PHASE I FIELD ACTIVITIES DATA SUMMARY REPORT FOR …3-6 3-7 4-1 5-1 title phase i field activities...
Transcript of PHASE I FIELD ACTIVITIES DATA SUMMARY REPORT FOR …3-6 3-7 4-1 5-1 title phase i field activities...
I| REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDY
(RI/FS)
I
• Data Summary Report
- Phase I Field Activities
-IM OKLAHOMA REFINING COMPANY (ORC)
SUPERFUND SITE
-I Cyril, Oklahoma
I
• Prepared for
Oklahoma State Department of HealthSuperfund Section
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Contract No. 60716
Bechtel Environmental, Inc. February 1991Houston, Texas
959655
III
1
I
IIII
SUMMARY OF PHASE I FIELD ACTIVITIES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE NUMBER
.1 Table of Contents i
8Appendices i
List of Figures ii
• List of Tables ii
• Glossary iii
• List of Revisions iv
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1-1
• 2.0 GEOLOGY 2-1
3.0 LABORATORY ANALYSES 3-1
B 3.1 Introduction 3-1
3.2 Detected Compounds 3-1
• 3.3 Background 3-2
3.4 Waste Sources 3-2
g 3.5 Groundwater 3-12
3.6 Surface Water and Sediment 3-21
K 3.7 Surface Soil 3-23
3.8 Subsurface Soil 3-26
4.0 GROUNDWATER 4-1
5.0 QUALITY CONTROL/QUALITY ASSURANCE 5-1
APPENDICES .
• APPENDIX A GEOLOGIC LOGS
APPENDIX B MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION REPORTS
ORC Superfund Site Revision 1SUMMARY PHASE I i February 1, 1991
FIGURE NUMBER
SUM 3-1
SUM 3-2
SUM 3-2A
SUM 3-2B
SUM 3-3
SUM 3-4
SUM 4-1
List of Figures
TITLE
SAMPLING LOCATIONS FOR WASTE SOURCES
SAMPLING LOCATIONS FOR GROUNDWATER
BENZENE GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION
AREAS OF FREE HYDROCARBON PRODUCT
SAMPLING LOCATIONS FOR SURFACE WATER ANDSEDIMENTS
SAMPLING LOCATIONS FOR SURFACE SOIL
GROUNDWATER ELEVATION CONTOURS
List of Tables
IIIII
TABLE NUMBER
1-1
3-1
3-2
3-3
3-4
3-5
3-6
3-7
4-1
5-1
TITLE
PHASE I FIELD ACTIVITIES
SUMMARY OF DETECTS/GEOMEDIA
SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTSBACKGROUND SAMPLES
SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTSMAXIMUM CONCENTRATIONS - WASTE SOURCES
SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTSGROUNDWATER
SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTSSURFACE WATER & SEDIMENTS - GLADYSCREEK/ TRIBUTARY/ ACID & CAUSTIC SEEP
SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTSSURFACE SOILS
SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTSSUBSURFACE SOILS
HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY
CHEMICAL CONTAMINANTS FOUND IN BLANKS
ORC Superfund SiteSUMMARY PHASE I ii
Revision 0October 1990
I• GLOSSARY
• BTEX Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, and Xylene
EP TOX Extraction Procedure Toxicity (analysis)
| GC/MS Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (analysis)
— MCL Maximum Contaminant Level as per the Safe Drinking• Water Act
O/HS Organic/Hydrocarbon Scan (analysis)
I PPM Parts Per Million
1
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I ORC Superfund Site • Revision 0SUMMARY PH\SE I iii October 1990
I
LIST OF REVISIONS
DATE REVISION NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF REVISION
10/90
11/90
02/91
0
0
1
Draft Issue
Report Issue
Table of ContentsPages 3-3, 3-5, 3-7, 4-1All Data Summary Tables
ORC Superfund SiteSUMMARY PHASE I iv
Revision 1February 1, 1991
[11.1llllIllll1 11 1llllII
I
•l
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This Phase I summary report was prepared as part of the RemedialInvestigation /Feasibility Study (RI/FS) and Risk Assessment forthe Oklahoma Refining Company (ORC) Superfund Site. It wasprepared for the Superfund Program of the Oklahoma StateDepartment of Health (OSDH) and Region VI of the EnvironmentalProtection Agency (EPA). This study was conducted by BechtelEnvironmental, Inc. (Bechtel) and OSDH. Bechtel prepared allproject plans which included the Work Plan, Field OperationsPlan, Quality Assurance Project Plan, and the Site Health andSafety Plan. OSDH personnel performed most of the samplingactivities during the field investigation and sample analysesreported in this Phase I summary report.
This document summarizes the Phase I field activities performedfor the RI/FS. The emphasis of this report is on the results ofthe analyses performed on the samples obtained during the fieldactivities. .Data obtained on the physical character of the RushSprings aquifer is also briefly discussed. The data presentedin this report was used to develop the Field Operations Plan forPhase II field activities. A list of the major tasks performedduring the Phase I field activities is presented in Table 1-1.
ORC Superfund Site S Revision 0SUMMARY PHASE I 1-1 October 1990
i
TABLE 1-1
PHASE I FIELD ACTIVITIES
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY
MONITORING WELLS CONSTRUCTED
^SHALLOW WELLS 17
INTERMEDIATE WELLS 4
MONITORING WELL AND BORING EVALUATION
EXISTING WELLS GEOPHYSICALLY LOGGED 50
EXISTING WELLS VIDEO LOGGED . 6
NEW WELLS GEOPHYSICALLY LOGGED 20
DEEP BORINGS GEOPHYSICALLY LOGGED 1
BORINGS
SHALLOW WASTE SOURCE BORINGS 25
DEEP BORINGS 1
SAMPLES COLLECTED
WASTE SOURCES
SURFACE WATER 13
SEDIMENT 66
SUBSOIL 29
GROUNDWATER
SHALLOW (Includes 2 product samples) ... 19.,
INTERMEDIATE 7 * •—•
SEDIMENT AND SURFACE WATER 25
SURFACE SOILS 21
SUBSOIL (MONITORING WELLS) 45
* Three of these samples were collected in three intermediatedepth wells that existed onsite before Phase I work began.These wells are identified as Mystery wells (MW). .
ORC Superfund Site Revision 0SUMMARY PHASE I October 1990
1IIII
IIII
II
2.0 GEOLOGY
Cyril, Oklahoma, is situated in the Western Sandhill Region ofsouthwestern Oklahoma. This region is in the Osage Plain of theCentral Lowland Physiographic Province. The Site overlies the axisof a major structural basin named the Anadarko syncline. Theregion is bounded to the north by the Central Kansas Uplift, to thesouthwest by the Amarillo-Wichita Mountains, to the east by theNemaha Ridge, and to the west by the Cimmaron Uplift-Keys Domestructure.
The local geology includes deposits of Quaternary and Permian age.Surface soils are composed of silty and sandy loam soils and gypsumoutcrops. Strata outcroppings of Permian age deposits at ORCinclude the basal Weatherford Member of the Cloud Chief Formationand the underlying Rush Springs Sandstone.
Alluvial soils, primarily silty clay, cover most of the site withthicknesses ranging from 0 to approximately 30 feet. Along GladysCreek 50 feet of canyon-filling alluvium was encountered. Thisalluvium consisted of clay, organic-rich clay, and a few thinlayers of silty sand.
At the ORC Site, the Weatherford Member outcrop is the result oferosion of most of the Cloud Chief Formation. Discontinuouserosional remnants were observed at the site with a maximumthickness of 31.5 feet. The Weatherford Member is primarily gypsumwith intervening shales and siltstones that identify thetransitional zone between the Cloud Chief Formation and RushSprings Sandstone. These intervening layers were not observed inborings drilled during Phase I field activities.
