Prestressed tensioning method and its application to ...
Transcript of Prestressed tensioning method and its application to ...
Journal of Chongqing University English Edition [ISSN 1671-8224]
Vol. 16 No. 1
March 2017
38
doi:10.11835/j.issn.1671-8224.2017.01.04
To cite this article: ZHANG Peng, LONG Yan-cheng, LUO Bing. Prestressed tensioning method and its application to testing anchor stress of anchor cables for side-slope
stabilization [J]. J Chongqing Univ Eng Ed [ISSN 1671-8224], 2017, 16(1): 38-50.
Prestressed tensioning method and its application to testing anchor stress of anchor cables for side-slope stabilization
ZHANG Peng 1,2,†, LONG Yan-cheng 3, LUO Bing 1, 2 1 China Merchants Chongqing Communications Technology Research & Design Institute Co.,Ltd. Chongqing 400067, P. R. China
2 China Highway Engineering Technology & Research Center, Chongqing 400067, P. R. China
3 Guizhou Expressway Group Co.,Ltd., Guiyang, Guizhou 550004, P. R. China
Received 19 May 2016; received in revised form 1 July 2016
Abstract: The anchor stress extent of a prestress anchor cable project has a direct relation with the project safety and
performance. Prestressed tensioning method is a kind of nondestructive testing method, by which a reverse stretching load is
applied on the external exposure section of anchor cable under construction or in service, and then the elongation variation of
stress bars is measured to determine the anchor stress. We elaborated the theory and testing mechanism of prestressed tensioning
method, and systematically studied key issues during the prestressed tensioning process of anchor cable by using physical model
test, including the composition of tension stress-elongation curve, the variation of anchor stress, the compensation of locked
anchor stress, and the judgment of anchor stress, and verified the theory feasibility of prestressed tensioning method. A case study
on slope anchor cable of one highway project was conducted to further discuss on the test method, operation procedures and
judgment of prestressed tensioning method on obtaining anchor stress, and then the test data of three situations were analyzed.
The result provides a theoretical basis and technical base for the application of prestressed tensioning method to the evaluation of
construction quality and operation conditions of anchor cable project.
Keywords: anchor cable; anchor stress; prestressed tensioning method; model test
CLC number: U417.1 Document code: A
1 Introduction a
Since the initial application abroad in 1958, the
prestress anchor cable has been widely used in
engineering fields like water conservancy, hydro-power,
† ZHANG Peng (张朋): [email protected].
Funded by the Science and Technolog Program of Ministry of
Transport of P. R. China (No. 2012318352100).
mining, metallurgy, railways, roads, buildings and
military projects, especially slope strengthening,
foundation pit supporting, hydraulic structure
strengthening, etc. The superiority and socioeconomic
benefits of active shoring are irreplaceable comparing
with other conventional methods [1]. As a key parameter
in anchoring technology, the anchor stress (also known as
anchor prestress, work load, work stress, anchorage force,
etc.) of a prestress anchor cable is influenced by
P. Zhang, et al.
Side slope anchor cable
J. Chongqing Univ. Eng. Ed. [ISSN 1671-8224], 2017, 16(1): 38-50 39
subjective and objective factors, such as the hydro-
geological condition, climatic environment, and
uncertainties of design and construction. The changes of
stress value and work conditions have direct impact on
the safety of the structure [2-6]. Hence, how to detect the
anchor stress of prestress anchor cable under construction
or in service is a key issue for engineering construction
and operation management department. Currently, the
main method contains presetting force-meter on the outer
anchor head [7-8], nondestructive testing method based on
acoustic theory [9-15], and the prestressed tensioning
method (also known as pulling method, re-drawing
method, etc.) based on the prestressed tensioning stress-
elongation curve. Among these methods, the prestressed
tensioning method has been applied worldwide due to its
reliability, high precision and operational convenience [16-
20]. However, until now, its theory and test mechanism
has not been clearly explained and verified, and the
detection error, scope of application, accuracy and
judgment standard still need further illustration.
