Presentation: NeoCon 2018 - Chemical Insights · Changes in FR Use: Sofas and Loveseats pre/post...
Transcript of Presentation: NeoCon 2018 - Chemical Insights · Changes in FR Use: Sofas and Loveseats pre/post...
Presentation:
NeoCon 2018
Chicago, Illinois
June 11-13, 2018
Human Health in the Built EnvironmentA Study on Chemical Exposure Risk and Flammability of
Upholstered Furniture and other Consumer Products
Why look at Flame Retardants?
• Traditionally used to reduce fire hazards
• Health Impacts• Endocrine disrupters,
carcinogenic
• Persistent in the environment• In common household
products• Bioaccumulation,
biomagnification
• Phased out, but not gone• 1977 – brominated tris
(replaced with chlorinated tris)
• 2004 – penta and octa-BDEs
Changes in FR Use:
Sofas and Loveseats pre/post 2005
• PentaBDE in very few samples purchased >2005• Use of alternate flame retardants increase >2005• TCIPP not observed <2005
Cooper et al. 2016
44% 41%
0% 4% 5%2%
44%
13%17%
28%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
PentaBDE TDCIPP TCIPP TBPP FM550
< 2005
>= 2005%
of
Prod
ucts
Co
nta
inin
g a
n F
R
Results Through October 2017(Detection indicates FR is >1.0% by weight)
http://foam.pratt.duke.edu
Exposure PathwayExposure pathway – The route a substance takes from its source to its end point, and how people can come into contact it. Five parts:
1. Source of contamination
2. Environmental media and transport
3. Point of exposure
4. Route of exposure
5. Receptor population
Source: CDC ATSDR https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/glossary.html#G-D-Day, G. et al. (2007). Exposure Pathway Assessment at a Copper-Beryllium Alloy Facility. The Annals of occupational hygiene. 51. 67-80. 10.1093/annhyg/mel041.
Common Human Exposure
Dermal contact
Inhalation
Ingestion
Health Effects of Chemicals Like FR’s are Concerning for Children
Neurodevelopmental Effects
Endocrine System Disruption
Reproductive Toxicant
Decreased memory and learning
Reduced IQ
Hyperactivity
Obesity
Chemicals that mimic estrogen
Alters thyroid hormone
Decreased fertility
Decreased birth weight
Decreased sperm quality
Respiratory Function
Research Plan
How do we achieve product safety convergence, balancing chemical exposure risks and fire safety for human health and environment?
Research Plan
• Recruitment of a furniture manufacturer partner
• Furniture and textile selection
• Acquire documentation:
• Specifications
• MSDS
• Life-cycle
• Sustainability statements
• Fabrication methods
• Materials list with surface area dimensions, mass/volume, and weight by parts and as a whole chair
• Fabrication of 20 chairs to specification
• Procurement of electronic devices
Chair Construction & Composition
Seat cushions
• Approx 1.8 lb/ft3; 70% PUF, 30% Soy-based
Back & throw pillows
• 100% recycled fiber made from plastic
bottles; cushion casing – down proof
ticking
Seat deck & trim pad
• 80% regenerated fiber, 20% binder fiber
Arm padding
• 70/30 foam with 80% regenerated fiber
Frame
• Engineered laminate panels & soy-based
resins; springs – 80% recycled metal
Dimensions
• Overall: W28” D38” H37”
• Inside: W20” D22” H19”
• Seat height: 19”
• Arm height: 24”
• Back Rail height: 31”
Textile
• Cotton fiber 100%, no FR
• Abrasion rating (Wyzenbeek) 9,0000 Double Rubs (medium)
Expected Life: 20+ yrs
• Components (cushion and fills) replaced after 10 yrs
• Legacy Furniture
Finish – Very low VOCs
Chair Construction & Composition - Barrier
• Commercially available
• Content: 100% Fiberglass
• Fiber: • Warp Yarn – ECE 225-1/0 1.0 Z Twist• Fill Yarn – ECE 225-1/0 1.0 Z Twist• Coating – Approximately 7% Organic Coating
• Finished weight: 3.4 oz/sq yd.
