Pressure Calibration in DAC -- Challenges for Increasing Accuracy and Precision

32
Pressure Calibration in DAC -- Challenges for Increasing Accuracy and Precision Ho-kwang Mao Carnegie Institution of Washington Pressure Calibration Workshop January 26-28, 2007

description

Pressure Calibration in DAC -- Challenges for Increasing Accuracy and Precision. Ho-kwang Mao Carnegie Institution of Washington. Pressure Calibration Workshop January 26-28, 2007. Different Challenges in Different P-T Ranges. 2. 1- 100 GPa 10 MPa – 1 GPa - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Pressure Calibration in DAC -- Challenges for Increasing Accuracy and Precision

Page 1: Pressure Calibration in DAC --  Challenges for Increasing Accuracy and Precision

Pressure Calibration in DAC --

Challenges for Increasing Accuracy and Precision

Ho-kwang Mao Carnegie Institution of Washington

Pressure Calibration Workshop January 26-28, 2007

Page 2: Pressure Calibration in DAC --  Challenges for Increasing Accuracy and Precision

• 1- 100 GPa

• 10 MPa – 1 GPa

• 100- 300 GPa

• High temperatures

Different Challenges in Different P-T Ranges

2

Page 3: Pressure Calibration in DAC --  Challenges for Increasing Accuracy and Precision

Topics

• Primary calibration (accuracy)

• Secondary calibration (precision)

• Hydrostaticity

• X-ray diffraction (axial and radial)

• Optical spectroscopy (Brillouin, Raman, fluorescence)

• Inelastic x-ray scattering spectroscopy

3

Page 4: Pressure Calibration in DAC --  Challenges for Increasing Accuracy and Precision

Goals

Primary calibration (accuracy)• 1- 100 GPa P/P = ±1%

• 100- 300 GPa P/P = ±1%

• High temperatures -- at 100 GPa-2500 K P/P = ±1%

Secondary calibration (precision)• 10 MPa – 1 GPa P = ±5 MPa

• 1- 100 GPa P/P = ±0.2%

• 100- 300 GPa P/P = ±0.2%

4

Page 5: Pressure Calibration in DAC --  Challenges for Increasing Accuracy and Precision

Goals

Primary calibration (accuracy)• 1- 100 GPa P/P = ±1%

• 100- 300 GPa P/P = ±1%

• High temperatures -- at 100 GPa-2500 K P/P = ±1%

Secondary calibration (precision)• 10 MPa – 1 GPa P = ±5 MPa

• 1- 100 GPa P/P = ±0.2%

• 100- 300 GPa P/P = ±0.2%

4

Page 6: Pressure Calibration in DAC --  Challenges for Increasing Accuracy and Precision

Primary calibration requires measurements of two independent functions related to pressure.

Examples:

• F and A – free rotation piston-cylinder

• US and UP – shock Hugoniot

• V and – DACV

2 = K/ K = dP/d P = V

2d.

5

Page 7: Pressure Calibration in DAC --  Challenges for Increasing Accuracy and Precision

Primary calibration requires measurements of two independent functions related to pressure.

Examples:

• F and A – free rotation piston-cylinder

• US and UP – shock Hugoniot

• V and – DACV

2 = K/ K = dP/d P = V

2d.

5

Page 8: Pressure Calibration in DAC --  Challenges for Increasing Accuracy and Precision

Goals

Primary calibration (accuracy)• 1- 100 GPa P/P = ±1%

• 100- 300 GPa P/P = ±1%

• High temperatures -- at 100 GPa-2500 K P/P = ±1%

Secondary calibration (precision)• 10 MPa – 1 GPa P = ±5 MPa

• 1- 100 GPa P/P = ±0.2%

• 100- 300 GPa P/P = ±0.2%

6

Page 9: Pressure Calibration in DAC --  Challenges for Increasing Accuracy and Precision

Pressure calibration, P/P ±1%

from x-ray diffractionVfrom Brillouin scatteringP- EOS by integration (Primary)

Ruby fluorescence shiftCalibrated by MgO P- EOS(Secondary)

Zha, Mao, Hemley, PNAS (2000)

6

Page 10: Pressure Calibration in DAC --  Challenges for Increasing Accuracy and Precision

Goals

Primary calibration (accuracy)• 1- 100 GPa P/P = ±1%

• 100- 300 GPa P/P = ±1%

• High temperatures -- at 100 GPa-2500 K P/P = ±1%

Secondary calibration (precision)• 10 MPa – 1 GPa P = ±5 MPa

• 1- 100 GPa P/P = ±0.2%

• 100- 300 GPa P/P = ±0.2%

10

Page 11: Pressure Calibration in DAC --  Challenges for Increasing Accuracy and Precision

Secondary Calibration of Six Metals

XRD, ±0.2%,P/P ±1%

Ruby fluorescence shiftCalibrated by MgO P- EOS(Secondary)

Dewaele, Loubeyre, Mezouar, PRB (2004)

Page 12: Pressure Calibration in DAC --  Challenges for Increasing Accuracy and Precision

