Poitou-Charentes workshop report Poit… · management of knowledge in the sector and organizes...
53
Euroshell – Poitou-Charentes forum report – march 20 th 2013 Program: FP7 Cooperation Deliverable D5.2 Project acronym: EUROSHELL Project title: Bridging the gap between science and producers to support the European marine mollusc production sector Project coordinator: Comité National de la Conchyliculture (CNC) Grant agreement number: 312025 – FP7 KBBE 2012.1.2-11 Funding scheme: Coordination Support Action Deliverable number 5.2 Poitou-Charentes workshop report
Transcript of Poitou-Charentes workshop report Poit… · management of knowledge in the sector and organizes...
Euroshell – Poitou-Charentes forum report – march 20th
2013
Program: FP7 Cooperation
Deliverable D5.2
Project acronym: EUROSHELL
Project title: Bridging the gap between science and
producers to support the European marine
mollusc production sector
Project coordinator: Comité National de la Conchyliculture (CNC)
Grant agreement number: 312025 – FP7 KBBE 2012.1.2-11
Funding scheme: Coordination Support Action
Deliverable number 5.2 Poitou-Charentes workshop report
Euroshell – Poitou-Charentes forum report – march 20th
2013
REPORT OF THE POITOU-CHARENTES REGIONAL FORUM
MARCH 20TH 2013
ATTENDEES
· AUBIER Annie, shellfish farmer, Syndicat des Affineurs Expéditeurs du bassin de
Marennes Oléron
· BAUDET Francis, shellfish farmer, Syndicat Conchylicole de Hiers Brouage Nodes
· BECHEMIN Christian, IFREMER
· BERTIN Michel, shellfish farmer, Association A PRO MARAIS
· BEYNAUD Jean-François, shellfish farmer, Syndicat des producteurs d'huîtres du
territoire rétais
· BLACHIER Philippe, director of CREAA
· BROSSARD Nicolas, quality service manager, CRC Poitou-Charentes
· CHAMPEAU Laurent, director of CRC Poitou Charentes
· COUGOT Roger, President of « L'huître pédagogique »
· COUTANT Catherine, shellfish farmer in la Tremblade
· ERIPRET Mariella, Euroshell project manager, CNC
· ETIENNE Monique, IFREMER
· FOKI Romain, Shellfish Project manager, SMIDAP
· GABORIAU Philippe, shellfish farmer, Syndicat de protection ostréicole du littoral
charentais
· GIGAROFF Hervé, teacher, Lycée de la Mer de Bourcefranc
· GILLARDEAU Thierry, shellfish farmer
· GRASSET Michel, shellfish farmer, Syndicat Rive Gauche de la Charente
· GUILLAUMIE Bruno, European affairs, CNC
· GUYAU Patrick, Vice-President of CRC Pays de la Loire
· JARNAN Nadine, CRC Poitou-Charentes
· KERAUDREN Hélène, project manager, CRC Pays de la Loire
· MILLE-CLAIRE Corinne, Lycée régional maritime et aquacole de La Rochelle
· MORANDEAU Philippe, CRC Poitou-Charentes
· PARACHE Alain, Lycée de la Mer
· PAUWELS Aline, director of the « Cité de l’Huître »
· PEREZ Marianne, director of the CFPPA
Euroshell – Poitou-Charentes forum report – march 20th
2013
· PERRAUDEAU Amélie, FLAG leader « Pays Marennes Oléron »
· PIQUET Jean-Come, IFREMER
· PRIVAT Freddy, shellfish farmer
· PRIVAT Adrien, project manager, CPIE Marennes-Oléron/ Association IODDE
· PROU Jean, IFREMER – partner of the project Euroshell
· RHONE Charlotte, Environment project manager, CRC Poitou-Charentes
· RUNIGO Michel, director of the Lycée régional maritime et aquacole de La Rochelle
· SOUBIELLE Marc, shellfish farmer, EARL Anthias
· SUIRE Jean Pierre, shellfish farmer, Groupement Qualité Huîtres Marennes Oléron
· VIAUD Gérald, President of the CRC Poitou-Charentes
· VOISIN Frédéric, organic shellfish farmer
WELCOME AND INTRODUCTION
Mariella Eripret thanks all participants of this day for accepting the invitation to the second
regional forum of the European program Euroshell.
She presents the project and the objectives of the day (see annex 1).
Euroshell aims to identify current and future challenges that the European shellfish sector is
facing and to create the conditions for improving knowledge transfer between science and
industry and for a better integration of industry needs by the research.
The project focuses on identifying the underlying factors that hinder the effective
management of knowledge in the sector and organizes regional forums to facilitate dialogue
between companies and researchers, focusing on the development of an effective
methodology for knowledge transfer.
It is proposed firstly, to establish an extension network, and secondly, to define a common
vision for the future of the sector and identify key targets for research that could be
integrated into the European Aquaculture Platform for Technology and Innovation (EATIP). It
will also provide opportunities for cooperation with Fishery Local Action Groups (FLAGs -
Axis 4 of the European Fisheries Fund) of the European fishing areas network (FARNET).
Participants are then invited to present themselves, by profile, telling their name, the
number of year of experience, where they work, what they producer or work on, etc.:
farmers first, then scientists and finally extension workers.
WORKSHOP 1 – VISION OF THE SHELLFISH SECTOR
As an introduction to this workshop was presented the European Aquaculture Platform for
Technology and Innovation (EATIP). Technology platforms, implemented in 2000 at the
Euroshell – Poitou-Charentes forum report – march 20th
2013
initiative of the European Commission, aims to bring together public and private actors
(producers, scientists, elected officials, local authorities, other experts ...) of a sector with
high technology potential to define a long-term vision on the needs in terms of research.
This allows the European Commission to focus its tenders in accordance with the actual
needs of different technology sectors. There are about forty platforms in all areas (energy,
transport, food, etc..).
For the aquaculture sector, the EATIP was created in 2007. As part of this platform, a
document on the vision of the aquaculture sector has been formulated following regional
consultations across Europe (Aquainnova project). But the shellfish sector is poorly
represented. Indeed fishfarming prevails. But it is also a communication tool and a
document that is enforceable against Commissioners, who must take it into account. It is
therefore essential that the shellfish sector is better integrated into the vision.
Euroshell is an opportunity for shellfish farming to take a better place in this platform. It is in
this context that an exercise on the vision of the sector has been proposed to the
participants of the forum.
The goal was to define a common vision for the sector and to identify priorities for research.
It was asked to the participants to comment on the schema of the vision of the shellfish
sector, proposed by EMPA with a few additions from the vision of EATIP (see schema in
Annex 2): do you agree with this view? Are there elements to add? Are there some to
remove? Can you clarify these ideas with examples? What are the most important
elements?
This document was sent to participants a few days before the date of the forum, so that they
could start to think about it.
Participants were divided into four mixed groups of nine persons, to facilitate speaking. Each
group consisted of 3-4 producers, 1-2 scientists, 2-3 extension workers and 2-3 CRC
representatives (employees or elected).
After an hour of discussion, a reporter from each group presented a summary of the
discussion of his group in plenary session. Here is what came out from the discussions.
I/ Territory-environment
1) Water quality
Clearly, the quality of the environment has emerged as a priority conditioning the sustainability of
shellfish farming in the medium and long term.
Water quality is the first concern. Indeed, the natural balance is hammered because of the presence
Euroshell – Poitou-Charentes forum report – march 20th
2013
of contaminants without being able to act on the partial or total removal of them.
It is unfortunate that professionals must adapt their way of working according to the pollution they
suffer from while in the absence of pollution, the situation would be much more comfortable to
work.
It is therefore essential to focus research on the impact of pollutants on the health of shellfish (eg,
pesticides), and how to eradicate the sources of pollution.
The lack of knowledge on the subject penalizes the sector by depriving it of means to weigh on some
trade-offs.
Indeed, at present, the profession has few levers truly effective in reversing the trend marked by a
continuing degradation of estuarine ecosystems.
2) Sanitary monitoring
Meanwhile, we must give to professionals the means to anticipate sanitary crisis that increase.
