Press Release - How do MPs utilize MPLADS in Karnataka?

PRESS Release ¥ÀwæPÁ ¥ÀæPÀluÉ

1

How do MPs utilise MPLADS in Karnataka? ¸ÀA¸Àvï ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀågÀ ¸ÀÜ½ÃAiÀÄ ¥ÀæzÉÃ±À C©üªÀÈ¢Þ AiÉÆÃd£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ

ºÉÃUÉ G¥ÀAiÉÆÃV¹PÉÆ¼ÀÄîvÁÛgÉ?

A Venugopala Reddy

K Prabhakar Patibandla Srikant

Public Affairs Centre 15, KIADB Industrial Area,

Bommasandra-Jigani Link Road Bangalore- 562 105. www.pacindia.org

Email: [email protected]

http://www.pacindia.org/


2

Introduction ¥ÀjZÀAiÀÄ

Member of Parliament Local Area Development Scheme (MPLADS) allows the legislators (MPs) get a chance to don the role of executive by choosing and allocating development works. Each MP is allocated Rs. 5 Crores per annum currently, while till last year it was Rs. 2 Crores per annum. With such a huge amount at the disposal of each MP, it is often assumed that it would be used completely. ¸ÀA¸Àvï ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀågÀ ¸ÀÜ½ÃAiÀÄ ¥ÀæzÉÃ±À C©üªÀÈ¢Þ AiÉÆÃd£É (MPLADS) ªÀÄÆ®PÀ, JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ vÀªÀÄä vÀªÀÄä PÁAiÀÄðªÁå¦Û PÉëÃvÀæUÀ¼À°è C©üªÀÈ¢Þ PÉ®¸ÀUÀ¼À CAiÉÄÌ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¤UÀ¢üvÀªÁzÀ

C£ÀÄzÁ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀÄªÀ ªÀÄÆ®PÀ PÁAiÀÄð¤ªÁðºÀPÀgÀ ¥ÁvÀæªÀ£ÀÄß ¤ªÀð»¸ÀÄªÀ CªÀPÁ±ÀªÀ£ÀÄß

¥ÀqÉ¢zÁÝgÉ. ¥Àæ¸ÀÄÛvÀªÁV F AiÉÆÃd£ÉAiÀÄr ¥ÀæwAiÉÆ§â ¸ÀA¸Àvï ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀågÀÆ, ªÁ¶ðPÀ gÀÆ. 5

PÉÆÃnUÀ¼ÀªÀgÉUÉ C£ÀÄzÁ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ®Ä CºÀðgÁVzÁÝgÉ. PÀ¼ÉzÀ ªÀµÀðzÀªÀgÉUÀÆ F «Äw

ªÁ¶ðPÀ gÀÆ.2 PÉÆÃnUÀ¼À¶ÖvÀÄÛ. EµÀÄÖ §ÈºÀvï ªÉÆvÀÛzÀ C£ÀÄzÁ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀÜ½ÃAiÀÄ C©üªÀÈ¢Þ

PÉ®¸ÀUÀ½UÁV G¥ÀAiÉÆÃV¸À®Ä C¢üPÁgÀªÀ£ÀÄß ºÉÆA¢gÀÄªÀ ¸ÀA¸Àvï ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀågÀÄ, EzÀgÀ ¸ÀA¥ÀÆtð

¥ÀæAiÉÆÃd£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ¥ÀqÉzÀÄ C©üªÀÈ¢Þ PÉ®¸ÀUÀ¼À°è vÉÆqÀV¹PÉÆArzÁÝgÉ JAzÀÄ

H»¹PÉÆ¼Àî¯ÁVwÛzÉ.

Against this backdrop, Public Affairs Centre (PAC) launched a study on MPLADS to understand and analyse the utilisation pattern among the MPs ( Sabha & Rajya Sabha) in Karnataka. The present study looked at variations in MPLADS spending by various criteria, such as backward and forward regions, education qualifications of MPs, extent of experience of MPs, among other factors. F »£Éß¯ÉAiÀÄ°è, ¥À©èPï C¥sÉÃgïì ¸ÉAlgï (¦J¹), F AiÉÆÃd£ÉAiÀÄrAiÀÄ°è JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ

(¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À s̈É & gÁdå¸À¨sÉ) ºÀtªÀ£ÀÄß AiÀiÁªÀ jÃw G¥ÀAiÉÆÃV¸ÀÄvÁÛgÉ JA§ÄzÀ£ÀÄß CxÀð

ªÀiÁrPÉÆAqÀÄ «±ÉèÃ¶¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀPÁÌV CzsÀåAiÀÄ£ÀªÉÇAzÀ£ÀÄß PÉÊUÉÆArvÀÄÛ. F CzsÀåAiÀÄ£ÀªÀÅ

ªÀÄÄAzÀÄªÀjzÀ ºÁUÀÆ »AzÀÄ½zÀ ¥ÀæzÉÃ±ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ, JA¦UÀ¼À ±ÉÊPÀëtÂPÀ CºÀðvÉ, C£ÀÄ¨sÀªÀ ºÁUÀÆ

EvÀgÀ ªÀiÁ£ÀzÀAqÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß DzsÀj¹ MPLADS AiÉÆÃd£ÉAiÀÄ ºÀtªÀ£ÀÄß AiÀiÁªÀ jÃw

G¥ÀAiÉÆÃV¹PÉÆ¼Àî¯ÁVzÉ JA§ÄzÀgÀ §UÉÎ UÀªÀÄ¤¸À¯ÁVzÉ.

Many MPs did not bother to utilise the MPLAD fund fully. Some members from Rajya Sabha did not even initiate spending under MPLADS. Only two MPs from 14thLok Sabha (2004-09) utilised 100 per cent of funds under MPLADS. At a time when MPs are not even utilising Rs. 2 Crore per annum completely, it is interesting to note that the same has been increased to Rs. 5 Crore per annum. ºÀ®ªÀÅ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ F ºÀtªÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀA¥ÀÆtðªÁV G¥ÀAiÉÆÃV¹PÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀ §UÉÎ ºÉaÑ£À

C¸ÀQÛªÀ»¸ÀzÉ EgÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ PÀAqÀÄ §A¢zÉ. DzÀgÉ PÉ®ªÀÅ gÁdå¸À¨sÁ ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀågÀÄ F ºÀtªÀ£ÀÄß

G¥ÀAiÉÆÃV¸ÀÄªÀ ¥ÀæAiÀÄvÀßªÀ£ÀÆß ¸ÀºÀ ªÀiÁqÀ¢gÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ PÀAqÀÄ §A¢zÉ. 14£ÉÃ ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÉAiÀÄ°è


