Prevalence Survey 2018 ( BNN - LIPI )

P R E VA L E N C ES U R V E Y

2018

Perpus

takaa

n BNN

DATA AND INFORMATION RESEARCH CENTERDATA AND INFORMATION RESEARCH CENTERDATA AND INFORMATION RESEARCH CENTERNATIONAL NARCOTICS BOARDNATIONAL NARCOTICS BOARDNATIONAL NARCOTICS BOARD

2019

P R E VA L E N C ES U R V E Y

2 0 1 8

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n BNN

BNN

ISBN : 978-602-74498-6-2

Prevalence Survey 2018Copyright @2019

Editorial Board :Supervisor : Drs. Agus Irianto, S.H., M.Si, M.H.Advisor : Dr. Sri Sunarti Purwaningsih, M.A Drs. Masyhuri Imron, M.AChief Editor : Dra. Endang Mulyani, M.SiSecretary : Siti Nurlela Marliani, SP., S.H., M.SiTeam Members : Dwi Sulistyorini, S.Si., M.Si Sri Lestari, S.Kom., M.Si Novita Sari, S.Sos., M.H Erma Antasari, S.Si Sri Haryanti, S.Sos., M.Si Quazar Noor Azhim, A.Md Tri Sugiharto, S.Kom Rizky Purnamasari, S.Psi Armita Eki Indahsari, S.Si Radityo Kunto Harimurti, S. StatCover & Content Design : Indoyanu Muhamad

All rights reserved.It is prohibited to quote or reproduce part or all of the contents of this book without written permission from the Publisher.

Publisher :Pusat Penelitian Data dan Informasi (Data and Information Research Center)Badan Narkotika Nasional Republik Indonesia (National Narcotics Board of the Republic of Indonesia)Jl. MT. Haryono No. 11 Cawang, East JakartaTelp.(021) 80871566, 80871567Fax. (021) 80885225, 80871591, 80871593Email : [email protected] Center : 184SMS Center : 081221675675Email : [email protected] : www.bnn.go.id

Perpus

takaa

n Sri Haryanti, S.Sos., M.Si

Perpus

takaa

n Sri Haryanti, S.Sos., M.Si Quazar Noor Azhim, A.Md

Perpus

takaa

n Quazar Noor Azhim, A.Md Tri Sugiharto, S.Kom

Perpus

takaa

n Tri Sugiharto, S.Kom Rizky Purnamasari, S.Psi

Perpus

takaa

n Rizky Purnamasari, S.Psi Armita Eki Indahsari, S.Si

Perpus

takaa

n Armita Eki Indahsari, S.Si Radityo Kunto Harimurti, S. Stat

Perpus

takaa

n

Radityo Kunto Harimurti, S. StatCover & Content Design : Indoyanu Muhamad

Perpus

takaa

n

Cover & Content Design : Indoyanu Muhamad

It is prohibited to quote or reproduce part or all of the contents of this book

Perpus

takaa

n

It is prohibited to quote or reproduce part or all of the contents of this book without written permission from the Publisher.Perp

ustak

aan

without written permission from the Publisher.

BNN Sri Lestari, S.Kom., M.Si

BNN Sri Lestari, S.Kom., M.Si Novita Sari, S.Sos., M.H

BNN Novita Sari, S.Sos., M.H Erma Antasari, S.Si

BNN Erma Antasari, S.Si Sri Haryanti, S.Sos., M.SiBNN Sri Haryanti, S.Sos., M.Si

i

Assalamu’alaikum Warahmatullahi Wabarakatuh. May peace be upon us.

Let us praise to God the Almighty for the blessing that BNN in cooperation with the Culture and Society Research Center of LIPI has completed the Book of Prevalence Survey 2018. The survey is conducted in three groups namely the group of students/university students, workers, and household.

abuse (ever use and current user) students/university students and workers

drugs, and P4GN program intervention. Furthermore, this research aims to identify the rate of household vulnerability toward the danger of drugs. With this the survey, it is expected that the society and stakeholders will aware of the issues on drug abuse in Indonesia and its development year by year.

Finally, as Chief of BNN, we would like to convey our gratitude to Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI) as the supervisor of research functions and to all parties involving in the formulation of this Book that enable us to publish it ontime. We hope that the results of this research can be used widely to support the policy of prevention and eradication of drug

this would be a reference for all ministries or institutions as well as society to

Thank you Wassalamu’alaikum Warahmatullahi Wabarakatuh. Jakarta, October 2019 Chief of National Narcotics Board

Drs. Heru Winarko, S.H

Foreword

iPrevalence Survey 2018

Perpus

takaa

n drugs, and P4GN program intervention. Furthermore, this research aims to

Perpus

takaa

n drugs, and P4GN program intervention. Furthermore, this research aims to identify the rate of household vulnerability toward the danger of drugs. With

Perpus

takaa

n identify the rate of household vulnerability toward the danger of drugs. With this the survey, it is expected that the society and stakeholders will aware of

Perpus

takaa

n this the survey, it is expected that the society and stakeholders will aware of the issues on drug abuse in Indonesia and its development year by year.

Perpus

takaa

n the issues on drug abuse in Indonesia and its development year by year.

Finally, as Chief of BNN, we would like to convey our gratitude to

Perpus

takaa

n

Finally, as Chief of BNN, we would like to convey our gratitude to Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI) as the supervisor of research

Perpus

takaa

n

Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI) as the supervisor of research functions and to all parties involving in the formulation of this Book that

Perpus

takaa

n

functions and to all parties involving in the formulation of this Book that enable us to publish it ontime. We hope that the results of this research can

Perpus

takaa

n

enable us to publish it ontime. We hope that the results of this research can be used widely to support the policy of prevention and eradication of drug Perp

ustak

aan

be used widely to support the policy of prevention and eradication of drug Perpus

takaa

n

this would be a reference for all ministries or institutions as well as society to Perp

ustak

aan

this would be a reference for all ministries or institutions as well as society to

BNNBNNabuse (ever use and current user) students/university students and workers

BNNabuse (ever use and current user) students/university students and workers

BNNBNN

drugs, and P4GN program intervention. Furthermore, this research aims to BNNdrugs, and P4GN program intervention. Furthermore, this research aims to

ii

Praise be to God the Almighty for his grace and guidance to us for completing the Book of Prevalence Survey 2018 on time. This research is a collaboration between Badan Narkotika Nasional (National Narcotics Board/BNN) and Culture and Society Research Center of LIPI. This research was assisted by University Researchers in 13 Provinces in Indonesia.

among students and university students, drug abuse prevalence among workers, and vulnerability rate of household toward the danger of drugs.

This survey involves many parties including expert team of BNN,

informan, enumerator, and university local partner in 13 Provinces. In this opportunity, we would like to convey our gratitude to Chief of BNN Drs. Heru Winarko S.H and Drs. Adhi Prawoto, S.H as Primary Secretary of BNN for the instruction. We would like to deliver our gratitude as well to Head of Research Center, Drs. Agus Irianto, S.H., M.H., M.Si, Dra. Endang Mulyani, M.Si, Siti Nurlela Marliani, SP, S.H, M.Si, Sri Lestari, S.Kom., M.Si, Erma Antasari, S.Si, Sri Haryanti, S.Sos, M.Si, Novita Sari, S.Sos., M.H, Quazar Noor Azhim, A.Md and all BNN staffs for the assistance and cooperation in each stage of this study, from instrument development to report writing.

Furthermore, we would like deliver our gratitude to Culture and Society Research Center of LIPI and all local universities partner namely: University of Syiah Kuala Aceh, University of Sumatera Utara, University of Sriwijaya Palembang, University of Nasional Jakarta, University of Padjajaran Bandung, University of Gajah Mada Yogyakarta, University of Airlangga Surabaya, University of Riau Kepulauan Batam, University of Udayana Bali, University of Mulawarman Samarinda, Politeknik Kesehatan (Polytechnic of Health) Pontianak, University of Hasanuddin Makassar, University of Cendrawasih Papua.

contribution on decision making and improvement on Prevention and

Jakarta, October 2019

Editorial Board

Preface

ii Prevalence Survey 2018

Perpus

takaa

n Research Center, Drs. Agus Irianto, S.H., M.H., M.Si, Dra. Endang Mulyani,

Perpus

takaa

n Research Center, Drs. Agus Irianto, S.H., M.H., M.Si, Dra. Endang Mulyani, M.Si, Siti Nurlela Marliani, SP, S.H, M.Si, Sri Lestari, S.Kom., M.Si, Erma

Perpus

takaa

n M.Si, Siti Nurlela Marliani, SP, S.H, M.Si, Sri Lestari, S.Kom., M.Si, Erma Antasari, S.Si, Sri Haryanti, S.Sos, M.Si, Novita Sari, S.Sos., M.H, Quazar

Perpus

takaa

n Antasari, S.Si, Sri Haryanti, S.Sos, M.Si, Novita Sari, S.Sos., M.H, Quazar Noor Azhim, A.Md and all BNN staffs for the assistance and cooperation

Perpus

takaa

n Noor Azhim, A.Md and all BNN staffs for the assistance and cooperation in each stage of this study, from instrument development to report writing.

Perpus

takaa

n in each stage of this study, from instrument development to report writing.

Furthermore, we would like deliver our gratitude to Culture and

Perpus

takaa

n

Furthermore, we would like deliver our gratitude to Culture and Society Research Center of LIPI and all local universities partner namely:

Perpus

takaa

n

Society Research Center of LIPI and all local universities partner namely: University of Syiah Kuala Aceh, University of Sumatera Utara, University

Perpus

takaa

n

University of Syiah Kuala Aceh, University of Sumatera Utara, University of Sriwijaya Palembang, University of Nasional Jakarta, University of

Perpus

takaa

n

of Sriwijaya Palembang, University of Nasional Jakarta, University of Padjajaran Bandung, University of Gajah Mada Yogyakarta, University of Perp

ustak

aan

Padjajaran Bandung, University of Gajah Mada Yogyakarta, University of Airlangga Surabaya, University of Riau Kepulauan Batam, University of Perp

ustak

aan

Airlangga Surabaya, University of Riau Kepulauan Batam, University of

BNNopportunity, we would like to convey our gratitude to Chief of BNN Drs.

BNNopportunity, we would like to convey our gratitude to Chief of BNN Drs. Heru Winarko S.H and Drs. Adhi Prawoto, S.H as Primary Secretary of BNN

BNNHeru Winarko S.H and Drs. Adhi Prawoto, S.H as Primary Secretary of BNN for the instruction. We would like to deliver our gratitude as well to Head of BNNfor the instruction. We would like to deliver our gratitude as well to Head of Research Center, Drs. Agus Irianto, S.H., M.H., M.Si, Dra. Endang Mulyani, BNNResearch Center, Drs. Agus Irianto, S.H., M.H., M.Si, Dra. Endang Mulyani,

iii

Prologue

iii

Currently, Indonesia has stated that the state is in drug emergency situation as drug abuse has spread to all layers of the society across the country. According to research by BNN in collaboration with Health Research Center of the University of Indonesia in 2017, the prevalence rate of drug abusers was 1.77% or equal to 3,376,115 of Indonesian population and the social-economic loss due to drug abuse was Rp 84.7 trillion.

Data on prevalence rate of drug abuse is obtained through a survey. In 2004-2017, BNN in cooperation with Health Research Center of the University of Indonesia conducted a survey to calculate the prevalence rate of drug abuse in three groups of the community, namely students and university stduents, workers, and households. In 2018, BNN in cooperation with Culture and Society Research Center of LIPI carried out a survey to calculate the prevalence rate of drug abuse. The survey was also carried out in three groups of the community, namely students and university stduents, workers, and households. The survey in 2018 was conducted in 13 Provinces, namely Aceh, North Sumatera, South Sumatera, Riau Islands, Jakarta, West Java, East Java, DI Yogyakarta, Bali, East Kalimantan, West Kalimantan, South Sulawesi, and Papua.

and LIPI in 2018. New facts revealed by this research such as prevalence rate of drug abuse (ever use and current user) among students and university students, and workers as well as related factors such as the

on drugs, and the P4GN program intervention. In addition, the survey on

toward the danger of drugs. With the result of this research, it is expected that the policy in prevention and eradication of drug abuse and its illegal

Prevalence Survey 2018

Perpus

takaa

n stduents, workers, and households. The survey in 2018 was conducted in

Perpus

takaa

n stduents, workers, and households. The survey in 2018 was conducted in 13 Provinces, namely Aceh, North Sumatera, South Sumatera, Riau Islands,

Perpus

takaa

n 13 Provinces, namely Aceh, North Sumatera, South Sumatera, Riau Islands, Jakarta, West Java, East Java, DI Yogyakarta, Bali, East Kalimantan, West

Perpus

takaa

n Jakarta, West Java, East Java, DI Yogyakarta, Bali, East Kalimantan, West Kalimantan, South Sulawesi, and Papua.

Perpus

takaa

n Kalimantan, South Sulawesi, and Papua.

Perpus

takaa

n

and LIPI in 2018. New facts revealed by this research such as prevalence

Perpus

takaa

n

and LIPI in 2018. New facts revealed by this research such as prevalence rate of drug abuse (ever use and current user) among students and

Perpus

takaa

n

rate of drug abuse (ever use and current user) among students and university students, and workers as well as related factors such as the

Perpus

takaa

n

university students, and workers as well as related factors such as the

Perpus

takaa

n

on drugs, and the P4GN program intervention. In addition, the survey on Perpus

takaa

n

on drugs, and the P4GN program intervention. In addition, the survey on

BNNuniversity stduents, workers, and households. In 2018, BNN in cooperation

BNNuniversity stduents, workers, and households. In 2018, BNN in cooperation with Culture and Society Research Center of LIPI carried out a survey to

BNNwith Culture and Society Research Center of LIPI carried out a survey to calculate the prevalence rate of drug abuse. The survey was also carried

BNNcalculate the prevalence rate of drug abuse. The survey was also carried out in three groups of the community, namely students and university BNNout in three groups of the community, namely students and university stduents, workers, and households. The survey in 2018 was conducted in BNNstduents, workers, and households. The survey in 2018 was conducted in

iviv

FOREWORDPREFACEPROLOGUE TABLE OF CONTENTSLIST OF TABLE LIST OF GRAPHIC

PENDAHULUAN1.1. Background 1.2. Issues 1.3. Objective and Target1.4. Conceptual Framework

1.4.2. Drugs Abuse and Its Impact 1.4.3. Workers and Drugs 1.4.4 Students and Drugs1.4.5 Household and Drugs

1.5. Research Methodology 1.5.1. Research Location 1.5.2. Data Collection Technique 1.5.3. Data Analysis 1.5.4. Research Instrument

SURVEY ON DRUG ABUSE AMONG STUDENTS AND UNIVERSITY STUDENTS2.1. Respondents’ Characteristic

2.1.1. Gender and Level of Education 2.1.2. Current Place of Residence 2.1.3. Monthly Pocket Money 2.1.4. Parents’ Condition

2.2. Knowledge on Drugs2.2.1. Knowledge on Types of Drugs 2.2.2. Distribution of Respondents According to Level of Education and Knowledge on Types of Drugs 2.2.3. Distribution of Respondents According to Knowledge on Types of Drugs and Province 2.2.4. Distribution of Respondents According to Knowledge on the Impact of Drug Abuse to Health, 2018

iiiiv

vix

xii

135677

101516171818182021

2325252727282929

31

32

32

Table Contents


Perpus

takaa

n 1.5.2. Data Collection Technique

Perpus

takaa

n 1.5.2. Data Collection Technique 1.5.3. Data Analysis

Perpus

takaa

n

1.5.3. Data Analysis 1.5.4. Research Instrument

Perpus

takaa

n

1.5.4. Research Instrument

SURVEY ON DRUG ABUSE AMONG STUDENTS AND UNIVERSITY

Perpus

takaa

n

SURVEY ON DRUG ABUSE AMONG STUDENTS AND UNIVERSITY

2.1. Respondents’ CharacteristicPerpus

takaa

n

2.1. Respondents’ Characteristic2.1.1. Gender and Level of Education

Perpus

takaa

n

2.1.1. Gender and Level of Education

BNN

v

Table Contents

v

2.2.5. Knowledge on the Impact of Drug Abuse to Health Among Students and University Students

2.2.6. Distribution of Knowledge on the Social Impact of Drug Abuse Among Students and University Students 2.2.7. Distribution of Students’ Knowledge on Issues due to Drug Abuse 2.2.8 Attitude toward Drug Abuse

2.3.1. Prevalence Rate of Drug Use Among Students and University Students 2.3.2 Prevalence Rate per Province 2.3.3. Risky Behavior Toward Drug Abuse 2.3.4. Source of Obtaining Drugs (Source, Level of Ease) 2.3.5 Trend of Drug Use (Comparing the Use of Drugs Currently and Years Before)

SURVEY ON DRUG ABUSE AMONG WORKERS 3.1. Characteristics of Respondents among Workers 3.2. Knowledge and Attitude on the Danger of Drugs among Workers

3.2.1. Knowledge on Drugs among Workers 3.2.2. Attitude toward Drug Abuse

3.3.1. Prevalence Rate of Drug Use among Workers 3.3.2. Prevalence Rate per Province 3.3.3. Risky Behaviour toward Drug Abuse Among Workers 3.3.4. Source to Obtain Drugs among Workers

FAMILY VULNERABILITY IN FACING THE DANGER OF DRUG ABUSE

4.1.1. Characteristics of Household Demography 4.1.2 Gender of Household Members 4.1.3. Composition of Household Members According to Age 4.1.4. Marital Status of Household Members4.1.5. Residence Status of Household Members

33

34

353636

36404243

43

4547

4848505151555859

61636364

656667


Perpus

takaa

n Currently and Years Before)

Perpus

takaa

n Currently and Years Before)

SURVEY ON DRUG ABUSE AMONG WORKERS

Perpus

takaa

n SURVEY ON DRUG ABUSE AMONG WORKERS 3.1. Characteristics of Respondents among Workers

Perpus

takaa

n 3.1. Characteristics of Respondents among Workers 3.2. Knowledge and Attitude on the Danger of Drugs among

Perpus

takaa

n 3.2. Knowledge and Attitude on the Danger of Drugs among

3.2.1. Knowledge on Drugs among Workers

Perpus

takaa

n

3.2.1. Knowledge on Drugs among Workers 3.2.2. Attitude toward Drug Abuse

Perpus

takaa

n

3.2.2. Attitude toward Drug Abuse

Perpus

takaa

n

3.3.1. Prevalence Rate of Drug Use among Workers Perpus

takaa

n

3.3.1. Prevalence Rate of Drug Use among Workers 3.3.2. Prevalence Rate per Province Perp

ustak

aan

3.3.2. Prevalence Rate per Province 3.3.3. Risky Behaviour toward Drug Abuse Among Workers

Perpus

takaa

n

3.3.3. Risky Behaviour toward Drug Abuse Among Workers

BNN2.3.3. Risky Behavior Toward Drug Abuse

BNN2.3.3. Risky Behavior Toward Drug Abuse 2.3.4. Source of Obtaining Drugs (Source, Level of Ease)

BNN2.3.4. Source of Obtaining Drugs (Source, Level of Ease) 2.3.5 Trend of Drug Use (Comparing the Use of Drugs BNN2.3.5 Trend of Drug Use (Comparing the Use of Drugs

vi

Table Contents

vi

4.2. Social Condition 4.2.1. Education 4.2.2. Social Status of the Head of Household 4.2.3. Economic Condition of Household According to Occupation 4.2.4. Household’s Average Income and Spending

4.3. Sensitivity of Household toward the Danger of Drugs 4.3.1. Environment Exposure from the Danger of Drugs 4.3.2. Knowledge on the Impact of Drugs Use 4.3.3. Knowledge on Drugs Prone-Place and Occupation 4.3.4. View and Attitude on Drugs Abuse

4.4. Household Exposure toward the Danger of Drugs 4.4.1. Risky Behaviour of Household Members 4.4.2. Household Exposure toward the Danger of Drugs

4.5 Household’s Strategy to Face the Danger of Drugs

P4GN (PREVENTION AND ERADICATION OF DRUG ABUSE AND ILLICIT TRAFICKING) PROGRAM INTERVENVENTION5.1. P4GN Program Implementation5.2. P4GN Program Among Workers

CLOSING6.1. Summary 6.2. Recommendation

6.2.1 Prevention 6.2.2 Community Empowerment 6.2.3 Rehabilitation

LIST OF ABBREVIATION & LIST OF RESEARCHERS List of AbbreviationList of BNN and LIPI Researchers

APPENDICESAppendix 1 Distribution of Respondents According to Types of Drugs And Province, 2018 (%) Appendix 2 Distribution of Students’ Knowledge on Issues Due to Drug Abuse (%)

676768

6970717171737475757677

798182

858788888989

919396

97

99

99


Perpus

takaa

n P4GN (PREVENTION AND ERADICATION OF DRUG ABUSE AND

Perpus

takaa

n P4GN (PREVENTION AND ERADICATION OF DRUG ABUSE AND ILLICIT TRAFICKING) PROGRAM INTERVENVENTION

Perpus

takaa

n ILLICIT TRAFICKING) PROGRAM INTERVENVENTION5.1. P4GN Program Implementation

Perpus

takaa

n 5.1. P4GN Program Implementation5.2. P4GN Program Among Workers

Perpus

takaa

n 5.2. P4GN Program Among Workers

6.2. Recommendation

Perpus

takaa

n

6.2. Recommendation 6.2.1 Prevention Perp

ustak

aan

6.2.1 Prevention 6.2.2 Community Empowerment Perp

ustak

aan

6.2.2 Community Empowerment

BNN4.4. Household Exposure toward the Danger of Drugs

BNN4.4. Household Exposure toward the Danger of Drugs

4.4.1. Risky Behaviour of Household Members

BNN4.4.1. Risky Behaviour of Household Members 4.4.2. Household Exposure toward the Danger of Drugs

BNN4.4.2. Household Exposure toward the Danger of Drugs Household’s Strategy to Face the Danger of Drugs BNNHousehold’s Strategy to Face the Danger of Drugs

vii

Table Contents

vii

Appendix 3 Distribution of Perception on the Attitude Toward Drug Abuse According to The Level of Education Among Students and University Students (%)Appendix 4 Respondents’ Knowledge on Social Impact From Drug Abuse Appendix 5 Perception on Attitude toward Drug Abuse According to the Level of Education Among Students and University Students (%) Appendix 6 Types of Consumed Drugs and the Age when Using Drugs for the First Time, 2018

EPILOG UE

BIBLIOGRAPHY

100

101

102

103

104

105


Perpus

takaa

n BNN

viiiviii

Table 1 Estimation on the Number of Drug Users and Current User Prevalence Rate According to Gender and Types of Group, 2017Table2 Estimation on the Number of Drug Users and Current User Prevalence Rate Among Students According to Gender and Type of Group, 2017Table 3 Respondent’s Knowledge on Types of Drugs, 2018Table 4 Distribution of Respondents based on the Level of Education and Knowledge on Types of Drugs (%)Table 5 Distribution of Respondents Based on the Impact of Drug Abuse to Health, 2018 (%)Table 6 Distribution of Knowledge to Social Impact of Drug Abuse Among Students and University Students, 2018 (%)Table 7 Prevalence Rate of Ever Used and Current User Among Students and University Students According to the Level of Education (%)Table 8 Prevalence Rate of Current User Among Students and University Students According to the Level of Education and GenderTable 9 Current Use of Drugs According to the Status of UsageTable 10 Reasons of Using DrugsTabel 11 Types of Drugs Consumed in the Past YearTable 12 Prevalence Rate in Past Year According to the Level of Education Per Capital City of ProvinceTable 13 Prevalence Rate of Past Year According to the Status of Usage in 13 Capital Cities of the ProvinceTable 14 Distribution of Respondents According to Profession SectorTable 15 Respondents’ Knowledge on Types of Drugs

Table 17 Respondents’ Attitude When Friends or Family Members Use DrugsTable 18 Prevalence of Ever Use and Current User Table 19 Prevalence Rate of Current Use According to GenderTable 20 Prevalence Rate of Current User According to the Status of Usage

15

1630

32

33

35

37

37

383940

41

42

474950

515152

53

List of Table


Perpus

takaa

n Among Students and University Students According

Perpus

takaa

n Among Students and University Students According to the Level of Education (%)

Perpus

takaa

n to the Level of Education (%)Table 8 Prevalence Rate of Current User Among Students

Perpus

takaa

n Table 8 Prevalence Rate of Current User Among Students and University Students According to the Level of

Perpus

takaa

n and University Students According to the Level of Education and Gender

Perpus

takaa

n Education and GenderTable 9 Current Use of Drugs According to the Status of

Perpus

takaa

n

Table 9 Current Use of Drugs According to the Status of

Table 10 Reasons of Using Drugs

Perpus

takaa

n

Table 10 Reasons of Using DrugsTabel 11 Types of Drugs Consumed in the Past Year

Perpus

takaa

n

Tabel 11 Types of Drugs Consumed in the Past YearTable 12 Prevalence Rate in Past Year According to the Level Perp

ustak

aan

Table 12 Prevalence Rate in Past Year According to the Level of Education Per Capital City of ProvincePerp

ustak

aan

of Education Per Capital City of Province

BNNTable 6 Distribution of Knowledge to Social Impact of Drug

BNNTable 6 Distribution of Knowledge to Social Impact of Drug Abuse Among Students and University Students,

BNN Abuse Among Students and University Students,

Table 7 Prevalence Rate of Ever Used and Current User BNNTable 7 Prevalence Rate of Ever Used and Current User Among Students and University Students According BNN Among Students and University Students According

ix

List of Table

ix

Table 21 Prevalence Rate of Current Use According to Work

Table 22 Respondent’s Reason of Using Drugs for the First Time Table 23 Prevalence Rate of Current Use According to Province and Gender Table 24 Prevalence Rate of Current Use According to Province and Status of UsageTable 25 Number of Smoker, Electric Smoker, and Alcoholics Among Workers in the Past Year According to GenderTable 26 The Age of Smoking, Smoking Electric Cigarette, and Drinking Alcohol for the First TimeTable 27 Ways to Obtain Drugs (N= 248)Table 28 The Ease of Obtaining Drugs in Workplace According to Types of Drugs (N = 248)Table 29 Household Income and SpendingTable 30 Environment Exposure from the Danger of DrugsTable 31 Knowledge on the Impact of Drugs Use

Table 33 Implementing Agency of P4GN Program According to Drug Users and Non-Drug User WorkersTable 34 The Most Effective Program for Drugs Prevention According to Workers

54

55

56

57

58

5859

6070717274

83

84


Perpus

takaa

n Table 29 Household Income and Spending

Perpus

takaa

n Table 29 Household Income and SpendingTable 30 Environment Exposure from the Danger of Drugs

Perpus

takaa

n Table 30 Environment Exposure from the Danger of DrugsTable 31 Knowledge on the Impact of Drugs Use

Perpus

takaa

n Table 31 Knowledge on the Impact of Drugs Use

Perpus

takaa

n Table 33 Implementing Agency of P4GN Program According

Perpus

takaa

n Table 33 Implementing Agency of P4GN Program According to Drug Users and Non-Drug User Workers

Perpus

takaa

n

to Drug Users and Non-Drug User WorkersTable 34 The Most Effective Program for Drugs Prevention

Perpus

takaa

n

Table 34 The Most Effective Program for Drugs Prevention According to Workers

Perpus

takaa

n

According to Workers

BNNTable 28 The Ease of Obtaining Drugs in Workplace According

BNNTable 28 The Ease of Obtaining Drugs in Workplace According

Table 29 Household Income and SpendingBNNTable 29 Household Income and Spending

x

Daftar Isi List of Graphic

x

Graphic 1 Respondents’ Gender Graphic 2 Respondents’ Level of Education Graphic 3 Current Respondents’ Place of Residence Graphic 4 Respondents’ Monthly Pocket Money Graphic 5 Respondents’ Parents Condition Graphic 6 Knowledge on Impact of Drug Abuse to Health Among Students, 2018 Graphic 7 Comparison of Prevalence Rate Among Students and University Students According to Gender Graphic 8 Graphic of Prevalence Rate Comparison Among Drug User Students and University Students in the Past Year According to GenderGraphic 9 Number of Household MembersGraphic 10 Gender of Household MembersGraphic 11 Household Members by GenderGraphic 12 Marital Status of Household MembersGraphic 13 Residence StatusGraphic 14 Level of Education of Household MembersGraphic 15 Social Status of Head of Household Graphic 16 Household Members’ Main Activity in the Past MonthGraphic 17 Household Members with Smoking Habit Graphic 18 Household Members with Attitude toward Drugs AbuseGraphic 19 Types of Drugs Consumed by Household MembersGraphic 20 Household Members Who Have an Issue with Law

Have Been Sentenced Due to Drugs Graphic 21 Distribution of Household Which Knows the Household Members’ Close Friend Graphic 22 P4GN Program Implementing Agency According to Student Respondents

2828293030

36

46

47686970717172

7374808182

83

84

88

Perpus

takaa

n Graphic 12 Marital Status of Household Members

Perpus

takaa

n Graphic 12 Marital Status of Household Members

Graphic 14 Level of Education of Household Members

Perpus

takaa

n Graphic 14 Level of Education of Household MembersGraphic 15 Social Status of Head of Household

Perpus

takaa

n Graphic 15 Social Status of Head of Household

Household Members’ Main Activity in the Past Month

Perpus

takaa

n Household Members’ Main Activity in the Past Month

Graphic 17 Household Members with Smoking Habit

Perpus

takaa

n

Graphic 17 Household Members with Smoking Habit Graphic 18 Household Members with Attitude toward Drugs

Perpus

takaa

n

Graphic 18 Household Members with Attitude toward Drugs Abuse

Perpus

takaa

n

AbuseGraphic 19 Types of Drugs Consumed by

Perpus

takaa

n

Graphic 19 Types of Drugs Consumed by Graphic 20 Household Members Who Have an Issue with Law Perp

ustak

aan

Graphic 20 Household Members Who Have an Issue with Law Perpus

takaa

n BNN

Graphic 11 Household Members by Gender BNNGraphic 11 Household Members by GenderGraphic 12 Marital Status of Household MembersBNNGraphic 12 Marital Status of Household Members

INTRODUCTION

I

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n INTRODUCTION

Perpus

takaa

n INTRODUCTIONBNNINTRODUCTIONBNNINTRODUCTION

2

Perpus

takaa

n BNN

3Prevalence Survey 2018

INTRODUCTION

1.1. Background

The vast ocean in Indonesia Unitary State which is larger than the maindland has encouraged drugs syndicate to smuggle drugs to Indonesia. In 2018, BNN seized 3.6 ton meth, 7.3 tons marijuana, 531 thousand ecstasies, 68 kilos cathinone, and 28,000 PCC/ Carisoprodol pills.1 Indonesia has become a target of drugs smuggling from international syndicate. Indonesia’s large population and high economic growth have been an attraction for drugs syndicate.

Health Research Center of the University of Indonesia (UI) in 2017, the prevalence trend of drug abuse was 1.77% or equal to 3,376,114 drug abusers. This number consists of several categories, namely 1,909,319 of experimental abusers, 920,100 of regular users, 489,197 non-injected drug addicts, and 58,498 injected drug addicts. The total of drug abusers was 3,376,115 people.

Until 2018, 74 types of New Psychoactive Substances (NPS) have been in circulation in Indonesia in which 66 of them have been regulated to the Ministry of Health Regulation. In BNN survey in 2017, several types

I

1 Research, Data, and Information Center of BNN, Research Findings of BNN & PPK UI, 2016

Perpus

takaa

n The vast ocean in Indonesia Unitary State which is larger than

Perpus

takaa

n The vast ocean in Indonesia Unitary State which is larger than the maindland has encouraged drugs syndicate to smuggle drugs to

Perpus

takaa

n the maindland has encouraged drugs syndicate to smuggle drugs to Indonesia. In 2018, BNN seized 3.6 ton meth, 7.3 tons marijuana, 531

Perpus

takaa

n Indonesia. In 2018, BNN seized 3.6 ton meth, 7.3 tons marijuana, 531 thousand ecstasies, 68 kilos cathinone, and 28,000 PCC/ Carisoprodol

Perpus

takaa

n thousand ecstasies, 68 kilos cathinone, and 28,000 PCC/ Carisoprodol pills.1 Indonesia has become a target of drugs smuggling from

Perpus

takaa

n

pills.1 Indonesia has become a target of drugs smuggling from international syndicate. Indonesia’s large population and high economic

Perpus

takaa

n

international syndicate. Indonesia’s large population and high economic growth have been an attraction for drugs syndicate.

Perpus

takaa

n

growth have been an attraction for drugs syndicate.

Perpus

takaa

n

Health Research Center of the University of Indonesia (UI) in 2017, the Perpus

takaa

n

Health Research Center of the University of Indonesia (UI) in 2017, the prevalence trend of drug abuse was 1.77% or equal to 3,376,114 drug

Perpus

takaa

n

prevalence trend of drug abuse was 1.77% or equal to 3,376,114 drug

BNN

4 Prevalence Survey 2018

and PCC pill which have become a serious threat to the community, especially a case in Kendari in September 2017.2

The data of drug seize through the years indicates that drug

revealed 46,537 cases across Indonesia as well as arrested 58,365 suspects, 34 suspects of money laundering, and 79 suspects who

were then known as drugs dealer and syndicate in Indonesia. The

ecstasy pills, and 627.84 kilogram of liquid ecstasy. In addition, BNN

vehicles, property, land, jewelry, cash money, and money in the account amounting to Rp 105 billion.3

2008 to 2011 of about 0.24% or equal to 911,805 abusers. Meanwhile, prevalence rate of drug abuse from 2011 to 2014 decreased about 0.05% or equal to 251.555 abusers. However, until 2017, the prevalence rate decreased 0.14% per year. The declining prevalence rate can be seen also in 2017 survey which shows that the prevalence rate among workers decreased from 12.8% in 2012 into 9.1% in 2017 (Health Research Center and BNN, 2017).

The declining prevalence rate of drug abuse is one of the indicators of the government success cq Ministry/Institution in reducing the prevalence rate of drug abuse in P4GN. In implementing P4GN, the operational pillars of BNN have formulated a number of strategies in the

Prevention, Community Empowerment, Eradication, and Rehabilitation.

Strategies and program are needed in eradicating drugs abuse as the implementation of P4GN. In order that the strategies and program meet the target, a survey on drug abuse is conducted. Related to

2 Research, Data, and Information Center of BNN, Survey Findings on Drug Abuse in 34 Provinces, 20173 https://news.idntimes.com/indonesia/fitang-adhitia/sepanjang-tahun-2017-bnn-ungkap-46537-kasus-narkoba/fullhttps://news.idntimes.com/indonesia/fitang-adhitia/sepanjang-tahun-2017-bnn-ungkap-46537-kasus-narkoba/full

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n 2008 to 2011 of about 0.24% or equal to 911,805 abusers. Meanwhile,

Perpus

takaa

n 2008 to 2011 of about 0.24% or equal to 911,805 abusers. Meanwhile, prevalence rate of drug abuse from 2011 to 2014 decreased about

Perpus

takaa

n prevalence rate of drug abuse from 2011 to 2014 decreased about 0.05% or equal to 251.555 abusers. However, until 2017, the prevalence

Perpus

takaa

n 0.05% or equal to 251.555 abusers. However, until 2017, the prevalence rate decreased 0.14% per year. The declining prevalence rate can be

Perpus

takaa

n

rate decreased 0.14% per year. The declining prevalence rate can be seen also in 2017 survey which shows that the prevalence rate among

Perpus

takaa

n

seen also in 2017 survey which shows that the prevalence rate among workers decreased from 12.8% in 2012 into 9.1% in 2017 (Health

Perpus

takaa

n

workers decreased from 12.8% in 2012 into 9.1% in 2017 (Health Research Center and BNN, 2017).

Perpus

takaa

n

Research Center and BNN, 2017).

The declining prevalence rate of drug abuse is one of the indicators Perpus

takaa

n

The declining prevalence rate of drug abuse is one of the indicators

BNNecstasy pills, and 627.84 kilogram of liquid ecstasy. In addition, BNN

BNNecstasy pills, and 627.84 kilogram of liquid ecstasy. In addition, BNN

BNNvehicles, property, land, jewelry, cash money, and money in the account

BNNvehicles, property, land, jewelry, cash money, and money in the account


this, BNN had conducted several surveys on drug abuse of which the result, especialy the prevalence rate of drug abuse, has been applied by Bappenas to arrange the main target in Defense and Security development 2015-2019. The result of the research has been used also in the annual international report like CND Annual Meeting, ASOD

etc.

The negative impact of drugs has made everyone worried since Indonesian population and the wide territory are a major market for drug dealers. It is not only the duty of the police to anticipate drug

ministry and state institution. Presidential Instruction No.6 of 2018 on National Action Plan of P4GN has become a legal basis to all ministry and state institution to implement this activity.

1.2. Issues

Drug abuse tends to increase in the community. Hence, data on drug abuse should be updated through the years. It is also important

expected to be able to answer drugs development in Indonesia through the prevalence rate. Related to this, the main questions in this research are the level of prevalence rate of drug abuse in 2018.

The questions of the research are: 1. How high is the prevalence rate of drug abuse among workers,

students, and university students?2. How is drug abuse among workers, students, and university

students being described according to the history of usage, method, and distribution pattern?

3. students, and university students?

4. What is the description of risky behaviour (smoking, drinking alcohol) toward drugs among workers, students, and university students?

Perpus

takaa

n Drug abuse tends to increase in the community. Hence, data on

Perpus

takaa

n Drug abuse tends to increase in the community. Hence, data on

drug abuse should be updated through the years. It is also important

Perpus

takaa

n drug abuse should be updated through the years. It is also important

Perpus

takaa

n

expected to be able to answer drugs development in Indonesia through

Perpus

takaa

n

expected to be able to answer drugs development in Indonesia through the prevalence rate. Related to this, the main questions in this research

Perpus

takaa

n

the prevalence rate. Related to this, the main questions in this research are the level of prevalence rate of drug abuse in 2018.

Perpus

takaa

n

are the level of prevalence rate of drug abuse in 2018.

The questions of the research are: Perpus

takaa

n

The questions of the research are: 1. How high is the prevalence rate of drug abuse among workers, Perp

ustak

aan

1. How high is the prevalence rate of drug abuse among workers,

BNNministry and state institution. Presidential Instruction No.6 of 2018 on

BNNministry and state institution. Presidential Instruction No.6 of 2018 on National Action Plan of P4GN has become a legal basis to all ministry

BNNNational Action Plan of P4GN has become a legal basis to all ministry and state institution to implement this activity.

BNNand state institution to implement this activity.


5. What is the level of knowledge on drugs and attitude toward the danger of drug abuse among workers, students, and university students?

6. What is the intervention of P4GN program both from the government and non-government institution among workers, students, and university students?

In addition, the questions related to household are: 1. How vulnerable is the family in the community toward the danger of

drugs?2. How is the household environment being exposed to the danger of

drugs?3. How is the household’s sensitivity to the danger of drugs? 4. How is the household being exposed to the danger of drugs?5. What is the household’s strategy not to be exposed to the danger of

drugs?

1.3. Objective and Target

rate of drug abuse among workers, students and university students, as well as to identify the vulnerability rate of household in dealing with drug threat in 13 provinces in 2018. Here are details of the particular objectives related to prevalence rate of drug abuse: 1. To identify the estimated prevalence of drug abuse among workers,

students, and university students according to usage time and category.

2. To know the illustration of drug abuse among workers, students, and university students according to the history of usage, method, and distribution pattern.

3. students, and university students.

4. alcohol, and sexual intercourse) toward drug among workers, students and university students.

5. the danger of drug abuse among workers, students, and university students.

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n rate of drug abuse among workers, students and university students, as

Perpus

takaa

n rate of drug abuse among workers, students and university students, as well as to identify the vulnerability rate of household in dealing with

Perpus

takaa

n

well as to identify the vulnerability rate of household in dealing with drug threat in 13 provinces in 2018. Here are details of the particular

Perpus

takaa

n

drug threat in 13 provinces in 2018. Here are details of the particular objectives related to prevalence rate of drug abuse:

Perpus

takaa

n

objectives related to prevalence rate of drug abuse: 1. To identify the estimated prevalence of drug abuse among workers,

Perpus

takaa

n

1. To identify the estimated prevalence of drug abuse among workers, students, and university students according to usage time and Perp

ustak

aan

students, and university students according to usage time and

BNN3. How is the household’s sensitivity to the danger of drugs?

BNN3. How is the household’s sensitivity to the danger of drugs? 4. How is the household being exposed to the danger of drugs?

BNN4. How is the household being exposed to the danger of drugs?5. What is the household’s strategy not to be exposed to the danger of

BNN5. What is the household’s strategy not to be exposed to the danger of


6. government and non-government institution among workers, students, and university students.

The targets of this research are workers, students, and university student as well as household members.

1.4. Conceptual Framework

Drugs cover narcotics, psychotropics, and addictive substances. The term of drugs is not stated in laws and regulations. Law No.35 of 2009 on Narcotics only says that narcotics are substances or drugs from plants or non-plants, either synthetic or semi-synthetic, which can cause degradation or alteration of consciousness, loss of taste, reduction or elimination of the pain, and can lead to dependency.

Synthetic narcotics are category of narcotics which require synthetic process for medical and research need as analgesic. The examples are amphetamine, methadone, dextropropakasifen, dexamphetamine, and others. Meanwhile, semi-synthetic narcotics are substances/drugs which are produced through isolation, extraction and others such as heroin, morphine, codeine, and others. Outside this category is called natural narcotics, namely substances and drugs which can be directly consumed as narcotics without fermentation, isolation, and other process since they can be directly consumed with simple process. The examples of natural narcotics are marijuana and coca leaf.

Based on Article 6 Paragraph 1 Law on Narcotics, narcotics are

Perpus

takaa

n Drugs cover narcotics, psychotropics, and addictive substances.

Perpus

takaa

n Drugs cover narcotics, psychotropics, and addictive substances. The term of drugs is not stated in laws and regulations. Law No.35 of

Perpus

takaa

n The term of drugs is not stated in laws and regulations. Law No.35 of 2009 on Narcotics only says that narcotics are substances or drugs

Perpus

takaa

n 2009 on Narcotics only says that narcotics are substances or drugs from plants or non-plants, either synthetic or semi-synthetic, which

Perpus

takaa

n from plants or non-plants, either synthetic or semi-synthetic, which can cause degradation or alteration of consciousness, loss of taste,

Perpus

takaa

n

can cause degradation or alteration of consciousness, loss of taste, reduction or elimination of the pain, and can lead to dependency.

Perpus

takaa

n

reduction or elimination of the pain, and can lead to dependency.

Synthetic narcotics are category of narcotics which require synthetic

Perpus

takaa

n

Synthetic narcotics are category of narcotics which require synthetic process for medical and research need as analgesic. The examples are Perp

ustak

aan

process for medical and research need as analgesic. The examples are amphetamine, methadone, dextropropakasifen, dexamphetamine, and Perp

ustak

aan

amphetamine, methadone, dextropropakasifen, dexamphetamine, and

BNN


and cannot be used in theraphy, having very high potential of causing

or for the development of science, having high potential of causing dependency), and narcotics category III (narcotics which are purposed for medication and used a alot in theraphy and/or for the development of science, having low potential of causing dependency).

Appendix I of Law on Narcotics contains types of narcotics in category I, category II, and category III. However, with the consideration on the increase of new drugs abuse with very high potential to cause dependency which is not included in the category listed in Appendix I of Law No 35 of 2009 on Narcotics and Minister of Health Regulation No.13 of 2014 on Change of Narcotics Category, based on Minister of Health Regulation No.2 of 2017 on Change of Narcotics category, narcotics is then categorized into category I, II and III. The Minister of Health Regulation No.58 of 2017 on the Change of Narcotics Category is then changed again into category I, II and III.

