RTI-THE 3 LETTER ACRONYM THAT

FOCUSES ON INDIVIDUAL KIDS

Presented by Terry Ward and

Michelle Robinette,

District Data Coordinators

CNYRIC

HISTORY OF RTI AT CNYRIC

School Year # Days of RTI Support &

Consultation Services Purchased

2010-2011 106

2011-2012 154

2012-2013 339

2013-2014* 355+

HISTORY (CONTINUED)

School Year # Students Screened

2010-2011 5,810

2011-2012 26,176

2012-2013 55,200

2013-2014* 62,000+

DISTRICT PARTICIPATION IN USE OF SCREENING TOOLS AT CNYRIC

22%

2010-2011

38%

2011-2012

64%

2012-2013

74%

2013-2014*

ParticipantsNon-Partic-ipants

RTI SUPPORT & CONSULTATION SERVICES

state and federal requirements

implementation of RtI processes

in-district support through an RtI Coordinator to not only meet the mandates, but to provide a preventative framework that will allow all students to achieve

EDMODO – CNYRIC RTI

www.edmodo.com

Group Code: 3rawlz

RTI PLAN WRITING Summer 2011 Workshop Key Components of a Comprehensive

RTI PlanRTI Assessment Types Multi-Tiered Intervention SystemParent NotificationProfessional DevelopmentData-based Decision MakingExplicit, Research-based ELA and Math

Instruction

RTI PLAN DOCUMENTS Handbook or Appendices Document Types:

Diagnostic Assessment MenuProgress Monitoring Rules Intervention FormsTier 2 and 3 Intervention Menu Intervention Team FlowchartParent LettersLiteracy Framework

SHORT & LONG-RANGE PLANNING

RTI Implementation Timetable

Sample 2012-13 Month-by-Month Timetable

USER GROUPS & RTI PLC Groups:

RTIm Direct – started in 2008AIMSweb – started in 2010CNY RTI PLC – started in 2010STAR – started in 2012

EvolutionChanges in FocusTypical AudienceTypical Agenda

Frequency3x per year, after screening periods

RTI DATA MEETING PROCESSES

Data-Driven Dialogue – Wellman & Lipton

Data Wise- Boudett, City, Murane

Tuning Protocol- Joseph McDonald

Data Coach’s Guide – Nancy Love

THE EFFECTS OF RTI ON

ONE SCHOOL Changes made in 2010-11 School Year Created Common Diagnostic Grade

Level Tests Data Conversations RTI Practices were established Universal Screening Each ELA teacher was responsible for

Tier 1 students Each person doing the intervetnion was

responsible for progress monitoring

Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 70%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2009-102010-112011-12

THE EFFECTS OF RTI ON

ONE SCHOOL