2 Prestressed tensioning method
The prestress anchor cable bears tensile force, and it
includes an inner anchoring section, a free section, an
outer anchoring section and an outer exposure section
(Fig. 1). Prestressed tensioning is a kind of testing
method, by which a reverse stretching load is applied on
the external exposure section of the anchor cable under
construction or in service, and then the elongation
variation of stress bars is measured to determine the
anchor stress. In an ideal state, there is no slippage
between the inner anchoring section and slurry, which
provides the anchoring force. The working stress of the free section is the anchor stress 0 , and the rock block or
concrete structure provides an outer anchoring section with supporting force 0N . The anchor bearing plate
supports the anchor, 0 0N A , where A is the area of
the anchor cable. During the prestressed tensioning
process, the loading equipment (lifting jack) clamps the
outer exposure section and applies prestressed tensioning
2N . The stress of outer exposure section 2 increases
gradually from 0, 2 2N A , and meanwhile the stress of
working anchor supported by bearing plate 1 decreases
gradually. 1 1 1N A , and 2 1 0N N N , where 1A is
the sectional area of working anchor. When 1 is equal
to 0 , 1N reduces to 0, and at this time,
2 0 0 2N N A A . If the tension process continues,
the free section and outer exposure section will be joint
load carrying to extend, which leads to an inflection point
because of the decreasing slope of tension stress-
elongation curve. The tension load at this inflection point
is equal to anchor stress or working stress of the free
section.
N2
σ0
N0 N1
Tool anchor
Loading equipment
Stop block
Outer
anchoring
Outer
exposed
section
Free section Inner anchoring
Fig. 1 Schematic diagram of prestressed tensioning method
P. Zhang, et al.
Side slope anchor cable
J. Chongqing Univ. Eng. Ed. [ISSN 1671-8224], 2017, 16(1): 38-50 40
The general anchor cable stress bar adopts steel
strand, of which the designed working load is less than
75 of the ultimate load of steel strands. Therefore, the
anchor stress of anchor cable under construction or in
active service is in the elastic deformation phase of
steel strands. Under the prestressed tensioning process
(the maximum tension is equal to 75 of the ultimate
load), when 2 1 0N N N and 1 0N , the
computational formula of tension stress and elongation
is
fl
nSE . (1)
When 2 0N N and 1 0N , the computational
formula of tension and elongation is
0 00f f L l f L l f Lf l
nSE nSE nSE
, (2)
where f is the tension stress, 0f is the anchor stress, δ
is the elongation, L is the length of free section, l is the
length of prestressed tensioning section, n is the
number of steel strands, S is the sectional area of a
single steel strand, and E is the elasticity modulus. Eqs.
(1) and (2) show that the tension stress-elongation
curve consists of 2 crossing straight lines with different
slopes, and the mutational site of slope or crossing
point of straight lines is the value of anchor stress.
With the same anchor cable, the smaller the length ratio
of prestressed tensioning section and free section is, the
more obvious the reflection point is. The theoretical
tension stress-elongation curve is shown in Fig. 2. When max 195.3 kN,f 0 156 kN,f 1 m,l 1,n
2140 mm ,S and 190.4 GPa,E the length ratios of
prestressed tensioning section and free section are 1/40,
1/30, 1/20, 1/10, and 1/5, respectively.
When the prestressed tensioning load is applied on
the prestress anchor cable (the outer steel strand has
been cut, and the connector can be used if the length of
outer exposure section is not enough [10]), the curve of
tension stress-elongation can be used to judge the
anchor stress. Indoor physical analog experimental
studies are conducted to study the key issues, including
the test mechanism, composition of tension stress-
elongation curve, the variation of anchor stress, the
compensation of anchor stress, and the judgment of
anchor stress.
