PollingResults...Dec 03, 2020  · 5 Twenty-nine percent of voters report having received a surprise...

25
Polling Results DECEMBER 2020

Transcript of PollingResults...Dec 03, 2020  · 5 Twenty-nine percent of voters report having received a surprise...

  • Polling Results

    DECEMBER 2020

  • This poll was conducted from November 20-23, 2020, amonga national sample of 1983 Registered Voters. The interviewswere conducted online and the data were weighted toapproximate a target sample of Registered Voters based onage, race/ethnicity, gender, educational attainment, and region.Results from the full survey have a margin of error of plus orminus 2 percentage points.

    METHODOLOGY

  • Nearly one in three (29%) voters report that they have personally received a surprise bill in thepast two years, and three in five voters (59%) are concerned that the care they receive may beunknowingly out-of-network.

    KEY PO INT S

    1

    2 Nearly nine in ten voters (86%) support Congress passing legislation that would protectpatients from surprise medical bills, including 89% of Democrats, 86% of independents, and82% of Republicans.

    Eighty-eight percent (88%) of voters say it is important for Congress to pass legislation that protects patients from surprise medical bills amidst the COVID-19 pandemic.

    More than two-thirds of voters are concerned about the role private equity plays in surprisemedical billing. After voters heard more about the role of private equity, 82% expressedconcerned over private equity’s impact and influence in surprise medical billing.

    3

    4

    More than three-quarters of voters (79%) support Congress passing legislation that wouldban all providers from sending a surprise bill and would base payments on what other providershave negotiated with health insurance companies.

    5

  • IMPACT OF SURPRISE MEDICAL BILLS FOR PATIENTS

    AGENDA

    THE ROLE OF CONGRESS

    PRIVATE EQUITY: INITIAL IMPRESSIONS

    PRIVATE EQUITY: INFORMED IMPRESSIONS

  • 5

    Twenty-nine percent of voters report having received a surprise medical bill while a fifth (21%) know someone who has received a surprise medical bill.

    21%

    29%

    53%

    79%

    71%

    47%

    Yes, someone I know has received asurprisemedical bill

    Yes, I have received asurprise medical bill

    No

    Selected Not Selected

    SURPRISE MEDICAL BILLS

    To the best of your knowledge, have you or someone you know ever received a surprise medical bill? Please select all that apply.

  • 6

    Forty-two percent of voters report they are worried about being able to afford surprise medical bills.

    13% 20% 22% 29% 5% 11%

    15% 21% 23% 28% 5% 8%

    16% 23% 20% 25% 5% 11%

    17% 20% 19% 27% 4% 13%

    17% 23% 24% 32%

    18% 24% 23% 21% 8% 7%

    Your monthly insurancepremium

    Your prescription drugcosts

    Your health insurance deductible, that is,the amount you pay before insurance kicksin

    Rent or mortgage

    Food

    Surprise medical bills

    Somewhat worried

    Not too worried

    Not atall worried

    Don't know/No opinion

    Very worried Not applicable

    SURPRISE MEDICAL BILLS

    How worried, if at all, are you about being able to afford each of the following for you and your family amidst the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic?

    42%

    40%

    37%

    39%

    36%

    33%

    Total Worr ied

    Total Worr ied= Very + Somewhat worr ied

  • 7

    18% 24% 23% 21% 8% 7%15% 24% 26% 23% 6% 6%20% 24% 20% 19% 9% 9%18% 28% 16% 15% 11% 13%

    25% 25% 20% 18% 7% 6%21% 24% 24% 19% 6% 6%

    9% 18% 29% 31% 7% 5%21% 24% 22% 18% 7% 7%

    16% 23% 21% 19% 10% 10%15% 23% 24% 25% 6% 7%19% 23% 19% 20% 9% 11%17% 24% 26% 21% 7% 4%17% 26% 25% 24% 4% 4%20% 28% 22% 19% 5% 6%17% 21% 24% 21% 10% 7%17% 23% 21% 22% 6% 10%