The Rush Springs Sandstone is a red to brown, very fine grained,silty sandstone. The Rush Springs outcrops along Gladys Creek andits tributary and serves as the principal aquifer in the area.Underlying the Rush Springs Sandstone in descending order are theMarlow Formation, Dog Creek Shale, Blaine Formation, FlowerpotShale and the Duncan Sandstone. The deepest Formation penetrated
ORC Superfund Site - Revision 0SUMMARY PHASE I 2-1 October 1990
3.0 LABORATORY ANALYSES
3.1 INTRODUCTION
This section presents a general discussion of the resultsof the laboratory analyses performed on the samples obtainedduring the Phase I field activities. The discussion isdivided into the following five sections:
• BACKGROUND SAMPLES
• WASTE SOURCES
• GROUNDWATER
• SURFACE WATER AND SEDIMENTS
• SURFACE SOIL
• SUBSURFACE SOIL
These discussions are for informational purposes only. Onlybrief interpretational comments with regard to extent ofcontamination, contaminant fate and transport, and potentialhealth risks are made. Additional discussion will beincluded in the RI report.
3.2 DETECTED COMPOUNDS*
A summary of all compounds detected during the Phase I- fieldinvestigation and the associated geomedia is shown onTable 3-1.
ORC Superfund Site * Revision 0SUMMARY PHASE I 3-1 October 1990
SUMMARY OF DETECTS/GEOMEDIA
DETECTED COMPOUNDSINORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTSarsenicbariumberylliumcadmiumchromiumcopper .- , .leadmercurynickelzinc
SEDIMENT OROONDWATER SURFACE WATER SURFACE SOIL SUBSOIL
11ItItItItItItI
1.1ItItItIItI
Note: Wast* tamplM «r» categorized under Mdimcnl umplw.
TABLE 3-1 PAGE1
SUMMARY OF DETECTS/GEOMEDIADETECTED COMPOUNDSORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS1,1,1-trichloroethane1 ,1 -dichtoroethylene1 ,2-dichloroethane1 ,2-<fichloropropane2,4,5- trichlorophenol2,4-dimethyl phenol2-chtorophenol2-hexanone2-methyl phenol2-methylnaphthalene4-methyl phenolacenaphthyleneacenaphtheneacetone totalanthracenebenzenebenzo(a)anthracene>enzo(a)pyrenebenzo(b)fiuranthenebenzo(8,h,i)perylenebenzo(k)fluoranthenebis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalatebutyl benzyl phthalatecarbon disulfidechlordanechlorobenzenechloroformdirysenedibenzoturandibenzo(ah)anthracenediethylphthalatedi-n-butylphthlate
di-n-octylphthalateethylbenzenefluorantneneluoreneindeno(1,2,3 cd)pyrenemethyl ethyl ketonemethylene chloridemethylisobutylketonenaphthalenen-butyl benzenen-propyl benzenepentachlorophenolphenanthrenephenolpyrenesec butylbenzenestyrene
toluenetrichloroethytenet-butyl benzenexylene
SEDIMENT
•
•
OROUNDWATER
«
| •
•
; •
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
*
•
•
*
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
SURFACE WATER
•
•
•
•
•
>•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
*
•
•'
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
SURFACE SOIL
•
*
•
*
•
•
*
•
•
•
•
•
*
•
•
•
*
•
•
•
•
•
•
*
SUBSOIL
•
•
•
•
••
•
••
•
••
".. ••
•
•
•
Note: Wart» Mmp4»» «r» ealagorizad under Mdinonl ennplM.
TABLE 3-1 PAGE 2
IIIIt1II1I1IIIIII
3.3 BACKGROUND SAMPLES
Background data, which represent the naturally occurringgeomedia chemistry, obtained during the Phase I fieldinvestigation are summarized on Table 3-2. This data,although limited, was used for the preliminary data reviewand evaluation process. Additional background data will beobtained during the Phase II field investigation to completethe data evaluation.
Upgradient data, which represent groundwater chemistry priorto groundwater migration onto the site, are summarized inTable 3-2.
3.4 WASTE SOURCES
Sampling of waste sources included surface water, sedimentsand subsoil. Sampling locations for each media are shownon Figure SUM 3-1. A summary of "hits" for all wastesources is included in Table 3-3.
Land Treatment Area
No surface water was in this area.
Metals - Elevated concentrations for arsenic (20 PPM), lead(460 PPM) , chromium (444 PPM) and barium (305 PPM)were detected in the upper 2 feet of soil. EP Tox forlead was < 1 PPM.
rt
GC/MS & 0/HS - No traces of hydrocarbons was detected insoil. Traces of hydrocarbon were detected ingroundwater beneath the land treatment area.
ORC Superfund Site Revision 0SUMMARY PHASE I 3-2 October 1990
I
TABLE 3-2
BACKGROUND SAMPLES
SURFACE WATER
OSDH SAMPLE NO.
38/40
LOCATION
SEDIMENTS 41
SURFACE SOILS 124
SUBSURFACE SOILS 36,37
UPGRADIENTGROUNDWATER 259
DRAINAGE DITCH/GLADYSCREEK
GLADYS CREEK
NORTH OF HIGHWAY 277
SBB-3
SBB-3
NOTE: See Figures SUM 3-2, SUM 3-3, AND SUM 3-4 for sample locations.
ORC Superfund SiteSUMMARY PHASE I
Revision 0October 1990
II1ItI
Iil
II
II1tI
Oil Skinwer Ponds
Metals - Surface water samples were at or below backgroundlevels for all metals except zinc which was 0.145 PPM.Elevated concentrations for arsenic (107 PPM), chromium(530 PPM), and lead (1,313 PPM) were detected in thewaste sediment samples. EP Tox for lead in the wastesamples (6.0 PPM) exceeded the toxic characteristiclevel of 5.0 PPM. The highest concentration for lead(3,725 PPM) was detected in the subsoils and chromium(530 PPM) was highest in the waste. In subsoils, EPTox for chromium was below the toxic characteristiclimit (5 PPM) and EP Tox was exceeded for lead(21.6 PPM).
GC/MS & O/HS - Surface water samples indicated noconcentrations for organics above laboratory detectionlimits. Elevated concentrations for PAHs in the wastesediments include pyrene (19 PPM), phenanthrene(37 PPM) , 2-methylnaphthalene (43 PPM) , and naphthalene(11 PPM). Subsoil samples indicated higherconcentrations for PAHs. Those were pyrene (30 PPM),phenanthrene (55 PPM), 2-methylnaphthalene (180 PPM),and naphthalene (29 PPM). Hydrocarbons were in lowconcentrations for waste sediments and subsoil.
Pump Pits
No surface water was at this location.
Metals - Elevated concentrations for lead (107 PPM) andchromium (27 PPM) were detected in the waste sediments.EP Tox for lead within sediments was below maximumallowable (5 PPM). Subsoil samples indicated elevatedconcentrations for lead (26 PPM) and chromium (25 PPM) .
GC/MS & O/HS - Low concentrations were detected for PAHsin the waste samples. These included <'.2-methylnaphthalene (0.91 PPM) and naphthalene(0.35 PPM). Pentachlorophenol was detected in thewaste at a concentration of 0.68 PPM. Chlorinatedhydrocarbons were detected in low concentration insubsoil samples. These included 1,1,1-trichloroethane(0.32 PPM), chlorobenzene (0.67 PPM), andtrichloroethylene (0.26 PPM). Total hydrocarbons weredetected in elevated concentrations for sediment wastes(154 PPM) and subsoil (1,330 PPM) samples.
ORG Superfund Site : Revision 1SUMMARY PHASE I 3-3 February 1, 1991
Asphalt Pit No« 1
No surface water was at this location.
Metals - A composite sample for five sampling locations inthe 12-inch waste depth had a concentration of 19,390PPM for lead. EP Tox for lead for the sample was ata concentration of 62.7 PPM. The maximum concentrationfor chromium was 193 PPM and EP Tox for chromium wasless than toxic characteristic limit (5 PPM).Concentrations detected in the subsoil samples belowthe waste were at or slightly above backgroundconcentrations.
GC/MS & O/HS - Naphthalene compounds and PAHs were detectedat concentrations between 78-440 PPM and 17-190 PPM,respectively in the waste samples. Very lowconcentrations were detected for PAHs in the subsoilsamples. Hydrocarbons were detected at elevatedconcentrations in the waste sediment (2,420 PPM)sample. Total hydrocarbons for subsoil sample(89.9 PPM) was below standard cleanup levels for soils(typically 100 to 150 PPM).