Fig. 2 Tension stress-elongation curve under ideal conditions
3 Model experiment and test
3.1 Experiment model and test equipment
A concrete pier base is adopted to simulate an
anchor cable structure with the pier strength of C50, a
length of 15 m, a width of 0.7 m, a height of 1.2 m and
a round hole casing diameter of 19 cm in the buried
zone. Fig. 3 shows the experiment model and test
equipment. The prestressed tensioning section of the
anchor cable model (exposed section) is equipped with
a limit device, a loading device (DS-10 tensioning
system), a tool anchor, and so on. The fixed end of
outer anchor is composed of a tool anchor, a
dynamometer and a pier base, the free end is in the
inner casing pipe of the pier base, and the inner anchor
end is fixed by a loading device (DS-10 tensioning
system) and a working anchor. The experimental
anchor cable structure consists of four steel strands
P. Zhang, et al.
Side slope anchor cable
J. Chongqing Univ. Eng. Ed. [ISSN 1671-8224], 2017, 16(1): 38-50 41
with a diameter of 15.2 mm, a length of 17 m, an
effective cross section area of 140 mm2, a prestressed
tensioning fb of about 269.7 kN, a non-proportional
extension force of 247.4 kN, an elongation of 5.5 and
an elastic modulus of 190.37 GPa. The working anchor,
the tool anchor and the clip are OVM15-4. HRC
measurement results show that the anchor hardness is
equal to or greater than 20, and the clip is equal to or
greater than 57. The limit device is custom-made. The
DS-10 tension system can collect and record the tensile
load and elongation with a load range of 0 kN to
1 300 kN and its resolution ratio is 0.01 kN, the
displacement meter ranges from 0 mm to 200 mm and
its resolution ratio is 0.01 mm, and the dynamometer
ranges from 0 kN to 1 300 kN and its resolution ratio is
0.01 kN.
3.2 Experimental process
The DS-10 tension system and the dynamometer will
be calibrated before experiments, and the deviation is
less than or equal to 1‰. The model exerts f0 through
DS-10 type tension system. Since the concrete
resilience can be ignored and stress of the anchor free
end is not changed basically, the stress of outer anchor
fixed section and inner anchor fixed section is basically
equal and the deviation is less than 0.5. When the
anchor cable structure stress is stabilized at the range of
set value f0, the DS-10 tension system is loaded on the
exposed section of anchor and the prestressed
tensioning load is exerted with the maximum tension
fmax, which is 72 of the steel strand tension resistance
(4 strands 195.3 kN/strand). At the same time, the
tension load and elongation are recorded every 10 kN.
After the prestressed tensioning is over, the prestressed
tensioning side will load the equipment and remove the
loads, while the dynamometer will still keep recording
the changes of outer fixed section stress of the anchor
cable structure. When the anchor cable structure
working stress (the dynamometer test value) becomes
stable, the anchor stress will be removed by the DS-10
tension system of the inner fixed section of anchor
cable structure. The above is a circle of the experiment
test. After one experiment is completed, the next
prestressed tensioning test experiment will start. There
are nine groups of experiments, and the set values of
the stress of the anchor cable structure are shown in
Table1.
Table 1 Set values and test results of the stress for the anchor
experiment
f0/fb/ f0/fmax Stress/kN Test
result/kN Deviation
14 0.2 156.24 158.23 1.27
22 0.3 234.65 235.23 0.25
29 0.4 312.43 313.97 0.54
36 0.5 389.39 390.97 0.41
44 0.6 469.36 471.49 0.45
51 0.7 546.70 547.74 0.19
58 0.8 625.47 634.03 1.37
65 0.9 703.30 693.66 1.37
72 1.0 781.19 751.81 3.76
3.3 Results and analysis
The similarities and differences between curve of
measured tensioning force-elongation and the theory
curve are analyzed. Fig. 4 shows the curve of measured
tensioning force (f)-elongation (δ) for anchor cable
model under different f0. Because the stress under the
anchor and the tensile force are in the elastic
deformation stage of the steel strands, according to
Eqs.(1) and (2), the corresponding theoretical extension
values of prestressed tensioning at various levels will
be calculated so as to compare and verify them. As a
result, the actual test curves are two approximately
P. Zhang, et al.
Side slope anchor cable
J. Chongqing Univ. Eng. Ed. [ISSN 1671-8224], 2017, 16(1): 38-50 42
straight lines which are similar to the theoretical curves,
and thus it can test and verify the feasibility of the
prestressed tensioning theory. When f f0, the actual f-
δ curve slope is smaller than the theoretical one; when
f f0, the measured f-δ curve slope is basically equal to
or slightly less than the theoretical slope; the
theoretical f-δ curve inflection point is very clear and
distinct while the actual f-δ curve inflection point is
smoother and it can be an interval section. Under the
same prestressed tensioning f, the actual δ is bigger
than the theoretical δthv. It is implied that for actually
tested elongation in the prestressed tensioning test
process, the anchor cable is not only influenced by the
steel strands elongation caused by the prestressed
tensioning loads, but also influenced by the anchor tool,
clips, anchor padding plates, concrete and interactive
force variation between different anchor fixed sections.
