Planning Report

Proposed Vodafone Mobile Telecommunications Base Station

117 Bedford Road

Andergrove QLD 4740 July 2015

Prepared on behalf of Vodafone Hutchison Australia Pty Ltd

Document Controls

Document description Planning Report: Proposed Vodafone Mobile Telecommunications Base Station Facility.

Site No.

440007

Site name

Andergrove South

Name Signed Date

Prepared by Benjamin Cross

7 July 2015

Prepared for:

Prepared by:

Vodafone Hutchison Australia Pty Ltd CPS Global Contact: Benjamin Cross Office 5/55 Bulcock Street PO Box 408 Moffat Beach QLD 4551 Phone: 0410 597 399 benjaminc@cosglobal.com

This report has been prepared as a supporting document to the Development Application. The report relies upon data, surveys, measurements and results taken at or under particular times and conditions specified herein. Any findings and conclusions or recommendations only apply to the aforementioned circumstances. CPS Global does not accept any responsibility for the use of this report by any parties other than the Brisbane City Council, without its prior written permission.

Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................ 2

1 Introduction.......................................................................................................................... 3

1.1 Objectives of this Report ..................................................................................... 3

1.2 The Proposal and its Objectives ............................................................................ 3

1.3 Mobile Base Stations and how they Work ............................................................. 3

2 Proposal Description ............................................................................................................. 5

2.1 Site Location and Surrounds ................................................................................ 5

2.2 Description of the Proposal.................................................................................. 7

2.3 Construction and Operational Access .................................................................... 7

3 Strategic Planning ................................................................................................................. 8

3.1 Need for the Proposal ......................................................................................... 8

3.2 Options Considered ............................................................................................ 8

3.3 Preferred Option ....................................................................................................11

4 Commonwealth Regulatory Framework .............................................................................. 12

4.1 Telecommunications Act 1997 ........................................................................... 12

4.2 Telecommunications Code of Practice 1997 ........................................................ 13

4.3 Telecommunications (Low-Impact Facilities) Determination 1997 ......................... 13

4.4 The Australian Communications Industry Forum (ACIF) - Industry Code for the Deployment of Mobile Phone Network ............................................................................ 13

4.5 Commonwealth Government Policy and the Digital Economy ............................... 14

5 QLD Planning Legislation ..................................................................................................... 15

5.1 Sustainable Planning Act 2009 ........................................................................... 15

5.2 Regional Planning ............................................................................................. 15

5.3 Referral Agencies .............................................................................................. 17

5.4 The Mackay City Plan ........................................................................................ 17

5.5 Application Requirements ................................................................................. 17

5.6 Desired Environmental Outcomes………………………………………………………………………….

5.7 Overall Outcomes for Telecommunications Facilities ............................................ 18

6 Potential Environmental Impacts and Proposed Mitigation Measures ................................ 42

6.1 Hazards, Risk and Health Impacts ....................................................................... 42

6.2 Visual Amenity ................................................................................................. 44

6.3 Flora and Fauna ................................................................................................ 46

6.4 Heritage ........................................................................................................... 46

6.5 Contaminated land ........................................................................................... 46

6.6 Erosion and sediment control ............................................................................ 46

6.7 Air Quality ........................................................................................................ 47

6.8 Noise and Vibration ................................................................................................47

6.9 Waste Minimisation and Management ............................................................... 47

6.10 Traffic and Access ............................................................................................. 47

6.11 Associated Infrastructure and Activities .............................................................. 48

6.12 Cumulative Environmental Effects ...................................................................... 48

7 Conclusion .......................................................................................................................... 49

Appendix A – IDAS Forms & Owner’s Consent .................................................................................. 50

Appendix B – Land Title .................................................................................................................... 51

Appendix C – Drawings .......................................................................................................................... 52

Appendix D – Environmental EME Report and Fact Sheets ............................................................... 53

Appendix E – Precautionary Approach Checklist 4.1 & 4.2 ................................................................ 54

Executive Summary

Proposal Vodafone Hutchison Australia Pty Ltd (Vodafone) propose to install a 25.0 metre monopole and associated infrastructure, the details are as follows:

One (1) 25.0 metre monopole;

Twelve (12) {Two (2) per sector} Tongyu TQB-D609017_Q172717DEI-60F port panel antennas (2680mm H x 620mm W x 146mm D in size) in the factory standard colour, mounted on a triangular headframe;

Power from the outdoor unit to the pole will run underground;

One (1) Vodafone 5 bay outdoor unit

One (1) Car Park Security light to be attached to monopole at the 10m Centreline mark (see Drawings)

The total compound area and lease area is 46.2 square metres.

The proposed facility is to provide improved Vodafone and Optus 4G coverage to Andergrove and its surrounding areas. The proposed base station would provide improved Vodafone 3G and 4G services to the community, businesses, emergency services and travellers in the subject area, and form an integral part of Vodafone and Optus 3G and 4G mobile telecommunications network.

Site Description / Location

Lot 12 SP252741/121

117 Bedford Road

Andergrove Qld 4740

Total Area of Site: 726m2

Planning Scheme Planning Scheme: Mackay City Planning Scheme 2006

Zoning: Urban Expansion

Neighbourhood Plan / Locality: Mackay Frame Locality

Existing Use: Car park used by adjoining Commercial businesses

Proposed Use: Telecommunications Facility

Application Details Impact Assessable Development Application Development Permit sought for a Material Change of Use for a proposed Telecommunications Facility.

Total Lease Area: 46.2 square metres

1 Introduction

1.1 Objectives of this Report

This Planning Report has been prepared by CPS Global on behalf of Vodafone Hutchison Australia Pty Ltd (Vodafone) to accompany a the Development Application for a Material Change of Use to Install a Telecommunications Facility. The proposed site is located at 117 Bedford Road Andergrove, QLD 4740

1.2 The Proposal and its Objectives

The proposal involves the installation of a 25 metre Monopole structure and associated mobile transmissions equipment including twelve (12) Tongyu TQB-D609017_Q172717DEI-60F po r t panel antennas (2680mm H x 620mm W x 146mm D in size) in the factory standard colour, mounted on a triangular headframe at 25 metres on the monopole. Power between the pole and outdoor unit will run underground.

The primary objective for the proposed facility is to provide improved Vodafone and Optus 3G and 4G coverage to Andergrove and its surrounding suburbs. The proposed base station would improve Vodafone and Optus 3G and 4G services to the community, businesses, emergency services and travellers in the subject area. The facility will form an integral part of Vodafone’s mobile telecommunications network and provide competitive and equitable regional coverage; inline with Telstra’s network in the area. The proposed base station would be linked to the rest of the Vodafone network via fibre.

1.3 Mobile Base Stations and how they Work

A Mobile Base Station is essentially a radio transmitter / transceiver and an antenna, which transmits and receives radio frequency (RF) or electromagnetic energy (EME) signals from mobile phones.

Mobile phones work by sending and receiving low power radio signals, much like a two-way radio system. The signals are sent to and received from antennas that are attached to radio transmitters and receivers, commonly referred to as mobile phone base stations. The base stations are linked to the rest of the mobile and fixed phone network and pass the signal/call on into those networks.

A base station typically consists of an Equipment Cabin (which houses all the electronics required to send and receive mobile phone calls), a series of Panel Antennas (which transmit and receive signals to and from the handset) and a Radio Transmission (RT) Dish or optical fibre cable which links the base station to the rest of the network.

When a call is made from a mobile phone, the first step in the process is for the phone to check that there is coverage in the area that the call is made. Once the phone has verified that there is sufficient signal strength to make the call, the phone establishes a connection with a nearby mobile phone base station. This base station then establishes the call and holds the call as long as the phone user remains on the call and in the range of that base station.

A mobile phone base station provides coverage to a geographic area known as a “cell”. Cells are aligned next to each other in a similar pattern to a honeycomb, and it is for this reason that mobile phone networks are sometimes referred to as “cellular” networks. The location of the base station within the cell is determined by a number of factors, including topography and other physical constraints such as trees and buildings, the cell ‘capacity’ or number of calls expected to be made in the cell, and the radio frequency at which the base station will operate.

Mobile phone base station antennas need to be located clear of obstructions like trees and buildings to ensure good signal quality. In essence, a mobile phone needs to have ‘sight’ of a mobile phone base station. In other words, the radio signal from the phone to the base station needs to be uninterrupted.

Hills, trees and tall buildings can obscure this line of sight and so base stations need to be very carefully located to maximise the coverage available.

Each base station can only carry a finite number of calls. In areas of high mobile phone use, such as central business districts and high density areas, more base stations are required to handle the level of call traffic. In high use areas, there are often a range of base stations, from very specific in-building solutions (designed to give quality coverage within a specific building), to very small base stations known as ‘microcells’. Microcells cover a small geographic area and are often found at intersections and in heavy pedestrian traffic areas. In rural areas, or areas where mobile phone use is not as high, base stations will often be located on hills or tall structures to maximise the coverage area.

(MCF Fact Sheet - How the mobile phone network operates).

1.4 Company Profile

Vodafone Group

Vodafone Group was established in the UK in 1993 and is now the world's largest mobile communications company. Vodafone has equity interests in 26 countries and partner networks in a further 13 countries - leaving an unmatched network footprint that has access to a total customer base of more than 151 million customers worldwide. Vodafone Group has played a significant role in Vodafone Australia's business since its inception as well as in the management and development of Vodafone New Zealand and Vodafone Fiji.

Vodafone Australia In Australia, Vodafone is operated by Vodafone Hutchison Australia (VHA); a 50:50 joint venture between Vodafone Group Plc and Hutchison 3G Australia.

In June 2009, 3 and Vodafone Australia merged businesses through a 50:50 joint venture between Vodafone Group and Hutchison 3G Australia, operating under Vodafone Hutchison Australia (VHA).VHA is now owned 50% by Hutchison Whampoa Group, and 50% by Vodafone Group Plc. As at 30 September 2009, there are 6.3 million VHA customers in Australia. Vodafone was awarded the third Australian mobile telecommunications carrier licence in December 1992.

It now provides 3G coverage to 94 per cent of Australians, giving consumers and business affordable access to innovative 3G services, such as internet and email on their mobile phone, or laptop via Vodafone Mobile Broadband, on-the-move.

By providing development consent to Vodafone, Council will ensure that Vodafone’s current and future customers will be provided with the highest quality telecommunications services using the most advanced technology available around the world. Vodafone continues to upgrade its network to allow the company to deliver mobile voice, data, video and Internet services at data transmission speeds which are significantly faster than the existing GSM networks can deliver.

2 Proposal Description

2.1 Site Location and Surrounds

The proposed site is located on land in South Andergrove currently used for commercial purposes. The subject site is surrounded by mixed uses. These include: residential lots which border the north and north-western boundary of the site, road infrastructure to the east and commercial to the south.

The land is properly described as Lot 12 SP252741/121. The zoning for the lot as defined in the Mackay City Planning Scheme 2006 is for UE - Urban Expansion.

In a planning context, the subject lot is bound by Urban Expansion zoning. The immediate area is considered mixed use as there are residential, commercial and infrastructure (roads) uses bordering the site. There are no sensitive land uses such as schools, childcare facilities, aged care homes, or hospitals located within 300m of the proposed facility.

Refer to Appendix B for land title search and Appendix C for drawings. Refer to Figure 2.1 and 2.2 for site location maps.