Health issues have been much discussed. They were qualified as major economic risks for companies.
The participants ask for:
- The development of predictive tools to be responsive to face crises (closures);
- An improved environmental monitoring (e.g. Vigo) and information towards professionals with a
more reactive monitoring network;
- The development of techniques that allow companies to adapt themselves (innovative equipment,
closed-circuit, water treatment techniques, etc.)
3) Access to the coast
The development of aquaculture is facing problems of sharing the territory and environmental
protection measures.
Indeed, the coast is a source of space conflicts between different activities that take place on it:
tourism, urbanization, industry, agriculture, aquaculture, protected natural areas...
To ensure the sustainability of shellfish farming, it is necessary to implement measures to protect the
territories, and in particular territories where shellfish farming is exercised.
There are various measures of territory protection (marine parks, marine SCoT, Natura 2000 sites ...)
emanating from a good initiative in the beginning but eventually prove to be regulatory barriers to
shellfish farmers.
Euroshell – Poitou-Charentes forum report – march 20th
2013
However, shellfish farming provides ecosystem services and thus could be totally compatible with
these protective measures.
Environmental groups sometimes come in conflict with the interests of production while shellfish
farming and environmental protection go hand in hand.
4) Ecosystem services
Shellfish are sentinels of the environment. They indicate whether the water is good or bad. A
comparison is made between shellfish farmers and beekeepers. Bees are also sentinels of the
environment, and beekeepers, like shellfish farmers, are not masters of their territory, but they
suffer the consequences of environmental degradation.
Shellfish provides ecological services (or ecosystem services). Indeed, it can purify / clean up the
water. It is necessary to take this into account and to use it as a defence of shellfish farming.
Moreover, this represents a significant economic weight. We must do some research on these
aspects and quantify the services provided.
5) Management of wild natural beds
This item has been added to the scheme presented.
It is essential to manage wild natural beds and to continue the natural collection to preserve
biodiversity and the quality of products. We can not depend solely on hatcheries.
6) Adaptation to environmental changes
Climate changes are affecting the environment and ecosystems. We need to improve our
understanding of these changes in order to better adapt.
7) Relationship with local stakeholders
Research supports professionals but also elected officials to guide spatial development policies they
put in place. Elected officials base - or at least, should base - their decisions on the results of scientific
research. Hence the importance of conducting research with professionals, enabling them to present
arguments to defend their work.
II/ Market
Euroshell – Poitou-Charentes forum report – march 20th
2013
1) Develop new markets
The shellfish market grows outside of Europe, particularly in Asia. It is therefore important to follow
the trend. A research on potential export markets has to be done.
In general, participants consider that more market research should be done to match production to
demand. Rather than producing first and then look for opportunities, it would be better to ensure
that there is sufficient demand to then produce and sell at a good price.
Demand should also be created and therefore, it is important to communicate better.
2) Develop communication
To better sell a product, one has to communicate about its qualities.
The introduction of labels, certifications, PGI (Protected Geographical Indication) can promote the
products.
Communication abroad should also be strengthened to develop export.
3) Diversify marketing methods
Supermarkets and hypermarkets represent a good market share (40% according to one participant).
Direct selling is also a widespread marketing mode (60 to 70% according to the same participant). It
is necessary to maintain a large share of direct sales in order to reduce dependence on supermarkets
and prevent any monopoly.
Other circuits related to our time (online orders, AMAP - associations supporting small farming- ,
baskets of products ...) seem difficult to implement given the specificity of shellfish: fresh and alive
products of which the purchase is subject to consumer confidence. However, there are systems such
as « panier poisson-coquillages » (shellfish and fish basket) developed in the Etang de Thau that work
well.
4) Improve marketing
Participants discussed the need to improve marketing with better distribution and delivery of
products, optimizing the transport of goods, better packaging of products, etc.
Pooling marketing was mentioned (eg cooperative). It would help improve all these aspects
mentioned above.
5) Diversify the activity
Euroshell – Poitou-Charentes forum report – march 20th
2013
Diversification is practiced on a small scale. “Pescatourism” for example, grows a bit, but it is seen
more as a burden than a benefit, especially because of all regulatory obligations related to it (safety
rules ...).
Diversification is often hampered by the territory competition. The tasting of products for example
generates competition with traditional restaurants. Moreover, this activity is considered full-fledged,
independent of the production activity. "This is another job."
6) Establish a level playing field within and outside Europe
Establish fair rules is a utopia. Certainly, it would be desirable because in the current context where
prices outside of France are very low while exports are booming, it would balance the relations and
ensure "free and not distorted competition”. But the producers do not believe in this possibility.
In addition, cultural differences make it difficult to work together even within Europe: between
English-speaking countries (culture of cooked food, sanitation) and the Latin countries (culture of
living food, control of the environment, but difficulty to manage the water catchments), attitudes are
very different. Holland, for example, is culturally a trading nation, with buy-sell activities.
7) Processing products
Research is also required on the processing of products, as new ways of consuming emerge and it is
necessary to offer new types of products.
III/ Product – production
1) Health
Producers, though legally responsible, do not control all the elements to ensure the health of the
consumer. They master the production process, but not the environment.
Shellfish health and disease depend largely on elements that producers cannot control. They have
therefore not been very much detailed, although their knowledge is considered crucial and obviously
needs to be strengthened.
Just as the life cycle of the species, on which there is still much to discover. The marine area is indeed
less known than terrestrial space.
2) Management of wild natural beds
Euroshell – Poitou-Charentes forum report – march 20th
2013
This item has been added to the scheme presented. It is also linked to the "environment"
component. Indeed, it is necessary to better manage wild natural beds to allow better natural
collection and ensure the good condition of wildlife and the preservation of biodiversity.
3) Development of new technologies
Participants consider the need to develop new technologies for:
- Packaging and processing products,
- Diversify species (find alternatives to Crassostrea gigas)
- Be able to produce offshore to limit conflicts of use.
IV/ Management and governance
1) Simplification and consistency of regulatory texts
Producers face administrative difficulties, because of the profusion of regulatory texts on the one
hand, and the contradiction between the texts themselves, on the other hand.
In addition, they express the need for a better regulatory framework for the management and
governance of the profession: who does what?
2) Representation of the profession in front of decision-making bodies
Producers are wondering if they are sufficiently well represented within the State or the European
Union. Representation is important for lobbying.
3) Socio-economic data
Participants consider that there is a lack of knowledge and statistical studies on the profession in
general. It is essential to conduct more comprehensive and reliable studies on the business: market
conditions, economic importance of the sector, sociological knowledge, companies' needs, economic
sustainability of companies, etc.
It is also necessary that these data are available and accessible to professionals themselves.
4) To promote and develop human capital
Euroshell – Poitou-Charentes forum report – march 20th
2013
Participants found it important to add to the schema the notion of training. It is essential to the
sustainability of shellfish farming. The better we are formed, the more we are able to face some
difficulties.
Some participants deplored the lack of oystermen while this is a great profession to enhance the
products.
Overall, participants found very interesting the exercise of exchanging points of views and
comprehensive reflection on the sector. Some have even said that they would like this discussion to
be conducted in all CRC.
WORKSHOP 2 – EXTENSION NETWORK
The afternoon was dedicated to the theme "knowledge transfer."
The purpose was introduced by a presentation of the Centre Régional d’Expérimentation et
d’Application Aquacole (CREAA) by its director, Philippe Blachier (see presentation in annex 3, in
French).
Then the participants were divided into four mixed groups of nine people, as the workshop on the
vision but differently constituted to ensure that everyone can talk to each other.
Questions were sent in advance to participants so that they could start thinking about knowledge
transfer. The same questions were asked by the facilitators to start the debate. The discussion was
free, the questions being a means to open discussion.
- What is knowledge transfer for you?
- What are the structures that you know, that transfer knowledge? Towards the general public?
Towards producers?
- What other structures could do that?
- Why is there no extension network in the shellfish area?
- How to create one that works?
- What resources (human, financial, technical ...)? Who, how, where? ...
- What are the needs of producers and researchers in terms of knowledge transfer?