The appearance of resilience, retraction and slippage
are the inevitable phenomena and it will also influence
the anchor cable [21-25].
The actually measured inflecting point in the f-δ
curve is a smooth inflecting section rather than a single
point, which is the BC section in Fig. 4 and the actual
anchor stress lies in this section. The straight line
fitting is conducted on AB and CD sections separately,
and the cross point of the 2 lines O is the value of
anchor stress. It can be seen from Table 1 that under
the condition that f0 is below 72 of the ultimate load,
when f0 0.7 fmax, the deviation of test results gradually
reduces with increasing f0, the maximum deviation with
σ0/fmax 0.2 is 1.27, and the minimum deviation with
σ0/fmax 0.7 is 0.19; when f0 0.7 fmax, the deviation
increases gradually, f0 781.19 kN, the free section
suffers small and short-time prestressed tensioning
loading effect from the outer exposure section, and the
deviation is 3.76. It is indicated that the prestressed
tensioning has an optimum effect when fmax is 1.5 times
of f0.
Reverse
tension
Outer
fixed end Free end
Inner fixed end
Anchor cable
Load equipment Working anchor
Tool anchor
Limit
device
Dynamometer
Concrete pier base Load equipment
Tool anchor
Load equipment Dynamometer Steel reinforce concrete Loading device
Fig. 3 Experiment model and test equipment
P. Zhang, et al.
Side slope anchor cable
J. Chongqing Univ. Eng. Ed. [ISSN 1671-8224], 2017, 16(1): 38-50 43
Fig. 4 Theoretical and test curves of tension stress versus elongation
P. Zhang, et al.
Side slope anchor cable
J. Chongqing Univ. Eng. Ed. [ISSN 1671-8224], 2017, 16(1): 38-50 44
Fig. 5 shows the correlation curve of f and f0. When
f 0.9f0, f0 basically remains the same with the increase
of f, and the curve is similar to a horizontal line. When
f 0.95f0, f0 increases slowly with the increase of f. The
f-f0 curve is on a nonlinear rising trend if f0 f 0.95 f0.
When f f0, the f-f0 curve has a linear correlation,
indicating that the anchor cable has been extended, and
the free section and outer exposure section are joint
load carrying to extend. As shown in Fig. 5, the anchor
stress is 546.7 kN, the nonlinear correlation section of f
and f0 is in the range of 515 kN to 550 kN. When they
exceed 550 kN, f0 will have a linear increase with the
increase of f (see the section after point M in Fig. 5).
Fig. 5 Relationship between tension stress and anchor stress
Fig. 6 shows the curve of locked anchor stress flk
after prestressed tensioning under different f0. When
f0 703 kN, flk is in the range of 720 kN to 730 kN.
When f0 781.19 kN and fmax 781 kN, flk basically
remains the same. It is indicated that when f is applied,
fmax should be larger than f0 with stress compensation
action if f0 is insufficient. When the conditions of steel
strand, anchor clamp and rock-soil body are defined,
the compensation value is influenced by f0 and f. When
f 0.9 f0, the value of flk is mainly influenced by the
steel strands and the anchor clamp. Generally, flk is in
the range of 90 to 93 of fmax.
Fig. 6 Set values of the anchor stress and the locked anchor
stress after prestressed tensioning
4 Engineering application
The case is a side slope of a highway (on the border
of Guizhou province and Yunan province) between
Bijie and Duge in Guizhou province. The field region
is located in the plateau mountain area of western
China with complex topographic conditions and a
relative altitude difference of 226 m. The overlying
strata is the residual slope layer of Quaternary system
containing macadam silty clay and gravelly soil, and
the underlying bedrock is sandstone, mudstone, split
coal and limestone of Dyas. The stress bar of anchor
cable adopts high strength and low-relaxed steel
strands, with its nominal diameter Φ 15.24 mm, the
nominal area A 140 mm2, the elasticity modulus
E 195 GPa, and the standard value of tensile strength
fptk 1 860 MPa, and the stretching resistance
fb 260.4 kN. The steel strand of the anchor cable is
designed to go through the split coal internally anchor
on the low weathered layer of limestone. The number
P. Zhang, et al.
Side slope anchor cable
J. Chongqing Univ. Eng. Ed. [ISSN 1671-8224], 2017, 16(1): 38-50 45
and parameters of tested anchor cables are shown in
Table 2.