Figure 2.1 Location map of the site at 117 Bedford Road, Andergrove QLD 4740 (Source: Google Map)

Figure 2.2 Aerial map of the site at 117 Bedford Road, Andergrove QLD 4740 (Source: Google Map)

2.2 Description of the Proposal

Vodafone is proposing to install a 25.0m metre monopole 117 Bedford Road Andergrove,

QLD 4740

The components of the proposed work are as follows:

One (1) 25.0 metre monopole;

Twelve (12) Tongyu po r t panel antennas (2680mm H x 620mm W x 146mm D in size) in the

factory standard colour, mounted on a triangular headframe; The feeder cables are to run

internally within the pole;

One (1) Vodafone 5-bay outdoor unit.

• One (1) Car Park Security light to be attached to monopole at the 10m Centreline mark (see Drawings)

The total compound area is 46.2 square meters

Refer to Appendix C – Drawings.

2.3 Construction and Operational Access

Construction and operational access to the proposed facility is available via Bedford Road. The subject site for the proposed facility is located just off Bedford Road, to the right of the car parking entrance located on Lot 12. Direct Access to that particular lot is readily available via the car park entrance. The main access to the proposed facility will be by Bedford Road.

Refer to Figure 2.3.

Mobile phone base stations are unmanned, of low maintenance and remotely operated. As such, operational visits to the site will be approximately 2 - 6 times per year for maintenance purposes. There is sufficient on site parking for these purposes.

Figure 2.3 Access map to the site of the proposed facility at 117 Bedford Road, Andergrove QLD 4740 (Source: Google Map)

Main Entrance to Proposed Facility Site

3 Strategic Planning

3.1 Need for the Proposal

This proposed facility is required to improve Vodafone and Optus Third and Fourth Generation mobile and mobile-broadband coverage to Andergrove and its surrounding suburbs. The proposal will improve in-building mobile phone coverage, capacity, and network performance; forming an integral part of the overall Vodafone and Optus network that will contribute to the economic development of the region; substantially benefitting businesses and private users of the network. The proposal also ensures Vodafone and Optus customers have equitable access to a high quality telecommunications service (as experienced by Telstra customers in the region already) where they receive excellent mobile phone reception with no interference or unexpected drop-outs. The proposal will ensure the continued growth of, and competition within the telecommunication industry; resulting in accountable practice and affordable prices for mobile and mobile-broadband users.

3.2 Options Considered

Carriers are required to apply a precautionary approach when selecting the optimal site and designing their radiocommunications networks. The optimal site solution is generally required to be located within, or immediately adjacent to, the identified search area which requires radiofrequency coverage objective.

Below is a list of factors that carriers need to consider when designing their mobile network infrastructure and locating their base stations. N.B. the factors below may not represent an exhaustive list of issues that need to be addressed when designing mobile network infrastructure.

Planning:

Compliance with Mackay City Planning Scheme 2006 and the Sustainable Planning Act 2009;

Acceptability to the local Council and community;

Suitable location with regard to sensitive land uses;

Minimal potential visual impacts;

Compliance with the EME standards mandated by the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA);

Minimal environmental impact on the subject site and surrounding area; and

Potential opportunities to collocate with existing telecommunications facilities where possible.

Property:

Willingness by the owner to enter into a lease agreement and provide access during construction and operation.

Engineering:

Feasibility of construction, availability of infrastructure such as power, and access to the facility for construction and maintenance.

Radio frequency coverage and objectives:

Ability to be linked to the existing Vodafone network and meet the radio frequency coverage objectives for the area. An assessment of network deficiencies in the area was prompted after customer complaints alerted Vodafone to the poor level of service currently offered. The first action in these instances is to determine if network optimisation of existing infrastructure will remedy the problem. The only solution to remedy these issues however was to locate new mobile network infrastructure in the local area.

With consideration given to the above criteria, the options considered as part of this proposal are discussed in Table 1.

Table 1: Options Considered

Proposed site Proposed facility Suitability of Site / Reasons for Rejection

A 111-117 Bedford

Road, Andergrove

QLD 4740

25m Monopole The landowner was agreeable to commercial terms

The site has adequate space for facility and access to the site for construction and maintenance can be undertaken via t h e existing entrance off Bedford road.

B 64 Andergrove Road,

Andergrove QLD 4740

(Andergrove Tavern)

30m Monopole Possible re-development of the site meant the land owner to not commit to long term tenure

A 30m monopole was considered to be more visually intrusive than the 25m solution proposed at the subject site.

C 1 Beaconsfield Road East, Andergrove QLD 4740

30m Monopole The site is low-lying and flood prone, therefore a facility would need to be built to withstand local flooding.

This site would have required a total height of 30.0m. Given the proposed site can achieve the same coverage at 25.0m, it was determined to proceed with the proposed site to reduce the need for additional construction requirements on account of the flood risk.

D 9 Lenesha Drive,

Andergrove QLD 4740 30m metre monopole There is no clear vehicular access to the set

up site and an additional access license would be required during the construction phase.

This site would have required a total height of 30.0m. Given the proposed site can achieve the same coverage at 25.0m, it was determined to proceed with the proposed site.

Figure 3.1: Options considered and their locations

3.3 Preferred Option

Following an evaluation of the above options, Candidate A (117 Bedford Road, Andergrove QLD 4740) was considered the most appropriate site for the proposed 25.0 metre monopole facility and associated infrastructure as it best satisfied the criteria outlined in section 3.2. Candidate A was selected for the following reasons:

The proposal is considered to be generally consistent with local and state environmental and planning requirements and is not expected to have an adverse impact on the environment during construction and operation of the facility;

The portion of land where the compound is sited will not prejudice the future uses of the lot, and requires little vegetation clearing;

The proposal meets the desired radio frequency coverage objectives for the Vodafone network; providing comprehensive coverage to Andergrove and its surrounding suburbs.

The site has a readily accessible power supply and appropriate access for construction and maintenance purposes;

The land owner is willing to enter into a commercial agreement with Vodafone;

The zoning of the subject site and the surrounding area is considered suitable;

The site is buffered from community sensitive locations such as schools and child-care facilities;

The site is located in close proximity to the nature strip lining Bedford Road. Power poles line this road and are located in intervals along the nature strip. These power poles are approximately 10 meters high and will serve to blend the proposed monopole with existing infrastructure.

An assessment of the prime candidate considered the environmental and planning aspects of the proposal in relation to the subject site. Please refer to Section 6 Potential Environmental Impacts and Proposed Mitigation Measurements. The proposal is unlikely to have a detrimental impact on the environment or the locality;

Vodafone recognises the need, and opts for co-location with other existing telecommunications facilities wherever possible. During the site selection process however, no suitable co-location options were identified;

A detailed assessment occurred taking into consideration the planning, environmental, engineering, property, radio frequency design issues and health and safety concerns in accordance with Commonwealth, state and local legislation. As a result, the proposed site was deemed the most suitable candidate to deliver Vodafone’s and Optus’s network and coverage objectives.

4 Commonwealth Regulatory Framework

The installation of certain telecommunications facilities (as defined in the Telecommunications Act 1997) is regulated by the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) under the Telecommunications Act 1997. Other applicable supplementary legislative and regulative requirements are:

The Telecommunications (Low-Impact) Determination 1997 (amended 1999);

The Telecommunications Code of Practice 1997 (amended 2002); and The Australian Communications Industry Forum (ACIF) Code for the Deployment of

Radiocommunications Infrastructure.

As in the case of this proposal, relevant State and Local government legislation applies to telecommunications facilities that do not come under the purview of the Telecommunications Act and its subordinate legislation.

The legislative requirements are discussed below in further detail.

4.1 Telecommunications Act 1997

The Telecommunications Act 1997 (TA) came into operation in July 1997. The TA sets up a framework for regulating the actions of telecommunications carriers and service providers. Vodafone is a licensed carrier under the TA.

Schedule 3 – Carriers’ powers and immunities, of the TA, specifies ‘authorised activities’ that a carrier is empowered to carry out without approval under QLD legislation. These activities include the inspection of land, and the installation and maintenance of certain facilities.

Part 1 of Schedule 3 of the TA authorises a carrier to enter on land and exercise any of the following powers:

Inspect the land;

Install a facility;

Maintain a facility.

A Carrier’s power to install a facility is contingent upon:

a) the Carrier being authorised to do so by a Facility Installation Permit, or b) the facility being a low-impact facility (as defined by the Telecommunications (Low-Impact

Facilities) Determination 1997 (as amended)), or c) the facility being temporary and used for a defence organisation for defence purposes, or d) if other conditions are satisfied in relation to the facility concerned.

Vodafone does not hold a Facility Installation Permit and the facility is not a temporary facility for use by a defence organisation or for defence purposes. As the proposal involves the installation of a 25 metre monopole, it does not constitute a low-impact facility under the Telecommunications (Low- Impact Facilities) Determination 1997 (as amended).

As the proposed facility does not meet the criteria mentioned above, the carrier is therefore not empowered to undertake the proposed works without approval under QLD legislation, and must obtain development consent from the Logan City Council in accordance with the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 and the Beaudesert Shire Planning Scheme 2007.

(Telecommunications Act 1997, p466)

4.2 Telecommunications Code of Practice 1997

The Telecommunications Code of Practice 1997 (TCP) is made under Schedule 3 of the Telecommunications Act 1997. The TCP ensures good practice measures under which a Carrier must operate and outlines conditions which carrier conduct must adhere to.

This addresses conditions on carrier conduct when:

Inspecting land

Installing a facility; and Maintaining a facility.

The proposal adheres to the conditions outlined in the TCP in accordance to the TA in particular section 2.11 best practice for inspection of land, section 3.11 best practice for subscriber connection and section 6.11 best practice conditions for maintenance of facilities.

This proposal has taken into consideration the requirements outlined above in the best practice conditions of the TCP and thus includes the best design, planning and location measurements to ensure the development is in accordance with sections 2.11 and 3.11 of the Act.

Section 3.13 of the TCP address co-location and the need for carriers to take all reasonable steps to find out whether existing facilities are available and to use all existing facilities for the activity.

As outlined in section 3.2 Options Considered and 3.3 Preferred Option, Vodafone considered co- location. Vodafone commissioned desktop studies of the area and the site itself. In this case, Lot 980 on SP214074 was selected as it met the criteria outlined in Section 3.2 and was considered not to have an adverse impact on the environment whilst complying with relevant state and local legislation.

4.3 Telecommunications (Low-Impact Facilities) Determination 1997

The Telecommunications (Lot-impact Facilities) Determination 1997 was made under subclause 6 (3) of Schedule 3 of the TA.

The Act outlines under subclauses 6 (4), (5) and (7), that certain facilities cannot be low-impact facilities, these include the following:

Designated overhead lines;

A tower that is not attached to a building;

A tower attached to a building and more than 5 metres high;

An extension to a tower that has previously been extended; and

An extension to a tower, if the extension is more than 5 metres high.

The proposal is not classed as a low-impact facility under the Determination as it involves the installation of a 25 metre monopole and is therefore subject to the assessment under the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 and the Beaudesert Shire Planning Scheme 2007.

(Telecommunications (Low-impact Facilities) Determination 1997, p. 3)

4.4 The Australian Communications Industry Forum (ACIF) - Industry Code for the Deployment of Mobile Phone Network

The Australian Communications Industry Forum (ACIF) Industry code is a mandatory code for all Carriers and deals with concerns raised by the community. The code applies to Carriers who are installing, intending to install, operating, contracting or arranging for the installation of fixed radiocommunication infrastructure.

An underlying principle of the Code is that public health and safety is of paramount importance and the overarching driver of the code is the precautionary approach used to minimise the impact of telecommunications facilities.