- What would be the benefits? Difficulties?
- If you were to implement this extension network, how would you do?
- Etc.
Euroshell – Poitou-Charentes forum report – march 20th
2013
After 45 minutes of discussion, a reporter from each group presented a summary of the discussion of
his group in plenary session. Here is what came out from the discussions.
General observations:
Participants think that the dissemination of knowledge is not enough in the industry. Professionals
are familiar with traditional farming but have no scientific knowledge.
How is it that in agriculture, especially in the post-war period, transfer of knowledge worked well
between scientists and farmers while no extension system has been implemented in the shellfish
industry? Just because shellfish farmers have never expressed this need…
IFREMER transfers knowledge towards the CRC but not to professionals and often only in times of
crisis, which creates a climate of mistrust and tension.
The CRC does not hold enough public meetings. However, they are not always easy to hold as
professionals do not participate easily and are not always very attentive...
For its part, IFREMER notes that conferences organized in the exposition of La Tremblade do not
necessarily passionate professionals. Few are present while the Institute needs them.
In general, the participants note that it is not easy to find people who want to get involved. The need
to motivate professionals is raised.
The lack of communication is partially due to the Direction Départementale des Territoires et de la
Mer ( French State) who put a barrier between scientists and professionals.
The problem of transparency of scientific organizations is also highlighted.
Example: mortalities were observed in Ireland last year and Ifremer said it was not aware of it.
A critic is made on the fact that the report of the Oyster World Congress has not been broadcast,
while the CNC has published it on its website. There is a lack of transmission of information even
within the industry.
The professionals present yet expressed interest in being informed about what is happening across
the world.
Ideas on knowledge transfer:
Who transfers knowledge?
Everyone cannot be an extension worker. It requires some teaching skills, interpersonal skills ... The
person has to be legitimate and neutral, neither a scientific nor a professional, but who has enough
knowledge to know how to convey.
Euroshell – Poitou-Charentes forum report – march 20th
2013
In order to transfer well the information, it is essential to establish a climate of confidence, a
balanced relation. The scientist must show some humility when he explains his research, he should
not be condescending. He must be able to explain that his results may be valid only at a given time
and place, that he encounters difficulties in conducting his study, etc. On the other hand, the
recipients of the study (professionals) should be indulgent, they need to understand the reality of a
research work (hazards, specific context ...) and should not expect immediate results. Research can
extend over a long period of time.
A good transfer of knowledge implies an adjustment of the language, the vocabulary used. Scientists
do not use the same vocabulary as producers. The vocabulary also differs by region.
Some suggest creating jobs of aquaculture consultants or advisers.
These extension agents may play a role in scientific watch, collecting information, gathering,
overlapping, synthesizing and disseminating it.
Organizations such as technical centers (CREAA, SMEL, SMIDAP, CEPRALMAR ...), professional
organizations, CRC or CNC, vocational colleges, associations transferring knowledge to the general
public (Cité de l’Huître, for example), FLAGs could "host" extension agents.
A system at the national level could bring all stakeholders (ministries, training centers, scientists,
professionals, representatives of CRC, CNC ...) and oversee everything.
The importance of networking between stakeholders is emphasized.
Information can be transferred from scientist to engineer / teacher / extension worker who then
makes the link with the professional. Or it can be transferred directly without intermediaries.
What should be transferred?
One should not disseminate knowledge in only one direction, from scientists to farmers. All the
knowledge must be taken into account, including empirical knowledge. We must not neglect the
experience of professionals. Moreover, scientists express themselves this need to acquire the
knowledge gained in the field by producers.
There are not scholars on one side and ignorant people on the other. Knowledge is co-constructed, it
is exchanged and expands by the contributions of each.
The information to be transmitted should be targeted on demand. It must be simplified without
being misrepresented. The purpose must be adapted to the public.
We must be vigilant on all the information available, especially on the Internet. You can find
everything and its opposite. This is why it is important to sort information and check its foundation.
The transcription of data should not lead to abuses, manipulations. It must remain faithful to the
source.
There is a lot of scattered knowledge that needs to be gathered and then disseminated.
Euroshell – Poitou-Charentes forum report – march 20th
2013
However, one must bear in mind that the results of experiments, research, depend heavily on spatial
and temporal context and are therefore not always generalizable.
How to transfer knowledge?
Several possibilities and ideas were mentioned:
• Public exchanges could be organized at regular intervals. Three per year seem desirable. Thus,
stakeholders would not have to wait until all results are established and scientists could explain why
a particular study advances slowly, why the results are delayed, what difficulties they encounter, in
order to involve the recipients in these studies.
• IFREMER could reedit data sheets, as it did a few years ago and which were appreciated by
professionals.
• regular information meetings could be organized by CREAA. Information transmitted by email is
necessary but not sufficient, as many producers do not use computers so much. Some participants
regretted the time when CREEA communicated more by visiting the farms. Professionals require
more information from the CREAA.
· The establishment of newsletters, a website dedicated to the transmission of knowledge, etc.
Reference is made to the blog "Ostrea" (http://www.ostrea.org/), led by a scientist, which is highly
appreciated by some professionals. The advantage of this blog is that it provides a forum for
interested people to express themselves, ask questions, provide feedback, tell what the situation is in
their farm or region, etc. There is a need for exchange , whether physical or virtual.
These locations would allow a transfer of knowledge between professionals themselves. They could
then share their knowledge. But is it possible? Individualism is often mentioned in this profession,
and it could be an obstacle to the transmission of information, in particular because of competition
between companies.
• The organization of visits of farms, trips and exchanges between different actors of the shellfish
industry would facilitate the understanding of certain phenomena, of results of experiments, etc.
besides creating links. Learning by example works better.
• More fun professional magazines could be created
PRESENTATION OF THE TOOLS DEVELOPED WITHIN EUROSHELL
1) Mapping the sector
Jean Prou, in charge of Work package 4 on useful tools for knowledge transfer, presented the
mapping tool which is under development. With Sextant team of IFREMER and the data provided by
the research and industry partners of Euroshell, he develops a map that will locate in Europe, the
main areas of shellfish production, research centers, technical centers, training centers, professional,
etc.
Euroshell – Poitou-Charentes forum report – march 20th
2013
2) Knowledge database
Mariella Eripret presents briefly the knowledge database which is under development as part of the
Work package 3 on the review of current knowledge. This database will be accessible on the Internet
and will collect all the useful knowledge for the shellfish industry, whether it results from applied or
basic research, empirical knowledge or gray literature, whether from European, national or regional
projects, of past, present and future projects. The project partners are in charge of gathering about
twenty projects per country.
This database will be available in the four languages of the project (French, English, Spanish and
Italian) and will then be used and supplied by extension agents, scientists, professionals...
PRESENTATION OF THE FLAG « PAYS DE MARENNES-OLÉRON » AND « BASSIN D’ARCACHON »
Amélie Perraudeau, leader of the FLAG « Pays de Marennes-Oléron » presents her group as well as
the group « Bassin d’Arcachon » (see presentation in annex 4, in French).
CONCLUSIONS AND EXCHANGES WITH PARTICIPANTS
Mariella Eripret thanks everyone for participating in this day of exchange. The report of the forum
will be sent to all participants. The next forum will be held in the Mediterranean, then in Ireland,
Spain, Italy and the Netherlands. The main ideas expressed in these forums as well as proposals and
tools suggested by the project Euroshell will be presented at a second meeting of European
stakeholders of the shellfish industry in January 2014.
An evaluation form was completed by the participants who found the day very interesting. These
remarks were made:
- Better explain the objectives of the day and the project in general because some participants had
not quite understood at the beginning of the day even if they better understood at the end;
- There was a lot to discuss and it would have taken more time for each workshop and for debate;
- Give more examples of knowledge transfer;
- Invite representatives of the State (e.g. Direction Départementale des Territoires et de la Mer) and
local authorities (Region, Department) or elected officials.
The day ended at 17:15.
