Is t
he
test
org
an
isati
on in
dep
enden
t fr
om t
he
dev
elop
men
t? (u
nit
, in
tegr
ati
on, sy
stem
)1.8
Wh
o dec
ides
in
case
of co
nflic
t bet
wee
n d
iffe
ren
tor
gan
isati
onal u
nit
s?1.9
Is P
rodu
ct A
ssu
ran
ce a
ppro
val m
an
dato
ry p
rior
to
soft
ware
rel
ease
?2
.R
eso
urc
es,
pers
on
nel
an
d t
rain
ing
2.1
Doe
s ea
ch s
oftw
are
dev
elop
er h
ave
pri
vate
com
pu
ter-
suppor
ted w
orkst
ati
on/te
rmin
al?
2.2
Are
pro
ject
man
age
rs fam
ilia
r w
ith
sof
tware
pro
ject
C =
Com
plian
t
N
C =
Not
Com
plian
tPag
e 19 o
f 28
PC
= P
arti
al C
omplian
t
N/A
= N
ot A
pplica
ble
Item
No.
Au
dit
Ele
men
tC
PC
NC
N/A
Rem
ark
sm
an
age
men
t dis
ciplin
es?
2.3
Is t
her
e a r
equ
ired
sof
tware
en
gin
eeri
ng
train
ing
pro
gram
for
sof
tware
dev
elop
ers?
3.
Soft
ware
en
gin
eeri
ng e
xperi
en
ce
3.1
Wh
at
is t
he
med
ian
nu
mber
of ye
ars
of applica
ble
exper
ien
ce o
f so
ftw
are
pro
ject
man
age
rs?
3.2
Wh
at
is t
he
med
ian
nu
mber
of ye
ars
of applica
ble
exper
ien
ce o
f so
ftw
are
in
tegr
ati
on a
nd t
est
man
age
rs?
3.3
Wh
at
is t
he
med
ian
nu
mber
of ye
ars
of so
ftw
are
dev
elop
men
t ex
per
ien
ce o
f th
e so
ftw
are
sta
ff?
3.4
Wh
at
per
cen
tage
of th
e so
ftw
are
sta
ff h
as
at
least
on
eye
ar
of d
evel
opm
ent
exper
ien
ce w
ith
th
e des
ign
an
dim
ple
men
tati
on lan
guage
s to
be
use
d?
3.5
Of th
ose
wit
h e
xper
ien
ce, w
hat
is t
he
med
ian
nu
mber
of y
ears
of ex
per
ien
ce w
ith
th
ose
lan
guage
s?3.6
Wh
at
is t
he
med
ian
siz
e, in
sou
rce
lin
es o
f co
de,
of
soft
ware
dev
elop
men
t pro
ject
s co
mple
ted in
th
e la
st fiv
eye
ars
?3.7
Wh
at
is t
he
size
of th
e sm
alles
t pro
ject
?3.8
Wh
at
is t
he
size
of th
e la
rges
t pro
ject
?4
.D
ocu
men
ted
sta
nd
ard
s an
d p
rocedu
res
4.1
Doe
s th
e so
ftw
are
org
an
isati
on u
se a
sta
ndard
ised
an
ddoc
um
ente
d s
oftw
are
dev
elop
men
t pro
cess
on
each
pro
ject
?4.2
Doe
s th
e st
an
dard
sof
tware
dev
elop
men
t pro
cess
doc
um
enta
tion
des
crib
e th
e u
se o
f to
ols
an
dte
chn
iqu
es?
4.3
Is a
for
mal pro
cedu
re u
sed t
o ass
ure
per
iodic
man
age
men
t re
view
of th
e st
atu
s of
each
sof
tware
dev
elop
men
t pro
ject
?4.4
Is t
her
e a m
ech
an
ism
for
ass
uri
ng
that
soft
ware
subco
ntr
act
ors,
if an
y, fol
low
a d
isci
plin
ed s
oftw
are
C =
Com
plian
t
N
C =
Not
Com
plian
tPag
e 20 o
f 28
PC
= P
arti
al C
omplian
t
N/A
= N
ot A
pplica
ble
Item
No.
