PHYS 490 - wiki.heprc.uvic.ca
Transcript of PHYS 490 - wiki.heprc.uvic.ca
PHYS 490 ORCASat and ALTAIR Development
Report 3
Josh Gage, V00876655
April 24th, 2020
Instructor: Dr. Justin Albert
PHYS 490 ORCASat and ALTAIR Development 1
University of Victoria Department of Physics
Table of Contents Table of Figures ............................................................................................................................................ 2
Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 4
Background ................................................................................................................................................... 5
Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 6
Design Progress ............................................................................................................................................ 6
Optical Payload Mechanical Design ......................................................................................................... 9
Integrating Sphere ................................................................................................................................... 10
Previous Integrating Sphere Designs .................................................................................................. 10
Updated Design ................................................................................................................................... 11
Laser Diode Heatsink .............................................................................................................................. 13
Previous Laser Diode Heatsink Designs ............................................................................................. 13
Present Design .................................................................................................................................... 13
Testing ........................................................................................................................................................ 17
Basic Electronics Functionality .............................................................................................................. 20
Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 20
Results ................................................................................................................................................. 20
Discussion ........................................................................................................................................... 21
Unobstructed Laser Light and Effect of Optical Stops ........................................................................... 21
Results ................................................................................................................................................. 21
Discussion ........................................................................................................................................... 23
Next Steps ................................................................................................................................................... 26
Conclusion .................................................................................................................................................. 26
References ................................................................................................................................................... 27
Appendices .................................................................................................................................................. 28
Appendix A: Spring 2018 Optical Payload Design (HOMATHKO) ..................................................... 28
Appendix B: Summer 2019 Optical Payload Design (ORCASat) .......................................................... 29
Appendix C: Winter 2020 Optical Payload Design (ORCASat) ............................................................ 30
Appendix D: Electrical Circuit Schematics ............................................................................................ 31
Appendix E: Test Plan Objectives .......................................................................................................... 33
Laser Diode Module Test Plan................................................................................................................ 33
1. Basic Electronics Functionality .................................................................................................. 33
2. Basic Optical Properties of Laser Diodes ................................................................................... 33
PHYS 490 ORCASat and ALTAIR Development 2
University of Victoria Department of Physics
3. Optical Noise Measurement ........................................................................................................ 33
4. Thermistor Calibration ................................................................................................................ 33
5. Active Power Control Accuracy ................................................................................................. 33
6. Temperature Gradient Between Laser Diode Case and Heatsink ............................................... 34
7. Wavelength Drift per Temperature Variation ............................................................................. 34
8. Failure of Laser Diode Driver ..................................................................................................... 34
9. Laser Diode Temperature-testing in Vacuum ............................................................................. 34
Appendix F: Unobstructed Laser Light and Effect of Optical Stops Photos .......................................... 35
Table of Figures Figure 1: ORCASat concept design .............................................................................................................. 5
Figure 2: Optical payload mechanical assembly, isometric view ................................................................. 7
Figure 3: Optical payload mechanical assembly, parts list ........................................................................... 7
Figure 4: Optical payload mechanical assembly, front view ....................................................................... 7
Figure 5: Optical payload mechanical assembly, front bolt section view and front laser diode section
view ............................................................................................................................................................... 8
Figure 6: Optical payload mechanical assembly, right view ........................................................................ 8
Figure 7: Optical Payload mechanical assembly, top view ........................................................................... 8
Figure 8: A fiber-optic laser guide ................................................................................................................ 9
Figure 9: ORCASat’s first Payload Design featuring two angled laser diode access ports ......................... 9
Figure 10: Vertical optical payload mechanical assembly, right laser diode section view ......................... 10
Figure 11: Integrating sphere upper hemisphere, isometric view ............................................................... 12
Figure 12: Integrating sphere upper hemisphere, front view ...................................................................... 12
Figure 13: Integrating sphere upper hemisphere, right view ...................................................................... 12
Figure 14: Laser diode module, isometric .................................................................................................. 14
Figure 15: Laser diode module, top view ................................................................................................... 14
Figure 16: Laser diode module, left view ................................................................................................... 14
Figure 17: Laser diode module, left laser diode section view ..................................................................... 15
Figure 18: Laser diode PCB, top-view (designed by Trevor Zakus for ECE 490) ..................................... 15
Figure 19: Laser diode PCB, bottom view (designed by Trevor Zakus for ECE 490) ............................... 16
Figure 20: 3M 203-6970-50-0602J laser diode socket ............................................................................... 16
Figure 21: Payload PC104 motherboard design, top view (designed by Evan Moore for ECE 490) ......... 17
Figure 22: Payload PC104 motherboard design, front view (designed by Evan Moore for ECE 490) ...... 17
Figure 23: Test Setup, Diagram .................................................................................................................. 18
Figure 24: Home Test Setup, Top View ..................................................................................................... 19
Figure 25: Home Test Setup, Front View ................................................................................................... 19
Figure 26: Home Test Set-up, Back View .................................................................................................. 20
Figure 27: Home Test Setup, Diode View .................................................................................................. 20
Figure 28: Laser light spread (28 [in] diameter) at 44.5 [in] with no optical stop ...................................... 21
Figure 29: Laser light spread (10 [in] diameter) at 44.5 [in] with 11/64 [in] optical stop at 0.375 [in] ..... 22
PHYS 490 ORCASat and ALTAIR Development 3
University of Victoria Department of Physics
Figure 30: Laser light spread (4.5 [in] diameter) at 44.5 [in] with 3/32 [in] optical stop at 0.375 [in] ...... 22
Figure 31: Laser light spread (2.5 [in] diameter) at 44.5 [in] with 1/16 [in] optical stop at 0.75 [in] ........ 23
Figure 32: Examination of incident light features....................................................................................... 24
Figure 33: Plot of laser diode spread angle vs optical stop diameter .......................................................... 25
Figure 34: Plot of spread angle of maximum wing length vs optical stop diameter ................................... 26
Figure 35: Homathko’s Optical Payload Design, isometric view ............................................................... 28
Figure 36: Homathko’s Optical Payload Design, front view ...................................................................... 28
Figure 37: Homathko’s Optical Payload Design, right view ...................................................................... 28
Figure 38: ORCASat’s First Optical Payload Design, isometric view ....................................................... 29
Figure 39: ORCASat’s First Optical Payload Design, front view .............................................................. 29
Figure 40: ORCASat’s First Optical Payload Design, right view .............................................................. 29
Figure 41: ORCASat’s Second Optical Payload Design, isometric view ................................................... 30
Figure 42: ORCASat’s Second Optical Payload Design, front view .......................................................... 30
Figure 43: ORCASat’s Second Optical Payload Design, right view .......................................................... 30
Figure 44: Laser diode heatsink circuit board schematic (designed by Trevor Zakus for ECE 490) ......... 31
Figure 45: Laser diode driver circuit board schematic (designed by Evan Moore for ECE 490) ............... 31
Figure 46: Temperature-monitoring circuit schematic (designed by Evan Moore for ECE 490) ............... 32
Figure 47: Payload motherboard circuit schematic (designed by Evan Moore for ECE 490) .................... 32
Figure 48: Incident laser light with no optical stop, featuring a 28” main diameter and an 18” wing, 44.5”
away. ........................................................................................................................................................... 35
Figure 49: Incident laser light with a 13/64" optical stop at 0.375", featuring a 12.5" main diameter and a
10" wing 44.5" away. .................................................................................................................................. 35
Figure 50: Incident laser light with a 3/16" optical stop at 0.375", featuring a 11" main diameter and a 9"
wing 44.5" away. ......................................................................................................................................... 35
Figure 51: Incident laser light with a 11/64" optical stop at 0.375", featuring a 10" main diameter and a
8" wing 44.5" away. .................................................................................................................................... 36
Figure 52: Incident laser light with a 5/32" optical stop at 0.375", featuring a 9" main diameter and a 8"
wing 44.5" away. ......................................................................................................................................... 36
Figure 53: Incident laser light with a 9/64" optical stop at 0.375", featuring a 8.5" main diameter and a 8"
wing 44.5" away. ......................................................................................................................................... 37
Figure 54:Incident laser light with a 1/8" optical stop at 0.375", featuring a 7" main diameter and a 6.5"
wing 44.5" away. ......................................................................................................................................... 37
Figure 55: Incident laser light with a 13/64" optical stop at 0.375", featuring a 6" main diameter and a 5"
wing 44.5" away. ......................................................................................................................................... 37
Figure 56: Incident laser light with a 3/32" optical stop at 0.375", featuring a 4.5" main diameter and a 4"
wing 44.5" away. ......................................................................................................................................... 38
Figure 57: Incident laser light with a 5/64" optical stop at 0.500", featuring a 4" main diameter and a 5"
wing 44.5" away. ......................................................................................................................................... 38
Figure 58: Incident laser light with a 1/16" optical stop at 0.750", featuring a 2.5" main diameter no wing
44.5" away. ................................................................................................................................................. 38
PHYS 490 ORCASat and ALTAIR Development 4
University of Victoria Department of Physics
Executive Summary This report contains an overview of work completed on the ORCASat Optical Payload project during the
spring 2020 semester.
