Preequilibrium Reactions
-
Upload
amela-shelton -
Category
Documents
-
view
17 -
download
3
description
Transcript of Preequilibrium Reactions
![Page 1: Preequilibrium Reactions](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042718/568130e7550346895d970268/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Preequilibrium Reactions
Dr. Ahmed A.Selman
![Page 2: Preequilibrium Reactions](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042718/568130e7550346895d970268/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
The exciton model was proposed by Griffin in 1966 in order to explain the nuclear emission from intermediate states, PE, where “a statistical model that analyze the formation and decay of the average compound-nuclear state was presented. In such state, a weak two-body residual interaction will cause transition among the eigenstates of the independent-particle Hamiltonian. These transitions occur in the region dE near the excitation energy E of the compound nucleus.”
![Page 3: Preequilibrium Reactions](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042718/568130e7550346895d970268/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
PE explains nuclear emission from intermediate states before attainment of statistical equilibrium.
Blann, and many others , developed this model and suggested similar approaches.
![Page 4: Preequilibrium Reactions](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042718/568130e7550346895d970268/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
![Page 5: Preequilibrium Reactions](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042718/568130e7550346895d970268/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
In the 1970’s Blann and Cline made the present development, as follows (proton emission)
The two-component system is based on proton-neutron distinguishability.
),,,,(
),,,,1()(
12)(
232 Ehphp
UhphpsW
p
![Page 6: Preequilibrium Reactions](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042718/568130e7550346895d970268/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
The state density is needed in the PE calculations. There are many types of state density formulae, for ESM and non-ESM systems.
The exciton model can be represented as follows (two-component):
![Page 7: Preequilibrium Reactions](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042718/568130e7550346895d970268/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
5400
6500
n=9, N=5
1022
3200 2111
3211 2122
4300 1033
4311 3222
2133
1044
5411 4322
3233
2144
1055
n=1, N=1
n=3, N=2
n=5, N=3
n=7, N=4
n=11, N=6
etc etc etc
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4) 2100
1000
1011
![Page 8: Preequilibrium Reactions](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042718/568130e7550346895d970268/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
The emission spectrum is
T(n,t) is the equilibration time, found from solving the master equation given by (from the Figure above):
),,,,(
),,,,(),()(
12
2
32 Ehphp
UhNphZptnTd
s
d
d aa
nn
![Page 9: Preequilibrium Reactions](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042718/568130e7550346895d970268/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
),,(),,(),,(),,(
),,(),,(),,(),,(
),,(),,(),,(),,(
),1,()1,,(
),1,()1,,(
),1,1()1,1,()1,1,(
),,1(),1,(),1,(
),,1(),1,(),1,(
),1,1(),1,(),1,(
),,(
00
00
00
0
0
00
00
thNPhNEWhNEhNE
hNEhNEhNEhNE
hNEhNEhNEhNE
thNPhNE
thNPhNE
thNPhNEhNE
thNPhNEhNE
thNPhNEhNE
thNPhNEhNEdt
thNdP
vv
vvvv
vvvv
v
v
v
vvv
vvv
v
![Page 10: Preequilibrium Reactions](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042718/568130e7550346895d970268/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Transition rates are found from Fermi Golden Rule
The matrix element is found from
2,, ||
2yxyx M
)MeV(9.203
|| 2
3
3
2
A
E
g
AKM
o
![Page 11: Preequilibrium Reactions](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042718/568130e7550346895d970268/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Main Contributions of This Work
1. The solution of the state density for one-component non-ESM:
With the solution (uncorrected)
)(
1
)(
1
)()(
0
)(2
)(2
0
)(1
)(1
0
)()(
0
)(2
)(2
0
)(1
)(1
01
)()...()(
)()...()(!!