3

(2004-09) DAiÉÄÌAiÀiÁzÀ PÉÃªÀ® JgÀqÀÄ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ, F MPLADS AiÉÆÃd£ÉAiÀÄrAiÀÄ°ègÀÄªÀ ºÀtªÀ£ÀÄß ±ÉÃ.100gÀµÀÄÖ G¥ÀAiÉÆÃV¹gÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ w½zÀÄ §A¢zÉ. »AzÉ EzÀÝ gÀÆ.2 PÉÆÃn

C£ÀÄzÁ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀA¥ÀÆtðªÁV G¥ÀAiÉÆÃV¸ÀÄªÀ°è JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ «¥sÀ®gÁVgÀÄªÀ ¸ÀAzÀ s̈ÀðzÀ°è,

C£ÀÄzÁ£ÀzÀ ªÉÆvÀÛªÀ£ÀÄß ªÁ¶ðPÀ gÀÆ. 5 PÉÆÃnUÀ½UÉ ºÉaÑ¹gÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ CvÀåAvÀ PÀÄvÀÆºÀ®PÀgÀ

«µÀAiÀÄªÁVzÉ.

Highlights of the Study CzsÀåAiÀÄ£ÀzÀ ªÀÄÄSÁåA±ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ

On an average LS MPs (57%) showed better utilisation than RS MPs (30%).

C£ÀÄzÁ£ÀzÀ §¼ÀPÉAiÀÄ ¸ÀgÁ¸Àj ¯ÉPÀÌzÀ°è ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÁ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ (57%) gÁdå¸À¨sÁ

JA¦UÀ½VAvÀ (30%) GvÀÛªÀÄªÁVzÁÝgÉ.

The utilisation seems to be deteriorating from 14th (57%) to 15th (47%) among LS MPs

F §¼ÀPÉAiÀÄ ¥ÀæªÀiÁt 14£ÉÃ (57%) ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÉVAvÀ 15£ÉÃ (47%) ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÁ

CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ ºÉÆÃ°PÉAiÀÄ°è PÀrªÉÄAiÀiÁVzÉ.

Backward region MPs (47%) from North Karnataka utilised less than forward region MPs (63%) from South Karnataka.

zÀQët PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ ªÀÄÄAzÀÄªÀjzÀ ¥ÀæzÉÃ±ÀUÀ¼À JA¦UÀ½VAvÀ (63%), GvÀÛgÀ PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ

»AzÀÄ½zÀ ¥ÀæzÉÃ±ÀUÀ¼À JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ (47%) §¼ÀPÉAiÀÄ°è »AzÀÄ½¢zÁÝgÉ.

High utilisation seems to be associated with the less educated MPs. C£ÀÄzÁ£ÀzÀ GvÀÛªÀÄ §¼ÀPÉ, ±ÉÊPÀëtÂPÀªÁV PÀrªÉÄ ªÀÄlÖzÀ°ègÀÄªÀ JA¦UÀ¼À°è ºÉaÑzÉ.

On the whole experienced MPs (58%) had fared better than first timers (56%) in utilisation of funds.

MmÁÖgÉAiÀiÁV F §¼ÀPÉAiÀÄ°è ªÉÆzÀ® ¨ÁjUÉ DAiÉÄÌAiÀiÁVgÀÄªÀ JA¦UÀ½UÉ(56%)

ºÉÆÃ°¹zÀgÉ, C£ÀÄ s̈ÀªÀ«gÀÄªÀ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ(58%) GvÀÛªÀÄªÁVzÁÝgÉ.

Objectives & Methodology GzÉÝÃ±ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ «zsÁ£ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ

To evaluate the utilisation of MPLADS funds in Karnataka; (2004-09 & 2009-11

PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ°è MPLADS §¼ÀPÉAiÀÄ ªÀiË®å¥Á¥À£À; (2004-09 & 2009-11)

To analyse spending patterns by region, party and other criteria; §¼ÀPÉAiÀÄ ªÀiÁzÀjUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀæzÉÃ±À, ¥Ánð ºÁUÀÆ EvÀgÀ ªÀiÁ£ÀzÀAqÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß DzsÀj¹

«±ÉèÃ¶¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ;

To rank MPs based on their utilisation of MPLADS MPLADS §¼ÀPÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß DzsÀj¹ JA¦UÀ½UÉ gÁåAPï ¤ÃqÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ;

Data-base from MPLADS website


4

MPLADS ªÉ¨ï¸ÉÊmï£À qÉÃmÁ-¨ÉÃ¸ï¤AzÀ <http://www.mplads.nic.in/sslapps/mplads

works/masterrep.ASP> Limitations of the Study CzsÀåAiÀÄ£ÀzÀ «ÄwUÀ¼ÀÄ

26 MPs (2004-09) – Belgaum &Chikkodi data not available 26 JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ (2004-09) - ¨É¼ÀUÁ« & aPÉÆÌÃr zÀvÁÛA±À ®¨sÀå«®è.

22 MPs (2009-11) – 6 constituencies data not available 22 JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ (2009-11) – 6 PÉëÃvÀæUÀ¼À zÀvÁÛA±À ®¨sÀå«®è.

MPLADS in India ¨sÁgÀvÀzÀ°è MPLADS Rs. 2 Crore per each MP per year for both Lok Sabha & Rajya Sabha (now

increased to Rs. 5 Crore) for constituency development. ¥ÀæwAiÉÆ§â ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÁ & gÁdå¸À s̈Á JA¦UÉ ¥ÀæwªÀµÀð PÉëÃvÀæ C©üªÀÈ¢ÞUÁV gÀÆ.2

PÉÆÃn (¥Àæ¸ÀÄÛvÀ gÀÆ. 5 PÉÆÃnUÀ½UÉ ºÉaÑ¸À¯ÁVzÉ)UÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁUÀÄwÛzÉ.

Nearly Rs. 8000 crores allocated for MPLADS (all India) for 2004-09. 2004-09gÀ £ÀqÀÄªÉ ¨sÁgÀvÀzÁzÀåAvÀ MPLADS AiÉÆÃd£ÉAiÀÄr ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁzÀ MlÄÖ ºÀt

¸Àj¸ÀÄªÀiÁgÀÄ gÀÆ. 8,000 PÉÆÃnUÀ¼ÀÄ

Of this, Rs. 5450 crores for LS MPs were allocated during 2004-09. Karnataka share is 5% (Rs. 280 crores).

EzÀgÀ°è 2004-09gÀ £ÀqÀÄªÉ ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À s̈Á JA¦UÀ½UÉ ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÀÝ MlÄÖ C£ÀÄzÁ£À gÀÆ. 5,450 PÉÆÃnUÀ¼ÀÄ. EzÀgÀ°è PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ ¥Á®Ä ±ÉÃ.5% (gÀÆ.280 PÉÆÃnUÀ¼ÀÄ).