Slop Oil Ponds
Metals - Surface water samples indicated elevatedconcentrations for arsenic (0.22 PPM and 1.021 PPM) andchromium (0.013 PPM and 0.02 PPM ). Subsoils were atbackground concentrations. Sediments containedelevated concentrations for barium. (436 PPM), chromium(3,820 PPM), copper (255 PPM), and lead (2,348 PPM).EP Tox for lead and chromium were below toxiccharacteristic levels (5 PPM).
ORC Superfund Site Revision 0SUMMARY PHASE I 3-4 October 1990
1I
I
GC/MS & O/HS - Waste sediments contained concentrations ofPAHs. Those include 2-methylnaphthalene (2,000 PPM),acenaphthene (91 PPM), anthracene (110 PPM),benzo(a)anthracene (300 PPM), benzo(b)fluoranthene(120 PPM), benzo(ghi)perylene (258 PPM), benzo(a)pyrene(222 PPM), chrysene (456 PPM), fluorene (170 PPM),naphthalene (350 PPM), phenanthrene (1,100 PPM), andpyrene (830 PPM). Benzene (28 PPM) , toluene (140 PPM) ,ethylbenzene (100 PPM), and xylene (880 PPM)concentrations were also detected. Total hydrocarbonsfor waste sediments was 2,380 PPM. Subsoil samples
} I contained PAHs including 2-methylnaphthalene (100 PPM),\* napthalene (15 PPM), acenaphthene (4.40 PPM),
anthracene (2.50 PPM), benzo(a)pyrene (0.59 PPM),iff chrysene (5.80 PPM), fluoranthene (0.12 PPM),I* phenanthrene (36 PPM), and pyrene (20 PPM). Total
hydrocarbons for subsoil sample was 423 PPM.
it "•*-,.
I fl Old Caustic Storage Pits. *• -
No surface water was at this location.
I
I
iiiiiiii
Metals - Elevated chromium (79 PPM) and lead (346 PPM)concentrations were in subsoils. EP Tox for lead wasless than the toxic characteristic level of 5 PPM.Waste sample had elevated concentration of lead (353PPM) and chromium (133 PPM).
GC/MS & O/HS - There were elevated concentrations of totalhydrocarbons in waste and subsoil. Naphthalenecompounds and PAHs were in very low concentrations.
General - Metals which may have leached from the causticsoda pits into the subsurface soils probably accountfor the high concentrations of metals in the subsurfacesoils. PH tests in the field indicate the waste tobe neutral (pH 7). Caustic soda is highly soluble inwater and the pH of the groundwater most likely hasbeen affected as evidenced by the high pH in the seepdowngradient of the caustic soda pits.
ORC Superfund Site Revision 1SUMMARY PHASE I 3-5 February 1, 1991
t\ Lime soda Storage Pits
\ No surface water was in this area.•*-> - '
Metals - Elevated concentrations for barium (2,510 PPM),chromium (62 PPM), and lead (58 PPM) were detected inwaste samples. EP Tox for barium in a subsoil sample
• (<1 PPM) was less than toxic characteristic level[ (100 PPM). Subsoil sample had elevated concentration
for lead (619 PPM). EP Tox for lead (1.9 PPM) was1 less than the toxic characteristic level (5 PPM).'I'
GC/MS & O/HS - High concentrations were detected forI naphthalene compounds in sediment samples. There was
an elevated concentration of total hydrocarbons in thesediment samples (114 PPM) , and a higher concentration
\ in the subsoil (574 PPM).
! North Pond System
I » Metals - Elevated concentrations in sediments for chromium* (404 PPM), lead (593 PPM), barium (31.4 PPM), mercury
(0.73 PPM) and arsenic (11 PPM) were detected. EP ToxI for lead (0.652 PPM) and chromium (0.047 PPM) were less
than toxic characteristic levels (5 PPM).i Concentrations in subsoil sample from NP-1 were at ori below background levels.
' GC/MS & O/HS - Concentrations of naphthalene compounds,I phenols, PAHs and hydrocarbons were detected in
sediment samples. Very small concentrations of someof these compounds were detected in subsoils. Totalhydrocarbons were 354 PPM in sediment and 3.3 PPM in
i• subsoil sample from NP-1.
ORC Superfund Site Revision 0SUMMARY PHASE I 3-6 October 1990
It
iitri1
tii
ii
Buried Acid Pits
No surface water was at this location.
Metals - Elevated concentration for barium (295 PPM) wasdetected in sediment from Pit BA-3. All other metalsin sediment were at background levels.
GC/M5 & O/HS - Low concentrations of naphthalene compoundsand volatile hydrocarbons (BTEX) were detected insediments. The total hydrocarbons level was at1,500 PPM.
General - Metals in the Acid Pits may have gone intosolution and entered the groundwater regime asevidenced by the high metal concentrations in the acidseeps. During sampling activities testing of the wasteand subsurface soils at BA-1 and BA-3 indicated the pHof the samples to range from pH = 0 to pH = 2.Sampling and testing for pH in BA-2 and by visualobservation of the samples indicated that no wasteexists in the pit.
South Pond System
Metals - Elevated concentrations for arsenic (6.20 PPM),chromium (333 PPM) and lead (131 PPM) were detected inPond SP-2 waste sediment sample. EP Tox for chromium(0.019 PPM) was less than the toxic characteristiclevel(5 PPM). Elevated chromium (170 PPM) was alsodetected in Pond SP-3 waste. EP Tox for chromium(0.043 PPM) was also less than toxic characteristiclevel (5 PPM) in SP-3 waste sample. An elevated
I Jjj concentration for arsenic (9.70 PPM) was also detected\ • in SP-5. ' .;
/ • GC/MS & O/HS - All ponds were below laboratory detection' limits. A small concentration of fluorene (0.11 PPM)
« was detected in Pond SP-5 sediment sample.
.
ORC Superfund Site Revision 1SUMMARY PHASE I 3-7 February 1, 1991
II
Old Storage Pits
No surface water was in this area.
Metals - Elevated concentrations for chromium (934 PPM),lead (2,488 to 20,530 PPM), arsenic (16 PPM), copper(143 PPM), mercury (1.40 PPM), barium (312 PPM), andnickel (30 PPM) were detected in the waste samples. EPTox for lead (9.829 PPM) was higher than toxiccharacteristic level (5 PPM) in the waste sample.Detected low to moderate concentrations for PAHs inthe waste and total hydrocarbons in the waste was high(4,430 PPM). Subsurface soil below the waste hadelevated concentration for lead (117 PPM). Subsoil hadlow concentrations for PAHs except for2-methylnaphthalene (100 PPM).
6C/MS & O/HS - Detected concentrations in wastes ofnaphthalene compounds and PAHs were in the low tomoderate range. There were low concentrations ofhydrocarbons for BTEX. The total hydrocarbons levelwas as high as 4,430 PPM (OS-7). Subsoils indicatedlow concentrations of PAHs and BTEX. Totalhydrocarbons were highest in OS-5 & OS-7 (46.80 PPM,each).
Pitch Pits
No surface water was in this area.. - * *
Metals - Concentrations for metals in waste were at or belowbackground concentrations. Subsoil samples were alsoat or below background.
GC/MS & O/HS - Sediments contained typical concentrationsof PAHs associated with asphaltic pitch. Lowconcentrations of total hydrocarbons were detected inthe waste and subsoils.
ORC Superfund Site Revision 0SUMMARY PHASE I 3-8 October 1990
r*
IIIiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
Asphalt Pits 2 & 3
No surface water was in this area.
Metals - Slightly elevated concentrations were detected insediments for lead and chromium, 42 and 30 PPM,respectively.
GC/MS & O/HS - Sediments contained low concentrations ofPAHs and naphthalene compounds.
Sludge Traps
Metals - Surface waters in the sludge traps had elevatedconcentrations for barium (0.066 PPM), lead(0.112 PPM), zinc (0.145 PPM), copper (0.024 PPM), andchromium (0.02 PPM). Waste contained elevatedconcentrations of chromium (24,020 PPM) in Sludge TrapNo. 4, arsenic (30 PPM) and lead (732 PPM) in SludgeTrap No. 3, and mercury (2.46 PPM) in Sludge TrapNo. 1. EP Tox concentrations were below toxiccharacteristic levels for lead (0.237 PPM) and chromium(2.808 PPM). Subsoil samples had elevatedconcentrations of barium (270 PPM), chromium (44 PPM)and arsenic (10 ppm).