    33% 31% 20% 12%9% 18% 23% 27% 11% 12%

    Registered Voters Gender: Male

    Gender: Female

    Age: 18-34Age: 35-44Age: 45-64

    Age: 65+PID: Dem (no lean)

    PID: Ind (no lean) PID: Rep (no lean) Income: Under 50k Income: 50k-100k

    Income: 100k+ Community: Urban

    Community: Suburban Community: Rural

    Received a SMB in past 2 years: YesReceived a SMB: No

    A plurality of women, younger voters, Democrats, urbanites, and those who have received a surprise medical bill in the past two years are concerned about being able to afford a surprise medical bill during the coronavirus pandemic.

    SURPRISE MEDICAL BILLS

    How worried, if at all, are you about being able to afford each of the following for you and your family amidst the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic? Surprise Medical Bills

    Total Worr ied= Very + Somewhat worr ied

    42%39%44%46%50%45%27%45%39%38%42%41%43%48%38%40%64%27%

    Somewhat worried

    Not too worried

    Not atall worried

    Don't know/No opinion

    Very worried Not applicable NETTotalWorr ied Worr ied

    -2-10+5+15+12+2-33+5-1-11+3-6-6+7-7-3

    +32-23

  • 8

    Three in five voters (59%) are concerned that the care they receive may unknowingly be out-of-network.How concerned are you that the care you receive may unknowingly be out-of-network?

    35%

    24% 25%

    16%

    Very concerned Somewhat concerned Not too concerned Not concerned at all

    SURPRISE MEDICAL BILLS

    59%

    41%

  • 9

    Voters age 35-44 and those who have received a surprise medical bill are the most concerned that the care they receive may unknowingly be out-of-network.

    SURPRISE MEDICAL BILLS

    How concerned are you that the care you receive may unknowingly be out-of-network?Total

    59%60%59%68%74%62%38%67%53%54%56%62%65%68%57%52%82%46%

    Concerned

    Total Concern= Very + Somewhat concerned

    24% 35% 25% 16%25% 35% 25% 15%24% 35% 25% 16%26% 42% 18% 14%

    36% 38% 17% 10%25% 37% 23% 15%

    15% 23% 41% 22%31% 36% 22% 11%

    20% 33% 27% 20%19% 35% 27% 19%23% 33% 25% 19%25% 37% 25% 13%28% 37% 24% 11%31% 37% 19% 12%

    21% 36% 28% 15%22% 30% 25% 23%

    48% 34% 11% 6%14% 32% 32% 23%

    RegisteredVoters

    Gender:Male Gender:Female

    Age:18-34Age:35-44Age:45-64

    Age:65+PID: Dem (no lean)PID: Ind (no lean)PID: Rep (nolean)

    Income: Under 50k Income:50k-100k

    Income:100k+ Community:Urban

    Community:Suburban Community:Rural

    Received a SMB in past 2 years: Yes

    Received a SMB:No

    Very concerned Somewhat concerned Not too concerned Not concerned atall

  • IMPACT OF SURPRISE MEDICAL BILLS FOR PATIENTS

    AGENDA

    THE ROLE OF CONGRESS

    PRIVATE EQUITY: INITIAL IMPRESSIONS

    PRIVATE EQUITY: INFORMED IMPRESSIONS

  • 11

    Nine in ten voters support (86%) Congress passing legislation that would protect patients from surprise medical bills.

    24%

    11% 2% 1%

    62%

    Strongly support Somewhat support Neither support nor oppose

    Somewhat oppose Strongly oppose

    THE ROLE OF CONGRESS

    Would you support or oppose Congress passing legislation that would protect patients from surprise medical bills?

    86%

    3%

  • 12

    A strong majority of Democrats, independents, and Republicans support Congress passing legislation that would protect patients from surprise medical bills.