20
ma
rs2
01
3
De
ux
ièm
e f
oru
m r
ég
ion
al,
CR
C P
oit
ou
_C
ha
ren
tes,
Bo
urc
efr
an
c
Pré
sen
tati
on
du
pro
jet
EU
RO
SH
ELL
Ma
rie
lla
ER
IPR
ET
- C
ha
rgé
e d
e m
issi
on
po
ur
la c
oo
rdin
ati
on
du
pro
jet
20
ma
rs2
01
3
De
ux
ièm
e f
oru
m r
ég
ion
al,
CR
C P
oit
ou
_C
ha
ren
tes,
Bo
urc
efr
an
c
No
v 2
01
0 :
RV
ave
c D
G
RT
D,
dé
cou
vert
e
pro
jet
Biv
ali
fe
CE
im
po
se
inté
gra
tio
n d
es
pro
du
cte
urs
Fév
20
11
:
sig
na
ture
p
roje
t B
iva
life
Ap
pe
l d
’off
re d
e la
CE
su
r
lie
n p
rod
uct
ion
/
rech
erc
he
, b
asé
su
r n
otr
e
de
ma
nd
e
Fév 2
01
2 :
AE
PM
re
mp
ort
e d
’ap
pe
l
d’o
ffre
Ma
i 2
01
2 :
ch
an
ge
me
nt
de
co
ord
ina
teu
r :
CN
C
Oct
20
12
:
dé
ma
rra
ge
du
p
roje
t
Ge
nè
se d
u p
roje
t
20
ma
rs2
01
3
De
ux
ièm
e f
oru
m r
ég
ion
al,
CR
C P
oit
ou
_C
ha
ren
tes,
Bo
urc
efr
an
c
•C
om
mis
sio
n E
uro
pé
en
ne
•C
om
me
nt
com
ble
r l’é
cart
en
tre
la
re
che
rch
e e
t
les
pro
du
cte
urs
afi
n d
e s
ou
ten
ir l
a p
rod
uct
ion
ma
rin
e e
uro
pé
en
ne
de
mo
llu
squ
es
?
•0
1/1
0/2
01
2 à
31
/03
/20
14
= 1
8 m
ois
•1
8 p
art
en
air
es
; 6
Eta
ts-m
em
bre
s :
RU
, IR
L, P
B,
FR
, E
SP,
IT
20
ma
rs2
01
3
De
ux
ièm
e f
oru
m r
ég
ion
al,
CR
C P
oit
ou
_C
ha
ren
tes,
Bo
urc
efr
an
c
Pa
rte
na
ria
t
Niv
ea
u e
uro
pé
en
AE
PM
EA
S
Niv
ea
u n
ati
on
al
RU
SA
GB
AR
DT
OE
PB
PO
M
DLO
IT
AM
A
UN
IVE
ES
CR
MG
CS
IC
FR
CN
C
IFR
EM
ER
IRL
ISG
A/I
FA
UC
C
Pa
rte
na
ire
s ré
gio
na
ux
en
Fra
nce
•C
RC
BN
•C
RC
PC
•C
RC
ME
Pa
rte
na
ire
te
chn
iqu
e
•A
C2
G
Co
ord
on
na
te
ur:
CN
C
20
ma
rs2
01
3
De
ux
ièm
e f
oru
m r
ég
ion
al,
CR
C P
oit
ou
_C
ha
ren
tes,
Bo
urc
efr
an
c
Ob
ject
ifs
clé
s
1)
Dif
fuse
r la
co
nn
ais
san
ce s
cie
nti
fiq
ue
au
prè
s d
es
pro
du
cte
urs
:
•R
ésu
lta
ts d
e r
ech
erc
he
s e
uro
pé
en
ne
s, n
ati
on
ale
s, r
ég
ion
ale
s…
•P
roje
ts d
e r
ech
erc
he
an
téri
eu
rs,
en
co
urs
et
futu
rs
•R
ech
erc
he
sci
en
tifi
qu
e a
pp
liq
ué
e,
con
na
issa
nce
em
pir
iqu
e,
litt
éra
ture
gri
se…
2)
Pe
rme
ttre
au
x p
rod
uct
eu
rs d
’ex
pri
me
r le
urs
be
soin
s e
n r
ech
erc
he
au
prè
s d
es
scie
nti
fiq
ue
s e
t d
e p
art
icip
er
au
x p
roje
ts d
e r
ech
erc
he
3)
Ide
nti
fie
r u
ne
vis
ion
po
ur
le s
ect
eu
r e
uro
pé
en
de
la
co
nch
yli
cult
ure
n
ota
mm
en
t le
s la
cun
es
et
les
be
soin
s e
n r
ech
erc
he
Þ
En
vu
e d
’un
e
me
ille
ure
in
tég
rati
on
du
se
cte
ur
da
ns
la P
late
form
e a
qu
aco
le e
uro
pé
en
ne
de
tech
no
log
ie e
t d
’in
no
va
tio
n (
EA
TIP
)
Ce
n’e
st p
as
un
e n
ou
ve
lle
str
uct
ure
de
ge
stio
n d
e l
a c
on
na
issa
nce
ma
is v
a
ren
forc
er
les
lie
ns
qu
i e
xis
ten
t e
ntr
e l
es
stru
ctu
res
act
ue
lle
s.
20
ma
rs2
01
3
De
ux
ièm
e f
oru
m r
ég
ion
al,
CR
C P
oit
ou
_C
ha
ren
tes,
Bo
urc
efr
an
c
Mé
tho
de
& h
yp
oth
èse
•M
éth
od
e:
la v
ulg
ari
sati
on
co
mm
e s
olu
tio
n
–V
ulg
ari
sate
urs
= l
ien
en
tre
la s
cie
nce
et
la p
rod
uct
ion
–O
uti
ls:
cart
og
rap
hie
, b
ase
de
do
nn
ée
s d
es
con
na
issa
nce
s, f
eu
ille
de
ro
ute
po
ur
la r
ech
erc
he
…
–R
ése
au
(tr
an
sfe
rt d
es
me
ille
ure
s p
rati
qu
es,
lie
n a
vec
les
terr
ito
ire
s e
t le
s a
cte
urs
)
•H
yp
oth
èse
: –
FLA
Gs
(gro
up
es
FE
P)
: 3
00
en
Eu
rop
e d
on
t 1
1 e
n
Fra
nce
; a
sso
cia
tio
ns
de
pro
du
cte
urs
…
–In
scri
re le
pri
nci
pe
de
vu
lga
risa
tio
n d
an
s le
s n
ou
vell
es
mis
sio
ns
de
s F
LAG
s o
u d
es
org
an
isa
tio
ns
pro
fess
ion
ne
lle
s (F
EA
MP
)
20
ma
rs2
01
3
De
ux
ièm
e f
oru
m r
ég
ion
al,
CR
C P
oit
ou
_C
ha
ren
tes,
Bo
urc
efr
an
c
Org
an
isa
tio
n d
u t
rava
il
1.
Ge
stio
n d
u p
roje
t
2.
Va
lid
ati
on
d’u
ne
mé
tho
do
log
ie p
ou
r le
tra
nsf
ert
de
s co
nn
ais
san
ces
(acc
ès,
de
ma
nd
e)
3.
Ra
sse
mb
ler
les
con
na
issa
nce
s a
ctu
ell
es
4.
Ou
tils
de
vu
lga
risa
tio
n :
ca
rto
gra
ph
ie d
es
act
eu
rs
de
la
co
nch
yli
cult
ure
– p
rod
uct
eu
rs,
cen
tre
s d
e
rech
erc
he
…–
et
feu
ille
de
ro
ute
vis
ue
lle
po
ur
la
rech
erc
he
5.
Ate
lie
rs r
ég
ion
au
x
20
ma
rs2
01
3
De
ux
ièm
e f
oru
m r
ég
ion
al,
CR
C P
oit
ou
_C
ha
ren
tes,
Bo
urc
efr
an
c
Ate
lie
rs r
ég
ion
au
x
•7
ate
lie
rs r
ég
ion
au
x :
Bre
tag
ne
No
rd,
Po
ito
u-
Ch
are
nte
s, M
éd
ite
rra
né
e,
Irla
nd
e,
Ga
lice
, It
ali
e,
Pa
ys-B
as.