Psychotropic is regulated in Law No.5 of 1997 on Psychotropic. Article 1 of the Law on Psychotropic states that psychotropic is substance or drug, both non drugs-natural and synthetic, with

system which causes typical change in mental and behaviour activity.

Psychotropic which has the potential to cause a dependency syndrome is grouped into 4 categories, namely psychotropic category I (psychotropic which can only be used for the purpose of science and can not be used in theraphy, but it has very strong potential to cause dependency syndrome), psychotropic category II (psychotropic which is used for medication and can be used in therapy and/or for the purpose of science, having moderate potential to cause dependency syndrome), psychotropic category III (psychotropic wich is used for medication and is used alot in theraphy and/or for the purpose of science, having moderate potential to cause dependency syndrome), and psychotropic category IV (psychotropic which is used for medication and widely used in theraphy and/or for the purpose of science, having light potential to cause dependency syndrome).

Perpus

takaa

n Health Regulation No.58 of 2017 on the Change of Narcotics Category

Perpus

takaa

n Health Regulation No.58 of 2017 on the Change of Narcotics Category is then changed again into category I, II and III.

Perpus

takaa

n is then changed again into category I, II and III.

Psychotropic is regulated in Law No.5 of 1997 on Psychotropic.

Perpus

takaa

n Psychotropic is regulated in Law No.5 of 1997 on Psychotropic.

Article 1 of the Law on Psychotropic states that psychotropic is

Perpus

takaa

n Article 1 of the Law on Psychotropic states that psychotropic is substance or drug, both non drugs-natural and synthetic, with

Perpus

takaa

n

substance or drug, both non drugs-natural and synthetic, with

Perpus

takaa

n


Perpus

takaa

n


Psychotropic which has the potential to cause a dependency Perpus

takaa

n

Psychotropic which has the potential to cause a dependency syndrome is grouped into 4 categories, namely psychotropic category Perp

ustak

aan

syndrome is grouped into 4 categories, namely psychotropic category

BNNof Law No 35 of 2009 on Narcotics and Minister of Health Regulation

BNNof Law No 35 of 2009 on Narcotics and Minister of Health Regulation No.13 of 2014 on Change of Narcotics Category, based on Minister

BNNNo.13 of 2014 on Change of Narcotics Category, based on Minister of Health Regulation No.2 of 2017 on Change of Narcotics category,

BNNof Health Regulation No.2 of 2017 on Change of Narcotics category, narcotics is then categorized into category I, II and III. The Minister of BNNnarcotics is then categorized into category I, II and III. The Minister of Health Regulation No.58 of 2017 on the Change of Narcotics Category BNNHealth Regulation No.58 of 2017 on the Change of Narcotics Category


Psychotropic category I is psychotropic which can only be used for the purpose of science and is not used in theraphy. It has very strong potential to cause dependency syndrome. The examples of this psychotropic are:

MDMA (Methylene Dioxy Meth Amphethamine), or Inex (Methylene Dioxy Meth Amphethamine), or Inex (Methylene Dioxy Meth Amphethamine),Shabu or UbasPsilocybin and psilosinLSD atorau Lisergic Acid Dietilamine derived from a type of ergot fungus that grows on white wheat and rye. Meskalina (peyote)

medication and can be used in a therapy and/or for the purpose of science as and has strong potential to cause dependency syndrome. Substances in this category are: amphetamine, methamfetamine, metacualona, methylphenidate, and etc.

medication and used alot in a therapy and/or used for the purpose of science and has moderate potential in causing dependency syndrome. Types of psychotropic in this category are: aKatina and etc.

medication and widely used in a therapy and/or used for the purpose of science and has light potential in causing dependency syndrome. Types of psychotropic in this category are: barbital, bromazepam, diazepam, estazolam, phenobarbital, clobazam, lorazepam, nitrazepam and etc. estazolam, phenobarbital, clobazam, lorazepam, nitrazepam and etc. estazolam, phenobarbital, clobazam, lorazepam, nitrazepam

Psychotropic category I and II based on Article 153 law No.35 of 2009 on Narcotics has been revoked and is included in the category of narcotics as mentioned in the Appendix of Law on Narcotics. The emergence of New Psychoactive Substances (NPS) in the last several years has potentially endangered the community since it is not under the international control. This substance has caused the increasing addiction. Many people have been hospitalized for consuming this substance. It even causes death. These psychoactive substances are usually known as ‘legal’ alternative as substances that are not under

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n medication and used alot in a therapy and/or used for the purpose of

Perpus

takaa

n medication and used alot in a therapy and/or used for the purpose of science and has moderate potential in causing dependency syndrome.

Perpus

takaa

n science and has moderate potential in causing dependency syndrome.

Perpus

takaa

n Types of psychotropic in this category are: a

Perpus

takaa

n Types of psychotropic in this category are: a

Perpus

takaa

n

medication and widely used in a therapy and/or used for the purpose of

Perpus

takaa

n

medication and widely used in a therapy and/or used for the purpose of science and has light potential in causing dependency syndrome. Types Perp

ustak

aan

science and has light potential in causing dependency syndrome. Types of psychotropic in this category are: Perp

ustak

aan

of psychotropic in this category are:

BNNmedication and can be used in a therapy and/or for the purpose of

BNNmedication and can be used in a therapy and/or for the purpose of science as and has strong potential to cause dependency syndrome.

BNNscience as and has strong potential to cause dependency syndrome. amphetamine, methamfetamine,

BNNamphetamine, methamfetamine,


risk.4 The Ministry of Health Regulation No.3 of 2017 has changed the category of psychotropic, especially psychotropic category II and IV. The Ministry of Health Regulation No.57 of 2017 has changed again the psychotropic category II and IV as mentioned in Appendix 2.

NPS has been well known in the market as “designer drugs”, “legal highs”, “herbal highs”, “bath salts”, “research chemicals”, or “laboratory reagents”. In order to clarify the terminology of this issue, UNODC only

as “drugs abuse, both in the form of genuine or mixture, which is not controlled by Single Convention on Narcotics Drug of 1961 or Convention on Psychotripic Substances of 1971 but causes a threat to the public’s health. The term “new”does not always refer to new discovery (several

new substances emerge in the market and are not listed in the above conventions. Types or main category of NPS as delivered by UNODC

Appendix 3. For cases in Indonesia, especially, BNN in its website in 5

1.4.2. Drugs Abuse and its Impact

Article 7 of Law on Narcotics says that narcotics may only be used for the purpose of health services and/or science and technology. Hence, the use of narcotics outside these purposes can be categorized as abuse. It is based on provisions in Article 1 No.15 Law on Narcotics which says that drugs abuse is people who use narcotics without rights or against the law.

Continous use of drugs may cause dependency which refers to Article 1 No.14 Law of Narcotics as a condition marked with a motivation to use drugs continuously with increasing dose to create the same effect and if the use is reduced and/or stopped suddenly, it will generate typical physical and psychological symptoms.

4 New psychoactive substances: overview of trends, challenges and legal approaches, Commission on Narcotic Drugs

Fifty-ninth session, Vienna, 14-22 March 20145 National Narcotics Board. List of NPS Substances already identified in Indonesia. 31 January 2016 http://lab.

bnn.go.id/nps_alert_system/12.%20Lampiran%20zat%20NPS%20terdeteksi%20di%20Indonesia.php

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n Appendix 3. For cases in Indonesia, especially, BNN in its website in

Perpus

takaa

n Appendix 3. For cases in Indonesia, especially, BNN in its website in

Perpus

takaa

n 1.4.2. Drugs Abuse and its Impact

Perpus

takaa

n 1.4.2. Drugs Abuse and its Impact

Article 7 of Law on Narcotics says that narcotics may only be

Perpus

takaa

n

Article 7 of Law on Narcotics says that narcotics may only be used for the purpose of health services and/or science and technology.

Perpus

takaa

n

used for the purpose of health services and/or science and technology. Hence, the use of narcotics outside these purposes can be categorized

Perpus

takaa

n

Hence, the use of narcotics outside these purposes can be categorized as abuse. It is based on provisions in Article 1 No.15 Law on Narcotics Perp

ustak

aan

as abuse. It is based on provisions in Article 1 No.15 Law on Narcotics which says that drugs abuse is people who use narcotics without rights Perp

ustak

aan

which says that drugs abuse is people who use narcotics without rights

BNNhealth. The term “new”does not always refer to new discovery (several

BNNhealth. The term “new”does not always refer to new discovery (several

BNNnew substances emerge in the market and are not listed in the above

BNNnew substances emerge in the market and are not listed in the above conventions. Types or main category of NPS as delivered by UNODC BNNconventions. Types or main category of NPS as delivered by UNODC BNN


There are several factors which motivate people to abuse drugs. The factors are grouped into three sources, namely:1. Causative factors from oneself, consisting of:

a) Great curiosity to try, unconseously and without a long thinking on the impact in the future.

b) Curiosity to try. c) Having fun. d) Willing to be accepted in a certain community or environment. e) Workaholic to be always in an activity by using stimulant. f) Running from problem, boring, or life bitterness. g) Feeling exhausted and lossing the spirit to study. h) Suffering from anxiety and bitterness.i) Addicted to smoking and drinking alcohol. These two things

lead to narcotics abuse. j) Self-entertaining and enjoying life to the fullest.k) Lossing weight or obesity by consuming excessive medicine for

appetite control.l) Feeling inattentive, unacceptable or unloved, in a family or social

environment.m) Inability to adjust to the environment.n) Ignorance on the effects and dangers of drug abuse.o) The misconception that trying drugs will never cause a problem.p) Not able or dare to face pressure from the environment or social

groups to use drugs.q) Unable to say NO to drugs.

2. Environmental factors, consisting of:a) Broken home.b) Having a drug user or abuser or dealer father, mother or both or

sibling. c) Being in a wrong association or community where one of or

several and all members are drug users or dealers.d) Visiting nightclubs frequently (cafe, discotheque, karaoke, etc).e) Having a spare time, dropout or unemployed. f) A less/not harmonious family. g) A family with no love, communication, openness, attention, and

respect between the family members.

Perpus

takaa

n l) Feeling inattentive, unacceptable or unloved, in a family or social

Perpus

takaa

n l) Feeling inattentive, unacceptable or unloved, in a family or social

m) Inability to adjust to the environment.

Perpus

takaa

n m) Inability to adjust to the environment.n) Ignorance on the effects and dangers of drug abuse.

Perpus

takaa

n n) Ignorance on the effects and dangers of drug abuse.o) The misconception that trying drugs will never cause a problem.

Perpus

takaa

n

o) The misconception that trying drugs will never cause a problem.p) Not able or dare to face pressure from the environment or social

Perpus

takaa

n

p) Not able or dare to face pressure from the environment or social groups to use drugs.

Perpus

takaa

n

groups to use drugs.q) Unable to say NO to drugs.

Perpus

takaa

n

q) Unable to say NO to drugs.

2. Environmental factors, consisting of:Perpus

takaa

n

2. Environmental factors, consisting of:

BNNi) Addicted to smoking and drinking alcohol. These two things

BNNi) Addicted to smoking and drinking alcohol. These two things

j) Self-entertaining and enjoying life to the fullest.

BNNj) Self-entertaining and enjoying life to the fullest.k) Lossing weight or obesity by consuming excessive medicine for BNNk) Lossing weight or obesity by consuming excessive medicine for


h) Having authoritarian parents. i) Permissive, indifferent, permissible, and less/no supervision

parents/family.j) busy parents/family.k) A social environment with high competition and uncertainty. l) A hectic urban life, people are not known personally, there is no

primary relationship, disintegration, loss of social control from

high crime rate.m) Poverty, unemployment, dropouts and abandonment.

3. Drugs availability factorDrugs have become a driving factor for someone to use drugs when:a) Drugs are easily obtained and bought.b) Price of drugs is cheap and affordable by people’s purchasing

power. c) Drugs are increasingly diverse in type, method of use, and form

of packaging

e) There are still many illegal drug laboratories that have not been revealed.

g) More accessible internet that provides information on drug making.

syndicates.

Uncontrolled drug use will ruin someone’s life. The impact is 207,400 death cases due to drug abuse in the world.6 The use of drugs in general and the use of psychotropic which is not according to the rules will create an effect that will endanger the body. The effect of drug abuse can be divided into three, namely:

6 World Drugs Report Tahun 2016. UNODC

Perpus

takaa

n c) Drugs are increasingly diverse in type, method of use, and form

Perpus

takaa

n c) Drugs are increasingly diverse in type, method of use, and form

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n e) There are still many illegal drug laboratories that have not been

Perpus

takaa

n e) There are still many illegal drug laboratories that have not been

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

g) More accessible internet that provides information on drug

Perpus

takaa

n

g) More accessible internet that provides information on drug making. Perp

ustak

aan

making. Perpus

takaa

n BNN

Drugs have become a driving factor for someone to use drugs when:

BNNDrugs have become a driving factor for someone to use drugs when:

b) Price of drugs is cheap and affordable by people’s purchasing

BNNb) Price of drugs is cheap and affordable by people’s purchasing

c) Drugs are increasingly diverse in type, method of use, and form BNNc) Drugs are increasingly diverse in type, method of use, and form


1. Depressants, which suppress the central nerves system and reduce the functional activities of the body so that the user feels calm. They can even make the user sleep and unconscious. The case of overdosing can lead to death. Types of depressant drugs include opioda, and various derivatives such as morphine and heroin. The example is Putaw.

2. Stimulants, stimulate the functions of body and increase Stimulants, stimulate the functions of body and increase Stimulantsexcitement and awareness. Types of stimulants: Caffeine, Cocaine, Amphetamine. Examples that are now often used are meth and Ecstasy.

3. Hallucinogens, the main effect is to change the perception or cause Hallucinogens, the main effect is to change the perception or cause Hallucinogenshallucinations. Hallucinogens mostly come from plants such as mescaline from cactus and psilocybin from mold-fungi. In addition, there are also mixed in the laboratory such as LSD. The most widely used is marijuana or cannabis.

Haryanto (2012) says that the negative impacts of drug abuse are physical, psychiological, and socio-environmental impact. These various impacts have encouraged the government to declare a war against narcotics.

The impacts of narcotics abuse to the physical are:a. Disorders in nerves system (neurological) such as seizures,

hallucinations, disturbance of consciousness and peripheral nerve damage.

b. Disorders of the heart and blood vessels (cardiovascular) such as acute infections of the heart muscle and circulatory disorders.

c. Skin disorders (dermatological) such as abdominal (abscess), allergies and eczema.

d. Lungs disorders (pulmonary) such as suppression of respiratory

e. Frequent headaches, nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, increased body temperature, muscle wasting of the liver and insomnia.

f. Disruption of endocrine hormones, such as decreased function of reproductive hormones (estrogen, progesterone, testosterone) and sexual dysfunction

g. Disruption of reproductive health in adolescent girls, including changes in menstrual periods, menstrual irregularities or amenorrhea.

Perpus

takaa

n Haryanto (2012) says that the negative impacts of drug abuse

Perpus

takaa

n Haryanto (2012) says that the negative impacts of drug abuse are physical, psychiological, and socio-environmental impact. These

Perpus

takaa

n are physical, psychiological, and socio-environmental impact. These various impacts have encouraged the government to declare a war

Perpus

takaa

n various impacts have encouraged the government to declare a war

Perpus

takaa

n

The impacts of narcotics abuse to the physical are:

Perpus

takaa

n

The impacts of narcotics abuse to the physical are:a. Disorders in nerves system (neurological) such as seizures,

Perpus

takaa

n

a. Disorders in nerves system (neurological) such as seizures, hallucinations, disturbance of consciousness and peripheral nerve

Perpus

takaa

n

hallucinations, disturbance of consciousness and peripheral nerve

b. Disorders of the heart and blood vessels (cardiovascular) such as Perpus

takaa

n

b. Disorders of the heart and blood vessels (cardiovascular) such as acute infections of the heart muscle and circulatory disorders.Perp

ustak

aan

acute infections of the heart muscle and circulatory disorders.

BNNmescaline from cactus and psilocybin from mold-fungi. In addition,

BNNmescaline from cactus and psilocybin from mold-fungi. In addition, there are also mixed in the laboratory such as LSD. The most widely

BNNthere are also mixed in the laboratory such as LSD. The most widely

Haryanto (2012) says that the negative impacts of drug abuse BNNHaryanto (2012) says that the negative impacts of drug abuse


h. For addicts, abusers and victims of narcotics abuse through syringes, especially the use of needles interchangeably, the risk can be contracted by diseases such as hepatitis B, C, and HIV which is no cure until now.

i. Narcotics abuse can be fatal in the case of overdose when narcotics consumption exceeds the body’s ability to accept it, and it can even cause death.

The physical impact includes: a. Work slowly, work carelessly, often tense and anxious.

c. Aggressive, being violent and having brutal behaviour.d. to concentrate.e. Tend to hurt oneself, feeling insecure, even wanting to suicide

The impacts of drug abuse to socio-environment are:a. Mental disorders, anti-social and immoral as well as ostracized by

the environment.b. Troublesome and a burden on the family.c. Education is disrupted and the future is bleak.

The physical, psychological, and social impacts are closely related. The physical dependency will cause tremendous pain (withdrawal) if abusers are not consuming drugs on time and strong psychological stimulus to consume drugs (the slang word is suggest). The physical suggest). The physical suggestand psychological impacts also correlate with social impact such as the suggestion to lie to parents, stealing, being grumpy, manipulative, etc.

Besides negative impacts to the users, narcotics also give negative impacts to the national security. As we know, national security is a nation’s ability to face and overcome threats, challenges, obstacles, and interference both from inside or outside directly or indirectly to guarantee the identity, integrity, life of the nation and state in achieving national goals. In other word, national security is the nation’s ability to defend its life and lives from threats. This ability is achieved only if the people are in healthy condition, physicaly and spiritually. Hence, if many nationals use narcotics, this nation would be weak and would not be able to face the threats.

Perpus

takaa

n a. Mental disorders, anti-social and immoral as well as ostracized by

Perpus

takaa

n a. Mental disorders, anti-social and immoral as well as ostracized by

b. Troublesome and a burden on the family.

Perpus

takaa

n b. Troublesome and a burden on the family.c. Education is disrupted and the future is bleak.

Perpus

takaa

n c. Education is disrupted and the future is bleak.

The physical, psychological, and social impacts are closely related.

Perpus

takaa

n

The physical, psychological, and social impacts are closely related. The physical dependency will cause tremendous pain (withdrawal)

Perpus

takaa

n

The physical dependency will cause tremendous pain (withdrawal) if abusers are not consuming drugs on time and strong psychological

Perpus

takaa

n

if abusers are not consuming drugs on time and strong psychological stimulus to consume drugs (the slang word is

Perpus

takaa

n

stimulus to consume drugs (the slang word is and psychological impacts also correlate with social impact such as the Perp

ustak

aan

and psychological impacts also correlate with social impact such as the suggestion to lie to parents, stealing, being grumpy, manipulative, etc.Perp

ustak

aan

suggestion to lie to parents, stealing, being grumpy, manipulative, etc.

BNNe. Tend to hurt oneself, feeling insecure, even wanting to suicide

BNNe. Tend to hurt oneself, feeling insecure, even wanting to suicide

The impacts of drug abuse to socio-environment are:BNNThe impacts of drug abuse to socio-environment are:a. Mental disorders, anti-social and immoral as well as ostracized by BNNa. Mental disorders, anti-social and immoral as well as ostracized by


1.4.3. Worker and Drugs

Worker is a drug abuse prone-social group. Based on drug case

with the declining percentage of 10.07% from 51,464 cases in 2017 into 46,283 cases in 2018. The declining suspects occurred in the group of Civil Servants from 422 in 2017 into 399 in 2018, private sector workers from 25,984 in 2017 into 20,150 in 2018, entrepreneurs from 17,200 in 2017 into 16,483 in 2018.7

Meanwhile, the increasing suspects occurred in the group of Police/Indonesian Army from 367 in 2017 into 426 in 2018, farmers from 2,625 in 2017 into 2,628 in 2018, labor from 6,902 in 2017 into 7,540 in 2018, and unemployment from 8,650 in 2017 into 9,256 in 2018. The survey by BNN and PPK UI shows the estimation of prevalence rate in students and workers in drug abuse as shown in the following table

Table 1 Estimation on the Number of Drug Users and Current User Prevalence

Rate According to Gender and Types of Group, 2017

Male Female % Prevalence

Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum Male Female

Workers living in

boarding house

829,826 924,826 134,209 148,816 9.0 2.7829,826 924,826 134,209 148,816 9.0 2.7

Workers not living in

boarding house

1,582,573 1,743,573 314,445 347,340 2.9 0.9

Students living in

boarding house

254,777 254,777 54,623 59,935 11.1 4.2254,777 254,777 54,623 59,935 11.1 4.2

Students not living

in boarding house

464,440 510,909 126,405 141,798 4.7 1.5

Female Sex Workers - - 63,191 69,719 - 27.6Female Sex Workers - - 63,191 69,719 - 27.6

Street children 12,671 13,802 1,949 2,187 17.4 10.8

Household 176,640 203,393 63,359 70,361 1.2 0.2Household 176,640 203,393 63,359 70,361 1.2 0.2

Source: BNN & PPKUI, 2017

7 BNN, Summary of Journal on Drug Abuse and Illicit Traficking Prevention and Eradication (P4GN), 2017, 2018 Edition

Perpus

takaa

n Table 1

Perpus

takaa

n Table 1 Estimation on the Number of Drug Users and Current User Prevalence

Perpus

takaa

n Estimation on the Number of Drug Users and Current User Prevalence

Rate According to Gender and Types of Group, 2017

Perpus

takaa

n Rate According to Gender and Types of Group, 2017

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Male

Perpus

takaa

n

Male

Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum Male F

Perpus

takaa

n


829,826 924,826 134,209 148,816 9.0 2.7

Perpus

takaa

n

829,826 924,826 134,209 148,816 9.0 2.7

Workers not living in Perpus

takaa

n

Workers not living in 1,582,573 1,743,573 314,445 347,340 2.9 0.9Perpus

takaa

n

1,582,573 1,743,573 314,445 347,340 2.9 0.9

BNNfrom 2,625 in 2017 into 2,628 in 2018, labor from 6,902 in 2017 into

BNNfrom 2,625 in 2017 into 2,628 in 2018, labor from 6,902 in 2017 into 7,540 in 2018, and unemployment from 8,650 in 2017 into 9,256 in 2018.

BNN7,540 in 2018, and unemployment from 8,650 in 2017 into 9,256 in 2018. The survey by BNN and PPK UI shows the estimation of prevalence rate

BNNThe survey by BNN and PPK UI shows the estimation of prevalence rate in students and workers in drug abuse as shown in the following tableBNNin students and workers in drug abuse as shown in the following table


1.4.4 Students and Drugs

Each student has different need and shows different growth rate.

to students in formal schools from Junior High School, Senior High School and University. The group of student is a social group which is prone to drug abuse.

trend in drug case relatively with the percentage of 10.07% from 51,464 cases in 2017 into 46,283 cases in 2018. The declining suspects occurred in university students from 1,327 in 2017 into 1,282 in 2018. In the group of students, the increase was from 1,050 in 2017 into 1,127 in 2018.8 Based on research by BNN and PPK UI in 2016, there was a declining prevalence rate in pupils and university students in 2011-2016. In 2011, the prevalence rate was 2.9% and declined into 1.9% in 2016. It increased again in 2017. In general, the drug abuse prevalence in male students is higher than female students. Based on the residence, the prevalence rate of students living in boarding house is higher than those who are not living in the boarding house. It occurs both in male and female students as shown in the following table.

Table 2 Estimation on the Number of Drug Users and Current User Prevalence Rate Among Students According to Gender and Type of Group, 2017

Source : BNN & PPKUI, 2017.

Male Female % Prevalence

Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum Male Female

Students living in

boarding house

254,777 254,777 54,623 59,935 11.1 4.2

Students not

living in boarding

house

464,440 510,909 126.,405 141,798 4.7 1.5

8 BNN, Summary of Journal on Drug Abuse and Illicit Traficking Prevention and Eradication (P4GN), 2017, 2018 Edition

Perpus

takaa

n 2016. It increased again in 2017. In general, the drug abuse prevalence in

Perpus

takaa

n 2016. It increased again in 2017. In general, the drug abuse prevalence in male students is higher than female students. Based on the residence,

Perpus

takaa

n male students is higher than female students. Based on the residence, the prevalence rate of students living in boarding house is higher than

Perpus

takaa

n the prevalence rate of students living in boarding house is higher than those who are not living in the boarding house. It occurs both in male

Perpus

takaa

n those who are not living in the boarding house. It occurs both in male and female students as shown in the following table.

Perpus

takaa

n and female students as shown in the following table.

Table 2

Perpus

takaa

n

Table 2 Estimation on the Number of Drug Users and Current User Prevalence

Perpus

takaa

n

Estimation on the Number of Drug Users and Current User Prevalence Rate Among Students According to Gender and Type of Group, 2017

Perpus

takaa

n

Rate Among Students According to Gender and Type of Group, 2017

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

MalePerpus

takaa

n

Male

Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum Male FPerpus

takaa

n


BNNIn the group of students, the increase was from 1,050 in 2017 into 1,127

BNNIn the group of students, the increase was from 1,050 in 2017 into 1,127

Based on research by BNN and PPK UI in 2016, there was

BNN Based on research by BNN and PPK UI in 2016, there was a declining prevalence rate in pupils and university students in 2011-

BNNa declining prevalence rate in pupils and university students in 2011-2016. In 2011, the prevalence rate was 2.9% and declined into 1.9% in BNN2016. In 2011, the prevalence rate was 2.9% and declined into 1.9% in 2016. It increased again in 2017. In general, the drug abuse prevalence in BNN2016. It increased again in 2017. In general, the drug abuse prevalence in


Based on BNN and PPK UI research in 2016, there was a declining prevalence rate in students and university students in 2011-2016. In 2011, the prevalence rate was 2.9% and declined into 1.9% in 2016. It increased again in 2017.

1.4.5 Household and Drugs

unit in the society consisting of head of family and family members living in a place under the same roof and being interdependence. Family is also

of father, mother and children. 2. Extended family, a nuclear family added with relatives living in the same house. 3. Serial family, a woman and a man who are married more than once and are one nuclear family. 4. Single family, a family with divorce or death. 5. Composite family, polygamous family and living together. 6. Cohabitation, two people forming a family without a marriage.9

danger of drug. Hence, family resistance is a condition created to face the danger of drug abuse. If the family resistance is created, the functions of family will work well to protect teh family from the danger of drugs. Family serves the function of protection. Family may also serve as an institution to give a protection to its family members and to give a safe and peaceful feeling.

A complete family is very effective since the family gives love. It means that there is love between the family members. Thus, there is a strong bond in the family. If a family has it, then any life problems faced by the family members would be able to be handled and will not use drugs easily as the solution to the life problems. A family has the function to grow the religious basis to its children and family members. A family also has the function to educate children before entering the formal schools. A family should also educate children from the early age to the growing and forming personality stage.

9 Irwanteasosial.blogspot.co.id, downloaded on 7 Maret 2018

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n danger of drug. Hence, family resistance is a condition created to face the

Perpus

takaa

n danger of drug. Hence, family resistance is a condition created to face the danger of drug abuse. If the family resistance is created, the functions of

Perpus

takaa

n

danger of drug abuse. If the family resistance is created, the functions of family will work well to protect teh family from the danger of drugs. Family

Perpus

takaa

n

family will work well to protect teh family from the danger of drugs. Family serves the function of protection. Family may also serve as an institution

Perpus

takaa

n

serves the function of protection. Family may also serve as an institution to give a protection to its family members and to give a safe and peaceful

Perpus

takaa

n

to give a protection to its family members and to give a safe and peaceful

BNNwith relatives living in the same house. 3. Serial family, a woman and a

BNNwith relatives living in the same house. 3. Serial family, a woman and a man who are married more than once and are one nuclear family. 4. Single

BNNman who are married more than once and are one nuclear family. 4. Single family, a family with divorce or death. 5. Composite family, polygamous

BNNfamily, a family with divorce or death. 5. Composite family, polygamous family and living together. 6. Cohabitation, two people forming a family BNNfamily and living together. 6. Cohabitation, two people forming a family BNN


1.5. Research Methodology

1.5.1. Research Location

on drug abuse national projection which was grouped into 3 categories namely: low, moderate, and high category. Each category takes four provinces with the highest national projection, except high category

Indonesia. The provinces in each category are as follow:1. Low category, covering: Bali, West Kalimantan, DIY and South

Sumatera2. Moderate category, covering: East Java, Riau Island, Aceh and

Papua3. High category, covering: DKI Jakarta, North Sumatera, East

Kalimantan, South Sulawesi, and West Java.

From each province of the research location, one city (the capital city of the province) is chosen to be studied. The capital city of the province is chosen with the reason that it is the city with most population and has the highest potential of drug abuse. However, there is an exception for particular provinces where the capital city has less population than the other cities. Then, the research location is another city, such as Batam in the Province of Riau Island.

Furthermore, For the capital city of province which lies very close with other regencies, the sample is taken from adjacent-location such as the city of Yogyakarta which is located very closely to the Regency of Sleman and Bantul, but these two regencies are inseparable with the city of Yogyakarta.

1.5.2. Data Collection Technique

This is a quantitative research. Data collection is conducted in two techniques, namely structured interview and secondary data collection. Structured interview is done by using questionnaire to the respondent. The determination of sample quantity is done in quota system (quota sampling).

Perpus

takaa

n From each province of the research location, one city (the

Perpus

takaa

n From each province of the research location, one city (the capital city of the province) is chosen to be studied. The capital city

Perpus

takaa

n capital city of the province) is chosen to be studied. The capital city of the province is chosen with the reason that it is the city with most

Perpus

takaa

n of the province is chosen with the reason that it is the city with most population and has the highest potential of drug abuse. However, there

Perpus

takaa

n population and has the highest potential of drug abuse. However, there is an exception for particular provinces where the capital city has less

Perpus

takaa

n

is an exception for particular provinces where the capital city has less population than the other cities. Then, the research location is another

Perpus

takaa

n

population than the other cities. Then, the research location is another city, such as Batam in the Province of Riau Island.

Perpus

takaa

n

city, such as Batam in the Province of Riau Island.

Furthermore, For the capital city of province which lies very close Perpus

takaa

n

Furthermore, For the capital city of province which lies very close with other regencies, the sample is taken from adjacent-location such Perp

ustak

aan

with other regencies, the sample is taken from adjacent-location such

BNN2. Moderate category, covering: East Java, Riau Island, Aceh and

BNN2. Moderate category, covering: East Java, Riau Island, Aceh and

3. High category, covering: DKI Jakarta, North Sumatera, East

BNN3. High category, covering: DKI Jakarta, North Sumatera, East Kalimantan, South Sulawesi, and West Java. BNNKalimantan, South Sulawesi, and West Java.


A. The Determination on the Number of Sample in The Group of WorkersThe workers taken as samples in this research are workers in

formal sectors in companies with more than 20 workers. It occurs since the company data sampling is using BPS data which only covers medium and large enterprise (with more than 20 workers).

The companies are from 9 business sectors. They are:1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Financial Institution /Real Estate/Rental & Business Services

7. 8. 9. Electricity-gas-drinking water

If a location has less than 9 business sectors, real sectors in the location are taken. Each location takes at least 10 companies. The number of companies is taken proportionally. Meanwhile, the number of respondents in each company is determined proportionally.

B. Sample-taking in the Group of Students and University StudentsThe data collection among students and university students is

The method to determine respondents from the group of students and university students:

Group of students in Junior High School and Senior High School. The distribution of sample in each level is: 100 respondents from Junior High School, 150 respondents from Senior High School, 150 respondents from University Students. The number of respondents from Junior High School is smaller since it is assumed that more drug users are from Senior High School and University Students.

Perpus

takaa

n If a location has less than 9 business sectors, real sectors in the

Perpus

takaa

n If a location has less than 9 business sectors, real sectors in the

location are taken. Each location takes at least 10 companies. The

Perpus

takaa

n location are taken. Each location takes at least 10 companies. The number of companies is taken proportionally. Meanwhile, the number

Perpus

takaa

n number of companies is taken proportionally. Meanwhile, the number of respondents in each company is determined proportionally.

Perpus

takaa

n

of respondents in each company is determined proportionally.

B. Sample-taking in the Group of Students and University Students

Perpus

takaa

n

B. Sample-taking in the Group of Students and University StudentsThe data collection among students and university students is

Perpus

takaa

n

The data collection among students and university students is

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n BNN

6. Financial Institution /Real Estate/Rental & Business Services

BNN6. Financial Institution /Real Estate/Rental & Business Services

BNN


In line with the quantity of respondents per level, the number of school as sample is: 4 Junior High Schools, 6 Senior High Schools, and 6 Universities. If a location has less than 6 universities, then all universities in that location are taken as samples. The sampling of Junior High School, Senior High School and University uses PPS (Probability Proportional to Size) method. With this method, the chosen school and university are those with more number of students. Meanwhile, the data of Junior High School and Senior High School in the city will be taken from Dapodiknas (basic data on primary and Junior High education) in the address http:// http://dapo.dikdasmen.kemdikbud.go.id/pddapo.dikdasmen.kemdikbud.go.id/pd, while the data of university will be taken from the website on information of higher education in the address https://forlap.ristekdikti.go.id/perguruantinggihttps://forlap.ristekdikti.go.id/perguruantinggi.

C. Sample-taking in the Group of HouseholdThe number of sample in household is 5,200 respondents. The

comparison of 60% prone-urban village and 40% non-prone urban village based on the information from BNN or Regional Police in each location.

prone-sub districts randomly. Then, in each sub district, 2 prone-urban villages and 2 non-prone urban villages are taken randomly.

D. Secondary Data CollectionSecondary data collection is done by searching documents in

1.5.3. Data Analysis

All compiled data is entered in SPSS data system. The data processing will also use SPSS program. Before data entry, data cleaning

that there is no more invalid data. Data cleaning is done to make new category in the data obtained from open question.

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n comparison of 60% prone-urban village and 40% non-prone urban village

Perpus

takaa

n comparison of 60% prone-urban village and 40% non-prone urban village based on the information from BNN or Regional Police in each location.

Perpus

takaa

n based on the information from BNN or Regional Police in each location.

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

prone-sub districts randomly. Then, in each sub district, 2 prone-urban

Perpus

takaa

n

prone-sub districts randomly. Then, in each sub district, 2 prone-urban villages and 2 non-prone urban villages are taken randomly.

Perpus

takaa

n

villages and 2 non-prone urban villages are taken randomly.

D. Secondary Data CollectionPerpus

takaa

n

D. Secondary Data CollectionSecondary data collection is done by searching documents in Perp

ustak

aan

Secondary data collection is done by searching documents in

BNNhttps://forlap.ristekdikti.go.id/perguruantinggi

BNNhttps://forlap.ristekdikti.go.id/perguruantinggihttps://forlap.ristekdikti.go.id/perguruantinggi

BNNhttps://forlap.ristekdikti.go.id/perguruantinggi

The number of sample in household is 5,200 respondents. The BNNThe number of sample in household is 5,200 respondents. The BNN


Data analysis is conducted in two ways, namely frequency distribution and cross tabulation inter-variable. To ease the data

document collection.

1.5.4. Research Instrument

The instrument in this research is a questionnaire which is composed in simple form to be easily understood by respondents since

In general, type of question to respondents in the group of students, university students and workers is given to obtain data on:1. Characteristics of respondents (gender, education level, type of

school (private, public, religious), place of residence (boarding

2. Family background (parents’ job, education of intact parents broken

3. Utilization of spare time outside of school (participation in

6. Impacts of drug use (health impacts, economic impacts, social

8. Intervention of the P4GN Program (type of intervention program, origin of the intervention program, involvement in the program,

9. Drug use behavior (frequency of use, types of drugs, how to use drugs, reasons for use, history of usege, source to obtain drugs,

Meanwhile, type of research question in the group of household is to obtain data on:1. Characteristics of household respondents (gender, age, education

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n 2. Family background (parents’ job, education of intact parents broken

Perpus

takaa

n 2. Family background (parents’ job, education of intact parents broken

Perpus

takaa

n 3. Utilization of spare time outside of school (participation in

Perpus

takaa

n 3. Utilization of spare time outside of school (participation in

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n


Perpus

takaa

n


Perpus

takaa

n

8. Intervention of the P4GN Program (type of intervention program, Perpus

takaa

n

8. Intervention of the P4GN Program (type of intervention program,

BNNIn general, type of question to respondents in the group of students,

BNNIn general, type of question to respondents in the group of students, university students and workers is given to obtain data on:

BNNuniversity students and workers is given to obtain data on:1. Characteristics of respondents (gender, education level, type of

BNN1. Characteristics of respondents (gender, education level, type of school (private, public, religious), place of residence (boarding BNNschool (private, public, religious), place of residence (boarding BNN


2. Family background (number of family members, parents’ occupation, education of parents and family members, intact/broken home

3. Environmental safety from the danger of drugs (drug exposure in

4. 5. 6. Family strategies in dealing with the danger of drugs.

Perpus

takaa

n BNN

23

SURVEY ON DRUG ABUSEAMONG STUDENTS ANDUNIVERSITY STUDENTS

II

Perpus

takaa

n SURVEY ON DRUG ABUSE

Perpus

takaa

n SURVEY ON DRUG ABUSEAMONG STUDENTS AND

Perpus

takaa

n AMONG STUDENTS AND

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n UNIVERSITY STUDENTS

Perpus

takaa

n UNIVERSITY STUDENTS

BNNSURVEY ON DRUG ABUSEBNNSURVEY ON DRUG ABUSE

24

Perpus

takaa

n BNN


SURVEY ON DRUG ABUSE AMONG STUDENTS AND UNIVERSITY STUDENTS

The result of survey which is based on several key questions reveals the respondents characteristics comprising gender, education level, type of school (private, public, religious), place of residence (boarding house, with parents, living with relatives, dormitory), pocket money, family background (parents’ occupation, intact/broken home parents’ education, closeness with parents), the use of spare time outside of school (participation in organizations/extracurricular) and

aspects which are as important as the respondents’ characteristics are respodents’ knowledge and attitude to drugs and drug use impact (health impact, economic impact, and social impact).

2.1. Respondents’ Characteristic

In the part of respondents’ characteristics, several data to be exposed are: gender and education level, current place of residence, monthly pocket money, and parents’ condition.

2.1.1. Gender and Level of Education

From the total 5,200 respondents from the group of students and university students, the majority is female with 2,761 (53.1%), while male respondents are 2,439 (46.9%). The gap between male and female respondents is not too standout. Hence, it indirectly emphasizes that

II

Perpus

takaa

n reveals the respondents characteristics comprising gender, education

Perpus

takaa

n reveals the respondents characteristics comprising gender, education level, type of school (private, public, religious), place of residence

Perpus

takaa

n level, type of school (private, public, religious), place of residence (boarding house, with parents, living with relatives, dormitory), pocket

Perpus

takaa

n (boarding house, with parents, living with relatives, dormitory), pocket money, family background (parents’ occupation, intact/broken home

Perpus

takaa

n money, family background (parents’ occupation, intact/broken home parents’ education, closeness with parents), the use of spare time

Perpus

takaa

n parents’ education, closeness with parents), the use of spare time outside of school (participation in organizations/extracurricular) and

Perpus

takaa

n

outside of school (participation in organizations/extracurricular) and

Perpus

takaa

n

aspects which are as important as the respondents’ characteristics

Perpus

takaa

n

aspects which are as important as the respondents’ characteristics are respodents’ knowledge and attitude to drugs and drug use impact

Perpus

takaa

n

are respodents’ knowledge and attitude to drugs and drug use impact

Perpus

takaa

n

(health impact, economic impact, and social impact). Perpus

takaa

n

(health impact, economic impact, and social impact).

2.1. Respondents’ Characteristic Perp

ustak

aan

2.1. Respondents’ Characteristic

BNNThe result of survey which is based on several key questions BNNThe result of survey which is based on several key questions

reveals the respondents characteristics comprising gender, education BNNreveals the respondents characteristics comprising gender, education


this survey is not gender-bias. The respondents sampling is based on the sampling method as mentioned in the previous chapter..

Graphic 1. Respondents’ Gender

From the level of education, respondents are divided into 3 clusters namely: Junior High School, Senior High School, and University Student. The number of respondents in this survey should be equal. The percentage of students is 25.3% in Junior High School and 38.3% in Senior High School. Meanwhile, respondent in university is 36.4%. The comparison between three clusters can be seen in Graphic 2 below.

Graphic 2. Respondents’ Level of Education

Male Female

53,9 46,9

Junior High School

and equivalent

Senior High School

and equivalent

University

25,3

38,338,3 36,445,040,035,030,025,020,015,010,0

5,00,0

Perpus

takaa

n From the level of education, respondents are divided into 3

Perpus

takaa

n From the level of education, respondents are divided into 3

clusters namely: Junior High School, Senior High School, and University

Perpus

takaa

n clusters namely: Junior High School, Senior High School, and University Student. The number of respondents in this survey should be equal.

Perpus

takaa

n Student. The number of respondents in this survey should be equal. The percentage of students is 25.3% in Junior High School and 38.3% in

Perpus

takaa

n The percentage of students is 25.3% in Junior High School and 38.3% in Senior High School. Meanwhile, respondent in university is 36.4%. The

Perpus

takaa

n Senior High School. Meanwhile, respondent in university is 36.4%. The comparison between three clusters can be seen in Graphic 2 below.

Perpus

takaa

n

comparison between three clusters can be seen in Graphic 2 below.


Perpus

takaa

n


Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

40,0 Perpus

takaa

n

40,0

BNNBNN

From the level of education, respondents are divided into 3 BNNFrom the level of education, respondents are divided into 3

clusters namely: Junior High School, Senior High School, and University BNNclusters namely: Junior High School, Senior High School, and University


2.1.2. Current Place of Residence

Based on the result of survey, the majority of respondents are still living with parents (76%). The number of respondents living in the boarding house is in the second biggest number with 16.1%. Respondents studying in university are mostly living in boarding house. Meanwhile, respondents living in school/university dormitory or apartment are less than 5%. This data show that the majority or 2/3 respondents of students and university students are still under parents or relatives’ supervision and guidance since they are still living together. The rest of respondents are living alone without others’ supervision.

Graphic 3. Current Respondents’ Place of Residence

2.1.3. Monthly Pocket Money

The majority of respondents of 55.6% receive monthly pocket money amounting to Rp 100,000 to Rp 499,999. Respondents with monthly pocket money less than Rp 100,000 are the lowest (4.6%). Respondents with monthly pocket money of around Rp 500,000 to Rp 1 million are quite big of around 19.7%. Respondents with bigger amount of pocket money show smaller number. Interestingly, respondents with pocket money higher than Rp 1.5 million are relatively high of 9%. This survey data shows that the majority of students have enough money to buy things as they wish.

Others

Apartement separated with parents

School/university dormitory

Boarding house

Relatives’ house (grandfather, grand-

mother, uncle/aunt)

Parents’ house

2,5

0,4

4,1

16,1

9,9

67,0

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n Boarding house

Perpus

takaa

n Boarding house

Perpus

takaa

n


Perpus

takaa

n


mother, uncle/aunt)

Perpus

takaa

n

mother, uncle/aunt)

Perpus

takaa

n

Parents’ house

Perpus

takaa

n

Parents’ house

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n 4,1

Perpus

takaa

n 4,1

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n BNN

Current Respondents’ Place of Residence

BNNCurrent Respondents’ Place of Residence

BNNBNN


Graphic 4. Respondents’ Monthly Pocket Money

2.1.4. Parents’ Condition

The majority of respondents of about 89% have parents who are still alive. Around 10% of respondents are orphans having only a father or a mother. Respondents with deceased parents are 0.92%. The survey shows that the majority of respondents have parents who are still alive and are still under parents’ supervision both directly or indirectly.