During the January 6th to March 31st period, work included: personnel onboarding and literature review,
mechanical designs and drawings of the vertical and horizontal integrating spheres and laser diode
heatsinks, and electrical design of laser diode boards and laser diode driver boards (completed by Evan
Moore and Trevor Zakus for ECE 490). The vertical configuration is preferred, and was designed around
placing the 660 nm and 840 nm (or 405 nm or 980 nm) laser diodes as near to colinear as possible to
minimize the difference between intensities measured by the two onboard photodiodes.
During the March 31st to April 24th period (since report 2), further work included: the testing of the basic
electronics functionality of the MLD203P2E laser diode driver and the L660P120 laser diode using a
Thorlabs MLDEVAL board, the testing of basic optical properties of laser diodes in a dark room, and the
design of the transimpedance amplifier (completed by Evan Moore and Trevor Zakus for ECE 490).
The first test verified that the L660P laser diode, the MLD203P2E driver, and the MLDEVAL board all
function as expected. The second test revealed that the L660P120 laser diode produces a roughly-circular
spread of speckled incident light on a flat, perpendicular surface with a maximum main-diameter spread
angle of 18 degrees and a single wing with a maximum spread angle of 45 degrees. This test also revealed
that optical stops can greatly reduce the spread angles of the incident light’s main-diameter and can also
greatly reduced the spread angles of its wing. Therefore, optical stops should be further investigated for
implementation in the laser diode heatsink design.
Next steps will include testing the power output of the 660 nm laser diode with a Thorlabs optical power
meter, designing a test jig for further optical stops testing for the L660P laser diode, inquiring with
Thorlabs about a modified laser diode driver that can provide 5V to operate the 405 nm laser diode,
testing various combinations of laser diodes and photodiodes, thermal simulation of laser diodes and laser
diode heatsinks, and optical simulation of laser diode beams inside the integrating sphere.
PHYS 490 ORCASat and ALTAIR Development 5
University of Victoria Department of Physics
Background ORCASat’s Optical Payload will serve to photometrically calibrate astronomical reference objects (stars
known as standard candles) which ground-based telescopes use in turn for daily calibration. Note that
ORCAsat’s Optical Payload will also be capable of directly calibrating ground-based telescopes. To
photometrically calibrate astronomical reference objects, it must operate two monochromatic light sources
in low earth orbit with power simultaneously measured onboard the satellite and on the ground by
telescopes. Comparing these measured target intensities will reduce the photometric uncertainty of
ground-based telescopes by at least an order of magnitude.
Figure 1: ORCASat concept design
Thus, the Optical Payload has three main functions:
1. Generate target light of two constant wavelengths and constant powers in low earth orbit that can
be observed by ground-based telescopes during an observation period.
2. Measure the optical power of the generated light onboard the spacecraft.
3. Downlink measured optical power values for the duration of the observation period.
The scope of this report includes initial design and development of functions 1 and 2.
Further design requirements are set by the Canadian Space Agency and by Nanoracks, who are hosting
the cubesat deployer on the International Space Station from which ORCASat will be launched in 2021.
The Canadian Space Agency requires that ORCASat complies with:
• NASA’s off-gassing requirement (that all parts off-gas less than 0.1% of mass)
• NASA’s guideline for hazardous materials (that no parts are made from hazardous materials)
Nanoracks requires that ORCASat adheres to:
• PC104 embedded computer standards
• A 2U total satellite geometry (10cm x 10cm x 20cm)
• Nanoracks’ vibration testing standards
PHYS 490 ORCASat and ALTAIR Development 6
University of Victoria Department of Physics
Introduction To generate target light of two constant wavelengths and constant powers that can be observed by ground-
based telescopes during an observation period, two laser diodes will be employed: one with a 660 nm
wavelength, and another of on of 405 nm, 840 nm, or 980 nm wavelength. To measure the optical power
of generated light onboard the spacecraft, two photodiodes will be employed. Both laser diodes and both
photodiodes will be mounted to an integrating sphere, which diffusively reflects the directional laser
source light, allowing for the light to be measured by an observer and by the onboard photodiodes during
the same observation period. The integrating sphere also ensures that the light emitted from the spacecraft
is uniform, and that the photometric reference calibration quality is not dependent on viewing angle.
Table 1: ORCASat Optical Payload Design Requirements
During the January 6th to April 24th period, mechanical design work (Josh Gage) included:
• Design of horizontal integrating sphere (featuring a horizontal laser diode configuration)
• Design of horizontal laser diode heatsink (featuring a horizontal laser diode configuration)
• Design of vertical integrating sphere (featuring a vertical laser diode configuration)
• Design of vertical laser diode heatsink (featuring a vertical laser diode configuration)
• Production of vertical integrating sphere drawing package (see attached)
• Production of vertical laser diode heatsink drawing package (see attached)
• 3D-Printing a prototype of the vertical integrating sphere
• 3D-Printing a prototype of the vertical laser diode heatsink
• Testing basic electronics properties of the L660P120 laser diode and MLD203P2E driver
• Testing basic optical properties of the L660P120 laser diode and the effect of optical stops
Also, during the January6th-April 24th period, Electrical design work (Evan Moore and Trevor Zakus)
relevant to this report included:
• Design of the laser diode boards
• Production of laser diode board drawings
• Design of the laser diode driver board (Optical Payload PC104 motherboard)
• Production of laser diode driver board drawings
• Ongoing design of the transimpedance amplifier board
Design Progress Design progress included redesigning the Homathko integrating sphere and designing laser diode
modules in both vertical and horizontal laser diode configurations. The vertical configuration is preferred,
and will be the main subject of this report—although the horizontal configuration may be later
implemented according to future test results or future design considerations.