ORC Superfund Site .Revision 0SUMMARY PHASE I 3-9 October 1990
I
I GC/MS & O/HS - Analytical results for surface waters frommost of the sludge traps showed concentrations below
| laboratory detection limits except for Sludge Trap No.' 1 and Sludge Trap No. 3. In each of these
2,4-dimethylphenol (.004 PPM each) and phenol! (0.002 PPM each) were detected in the first sampling
event of the sludge traps early in the Phase I fieldI activities. Waste sediments had low to moderate[ concentrations of PAHs. The highest concentrations for
PAHs was detected in Sludge Trap No. 2. These includedI naphthalene (253 PPM), phenanthrene (260.80 PPM), andI fluorene (78 PPM). Subsequently during field
activities a prolonged rainfall event infiltrated thei shallow groundwater regime causing a significant rise1 in the groundwater table. As a result groundwater, infiltrated the sludge traps and visual contamination( of the sludge traps was observed. A second sampling
event was conducted for Sludge Trap No. 4 as it\ appeared to be impacted the most. Analytical resultsI indicated low concentrations (< 1 PPM) of contamination
from hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the surface water. During) sampling of bottom sediments and subsurface soil below{ the waste visual observation of the samples clearly
indicated the .alluvial soils and sandstone to beI saturated with oily (hydrocarbon) wastes.
METHYLPHENOL SPILL AREAS
During the Phase I field activities a methylphenol spill wasobserved west of tanks 68 and 29 and east of the Spent LimeSoda Trap. Visual observation indicated a red stained areaapproximately 20 feet by 70 feet. A surface soil sample wasobtained for analytical testing. The results are discussedbelow.
Metals - Results indicated elevated concentrations forarsenic (21 PPM), barium (180 PPM), and lead (45 PPM).Slightly elevated concentrations were observed fornickel (10 PPM) and zinc (19 PPM).
ORC Superfund Site ••• Revision 0SUMMARY PHASE I 3-10 October 1990
I
I1I1
iiiiiii
11iiii
GC/MS & o/HS -Results indicated the stained area to becontaminated with phenols. Those included2,4-dimethylphenol (160 PPM), 2-methylphenol (1,700PPM), 4-methylphenol (5,400 PPM), and phenol(4,200 PPM).
While conducting the Phase I field investigation, salvagingoperations were being conducted concurrently by CyrilPetrochemical Company. During the salvaging operations aspill from a tank located near the facility warehouseoccurred on April 30, 1990. The spill was not adequatelycleaned up to prevent future contamination. Two days latera rainfall event occurred and spread contaminants across aparking area east of the warehouse and into nearby sumps.Sample number 61 was collected from the liquid in the sumppit and sample number 62 was collected from surface soil inthe contamination zone. The results are discussed below.
Metals - Concentrations for metals in red liquid sampleNo. 61 indicated elevated concentrations for arsenic(96.55 PPM), chromium (1.338 PPM), lead (0.489 PPM),and nickel (.675 PPM). EP Tox for arsenic indicateda concentration (96.12 PPM) significantly above toxiccharacteristics (0.05 PPM). Concentrations for metalsfrom soil sample (sample No. 62) had elevatedconcentrations for arsenic (70 PPM), barium (310 PPM),cadmium (1.60 PPM), chromium (184 PPM), copper(533 PPM), lead (250 PPM), mercury (6.10 PPM), nickel(30 PPM), and zinc (401 PPM). EP Tox for lead(0.411 PPM), chromium (0.079 PPM), and mercury(0.0056 PPM) were all below toxic characteristic limitsfor each compound. Those are 5 PPM for lead andchromium and 0.2 PPM for mercury. . j
GC/MS & O/HS - Analytical results indicatedconcentrations of phenols in both samples. Sample No.61 contained concentrations of 2,4-dimethylphenol i(750 PPM), 2-methylphenol (4,700 PPM), 4-methylphenol(26,000 PPM), and phenol (39,000 PPM). Concentrationsdetected in sample No. 62 included 2,4-dimethylphenol(200 PPM), 2-methylphenol (160 PPM), 4-methylphenoi(1,800 PPM), and phenol (3,200 PPM).
ORC Superfund Site Revision 0SUMMARY PHASE I 3-11 October 1990
TABLE 3-3SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS
WASTE SOURCES
WASTE SOURCE TYPESAMPLING LOCATIONSMEDIAOSDH SAMPLE NO.
INDICATOR PARAMETERS. PP*alkalinitychloridehardness, totalnitrite-nitrate as NPH (1)specific conductance (2)sulfate
INORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS. PPMarsenicbar Sunberyl linncadmiumchromiuncopperep tox arsenicep tox bar innep tox chromiunep tox leadleadmercurynickelzinc
ORGAN I CS I HS.PPMhydrocarbon scanbenzeneethyl benzene >n-butyl benzenen-propyl benzenesec-butylbenzenetoluene .xylene
(3)SOUTH POND SIS 1 titSP-1WASTE181
82.00
23.0011.00
11.00
12.0031.00
1.33
SP-2WASTE182
6.20118
33329.00
0.02
131
9.7034.00
0.48
SP-3WASTE183
8.60U3
94.0012.00:
11.00'10.0025.00
13.50
0.47 J
WASTE221
215
17026.00
0.04
25.000.4516.0059.00
SP-4WASTEyy»
229
34.0016.00
12.000.3013.0030.00
2.48
0.09 J
0.01 J0.13 J
SP-5WASTE•m
9.7085.00
46.003.70
6.400.286.5016.00
1.26
SP-6WASTE245
9.4068.00
16.005.90
6.40
8.6014.00
2.34
ASPHALT FLOW AREAASPHALT
S8S211
19.00
1934.90
0.05
51.00
19911.00
24200.13 J86.80 J
0.44 J478 J
SBS212
19.00124
11.0018.00
11.00
9.6020.00
0.53
ASPHALTPITHo.1AP-1SBS188
146
17.0025.00
17.00
14.0022.00
12.90
0.47 J
III
LEGENDSW • Surface Water.WASTE - Waste Sediments/Sludges.SBS • Subsurface Soil Below Waste.B « Compound was found in sample
•nd associated blank.J « Indicates on estimated value.P • Possible lab contaminant.(1) Standard Unit (field measurement).(2) unhos/co (field neasurement).(3) Samples for SP-7 ft SP-8 composited
with sample 245.
NOTES1. See Figure BOM 3-1 for waste
source sample locations.2. Where a concentration is not
shown, the compound was belowthe detection limit.
3. Analysis for indicator parametersperformed for surface samples only:Oil Skinner Pond No. 1, Slop OilPond No. 1, Sludge Traps, and Sumpnear Phenol Spi11.
4. Where a concentration is not shownfor EP tox compounds, the compoundwas not analyzed using EP ToxExtraction procedures.
02/08/91
IIIIIIIIIII
I II I1IIIIIIIII
TABLE 3-3SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS
HASTE SOURCES
WASTE SOURCE TYPESAMPLING LOCATIONSMEDIAOSDH SAMPLE NO.
GC/NS.PPM1.1.1-trichloroethane2.4-dimethytphenol2.4-dinitrophenol2-methyi- phenol2-methyln8phthalene4-methyl phenolacenaphtheneecenaphthyleneacetoneanthracenebenzenebenzo(a}anthracenebenzo(a)pyrenebenzo(b)f luoranthenebenio(q.h. Doervlenebenzolk)f luoranthenebis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalatebutylbenzylphthalatecarbon disulfideehlorobenzenechrvsenedi-n-butylphthalatedi-n-octylphthalatedibenzo(ah)anthracenedibenzofurandiethylphthalateethylbenzenef luoranthenefluoreneindeno(1,2,3 cd)pyrenemethyl ethyl ketonemethylene chloridenaphthalenepentachlorophenolphenanthrenephenolpyrenestyrenetoluenetrichloroethylenexylene
(3)SOUTH POND SYSTEMSP-1WASTE181
0.02 P
SP-2WASTE182
0.18 P
SP-3WASTE183
3.80 P0.08 P
WASTE221
0.04 P
SP-4WASTE7??