Graphic 5. Respondents’ Parents Condition

Both parents are still aliveDeceased fatherDeceased motherDeceased parents

89,10

7,10 2,882,88 0,920,92

9,111,0

19,7

4,6

55,6

> Rp. 1.500.000

Rp. 1.000.000 - 1

.499.999

Rp. 500.000 - 9

99.999

Rp. 100.000 - 4

99.999

< Rp. 100.000

Perpus

takaa

n The majority of respondents of about 89% have parents who are

Perpus

takaa

n The majority of respondents of about 89% have parents who are

still alive. Around 10% of respondents are orphans having only a father

Perpus

takaa

n still alive. Around 10% of respondents are orphans having only a father or a mother. Respondents with deceased parents are 0.92%. The survey

Perpus

takaa

n or a mother. Respondents with deceased parents are 0.92%. The survey shows that the majority of respondents have parents who are still alive

Perpus

takaa

n shows that the majority of respondents have parents who are still alive and are still under parents’ supervision both directly or indirectly.

Perpus

takaa

n and are still under parents’ supervision both directly or indirectly.


Perpus

takaa

n


Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

7,10

Perpus

takaa

n

7,10

Perpus

takaa

n

2,88

Perpus

takaa

n

2,882,88

Perpus

takaa

n

2,88

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n BNN

BNNThe majority of respondents of about 89% have parents who are BNNThe majority of respondents of about 89% have parents who are


2.2. Knowledge on Drugs

2.2.1. Knowledge on Types of Drugs

Narcotics are divided into several types, namely potent drugs, addictive substances, psychotropic drugs, natural drugs, synthetic drugs and semisynthetic drugs. Potent drugs, natural drugs, and semisynthetic drugs are divided again in several types (see Table 1). The respondents’ knowledge on types of drugs is varied, but the majority of respondents (77.4%) know natural drugs such as marijuana (gele, cimeng, marijuana, getok, linda). The second most-known drugs are shabu, yaba, SS, tastus, and ubas as synthetic drugs.

For poten drugs, respondents know about headache medicine which is consumed excessively or overdose (49.3%) and headache medicine which is mixed with soda drink (41.1%). Potent drugs such as dextro (dextromethorpan) which is consumed excessively, tramadol, and trihexyphenidyl/trihex/THP/yellow pill are less known by respondents.

Other types of drugs known by respondents are aibon glue, gasoline, markers, and electric hits (64.6%). The high knowledge of respondents on addictive substances is probably since these substances are very close with people’s daily life. Furthermore, the price is relatively cheap and it is easily obtained.

Meanwhile, synthetic drugs which are mostly known by respondents are shabu, yaba, SS, tastus, and ubas (methamphetamines) (71.1%).

tobacco are known by 48.0% respondents. The amphetamine (seed, dex, adderall, dan dexamphetamine) is synthetic drugs which are less known by respondents.

Semi-synthetic drugs which are mostly known by respondents are heroin (60.20%) and cocaine (59.4%), while other types less known by respondents are putaw (28.5%) and morphine (38.3%). The respondents’

drugs in their surrounding or types of drugs frequently heard. In details,

Perpus

takaa

n medicine which is mixed with soda drink (41.1%). Potent drugs such as

Perpus

takaa

n medicine which is mixed with soda drink (41.1%). Potent drugs such as dextro (dextromethorpan) which is consumed excessively, tramadol, and

Perpus

takaa

n dextro (dextromethorpan) which is consumed excessively, tramadol, and trihexyphenidyl/trihex/THP/yellow pill are less known by respondents.

Perpus

takaa

n trihexyphenidyl/trihex/THP/yellow pill are less known by respondents.

Other types of drugs known by respondents are aibon glue, gasoline,

Perpus

takaa

n Other types of drugs known by respondents are aibon glue, gasoline,

markers, and electric hits (64.6%). The high knowledge of respondents

Perpus

takaa

n

markers, and electric hits (64.6%). The high knowledge of respondents on addictive substances is probably since these substances are very

Perpus

takaa

n

on addictive substances is probably since these substances are very close with people’s daily life. Furthermore, the price is relatively cheap

Perpus

takaa

n

close with people’s daily life. Furthermore, the price is relatively cheap and it is easily obtained.

Perpus

takaa

n

and it is easily obtained.

Meanwhile, synthetic drugs which are mostly known by respondents Perpus

takaa

n

Meanwhile, synthetic drugs which are mostly known by respondents

BNNare shabu, yaba, SS, tastus, and ubas as synthetic drugs.

BNNare shabu, yaba, SS, tastus, and ubas as synthetic drugs.

For poten drugs, respondents know about headache medicine

BNNFor poten drugs, respondents know about headache medicine which is consumed excessively or overdose (49.3%) and headache BNNwhich is consumed excessively or overdose (49.3%) and headache medicine which is mixed with soda drink (41.1%). Potent drugs such as BNNmedicine which is mixed with soda drink (41.1%). Potent drugs such as


respondents’ knowledge on types of drugs can be seen in table 3 below.

Table 3. Respondent’s Knowledge on Types of drugs, 2018

Types of drug N %N %

Potent Drug

1 Dextromethorphan consumed excessively1 Dextromethorphan consumed excessively 901 17.30901 17.30

2 Tramadol2 Tramadol 1,105 21.301,105 21.30

3 Trihexyphenidyl3 Trihexyphenidyl 1,163 22.401,163 22.40

4 Medicine for headache consumed excessively4 Medicine for headache consumed excessively 2,564 49.302,564 49.30

5 Medicine for headache mixed with soda5 Medicine for headache mixed with soda 2,137 41.102,137 41.10

Addictive substances

6 Substances inhaled continuously (aibon glue, gasoline, markers, 6 Substances inhaled continuously (aibon glue, gasoline, markers,

electric mosquito, etc)

3,357 64.603,357 64.60

Psychotropics

7 Koplo pill, BK, Mboat, Mboti, roda7 Koplo pill, BK, Mboat, Mboti, roda 1,901 36.601,901 36.60

Natural Drug

8 Marijuana8 Marijuana 4,026 77.404,026 77.40

Synthetics Drug

9 Tembakau beruang, tembakau gorilla9 Tembakau beruang, tembakau gorilla 2.494 48,002.494 48,00

10 Ekstasi10 Ekstasi (inex, XTC, cece, happyfive) 2.533 48,702.533 48,70

11 Amphetamine 11 Amphetamine (Seed, Dex, Adderall, Dexamphetamine) 1.090 21,001.090 21,00

12 Shabu, Yaba, SS, Tastus, Ubas 12 Shabu, Yaba, SS, Tastus, Ubas (Methamphetamines) 3.697 71,103.697 71,10

Semi-Synthetics Drug

13 Putau (the lowest grade of heroin)13 Putau (the lowest grade of heroin) 1,481 28.501,481 28.50

14 Morphine14 Morphine 1,990 38.301,990 38.30

15 Heroin15 Heroin 3,129 60.203,129 60.20

16 Cocaine 3,087 59.4016 Cocaine 3,087 59.4016 Cocaine 3,087 59.4016 Cocaine 3,087 59.40

17 Others17 Others 64 1.2364 1.23

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

9 Tembakau beruang, tembakau gorilla

Perpus

takaa

n

9 Tembakau beruang, tembakau gorilla

(inex, XTC, cece, happyfive)

Perpus

takaa

n

(inex, XTC, cece, happyfive)

(Seed, Dex, Adderall, Dexamphetamine)

Perpus

takaa

n

(Seed, Dex, Adderall, Dexamphetamine)

12 Shabu, Yaba, SS, Tastus, Ubas Perpus

takaa

n

12 Shabu, Yaba, SS, Tastus, Ubas

Semi-Synthetics DrugPerpus

takaa

n

Semi-Synthetics Drug

BNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNN6 Substances inhaled continuously (aibon glue, gasoline, markers,

BNN6 Substances inhaled continuously (aibon glue, gasoline, markers, 3,357 64.60

BNN3,357 64.60


2.2.2. Distribution of Respondents According to Level of Education and Knowledge on Types of Drugs

In general, the highest respondents’ knowledge on types of drugs is potent drugs (77.42%) and addictive substances (77.92%). It occurs in respondents in the group of Junior High School, Senior High School, and University. Meanwhile, the lowest knowledge is on natural drugs of 36.56% compared to psychotropic (66.25%), semi-synthetic drugs (64.73%), and synthetic drugs (64.56%). The same pattern and tendency happens in all level of education (Junior High School, Senior High School, and University).

Respondents in Junior High School has the highest knowledge on potent drugs of 72.51%. Respondents in Senior High School have the highest knowledge on addictive substances of 79.18%, while respondents in University have the highest knowledge on addictive subtances of 80.78%. Meanwhile, the lowest knowledge on types of drugs acoording to level of education is natural drugs for Junior High School (27.8%), natural drugs for Senior High School (35.93%), and natural drugs for university (43.295). .

The data above shows that respondents in Senior High School and University have higher knowledge on types of drugs than respondents in Junior High School. It can be seen from the higher proportion of respondents who have the knowledge on types of drugs. In other word, respondents in Junior High School have lower knowledge on types of drugs than respondents in Senior High School and University. Thus, the higher level of education, the higher knowledge on types of drugs it has.

Perpus

takaa

n subtances of 80.78%. Meanwhile, the lowest knowledge on types of

Perpus

takaa

n subtances of 80.78%. Meanwhile, the lowest knowledge on types of drugs acoording to level of education is natural drugs for Junior High

Perpus

takaa

n drugs acoording to level of education is natural drugs for Junior High School (27.8%), natural drugs for Senior High School (35.93%), and

Perpus

takaa

n School (27.8%), natural drugs for Senior High School (35.93%), and natural drugs for university (43.295). .

Perpus

takaa

n natural drugs for university (43.295). .

The data above shows that respondents in Senior High School and

Perpus

takaa

n

The data above shows that respondents in Senior High School and University have higher knowledge on types of drugs than respondents

Perpus

takaa

n

University have higher knowledge on types of drugs than respondents in Junior High School. It can be seen from the higher proportion of

Perpus

takaa

n

in Junior High School. It can be seen from the higher proportion of

Perpus

takaa

n

respondents who have the knowledge on types of drugs. In other word,

Perpus

takaa

n

respondents who have the knowledge on types of drugs. In other word, respondents in Junior High School have lower knowledge on types of Perp

ustak

aan

respondents in Junior High School have lower knowledge on types of drugs than respondents in Senior High School and University. Thus, the Perp

ustak

aan

drugs than respondents in Senior High School and University. Thus, the

BNNRespondents in Junior High School has the highest knowledge

BNNRespondents in Junior High School has the highest knowledge

on potent drugs of 72.51%. Respondents in Senior High School have

BNNon potent drugs of 72.51%. Respondents in Senior High School have the highest knowledge on addictive substances of 79.18%, while

BNNthe highest knowledge on addictive substances of 79.18%, while

BNNrespondents in University have the highest knowledge on addictive BNNrespondents in University have the highest knowledge on addictive subtances of 80.78%. Meanwhile, the lowest knowledge on types of BNNsubtances of 80.78%. Meanwhile, the lowest knowledge on types of


Table 4 Distribution of Respondents based on the Level of Education and

Knowledge on Types of Drugs (%)

2.2.3. Distribution of Respondents According to Knowledge on Types of Drugs and Province

Based on survey of respondents’ knowledge on drugs, potent drugs and addictive substances are types of drugs mostly known by respondents in all provinces as survey locations (13 provinces). Appendix 1 shows that these two types of drugs have the biggest proportion of respondents in each province, except South Sulawesi where most respondents know better semi-synthetich drugs of around 74.3%.

2.2.4. Distribution of Respondents According to Knowledge on the Impact of Drug Abuse to Health, 2018

Based on the survey, in general the respondents’ knowledge on the

know the impact of drug abuse to health, except the impact of feeling stronger/energetic. The most known impact is that drugs can cause hallucination or imagination (77.6%), followed by depression, concentration at work and hallucination. The respondents’ knowledge on the impact of drugs which is least known is that drugs make the users feel stronger or more eenergetic (34.9%). It means that respondents less know that drugs can make the users stronger.

Type of drug Junior high Type of drug Junior high

school

Senior high

school

University TotalUniversity Total

Potent drug 72.51 78.12 80.10 77.42Potent drug 72.51 78.12 80.10 77.42Potent drug 72.51 78.12 80.10 77.42Potent drug 72.51 78.12 80.10 77.42Potent drug 72.51 78.12 80.10 77.42

Addictive substances 71.90 79.18 80.78 77.92Addictive substances 71.90 79.18 80.78 77.92Addictive substances 71.90 79.18 80.78 77.92Addictive substances 71.90 79.18 80.78 77.92Addictive substances 71.90 79.18 80.78 77.92Addictive substances 71.90 79.18 80.78 77.92

Psychotropic 50.80 66.48 76.72 66.25Psychotropic 50.80 66.48 76.72 66.25Psychotropic 50.80 66.48 76.72 66.25Psychotropic 50.80 66.48 76.72 66.25Psychotropic 50.80 66.48 76.72 66.25

Natural drugs 27.80 35.93 43.29 36.56Natural drugs 27.80 35.93 43.29 36.56Natural drugs 27.80 35.93 43.29 36.56Natural drugs 27.80 35.93 43.29 36.56Natural drugs 27.80 35.93 43.29 36.56Natural drugs 27.80 35.93 43.29 36.56

Synthetics drugs 61.23 65.28 66.10 64.56Synthetics drugs 61.23 65.28 66.10 64.56Synthetics drugs 61.23 65.28 66.10 64.56Synthetics drugs 61.23 65.28 66.10 64.56Synthetics drugs 61.23 65.28 66.10 64.56

Semi-synthetic drugs 57.50 66.83 67.53 64.73Semi-synthetic drugs 57.50 66.83 67.53 64.73Semi-synthetic drugs 57.50 66.83 67.53 64.73Semi-synthetic drugs 57.50 66.83 67.53 64.73Semi-synthetic drugs 57.50 66.83 67.53 64.73Semi-synthetic drugs 57.50 66.83 67.53 64.73

Perpus

takaa

n Based on survey of respondents’ knowledge on drugs, potent

Perpus

takaa

n Based on survey of respondents’ knowledge on drugs, potent drugs and addictive substances are types of drugs mostly known

Perpus

takaa

n drugs and addictive substances are types of drugs mostly known by respondents in all provinces as survey locations (13 provinces).

Perpus

takaa

n by respondents in all provinces as survey locations (13 provinces).

shows that these two types of drugs have the biggest

Perpus

takaa

n

shows that these two types of drugs have the biggest proportion of respondents in each province, except South Sulawesi

Perpus

takaa

n

proportion of respondents in each province, except South Sulawesi where most respondents know better semi-synthetich drugs of around

Perpus

takaa

n

where most respondents know better semi-synthetich drugs of around

2.2.4. Distribution of Respondents According to Knowledge on the Perpus

takaa

n

2.2.4. Distribution of Respondents According to Knowledge on the Impact of Drug Abuse to Health, 2018Perp

ustak

aan

Impact of Drug Abuse to Health, 2018

BNNBNN

2.2.3. Distribution of Respondents According to Knowledge on Types BNN2.2.3. Distribution of Respondents According to Knowledge on Types BNN

BNNSemi-synthetic drugs 57.50 66.83 67.53 64.73

BNNSemi-synthetic drugs 57.50 66.83 67.53 64.73


Table 5Distribution of Respondents Based on the Impact of Drug Abuse to

Health, 2018 (%)

2.2.5. Knowledge on the Impact of Drug Abuse to Health Among Students and University Students

The survey obtains data that respondents studying in Junior High School, Senior High School, and University mostly know the impact of drug abuse to health namely hallucination. Besides hallucination, respondents’ knowledge on the impact of drug abuse is depression, problem with concentration in studying, and dependency. Another drugs impact namely making stronger or energetic is less known than other impacts. Less than half of respondents or around 42% knows this impact. In other word, making drug users feeling stronger is not one of the drugs impacts.

Based on the level of education, respondents’ knowledge on the impact of drug abuse to health in university is higher than respondents’ knowledge in Junior High School and Senior High School. From the survey, it can be seen that respondents with higher level of education have higher knowledge on the impact of drug abuse (see Graphic 6).

Impact to Health Yes No Don’t knowYes No Don’t knowYes No Don’t know

Causing depression 70.70 2.80 26.4070.70 2.80 26.4070.70 2.80 26.40

Hallucination 77.60 0.90 21.50Hallucination 77.60 0.90 21.50Hallucination 77.60 0.90 21.50Hallucination 77.60 0.90 21.50

Feeling stronger 34.90 16.80 48.3034.90 16.80 48.3034.90 16.80 48.30

Causing Addiction 69.60 1.80 28.5069.60 1.80 28.5069.60 1.80 28.50

Concentration at work 70.60 1.40 28.0070.60 1.40 28.0070.60 1.40 28.00

Perpus

takaa

n The survey obtains data that respondents studying in Junior High

Perpus

takaa

n The survey obtains data that respondents studying in Junior High

School, Senior High School, and University mostly know the impact

Perpus

takaa

n School, Senior High School, and University mostly know the impact of drug abuse to health namely hallucination. Besides hallucination,

Perpus

takaa

n of drug abuse to health namely hallucination. Besides hallucination, respondents’ knowledge on the impact of drug abuse is depression,

Perpus

takaa

n respondents’ knowledge on the impact of drug abuse is depression, problem with concentration in studying, and dependency. Another

Perpus

takaa

n problem with concentration in studying, and dependency. Another drugs impact namely making stronger or energetic is less known than

Perpus

takaa

n

drugs impact namely making stronger or energetic is less known than other impacts. Less than half of respondents or around 42% knows this

Perpus

takaa

n

other impacts. Less than half of respondents or around 42% knows this impact. In other word, making drug users feeling stronger is not one of

Perpus

takaa

n

impact. In other word, making drug users feeling stronger is not one of the drugs impacts.

Perpus

takaa

n

the drugs impacts.

Based on the level of education, respondents’ knowledge on the Perpus

takaa

n

Based on the level of education, respondents’ knowledge on the impact of drug abuse to health in university is higher than respondents’

Perpus

takaa

n

impact of drug abuse to health in university is higher than respondents’

BNN2.2.5. Knowledge on the Impact of Drug Abuse to Health Among

BNN2.2.5. Knowledge on the Impact of Drug Abuse to Health Among

The survey obtains data that respondents studying in Junior High BNNThe survey obtains data that respondents studying in Junior High


Graphic 6Knowledge on Impact of Drug Abuse to Health Among Students, 2018

2.2.6. Distribution of Knowledge on the Social Impact of Drug Abuse Among Students and University Students

Based on the data of survey to students respondents with the knowledge on social impact such as shunned, bullied, hostiled, and ostracized in the friendship, with friends from different school, with family, and people around the resident, it is known that concerning the knowledge of social impact on drug abuse, the majority of respondents know that the relation with society especially those in neighbourhood is in a problem of being shunned by the society. It is indicated that the highest average of survey on social impact shows 64.0% respondents choose this. Another impact highly known by respondents from the survey is being shunned in friendship of 60.9%. The next impact known by the majority of respondents is being ostracized by people in neighbourhood of 57.5%. Meanwhile, the least known social impact compared to other impacts is being bullied in the family of 28.5%.

Depression Hallucination Stronger or more

energetic

Causing

dependency

Breaking

concentration in

studying

67,0

0%

69,9

0%

74,1

0%

70,7

0%

71,1

0% 77,8

0%

81,9

0%

77,6

0%

23,9

0% 34,7

0% 42,7

0%

34,9

0%

56,3

0%

69,1

0% 79,4

0%

69,6

0%

64,9

0%

70,6

0%

70,6

0%

74,7

0%

TOTALPTSMASMP

Junior High School Senior High School University TotalJunior High School Senior High School University TotalJunior High School Senior High School University TotalJunior High School Senior High School University TotalJunior High School Senior High School University Total

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n 2.2.6. Distribution of Knowledge on the Social Impact of Drug Abuse

Perpus

takaa

n 2.2.6. Distribution of Knowledge on the Social Impact of Drug Abuse Among Students and University Students

Perpus

takaa

n Among Students and University Students

Based on the data of survey to students respondents with the

Perpus

takaa

n

Based on the data of survey to students respondents with the knowledge on social impact such as shunned, bullied, hostiled, and

Perpus

takaa

n

knowledge on social impact such as shunned, bullied, hostiled, and ostracized in the friendship, with friends from different school, with

Perpus

takaa

n

ostracized in the friendship, with friends from different school, with family, and people around the resident, it is known that concerning the

Perpus

takaa

n

family, and people around the resident, it is known that concerning the knowledge of social impact on drug abuse, the majority of respondents Perp

ustak

aan

knowledge of social impact on drug abuse, the majority of respondents know that the relation with society especially those in neighbourhood Perp

ustak

aan

know that the relation with society especially those in neighbourhood

BNNBNNBNNBNNCausing

BNNCausing

dependency

BNNdependency

BNN


Table 6Distribution of Knowledge to Social Impact of Drug Abuse Among

Students and University Students, 2018 (%)

2.2.7. Distribution of Students’ Knowledge on Issues due to Drug Abuse

Based on the survey, student respondents state that almost all issues may occur due to drug abuse. Adding the burden to family shows the highest percentage of 79.4%, followed by spending the saving of 78.1%. Immoral action is the least issue known by respondents as the

Social Impact Junior High Social Impact Junior High

School

Senior High

School


Friendship

a. Shunned 60.90 59.00 62.90 60.90a. Shunned 60.90 59.00 62.90 60.90a. Shunned 60.90 59.00 62.90 60.90a. Shunned 60.90 59.00 62.90 60.90a. Shunned 60.90 59.00 62.90 60.90a. Shunned 60.90 59.00 62.90 60.90

b. Bullied 36.30 35.40 38.80 36.90b. Bullied 36.30 35.40 38.80 36.90b. Bullied 36.30 35.40 38.80 36.90b. Bullied 36.30 35.40 38.80 36.90b. Bullied 36.30 35.40 38.80 36.90

c. Hostile 45.20 40.40 42.30 42.30c. Hostile 45.20 40.40 42.30 42.30c. Hostile 45.20 40.40 42.30 42.30c. Hostile 45.20 40.40 42.30 42.30c. Hostile 45.20 40.40 42.30 42.30c. Hostile 45.20 40.40 42.30 42.30

d. Ostracized 46.90 47.60 51.40 48.80d. Ostracized 46.90 47.60 51.40 48.80d. Ostracized 46.90 47.60 51.40 48.80d. Ostracized 46.90 47.60 51.40 48.80d. Ostracized 46.90 47.60 51.40 48.80

Different school friends relationship

a. Shunned 53.90 44.40 46.90 46.60a. Shunned 53.90 44.40 46.90 46.60a. Shunned 53.90 44.40 46.90 46.60a. Shunned 53.90 44.40 46.90 46.60a. Shunned 53.90 44.40 46.90 46.60a. Shunned 53.90 44.40 46.90 46.60a. Shunned 53.90 44.40 46.90 46.60

b. Bullied 33.80 34.00 35.10 34.30b. Bullied 33.80 34.00 35.10 34.30b. Bullied 33.80 34.00 35.10 34.30b. Bullied 33.80 34.00 35.10 34.30b. Bullied 33.80 34.00 35.10 34.30b. Bullied 33.80 34.00 35.10 34.30

c. Hostile 32.20 37.50 36.50 38.20c. Hostile 32.20 37.50 36.50 38.20c. Hostile 32.20 37.50 36.50 38.20c. Hostile 32.20 37.50 36.50 38.20c. Hostile 32.20 37.50 36.50 38.20

d. Ostracized 42.90 42.90 43.70 43.20d. Ostracized 42.90 42.90 43.70 43.20d. Ostracized 42.90 42.90 43.70 43.20d. Ostracized 42.90 42.90 43.70 43.20d. Ostracized 42.90 42.90 43.70 43.20d. Ostracized 42.90 42.90 43.70 43.20

Relationship with family

a. Shunned 49.40 44.40 46.90 46.60a. Shunned 49.40 44.40 46.90 46.60a. Shunned 49.40 44.40 46.90 46.60a. Shunned 49.40 44.40 46.90 46.60a. Shunned 49.40 44.40 46.90 46.60a. Shunned 49.40 44.40 46.90 46.60a. Shunned 49.40 44.40 46.90 46.60



d. Ostracized 42.70 42.20 44.80 43.30d. Ostracized 42.70 42.20 44.80 43.30d. Ostracized 42.70 42.20 44.80 43.30d. Ostracized 42.70 42.20 44.80 43.30d. Ostracized 42.70 42.20 44.80 43.30d. Ostracized 42.70 42.20 44.80 43.30

Social relationship in the neighbourhood

a. Shunned 63.10 62.00 66.60 64.00a. Shunned 63.10 62.00 66.60 64.00a. Shunned 63.10 62.00 66.60 64.00a. Shunned 63.10 62.00 66.60 64.00a. Shunned 63.10 62.00 66.60 64.00

b. Bullied 37.80 40.20 47.70 42.30b. Bullied 37.80 40.20 47.70 42.30b. Bullied 37.80 40.20 47.70 42.30b. Bullied 37.80 40.20 47.70 42.30


d. Ostracized 54.50 56.20 60.90 57.50d. Ostracized 54.50 56.20 60.90 57.50d. Ostracized 54.50 56.20 60.90 57.50d. Ostracized 54.50 56.20 60.90 57.50d. Ostracized 54.50 56.20 60.90 57.50

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n d. Ostracized 42.90 42.90 43.70 43.20

Perpus

takaa

n d. Ostracized 42.90 42.90 43.70 43.20

a. Shunned 49.40 44.40 46.90 46.60

Perpus

takaa

n a. Shunned 49.40 44.40 46.90 46.60a. Shunned 49.40 44.40 46.90 46.60

Perpus

takaa

n a. Shunned 49.40 44.40 46.90 46.60

b. Bullied 24.80 27.70 31.70 28.50

Perpus

takaa

n b. Bullied 24.80 27.70 31.70 28.50b. Bullied 24.80 27.70 31.70 28.50

Perpus

takaa

n b. Bullied 24.80 27.70 31.70 28.50

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

c. Hostile 32.20 31.90 34.30 32.90

Perpus

takaa

n

c. Hostile 32.20 31.90 34.30 32.90c. Hostile 32.20 31.90 34.30 32.90

Perpus

takaa

n

c. Hostile 32.20 31.90 34.30 32.90

d. Ostracized 42.70 42.20 44.80 43.30

Perpus

takaa

n

d. Ostracized 42.70 42.20 44.80 43.30


Perpus

takaa

n


a. Shunned 63.10 62.00 66.60 64.00

Perpus

takaa

n

a. Shunned 63.10 62.00 66.60 64.00a. Shunned 63.10 62.00 66.60 64.00

Perpus

takaa

n

a. Shunned 63.10 62.00 66.60 64.00

b. Bullied 37.80 40.20 47.70 42.30Perpus

takaa

n

b. Bullied 37.80 40.20 47.70 42.30b. Bullied 37.80 40.20 47.70 42.30Perpus

takaa

n

b. Bullied 37.80 40.20 47.70 42.30

c. Hostile 46.20 46.60 50.30 47.80Perp

ustak

aan

c. Hostile 46.20 46.60 50.30 47.80

BNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNa. Shunned 53.90 44.40 46.90 46.60

BNNa. Shunned 53.90 44.40 46.90 46.60

b. Bullied 33.80 34.00 35.10 34.30

BNNb. Bullied 33.80 34.00 35.10 34.30

c. Hostile 32.20 37.50 36.50 38.20BNNc. Hostile 32.20 37.50 36.50 38.20c. Hostile 32.20 37.50 36.50 38.20BNNc. Hostile 32.20 37.50 36.50 38.20c. Hostile 32.20 37.50 36.50 38.20BNNc. Hostile 32.20 37.50 36.50 38.20

d. Ostracized 42.90 42.90 43.70 43.20BNNd. Ostracized 42.90 42.90 43.70 43.20


impact of drug abuse with 69% (see Appendix 2). This data shows that students’ knowledge on the issues of drug abuse is adequate. Students know well the impact of drug abuse.

2.2.8 Attitude Toward Drug Abuse

Respondents with Junior High School background are asked about their response on a case where their school friend is trading drugs. Most of them will report to school (41.00%) or report to police (36.40%). Those who choose to give advice are only around 15.70%. (See Appendix 3)

The attitude when being offered to buy drugs is mostly rejecting (98.305). Almost no respondents answer ‘accepting”. Respondents with doubtful answer are only 1.60%. This pattern of answer also occurs in respondents in the education level of Junior High School, Senior High School and University.

In the case of having school friend which uses drug, more than half of Junior High School students (55.105) will report to the police. Some wil give advice (20.30%) and prohibit (16.60%). Only few will keep silent.

2.3. Drug Abuse and Influencing Factors

2.3.1. Prevalence Rate of Drug Use Among Students and University Students

Overall, the prevalence rate among current users-students and university students is 3.2% or equivalent to 2,297,492 people. The prevalence rate of Senior High School students as ever used is the highest compared to Junior High School students and University students. In Senior High School, the prevalence rate is 6.40% (for ever used-respondents) and 3.60% (for current users-respondents).

The prevalence rate of Senior High School students is the highest compared to Junior High School students and university students. The prevalence rate of ever used-university students is below the

Perpus

takaa

n In the case of having school friend which uses drug, more than half

Perpus

takaa

n In the case of having school friend which uses drug, more than half

of Junior High School students (55.105) will report to the police. Some

Perpus

takaa

n of Junior High School students (55.105) will report to the police. Some wil give advice (20.30%) and prohibit (16.60%). Only few will keep silent.

Perpus

takaa

n wil give advice (20.30%) and prohibit (16.60%). Only few will keep silent.


Perpus

takaa

n


2.3.1. Prevalence Rate of Drug Use Among Students and University

Perpus

takaa

n

2.3.1. Prevalence Rate of Drug Use Among Students and University Students Perp

ustak

aan

Students

BNNThe attitude when being offered to buy drugs is mostly rejecting

BNNThe attitude when being offered to buy drugs is mostly rejecting

(98.305). Almost no respondents answer ‘accepting”. Respondents with

BNN(98.305). Almost no respondents answer ‘accepting”. Respondents with doubtful answer are only 1.60%. This pattern of answer also occurs in

BNNdoubtful answer are only 1.60%. This pattern of answer also occurs in respondents in the education level of Junior High School, Senior High BNNrespondents in the education level of Junior High School, Senior High


prevalence rate of Senior High School students with 6.00% followed by the prevalence rate of Junior High School students with 3.30%. Meanwhile, the prevalence rate of drug abuse in university student in the last one year is 2.80%.

Table 7Prevalence Rate of Ever Used and Current User

Among Students and University Students Acoording to the Level of Education (%)

The prevalence rate of drug abuse in Junior High School students is almost equal of 3.40% in male students and 3.20% in female students. Hence, current users among Junior High School students are equal in gender. The thing that differentiates is the use of drugs among Senior High School students and university students which is dominated by male students.

Table 8Prevalence Rate of Current User Among Students and University Students

According to the Level of Education and Gender

Ever used Current User

N % N %N % N %N % N %N % N %

Junior High School 63 4.80% 43 3.30%Junior High School 63 4.80% 43 3.30%Junior High School 63 4.80% 43 3.30%Junior High School 63 4.80% 43 3.30%Junior High School 63 4.80% 43 3.30%

Senior High School 127 6.40% 71 3.60%Senior High School 127 6.40% 71 3.60%Senior High School 127 6.40% 71 3.60%Senior High School 127 6.40% 71 3.60%Senior High School 127 6.40% 71 3.60%

University 113 6.00% 53 2.80%113 6.00% 53 2.80%113 6.00% 53 2.80%113 6.00% 53 2.80%

Total 303 5.80% 167 3.20%303 5.80% 167 3.20%303 5.80% 167 3.20%303 5.80% 167 3.20%

Male Female

N % N %N % N %N % N %N % N %N % N %

Junior High School 20 3.40 23 3.20Junior High School 20 3.40 23 3.20Junior High School 20 3.40 23 3.20Junior High School 20 3.40 23 3.20Junior High School 20 3.40 23 3.20

Senior High School 47 5.00 24 2.30Senior High School 47 5.00 24 2.30Senior High School 47 5.00 24 2.30Senior High School 47 5.00 24 2.30Senior High School 47 5.00 24 2.30Senior High School 47 5.00 24 2.30Senior High School 47 5.00 24 2.30

University 39 4.30 14 1.4039 4.30 14 1.4039 4.30 14 1.4039 4.30 14 1.40

Total 106 4.30 61 2.20106 4.30 61 2.20106 4.30 61 2.20106 4.30 61 2.20106 4.30 61 2.20

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n The prevalence rate of drug abuse in Junior High School students

Perpus

takaa

n The prevalence rate of drug abuse in Junior High School students

is almost equal of 3.40% in male students and 3.20% in female students.

Perpus

takaa

n is almost equal of 3.40% in male students and 3.20% in female students. Hence, current users among Junior High School students are equal in

Perpus

takaa

n Hence, current users among Junior High School students are equal in gender. The thing that differentiates is the use of drugs among Senior

Perpus

takaa

n

gender. The thing that differentiates is the use of drugs among Senior High School students and university students which is dominated by

Perpus

takaa

n

High School students and university students which is dominated by

Prevalence Rate of Current User Among Students and University Students Perpus

takaa

n

Prevalence Rate of Current User Among Students and University Students

BNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNN

Senior High School 127 6.40% 71 3.60%

BNNSenior High School 127 6.40% 71 3.60%

113 6.00% 53 2.80%

BNN113 6.00% 53 2.80%

303 5.80% 167 3.20%

BNN303 5.80% 167 3.20%303 5.80% 167 3.20%

BNN303 5.80% 167 3.20%


The survey among Junior and Senior High School students and University students shows that in the last one year, they consume drugs as an experiment or a trial (1.40%) with the highest reason compared to as a regular use (0.44%) and addiction (0.175). Meanwhile, students and university student respondents which use injected drugs are very low (0.06%).

Table 9Current Use of Drugs According to the Status of Usage

The survey shows that the reason to try is very dominant (64.00%) among students and university students as ever used and current users, followed by the reason for having fun (16.80%). Being persuaded or forced by a friend is also a reason with quite high percentage of 6.60%. Why do student and university students use drugs? This group of

by friends. Meanwhile, the factor of personal stress among students and university students shows the smallest percentage (5.605) among the four biggest reasons to use drugs in students and university student.

Status of Usage N %N %

Experiment 73 1.4073 1.40

Regular 23 0.4423 0.44

Addicted 9 0.179 0.17

Injected drug 3 0.063 0.06

Perpus

takaa

n The survey shows that the reason to try is very dominant (64.00%)

Perpus

takaa

n The survey shows that the reason to try is very dominant (64.00%) among students and university students as ever used and current

Perpus

takaa

n among students and university students as ever used and current users, followed by the reason for having fun (16.80%). Being persuaded

Perpus

takaa

n users, followed by the reason for having fun (16.80%). Being persuaded or forced by a friend is also a reason with quite high percentage of

Perpus

takaa

n

or forced by a friend is also a reason with quite high percentage of 6.60%. Why do student and university students use drugs? This group of

Perpus

takaa

n

6.60%. Why do student and university students use drugs? This group of

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

by friends. Meanwhile, the factor of personal stress among students

Perpus

takaa

n

by friends. Meanwhile, the factor of personal stress among students and university students shows the smallest percentage (5.605) among

Perpus

takaa

n

and university students shows the smallest percentage (5.605) among the four biggest reasons to use drugs in students and university student. Perp

ustak

aan

the four biggest reasons to use drugs in students and university student.

BNNBNN

9 0.17

BNN9 0.17

BNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNN3 0.06

BNN3 0.06


Table 10Reasons of Using Drugs

From the result of survey in table 11, less Junior High School students consumes drugs. The Junior High School students tend to use non drugs-addictive substances. Meanwhile, Senior High School and University students consume both drugs and non drugs-addictive substances. Students in Senior High School consume more varied hazardous drugs, both drugs and non-drugs addictive substances than University students. The detail use of drugs and other addictive substances can be seen in the following table.

Reasons N %N %

Experiment 194 64.00194 64.00

Having fun 51 16.8051 16.80

Forced by friends 20 6.6020 6.60

Forced by boyfriend/girlfriend 1 0.301 0.30

Stressed due to family problem 6 2.006 2.00

Stressed due to personal problem 17 5.6017 5.60

Stressed due to job 1 0.301 0.30

Being set up 7 2.307 2.30

Others 6 2.00

Total 303 100.00303 100.00

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n From the result of survey in table 11, less Junior High School

Perpus

takaa

n From the result of survey in table 11, less Junior High School

students consumes drugs. The Junior High School students tend to

Perpus

takaa

n students consumes drugs. The Junior High School students tend to use non drugs-addictive substances. Meanwhile, Senior High School

Perpus

takaa

n use non drugs-addictive substances. Meanwhile, Senior High School and University students consume both drugs and non drugs-addictive

Perpus

takaa

n

and University students consume both drugs and non drugs-addictive substances. Students in Senior High School consume more varied

Perpus

takaa

n

substances. Students in Senior High School consume more varied hazardous drugs, both drugs and non-drugs addictive substances

Perpus

takaa

n

hazardous drugs, both drugs and non-drugs addictive substances than University students. The detail use of drugs and other addictive

Perpus

takaa

n

than University students. The detail use of drugs and other addictive substances can be seen in the following table. Perp

ustak

aan

substances can be seen in the following table.

BNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNN

7 2.30

BNN7 2.307 2.30

BNN7 2.30

6 2.00

BNN6 2.006 2.00

BNN6 2.00

303 100.00BNN303 100.00303 100.00BNN303 100.00


Table 11Types of Drugs Consumed in the Past Year

Type of drug and other addic-

tive substances

Junior high

school

Senior

high

school


N % N % N % N %N % N % N % N %N % N % N % N %N % N % N % N %N % N % N % N %N % N % N % N %N % N % N % N %N % N % N % N %

Dextromethorpan overly consumed 0 0.00 3 4.20 2 3.8 5 3.00Dextromethorpan overly consumed 0 0.00 3 4.20 2 3.8 5 3.00Dextromethorpan overly consumed 0 0.00 3 4.20 2 3.8 5 3.00Dextromethorpan overly consumed 0 0.00 3 4.20 2 3.8 5 3.00Dextromethorpan overly consumed 0 0.00 3 4.20 2 3.8 5 3.00Dextromethorpan overly consumed 0 0.00 3 4.20 2 3.8 5 3.00Dextromethorpan overly consumed 0 0.00 3 4.20 2 3.8 5 3.00Dextromethorpan overly consumed 0 0.00 3 4.20 2 3.8 5 3.00Dextromethorpan overly consumed 0 0.00 3 4.20 2 3.8 5 3.00

Tramadol 1 2.30 4 5.60 3 5.70 8 4.80Tramadol 1 2.30 4 5.60 3 5.70 8 4.80Tramadol 1 2.30 4 5.60 3 5.70 8 4.80Tramadol 1 2.30 4 5.60 3 5.70 8 4.80Tramadol 1 2.30 4 5.60 3 5.70 8 4.80Tramadol 1 2.30 4 5.60 3 5.70 8 4.80Tramadol 1 2.30 4 5.60 3 5.70 8 4.80Tramadol 1 2.30 4 5.60 3 5.70 8 4.80Tramadol 1 2.30 4 5.60 3 5.70 8 4.80

Trihexiphenidyl 0 0.00 3 4.20 2 3.80 5 3.00Trihexiphenidyl 0 0.00 3 4.20 2 3.80 5 3.00Trihexiphenidyl 0 0.00 3 4.20 2 3.80 5 3.00Trihexiphenidyl 0 0.00 3 4.20 2 3.80 5 3.00Trihexiphenidyl 0 0.00 3 4.20 2 3.80 5 3.00Trihexiphenidyl 0 0.00 3 4.20 2 3.80 5 3.00Trihexiphenidyl 0 0.00 3 4.20 2 3.80 5 3.00Trihexiphenidyl 0 0.00 3 4.20 2 3.80 5 3.00Trihexiphenidyl 0 0.00 3 4.20 2 3.80 5 3.00

Headache medicine overly

consumed

4 9.30 14 19.70 8 15.10 26 15.604 9.30 14 19.70 8 15.10 26 15.604 9.30 14 19.70 8 15.10 26 15.604 9.30 14 19.70 8 15.10 26 15.604 9.30 14 19.70 8 15.10 26 15.604 9.30 14 19.70 8 15.10 26 15.604 9.30 14 19.70 8 15.10 26 15.604 9.30 14 19.70 8 15.10 26 15.60

Headache medicine mixed with

drinking soda

3 7.00 6 8.50 2 3.80 11 6.603 7.00 6 8.50 2 3.80 11 6.603 7.00 6 8.50 2 3.80 11 6.603 7.00 6 8.50 2 3.80 11 6.603 7.00 6 8.50 2 3.80 11 6.603 7.00 6 8.50 2 3.80 11 6.603 7.00 6 8.50 2 3.80 11 6.603 7.00 6 8.50 2 3.80 11 6.603 7.00 6 8.50 2 3.80 11 6.60

Substances inhaled continuously

(glue, gasoline, markers, electric

mosquito,etc. )

12 27.90 9 12.70 2 3.80 23 13.8012 27.90 9 12.70 2 3.80 23 13.8012 27.90 9 12.70 2 3.80 23 13.8012 27.90 9 12.70 2 3.80 23 13.8012 27.90 9 12.70 2 3.80 23 13.8012 27.90 9 12.70 2 3.80 23 13.8012 27.90 9 12.70 2 3.80 23 13.8012 27.90 9 12.70 2 3.80 23 13.80

Koplo pill, BK, mboat, mboti, roda 1 2.30 3 4.20 0 0.00 4 2.40Koplo pill, BK, mboat, mboti, roda 1 2.30 3 4.20 0 0.00 4 2.40Koplo pill, BK, mboat, mboti, roda 1 2.30 3 4.20 0 0.00 4 2.40Koplo pill, BK, mboat, mboti, roda 1 2.30 3 4.20 0 0.00 4 2.40Koplo pill, BK, mboat, mboti, roda 1 2.30 3 4.20 0 0.00 4 2.40Koplo pill, BK, mboat, mboti, roda 1 2.30 3 4.20 0 0.00 4 2.40Koplo pill, BK, mboat, mboti, roda 1 2.30 3 4.20 0 0.00 4 2.40Koplo pill, BK, mboat, mboti, roda 1 2.30 3 4.20 0 0.00 4 2.40

Marijuana 0Marijuana 0 0.00 8 11.30 8 15.10 16 9.600.00 8 11.30 8 15.10 16 9.600.00 8 11.30 8 15.10 16 9.600.00 8 11.30 8 15.10 16 9.600.00 8 11.30 8 15.10 16 9.600.00 8 11.30 8 15.10 16 9.600.00 8 11.30 8 15.10 16 9.60

Bear tobacco, gorilla tobacco 0Bear tobacco, gorilla tobacco 0 0.00 3 4.20 2 3.80 5 3.000.00 3 4.20 2 3.80 5 3.000.00 3 4.20 2 3.80 5 3.000.00 3 4.20 2 3.80 5 3.000.00 3 4.20 2 3.80 5 3.000.00 3 4.20 2 3.80 5 3.000.00 3 4.20 2 3.80 5 3.00

Ecstasy 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Ecstasy 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Ecstasy 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Ecstasy 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Ecstasy 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Ecstasy 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Ecstasy 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Ecstasy 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Ecstasy 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80

Amphetamine (seed, dex Adderall,

dexamphetamine)

0 0.00 1 1.40 0 0.00 1 0.600 0.00 1 1.40 0 0.00 1 0.600 0.00 1 1.40 0 0.00 1 0.600 0.00 1 1.40 0 0.00 1 0.600 0.00 1 1.40 0 0.00 1 0.600 0.00 1 1.40 0 0.00 1 0.600 0.00 1 1.40 0 0.00 1 0.600 0.00 1 1.40 0 0.00 1 0.60

Methaphetamine 0 0.00 4 5.60 1 1.90 5 3.00Methaphetamine 0 0.00 4 5.60 1 1.90 5 3.00Methaphetamine 0 0.00 4 5.60 1 1.90 5 3.00Methaphetamine 0 0.00 4 5.60 1 1.90 5 3.00Methaphetamine 0 0.00 4 5.60 1 1.90 5 3.00Methaphetamine 0 0.00 4 5.60 1 1.90 5 3.00Methaphetamine 0 0.00 4 5.60 1 1.90 5 3.00Methaphetamine 0 0.00 4 5.60 1 1.90 5 3.00Methaphetamine 0 0.00 4 5.60 1 1.90 5 3.00Methaphetamine 0 0.00 4 5.60 1 1.90 5 3.00

Putau 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Putau 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Putau 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Putau 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Putau 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Putau 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Putau 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Putau 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Putau 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Putau 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80

Morphine 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Morphine 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Morphine 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Morphine 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Morphine 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Morphine 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Morphine 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Morphine 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Morphine 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80

Heroin 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Heroin 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Heroin 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Heroin 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Heroin 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Heroin 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Heroin 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Heroin 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Heroin 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80

Cocaine 0 0.00 3 4.20 1 1.90 4 2.40Cocaine 0 0.00 3 4.20 1 1.90 4 2.40Cocaine 0 0.00 3 4.20 1 1.90 4 2.40Cocaine 0 0.00 3 4.20 1 1.90 4 2.40Cocaine 0 0.00 3 4.20 1 1.90 4 2.40Cocaine 0 0.00 3 4.20 1 1.90 4 2.40Cocaine 0 0.00 3 4.20 1 1.90 4 2.40Cocaine 0 0.00 3 4.20 1 1.90 4 2.40Cocaine 0 0.00 3 4.20 1 1.90 4 2.40

2.3.2 Prevalence Rate per Province

From the use of drugs and other addictive substances in the past one year, cities like Surabaya, Samarinda, Bandung, Jakarta and Yogyakarta are the cities with the highest prevalence rate of drugs and non drugs-addictive substances abuse compared to other cites.