Au
dit
Ele
men
tC
PC
NC
N/A
Rem
ark
sdev
elop
men
t pro
cess
?4.5
Are
sta
ndard
s u
sed t
o sp
ecify
the
con
ten
t of
sof
tware
doc
um
ents
(file
s/fo
lder
s)?
4.6
Are
in
spec
tion
s co
ndu
cted
du
rin
g th
e so
ftw
are
dev
elop
men
t pro
cess
?4.7
Are
cod
ing
stan
dard
s applied
to
the
soft
ware
dev
elop
men
t pro
cess
?4.8
Are
sta
ndard
s applied
to
the
pre
para
tion
of
un
it/in
tegr
ati
on/sy
stem
tes
t ca
ses?
4.9
Are
cod
e m
ain
tain
abilit
y st
an
dard
s applied
?4.1
0A
re in
tern
al des
ign
rev
iew
sta
ndard
s applied
?4.1
1A
re c
ode
insp
ecti
on s
tan
dard
s applied
?4.1
2A
re s
oftw
are
cla
ssific
ati
on r
ule
s applied
?4.1
3Is
a for
mal pro
cedu
re a
pplied
to
esti
mate
sof
tware
siz
e?4.1
4Is
a for
mal pro
cedu
re a
pplied
to
pro
du
ce s
oftw
are
dev
elop
men
t sc
hed
ule
s?4.1
5A
re for
mal pro
cedu
res
applied
to
esti
mati
ng
soft
ware
dev
elop
men
t co
st?
4.1
6Is
a m
ech
an
ism
use
d for
en
suri
ng
that
the
soft
ware
des
ign
tea
ms
are
fam
ilia
r w
ith
th
e so
ftw
are
requ
irem
ents
?4.1
7A
re m
an
-mach
ine
inte
rface
sta
ndard
s applied
to
each
appro
pri
ate
sof
tware
dev
elop
men
t pro
ject
?5
.P
rocess
metr
ics
5.1
Are
sof
tware
sta
ffin
g pro
file
s m
ain
tain
ed (act
ual
staffin
g ve
rsu
s pla
nn
ed s
taffin
g)?
5.2
Are
pro
file
s of
sof
tware
siz
e m
ain
tain
ed for
each
soft
ware
con
figu
rati
on ite
m, ov
er t
ime?
5.3
Are
sta
tist
ics
on s
oftw
are
cod
e an
d t
est
erro
rsga
ther
ed?
5.4
Are
des
ign
/co
din
g er
rors
pro
ject
ed a
nd c
ompare
d t
oact
ual?
C =
Com
plian
t
N
C =
Not
Com
plian
tPag
e 21 o
f 28
PC
= P
arti
al C
omplian
t
N/A
= N
ot A
pplica
ble
Item
No.
Au
dit
Ele
men
tC
PC
NC
N/A
Rem
ark
s5.5
Are
pro
file
s m
ain
tain
ed o
f act
ual ve
rsu
s pla
nn
eddes
ign
ed s
oftw
are
un
its,
ove
r ti
me?
5.6
Are
pro
file
s m
ain
tain
ed o
f act
ual ve
rsu
s pla
nn
ed t
este
dso
ftw
are
un
its,
ove
r ti
me?
5.7
Are
pro
file
s m
ain
tain
ed o
f act
ual ve
rsu
s pla
nn
edin
tegr
ate
d s
oftw
are
un
its,
ove
r ti
me?
5.8
Are
pro
cess
or m
emor
y u
tilisa
tion
est
imate
s ve
rsu
sact
ual si
ze t
rack
ed?
(siz
ing
figu
res)
5.9
Are
targ
et p
roce
ssor
th
rou
ghpu
t u
tilisa
tion
est
imate
sve
rsu
s act
ual u
sed, tr
ack
ed?
(tim
ing
figu
res)
5.1
0A
re d
esig
n a
nd c
ode
revi
ew c
over
age
mea
sure
d a
nd
reco
rded
?5.1
1Is
tes
t co
vera
ge m
easu
red a
nd r
ecor
ded
for
each
ph
ase
of fu
nct
ion
al te
stin
g?5.1
2A
re t
he
act
ion
ite
ms
resu
ltin
g fr
om s
oftw
are
rev
iew
str
ack
ed t
o cl
osu
re?