•R
ass
em
ble
r le
s a
cte
urs
lo
cau
x d
e l
a
con
chy
licu
ltu
re
•B
uts
: a
pp
rofo
nd
ir l
es
pis
tes
pro
po
sée
s lo
rs d
u
coll
oq
ue
de
la
nce
me
nt
; a
sso
cie
r le
s p
rofe
ssio
nn
els
à l
a d
éfi
nit
ion
de
s p
rio
rité
s ;
dé
fin
ir a
u m
ieu
x la
vu
lga
risa
tio
n n
éce
ssa
ire
.
20
ma
rs2
01
3
De
ux
ièm
e f
oru
m r
ég
ion
al,
CR
C P
oit
ou
_C
ha
ren
tes,
Bo
urc
efr
an
c
Ob
ject
ifs
de
la
jo
urn
ée
1)
Ech
an
ge
r su
r la
vis
ion
de
l’a
ve
nir
du
se
cte
ur
con
chy
lico
le (
1h
30
)
-P
rése
nta
tio
n d
e l
’EA
TiP
-P
réci
ser
les
be
soin
s d
u s
ect
eu
r co
nch
yli
cole
-E
tab
lir
les
pri
ori
tés
2)
Ech
an
ge
r su
r la
vu
lga
risa
tio
n (
1h
30
)
-V
os
be
soin
s
-E
xem
ple
d’u
ne
str
uct
ure
de
vu
lga
risa
tio
n :
le
CR
EA
A
-D
iscu
ssio
n s
ur
le c
on
cep
t e
t la
mis
e e
n p
lace
d’u
n r
ése
au
de
v
ulg
ari
sati
on
3)
Pré
sen
ter
cert
ain
s d
es
ou
tils
dé
ve
lop
pé
s p
ar
Eu
rosh
ell
-B
ase
de
do
nn
ée
s d
es
con
na
issa
nce
s (1
0 m
n p
ou
r in
form
ati
on
)
-O
uti
l ca
rto
gra
ph
iqu
e (
1h
)
20
ma
rs2
01
3
De
ux
ièm
e f
oru
m r
ég
ion
al,
CR
C P
oit
ou
_C
ha
ren
tes,
Bo
urc
efr
an
c
« S
i E
uro
she
ll r
éu
ssit
à c
rée
r u
n
ou
til
ave
c e
t p
ou
r la
pro
fess
ion
,
c’e
st la
pro
fess
ion
qu
i va
ga
gn
er
de
ce
tte
in
itia
tive
»
Ali
sta
ir L
an
e –
EA
S (
Eu
rop
ea
n A
qu
acu
ltu
re S
oci
ety
)
PR
OD
UC
TE
UR
D
E
MO
LLU
SQ
UE
S
Pro
du
it
Pro
du
ctio
n
Te
chn
olo
gie
s e
t in
no
va
tio
ns
(pro
du
ctio
n e
n é
clo
seri
e,
cult
ure
s e
n s
usp
en
sio
n,
colle
cte
de
se
me
nce
s, c
ult
ure
"o
ffsh
ore
" o
u
inté
gré
e,
réco
lte
, d
ép
ura
tio
n,
1è
re
tra
nsf
orm
ati
on
, co
nd
itio
nn
em
en
t...
)
Cy
cle
de
vie
de
s
esp
èce
s (d
on
t re
pro
du
ctio
n e
t g
én
éti
qu
e)
Sa
nté
de
s m
oll
usq
ue
s e
t p
ath
olo
gie
s
Qu
ali
té d
es
mo
llu
squ
es,
co
nso
mm
ati
on
et
san
té
hu
ma
ine
Terr
ito
ire
En
vir
on
ne
me
nt
Qu
ali
té d
e l
'ea
u (
po
llu
tio
n,
serv
ice
s é
cosy
sté
miq
ue
s...
)
An
cra
ge
au
te
rrit
oir
e,
imp
ort
an
ce d
u
tiss
u/g
rou
pe
so
cia
l
Re
lati
on
av
ec
les
act
eu
rs d
u t
err
ito
ire
(ad
min
istr
ati
on
, é
lus,
ma
rch
és,
co
nso
mm
ate
urs
, a
utr
es
pro
du
cte
urs
...)
Acc
ès
à l
a c
ôte
po
ur
ma
inte
nir
ou
in
sta
lle
r d
es
en
tre
pri
ses
con
chy
lico
les
du
rab
les
Ma
rch
é
Am
éli
ora
tio
n
qu
an
tita
tiv
e e
t
qu
ali
tati
ve
de
la
pro
du
ctio
n
eu
rop
ée
nn
e
Pro
mo
tio
n s
ur
d'a
utr
es
ma
rch
és
Div
ers
ific
ati
on
et
dé
fin
itio
n d
e
no
uv
ea
ux
pro
du
its
Eta
bli
r d
es
règ
les
de
je
u
éq
uit
ab
les
au
se
in e
t e
n d
eh
ors
d
e l'
Eu
rop
e
Ge
stio
n e
t g
ou
vern
an
ce
Fa
vo
rise
r e
t d
év
elo
pp
er
le c
ap
ita
l
hu
ma
in
Ge
stio
n d
u
sav
oir
Co
mm
un
ica
tio
n s
ur
les
av
an
tag
es
de
la
con
chy
licu
ltu
re M
on
tag
es
d'in
gé
nie
rie
fi
na
nci
ère
, a
ssu
ran
ces.
..
Eu
rosh
ell
20
ma
rs 2
013
¡L
e p
rog
ram
me
§C
om
ble
r l’é
cart
en
tre
la s
cie
nce
et
les
pro
du
cte
urs
§F
avo
rise
r l’a
ccè
s a
ux
résu
lta
ts d
’étu
de
s
¡L
e R
DV
§C
on
trib
ue
r à
la v
isio
n d
u s
ect
eu
r co
nch
ylic
ole
§M
ise
en
pla
ce d
’un
ré
sea
u d
e v
ulg
ari
sati
on
¡M
a c
on
trib
uti
on
§T
ém
oig
na
ge
pa
rtia
l et
pa
rtie
l co
nce
rna
nt
les
exe
mp
les
de
dé
velo
pp
em
en
t-tr
an
sfe
rt
E
uro
she
ll 2
0 m
ars
20
13
Eu
rosh
ell
20
ma
rs 2
013
• R
ég
ion
Po
ito
u-
Ch
aren
tes
• C
on
seil
Gén
éral
17
• IF
RE
ME
R
• C
RC
-PC
• C
hâ
tea
u d
’Olé
ron
• L
ycée
de
la M
er
• S
FAM
N
• C
RP
ME
M P
-C
• E
PT
B F
leuv
e
Ch
aren
te
• P
ays
?
Ass
oci
atio
n lo
i de
1901
Cré
ée e
n 1
990
: 9
mem
bre
s
•O
bje
ctif
: F
av
ori
ser
le d
év
elo
pp
em
en
t d
e l’
aq
ua
cult
ure
, d
e la
con
chy
licu
ltu
re e
t d
es
pê
che
s e
n r
ég
ion
Po
ito
u-C
ha
ren
tes
CR
EA
A
Co
nch
yli
cult
ure
¡
33 %
des
en
trep
rise
s fr
ança
ises
(Co
nch
.)
¡9
60
entr
epri
ses
, do
nt
80
%
fam
ilia
les
(3 5
00 e
mp
lois
) ¡
26
00
0 t
/14
00
0 t
d’h
uît
res
pro
d,
49 0
000t
ven
due
s su
r 12
0 00
0/ 1
00 0
00 t
on
nes
n
at.
¡
12 0
00 t
mo
ules
(17%
nat
.)
¡C
A >
16
0 M
d’€
Aq
ua
cult
ure
¡
Cre
vett
es 4
0 t.