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n Koplo pill, BK, mboat, mboti, roda 1 2.30 3 4.20 0 0.00 4 2.40

Perpus

takaa

n Koplo pill, BK, mboat, mboti, roda 1 2.30 3 4.20 0 0.00 4 2.40Koplo pill, BK, mboat, mboti, roda 1 2.30 3 4.20 0 0.00 4 2.40

Perpus

takaa

n Koplo pill, BK, mboat, mboti, roda 1 2.30 3 4.20 0 0.00 4 2.40Koplo pill, BK, mboat, mboti, roda 1 2.30 3 4.20 0 0.00 4 2.40

Perpus

takaa

n Koplo pill, BK, mboat, mboti, roda 1 2.30 3 4.20 0 0.00 4 2.40

0.00 8 11.30 8 15.10 16 9.60

Perpus

takaa

n 0.00 8 11.30 8 15.10 16 9.600.00 8 11.30 8 15.10 16 9.60

Perpus

takaa

n 0.00 8 11.30 8 15.10 16 9.600.00 8 11.30 8 15.10 16 9.60

Perpus

takaa

n 0.00 8 11.30 8 15.10 16 9.60

Bear tobacco, gorilla tobacco 0

Perpus

takaa

n Bear tobacco, gorilla tobacco 0 0.00 3 4.20 2 3.80 5 3.00

Perpus

takaa

n 0.00 3 4.20 2 3.80 5 3.000.00 3 4.20 2 3.80 5 3.00

Perpus

takaa

n 0.00 3 4.20 2 3.80 5 3.00

Ecstasy 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80

Perpus

takaa

n

Ecstasy 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Ecstasy 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80

Perpus

takaa

n

Ecstasy 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Ecstasy 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80

Perpus

takaa

n

Ecstasy 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80

Amphetamine (seed, dex Adderall,

Perpus

takaa

n

Amphetamine (seed, dex Adderall, 0 0.00 1 1.40 0 0.00 1 0.60

Perpus

takaa

n

0 0.00 1 1.40 0 0.00 1 0.600 0.00 1 1.40 0 0.00 1 0.60

Perpus

takaa

n

0 0.00 1 1.40 0 0.00 1 0.60

Methaphetamine 0 0.00 4 5.60 1 1.90 5 3.00

Perpus

takaa

n

Methaphetamine 0 0.00 4 5.60 1 1.90 5 3.00

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Putau 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Perpus

takaa

n

Putau 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80

Morphine 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Perp

ustak

aan

Morphine 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80

BNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNN3 7.00 6 8.50 2 3.80 11 6.60

BNN3 7.00 6 8.50 2 3.80 11 6.603 7.00 6 8.50 2 3.80 11 6.60

BNN3 7.00 6 8.50 2 3.80 11 6.60

12 27.90 9 12.70 2 3.80 23 13.80

BNN12 27.90 9 12.70 2 3.80 23 13.8012 27.90 9 12.70 2 3.80 23 13.80

BNN12 27.90 9 12.70 2 3.80 23 13.8012 27.90 9 12.70 2 3.80 23 13.80

BNN12 27.90 9 12.70 2 3.80 23 13.80


Table 12Prevalence Rate in Past Year According to the Level of Education

Per Capital City of Province

Meanwhile, based on drugs dependency rate (ever used, regular and addiction), the highest prevalence rate among students and university students as current users are in Surabaya with ever used (4.5%), regular (2.0%), and addiction (1.0%).

City

Junior high

school

Senior high

schoolCollege TotalCollege Total

N % N % N % N %N % N % N % N %N % N % N % N %N % N % N % N %N % N % N % N %N % N % N % N %N % N % N % N %N % N % N % N %N % N % N % N %N % N % N % N %

Banda Aceh 1 1.00 5 3.30 4 2.70 10 2.50Banda Aceh 1 1.00 5 3.30 4 2.70 10 2.50Banda Aceh 1 1.00 5 3.30 4 2.70 10 2.50Banda Aceh 1 1.00 5 3.30 4 2.70 10 2.50Banda Aceh 1 1.00 5 3.30 4 2.70 10 2.50Banda Aceh 1 1.00 5 3.30 4 2.70 10 2.50Banda Aceh 1 1.00 5 3.30 4 2.70 10 2.50Banda Aceh 1 1.00 5 3.30 4 2.70 10 2.50Banda Aceh 1 1.00 5 3.30 4 2.70 10 2.50

Medan 5 5.00 2 1.30 3 2.00 10 2.50Medan 5 5.00 2 1.30 3 2.00 10 2.50Medan 5 5.00 2 1.30 3 2.00 10 2.50Medan 5 5.00 2 1.30 3 2.00 10 2.50Medan 5 5.00 2 1.30 3 2.00 10 2.50Medan 5 5.00 2 1.30 3 2.00 10 2.50Medan 5 5.00 2 1.30 3 2.00 10 2.50Medan 5 5.00 2 1.30 3 2.00 10 2.50Medan 5 5.00 2 1.30 3 2.00 10 2.50Medan 5 5.00 2 1.30 3 2.00 10 2.50Medan 5 5.00 2 1.30 3 2.00 10 2.50

Palembang 3 2.90 5 3.40 1 0.70 9 2.30Palembang 3 2.90 5 3.40 1 0.70 9 2.30Palembang 3 2.90 5 3.40 1 0.70 9 2.30Palembang 3 2.90 5 3.40 1 0.70 9 2.30Palembang 3 2.90 5 3.40 1 0.70 9 2.30Palembang 3 2.90 5 3.40 1 0.70 9 2.30Palembang 3 2.90 5 3.40 1 0.70 9 2.30Palembang 3 2.90 5 3.40 1 0.70 9 2.30Palembang 3 2.90 5 3.40 1 0.70 9 2.30

Batam 1 1.00 4 2.50 5 3.60 10 2.50Batam 1 1.00 4 2.50 5 3.60 10 2.50Batam 1 1.00 4 2.50 5 3.60 10 2.50Batam 1 1.00 4 2.50 5 3.60 10 2.50Batam 1 1.00 4 2.50 5 3.60 10 2.50Batam 1 1.00 4 2.50 5 3.60 10 2.50Batam 1 1.00 4 2.50 5 3.60 10 2.50Batam 1 1.00 4 2.50 5 3.60 10 2.50Batam 1 1.00 4 2.50 5 3.60 10 2.50Batam 1 1.00 4 2.50 5 3.60 10 2.50Batam 1 1.00 4 2.50 5 3.60 10 2.50

Jakarta 2 2.00 11 6.30 3 2.40 16 4.00Jakarta 2 2.00 11 6.30 3 2.40 16 4.00Jakarta 2 2.00 11 6.30 3 2.40 16 4.00Jakarta 2 2.00 11 6.30 3 2.40 16 4.00Jakarta 2 2.00 11 6.30 3 2.40 16 4.00Jakarta 2 2.00 11 6.30 3 2.40 16 4.00Jakarta 2 2.00 11 6.30 3 2.40 16 4.00Jakarta 2 2.00 11 6.30 3 2.40 16 4.00Jakarta 2 2.00 11 6.30 3 2.40 16 4.00

Bandung 7 6.90 5 3.40 6 4.00 18 4.50Bandung 7 6.90 5 3.40 6 4.00 18 4.50Bandung 7 6.90 5 3.40 6 4.00 18 4.50Bandung 7 6.90 5 3.40 6 4.00 18 4.50Bandung 7 6.90 5 3.40 6 4.00 18 4.50Bandung 7 6.90 5 3.40 6 4.00 18 4.50Bandung 7 6.90 5 3.40 6 4.00 18 4.50Bandung 7 6.90 5 3.40 6 4.00 18 4.50Bandung 7 6.90 5 3.40 6 4.00 18 4.50Bandung 7 6.90 5 3.40 6 4.00 18 4.50Bandung 7 6.90 5 3.40 6 4.00 18 4.50

Surabaya 8 7.60 14 9.40 8 5.50 30 7.50Surabaya 8 7.60 14 9.40 8 5.50 30 7.50Surabaya 8 7.60 14 9.40 8 5.50 30 7.50Surabaya 8 7.60 14 9.40 8 5.50 30 7.50Surabaya 8 7.60 14 9.40 8 5.50 30 7.50Surabaya 8 7.60 14 9.40 8 5.50 30 7.50Surabaya 8 7.60 14 9.40 8 5.50 30 7.50Surabaya 8 7.60 14 9.40 8 5.50 30 7.50Surabaya 8 7.60 14 9.40 8 5.50 30 7.50

Yogyakarta 7 6.90 7 4.70 1 0.70 15 3.80Yogyakarta 7 6.90 7 4.70 1 0.70 15 3.80Yogyakarta 7 6.90 7 4.70 1 0.70 15 3.80Yogyakarta 7 6.90 7 4.70 1 0.70 15 3.80Yogyakarta 7 6.90 7 4.70 1 0.70 15 3.80Yogyakarta 7 6.90 7 4.70 1 0.70 15 3.80Yogyakarta 7 6.90 7 4.70 1 0.70 15 3.80Yogyakarta 7 6.90 7 4.70 1 0.70 15 3.80Yogyakarta 7 6.90 7 4.70 1 0.70 15 3.80Yogyakarta 7 6.90 7 4.70 1 0.70 15 3.80

Denpasar 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.70 1 0.30Denpasar 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.70 1 0.30Denpasar 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.70 1 0.30Denpasar 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.70 1 0.30Denpasar 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.70 1 0.30Denpasar 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.70 1 0.30Denpasar 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.70 1 0.30Denpasar 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.70 1 0.30Denpasar 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.70 1 0.30Denpasar 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.70 1 0.30

Samarinda 5 5.00 8 5.20 8 5.40 21 5.30Samarinda 5 5.00 8 5.20 8 5.40 21 5.30Samarinda 5 5.00 8 5.20 8 5.40 21 5.30Samarinda 5 5.00 8 5.20 8 5.40 21 5.30Samarinda 5 5.00 8 5.20 8 5.40 21 5.30Samarinda 5 5.00 8 5.20 8 5.40 21 5.30Samarinda 5 5.00 8 5.20 8 5.40 21 5.30Samarinda 5 5.00 8 5.20 8 5.40 21 5.30Samarinda 5 5.00 8 5.20 8 5.40 21 5.30Samarinda 5 5.00 8 5.20 8 5.40 21 5.30Samarinda 5 5.00 8 5.20 8 5.40 21 5.30

Pontianak 1 1.00 3 2.00 1 0.70 5 1.30Pontianak 1 1.00 3 2.00 1 0.70 5 1.30Pontianak 1 1.00 3 2.00 1 0.70 5 1.30Pontianak 1 1.00 3 2.00 1 0.70 5 1.30Pontianak 1 1.00 3 2.00 1 0.70 5 1.30Pontianak 1 1.00 3 2.00 1 0.70 5 1.30Pontianak 1 1.00 3 2.00 1 0.70 5 1.30Pontianak 1 1.00 3 2.00 1 0.70 5 1.30

Makassar 1 1.00 5 3.30 8 5.40 14 3.50Makassar 1 1.00 5 3.30 8 5.40 14 3.50Makassar 1 1.00 5 3.30 8 5.40 14 3.50Makassar 1 1.00 5 3.30 8 5.40 14 3.50Makassar 1 1.00 5 3.30 8 5.40 14 3.50Makassar 1 1.00 5 3.30 8 5.40 14 3.50Makassar 1 1.00 5 3.30 8 5.40 14 3.50Makassar 1 1.00 5 3.30 8 5.40 14 3.50Makassar 1 1.00 5 3.30 8 5.40 14 3.50Makassar 1 1.00 5 3.30 8 5.40 14 3.50

Jayapura 2 2.00 2 1.40 4 2.70 8 2.00Jayapura 2 2.00 2 1.40 4 2.70 8 2.00Jayapura 2 2.00 2 1.40 4 2.70 8 2.00Jayapura 2 2.00 2 1.40 4 2.70 8 2.00Jayapura 2 2.00 2 1.40 4 2.70 8 2.00Jayapura 2 2.00 2 1.40 4 2.70 8 2.00Jayapura 2 2.00 2 1.40 4 2.70 8 2.00Jayapura 2 2.00 2 1.40 4 2.70 8 2.00Jayapura 2 2.00 2 1.40 4 2.70 8 2.00

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n Denpasar 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.70 1 0.30

Perpus

takaa

n Denpasar 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.70 1 0.30Denpasar 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.70 1 0.30

Perpus

takaa

n Denpasar 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.70 1 0.30

Samarinda 5 5.00 8 5.20 8 5.40 21 5.30

Perpus

takaa

n Samarinda 5 5.00 8 5.20 8 5.40 21 5.30Samarinda 5 5.00 8 5.20 8 5.40 21 5.30

Perpus

takaa

n Samarinda 5 5.00 8 5.20 8 5.40 21 5.30

Pontianak 1 1.00 3 2.00 1 0.70 5 1.30

Perpus

takaa

n Pontianak 1 1.00 3 2.00 1 0.70 5 1.30Pontianak 1 1.00 3 2.00 1 0.70 5 1.30

Perpus

takaa

n Pontianak 1 1.00 3 2.00 1 0.70 5 1.30Pontianak 1 1.00 3 2.00 1 0.70 5 1.30

Perpus

takaa

n Pontianak 1 1.00 3 2.00 1 0.70 5 1.30

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n Makassar 1 1.00 5 3.30 8 5.40 14 3.50

Perpus

takaa

n Makassar 1 1.00 5 3.30 8 5.40 14 3.50Makassar 1 1.00 5 3.30 8 5.40 14 3.50

Perpus

takaa


Perpus

takaa


Perpus

takaa

n Makassar 1 1.00 5 3.30 8 5.40 14 3.50

Jayapura 2 2.00 2 1.40 4 2.70 8 2.00

Perpus

takaa

n

Jayapura 2 2.00 2 1.40 4 2.70 8 2.00Jayapura 2 2.00 2 1.40 4 2.70 8 2.00

Perpus

takaa

n

Jayapura 2 2.00 2 1.40 4 2.70 8 2.00Jayapura 2 2.00 2 1.40 4 2.70 8 2.00

Perpus

takaa

n

Jayapura 2 2.00 2 1.40 4 2.70 8 2.00

Perpus

takaa

n

Meanwhile, based on drugs dependency rate (ever used, regular

Perpus

takaa

n

Meanwhile, based on drugs dependency rate (ever used, regular and addiction), the highest prevalence rate among students and Perp

ustak

aan

and addiction), the highest prevalence rate among students and university students as current users are in Surabaya with ever used Perp

ustak

aan

university students as current users are in Surabaya with ever used (4.5%), regular (2.0%), and addiction (1.0%).

Perpus

takaa

n

(4.5%), regular (2.0%), and addiction (1.0%).Perp

ustak

aan B

NNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBandung 7 6.90 5 3.40 6 4.00 18 4.50

BNNBandung 7 6.90 5 3.40 6 4.00 18 4.50Bandung 7 6.90 5 3.40 6 4.00 18 4.50

BNNBandung 7 6.90 5 3.40 6 4.00 18 4.50

Surabaya 8 7.60 14 9.40 8 5.50 30 7.50

BNNSurabaya 8 7.60 14 9.40 8 5.50 30 7.50Surabaya 8 7.60 14 9.40 8 5.50 30 7.50

BNNSurabaya 8 7.60 14 9.40 8 5.50 30 7.50Surabaya 8 7.60 14 9.40 8 5.50 30 7.50

BNNSurabaya 8 7.60 14 9.40 8 5.50 30 7.50

BNNBNNBNNBNNBNN

Yogyakarta 7 6.90 7 4.70 1 0.70 15 3.80BNNYogyakarta 7 6.90 7 4.70 1 0.70 15 3.80Yogyakarta 7 6.90 7 4.70 1 0.70 15 3.80BNNYogyakarta 7 6.90 7 4.70 1 0.70 15 3.80Yogyakarta 7 6.90 7 4.70 1 0.70 15 3.80BNNYogyakarta 7 6.90 7 4.70 1 0.70 15 3.80

Denpasar 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.70 1 0.30BNNDenpasar 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.70 1 0.30Denpasar 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.70 1 0.30BNNDenpasar 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.70 1 0.30


Table 13Prevalence Rate of Past Year

According to the Status of Usage in 13 Capital Cities of the Province

2.3.3. Risky Behaviour toward Drug Abuse

The risky behaviour toward drugs abuse is the activity among students and university students with the frequency and intensity that may create vulnerability on drugs use.

Students and university students with drinking alcohol experience is about 26.7%. This percentage has experienced being drunk because of alcohol. Based on the level of education, drinking alcohol was experienced by 21.6% of Junior High School students, 29.6% of Senior High School students, and 25.9% of University students.

The second-quite prominent risky behaviour among students and university students is the habit of smoking reaching 12.3% in Junior

Cities Experimental Cities Experimental

use

Regular Addicted Injected Regular Addicted Injected Regular Addicted Injected

drug use

Banda Aceh 1,00% 0,75% 0,75% -Banda Aceh 1,00% 0,75% 0,75% -Banda Aceh 1,00% 0,75% 0,75% -Banda Aceh 1,00% 0,75% 0,75% -Banda Aceh 1,00% 0,75% 0,75% -

Medan 2,00% 0,25% 0,25% -Medan 2,00% 0,25% 0,25% -Medan 2,00% 0,25% 0,25% -Medan 2,00% 0,25% 0,25% -Medan 2,00% 0,25% 0,25% -

Palembang 1,25% 0,50% 0,50% -Palembang 1,25% 0,50% 0,50% -Palembang 1,25% 0,50% 0,50% -Palembang 1,25% 0,50% 0,50% -Palembang 1,25% 0,50% 0,50% -

Batam 1,50% 0,75% - 0,25%Batam 1,50% 0,75% - 0,25%Batam 1,50% 0,75% - 0,25%Batam 1,50% 0,75% - 0,25%Batam 1,50% 0,75% - 0,25%

DKI Jakarta 2,25% 1,75% - -DKI Jakarta 2,25% 1,75% - -DKI Jakarta 2,25% 1,75% - -DKI Jakarta 2,25% 1,75% - -DKI Jakarta 2,25% 1,75% - -

Bandung 3,50% 0,75% 0,25% -Bandung 3,50% 0,75% 0,25% -Bandung 3,50% 0,75% 0,25% -Bandung 3,50% 0,75% 0,25% -Bandung 3,50% 0,75% 0,25% -

Surabaya 4,50% 2,00% 1,00% -Surabaya 4,50% 2,00% 1,00% -Surabaya 4,50% 2,00% 1,00% -Surabaya 4,50% 2,00% 1,00% -

Yogyakarta 2,00% 1,50% 0,25% -Yogyakarta 2,00% 1,50% 0,25% -Yogyakarta 2,00% 1,50% 0,25% -Yogyakarta 2,00% 1,50% 0,25% -Yogyakarta 2,00% 1,50% 0,25% -Yogyakarta 2,00% 1,50% 0,25% -

Denpasar - - 0,25% -Denpasar - - 0,25% -Denpasar - - 0,25% -Denpasar - - 0,25% -Denpasar - - 0,25% -Denpasar - - 0,25% -

Samarinda 4,25% 0,75% 0,25% -Samarinda 4,25% 0,75% 0,25% -Samarinda 4,25% 0,75% 0,25% -Samarinda 4,25% 0,75% 0,25% -Samarinda 4,25% 0,75% 0,25% -

Pontianak 0,25% 0,50% 0,50% -Pontianak 0,25% 0,50% 0,50% -Pontianak 0,25% 0,50% 0,50% -Pontianak 0,25% 0,50% 0,50% -Pontianak 0,25% 0,50% 0,50% -

Makassar 2,50% 0,75% 0,25% -Makassar 2,50% 0,75% 0,25% -Makassar 2,50% 0,75% 0,25% -Makassar 2,50% 0,75% 0,25% -Makassar 2,50% 0,75% 0,25% -Makassar 2,50% 0,75% 0,25% -

Jayapura 1,50% 0,25% - 0,25%Jayapura 1,50% 0,25% - 0,25%Jayapura 1,50% 0,25% - 0,25%Jayapura 1,50% 0,25% - 0,25%Jayapura 1,50% 0,25% - 0,25%Jayapura 1,50% 0,25% - 0,25%

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n Samarinda 4,25% 0,75% 0,25% -

Perpus

takaa

n Samarinda 4,25% 0,75% 0,25% -Samarinda 4,25% 0,75% 0,25% -

Perpus

takaa

n Samarinda 4,25% 0,75% 0,25% -

Pontianak 0,25% 0,50% 0,50% -

Perpus

takaa

n Pontianak 0,25% 0,50% 0,50% -Pontianak 0,25% 0,50% 0,50% -

Perpus

takaa

n Pontianak 0,25% 0,50% 0,50% -

Makassar 2,50% 0,75% 0,25% -

Perpus

takaa

n Makassar 2,50% 0,75% 0,25% -Makassar 2,50% 0,75% 0,25% -

Perpus

takaa

n Makassar 2,50% 0,75% 0,25% -

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n


Perpus

takaa

n


The risky behaviour toward drugs abuse is the activity among Perpus

takaa

n

The risky behaviour toward drugs abuse is the activity among

Jayapura 1,50% 0,25% - 0,25%

Perpus

takaa

n Jayapura 1,50% 0,25% - 0,25%Jayapura 1,50% 0,25% - 0,25%

Perpus

takaa

n Jayapura 1,50% 0,25% - 0,25%

Perpus

takaa

n BNN

BNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNSurabaya 4,50% 2,00% 1,00% -

BNNSurabaya 4,50% 2,00% 1,00% -Surabaya 4,50% 2,00% 1,00% -

BNNSurabaya 4,50% 2,00% 1,00% -

Yogyakarta 2,00% 1,50% 0,25% -

BNNYogyakarta 2,00% 1,50% 0,25% -Yogyakarta 2,00% 1,50% 0,25% -

BNNYogyakarta 2,00% 1,50% 0,25% -

Denpasar - - 0,25% -BNNDenpasar - - 0,25% -

Samarinda 4,25% 0,75% 0,25% -BNNSamarinda 4,25% 0,75% 0,25% -


High School, 22.2% in Senior High School, and 24.4% in University. Generally, respondents admitted that they started smoking at the age of 14. The next risky behaviour among students and university students is smoking with vaping and visiting nightclubs. Smoking with vaping is known among 10.4% of Junior High School students and 12.8% of Senior High School students. They mostly confessed having vaping in the age of 16. Smoking with vaping is not popular among university students. Visiting nightclubs becomes a risky behaviour towatd drug abuse (15.8%).

2.3.4. Source of Obtaining Drugs (Source, Level of Ease)

Students and university students obtain drugs from being offered (17.9%) and by buying (17.9%) from hang out friends. They also obtain drugs from being offered by a friend (10.6%) and by buying from school/

there are two types of drugs that are easiest to get despite that less respondents admit on it. They are marijuana (gele, cimeng, marijuana, getok, hemp leaf [linda]), and bear tobacco or gorilla tobacco.

2.3.5 Trend of Drug Use (Comparing the Use of Drugs Currently and Years before)

Students and university students realize that drug use is not for medication, but for enjoying its impact since it is mostly started with trial, being offered, or buying from hang out friends. Since drug substances are addictive, there is the potential of addiction even in excessive amount, regularly and long enough that may cause health, phisycal, mental and social disorder. From the previous surveys, drug

not easy to prevent drug use especially among students and university students. Graphic 7 shows that the trend of drug use among students and university students from 2006, 2009 and 2011 was declining from 8.1% (2006), 7.8% (2009), and 4.3% (2011). However, the prevalence rate of drug abuse in 2011 was higher than in 2016. The prevalence rate of drug abuse increased into 6.4% in 2016 and declined into 5.8% in 2018.

Perpus

takaa

n there are two types of drugs that are easiest to get despite that less

Perpus

takaa

n there are two types of drugs that are easiest to get despite that less respondents admit on it. They are marijuana (gele, cimeng, marijuana,

Perpus

takaa

n respondents admit on it. They are marijuana (gele, cimeng, marijuana, getok, hemp leaf [linda]), and bear tobacco or gorilla tobacco.

Perpus

takaa

n getok, hemp leaf [linda]), and bear tobacco or gorilla tobacco.

2.3.5 Trend of Drug Use (Comparing the Use of Drugs Currently

Perpus

takaa

n 2.3.5 Trend of Drug Use (Comparing the Use of Drugs Currently and Years before)

Perpus

takaa

n

and Years before)

Students and university students realize that drug use is not

Perpus

takaa

n

Students and university students realize that drug use is not for medication, but for enjoying its impact since it is mostly started

Perpus

takaa

n

for medication, but for enjoying its impact since it is mostly started with trial, being offered, or buying from hang out friends. Since drug Perp

ustak

aan

with trial, being offered, or buying from hang out friends. Since drug substances are addictive, there is the potential of addiction even in Perp

ustak

aan

substances are addictive, there is the potential of addiction even in

BNNStudents and university students obtain drugs from being offered

BNNStudents and university students obtain drugs from being offered

(17.9%) and by buying (17.9%) from hang out friends. They also obtain

BNN(17.9%) and by buying (17.9%) from hang out friends. They also obtain drugs from being offered by a friend (10.6%) and by buying from school/

BNNdrugs from being offered by a friend (10.6%) and by buying from school/

BNNthere are two types of drugs that are easiest to get despite that less BNNthere are two types of drugs that are easiest to get despite that less


Based on gender, the prevalence rate of drug abuse among male and female was declining in 2011 and increasing in 2016 compared to in 2018. The prevalence rate is increasing respectably among female students and university students.

Graphic 7Comparison of Prevalence Rate Among Students and University Students

According to Gender

Compared to prevalence rate of druig abuse in the past year among students and university students, there has been a difference. The tendency to use drugs among students and university students in total from 2006 to 2016 was declining from 5.2% (2006), 5.1% (2009), 2.9% (2011) and 1.9% (2016). The prevalence rate according to gender shows that prevalence rate of drug abuse both among male and female students and university students was declining from 2011 to 2016. However, compared to the prevalence rate of drug abuse in 2018, the prevalence rate was increasing both in total and between male and female. The detail prevalence rate is shown in Graphic 8.

Graphic 8Graphic of Prevalence Rate Comparison among Drug User Students and

University Students in the Past Year According to Gender

Male Female TotalTotalTotal

9,19,19,1

7,5

4,84,8 3,54,35,25,2

5,15,15,1

2,92,93,21,91,9 2,8

1,31,31,3 0,60,60,62,2

1,91,91,9

2006 2009 2011 2016 2018

Male Female

15

10

5

0

13,713,7

11,3

7,17,1 6,46,47,88,18,1

7,87,87,8

4,34,35,8

3,33,3 4,74,7

1,91,91,9 1,61,61,64,1

20062009

2011 2016

6,4

2018

Perpus

takaa

n Compared to prevalence rate of druig abuse in the past year among

Perpus

takaa

n Compared to prevalence rate of druig abuse in the past year among students and university students, there has been a difference. The

Perpus

takaa

n students and university students, there has been a difference. The tendency to use drugs among students and university students in total

Perpus

takaa

n tendency to use drugs among students and university students in total from 2006 to 2016 was declining from 5.2% (2006), 5.1% (2009), 2.9%

Perpus

takaa

n from 2006 to 2016 was declining from 5.2% (2006), 5.1% (2009), 2.9% (2011) and 1.9% (2016). The prevalence rate according to gender shows

Perpus

takaa

n

(2011) and 1.9% (2016). The prevalence rate according to gender shows that prevalence rate of drug abuse both among male and female students

Perpus

takaa

n

that prevalence rate of drug abuse both among male and female students and university students was declining from 2011 to 2016. However,

Perpus

takaa

n

and university students was declining from 2011 to 2016. However, compared to the prevalence rate of drug abuse in 2018, the prevalence

Perpus

takaa

n

compared to the prevalence rate of drug abuse in 2018, the prevalence rate was increasing both in total and between male and female. The detail

Perpus

takaa

n

rate was increasing both in total and between male and female. The detail prevalence rate is shown in Graphic 8.Perp

ustak

aan

prevalence rate is shown in Graphic 8.

BNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNTotal

BNNTotalTotal

BNNTotalTotal

BNNTotal

BNN

45

SURVEY ON DRUG ABUSEAMONG WORKERS

III

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n SURVEY ON DRUG ABUSE

Perpus

takaa

n SURVEY ON DRUG ABUSEAMONG WORKERS

Perpus

takaa

n AMONG WORKERS

BNNSURVEY ON DRUG ABUSEBNNSURVEY ON DRUG ABUSE

46

Perpus

takaa

n BNN


SURVEY ON DRUG ABUSE AMONG WORKERS

3.1. Characteristics of Respondents Among Workers

The total number of respondents in the capital city of 13 provinces is 5,200 workers, consisting of 3,066 male workers (59.0%) and 2,134 female workers (41%). The result of reaserach survey on drug abuse in 13 provinces in Indonesia shows that more than half of respondents (51%) are married and 47.2% are not married.

Table 14 Distribution of Respondents According to Profession Sector

Professional sector N % N %

1 Agriculture1 Agriculture 0.0%

2 Mine dan excavation2 Mine dan excavation 60 1.2%60 1.2%

3 Industry of proces3 Industry of proces 463 8.9%463 8.9%

4 electricity, gas, water4 electricity, gas, water 40 0.8%40 0.8%

5 construction5 construction 640 12.3%640 12.3%

6 commerce, restaurant dan hotel6 commerce, restaurant dan hotel 2,411 46.4%2,411 46.4%

7 transportation, warehousesing, communication7 transportation, warehousesing, communication 460 8.8%460 8.8%

8 finance, real estate, rental dan service company8 finance, real estate, rental dan service company 140 2.7%140 2.7%

9 Social service/ private social9 Social service/ private social 986 19.0%986 19.0%

Total 5,200 100% 5,200 100%

III

Perpus

takaa

n The total number of respondents in the capital city of 13 provinces

Perpus

takaa

n The total number of respondents in the capital city of 13 provinces is 5,200 workers, consisting of 3,066 male workers (59.0%) and 2,134

Perpus

takaa

n is 5,200 workers, consisting of 3,066 male workers (59.0%) and 2,134 female workers (41%). The result of reaserach survey on drug abuse in

Perpus

takaa

n female workers (41%). The result of reaserach survey on drug abuse in 13 provinces in Indonesia shows that more than half of respondents

Perpus

takaa

n 13 provinces in Indonesia shows that more than half of respondents (51%) are married and 47.2% are not married.

Perpus

takaa

n (51%) are married and 47.2% are not married.

Table 14

Perpus

takaa

n

Table 14 Distribution of Respondents According to Profession Sector

Perpus

takaa

n

Distribution of Respondents According to Profession Sector

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Professional sector

Perpus

takaa

n

Professional sector

1 Agriculture Perpus

takaa

n

1 Agriculture

2 Mine dan excavationPerpus

takaa

n

2 Mine dan excavation

BNN3.1. Characteristics of Respondents Among Workers

BNN3.1. Characteristics of Respondents Among Workers

The total number of respondents in the capital city of 13 provinces BNNThe total number of respondents in the capital city of 13 provinces


3.2. Knowledge and Attitude on the Danger of Drugs Among Workers

3.2.1. Knowledge on Drugs Among Workers

Worker respondents’ knowledge on the types of drugs is varied. Basically, there are six groups of drugs type known by respondents, such as potent drug, addictive substances, psychotropic,natural drugs, synthetic drugs, and semi-synthetic drugs.

Semi-synthetic drugs are quite well known by most respondents, such as heroine (57.5%) and cocaine (53.7%). Meanwhile, morphine and putaw including etep and pete are also known by respondents reaching 45.2% and 43.4% from the total respondents (Table 15).

Worker respondents also know types of potent drug which have the effect as drugs. Most respondents (31.5%) know that headache-potent medicine can cause tremendous effect when consumed excessively. Around 31.0% respondents know that headache medine when mixed with soda may cause drugs effect also. Meanwhile, psychotropic drug mostly known by workers is koplo pill of around 39.1%.

Perpus

takaa

n the effect as drugs. Most respondents (31.5%) know that headache-

Perpus

takaa

n the effect as drugs. Most respondents (31.5%) know that headache-

Perpus

takaa

n potent medicine can cause tremendous effect when consumed

Perpus

takaa

n potent medicine can cause tremendous effect when consumed excessively. Around 31.0% respondents know that headache medine

Perpus

takaa

n excessively. Around 31.0% respondents know that headache medine when mixed with soda may cause drugs effect also. Meanwhile,

Perpus

takaa

n when mixed with soda may cause drugs effect also. Meanwhile, psychotropic drug mostly known by workers is koplo pill of around

Perpus

takaa

n psychotropic drug mostly known by workers is koplo pill of around

BNNand putaw including etep and pete are also known by respondents

BNNand putaw including etep and pete are also known by respondents reaching 45.2% and 43.4% from the total respondents (Table 15).

BNNreaching 45.2% and 43.4% from the total respondents (Table 15).

Worker respondents also know types of potent drug which have BNNWorker respondents also know types of potent drug which have

the effect as drugs. Most respondents (31.5%) know that headache-BNNthe effect as drugs. Most respondents (31.5%) know that headache-


Table 15 Respondents’ Knowledge on Types of Drugs

Respondents also know other impacts of drug abuse in three

relatives, and society (see Appendix 4). More than half of respondents

Types of drug N %N %

Potent medicine

1 Dextromethorphan overly consumed 1 Dextromethorphan overly consumed 1,278 24.6%1,278 24.6%

2 Tramadol2 Tramadol 1,068 20.5%1,068 20.5%

3 Trihexyphenidyl3 Trihexyphenidyl 887 17.1%887 17.1%

4 Medicine for headache overly consumed4 Medicine for headache overly consumed 1,640 31.5%1,640 31.5%

5 Medicine for headache that’s mixed with drinking soda5 Medicine for headache that’s mixed with drinking soda 1,610 31.0%1,610 31.0%

Addictive substances

6 Substances inhaled continuously (glue aibon, gasoline, markers, 6 Substances inhaled continuously (glue aibon, gasoline, markers,

electric mosquito, etc

2,436 46,8%2,436 46,8%

Psychotropics

7 Koplo pill, BK, Mboat, Mboti, roda7 Koplo pill, BK, Mboat, Mboti, roda 2,436 46,8%2,436 46,8%

Natural drug

8 Marijuana8 Marijuana 3,572 68.7%3,572 68.7%

Synthetics drug

9 Bear tobacco, gorilla tobacco9 Bear tobacco, gorilla tobacco 1,911 36.8%1,911 36.8%

10 Ecstasy 2,912 56.0%2,912 56.0%

11 Amphetamine (seed, dex, addrall, dexamphetamine) 1.123 21.6%1.123 21.6%

12 Methamphetamine 3,431 66.0%3,431 66.0%

Semi-synthetics drug

13 Putau (the lowest grade of heroin)13 Putau (the lowest grade of heroin) 2.255 43.4%2.255 43.4%

14 Morphine14 Morphine 2,348 45.2%2,348 45.2%

15 Heroin15 Heroin 2,992 57.5%2,992 57.5%

16 Cocaine 2,790 53.7%16 Cocaine 2,790 53.7%16 Cocaine 2,790 53.7%16 Cocaine 2,790 53.7%

17 Others17 Others 64 1.23%64 1.23%

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Amphetamine (seed, dex, addrall, dexamphetamine)

Perpus

takaa

n

Amphetamine (seed, dex, addrall, dexamphetamine)

Methamphetamine

Perpus

takaa

n

Methamphetamine

Semi-synthetics drugPerpus

takaa

n

Semi-synthetics drug

13 Putau (the lowest grade of heroin)Perpus

takaa

n

13 Putau (the lowest grade of heroin)


6 Substances inhaled continuously (glue aibon, gasoline, markers,

BNN6 Substances inhaled continuously (glue aibon, gasoline, markers,


(51.3%) acknolwdges the social impact of drug abuse such as being

also ostracized from the community when being caught of using drugs. The percentage reaches 37.9%.

3.2.2. Attitude Toward Drug Abuse

Attitude is a representation of what someone will do in facing a situation related to drug abuse. This research shows that more than one third of respondents (38.6%) has the viewpoint and will give an

one fourth of respondents (28.2%) will report it to the police, while

will keep silent.

Table 16

The respondents’ knowledge and attitude is varied when knowing that their friend and family are involved in drug abuse. This research shows that almost half of respondents (45.5%) will expressly prohibit when their parents are involved in drug abuse. Furthermore, almost half of respondents (48.9%) will strictly prohibit if their spouse, husband or wife, is involved in drug abuse (Table 17).

WHAT’S IS YOUR RESPONSE IF YOUR OFFICE MATE INVOLVED IN

DRUGS DEALING

N %N %

Keep silent 344 6.6%Keep silent 344 6.6%Keep silent 344 6.6%Keep silent 344 6.6%

Advise them 2,009 38.6%Advise them 2,009 38.6%Advise them 2,009 38.6%

Forbid them 1,287 24%Forbid them 1,287 24%Forbid them 1,287 24%

Report them to the police 1,468 28%Report them to the police 1,468 28%Report them to the police 1,468 28%

Others 92 1.8%Others 92 1.8%Others 92 1.8%

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n WHAT’S IS YOUR RESPONSE IF YOUR OFFICE MATE INVOLVED IN

Perpus

takaa

n WHAT’S IS YOUR RESPONSE IF YOUR OFFICE MATE INVOLVED IN

DRUGS DEALING

Perpus

takaa

n DRUGS DEALING

Keep silent 344 6.6%

Perpus

takaa

n Keep silent 344 6.6%

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Advise them 2,009 38.6%

Perpus

takaa

n

Advise them 2,009 38.6%

Forbid them 1,287 24%

Perpus

takaa

n

Forbid them 1,287 24%

Report them to the police 1,468 28%

Perpus

takaa

n

Report them to the police 1,468 28%

Others 92 1.8%

Perpus

takaa

n

Others 92 1.8%

BNNBNNBNN


Table 17Respondents’ Attitude When Friends or Family Members Use Drugs

3.3.1. Prevalence Rate of Drug Use among Workers

The prevalence rate of drug use in the past year among workers in 13 capitals of the provinces in 2018 was 2.10% or equivalent to 1,514,037 workers. Table 18 below shows that male workers have higher prevalence rate compared to female workers of 2.7%.

Table 18Prevalence of Ever Use and Current User

Attitude

If respondents have

Office

mate

using

drugs

Relatives

using drugs

Parents

using

drugs

Boyfriend/

Girlfriend

Your

couple

using

drugs

Keep silent 7.1% 2.2% 1.3% 1.0% 0.9%2.2% 1.3% 1.0% 0.9%2.2% 1.3% 1.0% 0.9%2.2% 1.3% 1.0% 0.9%

Advise them 43.7% 39.7% 32.5% 25.2% 25.3%Advise them 43.7% 39.7% 32.5% 25.2% 25.3%Advise them 43.7% 39.7% 32.5% 25.2% 25.3%Advise them 43.7% 39.7% 32.5% 25.2% 25.3%Advise them 43.7% 39.7% 32.5% 25.2% 25.3%Advise them 43.7% 39.7% 32.5% 25.2% 25.3%Advise them 43.7% 39.7% 32.5% 25.2% 25.3%

Forbid them 22.5% 37.0% 45.5% 45.0% 48.9%Forbid them 22.5% 37.0% 45.5% 45.0% 48.9%Forbid them 22.5% 37.0% 45.5% 45.0% 48.9%Forbid them 22.5% 37.0% 45.5% 45.0% 48.9%Forbid them 22.5% 37.0% 45.5% 45.0% 48.9%Forbid them 22.5% 37.0% 45.5% 45.0% 48.9%

Report to the

police

24.5% 19.3% 18.6% 22.5% 20.2%24.5% 19.3% 18.6% 22.5% 20.2%24.5% 19.3% 18.6% 22.5% 20.2%24.5% 19.3% 18.6% 22.5% 20.2%24.5% 19.3% 18.6% 22.5% 20.2%24.5% 19.3% 18.6% 22.5% 20.2%

Others 2.2% 1.9% 2.1% 6.4% 4.6%Others 2.2% 1.9% 2.1% 6.4% 4.6%Others 2.2% 1.9% 2.1% 6.4% 4.6%Others 2.2% 1.9% 2.1% 6.4% 4.6%Others 2.2% 1.9% 2.1% 6.4% 4.6%

GENDER EVER USED DRUGGENDER EVER USED DRUG CURRENT USE

Male 199 6.50% 84 2.70%199 6.50% 84 2.70%199 6.50% 84 2.70%199 6.50% 84 2.70%

Female 49 2.30% 24 1.10%49 2.30% 24 1.10%49 2.30% 24 1.10%49 2.30% 24 1.10%

Total 248 4.80% 108 2.10%248 4.80% 108 2.10%248 4.80% 108 2.10%248 4.80% 108 2.10%

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n 3.3.1. Prevalence Rate of Drug Use among Workers

Perpus

takaa

n 3.3.1. Prevalence Rate of Drug Use among Workers

The prevalence rate of drug use in the past year among workers

Perpus

takaa

n

The prevalence rate of drug use in the past year among workers in 13 capitals of the provinces in 2018 was

Perpus

takaa

n

in 13 capitals of the provinces in 2018 was 1,514,037 workers.