The precautionary approach must be applied to site selection, infrastructure design, installation and operation. The National Site Archive (NSA) is an internet based publication of Carriers works listing all new mobile base station facilities built or upgraded since April 2003 and was launched in conjunction with the ACIF code.

The precautionary approach has been taken for the proposed development; please refer to Appendix E – 4.1 & 4.2 Precautionary Approach Checklist.

(ACIF – Industry Code, p. 3)

4.5 Commonwealth Government Policy and the Digital Economy

The expansion of the Vodafone network can be considered in the context of current Government policy and studies undertaken in relation to the digital future of Australia’s economic and social development. The provision of a high speed mobile telecommunications service is entrenched in Federal Government policy, backed by significant consumer demand for the technology

In its Broadband Blueprint (2006), the Australian Government cites an “estimated economic benefit of $12 billion to $30 billion per annum that universal availability of broadband could produce. The first wave of information and communications technology (ICT) delivered an immense boost to Australian productivity, accounting for up to 70 per cent of productivity growth between 1984-85 and 2001-02. Given the importance of telecommunications in an increasingly knowledge-based economy, a world- class telecommunications network is essential.”

(Infrastructure Australia Report to Council of Australian Governments, December 2008).

This is further actualised by later publications which forecast a transition to a digital economy;

“The global network of economic and social activities that are enabled by information and

communications technologies, such as the internet, mobile and sensor networks.”

According to the Australian Government, “greater digital engagement can boost productivity. It can bridge distances and improve service delivery for regional and rural Australians. It can improve educational and health outcomes, allow for better management of the country’s growing and ageing population, promote social inclusion and facilitate more environmentally sustainable better management of the built and natural environment.”

(National Digital Economy Strategy, 2011).

5 QLD Planning Legislation

5.1 Sustainable Planning Act 2009

The Sustainable Planning Act 2009 (SPA) came into effect on 18 December 2009 replacing the Integrated Planning Act 1997 (IPA). The purpose of the Sustainable Planning Act (SPA) is to achieve ecological sustainability by –

Managing the process by which development takes place, including ensuring the process is accountable effective and efficient and delivers sustainable outcomes;

Managing the effects of development on the environment, including managing the use of premises; and

Continuing the coordination and integration of planning at the local, regional and State levels.

The SPA emphasises the coordination and integration of planning at three levels:

Local Government planning;

Regional planning; and State planning

(SPA, p. 42, 17/2/10)

The proposed facility involves a ‘Material Change of Use’ of the premises and is defined as ‘Assessable Development’ for the purposes of the SPA. A development permit is therefore required to be obtained prior to the commencement of the proposal. All applications for development are subject to the Integrated Development Assessment System (IDAS) process as set out in Chapter 6 of the SPA. Assessment of the proposal will be in accordance with the relevant local government planning legislation and the SPA.

5.2 Regional Planning

The subject site falls within The Mackay, Isaac and Whitsunday Regional Plan 2009 – 2031. The purpose of the Mackay, Isaac and Whitsunday Regional Plan is to

“Guide and support projected growth. The plan recognises the region’s accelerated growth over the past five years. The impacts associated with the resources boom have further highlighted the need to sustainably manage development and resources and to plan effectively for essential infrastructure services, such as transport, community, and social services. The plan also recognises the need to prepare for, and appropriately respond to, the anticipated impacts of climate change.”

The plan identifies specific policies for the region, with Desired Environmental Outcomes, principles and strategies developed to address and manage growth within North Queensland. Figure 5.1 below identifies the lot as being within the Urban Footprint.

Figure 5.1: The Proposed site is land designated as Urban Footprint (

“The Urban Footprint includes established urban areas, broadhectare and remnant broadhectare areas that could be suitable for future urban development. It incorporates the full range of urban uses, including housing, industry, business, infrastructure, community facilities and urban open space.”

The proposed development aims to enhance the communication links for residents and tourists in Andergrove and its surrounding suburbs. Ensuring an efficient and high-standard telecommunication technology exists in the area. A strong telecommunications link with surrounding areas will help to facilitate the continuation and development of the regions industrial, commercial, and infrastructure trades. The State Governments Smart State strategy states that “in a modern society telecommunications underpins many of the fundamentals of life and the ongoing development of the State of Queensland.” The impact of this statement highlights the role of telecommunications and in particular mobile phone networks as an increasing medium for not only the health of the economy, but day-to-day social interactions and public safety.

Desired Regional Outcome – Infrastructure

Section 9 of the Regional Plan identifies infrastructure as a regional policy; its vision being to plan, coordinate and deliver regional infrastructure and services in a timely manner to support the regional settlement pattern and desired community outcomes.

Information and Communication

Section 9.4 of the regional plan outlines the importance of information and communication infrastructure with the key principle being the need to provide affordable access to high speed broadband telecommunications. The plan places an emphasis on wireless technology to be made available to communities in outlying and rural areas; supporting the proposed developments objectives.

The proposed telecommunication facility will provide the region with improved mobile phone and mobile broadband coverage. The proposal will provide up to date technology that will advance current

practices, services and competitiveness of businesses and educational sectors, and will also provide private users with improved communication technology.

The proposed telecommunications facility is required to meet the needs of current and future users. Vodafone identified the need for an upgrade to existing telecommunications links in the area, with this facility being used to link to existing sites in the Vodafone network, and become available for future linkages. This facility will ensure that reliable and modern telecommunications facilities and communication technology are available throughout the region.

(Mackay, Isaac and Whitsunday Regional Plan 2009 - 2031, p. 128, 133)

5.3 Referral Agencies

A referral agency is an agency that has jurisdiction over a matter in a Development Application if referral to that agency is triggered under Schedule 7 of the Sustainable Planning Regulation 2009.

The State Assessment and Referral Agency (SARA) established on 1 July 1 2013, made the Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning (DSDIP) the single referral agency for all development applications where the Chief Executive of the Sustainable Planning Act has a jurisdiction as either the Assessment Manager or referral agency. While DSDIP is responsible for a number of referral agency triggers now that the SARA provisions have commenced, there are still a number of other entities that exist outside of SARA, that still hold jurisdiction for their own referral agency triggers.

Upon review of Schedule 7 of the Sustainable Planning Regulation 2009, it was determined that the proposed development requires no referral.

5.4 The Mackay City Plan

The Mackay City Planning Scheme has been prepared in accordance with the Integrated Planning Act 1997 (the Act) as a framework for managing development in a way that advances the purpose of the Act.

The planning scheme provides a framework for managing development and consists of Desired Environmental Outcomes (DEOs), a Strategic Framework, Zones and Overlays, and assessment levels and development consistencies.

Section 5.6 of this planning report outlines the application requirements of the proposal and assesses the scheme against the applicable content of the Brisbane City Plan 2014

5.5 Application Requirements

This section will identify the level of assessment required for the proposed development under the Mackay City Plan 2006.

Defined Use:

The proposed development is defined as a Telecommunications Facility in Schedule 1 Definitions of the Mackay City Plan 2006.

Defined Use Definition

Telecommunications Facilities Any premises used for the purpose of providing telecommunications services, which does not fall within the Schedule of Facilities and Areas under the Telecommunications Act 1997, Telecommunications (Low Impact Facilities) Determination 1997 as amended. The term may include, but is not limited to:

(i) a telecommunications tower more than 5m in height; and (ii) an equipment shelter of more than 7.5m2 in area and 3m in height.

Zoning:

As shown on the zoning map in Figure 5.2, the proposed location for the facility is within the UE – Urban Expansion Zone

Subject Site

Figure 5.2: Excerpt from “Zoning Series 19” Map.

Level of Assessment:

Use Level of Assessment Assessment Criteria

Telecommunications Facility Impact-assessable Urban Expansion Zone

Telecommunications

Facilities Code

Environment &

Infrastructure Code

The proposed telecommunications facility is therefore Impact Assessable. The proposal requires assessment against the codes identified in the table above.

5.6 Desired Environmental Outcomes

There are Five (5) aspects of DEOs within the planning scheme which relate to; Biodiversity and Habitat, Cultural Heritage, Economic Development, Amenity and Community well-being and infrastructure and urban growth which are relevant to this proposal. In assessing the proposal against the relevant DEOs listed above, the following points are made in demonstrating compliance:

Table 5.1 Relevant Desired Environmental Outcomes

Biodiversity and Habitat/ Natural Features (i) significant natural features1 are conserved and their values are not compromised in order to sustain ecological processes and maintain biodiversity in the City for present and future generations. (ii) adverse effects on the natural environment including remnant vegetation, coastal and inland wetlands, habitat and biodiversity, clean air, and water resources are minimised or prevented for their greenhouse, environmental health and amenity implications. (iii) the use of land and resources: (A) takes into account the direct and indirect, short and long-term, and cumulative consequences of a use; and (B) has regard for the multiple use and values of land and resources for present and future generations. (iv) community safety and buildings, structures and other physical infrastructure are not jeopardised by unacceptable risks due to natural hazards such as bushfire, excessive erosion and land slippage, disturbance of acid sulfate soils, or inundation by flood waters. (v) the interface between developed and undeveloped areas is managed to maintain remnant ecosystems and areas of natural, landscape or cultural importance to the community. (vi) a balance is achieved between the conservation and use of natural resources in order to achieve sustainable economic, social and ecological outcomes.

The impact of the proposal on the native vegetation and natural ecosystems is considered to be negligible. Only small low lying vegetation is required to be removed for the proposed facility and as a result there will be no adverse effects on the natural environment. The proposed facility has been carefully considered and the direct and indirect, short and long-term consequences of the use have been determined. It has been determined that no substantial consequences will be had as the proposed facility meets all the mandatory safety and operational requirements.

Cultural Heritage & Landscape Character (i) the aesthetic and amenity values of significant cultural heritage places and areas2 , as well as notable features of landscape character3 , are retained and enhanced for the benefit of present and future generations. (ii) places of cultural heritage are recognised and conserved.

No significant cultural heritage places and areas or notable features of landscape have been identified at the subject site and its surrounding area.