Design Requirement Solution
Generate monochromatic 660 nm light source Thorlabs L660P120 - 660 nm, 120 mW, Ø5.6 mm, C Pin Code, Laser Diode
Generate second monochromatic light source Thorlabs L840P200 - 840 nm, 200 mW, Ø5.6 mm, C Pin Code, Laser Diode
OR Thorlabs
OR U.S. Lasers D405-120, 120mW, Ø5.6 mm, B Pin Code, Laser Diode
Optimize light source viewing angle and uniform power distribution per area 2" ID Integrating Sphere
Measure optical power onboard spacecraft Two Photodiodes
PHYS 490 ORCASat and ALTAIR Development 7
University of Victoria Department of Physics
Figure 2: Optical payload mechanical assembly, isometric view
Figure 3: Optical payload mechanical assembly, parts list
Figure 4: Optical payload mechanical assembly, front view
PHYS 490 ORCASat and ALTAIR Development 8
University of Victoria Department of Physics
Figure 5: Optical payload mechanical assembly, front bolt section view and front laser diode section view
Figure 6: Optical payload mechanical assembly, right view
Figure 7: Optical Payload mechanical assembly, top view
PHYS 490 ORCASat and ALTAIR Development 9
University of Victoria Department of Physics
Optical Payload Mechanical Design The initial vertical integrating sphere and vertical laser diode heatsink design configuration was
completed.
This configuration was designed around the need to have laser diodes’ laser beams as near to colinear as
possible. This is desired as it allows the two photodiodes to read as near to same power from each of the
laser diodes as possible, as the laser beams from the 660nm and the second laser diode will strike the
inside of the integrating sphere at two points that are close with respect to the photodiodes before diffuse-
reflecting. To get the laser beams as close as possible, there are three options:
1) Implement a laser guide for the two beams at a single access port:
This solution was deemed to be overly complex for use onboard the satellite by previously
involved members.
Figure 8: A fiber-optic laser guide
2) Mount the two laser diodes onto two angled access ports such that their laser beams would be
incident on the same point inside the integrating sphere:
This solution was deemed to be unsatisfactory by Prof. Justin Albert because laser beams should
be incident on the interior of the integrating sphere with the same incident angle.
Angled beams should be avoided as the imperfections in the integrating sphere will not perfectly
diffuse-reflect the laser light. If the light is not perfectly diffuse-reflected, the difference in
incident angles will cause exposure differences between the two photodiodes. By ensuring the
angle of incidence is the same, it can be ensured that both photodiodes will be exposed to an
equivalent amount of light. This can be achieved by designing the laser diodes such that their
emissions are as co-linear as possible.
Figure 9: ORCASat’s first Payload Design featuring two angled laser diode access ports
3) Mount the two laser diodes onto a single access port such that they are parallel with minimum
distance between them:
PHYS 490 ORCASat and ALTAIR Development 10
University of Victoria Department of Physics
This solution was deemed to be most satisfactory by Prof. Justin Albert so long as the laser diodes
have an absolute minimum distance between them. This is to ensure that light from the two lasers
strikes the opposite side of the integrating sphere interior surface in as similar a way as possible.
This was achieved by mounting the two laser diodes such that their mounting cases are parallel
and nearly in contact, with a total center-to-center distance of 6.5mm (laser diode mounting cases
are 6mm in diameter).
Figure 10: Vertical optical payload mechanical assembly, right laser diode section view
Integrating Sphere The vertical integrating sphere design was completed.
The integrating sphere serves to diffusively reflect two directional laser source lights, allowing for the
light to be measured by an observer and by the onboard photodiodes during the same observation period.
Furthermore, it ensures that the light emitted from the spacecraft is uniform, and that the photometric
reference calibration quality is not dependent on viewing angle.
Previous Integrating Sphere Designs
This design is a revision of the design concept established by the ALTAIR balloon payload, and
integrating sphere designs from Spring 2018, Summer 2019, Winter 2020 (see Appendix A, B, C):
• The Spring 2018 integrating sphere design failed to meet current requirements as it only
accommodated a single laser diode and did not have a simple assembly procedure (see Appendix
A).
• The Summer 2019 integrating sphere design failed to meet current requirements as the laser
emissions were not optimized to be as colinear as possible and it was also not optimized for
fabrication and assembly, resulting in high cost estimates and complicated assembly procedures
(see Appendix B).
• The Winter 2020 integrating sphere design failed to meet current requirements as it featured two
laser diode access ports mounted 90 ° from the photodiode modules.
In this case, it suffered the same design drawbacks as the first ORCASat integrating sphere did
due to angled laser diode access ports—however, these drawbacks were further aggravated by
increasing the separation between laser diode access ports, having the laser diode access ports
PHYS 490 ORCASat and ALTAIR Development 11
University of Victoria Department of Physics
angled such that laser diode beams were incident at different points on the southern hemisphere
(see Appendix C).
Updated Design
The vertical design was based directly off of the first ORCASat Optical Payload design (see appendix C).
The sphere’s interior dimensions were not changed, as they could remain the same while meeting other
design requirements. Interior diffuse-reflective coating is to remain Avian-B. Avian-B meets diffuse-
reflectivity requirements and is readily available from Dr. Justin Albert.
Changes to the integrating sphere include:
1. A single, slotted laser diode access port replaced the two laser diode access ports to meet the
requirement of nearly-colinear laser diode laser beams.
2. The integrating sphere’s north hemisphere wall was thickened to feature larger flat faces for the
laser diode access port and the two photodiode access ports to meet the requirement for locating
features on each access port. Consequently, the integrating sphere’s mounting holes were located
on a new (30mm) diameter. This increases the payload’s mass slightly, but ORCASat remains
under overall mass requirements. Exact increase and margins to be included in future
documentation.
3. Laser diode module and photodiode module access ports were altered. This included:
o Removing excess material from laser diode access ports. This allowed the laser diode
heatsink to be mounted directly onto a flat face milled into the integrating sphere’s
surface with an adhesive (as was already done for the photodiode modules). This was
done to improve the feasibility of integrating sphere fabrication
o Locating holes and edges were added to the laser diode module access port for ease of
assembly and increased quality of adhesion. This will allow for accurate mounting and
adhesion of the laser diode module with respect to access ports’ planar direction and
orientation (in this case oriented as the vertical laser diode configuration).
o Locating holes were added to photodiode module access ports for ease of assembly and
increased quality of adhesion. This will allow for accurate mounting and adhesion of
photodiode modules with respect to access ports’ location (no planar directional
preference for photodiodes).