5.1
3A
re s
oftw
are
pro
ble
m r
epor
ts r
esu
ltin
g fr
om t
esti
ng
track
ed t
o cl
osu
re?
5.1
4A
re t
he
act
ion
ite
ms
resu
ltin
g fr
om d
esig
n/co
de
insp
ecti
ons
track
ed t
o cl
osu
re?
5.1
5Is
tes
t pro
gres
s tr
ack
ed for
each
del
iver
able
sof
tware
un
it/co
mpon
ent?
6.
Data
man
agem
en
t an
d a
naly
sis
6.1
Has
a m
an
age
d a
nd c
ontr
olle
d p
roce
ss d
ata
base
bee
nes
tablish
ed t
o pro
cess
met
rics
data
acr
oss
all p
roje
cts?
6.2
Are
th
e re
view
data
gath
ered
du
rin
g so
ftw
are
rev
iew
san
aly
sed?
6.3
Is t
he
erro
r data
fro
m c
ode
insp
ecti
ons
an
d t
ests
an
aly
sed t
o det
erm
ine
the
likel
y dis
trib
uti
on a
nd
chara
cter
isti
cs o
f th
e re
main
ing
erro
rs in
th
e pro
du
ct?
6.4
Are
an
aly
ses
of e
rror
s co
ndu
cted
to
det
erm
ine
thei
rpro
cess
rel
ate
d c
au
ses?
C =
Com
plian
t
N
C =
Not
Com
plian
tPag
e 22 o
f 28
PC
= P
arti
al C
omplian
t
N/A
= N
ot A
pplica
ble
Item
No.
Au
dit
Ele
men
tC
PC
NC
N/A
Rem
ark
s6.5
Is a
mec
han
ism
use
d for
err
or c
au
se a
naly
sis?
6.6
Are
th
e er
ror
cau
ses
revi
ewed
to
det
erm
ine
the
pro
cess
chan
ges
requ
ired
to
pre
ven
t th
em?
6.7
Is a
mec
han
ism
use
d for
in
itia
tin
g er
ror
pre
ven
tion
act
ion
?7
.P
rocess
con
trol
7.1
Doe
s m
an
age
men
t h
ave
a m
ech
an
ism
for
th
e re
gula
rre
view
of th
e st
atu
s of
sof
tware
dev
elop
men
t pro
ject
s?7.2
Is a
mec
han
ism
use
d for
per
iodic
ally
ass
essi
ng
the
soft
ware
en
gin
eeri
ng
pro
cess
an
d im
ple
men
tin
gim
pro
vem
ents
?7.3
Is a
mec
han
ism
use
d for
iden
tify
ing
an
d r
esol
vin
gsy
stem
en
gin
eeri
ng
issu
es t
hat
cou
ld a
ffec
t so
ftw
are
?7.4
Is a
mec
han
ism
use
d for
reg
ula
r te
chn
ical in
terc
han
ges
wit
h t
he
cust
omer
?7.5
Is a
mec
han
ism
use
d for
en
suri
ng
com
plian
ce w
ith
th
eso
ftw
are
en
gin
eeri
ng
stan
dard
s?7.6
Is a
mec
han
ism
use
d for
en
suri
ng
trace
abilit
y bet
wee
nth
e so
ftw
are
req
uir
emen
ts a
nd t
op-l
evel
des
ign
?7.7
Is a
mec
han
ism
use
d for
con
trol
lin
g ch
an
ges
to t
he
soft
ware
req
uir
emen
ts?
7.8
Is c
onfigu
rati
on m
an
age
men
t im
ple
men
ted?
