Philipp Aerni - AGRI Press · 2012. 12. 13. · St.Anthony of Egypt: ... Working for a...
Transcript of Philipp Aerni - AGRI Press · 2012. 12. 13. · St.Anthony of Egypt: ... Working for a...
Green Biotech for Society, 06.12.2012
Philipp Aerni
ETH Zurich &
University of Bern
Overview
1. Dual subordination of farming
4. Aid, Trade and Business in African Agriculture
5. Concluding Remarks
3. European Hypocrisy and Food Sovereignty
2. Causes and consequences of industrial agriculture
> Environmental Variation (abiotic/biotic stress factors)
- Hesiod’s ‘Erga’: ‘unheroic’ focus on practices and tools
to cope with variation. Restraint versus hybris
> Political Control (conquest > land ownership>power)
- Agriculture as the base of civilization…and domination
> Subject to rule of public (tax) and private agents (lenders)
Old Testament (Deuteronomy 15, Leviticus 25):
Social Policy: Redemption of Property / Debt relief
Ancient civilization ruled by clans with divine legitimacy (Vico)
> Peasants as slaves, serfs, clients of costal warriors
Rational Household management (oikos): Pater familias as
land owner ensures revenues through taxes/rents/unfree labor
Little prestige for entrepreneurship and Innovation (except war)
Hermes: Messenger God (individual adventure, trade, theft)
No incentive to increase in productivity in
Athens and later Rome (surpluses = taxes)
Population pressure offset by war losses
Food from subjected land > zero-sum game
Max Weber: Ancient Culture = Slavery Culture
St.Anthony of Egypt: Passive Protest against Roman terror
Choice to move out of the system > Life in the desert
First Monastery set up in Egypt by St. Pachomius
Walls of protection, rules and work discipline
> First capitalist enterprise (Conrad Zander)
Monasteries as creators of agricultural
innovation: flour mill, brewing, agricultural tools
and techniques in medieval times / Gregor
Mendel in the 19th century: laws of genetics
Capital endowment, no commercial pressure
> commercialization of prototype elsewhere > welfare
Hanseatic League/Renaissance Italy
> Commerce as a driver of peace and human development
(movement for equal rights)
1492: Discovery of the New World
New Crops > troubles (resistance against potato in France)
Reversal to slavery culture: Slave plantations overseas and
rightless farmers in Europe feed European elite
The alternative to slavery plantation was innovation in crop
production, grain trade (chicago board of trade),
transportation (railways), storage (refrigerator)
1789: French Revolution / 1791-1804 Slave Revolt in Haiti
US-Civil War > Abolishment of Slavery
> Morill Act 1962 > Land Grant System
Napoleon failed to reconquer Haiti > Continental
System (award system for import substitutes)
Population Growth thanks to industrial Revolution
> Extension of agriculture at the expense of forests
Crisis of the Allmende (Commons) and the
Manorial System (focused on Self-Sufficiency)
Growth of cities & decline of rent-seeking aristocrats opened
opportunities, enabled structural change, investment in
agriculture and productivity
Elinor Ostrom’s error: local institutions in
Swiss mountain villages were sustainable
because they exported their population surplus
(less people to feed plus possible remittances)
Catch-up growth > exchange in ideas more important
than exchange in commodities > Malthus was wrong
19th century: First unholy alliance between
French farmers and technophobic medical
scholars prevented the import of refrigerated
meat from Argentina > public perception problem
of the refrigerator: distrust of ‘freshness’, no need
for such an unsafe technology (Freidberg 2009)
Resistance against the use of Mendel’s laws in plant
breeding > Germany and France claimed to have their own
breeding methods / biodynamic agriculture
First Hybrid Corn developed in the
1920s at Iowa State University > Birth of
modern Agro-industry
Birth of Agro-industry (~1920)
Invention of fertilizer
Plant Protection Improved irrigation systems
Tractors
Environmental problems
Birth of green gene technology (~1980)
Public sector research dominates
Private sector research increases Great expectations
Die Birth of public resistance against GMOs (~1990)
NGO activities, mass media
No new products on the market > industry concentration
Great public concerns
Hybrid varieties
Prohibitive Regulation
Opposition against GM food merging with Food Sovereignty
movement > GMOs as a symbol for industrial agriculture
and unwanted change („profits before people“)
Lessons learned: emotion prior to reason /
unconscious prior to conscious
Dual framing: Food Sovereignty = people, local, controllable
GMOs = profits, global, uncontrollable > NFP 59 Project
Negative emotional tags > negative public perception
Hansjörg Walter (President of Swiss farmers:
«Everything we import is missing elsewhere»
Self-interest wrapped in a language of
moral concern
Facing Reality in Europe
The biggest famines ocurred in closed socialist systems
with policies of self-sufficiency (China, North Korea, Ethiopia)
José Bové, Vandana Shiva and Prince Charles represent the fears of
the ‚haves‘ about globalization. They „feel“ right. But they may harm
the poor and the environment because they
- use public trust as a private political resource
(burning rather than building bridges)
- export the culture of fear to poor countries that need change
- Start from wrong baseline assumptions:
Farmers before industrial agriculture were not free and
happy. They lived in bondage and were badly nourished
Farms in Africa are not getting bigger but smaller (farming
there is not a lifestyle choice) > structural change is needed
4. Aid, Trade and Business in African Agriculture
Working for a multinational corporation (commodities, retailing)
Working for an international NGO/Donor (aid, policy advocacy)
Working for the government (more
committed to foreign donors)
Problem: Heteronomous Development (not driven by Africans)
What are the best jobs for skilled people in Africa?
Most of these organizations serve
non-African customers, donors
and constituencies
- Africans better educated but low chance to succeed with a formal
business > complying with regulation can be as expensive as in
Europe > lack of empowered middle class
- Africa’s potential begins with the primary sector (structural change)
> Europe: part of the problem rather than part of the solution?
Most trade with Africa is Intra-firm trade of European companies
Investors in Africa as off-shore islands of Europe with CSR standards?
Most aid benefits European consultants, NGOs more than local people
Many African governments tend to accept bad deals if some of it helps to
strenghten the ruling party’s power (historical fact of unholy alliance)
Aid agencies: negative selection (aiming to support to less able rather
than the more able) and foster dishonesty (evalution reports done by
locals often as a copy-paste exercise) > Principal-agent problem
‚Capacity building‘ > Europeans explain why Europe knows better
CAP and opposition to industrial agriculture > declining productivity
growth rates (Europe imports food grown on a surface of Germany)
If Food Sovereignty means closing borders, CH agriculture would collapse
Producing/consuming fresh food locally has always been the
privilege of affluent landowners (symbol of prestige). Today it can be
sustainable if infrastructure is there, otherwise return to old times?
Overcoming trade-offs by facilitating exchange and testing of ideas > innovation, creation of new markets, connecting urban/rural dev
Population Growth Innovation
Institutions
5. Conclusions
We need to move away from the paternalist approach practiced
in aid, trade and regulation with Africa
Europeans do not remember anymore how their countries moved
from poverty to affluence – the Chinese and the Brazilians still do
remember > success of South-South Collaboration
‚Food Sovereignty‘ is based on wrong baseline assumptions
Introducing the history of technological change in
schools and social science departments
Save agriculture departments from environmental
takeover at universities
Most advocates of Food Sovereignty do so because
they „feel“ right. They are mostly chefs, lawyers, bored
agroecologists and political entrepreneurs