Table 2: Integrating sphere design requirements
Design Requirement Solution
Provide diffuse-reflective surface inside integrating sphere Avian-B coating
Prevent laser diodes from directing light directly into photodiodes Laser diodes and photodiodes all mounted in earth-facing hemisphere of integrating sphere
Investigate wings and speckle of laser diodes
Implement necessary optical stop
PHYS 490 ORCASat and ALTAIR Development 12
University of Victoria Department of Physics
Figure 11: Integrating sphere upper hemisphere, isometric view
Figure 12: Integrating sphere upper hemisphere, front view
Figure 13: Integrating sphere upper hemisphere, right view
PHYS 490 ORCASat and ALTAIR Development 13
University of Victoria Department of Physics
Laser Diode Heatsink The initial vertical laser diode heatsink design configuration was completed. This design is significantly
different from all of this project’s previous laser diode heatsink designs, as it needed to address the new
requirements of housing two laser diodes in a single heatsink to mount to a single access port on the
integrating sphere, and of including on-board temperature monitoring of laser diodes during operation.
Previous Laser Diode Heatsink Designs
This design is an alternative to Homathko and ORCASat laser diode housing designs (see Appendix A, B,
C):
• The Spring 2018 laser diode insertion point failed to meet present requirements as it only
accomadated a single laser diode, did not include on-board temperature monitoring during
operation.
• The Summer 2019 laser diode heatsink failed to meet requirements as it only accommodates a
single laser diode, and did not include on-board temperature monitoring during operation.
• The Winter 2019 laser diode heatsink failed to meet present requirements as it only
accommodates a single laser diode.
Present Design
The vertical laser diode heatsink is designed to mount two parallel laser diodes to a single access port on
the integrating sphere such that the laser diodes are as near colinear as possible.
The aluminum body acts as a heat sink for the laser diodes, while the laser diodes’ temperatures are
monitored by two thermistors that accesses the base of the laser diode through the side of the heat sink.
6061-T6 Aluminum was selected for the laser diodes’ heatsink body because it is a good conductor, meets
NASA off gassing and hazardous materials requirements, is readily available, is easy to manufacture, and
has low cost. The laser diodes’ temperatures are monitored by two thermistors that are potted in the
heatsink to access the base of the laser diodes. Temperature measurement is performed at the base of the
laser diodes, as their bases are the source of heat during operation. To minimize thermal resistance
between the diodes and the thermistors, thermistors will be potted with minimal heatsink material
between them and the laser diodes’ bases. The selected thermometer is a thermistor with an analog-to
digital conversion circuit (see Appendix D). The decision to use a thermistor instead of a digital
temperature sensor or a thermocouple is outside of the scope of the scope of this report but will be
included in future documentation.
The module also features two M3x0.5 threaded holes, which will be used to mount the laser diode boards
to the heatsink, and also during testing to mount the laser diode module as needed.
The laser diode module’s aluminum heatsink body also features a locating edges and extrusion for ease of
assembly and quality of adhesion when mounted to the integrating sphere.
Table 3: Laser diode heatsink design requirements
Design Requirement Solution
Mount laser diodes Thorlabs S7060R - Laser Diode Socket for Ø5.6 mm Laser, 3 Pin
Drive laser diodes Thorlabs MLD203P2 - Constant Power LD Driver, SMT Package, for Pin Codes C and D
Monitor laser diode temperatures TDK Electronics B57861S0103F040 THERMISTOR NTC 10KOHM 3988K BEAD
Regulate laser diode temperatures Lase diode module heat sinks
PHYS 490 ORCASat and ALTAIR Development 14
University of Victoria Department of Physics
Figure 14: Laser diode module, isometric
Figure 15: Laser diode module, top view
Figure 16: Laser diode module, left view
PHYS 490 ORCASat and ALTAIR Development 15
University of Victoria Department of Physics
Figure 17: Laser diode module, left laser diode section view
To minimize noise, laser drive circuitry would ideally be located in the laser module. It was moved off
due to size constraints, leaving a small laser module PCB mounted to the top of the laser diode heat sink
modules (not shown in figures, see appendix A for laser diode circuit board schematic and pcb) that will
feature two thermistors and a 660 nm laser diode and one of a 405 nm, a 840 nm, or 980 nm laser diode.
Figure 18: Laser diode PCB, top-view (designed by Trevor Zakus for ECE 490)
Instead of soldering the thermistors (that has their own wiring off-the shelf) directly to the heatsink board,
a two-pin connector will connect the thermistor to the board so that it can be swapped out or changed
during the design process. Off-the-shelf 3M 203-6970-50-0602J laser diode sockets will connect the laser
diode to the heatsink board. Although the LP660 and LP840 laser diodes are shown in figures, the LP980
is also compatible as all three laser diodes use the same 5.6 mm diameter TO can case. However, the 405
nm laser diode requires 5V, and the MLD203P1 laser diode driver (for pin code B laser diodes, se figure
21) can only deliver 3V. Thus, a modified laser diode driver board is being investigated from Thorlabs.
PHYS 490 ORCASat and ALTAIR Development 16
University of Victoria Department of Physics
Figure 19: Laser diode PCB, bottom view (designed by Trevor Zakus for ECE 490)
Figure 20: 3M 203-6970-50-0602J laser diode socket
The electrical layout of the optical payload will be summarized here, but not discussed (see Appendix D).
Details are outside of the scope of this report.
A five-pin cable will connect the heatsink board to the laser driver board, located on the payload PC104
motherboard located next to the integrating sphere in the payload module. On the five-pin cable, three
pins are for the laser diode and its built-in photodiode (they share a common ground but have separate
anodes), and two pins for the thermistor. This cable was selected to based on the peak current drawn by
the laser diode, and on the assumption that it the cable would not require shielding. If shielding is found
to be necessary during testing, then this cable will be reconsidered. This same five-pin cable is also used
elsewhere on the spacecraft, allowing for shared parts compatibility and expensive crimping tools.
PHYS 490 ORCASat and ALTAIR Development 17
University of Victoria Department of Physics
Figure 21: Payload PC104 motherboard design, top view (designed by Evan Moore for ECE 490)
Figure 22: Payload PC104 motherboard design, front view (designed by Evan Moore for ECE 490)
Testing For full test procedures, see the “Laser Wings and Optical Stops Test Plan” document.
Testing progress included basic electronics functionality testing, unobstructed laser light testing, and the
effect of optical stops on laser light testing. Testing was performed on the L660P120 laser diode and the
MLD203P2E driver with a Thorlabs MLDEVAL board. Results of the basic electronics testing included
PHYS 490 ORCASat and ALTAIR Development 18
University of Victoria Department of Physics
successful operation of the 660 nm laser diode using the MLD203P2E laser driver and the MLDEVAL
board. Results of the optical stop testing include photographs of incident light on the target wall to
investigate the presence of laser wings and the laser speckle’s uniformity, and a calculation of the laser’s
angle of spread in its main diameter and in its wing.
Due to social-distancing and the COVID-19 pandemic, these tests were performed at a member’s home
using equipment from the ORCASat lab in UVic’s Centre for Aerospace Research. Tests were performed
in a basement room at night with blinds and a blackout curtain on the windows, with no other light
sources present in the room (aside from the single green light on the MLDEVAL board itself—see light
blocker in figure 24). The optical stops were positioned as close to the front of the laser diode heatsink as
possible. Due to the equipment available, this was at 0.375 inches from the front of the laser diode
heatsink (except for the tests of the 5/64 inch and 1/16 inch diameter optical stop holes, which were at
0.500 inches and 0.750 inches respectively due to equipment limitations).