(Base
lin
es,
Iden
tifica
tion
, Lib
rari
es, R
elea
se a
nd v
ersi
on c
ontr
ol)
7.9
Is a
mec
han
ism
use
d for
en
suri
ng
trace
abilit
y bet
wee
nth
e so
ftw
are
top
-lev
el a
nd d
etailed
des
ign
s?7.1
0A
re in
tern
al so
ftw
are
des
ign
rev
iew
s co
ndu
cted
?7.1
1Is
a m
ech
an
ism
use
d for
con
trol
lin
g ch
an
ges
to t
he
soft
ware
des
ign
?7.1
2Is
a m
ech
an
ism
use
d for
en
suri
ng
trace
abilit
y bet
wee
nth
e so
ftw
are
det
ailed
des
ign
an
d c
ode
un
its
/co
mpon
ents
?7.1
3Is
a m
ech
an
ism
use
d for
en
suri
ng
trace
abilit
y bet
wee
n
C =
Com
plian
t
N
C =
Not
Com
plian
tPag
e 23 o
f 28
PC
= P
arti
al C
omplian
t
N/A
= N
ot A
pplica
ble
Item
No.
Au
dit
Ele
men
tC
PC
NC
N/A
Rem
ark
sth
e so
ftw
are
det
ailed
des
ign
an
d c
ode
un
its/
com
pon
ents
?7.1
4A
re s
oftw
are
cod
e re
view
s co
ndu
cted
?7.1
5Is
a m
ech
an
ism
use
d for
con
trol
lin
g ch
an
ges
to t
he
code?
(W
ho
can
make
chan
ges
an
d u
nder
wh
ich
circ
um
stan
ces?
)7.1
6Is
a m
ech
an
ism
use
d for
con
figu
rati
on m
an
age
men
t of
the
soft
ware
too
ls u
sed in
th
e dev
elop
men
t pro
cess
?7.1
7Is
a m
ech
an
ism
use
d for
ver
ifyi
ng
that
the
sam
ple
sex
am
ined
by
Sof
tware
Pro
du
ct A
ssu
ran
ce a
re t
ruly
repre
sen
tati
ve o
f th
e w
ork p
erfo
rmed
?7.1
8Is
th
ere
a m
ech
an
ism
for
ass
uri
ng
that
regr
essi
onte
stin
g is
rou
tin
ely
per
form
ed?
7.1
9Is
th
ere
a m
ech
an
ism
for
ass
uri
ng
the
adeq
uacy
of
regr
essi
on t
esti
ng?
7.2
0A
re for
mal te
st c
ase
rev
iew
s co
ndu
cted
?7.2
1D
o th
e co
mpan
y's
pro
cedu
res
des
crib
e ta
sks
an
dre
spon
sibilit
ies
for
diffe
ren
t te
st t
ypes
?7.2
2Is
mod
ule
(in
tegr
ati
on, sy
stem
) le
vel te
stin
g co
vere
d b
yth
ese
pro
cedu
res?
7.2
3A
re t
est
cove
rage
mea
sure
men
ts d
efin
ed?
7.2
4Is
th
ere
an
appro
ach
for
for
mal qu
alifica
tion
tes
tin
g?7.2
5A
re n
onco
nfo
rman
ces
pro
per
ly d
ocu
men
ted, in
clu
din
gdis
pos
itio
ns
an
d r
etes
tin
g?8
.T
ools
an
d T
ech
nolo
gy
8.1
Is a
uto
mate
d c
onfigu
rati
on c
ontr
ol a
nd t
rack
ch
an
geact
ivit
y th
rou
ghou
t th
e so
ftw
are
dev
elop
men
t pro
cess
?8.2
Are
com
pu
ter
tool
s u
sed t
o ass
ist
in t
raci
ng
soft
ware
requ
irem
ents
to
soft
ware
des
ign
?8.3
Are
des
ign
met
hod
olog
ies
use
d in
pro
gram
des
ign
?8.4
Are
com
pu
ter
tool
s u
sed t
o ass
ist
in t
raci
ng
the
soft
ware
des
ign
to
the
code?
C =
Com
plian
t
N
C =
Not
Com
plian
tPag
e 24 o
f 28
PC
= P
arti
al C
omplian
t
N/A
= N
ot A
pplica
ble
Item
No.
Au
dit
Ele
men
tC
PC
NC
N/A
Rem
ark
s8.5
Wh
ich
lan
guage
s are
use
d in
sof
tware
dev
elop
men
ts?