Economic Development (i) Economic resources such as good quality agricultural land, forests, fisheries, extractive materials, water and land resources are protected from the adverse or limiting effects of proximate, incompatible activity for future ongoing use. Good quality agricultural land is made available for urban uses only with a demonstration of overriding community need. (ii) diverse employment opportunities are available in accessible locations both north and south of the Pioneer River, and include home-based businesses, business ‘incubators’, technology centres and the like. (iii) the continued development and lawful operations of the Port of Mackay and the Mackay Airport are facilitated and their operational efficiency protected by: (A) limiting development on land directly affected by Seaport and Airport operations; and (B) the inclusion of buffers on adjoining land to mitigate potential impacts of Port and Airport operations. (iv) A network of centres is established and maintained according to a hierarchical arrangement of roles and functions to meet the needs of the population, and includes the following elements, as shown on the Information Map – Network of Centres5 : (A) the Mackay City Centre (including a core area and a frame area) as the principal centre for all multi-purpose centre activities in the City and the region; (B) the Mt Pleasant Sub-Regional Centre, including Greenfields, Sams Road and Heaths Road, as the second major focus for shopping, commercial and entertainment in the City, functioning as a supporting role to the City Centre; (C) The Rural View Major Neighbourhood Centre as the third major focus for shopping, community and commercial needs in the City. (D) the neighbourhood centres, including Andergrove, Bucasia, Rural View and Walkerston, providing for weekly or high-frequency shopping, community and commercial needs; and (E) a mixed use centre at North Mackay; and (F) the local centres, including the small convenience centres at Bucasia, Blacks Beach, North Mackay, Mt Pleasant, Slade Point and West Mackay. (v) the growth of centres occurs in step with demonstrated community need, recognising the role and function of other centres within the network of centres. (vi) retail and commercial activities outside a centre identified within the network of centres are limited to premises with a size and function consistent with the provision of local facilities. (vii) the Mackay City Centre is retained and reinforced as the principal centre for the Mackay and Whitsunday region providing high order administrative, business, commercial, cultural, entertainment, and shopping services as well as providing a choice of housing types and densities for residents and visitors. (viii) centres, villages and other commercial areas are attractive, provide a safe environment and are able to be economically and efficiently supported by infrastructure. (ix) operational efficiency of industrial land, particularly for major industries6 , is protected by: (A) retaining such land primarily for the establishment of industrial activities and related services; (B) encouraging new industrial activities in designated industrial locations7 on the basis the necessary infrastructure is available or can be made available efficiently and equitably; (C) retaining the major industrial areas free from the constraining effects of inappropriate or sensitive activities either within or adjacent to such areas; and (D) servicing with safe and effective transport infrastructure, such as the sea port, the airport, the rail network and the State and national highway system. (x) A transport network is maintained in functional corridors unconstrained by incompatible or inappropriate activities, servicing the major industries and other major employment and activity centres. (xi) Rural land:

(A) is protected from incompatible land uses; 6 The preferred locations for major industries in the City include the Mackay sea port, Paget and Ooralea, and the major rural industries, such as the sugar mills at Racecourse, Pleystowe and Farleigh, and the abattoir at Bakers Creek. 7 Industrial land is shown on the relevant Zone Map. (B) is maintained in agricultural use, where possible, in order to ensure the viability of the sugar industry in the City; and (C) provides opportunities for use for a wide range of economic activities including extractive industries, forestry, grazing, intensive animal husbandry and water supply development. (xii) changing trends in the tourism, hospitality and business services sectors in the City are recognised and supported to ensure each industry is able to evolve and grow. (xiii) mixed use development and higher intensity residential development is located within the City Centre and possibly at transport nodes and some of the tourism nodes.

This proposed facility will improve Vodafone and Optus Third and Fourth Generation mobile and mobile-broadband coverage to Andergrove and its surrounding areas. The proposal will improve in-building mobile phone coverage, capacity, and network performance; forming an integral part of the overall Vodafone and Optus network that will contribute to the economic development of the region. It will benefit residents, businesses and visitors accessing the areas and in-turn potentially increasing local employment opportunities. The improved mobile network coverage will integrate the community both socially and economically and it will enhance the liveability of the region. Tourism opportunities in the local area will be supported by the proposed development. The use of Smartphone’s, mobile internet, and GPS on mobile phones to navigate through a region is common practice for tourists. These services will be made available by the proposal; The proposal will not have any detrimental impact on any natural assets of the area.

Amenity and Community Well-Being Community identity is established through the following: (i) a wide range of affordable and accessible housing is available which is suitable for the climate, meets the needs of the City's population and is convenient to community facilities, employment and recreation opportunities. (ii) convenient access is provided to a range of community facilities and services, including health care, education, shopping and business services, cultural and entertainment facilities, and recreation and sporting facilities to achieve a standard of living coincident with residents’ expectations. (iii) the City's population has a high level of mobility through an efficient and viable transport system, including public transport and pedestrian and cycle transport. (iv) a diverse range of public open spaces and recreation opportunities is provided in generally accessible locations or in locations and settings suitable for the desired range of recreational experiences and for the appreciation of the City's habitat and biodiversity values. (v) a wide range of living and lifestyle options are available to residents including urban, rural residential, village, rural and island living. (vi) the open space network of the City is established and enhanced for the continued use and enjoyment of the City's population.

The proposed facility will enhance community identity and interaction. Local businesses, residents and visitors will benefit from the improved broadband coverage provided by the improved 3G and 4G mobile network. The improved network will allow for the transmission of live video footage and faster data speeds for downloading information from the internet to mobile phone. The public interest would be served by the approval of this proposal through improved mobile telephone coverage and the provision of the latest wireless broadband network in the area.

Infrastructure and Urban Growth (i) the pattern and rate of urban development meets, in a timely manner, the needs of the Mackay community with respect to housing, commercial services, industrial activities, recreation and cultural pursuits, and includes the efficient provision and use of urban infrastructure. (ii) the sequence of urban growth within the City is based on achieving the most efficient and equitable use of land and making greatest use of the existing network of development, transport and community infrastructure. (iii) new development in the City is directed and consolidated into areas presently serviced or areas able to be serviced efficiently and economically. (iv) ‘in sequence’ urban growth occurs in the following pattern: Mackay City Planning Scheme (24 March 2006) PAGE 3-4 Consolidated Planning Scheme (24 April 2009) Mackay City Planning Scheme (24 March 2006) PAGE 3-5 Consolidated Planning Scheme (24 April 2009) (A) urban consolidation occurs within the existing urban areas, particularly in the McCready's Creek, Goosepond Creek and Pioneer River (Urban) precincts of the City; and (B) urban, rural residential and village development occurs in land zoned for urban residential, urban expansion, rural residential or village purposes to which infrastructure and community services can be provided efficiently and effectively. (v) ‘out of sequence’ urban growth occurs only where a need for additional land is demonstrated and the need is balanced against the cost of providing infrastructure, including community facilities and services, and the impacts on the environment. Any such growth must be ecologically sustainable and is limited to areas in the McCready's Creek, Goosepond Creek and Pioneer River and Southern Streams precincts, which are most easily and economically serviced, providing that the interface with agricultural and other incompatible land uses can be managed appropriately and effectively and the landscape and heritage values of the City are not diminished. (vi) in addition, urban growth is located to: (A) reduce travel-to-work demands and achieve increased transport network efficiency; and (B) maintain transport corridors, including possible future corridors, free of constraining incompatible uses (eg noise sensitive) wherever possible and practical. (vii) urban development incorporates ecological sustainability principles including efficient design and the efficient use of water8 : (viii) the interface between urban areas and other areas is managed to avoid land use conflicts and maintain a high level of amenity for the City. (ix) villages continue to provide a specific lifestyle option to residents of the City, supported by community facilities and small-scale tourism and convenience services. Major industries coexist with these services in specific village locations . (x) off-shore Islands provide a lifestyle option with limited opportunity for residential development. Tourism development subservient to the natural landscape and does not adversely affect the sensitive coastal environment is encouraged on the islands within established resort areas.

The proposed telecommunications facility is a reflection of required major infrastructure in modern society, the same as other utility services. As new technologies arise and the demand for this service grows exponentially, so does the demand for improved telecommunications infrastructure and reliable services. The public interest would be served by the approval of this proposal through enhanced mobile telephone coverage and the provision of the latest wireless broadband network in the area. The proposed development is a lawful use which promotes an efficient land use pattern in the surrounding areas. Providing a service which integrates the community both socially and economically will enhance the liveability of the region. The proposal may promote a more compact urban form by concentrating both residential and commercial development nearer the facility; as access to a high quality mobile telecommunications service is paramount to current consumer trends.

Zone Code

The site is within the Urban Expansion Zone under the Mackay Planning Scheme 2006. There are five (5) performance criteria which apply to all code and impact assessable development in this domain.

Table 5.2 Urban Expansion Zone Code

Specific outcomes Probable & Acceptable outcomes

P1 Urban development on land within the Urban Expansion zone occurs in an

orderly and efficient manner in

locations where: (i) the land is connected to development

infrastructure and extends the

infrastructure network on the basis of the planned capacity requirements of

the development and the network; and

(ii) Development located on land in the Urban Expansion Zone is Master

Planned.

S1 No solution specified. No urban development is proposed for this site.

Development Infrastructure is proposed though the deployment of the telecommunications facility as it is a reflection of the required major infrastructure in the area.

P2 Urban residential development

within the Pioneer River (Urban)

precinct, includes a network of streets and paths which combine to provide

direct pedestrian, cyclist and vehicle

access to the university campus and to public open space.

S2 No solution specified. N/A

P3 Urban development on land within the Urban Expansion Zone adjoining

any habitat areas as shown on the

relevant Coastal Management and Biodiversity Overlay Map including

the Pioneer River, Baker’s Creek,

McCready’s Creek, wetlands, fish habitat areas, coastal areas and remnant

vegetation adopts suitable design and

siting measures and adequate

separation distances to protect the: (i)

amenity of the locality; (ii) remnant and

ridge-top vegetation; and (iii) environmental values of the habitat

area.

S3 No solution specified. The site is not adjoining any habitat areas.

P4 Separation distances and design and

siting measures are provided for future

urban development of land in the Urban Expansion Zone and adjacent to high

impact activity areas and valuable

economic resources such as the Racecourse Mill so that:

(i) land uses achieve an appropriate

level of amenity; and (ii) the operations of the high impact

activities are not impeded by the

proximity to incompatible land uses.

S4 Urban development on Urban Expansion

zoned land:

(i) is located a minimum of 1 km from the

Racecourse Mill; and

(ii) provides a minimum buffer of 400 m between any activity areas on the site and the

operation areas of the adjoining valuable resource.

The proposed facility has been positioned in an undeveloped portion of land in the southern section of the site and therefore will not impede future expansion of the site (provided expansion does not involve any sensitive uses).

There are no high impact activities in close proximity to the site.

P5 Rural Residential Development

does not occur. S5 No solution specified.

N/A

5.7 Overall Outcomes for Telecommunications Facilities The defined use of the proposed development is a telecommunications facility; requiring assessment against the criteria contained within the use code. The performance outcomes for telecommunications facilities are responded to below:

Table 5.3 Telecommunications Facilities Code

Specific outcomes Probable & Acceptable outcomes

Visual Impact P1 Telecommunication facilities are to be

designed and located to minimise their visual

impact by:

(i) providing finishes on structures

compatible with the surrounding environment;

(ii) providing facilities in residential areas

whose bulk, scale and height is consistent

with the bulk, scale and height of the surrounding buildings and structures; and

(iii) providing facilities in areas included in

the character/heritage overlay code that are

compatible with the overall and specific

outcomes of that code.

S1 No solution specified.

Bedford Road is lined with existing power poles which are of about 10m in height and will serve

to help the facility blend with the local surroundings. There is also a large tree located close to the site which will help shield the facility

from residents on Bedford Road. The footprint of the proposed compound is small

and the location and design of the proposal have been carefully considered.

Environmental Impact P1 Premises are installed and operated to minimise the

adverse impacts on the natural

environment by:

(i) avoiding impacts on

locations containing remnant vegetation, fauna habitat,

watercourses or sites of natural

or cultural heritage; (ii) minimising the need for

earthworks through careful

siting and design of facilities; (iii) noise and dust emissions

during construction and

operations of the facility are minimised;

(iv) ensuring vegetation clearing associated with

establishment of the facility

does not extend beyond the installation site, associated

power links and associated

parking and access areas; (v) minimising vegetation loss

on steep land;

(vi) minimising alterations to key landforms

(viii) being positioned and

designed to minimise visibility to pedestrians.

S1 No solution specified.

The proposal will not have significant impact on the natural environment.

Given the minor nature of the proposal, it is

not expected the proposal will cause any soil erosion. However, soil and water management measures will be undertaken

during the construction of the facility.