The test data is collected and recorded by using AP-
10 prestress detecting system, and the installation of
detecting device is shown in Fig. 7. The range of the
ergometer is from 0 kN to 1 300 kN and its resolution
is 0.01 kN. The range of displacement meter is from
0 mm to 200 mm and its resolution is 0.01 mm. The
initial value of prestressed tensioning stress is 80 kN,
and the tension stress and elongation is recorded with
an interval stress of 20 kN. The theoretical maximum
tension stress is 1 200 kN. The test results are as
follows.
Table 2 Parameters of test anchor cables
Anchor cable Steel strand number Anchor section
Length/m Designed work
load/kN Free section Outer exposed section
An-1 7 10 30 1.5 800
An-2 7 10 30 1.5 800
An-3 7 10(8) 30(19) 1.5 800
a b
Fig. 7 Schematic diagram of detecting system
P. Zhang, et al.
Side slope anchor cable
J. Chongqing Univ. Eng. Ed. [ISSN 1671-8224], 2017, 16(1): 38-50 46
4.1 An-1 anchor cable
The curve of An-1 anchor cable f-δ is shown in Fig.
8. Based on the elasticity modulus and the section area,
the theoretical maximum elongation Δδmax of different
tension stress increment is calculated. When f f0 and
Δδmax is with the tension increment of Δf 20 kN (at
this time, the stress-loading strand length is equal to the
sum of the length of inner anchoring section, the free
section, the outer anchoring section and the prestressed
tensioning section), Δδmax Δf (L l)/(nAE)
20 kN (30 000 mm 10 000 mm 760 mm)/(7
140 mm2195 GPa) 4.27 mm. When measured Δδ
Δδmax, the total shear force on the inner anchoring
section increases with increasing tension stress,
slippage among slurry, rock-soil body and stress bars
may happen, and partial wire break of steel strand or
the rock-soil body of the outer anchoring section may
be damaged by compression [26-27]. The loading process
will be stopped to avoid damaging the anchoring
structure.
Fig. 8 Tension stress-elongation curve of An-1 anchor cable
In Fig. 8, when the prestressed tensioning force f
raises from 982.62 kN to 1 004.4 kN, the steel strand
and counter-force structure have no abnormality. When
Δδ 6.46 mm and exceeds Δδmax, a slippage happens
between stress bars of internal anchoring structure.
Then the loading is stopped, and the stress at this time
is 1.25 times of the design load. The single tension
stress is 143.48 kN, which is less than 0.75 times of the
stretching resistance fb, and the steel strand is under the
elastic deformation phase. The f-δ curve consists of two
curves similar to straight lines, which is similar to the
theory. Combined with the judgment method of anchor
stress, the straight line fittings, y 68.65 x 20.616
and y 5.424 1 x 741.45 are adopted, repectively, on
the two curves, and the cross point of the two lines is
the value of the anchor stress f0 803.29 kN, which is
in line with the record result of the prestressed
tensioning process.
4.2 An-2 anchor cable
The curve of An-2 anchor cable f-δ is shown in Fig.