(75%
nat
.), 1
0 em
plo
is
¡U
ne
éclo
seri
e p
ois
son
s
Pê
che
¡
250
bat
eaux
, 846
mar
ins
(84
pêc
heu
rs à
pie
d) 4
3 M
d’€
po
ur 9
00
0 t
déb
arqu
ées
Div
ers
ific
ati
on
¡
Pro
duc
tio
n d
e sa
lico
rnes
en
d
émar
rag
e
¡P
alli
er
l’ab
sen
ce d
e C
en
tre
s T
ech
niq
ue
s,
Ferm
es d
e ré
fére
nce
, Co
nse
iller
s te
chn
ique
s ¡
Ob
ten
ir d
es r
éfér
ence
s te
chn
ique
s et
éc
on
om
ique
s ¡
Ap
pui
aux
act
ivit
és t
rad
itio
nn
elle
s et
n
ouv
elle
s ¡
Dév
elo
pp
emen
t d
e n
ouv
elle
s ac
tivi
tés
¡P
rése
rvat
ion
du
mar
ais
par
la p
rom
oti
on
de
son
dév
elo
pp
emen
t d
urab
le
Eu
rosh
ell
20
ma
rs 2
013
Eu
rosh
ell
20
ma
rs 2
013
•C
on
chy
licu
ltu
re :
•O
bse
rvat
oir
e co
nch
ylic
ole
•S
uiv
i du
re
cru
tem
en
t d
e m
ou
les
et
d’h
uit
res
•S
uivi
de
la q
ualit
é d
u m
ilieu
(mar
ais)
•P
rog
ram
me
s d
’étu
de
et
de
lutt
e c
on
tre
les
mo
rta
lité
s
•É
tud
e d
es m
utat
ion
s co
nch
ylic
ole
s, d
ével
op
pem
ent
de
no
uvel
les
filiè
res
•S
uivi
du
pro
grè
s g
énét
ique
, SC
OR
E
•D
ive
rsif
ica
tio
n e
n m
ara
is
•A
quac
ultu
re s
emi i
nte
nsi
ve, p
ois
son
s, c
rust
acés
, mo
llusq
ues
•S
alic
orn
e
•R
éhab
ilita
tio
n d
e zo
nes
hum
ides
•C
o-a
nim
ati
on
de
la c
ell
ule
mig
rate
ur
(EP
TB
Ch
are
nte
)
•P
êch
e
•R
écif
s ar
tifi
ciel
s
•P
lan
ges
tio
n a
ng
uille
; Étu
de
de
la r
aie
bru
net
te (A
glia
), g
esti
on
pêc
he
à P
Eu
rosh
ell
20
ma
rs 2
013
• L
a F
erm
e d
’Ap
pli
cati
on
Aq
ua
cole
Ré
gio
na
le
• 1
4 h
a, 4
0 b
assi
ns,
nur
seri
e
•20
0 m
² de
bur
eaux
, Lab
ora
toir
e, s
alle
hu
mid
e…
•N
avir
e o
stré
ico
le, p
arcs
en
mer
, fili
ère
•U
ne
éq
uip
e d
e 1
0 p
erm
an
en
ts :
•6
cad
res
bio
log
iste
s, 3
tec
hn
icie
ns,
1 s
ecré
tair
e
•U
n b
ud
ge
t d
’en
vir
on
70
0 0
00
€:
•U
n fi
nan
ceur
pri
nci
pal
: le
Co
nse
il R
égio
nal
Po
ito
u-C
har
ente
s
•D
e n
om
bre
ux
cofi
na
nce
urs
: l’E
PT
B C
ha
ren
te, l
e C
NC
, le
Co
nse
il G
én
éra
l
17, l
’Eu
rop
e (
FE
P, In
terr
eg
), le
CR
C-P
C, L
’AG
LIA
, le
CR
PM
EM
-PC
, IF
RE
ME
R…
•
Acc
ord
ca
dre
IF
RE
ME
R e
t C
en
tre
s T
ech
niq
ue
s (
4)
Eur
osh
ell 2
0 m
ars
2013
Inti
tulé
P
ort
age
In
titu
lé
Po
rtag
e
1 O
bse
rvat
oir
e o
stré
ico
le
CR
EA
A/C
RC
-PC
10
R
aie
BE
CA
C
RE
AA
2a
An
imat
ion
de
la c
ellu
le d
e ve
ille
rég
ion
ale
C
RC
/CR
EA
A/I
FR
EM
ER
/DD
DT
M
11
Su
ivi
de
la p
êch
e à
pie
d
pro
fess
ion
nel
le
CR
PM
EM
-P
C
2b
An
imat
ion
du
su
ivi
sen
tin
elle
An
gen
ts I
nfe
ct.
CR
EA
A/C
T/C
RC
-PC
12
R
écif
s ar
tifi
ciel
s
CR
PM
EM
-PC
2c
Rec
her
che
de
solu
tio
ns
zoo
tech
niq
ues
C
RE
AA
/CR
C-P
C
13
Par
tici
pat
ion
à la
cel
lule
m
igra
teu
r d
e l'E
PT
B
EP
TB
3 É
valu
atio
n d
u p
rog
rès
gén
étiq
ue
C
RE
AA
/CT
14
P
on
do
ir S
eich
e C
RP
ME
M-P
C
4 S
uiv
i de
la q
ual
ité
de
l'eau
en
mar
ais
salé
C
RE
AA
1
5 O
uti
l mic
roéc
on
om
iqu
e co
nch
ylic
ole
A
GLIA
5 S
uiv
i des
larv
es e
t ca
pta
ge
hu
itre
s m
ou
les
C
RC
-PC
15
P
rog
ram
me
coll
ecti
f d
e sé
lect
ion
gén
étiq
ue
SC
OR
E
CN
C
6 A
pp
ui
au d
ével
op
pem
ent
des
fil
ière
s o
stré
ico
les
C
RE
AA
/CR
C-P
C
16
Pla
n g
esti
on
an
gu
ille
re
peu
ple
men
t C
RP
ME
M-P
C
7 P
rég
ross
isse
men
t e
n
mar
ais
CR
C-P
C
17
Rô
le s
anit
aire
des
cla
ires
C
RC
-PC
8 A
nim
ati
on
d’u
n g
rou
pe
filiè
res
CR
C-P
C
18
Div
ersi
fica
tio
n P
éto
ncl
e
CR
EA
A/C
RP
ME
M-P
C
9É
tud
e d
e la
pré
dat
ion
des
m
ou
les
CR
EA
A/C
T
¡C
ara
cté
risa
tio
n e
xp
éri
me
nta
le d
e l’
aff
ina
ge
- M
éco
nn
ais
san
ce d
e l’
exp
éri
me
nta
tio
n
- C
on
fusi
on
sur
les
ob
ject
ifs
- R
ésul
tats
dér
ang
eant
s/à
la c
om
mun
icat
ion
/pra
tiqu
es
+ Fo
rmul
atio
n d
es p
rob
lèm
es p
erm
et la
pri
se d
e co
nsc
ien
ce
: O
n n
e fa
it p
as q
ue s
ubir,
on
dev
ien
t ac
teur
+ M
essa
ge
peu
t êt
re e
nte
nd
u si
on
a d
es b
on
nes
rai
son
s
+ L
e c
on
sta
t p
art
ag
é m
èn
e à
l’a
ctio
n (
refo
nte
de
la n
orm
e
d’a
ffin
ag
e, m
od
ific
ati
on
de
ce
rta
ine
s p
rati
qu
es)
E
uro
shel
l 20
mar
s 20
13
¡T
est
de
s h
uit
res
trip
loïd
es
§R
eto
ur
d’e
xpé
rie
nce
trè
s d
ive
rs/l
itté
ratu
re im
po
rta
nte
§D
eman
de
de
la p
rofe
ssio
n :
Éva
luat
ion
en
rés
eau,
no
te
de
vulg
aris
atio
n
§Tr
avai
l en
rés
eau
avec
35
pro
fess
ion
nel
s su
r tr
ois
cy
cle
s co
mp
lets
d’é
leva
ge
et
d’a
ffin
ag
e
§M
ise
en
évi
de
nce
de
s fa
cte
urs
de
ré
uss
ite
ou
d’é
che
c
§N
éces
sair
e ad
apta
tio
n s
ous
rés
erve
de
reje
t (d
ensi
té,
trav
ail,
cycl
e, p
arc)
Eur
osh
ell 2
0 m
ars
2013
¡G
est
ion
de
s a