1.30 P
0.09 P
SP-5WASTE223
0.23 P
0.11
0.09 P
SP-6WASTE245
ASPHALT FLOW AREAASPHALT
S8S211
62.00
35,0011.0028.00
0.66
0.37
1.50 P6.70
6.409.20
0.131.70
2.20
SBS212
' 0.02
0.04
1.50 P
0.02
ASPHALTPITNo.1AP-1SBS188
1.30
0.120.02
6.30 P
0.07
0.05
0.31
1.40 P0.02 P
1.90
0.95
0.03
0.17J 0.19
LEGENDSW • Surface Water.WASTE - Waste Sediments/Sludges.SBS • Subsurface Soil Below Waste.B * Compound was found in sample
and associated blank.J « Indicates en estimated value.P • Possible lab contaminant.'(1) Standard Unit (field Masurement).(2) ujthos/cn (field measurement).(3) Samples for SP-7 I SP-8 composited
with sample 245.
NOTES1. See Figure *"* »-* for waste
source sample locations.2. Where a concentration is not
shown, the compound was belowthe detection limit.
3. Analysis for indicator parametersperformed for surface samples only:Oil Skinner Pond No. 1. Slop OilPond No. 1, Sludge Traps, and Sumpnear Phenol Spill.
4. Where a concentration is not shown ;for EP tox compounds, the compoundwas not analyzed using EP ToxExtraction procedures.
02/08/91
TABLE 3-3
SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTSWASTE SOURCES
WASTE SOURCE TYPESAMPLING LOCATIONSMEDIAOSOH SAMPLE NO.
INDICATOR PARAMETERS. PPMalkalinitychloridehardness, totalnitrite-nitrate as NPH (1) .specific conductance (2)sulfate
INORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS. PPMarsenicbar innberylliumcadmiumchromiumcodoerep tox arseniceo tox bar inneo tox chromiunep tox leadleadmercurynickelzinc
3RGANICS t HS.PPMhydrocarbon scanbenzeneethylbenzenen- butyl benzenen-propyl benzenesec-butvlbenzenetoluenexylene
ASPHALT PIT Ho.1AP-1
S8S189
207
14.0018.00
13.00
U.OO18.00
89.90
2.04 J
5.58 J
WASTE190
26.0093.00
0.6431.00241
62.68193905.5010.00121
86630.70 J26.80 J
73.70 J
ASPHALT PITSAP-2WASTE258
3.70
12.001.50
12.000.401.209.20
0.05
0.008 J
0.004 J
AP-3WASTE254
9.50
30.0019.00
42.000.35
33.00
BURIED ACID PITSBA-1
SBS249
99.00
16.004.70
5.50
7.5016.00
5.97
WASTE247
149
19.004.70
9.10
11.0017.00
1500
4.55 J
114 J
WASTE248
87.00
15.008.50
5.10
8.1016.00
348
1.08 J
42.00 J
BA-2SBS250
166
17.0014.00
11.00
17.0023.00
BA-3SBS? ?
16.00
2.0010.00
604
1.87 J
12.70 J
WASTE251
295
11.005.80
15.00
5.2088.00
0.02
0.005 J
LEGENDSW - Surface Water.WASTE • Waste Sediments/Sludges.SBS - Subsurface Soil Below Waste.B « Compound was found in sample
and associated blank.J « Indicates an estimated value.P « Possible lab contaminant.(1) Standard Unit (field measurement).(2) urhos/cn (field measurement).(3) Samples for SP-7 I SP-8 composited
with sample 245.
NOTES1. See Figure not a-i for waste
source sample locations.2. Where a concentration is not
shown, the compound was belowthe detection limit.
3. Analysis for indicator parametersperformed for surface samples only:Oil Skinner Pond No. 1. Slop OilPond No. 1, Sludge Traps, and Sumpnear Phenol Spill.
4. Where a concentration is not shownfor EP tox compounds, the compoundwas not analyzed using EP ToxExtraction procedures.
02/08/91
11iiiiiiiiiiiiiiI
TABLE 3-3SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS
WASTE SOURCES
WASTE SOURCE TYPESAMPLING LOCATIONSMEDIAOSDH SAMPLE NO.
GC/MS.PPM1 . 1 . 1 • tr i ch I oroethane2,4-dimethylphenol2.4-dinitrophenol2-methyl phenol2-methvlnaohthalene4-methvl phenolacenaohtheneaeenaohthyleneacetoneanthracenebenzenebenzo( a ianth racenebenzo(a)pypenebenzo(b)f luoranthenebenzo(q.h. Ooerylenebenzo(k)f luoranthenebis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalatebutylbenzylphthaletecarbon disulf ide -ehlorobenzenechrysenedi-n-butylphthalatedi-n-octylphthalatedibenzo(ah)anthracenedibenzofurandiethvlphthaleteethylbenzenef luoranthenef luoreneindeno(1,2.3 cd)pyrenemethyl ethyl ketonemethylene chloridenaphthalenepentachlorophenolphenanthrenephenoloyrenestyrenetoluenetrichloroethylenexylene
ASPHALT PIT No.1AP-1
SBS189
18.00
0.70 P
0.06
1.60 P
2.30
9.20
4.70
0.07
0.46
WASTE190
440
17.00
23.00
1.20 P78.00
190
98.00
41.00
ASPHALT PITSAP-2WASTE258
3.70
0.74
14.0016.00
1.506.90
5.70 P
29.00
4.20
2.705.80
18.00 P0.73 P
1.10
6.60
24.00
AP-3WASTE254
11.00
0.75
8.20
11.00
1.206.00
2.30
6.90
0.05
BURIED ACID PITS. ' BA-1
SBS249
0.05 P
0.84 P0.01 P
0.05
WASTE247
37.00
0.39 P48.00
52.00
WASTE248
4.40
0.71 P6.10
16.00
BA-2SBS250
0.01 P
BA-3SBS252
4.50
5.20
WASTE251
'.
4.00 P
0.006
0.01 P
LEGENDSU • Surface Water.WASTE - Waste Sediments/Sludges.SBS - Subsurface SoiI Below Waste.B « Compound was found in sample
and associated blank.J » Indicates an estimated value.P * Possible lab contaminant.(1) Standard Unit (field measurement).(2) mhos/cm (field measurement).(3) Samples for SP-7 & SP-8 composited
with sample 245.
i
NOTES1. See Figure am 3-1 for waste
source sample locations.2. Where a concentration is not
shown, the compound was belowthe detection limit.
3. Analysis for indicator parametersperformed for surface samples only:Oil Skinner Pond No. 1, Slop OilPond No. 1, Sludge .Traps, and Sumpnear Phenol Spill..
4. Uhere a concentration is not shownfor EP tox compounds, the compoundwas not analyzed using EP ToxExtraction procedures.
02/08/91
TABLE 3-3SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS
WASTE SOURCES
WASTE SOURCE TYPESAMPLING LOCATIONSMEDIAOSOH SAMPLE NO.
INDICATOR PARAMETERS. PPMalkalinitychloridehardness, totalnitrite-nitrate as NDH (1)specific conductance (2)sulfate
INORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS. PPMarsenicbariumberylliumcadmiumchromiumcoooerec tox arsenicep tox bariumeo tox chromiumeo tox leadleadmercurynickelzinc
ORGAN I CS I HS.PPMhydrocarbon scanbenzeneethylbenzenen-butyl benzenen-oropyl benzenesec-butylbenzenetoluenexylene
LAND TREATMENT AREALAND TREATMENT
SBS232
20.00305
44465.00
0.050.53460
15.00196
0.22
SBS233
158
28623.00
0.050.211410.4013.00107
0.75
SBS234
34.00
18.009.20
8.40
12.0023.00
6.450.31 J0.34 J
0.32 J0.37 J
S8S235
134
15.0014.00
12.00
12.0023.00
LIME SODA PITLSSP
SBS237
114
21.009.30
1.92619
24.0033.00
574
131 J
96.10 J
SBS238
2510
20.0035.00
0.37
18.00
19.0033.00
18.30
1.63 J
3.87 J
WASTE236
41.00
62.0010.00
58.00
11.2037.00
114
1.16 J
14.60 J
NORTH POND SYS 1 EMNP-1
SBS148
144
16.0083.00
14.00
11.0035.00
3.30
WASTE1*7
7.5089.00
85.0012.00
0.65277
3.9011.00
354
18.10 J
32.90 J
NP-2WASTE216
9.90128
40430.00
0.02
5930.7313.0056.00
42.10
0.62 J
0.76 J
1
Iiii
LEGENDSU - Surface Water.WASTE - Waste Sediments/Sludges.SBS • Subsurface Soil Below Waste.B • Compound was found in cample
and associated blank.J « Indicates an estimated value.P • Possible lab contaminant.(1) Standard Unit (field measurement).(2) umhos/cm (field measurement).(3) Samples for SP-7 & SP-8 composited
with sample 245.