The facility will have no impact on the existing watercourse, water storage, and drainage

system. Given the small compound size and permeable nature of its built elements, it is not expected to interrupt any water flows.

The proposal does not involve any clearance of the mature vegetation.

P2 Landscaping is low maintenance and semi-mature

upon establishment.

S2 No solution specified No landscaping is proposed for the site.

.

Development Abutting Residential Uses P1 Appropriate setbacks and buffering are provided between telecommunication

facilities and any adjoining residential development or any residential area or

land included within the Open Space Zone

to maintain the amenity of adjoining residential properties in terms of:

(i) visual impact;

(ii) acoustic privacy; and (iii) access to sunlight.

S1.1 The facility is setback at least 50m

from any dwelling unit or rooming unit.

S1.2 A landscaped buffer strip 2m in width

and including screen fencing is provided and maintained adjacent to any free-

standing structures.

S1.3 All potential noise sources (such as

air-conditioning and other mechanical

plant) are oriented away from any dwelling unit or rooming unit.

S1.4 Residential open space areas or living areas are not overshadowed at any time.

S1.5 Overshadowing of open space or

activity areas associated with childcare

centres, public areas, local parks and

schools is limited to 3 hours on any day.

The appropriate setbacks have been accounted for and the facility has been positioned / located in a way that reflects this.

It is acknowledged that there will be some visual impact from the facility however there are existing bulky power lines in the vicinity of the area which will serve to lessen some of the visual impact of the facility.

At times minimal shadowing may be experienced on account of the monopole. This shadow will be minimal and of a short duration and will not affect access to sunlight.

Co-Location P1 Premises are co-located with other telecommunications facilities or on buildings or other structures wherever feasible on the

basis there is no existing adverse

environmental or public health and safety impact.

S1 Facilities are located on a new site only where co-location options are exhausted and proven not to meet

Specific Outcome 1 and 2.

Vodafone and Optus will share the proposed facility in the deployment of their network. This will eliminate the chance of deploying

another telecommunications structure in the close proximity, thus reducing the environmental impact.

P2 Co location will reduce cumulative visual impacts associated with the establishment of

telecommunications facilities.

By Vodafone and Optus sharing the proposed facility it will eliminate the need for deployment of more telecommunication structures in the area, thus reducing the risk of cumulative visual impacts.

Public Health & Safety

P1 Telecommunication facilities are

established, operated and maintained so

as to minimise risks to public health and safety.

S1.1 Telecommunication facilities which

include “climbable’ structures are enclosed by

secure perimeter fencing to preclude unauthorised access.

S1.2 Safety and warning signage is used to provide information on facility related safety

issues and to discourage unauthorised access to

facility sites. S1.3 Decommissioned or obsolete facilities are

removed from facility sites at the conclusion of

their operational life.

Vodafone and Optus operate their telecommunications facilities in compliance with the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) mandatory standard, for human exposure to EME – currently the Radio-communications (Electromagnetic Radio – Human Exposure) Standard 2003. The EME report that was submitted with the development application demonstrates that the predicted cumulative EME will be significantly less than the ACMA mandated exposure limit. Therefore it is not considered the public health and safely will be affected as a result.

P2 Facilities are appropriately fenced to

preserve public safety.

S2 A 2m high security fence, appropriately

landscaped, is provided around all free-

standing facilities.

Fencing is not proposed at this location. The

facility proposes to use a 5bay outdoor unit

instead of an equipment cabin. The 5 bay

outdoor unit is similar in size and scale to a power sub-main or alike. The units are

securely locked at all times and offer no

threat to public safety. The tower will be fitted with anti-climbing devices and will

also offer no threat to public safety.

Separation from Incompatible Uses P1 Telecommunication Facilities are separated

from any incompatible uses on the same site

or neighbouring premises by a distance sufficient to minimise impact on amenity.

S1 No solution specified. The proposed facility is located in an area of

mixed uses. It is surrounded by commercial,

residential and road infrastructure. The site is currently operating as an informal carpark

servicing the commercial premises

bordering the site. The closest residential building is located about 8m from the

proposed facility and is separated from the

proposed site by an existing fence.

There are no sensitive land uses such as

schools, childcare facilities, aged care homes,

or hospitals located within 300m of the

proposed facility

Shadowing

P1 A telecommunications tower does not cast

shadows such that the amenity of surrounding

premises or the useable area of public open space is reduced.

S1 No solution specified. The proposed facilities monopole is considered to be relatively thin and therefore the effect of shadowing would be minor and for only very small amounts of time.

Environment and Infrastructure Code

Table 5.4 Telecommunications Facilities Code

Specific outcomes Probable & Acceptable outcomes

P1 Adequate infrastructure is provided

in time to meet the needs of the development.

P2 Premises are provided with

appropriate areas of private and public

open space. Note: Guidance in regards

to the design and provision of open

space is provided in the Open Space Planning Scheme Policy and the

Contributions Planning Scheme Policy.

P3 Premises have an adequate, safe and

reliable supply of water, including potable water, and is connected, where

possible, to an existing reticulated

water supply.

P4 Treatment and disposal of waste water ensures:

(i) no adverse ecological impacts on the

environment, particularly nearby receiving environments including

surface waters and ground water; and

(ii) the cumulative impacts of on site waste water treatment will not cause

deterioration of environmental

conditions.

S1 The timing for provision of

infrastructure for development complies with the standards and contribution requirements

detailed in the Engineering Design

Guidelines Planning Scheme Policy

S2 The provision of open space complies with the standards and requirements detailed

in the Open Space Planning Scheme Policy

and the Contributions Planning Scheme Policy

S3.1 Premises are connected to Council’s reticulated water supply system.

S3.2 If connection to Council’s reticulated

water supply system is not possible, a potable water supply is provided in accordance with

the standards detailed in the Engineering

Design guidelines Planning Scheme Policy).

S4.1 Connection to Council’s reticulated

sewerage treatment system; or.

S4.2 Where connection to Council reticulated

sewerage system is not possible, and where

20 people or less, Council will refer to the requirements of the Environmental

Protection (Water) Policy 1997 and the On Site Sewerage Code (NR&M July 2002) and

AS 1547. to ensure the premises are suitable

for effluent disposal.

S4.3 Where more than 20 people, no solution

specified.

The purpose of the site is to ensure the surrounding area has improved access to Vodafone and Optus Mobile networks. Energy supply will be sourced from the subject site.

The site is currently used by the public as an informal carpark servicing the commercial use bordering the site. Given the current public use of the site it is felt that there is no need to provide areas of private open space.

The exisiting Lot is serviced. The proposed facility will not require access to these services.

No waste will be generated

On-Site Works

P5 Drainage works are designed to ensure that adjoining land and the

existing upstream and downstream

drainage systems are not adversely affected by development, taking into

account:

(i) scope for on-site stormwater retention, including the collection of

water for reuse, and the use of

communal carparks for stormwater retardation;

(ii) maximisation of on-site infiltration

by minimising hardstand areas; (iii) need for a stormwater system that

can be economically maintained;

(iv) protection of downstream water quality;

(v) safety of pedestrians and vehicles;

(vi) location of discharge;

(vii) proportion of impervious area on

the site to minimise the amount of run-

off; and (viii) construction of buildings,

structures or paving up to site

boundaries which avoid

S5 Drainage works complies with the

requirements of the Engineering Design Guidelines Planning Scheme Policy

The low impact nature of the facility is not expected to generate enough runoff to require drainage or stormwater management systems.

The development will ensure natural waterway corridors and drainage channel paths are retained in order to protect and maintain downstream water quality.

Specific outcomes Probable & Acceptable outcomes

External Works

P6 Kerb and channelling is provided to a

satisfactory standard and constructed to:

(i) prevent edge fretting; (ii) perform required drainage functions;

(iii) provide the appropriate level of control

for vehicle movement; (iv) allow ready access to abutting

properties at suitable locations; and

(v) contribute to the desired streetscape character of the locality.

S6 Premises are provided with kerb and

channel in accordance with the

Engineering Design Guidelines Planning Scheme Policy.

Site is already developed with effective roadway, kerb and channel, vehicle crossings and verges.

Roads

P7 All proposed road pavement surfaces:

(i) are of a quality and durability suitable

to the intended traffic volumes and loads; (ii) provide all-weather access;

(iii) allow the discharge of rainfall;

(iv) provide the safe passage of vehicles and pedestrians; and

(v) provide a reasonable, comfortable riding

quality.

S7 Roads are provided in accordance with

the Engineering Design Guidelines

Planning Scheme Policy ‘

No new roads are proposed

Drainage networks

P8 In urban areas, the major drainage

network is designed and constructed with

the capacity to control stormwater flows

under normal and minor system blockage

conditions for the DFE applicable to drainage so that:

(i) floodways are restricted to areas where

there is no damage to property or hazards for motorists, and

(ii) runoff is directed to a lawful point of

discharge through competently designed and constructed outlet works.

S8 Design requirements of the Engineering

Design Guidelines Planning Scheme

Policy

No stormwater drainage is proposed and is considered unnecessary for a use with such a small foot print and limited impervious areas.

Public Utilities

P9 Street lighting and signs are provided

to ensure the safety of both vehicles and pedestrians, and to facilitate access and

movement.

S9 Street lighting and signage comply with the requirements of the Engineering

Design Guidelines Planning Scheme

Policy

Car park security lighting is proposed as part of the facility. One light Is to be attached onto the monopole at the 10m Centreline (see plans)

Infrastructure Payments

P10 The costs of providing infrastructure

is funded by the development giving rise to the need for the infrastructure.

S10 The funding of infrastructure complies with the requirements of the Contributions

Planning Scheme Policy

The facility is unmanned and therefore no

connection or utilisation of Council’s infrastructure is required. Infrastructure

charges are considered not applicable to this

proposal.

Car Parking and Access

P11 Premises are provided with:

(i) adequate vehicle parking spaces to satisfy the anticipated requirements of the

activity;

(ii) safe and efficient access and manoeuvring areas to meet the anticipated

volume and type of traffic;

(iii) large vehicles are able to enter and leave the site without prejudicing the safety and

efficiency of the road;

(iv) access driveways are located and designed to minimise conflicts with traffic

and pedestrians; and (v) vehicle crossings from the carriageway

to the frontage of the site are constructed and

finished to appropriate standards for the excepted volume and type of traffic

generated by activities on the site.

S11.1 Vehicle parking on the site is in accordance with the rates specified in

Schedule 2

S11.2 Vehicles are able to enter and exit

the site (with the exception of dwelling house and duplex) in a forward gear.

S11.3 The design of car parking and access complies with the requirements detailed in

the Engineering Design Guidelines Planning Scheme Policy

The proposed facility is located on a site which is currently used as an informal car park. It provides ample parking for the commercial use located on the boundary of the site (111 Bedford Road).

There is an existing access point located off Bedford road which allows vehicles to enter and safely manoeuvre around the site.

Environmental Amenity

Specific outcomes Probable & Acceptable outcomes

Lighting Management

P1 Outdoor lighting does not cause a

loss of amenity to adjacent premises as

a result of the light it emits either

directly or by reflection. Note: Council will refer to the

provisions of AS4282 – Control of the

Obtrusive Effects of Outdoor Lighting

S1 No solution specified One car park security light attached to the monopole has been proposed. This lighting will not cause a loss of amenity as the site is currently used as an informal car park. The proposed security light is to emit light into the carpark and should not affect residents in the neighbouring area.

Overshadowing

P2 The amenity of adjacent residential

land is not adversely affected by

shadows cast by adjoining building or structures.