While these tests served as a successful initial examination of basic laser diode electronic and optical
properties, the next round of testing should incorporate a custom 3D-Printed test assembly, to allow for
the optical stop plate to be placed as near to the laser diode heat sink as possible (and at adjustable
distances), while ensuring the alignment and proper relative orientation of the laser diode and the optical
stops.
Figure 23: Test Setup, Diagram
PHYS 490 ORCASat and ALTAIR Development 19
University of Victoria Department of Physics
Figure 24: Home Test Setup, Top View
Figure 25: Home Test Setup, Front View
PHYS 490 ORCASat and ALTAIR Development 20
University of Victoria Department of Physics
Figure 26: Home Test Set-up, Back View
Figure 27: Home Test Setup, Diode View
Basic Electronics Functionality
Introduction
The basic electronics functionality test was comprised of basic electronics tests of the L660P120 laser
diode and the MLD203P2E driver on the MLDEVAL board, including:
• Verifying that the laser diodes turn on and off
• Verifying that the laser diode driver power control is operational
Results
This test successfully verified that the 660 nm laser diode could be turned on and off and have its input
power controlled by the laser diode driver using the potentiometers on the MLDEVAL board.
PHYS 490 ORCASat and ALTAIR Development 21
University of Victoria Department of Physics
Discussion
Once the MLDEVAL board was set up according to its operation manual with the 660 nm laser diode (pin
code C) and the MLD203P2E laser diode driver, the 660 nm laser diode would still not turn on by fine
adjustment of the potentiometer P2 as recommended in the operation manual. Note that the potentiometer
P2 does not have a clockwise or counter clockwise limit position as is suggested in the MLDEVAL
operation manual. Thus, as the laser diode only operates in a small voltage window, the variable
resistance across P2 had to be accurately measured to get within operational voltage range. Once in range,
the laser diode could be turned on and off and have its power adjusted the fine adjustment of the
potentiometer P2 on the MLDEVAL board.
Furthermore, it was realized that the 405 nm laser diode (pin code B) could not run with the MLD203P1E
laser diode driver as the 405nm laser diode requires 5V and the MLD203P1E can provide a maximum of
3V. Thus, a quote is being sought from Thorlabs for an alternative laser diode driver that can run the 405
nm laser diode, and that ideally would have the same form factor and interference requirements as the
MLD203P2E and MLD203P1E laser diode drivers to be compatible with the payload’s electrical design.
This form factor and interference requirement is outside of the scope of this report but will be included in
future documentation.
This test can also be performed for the 840 nm and 980 nm laser diodes once an infra-red camera is
obtained—this will likely be a modified raspberry pi camera.
Unobstructed Laser Light and Effect of Optical Stops The unobstructed laser light and effect of optical stops test was comprised of basic optical tests of the 660
nm laser diode, including:
• Examining the spread of laser light from the L660P120 laser diode
• Examining the presence of laser light “wings” from the incident laser light
• Examining the effect of various sizes of optical stops on laser light spread and laser lights wings
Results
Figure 28: Laser light spread (28 [in] diameter) at 44.5 [in] with no optical stop
PHYS 490 ORCASat and ALTAIR Development 22
University of Victoria Department of Physics
Figure 29: Laser light spread (10 [in] diameter) at 44.5 [in] with 11/64 [in] optical stop at 0.375 [in]
Figure 30: Laser light spread (4.5 [in] diameter) at 44.5 [in] with 3/32 [in] optical stop at 0.375 [in]
PHYS 490 ORCASat and ALTAIR Development 23
University of Victoria Department of Physics
Figure 31: Laser light spread (2.5 [in] diameter) at 44.5 [in] with 1/16 [in] optical stop at 0.75 [in]
For complete set of test photos, see appendix F.
Table 4: Unobstructed laser light and optical stops testing data
Discussion
Using collected data, angles of spread for the incident laser light and maximum wing were determined—
note that a single wing was visible in all tests aside from the very last test that had no wing (1/16 inch
optical stop at 0.75 inch in front of laser diode heatsink). All tests that used an optical stop also
demonstrated a uniform speckle pattern inside of the incident diameter.
Diameter of optical stop used [in] Incident diameter of light [in] Laser diode heatsink distance to optical stop [in] Maximum Normal Wing Length [in]
0 28 0 18
13/64 12.5 0.375 10
3/16 11 0.375 9
11/64 10 0.375 8
5/32 9 0.375 8
9/64 8.5 0.375 8
1/8 7 0.375 6.5
7/64 6 0.375 5
3/32 4.5 0.375 4
5/64 4 0.5 5
1/16 2.5 0.75
**Distance from laser diode heatsink front to target wall: 44.5 [in]
PHYS 490 ORCASat and ALTAIR Development 24
University of Victoria Department of Physics
Figure 32: Examination of incident light features
The spread angle for the incident laser light was calculated as:
𝜃 = arcsin (
𝐷2
44.5 [𝑖𝑛])
With D = Incident diameter of light in inches.
Table 5:Spread angles of incident diameters of light of unobstructed laser light and optical stops
PHYS 490 ORCASat and ALTAIR Development 25
University of Victoria Department of Physics
Figure 33: Plot of laser diode spread angle vs optical stop diameter
The spread angle of wings of unobstructed laser light and optical stops was calculated as:
𝛼 = arcsin (
𝐷2 + 𝑊
44.5 [𝑖𝑛])
With D = Incident diameter of light in inches, and W = Maximum normal wing length in inches.
Table 6: Spread angles of wings of unobstructed laser light and optical stops
y = 44.682x - 1.054
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
9.00
0 1/20 1/10 3/20 1/5 1/4
Lase
r Sp
read
An
gle
[deg
]
Optical Stop Diameter [in]
660 nm Laser Diode Laser Spread Angle vs. Optical Stop Diameter at 44.5 [in] Dist. to Wall
PHYS 490 ORCASat and ALTAIR Development 26
University of Victoria Department of Physics
Figure 34: Plot of spread angle of maximum wing length vs optical stop diameter
As shown in the plots above, this test reveals that the spread angle for incident light increases linearly
with the diameter of the optical stop, up to a maximum angle of 18 degrees (with no optical stop), and that
the max wing spread angle also increases linearly with the diameter of the optical stop, up to a maximum
angle of 45 degrees (with no optical stop). This suggests that an optical stop could be of value to the laser
diode heatsink design, and that a second round of testing on the effect of optical stops should be
performed to determine what size of optical stop should be used on the spacecraft, and what the distance
between the optical stop and the laser diode need be.
Therefore this test successfully revealed a roughly circular spread of speckled laser light from the
L660P120 laser diode on a flat, perpendicular target surface; revealed the presence of a single laser light
wing; and demonstrated that optical stops can effectively minimize the spread angle of both the incident
light diameter and the wing from the L660P120 laser diode.
Next Steps Immediate next steps in designing and testing the ORCASat Optical Payload include: testing the power
output of the 660 nm laser diode with a Thorlabs optical power meter, designing a test jig for further
optical stops testing for the L660P laser diode, inquiring with Thorlabs about a modified laser diode
driver that can provide 5V to operate the 405 nm laser diode, testing various combinations of laser diodes
and photodiodes, thermal simulation of laser diodes and laser diode heatsinks, and optical simulation of
laser diode beams inside the integrating sphere.