8.6
Wh
at
is t
he
per
cen
tage
of so
ftw
are
dev
elop
men
tsim
ple
men
ted in
hig
h-o
rder
lan
guage
?8.7
Wh
at
is t
he
per
cen
tage
of so
ftw
are
dev
elop
men
tsim
ple
men
ted in
ass
emble
r la
ngu
age
?8.8
Are
au
tom
ate
d t
est
inpu
t data
gen
erato
rs u
sed for
test
ing?
8.9
Are
com
pu
ter
tool
s u
sed t
o m
easu
re t
est
cove
rage
? (t
ool
for
dyn
am
ic a
naly
ses)
8.1
0A
re c
ompu
ter
tool
s u
sed t
o tr
ack
eve
ry r
equ
ired
fun
ctio
n a
nd a
ssu
re t
hat
it is
test
ed/ve
rified
?8.1
1A
re a
uto
mate
d t
ools
use
d t
o an
aly
se t
he
size
an
dch
an
ge a
ctiv
ity
in s
oftw
are
com
pon
ents
?8.1
2A
re a
uto
mate
d t
ools
use
d t
o an
aly
se s
oftw
are
com
ple
xity
? (to
ols
for
stati
c an
aly
ses)
8.1
3A
re in
tera
ctiv
e so
urc
e-le
vel deb
ugg
ers
use
d?
8.1
4A
re c
ompu
ter
tool
s u
sed for
tra
ckin
g an
d r
epor
tin
g th
est
atu
s of
th
e so
ftw
are
in
th
e so
ftw
are
dev
elop
men
tlibra
ry?
8.1
5A
re p
roto
typin
g m
eth
ods
use
d in
des
ign
ing
the
crit
ical
elem
ents
of th
e m
an
-mach
ine
inte
rface
?8.1
6W
hic
h o
ther
SD
E t
ools
are
cu
rren
tly
use
d?
9.
Pro
cu
rem
en
t of
CO
TS
9.1
Is t
her
e a p
roce
du
re for
CO
TS
pro
cure
men
t?9.2
Is t
he
supplier
's c
apabilit
y or
en
suri
ng
CO
TS
main
ten
an
ce t
aken
in
to a
ccou
nt
wh
en p
rocu
rin
gso
ftw
are
?9.3
Are
lic
ensi
ng
arr
an
gem
ents
taken
in
to c
onsi
der
ati
onw
hen
pro
curi
ng
soft
ware
9.4
Wh
at
is t
he
doc
um
enta
tion
pol
icy
for
pro
cure
d C
OTS
to
be
use
d t
oget
her
wit
h c
ompan
y's
dev
elop
ed s
oftw
are
?
C =
Com
plian
t
N
C =
Not
Com
plian
tPag
e 25 o
f 28
PC
= P
arti
al C
omplian
t
N/A
= N
ot A
pplica
ble
Item
No.
Au
dit
Ele
men
tC
PC
NC
N/A
Rem
ark
sV
I.C
on
figu
rati
on
Man
agem
en
t1
.O
rgan
isati
on
1.1
Is a
con
figu
rati
on M
an
age
r th
e si
ngl
e-poi
nt
con
tact
for
all m
att
ers
rela
tin
g to
CM
?1.2
Is t
her
e a c
lear
state
men
t of
res
pon
sibilit
ies
an
dau
thor
ity
for
the
CM
fu
nct
ion
?1.3
Is t
he
orga
nis
ati
onal pla
cem
ent
of C
M a
t appro
pri
ate
leve
l?2
.S
ubcon
tracto
r's
CM
2.1
Do
pro
cedu
res
pro
vide
for
the
applica
tion
of C
Mre
qu
irem
ents
to
subco
ntr
act
ors?
2.2
Doe
s th
e ch
an
ge c
ontr
ol s
yste
m p
rovi
de
for
inpu
t of
subco
ntr
act
or-i
nit
iate
d c
han
ges,
pro
cess
ing
an
dch
an
ge a
uth
oris
ati
on?
3.
Fu
ncti
on
of
CM
off
ice
3.1
Doe
s th
e C
MO
per
form
th
e fo
llow
ing
fun
ctio
ns:
a.
Pre
para
tion
an
d m
ain
ten
an
ce o
f C
M p
roce
du
res
an
dpla
ns?
b.