S2 Buildings do not cast a shadow over more

than 30% of an adjoining residential lot at any time between the hours of 9am and 3pm

on 22 June.

The proposed facilities monopole is considered to be relatively thin and therefore the effect of shadowing would be minor and for only very small amounts of time.

Building Setbacks

P3 Residential buildings are sited to

minimise loss of amenity for residents’

adjacent to cane tram lines.

P4 Buildings are set back from a road frontage to: (i) complement the existing

built form; and (ii) preserve the safety

of vehicle movement along adjoining roads.

S3 Residential buildings are set back a

minimum of: (i) 50m from cane tram lines;

and (ii) 100m from cane tram line level crossings and sidings.

S4 No solution specified.

N/A

N/A

Noise and Vibration Management

Specific outcomes Probable & Acceptable outcomes

P1 Noise and vibration do not detract

from the amenity of residents or employees of any adjacent premises.

S1 No solution specified. Although it is expected that there would be some noise and vibration generated during the construction of the proposed facility, it is expected to be minor and short term in duration.

P2 Premises accommodating uses

which are likely to generate noise are designed and constructed with noise

attenuation measures to avoid noise

nuisance to nearby uses.

S2 No solution specified. Noise generated during the operational stage of the facility includes air-conditioning units servicing the equipment cabin. The air-conditioning units are similar to those used for cooling of residential premises, and will comply with the relevant noise emission guidelines.

P3 Noise sensitive uses locating

adjacent to State controlled transport

infrastructure incorporate attenuation, building design and orientation

measures.

S3 No solution specified. N/A

Air Quality

Specific outcomes Probable & Acceptable outcomes

Flooding

P1 Premises used for purposes likely to

generate emissions such as air

pollutants, heat and odours incorporate:

(i) physical measures for removing

pollutants from emissions prior to

discharge to the atmosphere; (ii) physical measures for reducing the

temperature gradient between

emissions and the atmosphere prior to discharge; and

(iii) operational systems, including

monitoring systems for major industry and major infrastructure, which

maintain emissions within ANZECC

guideline standards.

S1 No solution specified. No emissions will be emitted from the proposed facility and therefore it will not have any long term impact on the air quality. The dust generation during the construction phase of the proposed facility is expected to be localised, minimal and of short term duration. The compound site and surrounds would be appropriately restored after the completion of works. Once installed the proposal will have no air pollution and is not expected to cause dust hazards.

Specific outcomes Probable & Acceptable outcomes

P1 Premises subject to risk of

inundation or damage through flood are provided with immunity to that risk in

order to reduce potential property

damage and to ensure public safety.

S1 1 Development is sited on land that would

not be subject to flooding during a DFE; or

S1.2 For development comprising a residential element, the floors of all habitable

rooms are located 300mm above the DFE; or

S1.3 For non residential development or

development involving temporary or moveable residential structures (e.g. caravan

parks):

(i) buildings are located and designed so that

floor levels (except areas used for car parking)

are 300mm above the DFE; or

(ii) there is at least one evacuation route that

remains passable for emergency evacuations during all floods up to and including the DFE.

The subject site is not located in a flood risk/ inundation area.

P2 There is no increase in the number

of people living or working on a flood prone site, except where the premises

are occupied on a short term or

intermittent basis.

S2 No solution specified N/A

Water Quality

P3 Development does not result in

adverse impacts for the safety of people

or the capacity to use land within a

floodplain and does not involve:

(i) Any physical alteration to a watercourse; or

(ii) Net filling of 50 cubic metres; or

(iii) The proposed works either: (A) avoid any reductions of on-site flood

storage capacity and contain within the

subject site any changes in depth/duration/velocity in flood waters of

all floods up to and including the DFE; or

(B) do not change the flood characteristics at the DFE outside the subject site in ways

that result in: - loss of flood storage; - loss

of / changes to flow paths; - acceleration or retardation of flows; or - any reduction

of flood warning times elsewhere on the

floodplain.

S3 No solution specified.

N/A

P4 Storage and handling of hazardous

substances on sites that are subject to risk

of inundation or damage through flood, ensures that persons and property are not

placed at unreasonable risk.

S4 Storage or handling of substances that

may be a hazard to the environment or

human safety by the risk of contamination due to flooding: (i) is undertaken in

accordance with a risk assessment; and (ii)

provides for the storage of any hazardous substances above or securely isolated from

the DFE level.

No dangerous goods or substances will be

stored on site.

P5 The use is designed to minimise the impact of Cyclonic Hazards

S5 No solution specified. The facility has been designed in accordance with the TCP standards and best practise

guidelines in order to ensure safe and

appropriate design.

Undefined Flood & Inundation Areas

P6 Where flood limits are not

identified, development is undertaken

such that there is no adverse affects on flood levels or flows on the site or up-

stream and down-stream of the site

S6 No solution specified. The development will not result in and

increase the flood risk for any adjacent

premises.

Specific outcomes Probable & Acceptable outcomes

P1 Development does not detract from the maintenance of water quality in the

City’s watercourses and bulk water

storages, in particular its: (i) environmental values; and (ii) where

applicable, potability of the water

supply.

S1 No solution specified Development will have no impact on water quality or adversely affect environmental values in the city’s watercourses.

P2 Premises incorporate: (i) physical measures for intercepting and treating

surface water drainage and spilled

substances prior to their release to the watercourses; and (ii) bunding of sites

or areas within sites or integrated

drainage systems which include waste water treatment measures, where

chemicals, fuels, lubricants or other

soluble pollutants are being handled or stored. Note: Council will refer to the

Environmental Protection Policy

(Water) 1997

S2 No solution specified N/A

Sediment and Erosion Control Specific Outcomes

P3 The City’s groundwater resources

are maintained by:

(i) providing an integrated treatment

system capable of removing gross

pollutants, sediments, oily residues and sludges from drainage and stormwater;

(ii) providing storage of waste water in

secure and sealed storage facilities; (iii) ensuring efficient disposal areas and

ground and surface water retrieval areas

are buffered from each other; (iv) ensuring that contaminants do not

enter the groundwater resources; and

(v) with reuse of reclaimed water, ensuring safe treatment and disposal of

contaminated water.

S3 No solution specified. N/A

P4 The biodiversity and habitat values

of coastal areas and associated estuarine

systems are protected from: (i)

increased nutrient or sediment levels; or

(ii) changed flow, inhibited passage, or hydrologic regimes of the natural

coastal and marine margins, which may

result from development.

S4 No solution specified.

N/A

P5 Sediment and nutrient loadings into a watercourse are minimised through:

(i) treated on-site effluent; (ii) adequate

stormwater run-off controls; and (iii) on-site and off site erosion controls.

S5 No solution specified.

Erosion and sediment control standards will be done in accordance with best practice

guidelines

Specific outcomes Probable & Acceptable outcomes

P1 Minimisation of the risk of erosion and sedimentation either on-site or

elsewhere, by a comprehensive

approach to soil erosion control and sedimentation management, including:

(i) the minimisation of:

(ii) earthworks; (a) clearing of land; (b) long term stockpiling of excavated

materials;

(iii) use of appropriate construction management techniques;

(iv) diverting surface water drainage

around disturbed areas; and (v) treating and removing sediments

from stormwater over disturbed areas

prior to release from the site.

S1.1 In urban areas, no solution specified6 .

S1.2 In rural areas, a comprehensive approach to soil erosion and sedimentation control is

adopted by:

(i) minimising the extent of disturbance on

slopes steeper than 10% (or 1:10);

(ii) controlling surface drainage by using natural flow paths wherever possible;

(iii) rehabilitating disturbed areas as soon as practical after completion of works by seeding

with native grasses, ground covers and trees;

and

(iv) constructing ponds or small dams off

natural flow paths, for collection and interception of surface drainage from areas

disturbed for prolonged periods.

Erosion and sediment control standards

will be done in accordance with best

practice guidelines

Coastal Management

P2 Progressive rehabilitation of disturbed

areas occurs within the site through a

comprehensive rehabilitation program

including:

(i) the grading and reshaping of the disturbed areas to provide controlled and

stable drainage flow paths;

(ii) the construction of drainage paths which divert high velocity flows away

from disturbed areas;

(iii) the re-spreading of stored top soil stripped from the site; and

(iv) the planting of the disturbed area with

native species of grasses, ground covers and trees.

S2 No solution specified The development is considered minor and will not have an adverse effect on the area or the surrounding site.

Specific outcomes Probable & Acceptable outcomes

Public Access and Roads

P1 (i) there is no net loss of public access

to the foreshore, or of public useability of coastal waters;

(ii) appropriate location and design is

achieved with respect to sensitive coastal resources and their values;

(iii) roads that run parallel to the coast,

are set back from erosion prone areas and significant coastal resources, with only

smaller access roads running to the coast;

and (iv) minor spur roads to the foreshore and

associated car parks provide access to the

foreshore at locations that are convenient to the public, have low environmental

sensitivity, and avoid locations that may

increase storm tide hazard.

S1 No solution specified. N/A

Erosion Prone Areas

P1 Development and permanent buildings

are minimised in erosion-prone areas as

defined in this code (apart from temporary

or relocatable structures required for

safety and recreational

S1.1 Reconfiguring a lot within an erosion

prone area incorporates erosion prone land as

undeveloped open space.

S1.2 Relocatable structures such as picnic tables, barbecues, coastal trails, bikeways,

demountable structures, equipment sheds,

lookouts, elevated decks, shelter sheds etc are located within erosion prone areas only where

they remain relocatable. S1.3 All other

development is;

(i) located outside of the erosion prone area; or

(ii) as far landward as practical within the lot ; and

(iii) is coastal dependent development (as

defined in this code).

S1.4 All building works (excluding

demolition), including extension to existing

buildings, on lots wholly or partly within the

erosion prone area are:

(i) For rural areas and undeveloped urban areas, located landward of the erosion prone

area to minimise the extent of permanent

building inside the erosion prone area; and

(ii) For urban areas, located wholly landward

of the alignment of existing neighbouring buildings and of a scale and intensity similar to

that of the surrounding development.

The development is not located in an erosion prone area.

P2 Where there is existing development within an erosion-prone area,

redevelopment and extensions do not (as

defined in this code):- (i) extend the intensity of the existing

level; or

(ii) compromise coastal management

outcomes and principles

Note: Supporting information required in order to demonstrate compliance is set out

in the Erosion Prone Area Planning

Scheme Policy. purposes).

P2 No solution specified. N/A

Landscaping and Fencing

Specific outcomes Probable & Acceptable outcomes

P1 Development is provided with

adequate and suitable landscaping and

screening on the site which ensures: (i) an attractive streetscape appearance; and (ii)

the privacy and amenity of any adjoining

residences.

S1 Landscaping is provided in accordance with

the Landscaping Planning Scheme Policy

No landscaping is proposed for the site

P2 Landscaping is designed to prevent encroachment upon electricity

infrastructure.

S2.1 Landscaping near electricity lines or substations, are designed and developed so that

any vegetation at maturity or landscaping structures or works will not exceed 4.0m in

height on land:

(i) in an electric line shadow9 ; or

(ii) within 5m of an electric line shadow; or

(iii) within 5m of a substation boundary.

S2.2 Elsewhere, vegetation is planted in a

position that is further from the nearest edge of

an electric line shadow or substation boundary

than the expected maximum height at maturity of vegetation.

S2.3 On land adjoining an electricity

substation boundary, the vegetation foliage at

maturity will not be within 3m of the substation boundary. However, where a substation has a

solid wall along any part of its boundary,

foliage may extend to, but not above or beyond, that solid wall.