Conclusion Work completed during the January 6th to April 24th period has included extensive design development
and preliminary testing of the ORCASat optical payload.
Design development was focused on situating the laser diodes parallel and as close together as possible,
such that the light from the two lasers strikes the opposite side of the integrating sphere interior surface in
as similar a way as possible. This will minimize the difference between light intensities measured by the
two onboard photodiodes. As such, this design development includes mechanical designs and drawings of
y = 121.59x - 2.9691
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 1/20 1/10 3/20 1/5 1/4
Max
Win
g Sp
read
An
gle
[deg
]
Optical Stop Diameter [in]
660 nm Laser Diode Max Wing Spread Angle vs. Optical Stop Diameter at 44.5 [in] Dist. to Wall
PHYS 490 ORCASat and ALTAIR Development 27
University of Victoria Department of Physics
the vertical integrating sphere and laser diode heatsinks, electrical designs and drawings of the laser diode
boards and laser diode driver boards and design planning for the transimpedance amplifier.
Two tests were also completed: a test of the basic electronics functionality of the L660P120 laser diode,
the MLD203P2E laser diode driver, and the MLDEVAL board; and a test of the L660P120’s laser light
spread when unobstructed and affected by optical stops of various standard sizes. The basic electronics
test revealed that the L660P120 laser diode, the MLD203P2E driver, and the MLDEVAL board are all
functional (and that the MLDEVAL board need be very finely tuned to remain in an operational voltage
range). The test of the laser light’s spread revealed that the L660P120 laser diode produces a roughly-
circular spread of speckled incident light on a flat, perpendicular surface with a maximum main-diameter
spread angle of 18 degrees and a single wing with a maximum spread angle of 45 degrees. This test also
revealed that optical stops can greatly reduce the spread angles of the main-diameter and the wing.
References (This is an internal document. Formal list of references also available upon request)
Optical Payload Subsystem Design and Development for ORCASat – Peter Ogilvie
Airborne Laser for Telescopic Atmospheric Interference Reduction Payload – Alex Dokjnas
MECH 400 - Final Report UVic Satellite Design Payload – Gregory Perry, Roderick Gravouille, and
James Sease
ECE 490 – Progress Report – Evan Moore and Trevor Zakus
PHYS 490 ORCASat and ALTAIR Development 28
University of Victoria Department of Physics
Appendices
Appendix A: Spring 2018 Optical Payload Design (HOMATHKO)
Figure 35: Homathko’s Optical Payload Design, isometric view
Figure 36: Homathko’s Optical Payload Design, front view
Figure 37: Homathko’s Optical Payload Design, right view
PHYS 490 ORCASat and ALTAIR Development 29
University of Victoria Department of Physics
Appendix B: Summer 2019 Optical Payload Design (ORCASat)
Figure 38: ORCASat’s First Optical Payload Design, isometric view
Figure 39: ORCASat’s First Optical Payload Design, front view
Figure 40: ORCASat’s First Optical Payload Design, right view
PHYS 490 ORCASat and ALTAIR Development 30
University of Victoria Department of Physics
Appendix C: Winter 2020 Optical Payload Design (ORCASat)
Figure 41: ORCASat’s Second Optical Payload Design, isometric view
Figure 42: ORCASat’s Second Optical Payload Design, front view
Figure 43: ORCASat’s Second Optical Payload Design, right view
PHYS 490 ORCASat and ALTAIR Development 31
University of Victoria Department of Physics
Appendix D: Electrical Circuit Schematics
Figure 44: Laser diode heatsink circuit board schematic (designed by Trevor Zakus for ECE 490)
Figure 45: Laser diode driver circuit board schematic (designed by Evan Moore for ECE 490)
PHYS 490 ORCASat and ALTAIR Development 32
University of Victoria Department of Physics
Figure 46: Temperature-monitoring circuit schematic (designed by Evan Moore for ECE 490)
Figure 47: Payload motherboard circuit schematic (designed by Evan Moore for ECE 490)
PHYS 490 ORCASat and ALTAIR Development 33
University of Victoria Department of Physics
Appendix E: Test Plan Objectives To complete its primary functions (generate target light of two constant wavelengths and constant powers
in low earth orbit that can be observed by ground-based telescopes during an observation period, and
measure the optical power of the generated light onboard the spacecraft), mission requirements for
ORCASat’s optical payload were set to include:
• Minimum Optical Power Output of 80mW
• Wavelength drift maximum of 10nm
• Center Wavelength Determination of 0.25nm
• RMS power noise needs to be less than 1%
• Light Visible for an Observer at Sea Level Apparent Magnitude: 12 - 22
• 50 samples per second minimum for light measurements from the photodiode
• The laser needs to emit for minimum 2 seconds continuously without overheating
• The payload to be able to operate within -40 to +65 degrees Celsius
To verify that these mission requirements are met, a test plan is being developed for the Optical Payload.
First, the laser diode module’s operation and design will be tested. Testing of the entire Optical Payload
including the integrating sphere will be the subject of future documentation.
Laser Diode Module Test Plan Verification tests for laser diode module operation and design are outlined here, many of which are pulled
from Evan Moore and Trevor Zakus’ ECE 490 report. Full test procedures for each test will be the subject
of future documentation.
1. Basic Electronics Functionality
This first test will follow PCB population, and is comprised of several basic electronics checks, including:
• Laser diodes turn on and off.
• Laser diode driver power control is operational.
• Thermistor is reading temperature.
2. Basic Optical Properties of Laser Diodes
To examine the basic properties of the laser diodes used in this design, this test will include:
• Examining laser diodes’ bare light pattern (on the wall in a dark room).
• Examining laser diodes’ light pattern alongside basic optical stops of various sizes.
3. Optical Noise Measurement
• Examining the stability of the laser system by measuring the laser diodes’ output optical
power using an optical power meter to measure a high sample rate of light intensity. Note that
changes of a frequency lower than that which is measurable by the TIA sample rate would be
acceptable. Although this TIA threshold is currently unknown (the TIA has not yet been
designed), preliminary readings of the laser diodes’ optical noise are important.
4. Thermistor Calibration
• Calibrating the thermistor using high-quality temperature measurements in 0.5 °C steps.
5. Active Power Control Accuracy
• Examining the accuracy of the laser diode driver power measurement by sending a power
level to the digital to analog converter while measuring the laser diode driver’s power output
• Examining the responsiveness of the laser diode driver by measuring the output power of the
laser diode driver while changing its desired output power.
PHYS 490 ORCASat and ALTAIR Development 34
University of Victoria Department of Physics
6. Temperature Gradient Between Laser Diode Case and Heatsink
• Examining the error between the temperature measured by the thermistor potted in the laser
diode heatsink and the temperature of the laser diode case (using a laser diode with a built-in
thermistor).
7. Wavelength Drift per Temperature Variation
• Examining the laser diodes’ emitted wavelength drift due to the laser diodes’ temperatures by
measuring the laser diodes’ output wavelength with a spectrum analyzer while
simultaneously measuring the laser diode heatsink’s temperature using its potted thermistor.