Rs. 2500 crores was allocated for Rajya Sabha MPs (2004-09). Karnataka share is 4.8% (Rs. 120 crores)

2004-09gÀ £ÀqÀÄªÉ gÁdå¸À s̈Á JA¦UÀ½UÉ gÀÆ.2,500 PÉÆÃnUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVvÀÄÛ.

EzÀgÀ°è PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ ¥Á®Ä 4.8% (gÀÆ. 120 PÉÆÃnUÀ¼ÀÄ)

Total share for Karnataka is Rs. 400 crores. PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ MlÄÖ ¥Á®Ä gÀÆ. 400 PÉÆÃnUÀ¼ÀÄ

How is MPLADS utilised in Karnataka? PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdåzÀ°è MPLADS §¼ÀPÉ ºÉÃVzÉ?


5

How Lok Sabha MPs (2004-09)performed (Top & Bottom five MPs)? ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÁ JA¦UÀ¼À(2004-09)PÁAiÀÄð¤ªÀðºÀuÉ (ªÉÆzÀ® ºÁUÀÆ PÉÆ£ÉAiÀÄ 5 JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ)?

(Rs in Lakhs)

Note: Numbers in parenthesis denote ranking on spending and number of works carried out respectively. UÀªÀÄ¤¹: ªÉÄÃ¯É ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVgÀÄªÀ CªÀgÀuÉ aºÉß ªÀåAiÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ PÉ®¸ÀUÀ¼À ¸ÀASÉåAiÀÄ£ÀÄß DzsÀj¹ ¤qÀ¯ÁVgÀÄªÀ ¸ÁÜ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß

¸ÀÆa¸ÀÄvÀÛzÉ.

According to CAG report, at the national level minimum utilisation of funds is 37.4% and maximum 52.4%. Around 50% of funds went unutilised for 2004-09 Lok Sabha. ¹Jf ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ, F ºÀt §¼ÀPÉ ¥ÀæªÀiÁt gÁµÀÖç ªÀÄlÖzÀ°è PÀ¤µÀ× ±ÉÃ.37.4 ªÀÄvÀÄÛ

UÀjµÀ× ±ÉÃ.37.4 gÀ¶ÖzÉ. 2004-09gÀ ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÁ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°è MlÄÖ ±ÉÃ.50% ºÀt

§¼ÀPÉAiÀiÁUÀzÉ G½¢zÉ.

Overall 14thLok Sabha MPs from Karnataka utilised 57%. PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ°è 14£ÉÃ ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÁ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ MmÁÖgÉ ±ÉÃ.57% ºÀt §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrzÁÝgÉ.

Only Devegowda and Mallikarjunappa managed to utilise 100 per cent of funds allocated to them.

²æÃ zÉÃªÉÃUËqÀ ºÁUÀÆ ²æÃ ªÀÄ°èPÁdÄð£À¥ÀàgÀªÀgÀÄ ªÀiÁvÀæ ±ÉÃ.100%gÀµÀÄÖ ºÀt §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrzÁÝgÉ.

Srikantappa ranks last in fund utilisation for the period 2004-09 among Karnataka Lok Sabha MPs.

2004-09gÀ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÁ JA¦UÀ¼À ¥ÉÊQ, F ºÀtªÀ£ÀÄß G¥ÀAiÉÆÃV¸ÀÄªÀ°è

²æÃPÀAoÀ¥Àà£ÀªÀgÀÄ PÉÆÃ£ÉAiÀÄ ¸ÁÜ£ÀzÀ°èzÁÝgÉ.


6

How Rajya Sabha MPs performed 2004-09? 2004-09gÀ £ÀqÀÄªÉ gÁdå¸À¨sÁ JA¦UÀ¼À PÁAiÀÄð¤ªÀðºÀuÉ ºÉÃVvÀÄÛ?

Sl.No. PÀæªÀÄ

¸ÀASÉå Name of Member ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀågÀ ºÉ¸ÀgÀÄ

Party ¥Ánð

State of Origin ªÀÄÆ® gÁdå

% of spend on actual entitled MlÄÖ ºÀtzÀ°è RZÀÄð ªÀiÁrzÀ

±ÉÃPÀqÀªÁgÀÄ «ªÀgÀ

1

Prema Cariappa ¥ÉæÃªÀiÁ PÁjAiÀÄ¥Àà

INC LJ£ï¹

Karnataka PÀ£ÁðlPÀ

84.7 84.7

2

Oscar Fernandes D¸ÀÌgï ¥sÀ£ÁðAr¸ï

INC LJ£ï¹


79.0 79.0

3

Janardhana Poojary d£ÁzsÀð£À ¥ÀÆeÁj

INC LJ£ï¹


74.4 74.4

4

Bimba Raikar ©A¨Á gÁAiÀiïPÀgï

INC LJ£ï¹


45.9 45.9

5

K.B. Krishna Murthy PÉ.©. PÀÈµÀÚªÀÄÆwð

INC LJ£ï¹


31.7 31.7

6

B. K. Hariprasad ©.PÉ. ºÀj¥Àæ¸Ázï

INC LJ£ï¹


27.5 27.5

7

K. Rahman Khan PÉ. gÀºÀªÀiÁ£ï SÁ£ï

INC LJ£ï¹


23.5 23.5

8

M. V. Rajashekaran JA.«. gÁd±ÉÃRgÀ£ï

INC LJ£ï¹


19.6 19.6

9

Vijay Mallya «dAiÀiï ªÀÄ¯Áå

IND LJ£ïr


8.5 8.5

10

M. Venkaiah Naidu JA. ªÉAPÀAiÀÄå £ÁAiÀÄÄØ

BJP ©eÉ¦

Andhra Pradesh DAzsÀæ ¥ÀæzÉÃ±À

5.5 5.5

11

K.B. Shanappa PÉ.©.±Át¥Àà

BJP ©eÉ¦


5.3 5.3

12

M. A. M. Ramaswamy JA.J.JA. gÁªÀÄ¸Áé«Ä

JDS eÉrJ¸ï

Tamil Nadu vÀ«Ä¼ÀÄ£ÁqÀÄ

2.0 2.0

13

M. Rajasekara Murthy JA. gÁd±ÉÃRgÀ ªÀÄÆwð

JDS eÉrJ¸ï


0.9 0.9

STATE AS A WHOLE MmÁÖgÉ gÁdå

30.4 30.4

Prema Cariappa ranks top in utilisation, while Rajasekara Murthy ranks lowest.

§¼ÀPÉAiÀÄ°è ¥ÉæÃªÀiÁ PÁjAiÀÄ¥Àà ªÉÆzÀ® ¸ÁÜ£ÀzÀ°zÀÝgÉ, gÁd±ÉÃRgÀ ªÀÄÆwð J®èjVAvÀ PÉ¼ÀV£À ¸ÁÜ£ÀzÀ°èzÁÝgÉ.