No landscaping is proposed for the site

P3 Landscaping provides a 2m wide

landscaped strip adjacent to the road frontage incorporating existing vegetation

wherever possible.

S3 No solution specified. No landscaping is proposed for the site

P4 A landscape strip is provided

comprising either a 1.8m high solid fence

or 2m wide planted screen adjacent to all side and rear boundaries of a site which

adjoins any residential area.

S4 No solution specified. No landscaping is proposed for the site

P5 Landscaping around buildings is

designed to maximise shade and redirect cooling breezes in summer and to provide

a windbreak in winter.

S5 No solution specified. No landscaping is proposed for the site

P6 Landscaping incorporates planting for shading summer sun, including: (i) tall

shade trees to the west and east of the

building; and (ii) trellises or pergolas adjacent to windows to the north of the

building.

S6 No solution specified. No landscaping is proposed for the site

P7 Landscaping is designed to maximise

the outdoor shade areas and minimise use of hard reflective surfaces around the

building.

S7 No solution specified. No landscaping is proposed for the site

Specific outcomes Probable & Acceptable outcomes

Landscaping for Outdoor Vehicle Parking Areas

P8 Landscaping for outdoor vehicle

parking areas, where development is for the purposes of Accommodation

units, multiple dwelling units, Sport

and recreation, indoor entertainment, outdoor entertainment, child care

centre, service station, motel, Industrial

uses and retail or commercial uses, will: (i) visually enhance the area along any

road frontage; (ii) screen the area from any adjoining

residential or other sensitive uses;

(iii) provide visual relief and shade throughout the area; and

(iv) be compatible with local native

species.

S8.1 Landscaping of outdoor vehicle parking areas

provides planting of trees and shrubs:

(i) in a strip 2m wide along any primary road frontage at a density and a scale appropriate to

the size of the vehicle parking area and the function of the adjoining road; and

(ii) in median areas throughout the vehicle parking area at a rate of 1 shade tree for every

6 parking spaces.

S8.2 Provide a wall, fence or continuous screen planting, to a height of at least 1.8m along any

boundary to land used or likely to be used for

residential or other sensitive use.

No landscaping is proposed for the site

Landscaping - General Requirements

P9 Landscaping is designed and established to:

(i) an appropriate scale relative to both the

street reserve width and to the size and nature of the development;

(ii) incorporate remnant vegetation,

where possible; (iii) provide summer shade and shelter for pedestrian comfort

and energy efficiency of buildings;

(iv) maximise areas suitable for on-site infiltration of stormwater; (v) allow for

pedestrian and vehicle safety;

(vi) generate a cohesive and distinct visual character for the streetscape and

locality;

(vii) be suitable to the tropical climate;

(viii) provides planting, paving and other

landscape treatment according to a

Landscaping Plan; and (ix) minimise irrigation requirements

through appropriate plant selection, mulching and water efficient irrigation

systems.

Note: The Landscape Planning Scheme

Policy should be referred to for information that may be required by

Council to assist in assessment of an

application.

S9 No solution specified. No landscaping is proposed for the site

Vegetation Management

P10 Natural vegetation is maintained

wherever possible.

Note: Assessable development being

operational work that is clearing of native

vegetation of freehold land consistent with Schedule 8, Part 1, 3A of IPA will be

assessed under the provisions of the

Vegetation Management Act 1999 and the State code for clearing of vegetation on

freehold land.

S10 No solution specified. The proposal only requires minimal vegetation removal.

It is proposed to remove the low lying vegetation for the proposed equipment cabinet.

Community Safety Design Principles

Specific outcomes Probable & Acceptable outcomes

Surveillance and Sightlines

P1 Premises provide opportunities for informal surveillance from surrounding

buildings and land uses.

Note: Ways of showing compliance are

as follows:

(i) Windows in buildings overlook pedestrian routes, open space areas and

carparks.

(ii) No blank building facade is presented to any street frontage.

(iii) Street level windows are provided in

buildings fronting onto public spaces and movement routes.

S1 No solution specified. The facility will not have any effect on informal surveillance methods or obstruct the vision of surrounding residences.

P2 Where located adjacent to public areas, premises are designed to permit

surveillance of public areas.

S2 No solution specified The facility will not affect surveillance in public areas.

P3 Buildings and street addresses in urban

areas are easily identified. S3 No solution specified

N/A

P4 Premises for uses other than dwelling

houses and dual occupancy, are illuminated at night to:

(i) maximise personal safety of site users;

and (ii) minimise opportunities for attack by

hidden persons.

(iii) provide lighting along access routes, in building entrances, site entries, car

parking areas and other movement areas

used after dark.

S4 No solution specified One car park security light attached to the monopole has been proposed. The proposed security light is to emit light onto the carpark so it is illuminated at night and increase safely on the site and its surrounding areas.

P5 Visibility is provided into stairwells,

elevators, car parks, lobby entrances and bicycle parking facilities

S5 No solution specified. N/A

P6 Premises and their surrounds do not include:

(i) ‘blind’ corners (including on stairs, in

corridors or other situations where movement can be predicted);

(ii) sudden changes of grade on pathways

which reduces sightlines; (iii) concealment spots (unless they can

be secured after hours); and

(iv) pedestrian tunnels, excepting that where unimpeded sightlines or the

absence of concealment points cannot be

reasonably achieved, equipment (such as security mirrors) and good lighting is

provided to enhance visibility.

(v) Potential concealment areas (i.e. dead-end alleys) are restricted or locked

after hours.

(vi) Where a concealment spot is unavoidable, there are aids to visibility

such as convex mirrors and good secure

lighting. (vii) Concealment spots such as:

(A) dark areas adjacent to a

main/designated pedestrian routes; (B) private dead-end alleyways;

(C) indentation in fencing or walls;

(D) gaps in the streets such as entrances to interior courtyards and recessed

doorways; and (E) areas that are isolated

after dark; are not located on the premises.

S6 No solution specified. N/A

Specific outcomes Probable & Acceptable outcomes

P7 Building entrances:

(i) are clearly defined; (ii) are well lit and face the street;

(iii) do not create concealment spots;

(iv) provide clear sightlines from the building foyer so that occupants can see

outside before leaving the building;

(v) have lobbies visible from the exterior; and

(vi) Have staff entrances, if separate,

which are well lit and maximise opportunities for informal surveillance

and for clear sightlines.

S7 No solution specified N/A

P8 Landscaping is designed and maintained to provide informal

surveillance and clear sight lines on

accessways and to other public spaces.

S8 “Vulnerable premises” provide landscaping designed to promote safety including: (i)

planting which does not obscure doors and windows overlooking public spaces and

isolated areas; (ii) shrubbery and low-level

planting associated with footpaths which does

not exceed 0.5m in height where abutting

pavements; (iii) trees in vulnerable settings

which do not have branches below 1.5m; and (iv) hard landscaping elements such as low

fencing and walls (below 1.2m) which guide

pedestrians and vehicles along designated paths.

No landscaping has been proposed

Safe Movement and Access

P9 The design of premises provides for

unimpeded sightlines, particularly along

pedestrian and bicycle routes.

S9 All barriers (including landscaping

features) along bicycle and pedestrian routes are visually permeable (i.e. can be easily seen

through to reduce concealment points).

The proposed facility will not impeded any sightlines.

P10 Car parking areas are:

(i) designed to optimise informal surveillance and illumination, and to

minimise unlawful access;

(ii) well lit to enable visibility of all external edges and routes providing

access to thecar park;

(iii) designed to minimise instances of large numbers of cars being co-located

(over 100 cars in a single block). If more

than 100 cars, more than one entry / exit point is provided so that the car park does

not become an entrapment area.

S10 No solution specified. The site is currently used as an informal car park.

The proposed facility intends to provide 1 car park security light which will be attached to the monopole. This will illuminate areas of the car park and enable greater visibility.

P11 Underpasses and overpasses are

designed and located to reduce opportunities for crime, so that: (i)

pedestrians are able to see what is in an

underpass or tunnel and at the end of it before entering; and (ii) signs at each end

of an underpass indicate where it leads and

an alternative route to use at night.

S11 No solution specified N/A

P12 Underpasses are wide enough to

accommodate both pedestrian and cycle

traffic, (Note: Council will refer to the provisions of AUSTROADS Guide to

Traffic Engineering Practice Part 14-

Bicycles). ]

S12 No solution specified N/A

P13 The design and location of laneways and alleyways promotes community

safety.

S13.1 Laneways are straight and have more than one entrance.

S13.2 Unnecessary access to buildings from

laneways is avoided.

N/A

Constructed Lakes

Specific outcomes Probable & Acceptable outcomes

Building Design and Lighting S14.1 Ramps and elevator entrances are located in areas which are not isolated.

S14.2 Lifts are located within a secure

entrance, and incorporate graffiti and vandal-resistant measures (i.e. a fully glazed and

enclosed vestibule area at the exit to the lifts).

S14.3 Loading and storage areas are well lit or

can be locked after hours.

S14.4 Parking spaces are allocated near the building entry for employees working after

hours.

S14.5 Enclosed or underground car parks can

only be accessed from inside the building or through a security system.

S14.6 All windows, particular those at street

level are secure, without creating a ‘fortress-

like’ appearance (i.e. avoid solid roller shutters).

The facility will not hinder public safety and

security in any way. P14 Buildings contribute positively to the enhancement of public safety and

security.

P15 Lighting is provided which:

(i) increases safety and security in and around the premises;

(ii) considers vegetation, in both its

existing and mature forms, or other elements that may have the potential to

block out light;

(iii) illuminates inset spaces, access/egress routes car parking areas and

signage; and

(iv) supports visibility for pedestrians, as well as road users.

S15 No specific solution.

Note: Council will refer to the following as

guidance in assessment of compliance: Security lighting is consistent with Australian

Standard S 4282 (1997) (The Control of

Obtrusive Effects of Outdoor Lighting. Lighting of pedestrian and bicycle movement

routes, public spaces and outdoor signage in

public spaces is to the minimum Australian Standard of AS1158 (Public Lighting Code).

One car park security light attached to the monopole has been proposed. This lighting will increase safety and security in the car park and its surrounding areas. It will increase visibility on the site and make it safer for pedestrians.

The proposed security light is to emit light into the carpark and should not affect residents in the neighbouring area.

Specific outcomes Probable & Acceptable outcomes

P1 Natural design concepts are a

primary consideration for a constructed lake.

S1 No solution specified N/A

P2 Constructed lakes are designed to be: (i) consistent with the area’s social

and recreational masterplans; (ii)

sustainable; (iii) appropriately managed; and (iv) have minimal

adverse impacts on surrounding

environments.

S2.1 Lake depth is ≤3 m.

S2.2 The design of a constructed lake complies with the Engineering Design Guideline

Planning Scheme Policy.

N/A

P3 Constructed lakes are to operate

under a financially sustainable management regime.

S3 Lakes are provided under private ownership.

N/A

6 Potential Environmental Impacts and Proposed Mitigation Measures

6.1 Hazards, Risk and Health Impacts

The ACMA mandates exposure limits for continuous exposure of the general public to Radio Frequency Electro Magnetic Emissions (RF EME) from mobile base stations. These limits are specified in the Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA) 2002, ‘Radiation Protection

Standard: Maximum Exposure Levels to radiofrequency Fields – 3 kHz to 300 GHz’, Radiation Protection Series Publication No.3 ARPANSA (“RPS 3”).

