Presentation on WTP GIZ HEU Dissemination V1.3
-
Upload
mohammmad-faisal-haq -
Category
Documents
-
view
62 -
download
4
Transcript of Presentation on WTP GIZ HEU Dissemination V1.3
![Page 1: Presentation on WTP GIZ HEU Dissemination V1.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062522/589f687d1a28aba6768b7235/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Innovision Consulting Private Limited
Analytics| Strategies | Interventions
Providing 360º Support | Delivering Results | Adopting Tools that Work |
Willingness to PayFor Social Health
Insurance RMG Sector Workers
![Page 2: Presentation on WTP GIZ HEU Dissemination V1.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062522/589f687d1a28aba6768b7235/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Source:
Schedule
•Project Background
•Survey Design
•Snapshot of Key Findings
2
![Page 3: Presentation on WTP GIZ HEU Dissemination V1.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062522/589f687d1a28aba6768b7235/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Objectives
Conduct a Willingness-to-pay (WTP) study in order to:
Gauge the feasibility of rolling out a SHI scheme for the RMG sector;
Identify measures to increase acceptance of SHI in the sector
Specific tasks:
Design hypothetical SHI scheme;
Elicit responses regarding the WTP from the RMG workers and employers, following appropriate sensitization;
Identify socio-economic and other determinants of WTJ/WTP.
![Page 4: Presentation on WTP GIZ HEU Dissemination V1.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062522/589f687d1a28aba6768b7235/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Source:
Schedule
4
•Project Background
•Survey Design
•Snapshot of Key Findings
![Page 5: Presentation on WTP GIZ HEU Dissemination V1.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062522/589f687d1a28aba6768b7235/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Survey Design
The study was conducted using a quantitative approach with a stratified multistage random sampling model. Interviews were conducted face to face.
The target respondents were RMG workers (both male and female) as well as higher officials in the factories.
The sample size of workers was 600 workers. The sample size was determined after considering 95% CI, 5% error level, 1.5 de and 10% non-response rate.
n = Z2p (1-p)d2
Based on the database of Department of Inspection for Factories and Establishments (DIFE), 99% of the garment factories are in Dhaka, Gazipur, Chittagong and Narayanganj. Therefore our survey was conducted in these four areas.
The sample was also stratified by factory size and whether it was a member of BKMEA or BGMEA.
![Page 6: Presentation on WTP GIZ HEU Dissemination V1.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062522/589f687d1a28aba6768b7235/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Sample Distribution
A total of 60 factories were visited to take interviews of 600 workers.
90 workers were interviewed in the community as they were busy working while at the factory.
Workers were selected randomly from the attendance register.
From each factory two higher officials (management staff) were interviewed. Thus the sample size of management segment was 120.
The sample size of
each center and
trade body was
proportionate to the
total worker number
found in the DIFE
database for each
center and trade
body
470
130
BGMEA
BKMEA
250
8050
220
Dhaka
Chittagong
Narayanganj
Gazipur
![Page 7: Presentation on WTP GIZ HEU Dissemination V1.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062522/589f687d1a28aba6768b7235/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Demographic Information
34.7%
65.3%
Gender Profile
MaleFemale
18-25 years 26-35 years 35+ years0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80 70.5%
24.2%
5.3%
Age Profile
Per
cent
age
Single Married Divorced Widowed0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
37.3%
61.5%
0.5% 0.7%
Marital Status
20.5%
27.5%
14.7%
37.3%
Family Status
None
One child
Two or more children
Unmarried
![Page 8: Presentation on WTP GIZ HEU Dissemination V1.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062522/589f687d1a28aba6768b7235/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Sensitization
Why did we design and conduct a sensitization session?
The concept of social health insurance in Bangladesh is new.
Limited information and understanding about the concept
Raise awareness of benefits of SHI amongst workers and its functional modalities
![Page 9: Presentation on WTP GIZ HEU Dissemination V1.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062522/589f687d1a28aba6768b7235/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Sensitization: what was done?