    THE ROLE OF CONGRESS

    Would you support or oppose Congress passing legislation that would protect patients from surprise medical bills?

    86%86%86%78%88%

    89%90%89%86%82%85%86%88%86%

    87%84%93%80%

    TotalSuppor t

    Total Support= Strongly + Somewhat support26% 15%

    20% 6%23% 13%24% 10%

    26% 10%29% 10%27% 11%21% 11%

    29% 14%25% 12%

    20% 8%26% 9%20% 8%

    28% 10%27% 17%

    20% 11%29% 11%24% 11%

    54%73%

    61%63%60%59%59%64%

    53%61%

    69%64%69%

    60%51%

    66%57%62%RegisteredVoters

    Gender:Male

    Gender:Female

    Age:18-34

    Age:35-44

    Age:45-64

    Age:65+PID: Dem (no lean)

    PID: Ind (no lean)

    PID: Rep (nolean)

    Income: Under50kIncome:50k-100k

    Income:100k+

    Community:Urban Community:Suburban

    Community:Rural

    Received a SMB in past 2 years: Yes

    Received a SMB:No

    Strongly support Somewhat support Neither supportnor oppose

    Somewhat oppose Strongly oppose

  • 13

    Nine in ten voters (88%) believe it is important for Congress to ban surprise medical bills amidst the coronavirus pandemic.

    31%

    9%3%

    57%

    Very important Somewhat important Not too important Not at all important

    THE ROLE OF CONGRESS

    How important is it to you, if at all, that Congress ban surprise medical bills amidst the coronavirus pandemic?

    88%

    12%

  • 14

    A strong bipartisan majority believe it is important for Congress to ban surprise medical bills amidst the coronavirus pandemic.

    THE ROLE OF CONGRESS

    How important is it to you, if at all, that Congress ban surprise medical bills amidst the coronavirus pandemic?

    88%85%89%88%93%89%83%94%87%81%89%87%87%91%88%85%94%84%

    TotalImpor tant

    24%50% 34% 11% 5%

    Total Important = Very + Somewhat important

    70% 5%11% 4%9%6%11%9%7% 4%

    51% 30%59% 30%

    55% 32%53% 34%58% 33%57% 31%

    54% 31%

    13% 6%10%

    62% 32%54% 33%

    5%13%

    61% 28%54% 29%

    8%6%

    52% 36%58% 35%

    7% 5%8%

    53% 32%59% 30%

    10% 4%9%RegisteredVoters

    Gender:Male Gender:Female

    Age:18-34Age:35-44Age:45-64

    Age:65+PID: Dem(no lean)

    PID: Ind (nolean)

    PID: Rep (nolean)Income: Under 50k Income:50k-100k

    Income:100k+ Community:Urban

    Community:Suburban Community:Rural

    Received a SMB in past 2 years: Yes

    Received a SMB:No

    Very important Somewhat important Not too important Not at all important

    57% 31%

  • 15

    Four in five voters (79%) support Congress passing legislation that would ban all providers from sending a surprise bill and would base payments on what other providers have negotiated with insurance companies– including 51% who strongly support this legislation.

    28%

    17%2% 2%

    51%

    Strongly support Somewhat support Neither support nor oppose

    Somewhat oppose Strongly oppose

    THE ROLE OF CONGRESS

    Would you support or oppose Congress passing legislation that would ban all providers from sending a surprise bill and would base payments on what other providers have negotiated with insurance companies?

    79%

    4%

  • 16

    A bipartisan majority of voters support Congress passing legislation that would ban all providers from sending a surprise bill and that would also base payments on what other providers have negotiated with insurance companies.

