Principal Level Meetings April 16/17, 2012 Professional Performance Process.
-
Upload
carol-mcdaniel -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
1
Transcript of Principal Level Meetings April 16/17, 2012 Professional Performance Process.
![Page 1: Principal Level Meetings April 16/17, 2012 Professional Performance Process.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649f215503460f94c398c7/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Principal Level MeetingsApril 16/17, 2012
Professional Performance Process
![Page 2: Principal Level Meetings April 16/17, 2012 Professional Performance Process.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649f215503460f94c398c7/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
OutcomesParticipants will…
• Review revised Professional Educator Performance Standards.
• Review and discuss draft rubrics with revised 4-tiered rating system for Standard V: Learning Environment and Standard VII: Student Academic Progress.
• Discuss and provide input on Professional Improvement Plans within the 4-tiered rating system.
• Discuss and provide input on guidelines for the overall evaluation rating.
![Page 3: Principal Level Meetings April 16/17, 2012 Professional Performance Process.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649f215503460f94c398c7/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
PPP Revisions Timeline• January 6, 2012 - PPP Work Group
• January 19, 2012 - PPP Work Group
• January 24, 2012 - PPP Core Committee
• February 17, 2012 - PPP Work Group
• February 21/23, 2012 - Principal Level Meetings
• February 23 – March 16 – Principals share draft of revised standards with teachers and collect input
• February 28, 2012 - PPP Core Committee
• March 12/13/15, 2012 - Articulation Meetings – Principals receive information on 4-tiered rating system, Student Growth Percentiles, and Standard VII: Student Academic Progress – Principals share information with teachers.
• March 27, 2012 - PPP Work Group
• April 16/17, 2012 - Principal Level Meetings
3
![Page 4: Principal Level Meetings April 16/17, 2012 Professional Performance Process.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649f215503460f94c398c7/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Principal suggested
language refinements
Teacher suggested
language refinements
4
![Page 5: Principal Level Meetings April 16/17, 2012 Professional Performance Process.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649f215503460f94c398c7/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
PWCS
Professional
Educator
Performance
Standards Revised March 2012
5
![Page 6: Principal Level Meetings April 16/17, 2012 Professional Performance Process.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649f215503460f94c398c7/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Exploring “Approaching” Standards
• Work groups identified issues related to addition of “Approaching Standard”– What the language of that tier of the rubric
should look like– How/when the “Approaching Standard” tier
should be used
• Scenario Developed for Today– Standard V: Learning Environment
6
![Page 7: Principal Level Meetings April 16/17, 2012 Professional Performance Process.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649f215503460f94c398c7/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Standard V: Learning EnvironmentThe professional educator uses resources, routines, and procedures
to provide a respectful, positive, safe, student-centered environment that is conducive to learning.
Teacher Scenario #1 - Tom
• 5th grade teacher/6th grade math/Algebra I
• Continuing Contract in 4th year
• Positive, personable
• “Rookie of the Year”
• End of third year, a little slip in instructional planning and classroom management
7
![Page 8: Principal Level Meetings April 16/17, 2012 Professional Performance Process.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649f215503460f94c398c7/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Supervision and Evaluation Timeline for CC Teacher
• Within 30 days of beginning of contract: Professional Growth Conference and Plan
• September – June: Ongoing informal observations, ongoing professional/coaching interactions, PGP review and refinement
• June 15: PGP review conference held and documented • Currently, if a continuing contract teacher is not meeting
a standard(s), he/she goes back onto the formal evaluation cycle and will need to receive a Mid-Year Report (signed first by Associate Superintendent) by February 8.
8
![Page 9: Principal Level Meetings April 16/17, 2012 Professional Performance Process.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649f215503460f94c398c7/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Using the Revised RubricStandard V: Learning Environment
(Handout)
• Read page 1
• Questions– What are you seeing in Tom’s classroom?– What is the impact on the student learning?
9
![Page 10: Principal Level Meetings April 16/17, 2012 Professional Performance Process.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649f215503460f94c398c7/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
September Walkthrough (5 minutes)
October Informal Observation (15 minutes)______
• What are you seeing in Tom’s classroom?– Only some students engaged when not directly
supervised– ?– ?