NOTES1. See Figure COM 1-1 for waste
source sample locations.2. Where a concentration is not
shown, the compound was belowthe detection limit.
3. Analysis for indicator parametersperformed for surface samples only:Oil Skinner Pond No. 1, Slop OilPond No. 1, Sludge Traps, and Snipnear Phenol Spill.
4. Where a concentration is not shownfor EP tox compounds, the compoundwas not analyzed using EP ToxExtraction procedures.
02/08/91
TABLE 3-3SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS
WASTE SOURCES
WASTE SOURCE TYPESAMPLING LOCATIONSMEDIAOSOH SAMPLE NO.
GC/MS.PPM1.1. 1 -triehloroethane2,4-dimethylphenol2.4-dinitrophenol2-methyl phenol2*methy (naphthalene4-methvl phenolecenaphtheneacenaphthyleneacetoneanthracenebenzenebenz o ( a ) ant h r acenebenzo(a)pyrenebenzoC b) f I uoranthenebenzo(g.h. i )perylenebenzo(k)f I uoranthenebis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalatebutylbenzylphthalatecarbon disulfidechlorobenzenechrysenedi-n-butylphthalatedi-n-octylphthalatedibenzo(ah)anthracenedibenzofurandiethylphthalateethyl benzenef I uoranthenef luoreneindeno(1,2j3 cd)pyrenemethyl ethyl ketonemethylene chloridenaphthalenepentachlorophenolphenanthrenephenolpyrenestyrenetoluenetrichloroethvlenexvlene
L
.SBS232
0.01 B
AND TREATLAND TRESBS233
1.70 P
0.009 B
WENT AREAATMENTS8S23*
0.97 P
0.02
0.01 B
0.03
SBS235
0.68 P
0.01 B
UK
SBS237
6.50
20.00 P
0.68
3.00 P2.20
8.30
1: SODA PILSSPSBS238
0.18 P
0.003 P
0.006
T
UASTE236
360
0.78 P
1.20
16.00
27.00
2.50
0.08 P110
95.00
230
NORTHNP-
S8S1*8
6.30
13.003.4020.000.30
0.28 B0.22
1.70 B
-
0.03
1.20
3.2020.000.85
0.04
0.60
POND SYS1UASTE147
18.00
7.501507.50
11.000.739.801.10
0.96
3.203.907.8035.00
2.70 P18.00
1802.80120
30.00
TEHNP-2UASTE216
5.20
4.40
20.00
1.10
11.009.20
1.90 P
64.00
98.00
0.39
LEGENDSU - Surface Uater.WASTE • Waste Sediments/Sludges.SBS • Subsurface Sot I Below Waste.B « Compound was found in sample
and associated blank.J » Indicates an estimated value.P « Possible lab contaminant.(1) Standard Unit (field measurement).(2) unhos/cm (field measurement).(3) Samples for SP-7 t SP-8 composited
with sample 245.
NOTES1. See Figure •m 1-1 for waste
source sample locations.2. Where a concentration is not
shown, the compound was belowthe detection limit.
3. Analysis for indicator parametersperformed for surface samples only:Oil Skimmer Pond No. 1, Slop OilPond No. 1, Sludge Traps, and Sumpnear Phenol Spill.
4. Where a concentration is not shownfor EP tox compounds, the compoundwas not analyzed using EP ToxExtraction procedures.
02/08/91
02/08/91
TABLE 3-3SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS
WASTE SOURCES
WASTE SOURCE TYPESAMPLING LOCATIONSMEDIAOSOH SAMPLE NO.
INDICATOR PARAMETERS. PPMalkalinitychloridehardness, totalnitrite-nitrate as NoH (1)'specific conductance (2)sulfate
INORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS. PPMarsenicbariumberyl linncadmiumeh ram inncoppereo tox arseniceo tox bariuneo tox chromiumep tox leadleadmercurynizckelnc
ORGAN I CS t MS. PPMhydrocarbon scanbenzeneethyl benzenen- butyl benzenen-propyl benzenesec-butyl benzenetoluenexylene
NORTH POND SYSTEMNP-3WASTE178
9.5093.00
68.0010.00
75.00
6.9027.00
329
11.40 J
4.70 J44.00 J
NP-4WASTE179
86.00
21513.00
0.05
59.000.508.4040.00
NP-5WASTE217
282
11015.00
0.01
18.000.3515.0043.00
3.12
NP-6WASTE218
j
11.0057.00
33.005.20
6.800.254.9023.00
MP-7WASTE219
6.003141.30
23149.00
28.000.3818.00106
0.46
OIL SKIMMER PONDSSK-1
S8S201
37.0092.00
0.5130.0029.00
6.0113130.638.3042.00
60013.60 J34.80 J
54.10 J
WASTE52
7.10383
1.40166
78.00
0.020.313251.9019.00257
1.56
WASTE202
107255
11561.00
. 0.11
1.063852.2316.00116
SW51
10434.00338
6.201029285
0.08
0.15
SK-2S8S200
6.30127
32.0075.00
21.5637240.9810.00112
126065.50 J57.30 J
52.80 J126 J
ii1iliiiiIiiiiitiii
LEGENDSW • Surface Water.WASTE • Waste Sediments/Sludges.SBS - Subsurface Soil Below Waste.B • Compound was found in staple
and associated blank.J • Indicates an estimated value.P * Possible lab contaminant.(1) Standard Unit (field measurement).(2) umhos/cn (field measurement).(3) Samples for SP-7 I SP-8 composited
with sample 245.
NOTES1. See Figure am 3-1 for waste
source sample locations.2. Where a concentration is not
shown, the compound was belowthe detection limit.
3. Analysis for indicator parametersperformed for surface samples only:Oil Skinner Pond No. 1, Slop OilPond No. 1, Sludge Traps, and Sumpnear Phenol Spill. •
4. Where a concentration is not shownfor EP tox compounds, the compoundMas not analyzed using EP ToxExtraction procedures.
02/08/91
IIiiiiifiiiiiiii
TABLE 3-3SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS
HASTE SOURCES
WASTE SOURCE TYPESAMPLING LOCATIONSMEDIAOSDH SAMPLE NO.
GC/NS.PPM1.1,1-trichloroethane2.4-dimethylphenol2.4-dinitrophenol2-methyl phenol2-methvlnaphth8lene4-methyl phenolecenaphtheneaeenaphthyleneacetoneanthracenebenzenebenzo(e)anthracenebenzo(8)Dvrenebenzo(bjf luoranthenebenzo(Q.h. i )perytenebenzo(k)f luoranthenebis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalatebutylbenzylphthalatecarbon disutfidechlorobenzeneehrvsenedi-n-butylphthalatedi-n-octylphthelatedibenzo(ah)anthracenedibenzofurandiethylphthalateethyl benzenef luoranthenefluoreneindeno(1,2,3 cd)pyrenemethyl ethyl ketonemethylene chloridenaphthalenepentachlorophenolphenanthrenephenolpyrenestyrenetoluenetrichloroethylenexylene
NORTH POND STSItMHP-3WASTE178
0.90 P
3.40 P0.77 P
6.20
0.09
NP-4WASTE179
0.13 P
NP-5WASTE217
0.37 P
0.43 P
NP-6WASTE218
1.30 P
0.05 P
NP-7WASTE .219
0.64 P
0.05 P
OIL SKINNER PONDSSK-1
S8S201
43.00
0.22
8.10 P
1.40
7.60
1.90 P0.23 P11.00
14.00
7.50
1.60
10.00
WASTE52
WASTE202
0.36 P
0.15 B0.02 B
SW51
SK-2S8S200
180
1.80
9.40
2.60 P29.00
55.00
30.00
12.00
38.00
LEGENDSW • Surface Water.WASTE • Waste Sediments/Sludges.SBS - Subsurface Soil Below Waste.B » Compound was found in sample
and associated blank.J » Indicates an estimated value.P • Possible lab contaminant.(1) Standard Unit (field measurement).(2) «*os/cm (field measurement).(3) Samples for SP-7 & SP-8 composited
with sample 245.