Some community members perceive that there is a potential health risk associated with mobile phones and mobile phone base stations. RPS 3, which sets public and occupational limits of exposure to radiation, is designed to avoid any known adverse effects where people are exposed to RF EME. Compliance with these exposure limits is a condition of the Radiocommunications licenses issued by the ACMA.

ARPANSA states:

“The weight of national and international scientific opinion is that there is no substantiated evidence that RF emissions associated with living near a mobile phone base station poses a health risk.”

The World Health Organisation’s current advice is:

“None of the recent reviews have concluded that exposure to RF fields from mobile phones and their base stations causes any health consequences.”

In accordance with RPS 3, an estimate has been made of the maximum cumulative radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic energy (EME) levels at ground level emitted from the proposed mobile base station. Estimates of RF EME levels are provided for 360o circular bands at 0-50, 50-100, 100-200, 200- 300, 300-400 and 400-600m from the base of the antenna.

The predictions in the Environmental EME Report assume a near worst-case scenario including:

- base station transmitters operating at maximum power (no automatic power reduction);

- simultaneous telephone calls on all channels; and

- an unobstructed line of sight view to the antennas.

Further to the above, emission levels produced by 3G transmitters such as that proposed by this proposal are considered to be lower than other common types of transmitters.

“The EME emission levels produced by 3G transmitters are considered low, with an average radiated power of around 3 watts. This is significantly lower than the power levels of some other common types of transmitters, such as two-way radios used by taxis and emergency services. For

example, a 3G mobile phone base station antenna radiates a little more than one-tenth of the power of a taxi’s two-way radio.”

This fact sheet further goes on to describe the low EME exposure levels from operating base stations as follows:

“From 1997 to 1999, ARPANSA conducted tests to measure the radiofrequency EME levels at GSM mobile phone base stations in 14 different localities, finding that emissions were usually many times lower than the allowable limits.“

6.2 Visual Amenity Vodafone and Optus have endeavoured to strike a balance between providing mobile phone coverage and minimising the visual impact of the facility on the local environment. Mobile phone base stations need to be located in or near the area for which they are designed to provide coverage. This particular location was partly chosen as it is located within a commercial site and is not located in any areas of environmental significance whilst providing the required radio frequency (RF) coverage for the Rocklea area. The height of the proposed monopole is the minimum required to achieve Optus and Vodafone RF objectives.

The subject site is a commercially used lot located off Bedford Road. It is surrounded by mixed uses, residential to the North and North West, Road Infrastructure to the East and Commercial to the South. The site is currently used as an informal carpark servicing the commercial use on the Southern boundary of the site.

It is acknowledged that the proposed telecommunications facility would be visible from some residential properties located on Bedford Road and the local streets to the North West. The proposed telecommunications facility would be located approximately 8m from the closest residential dwelling. However, existing power poles line Bedford Road and are located in intervals along the nature strip. These power poles are approximately 10 meters high and will serve to reduce some of the monopoles visual impact. The proposed monopole is made of steel and in manufactured light grey in colour. The equipment shelter will be in merina colour. Views will be mitigated by the existing power poles which line Bedford Road. In terms of the bulk, scale and color, the proposed facilities will blend in with the existing tall bulky power poles lining Bedford Road. The use of a monopole structure rather than a lattice tower will reduce the visual bulk and sky-lining (visual prominence against the backdrop of the sky) of the facility.

It is acknowledged that the proposed facility would be an addition to the locality. Nonetheless, the proposal is considered necessary as it will improve communication in the Andergrove area among residents, businesses and visitors. The location for the proposed facility has been selected so that no vegetation removal will be required and it is sited within a commercially used site. The proposed location will also allow Vodafone and Optus to achieve the required RF objectives to deliver the required coverage to Rocklea.

Overall, the proposed telecommunications facility is of appropriate distance and setback from environmentally sensitive areas. The visual presence of the proposed facility will be further mitigated by the setback distance of the proposed facility from the main road frontage and its design.

Figure 6.1 Proposed facility looking south the intersection of Andergrove and Bedford Roads

Figure 6.2 Proposed facility looking north from Bedford Road

6.3 Flora and Fauna

The proposed facility does not require clearance of vegetation. Therefore, flora and fauna should not be impacted by the proposed development.

6.4 Heritage

Online searches were undertaken in order to determine any natural or cultural values of state or national significance. The following databases were viewed:

Australian Heritage Places Inventory;

Register of the National Estate; and

Queensland Heritage Register.

Searches using the aforementioned registers established the site is not subject to nor has any recognised cultural significance. Notwithstanding, precaution and due diligence will be exercised during the construction phase and if any items of indigenous or cultural heritage are encountered, works would cease and the Department of Environment and Resource Management will be contacted.

6.5 Contaminated land

The site is not listed on the Contaminated Land Register or the Environmental Management Register, nor known to contain Acid Sulfate Soils. No signs of land contamination were observed during the site inspection. As such, it is unlikely that the proposed works would encounter any contaminated soils. Any contaminated soils exposed during the proposed works will be managed in accordance with the relevant guidelines.

6.6 Erosion and sediment control

Given the scale of the works and location of the proposal, potential impacts would be addressed and mitigated with the following soil and water management measures undertaken during construction of the proposed facility and continued after construction until the site is established. These measurements include:

Keeping ground disturbing activities to a minimum;

Implementing appropriate sediment control measures as required, such as the installation of silt/sediment fences and/or sediment traps;

Stabilisation of the site compound area with weed matting and gravel base;

Erosion and sediment controls will be checked regularly;

Fill in and compact any trenches immediately after services have been laid; and

Works would not occur during periods of heavy rainfall.

6.7 Air Quality

Where there is potential for dust generation during excavation for the footing and during the movement of construction vehicles, it is expected to be localised and any impacts minimal and of short term duration. The compound site and surrounds would be appropriately restored after the completion of works.

Overall, minimal dust generation will occur during the construction stage of the facility. Measures such as wetting down exposed surfaces would be undertaken if required to mitigate any construction related impacts due to dust generation. Once installed the proposal will have no air pollution and is not expected to cause dust hazards.

6.8 Noise and Vibration

Any noisy construction activities would be as a result of drilling and excavation of the foundation / footing for the monopole. It is also expected that there would be some noise generated from construction vehicles and machinery.

The nearest noise sensitive receptors include nearby residential dwellings, the closest being the neighbouring residence at 113 Bedford Road and the residential dwellings approximately 10m west of the proposed facility. Any potential noise impacts are expected to be minor and short term in duration. Works would be undertaken only during standard working hours.

It is not expected that construction works would have any vibration impacts on the surrounding area.

No noise will be generated from the facility once it is operational.

6.9 Waste Minimisation and Management

Due to the relatively minor nature of the works, the generation of waste resulting from construction of the proposed facility is expected to be minimal. The majority of the waste generated is expected to be excess spoil as a result of construction of the footing foundation for the monopole.

Excess spoil from the earthworks would be reused onsite if suitable, reused off site, or disposed of at an approved waste disposal facility. Other waste packaging material will also be disposed of at an approved waste disposal facility. The ongoing operation of the facility will be unmanned and will not generate any waste or odour emissions.

6.10 Traffic and Access

The site will be accessed via the existing entrance of 117 Bedford Road, Andergrove during construction. It is anticipated that works would be completed in approximately five weeks after commencement given ideal working conditions.

There would be a minor increase in traffic volume on the surrounding roads during construction. However, any such impacts are expected to be minor and short term in duration. Traffic controllers will also assist vehicle movements of the crane and cherry picker to reduce impact on traffic flows.

During operation the proposed facility is not expected to impact upon traffic movements on any local roads and have no noticeable increase in traffic volumes.

Once constructed, mobile phone base stations are of low maintenance, unmanned and remotely operated. As such, operational visits to the site will be approximately 2 - 6 times per year. The proposed facility will not require public transport services or parking facilities. Parking for maintenance vehicles is available on-site.

6.11 Associated Infrastructure and Activities

An underground power route will be used for the facilities electrical supply. The route and further identification of utilities would be undertaken during the detailed design stage of the proposal, and any impacts assessed and necessary safeguards implemented as required.

The following mitigation measures would be implemented to ameliorate any impacts on existing infrastructure:

A ‘dial-before you dig’ search would be undertaken during the detailed design stage;

Prior to construction, all infrastructure and utilities would be identified;

If required, prior to construction, relevant utilities and adjacent residents would be notified of any impending disruptions to services.

Please refer to Appendix C – Drawings. When operational, the site will be unmanned, and does not require utility services such as telephone, water and sewerage.

6.12 Cumulative Environmental Effects

The key perceived and potential environmental impacts for this proposed development have been identified as: health and risk issues (perceived); visual impact (potential); and potential impacts during construction of the proposed facility. Each of these aspects have been considered individually and collectively from a cumulative impact perspective.

A common concern about base station and local wireless network antennas relates to the possible long-term health effects that whole-body exposure to the RF signals may have. To date, the only health effect from RF fields identified in scientific reviews has been related to an increase in body temperature (> 1 °C) from exposure at very high field intensity found only in certain industrial facilities, such as RF heaters. The levels of RF exposure from base stations and wireless networks are so low that the temperature increases are insignificant and do not affect human health.

The strength of RF fields is greatest at its source, and diminishes quickly with distance. Access near base station antennas is restricted where RF signals may exceed international exposure limits. Recent surveys have indicated that RF exposures from base stations and wireless technologies in publicly accessible areas (including schools and hospitals) are normally thousands of times below international standards.

The proposed base station will comply well within the standard limits set by the ACMA. Any potential environmental impacts during construction are expected to be temporary and mitigated through the implementation of appropriate work practices and management measures specified in this development application report. Consequently, the proposed development is not considered likely to have an adverse cumulative impact on the environment and the community.

7 Conclusion

Vodafone proposes to install a 25 metre monopole and associated infrastructure at Lot 12 on SP252741/121, 117 Bedford Road, Andergrove 4740. This report provides the necessary information to support the application for a development permit for a Material Change of Use.

The proposal will form an integral part of the Vodafone and Optus 3G and 4G network; meeting the increasing demand for mobile/wireless communication services and improving the coverage and quality for consumers. The proposed facility is considered appropriate for the following reasons:

The proposed telecommunications base station and associated infrastructure is considered

unlikely to have significant impact on the environment, the visual amenity of the area, or on neighbouring properties;

The proposal will provide telecommunication services to Andergrove and its surrounding suburbs. The delivery of this essential community infrastructure is in accordance with provisions under the Mackay, Isaac and Whitsunday Regional Plan 2009 – 2031 and the Mackay City Plan 2006;

The proposed development is expected to provide socio-economic benefits to the community, businesses, travellers, and emergency services in the region;

The proposal ensures the local community has equitable access to all three licensed telecommunication providers in Australia; in-line with the majority of populated areas. Ultimate choice over mobile network supplier ensures the service they receive is suitable for their needs and budgets;

The proposed facility will provide a structure on which other telecommunication carriers can co-locate on in the future if required;

The proposed site was considered the most viable option for the area as it meets the required radio frequency objectives, construction, access and power requirements of the facility and meets planning and property assessment criteria as outlined in section 3;

The facility will comply with all Government standards outlined by ARPANSA.

Through the assessment undertaken in this report it is considered that the development is in accordance with the relevant legislation and statutory requirements, including the Mackay City Plan 2006, Telecommunications Act 1997 and the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 and we request that a development permit for a material change of use be granted, subject to reasonable and relevant conditions.