A sensitization session was conducted before asking questions in each factory. The length of the session was about 15-20 minutes.
The session comprised:
Showing a video
A video clip was shown to the respondents to illustrate how health episodes can be unpredictable and how a health protection can be helpful
Introduction and playing a game to explain concept of SHI
Feedback session to check the workers have understood the scheme.
![Page 10: Presentation on WTP GIZ HEU Dissemination V1.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062522/589f687d1a28aba6768b7235/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
WTP assessed using bidding process
Willingness to Pay (WTP) methodologies are used to help determine the best price in many social sectors including health..
An open-ended WTP question simply asks the respondents to give a monetary value.
However a major drawback is that the responses are skewed towards either a zero value (protest bid) or a very high value.
The bidding game is a set of prices as starting point.
Evidence suggests that this bidding process tends to be superior at eliciting “real” responses.
A potential drawback is that bidding can be affected by the starting value (anchoring bias). For this reason the study used multiple starting points.
![Page 11: Presentation on WTP GIZ HEU Dissemination V1.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062522/589f687d1a28aba6768b7235/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Bidding Explanation
250
500(2x)
125
188 63750(1/2x)
250
Starting point for cost of benefit package
![Page 12: Presentation on WTP GIZ HEU Dissemination V1.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062522/589f687d1a28aba6768b7235/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Benefit Package: Inpatient care
Note: Benefit Package designed via joint consultation
A worker and other family members (spouse + any number of unmarried children below 18 years) can get hospital treatment (at a clinic close to respondent’s factory).
The maximum reimbursement for a family is 200,000 BDT annually.
This includes all ancillary hospital costs, that is: bed rate, medicines, and laboratory tests.
However, except in case of emergencies, workers can go to the hospital only if the general practitioner – the first point of entry and so called ‘gatekeeper’ – refers them to the hospital.
![Page 13: Presentation on WTP GIZ HEU Dissemination V1.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062522/589f687d1a28aba6768b7235/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Benefit Package: Outpatient care
General Practitioner (GP): An unlimited number of visits. The GP will serve as a gatekeeper, with a referral system put in place.
Specialist Doctor: Upon referral from the general doctor, the family can avail of
specialist services 3 times a year.
For medicines, the scheme will give worker’s family up to 3000 BDT per year with 20% co-payment. This does not include medicines that are commonly prescribed (e.g. Paracetamol, generic antibiotics, etc.). A negative list will be drawn up.
For lab tests (X-ray, blood test, etc.), you will receive up to 3000 BDT per year (in total) – again with a 20% copayment.
Workers will not receive any cash. This is the total receivable for all members as part of one policy (spouse + any number of unmarried children under 18 years).
![Page 14: Presentation on WTP GIZ HEU Dissemination V1.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062522/589f687d1a28aba6768b7235/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Benefit Package: Enrollment and payment explained
To be part of this scheme, workers will have to pay a premium on a monthly basis.
This will be taken out from their salary, but will provide them and their family with health services as described previously.
They pay some amount, and the remaining amount will be paid by their employer.
![Page 15: Presentation on WTP GIZ HEU Dissemination V1.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062522/589f687d1a28aba6768b7235/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Study Limitations
Limited time for sensitization;
Response bias due to congested environment in which the interviews were taken;
Presence of management authorities could affect response in some cases.
DIFE list was used- and we’re not certain how up to date this is.
We were forced to rely on workers’ estimates/recollections of their household income, saving and monthly medical expenses.
Small sample size for management (120).
![Page 16: Presentation on WTP GIZ HEU Dissemination V1.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062522/589f687d1a28aba6768b7235/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Source:
Schedule
16
•Project Background
• Introduction of study team
•Snapshot of Key Findings
![Page 17: Presentation on WTP GIZ HEU Dissemination V1.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062522/589f687d1a28aba6768b7235/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Willingness to pay per month
When workers were asked what they would pay (thinking about heir salaries), the mean value of the responses is BDT 83.6. This corresponds with the value derived from the responses they gave during WTP bidding part (BDT 82.7).