Rel
ease
au
thor
ity
for
engi
nee
rin
g doc
um
ents
?c.
O
per
ati
on o
f th
e C
CB
?d.
Su
ppor
t to
des
ign
rev
iew
s?e.
Pro
cess
ing
an
d r
elea
se o
f ch
an
ges
an
d w
aiv
ers?
4.
Con
figu
rati
on
id
en
tifi
cati
on
4.1
Is t
he
con
cept
of C
onfigu
rati
on I
tem
use
d a
nd
imple
men
ted?
(CI-
spec
ific
ati
on-d
raw
ing
list
-des
ign
revi
ews-
qu
alifica
tion
)4.2
Are
cri
teri
a for
sel
ecti
on o
f C
Is p
rovi
ded
?4.3
Do
pro
cedu
res
esta
blish
a s
tan
dard
iden
tifica
tion
syst
em for
dra
win
gs, sp
ecific
ati
ons,
hard
ware
an
dS
/W
?5
.C
on
figu
rati
on
data
man
agem
en
t5.1
Do
pro
cedu
res
or m
an
ual pro
vide
inst
ruct
ion
s fo
r
C =
Com
plian
t
N
C =
Not
Com
plian
tPag
e 26 o
f 28
PC
= P
arti
al C
omplian
t
N/A
= N
ot A
pplica
ble
Item
No.
Au
dit
Ele
men
tC
PC
NC
N/A
Rem
ark
sfo
rmat
an
d c
onte
nt
of d
raw
ings
an
d s
pec
ific
ati
ons?
5.2
Do
pro
cedu
res
or m
an
uals
est
ablish
met
hod
s fo
ram
endm
ents
an
d r
evis
ion
s to
spec
ific
ati
ons
an
ddra
win
gs?
5.3
Is t
he
CM
O fu
nct
ion
res
pon
sible
for
iden
tifica
tion
nu
mber
s ass
ign
men
t?5.4
Are
en
d-i
tem
ser
ial n
um
ber
s pro
vided
by
CM
O for
con
figu
rati
on a
nd c
han
ge t
race
abilit
y?5.5
Are
th
ere
pre
scri
bed
pro
cedu
res
for
rele
ase
of
con
figu
rati
on d
ocu
men
tati
on t
hat
pro
vide,
as
am
inim
um
, es
tablish
men
t of
rec
ords
an
d im
pou
nd o
for
igin
als
?5.6
Is t
her
e a d
efin
ed a
ppro
val pro
cedu
re for
con
figu
rati
ondoc
um
enta
tion
pri
or t
o re
lease
?5.7
Is r
elea
se o
f co
nfigu
rati
on d
ocu
men
tati
on b
y th
eapplica
ble
rel
ease
sys
tem
req
uir
ed p
rior
to
man
ufa
ctu
re o
r pro
cure
men
t?5.8
Do
pro
cedu
res
pro
vide
for
rele
ase
of so
ftw
are
doc
um
enta
tion
?5.9
Is t
he
S/W
Lib
rary
use
d a
s th
e re
lease
fu
nct
ion
an
d is
ther
e an
est
ablish
ed p
roce
du
re for
its
oper
ati
on?
5.1
0D
oes
the
impou
nd s
yste
m p
rovi
de
adeq
uate
sec
uri
ty t
opre
ven
t u
nau
thor
ised
ch
an
ges
an
d p
rovi
de
dis
ast
erpro
tect
ion
?5.1
1D
o pro
cedu
res
pro
vide
for
a S
/W
rep
osit
ory
for
per
man
ent
rete
nti
on o
f del
iver
ed s
oftw
are
?5.1
2Is
CM
applied
to
CA
D/C
AM
sof
tware
an
d s
oftw
are
tool
s?6
.C
on
figu
rati
on
Con
trol
6.1
Are
th
ere
pro
cedu
res
for
applica
tion
of base
lin
eid
enti
fica
tion
an
d c
ontr
ol?
6.2
Are
base
lin
es e
stablish
ed a
t sy
stem
, su
bsy
stem
an
d
C =
Com
plian
t
N
C =
Not
Com
plian
tPag
e 27 o
f 28
PC
= P
arti
al C
omplian
t
N/A
= N
ot A
pplica
ble
Item
No.