Ideally this test will be performed at each laser diodes’ maximum output power, but that may
be limited by available spectrum analyzers.
8. Failure of Laser Diode Driver
• Rigorously examining how Thorlabs laser drivers fail, and what makes them fluctuate.
9. Laser Diode Temperature-testing in Vacuum
• Examining the laser diode heat sink’s thermal response in vacuum by measuring its
temperature while operational in vacuum for the maximum operational time.
PHYS 490 ORCASat and ALTAIR Development 35
University of Victoria Department of Physics
Appendix F: Unobstructed Laser Light and Effect of Optical Stops Photos
Figure 48: Incident laser light with no optical stop, featuring a 28” main diameter and an 18” wing, 44.5”
away.
Figure 49: Incident laser light with a 13/64" optical stop at 0.375", featuring a 12.5" main diameter and a
10" wing 44.5" away.
Figure 50: Incident laser light with a 3/16" optical stop at 0.375", featuring a 11" main diameter and a 9"
wing 44.5" away.
PHYS 490 ORCASat and ALTAIR Development 36
University of Victoria Department of Physics
Figure 51: Incident laser light with a 11/64" optical stop at 0.375", featuring a 10" main diameter and a
8" wing 44.5" away.
Figure 52: Incident laser light with a 5/32" optical stop at 0.375", featuring a 9" main diameter and a 8"
wing 44.5" away.
PHYS 490 ORCASat and ALTAIR Development 37
University of Victoria Department of Physics
Figure 53: Incident laser light with a 9/64" optical stop at 0.375", featuring a 8.5" main diameter and a 8"
wing 44.5" away.
Figure 54:Incident laser light with a 1/8" optical stop at 0.375", featuring a 7" main diameter and a 6.5"
wing 44.5" away.
Figure 55: Incident laser light with a 13/64" optical stop at 0.375", featuring a 6" main diameter and a 5"
wing 44.5" away.
PHYS 490 ORCASat and ALTAIR Development 38
University of Victoria Department of Physics
Figure 56: Incident laser light with a 3/32" optical stop at 0.375", featuring a 4.5" main diameter and a 4"
wing 44.5" away.
Figure 57: Incident laser light with a 5/64" optical stop at 0.500", featuring a 4" main diameter and a 5"
wing 44.5" away.
Figure 58: Incident laser light with a 1/16" optical stop at 0.750", featuring a 2.5" main diameter no wing
44.5" away.
ORCASat Optical Payload
0.003"
A A
B B
C C
D D
E E
F F
4
4
3
3
2
2
1
1
DRAWN
CHK'D
APPV'D
MFG
Q.A
UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED:DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHESSURFACE FINISH:TOLERANCES: LINEAR: ANGULAR:
FINISH: DEBURR AND BREAK SHARP EDGES
NAME SIGNATURE DATE
MATERIAL:
DO NOT SCALE DRAWING REVISION
TITLE:
DWG NO.
SCALE:1:2 SHEET 1 OF 14
A4
WEIGHT:
ORCA PayloadSOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only.
Bill of Materials
ITEM NO. PART NUMBER DESCRIPTION QTY.
1 RotatedSecondHeatsink_Double_Down Laser Diode Heatsink 1
2RotatedSecondIntegrating sphere Front Double Down
Integrating Sphere Front Hemisphere 1
3 Rotatedlaser-socket Laser Diode Socket 2
4RotatedSecond Integrating sphere Back
Integrating Sphere Back Hemisphere 1
5 96126A121 Shoulder Screw 2
6 RotatedSecondL660P120-Solidworks Red Laser Diode 1
7 RotatedSecondL850P200-Solidworks IR Laser Diode 1
8 Rotated Support Ring Integrating Sphere Support Ring 1
9 Rotated Retainer Laser Diode Heatsink Retaining Ring 1
A A
B B
C C
D D
E E
F F
4
4
3
3
2
2
1
1
DRAWN
CHK'D
APPV'D
MFG
Q.A
UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED:DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHESSURFACE FINISH:TOLERANCES: LINEAR: ANGULAR:
FINISH: DEBURR AND BREAK SHARP EDGES
NAME SIGNATURE DATE
MATERIAL:
DO NOT SCALE DRAWING REVISION
TITLE:
DWG NO.
SCALE:1:2 SHEET 2 OF 14
A4
WEIGHT:
ORCA Payload
0.003"
SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only.
2.162
2.555
BHS2.362
A
A
M2.5 CLEARANCE8 PLCS 0.059
0.941
1.
929
SECTION A-ASCALE 1 : 1
SECTION A-ASCALE 2 : 1
Integrating SphereFront Hemisphere
Al 6061-T6
0.003"
A A
B B
C C
D D
E E
F F
4
4
3
3
2
2
1
1
DRAWN
CHK'D
APPV'D
MFG
Q.A
UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED:DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHESSURFACE FINISH:TOLERANCES: LINEAR: ANGULAR:
FINISH: DEBURR AND BREAK SHARP EDGES
NAME SIGNATURE DATE
MATERIAL:
DO NOT SCALE DRAWING REVISION
TITLE:
DWG NO.
SCALE:1:2 SHEET 3 OF 14
A4
WEIGHT:
ORCA PayloadSOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only.
0°
22.5°
67.5° 112.5°
157
.5°
202.5° 225°
315°
337
.5°
0.003"
A A
B B
C C
D D
E E
F F
4
4
3
3
2
2
1
1
DRAWN
CHK'D
APPV'D
MFG
Q.A
UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED:DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHESSURFACE FINISH:TOLERANCES: LINEAR: ANGULAR:
FINISH: DEBURR AND BREAK SHARP EDGES
NAME SIGNATURE DATE
MATERIAL:
DO NOT SCALE DRAWING REVISION
TITLE:
DWG NO.
SCALE:1:2 SHEET 4 OF 14
A4
WEIGHT:
ORCA PayloadSOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only.
0°
30°
150°
D
D E
E
0.250
0.0
20
30°
0.938 0
.087
SECTION D-DSCALE 1 : 1
0.020
30°
0.938 0.087
SECTION E-ESCALE 1 : 1
0.250
0.70 INC
H CLO
SE FIT
(LOC
ATIN
G FEA
TURE)
0.250
0.70
INC
H C
LOSE
FIT
(LO
CA
TING
FEA
TURE
)
0.003"
0.003"
A A
B B
C C
D D
E E
F F
4
4
3
3
2
2
1
1
DRAWN
CHK'D
APPV'D
MFG
Q.A
UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED:DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHESSURFACE FINISH:TOLERANCES: LINEAR: ANGULAR:
FINISH: DEBURR AND BREAK SHARP EDGES
NAME SIGNATURE DATE
MATERIAL:
DO NOT SCALE DRAWING REVISION
TITLE:
DWG NO.
SCALE:1:2 SHEET 5 OF 14
A4
WEIGHT:
ORCA PayloadSOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only.