Two MPs from outside Karnataka – Venkaiah Naidu and MAM Ramaswamy – ranks lowest in utilisation.


7

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdåzÀ ºÉÆgÀV£À E§âgÀÄ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ – ªÉAPÀAiÀÄå £ÁAiÀÄÄØ ºÁUÀÆ JAJJA gÁªÀÄ¸Áé«ÄAiÀÄªÀgÀÄ §¼ÀPÉAiÀÄ°è PÉÆÃ£ÉAiÀÄ ¸ÁÜ£ÀzÀ°èzÁÝgÉ.

None of the MPs from Rajya Sabha managed to utilise 100 per cent of allocated funds for the period 2004-09.

2004-09gÀ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°è, gÁdå ¸À s̈ÉAiÀÄ AiÀiÁªÉÇ§â ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀågÀÆ ¤UÀ¢ü¥Àr¹zÀÝ ºÀtzÀ°è ±ÉÃ.100gÀµÀÄÖ §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrgÀÄªÀÅ¢®è.

Ten out of 13 MPs utilised less than 50% of their fund. 13gÀ°è 10 JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ ±ÉÃ.50QAvÀ PÀrªÉÄ ºÀtªÀ£ÀÄß §¼À¹zÁÝgÉ.

Overall fund utilisation by Rajya Sabha MPs was 30% during 2004-09. 2004-09gÀ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°è, gÁdå¸À¨sÉ JA¦UÀ¼À MmÁÖgÉ ºÀt §¼ÀPÉ ±ÉÃ.30%.

MPs from which region spent more – Backward or forward? AiÀiÁªÀ ¥ÀæzÉÃ±ÀzÀ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ ºÉZÀÄÑ §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrzÁÝgÉ - »AzÀÄ½zÀ CxÀªÁ ªÀÄÄAzÀÄªÀjzÀ?

Though the needs of backward regions would be more, in Karnataka, MPs from North Karnataka showed lower utilisation than the MPs from South Karnataka. ¸ÁªÀiÁ£ÀåªÁV ºÀtzÀ CªÀ±ÀåPÀvÉ ºÉZÁÑV »AzÀÄ½zÀ ¥ÀæzÉÃ±ÀUÀ¼À°èzÀÝgÀÆ, GvÀÛgÀ PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ

JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ zÀQët PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ JA¦UÀ½VAvÀ PÀrªÉÄ ºÀtªÀ£ÀÄß §¼À¹PÉÆArzÁÝgÉ.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

North Karnataka (10) South Karnataka(16)

47

63

Percentage of fund utilisation by North Vs South Karnataka

57


8

Does higher education of MPs mean higher utilisation? ºÉZÀÄÑ «zÁåºÀðvÀ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ, ºÉZÀÄÑ ºÀt §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrzÁÝgÉAiÉÄÃ?

MPs with lower academic qualifications utilised MPLADS better than the

more educated. ºÉZÀÄÑ «zÁåºÀðvÀ JA¦UÀ½VAvÀ, PÀrªÉÄ «zÁåºÀðvÉ ¥ÀqÉzÀ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ MPLADS

ºÀt§¼ÀPÉAiÀÄ°è ªÀÄÄA¢zÁÝgÉ.

Which party leads? AiÀiÁªÀ ¥Ánð ªÀÄÄAZÀÆtÂAiÀÄ°èzÉ?

50

52

54

56

58

60

62

64

66

PUC (5) Matriculation (3)

Graduate & Above (18)

65.2

59.1

55.2

70

56

52

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

JDS (2) BJP (14) INC (9)

57


9

JD(S) with 70% utilisation leads in utilisation of MPLADS among all the

parties. eÉrJ¸ï ±ÉÃ.70%gÀµÀÄÖ §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁqÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ ªÀÄÆ®PÀ, MPLADS ºÀt §¼ÀPÉAiÀÄ°è

J¯Áè ¥ÀPÀëUÀ½VAvÀ ªÀÄÄA¢zÉ.

BJP with 14 MPs ranks second in utilisation (56%), while Congress with 9 MPs has utilised only around 50 %.

14 JA¦UÀ¼À£ÀÄß ºÉÆA¢gÀÄªÀ ©eÉ¦ ±ÉÃ. 56%gÀµÀÄÖ ºÀt §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁqÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ ªÀÄÆ®PÀ JgÀqÀ£ÉÃ ¸ÁÜ£ÀzÀ°èzÀÝgÉ, 9 JA¦UÀ¼À£ÀÄß ºÉÆA¢gÀÄªÀ PÁAUÉæ̧ ï PÉªÀ® ±ÉÃ.50%gÀµÀÄÖ

§¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrzÉ.

Only JD(S) managed to utilise more than the Karnataka state average of 57 %.

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdåzÀ ¸ÀgÁ¸Àj ±ÉÃ.57% gÀµÀÄÖ ºÀt§¼ÀPÉ ¥ÀæªÀiÁtQÌAvÀ ºÉZÀÄÑ ¥ÀæªÀiÁtzÀ ºÀt §¼ÀPÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß eÉr(J¸ï) ¥ÀPÀë ªÀiÁrPÉÆArzÉ.

Who spends more: Experienced MPs or First-timers? ºÉZÀÄÑ §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrPÉÆArgÀÄªÀªÀgÀÄ AiÀiÁgÀÄ: C£ÀÄ¨sÀªÀ ºÉÆA¢gÀÄªÀ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ CxÀªÁ

ªÉÆzÀ°UÀgÀÄ?

Experienced MPs showed better utilisation in JD(S) eÉr(J¸ï) ¥ÀPÀëzÀ°è C£ÀÄ¨sÀªÀ ºÉÆA¢gÀÄªÀ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ ºÉZÀÄÑ §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrzÁÝgÉ.

First time MPs showed better utilisation of MPLADS funds in BJP and marginally better in Congress.

JDS-(1+1) INC-(3+6) BJP-(8+6) Overall (13+13)

29

56 54 56

100

50

28

58

Frist Time Experienced


10

©eÉ¦AiÀÄ°è ªÉÆzÀ® ¨ÁjUÉ DAiÉÄÌAiÀiÁzÀ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ ºÉZÀÄÑ MPLADS ºÀt §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrzÁÝgÉ. PÁAUÉæ¸ï£À°è ªÉÆzÀ® ¨ÁjUÉ DAiÉÄÌAiÀiÁzÀ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ ¸Àé®à ªÀÄnÖUÉ

GvÀÛªÀÄ ºÀt §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrzÁÝgÉ.

On the whole experienced MPs with 58% utilisation did marginally better than first time MPs (56%).