1),,(
hj
h
j
pp
hhh
hh
hh
hhh
h
ppp
pp
pp
ppp
p
uuEugduugduugdu
ugduugduugduhp
Ehp
)!1(!!2),,(
1
2/
NF
E
hp
gEhp
nN
N
nn
no
![Page 12: Preequilibrium Reactions](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042718/568130e7550346895d970268/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Main Contributions of This Work
Where
and
hb
hpa
p
j
hbbbaaa
CCj
p
11
0,..,,,..,1
21
2
!2
3
!2
3)1( 1
mC
mC
h
m
mp
m
![Page 13: Preequilibrium Reactions](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042718/568130e7550346895d970268/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Main Contributions of This Work
Corrected for Pauli Energy:
Corrected for Pairing:
)!1(
),(
!!2),,(
1
2/
NF
hpAE
hp
gEhp
nN
N
nn
noESMnon
))((
)!1(
)(
!!2),,( ,
1
,
2/ hpnN
N
hp
nn
noESMnon BPE
NF
BPE
hp
gEhp
![Page 14: Preequilibrium Reactions](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042718/568130e7550346895d970268/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
State Density Results ESM
A comparison of the state
density results of this work (dotted
curves) with those of
Kalbach for 54Fe+p
reaction at 33.5 MeV.
1.00E+03
1.00E+04
1.00E+05
1.00E+06
1.00E+07
1.00E+08
1.00E+09
1.00E+10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
p or p
log
(n
,E)
MeV
-1
p=7p=7 this workp=6p=6 this workp=5p=5 this workp=4p=4 this workp=3p=3 this workp=2
p + 54Fe reaction at
E=33.5 MeV
![Page 15: Preequilibrium Reactions](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042718/568130e7550346895d970268/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
1.00E+00
1.00E+01
1.00E+02
1.00E+03
1.00E+04
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Energy, MeV
Log
(p
,h,E
) (M
eV-1
)
Herman et al.
This Work No Pairing
This Work With pairing
state density for 1p-1h of 56Fe for 50 terms of summationDo=1.49 MeV, D(pi)=1.41MeVD(Nu)=1.22 MeVS=0.53 MeVCe=2.22 MeV
1p-1h of 56Fe for 50 terms of summationo=1.49 MeV, =1.41MeV, )=1.22 MeV,
S=0.53 MeV, Ce=2.22 MeV
State Density Results non-ESM
1p-1h of
56Fe
![Page 16: Preequilibrium Reactions](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042718/568130e7550346895d970268/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
1.00E+00
1.00E+01
1.00E+02
1.00E+03
1.00E+04
1.00E+05
1.00E+06
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Energy, MeV
Log
(p
,h,E
) (M
eV-1
)
Herman et al.
This Work No pairing
This Work With pairing
s.d. of 54Mn for 2p-1hS=--0.45 MeVDo=2.6 MeVCe=1.5 MeV
State Density Results non-ESM
2p-1h of 54Mn
![Page 17: Preequilibrium Reactions](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042718/568130e7550346895d970268/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Master Equation Results
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
time (arbitrary units)
Pn
(%)
n=1n=3n=5n=1n=3n=5
Euler centered scheme (Bold lines) vs. Runge-Kutta (Thin lines)
E=20 MeV
E=20 MEV, g=14 MeV-1, energy-dependent matrix element, p+54Fe
p+56Fe at 20 MeV
![Page 18: Preequilibrium Reactions](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042718/568130e7550346895d970268/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Master Equation Results
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
time (arbitrary units)
Pn
(%)
n=1n=3n=5n=1n=3n=5
E=80 MeV
E=80 MEV, g=14 MeV-1, energy-dependent matrix element, p+54Fe
Euler centered scheme (Bold lines) vs. Runge-Kutta (Thin lines)
p+56Fe at 80 MeV
![Page 19: Preequilibrium Reactions](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042718/568130e7550346895d970268/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
1.00E-01
1.00E+00
1.00E+01
1.00E+02
0 5 10 15 20 25
MeV)
d /
d
(mb
/MeV
)
(p,n) Kalbach(p,n) this work(p,p) Kalbach (p,p) this work
54Fe+p at E=33.5 MeV
Preequilibrium Spectrum (no
evaporation added yet). This is for
54Fe+p at E=33.5 MeV
Results of PE Spectra1. Pure PE
![Page 20: Preequilibrium Reactions](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042718/568130e7550346895d970268/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Results of PE Spectra2. PE +Evaporation
![Page 21: Preequilibrium Reactions](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042718/568130e7550346895d970268/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
1.00E-01
1.00E+00
1.00E+01
1.00E+02
1.00E+03
0 5 10 15 20 25
(MeV)
d /
d
(mb
/MeV
)
GRIMES et al.