9. Based on the elasticity modulus and the section area,
the theoretical minimum elongation Δδmin of different
tension stress increment is calculated. When f f0 and
Δδmin is with the tension increment of Δf 20 kN (at
this time, the stress-loading strand length is equal to the
length of prestressed tensioning section), Δδmin Δf
l/nAE 20 kN (730 mm)/(7 140 mm2 195 GPa)
0.08 mm. When the tested Δδ 0.08 mm, the free
section and the prestressed tensioning section jointly
carry the load to extend, and the slope of the f-δ curve
decreases gradually and produces a inflecting point, at
which the prestressed tensioning stress is equal to the
anchor stress. In Fig. 9, when An-2 anchor cable
prestressed tensioning force f raises from 731.82 kN to
746.93 kN, the steel strands and counter-force structure
have no abnormality. When Δδ 3.51 mm and exceeds
Δδmin, the inflection point obviously occurs on the
curve. It is indicated that the free section gradually
suffers prestressed tensioning loading effect from outer
P. Zhang, et al.
Side slope anchor cable
J. Chongqing Univ. Eng. Ed. [ISSN 1671-8224], 2017, 16(1): 38-50 47
exposed section, and these two sections are jointly
carrying the load to extend. Then the loading is stopped,
and the stress at this time is 93.4 of the design load.
The single tension stress is 106.70 kN, which is less
than 0.75 times of fb, and the steel strands are still in
the elastic deformation phase. Combined with the
judgment method of anchor stress, the straight line
fittings, y 67.678x 35.372 and y 5.883 9 x
643.64 are adopted, repectively, on the two curves, and
the cross point of the two lines is the value of the
anchor stress f0 697.70 kN.
Fig. 9 Tension stress-elongation curve of An-2 anchor cable
4.3 An-3 anchor cable
The curve of An-3 anchor cable f-δ is shown in Fig.
10. It can be seen that when the tension force raises
from 300.03 kN to 324.69 kN (Δf 24.69 kN), Δδ
10.38 mm. Δδ 14.32 mm when the tension force
raises from 366.26 kN to 376.59 kN (Δf 10.3 kN),
which far exceeds Δδmax. An inflecting point occurs on
the curve, and the anchor cable steel strands and
counter-force structure have no abnormality, which
indicates that the anchor cable internal anchoring
structure has destructive mutation, and the length of
anchorage section, slurry intensity, wall-rock features
as well as the caking power of these three cannot
satisfy design requirements. Then the loading is
stopped, and the stress at this time is 47.1 of the
design load. The single tension stress is 53.80 kN,
which is less than 0.75 times of fb, and the steel strands
are in the elastic deformation phase. Combined with
the judgment method of anchor stress, the straight line
fittings, y 29.019 x 88.15 and y 1.055 9 x
301.06 are adopted, repectively, on the two curves, and
the cross point of the two lines is the value of the
anchor stress f0 309.10 kN. It is verified that the inner
anchoring section is 8 m, the free section is 19 m, and
the inner anchoring section lies in the low weathered
layer of mudstone split coal. The construction of the
anchor cable did not achieve the designed work load.
Fig. 10 Tension stress-elongation curve of An-3 anchor cable
5 Conclusions
1) The prestressed tensioning method is a quasi-
nondestructive method to test the anchor stress of the
anchor cable. In an ideal state, the f-δ curve exhibits
two linear elasticity deformation stages, represented by
two intersecting straight lines of different slopes, and
P. Zhang, et al.
Side slope anchor cable
J. Chongqing Univ. Eng. Ed. [ISSN 1671-8224], 2017, 16(1): 38-50 48
the intersection point acts as the anchor stress value.
2) Influenced by rock mass springback, anchor tongs
retraction, pore friction, slippage of inner anchorage
section and other factors, the actual measured f-δ curve
is two non-linear elastic deformation stages with a
sleek inflection point. The slopes of two fitting
straight-lines are lower than the ideal state with a slight
deviation of test results. The model testing study shows
that when the ratio of the anchor stress to maximum
tension force is less than 0.7, the test deviation will
gradually decrease with the increasing specific value,
and the minimum deviation is 0.19%.
3) The prestressed tensioning method plays a stress-
compensation role for the anchor cable which lacks
anchor stress. Locking anchor stress after prestressed
tensioning or stress-compensation is mainly affected by
the maximum tension force, anchor stress, anchor tongs
retraction and other factors.
4) In engineering application, the maximum
prestressed tensioning force is preferably 1.5 times of
the design load of anchor cable, and theoretically
calculated maximum and minimum elongation are
generated by the grading increment of prestressed
tensioning force. Considering the correlation between
the prestressed tensioning force, actually measured
elongation of anchor cable and theoretically maximum
and minimum elongation, increasing load suspensive
condition is established to determine whether the
anchor prestress extent and the caking power of inner
anchorage section meet design requirements and the
occurrence of sliding failure.