    THE ROLE OF CONGRESS

    79%82%76%75%82%78%82%84%75%74%75%81%87%81%79%75%88%71%

    Suppor t

    Total Support= Strongly + Somewhat support27% 23%

    24% 10%24% 20%28% 17%31% 15%

    35% 10%30% 16%

    24% 20%30% 21%

    26% 21%27% 12%23% 14%

    25% 18%32% 16%

    34% 19%25% 20%31% 14%28% 17%

    44%62%

    51%51%50%52%51%51%

    44%49%

    57%59%

    53%50%

    41%51%51%51%RegisteredVoters

    Gender:Male Gender:Female

    Age:18-34Age:35-44Age:45-64

    Age:65+PID: Dem (nolean)

    PID: Ind (no lean) PID: Rep (nolean)Income: Under 50k Income:50k-100k

    Income:100k+ Community:Urban

    Community:Suburban Community:Rural

    Received a SMB in past 2 years: YesReceived a SMB:No

    Strongly support Somewhat support Neither support nor Somewhat oppose Strongly oppose oppose

    Would you support or oppose Congress passing legislation that would ban all providers from sending a surprise bill and would base payments on what other providers have negotiated with insurance companies?

    Total

  • IMPACT OF SURPRISE MEDICAL BILLS FOR PATIENTS

    PRIVATE EQUITY: INFORMED IMPRESSIONS

    AGENDA

    THE ROLE OF CONGRESS

    PRIVATE EQUITY: INITIAL IMPRESSIONS

  • 18

    More than two-thirds of voters (68%) are concerned about the role private equity might play in surprise medical billing while a third (32%) are not concerned.

    40%

    28%

    18%14%

    Very concerned Somewhat concerned Not too concerned Not at all concerned

    PRIVATE EQUITY: INITIAL IMPRESSIONS

    How concerned are you about the role private equity might play in surprise medical billing?

    68%

    32%

  • 19

    Voters across key demographics, particularly Democrats, urbanites, and voters 35-44, are concerned about the role private equity might play in surprise billing.

    37%43%

    40%42%

    38%39%

    37%41%

    42%38%

    41%40%

    42%43%38%40%

    20%40% 8% 9%

    23% 20%

    21% 20% 19%24% 19% 15%

    38% 14% 9%34% 21% 7%

    23% 21% 19%22% 21% 16%

    35% 14% 9%20% 25% 16%

    27% 17% 15%37% 11% 11%

    30% 16% 12%25% 16% 16%30% 20% 12%28% 18% 14%

    Income: Under50k 25% 42% 17% 16%Income:50k-100k 29% 38% 18% 15%

    RegisteredVoters Gender:Male

    Gender:Female

    Age:18-34Age:35-44Age:45-64

    Age:65+PID: Dem (nolean)

    PID: Ind (no lean) PID: Rep (nolean)

    Very concerned Somewhat concerned Not tooconcerned Not at all concerned

    PRIVATE EQUITY: INITIAL IMPRESSIONS

    How concerned are you about the role private equity might play in surprise medical billing?

    68%68%68%72%77%68%58%77%63%60%67%67%73%76%66%61%83%57%

    TotalConcerned

    Total Concern = Very + Somewhat concern

    Income:100k+ Community:Urban

    Community:Suburban Community:Rural

    Received a SMB in past 2 years: YesReceived a SMB:No

  • IMPACT OF SURPRISE MEDICAL BILLS FOR PATIENTS

    PRIVATE EQUITY: INFORMED IMPRESSIONS

    AGENDA

    THE ROLE OF CONGRESS

    PRIVATE EQUITY: INITIAL IMPRESSIONS

  • 21

    After hearing more, four in five voters (82%) are concerned about the role private equity plays in surprise medical billing.

    43%

    6%

    39%

    12%

    Very concerned Somewhat concerned Not too concerned Not at all concerned

    PRIVATE EQUITY: INFORMED IMPRESSIONS

    After hearing more, how concerned are you about the role private equity plays in surprise medical billing?