present work
103Rh(p,n) reaction E=18 MeV
Results of PE Spectra2. PE +Evaporation
![Page 22: Preequilibrium Reactions](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042718/568130e7550346895d970268/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
1.00E+00
1.00E+01
1.00E+02
1.00E+03
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
, MeV
d /
d
(mb
/Me
V)
Dobes&Betak Bi209 (p,n)This Work Bi209 (p,n) Dobes&Betak Bi209 (p,p) This Work Bi209 (p,p)
209Bi+p at 52 MeV
Results of PE Spectra2. PE +Evaporation
![Page 23: Preequilibrium Reactions](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042718/568130e7550346895d970268/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Results of PE Spectra4. PE +Evaporation +NT
1.00E+00
1.00E+01
1.00E+02
1.00E+03
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
(MeV)
d /
d
(mb
/MeV
)
present work (PE+evap+NT)
Exp. at E=38.8 MeV
PE +evap.
PE only
NT
Exp/ from (F.E.BERTRAND,R.W.PEELLE),
(J,PR/C,8,1045,1973)
54Fe(p,n) at E=38.8 MeV
![Page 24: Preequilibrium Reactions](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042718/568130e7550346895d970268/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Results of PE Spectra4. PE +Evaporation +NT
1.00E+00
1.00E+01
1.00E+02
1.00E+03
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
(MeV)
d /
d
(mb
/MeV
)present work (PE+evap+NT)Exp. at E=28.8 MeVPE +evap. onlyNT only
Exp/ from F.E.BERTRAND, and R.W.PEELLE,
PR/C,8,(1971045,1973)54Fe(p,p) at E=28.8 MeV
54Fe(p,n) at E=28.8 MeV
![Page 25: Preequilibrium Reactions](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042718/568130e7550346895d970268/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
1.00E+00
1.00E+01
1.00E+02
1.00E+03
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 (MeV)
d/ d
(m
b/M
eV)
This Work (PE+Evap.+NT)PE OnlyPE+Evap.NT OnlyLYCHAGIN et al.KOZYR and PROKOPETS BROND-2.2
56Fe(n,n/) reactionat E=20 MeV
Results of PE Spectra4. PE +Evaporation +NT
![Page 26: Preequilibrium Reactions](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042718/568130e7550346895d970268/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
1.00E-02
1.00E-01
1.00E+00
1.00E+01
1.00E+02
1.00E+03
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 (MeV)
d/
d
(mb
/MeV
)
This Work (PE+Evap.+NT)
PE Only
PE+Evap.
NT Only
BROND-2.2
103Rh(n,n/) reactionat E=18.8 MeV
Results of PE Spectra4. PE +Evaporation +NT
![Page 27: Preequilibrium Reactions](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042718/568130e7550346895d970268/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Cross-Section Results
1.00E+00
1.00E+01
1.00E+02
1.00E+03
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Energy, E (MeV)
(m
b)
this workS.Sudar et al.A.Hermanne et al.
103Rh(p,n) Reaction Cross-Section
S.Sudar, F.Cserpak, S.M.Qaim, REFERENCE (J,Journ.: Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 56,821,2002)
A.HERMANNE, M.SONCK, A.FENYVESI, L.DARABAN) REFERENCE (J,Nucl. Instrum. Methods in Physics Res., Sect.B,170,281,2000)
![Page 28: Preequilibrium Reactions](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042718/568130e7550346895d970268/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Cross-Section Results
1.00E-02
1.00E-01
1.00E+00
1.00E+01
1.00E+02
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Energy, E (MeV)
(m
b)
This work103Rh(p,p) Reaction
Cross-Section
![Page 29: Preequilibrium Reactions](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042718/568130e7550346895d970268/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
1.00E+00
1.00E+01
1.00E+02
1.00E+03
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Energy, E (MeV)
(m
b)
This WorkLevkovskij [137]Gadioli et al. [138]Jenkins and Wain [139]Antropov et al. [140]Tanaka and Furukawa [141]
56Fe(p,n) ReactionCross-Cection
Cross-Section Results
![Page 30: Preequilibrium Reactions](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042718/568130e7550346895d970268/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Thank You