MmÁÖgÉ C£ÀÄ¨sÀªÀ ºÉÆA¢gÀÄªÀ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ ±ÉÃ.58%gÀµÀÄÖ ºÀt §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁqÀÄªÀÅzÀgÀ

ªÀÄÆ®PÀ, ±ÉÃ. 56%gÀµÀÄÖ ºÀt §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrgÀÄªÀ ªÉÆzÀ® ¨ÁjUÉ DAiÉÄÌAiÀiÁzÀ

JA¦UÀ½VAvÀ ¸Àé®à ªÀÄÄA¢zÁÝgÉ.

Sector-wise utilisation by Lok Sabha & Rajya Sabha MPs ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÉ & gÁdå¸À¨sÉ JA¦UÀ¼À «¨sÁUÀªÁgÀÄ ºÀt§¼ÀPÉ «ªÀgÀ

Majority of the MPs from Lok Sabha spent money (48%) on community halls, while Rajya Sabhas spent on roads with 37%

§ºÀÄvÉÃPÀ ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À s̈Á JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ ±ÉÃ. 48%gÀµÀÄÖ ºÀtªÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀªÀÄÄzÁAiÀÄ ¨sÀªÀ£ÀUÀ½UÁV §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrzÀÝgÉ, gÁdå¸À¨sÁ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ ±ÉÃ.37%gÀµÀÄÖ ºÀtªÀ£ÀÄß gÀ¸ÉÛUÀ¼À C©üªÀÈ¢ÞUÁV

§¼À¹zÁÝgÉ.

Health and sanitation ranked lower among both Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha MPs.

DgÉÆÃUÀå ºÁUÀÆ £ÉÊªÀÄð®åPÉÌ ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÉ ºÁUÀÆ gÁdå¸À¨sÉ JgÀqÀÆ ªÀÄ£ÉUÀ¼À

JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ PÉÆÃ£ÉAiÀÄ ¸ÁÜ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ¤ÃrzÁÝgÉ.

% of utilisation for Lok Sabha 2009-11 2009-11gÀ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°è ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÉAiÀÄ ±ÉÃPÀqÀªÁgÀÄ ºÀt§¼ÀPÉ

Sl.No PÀæªÀÄ

¸ÀASÉå

Name of Member ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀågÀ ºÉ¸ÀgÀÄ

Constituency PÉëÃvÀæ

Party ¥ÀPÀë

% spend on actual

RZÀÄð ªÀiÁrzÀ

±ÉÃPÀqÀªÁgÀÄ

ºÀtzÀ ¥ÀæªÀiÁt

1 Joshi, Pralhad Venkatesh eÉÆÃ¶, ¥ÀæºÁèzï ªÉAPÀmÉÃ±ï

Dharwad zsÁgÀªÁqÀ

BJP ©eÉ¦

100.0 100.0

2 Gowda, Chandre D.B. UËqÀ, ZÀAzÉæÃ r.©.

Bangalore North ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ GvÀÛgÀ

BJP ©eÉ¦

100.0 100.0

3 Hegde, Anant Kumar Dattatreya ºÉUÉØ, C£ÀAvÀPÀÄªÀiÁgï zÀvÁÛvÉæÃAiÀÄ

Uttara Kannada GvÀÛgÀ PÀ£ÀßqÀ

BJP ©eÉ¦

100.0 100.0

4 D. V. Sadananda Gowda r.«. ¸ÀzÁ£ÀAzÀ UËqÀ

Udupi,Chikmagalur GqÀÄ¦, aPÀÌªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ

BJP ©eÉ¦

83.4 83.4

5 Kateel, Nalin Kumar PÀnÃ®Ä, £À½£ï PÀÄªÀiÁgï

Dakshina Kannada zÀQët PÀ£ÀßqÀ

BJP ©eÉ¦

75.1 75.1


11

6 Vishwanath, Adagooru Huchegowda «±Àé£Áxï, CqÀUÀÆgÀÄ ºÀÄZÉÑÃUËqÀ

Mysore ªÉÄÊ¸ÀÆgÀÄ

INC LJ£ï¹

73.7 73.7

7 Gaddigoudar, Parvatagouda Chandanagouda UÀrØUËqÀgÀ, ¥ÀªÀðvÀUËqÀ ZÀAzÀ£ÀUËqÀ

Bagalkot ¨ÁUÀ®PÉÆÃmÉ

BJP ©eÉ¦

59.8 59.8

8 Devegowda, H.D. zÉÃªÉÃUËqÀ, ºÉZï.r.

Hassan ºÁ¸À£À

JD(S) eÉr(J¸ï

)

53.5 53.5

9 Jigajinagi, Ramesh Chandappa fUÀftV, gÀªÉÄÃ±ï ZÀAzÀ¥Àà

Bijapur(SC) ©eÁ¥ÀÄgÀ (J¸ï¹)

BJP ©eÉ¦

52.0 52.0

10 Moily, M. Veerappa ªÉÆ¬Äè, JA. «ÃgÀ¥Àà

Chikkballapur aPÀÌ§¼Áî¥ÀÄgÀ

INC LJ£ï¹

50.3 50.3

11 Udasi, Shivkumar Chanabasappa GzÁ¹, ²ªÀPÀÄªÀiÁgï ZÀ£Àß§¸À¥Àà

Haveri ºÁªÉÃj

BJP ©eÉ¦

44.4 44.4

12 Mohan, P. C. ªÉÆÃºÀ£ï ¦.¹.

Bangalore Central ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ ¸ÉAlæ¯ï

BJP ©eÉ¦

28.6 28.6

13 Ananth Kumar C£ÀAvÀ PÀÄªÀiÁgï

Bangalore South ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ zÀQët

BJP ©eÉ¦

24.8 24.8

14 Shivaramagouda ²ªÀgÁªÀÄUËqÀ

Koppal PÉÆ¥Àà¼À

BJP ©eÉ¦

24.6 24.6

15 Shantha, J. ±ÁAvÁ, eÉ.

Bellary (ST) §¼Áîj (J¸ïn)

BJP ©eÉ¦

23.6 23.6

16 Yeddyurappa, Raghavendra AiÀÄqÀÆågÀ¥Àà, gÁWÀªÉÃAzÀæ

Shimoga ²ªÀªÉÆUÀÎ

BJP ©eÉ¦

22.4 22.4

17 Swamy, Janardhana ¸Áé«Ä, d£ÁzsÀð£À

Chitradurga(SC) avÀæzÀÄUÀð (J¸ï¹)

BJP ©eÉ¦

20.1 20.1

18 Singh, N.Dharam ¹AUï, J£ï. zsÀgÀA

Bidar ©ÃzÀgï

INC LJ£ï¹

15.9 15.9

19 Kumaraswamy, H.D. PÀÄªÀiÁgÀ¸Áé«Ä, ºÉZï.r.

Bangalore Rural ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ UÁæªÀiÁAvÀgÀ