I
NOTES1. See Figure mt 3-1 for waste
source sample locations.2. Where a concentration is not
shown, the compound was belowthe detection limit.
3. Analysis for indicator parameters 'performed for surface samples only:Oil Skimmer Pond No. 1, Slop OilPond No. 1, Sludge.Traps, and Sumpnear Phenol Spill.
4. Where a concentration is not shownfor EP tox compounds, the compoundwas not analyzed using EP ToxExtraction procedures.
02/08/91
[1IIIIIII1I
11iiII11IIII
TABLE 3-3SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS
WASTE SOURCES
WASTE SOURCE TYPESAMPLING LOCATIONSMEDIAOSDH SAMPLE NO.
INDICATOR PARAMETERS. PPMalkalinitychloridehardness, totalnitrite-nitrate as NPH (1)specific conductance (2)sulfate
INORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS. PPMarsenicbariumberylliumcadmiumchromiumcopperep tox arsenicep tox bariumep tox chromiumep tox leadleadmercurynickelzinc
ORGAN ICS ft HS.PPMhydrocarbon scanbenzeneethyl benzenen-butyl benzenen-prooyl benzenesec-butvlbenzenetoluenexylene
OIL SKINNER PONDSSK-2WASTE199
25.00154
0.81324
84.00
0.021.849761.0512.00256
71.90
4.43 J
3.09 J7.07 J
SK-SBS194
333
46.0060.00
72.00
21.0040.00
41.00
2.90 J
4.90 J
3WASTE193
14.00260
1.10530
73.00
0.040.312591.2516.00371
27.90
0.13 J
0.58 J
OLD CAUSTIC PITOC-8
SBS241
46.00
79.007.80
0.33346
6.6053.00
515
33.10 J
62.70
WASTE240
14.0032.00
13314.00
0.13353
5.40107
928
75.10 J
87.40 J
OC-9SBS244
160
11.0011.00
43.00
8.6016.00
204
10.10 J
25.40 J
WASTE243
21.00
3.409.70
52.00
7.40
464
24.80 J
48.80 J
OLD STORAGE PITSOS-1
SBS228
135
13.0021.00
22.00
12.0025.00
0.57
WASTE229
13.00
30.004.40
7;30
9.907.20
OS-2SBS214
62.00
21.0090.00
71.000.7812.0051.00
1.79
0.11 J
LEGENDSU - Surface Water.WASTE • Waste Sediments/Sludges.SBS - Subsurface SoiI Below Waste.B • Compound Mas found in sample
and associated blank.J * Indicates an estimated value.P * Possible lab contaminant.(1) Standard Unit (field measurement).(2) umhos/cm (field measurement).(3) Samples for SP-7 & SP-8 composited
Mith sample 245.
I
NOTES1. See Figure BOM J-i for waste
. source sample locations.2. Where a concentration is not
shown, the compound was belowthe detection limit.
3. Analysis for indicator parametersperformed for surface samples only:Oil Skinner Pond No. 1, Slop OilPond No. 1, Sludge Traps, and Sumpnear Phenol Spill.
4. Where a concentration is not shownfor EP tox compounds, the compoundwas not analyzed using EP ToxExtraction procedures.
02/08/91
TABLE 3-3
SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTSWASTE SOURCES
WASTE SOURCE TYPESAMPLING LOCATIONSMEDIAOSOH SAMPLE NO.
GC/MS.PPM1.1.1-trichloroethane2,4-dimethyiphenol2.4-dinitrophenol2-methyl- phenol2-methylnaphthalene4-methyl phenolacenaphtheneacenaphthyleneacetoneanthracenebenzenebenzoC a ) anthracenebenzo(a)pyrenebenzo( b) f luoranthenebenzo(g.h. i )perylenebenzo( k ) f luoranthenebis(Z-ethylhexyl) phthalatebutylbenzylphthalatecarbon disulfidechlorobenzenechrvsenedi-n-butylphthalatedi-n-octylphthalatedibenzo(ah)anthreeenedibenzofurandiethylphthalateethylbenzenef luoranthenef luoreneindeno(1 2,3 cd)pyrenemethyl ethyl ketonemethylene chloridenaphthalenepentachlorophenolphenanthrenephenolpyrenestyrenetoluenetrichloroethylenexylene
OIL STIUCR PONDSSt-ZUASTE199
4.20
0.51 P
0.09
11.00 P
0.13
0.23 P0.07 P
37.00
19.00
0.21
1.30
SK-3SBS194
1.60
12.00 P
0.04
1.70 P0.05 B
0.06
0.31
UASTE193
0.58
20.00 P
0.40
2.70
OLD CAUSTIC PITOC-8
S8S241
14.00
0.35
0.34
4.00
0.71
0.13
0.03
7.50
UASTE240
23.00
0.42 P
0.51
9.10
1.20
0.52
6.10
OC-9S8S244
2.10
0.15 P
0.36
0.32
0.60
0.78
0.27
2.90
UASTE243
0.28
0.03
0.06 P
0.38
OLD STORAGE PITSOS-1
SBS228
0.02 P
4.90 P
0.02 P
UASTE229
6.40
0.02 P
3.50
OS-2SBS214
0.003
0.10 P
0.01
0.03
LEGENDSW - Surface Water.UASTE • Waste Sediments/Sludges.SBS - Subsurface SoiI Below Waste.B • Compound was found in sample
and associated blank.J * Indicates.an estimated value.P * Possible lab contaminant.(1) Standard Unit (field neasurenent).(2) urahos/cm (field Measurement).(3) Samples for SP-7 I SP-8 composited
with cample245.
NOTES1. See Figure w* »-* for waste
source sample locations.2. Where • concentration is not
shown, the compound was belowthe detection limit.
3. Analysis for indicator parametersperformed for surface samples only:Oil Skimmer Pond No. 1, Slop OilPond No. 1, Sludge Traps, and Sumpnear Phenol Spi 11...
4. Where a concentration is not shownfor EP tox compounds, the compoundwas not analyzed using EP ToxExtraction procedures.
02/08/91
IIIIIIIIIIII
TABLE 3-3SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS
WASTE SOURCES
WASTE SOURCE TYPESAMPLING LOCATIONSMEDIAOSDH SAMPLE NO.
INDICATOR PARAMETERS. PPMalkalinitychloridehardness, totalnitrite-nitrate as NDH (1)specific conductance (2)sulfate
INORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS, PPMarsenicbariumberylliumcadmiumchromiumcopperep tox arsenicep tox bariumep tox chromiumep tox leadleadmercurynickelzinc
ORGAN I CS I HS.PPMhydrocarbon scanbenzeneethyl benzenen-butyl benzenen-propyl benzenesec-butytbenzenetoluenexylene
OLD STORAGE PITSOS-2WASTE213
1.403.50
1.401.60
2000
257 J
382 J
OS-3SBS77S
183
21.0033.00
U.OO
18.0030.00
WASTE224
1.50
63.00
21.001.10
OS-4WASTE209
201
23.0072.00
9.40
25.0037.00
200
15.90 J
8.37 J6.59 J
OS-5SBS231
120
21.0018.00
117
• 10.0029.00
46.80
1.84 J
1.77 J5.56 J
WASTE230
159
79.0059.00
9.83205300.25
66.00
138023.10 J51.10 J
103 J
OS-6SBS207
1471.30
32.0076.00
13.00
30.0065.00
160
3.17 J
6.93 J
WASTE208
16.00214
934143
0.160.4824881.439.2083.00
725
32.20 J
65.00 J
OS-7:SBS205
215
63.0032.00
24.00
13.0035.00
46.80
1.27 J
2.44 J
WASTE203
312
11.0040.00
37.00
5.4018.00
4430
21.40 J
66.80 J I
II
1II
LEGENDSW - Surface Water.WASTE • Waste Sediments/Sludges.SBS • Subsurface So<I Below Waste.B • Compound was found in sample
and associated blank.J • Indicates an estimated value.P * Possible lab contaminant.(1) Standard Unit (field measurement).(2) umhos/cm (field measurement).(3) Samples for SP-7 & SP-8 composited
with sample 245.