• Count – Warp: 60 per inch
• Count – Fill: 58 per inch
• Weave: Plainweave
• Breaking Strength – Warp: 115 lbf/in
• Breaking Strength – Fill: 105lbf/in
• Shrinkage: Fabric is dimensionally stable up to at least 700⁰F
Chair Construction & Composition• All chairs constructed to specification
• 20 chairs divided into 4 test sample groups: changes in cushion composition
1. Non-FR Foam – 70% PUF, 30% Soy-based – No FR detected
2. Non-FR Foam + Fire Barrier – No FR detected
3. Traditional FR Foam – TBPP Mixture
4. Reactive FR Foam – Proprietary – No indication of FRs
Content Analysis conducted by independent lab
Material Identification Analysis – Furniture Components
Material EDX Analysis Polymer Type (EGA)
Cover textile C,O Cotton
Ticking C,O Cotton + PET
Fiber C,O PET
Non-FR foam C,O PU
Standard FR foam* C,O PU
Reactive FR foam C,O PU
Poly loose filling C,O PET
Fiberglass barrier Na, Cl, Ti Glass fiber
Decking textile C,O Cotton + PET
*Standard FR foam: triphenyl phosphate and isomers of tertbutylphenyl diphenyl phosphates (confirmed by two separate labs)
Material Identification Analysis –Electronic Components
• TV and laptop casing: C, O, Mg, Si
• TV and laptop printed circuit board laminate: Br
• TV wire insulation: Cl
Research Plan - Chemicals• Test Sample (Chairs) Preparation
• New - conditioned
• Aged – mechanical aging process – 10 years (ANSI/BIFMA X5.4-2014 standard)
• Environmental Chamber Exposure Testing• VOC
• Environmental Chamber Lab and Fire Performance Lab Sampling
• Air
• SVOC-FR• Environmental Chamber Lab and Fire
Performance Lab Sampling –
• Air
• Dust
• Surface
Research Plan - Fire Performance
• Upholstered Chairs Cal TB 117-2013 Smolder test
• Cover textile
• Fire barrier
• Resilient filling material
• Decking material
• Fire Performance – Whole Chair Open Flame Test. ISO 9705 Test Room Lab and Calorimeter
• Heat release rate
• Mass loss
• Smoke
• Fire effluent gases
• Temperature
• VOC/SVOC
• Electronics (open flame only) – 55” Flat Screen HD TV, 15.6” Laptop Computer
Chair VOC Exposure Summary
• Complex mixture of low level VOCs for all
chairs
• All chairs are well below VOC requirements
for GREENGUARD/BIFMA/LEED
Certifications
• Similar primary VOCs emitting from all chairs
• Majority of VOCs include alcohols, ketones,
glycols, siloxanes, carboxylic acids, and
aldehydes
• New chair and aged chairs similar in
emissions with aged slightly lower (~10-15%)
Most Common VOCs Among
Test Chairs
µg/m3
Analyte No FR
(65)
Barrier
FR (75)
Reactive
FR (80)
Traditional
FR (125)
Hexanal 63 75 18 99
Butanol 34 42 - 13
Propanoic Acid 16 34 30 33
2-butoxyethanol 9 12 5 8
Formaldehyde 4 6 5 4
Comparison of VOC Emissions Across Products
400
170
127 120
60
50
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
TV Traditional FRChair
Barrier Chair No FR Chair Reactive FR Chair Laptop
TV
OC
µg
/m3
Residential Chair VOC Comparison
Formaldehyde – 2016 chairs vs study chair
42
35
60
6
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Study Chair
pp
b
Flame Retardant Exposure from Chairs
• Only measurable FR was from chair with added
traditional FR
• Tris-isobutylated triphenyl phosphate FR mixture
• Measurable exposure amounts found in: airborne vapor,
airborne particles, settled dust and dermal transfers.
• Exposure levels are very low, but accumulation may develop
with dust.
©2017 Underwriters Laboratories Inc. All rights reserved. UL and the UL logo are trademarks of UL LLC.
Test Methodologies – Open Flame
Heat Release Calorimeter ISO 9705 Fire Test Room
©2017 Underwriters Laboratories Inc. All rights reserved. UL and the UL logo are trademarks of UL LLC.
Heat Release Rate
Chairs with fire barrier
Chairs without fire barrier
©2017 Underwriters Laboratories Inc. All rights reserved. UL and the UL logo are trademarks of UL LLC.