References
[1] 陈良奎,范景伦,韩军,等.岩土锚固[M].北京:中国建筑
工业出版社,2003.
CHEN L K, FAN J L, HAN J, et al. Anchoring in rock
soil [M]. Beijing: China Architecture and Building
Press, 2003. (In Chinese).
[2] 何思明,王全才.预应力锚索作用机理研究中的几个
问题[J].地下空间工程学报,2006,2(1):160-165.
HE S M, WANG Q C. Problems of the study on
mechanism of anchor cable [J]. Chinese Journal of
Underground Space and Engineering, 2006, 2(1): 160-
165. (In Chinese).
[3] 杨辉,陈晨.浅析锚杆预应力的影响因素[J].西部探矿
工程,2006,18(4):57 -59.
YANG H, CHEN C. Research on the influencing
factors of anchor [J]. West-China Exploration
Engineering, 2006, 18(4): 57-59. (In Chinese).
[4] KUMAR R, SHARMA K G, VARADARAJAN A.
Post-peak response of some metamorphic rocks of
India under high confining pressures [J]. International
Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2010,
47(8): 1357-1362.
[5] 高大水,曾勇.三峡永久船闸高边坡锚索预应力状态
监测分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报 ,2007,20(5):653-
656.
GAO D S, ZENG Y. Monitoring analysis on pre-stress
state of anchor cable of high slope of the tgp permanent
shiplocks [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and
Engineering, 2001, 20(5): 653-656. (In Chinese).
[6] 丁秀丽,盛谦.预应力锚索锚固机理的数值模拟试验
研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2002,21(7):980-988.
DING X L, SHENG Q. Numerical simulation testing
study on reinforcement mechanism of prestressed
anchorage cable [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock
Mechanics and Engineering, 2002, 21(7): 980-988. (In
Chinese).
[7] 中华人民共和国国家经济贸易委员会.水电工程预应
力锚固设计规范:DL/T5176-2003[S].北京:中国电力
出版社,2003.
State Economic and Trade Commission of the PRC.
Design specification of prestressed anchorage for
hydropower project: DL/T5176-2003 [S]. Beijing:
China Power Press, 2003. (In Chinese).
[8] 时南翔.预应力锚固系统的检测与监控[J].重庆建筑
大学学报,2002,24(2):43-46.
SHI N X. Inspection and monitoring of prestressed
anchoring system [J]. Journal of Chongqing Jianzhu
P. Zhang, et al.
Side slope anchor cable
J. Chongqing Univ. Eng. Ed. [ISSN 1671-8224], 2017, 16(1): 38-50 49
University, 2002, 24(2): 43-46. (In Chinese).
[9] CHAKI S, BOURSE G. Guided ultrasonic waves for
non-destructive monitoring of the stress levels in
prestressed steel strands [J]. Ultrasonics, 2009, 4(2):
162-171.
[10] CHEN H L, WISSAWAPAISAL K. Measurement of
tensile forces in a seven-wire prestressing strand using
stress waves [J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics,
2001, 127(6): 599-606.
[11] 唐树名,罗斌,刘涌江.岩土锚固安全性无损检测技术
[J].公路交通技术,2005,10(5):29-32.
TANG S M, LUO B, LIU Y J. Non-destructive testing
technology of geotactical anchorage safety [J].
Technology of Highway and Transport, 2005, 10(5):
29-32. (In Chinese).
[12] 赵明阶,徐容.锚索预应力声测技术研究及工程应用
[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2003,22(7):1146-1150.
ZHAO M J, XU R. Ultrasonic testing on the load
monitoring of per-stressed cable an its application [J].
Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,
2003, 22(7): 1146-1150. (In Chinese).
[13] SCALEA F, RIZZO P, SEIBLE F. Stress measurement
and defect detection in steel strands by guided stress
waves [J]. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering,
2003, 15(3): 219-227.
[14] 何文,王成,宁建国,等.端锚锚杆工作载荷的导波确定
法[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2009,28(9):1767-1772.
