Powersimulationall
-
Upload
johnpayne -
Category
Technology
-
view
616 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Powersimulationall
TIDAL BARRAGE
FOR
Already successful in France at the Rance estuary in Brittany
Water is held back at the ebb and flow of tides providing intermittent yet reliable electricity production. Tides are very predictable
Renewable; no pollution, no waste, no increase in carbon dioxide, no increase in global warming
Very low cost electricity. Massive 1000MW production possible. Lasts 100 years at least
Protects coastline behind barrage from erosion and flooding
1000’s of construction jobs created for 10 years and 100’s of jobs once on stream
Improved tourism, safer for marinas and water sports
Improved transport links if barrage has road
TIDAL BARRAGE
AGAINST
An 8 km long barrage is needed at enormous cost, taking perhaps 10 years to build
Electricity is only produced during tides, approximately 10 hours a day
Limits shipping and size of vessels above the barrage. Having a negative impact on Hull and Immingham
May have a negative effect on tourism due to visual pollution
Negative impact on habitats, wildlife; ecosystems and food chains affected
Cuts off sediment supply to lower estuary which increases erosion and makes flooding more likely
Makes sewage disposal more difficult and more expensive
Negative impact on inshore fisheries and fish migration
NUCLEAR POWER STATIONAGAINST
Produces radioactive materials that can trigger cancers and other serious illnesses
Radioactive leaks can affect ecosystems, causing contamination lasting 100’s of years. Possible security and terrorism issues
Nuclear waste is difficult to deal with. It needs storing for 100’s if not 1000’s of years
The UK has no commercial uranium. We are reliant on imports of foreign fuel
Nuclear power produces no carbon, but mining and enrichment of uranium do produce emissions
Power station cannot respond to peaks and troughs in demand, it must be run continuously
Construction and decommission are very expensive
The Chernobyl disaster clearly showed the inherent dangers
NUCLEAR POWER STATION
FOR
20 % of our existing energy needs are produced by nuclear power stations. We have the technology
France produces 70 % of its energy from nuclear, Sweden nearly 50 %, and other countries are looking to expand this sector
Nuclear electricity is very cheap and only very small amounts of uranium are needed
No carbon emissions are produced. The technology does not add to global warming
Nuclear power stations can be made leak free and secure from terrorism
We have never had problems with our nuclear power stations. We are very experienced with the technology
We have our own stockpile of plutonium
There is a plentiful world supply of uranium in stable countries such as Canada
WIND TURBINES/FARMS
FOR
Wind is a free, renewable source of energy. The UK is well endowed with wind
Wind farms can be onshore or offshore, using simple technology they produce low cost electricity
Offshore sites have little environmental impact, and have access to stronger more reliable winds
No carbon emissions are produced by wind turbines, reducing our impact on global warming
There is minimal environmental / visual impact and little bird damage
Wind farms can be confined to less beautiful, less sensitive areas. Not in National Parks or SSSI’s
More power will be produced on cold windy winter days when it is needed
Wind turbines /farms are easy to dismantle after 25 year life and sites can be restored
WIND TURBINES/FARMSAGAINST
Wind farms cover large areas with 50 to 60 m towers and turbines, each producing only 1 MW of electricity
Winds are unpredictable and unreliable. Turbines need a 10 mph wind to operate and must be shut down at 50 mph
Wind turbines interfere with TV and may have an adverse effect on health
Turbines have a negative impact on the beauty of the countryside. Some of our best views have already been spoilt
Bird damage can be great. The RSPB calls the turbines ‘bird mincing machines’
Wind farms built in coastal areas and areas of outstanding beauty such as the Wolds have negative effects on tourism
Offshore sites affect seabed ecology and fishing areas
Offshore farms are more costly to build, use more complex technology and are costlier to maintain