Perpus

takaa

n

1,514,037 workers. Table 18 below shows that male workers have

Perpus

takaa

n

Table 18 below shows that male workers have higher prevalence rate compared to female workers of 2.7%.

Perpus

takaa

n

higher prevalence rate compared to female workers of 2.7%.

BNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNOthers 2.2% 1.9% 2.1% 6.4% 4.6%

BNNOthers 2.2% 1.9% 2.1% 6.4% 4.6%Others 2.2% 1.9% 2.1% 6.4% 4.6%

BNNOthers 2.2% 1.9% 2.1% 6.4% 4.6%


Based on prevalence of drug use among workers in the past year (current users), this survey tries to further study the prevalence according to age, level of education, marital status and residence. Table 19 shows that the prevalence of drug use among male workers

43 workers (2.70%) under 30 years old and 41 workers (2.80%) over 30 years old.

Table 19Prevalence Rate of Current Use According to Gender

CURRENT USE

Group of age, educational level, status, residence N PREVALENCEGroup of age, educational level, status, residence N PREVALENCEGroup of age, educational level, status, residence N PREVALENCE

Male Female Male FemaleMale Female Male FemaleMale Female Male FemaleMale Female Male Female

GROUP OF AGE

<30 43 14 2.70% 1.00%43 14 2.70% 1.00%43 14 2.70% 1.00%43 14 2.70% 1.00%

30 + 41 10 2.80% 1.40%41 10 2.80% 1.40%41 10 2.80% 1.40%41 10 2.80% 1.40%41 10 2.80% 1.40%

EDUCATIONAL LEVEL

Junior high school and under 8 2 4.00% 2.90%8 2 4.00% 2.90%8 2 4.00% 2.90%8 2 4.00% 2.90%

Senior high school 42 9 2.60% 0.90%42 9 2.60% 0.90%42 9 2.60% 0.90%42 9 2.60% 0.90%42 9 2.60% 0.90%

Diploma degree 34 13 2.80% 1.30%34 13 2.80% 1.30%34 13 2.80% 1.30%34 13 2.80% 1.30%

MARITAL STATUS

Not married 40 10 3.00% 0.90%40 10 3.00% 0.90%40 10 3.00% 0.90%40 10 3.00% 0.90%

Menikah 44 9 2.60% 1.00%44 9 2.60% 1.00%44 9 2.60% 1.00%44 9 2.60% 1.00%44 9 2.60% 1.00%

Divorce (live) 0 5 0.00% 12.80%0 5 0.00% 12.80%0 5 0.00% 12.80%0 5 0.00% 12.80%

Divorce (die) 0 0 0.00% 0.00%0 0 0.00% 0.00%0 0 0.00% 0.00%0 0 0.00% 0.00%0 0 0.00% 0.00%

RESIDENCE

Own house 20 5 2.10% 1.00%20 5 2.10% 1.00%20 5 2.10% 1.00%20 5 2.10% 1.00%

Family’s house 37 8 3.40% 0.80%37 8 3.40% 0.80%37 8 3.40% 0.80%37 8 3.40% 0.80%37 8 3.40% 0.80%

Official residence 1 1 0.60% 1.30%1 1 0.60% 1.30%1 1 0.60% 1.30%1 1 0.60% 1.30%

House for rent 26 10 3.10% 1.80%26 10 3.10% 1.80%26 10 3.10% 1.80%26 10 3.10% 1.80%26 10 3.10% 1.80%

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n 43 14 2.70% 1.00%

Perpus

takaa

n 43 14 2.70% 1.00%

41 10 2.80% 1.40%

Perpus

takaa

n 41 10 2.80% 1.40%BNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNN

Group of age, educational level, status, residence N PREVALENCE

BNNGroup of age, educational level, status, residence N PREVALENCEGroup of age, educational level, status, residence N PREVALENCE

BNNGroup of age, educational level, status, residence N PREVALENCE

Male Female Male Female

BNNMale Female Male FemaleMale Female Male Female

BNNMale Female Male Female

BNNBNNBNN

43 14 2.70% 1.00%BNN43 14 2.70% 1.00%43 14 2.70% 1.00%BNN43 14 2.70% 1.00%


The survey in 2018 was also targeted on the age of workers

consumed drugs. Types of consumed drugs are divided into 6 (six) groups, namely: potent drugs, addictive substances, psychotropic, natural drugs, synthethic drugs, and semi-synthethic drugs.

Table 20Prevalence Rate of Current User According to the Status of Usage

In 2018, group of workers in 13 capitals of the provinces was

contribution to the economy of the capital of the province. Since agriculture in each city is not among the six major sectors, workers in agriculture sector are not being surveyed.

Type of use N %N %

Experiment 73 1.40%Experiment 73 1.40%Experiment 73 1.40%

Regular 23 0.44%23 0.44%

Addicted 9 0.17%9 0.17%9 0.17%

Injected drug 3 0.06%

Others 92 1.80%92 1.80%

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n In 2018, group of workers in 13 capitals of the provinces was

Perpus

takaa

n In 2018, group of workers in 13 capitals of the provinces was

Perpus

takaa

n

contribution to the economy of the capital of the province. Since

Perpus

takaa

n

contribution to the economy of the capital of the province. Since agriculture in each city is not among the six major sectors, workers in

Perpus

takaa

n

agriculture in each city is not among the six major sectors, workers in agriculture sector are not being surveyed.

Perpus

takaa

n

agriculture sector are not being surveyed.

Perpus

takaa

n BNN

BNN23 0.44%

BNN23 0.44%

BNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNN9 0.17%

BNN9 0.17%9 0.17%

BNN9 0.17%

3 0.06%

BNN3 0.06%3 0.06%

BNN3 0.06%

BNNBNN

92 1.80%BNN92 1.80%92 1.80%BNN92 1.80%


Table 21 Prevalence Rate of Current Use

trial is the reason with then highest percentage of 57.7% followed by the reason of being persuaded/forced by friends with the percentage of 11.7%. The reason with the lowest percentage of 0.8% is being persuaded/forced by boyfriend/girlfriend

SECTOR MALE+FEMALE

N %N %

Agriculture

Mining and Quarrying

Processing Industry 9 1.90%9 1.90%

Electricity, gas and water

Construction 15 2.3%15 2.3%

Trade, restaurant, hotel 44 1.80%44 1.80%

Transportation, ware housing, communication 13 2.80%13 2.80%

Finance, real estate, rental and service company 1 0.70%

Social/private services 26 2.60%26 2.60%

POSITION IN COMPANY

Leader (manager, supervisor, foreman) 12 2.40%12 2.40%

Administrative staff 11 1.10%11 1.10%

Operational staff 85 2.30%85 2.30%

STATUS OF STAFFING

Permanent workers 57 2.20%57 2.20%

Contract workers 35 1.70%35 1.70%

Daily workers 15 3.70%15 3.70%

Outsourcing workers 1 0.60%1 0.60%

Others 92 1.80%92 1.80%

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n BNN

BNNBNNBNNBNNBNN

44 1.80%

BNN44 1.80%

13 2.80%

BNN13 2.80%

1

BNN1


Table 22Respondent’s Reason of Using Drugs for the First Time

3.3.2. Prevalence Rate per Province

The lowest prevalence rate among drug used-workers in 13 capitals of provinces occurs in Bali and Papua with 1.50%. However, this position is not in line with the prevalence rate of current users-workers in West Kalimantan with 1.00%. Despite that the gap with the lowest

are in the second lowest position after West Kalimantan.

Reason of using drug for the first time N %N %

Experiment 143 57.7143 57.7

Having fun 25 10.125 10.1

Forced by friend 29 11.729 11.7

Forced by lover 2 0.82 0.8

Stressed due to family problem 4 1.64 1.6

Stressed due to personal problem 10 4.010 4.0

Stressed due to work problem 3 1.23 1.2

Being set up 26 10.526 10.5

Others 6 2.46 2.4

Total 248 100.0248 100.0

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n 3.3.2. Prevalence Rate per Province

Perpus

takaa

n 3.3.2. Prevalence Rate per Province

The lowest prevalence rate among drug used-workers in 13

Perpus

takaa

n The lowest prevalence rate among drug used-workers in 13

capitals of provinces occurs in Bali and Papua with 1.50%. However, this

Perpus

takaa

n

capitals of provinces occurs in Bali and Papua with 1.50%. However, this position is not in line with the prevalence rate of current users-workers

Perpus

takaa

n

position is not in line with the prevalence rate of current users-workers in West Kalimantan with 1.00%. Despite that the gap with the lowest

Perpus

takaa

n

in West Kalimantan with 1.00%. Despite that the gap with the lowest

Perpus

takaa

n

are in the second lowest position after West Kalimantan.Perpus

takaa

n

are in the second lowest position after West Kalimantan.

BNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNN

26 10.5

BNN26 10.5

6 2.4

BNN6 2.46 2.4

BNN6 2.4

248 100.0

BNN248 100.0


Table 23Prevalence Rate of Current Use According to Province and Gender

ProvinceEver used Current use GenderEver used Current use GenderEver used Current use GenderEver used Current use Gender

N %N %N % N %N % Male FemaleMale Female

Aceh 19 4.80% 7 1.80% 2.20% 0.80%19 4.80% 7 1.80% 2.20% 0.80%19 4.80% 7 1.80% 2.20% 0.80%19 4.80% 7 1.80% 2.20% 0.80%19 4.80% 7 1.80% 2.20% 0.80%19 4.80% 7 1.80% 2.20% 0.80%

North Sumatera 16 4.00% 6 1.50% 2.00% 0.70%North Sumatera 16 4.00% 6 1.50% 2.00% 0.70%North Sumatera 16 4.00% 6 1.50% 2.00% 0.70%North Sumatera 16 4.00% 6 1.50% 2.00% 0.70%North Sumatera 16 4.00% 6 1.50% 2.00% 0.70%North Sumatera 16 4.00% 6 1.50% 2.00% 0.70%North Sumatera 16 4.00% 6 1.50% 2.00% 0.70%North Sumatera 16 4.00% 6 1.50% 2.00% 0.70%North Sumatera 16 4.00% 6 1.50% 2.00% 0.70%

South Sumatera 30 7.50% 14 3.50% 5.90% 0.60%South Sumatera 30 7.50% 14 3.50% 5.90% 0.60%South Sumatera 30 7.50% 14 3.50% 5.90% 0.60%South Sumatera 30 7.50% 14 3.50% 5.90% 0.60%South Sumatera 30 7.50% 14 3.50% 5.90% 0.60%South Sumatera 30 7.50% 14 3.50% 5.90% 0.60%South Sumatera 30 7.50% 14 3.50% 5.90% 0.60%

Riau Islands 21 5.30% 5 1.30% 1.40% 0.80%Riau Islands 21 5.30% 5 1.30% 1.40% 0.80%Riau Islands 21 5.30% 5 1.30% 1.40% 0.80%Riau Islands 21 5.30% 5 1.30% 1.40% 0.80%Riau Islands 21 5.30% 5 1.30% 1.40% 0.80%Riau Islands 21 5.30% 5 1.30% 1.40% 0.80%Riau Islands 21 5.30% 5 1.30% 1.40% 0.80%Riau Islands 21 5.30% 5 1.30% 1.40% 0.80%Riau Islands 21 5.30% 5 1.30% 1.40% 0.80%

Jakarta 22 5.50% 6 1.50% 1.80% 0.80% Jakarta 22 5.50% 6 1.50% 1.80% 0.80% Jakarta 22 5.50% 6 1.50% 1.80% 0.80% Jakarta 22 5.50% 6 1.50% 1.80% 0.80% Jakarta 22 5.50% 6 1.50% 1.80% 0.80% Jakarta 22 5.50% 6 1.50% 1.80% 0.80% Jakarta 22 5.50% 6 1.50% 1.80% 0.80%

West java 33 8.30% 22 5.50% 5.20% 5.80%West java 33 8.30% 22 5.50% 5.20% 5.80%West java 33 8.30% 22 5.50% 5.20% 5.80%West java 33 8.30% 22 5.50% 5.20% 5.80%West java 33 8.30% 22 5.50% 5.20% 5.80%West java 33 8.30% 22 5.50% 5.20% 5.80%West java 33 8.30% 22 5.50% 5.20% 5.80%West java 33 8.30% 22 5.50% 5.20% 5.80%West java 33 8.30% 22 5.50% 5.20% 5.80%

East java 22 5.50% 11 2.80% 3.20% 1.70%East java 22 5.50% 11 2.80% 3.20% 1.70%East java 22 5.50% 11 2.80% 3.20% 1.70%East java 22 5.50% 11 2.80% 3.20% 1.70%East java 22 5.50% 11 2.80% 3.20% 1.70%East java 22 5.50% 11 2.80% 3.20% 1.70%East java 22 5.50% 11 2.80% 3.20% 1.70%

Special region of

Yogyakarta

18 4.50% 5 1.30% 2.30% -18 4.50% 5 1.30% 2.30% -18 4.50% 5 1.30% 2.30% -18 4.50% 5 1.30% 2.30% -18 4.50% 5 1.30% 2.30% -18 4.50% 5 1.30% 2.30% -18 4.50% 5 1.30% 2.30% -18 4.50% 5 1.30% 2.30% -18 4.50% 5 1.30% 2.30% -

Bali 6 1.50% 5 1.30% 1.90% 0.50%Bali 6 1.50% 5 1.30% 1.90% 0.50%Bali 6 1.50% 5 1.30% 1.90% 0.50%Bali 6 1.50% 5 1.30% 1.90% 0.50%Bali 6 1.50% 5 1.30% 1.90% 0.50%Bali 6 1.50% 5 1.30% 1.90% 0.50%Bali 6 1.50% 5 1.30% 1.90% 0.50%Bali 6 1.50% 5 1.30% 1.90% 0.50%

East Kalimantan 21 5.30% 8 2.00% 3.70% -East Kalimantan 21 5.30% 8 2.00% 3.70% -East Kalimantan 21 5.30% 8 2.00% 3.70% -East Kalimantan 21 5.30% 8 2.00% 3.70% -East Kalimantan 21 5.30% 8 2.00% 3.70% -East Kalimantan 21 5.30% 8 2.00% 3.70% -East Kalimantan 21 5.30% 8 2.00% 3.70% -East Kalimantan 21 5.30% 8 2.00% 3.70% -East Kalimantan 21 5.30% 8 2.00% 3.70% -East Kalimantan 21 5.30% 8 2.00% 3.70% -

West Kalimantan 8 2.00% 4 1.00% 1.4% 0.80%West Kalimantan 8 2.00% 4 1.00% 1.4% 0.80%West Kalimantan 8 2.00% 4 1.00% 1.4% 0.80%West Kalimantan 8 2.00% 4 1.00% 1.4% 0.80%West Kalimantan 8 2.00% 4 1.00% 1.4% 0.80%West Kalimantan 8 2.00% 4 1.00% 1.4% 0.80%West Kalimantan 8 2.00% 4 1.00% 1.4% 0.80%

South Sulawesi 26 6.50% 10 2.50% 3.50% 1.20%South Sulawesi 26 6.50% 10 2.50% 3.50% 1.20%South Sulawesi 26 6.50% 10 2.50% 3.50% 1.20%South Sulawesi 26 6.50% 10 2.50% 3.50% 1.20%South Sulawesi 26 6.50% 10 2.50% 3.50% 1.20%South Sulawesi 26 6.50% 10 2.50% 3.50% 1.20%South Sulawesi 26 6.50% 10 2.50% 3.50% 1.20%South Sulawesi 26 6.50% 10 2.50% 3.50% 1.20%

Papua 6 1.50% 5 1.30% 1.20% 1.30%Papua 6 1.50% 5 1.30% 1.20% 1.30%Papua 6 1.50% 5 1.30% 1.20% 1.30%Papua 6 1.50% 5 1.30% 1.20% 1.30%Papua 6 1.50% 5 1.30% 1.20% 1.30%Papua 6 1.50% 5 1.30% 1.20% 1.30%Papua 6 1.50% 5 1.30% 1.20% 1.30%

Total 248 4.80% 108 2.10%Total 248 4.80% 108 2.10%Total 248 4.80% 108 2.10%Total 248 4.80% 108 2.10%Total 248 4.80% 108 2.10%Total 248 4.80% 108 2.10%Total 248 4.80% 108 2.10%

Based on Table 23, when current user workers are grouped according to gender, it can be seen in Table 24 that in general the average prevalence rate for male in each province is relatively higher than female, except in West Java and Papua where the prevalence rate of female is higher than male.

The province with the highest prevalence rate of male-current users is South Sumatera (5.90%), followed by West Java (5.20%) and East Kalimantan (3.70%). Meanwhile, the highest prevalence rate for female-current user workers is in West Java (5.80%), followed by East Java (1.70%) and Papua (1.30%). The prevalence rate of current user workers in West Java is relatively the same, 5.20% for male and 5.80% for female. Meanwhile, the lowest prevalence rate for female-current

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n Bali 6 1.50% 5 1.30% 1.90% 0.50%

Perpus

takaa

n Bali 6 1.50% 5 1.30% 1.90% 0.50%

East Kalimantan 21 5.30% 8 2.00% 3.70% -

Perpus

takaa

n East Kalimantan 21 5.30% 8 2.00% 3.70% -East Kalimantan 21 5.30% 8 2.00% 3.70% -

Perpus

takaa

n East Kalimantan 21 5.30% 8 2.00% 3.70% -

West Kalimantan 8 2.00% 4 1.00% 1.4% 0.80%

Perpus

takaa

n West Kalimantan 8 2.00% 4 1.00% 1.4% 0.80%West Kalimantan 8 2.00% 4 1.00% 1.4% 0.80%

Perpus

takaa

n West Kalimantan 8 2.00% 4 1.00% 1.4% 0.80%

South Sulawesi 26 6.50% 10 2.50% 3.50% 1.20%

Perpus

takaa

n South Sulawesi 26 6.50% 10 2.50% 3.50% 1.20%South Sulawesi 26 6.50% 10 2.50% 3.50% 1.20%

Perpus

takaa

n South Sulawesi 26 6.50% 10 2.50% 3.50% 1.20%South Sulawesi 26 6.50% 10 2.50% 3.50% 1.20%

Perpus

takaa

n South Sulawesi 26 6.50% 10 2.50% 3.50% 1.20%

Papua 6 1.50% 5 1.30% 1.20% 1.30%

Perpus

takaa

n

Papua 6 1.50% 5 1.30% 1.20% 1.30%Papua 6 1.50% 5 1.30% 1.20% 1.30%

Perpus

takaa

n

Papua 6 1.50% 5 1.30% 1.20% 1.30%

Total 248 4.80% 108 2.10%

Perpus

takaa

n

Total 248 4.80% 108 2.10%Total 248 4.80% 108 2.10%

Perpus

takaa

n

Total 248 4.80% 108 2.10%Total 248 4.80% 108 2.10%

Perpus

takaa

n

Total 248 4.80% 108 2.10%Total 248 4.80% 108 2.10%

Perpus

takaa

n

Total 248 4.80% 108 2.10%

Perpus

takaa

n

Based on Table 23, when current user workers are grouped

Perpus

takaa

n

Based on Table 23, when current user workers are grouped according to gender, it can be seen in Table 24 that in general the Perp

ustak

aan

according to gender, it can be seen in Table 24 that in general the average prevalence rate for male in each province is relatively higher Perp

ustak

aan

average prevalence rate for male in each province is relatively higher

BNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNN

East java 22 5.50% 11 2.80% 3.20% 1.70%

BNNEast java 22 5.50% 11 2.80% 3.20% 1.70%

18 4.50% 5 1.30% 2.30% -

BNN18 4.50% 5 1.30% 2.30% -18 4.50% 5 1.30% 2.30% -

BNN18 4.50% 5 1.30% 2.30% -18 4.50% 5 1.30% 2.30% -

BNN18 4.50% 5 1.30% 2.30% -

Bali 6 1.50% 5 1.30% 1.90% 0.50%BNNBali 6 1.50% 5 1.30% 1.90% 0.50%Bali 6 1.50% 5 1.30% 1.90% 0.50%BNNBali 6 1.50% 5 1.30% 1.90% 0.50%


Survey in 2018 also sees the prevalence rate according to status of drug use, namely whether current users are being in trial with the

to 49 times, addicts with the frequency of more than 50 times in the last one year, and using injection drugs.

Table 24Prevalence Rate of Current Use

According to Province and Status of Usage

user workers is in D.I. Yogyakarta and East Kalimantan with 0% since there are no female workers used drugs in the past year.

Province Experiment RegularExperiment Regular AddictInjected

drug

Aceh 1.00% - 0.75%Aceh 1.00% - 0.75%Aceh 1.00% - 0.75%

North Sumatera 1.25% 0.25%North Sumatera 1.25% 0.25%North Sumatera 1.25% 0.25%North Sumatera 1.25% 0.25%North Sumatera 1.25% 0.25%North Sumatera 1.25% 0.25%

South Sumatera 2.25% 0.50% 0.25% 0.50%South Sumatera 2.25% 0.50% 0.25% 0.50%South Sumatera 2.25% 0.50% 0.25% 0.50%South Sumatera 2.25% 0.50% 0.25% 0.50%South Sumatera 2.25% 0.50% 0.25% 0.50%South Sumatera 2.25% 0.50% 0.25% 0.50%

Riau Islands 1.00% 0.25%Riau Islands 1.00% 0.25%

Jakarta 1.50%Jakarta 1.50%

West java 2.00% 3.00% 0.25% 0.25%West java 2.00% 3.00% 0.25% 0.25%West java 2.00% 3.00% 0.25% 0.25%West java 2.00% 3.00% 0.25% 0.25%West java 2.00% 3.00% 0.25% 0.25%West java 2.00% 3.00% 0.25% 0.25%West java 2.00% 3.00% 0.25% 0.25%

East java 2.00% 0.25%East java 2.00% 0.25%East java 2.00% 0.25%East java 2.00% 0.25%East java 2.00% 0.25%

Special region of

Yogyakarta

1.25% 0.50%1.25% 0.50%

Bali 0.75% 0.50%Bali 0.75% 0.50%Bali 0.75% 0.50%Bali 0.75% 0.50%

East kalimantan 1.50% 0.50%East kalimantan 1.50% 0.50%East kalimantan 1.50% 0.50%

West kalimantan 0.75% 0.25%West kalimantan 0.75% 0.25%West kalimantan 0.75% 0.25%West kalimantan 0.75% 0.25%

South Sulawesi 2.00% 0.50%South Sulawesi 2.00% 0.50%South Sulawesi 2.00% 0.50%

Papua 1.00% 0.25%Papua 1.00% 0.25%Papua 1.00% 0.25%Papua 1.00% 0.25%

Total 1.40% 0.44% 0.17 0.06%Total 1.40% 0.44% 0.17 0.06%Total 1.40% 0.44% 0.17 0.06%Total 1.40% 0.44% 0.17 0.06%Total 1.40% 0.44% 0.17 0.06%Total 1.40% 0.44% 0.17 0.06%

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n North Sumatera 1.25% 0.25%

Perpus

takaa

n North Sumatera 1.25% 0.25%

South Sumatera 2.25% 0.50% 0.25% 0.50%

Perpus

takaa

n South Sumatera 2.25% 0.50% 0.25% 0.50%

Riau Islands 1.00% 0.25%

Perpus

takaa

n Riau Islands 1.00% 0.25%Riau Islands 1.00% 0.25%

Perpus

takaa

n Riau Islands 1.00% 0.25%

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n Jakarta 1.50%

Perpus

takaa

n Jakarta 1.50%

West java 2.00% 3.00% 0.25% 0.25%

Perpus

takaa

n

West java 2.00% 3.00% 0.25% 0.25%West java 2.00% 3.00% 0.25% 0.25%

Perpus

takaa

n

West java 2.00% 3.00% 0.25% 0.25%

East java 2.00% 0.25%

Perpus

takaa

n

East java 2.00% 0.25%East java 2.00% 0.25%

Perpus

takaa

n

East java 2.00% 0.25%

1.25% 0.50%

Perpus

takaa

n

1.25% 0.50%

Bali 0.75% 0.50%Perpus

takaa

n

Bali 0.75% 0.50%Bali 0.75% 0.50%Perpus

takaa

n

Bali 0.75% 0.50%

East kalimantan 1.50% 0.50%Perp

ustak

aan

East kalimantan 1.50% 0.50%

BNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNAddict

BNNAddict

Aceh 1.00% - 0.75%BNNAceh 1.00% - 0.75%Aceh 1.00% - 0.75%BNNAceh 1.00% - 0.75%

North Sumatera 1.25% 0.25%BNNNorth Sumatera 1.25% 0.25%North Sumatera 1.25% 0.25%BNNNorth Sumatera 1.25% 0.25%North Sumatera 1.25% 0.25%BNNNorth Sumatera 1.25% 0.25%


3.3.3. Risky Behaviour toward Drug Abuse Among Workers

Survey on drug illicit and abuse in 2018 also touches upon the risky behaviour among workers in the last one year. The risky behaviour consists of three behaviours namely smoking, vaping, and drinking alcohol. The prevalence rate of the most risky behaviour among workers, both male and female, is smoking with 38.20%.

Table 25Number of Smoker, Electric Smoker, and Alcoholics among Workers in

the Past Year According to Gender

years old. They did vaping at the age of 10 years old and drinking alcohol at the age of 7 years old.

Kind of worker’s habitMale Female TotalMale Female TotalMale Female TotalMale Female Total

N %N % N % N %N % N %N % N %N % N %N % N %

Smoking cigarette 1.879 61.30% 105 4.90% 1,984 38.20%Smoking cigarette 1.879 61.30% 105 4.90% 1,984 38.20%Smoking cigarette 1.879 61.30% 105 4.90% 1,984 38.20%Smoking cigarette 1.879 61.30% 105 4.90% 1,984 38.20%Smoking cigarette 1.879 61.30% 105 4.90% 1,984 38.20%Smoking cigarette 1.879 61.30% 105 4.90% 1,984 38.20%Smoking cigarette 1.879 61.30% 105 4.90% 1,984 38.20%

Smoking electric cigarette (vaping) 290 9.50% 32 1.50% 322 6.20%290 9.50% 32 1.50% 322 6.20%290 9.50% 32 1.50% 322 6.20%290 9.50% 32 1.50% 322 6.20%290 9.50% 32 1.50% 322 6.20%

Drinking alcohol 752Drinking alcohol 752 24.50% 125 5.90% 877 16.90%24.50% 125 5.90% 877 16.90%24.50% 125 5.90% 877 16.90%24.50% 125 5.90% 877 16.90%24.50% 125 5.90% 877 16.90%

Type of Worker’s

habit Mean MedianMean Median Mode Minimum MaximumMode Minimum MaximumMode Minimum Maximum

Smoking cigarette 18 18 20 6 54Smoking cigarette 18 18 20 6 54Smoking cigarette 18 18 20 6 54Smoking cigarette 18 18 20 6 54Smoking cigarette 18 18 20 6 54Smoking cigarette 18 18 20 6 54

Smoking electric

cigarette (vaping)

24 22 20 10 4224 22 20 10 4224 22 20 10 4224 22 20 10 4224 22 20 10 42

Drinking alcohol 20 20 20 7 45Drinking alcohol 20 20 20 7 45Drinking alcohol 20 20 20 7 45Drinking alcohol 20 20 20 7 45Drinking alcohol 20 20 20 7 45Drinking alcohol 20 20 20 7 45

Tabel 26Umur Pertama kali Merokok, Mengisap Rokok Elektrik, dan Minum

Minuman Beralkohol Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

years old. They did vaping at the age of 10 years old and drinking

Perpus

takaa

n

years old. They did vaping at the age of 10 years old and drinking alcohol at the age of 7 years old.

Perpus

takaa

n

alcohol at the age of 7 years old.

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n 24.50% 125 5.90% 877 16.90%

Perpus

takaa

n 24.50% 125 5.90% 877 16.90%24.50% 125 5.90% 877 16.90%

Perpus

takaa

n 24.50% 125 5.90% 877 16.90%

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Tabel 26

Perpus

takaa

n

Tabel 26Umur Pertama kali Merokok, Mengisap Rokok Elektrik, dan Minum

Perpus

takaa

n

Umur Pertama kali Merokok, Mengisap Rokok Elektrik, dan Minum Minuman Beralkohol Perpus

takaa

n

Minuman Beralkohol

BNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNN % N %

BNNN % N %N % N %

BNNN % N %

Smoking cigarette 1.879 61.30% 105 4.90% 1,984 38.20%

BNNSmoking cigarette 1.879 61.30% 105 4.90% 1,984 38.20%Smoking cigarette 1.879 61.30% 105 4.90% 1,984 38.20%

BNNSmoking cigarette 1.879 61.30% 105 4.90% 1,984 38.20%Smoking cigarette 1.879 61.30% 105 4.90% 1,984 38.20%

BNNSmoking cigarette 1.879 61.30% 105 4.90% 1,984 38.20%

290 9.50% 32 1.50% 322 6.20%BNN290 9.50% 32 1.50% 322 6.20%290 9.50% 32 1.50% 322 6.20%BNN290 9.50% 32 1.50% 322 6.20%290 9.50% 32 1.50% 322 6.20%BNN290 9.50% 32 1.50% 322 6.20%

24.50% 125 5.90% 877 16.90%BNN24.50% 125 5.90% 877 16.90%24.50% 125 5.90% 877 16.90%BNN24.50% 125 5.90% 877 16.90%


3.3.4. Source to Obtain Drugs Among Workers

Based on Table 27, workers obtain drugs mostly by being given by hang out friends with the percentage of 23.00%. The second source to obtain drugs with the percentage of 21.40% is by buying from hang out friends. Hence, hang out friends are the easiest source to obtain drugs. The least wat to obtain drugs is through relatives/family with the percentage of 2.40% followed by being given by unknown person with the percentage of 3.20%.

Table 27Ways to Obtain Drugs (N= 248)

The way to get drug N %N %

Directly buying from the dealer 44 17.70%44 17.70%

buying from the courier 40 16.10%40 16.10%

buying from office mate 26 10.50%26 10.50%

Buying from other than office mate 41 16.50%41 16.50%

Buying from hangout friends 53 21.40%53 21.40%

Buying from friends with the same hobby 25 10.10%25 10.10%

Buying from relatives 6 2.40%6 2.40%

Buying in drug store 19 7.70%19 7.70%

Buying from the strangers 13 5.20%13 5.20%

Given by lover 16 6.50%16 6.50%

Given by office mate 24 9.70%24 9.70%

Given by friends other than office mate 39 15.70%39 15.70%

Given by hangout friends 57 23.00%57 23.00%

Given by friends with the same hobby 30 12.10%30 12.10%

Given by relatives 14 5.60%14 5.60%

Given by strangers 8 3.20%8 3.20%

Given by parents 0 0.00%0 0.00%

Others 7 2.80%7 2.80%

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n Buying from friends with the same hobby

Perpus

takaa

n Buying from friends with the same hobby

Buying from the strangers

Perpus

takaa

n

Buying from the strangers

Given by lover

Perpus

takaa

n

Given by lover

Given by office matePerpus

takaa

n

Given by office mate

BNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNN %

BNNN %

44 17.70%

BNN44 17.70%


Table 28 shows the level of easiness in obtaining drugs and types of drugs in eoking place. The categories are very easy, easy, not easy, and doesn’t know. Among workers, marijuana is type of drugs that is easy (5.205) and very easy to be obtaines in working place (5.20%). Other types of drugs with very easy and easy category are shabu, yaba, SS, tastus, ubas with the percentage of 4.00%. The survey also

Table 28

The Ease of Obtaining Drugs in Workplace According to Types of Drugs (N = 248)

Type of Drug

Ease of Getting Drug

Very Easy Easy Not Easy Don’t Very Easy Easy Not Easy Don’t Very Easy Easy Not Easy Don’t Very Easy Easy Not Easy Don’t Very Easy Easy Not Easy Don’t

know

Marijuana 5.20% 5.20% 22.20% 67.30%5.20% 5.20% 22.20% 67.30%5.20% 5.20% 22.20% 67.30%5.20% 5.20% 22.20% 67.30%

Bear tobacco, gorilla tobacco 0.80% 3.60% 19.40% 76.20%Bear tobacco, gorilla tobacco 0.80% 3.60% 19.40% 76.20%Bear tobacco, gorilla tobacco 0.80% 3.60% 19.40% 76.20%Bear tobacco, gorilla tobacco 0.80% 3.60% 19.40% 76.20%Bear tobacco, gorilla tobacco 0.80% 3.60% 19.40% 76.20%Bear tobacco, gorilla tobacco 0.80% 3.60% 19.40% 76.20%

Ecstasy 2.00% 3.60% 21.40% 73.00%2.00% 3.60% 21.40% 73.00%2.00% 3.60% 21.40% 73.00%2.00% 3.60% 21.40% 73.00%2.00% 3.60% 21.40% 73.00%

Methamphetamine 4.00% 4.00% 21.40% 70.60%Methamphetamine 4.00% 4.00% 21.40% 70.60%Methamphetamine 4.00% 4.00% 21.40% 70.60%Methamphetamine 4.00% 4.00% 21.40% 70.60%Methamphetamine 4.00% 4.00% 21.40% 70.60%

Putau (heroin) 2.00% 2.00% 19.40% 76.60%Putau (heroin) 2.00% 2.00% 19.40% 76.60%Putau (heroin) 2.00% 2.00% 19.40% 76.60%Putau (heroin) 2.00% 2.00% 19.40% 76.60%Putau (heroin) 2.00% 2.00% 19.40% 76.60%Putau (heroin) 2.00% 2.00% 19.40% 76.60%

Morphine 1.20% 1.60% 21.80% 75.40%Morphine 1.20% 1.60% 21.80% 75.40%Morphine 1.20% 1.60% 21.80% 75.40%Morphine 1.20% 1.60% 21.80% 75.40%Morphine 1.20% 1.60% 21.80% 75.40%

Cocaine 1.20% 1.60% 21.80% 76.20%Cocaine 1.20% 1.60% 21.80% 76.20%Cocaine 1.20% 1.60% 21.80% 76.20%Cocaine 1.20% 1.60% 21.80% 76.20%Cocaine 1.20% 1.60% 21.80% 76.20%

Others 0.40% - 69.40% 30.20%Others 0.40% - 69.40% 30.20%Others 0.40% - 69.40% 30.20%Others 0.40% - 69.40% 30.20%Others 0.40% - 69.40% 30.20%Others 0.40% - 69.40% 30.20%

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n Bear tobacco, gorilla tobacco 0.80% 3.60% 19.40% 76.20%

Perpus

takaa

n Bear tobacco, gorilla tobacco 0.80% 3.60% 19.40% 76.20%

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n 2.00% 3.60% 21.40% 73.00%

Perpus

takaa

n 2.00% 3.60% 21.40% 73.00%2.00% 3.60% 21.40% 73.00%

Perpus

takaa

n 2.00% 3.60% 21.40% 73.00%

Methamphetamine 4.00% 4.00% 21.40% 70.60%

Perpus

takaa

n Methamphetamine 4.00% 4.00% 21.40% 70.60%Methamphetamine 4.00% 4.00% 21.40% 70.60%

Perpus

takaa

n Methamphetamine 4.00% 4.00% 21.40% 70.60%

Putau (heroin) 2.00% 2.00% 19.40% 76.60%

Perpus

takaa

n Putau (heroin) 2.00% 2.00% 19.40% 76.60%Putau (heroin) 2.00% 2.00% 19.40% 76.60%

Perpus

takaa

n Putau (heroin) 2.00% 2.00% 19.40% 76.60%

Morphine 1.20% 1.60% 21.80% 75.40%

Perpus

takaa

n

Morphine 1.20% 1.60% 21.80% 75.40%Morphine 1.20% 1.60% 21.80% 75.40%

Perpus

takaa

n

Morphine 1.20% 1.60% 21.80% 75.40%

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Cocaine 1.20% 1.60% 21.80% 76.20%

Perpus

takaa

n

Cocaine 1.20% 1.60% 21.80% 76.20%Cocaine 1.20% 1.60% 21.80% 76.20%

Perpus

takaa

n

Cocaine 1.20% 1.60% 21.80% 76.20%

Others 0.40% - 69.40% 30.20%

Perpus

takaa

n

Others 0.40% - 69.40% 30.20%Others 0.40% - 69.40% 30.20%

Perpus

takaa

n

Others 0.40% - 69.40% 30.20%

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n BNN

BNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNN

Ease of Getting Drug

BNNEase of Getting Drug

Very Easy Easy Not Easy Don’t

BNNVery Easy Easy Not Easy Don’t

5.20% 5.20% 22.20% 67.30%BNN5.20% 5.20% 22.20% 67.30%5.20% 5.20% 22.20% 67.30%BNN5.20% 5.20% 22.20% 67.30%

Bear tobacco, gorilla tobacco 0.80% 3.60% 19.40% 76.20%BNNBear tobacco, gorilla tobacco 0.80% 3.60% 19.40% 76.20%Bear tobacco, gorilla tobacco 0.80% 3.60% 19.40% 76.20%BNNBear tobacco, gorilla tobacco 0.80% 3.60% 19.40% 76.20%

61

FAMILY VULNERABILITYIN FACING THE DANGEROF DRUG ABUSE

IV

Perpus

takaa

n FAMILY VULNERABILITY

Perpus

takaa

n FAMILY VULNERABILITYIN FACING THE DANGER

Perpus

takaa

n IN FACING THE DANGER

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n OF DRUG ABUSE

Perpus

takaa

n OF DRUG ABUSE

BNNFAMILY VULNERABILITYBNNFAMILY VULNERABILITY

62

Perpus

takaa

n BNN


FAMILY VULNERABILITY IN FACING THE DANGER OF DRUG ABUSE

4.1.1. Characteristic of Household Demography

Household in this research is a group of people living in the same house and consuming the food from the same kitchen. In other word, household is a residential unit with the orientation on duties to carry out economy-production, consumption and distribution function to meet the daily need. But the most important thing is the social unit with the interaction between one household and anothers (Fox, 1982)..10

The number of research sample in drug abuse prevention is 5,200 housheolds spread in 13 capitals of provinces in Indonesia. A number of 400 households in each province (capital of the province) is taken

questions in the quiestionaire. The target of household respondents reaches 100 percent.

Around 46.92% respondents are son/daughter and son/daughter-in-law. The proportion of son/daughter and son/daughter-in-law living in the same house shows the characteristic of respondent household with little children and children in school age who are still under the

10 Fox, R, .1982 Kinship and Marriage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

IV

Perpus

takaa

n 4.1.1. Characteristic of Household Demography

Perpus

takaa

n 4.1.1. Characteristic of Household Demography

Household in this research is a group of people living in the same

Perpus

takaa

n Household in this research is a group of people living in the same

house and consuming the food from the same kitchen. In other word,

Perpus

takaa

n house and consuming the food from the same kitchen. In other word, household is a residential unit with the orientation on duties to carry out

Perpus

takaa

n household is a residential unit with the orientation on duties to carry out economy-production, consumption and distribution function to meet

Perpus

takaa

n

economy-production, consumption and distribution function to meet the daily need. But the most important thing is the social unit with the

Perpus

takaa

n

the daily need. But the most important thing is the social unit with the interaction between one household and anothers (Fox, 1982)..

Perpus

takaa

n

interaction between one household and anothers (Fox, 1982)..

The number of research sample in drug abuse prevention is 5,200 Perpus

takaa

n

The number of research sample in drug abuse prevention is 5,200 housheolds spread in 13 capitals of provinces in Indonesia. A number Perp

ustak

aan

housheolds spread in 13 capitals of provinces in Indonesia. A number

BNN4.1.1. Characteristic of Household Demography BNN4.1.1. Characteristic of Household Demography


parents’ supervision. Meanwhile, son/daughter-in-law living in the same house does not mean that they are not independent. It is more on the reason that they are there to takecare elderly parents. Thus, they are not leaving the house.

Another biggest proportion is more household in research location

household is represented only husband or wife. This data strengthen the previous hypothesis that many son/daughter and son/daughter-in-law are not allowed to leave the house to takecare the parents.

4.1.2 Gender of Household Members

Reviewed from the composition of the household members’ gender in 13 research locations, the number of male is bigger than female (50.1% compared to 49.9%) (see Graphic 10). This data shows that the sex ratio of household members is similar to sex ratio of Indonesian population in total. It means that the number of male and female population is balanced. It can be summarized that their participation is economic development is the same.

Graphic 9. Number of Household Members

50,00

45,00

40,00

35,00

30,00

25,00

20,00

15,00

10,00

5,00

0,00

Head of House

hold

Wife/H

usband

Grandchild

ren

Parents/parents-

in-law

Relatives

Others

24,59 21,78

46,92

1,50 2,19 0,29

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

son/d

aughter/son-in

-law/

Perpus

takaa

n

son/d

aughter/son-in

-law/

son/d

aughter/son-in

-law/

Perpus

takaa

n

son/d

aughter/son-in

-law/

daughter-in-la

w

Perpus

takaa

n

daughter-in-la

w

Perpus

takaa

n

Grandchild

ren

Perpus

takaa

n

Grandchild

ren

Perpus

takaa

n 2,73

Perpus

takaa

n 2,73

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n BNN

BNN


4.1.3. Composition of Household Members According to Age

The distribution of household member respondents according to age shows that most respondents are young. The group of young respondents is in productive age ranging from 15 to 19 years old and 20 to 24 years old with the percentage of 10 percent each (Graphic 11). Conversely, the proportion of household members in older age is declining. This graphic also shows that the pyramid of household members is big in the middle and smaller in the upper and lower part.

The number of household members wih young age is almost the same with the composition of Indonesian population according to age. Based on composition of age of household member respondents, it can be concluded that the ratio of deopendency is low. Thus, it is assumed that the economic potential in a region is the high number of productive age. The high number of productive age can be utilized optimally as an asset in resources development.

On the other hand, many of them are household member respondents in school age. Usually, this group of age is evry vulnerable to drug abuse. In fact, older population is also involved in drug abuse. It is proved that drug offenders are mostly over 50 years old.11

Graphic 10. Gender of Household Members

Male Female

50,149,9

11 Interview with Head of LAPAS Class IIA. Banda Aceh

Perpus

takaa

n respondents is in productive age ranging from 15 to 19 years old and

Perpus

takaa

n respondents is in productive age ranging from 15 to 19 years old and 20 to 24 years old with the percentage of 10 percent each

Perpus

takaa

n 20 to 24 years old with the percentage of 10 percent each Conversely, the proportion of household members in older age

Perpus

takaa

n Conversely, the proportion of household members in older age

is declining. This graphic also shows that the pyramid of household

Perpus

takaa

n is declining. This graphic also shows that the pyramid of household members is big in the middle and smaller in the upper and lower part.

Perpus

takaa

n members is big in the middle and smaller in the upper and lower part.

The number of household members wih young age is almost the

Perpus

takaa

n

The number of household members wih young age is almost the same with the composition of Indonesian population according to age.

Perpus

takaa

n

same with the composition of Indonesian population according to age. Based on composition of age of household member respondents, it can

Perpus

takaa

n

Based on composition of age of household member respondents, it can be concluded that the ratio of deopendency is low. Thus, it is assumed Perp

ustak

aan

be concluded that the ratio of deopendency is low. Thus, it is assumed that the economic potential in a region is the high number of productive Perp

ustak

aan

that the economic potential in a region is the high number of productive

BNN4.1.3. Composition of Household Members According to Age

BNN4.1.3. Composition of Household Members According to Age

The distribution of household member respondents according

BNNThe distribution of household member respondents according to age shows that most respondents are young. The group of young BNNto age shows that most respondents are young. The group of young respondents is in productive age ranging from 15 to 19 years old and BNNrespondents is in productive age ranging from 15 to 19 years old and


4.1.4. Marital Status of Household Members

Married respondents show the biggest proportion with 64.905. It is well understood since the research is conducted in household. Meanwhile, the proportion of not married respondents is 28.32%.