    82%

    18%

    Some say private equity firms, who purchasemedical practice groups, often times staffhospitals with doctor’s who practice out of-network without the patient’s knowledge. Thismeans, that when a patient seeks care theycan be treated by a doctor, staffed by aprivate equity firm, that is not covered bytheir insurance. This will often result insurprise medical bills leaving the patient todispute the bill.

    Others say that private equity firms arenecessary and are responsible for helping tobring doctors and other medical practices tohospitals who are understaffed. Withoutprivate equity firms to help staff understaffedfacilities, this would lead to doctor shortages,hospital closures, and loss of access tomedical care in various communities.

  • 22

    Additionally, concern about the role private equity plays in surprise medical billing increased across all key demographics.

    39% 43% 12% 6%39% 43% 11% 6%38% 44% 12% 6%

    35% 48% 11% 6%44% 43% 7% 6%

    40% 43% 11% 6%38% 39% 17% 6%

    48% 40% 7% 5%34% 45% 14% 7%

    30% 47% 16% 7%36% 44% 13% 7%40% 45% 10% 6%46% 40% 13%43% 43% 9% 5%

    38% 44% 12% 6%35% 42% 14% 8%

    53% 38% 6%29% 45% 16% 10%

    RegisteredVoters Gender:Male

    Gender:FemaleAge:18-34Age:35-44Age:45-64

    Age:65+PID: Dem (nolean)

    PID: Ind (no lean) PID: Rep (nolean)

    Income: Under 50k Income:50k-100k

    Income:100k+ Community:Urban

    Community:Suburban Community:Rural

    Received a SMB in past 2 years: Yes

    Received a SMB:No

    Very concerned Somewhat concerned Not tooconcerned Not at all concerned

    PRIVATE EQUITY: INFORMED IMPRESSIONS

    After hearing more, how concerned are you about the role private equity plays in surprise medical billing?

    To ta l Ch ange in Co n ce rn e d Co nce rn

    82% +14%82% +14%82% +14%83% +11%87% +10%83% +15%77% +19%88% +11%79% +16%77% +17%80% +13%85% +18%86% +13%86% +10%82% +16%77% +16%92% +9%74% +17%

    Total Concern = Very + Somewhat concern

  • 23

    After hearing more, four in five voters (81%) feel private equity firms are responsible in surprise medical bills.

    45%

    7%

    36%

    12%

    Very responsible Somewhat responsible Not too responsible Not responsible at all

    PRIVATE EQUITY: INFORMED IMPRESSIONS

    And, how responsible do you feel private equity firms are in surprise medical bills?

    81%

    19%

  • 24

    Additionally, a strong majority of voters across key demographics see private equity firms responsible.

    45%

    41%48%

    45%48%43%

    46%46%

    46%45%

    45%

    47%46%45%46%

    29% 15% 10%

    35% 12% 11%33% 12% 7%

    40% 10% 5%38% 12%41% 11% 5%

    32% 12% 10%29% 16% 8%35% 11% 8%

    42% 8% 5%36% 13% 6%36% 45% 11% 8%40% 8% 5%

    33% 13% 8%35% 11% 9%37% 12% 5%

    7%RegisteredVoters Gender:Male

    Gender:FemaleAge:18-34Age:35-44Age:45-64

    Age:65+PID: Dem (no lean)PID: Ind (no lean)PID: Rep (nolean)Income: Under50k

    Income:50k-100k Income:100k+

    Community:Urban Community:Suburban

    Community:Rural

    Received a SMB in past 2 years: Yes

    Received a SMB:No

    Very responsible Somewhat responsible Not too responsible Not responsible at all

    36% 45% 12%

    PRIVATE EQUITY: INFORMED IMPRESSIONS

    And, how responsible do you feel private equity firms are in surprise medical bills?Total

    81%83%80%79%87%81%81%87%81%75%78%84%86%85%81%76%87%74%

    Responsible

    Total Responsible = Very + Somewhat responsible

    40%47% 8% 5%