Precipitation Intensity Climate Impacts Group & Department of Atmospheric Sciences University of...
-
Upload
melina-hunt -
Category
Documents
-
view
224 -
download
0
Transcript of Precipitation Intensity Climate Impacts Group & Department of Atmospheric Sciences University of...
Precipitation IntensityPrecipitation Intensity
Climate Impacts Group&
Department of Atmospheric SciencesUniversity of Washington
Eric Salathé
Climate Change: North America
Annual SummerWinter
Climate Change: Pacific Northwest Precipitation
-25.00
-20.00
-15.00
-10.00
-5.00
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
J F M A M J J A S O N D
SRES A1B 2020s
SRES A1B 2040s
SRES A1B 2080s
Pre
cip
itatio
n C
ha
ng
e (
%)
Change in U.S. PNW precipitation by monthfrom 1990s to futuresimulated by 20 climate models
Consensus of current Global Climate Models: Intensification of Mid-latitude storms Less frequent storms Northward shift in storm track
Changes in Pacific Storm Track
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Shift in Pacific Storm Track J Yin, Geophys Res Lett, 2005
S Pole S PoleN Pole N PoleEQ EQ
Temperature Change 1980-2000 to 2080-2100
Change in Storm Growth
Shift in Pacific Storm Track
Salathé, Geophys Res Lett, 2006
Observed (NCEP-NCAR Reanalysis)
20th Century Model Composite
21st Century Model Composite
1950-2000 to 2050-2100 Nov-Dec-Jan
Shift in Aleutian Low
Salathé, Geophys Res Lett, 2006
Observed
20th Century Model Composite
1950-2000 to 2050-2100 Nov-Dec-Jan
Movement of Jetstream
1950s
Movement of Jetstream
1960s
Movement of Jetstream
1970s
Movement of Jetstream
1980s
Movement of Jetstream
1990s
Movement of Jetstream
1950s
Are extreme rain events becoming more frequent?
Valérie Dulière, Philip Mote, Eric Salathé, Josiah Mault and Marketa McGuire Elsner
(Climate Impacts Group, University of Washington)
2008 Pacific Northwest Weather Workshop
Source : THE OREGONIAN/Bruce Ely
Source : THE OREGONIAN/Bruce Ely
The Chehalis River flooding
The Centralia station
The Centralia station
Distribution function of daily precipitationsfrom 1948 to 2006
10 cm5 cm
The Centralia station
Distribution function of daily precipitationsfrom 1948 to 2006 (Zoom)
10 cm5 cm
19901990
2001
2006
1996
1986
1951, 1981
1986
1994, 1986
The Centralia station
Distribution function of daily precipitationsfrom 1948 to 2006 (Zoom)
10 cm5 cm
19901990
2001
2006
1996
1986
1951, 1981
1986
1994, 1986
Since 1948, 80% of the 20 greatest extreme daily rain events occurred after 1985!
The Centralia station
Distribution function of daily precipitationsfrom 1948 to 2006 (Zoom)
10 cm5 cm
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1.00 10.00 100.00
Return Period, Tr (1/p)
Annual Peak Precip (in)
Return period of annual maximum daily precipitation
--1948-1976--1977-2006
The Centralia station
2.5 yr
3.3 in
Source : THE OREGONIAN/Bruce Ely
The Past 50 Years
The Cooperative Observer Program network
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1.00 10.00 100.00
Return Period, Tr (1/p)
Annual Peak Precip (in)
Return period of annual maximum daily precipitation
--1948-1976--1977-2006
The Centralia station
10-year Return
} Percent Change
(P2-P1)/P1*100Return period = 10 years
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1
Climate Division
Percentage of change
Stations
Average
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Percentages of change in the annual maximum daily precipitation with a 10 years return period for each station
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
What Do Climate Models Project for the Future?
Source : THE OREGONIAN/Bruce Ely
Projected Future Changes from Climate Models(2046-2065 versus 1981-2000)
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Grid cell
Percentage of change
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Grid cell
Percentage of change
IPSL
SRES A1B SRES B1
Percentages of change in the annual maximum daily precipitation with a 10 years return period for each grid cell between 1981-2000 and 2046-
2065.
ECHAM5
CCSM3
Projected Future Changes from Climate Models(2046-2065 versus 1981-2000)
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Grid cell
Percentage of change
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Grid cell
Percentage of change
IPSL
SRES A1B SRES B1
Percentages of change in the annual maximum daily precipitation with a 10 years return period for each grid cell between 1981-2000 and 2046-
2065.