MaleFemale

Graphic 12. Marital Status of Household Members

28,32

64,9070,00

60,00

50,00

40,00

30,00

20,00

10,00

0,00

Not Married Married Widow/Widower

6,78

Graphic 11. Household Members by Gender

-15,00 -10,00 -5,00 0,00 5,00 10,00 15,00

60 years old+

60-64 years old

55-59 years old 55-59 years old 55-59 y












Perpus

takaa

n Married respondents show the biggest proportion with 64.905.

Perpus

takaa

n Married respondents show the biggest proportion with 64.905. It is well understood since the research is conducted in household.

Perpus

takaa

n It is well understood since the research is conducted in household. Meanwhile, the proportion of not married respondents is 28.32%.

Perpus

takaa

n Meanwhile, the proportion of not married respondents is 28.32%.

Graphic 12. Marital Status of Household Members

Perpus

takaa

n Graphic 12. Marital Status of Household Members

Perpus

takaa

n BNN

Married respondents show the biggest proportion with 64.905. BNNMarried respondents show the biggest proportion with 64.905. BNN


4.1.5. Residence Status of Household Members

The highest distribution of household members’ residence status is living in their own residence (61/6%). This data indirectly shows the socio-economy level of the household members. Meanwhile, household member respondents who reside in leased residence is 19.1%. Those who reside in parents/parents-in-law’s house is 14.5%. Only few reside in

13).

4.2. Social Condition

4.2.1. Education

PBoth formal and non formal education is one of the means in improving the quality of human resources in a region, especially in supporting the development. According to the level of education, the distribution of household respondents is dominated by Senior High School graduates with 39.77% followed by Elementary School graduates with 22.14%, Junior High School graduates with 17.21% and University graduates with 15.18% (Graphic 14). It can be concluded that

half of respondents are Senior High School or University graduates.

Graphic 13. Residence Status

70,00

60,00

50,00

40,00

30,00

20,00

10,00

0,00

own residence

official residence

lease

parents-in-law/parents residence

relatives residence

others

61,6

19,1

14,5

1,1 2,4

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n


Perpus

takaa

n


4.2.1. EducationPerpus

takaa

n

4.2.1. Education

1,3

Perpus

takaa

n 1,3

Perpus

takaa

n 2,4

Perpus

takaa

n 2,4

Perpus

takaa

n BNN

BNNown residence

BNNown residence

BNNofficial residence

BNNofficial residence


4.2.2. Social Status of the Head of Household

the toughness of a household. Head of household, both a father or a mother, is a captain to guide and shape the character of household members which is different one to another. Related to drugs abuse, head of household has an important role in taking care each member of the household from the use of illicit goods.

The result of research on drug abuse in 13 capitals of the provinces shows that a father or a mother as the head of household is in majority having the status of ordinary people. The slight difference is that a

a mother as a head of household (10.1% compared to 5.96%) (Graphic 15).

Graphic 14. Level of Education of Household Members

5,715,715,715,715,715,71

15,1815,1815,1815,1815,1815,1815,1815,18

39,7739,7739,7739,7739,7739,7739,7739,7739,7739,77

17,2117,2117,2117,2117,2117,2117,21

22,1422,1422,1422,1422,1422,1422,1422,1422,14

45,0045,0045,0045,0045,0045,0045,0045,0045,0045,0045,0045,0045,00

40,0040,0040,0040,0040,0040,0040,0040,0040,0040,0040,0040,0040,0040,0040,00

35,0035,0035,0035,0035,0035,0035,0035,0035,0035,00

30,0030,0030,0030,0030,0030,0030,0030,0030,0030,0030,00

25,0025,0025,0025,0025,0025,0025,0025,0025,0025,00

20,0020,0020,0020,0020,0020,0020,0020,0020,00

15,0015,0015,0015,0015,0015,0015,0015,0015,00

10,0010,0010,0010,0010,0010,0010,0010,0010,0010,0010,0010,00

5,00 5,00 5,00 5,00 5,00 5,00 5,00

0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00

Not yet in schoolNot yet in schoolNot yet in schoolNot yet in schoolNot yet in schoolNot yet in schoolNot yet in schoolNot yet in schoolNot yet in schoolNot yet in schoolNot yet in schoolNot yet in schoolNot yet in schoolNot yet in schoolNot yet in schoolNot yet in schoolNot yet in schoolNot yet in school UniversityUniversityUniversityUniversityUniversityUniversityUniversityUniversityUniversityUniversityUniversityUniversityUniversityUniversityUniversity

Elementary SchoolElementary SchoolElementary SchoolElementary SchoolElementary SchoolElementary SchoolElementary SchoolElementary SchoolElementary SchoolElementary SchoolElementary SchoolElementary SchoolElementary SchoolElementary SchoolElementary SchoolElementary SchoolElementary SchoolElementary SchoolElementary SchoolElementary SchoolElementary School

Junior High SchoolJunior High SchoolJunior High SchoolJunior High SchoolJunior High SchoolJunior High SchoolJunior High SchoolJunior High SchoolJunior High SchoolJunior High SchoolJunior High SchoolJunior High SchoolJunior High SchoolJunior High SchoolJunior High SchoolJunior High SchoolJunior High SchoolJunior High SchoolJunior High SchoolJunior High SchoolJunior High School

Senior High SchoolSenior High SchoolSenior High SchoolSenior High SchoolSenior High SchoolSenior High SchoolSenior High SchoolSenior High SchoolSenior High SchoolSenior High SchoolSenior High SchoolSenior High SchoolSenior High SchoolSenior High SchoolSenior High SchoolSenior High SchoolSenior High SchoolSenior High SchoolSenior High SchoolSenior High SchoolSenior High SchoolSenior High School

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n the toughness of a household. Head of household, both a father or a

Perpus

takaa

n the toughness of a household. Head of household, both a father or a mother, is a captain to guide and shape the character of household

Perpus

takaa

n mother, is a captain to guide and shape the character of household members which is different one to another. Related to drugs abuse,

Perpus

takaa

n members which is different one to another. Related to drugs abuse, head of household has an important role in taking care each member of

Perpus

takaa

n

head of household has an important role in taking care each member of the household from the use of illicit goods.

Perpus

takaa

n

the household from the use of illicit goods.

The result of research on drug abuse in 13 capitals of the provinces

Perpus

takaa

n

The result of research on drug abuse in 13 capitals of the provinces shows that a father or a mother as the head of household is in majority Perp

ustak

aan

shows that a father or a mother as the head of household is in majority having the status of ordinary people. The slight difference is that a Perp

ustak

aan

having the status of ordinary people. The slight difference is that a

BNN4.2.2. Social Status of the Head of Household BNN4.2.2. Social Status of the Head of Household BNN

BNNBNNBNN


4.2.3. Economic Condition of Household According to Occupation

The distribution of household member respondents’ activity in the last one month shows biggest portion in respondents with occupation (46.56%). Most of the working respondents are male. This phenomenon usually occurs in the society since male is taking the responsibility in a household. Meanwhile, the unemployed household members or those who are applying for jobs is 11.10% (Graphic 16).

Graphic 15. Social Status of Head of Household

100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%

80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%

60%60%60%60%60%60%60%60%60%60%60%60%

40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%

20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%

0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%FatherFatherFatherFatherFatherFatherFatherFatherFatherFatherFather MotherMotherMotherMotherMotherMotherMotherMotherMotherMotherMother

Public FigurePublic FigurePublic FigurePublic FigurePublic FigurePublic FigurePublic FigurePublic FigurePublic FigurePublic FigurePublic FigurePublic FigurePublic FigurePublic FigurePublic FigurePublic FigurePublic FigurePublic Figure Ordinary People Ordinary People Ordinary People Ordinary People Ordinary People Ordinary People Ordinary People Ordinary People Ordinary People Ordinary People Ordinary People Ordinary People Ordinary People Ordinary People Ordinary People Ordinary People Ordinary People Ordinary People Ordinary People Ordinary People Ordinary People Ordinary People Ordinary People

10,10 5,96

89,90 94,04

Graphic 16. Household Members’ Main Activity in the Past Monthothers, mention it: 2,12%

Taking care of household

17,50%

working ; 46,56%

Studying at school 22,75%

unemployed; 11,07%

Perpus

takaa

n The distribution of household member respondents’ activity in the

Perpus

takaa

n The distribution of household member respondents’ activity in the last one month shows biggest portion in respondents with occupation

Perpus

takaa

n last one month shows biggest portion in respondents with occupation (46.56%). Most of the working respondents are male. This phenomenon

Perpus

takaa

n (46.56%). Most of the working respondents are male. This phenomenon usually occurs in the society since male is taking the responsibility in a

Perpus

takaa

n usually occurs in the society since male is taking the responsibility in a household. Meanwhile, the unemployed household members or those

Perpus

takaa

n household. Meanwhile, the unemployed household members or those who are applying for jobs is 11.10%

Perpus

takaa

n

who are applying for jobs is 11.10%

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Graphic 16. Household Members’ Main Activity in the Past Month

Perpus

takaa

n

Graphic 16. Household Members’ Main Activity in the Past Month

Perpus

takaa

n

Taking care of household Perpus

takaa

n

Taking care of household

17,50%Perpus

takaa

n

17,50%

BNNBNN4.2.3. Economic Condition of Household According to Occupation

BNN4.2.3. Economic Condition of Household According to Occupation

The distribution of household member respondents’ activity in the BNNThe distribution of household member respondents’ activity in the


4.2.4. Household’s Average Income and Spending

Income and spending are two economic indicators which become the measurement to describe society’s welfare in a region. The higher amount of income and spending in a society becomes a proxy that the people’s welfare of the area is improving. The improving economic condition in a region refers to the development of Gross Regional Domestic Product (GRDP).

each supporting sector. GRDP of a region is derived from three sectors namely primary, secondary, and tertiary sector. The primary sector is a sector of which the main activity related to direct natural resources management such as agriculture, mining and quarrying. Secondary sector is the sector which further manages primary sector, such as gas processing industry, water and building. Tertiary sector is the supporting production sector such as tarde, services, hotel, telecommunication, and transportation.

According to household’s average income and spending in 13 capitals of the provinces, it can be described that the income is two times higher then the spending (Rp. 4.46 million compared to Rp 2.75 million) (Table 29). This data indirectly shows that most respondents have very good level of welfare. It means that the average of household respondents have the residual income due to less spending.

Table 29. Household Income and Spending

Data Income SpendingIncome Spending

Mean 4,462,676 2,758,7714,462,676 2,758,771

Median 3,500,000 2,350,0003,500,000 2,350,000

Mode 3,000,000 2,000,0003,000,000 2,000,000

Standard Deviation 3,359,972 1,868,223Standard Deviation 3,359,972 1,868,223Standard Deviation 3,359,972 1,868,223

Minimum 100,000 80,00

Maximum 42,000,000 20,000,00042,000,000 20,000,000

Perpus

takaa

n processing industry, water and building. Tertiary sector is the supporting

Perpus

takaa

n processing industry, water and building. Tertiary sector is the supporting production sector such as tarde, services, hotel, telecommunication,

Perpus

takaa

n production sector such as tarde, services, hotel, telecommunication,

According to household’s average income and spending in 13

Perpus

takaa

n According to household’s average income and spending in 13

capitals of the provinces, it can be described that the income is two

Perpus

takaa

n

capitals of the provinces, it can be described that the income is two times higher then the spending (Rp. 4.46 million compared to Rp 2.75

Perpus

takaa

n

times higher then the spending (Rp. 4.46 million compared to Rp 2.75 This data indirectly shows that most respondents

Perpus

takaa

n

This data indirectly shows that most respondents have very good level of welfare. It means that the average of household

Perpus

takaa

n

have very good level of welfare. It means that the average of household respondents have the residual income due to less spending.

Perpus

takaa

n

respondents have the residual income due to less spending.

Table 29. Household Income and Spending Perpus

takaa

n

Table 29. Household Income and Spending

BNNa sector of which the main activity related to direct natural resources

BNNa sector of which the main activity related to direct natural resources management such as agriculture, mining and quarrying. Secondary

BNNmanagement such as agriculture, mining and quarrying. Secondary sector is the sector which further manages primary sector, such as gas BNNsector is the sector which further manages primary sector, such as gas processing industry, water and building. Tertiary sector is the supporting BNNprocessing industry, water and building. Tertiary sector is the supporting


4.3. Sensitivity of Household toward the Danger of Drugs

4.3.1. Environment Exposure from the Danger of Drugs

Almost all residential environments are involved in drugs, both as dealer, user, dealings with the police, or deceased victim due to drugs. Despite that the percentage of each category is below 15%, the data shows that the level of exposure of the environment toward the danger of drugs is quite high. It can be seen from the result of research in 13 capitals of the provinces that the level of exposure of drug users in residential environment is quite high of 14.0 (Table 30).

Despite of its small proportion, there are inhabitants died due to drugs exposure (4.8%). Anticipation should be taken immediately upon this warning to early prevent illicit drugs in residential environment and its inhabitants.

Table 30Environment Exposure from the Danger of Drugs

4.3.2. Knowledge on the Impact of Drugs Use

In general, there are three impacts when someone uses drugs namely health, social, and economic impact. The three impacts are correlated one and another. If someone’s health is worsening due to

More than three fourth of respondents say that drug abuse gives impact on health such as stress (84.06%), hallucination (84.375), dependency (84.48%), and concentration disruption in studying (81.96%).

Description Many Few NoneMany Few NoneMany Few NoneMany Few NoneDon’t know

People dealing drug in your environment 11.2 13.6 44.7 30.5People dealing drug in your environment 11.2 13.6 44.7 30.5People dealing drug in your environment 11.2 13.6 44.7 30.5People dealing drug in your environment 11.2 13.6 44.7 30.5People dealing drug in your environment 11.2 13.6 44.7 30.5People dealing drug in your environment 11.2 13.6 44.7 30.5

People using drug in your neighbourhood 14.0 17.5 40.8 27.7People using drug in your neighbourhood 14.0 17.5 40.8 27.7People using drug in your neighbourhood 14.0 17.5 40.8 27.7People using drug in your neighbourhood 14.0 17.5 40.8 27.7People using drug in your neighbourhood 14.0 17.5 40.8 27.7People using drug in your neighbourhood 14.0 17.5 40.8 27.7People using drug in your neighbourhood 14.0 17.5 40.8 27.7

People arrested by the police as they deal drug 9.7 14.7 47.1 28.6People arrested by the police as they deal drug 9.7 14.7 47.1 28.6People arrested by the police as they deal drug 9.7 14.7 47.1 28.6People arrested by the police as they deal drug 9.7 14.7 47.1 28.6People arrested by the police as they deal drug 9.7 14.7 47.1 28.6People arrested by the police as they deal drug 9.7 14.7 47.1 28.6

People arrested by the police as they use drug 10.5 16.7 45.8 26.910.5 16.7 45.8 26.910.5 16.7 45.8 26.910.5 16.7 45.8 26.910.5 16.7 45.8 26.9

People died as they use drug 4.8 7.1 61.1 27.04.8 7.1 61.1 27.04.8 7.1 61.1 27.04.8 7.1 61.1 27.0Perpus

takaa

n Table 30

Perpus

takaa

n Table 30Environment Exposure from the Danger of Drugs

Perpus

takaa

n Environment Exposure from the Danger of Drugs

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n Many Few None

Perpus

takaa

n Many Few None

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

People dealing drug in your environment 11.2 13.6 44.7 30.5

Perpus

takaa

n

People dealing drug in your environment 11.2 13.6 44.7 30.5

People using drug in your neighbourhood 14.0 17.5 40.8 27.7

Perpus

takaa

n

People using drug in your neighbourhood 14.0 17.5 40.8 27.7

People arrested by the police as they deal drug 9.7 14.7 47.1 28.6

Perpus

takaa

n

People arrested by the police as they deal drug 9.7 14.7 47.1 28.6

People arrested by the police as they use drug

Perpus

takaa

n

People arrested by the police as they use drug

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

People died as they use drugPerpus

takaa

n

People died as they use drug

BNNDespite of its small proportion, there are inhabitants died due to

BNNDespite of its small proportion, there are inhabitants died due to

drugs exposure (4.8%). Anticipation should be taken immediately upon

BNNdrugs exposure (4.8%). Anticipation should be taken immediately upon this warning to early prevent illicit drugs in residential environment and

BNNthis warning to early prevent illicit drugs in residential environment and


The social impact of drugs is varied according to social relation. However, most respondents say that drug users are mostly shunned by others. The research shows that most drug user-respondents in their social relation will be shunned since they interference the relation with neighbours (61.5%), friends (56.25), relatives (39.0%), and society near residence (56.5%) (Table 31).

Description Yes NoYes NoDon’t

know Total

A. Health Impact

Drug abuse potentially causes stress 84.06 2.35 13.60 100.0084.06 2.35 13.60 100.0084.06 2.35 13.60 100.0084.06 2.35 13.60 100.00

Drug abuse can lead to hallucination 84.37 1.85 13.79 100.0084.37 1.85 13.79 100.0084.37 1.85 13.79 100.0084.37 1.85 13.79 100.0084.37 1.85 13.79 100.00

Drug abuse can make nore energetic 49.31 19.37 31.33 100.0049.31 19.37 31.33 100.0049.31 19.37 31.33 100.0049.31 19.37 31.33 100.0049.31 19.37 31.33 100.00

Drug abuse can cause addiction 84.48 2.10 13.42 100,0084.48 2.10 13.42 100,0084.48 2.10 13.42 100,00

Drug abuse can interfere concentration in studying 81.96 2.31 15.73 100.00Drug abuse can interfere concentration in studying 81.96 2.31 15.73 100.00Drug abuse can interfere concentration in studying 81.96 2.31 15.73 100.00Drug abuse can interfere concentration in studying 81.96 2.31 15.73 100.00Drug abuse can interfere concentration in studying 81.96 2.31 15.73 100.00

B. Social Impact

1. Drug use impact to neighbourhood relationship

a.Shunned 61.5 26.7 11.9 100,0061.5 26.7 11.9 100,0061.5 26.7 11.9 100,0061.5 26.7 11.9 100,00

b. Bullied 20.0 57.8 22.2 100.0020.0 57.8 22.2 100.0020.0 57.8 22.2 100.0020.0 57.8 22.2 100.00

c. Hostile 23.8 55.6 20.7 100.0023.8 55.6 20.7 100.0023.8 55.6 20.7 100.0023.8 55.6 20.7 100.00

d. Ostracized 28.1 51.9 19.9 100.0028.1 51.9 19.9 100.0028.1 51.9 19.9 100.0028.1 51.9 19.9 100.00

2. Drug use impact to friendship

a.Shunned 56.2 30.7 13.1 100.0056.2 30.7 13.1 100.0056.2 30.7 13.1 100.0056.2 30.7 13.1 100.00

b. Bullied 20.4 57.7 21.9 100.0020.4 57.7 21.9 100.0020.4 57.7 21.9 100.0020.4 57.7 21.9 100.00

c. Hostile 23.2 55.4 21.4 100.0023.2 55.4 21.4 100.0023.2 55.4 21.4 100.0023.2 55.4 21.4 100.00

d. Ostracized 27.3 52.4 20.3 100.0027.3 52.4 20.3 100.0027.3 52.4 20.3 100.0027.3 52.4 20.3 100.00

3. Drug use impact to family relationship

a.Shunned 39.0 48.6 12.3 100.0039.0 48.6 12.3 100.0039.0 48.6 12.3 100.0039.0 48.6 12.3 100.00

b. Bullied 16.0 64.2 19.7 100.0016.0 64.2 19.7 100.0016.0 64.2 19.7 100.0016.0 64.2 19.7 100.00

c. Hostile 16.8 63.8 19.5 100.0016.8 63.8 19.5 100.0016.8 63.8 19.5 100.0016.8 63.8 19.5 100.00

d. Ostracized 19.8 61.6 18.7 100.0019.8 61.6 18.7 100.0019.8 61.6 18.7 100.0019.8 61.6 18.7 100.00

Table 31Knowledge on the Impact of Drugs Use

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n 49.31 19.37 31.33 100.00

Perpus

takaa

n 49.31 19.37 31.33 100.00

84.48 2.10 13.42 100,00

Perpus

takaa

n 84.48 2.10 13.42 100,0084.48 2.10 13.42 100,00

Perpus

takaa

n 84.48 2.10 13.42 100,00

Drug abuse can interfere concentration in studying 81.96 2.31 15.73 100.00

Perpus

takaa

n Drug abuse can interfere concentration in studying 81.96 2.31 15.73 100.00Drug abuse can interfere concentration in studying 81.96 2.31 15.73 100.00

Perpus

takaa

n Drug abuse can interfere concentration in studying 81.96 2.31 15.73 100.00


Perpus

takaa

n


2. Drug use impact to friendship Perpus

takaa

n

2. Drug use impact to friendship

BNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNN84.06 2.35 13.60 100.00

BNN84.06 2.35 13.60 100.0084.06 2.35 13.60 100.00

BNN84.06 2.35 13.60 100.00

84.37 1.85 13.79 100.00BNN84.37 1.85 13.79 100.0084.37 1.85 13.79 100.00BNN84.37 1.85 13.79 100.00

49.31 19.37 31.33 100.00BNN49.31 19.37 31.33 100.00


4.3.3. Knowledge on Drugs Prone-Place and Occupation

The respondents’ knowledge on drugs prone-place and occupation is varied. However, the most drugs-prone place according to respondents is nightclubs with 94.12%. Other drugs illicit-prone places are hotel apartment, and low cost apartment (72.46%). The next prone-places are boarding house/dormitory (68.12%), billyard place (67.85%), and hangout places (66.56%) (Table 32).

Description Yes NoYes NoDon’t

know Total

4. Drug use effect to social relationship in the neighbourhood

a.Shunned 56.5 30.3 13.2 100.0056.5 30.3 13.2 100.0056.5 30.3 13.2 100.0056.5 30.3 13.2 100.00


c. Hostile 24.3 54.4 21.2 100.0024.3 54.4 21.2 100.0024.3 54.4 21.2 100.0024.3 54.4 21.2 100.00

d. Ostracized 29.6 51.2 19.2 100.0029.6 51.2 19.2 100.0029.6 51.2 19.2 100.0029.6 51.2 19.2 100.00

C. Economic effect

Study continuity 89.5 2.7 7.8 100.0089.5 2.7 7.8 100.0089.5 2.7 7.8 100.0089.5 2.7 7.8 100.00

Difficulty to get job 86.2 3.6 10.3 100.0086.2 3.6 10.3 100.0086.2 3.6 10.3 100.0086.2 3.6 10.3 100.00

Family burden 89.6 2.4 8.0 100.0089.6 2.4 8.0 100.0089.6 2.4 8.0 100.0089.6 2.4 8.0 100.00

Spending the saving 88.3 2.4 9.3 100.0088.3 2.4 9.3 100.0088.3 2.4 9.3 100.0088.3 2.4 9.3 100.00

Wasting family’s properties 89.6 2.3 10.0 100.0089.6 2.3 10.0 100.0089.6 2.3 10.0 100.00

Selling personal asset 87.9 2.2 9.9 100.0087.9 2.2 9.9 100.0087.9 2.2 9.9 100.00

Spending on cost due to law process 85.9 2.7 11.4 100.0085.9 2.7 11.4 100.0085.9 2.7 11.4 100.0085.9 2.7 11.4 100.00

Adding Debt 86.7 2.4 10.9 100.0086.7 2.4 10.9 100.0086.7 2.4 10.9 100.0086.7 2.4 10.9 100.00

Conducting crime (stealing , robbing) 88.8 2.4 8.8 100.0088.8 2.4 8.8 100.0088.8 2.4 8.8 100.0088.8 2.4 8.8 100.00

Being drug courier 84.6 2.8 12.6 100.0084.6 2.8 12.6 100.0084.6 2.8 12.6 100.0084.6 2.8 12.6 100.00

Immoral act 81.3 4.1 14.6 100.0081.3 4.1 14.6 100.0081.3 4.1 14.6 100.0081.3 4.1 14.6 100.00

Lainnya 2,0 3,7 94,3 100,002,0 3,7 94,3 100,002,0 3,7 94,3 100,002,0 3,7 94,3 100,00

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n 85.9 2.7 11.4 100.00

Perpus

takaa

n 85.9 2.7 11.4 100.00

86.7 2.4 10.9 100.00

Perpus

takaa

n 86.7 2.4 10.9 100.00

Perpus

takaa

n

4.3.3. Knowledge on Drugs Prone-Place and OccupationPerpus

takaa

n

4.3.3. Knowledge on Drugs Prone-Place and OccupationPerpus

takaa

n BNN

BNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNN88.3 2.4 9.3 100.00

BNN88.3 2.4 9.3 100.0088.3 2.4 9.3 100.00

BNN88.3 2.4 9.3 100.00

89.6 2.3 10.0 100.00

BNN89.6 2.3 10.0 100.0089.6 2.3 10.0 100.00

BNN89.6 2.3 10.0 100.00

87.9 2.2 9.9 100.00BNN87.9 2.2 9.9 100.0087.9 2.2 9.9 100.00BNN87.9 2.2 9.9 100.00

85.9 2.7 11.4 100.00BNN85.9 2.7 11.4 100.00


4.3.4. View and Attitude on Drugs Abuse

People’s view on drugs abuse is changing through the years. In the past, people thought that the main factor which caused drugs abuse was worse social conditions such as habitation, unemployment, and poverty. It is highly dependent on someone’s knowledge. However, this view is shifting. People said that drugs abuse was caused by family issue. This view occurred since 1960s (Pattison, 1980).12

The research on drugs abuse in 13 capitals of the provinces shows that most household respondents (92.8%) are not agree on drugs abuse (Graphic 17). It means that there is a tendency of respondents to avoid, keep a distance, and hate drugs abuse which is now very booming. It is since most household respondents have the basic knowledge on drugs abuse that it gives a positive impact on forming the respondents’ attitude especially in avoiding and keeping a distance from drugs abuse.

Location Yes No totalYes No totalYes No total

Nightclubs (discotheque, bar, pub,and cafe) 94.12 5.88 100.0094.12 5.88 100.0094.12 5.88 100.00

Salon, spa, massage parlor 50.15 49.85 100.0050.15 49.85 100.0050.15 49.85 100.00

lounge 66.56 33.44 100.0066.56 33.44 100.0066.56 33.44 100.00

Coffee shop, Javanese food stall (angkringan) 41.10 58.90 100.0041.10 58.90 100.0041.10 58.90 100.00

Billiard center 67.85 32.15 100.0067.85 32.15 100.0067.85 32.15 100.00

Internet cafe 49.42 50.58 100.0049.42 50.58 100.0049.42 50.58 100.00

Hotel, apartment, low cost apartment 72.26 27.54 100.0072.26 27.54 100.0072.26 27.54 100.00

restaurant 32.46 67.54 100.0032.46 67.54 100.0032.46 67.54 100.00

Boarding house 68.12 31.88 100.0068.12 31.88 100.0068.12 31.88 100.00

school/campus 48.85 51.15 100.0048.85 51.15 100.00

Work place 39.65 60.35 100.0039.65 60.35 100.0039.65 60.35 100.00

Street alleys 65.54 35.46 100.0065.54 35.46 100.0065.54 35.46 100.00

Others 3.83 96.17 100.003.83 96.17 100.003.83 96.17 100.00

12 Pattison. 1980. “Pandangan Keluarga dan Masyarakat Terhadap Permasalahan Penyalahgunaan dan

Ketergantungan Narkoba”. Medanoline.

Table 32

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n


Perpus

takaa

n


People’s view on drugs abuse is changing through the years. In the

Perpus

takaa

n

People’s view on drugs abuse is changing through the years. In the past, people thought that the main factor which caused drugs abuse

Perpus

takaa

n

past, people thought that the main factor which caused drugs abuse was worse social conditions such as habitation, unemployment, and

Perpus

takaa

n

was worse social conditions such as habitation, unemployment, and poverty. It is highly dependent on someone’s knowledge. However, this Perp

ustak

aan

poverty. It is highly dependent on someone’s knowledge. However, this view is shifting. People said that drugs abuse was caused by family Perp

ustak

aan

view is shifting. People said that drugs abuse was caused by family Perpus

takaa

n BNN

BNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNN32.46 67.54 100.00

BNN32.46 67.54 100.00

68.12 31.88 100.00

BNN68.12 31.88 100.0068.12 31.88 100.00

BNN68.12 31.88 100.00

48.85 51.15 100.00

BNN48.85 51.15 100.0048.85 51.15 100.00

BNN48.85 51.15 100.00

39.65 60.35 100.00BNN39.65 60.35 100.00


4.4. Household Exposure Toward the Danger of Drugs

4.4.1. Risky Behaviour of Household Members

The risky behaviour is negative behaviour which enables someone to be exposed by drugs. Several risky behaviours in this book include smoking, vaping, drinking alcohol, visiting nightclubs, and hanging out.

Graphic 18 below shows that 16.44% of household members have the habit of smoking. Meanwhile, 45.98% of household members don not have the habit of smoking. However, it should be noted that many respondents do not know wthether that their members are smoking or not (37.58%). It shows their ignorance toward the behaviour of their household members.

Graphic 17. Attitude toward Drugs Abuse

2,6%2,6% 4,5%4,5%

92,8%

a. agree b. disagree c. ignorantc. ignorant

Yes No Dont know/no answer

16,44%37,58%37,58%

45,98%45,98%

Graphic 18. Household Members with Smoking HabitGraphic 18. Household Members with Smoking Habit

Perpus

takaa

n 4.4.1. Risky Behaviour of Household Members

Perpus

takaa

n 4.4.1. Risky Behaviour of Household Members

The risky behaviour is negative behaviour which enables someone

Perpus

takaa

n The risky behaviour is negative behaviour which enables someone to be exposed by drugs. Several risky behaviours in this book include

Perpus

takaa

n to be exposed by drugs. Several risky behaviours in this book include smoking, vaping, drinking alcohol, visiting nightclubs, and hanging out.

Perpus

takaa

n smoking, vaping, drinking alcohol, visiting nightclubs, and hanging out.

Graphic 18 below shows that 16.44% of household members have

Perpus

takaa

n

Graphic 18 below shows that 16.44% of household members have the habit of smoking. Meanwhile, 45.98% of household members don

Perpus

takaa

n

the habit of smoking. Meanwhile, 45.98% of household members don not have the habit of smoking. However, it should be noted that many

Perpus

takaa

n

not have the habit of smoking. However, it should be noted that many respondents do not know wthether that their members are smoking

Perpus

takaa

n

respondents do not know wthether that their members are smoking or not (37.58%). It shows their ignorance toward the behaviour of their Perp

ustak

aan

or not (37.58%). It shows their ignorance toward the behaviour of their household members. Perp

ustak

aan

household members.

BNNBNN4.4. Household Exposure Toward the Danger of Drugs

BNN4.4. Household Exposure Toward the Danger of Drugs

4.4.1. Risky Behaviour of Household MembersBNN4.4.1. Risky Behaviour of Household Members


Meanwhile, household members with risky behaviour usually have the habit of vaping (1.98%), drinking alcohol (2.27%), visiting nightclubs (1.00%), and hanging out (3%).

4.4.2. Household Exposure toward the Danger of Drugs Household exposure shows the quantity of household and

household members exposed to drugs use. The research shows that only 92 households of which the members are exposed to drugs. Meanwhile, there are 102 household members that are exposed to drugs.

Types of drugs mostly used by household member respondents are Methampetamine, such as Shabu, Yaba, SS, Tastus and Ubas. The number of household members who consume these drugs is 43.1% from the total 102 users. Another type of drugs consumed by household members is marijuana with 25.5% (Graphic 19). Hence, these two types of drgugs are the most popular among household members.

The drugs-exposed household and risky behaviour (smoking, smoking electric cigarette, drinking alcohol, visiting night entertainment place, and night hanging out) are closely related. The result of Chi square shows that all risky behaviours, except smoking electric cigarette

with 1% of the level of mistake.

Graphic 19. Types of Drugs Consumed by Household Members

marijuana and shabu

others, mention it

Putau, Etep, Pete

Shabu, Yaba, SS, Tastus, Ubas (Methamphetamines)

Ekstasi (inex, XTC, Cece, Happyfive)

Bear or gorilla tobacco

Marijuana (gele, cimeng, marijuana, getok, hand-rolled Marijuana (gele, cimeng, marijuana, getok, hand-rolled

Dextro (Dextromethorpan) which is consumed..

Trihexyphenidyl/ Trihex/ THP/ Pil kuning

Koplo Pills, BK, mboat, mboti, roda

substances that are purposively sniffing (ex: glue..)

headache medicine which is mixed with

2,92,9

3,93,9

1,01,0

43,143,1

6,96,9

25,525,5

2,02,0

5,95,9

2,92,9

2,92,9

2,02,0

1,01,0

0,00,0 10,010,0 20,020,0 30,030,0 40,040,0 50,050,0

Perpus

takaa

n (Graphic 19)

Perpus

takaa

n (Graphic 19). Hence, these two types

Perpus

takaa

n . Hence, these two types of drgugs are the most popular among household members.

Perpus

takaa

n of drgugs are the most popular among household members.

The drugs-exposed household and risky behaviour (smoking,

Perpus

takaa

n The drugs-exposed household and risky behaviour (smoking,

smoking electric cigarette, drinking alcohol, visiting night entertainment

Perpus

takaa

n smoking electric cigarette, drinking alcohol, visiting night entertainment place, and night hanging out) are closely related. The result of Chi square

Perpus

takaa

n

place, and night hanging out) are closely related. The result of Chi square shows that all risky behaviours, except smoking electric cigarette

Perpus

takaa

n

shows that all risky behaviours, except smoking electric cigarette

Perpus

takaa

n


Perpus

takaa

n


Graphic 19. Types of Drugs Consumed by Household MembersPerpus

takaa

n

Graphic 19. Types of Drugs Consumed by Household MembersPerpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n BNN

Types of drugs mostly used by household member respondents

BNNTypes of drugs mostly used by household member respondents

are Methampetamine, such as Shabu, Yaba, SS, Tastus and Ubas. The

BNNare Methampetamine, such as Shabu, Yaba, SS, Tastus and Ubas. The number of household members who consume these drugs is 43.1%

BNNnumber of household members who consume these drugs is 43.1% from the total 102 users. Another type of drugs consumed by household BNNfrom the total 102 users. Another type of drugs consumed by household

. Hence, these two types BNN

. Hence, these two types


Besides being exposed to drugs, several household members are also known for having an issue with the law due to drugs, being rehabilitated, or

number of household members who have been sentenced due to drugs is 19.6% or 1 out of 5. The household members who have been rehabilitated are 35.3% or 1 out of 3. Meanwhile, the household members who have


Each household has a strategy to face drugs’ threat in order to avoid drugs exposure. There are 9 (nine) indicators as the household’s startegies to avoid drugs exposure. They are:1. Involving household members in drug prevention activities2. Spending time together with household members3. Involving household members in religious activities4. Knowing members’ close friends5. Knowing household members’ behavior outside the house6. Prohibiting household members from smoking 7. Prohibiting household members from drinking alcohol8. Prohibiting household members from visiting nightclubs9. Prohibiting household members from hanging out or staying up late

Graphic 20. Household Members Who Have An Issue with Law

Sentenced Due to Drugs120,0

100,0

80,0

60,0

40,0

20,0

0,0having an issue with law

enforcement officersHave been rehabilitated have been sentenced due to drugs

74,5 64,7 80,4

25,5 35,319,6

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n Have been rehabilitated

Perpus

takaa

n Have been rehabilitated

Perpus

takaa

n Yes

Perpus

takaa

n Yes

Perpus

takaa

n No

Perpus

takaa

n No

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n


Perpus

takaa

n


Each household has a strategy to face drugs’ threat in order to avoid

Perpus

takaa

n

Each household has a strategy to face drugs’ threat in order to avoid drugs exposure. There are 9 (nine) indicators as the household’s startegies Perp

ustak

aan

drugs exposure. There are 9 (nine) indicators as the household’s startegies to avoid drugs exposure. They are:Perp

ustak

aan

to avoid drugs exposure. They are:Perpus

takaa

n BNN


Graphic 21 shows the head of household’s knowledge on household members’ close friend and behaviour outside the house. Only 47.92% heads of household know most household members’ close friends. Around 40.46% heads of household know very few of household members’ close friends and 12.25% heads of household know none of household members’ close friends.

Graphic 21. Distribution of Household which Knows the Household Members’ Close Friend

50

45

40

35

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

Knowing Most Knowing few Knowing None

47,2947,29

40,4640,46

12,2512,25

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n Knowing few

Perpus

takaa

n Knowing few

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n BNN

BNNBNNBNNBNN

12,25

BNN12,2512,25

BNN12,25

79

P4GN PROGRAM INTERVENSION(PREVENTION AND ERADICATION OF DRUG ABUSE AND ILLICIT TRAFICKING)

V

Perpus

takaa

n P4GN PROGRAM

Perpus

takaa

n P4GN PROGRAM INTERVENSION

Perpus

takaa

n INTERVENSION

Perpus

takaa

n (PREVENTION AND

Perpus

takaa

n (PREVENTION AND ERADICATION OF DRUG ABUSE

Perpus

takaa

n

ERADICATION OF DRUG ABUSE

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

AND ILLICIT TRAFICKING)

Perpus

takaa

n

AND ILLICIT TRAFICKING)

BNNP4GN PROGRAM BNNP4GN PROGRAM

80

Perpus

takaa

n BNN


P4GN PROGRAM INTERVENSION(PREVENTION AND ERADICATION OF DRUG

ABUSE AND ILLICIT TRAFICKING)

5.1. P4GN Program Implementation

The survey shows that the most appropriate activity to deliver P4GN program according to students as respondents is lecture/counselling. The detail percentage is as follow:

1) Lecture/counseling: 1,857 (35.7%) respondents.2) Interactive discussion/dialogue: 399 (7.70%) respondents.

respondents4) Seminar/workshop: 478 (9,20%) respondents.5) Training as a member of the anti-drug Task Force in the company:

779 (15%) respondents.6) Anti-drug campaign: 660 (12.70%) respondents.7) Joint sports activities: 346 (6.70%) respondents.8) Others: 85 (1.60%) of respondents.

The survey also shows that according to students and university student respondents, the police is the most appropriate institution

school/university, BNNK, Hospital, BNNP, TNI (Indonesian Army), Social

V

Perpus

takaa

n The survey shows that the most appropriate activity to deliver P4GN

Perpus

takaa

n The survey shows that the most appropriate activity to deliver P4GN program according to students as respondents is lecture/

Perpus

takaa

n program according to students as respondents is lecture/counselling. The detail percentage is as follow:

Perpus

takaa

n counselling. The detail percentage is as follow:

1) Lecture/counseling: 1,857 (35.7%) respondents.

Perpus

takaa

n

1) Lecture/counseling: 1,857 (35.7%) respondents.2) Interactive discussion/dialogue: 399 (7.70%) respondents.

Perpus

takaa

n

2) Interactive discussion/dialogue: 399 (7.70%) respondents.

Perpus

takaa

n

respondents

Perpus

takaa

n

respondents

Perpus

takaa

n

4) Seminar/workshop: 478 (9,20%) respondents.

Perpus

takaa

n

4) Seminar/workshop: 478 (9,20%) respondents.5) Training as a member of the anti-drug Task Force in the company: Perp

ustak

aan

5) Training as a member of the anti-drug Task Force in the company: 779 (15%) respondents.Perp

ustak

aan

779 (15%) respondents.

BNN


Graphic 22. P4GN Program Implementing Agency According to Student Respondents

5.2. P4GN Program among Workers

5.2.1. Knowledge on P4GN Program

From the total 5,200 worker respondents surveyed in 13 cities in Indonesia, all of them has seen or heard about drugs prevention promotion. From 93 narcotics user-workers, 86.10% has seen or heard about P4GN. From 4,420 non drugs user-workers, 86.80% has never seen or heard about drugs prevention promotion. The rest answers “do not know”.

Based on the survey, BNN as the institution which gives drugs prevention activity is known by 76.20% respondents. Other institutions which carry out P4GN program beside BNN are the police (69.605),

(38.00%), Indonesian Army (38.705), company (38.605), social services

The Police

BNN

Public Health Office

School/University

BNNKHospital

BNNP

TNI

Social Service Office

MUI, etc

NGO

Regional Service Office

Manpower Office

79%77%

74%71%

63%

63%61%

40%

39%39%

36%

31%

21%

63%

63%61%

79%

0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n


Perpus

takaa

n



Perpus

takaa

n


From the total 5,200 worker respondents surveyed in 13 cities in Perpus

takaa

n

From the total 5,200 worker respondents surveyed in 13 cities in Indonesia, all of them has seen or heard about drugs prevention

Perpus

takaa

n

Indonesia, all of them has seen or heard about drugs prevention

0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

Perpus

takaa

n 0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

BNNBNN


Table 33Implementing Agency of P4GN Program

According to Drug Users and Non-Drug User Workers

Sumber : Survei Penyalahgunaan dan Peredaran Gelap Narkoba, 2018

The most appropriate activity of drugs prevention program according to workers is lecture or counselling (39.90%), anti narcotics campaign (13.20%), interactive discussion or dialog (11.30%), anti

sports activity (8.70%), seminar or workshop (8.00%), and training as a member of the anti-drug Task Force in the company (7.20%).