Goals

Primary calibration (accuracy)• 1- 100 GPa P/P = ±1%

• 100- 300 GPa P/P = ±1%

• High temperatures -- at 100 GPa-2500 K P/P = ±1%

Secondary calibration (precision)• 10 MPa – 1 GPa P = ±5 MPa

• 1- 100 GPa P/P = ±0.2%

• 100- 300 GPa P/P = ±0.2%

12

Page 13: Pressure Calibration in DAC --  Challenges for Increasing Accuracy and Precision

High T Primary Calibration Using V and

Problem: KS = (1 + T) KT

Difference ~10% at 3000 K introduces >1% error

A practical alternative is to combine 300 K primary calibration and high resolution high P-T XRD

13

Page 14: Pressure Calibration in DAC --  Challenges for Increasing Accuracy and Precision

121

122

123

124

125

126

127

106 110 114 118 122 126 130 134

0

0.006

0.012

0.018

0.024

0.03

300 900 1500 2100

Pressure (GPa)

Vol

ume

(Å3 )

300 K

1400 K

2000 K

Fs20 ppv

Temperature (K)

(VT –

V30

0)/

V30

0

14

Post-perovskite P-V-TW. Mao et al, submitted (2007)

Page 15: Pressure Calibration in DAC --  Challenges for Increasing Accuracy and Precision

Goals

Primary calibration (accuracy)• 1- 100 GPa P/P = ±1%

• 100- 300 GPa P/P = ±1%

• High temperatures -- at 100 GPa-2500 K P/P = ±1%

Secondary calibration (precision)• 10 MPa – 1 GPa P = ±5 MPa

• 1- 100 GPa P/P = ±0.2%

• 100- 300 GPa P/P = ±0.2%

15

Page 16: Pressure Calibration in DAC --  Challenges for Increasing Accuracy and Precision

- BIOCHEMICAL REACTIONS IN HYDROTHERMA FLUIDS

- LIFE IN EXTREME ENVIRONMENTS (>1600 MPa)

[Sharma et al., Science 295, 1514 (2002)]- PRESSURE EFFECTS ON STRUCTURE-FUNCTION RELATIONS

Single-Crystal Diffraction of Cow Pea Mosaic Virus

[Lin et al., Acta Crystal. D61, 737 (2005)]

Biomaterials -- bacteria and virus16

350 MPa

Page 17: Pressure Calibration in DAC --  Challenges for Increasing Accuracy and Precision

Hydrogen storage in clathrate

Energy, keV

d-spacing, Å

Intensity

25 35 45 55 65

311

5 2.56 4 35.5 4.5 3.5

533

220

222

400

331 42

2

440

531

620

511

333

H2-2H2O S-II clathrate-- A clean and efficient material for hydrogen storage

0.2 GPa

10 kPa77 K 110 140 240

HH-sII

280

H2+H2O

17

W Mao et al, Science (2002)--Synthesis S-II at HP and quenched to low PT;

Lokshin et al, PRL (2004)--Identification of H2 in S-II cages with neutron;

Florusse et al, Science (2004)-- Stabilized to 280K at 1 bar

Page 18: Pressure Calibration in DAC --  Challenges for Increasing Accuracy and Precision

Goals

Primary calibration (accuracy)• 1- 100 GPa P/P = ±1%

• 100- 300 GPa P/P = ±1%

• High temperatures -- at 100 GPa-2500 K P/P = ±1%

Secondary calibration (precision)• 10 MPa – 1 GPa P = ±5 MPa

• 1- 100 GPa P/P = ±0.2%

• 100- 300 GPa P/P = ±0.2%

18

Page 19: Pressure Calibration in DAC --  Challenges for Increasing Accuracy and Precision

High Pressure Experiments Challenge Existing Understanding of Seismic Waves in Deep Earth

The crushing pressures in the lower mantle squeeze atoms and electrons so closely together that they interact differently from under normal conditions, even forcing spinning electrons to pair up in orbits. In theory, seismic-wave behavior at those depths may result from the vice-gripping pressure effect on the electron spin-state of iron in lower-mantle materials. Carnegie’s team performed ultra high-pressure experiments on the most abundant oxide material there, magnesiowüstite (Mg,Fe)O, and found that the changing electron spin states of iron in that mineral drastically affect the elastic properties of magnesiowüstite. The research may explain the complex seismic wave anomalies observed in the lowermost mantle.

Normalized volume of magnesiowüstite, (Mg0.83,Fe0.17)O, as a function of pressure at 300 K.

