Postal Vision 2020, Post Expo 2011, Harry Koorstra, CEO PostNL

13
Postal Vision 2020 The continuation of trends versus the likelihood of disruptive elements Harry Koorstra, CEO PostNL September 2011

description

Postal Vision 2020, The continuation of trends versus the likelihood of disruptive elements, Harry Koorstra, CEO PostNL, Post Expo, september 2011. Post NL Shore mentioned as part of a balanced PostNL portfolio.

Transcript of Postal Vision 2020, Post Expo 2011, Harry Koorstra, CEO PostNL

Page 1: Postal Vision 2020, Post Expo 2011, Harry Koorstra, CEO PostNL

Postal Vision 2020The continuation of trends versus the likelihood of disruptive

elements

Harry Koorstra, CEO PostNL

September 2011

Page 2: Postal Vision 2020, Post Expo 2011, Harry Koorstra, CEO PostNL

Looking into the future:a balance between trends and disruptions

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

jaren

po

pu

lati

e

Growth of population over 5 years

Page 3: Postal Vision 2020, Post Expo 2011, Harry Koorstra, CEO PostNL

Looking into the future:a balance between trends and disruptions

Growth population over 150 years

Page 4: Postal Vision 2020, Post Expo 2011, Harry Koorstra, CEO PostNL

Agenda

Relevant trends for postal companies

Can portfolio choices shield postal companies from disruption?

How do postal companies react?

Page 5: Postal Vision 2020, Post Expo 2011, Harry Koorstra, CEO PostNL

The trends as we see them … what’s new

Economic & social

� Low economic growth

� High public financial burdens

� Ageing population

� Increasing pension costs

Technology

� High penetration fast internet (infrastructure and use)

� Further development social media

� Technology companies replacing dominance banks and oil

� Continued focus on environmental issues

� Increasing regulation

Environment Digitisation

� Marginalization letter mail

� Intense restructuring

� Increase parcels volumes

� Postal USO: out of date

Page 6: Postal Vision 2020, Post Expo 2011, Harry Koorstra, CEO PostNL

The trends and their consequences … what’s new

Financial

� Shortage of public money to finance postal operators

� Aim to reduce pension obligations

� Just historical arguments for public ownership

USO

� USO letter mail will become outdated

� Disappearance of regulatory burden

� Shift to Interest Group Policies

� USO � IGP

� High restructuring costs depending on

� Mail density

� Level of competition

� Towards a three days a week delivery system

Restructuring (New) Portfolio : choices

� Parcels

� Express

� Logistics

� Banking

� E-commerce

� Neighbourhood services

Page 7: Postal Vision 2020, Post Expo 2011, Harry Koorstra, CEO PostNL

Agenda

Relevant trends for postal companies

Can portfolio choices shield postal companies from disruption?

How do postal companies react?

Page 8: Postal Vision 2020, Post Expo 2011, Harry Koorstra, CEO PostNL

Common view: diversification works

Cathy Rogerson, IBM conference 2007

Page 9: Postal Vision 2020, Post Expo 2011, Harry Koorstra, CEO PostNL

Common view: diversification works

Cathy Rogerson, IBM conference 2007

Page 10: Postal Vision 2020, Post Expo 2011, Harry Koorstra, CEO PostNL

Portfolio development postal companies

� Source: IPC global postal industry report 2010

Page 11: Postal Vision 2020, Post Expo 2011, Harry Koorstra, CEO PostNL

A balanced portfolio deals with a wide range of trends

MailParcels / Express

LogisticsFinancial services / Retail services

ShoreE-com-merce services

Neighbour-hood servi-ces

Increasing financial pressure

Increased digitisation

Postal regulation

Ageing population

Increased focus on cost efficiency

Negative Positive Neutral

Page 12: Postal Vision 2020, Post Expo 2011, Harry Koorstra, CEO PostNL

Agenda

Relevant trends for postal companies

Can portfolio choices shield postal companies from disruption?

How do postal companies react?

Page 13: Postal Vision 2020, Post Expo 2011, Harry Koorstra, CEO PostNL

Possible disruption scenario’s

� Economic decline and further credit squeeze

� Shareholders activism

� Regulation

� Political decision making

� Could lead to break up of portfolio's

� Forced sale of portfolio elements

� Break up of companies

� High costs to operators