Institutions conducting

drug preventions

Using drugs Not using drugs TotalUsing drugs Not using drugs TotalUsing drugs Not using drugs TotalUsing drugs Not using drugs Total

N % N % N %N % N % N %N % N % N %N % N % N %N % N % N %N % N % N %N % N % N %

BNN (National Narcotic Board) 83 76.90% 3,878 76.20% 3,961 76.20%BNN (National Narcotic Board) 83 76.90% 3,878 76.20% 3,961 76.20%BNN (National Narcotic Board) 83 76.90% 3,878 76.20% 3,961 76.20%BNN (National Narcotic Board) 83 76.90% 3,878 76.20% 3,961 76.20%BNN (National Narcotic Board) 83 76.90% 3,878 76.20% 3,961 76.20%BNN (National Narcotic Board) 83 76.90% 3,878 76.20% 3,961 76.20%BNN (National Narcotic Board) 83 76.90% 3,878 76.20% 3,961 76.20%BNN (National Narcotic Board) 83 76.90% 3,878 76.20% 3,961 76.20%

BNNP (Provincial-National Narcotic

Board)64 59.30% 3,092 60.70% 3,156 60.70%64 59.30% 3,092 60.70% 3,156 60.70%64 59.30% 3,092 60.70% 3,156 60.70%64 59.30% 3,092 60.70% 3,156 60.70%64 59.30% 3,092 60.70% 3,156 60.70%64 59.30% 3,092 60.70% 3,156 60.70%

BNNK (Municipal-National Narcotic

Board)63 58.30% 3,021 63,60% 3,294 59.30%63 58.30% 3,021 63,60% 3,294 59.30%63 58.30% 3,021 63,60% 3,294 59.30%63 58.30% 3,021 63,60% 3,294 59.30%63 58.30% 3,021 63,60% 3,294 59.30%63 58.30% 3,021 63,60% 3,294 59.30%63 58.30% 3,021 63,60% 3,294 59.30%63 58.30% 3,021 63,60% 3,294 59.30%63 58.30% 3,021 63,60% 3,294 59.30%

Health office 57 52.80% 3,237 63.60% 3,294 63.30%57 52.80% 3,237 63.60% 3,294 63.30%57 52.80% 3,237 63.60% 3,294 63.30%57 52.80% 3,237 63.60% 3,294 63.30%57 52.80% 3,237 63.60% 3,294 63.30%57 52.80% 3,237 63.60% 3,294 63.30%

Indonesian National Police 68 63.00% 3,553 69.80% 3,621 69.60%Indonesian National Police 68 63.00% 3,553 69.80% 3,621 69.60%Indonesian National Police 68 63.00% 3,553 69.80% 3,621 69.60%Indonesian National Police 68 63.00% 3,553 69.80% 3,621 69.60%Indonesian National Police 68 63.00% 3,553 69.80% 3,621 69.60%Indonesian National Police 68 63.00% 3,553 69.80% 3,621 69.60%Indonesian National Police 68 63.00% 3,553 69.80% 3,621 69.60%Indonesian National Police 68 63.00% 3,553 69.80% 3,621 69.60%

Indonesian National Army 45 41.70% 1,965 38.60% 2,010 38.70%Indonesian National Army 45 41.70% 1,965 38.60% 2,010 38.70%Indonesian National Army 45 41.70% 1,965 38.60% 2,010 38.70%Indonesian National Army 45 41.70% 1,965 38.60% 2,010 38.70%Indonesian National Army 45 41.70% 1,965 38.60% 2,010 38.70%Indonesian National Army 45 41.70% 1,965 38.60% 2,010 38.70%Indonesian National Army 45 41.70% 1,965 38.60% 2,010 38.70%

Regional Office of Religion

affairs25 23.10% 1,498 29.40% 1,523 29.30%25 23.10% 1,498 29.40% 1,523 29.30%25 23.10% 1,498 29.40% 1,523 29.30%25 23.10% 1,498 29.40% 1,523 29.30%25 23.10% 1,498 29.40% 1,523 29.30%25 23.10% 1,498 29.40% 1,523 29.30%25 23.10% 1,498 29.40% 1,523 29.30%25 23.10% 1,498 29.40% 1,523 29.30%

Social services Office 40 37.00% 1,929 37.90% 1.969 37.90%40 37.00% 1,929 37.90% 1.969 37.90%40 37.00% 1,929 37.90% 1.969 37.90%40 37.00% 1,929 37.90% 1.969 37.90%40 37.00% 1,929 37.90% 1.969 37.90%

Manpower office 31 28.70% 1,527 30.00% 1,558 30.00%31 28.70% 1,527 30.00% 1,558 30.00%31 28.70% 1,527 30.00% 1,558 30.00%31 28.70% 1,527 30.00% 1,558 30.00%31 28.70% 1,527 30.00% 1,558 30.00%31 28.70% 1,527 30.00% 1,558 30.00%31 28.70% 1,527 30.00% 1,558 30.00%

Non-governmental organization 41 38.00% 1,935 38.00% 1,976 38.00%38.00% 1,935 38.00% 1,976 38.00%38.00% 1,935 38.00% 1,976 38.00%38.00% 1,935 38.00% 1,976 38.00%38.00% 1,935 38.00% 1,976 38.00%

hospital 54 50.00% 2,701 53.00% 2,755 53%50.00% 2,701 53.00% 2,755 53%50.00% 2,701 53.00% 2,755 53%50.00% 2,701 53.00% 2,755 53%50.00% 2,701 53.00% 2,755 53%

Religious organization 33Religious organization 33Religious organization 33 30.60% 1,910 37.50% 1,943 37.40%30.60% 1,910 37.50% 1,943 37.40%30.60% 1,910 37.50% 1,943 37.40%30.60% 1,910 37.50% 1,943 37.40%30.60% 1,910 37.50% 1,943 37.40%

Company 45 41.70% 1,964 38.60% 2,009 38.60%45 41.70% 1,964 38.60% 2,009 38.60%45 41.70% 1,964 38.60% 2,009 38.60%45 41.70% 1,964 38.60% 2,009 38.60%45 41.70% 1,964 38.60% 2,009 38.60%45 41.70% 1,964 38.60% 2,009 38.60%45 41.70% 1,964 38.60% 2,009 38.60%

others 1 3.70% 137 12.30% 138 12.10%1 3.70% 137 12.30% 138 12.10%1 3.70% 137 12.30% 138 12.10%1 3.70% 137 12.30% 138 12.10%1 3.70% 137 12.30% 138 12.10%1 3.70% 137 12.30% 138 12.10%

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n Indonesian National Police 68 63.00% 3,553 69.80% 3,621 69.60%

Perpus

takaa

n Indonesian National Police 68 63.00% 3,553 69.80% 3,621 69.60%Indonesian National Police 68 63.00% 3,553 69.80% 3,621 69.60%

Perpus

takaa

n Indonesian National Police 68 63.00% 3,553 69.80% 3,621 69.60%

Indonesian National Army 45 41.70% 1,965 38.60% 2,010 38.70%

Perpus

takaa

n Indonesian National Army 45 41.70% 1,965 38.60% 2,010 38.70%Indonesian National Army 45 41.70% 1,965 38.60% 2,010 38.70%

Perpus

takaa

n Indonesian National Army 45 41.70% 1,965 38.60% 2,010 38.70%

25 23.10% 1,498 29.40% 1,523 29.30%

Perpus

takaa

n 25 23.10% 1,498 29.40% 1,523 29.30%25 23.10% 1,498 29.40% 1,523 29.30%

Perpus

takaa

n 25 23.10% 1,498 29.40% 1,523 29.30%25 23.10% 1,498 29.40% 1,523 29.30%

Perpus

takaa

n 25 23.10% 1,498 29.40% 1,523 29.30%25 23.10% 1,498 29.40% 1,523 29.30%

Perpus

takaa

n 25 23.10% 1,498 29.40% 1,523 29.30%

40 37.00% 1,929 37.90% 1.969 37.90%

Perpus

takaa

n

40 37.00% 1,929 37.90% 1.969 37.90%40 37.00% 1,929 37.90% 1.969 37.90%

Perpus

takaa

n

40 37.00% 1,929 37.90% 1.969 37.90%

31 28.70% 1,527 30.00% 1,558 30.00%

Perpus

takaa

n

31 28.70% 1,527 30.00% 1,558 30.00%31 28.70% 1,527 30.00% 1,558 30.00%

Perpus

takaa

n

31 28.70% 1,527 30.00% 1,558 30.00%31 28.70% 1,527 30.00% 1,558 30.00%

Perpus

takaa

n

31 28.70% 1,527 30.00% 1,558 30.00%

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Non-governmental organization 41

Perpus

takaa

n

Non-governmental organization 41Non-governmental organization 41

Perpus

takaa

n

Non-governmental organization 41

Religious organization 33Perpus

takaa

n

Religious organization 33

BNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNN63 58.30% 3,021 63,60% 3,294 59.30%

BNN63 58.30% 3,021 63,60% 3,294 59.30%63 58.30% 3,021 63,60% 3,294 59.30%

BNN63 58.30% 3,021 63,60% 3,294 59.30%

57 52.80% 3,237 63.60% 3,294 63.30%BNN57 52.80% 3,237 63.60% 3,294 63.30%57 52.80% 3,237 63.60% 3,294 63.30%BNN57 52.80% 3,237 63.60% 3,294 63.30%

Indonesian National Police 68 63.00% 3,553 69.80% 3,621 69.60%BNNIndonesian National Police 68 63.00% 3,553 69.80% 3,621 69.60%Indonesian National Police 68 63.00% 3,553 69.80% 3,621 69.60%BNNIndonesian National Police 68 63.00% 3,553 69.80% 3,621 69.60%


Table 34 The Most Effective Program for Drugs Prevention According to Workers

The most effective activitiesUsing drugs Not using drugs TotalUsing drugs Not using drugs TotalUsing drugs Not using drugs TotalUsing drugs Not using drugs Total

N % N % N %N % N % N %N % N % N %N % N % N %N % N % N %N % N % N %N % N % N %

Lecture/counseling 45 41.70% 2,031 39.90% 2,076 39.90%45 41.70% 2,031 39.90% 2,076 39.90%45 41.70% 2,031 39.90% 2,076 39.90%45 41.70% 2,031 39.90% 2,076 39.90%45 41.70% 2,031 39.90% 2,076 39.90%45 41.70% 2,031 39.90% 2,076 39.90%

Interactive discussion/dialog 11 10.20% 576 11.30% 587 11.30%Interactive discussion/dialog 11 10.20% 576 11.30% 587 11.30%Interactive discussion/dialog 11 10.20% 576 11.30% 587 11.30%Interactive discussion/dialog 11 10.20% 576 11.30% 587 11.30%Interactive discussion/dialog 11 10.20% 576 11.30% 587 11.30%Interactive discussion/dialog 11 10.20% 576 11.30% 587 11.30%Interactive discussion/dialog 11 10.20% 576 11.30% 587 11.30%Interactive discussion/dialog 11 10.20% 576 11.30% 587 11.30%

anti-drug film/ performance/

concert13 12.00% 529 10.40% 542 10.40%13 12.00% 529 10.40% 542 10.40%13 12.00% 529 10.40% 542 10.40%13 12.00% 529 10.40% 542 10.40%13 12.00% 529 10.40% 542 10.40%13 12.00% 529 10.40% 542 10.40%

Seminar/ workshop 9 8.30% 407 8.00% 416 8.00%9 8.30% 407 8.00% 416 8.00%9 8.30% 407 8.00% 416 8.00%9 8.30% 407 8.00% 416 8.00%9 8.30% 407 8.00% 416 8.00%9 8.30% 407 8.00% 416 8.00%9 8.30% 407 8.00% 416 8.00%

Anti-drug Taskforce training in the

company

Anti-drug campaign 8 7.40% 680 13.40% 688 13.20%8 7.40% 680 13.40% 688 13.20%8 7.40% 680 13.40% 688 13.20%8 7.40% 680 13.40% 688 13.20%8 7.40% 680 13.40% 688 13.20%8 7.40% 680 13.40% 688 13.20%8 7.40% 680 13.40% 688 13.20%8 7.40% 680 13.40% 688 13.20%

Joint Sport activity 11 10.20% 440 8.60% 451 8.70%11 10.20% 440 8.60% 451 8.70%11 10.20% 440 8.60% 451 8.70%11 10.20% 440 8.60% 451 8.70%11 10.20% 440 8.60% 451 8.70%11 10.20% 440 8.60% 451 8.70%11 10.20% 440 8.60% 451 8.70%

others 0 0.00% 56 1.10% 56 1.10%0 0.00% 56 1.10% 56 1.10%0 0.00% 56 1.10% 56 1.10%0 0.00% 56 1.10% 56 1.10%0 0.00% 56 1.10% 56 1.10%0 0.00% 56 1.10% 56 1.10%

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n 11 10.20% 440 8.60% 451 8.70%

Perpus

takaa

n 11 10.20% 440 8.60% 451 8.70%

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n 0 0.00% 56 1.10% 56 1.10%

Perpus

takaa

n 0 0.00% 56 1.10% 56 1.10%0 0.00% 56 1.10% 56 1.10%

Perpus

takaa

n 0 0.00% 56 1.10% 56 1.10%0 0.00% 56 1.10% 56 1.10%

Perpus

takaa

n 0 0.00% 56 1.10% 56 1.10%

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n BNN

BNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNN

8 7.40% 680 13.40% 688 13.20%

BNN8 7.40% 680 13.40% 688 13.20%8 7.40% 680 13.40% 688 13.20%

BNN8 7.40% 680 13.40% 688 13.20%8 7.40% 680 13.40% 688 13.20%

BNN8 7.40% 680 13.40% 688 13.20%

11 10.20% 440 8.60% 451 8.70%BNN11 10.20% 440 8.60% 451 8.70%11 10.20% 440 8.60% 451 8.70%BNN11 10.20% 440 8.60% 451 8.70%

85

CLOSING

VI

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n BNN

86

Perpus

takaa

n BNN


CLOSING

6.1 Summary

1. The survey on student and university student shows that the majority of student and university student respondents knows about the type of natural drugs, synthetic drugs and semi-synthetic drugs, such as marijuana (gele, cimeng, marijuana, getok, linda), shabu, heroin and cocaine. The majority of respondents also knows non drugs-addictive substance especially headache medicine which is consumed excessively and headache medicine which is mixed with soda drink. The prevalence rate of current user-students and university students is 3.2% or equivalent to 2,297,492.

2. The prevalence rate of current user-workers in 13 capitals of provinces is 2.10%. This prevalence rate is slightly declining compared to the prevalence rate in 2017 of 2.90%. Based on gender, drug users are dominated by male. Drug user among workers is not limited to gender since both male and female workers have become drug users.

3. 3. Based on the survey of sources to obtain drugs, marijuana (10.405) and shabu (8.005) should be taken into attention since they are relatively easy and very easy to be obtained in working place. It can be concluded that working place is a place of drugs transaction and drugs abuse.

4. The research shows that only 92 households of which the members are exposed to drugs. The total household members exposed to drugs are 102.

VI

Perpus

takaa

n majority of student and university student respondents knows

Perpus

takaa

n majority of student and university student respondents knows about the type of natural drugs, synthetic drugs and semi-synthetic

Perpus

takaa

n about the type of natural drugs, synthetic drugs and semi-synthetic drugs, such as marijuana (gele, cimeng, marijuana, getok, linda),

Perpus

takaa

n drugs, such as marijuana (gele, cimeng, marijuana, getok, linda), shabu, heroin and cocaine. The majority of respondents also knows

Perpus

takaa

n shabu, heroin and cocaine. The majority of respondents also knows non drugs-addictive substance especially headache medicine

Perpus

takaa

n non drugs-addictive substance especially headache medicine which is consumed excessively and headache medicine which is

Perpus

takaa

n

which is consumed excessively and headache medicine which is mixed with soda drink. The prevalence rate of current user-students

Perpus

takaa

n

mixed with soda drink. The prevalence rate of current user-students and university students is 3.2% or equivalent to 2,297,492.

Perpus

takaa

n

and university students is 3.2% or equivalent to 2,297,492. 2. The prevalence rate of current user-workers in 13 capitals of

Perpus

takaa

n

2. The prevalence rate of current user-workers in 13 capitals of provinces is 2.10%. This prevalence rate is slightly declining Perp

ustak

aan

provinces is 2.10%. This prevalence rate is slightly declining Perpus

takaa

n

compared to the prevalence rate in 2017 of 2.90%. Based on gender, Perpus

takaa

n

compared to the prevalence rate in 2017 of 2.90%. Based on gender, drug users are dominated by male. Drug user among workers is not

Perpus

takaa

n

drug users are dominated by male. Drug user among workers is not

BNN1. The survey on student and university student shows that the BNN1. The survey on student and university student shows that the

majority of student and university student respondents knows BNNmajority of student and university student respondents knows


5. Type of drugsmostly consumed by household member respondents is methamphetamine, such as shabu, tastus and ubas. The number of household members who consume this type of drug is 43.1% from the total 102 members. Another type of drugs consumed by household members is marijuana of 25.5%.

6.2 Recommendation

Several recommendations to prevent drugs among students/university students, workers and households are:1. The need of special supervison on drugs-prone places, such as:

nightclubs massage place (beauty shop and sauna), coffee shop, billyard palce, internet cafe, hotel/apartment/low cost apartment, restaurant, boarding house/dormitory, school/campus, working places, street alleys.

2. Information-sharing or socialization for certain professions that are most likely to abuse drugs, such as song guide, bartender, masseuse, DJ, capster, billyard guide, night shift worker, cruiser.

3. Information-sharing or socialization on the impact of drugs abuse should be encouraged in household.

4. In order to protect household members from drugs abuse, heads of household are suggested to conduct these activities:

Involving household members in drug prevention activitiesSpending time together with household members Knowing members’ close friendsKnowing household members’ behavior outside the houseConsistenly prohibiting household members from smoking Consistenly prohibiting household members from drinking alcoholProhibiting household members from visiting nightclubs, staying up late or hanging out

6.2.1 Prevention

1. Advising boarding house owner and local people to increase the supervision to boarding house occupants by involving community

Perpus

takaa

n are most likely to abuse drugs, such as song guide, bartender,

Perpus

takaa

n are most likely to abuse drugs, such as song guide, bartender, masseuse, DJ, capster, billyard guide, night shift worker, cruiser.

Perpus

takaa

n masseuse, DJ, capster, billyard guide, night shift worker, cruiser.3. Information-sharing or socialization on the impact of drugs abuse

Perpus

takaa

n 3. Information-sharing or socialization on the impact of drugs abuse

should be encouraged in household.

Perpus

takaa

n should be encouraged in household.

4. In order to protect household members from drugs abuse, heads of

Perpus

takaa

n 4. In order to protect household members from drugs abuse, heads of

household are suggested to conduct these activities:

Perpus

takaa

n

household are suggested to conduct these activities:Involving household members in drug prevention activities

Perpus

takaa

n

Involving household members in drug prevention activitiesSpending time together with household members

Perpus

takaa

n

Spending time together with household members Knowing members’ close friends

Perpus

takaa

n

Knowing members’ close friendsKnowing household members’ behavior outside the housePerp

ustak

aan

Knowing household members’ behavior outside the housePerpus

takaa

n

Consistenly prohibiting household members from smoking Perpus

takaa

n

Consistenly prohibiting household members from smoking

BNNbillyard palce, internet cafe, hotel/apartment/low cost apartment,

BNNbillyard palce, internet cafe, hotel/apartment/low cost apartment, restaurant, boarding house/dormitory, school/campus, working

BNNrestaurant, boarding house/dormitory, school/campus, working

2. Information-sharing or socialization for certain professions that BNN2. Information-sharing or socialization for certain professions that

are most likely to abuse drugs, such as song guide, bartender, BNNare most likely to abuse drugs, such as song guide, bartender,


2. Cooperation with school/university in increasing the supervision in hang out places visited oftenly by students or university students.

3. Advising school/university to monitor students or university students indicated as drugs users..

4. Conducting information sharing or socialization to the society that drugs user is not a ‘disgrace’ to the family, but a patient who needs a medication or rehabilitation to recover them from drug addiction

6.2.2 Community Empowerment

1. Increasing raids in boarding houses by involving the community.2. Increasing the empowerment of anti-drugs task force and

community to jointly supervise hang out places in the community environment.

3. Increasing the role of parents and teachers in giving accompaniment to ex-drug addicts to come back to the community and school/university and not to use drugs again (relaps).

6.2.3 Rehabilitation

1. Information sharing or socialization on the existence of rehabilitation center by forming network between BNN – School/University – Rehabilitation Center.

2. The involvement of school or university in Integrated Assesment Team in drugs abuse case by students or university students. The

rehabilitated to save their future. Perpus

takaa

n university and not to use drugs again (relaps).

Perpus

takaa

n university and not to use drugs again (relaps).

1. Information sharing or socialization on the existence of rehabilitation

Perpus

takaa

n 1. Information sharing or socialization on the existence of rehabilitation

center by forming network between BNN – School/University –

Perpus

takaa

n

center by forming network between BNN – School/University – Rehabilitation Center.

Perpus

takaa

n

Rehabilitation Center.2. The involvement of school or university in Integrated Assesment

Perpus

takaa

n

2. The involvement of school or university in Integrated Assesment Team in drugs abuse case by students or university students. The

Perpus

takaa

n

Team in drugs abuse case by students or university students. The

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

rehabilitated to save their future. Perpus

takaa

n

rehabilitated to save their future.

BNNcommunity to jointly supervise hang out places in the community

BNNcommunity to jointly supervise hang out places in the community

3. Increasing the role of parents and teachers in giving accompaniment

BNN3. Increasing the role of parents and teachers in giving accompaniment

BNNto ex-drug addicts to come back to the community and school/BNNto ex-drug addicts to come back to the community and school/university and not to use drugs again (relaps).BNNuniversity and not to use drugs again (relaps).


Perpus

takaa

n BNN

91

LIST OF ABBREVIATION & LIST OF RESEARCHERS

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n BNNLIST OF ABBREVIATION &

BNNLIST OF ABBREVIATION & LIST OF RESEARCHERSBNNLIST OF RESEARCHERS

92

Perpus

takaa

n BNN

93Prevalence Survey 2018 93Prevalence Survey 2018

List of Abbreviation

ARQ : Annual Report Questionnaire is an Annual Development Report on Drugs Abuse

Babinsa : Bintara Pembina Desa Functioning to carry out coaching and having the main

as well Supervision of Defense and Security facilities and infrastructure at villages.

Bhabinkamtib- : Bhayangkara Pembina Keamanan dan Ketertiban mas Masyarakat. In charge of conducting community coaching, early detection and mediation/negotiation to create conducive conditionsin the village

BNN : Badan Narkotika Nasional a non-ministerial government agency in Indonesia

BNNP : Badan Narkotika Nasional Provinsi a vertical agency of the National Narcotics Agency Organization (BNN)

BNNK : Badan Narkotika Nasional Kabupaten/Kota a vertical agency of the National Narcotics Agency Organization (BNN)

CND : Commission on Narcotic Drugs a decision-making body under UNODC

DAINAP : Drug Abuse Information Network for Asia and

reported quarterly and annually

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n BNN : Badan Narkotika Nasional

Perpus

takaa

n BNN : Badan Narkotika Nasional a non-ministerial government agency in Indonesia

Perpus

takaa

n a non-ministerial government agency in Indonesia

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

BNNP : Badan Narkotika Nasional Provinsi

Perpus

takaa

n

BNNP : Badan Narkotika Nasional Provinsi a vertical agency of the National Narcotics Agency

Perpus

takaa

n

a vertical agency of the National Narcotics Agency Organization (BNN)

Perpus

takaa

n

Organization (BNN)

BNNK : Badan Narkotika Nasional Kabupaten/KotaPerpus

takaa

n

BNNK : Badan Narkotika Nasional Kabupaten/Kota a vertical agency of the National Narcotics Agency Perp

ustak

aan

a vertical agency of the National Narcotics Agency

BNNBNN In charge of conducting community coaching, early

BNN In charge of conducting community coaching, early detection and mediation/negotiation to create

BNN detection and mediation/negotiation to create conducive conditionsin the villageBNN conducive conditionsin the village

94 Prevalence Survey 201894 Prevalence Survey 2018

Dinsos : Dinas Sosial Agency that helps the Regent carrying out

Disnaker : Dinas Tenaga Kerja

Kanwil Agama : Kantor Wilayah Kementerian Agama

LAPAS : Lembaga Permasyarakatan A place to conduct coaching of inmates and correctional students in Indonesia

LSM : Lembaga Swadaya Masyarakat Non governmental organization, An organization founded by individuals or a group of people who volunteered to provide services to the public

MUI : Majelis Ulama Indonesia An institution that facilitates Islamic scholars, zuama, and intellectuals in Indonesia to guide, foster and nurture Muslims throughout Indonesia

NPS : New Psychoactive Substances Drug abuse, whether in pure or mixed form, which is not controlled by the 1961 Single Convention on Narcotics Drug or the 1971 Convention on Psychotripic Substances but which poses a public health threat.


Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n A place to conduct coaching of inmates and correctional

Perpus

takaa

n A place to conduct coaching of inmates and correctional

LSM : Lembaga Swadaya Masyarakat

Perpus

takaa

n LSM : Lembaga Swadaya Masyarakat

Non governmental organization, An organization

Perpus

takaa

n Non governmental organization, An organization

founded by individuals or a group of people who

Perpus

takaa

n

founded by individuals or a group of people who volunteered to provide services to the public

Perpus

takaa

n

volunteered to provide services to the public

Perpus

takaa

n

MUI : Majelis Ulama IndonesiaPerpus

takaa

n

MUI : Majelis Ulama Indonesia An institution that facilitates Islamic scholars, zuama, Perp

ustak

aan

An institution that facilitates Islamic scholars, zuama, and intellectuals in Indonesia to guide, foster and

Perpus

takaa

n

and intellectuals in Indonesia to guide, foster and

BNNBNNBNNBNN

A place to conduct coaching of inmates and correctional BNNA place to conduct coaching of inmates and correctional



P4GN : Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan, Penyalahgunaan dan Peredaran Gelap Narkoba (Prevention and

PPK UI : Pusat Penelitian Kesehatan Universitas Indonesia Health Research Center of University of Indonesia

RS : Rumah Sakit (Hospital) A professional health care institution of which the services are provided by doctors, nurses, and other health professionals.

RT : Rumah Tangga (Household) The division of territory in Indonesia under the Neighborhood.

SATGAS Anti Narkoba : Satuan Tugas Anti Narkoba (Anti-drugs Task Force)

SMA : Sekolah Menengah Atas (Senior High School) Is a level of secondary education in Indonesia formal education after graduating from Junior High School (or equivalent)

SMP : Sekolah Menengah Pertama (Junior High School) Is a level of secondary education in Indonesia formal education after graduating from elementary school

TAT : Tim Asesmen Terpadu (Integrated Assesment Team) is an assessment and medical analysis, psychosocial, and therapy and rehabilitation plan recommendation for someone who has been arrested and/or red-handed in

TNI : Tentara Nasional Indonesia Indonesian national army

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n Satuan Tugas Anti Narkoba (Anti-drugs Task Force)

Perpus

takaa

n Satuan Tugas Anti Narkoba (Anti-drugs Task Force)

SMA : Sekolah Menengah Atas (Senior High School)

Perpus

takaa

n SMA : Sekolah Menengah Atas (Senior High School)

Is a level of secondary education in

Perpus

takaa

n

Is a level of secondary education in Indonesia formal education after graduating from

Perpus

takaa

n

Indonesia formal education after graduating from Junior High School (or equivalent)

Perpus

takaa

n

Junior High School (or equivalent)

SMP : Sekolah Menengah Pertama (Junior High School)Perpus

takaa

n

SMP : Sekolah Menengah Pertama (Junior High School) Is a level of secondary education in Indonesia formal Perp

ustak

aan

Is a level of secondary education in Indonesia formal

BNNBNN The division of territory in Indonesia under

BNN The division of territory in Indonesia under


List of Researchers

List of Researchers

1. Drs. Heru Winarko, S.H.2. Drs. Adhi Prawoto, S.H.3. Drs. Agus Irianto, S.H., M.Si., M.H.4. Drs. Endang Mulyani, M.Si5. Siti Nurlela Marliani, SP, S.H, M.Si6. Dwi Sulistyorini, S.Si., M.Si7. Sri Lestari, S.Kom., M.Si8. Sri Haryanti, S.Sos, M.Si9. Novita Sari, S.Sos., M.H.10. Erma Antasari, S.Si11. Ranny Febriani, A.Md12. Quazar Noor Azhim, A.Md13. Suryaman, S.Kom14. Sri Indarsih, S.Kom15. Rizky Purnamasari, S.Psi16. Tri Sugiharto, S.Kom

1. Dr. Sri Sunarti Purwaningsih2. Drs. Masyhuri Imron.,MA3. Prof. Dr. Dwi Purwoko, M.Si 4. Drs. Ary Wahyono, M.Sc5. Dr. Robert Siburian, SE., M.Si6. Dr. Fadjri Alihar7. Drs. Suprihadi8. Dr. M. Alie Humaedi, S.Ag., M.Ag., M.Hum9. Dra. DTP. Kusumawardhani, M.Si 10. Drs Aziz Suganda SH., M.Si11. Drs. Agus Santoso12. Drs. Sudiyono

14. Drs. Ujud Tahajuddin, MBA15. Drs. Bayu Setiawan, MPS.,MA 16. Drs. M. Azzam Manan, MA17. Fanny Henry Tondo, M. Hum 18. Devi Asiati, SE., MS 19. Usman S. , S.Ag.,MA20. Dr. Laely Nurhidayah, SH., LLM21. Lamijo, S.S., M.Phil22. 23. Jane K. Propiana, SKM., M.Kes24. 25. Radot Manalu, S.Sos26. Muhammad Saifullah Rohman, S.S., MA 27. Dede Wardiat, M.Si28. Luis Feneteruma, SH29. Djoko Kristijanto, S.Sos30. Hermadi

Perpus

takaa

n

15. Rizky Purnamasari, S.Psi

Perpus

takaa

n

15. Rizky Purnamasari, S.Psi

9. Dra. DTP. Kusumawardhani, M.Si

Perpus

takaa

n 9. Dra. DTP. Kusumawardhani, M.Si 10. Drs Aziz Suganda SH., M.Si

Perpus

takaa

n 10. Drs Aziz Suganda SH., M.Si11. Drs. Agus Santoso

Perpus

takaa

n 11. Drs. Agus Santoso12. Drs. Sudiyono

Perpus

takaa

n 12. Drs. Sudiyono13.

Perpus

takaa

n 13.

Perpus

takaa

n

14. Drs. Ujud Tahajuddin, MBA

Perpus

takaa

n

14. Drs. Ujud Tahajuddin, MBA15. Drs. Bayu Setiawan, MPS.,MA

Perpus

takaa

n

15. Drs. Bayu Setiawan, MPS.,MA

BNN4. Drs. Ary Wahyono, M.Sc

BNN4. Drs. Ary Wahyono, M.Sc5. Dr. Robert Siburian, SE., M.Si

BNN5. Dr. Robert Siburian, SE., M.Si6. Dr. Fadjri Alihar

BNN6. Dr. Fadjri Alihar7. Drs. Suprihadi

BNN7. Drs. Suprihadi

BNN8. Dr. M. Alie Humaedi, S.Ag., M.Ag., M.HumBNN8. Dr. M. Alie Humaedi, S.Ag., M.Ag., M.Hum9. Dra. DTP. Kusumawardhani, M.Si BNN9. Dra. DTP. Kusumawardhani, M.Si

97

APPENDICES, EPILOGUEBIBLIOGRAPHY

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n BIBLIOGRAPHY

Perpus

takaa

n BIBLIOGRAPHYBNNAPPENDICES, EPILOGUE

BNNAPPENDICES, EPILOGUEBIBLIOGRAPHYBNNBIBLIOGRAPHY

98

Perpus

takaa

n BNN


Appendix 2 Distribution of Students’ Knowledge on Issues Due to Drug Abuse (%)

Drug abuse impact Junior high

school

Senior high

school


Education continuity 63.90 74.50 83.50 75.10Education continuity 63.90 74.50 83.50 75.10Education continuity 63.90 74.50 83.50 75.10Education continuity 63.90 74.50 83.50 75.10Education continuity 63.90 74.50 83.50 75.10Education continuity 63.90 74.50 83.50 75.10

Difficulty to get job 64.80 74.20 82.40 74.8064.80 74.20 82.40 74.8064.80 74.20 82.40 74.8064.80 74.20 82.40 74.8064.80 74.20 82.40 74.80

Family burden 71.70 79.20 85.00 79.40Family burden 71.70 79.20 85.00 79.40Family burden 71.70 79.20 85.00 79.40Family burden 71.70 79.20 85.00 79.40Family burden 71.70 79.20 85.00 79.40

spending the saving 68.50 77.60 85.30 78.10spending the saving 68.50 77.60 85.30 78.10spending the saving 68.50 77.60 85.30 78.10spending the saving 68.50 77.60 85.30 78.10spending the saving 68.50 77.60 85.30 78.10spending the saving 68.50 77.60 85.30 78.10

Wasting family’s properties 67.20 75.60 82.60 76.00Wasting family’s properties 67.20 75.60 82.60 76.00Wasting family’s properties 67.20 75.60 82.60 76.00Wasting family’s properties 67.20 75.60 82.60 76.00Wasting family’s properties 67.20 75.60 82.60 76.00

Selling personal asset 68.20 75.60 83.70 75.70Selling personal asset 68.20 75.60 83.70 75.70Selling personal asset 68.20 75.60 83.70 75.70Selling personal asset 68.20 75.60 83.70 75.70Selling personal asset 68.20 75.60 83.70 75.70Selling personal asset 68.20 75.60 83.70 75.70

spending on cost due to law process 68.20 76.60 84.60 77.4068.20 76.60 84.60 77.4068.20 76.60 84.60 77.4068.20 76.60 84.60 77.40

adding Debt 64.40 74.90 81.80 74.80adding Debt 64.40 74.90 81.80 74.80adding Debt 64.40 74.90 81.80 74.80adding Debt 64.40 74.90 81.80 74.80adding Debt 64.40 74.90 81.80 74.80adding Debt 64.40 74.90 81.80 74.80

conducting crime (stealing , robbing) 68.20 76.90 84.70 77.6068.20 76.90 84.70 77.6068.20 76.90 84.70 77.6068.20 76.90 84.70 77.60

Being drug courier 64.60 74.20 81.20 74.30Being drug courier 64.60 74.20 81.20 74.30Being drug courier 64.60 74.20 81.20 74.30Being drug courier 64.60 74.20 81.20 74.30Being drug courier 64.60 74.20 81.20 74.30Being drug courier 64.60 74.20 81.20 74.30

Immoral act 56.20 68.80 78.20 69.10Immoral act 56.20 68.80 78.20 69.10Immoral act 56.20 68.80 78.20 69.10Immoral act 56.20 68.80 78.20 69.10Immoral act 56.20 68.80 78.20 69.10

Others 4.40 5.60 6.40 5.60Others 4.40 5.60 6.40 5.60Others 4.40 5.60 6.40 5.60Others 4.40 5.60 6.40 5.60Others 4.40 5.60 6.40 5.60Others 4.40 5.60 6.40 5.60

Appendix 1 Distribution of Respondents According to Types of Drugs and Province, 2018 (%)

Province

Potent

medi-

cine

Addic-

tive sub-

stances

Psycho-

tropic

Natural

drug

Synthetic

drug

Semi-

synthetic

drug

Aceh 80.30 76.80 65.00 23.00 66.00 55.50Aceh 80.30 76.80 65.00 23.00 66.00 55.50Aceh 80.30 76.80 65.00 23.00 66.00 55.50Aceh 80.30 76.80 65.00 23.00 66.00 55.50Aceh 80.30 76.80 65.00 23.00 66.00 55.50Aceh 80.30 76.80 65.00 23.00 66.00 55.50Aceh 80.30 76.80 65.00 23.00 66.00 55.50

North Sumatera 80.80 81.80 68.80 29.30 64.00 54.50North Sumatera 80.80 81.80 68.80 29.30 64.00 54.50North Sumatera 80.80 81.80 68.80 29.30 64.00 54.50North Sumatera 80.80 81.80 68.80 29.30 64.00 54.50North Sumatera 80.80 81.80 68.80 29.30 64.00 54.50North Sumatera 80.80 81.80 68.80 29.30 64.00 54.50North Sumatera 80.80 81.80 68.80 29.30 64.00 54.50North Sumatera 80.80 81.80 68.80 29.30 64.00 54.50North Sumatera 80.80 81.80 68.80 29.30 64.00 54.50

South Sumatera 76.50 82.30 61.30 31.80 75.50 59.00South Sumatera 76.50 82.30 61.30 31.80 75.50 59.00South Sumatera 76.50 82.30 61.30 31.80 75.50 59.00South Sumatera 76.50 82.30 61.30 31.80 75.50 59.00South Sumatera 76.50 82.30 61.30 31.80 75.50 59.00South Sumatera 76.50 82.30 61.30 31.80 75.50 59.00South Sumatera 76.50 82.30 61.30 31.80 75.50 59.00

Riau Islands 74.30 76.80 68.50 29.80 62.50 65.80Riau Islands 74.30 76.80 68.50 29.80 62.50 65.80Riau Islands 74.30 76.80 68.50 29.80 62.50 65.80Riau Islands 74.30 76.80 68.50 29.80 62.50 65.80Riau Islands 74.30 76.80 68.50 29.80 62.50 65.80Riau Islands 74.30 76.80 68.50 29.80 62.50 65.80Riau Islands 74.30 76.80 68.50 29.80 62.50 65.80Riau Islands 74.30 76.80 68.50 29.80 62.50 65.80Riau Islands 74.30 76.80 68.50 29.80 62.50 65.80

Jakarta 77.50 77.00 64.80 38.00 63.80 71.30Jakarta 77.50 77.00 64.80 38.00 63.80 71.30Jakarta 77.50 77.00 64.80 38.00 63.80 71.30Jakarta 77.50 77.00 64.80 38.00 63.80 71.30Jakarta 77.50 77.00 64.80 38.00 63.80 71.30Jakarta 77.50 77.00 64.80 38.00 63.80 71.30Jakarta 77.50 77.00 64.80 38.00 63.80 71.30

West Java 81.50 83.50 75.30 31.30 73.80 73.80West Java 81.50 83.50 75.30 31.30 73.80 73.80West Java 81.50 83.50 75.30 31.30 73.80 73.80West Java 81.50 83.50 75.30 31.30 73.80 73.80West Java 81.50 83.50 75.30 31.30 73.80 73.80West Java 81.50 83.50 75.30 31.30 73.80 73.80West Java 81.50 83.50 75.30 31.30 73.80 73.80West Java 81.50 83.50 75.30 31.30 73.80 73.80West Java 81.50 83.50 75.30 31.30 73.80 73.80

East java 78.00 76.80 68.80 68.50 64.00 66.80East java 78.00 76.80 68.80 68.50 64.00 66.80East java 78.00 76.80 68.80 68.50 64.00 66.80East java 78.00 76.80 68.80 68.50 64.00 66.80East java 78.00 76.80 68.80 68.50 64.00 66.80East java 78.00 76.80 68.80 68.50 64.00 66.80East java 78.00 76.80 68.80 68.50 64.00 66.80

DI Yogyakarta 84.80 83.80 77.50 62.00 73.30 74.30DI Yogyakarta 84.80 83.80 77.50 62.00 73.30 74.30DI Yogyakarta 84.80 83.80 77.50 62.00 73.30 74.30DI Yogyakarta 84.80 83.80 77.50 62.00 73.30 74.30DI Yogyakarta 84.80 83.80 77.50 62.00 73.30 74.30DI Yogyakarta 84.80 83.80 77.50 62.00 73.30 74.30DI Yogyakarta 84.80 83.80 77.50 62.00 73.30 74.30DI Yogyakarta 84.80 83.80 77.50 62.00 73.30 74.30DI Yogyakarta 84.80 83.80 77.50 62.00 73.30 74.30

Bali 86.30 88.00 75.50 50.00 49.30 55.30Bali 86.30 88.00 75.50 50.00 49.30 55.30Bali 86.30 88.00 75.50 50.00 49.30 55.30Bali 86.30 88.00 75.50 50.00 49.30 55.30Bali 86.30 88.00 75.50 50.00 49.30 55.30Bali 86.30 88.00 75.50 50.00 49.30 55.30Bali 86.30 88.00 75.50 50.00 49.30 55.30

East Kalimantan 73.30 78.80 59.30 40.30 59.50 63.50East Kalimantan 73.30 78.80 59.30 40.30 59.50 63.50East Kalimantan 73.30 78.80 59.30 40.30 59.50 63.50East Kalimantan 73.30 78.80 59.30 40.30 59.50 63.50East Kalimantan 73.30 78.80 59.30 40.30 59.50 63.50East Kalimantan 73.30 78.80 59.30 40.30 59.50 63.50East Kalimantan 73.30 78.80 59.30 40.30 59.50 63.50East Kalimantan 73.30 78.80 59.30 40.30 59.50 63.50East Kalimantan 73.30 78.80 59.30 40.30 59.50 63.50East Kalimantan 73.30 78.80 59.30 40.30 59.50 63.50

West Kalimantan 72.50 75.50 62.80 29.50 61.00 63.50West Kalimantan 72.50 75.50 62.80 29.50 61.00 63.50West Kalimantan 72.50 75.50 62.80 29.50 61.00 63.50West Kalimantan 72.50 75.50 62.80 29.50 61.00 63.50West Kalimantan 72.50 75.50 62.80 29.50 61.00 63.50West Kalimantan 72.50 75.50 62.80 29.50 61.00 63.50West Kalimantan 72.50 75.50 62.80 29.50 61.00 63.50

South Sulawesi 65.00 64.30 50.50 17.80 58.80 74.30South Sulawesi 65.00 64.30 50.50 17.80 58.80 74.30South Sulawesi 65.00 64.30 50.50 17.80 58.80 74.30South Sulawesi 65.00 64.30 50.50 17.80 58.80 74.30South Sulawesi 65.00 64.30 50.50 17.80 58.80 74.30South Sulawesi 65.00 64.30 50.50 17.80 58.80 74.30South Sulawesi 65.00 64.30 50.50 17.80 58.80 74.30South Sulawesi 65.00 64.30 50.50 17.80 58.80 74.30South Sulawesi 65.00 64.30 50.50 17.80 58.80 74.30

Papua 76.00 68.00 63.50 24.30 68.00 64.30Papua 76.00 68.00 63.50 24.30 68.00 64.30Papua 76.00 68.00 63.50 24.30 68.00 64.30Papua 76.00 68.00 63.50 24.30 68.00 64.30Papua 76.00 68.00 63.50 24.30 68.00 64.30Papua 76.00 68.00 63.50 24.30 68.00 64.30Papua 76.00 68.00 63.50 24.30 68.00 64.30Papua 76.00 68.00 63.50 24.30 68.00 64.30

Appendices

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n East Kalimantan 73.30 78.80 59.30 40.30 59.50 63.50

Perpus

takaa

n East Kalimantan 73.30 78.80 59.30 40.30 59.50 63.50East Kalimantan 73.30 78.80 59.30 40.30 59.50 63.50

Perpus

takaa

n East Kalimantan 73.30 78.80 59.30 40.30 59.50 63.50

West Kalimantan 72.50 75.50 62.80 29.50 61.00 63.50

Perpus

takaa

n West Kalimantan 72.50 75.50 62.80 29.50 61.00 63.50West Kalimantan 72.50 75.50 62.80 29.50 61.00 63.50

Perpus

takaa

n West Kalimantan 72.50 75.50 62.80 29.50 61.00 63.50

South Sulawesi 65.00 64.30 50.50 17.80 58.80 74.30

Perpus

takaa

n South Sulawesi 65.00 64.30 50.50 17.80 58.80 74.30South Sulawesi 65.00 64.30 50.50 17.80 58.80 74.30

Perpus

takaa

n South Sulawesi 65.00 64.30 50.50 17.80 58.80 74.30

Perpus

takaa

n Appendix 2 Distribution of Students’ Knowledge on Issues

Perpus

takaa

n Appendix 2 Distribution of Students’ Knowledge on Issues Due to Drug Abuse (%)

Perpus

takaa

n

Due to Drug Abuse (%)

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n


Perpus

takaa

n

Drug abuse impact Junior high Drug abuse impact Junior high

Perpus

takaa

n


Education continuity 63.90 74.50 83.50 75.10

Perpus

takaa

n

Education continuity 63.90 74.50 83.50 75.10

get jobPerpus

takaa

n

get job

Family burden 71.70 79.20 85.00 79.40Perp

ustak

aan

Family burden 71.70 79.20 85.00 79.40Perp

ustak

aan

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n Papua 76.00 68.00 63.50 24.30 68.00 64.30

Perpus

takaa

n Papua 76.00 68.00 63.50 24.30 68.00 64.30Papua 76.00 68.00 63.50 24.30 68.00 64.30

Perpus

takaa

n Papua 76.00 68.00 63.50 24.30 68.00 64.30

BNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNN

East java 78.00 76.80 68.80 68.50 64.00 66.80

BNNEast java 78.00 76.80 68.80 68.50 64.00 66.80

DI Yogyakarta 84.80 83.80 77.50 62.00 73.30 74.30

BNNDI Yogyakarta 84.80 83.80 77.50 62.00 73.30 74.30DI Yogyakarta 84.80 83.80 77.50 62.00 73.30 74.30

BNNDI Yogyakarta 84.80 83.80 77.50 62.00 73.30 74.30

Bali 86.30 88.00 75.50 50.00 49.30 55.30

BNNBali 86.30 88.00 75.50 50.00 49.30 55.30Bali 86.30 88.00 75.50 50.00 49.30 55.30

BNNBali 86.30 88.00 75.50 50.00 49.30 55.30

East Kalimantan 73.30 78.80 59.30 40.30 59.50 63.50BNNEast Kalimantan 73.30 78.80 59.30 40.30 59.50 63.50


Appendices

APPENDIX 3 Distribution of Perception on the Attitude Toward Drug Abuse According to the Level of Education Among Students and University Students (%)