The median values are lower at BDT 63 (salary) and BDT 50 (WTP) respectively.
Up to 50 Taka
Taka 50 - 100
Taka 100 - 150
Taka over 150
Will not participate
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Willingness to Pay (% Respondents)
The respondents were asked to express the desired amount that they will spend to join in the scheme based on their salary and savings.
AverageWorkers’ Monthly Claimed Saving 1,139Workers’ Monthly Claimed Household Income
11,185
![Page 18: Presentation on WTP GIZ HEU Dissemination V1.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062522/589f687d1a28aba6768b7235/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Experience of IllnessAmong the interviewed respondents 40.7% workers have fallen sick at least once in last 3 months. 37.9% said that someone from their family members suffered from sickness.
Pharmacy
Local clinic (private/ NGO)
Government hospital
61.1
16.4
9.8
54.5
28.1
15.2
Health Provider Usage
For Fam-ily
Worker
OwnBase: 600
91
112
SpouseBase: 376
111
110
OffspringBase: 253
103
98
Monthly Medical Expenses (in BDT)
Spend on Medicine
Spend on Doctor
9.8% of workers go to factory health facilities as well
Among those who have fallen sick
![Page 19: Presentation on WTP GIZ HEU Dissemination V1.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062522/589f687d1a28aba6768b7235/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Willingness to Join the SHI Scheme
Most of the workers were willing to purchase insurance but BKMEA’s workers showed greater interest.
No strong association between willingness to join SHI scheme and different demographic characteristics has been found.
However, a test of independence suggests that willingness to join and trade body are dependent or have some association. (the sig. value of <.5(0.001))
All BKMEA Workers BGMEA Workers0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
84.3% 93.1% 81.9%
15.7%6.90000000
000001% 18.1%
Willingness to Join
Willing Unwilling
![Page 20: Presentation on WTP GIZ HEU Dissemination V1.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062522/589f687d1a28aba6768b7235/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Understanding of SHI Scheme (post-sensitisation)
Overall, most of the workers absorbed the concept of insurance after the sensitization process.The most common misconception was that they would be able to reclaim insurance premiums if they did not need health treatment.This was particularly prevalent in Chittagong where 47% of workers thought they could claim back money if they did not pursue treatment.
All BKMEA Workers BGMEA Workers0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
87% 90% 86.2%
13% 10% 13.8%
Comprehension of SHI Scheme
Understood Did not understand
![Page 21: Presentation on WTP GIZ HEU Dissemination V1.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062522/589f687d1a28aba6768b7235/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Motivations to join an SHI scheme
The main motivation behind the willingness to participate in SHI scheme is the assurance of the low cost healthcare. However, there is also evidence of solidarity as a motivation.
Low cost healthcare
To help others
Own and Family Health Security
Facing health problems frequently
Others
87.5
58.9
57.1
17.6
1.6
Reason for the Willingness (in%)
![Page 22: Presentation on WTP GIZ HEU Dissemination V1.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062522/589f687d1a28aba6768b7235/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Reasons for not wanting to join the SHI Scheme
Lack of trust in the insurance scheme was the most common reason for rejection.
Among those who rejected the scheme (Base:94)
68.1
40.4
37.2
29.8
25.5
Don't trust insurance
Will pay as required
Do not want to pay in advance
Not my decision (husband/wife needs to decide)
Lack of money
Reason for the Rejection (in%)
Mistrust of insurance is much higher among female (76.3%) workers than male workers (54.3%)
![Page 23: Presentation on WTP GIZ HEU Dissemination V1.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062522/589f687d1a28aba6768b7235/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Readiness to Lend Money to Colleagues when they fall sick
23
Most of the respondents would loan their colleagues money if they became sick. Male workers are prepared to loan more money than female workers.