• What is the impact on student learning?– Loss of instructional time– ?– ?
10
![Page 11: Principal Level Meetings April 16/17, 2012 Professional Performance Process.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649f215503460f94c398c7/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Reflective ConferenceIn your reflective conference the next day, you and Tom talk about what you had observed. You remark that many of the students were off-task. He replied, yes, but they were at least quiet and under control. You show him the rubric of Standard V: Learning Environment and the two of you discuss what “meeting” this standard would look like in the classroom.
• What should have happened at this reflective conference?
• What are the critical components of a reflective conference?
11
![Page 12: Principal Level Meetings April 16/17, 2012 Professional Performance Process.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649f215503460f94c398c7/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Using the Revised RubricStandard V: Learning Environment
(Handout)
• Read page 2
• Questions– What are you seeing in Tom’s classroom from
these 2 informals and 1 walkthrough?– What is the impact on student learning?– Do you think Tom is truly aware that a
problem exists?
12
![Page 13: Principal Level Meetings April 16/17, 2012 Professional Performance Process.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649f215503460f94c398c7/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
November 7 Informal Observation (15 minutes)
December 2 Informal Observation (15 minutes)
December 15 Walkthrough (5 minutes)_________• What are you seeing in Tom’s classroom from these
2 informal observations and 1 walkthrough?– Unacceptable noise level– Lack of clear directions– ?
• What is the impact on student learning?– Learning is not always accessible to some students– Loss of instructional time– ?
• Do you think Tom is truly aware that a problem exists?
13
![Page 14: Principal Level Meetings April 16/17, 2012 Professional Performance Process.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649f215503460f94c398c7/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Table Talk
• Would you put Tom on a Professional Improvement Plan (PIP) right now?
– Discuss, come to consensus, and use clicker
14
![Page 15: Principal Level Meetings April 16/17, 2012 Professional Performance Process.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649f215503460f94c398c7/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Would you put Tom on a Professional Improvement Plan right now?
15
1 2 3
33% 33%33%1. Yes
2. No
3. There is not enough data/evidence to make a decision at this time.
![Page 16: Principal Level Meetings April 16/17, 2012 Professional Performance Process.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649f215503460f94c398c7/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Table Talk
• Looking at the rubric for Standard V: Learning Environment, where would you rate Tom’s performance up to this point?
– Discuss, come to consensus, and use clicker
16
![Page 17: Principal Level Meetings April 16/17, 2012 Professional Performance Process.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649f215503460f94c398c7/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Looking at the rubric for Standard V: Learning Environment, where would you rate Tom’s performance up to this point?
17
1 2 3 4
25% 25%25%25%1. Not Meeting
2. Approaching
3. Meeting
4. Exceeding
![Page 18: Principal Level Meetings April 16/17, 2012 Professional Performance Process.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649f215503460f94c398c7/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Using the Revised RubricStandard V: Learning Environment
(Handout)• Read page 3
• Questions– During your post-observation conference, how
are you going to help Tom make the connection between what he is doing and not doing that is resulting in inconsistent/ ineffective classroom management?
– How can you capture this in writing?
18
![Page 19: Principal Level Meetings April 16/17, 2012 Professional Performance Process.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649f215503460f94c398c7/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Over Winter Break, four emails from parents
January 6 after school, the 5th grade/6th grade math/Algebra I team leader
January 13 Formal Observation (Full lesson)_____
• During your post-observation conference, how are you going to help Tom make the connection between what he is doing and not doing that is resulting in inconsistent/ ineffective classroom management?
• How can you capture this in writing?
19
![Page 20: Principal Level Meetings April 16/17, 2012 Professional Performance Process.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649f215503460f94c398c7/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Table Talk
• Your post-observation conference with Tom is on Jan. 17. Would Tom definitely be put on a PIP at this time?
– Discuss, come to consensus, and use clicker
20
![Page 21: Principal Level Meetings April 16/17, 2012 Professional Performance Process.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649f215503460f94c398c7/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Your post-observation conference with Tom is on Jan. 17. Would Tom
definitely be put on a PIP at this time?