Responds Junior high

school

Senior high

school


Respond when someone dealing drug in school or campus

Keep silent 5.50 9.00 10.30 8.605.50 9.00 10.30 8.605.50 9.00 10.30 8.605.50 9.00 10.30 8.60

Advising 15.70 25.00 28.70 24.0015.70 25.00 28.70 24.0015.70 25.00 28.70 24.0015.70 25.00 28.70 24.00

Reporting to school or campus staff 41.00 39.20 29.80 36.2041.00 39.20 29.80 36.2041.00 39.20 29.80 36.2041.00 39.20 29.80 36.20

Reporting to the police 36.40 24.60 28.00 28.0036.40 24.60 28.00 28.0036.40 24.60 28.00 28.0036.40 24.60 28.00 28.00

Others 1.40 2.20 3.20 2.401.40 2.20 3.20 2.401.40 2.20 3.20 2.401.40 2.20 3.20 2.40

Reaction when offered to buy drug

Refusing 98.30 98.10 98.50 98.3098.30 98.10 98.50 98.3098.30 98.10 98.50 98.3098.30 98.10 98.50 98.30

Accepting 0.10 0.40 0.40 0.300.10 0.40 0.40 0.300.10 0.40 0.40 0.300.10 0.40 0.40 0.300.10 0.40 0.40 0.30

Being doubtful 1.60 1.60 1.20 4.401.60 1.60 1.20 4.401.60 1.60 1.20 4.401.60 1.60 1.20 4.401.60 1.60 1.20 4.40

Reaction when offered drug for free

Refusing 98.10 97.40 97.60 97.6098.10 97.40 97.60 97.6098.10 97.40 97.60 97.6098.10 97.40 97.60 97.60

Accepting 0.20 1.00 1.10 0.800.20 1.00 1.10 0.800.20 1.00 1.10 0.800.20 1.00 1.10 0.80

Being doubtful 1.70 1.70 1.40 1.601.70 1.70 1.40 1.601.70 1.70 1.40 1.601.70 1.70 1.40 1.60

Reaction when asked to give drug to others

Refusing 97,90 98,00 98,70 98,2097,90 98,00 98,70 98,2097,90 98,00 98,70 98,2097,90 98,00 98,70 98,20

Accepting 0,30 0,30 0,20 0,300,30 0,30 0,20 0,300,30 0,30 0,20 0,300,30 0,30 0,20 0,30

Being doubtful 1,80 1,70 1,20 1,501,80 1,70 1,20 1,501,80 1,70 1,20 1,501,80 1,70 1,20 1,50

Reaction when asked to selling drug to others

Refusing 98,40 98,30 98,80 98,5098,40 98,30 98,80 98,5098,40 98,30 98,80 98,5098,40 98,30 98,80 98,50

Accepting 0,20 0,40 0,20 0,300,20 0,40 0,20 0,300,20 0,40 0,20 0,300,20 0,40 0,20 0,30

Being doubtful 1,40 1,40 1,00 1,201,40 1,40 1,00 1,201,40 1,40 1,00 1,201,40 1,40 1,00 1,20

Reaction when someone using drug in school or campus

Keep silent 5,20 8,20 8,70 7,605,20 8,20 8,70 7,605,20 8,20 8,70 7,605,20 8,20 8,70 7,60

Advising 20,30 32,30 36,90 30,9020,30 32,30 36,90 30,9020,30 32,30 36,90 30,9020,30 32,30 36,90 30,90

Reporting to school or campus staff 16,60 18,40 17,00 17,40Reporting to school or campus staff 16,60 18,40 17,00 17,40Reporting to school or campus staff 16,60 18,40 17,00 17,40Reporting to school or campus staff 16,60 18,40 17,00 17,40Reporting to school or campus staff 16,60 18,40 17,00 17,40

Reporting to the police 55,10 37,70 33,90 40,7055,10 37,70 33,90 40,7055,10 37,70 33,90 40,7055,10 37,70 33,90 40,70

Others 2,90 3,50 3,50 3,302,90 3,50 3,50 3,302,90 3,50 3,50 3,302,90 3,50 3,50 3,30

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n 1.60 1.60 1.20 4.40

Perpus

takaa

n 1.60 1.60 1.20 4.40

98.10 97.40 97.60 97.60

Perpus

takaa

n 98.10 97.40 97.60 97.6098.10 97.40 97.60 97.60

Perpus

takaa

n 98.10 97.40 97.60 97.60

0.20 1.00 1.10 0.80

Perpus

takaa

n 0.20 1.00 1.10 0.800.20 1.00 1.10 0.80

Perpus

takaa

n 0.20 1.00 1.10 0.80

1.70 1.70 1.40 1.60

Perpus

takaa

n

1.70 1.70 1.40 1.60


Perpus

takaa

n


Reaction when asked to selling drug to othersPerp

ustak

aan

Reaction when asked to selling drug to others

BNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNN98.30 98.10 98.50 98.30

BNN98.30 98.10 98.50 98.3098.30 98.10 98.50 98.30

BNN98.30 98.10 98.50 98.30

0.10 0.40 0.40 0.30BNN0.10 0.40 0.40 0.300.10 0.40 0.40 0.30BNN0.10 0.40 0.40 0.30

1.60 1.60 1.20 4.40BNN1.60 1.60 1.20 4.40


APPENDIX 4 Respondents’ Knowledge on Social Impact From Drug Abuse (%)

Appendices

Social Impact Yes No TotalYes No TotalYes No TotalYes No Total

Friendship

a. Shunned 53.0% 12.0% 35.0%53.0% 12.0% 35.0%53.0% 12.0% 35.0%53.0% 12.0% 35.0%

b. Bullied 31.3% 25.0% 43.7%31.3% 25.0% 43.7%31.3% 25.0% 43.7%

c. Hostile 32.8% 24.8% 42.4%32.8% 24.8% 42.4%32.8% 24.8% 42.4%32.8% 24.8% 42.4%

d. Ostracized 38.8% 20.9% 40.3%38.8% 20.9% 40.3%38.8% 20.9% 40.3%

Friends other than office mate

a. Shunned 51.3% 11.3% 37.4%51.3% 11.3% 37.4%51.3% 11.3% 37.4%51.3% 11.3% 37.4%

b. Bullied 31.4% 23.6% 45.1%31.4% 23.6% 45.1%31.4% 23.6% 45.1%31.4% 23.6% 45.1%

c. Hostile 32.7% 23.2% 44.2%32.7% 23.2% 44.2%32.7% 23.2% 44.2%32.7% 23.2% 44.2%32.7% 23.2% 44.2%

d. Ostracized 37.9% 19.6% 42.5%37.9% 19.6% 42.5%37.9% 19.6% 42.5%

Relationship with family or relatives

a. Shunned 41.4% 22.0% 36.6%41.4% 22.0% 36.6%41.4% 22.0% 36.6%41.4% 22.0% 36.6%41.4% 22.0% 36.6%

b. Bullied 27.8% 29.7% 42.5%27.8% 29.7% 42.5%27.8% 29.7% 42.5%

c. Hostile 29.3% 29.3% 41.4%29.3% 29.3% 41.4%29.3% 29.3% 41.4%29.3% 29.3% 41.4%

d. Ostracized 34.2% 25.7% 40.1%34.2% 25.7% 40.1%34.2% 25.7% 40.1%

Relationship in the society

a. Shunned 55.0% 10.5% 34.4%55.0% 10.5% 34.4%55.0% 10.5% 34.4%55.0% 10.5% 34.4%

b. Bullied 37.0% 21.8% 41.2%37.0% 21.8% 41.2%37.0% 21.8% 41.2%

c. Hostile 39.2% 20.6% 40.2%39.2% 20.6% 40.2%39.2% 20.6% 40.2%39.2% 20.6% 40.2%

d. Ostracized 44.6% 17.2% 38.2%44.6% 17.2% 38.2%44.6% 17.2% 38.2%Perp

ustak

aan

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n 41.4% 22.0% 36.6%

Perpus

takaa

n 41.4% 22.0% 36.6%

27.8% 29.7% 42.5%

Perpus

takaa

n 27.8% 29.7% 42.5%

29.3% 29.3% 41.4%

Perpus

takaa

n 29.3% 29.3% 41.4%


Perpus

takaa

n



51.3% 11.3% 37.4%

BNN51.3% 11.3% 37.4%

31.4% 23.6% 45.1%

BNN31.4% 23.6% 45.1%

32.7% 23.2% 44.2%

BNN32.7% 23.2% 44.2%32.7% 23.2% 44.2%

BNN32.7% 23.2% 44.2%32.7% 23.2% 44.2%

BNN32.7% 23.2% 44.2%

BNNBNNBNNBNNBNN

37.9% 19.6% 42.5%BNN37.9% 19.6% 42.5%37.9% 19.6% 42.5%BNN37.9% 19.6% 42.5%


APPENDIX 5 Perception on Attitude Toward Drug Abuse According to the Level of Education Among Students and University Students (%)

Perception toward drug abuseJunior high

school

Senior high

schoolUniversity totalUniversity total

Reaction when a family member or relative uses drugs

Keep silent 3.10 3.40 2.90 3.103.10 3.40 2.90 3.103.10 3.40 2.90 3.103.10 3.40 2.90 3.10

Advising 21.90 29.80 35.60 29.9021.90 29.80 35.60 29.9021.90 29.80 35.60 29.9021.90 29.80 35.60 29.9021.90 29.80 35.60 29.90

Forbidding 31.20 33.30 30.00 31.6031.20 33.30 30.00 31.6031.20 33.30 30.00 31.6031.20 33.30 30.00 31.60

Reporting to the police 42.50 30.90 29.00 33.2042.50 30.90 29.00 33.2042.50 30.90 29.00 33.2042.50 30.90 29.00 33.2042.50 30.90 29.00 33.20

Others 1.30 2.70 2.50 2.301.30 2.70 2.50 2.301.30 2.70 2.50 2.301.30 2.70 2.50 2.301.30 2.70 2.50 2.30

Reaction when your parent use drugs

Keep silent 2.40 1.80 1.90 2.002.40 1.80 1.90 2.002.40 1.80 1.90 2.002.40 1.80 1.90 2.002.40 1.80 1.90 2.00

Advising 17.10 22.40 25.90 22.3017.10 22.40 25.90 22.3017.10 22.40 25.90 22.3017.10 22.40 25.90 22.3017.10 22.40 25.90 22.3017.10 22.40 25.90 22.30

Forbidding 43.10 43.50 40.10 42.1043.10 43.50 40.10 42.1043.10 43.50 40.10 42.1043.10 43.50 40.10 42.10


Others 1.30 3.70 3.20 3.101.30 3.70 3.20 3.101.30 3.70 3.20 3.101.30 3.70 3.20 3.10

Reaction when your boyfriend/girlfriend uses drugs

Keep silent 1.40 1.30 1.10 1.301.40 1.30 1.10 1.301.40 1.30 1.10 1.301.40 1.30 1.10 1.30

Advising 13.50 18.20 21.40 18.2013.50 18.20 21.40 18.2013.50 18.20 21.40 18.2013.50 18.20 21.40 18.2013.50 18.20 21.40 18.20

Forbidding 38.60 40.90 37.90 39.2038.60 40.90 37.90 39.2038.60 40.90 37.90 39.2038.60 40.90 37.90 39.20


Others 6.20 8.60 7.60 7.706.20 8.60 7.60 7.706.20 8.60 7.60 7.706.20 8.60 7.60 7.70

Appendices

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n 17.10 22.40 25.90 22.30

Perpus

takaa

n 17.10 22.40 25.90 22.30

43.10 43.50 40.10 42.10

Perpus

takaa

n 43.10 43.50 40.10 42.1043.10 43.50 40.10 42.10

Perpus

takaa

n 43.10 43.50 40.10 42.10

35.50 28.70 28.90 30.50

Perpus

takaa

n 35.50 28.70 28.90 30.5035.50 28.70 28.90 30.50

Perpus

takaa

n 35.50 28.70 28.90 30.50

1.30 3.70 3.20 3.10

Perpus

takaa

n 1.30 3.70 3.20 3.101.30 3.70 3.20 3.10

Perpus

takaa

n 1.30 3.70 3.20 3.10


Perpus

takaa

n


Reporting to the police Perpus

takaa

n

Reporting to the police

BNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNN1.30 2.70 2.50 2.30

BNN1.30 2.70 2.50 2.301.30 2.70 2.50 2.30

BNN1.30 2.70 2.50 2.30

2.40 1.80 1.90 2.00BNN2.40 1.80 1.90 2.002.40 1.80 1.90 2.00BNN2.40 1.80 1.90 2.00

17.10 22.40 25.90 22.30BNN17.10 22.40 25.90 22.30


APPENDIX 6 Types of Consumed Drugs and the Age when Using Drugs for the First Time, 2018

Type of drug Amount % Mean Median Mode Min MaxAmount % Mean Median Mode Min MaxAmount % Mean Median Mode Min MaxAmount % Mean Median Mode Min MaxAmount % Mean Median Mode Min MaxAmount % Mean Median Mode Min MaxAmount % Mean Median Mode Min MaxAmount % Mean Median Mode Min MaxAmount % Mean Median Mode Min Max

Dextromethorphan overly

consumed

11 6.6 16 17 17 10 1011 6.6 16 17 17 10 1011 6.6 16 17 17 10 1011 6.6 16 17 17 10 1011 6.6 16 17 17 10 1011 6.6 16 17 17 10 1011 6.6 16 17 17 10 10

Tramadol 17 10.2 16 16 16 12 1917 10.2 16 16 16 12 1917 10.2 16 16 16 12 1917 10.2 16 16 16 12 1917 10.2 16 16 16 12 1917 10.2 16 16 16 12 1917 10.2 16 16 16 12 1917 10.2 16 16 16 12 1917 10.2 16 16 16 12 19

Trihexiphenidyl 11 6.6 16 16 16 13 1911 6.6 16 16 16 13 1911 6.6 16 16 16 13 1911 6.6 16 16 16 13 1911 6.6 16 16 16 13 1911 6.6 16 16 16 13 1911 6.6 16 16 16 13 19

Headache medicine

excessively consumed

50 29.9 15 15 15 10 2050 29.9 15 15 15 10 2050 29.9 15 15 15 10 2050 29.9 15 15 15 10 2050 29.9 15 15 15 10 2050 29.9 15 15 15 10 2050 29.9 15 15 15 10 2050 29.9 15 15 15 10 2050 29.9 15 15 15 10 20

Headache medicine mixed

with soda drink

21 12.6 14 14 12 10 1721 12.6 14 14 12 10 1721 12.6 14 14 12 10 1721 12.6 14 14 12 10 1721 12.6 14 14 12 10 1721 12.6 14 14 12 10 1721 12.6 14 14 12 10 17

Substances inhaled

continuously (glue,

gasoline, markers, electric

mosquito,etc. )

49 29.3 13 13 13 7 2249 29.3 13 13 13 7 2249 29.3 13 13 13 7 2249 29.3 13 13 13 7 2249 29.3 13 13 13 7 2249 29.3 13 13 13 7 2249 29.3 13 13 13 7 2249 29.3 13 13 13 7 2249 29.3 13 13 13 7 22

Koplo pill, BK, mboat,

mboti, roda

13 7.8 15 16 16 12 1713 7.8 15 16 16 12 1713 7.8 15 16 16 12 1713 7.8 15 16 16 12 1713 7.8 15 16 16 12 1713 7.8 15 16 16 12 1713 7.8 15 16 16 12 17

Marijuana 42 25.1 16 16 15 10 2242 25.1 16 16 15 10 2242 25.1 16 16 15 10 2242 25.1 16 16 15 10 2242 25.1 16 16 15 10 2242 25.1 16 16 15 10 2242 25.1 16 16 15 10 2242 25.1 16 16 15 10 22

Bear tobacco, gorilla

tobacco

20 12.0 16 16 14 12 2020 12.0 16 16 14 12 2020 12.0 16 16 14 12 2020 12.0 16 16 14 12 2020 12.0 16 16 14 12 2020 12.0 16 16 14 12 2020 12.0 16 16 14 12 20

Ecstasy 8 4.8 17 17 16 14 198 4.8 17 17 16 14 198 4.8 17 17 16 14 198 4.8 17 17 16 14 198 4.8 17 17 16 14 198 4.8 17 17 16 14 198 4.8 17 17 16 14 198 4.8 17 17 16 14 198 4.8 17 17 16 14 19

Amphetamine

(seed, dex Adderall,

dexamphetamine)

4 2.4 17 17 17 17 174 2.4 17 17 17 17 174 2.4 17 17 17 17 174 2.4 17 17 17 17 174 2.4 17 17 17 17 174 2.4 17 17 17 17 174 2.4 17 17 17 17 17

Methamphetamine 15 9.0 16 17 17 8 20Methamphetamine 15 9.0 16 17 17 8 20Methamphetamine 15 9.0 16 17 17 8 20Methamphetamine 15 9.0 16 17 17 8 20Methamphetamine 15 9.0 16 17 17 8 20Methamphetamine 15 9.0 16 17 17 8 20Methamphetamine 15 9.0 16 17 17 8 20Methamphetamine 15 9.0 16 17 17 8 20Methamphetamine 15 9.0 16 17 17 8 20Methamphetamine 15 9.0 16 17 17 8 20

Putau 3 1.8 18 17 17 17 193 1.8 18 17 17 17 193 1.8 18 17 17 17 193 1.8 18 17 17 17 193 1.8 18 17 17 17 193 1.8 18 17 17 17 193 1.8 18 17 17 17 19

Morphine 4 2.4 17 17 17 17 174 2.4 17 17 17 17 174 2.4 17 17 17 17 174 2.4 17 17 17 17 174 2.4 17 17 17 17 174 2.4 17 17 17 17 174 2.4 17 17 17 17 174 2.4 17 17 17 17 174 2.4 17 17 17 17 17

Heroin 6 3.6 17Heroin 6 3.6 17Heroin 6 3.6 17Heroin 6 3.6 17 17 17 17 1717 17 17 1717 17 17 1717 17 17 17

Cocaine 7 4.2 15 17 10 10 197 4.2 15 17 10 10 197 4.2 15 17 10 10 197 4.2 15 17 10 10 197 4.2 15 17 10 10 197 4.2 15 17 10 10 197 4.2 15 17 10 10 197 4.2 15 17 10 10 197 4.2 15 17 10 10 19

Others 8 3.6 17 17 16 16 188 3.6 17 17 16 16 188 3.6 17 17 16 16 188 3.6 17 17 16 16 188 3.6 17 17 16 16 188 3.6 17 17 16 16 188 3.6 17 17 16 16 18

Appendices

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n 13 7.8 15 16 16 12 17

Perpus

takaa

n 13 7.8 15 16 16 12 1713 7.8 15 16 16 12 17

Perpus

takaa

n 13 7.8 15 16 16 12 17

42 25.1 16 16 15 10 22

Perpus

takaa

n 42 25.1 16 16 15 10 2242 25.1 16 16 15 10 22

Perpus

takaa

n 42 25.1 16 16 15 10 2242 25.1 16 16 15 10 22

Perpus

takaa

n 42 25.1 16 16 15 10 2242 25.1 16 16 15 10 22

Perpus

takaa

n 42 25.1 16 16 15 10 22

20 12.0 16 16 14 12 20

Perpus

takaa

n

20 12.0 16 16 14 12 2020 12.0 16 16 14 12 20

Perpus

takaa

n

20 12.0 16 16 14 12 2020 12.0 16 16 14 12 20

Perpus

takaa

n

20 12.0 16 16 14 12 20

8 4.8 17 17 16 14 19

Perpus

takaa

n

8 4.8 17 17 16 14 198 4.8 17 17 16 14 19

Perpus

takaa

n

8 4.8 17 17 16 14 19


Perpus

takaa

n


dexamphetamine) Perpus

takaa

n

dexamphetamine)

4 2.4 17 17 17 17 17

Perpus

takaa

n

4 2.4 17 17 17 17 17

Methamphetamine 15 9.0 16 17 17 8 20Perp

ustak

aan

Methamphetamine 15 9.0 16 17 17 8 20

BNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNN49 29.3 13 13 13 7 22

BNN49 29.3 13 13 13 7 2249 29.3 13 13 13 7 22

BNN49 29.3 13 13 13 7 22


The data presented in this book is the result of research by BNN and LIPI. The research shows that the majority of student and university student respondents have the knowledge on the types of drugs such as natural narcotics, synthetic and semi-synthetic drugs including marijuana (gele, cimeng, marijuana, getok, linda), shabu, heroine and cocaine. The majority of respondents also have the knowledge that the misuse of addictive substances will endanger theirselves such as the excessive use of headache medicine and the use of headache medicine mixed with soda drink. The data shows that drug abuse has been known by all layers of the community, including students and university students.

The publication of this book is expected to present real facts of drug abuse and drug issues in this nation to policy maker (the government) and the community. The level of severe condition described in the continuous research is expected to increase the

of drugs.

Epilogue

Perpus

takaa

n government) and the community. The level of severe condition

Perpus

takaa

n government) and the community. The level of severe condition described in the continuous research is expected to increase the

Perpus

takaa

n described in the continuous research is expected to increase the

Perpus

takaa

n BNNThe publication of this book is expected to present real facts

BNNThe publication of this book is expected to present real facts of drug abuse and drug issues in this nation to policy maker (the BNNof drug abuse and drug issues in this nation to policy maker (the government) and the community. The level of severe condition BNNgovernment) and the community. The level of severe condition


Bibliography

Anggreni, Dewi. 2015. “Dampak bagi pengguna narkotika, psikotropika, dan

Dalam e-Journal Sosiatri-Sosiologi 3(3). Hlm.: 37-51.

Badan Narkotika Nasional, 2009. Advokasi Pencegahan Penyalahgunaan Narkoba. Jakarta, BNNRI.Narkoba. Jakarta, BNNRI.Narkoba.

Badan Narkotika Nasional, 2016. http://lab.bnn.go.id/nps_alert_ http://lab.bnn.go.id/nps_alert_ http://lab.bnn.go.id/nps_alert_

system/12.%20 Lampiran%20zat%20NPS%20terdeteksi%20di%20system/12.%20 Lampiran%20zat%20NPS%20terdeteksi%20di%20Indonesia.php.Indonesia.php.

Badan Narkotika Nasional, Ringkasan Jurnal Data Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Penyalahgunaan dan Peredaran Gelap Narkoba (P4GN) Tahun 2015. Edisi Tahun 2016.(P4GN) Tahun 2015. Edisi Tahun 2016.(P4GN) Tahun 2015.

Commission on Narcotic Drugs Fifty-ninth session, 2014. New psychoactive substances: overview of trends, challenges and legal approaches.Vienna, 14-22 March 2014.

David C. McClelland. (1985). Human Motivation. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.Human Motivation. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.Human Motivation.

Fremont Ellsworth Kast & James Erwin Rosenzweig. (1970). Organization and Management: A Systems and Contingency Approach. New York: and Management: A Systems and Contingency Approach. New York: and Management: A Systems and Contingency Approach.McGraw-Hill Book Company.

Gordon, L., Tinsley, L., Godfrey, C., Parott, S. 2006. The economic and social costs of Class A drug use in England and Wales 2003/2004. Home costs of Class A drug use in England and Wales 2003/2004. Home costs of Class A drug use in England and Wales 2003/2004.

Haryanto, 2012. Dampak Penyalahgunaan Narkotika. http://belajarpsikologi. http://belajarpsikologi.Dampak Penyalahgunaan Narkotika. http://belajarpsikologi.Dampak Penyalahgunaan Narkotika.com/dampak-penyalahgunaan-Narkotika/.com/dampak-penyalahgunaan-Narkotika/.

Kompas. 2018. “Makin Mudah Beli Narkoba”. Dalam KOMPAS, Jumat 21 KOMPAS, Jumat 21 KOMPASDesember 2018. Hlm.: 27.

Kompas. 2018. “Narkotika: Oknum Polisi Kawal Pengiriman Sabu”. Dalam KOMPAS, Jumat 21 Desember 2018. Hlm.: 21. KOMPAS, Jumat 21 Desember 2018. Hlm.: 21. KOMPAS,

Lestari, Anna Puji. 2018. “Komunikasi imun penyalahgunaan narkoba”. Dalam https://jateng.antaranews.com/berita/188564/komunikasi-imun-https://jateng.antaranews.com/berita/188564/komunikasi-imun-penyalahgunaan-narkoba. Akses 5 Maret 2018.penyalahgunaan-narkoba. Akses 5 Maret 2018.

Perpus

takaa

n Commission on Narcotic Drugs Fifty-ninth session, 2014.

Perpus

takaa

n Commission on Narcotic Drugs Fifty-ninth session, 2014.

substances: overview of trends, challenges and legal approaches.

Perpus

takaa

n substances: overview of trends, challenges and legal approaches.

Human Motivation.

Perpus

takaa

n Human Motivation.

Fremont Ellsworth Kast & James Erwin Rosenzweig. (1970).

Perpus

takaa

n

Fremont Ellsworth Kast & James Erwin Rosenzweig. (1970). and Management: A Systems and Contingency Approach.

Perpus

takaa

n

and Management: A Systems and Contingency Approach.McGraw-Hill Book Company.

Perpus

takaa

n

McGraw-Hill Book Company.

Gordon, L., Tinsley, L., Godfrey, C., Parott, S. 2006.

Perpus

takaa

n

Gordon, L., Tinsley, L., Godfrey, C., Parott, S. 2006. costs of Class A drug use in England and Wales 2003/2004.Perp

ustak

aan

costs of Class A drug use in England and Wales 2003/2004.Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n BNN

Ringkasan Jurnal Data Pencegahan dan

BNNRingkasan Jurnal Data Pencegahan dan

Pemberantasan Penyalahgunaan dan Peredaran Gelap Narkoba

BNNPemberantasan Penyalahgunaan dan Peredaran Gelap Narkoba

BNNCommission on Narcotic Drugs Fifty-ninth session, 2014. BNNCommission on Narcotic Drugs Fifty-ninth session, 2014.

substances: overview of trends, challenges and legal approaches.BNNsubstances: overview of trends, challenges and legal approaches.


Mantra, I.B. 2003. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Maulana, Heri.D.J.(2009). Promosi Kesehatan,Promosi Kesehatan,Promosi Kesehatan,Jakarta: EGC

Puslitkes UI dan BNN, 2017. Laporan Akhir Survei Nasional Penyalahgunaan Narkoba di 34 Provinsi Tahun 2017. Bagian I. Kelompok Pekerja. Narkoba di 34 Provinsi Tahun 2017. Bagian I. Kelompok Pekerja. Narkoba di 34 Provinsi Tahun 2017Jakarta Puslitkes UI.

Rahmawati, Ira. 2016. “Buwas: Pengguna Narkoba di Indonesia Meningkat hingga 5,9 Juta Orang”. Dalam https://regional.kompas.com/hingga 5,9 Juta Orang”. Dalam https://regional.kompas.com/read/2016/01/11/14313191/Buwas.Peng-guna.Narkoba.di.Indonesia.read/2016/01/11/14313191/Buwas.Peng-guna.Narkoba.di.Indonesia.Meningkat.hingga.5.9.Juta.Orang. Akses, 5 Maret 2018.Meningkat.hingga.5.9.Juta.Orang. Akses, 5 Maret 2018.

juta”. Dalam Sindonews.com edisi Selasa, 4 Juni 2013. Akses 5 Maret Sindonews.com edisi Selasa, 4 Juni 2013. Akses 5 Maret Sindonews.com2018.

Survey Nasional

Akhir). Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian Kesehatan Universitas Indonesia Akhir). Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian Kesehatan Universitas Indonesia Akhir).

Ulfah, Desi Maria. 2005. F

UNODC. 2018. World Drugs Report Tahun 2018.

Ditjen Pemasyarakatan Kementerian Hukum dan HAM RI, Maret 2016.

Perundangan:

Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 tentang Perubahan Penggolongan Narkotika,

Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor 3 Tahun 2017 tentang Perubahan Penggolongan Psikotropika,


Mantra, I.B. 2003. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Maulana, Heri.D.J.(2009). Promosi Kesehatan,Jakarta: EGC

Puslitkes UI dan BNN, 2017. Laporan Akhir Survei Nasional Penyalahgunaan Narkoba di 34 Provinsi Tahun 2017. Bagian I. Kelompok Pekerja.7Jakarta Puslitkes UI.

Rahmawati, Ira. 2016. “Buwas: Pengguna Narkoba di Indonesia Meningkat hingga 5,9 Juta Orang”. Dalam https://regional.kompas.com/p // g p /read/2016/01/11/14313191/Buwas.Peng-guna.Narkoba.di.Indonesia./ / / / / g gMeningkat.hingga.5.9.Juta.Orang. Akses, 5 Maret 2018.g gg g ,

Satibi, M. 2013. “BNN perkirakan 2015 jumlah pengguna narkotika capai 5,1 juta”. Dalam Sindonews.com edisi Selasa, 4 Juni 2013. Akses 5 Maret m2018.

Sucahya, Purwa Kurnia dan kawan-kawan. 2017.Survey Nasional Penyalahgunaan Narkoba di 34 Provinsi Tahun 2017 (Laporan Akhir). Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian Kesehatan Universitas Indonesiadisampaikan kepada Badan Narkotika Nasional Republik Indonesia.

Ulfah, Desi Maria. 2005. Faktor-Faktor Penggunaan Minuman Keras Di Kalangan Remaja Di Desa Losari Kecamatan Rembang Kabupaten Purbalingga.Skripsi untuk memperoleh gelar Sarjana Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan pada Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Jurusan Hukum danKewarganegaraan Universitas Negeri Semarang.

UNODC, 2016. World Drugs Report Tahun 2016.

UNODC. 2018. World Drugs Report Tahun 2018.

Ditjen Pemasyarakatan Kementerian Hukum dan HAM RI, Maret 2016.

Perundangan:

Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 tentang PerubahanPenggolongan Narkotika,

Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor 3 Tahun 2017 tentang PerubahanPenggolongan Psikotropika,

Bibliography

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n a, Purwa Kurnia dan kawan-kawan. 2017

Perpus

takaa

n a, Purwa Kurnia dan kawan-kawan. 2017

Perpus

takaa

n Penyalahgunaan Narkoba di 34 Provinsi Tahun 2017 (Laporan

Perpus

takaa

n Penyalahgunaan Narkoba di 34 Provinsi Tahun 2017 (Laporan

Perpus

takaa

n Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian Kesehatan Universitas Indonesia

Perpus

takaa

n Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian Kesehatan Universitas Indonesia

Perpus

takaa

n ada Badan Narkotika Nasional Re

Perpus

takaa

n ada Badan Narkotika Nasional Re

Perpus

takaa

n

aktor-Faktor Penggunaan Minuman Keras Di Kalangan

Perpus

takaa

n

aktor-Faktor Penggunaan Minuman Keras Di Kalangan

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

Remaja Di Desa Losari Kecamatan Rembang Kabupaten Purbalingga.

Perpus

takaa

n

Remaja Di Desa Losari Kecamatan Rembang Kabupaten Purbalingga.

Perpus

takaa

n

kripsi untuk memperoleh

Perpus

takaa

n

kripsi untuk memperoleh

Perpus

takaa

n

araan pada Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Jurusan Hukum dan

Perpus

takaa

n

araan pada Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Jurusan Hukum dan

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

ane

Perpus

takaa

n

aneg

Perpus

takaa

n

garaan Universitas Ne

Perpus

takaa

n

araan Universitas Ne

Perpus

takaa

n

Perpus

takaa

n

UNODC, 2016. World DruPerpus

takaa

n

UNODC, 2016. World Dru

BNNBNNBNNBNNuna narkotika capai 5,1

BNNuna narkotika capai 5,1

BNN edisi Selasa, 4 Juni 2013. Akses 5 Maret

BNN edisi Selasa, 4 Juni 2013. Akses 5 Maret


Bibliography

Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor 57 Tahun 2017 tentang Perubahan Penggolongan Narkotika,

Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor 58 Tahun 2017 tentang Perubahan Penggolongan Psikotropika

Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 81 Tahun 2010 tentang Grand Design Reformasi Birokrasi 2010-2025

Undang-Undang Nomor 13 tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan

Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika

Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1997 tentang Psikotropika

Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2009 tentang Pelayanan Publik

Website:

http://sosiologimuchibbur.blogspot.co.id/2013/01/sosiologi-keluarga.html http://sosiologimuchibbur.blogspot.co.id/2013/01/sosiologi-keluarga.html Akses pada tanggal 11 Desember 2018.

https://majalahqalam.wordpress.com/artikel-2/artikel-keluarga/dampak-https://majalahqalam.wordpress.com/artikel-2/artikel-keluarga/dampak-https://majalahqalam.wordpress.com/artikel-2/artikel-keluarga/dampak-https://majalahqalam.wordpress.com/artikel-2/artikel-keluarga/dampak-narkoba-bagi-lingkungan-keluarga/ Akses pada tanggal 18 Desember narkoba-bagi-lingkungan-keluarga/ Akses pada tanggal 18 Desember narkoba-bagi-lingkungan-keluarga/ Akses pada tanggal 18 Desember narkoba-bagi-lingkungan-keluarga/ Akses pada tanggal 18 Desember 2018.

https://marhenyantoz.wordpress.com/2012/02/28/dampak-https://marhenyantoz.wordpress.com/2012/02/28/dampak-https://marhenyantoz.wordpress.com/2012/02/28/dampak-https://marhenyantoz.wordpress.com/2012/02/28/dampak-penyalahgunaan-narkoba-dampak-penyalahgunaan-narkoba/ Akses penyalahgunaan-narkoba-dampak-penyalahgunaan-narkoba/ Akses penyalahgunaan-narkoba-dampak-penyalahgunaan-narkoba/ Akses penyalahgunaan-narkoba-dampak-penyalahgunaan-narkoba/ Akses pada tanggal 18 Desember 2018.

https://news.idntimes.com/indonesia/fitang-adhitia/sepanjang-tahun-https://news.idntimes.com/indonesia/fitang-adhitia/sepanjang-tahun-2017-bnn-ungkap-46537-kasus-narkoba/full Akses pada tanggal 10 2017-bnn-ungkap-46537-kasus-narkoba/full Akses pada tanggal 10 November 2018.

https://news.okezone.com/read/2017/07/20/337/1740743/https://news.okezone.com/read/2017/07/20/337/1740743/mencengangkan-pecandu-narkoba-di-indonesia-tembus-6-juta-mencengangkan-pecandu-narkoba-di-indonesia-tembus-6-juta-orang. Akses pada tanggal 11 November 2018.orang. Akses pada tanggal 11 November 2018.

https://www.merdeka.com/peristiwa/tahun-2017-jumlah-pengguna-https://www.merdeka.com/peristiwa/tahun-2017-jumlah-pengguna-narkoba-di-kalangan-pelajar-surabaya-meningkat.html Akses pada narkoba-di-kalangan-pelajar-surabaya-meningkat.html Akses pada tanggal 21 Desember 2018.

Perpus

takaa

n http://sosiologimuchibbur.blogspot.co.id/2013/01/sosiologi-keluarga.html

Perpus

takaa

n http://sosiologimuchibbur.blogspot.co.id/2013/01/sosiologi-keluarga.html http://sosiologimuchibbur.blogspot.co.id/2013/01/sosiologi-keluarga.html

Perpus

takaa

n http://sosiologimuchibbur.blogspot.co.id/2013/01/sosiologi-keluarga.html

Perpus

takaa

n Akses pada tanggal 11 Desember 2018.

Perpus

takaa

n Akses pada tanggal 11 Desember 2018.

https://majalahqalam.wordpress.com/artikel-2/artikel-keluarga/dampak-

Perpus

takaa

n https://majalahqalam.wordpress.com/artikel-2/artikel-keluarga/dampak-https://majalahqalam.wordpress.com/artikel-2/artikel-keluarga/dampak-

Perpus

takaa

n https://majalahqalam.wordpress.com/artikel-2/artikel-keluarga/dampak-

narkoba-bagi-lingkungan-keluarga/ Akses pada tanggal 18 Desember

Perpus

takaa

n

narkoba-bagi-lingkungan-keluarga/ Akses pada tanggal 18 Desember narkoba-bagi-lingkungan-keluarga/ Akses pada tanggal 18 Desember

Perpus

takaa

n

narkoba-bagi-lingkungan-keluarga/ Akses pada tanggal 18 Desember

https://marhenyantoz.wordpress.com/2012/02/28/dampak-

Perpus

takaa

n

https://marhenyantoz.wordpress.com/2012/02/28/dampak-https://marhenyantoz.wordpress.com/2012/02/28/dampak-

Perpus

takaa

n

https://marhenyantoz.wordpress.com/2012/02/28/dampak-penyalahgunaan-narkoba-dampak-penyalahgunaan-narkoba/ Akses

Perpus

takaa

n

penyalahgunaan-narkoba-dampak-penyalahgunaan-narkoba/ Akses penyalahgunaan-narkoba-dampak-penyalahgunaan-narkoba/ Akses

Perpus

takaa

n

penyalahgunaan-narkoba-dampak-penyalahgunaan-narkoba/ Akses pada tanggal 18 Desember 2018.Perp

ustak

aan

pada tanggal 18 Desember 2018.

BNNUndang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1997 tentang Psikotropika

BNNUndang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1997 tentang Psikotropika

Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2009 tentang Pelayanan Publik

BNNUndang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2009 tentang Pelayanan Publik


Malaysia”. Dalam https://m.liputan6.co. Akses pada tanggal 21 Malaysia”. Dalam https://m.liputan6.co. Akses pada tanggal 21 Desember 2018.

http://jakarta.tribunnews.com/2018/12/20/sepanjang-tahun-2018-bnn-http://jakarta.tribunnews.com/2018/12/20/sepanjang-tahun-2018-bnn-ungkap-914-kasus-narkoba-dan-tangkap-1355-tersangka#gref Akses ungkap-914-kasus-narkoba-dan-tangkap-1355-tersangka#gref Akses pada tanggal 12 Januari 2019.

http://www.tribunnews.com/nasional/2018/12/19/jumlah-napi-dan-http://www.tribunnews.com/nasional/2018/12/19/jumlah-napi-dan-tahanan-narkoba-kian-meningkat-menkum-ham-pengguna-tidak-tahanan-narkoba-kian-meningkat-menkum-ham-pengguna-tidak-perlu-dipenjara. Akses pada tanggal 12 Januari 2018.perlu-dipenjara. Akses pada tanggal 12 Januari 2018.

https://tirto.id/27-persen-pengguna-narkoba-di-indonesia-adalah-pelajar-https://tirto.id/27-persen-pengguna-narkoba-di-indonesia-adalah-pelajar-amp-mahasiswa-czi5. Akses pada tanggal 22 Desember 2018.amp-mahasiswa-czi5. Akses pada tanggal 22 Desember 2018.

https://www.liputan6.com/news/read/3553484/kepala-bnn-674-jenis-narkoba-https://www.liputan6.com/news/read/3553484/kepala-bnn-674-jenis-narkoba-belum-terdaftar-di-undang-undang. Diakses pada tanggal 26 Desember belum-terdaftar-di-undang-undang. Diakses pada tanggal 26 Desember belum-terdaftar-di-undang-undang. Diakses pada tanggal 26 Desember belum-terdaftar-di-undang-undang. Diakses pada tanggal 26 Desember 2018.

Pelajarindo.com, downloaded 7 Maret 2018

Bibliography

Perpus

takaa

n Pelajarindo.com, downloaded 7 Maret 2018

Perpus

takaa

n Pelajarindo.com, downloaded 7 Maret 2018

BNNamp-mahasiswa-czi5. Akses pada tanggal 22 Desember 2018.

BNNamp-mahasiswa-czi5. Akses pada tanggal 22 Desember 2018.

https://www.liputan6.com/news/read/3553484/kepala-bnn-674-jenis-narkoba-

BNNhttps://www.liputan6.com/news/read/3553484/kepala-bnn-674-jenis-narkoba-https://www.liputan6.com/news/read/3553484/kepala-bnn-674-jenis-narkoba-

BNNhttps://www.liputan6.com/news/read/3553484/kepala-bnn-674-jenis-narkoba-

BNNbelum-terdaftar-di-undang-undang. Diakses pada tanggal 26 Desember BNNbelum-terdaftar-di-undang-undang. Diakses pada tanggal 26 Desember belum-terdaftar-di-undang-undang. Diakses pada tanggal 26 Desember BNNbelum-terdaftar-di-undang-undang. Diakses pada tanggal 26 Desember


Perpus

takaa

n BNN

Data and Information Research Center Data and Information Research Center National Narcotics Board of the Republic of IndonesiaNational Narcotics Board of the Republic of Indonesia(PUSLITDATIN BNN)(PUSLITDATIN BNN)Jl. MT Haryono No 11 Cawang. East JakartaJl. MT Haryono No 11 Cawang. East JakartaJl. MT Haryono No 11 Cawang. East JakartaTelp. (021) 80871566, 80871567Telp. (021) 80871566, 80871567Telp. (021) 80871566, 80871567Fax. (021) 80885225, 80871591, 80871593Fax. (021) 80885225, 80871591, 80871593Website : www.bnn.go.idWebsite : www.bnn.go.idEmail : [email protected] : [email protected] Center : 184Call Center : 184Sms Center : 0812-221-675-67Sms Center : 0812-221-675-675

P R E VA L E N C E S U RV E Y 2018

Currently, Indonesia has stated that the state is in drug emergency urrently, Indonesia has stated that the state is in drug emergency situation as drug abuse has spread to all layers of the society situation as drug abuse has spread to all layers of the society and across the country. In 2018, BNN in cooperation with Culture and across the country. In 2018, BNN in cooperation with Culture

and Society Research Center of LIPI carried out a survey to calculate the and Society Research Center of LIPI carried out a survey to calculate the prevalence rate of drug abuse. The survey was also carried out in three prevalence rate of drug abuse. The survey was also carried out in three prevalence rate of drug abuse. The survey was also carried out in three prevalence rate of drug abuse. The survey was also carried out in three prevalence rate of drug abuse. The survey was also carried out in three groups of the community, namely students and university students, groups of the community, namely students and university students, workers, and households. The survey in 2018 was conducted in 13 workers, and households. The survey in 2018 was conducted in 13 workers, and households. The survey in 2018 was conducted in 13 workers, and households. The survey in 2018 was conducted in 13 workers, and households. The survey in 2018 was conducted in 13 workers, and households. The survey in 2018 was conducted in 13 Provinces, namely Aceh, North Sumatera, South Sumatera, Riau Islands, Provinces, namely Aceh, North Sumatera, South Sumatera, Riau Islands, Provinces, namely Aceh, North Sumatera, South Sumatera, Riau Islands, Provinces, namely Aceh, North Sumatera, South Sumatera, Riau Islands, Provinces, namely Aceh, North Sumatera, South Sumatera, Riau Islands, Provinces, namely Aceh, North Sumatera, South Sumatera, Riau Islands, Jakarta, West Java, East Java, DI Yogyakarta, Bali, East Kalimantan, West Jakarta, West Java, East Java, DI Yogyakarta, Bali, East Kalimantan, West Kalimantan, South Sulawesi, and Papua.

Perpus

takaa

n BNNworkers, and households. The survey in 2018 was conducted in 13

BNNworkers, and households. The survey in 2018 was conducted in 13

BNNProvinces, namely Aceh, North Sumatera, South Sumatera, Riau Islands,

BNNProvinces, namely Aceh, North Sumatera, South Sumatera, Riau Islands, Jakarta, West Java, East Java, DI Yogyakarta, Bali, East Kalimantan, West BNNJakarta, West Java, East Java, DI Yogyakarta, Bali, East Kalimantan, West

Prevalence Survey 2018 ( BNN - LIPI )

Documents

Transcript of Prevalence Survey 2018 ( BNN - LIPI )