lgu
es
ma
cro
ph
yte
s
§P
erte
de
la c
ultu
re e
t d
es p
rati
ques
liée
s au
mar
ais
§C
om
pila
tio
n d
es s
avo
irs
fair
e (E
nqu
ête)
et
syn
thès
e b
iblio
gra
ph
ique
: Cah
ier
tech
niq
ue
§A
ccè
s à
l’in
form
ati
on
trè
s va
ria
ble
en
fo
nct
ion
du
pub
lic
§D
iffu
sio
n p
ar
l’exe
mp
le (
pa
r ta
che)
¡G
uid
e t
ech
niq
ue
cre
ve
tte
Eur
osh
ell 2
0 m
ars
2013
¡D
év
elo
pp
em
en
t d
es
fili
ère
s d
’hu
itre
s
§In
itia
tive
du
CT
§10
an
née
s d
e d
émo
nst
rati
on
san
s éc
ho
s
§Fa
ire
le t
our
les
mét
ho
des
co
nn
ues
§L
a p
reu
ve a
pp
ort
ée
pa
r l’e
xem
ple
▪
Un
pro
fess
ion
nel
▪D
émo
nst
rati
on
par
un
GIE
Eur
osh
ell 2
0 m
ars
2013
¡S
pé
cifi
cité
de
l’e
ntr
ep
rise
tra
dit
ion
ne
lle o
ù
l’ap
pre
nti
ssa
ge
pa
r l’e
xem
ple
est
pré
po
nd
éra
nt
¡L
e b
eso
in d
’info
rma
tio
n e
st a
van
t to
ut
un
e
rech
erch
e d
e ré
po
nse
à u
n p
rob
lèm
e p
osé
, g
énér
alem
ent
dif
fére
nt
de
celu
i du
scie
nti
fiqu
e ¡
Gra
nd
e va
riab
ilité
du
mili
eu e
t d
urée
s d
es
cycl
es r
end
ent
la d
émo
nst
rati
on
alé
ato
ire
¡N
e p
as
né
glig
er
les
fre
ins
soci
au
x q
u’il
fa
ut
app
réh
end
er a
u p
réal
able
so
us p
ein
e d
e re
jet
E
uro
shel
l 20
mar
s 20
13
An
ne
xe 4
: P
rése
nta
tio
n d
es
gro
up
es
FE
P
Axe
4 «
Pa
ys
de
Ma
ren
ne
s O
léro
n »
et
«B
ass
in d
’Arc
ach
on
»
pa
r A
mé
lie
Pe
rra
ud
ea
u
LE G
RO
UP
E F
EP
AX
E 4
DU
PA
YS
MA
RE
NN
ES
OLE
RO
N
Pré
sen
tati
on
EU
RO
SH
ELL
– m
ars
20
13
L'a
xe 4
du F
EP
: m
ise e
n œ
uvre
de s
traté
gie
s locale
s
pour
un «
dévelo
ppem
ent
dura
ble
des z
ones c
ôtière
s
trib
uta
ires d
e la p
êche e
t de l'a
quaculture
».
11 g
roupes e
n F
R s
éle
ctionnés s
uite à
un a
ppel à
pro
jet
national →
2%
de l'e
nvelo
ppe n
ationale
FE
P,
com
plé
tée p
ar
une e
nvelo
ppe E
tat.
D
éplo
iem
ent
de la s
traté
gie
sur
la p
ériode 2
010
-2014,
dans le c
adre
d’u
ne c
onvention t
ripart
ite a
vec la
DP
MA
et l’A
SP.
LE P
RO
GR
AM
ME
AX
E 4
DU
FO
ND
S E
UR
OP
EE
N P
OU
R L
A P
EC
HE
Un
te
rrit
oir
e d
e p
roje
t co
mp
osé
de
de
ux in
terc
om
mu
na
lité
s :
la
com
mu
na
uté
de
co
mm
un
es
de
l'I
le
d'O
léro
n,
la c
om
mu
na
uté
de
com
mu
ne
s d
u B
ass
in d
e M
are
nn
es.
LE P
AY
S M
AR
EN
NE
S O
LER
ON
●U
n t
err
itoire d
e p
roje
t et
une s
tructu
re p
ort
euse :
le P
ays M
are
nnes O
léro
n.
●U
ne s
traté
gie
: r
enfo
rcer
l'identité
maritim
e d
u t
err
itoire.
●U
n p
art
enariat
local, o
rganis
é a
uto
ur
des f
ilière
s d
e la p
êch
e e
t de la
conchylic
ulture
: le c
om
ité d
e p
rogra
mm
ation.
●D
es a
xes d
'inte
rventions c
olle
ctivem
ent
définis
, perm
ett
ant
l'att
ribution d
'aid
es
financiè
res à
des p
roje
ts c
olle
ctifs
, in
novants
ou s
tructu
rants
.
●U
ne a
nim
ation d
édié
e a
u p
rogra
mm
e :
accom
pagner
le m
onta
ge d
es d
ossie
rs d
e
subvention e
t fa
voriser
l’ém
erg
ence d
e n
ouvelle
s a
ctions e
n lie
n a
vec la s
traté
gie
.
LE G
RO
UP
E F
EP
DU
PA
YS
MA
RE
NN
ES
OLE
RO
N
LE G
RO
UP
E F
EP
DU
PA
YS
MA
RE
NN
ES
OLE
RO
N
Tro
is a
xes
d'in
terv
enti
on
●La v
alo
risation d
es p
roduits : c
ircu
its c
ourt
s, pro
motion, dém
arc
he
qualit
é, nouveaux d
ébouchés...
–A
ctio
n c
olle
ctiv
e «
Fourc
hett
es
et
Save
urs
de
la M
er
» –
Gro
up
em
ent
Qualit
é
–C
onco
urs
meill
eur
éca
iller
Mare
nnes
Olé
ron –
Cité d
e l’H
uît
re
–É
tud
e r
ela
tive a
u r
ôle
pu
rific
ate
ur
des
clair
es
– C
RC
PC
Tro
is a
xes
d'in
terv
enti
on
●La v
alo
risation d
es p
roduits : c
ircu
its c
ourt
s, pro
motion, dém
arc
he
qualit
é, nouveaux d
ébouchés...
●L'e
nviro
nnem
en
t et le
patr
imoin
e m
aritim
e : g
estion inté
gré
e d
es
zo
nes c
ôtière
s, to
urism
e d
ura
ble
, déchets
pro
fessio
nnels
...
–E
xpérim
enta
tion d
u p
esc
ato
urism
e –
CR
C P
C
–A
ctio
n c
olle
ctiv
e d
e v
alo
risa
tion d
u p
atr
imoin
e e
t de
s act
ivité
s m
aritim
es
– M
ais
on
du T
ourism
e I
le d
'Olé
ron B
ass
in d
e M
are
nnes
–A
naly
se d
es
liens
entr
e o
stré
icultu
re e
t envi
ronnem
ent
– C
RC
PC
–C
réatio
n d
'une f
ilière
de v
alo
risa
tion d
es
pla
stiq
ues
maritim
es,
nota
mm
ent
conch
ylic
ole
s –
Chantie
r d'in
sert
ion T
err
e-M
er
Chantie
rs
LE G
RO
UP
E F
EP
DU
PA
YS
MA
RE
NN
ES
OLE
RO
N
Tro
is a
xes
d'in
terv
enti
on
●La v
alo
risation d
es p
roduits : c
ircu
its c
ourt
s, pro
motion, dém
arc
he
qualit
é, nouveaux d
ébouchés...
●L'e
nviro
nnem
en
t et le
patr
imoin
e m
aritim
e : g
estion inté
gré
e d
es
zo
nes c
ôtière
s, to
urism
e d
ura
ble
, déchets
pro
fessio
nnels
...