JD(S) eÉr(J¸ï

)

7.0 7.0

20 Basavaraj,GangasandraSiddappa §¸ÀªÀgÁeï, UÀAUÀ¸ÀAzÀæ ¹zÀÝ¥Àà

Tumkur vÀÄªÀÄPÀÆgÀÄ

BJP ©eÉ¦

4.9 4.9

21 Siddeshwara, GowdarMallikarjunappa

Davanagere zÁªÀtUÉgÉ

BJP ©eÉ¦

2.6 2.6


12

¹zÉÝÃ±ÀégÀ, UËqÀgÀ ªÀÄ°èPÁdÄð£À¥Àà

22 Dhruvanarayana, Rangaswamy zsÀÈªÀ£ÁgÁAiÀÄt, gÀAUÀ¸Áé«Ä

Chamrajanagar(SC) ZÁªÀÄgÁd£ÀUÀgÀ (J¸ï¹)

INC LJ£ï¹

1.3 1.3

STATE AS A WHOLE MmÁÖgÉ gÁdå

47.0 47.0

During the 15th Lok Sabha (2009-11), only 3 MPs managed to utilise 100 per cent of allocated funds.

15£ÉÃ ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À s̈É CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°è (2009-11), PÉÃªÀ® 3 JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ ±ÉÃ.100%gÀµÀÄÖ ºÀt §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrzÁÝgÉ.

Devegowda who topped in utilisation of MPLAD funds in 14thLok Sabha, managed to spend only little above 50% in the first two years of 15thLok Sabha.

14£ÉÃ ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÉ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ ºÀt §¼ÀPÉAiÀÄ°è ¥ÀæxÀªÀÄ ¸ÁÜ£À ¥ÀqÉ¢zÀÝ zÉÃªÉÃUËqÀ CªÀgÀÄ, 15£ÉÃ ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÁ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ ªÉÆzÀ® 2 ªÀµÀðUÀ¼À°è ±ÉÃ.50%gÀµÀÄÖ ªÀiÁvÀæ

ºÀt §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrzÀÝgÀÄ.

Rangaswamy Dhruvanaryana of Congress ranks the lowest in utilisation of MPLADS funds in 15thLok Sabha.

15£ÉÃ ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÉAiÀÄ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°è PÁAUÉæ¸ï£À ²æÃ gÀAUÀ¸Áé«Ä zsÀÈªÀ£ÁgÁAiÀÄt CªÀgÀÄ

MPLADS ºÀt §¼ÀPÉAiÀÄ°è J®èjVAvÀ PÉ¼ÀV£À ¸ÁÜ£ÀzÀ°èzÁÝgÉ.

Only 9 MPs managed to utilise more than 50 % of funds in 15thLok Sabha.

15£ÉÃ ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À s̈Á CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°è PÉÃªÀ® 9 JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ ±ÉÃ.50%QÌAvÀ ºÉZÀÄÑ ¥ÀæªÀiÁtzÀ ºÀtªÀ£ÀÄß §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrzÁÝgÉ.

Average utilisation ¸ÀgÁ¸Àj §¼ÀPÉ

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

14th Lok Sabha (2004-09) 26

15th Lok Sabha (2009-11) 22

Past 7 Years spending (2004-11)

57.1

47

54.5


13

14thLok Sabha showed better utilisation of MPLAD funds than 15thLok Sabha. Thus, utilisation ratio is declining over these periods.

15£ÉÃ ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À s̈ÉVAvÀ, 14£ÉÃ ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À s̈Á CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°è MPLADS ºÀtªÀ£ÀÄß ºÉaÑ£À ¥ÀæªÀiÁtzÀ°è §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrPÉÆ¼Àî¯ÁVzÉ. F ¥ÀæPÁgÀ, §¼ÀPÉ ¥ÀæªÀiÁtzÀ C£ÀÄ¥ÁvÀ

ªÀµÀð¢AzÀ ªÀµÀðPÉÌ E½ªÀÄÄRªÁUÀÄwÛzÉ.

On an average Karnataka Lok Sabha MPs spent 54.5% in the past 7 years.

PÀ¼ÉzÀ 7 ªÀµÀðUÀ¼À°è PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÁ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ ¸ÀgÁ¸Àj ±ÉÃ.54.5%gÀµÀÄÖ

ºÀt§¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrzÁÝgÉ.

Comparative Ranking of 14th & 15th LS 14 & 15£ÉÃ ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÉAiÀÄ gÁåAQAUï ºÉÆÃ°PÉ

14th

Ranking

(Works) 14£ÉÃ gÁåAQAUï

(PÉ®¸ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ)

15th

Ranking

(Works) 15£ÉÃ gÁåAQAUï

(PÉ®¸ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ)

SECTOR («¨sÁUÀ)

14th

Ranking

(Amount) 14£ÉÃ

gÁåAQAUï

(ªÉÆvÀÛ)

15th

Ranking

(Amount) 15£ÉÃ gÁåAQAUï

(ªÉÆvÀÛ)

1 1 Community Halls ¸ÀªÀÄÄzÁAiÀÄ ¨sÀªÀ£ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ

1 1

2 2 Roads gÀ¸ÉÛUÀ¼ÀÄ

2 2

3 3 Education ²PÀët

3 3

4 4 Others EvÀgÉ

4 4

5 5 Drinking Water PÀÄrAiÀÄÄªÀ ¤ÃgÀÄ

5 6

6 6 Drainage/Culverts ZÀgÀAr/PÁ®ÄªÉUÀ¼ÀÄ

6 8

7 7 Bus Shelters §¸ï ¤¯ÁÝtUÀ¼ÀÄ

7 5

8 7 Sanitation £ÉÊªÀÄð®å

8 9

9 10 Street Lights ©Ã¢ ¢Ã¥ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ

9 10

10 8 Irrigation ¤ÃgÁªÀj

10 7

11 11 Health DgÉÆÃUÀå

11 11

There is no priority change in the top three sectors – community halls,

roads, education – between 14th & 15th LS.

14£ÉÃ & 15£ÉÃ ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÁ CªÀ¢üUÀ¼À°è ¸ÀªÀÄÄzÁAiÀÄ s̈ÀªÀ£ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ, gÀ¸ÉÛUÀ¼ÀÄ, ²PÀët

«¨sÁUÀUÀ½UÉ ºÉaÑ£À ªÀÄºÀvÀÛ÷é ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.


14

Health continues to remain the least favoured.

DgÉÆÃUÀåPÉÌ J®èQÌAvÀ PÀrªÉÄ UÀªÀÄ£À ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.

Major Findings ¥ÀæªÀÄÄR D«µÁÌgÀUÀ¼ÀÄ

Overall, the average utilisation of funds by all MPs is only 50% according to the CAG for 2004-09.