+18.8% +11.8%
ECHAM5
CCSM3
Projected Future Changes from Climate Models(2046-2065 versus 1981-2000)
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Grid cell
Percentage of change
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Grid cell
Percentage of change
IPSL
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47
Grid cell
Percentage of change
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47
Grid cell
Percentage of change
ECHAM5
SRES A1B SRES B1
Percentages of change in the annual maximum daily precipitation with a 10 years return period for each grid cell between 1981-2000 and 2046-
2065.
+18.8%
+11.4%
+11.8%
+10.6%
CCSM3
Projected Future Changes from Climate Models(2046-2065 versus 1981-2000)
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Grid cell
Percentage of change
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Grid cell
Percentage of change
IPSL
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47
Grid cell
Percentage of change
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47
Grid cell
Percentage of change
ECHAM5
SRES A1B SRES B1
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40 43 46 49 52 55 58 61 64 67 70 73 76 79 82 85 88
Grid cell
Percentage of change
CCSM3
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40 43 46 49 52 55 58 61 64 67 70 73 76 79 82 85 88
Grid cell
Percentage of change
Percentages of change in the annual maximum daily precipitation with a 10 years return period for each grid cell between 1981-2000 and 2046-
2065.
+12.2%
+18.8%
+11.4%
+10.8%
+11.8%
+10.6%
Projected Future Changes from Climate Models(2046-2065 versus 1981-2000)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
IPSL ECHAM5 CCSM3
20c
sresa1b
sresb1
Num
ber
of
days
per
ye
ar
Number of days per year with
P > 0.4 inches
Projected Future Changes from Climate Models(2046-2065 versus 1981-2000)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
IPSL ECHAM5 CCSM3
20c
sresa1b
sresb1
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
IPSL ECHAM5 CCSM3
20c
sresa1b
sresb1
Num
ber
of
days
per
ye
ar
Number of days per year with
P > 0.4 inches P > 1.6 inches
Number of days per year with
P > 0.4 inches P > 1.6 inches P > 2.8 inches
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
IPSL ECHAM5 CCSM3
20c
sresa1b
sresb1
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
IPSL ECHAM5 CCSM3
sresa1b
sresb1
20c
0.0000
0.0005
0.0010
0.0015
0.0020
0.0025
0.0030
0.0035
IPSL ECHAM5 CCSM3
20c
sresa1b
sresb1
Num
ber
of
days
per
ye
arProjected Future Changes from Climate Models
(2046-2065 versus 1981-2000)
GOING TO THE EXTREMES
GOING TO THE EXTREMES AN INTERCOMPARISON OF MODEL-SIMULATED
HISTORICAL AND FUTURE CHANGES IN EXTREME EVENTS CLAUDIA TEBALDI ,
KATHARINE HAYHOE, JULIE M. ARBLASTER and GERALD A. MEEHL, Climatic
Change (2006) 79: 185-211
9 Global Model Simulations for IPCC
1. Number of days with precipitation greater than 10 mm (precip > 10).
2. Maximum number of consecutive dry days (dry days).
3. Maximum 5-day precipitation total (5 day precip).
4. Simple daily intensity index, defined as the annual total precipitation divided by the number of
wet days (precip intensity).
5. Fraction of total precipitation due to events exceeding the 95th percentile of the climatological
distribution for wet day amounts ( precip > 95th).
Going to Extremes
Going to Extremes
Mesoscale Effects
Global models do not resolve fine-scale processessuch as topographic precipitation
Downscaling methods are used to account forregional effects
Statistical downscaling uses observed relationshipbetween large-scale and fine-scale patternsto extrapolate to climate model results
Regional climate model simulates fine-scale physical processes
Change in Orographic Enhancement
Salathé, Geophys Res Lett, 2006
Downscaling without wind effect
1990-2000 to 2045-2055 Sept-Oct-Nov
Downscaling with wind effect
Mesoscale Climate Model Based on Regional Weather Model (MM5, WRF)
Nested grids 135-45-15 km
Advanced land-surface model (NOAH) with interactive deep soil
temperature
Global Climate Model used as Input (boundary conditions)
Autumn Precipitation Changes
mm per day
Change in Autumn precipitation rate from 1990s to 2050sas simulated in regional climate model
WindsShift toOnshore
Rain increases along mountain ridge
Change in Orographic Enhancement
MM5 vs Statistical Downscaling
Statistical DownscalingP only P & Wind MM5
Change in November Precip (mm/day) 1990s to 2050s
Conclusions :
-This is the beginning of our work.
- According to the observations from the COOP network, extreme rain events have globally increased in frequency and intensity between 1948-1976 and 1977-2006 over the Washington state.
- According to global climate models (IPSL, ECHAM5 and CCSM3), extreme rain events will in average be more intense and more frequent in 2046-2065 than now, over the PNW region.
Coming next :
Analysis of output from regional climate models.
Source : http://www.earthcam.com/