21
1 2
50%50%1. Yes
2. No
![Page 22: Principal Level Meetings April 16/17, 2012 Professional Performance Process.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649f215503460f94c398c7/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Table Talk
• You placed Tom on a PIP. Less than 3 weeks later, you are completing his Mid-Year Report. What rating will you give him for Standard V: Learning Environment?– Discuss, come to consensus, and use clicker
22
![Page 23: Principal Level Meetings April 16/17, 2012 Professional Performance Process.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649f215503460f94c398c7/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
You placed Tom on a PIP. Less than 3 weeks later, you are completing his Mid-Year Report. What rating will you
give him for Standard V: Learning Environment?
23
1 2
50%50%1. Not Meeting
2. Approaching
![Page 24: Principal Level Meetings April 16/17, 2012 Professional Performance Process.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649f215503460f94c398c7/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Table Talk
• Should you give the rating of “Approaching” a standard to a teacher without putting him/her on a PIP?
– Discuss, come to consensus, and use clicker
24
![Page 25: Principal Level Meetings April 16/17, 2012 Professional Performance Process.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649f215503460f94c398c7/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Should you give the rating of “Approaching” a standard to a teacher without putting him/her on a PIP?
25
1 2
50%50%1. Yes
2. No
![Page 26: Principal Level Meetings April 16/17, 2012 Professional Performance Process.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649f215503460f94c398c7/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Table Talk
• For how long should you be able to give a teacher the rating of “Approaching” for the same standard?
– Discuss, come to consensus, and use clicker
26
![Page 27: Principal Level Meetings April 16/17, 2012 Professional Performance Process.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649f215503460f94c398c7/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
For how long should you be able to give a teacher the rating of “Approaching” for the same standard?
27
1 2 3
33% 33%33%1. Indefinitely
2. Only for one of the evaluation reports (e.g. “Approaching” a standard on the Mid-Year Report should be either “Not Meeting” or “Meeting” by the Summative Report)
3. For one full year
![Page 28: Principal Level Meetings April 16/17, 2012 Professional Performance Process.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649f215503460f94c398c7/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Achievement of Outcomes
• Review and discuss draft rubrics with revised 4-tiered rating system for Standard V: Learning Environment and Standard VII: Student Academic Progress.
• Discuss and provide input on Professional Improvement Plans within the 4-tiered rating system.
28
![Page 29: Principal Level Meetings April 16/17, 2012 Professional Performance Process.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649f215503460f94c398c7/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Standard VII: Student Academic Progress
• Read the draft rubric of Standard VII: Student Academic Progress.
• Read Teacher Scenario #2.
• Using the rubric discuss with your table or partner rate where you would rate this teacher on Standard VII.
29
![Page 30: Principal Level Meetings April 16/17, 2012 Professional Performance Process.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649f215503460f94c398c7/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
What rating should the teacher in scenario #2 receive for Standard VII?
30
1 2 3
33% 33%33%1. Not Meeting
2. Approaching
3. Meeting
![Page 31: Principal Level Meetings April 16/17, 2012 Professional Performance Process.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649f215503460f94c398c7/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Input on Rubrics
• Please send any suggestions regarding the rubrics on yellow sheet to Jennifer Cassata by May 4, 2012.
31
![Page 32: Principal Level Meetings April 16/17, 2012 Professional Performance Process.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649f215503460f94c398c7/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Guidelines for Overall Evaluation Rating
• How do the individual standard ratings add up to the overall evaluation rating?• E.g. Could “Not meeting” one standard
result in an overall evaluation rating of “Not meeting?”
32
![Page 33: Principal Level Meetings April 16/17, 2012 Professional Performance Process.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649f215503460f94c398c7/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
We Value Your and Your Teachers’ Input
• Please meet with your leadership team or another group of teachers and provide answers to the questions on the Input on PPP Guidelines orange sheet in your folder.
• Please send this completed paper to Natalie Bonshire by May 4, 2012.
• All of your input from today and in the future will be used to make refinements to the PPP.
33
![Page 34: Principal Level Meetings April 16/17, 2012 Professional Performance Process.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649f215503460f94c398c7/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Thank You!
34