Jung-Fu Lin, Viktor V. Struzhkin, Steven D. Jacobsen, Michael Y. Hu, Paul Chow, Jennifer Kung, Haozhe Liu, Ho-kwang Mao and Russell J. Hemley; "Spin transition of iron in magnesiowüstite in the Earth's lower mantle" Nature 436, 377-380 (21 July 2005)

Spin transition of iron in magnesiowüstite19

Page 20: Pressure Calibration in DAC --  Challenges for Increasing Accuracy and Precision

Goals

Primary calibration (accuracy)• 1- 100 GPa P/P = ±1%

• 100- 300 GPa P/P = ±1%

• High temperatures -- at 100 GPa-2500 K P/P = ±1%

Secondary calibration (precision)• 10 MPa – 1 GPa P = ±5 MPa

• 1- 100 GPa P/P = ±0.2%

• 100- 300 GPa P/P = ±0.2%

20

Page 21: Pressure Calibration in DAC --  Challenges for Increasing Accuracy and Precision

Topics

• Primary calibration (accuracy)

• Secondary calibration (precision)

• Hydrostaticity

• X-ray diffraction (axial and radial)

• Optical spectroscopy (Brillouin, Raman, fluorescence)

• Inelastic x-ray scattering spectroscopy

21

Page 22: Pressure Calibration in DAC --  Challenges for Increasing Accuracy and Precision

0

1

2

3

0 20 40 60

Argon

t(G

Pa)

P(GPa)

Shear strength of argon

Mao, et al, J. Phys.: Cond. Mat. (2006)

Primary calibration needs to use He medium

Page 23: Pressure Calibration in DAC --  Challenges for Increasing Accuracy and Precision

Topics

• Primary calibration (accuracy)

• Secondary calibration (precision)

• Hydrostaticity

• X-ray diffraction (axial and radial)

• Optical spectroscopy (Brillouin, Raman, fluorescence)

• Inelastic x-ray scattering spectroscopy

23

Page 24: Pressure Calibration in DAC --  Challenges for Increasing Accuracy and Precision

Attaining V /V± 1%

• Ultrasonic measurements

• Nuclear resonant inelastic x-ray scattering

• Brillouin Spectroscopy

• Inelastic x-ray scattering spectroscopy

24

Page 25: Pressure Calibration in DAC --  Challenges for Increasing Accuracy and Precision

Attaining V /V± 1%

• Ultrasonic measurements to 50-300 GPa?

• Nuclear resonant inelastic x-ray scattering

• Brillouin Spectroscopy

• Inelastic x-ray scattering spectroscopy

25

Page 26: Pressure Calibration in DAC --  Challenges for Increasing Accuracy and Precision

Nuclear resonant inelastic x-ray spectroscopy (NRIXS)

APD

APD HRM M

KBmirrors

x-rays

DAC150nsec

NRIXS signal

SMS signal

nonmagnetic

magnetic

time

Energy

Inte

nsi

ty

Anti-stokes Stokes

Elastic line

XOR, Sector 3, APS, ANLXOR, Sector 3, APS, ANL

g(

) de

nsity

of s

tate

s

Debye Model

“Real” Crystal

2322

)(

Vg

333

213

SpD

222

3

4

)(

SP

KV

PVK

Page 27: Pressure Calibration in DAC --  Challenges for Increasing Accuracy and Precision

Attaining V /V± 1%

• Ultrasonic measurements

• Nuclear resonant inelastic x-ray scattering

• Brillouin Spectroscopy

• Inelastic x-ray scattering spectroscopy

27

Page 28: Pressure Calibration in DAC --  Challenges for Increasing Accuracy and Precision

Brillouin Spectroscopy

• Single crystalV accuracy ±1%

• PolycrystallineV accuracy 3-10%

28

Page 29: Pressure Calibration in DAC --  Challenges for Increasing Accuracy and Precision

Fiquet et al., Science 2001

Antonangeli et al., EPSL 2004

Antonangeli et al, PRL 2005

Single-xtal Co at 39 GPa

Inelastic x-ray scattering spectroscopy (IXSS)Poly-xtal hcp-Fe to over 100 GPa

Determines phonon dispersion

Page 30: Pressure Calibration in DAC --  Challenges for Increasing Accuracy and Precision

Inelastic x-ray scattering spectroscopy (IXSS)

7.6

7.8

8

8.2

8.4

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

angle between q and DAC compression axis

VP

(km

/sec

)

high resolution

medium resolution

Improve energy resolution from 6 meV to 1 meVto get to V /V± 1%

35XU, SPring-8

30

hcp-Fe at 52 GPa

W. Mao et al, in prep.

Page 31: Pressure Calibration in DAC --  Challenges for Increasing Accuracy and Precision

High Res. XRD with panoramic DAC

CCD

CCD

ctn Going from 2 = 10º to 2 = 90º, / improves 10x !

UNICAT, 34-ID, APS, ANL

Page 32: Pressure Calibration in DAC --  Challenges for Increasing Accuracy and Precision

Summary: Achievable Goals

Primary calibration (accuracy)• Hydrostaticity of He? P/P = 0.2-1%?

• Single-xtl Brillouin scattering or single-xtl ixss to 100- 300 GPa V/ V = ±1%

• Polycrystalline XRD to 100- 300 GPa and 100 GPa-2500 K / = ±0.2% P/P = ±1%

Secondary calibration (precision)• High resolution XRD at 10 MPa- 300 GPa

/ = ±0.02% P/P = ±0.2%

• Optical calibration P/P = ±0.2%

32