Summary: Heat Release Calorimeter
Chair
Construction
Sample
IDNew/Aged
Test
Duration
(min.)
Weight
Loss
(lb.)
Weight
Loss
(%)
Max.
Heat
Release
Rate
(kW)
Time to
Max.
Heat
Release
Rate
(min:sec)
Time to
Reach
200 kW
(min:sec)
[1]
Non-FR foam NFRNew 23 49.9 74.1% 1,196 12:07 8:10
Aged 15 34.7 50.7% 1,378 11:42 9:04
Non-FR foam +
Fire BarrierNFR+FB
New 50 5.2 7.5% 17 30:51 NA
New 50 8.4 12.1% 63 [2] 39:58 NA
Aged 50 4.1 6.0% 16 35:16 NA
Standard FR
foamFR
New 12 27.1 41.4% 1,200 11:16 7:46
Aged 14 35.2 52.9% 1,373 12:26 9:00
Reactive FR
foamGFR
New 15 39.7 59.4% 1,253 12:00 8:30
Aged 15 36.3 52.0% 1,251 12:36 8:20
Aged 15 38.9 55.7% 1,379 12:22 8:58
[1] Maximum HRR requirement for flammability of mattresses:
Standard for the Flammability (Open Flame) of Mattress Sets - 16 CFR 1633
[2] Fire spread into the back cushion unlike other tests with fire barrier
©2017 Underwriters Laboratories Inc. All rights reserved. UL and the UL logo are trademarks of UL LLC.
Fire Hazard Summary
Chair
Constructio
n
Sample
ID
New/Age
d
Weight
Loss
(lb.)
%
Weight
Loss
Max. Heat
Release Rate
(kW)
Max.
Doorway
Temperature
(C)
Max.
CO
(PPM)
Max.
HCN
(PPM)
Max.
Smoke
Optical
Density
(1/m)
Non-FR
foamNFR
New 36 53.6% 1,416 530 5950 NA 0.98
Aged 39.7 58.3% 1,400 570 3390 25 0.93
Non-FR
foam + Fire
Barrier
NFR+FB
New 3.4 4.9% 8 59 266 T 0.01
Aged 5.8 8.3% 51 69 821 T 0.03
Standard FR
foamFR
New 40.2 60.5% 1,432 594 1613 43 1.00
Aged 38.5 58.2% 2,028 601 1137 47 1.10
Reactive FR
foamGFR
New 41.9 61.8% 1,335 538 2596 51 0.80
Aged 40 59.4% 1,406 574 1485 43 0.88
©2017 Underwriters Laboratories Inc. All rights reserved. UL and the UL logo are trademarks of UL LLC.
Test Photographs
NFRNFR+FB
©2017 Underwriters Laboratories Inc. All rights reserved. UL and the UL logo are trademarks of UL LLC.
Comparison of Upholstered Furniture Heat
Release Rate with Electronics in Homes
Chairs with fire barrier
Electronic
Items
Mattress
Chairs without fire barrier
©2017 Underwriters Laboratories Inc. All rights reserved. UL and the UL logo are trademarks of UL LLC.
Significant Findings
• The use of a fire barrier in chair construction showed reduction in
fire hazards in comparison to other chairs with and without FRs
• The chemistry of the foam did not have a significant influence on
fire hazards- except no HCN was measured with barrier chair
• Traditionally added FR produced low level human exposure
primarily through settled dust and transfer dust
• Furniture foam with reactive alternative FR indicated no
measurable exposure
• Furniture with carefully selected materials can be very low in
VOC airborne risks
©2017 Underwriters Laboratories Inc. All rights reserved. UL and the UL logo are trademarks of UL LLC.
Some Tips for Protecting Consumers
• Choose or specify products low in VOCs (i.e. GREENGUARD, A
1350)
• Choose or specify products with proven fire protection without
FR’s if feasible (i.e. barrier construction, alternative FR’s)
• Vacuum and clean settled dust frequently on surfaces of
furniture, flooring, electronics, and other interior surfaces with
HEPA vacuums or wet cloths.
• Clean children’s hands well, frequently and always before eating.
PARTNERING WITH
SUSTAINABLE,
RESOURCEFUL,
ECO-FRIENDLY, ENERGY
EFFICIENT, AND HEALTHIER
BUILDING AND DESIGN
PRACTICES
Leads to Healthier People