K
K
0.142
30°
0.938
0.0
67
0.0
87
SECTION K-KSCALE 1 : 1
0.625 INCH CLOSE FIT
(LOCATING FEATURE)
0.3
54 R0.12
1.0
69
0.003"
A A
B B
C C
D D
E E
F F
4
4
3
3
2
2
1
1
DRAWN
CHK'D
APPV'D
MFG
Q.A
UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED:DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHESSURFACE FINISH:TOLERANCES: LINEAR: ANGULAR:
FINISH: DEBURR AND BREAK SHARP EDGES
NAME SIGNATURE DATE
MATERIAL:
DO NOT SCALE DRAWING REVISION
TITLE:
DWG NO.
SCALE:1:2 SHEET 6 OF 14
A4
WEIGHT:
ORCA PayloadSOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only.
1.9
29
2.
555
BHS R1.18
C
C
M2.5 CLEARANCE8 PLCS
0.059
2.
044
SECTION C-CSCALE 1 : 1
Al 6061-T6
Integrating Sphere Back Hemisphere
0.003"
0.003"
A A
B B
C C
D D
E E
F F
4
4
3
3
2
2
1
1
DRAWN
CHK'D
APPV'D
MFG
Q.A
UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED:DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHESSURFACE FINISH:TOLERANCES: LINEAR: ANGULAR:
FINISH: DEBURR AND BREAK SHARP EDGES
NAME SIGNATURE DATE
MATERIAL:
DO NOT SCALE DRAWING REVISION
TITLE:
DWG NO.
SCALE:1:2 SHEET 7 OF 14
A4
WEIGHT:
ORCA PayloadSOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only.
0°
22.5°
67.5° 112.5°
157
.5°
202.5° 225°
315°
337
.5°
0.003"
0.003"
A A
B B
C C
D D
E E
F F
4
4
3
3
2
2
1
1
DRAWN
CHK'D
APPV'D
MFG
Q.A
UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED:DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHESSURFACE FINISH:TOLERANCES: LINEAR: ANGULAR:
FINISH: DEBURR AND BREAK SHARP EDGES
NAME SIGNATURE DATE
MATERIAL:
DO NOT SCALE DRAWING REVISION
TITLE:
DWG NO.
SCALE:1:2 SHEET 8 OF 14
A4
WEIGHT:
ORCA PayloadSOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only.
2.054
2.565
2.713
BHS 2.362
LL
M2.5x0.458 PLCS
0 0.098 0.157 SECTION L-L
Integrating SphereSupport Ring
0.003"
A A
B B
C C
D D
E E
F F
4
4
3
3
2
2
1
1
DRAWN
CHK'D
APPV'D
MFG
Q.A
UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED:DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHESSURFACE FINISH:TOLERANCES: LINEAR: ANGULAR:
FINISH: DEBURR AND BREAK SHARP EDGES
NAME SIGNATURE DATE
MATERIAL:
DO NOT SCALE DRAWING REVISION
TITLE:
DWG NO.
SCALE:1:1 SHEET 9 OF 14
A4
WEIGHT:
ORCA PayloadSOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only.
0°
22.5°
67.5° 112.5°
157
.5°
202.5° 225°
315°
337
.5°
A A
B B
C C
D D
E E
F F
4
4
3
3
2
2
1
1
DRAWN
CHK'D
APPV'D
MFG
Q.A
UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED:DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHESSURFACE FINISH:TOLERANCES: LINEAR: ANGULAR:
FINISH: DEBURR AND BREAK SHARP EDGES
NAME SIGNATURE DATE
MATERIAL:
DO NOT SCALE DRAWING REVISION
TITLE:
DWG NO.
SCALE:1:1 SHEET 10 OF 14
A4
WEIGHT:
ORCA Payload
0.003"
SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only.
1.25 INCHNOM.
0.000
0.236
0.500
0.236
0.500 0
0
.128
0.3
74
0.1
28
0.3
74
0.1
33
0.1
33
60° 0.069
0
0.648
1.052
0
0.1
4 0
.04
0.2
4 0
.51
0.6
1 0
.71
0.7
5
0.710
Laser Diode Heatsink
Al 6061-T6
0.003"
A A
B B
C C
D D
E E
F F
4
4
3
3
2
2
1
1
DRAWN
CHK'D
APPV'D
MFG
Q.A
UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED:DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHESSURFACE FINISH:TOLERANCES: LINEAR: ANGULAR:
FINISH: DEBURR AND BREAK SHARP EDGES
NAME SIGNATURE DATE
MATERIAL:
DO NOT SCALE DRAWING REVISION
TITLE:
DWG NO.
SCALE:2:1 SHEET 11 OF 14
A4
WEIGHT:
ORCA PayloadSOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only.
4-40 UNC 2 PLCS
M3x0.5 2 PLCS
0.25 INCH CLEARANCELOOSE FIT2 PLCS
R0.063 FILLET
4 PLCS
0.232(6MM)
2 PLCS
0.177(4.5MM)THRU 2 PLCS
6MM CLEARNACE
LOOSE FIT
2 PLCS
NNOO
0
0.315 0.394 0.632 0.671
0.868 0.880
SECTION N-N
0
0.671
SECTION O-O
0.003"
A A
B B
C C
D D
E E
F F
4
4
3
3
2
2
1
1
DRAWN
CHK'D
APPV'D
MFG
Q.A
UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED:DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHESSURFACE FINISH:TOLERANCES: LINEAR: ANGULAR:
FINISH: DEBURR AND BREAK SHARP EDGES
NAME SIGNATURE DATE
MATERIAL:
DO NOT SCALE DRAWING REVISION
TITLE:
DWG NO.
SCALE:2:1 SHEET 12 OF 14
A4
WEIGHT:
ORCA PayloadSOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only.
0.
625
0
0.319
0.015
0.003"
A A
B B
C C
D D
E E
F F
4
4
3
3
2
2
1
1
DRAWN
CHK'D
APPV'D
MFG
Q.A
UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED:DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHESSURFACE FINISH:TOLERANCES: LINEAR: ANGULAR:
FINISH: DEBURR AND BREAK SHARP EDGES
NAME SIGNATURE DATE
MATERIAL:
DO NOT SCALE DRAWING REVISION
TITLE:
DWG NO.
SCALE:2:1 SHEET 13 OF 14
A4
WEIGHT:
ORCA PayloadSOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only.
R0.123
R0.114
R0.073FILLET4 PLCS
0.136THRU2 PLCS
0.125 INCH CLEARANCE
LOOSE FIT
2 PLCS 0
0
.016
0
.031
0.1
28
0.1
23
0.0
16
0.0
31
0.1
28
0.1
23
0 0.016
0.236
0.236
0.016
0
0.09 0.13
Laser Diode Heat SinkRetaining Ring
0.003"
ABS PLASTIC
NOTE:-3D PRINTED ABS TO BE TESTED FOR THERMAL PROPERTIES.-3D PRINTED ABS DOES SATISFY NASA OUTGASSING REQ.
A A
B B
C C
D D
E E
F F
4
4
3
3
2
2
1
1
DRAWN
CHK'D
APPV'D
MFG
Q.A
UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED:DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHESSURFACE FINISH:TOLERANCES: LINEAR: ANGULAR:
FINISH: DEBURR AND BREAK SHARP EDGES
NAME SIGNATURE DATE
MATERIAL:
DO NOT SCALE DRAWING REVISION
TITLE:
DWG NO.
SCALE:5:1 SHEET 14 OF 14
A4
WEIGHT:
ORCA PayloadSOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only.