¹Jf ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ 2004-09gÀ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°è, J¯Áè JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ MmÁÖgÉ

±ÉÃ.50%gÀµÀÄÖ ºÀt ªÀiÁvÀæ §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrzÁÝgÉ.

On an average LS MPs (57%) showed better utilisation than RS MPs (30%). Since RS MPs are not directly elected, it appears that there is no incentive/pressure on them to utilise MPLADS.

±ÉÃ.57%gÀµÀÄÖ ºÀt §¼ÀPÉAiÉÆA¢UÉ ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÁ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ, ±ÉÃ. 30%gÀµÀÄÖ ºÀt §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrzÀÝ gÁdå¸À¨sÁ JA¦UÀ½VAvÀ G£ÀßvÀ ¸ÁÜ£ÀzÀ°èzÁÝgÉ. gÁdå¸À¨sÁ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ

£ÉÃgÀªÁV DAiÉÄÌAiÀiÁV®è¢gÀÄªÀÅzÀjAzÀ MPLADS ºÀt §¼ÀPÉAiÀÄ PÀÄjvÀÄ CªÀgÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É ºÉaÑ£À MvÀÛqÀ/¥ÉÆæÃvÁìºÀ E®è JAzÀÄ w½zÀÄ §gÀÄvÀÛzÉ.

The utilisation seems to be deteriorating from 14th (57%) to 15th (47%) among LS MPs.

14£ÉÃ (57%) ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÁ CªÀ¢üVAvÀ 15£ÉÃ (47%) ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÁ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°è

JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ ºÀt§¼ÀPÉAiÀÄ°è E½ªÀÄÄR ¥ÀæzÀ±Àð£À ¤ÃrzÁÝgÉ.

Among the current RS Vijay Mallya (IND,) did not utilise the funds as of 2011.

¥Àæ¸ÀÄÛvÀ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°è, CAzÀgÉ 2011gÀ ®¨sÀå«gÀÄªÀ «ªÀgÀUÀ¼À ¥ÀæPÁgÀ gÁdå¸À s̈Á

JA¦UÀ¼ÁzÀ «dAiÀiï ªÀÄ¯Áå (LJ£ïr), C£ÀÄzÁ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁr®è.

Backward region MPs (47%) from North Karnataka utilised less than forward region MPs (63%) from South Karnataka.

GvÀÛgÀ PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ »AzÀÄ½zÀ ¥ÀæzÉÃ±ÀUÀ¼À JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ (±ÉÃ.47%) zÀQët PÀ£ÁðlPÀ

¥ÀæzÉÃ±ÀzÀ JA¦UÀ½VAvÀ (±ÉÃ. 63%) PÀrªÉÄ ºÀt §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrzÁÝgÉ.

High utilisation seems to be associated with the less educated MPs. PUC qualified MPs topped the spending followed by Matriculates and Graduates. Is higher education a liability?

PÀrªÉÄ ²PÀët ¥ÀqÉ¢gÀÄªÀ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ ºÉaÑ£À ºÀt §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrgÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ PÀAqÀÄ §A¢zÉ. ¦AiÀÄÄ¹ vÉÃUÀðqÉAiÀiÁVgÀÄªÀ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ ªÉÆzÀ®£ÉÃ ¸ÁÜ£ÀzÀ°èzÀÝgÉ, J¸ïJ¸ïJ¯ï¹

ºÁUÀÆ ¥ÀzÀ«ÃzsÀgÀ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ £ÀAvÀgÀzÀ ¸ÁÜ£ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀqÉzÀÄPÉÆArzÁÝgÉ. CAzÀgÉ

G£ÀßvÀ ªÁå¸ÀAUÀ MAzÀÄ ºÉÆgÉAiÉÄÃ?

On the whole experienced MPs (58%) had fared better than first timers (56%) in utilisation of funds.

MmÁÖgÉAiÀiÁV C£ÀÄ¨sÀªÀ ºÉÆA¢gÀÄªÀ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ ±ÉÃ.58%gÀµÀÄÖ ºÀt §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrzÀÝgÉ, ªÉÆzÀ®£É ¨ÁjUÉ DAiÉÄÌAiÀiÁzÀ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ ±ÉÃ. 56%gÀµÀÄÖ §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrgÀÄvÁÛgÉ.


15

Only first timers from BJP fared better with 54%, while experienced MPs spent only 28%

PÉÃªÀ® ªÉÆzÀ® ¨ÁjUÉ DAiÉÄÌAiÀiÁzÀ ©eÉ¦ ¥ÀPÀëzÀ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ ±ÉÃ.54%gÀµÀÄÖ ºÀt

§¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrzÁÝgÉ. C£ÀÄ s̈ÀªÀ ºÉÆA¢gÀÄªÀ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ ±ÉÃ.28%gÀµÀÄÖ §¼À¹zÁÝgÉ.

Party-wise (2004-09), JDS leads with 70% utilisation followed by BJP with 56% and INC with 52%

2004-09gÀ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°è ¥ÀPÀëªÁgÀÄ «ªÀgÀUÀ¼À ¥ÀæPÁgÀ, ±ÉÃ. 70%gÀµÀÄÖ ºÀt

§¼ÀPÉAiÉÆA¢UÉ eÉr(J¸ï) ¥ÀPÀë ªÀÄÄA¢zÀÝgÉ, ©eÉ¦ ±ÉÃ. 56% ºÁUÀÆ LJ£ï¹

±ÉÃ.52%gÀµÀÄÖ §¼ÀPÉAiÉÆA¢UÉ »AzÀÄ½¢ªÉ.

BJP leads in utilisation for 15th LS (2009-11) with 52% utilisation followed by INC with 35% and JDS with 30%

2009-11gÀ ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÁ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°è ©eÉ¦ ±ÉÃ. 52%gÀµÀÄÖ ºÀt§¼ÀPÉAiÉÆA¢UÉ

ªÉÆzÀ®£ÉÃ ¸ÁÜ£ÀzÀ°èzÀÝgÉ, LJ£ï¹ ±ÉÃ. 35% ºÁUÀÆ eÉr(J¸ï) ±ÉÃ.30%gÀµÀÄÖ

§¼ÀPÉAiÉÆA¢UÉ »AzÀÄ½¢ªÉ.

Two MPs (Devegowda, Mallikarjunappa) utilised 100% of the allocated money (2004-09).

2004-09gÀ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°è E§âgÀÄ JA¦UÀ¼ÁzÀ zÉÃªÉÃUËqÀ, ºÁUÀÆ ªÀÄ°èPÁdÄð£À¥Àà CªÀgÀÄ ¤UÀ¢üvÀ C£ÀÄzÁ£ÀzÀ ±ÉÃ.100%gÀµÀÄÖ C£ÀÄzÁ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrgÀÄvÁÛgÉ.

Community halls seem to be the most preferred works for MPs of LS, while roads is the preferred sector for Rajya Sabha MPs during 2004-09.

2004-09gÀ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°è §ºÀÄvÉÃPÀ ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÁ JA¦UÀ½UÉ ¸ÀªÀÄÄzÁAiÀÄ ¨sÀªÀ£ÀUÀ¼À

C©üªÀÈ¢Þ ºÁUÀÆ ¤ªÀiÁðt ¥ÀæªÀÄÄRªÁVzÀÝgÉ, gÁdå¸À¨sÉAiÀÄ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ gÀ¸ÉÛUÀ¼À

C©üªÀÈ¢ÞUÉ ¥ÁæªÀÄÄRåvÉ ¤ÃrzÁÝgÉ.

Devegowda tops spending on community halls with 95.6% of his total funds (2004-09).

2004-09gÀ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°è zÉÃªÉÃUËqÀ CªÀgÀÄ ¤UÀ¢üvÀ C£ÀÄzÁ£ÀzÀ°è ±ÉÃ.95.6%gÀµÀÄÖ

ºÀtªÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀªÀÄÄzÁAiÀÄ ¨sÀªÀ£ÀUÀ½UÁV §¼À¹zÁÝgÉ.

RS MPs nominated from outside Karnataka have no incentive to spend -- Venkaiah Naidu & MAM Ramaswamy from other states had very low utilisation.

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdåzÀ ºÉÆgÀV¤AzÀ DAiÉÄÌAiÀiÁzÀ gÁdå¸À¨sÁ JA¦UÀ¼À §½, RZÀÄð

ªÀiÁqÀ®Ä AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ ¥ÉÆæÃvÁìºÀzsÀ£À«gÀ°®è. EvÀgÀ gÁdåUÀ¼À JA¦UÀ¼ÁzÀ ªÉAPÀAiÀÄå

£ÁAiÀÄÄØ & JAJJA gÁªÀÄ¸Áé«Ä CªÀgÀÄ CvÀåAvÀ PÀ¼À¥É ¥ÀæzÀ±Àð£À ¤ÃrgÀÄvÁÛgÉ.

Spending pattern varies significantly between the MPs of LS & RS. ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÉ ºÁUÀÆ gÁdå¸À s̈É JA¦UÀ¼À £ÀqÀÄªÉ §¼ÀPÉ «zsÁ£ÀzÀ°è §ºÀ¼ÀµÀÄÖ

ªÀåvÁå¸ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ PÀAqÀÄ §A¢ªÉ.


16

Tejasvini Gowda with Ph.D spent only 26.5% of funds, while Devegowda with diploma and Mallikarjunappa with matriculation spent100%.

¦ºÉZïr ºÉÆA¢gÀÄªÀ vÉÃd¹é¤ UËqÀ CªÀgÀÄ ±ÉÃ.26.5%gÀµÀÄÖ ªÀiÁvÀæ ºÀt §¼À¹zÀÝgÉ, r¥ÉÆèªÀiÁ ¥ÀqÉ¢gÀÄªÀ zÉÃªÉÃUËqÀ ºÁUÀÆ J¸ïJ¸ïJ¯ï¹ ²PÀët ºÉÆA¢gÀÄªÀ

ªÀÄ°èPÁdÄð£À¥Àà CªÀgÀÄ ±ÉÃ. 100%gÀµÀÄÖ ºÀt §¼À¹zÁÝgÉ.

Policy Implications… PÁAiÀÄð¤Ãw vÉÆqÀPÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ...

When nearly 50% of MPLADS entitlements remain unutilised, was there a need for increasing the allocation to Rs. 5 crores per MP?

MPLADS ºÀt ¥ÀæªÀiÁtzÀ°è ±ÉÃ.50%gÀµÀÄÖ ªÉÆvÀÛ §¼ÀPÉAiÀiÁUÀzÉÃ G½¢gÀÄªÀ

¸ÀAzÀ s̈ÀðzÀ°è, F C£ÀÄzÁ£ÀzÀ ªÉÆvÀÛªÀ£ÀÄß ¥Àæw JA¦UÉ gÀÆ.5 PÉÆÃnUÀ½UÉ ºÉaÑ¸ÀÄªÀ

CªÀ±ÀåPÀvÉ EvÉÛÃ?

The poor record of RS MPs clearly reflects their lack of constituency linkages, as they are nominated by parties. What is the need and rationale of the fund for RS MPs?

gÁdå¸À¨sÁ JA¦UÀ¼À PÀ¼À¥É ¥ÀæzÀ±Àð£À¢AzÁV, vÀªÀÄä vÀªÀÄä PÉëÃvÀæUÀ¼À PÀqÉUÉ CªÀjVgÀÄªÀ ¸ÀA¥ÀPÀðzÀ §UÉÎ w½AiÀÄÄvÀÛzÉ. ¥ÀPÀëUÀ½AzÀ EªÀgÀ£ÀÄß £ÉÃgÀ £ÉÃªÀÄPÀ ªÀiÁqÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ EzÀPÉÌ

PÁgÀt«gÀ§ºÀÄzÀÄ. ºÁUÁV gÁdå¸À¨sÁ JA¦UÀ½UÉ C£ÀÄzÁ£À §¼ÀPÉAiÀÄ C¢üPÁgÀ

¤ÃqÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ CªÀ±ÀåPÀªÉÃ?

What needs to be done to improve greater responsiveness and interest in the use of the Fund by MPs from Northern Karnataka where the needs are in fact greater?

ºÉZÀÄÑ »AzÀÄ½zÀ ¥ÀæzÉÃ±ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ºÉÆA¢gÀÄªÀ GvÀÛgÀ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¥ÁæAvÀåzÀ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ F

C£ÀÄzÁ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀªÀÄxÀðªÁV §¼À¹PÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀAvÉ ªÀiÁqÀ®Ä AiÀiÁªÀ PÀæªÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß

vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼Àî¨ÉÃPÀÄ?

How can the public be better informed about the use of the Fund, so that MP’s accountability is enhanced?

F jÃw C£ÀÄzÁ£ÀzÀ ®¨sÀåvÉ §UÉÎ d£ÀgÀ°è ºÉaÑ£À CjªÀÅ ªÀÄÆr¹, D ªÀÄÆ®PÀ F

C£ÀÄzÁ£ÀzÀ ¸ÀªÀÄxÀð §¼ÀPÉUÁV JA¦UÀ¼À dªÁ¨ÁÝj ºÉaÑ¸ÀÄªÀÅzÀÄ ºÉÃUÉ?

Press Release - How do MPs utilize MPLADS in Karnataka?

News & Politics

Transcript of Press Release - How do MPs utilize MPLADS in Karnataka?