97.7%
2.3%
Will Lend Money to Colleagues
Yes No
Average intended amount of lending is BDT 522 however this amount differs between male (BDT 597) and female
(BDT 482)
![Page 24: Presentation on WTP GIZ HEU Dissemination V1.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062522/589f687d1a28aba6768b7235/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Availability of Health Facilities in Factory
More than 85% of factories have in-house health-care facilities. And 96% of workers in those factories have said they use these facilities.
85.7%
14.3%
Have health facilities in factory
Yes No
95.7% Can visit the facility during working hour
There were no claims that the factory authority would deduct salary if the workers use emergency treatment during working hours.
![Page 25: Presentation on WTP GIZ HEU Dissemination V1.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062522/589f687d1a28aba6768b7235/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Barriers to Accessing Health Facilities
Expense of treatment is the biggest barrier for the workers. Lack of health-care facilities nearby and lack of confidence in quality of the health care services are also significant factors.Barriers were higher for family members’ treatment. This may be because family members are not allowed to use factory based treatment facilities.
Treatment too Expensive
No Nearby Health Facility
Don’t trust quality of care received
Lack of Money
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
35.7%
46.8%
32.7%
46%
32% 34.2%
14.3%12%
Barriers to Accessing Treatment (%)
Personal
For Family
![Page 26: Presentation on WTP GIZ HEU Dissemination V1.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062522/589f687d1a28aba6768b7235/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Willingness to Join in SHI Scheme (Management)
26
Just over half of the management employees interviewed felt that their companies would like to be part of the SHI scheme
The average monthly premium that management is willing to pay is BDT 74 and the Median is BDT 30.
54%46%
Yes No
![Page 27: Presentation on WTP GIZ HEU Dissemination V1.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062522/589f687d1a28aba6768b7235/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Expected Benefit and Willingness to continue
27
More than half of the management employees expected that joining the scheme would impress foreign buyers and lead to increased order.
However, the majority of the respondents would continue the scheme even if they did not see an increase in orders.
55%45%
Expected Benefit for company’s Business
Yes No
68%
32%
Willingness to Continue
Yes No
![Page 28: Presentation on WTP GIZ HEU Dissemination V1.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062522/589f687d1a28aba6768b7235/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Recommendations about SHI Scheme from Employees
28
Inclusion of all family members (especially parents) was the most common additional recommendation.
No opinion
Others
Quality health facility should be arranged
Nothing needs to be changed
If the skim is of 50 BDT
If the money is refunded
If the amount is less
Covering all family members
31.0%
17.0%
3.5%
3.7%
4.8%
6.8%
13.5%
25.0%
![Page 29: Presentation on WTP GIZ HEU Dissemination V1.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062522/589f687d1a28aba6768b7235/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Workers’ Expectations of Employer Contribution
47.7
27.0
11.2
6.73.5
Expected Owner's Contribution (in%)50%
75%
100%
80%
60%
As owner's willingness
As par affordability
Double of employees' share
No Comment
Almost half of the employees think that the authority should contribute equally with the workers for the SHI Scheme.
![Page 30: Presentation on WTP GIZ HEU Dissemination V1.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062522/589f687d1a28aba6768b7235/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Policy Implications
Whilst workers showed a strong understanding of most aspects of SHI, a Communication strategy is needed to ensure full comprehension:
That insurance is non-refundable;
That there will be cost-sharing between workers and employer. “Trust” is crucial to the scheme’s viability, particularly for female workers.
The premium value set for SHI needs to be re-visited. Workers monthly contribution should be between 50-80 taka plus a matching share from employer.
Health facilities in factory premises should be leveraged to cover primary care. This will allow the scheme to focus on curative care and specialized treatment.
Gazipur and Naryanganj had higher median WTP. This could mean that they are better choices for pilot sites.
Some factories showed a high WTP. These might also be good pilot sites.
![Page 31: Presentation on WTP GIZ HEU Dissemination V1.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062522/589f687d1a28aba6768b7235/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Thank You!
Source: 31