●L'a
cco
mpagnem
ent des fili
ère
s p
rofe
ssio
nnelle
s s
ur
les q
uestions
socio
-économ
iques
–C
réatio
n d
'un o
bse
rvato
ire s
oci
o-é
conom
ique d
e la
pro
fess
ion –
CR
C P
C
–É
tud
e d
e la
pré
datio
n d
es
éle
vages
de m
oule
s –
CR
EA
A
LE G
RO
UP
E F
EP
DU
PA
YS
MA
RE
NN
ES
OLE
RO
N
Tro
is a
xes
d'in
terv
enti
on
●La v
alo
risation d
es p
roduits : c
ircu
its c
ourt
s, pro
motion, dém
arc
he
qualit
é, nouveaux d
ébouchés...
●L'e
nviro
nnem
en
t et le
patr
imoin
e m
aritim
e : g
estion inté
gré
e d
es
zo
nes c
ôtière
s, to
urism
e d
ura
ble
, déchets
pro
fessio
nnels
...
●L'a
cco
mpagnem
ent des fili
ère
s p
rofe
ssio
nnelle
s s
ur
les q
uestions
socio
-économ
iques
LE G
RO
UP
E F
EP
DU
PA
YS
MA
RE
NN
ES
OLE
RO
N
La
coo
pér
atio
n a
u s
ein
du
rés
eau
des
gro
up
es F
EP
LE G
RO
UP
E F
EP
AX
E 4
DU
PA
YS
BA
SS
IN D
’AR
CA
CH
ON
- V
AL
DE
L’E
YR
E
Le
Pa
ys
Ba
ssin
d‘A
rca
cho
n-V
al
de
l’E
yre
U
n t
err
ito
ire
de
pro
jets
co
mp
osé
de
tro
is
inte
rco
mm
un
ali
tés
: C
OB
AS
, C
OB
AN
, C
dC
VE
Un
en
jeu
ma
jeu
r :
Pe
rme
ttre
a
ux
pro
fess
ion
ne
ls
de
la
m
er
d’e
xerc
er
leu
rs
mé
tie
rs,
leu
r o
ffri
r d
es
pe
rsp
ect
ive
s d
e d
éve
lop
pe
me
nt,
en
ha
rmo
nie
ave
c le
s a
utr
es
usa
ge
s, t
ou
t e
n v
eil
lan
t à
la
pré
serv
ati
on
de
l’e
nv
iro
nn
em
en
t
Un
pa
rte
na
ria
t in
éd
it
- C
om
ité
Ré
gio
na
l C
on
chy
lico
le A
rca
cho
n -
Aq
uit
ain
e
- C
om
ité
lo
cal
de
s p
êch
es
ma
riti
me
s e
t d
es
éle
va
ge
s m
ari
ns
d’A
rca
cho
n
- P
ays
Ba
ssin
d’A
rca
cho
n –
Va
l d
e l
’Ey
re (
CO
BA
S,
CO
BA
N,
Cd
c V
al
de
l’E
yre
)
→ u
n c
om
ité
de
pro
gra
mm
ati
on
co
-pré
sid
é p
ar
les
fili
ère
s d
e la
pê
che
et
de
l'o
stré
icu
ltu
re
Ela
bo
rati
on
co
lle
ctiv
e d
’un
e s
tra
tég
ie i
nti
tulé
e :
«
De
s so
lid
ari
tés
ma
riti
me
s p
ou
r re
lev
er
les
dé
fis
en
vir
on
ne
me
nta
ux
et
éco
no
miq
ue
s
d’u
n t
err
ito
ire
un
iqu
e :
le
Ba
ssin
d’A
rca
cho
n -
Va
l d
e l
’Ey
re »
L’a
xe 4
du
FE
P :
un
e a
mb
itio
n p
ou
r le
s se
cte
urs
ma
riti
me
s d
u t
err
ito
ire
L’a
xe 4
du
FE
P :
un
so
uti
en
au
x p
roje
ts d
u
terr
ito
ire
Le g
rou
pe
so
uti
en
t le
s p
roje
ts q
ui
s’in
scri
ve
nt
da
ns
la s
tra
tég
ie s
uiv
an
te :
A
. P
rése
rve
r e
t v
alo
rise
r le
pa
trim
oin
e e
t l’e
nv
iro
nn
em
en
t E
du
qu
er/
sen
sib
ilis
er
(dé
cou
ve
rte
mé
tie
rs e
t m
ilie
u,
dif
fuse
r co
nn
ais
san
ce,.
..)
Ré
po
nd
re à
l’e
nje
u e
nv
iro
nn
em
en
tal
(pré
serv
ati
on
, g
est
ion
co
nce
rté
e,…
)
B.
Ass
ure
r u
n d
év
elo
pp
em
en
t é
con
om
iqu
e r
esp
on
sab
le
Fav
ori
ser
l’in
no
va
tio
n (
no
uv
ell
es
pro
du
ctio
ns,
pê
che
s, v
alo
rise
r/tr
an
sfo
rme
r le
s p
rod
uit
s D
iffu
ser
et
com
me
rcia
lise
r (s
ign
es
de
qu
ali
té,
no
uv
ea
ux
cir
cuit
s d
e
com
me
rcia
lisa
tio
n,
pro
mo
tio
n)
Dé
ve
lop
pe
r l’é
coto
uri
sme
(v
alo
risa
tio
n d
u p
atr
imo
ine
ma
riti
me
)
C.
Re
no
ue
r le
dia
log
ue
te
rrit
ori
al
Fav
ori
ser
le l
ien
so
cia
l (c
lub
d’e
ntr
ep
rise
s, m
éd
iati
on
, …
) Fa
vo
rise
r l’a
ccu
eil
et
le m
ain
tie
n d
es
pro
fess
ion
ne
ls (
log
em
en
t, f
orm
ati
on
,…)
Co
op
éra
tio
n,
An
ime
r e
t co
mm
un
iqu
er
L’a
xe 4
du
FE
P :
exe
mp
les
de
pro
jets
fin
an
cés
● J
ou
rné
es
d’é
cha
ng
es
av
ec
Ma
ren
ne
s O
léro
n
● J
ou
rné
es
tech
niq
ue
s à
de
stin
ati
on
de
s p
rofe
ssio
nn
els
– A
AM
Ps
● E
lab
ora
tio
n d
’un
e r
en
con
tre
mo
nd
iale
de
l’o
stré
icu
ltu
re –
C
RC
AA
● E
tat
de
la
fé
con
dit
é d
es
hu
ître
s e
n l
ien
av
ec
la q
ua
lité
de
l’e
au
d
u B
ass
in d
’Arc
ach
on
– S
IBA
/CR
AA
: r
en
forc
em
en
t d
u C
RC
AA
pa
r u
n s
cie
nti
fiq
ue
en
ch
arg
e d
e s
yn
thé
tise
r le
s é
tud
es,
te
ste
r d
es
hy
po
thè
ses,
dif
fuse
r le
s co
nn
ais
san
ces
à l
a p
rofe
ssio
n
L’a
xe 4
du
FE
P :
de
s p
roje
ts q
ui
pe
uv
en
t
con
fort
er
les
ob
ject
ifs
d’E
uro
she
ll
Pa
rta
ge
r e
t d
iffu
ser
le
s co
nn
ais
san
ces,
re
no
ue
r le
d
ialo
gu
e t
err
ito
ria
l, d
év
elo
pp
er
la c
oo
pé
rati
on
…
-->
De
s p
réco
nis
ati
on
s d
’EU
RO
SH
ELL
qu
i p
ou
rra
ien
t ê
tre
pri
ses
en
co
mp
tes
da
ns
les
no
uv
ell
es
can
did
atu
res
de
s te
rrit
oir
es
Gro
up
e F
EP
Ba
ssin
d’A
rca
cho
n V
al
de
l’E
yre
: A
uré
lie
Le
can
u -
fe
pb
ass
ind
arc
ach
on
@va
lde
leyre
.fr
Gro
up
e F
EP
Pa
ys
Ma
ren
ne
s O
léro
n :
Am
éli
e P
err
au
de
au
- a
.pe
rra
ud
ea
u@
ma
ren
ne
s-o
lero
n.c
om