HE W, WANG C, NING J G, et al. Guided wave
determination method of service load in partially
grouted bolt [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics
and Engineering, 2009, 28(9): 1767-1772. (In Chinese).
[15] 汪明武,王鹤龄.锚固体系无损检测的研究[J].岩石力
学与工程学报,2001,23(1):109-113.
WANG M W, WANG H L. Nondestructive testing of
grouted bolts system [J]. Chines Journal of Rock
Mechanics and Engineering, 2001, 23(1): 109-113. (In
Chinese).
[16] BRUCE M, GOMEZ J, TRAYLOR R. Repeated lift-
off testing of single bore multiple anchors for dam
retaining wall over a 5-year period [M]. New York:
American Society of Civil Engineers, 2009.
[17] BRUCE M E C, GÓMEZ J, TRAYLOR R P. Repeated
lift-off testing of single bore multiple anchors for dam
retaining wall over a 5-year period [C]// International
Foundation Congress and Equipment Expo 2009.
Orlando: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2009.
[18] 罗斌,唐树名,程晓辉,等.锚下预应力反拉检测技术[J].
公路交通技术,2012,2(1):12-14.
LUO B, TANG S M, CHENG X H, et al. Techniques
of reverse drawing detection for of prestress under
anchor [J]. Technology of Highway and Transport,
2012, 2(1): 12-14. (In Chinese).
[19] BRUCE M E C, GOMEZ J, TRAYLOR R. Repeated
lift-off testing of single bore multiple anchors for dam
retaining wall over a 5-year period [M]. New York:
American Society of Civil Engineers, 2009.
[20] HIROAKI M, TAKESHI O, HIROAKI K, et al. A new
manual for ground anchor inspection, integrity
investigation and remedial measures [C]// International
Conference on Ground Anchorages and Anchored
Structures in Service. London: Institution of Civil
Engineers, 2007.
[21] 刘华太,曾德荣.锚索力学参数拉拔试验研究[J].重庆
交通学院学报,2007,26(2):36-39.
LIU H T, ZENG D R. Study on mechanical
coefficients of anchor cables by experiments [J].
Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2007, 26(2):
36-39. (In Chinese).
[22] 韩侃,李登科,吴冠仲.预应力锚索锚固力拉拔试验分
析[J].岩土工程学报,2011,33(Sup1):385-387.
HAN K, LI D K, WU G Z. Pull-out tests on anchoring
force of prestressed anchor cables [J]. Chinese Journal
of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(Sup1): 385-387.
(In Chinese).
[23] 付丹,郭红仙,程晓辉,等.预应力锚索工作应力的检测
方法拉脱法的检测机制和试验研究[J].岩土力学,
2012,33(8):2247-2252.
FU D, GUO H X, CHENG X H, et al. Working stress
measurement of prestressed anchor cables:detection
mechanism and experimental study of lift-off test [J].
P. Zhang, et al.
Side slope anchor cable
J. Chongqing Univ. Eng. Ed. [ISSN 1671-8224], 2017, 16(1): 38-50 50
Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2012, 33(8): 2247-2252. (In
Chinese).
[24] 张发明,陈祖煜,刘宁.岩体与锚固体间黏结强度的确
定[J].岩土力学,2001,22(4):470-473.
ZHANG F M, CHEN Z Y, LIU N. Determination of
cohesive strength between rock mass and anchors [J].
Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2001, 22(4): 470-473. (In
Chinese).
[25] VASIL’EV V Z. Axisymmetric deformation of an
elastic mass containing a hole [J]. Soil Mechanics and
Foundation Engineering, 1977, 14(1): 63-68.
[26] 李铀,白世伟,方昭茹,等.预应力锚索锚固体破坏与锚
固力传递模式研究[J].岩土力学,2003,24(5):686-690.
LI Y, BAI S W, FANG Z R, et al. Research on failure
mechanism and anchoring force transmission of
prestressed cable [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2003,
24(5): 686-690. (In Chinese).
[27] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.预应力筋用锚具,
夹具和连接器:GB/T14370-2015[S].北京:中国标准出
版社,2016.
Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s
Republic of China. Anchorage, grip and coupler for
prestressing tendons: GB/T 14370-2007 [S]. Beijing:
China Standards Press, 2016. (In Chinese).