Au
dit
Ele
men
tC
PC
NC
N/A
Rem
ark
seq
uip
men
t le
vel?
7.
Con
figu
rati
on
Con
trol
Board
7.1
Doe
s th
e sy
stem
pro
vide
for
a C
CB
wit
h m
ember
ship
that
will en
sure
a c
ompre
hen
sive
im
pact
an
aly
sis?
7.2
Is a
Sof
tware
CC
B p
rovi
ded
wit
h a
ppro
pri
ate
mem
ber
ship
to
evalu
ate
an
d d
ispos
itio
n S
/W
ch
an
ges?
7.3
Are
cle
arl
y def
ined
in
terf
ace
s bet
wee
n t
he
syst
em C
CB
an
d S
/W
CC
B h
ard
ware
/so
ftw
are
ch
an
ges?
7.4
Is t
he
CC
B in
ch
arg
e of
rev
iew
ing
an
d c
ontr
ollin
g th
edes
ign
base
lin
es?
7.5
Are
CC
B D
irec
tive
s is
sued
?8
.C
han
ge E
valu
ati
on
8.1
Doe
s th
e sy
stem
pro
vide
for
impact
an
aly
sis
pri
or t
oappro
val/
dis
appro
val?
8.2
Doe
s ch
an
ge im
pact
an
aly
sis
incl
ude
all a
spec
ts o
fen
gin
eeri
ng,
man
ufa
ctu
rin
g, log
isti
cs c
osts
, sc
hed
ule
?8.3
Are
ch
an
ges
an
d im
ple
men
tati
on d
ocu
men
ts m
ark
edw
ith
th
e cl
ass
?8.4
Are
ch
an
ges
an
d w
aiv
ers
subm
itte
d t
o th
e appro
val
au
thor
ity
esta
blish
ed b
y th
e co
ntr
act
, bef
ore
imple
men
tati
on?
8.5
Are
ch
an
ges
an
d w
aiv
ers
rele
ase
d b
y th
e sa
me
rele
ase
syst
em u
sed for
in
itia
l dra
win
g an
d s
pec
ific
ati
onre
lease
?8.6
Is t
he
inte
rch
an
geabilit
y st
atu
s m
ark
ed o
n t
he
chan
ges?
8.7
Is t
her
e a p
roce
du
re for
th
e re
-iden
tifica
tion
of n
on-
inte
rch
an
geable
ite
ms?
8.8
Doe
s th
e sy
stem
pro
vide
for
the
pre
para
tion
an
dpre
sen
tati
on o
f w
aiv
er?
8.9
Are
waiv
ers
pro
cess
ed t
hro
ugh
th
e cu
stom
er's
CC
B?
9.
Con
figu
rati
on
Sta
tus
Accou
nti
ng
C =
Com
plian
t
N
C =
Not
Com
plian
tPag
e 28 o
f 28
PC
= P
arti
al C
omplian
t
N/A
= N
ot A
pplica
ble
Item
No.
Au
dit
Ele
men
tC
PC
NC
N/A
Rem
ark
s9.1
Doe
s th
e C
M s
yste
m p
rovi
de
for
the
doc
um
enta
tion
of
the
'as-
des
ign
ed' s
tan
dard
by
mea
ns
of a
CID
L(C
onfigu
rati
on I
tem
Data
Lis
t)?
9.2
Do
pro
cedu
res
pre
scri
be
the
fun
ctio
n r
espon
sible
for
CID
L in
pu
ts?
9.3
Doe
s th
e C
IDL c
onta
in a
s a m
inim
um
th
e list
of
rele
ase
d:
a.
Dra
win
gs?
b.
Spec
ific
ati
on?
c.
Tes
t pro
cedu
res?
d.
EE
E p
art
s list
?e.
M
ate
rial list
?f.
Pro
cess
es lis
t?9.4
Doe
s th
e sy
stem
pro
vide
for
the
pre
para
tion
of 'a
s-bu
ilt'
list
s an
d e
stablish
th
e re
spon
sibilit
y fo
r pre
para
tion
an
d d
ata
in
pu
t?
