Pol Sc 341 Winter term 2013 Case Study Presentations and Papers Purpose Topics/ Dates Team Process...
-
Upload
crystal-simmons -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of Pol Sc 341 Winter term 2013 Case Study Presentations and Papers Purpose Topics/ Dates Team Process...
Pol Sc 341 Winter term 2013 Case Study Presentations and Papers
Purpose Topics/ Dates Team Process Evaluation
Purpose
To promote class involvement and discussion
To research and analyze “case studies” of public management reform
To learn and apply team skills To make effective presentations To undertake individual written analysis of
selected aspects of the case
Potential Dates for Team Presentations
March 25March 27April 1April 3April 8
Possible Topics…Federal Accountability post-Gomery report Program review (expenditure reform) Public-Private Partnerships Employment Equity issues Freedom of Information/transparency in
government Defence procurement Reforming Indian Band government
Possible topics…provincial Budget Options (revenues, expenditures,
balance) Program review (expenditure reform) Municipal mergers Privatization (eg NS Power, Ont Hydro,
Alberta liquor stores) P-P-Ps for transportation and other
infrastructure Outsourcing
Team Process
Select members ..sign-up sheet…by March 15 at latest
Teams meet to organize their work Decide who is to present what Do a dry run among yourselves Present on the day (30 minutes max) Take questions/ promote class discussion
Individual Papers
Each student to write a separate paper covering one aspect of the team’s caseCan follow naturally from student’s research
for team effort and their role in presentation.E.g. a specific example within the overall
theme, or results in a specific province Due within a week of the presentation.
Evaluation (overall: 40 % of final mark)
Presentation worth 25%; paper 15%. Presentation mark is a group mark, paper
mark is individual. Both peer and instructor evaluation of
presentations. Presentations evaluated on:
presentation skills (eg. Clarity,Technical skill, On-time)
Content (Comprehension of material; effective argument of the case –pro’s and con’s; issues for discussion).