PPT

35
Attention - Overview Definition Theories of Attention Neural Correlates of Attention Human neurophysiology and neuroimaging Change Blindness Deficits of Attention Unilateral neglect

Transcript of PPT

Page 1: PPT

Attention - Overview

Definition

Theories of Attention

Neural Correlates of Attention•Human neurophysiology and neuroimaging

Change Blindness

Deficits of Attention•Unilateral neglect

Page 2: PPT

Stroop Task

Blue

Green

Yellow

Red

Yellow

Yellow

Green

Blue

Red

Green

Blue

Red

Green

Yellow

Blue

Green

Page 3: PPT

Stroop Task

*****

*****

*****

*****

*****

*****

*****

*****

*****

*****

*****

*****

*****

*****

*****

*****

Page 4: PPT

Stroop Task

Blue

Green

Yellow

Red

Yellow

Yellow

Green

Blue

Red

Green

Blue

Red

Green

Yellow

Blue

Green

Page 5: PPT

Stroop

• Failure of selective attention

• Race model– Word name is processed automatically

– Color is not so automatic

– Both arrive at the same time, we have a hard time attending to the relevant stimulus attribute

– Doesn’t happen upside down

Page 6: PPT

Stroop Task.

Page 7: PPT

Attention – Neurophysiology

Hillyard’s experiments – dichotic listening: attention-dependent effect on ERP amplitude.

Early or late?

Study by Woldorff et al., localization of an early (20-50 ms latency) attention effect using ERP(F)/MRI).

Page 8: PPT

W. W. Norton

Page 9: PPT

W. W. Norton

Page 10: PPT

W. W. Norton

Page 11: PPT

Woodman, G., and Luck, S. (1999). Electrophysiological measurements of rapid shifts of attention during visual search. Nature 400:867.

Page 12: PPT

Figs. 4, 5, and 6, Corbetta et al., “Selective and divided attention during visual discriminations of shape, color and speed: Functional anatomy by positron emission tomography, The Journal of Neuroscience 11: 2383–2402, (1991) Adapted with permission of The Society for Neuroscience.

Adapted from Heinze, H.J., Mangun, G.R., Burchert, W., Hinrichs, H., Scholz, M., Münte, T.G., Gös, A., Scherg, M., Johannes, S., Hundeshagen, H., Gazzaniga, M.S. and Hillyard, S.A., Combined spatial and temporal imaging of brain activity during visual selective attention in humans,

Nature 372 (1994): 543–546.

Page 13: PPT

Attention – Neuroimaging

Previous imaging studies revealed: changes in neural activity related to attentional shifts (parietal lobe) and attention-related specific activation of extrastriate areas (color, form, motion). No changes in V1.

Recent fMRI studies (e.g. Somers et al., 1999):

- Selective visual attention modulates neural activity in extrastriate cortex, as well as in V1.- Attentional modulations in V1 are spatially specific.- “Window of attention can be spatially complex”, hints at object-selective attention.

Page 14: PPT

Attention – Neuroimaging

Flattening of the occipital lobe (Somers et al., 1999)

Page 15: PPT

(a) and (b): Stimulus(c) and (d): Topography(e) and (f): Attentional Modulation

Page 16: PPT

Attention – Top-Down

Most “natural” visual scenes are composed of multiple objects.

Receptive fields in higher visual areas are large (up to 25 degrees) and typically contain multiple objects at one time.

This creates a problem for neurons encoding specific object features…

Page 17: PPT

Attention – Top-Down

Ambiguous response

Page 18: PPT

Attention – Top-Down

Ambiguity in neural response can be reduced by:

a) Referencing spatial (retinal) location

b) Attentional modulation of firing rate

Page 19: PPT

Attention – Top-Down

Prediction

Un-ambiguous response

Page 20: PPT

W. W. Norton

Page 21: PPT

W. W. Norton

Page 22: PPT

Moran and Desimone, 1985

Note: visual input does not change (fixation point), what changes is the focus of covert attention

Cellular Basis of Attention

Page 23: PPT

Unilateral Neglect

Page 24: PPT

Unilateral Neglect

Eye movements from a patient with left unilateral neglect, during visual exploration

Page 25: PPT

Hemineglect

QuickTime™ and aYUV420 codec decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Page 26: PPT

Unilateral Neglect: Frames of Reference

“On the side opposite to”: In what frame of reference does neglect occur (space, object, world)?

How do we define LEFT?

Reference Frame: system for representing locations relative to some standard coordinate system

Neglect affects multiple reference frames

Page 27: PPT

Unilateral Neglect: Frames of Reference

Neglect patient JM’s copying of a daisy presented in different orientions.

Spatial or object-centered?

Page 28: PPT

Unilateral Neglect and Memory

Bisiach’s patient (unable to recall half of the piazza del duomo) – representations are affected, not just acute visual input (“unilateral neglect of representational space”)

Page 29: PPT

What Causes Unilateral Neglect?

1. Neglect results from damage to the attentional orienting system. Attention is mostly deployed to the right.

2. Neglect is caused by a failure to construct a complete mental representation of contralesional space.

Page 30: PPT

Change Blindness

QuickTime™ and aSorenson Video decompressorare needed to see this picture.

Page 31: PPT

Change Blindness

QuickTime™ and aSorenson Video decompressorare needed to see this picture.

Page 32: PPT

Change Blindness

QuickTime™ and aQuickDraw decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Page 33: PPT

Change Blindness

QuickTime™ and aAnimation decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Page 34: PPT

Change Blindness Applet

Change Blindness Applet

Page 35: PPT

Salience Model

QuickTime™ and aYUV420 codec decompressor

are needed to see this picture.