NOTES1. See Figure *DM a-i fOr waste
source sample locations.2. Where a concentration is not
shown, the compound was belowthe detection limit.
3. Analysis for indicator parametersperformed for surface samples only:Oil Skinner Pond No. 1, Slop OilPond No. 1, Sludge Traps, and Sumpnear Phenol Spill. •••
4. Where a concentration is not shownfor EP tox compounds, the compoundMBS not analyzed using EP ToxExtraction procedures.
02/08/91
TABLE 3-3SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS
HASTE SOURCES
WASTE SOURCE TYPESAMPLING LOCATIONSMEDIAOSOH SAMPLE NO.
GC/KS.PPM1 . 1 . 1 - 1 r i ch I oroethane2.4-dimethylphenol2.4-dim'trophenol2-mcthyl phenol2-methvlnaDhthalene4-methyl phenolacenaphtheneacenaphthyleneacetoneanthracenebenzenebenzo(e)anthracenebenzo(a)oyrenebenzo(b) f luoranthenebenzo(g.h.i)perylenebenzo(k)f luoranthenebis(2-ethylhexyt) phthalatebutylbenzylphthaletecarbon disulf idechlorobenzenechrvsenedi-n-butylphthalatedi-n-octvlohthalatedibenzo(ah)anthracenedibenzofurandiethylphthatateethvlbenzenef luoranthenefluoreneindeno(1,2,3 cd)pyrenemethyl ethyl ketonemethylene chloridenaphthalenepentachloroohenolohenanthrenephenolpyrenestyrenetoluenetrichloroethylenexylene
OU> STORAGE PITSOS-2WASTE213
46.00
6.90
6.000.1323.0016.00
51.00
0.787.8021.00
1.80 P
A3. 00
30.00
3.20
7.60
OS-3S8S225
0.40 P
0.03 P
UASTE224
3.10
0.08 P
0.17
OS-4UASTE209
36.007.8033.000.4160.00
0.04 P
0.09
0.2B P
0.06
0.25
0.05 P
42.00
0.75
1.70
OS-5S8S231
6.00 P
0.02
0.11
0.01 8
0.18
0.79
UASTE230
36.00
0.44 P
7.30
6.30
2.90
26.00
05-6SBS207
22.00
0.56 P1.100.050.35
0.68
0.520.705.00
1.90
13.00
4.20
0.53
3.10
UASTE208
14.00
0.65
1.800.46
0.20
2.40
3.300.914.20
0.47 P1.50
15.00
9.30
8.00
33.00
OS-7SBS205
1.90
0.02
2.50 P
0.13
0.21
0.03 P
0.56
0.42
1.50
UASTE203
68.00
0.18
0.57
1.90
8.30 P0.66 P
7.10
1.30
10.00
LEGENDSU - Surface Water.UASTE - Waste Sediments/Sludges.SBS • Subsurface SoiI Below Waste.B » Compound was found In sample
and associated blank.J * Indicates an estimated value.P « Possible lab contaminant.(1) Standard Unit (field measurement).(2) mhos/cm (field measurement).(3) Samples for SP-7 I SP-8 composited
with sanple 245.
NOTES1. See Figure *w »-l for waste
source sample locations.2. Where a concentration is not
shown, the compound was belowthe detection limit.
3. Analysis for indicator parametersperformed for surface samples only:Oil Skinner Pond No. 1, Slop OilPond No. 1, Sludge Traps, and Sumpnear Phenol Spill.
4. Where a concentration is not shownfor EP tox compounds, the compoundwas not analyzed using EP ToxExtraction procedures.
02/08/91
IIIIIIIIII1I1iii
TABLE 3-3
SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTSHASTE SOURCES
WASTE SOURCE TYPESAMPLING LOCATIONSMEDIAOSDH SAMPLE NO.
INDICATOR PARAMETERS. PPMalkalinitychloridehardness, totalnitrite-nitrate as NDH (1)specific conductance (2)sulfate
INORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS. PPMarsenicbariunberylliumcadmiunchromiumeoooereo tox arseniceo tox bariumeo tox chromiumeo tox leadleadmercurynickelzinc
ORGANICS ft HS.PPMhydrocarbon scanbenzeneethyl benzenen-butvl benzenen-oroovl benzenesec-butylbenzenetoluenexylene
OLD STORAGE PITSOS-7
WASTE204
1461.30
23.0034.00
9.90
24.0044.00
48.90
1.90 J
6.92 J
WASTE206
216
37.0031.00
0.36139
9.7023.00
173
1.24 J
2.15 J
PHENOLSPILLSUMPSW61
96.550.22
1.341.7696.12
0.49
0.682.81
PITCH PITSPP-1
SBS184
184
20.0023.00
11.00
16.0029.00
0.95
WASTE195
4.60
1.30
1.10
17.50
PP-2SBS186
128
41.0013.00
7.40
9.2016.00
PP-3SBS187
97.00
10.005.90
5.90
8.6015.00
4.71
PUMP PITSPU-1
SBS256
71.00
25.0013.00
26.00
12.00,31.00
1330
79.60 J
72.70 J
WASTE255
130
27.008.60
1031070.306.4014.00
4.780.04 J0.05 J
0.05 J0.16 J
PU-3WASTE257
62.00
5.807.40
38.00
4.506.20
154
0.60 J
1.21 J
I
I
LEGENDSW - Surface Water.WASTE - Waste Sediments/Sludges.SBS • Subsurface Soil Below Waste.B « Compound was found in sample
and associated blank.J * Indicates an estimated value.P • Possible lab contaminant.(1) Standard Unit (field neasureroent).(2) umhos/cn (field Measurement).(3) Samples for SP-7 t SP-8 composited
with sample 245.
NOTES1. See Figure KM a-i for waste
source sample locations.2. Where a concentration is not
shown, the compound was belowthe detection Unit.
3. Analysis for indicator parametersperformed for surface samples only:Oil Skinner Pond No. 1. Slop OilPond No. 1, Sludge Traps; and Sumpnear Phenol Spill.
4. Where a concentration is not shownfor EP tox compounds, the compoundwas not analyzed using EP ToxExtraction procedures.
02/08/91
TABLE 3-3SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS
HASTE SOURCES
WASTE SOURCE TYPESAMPLING LOCATIONSMEDIAOSDH SAMPLE NO.
jC/MStPPH1,1.1-trichloroethane2.4-dimethylphenol2.4-dimtrophenol2-methyl phenol2-tnethvlnaDhthatene4-methyl phenoleeenaphtheneacenaphthyleneacetoneanthracenebenzenebenzo(a)anthracenebenzol a ipyrenebenzo( b) f I uoranthenebenzot u .h . i leervlenebenzoC k ) f luorenthenebis(2-ethylhexyl) ohthalatebutylbenzylphthalatecarbon disulfidechlorobenzenechrvsenedi-n-butylphthalatedi-n-octvlch thai atedibenzo(ah)anthracenedibenzofurandiethylphthalateethylbenzenef I uoranthenefluoreneindeno( 1,2,3 cd)pyrenemethyl ethyl ketonemethylene chloridenaphthalenepentachlorophenolphenanthrenephenolpyrenestyrenetoluenetrichloroethylenexylene
OLD STORAGE PITSOS-7
UASTE204
5.70
0.08
0.18
0.42
0.19 P
1.50
0.56
0.81
2.00
UASTE206
0.802.901.70
0.50
0.88
0.37
0.040.400.33
0.04 P
3.001.903.50
0.07
0.51
P8EUOLSPILLSIMPSW61
750
4700
26000
39000
3.30
PITCH PITSPP-I
S8S184
0.01 B
0.01 P
UASTE195
0.50
0.02 B4.80
73.00280
45.00440
35.00
120
23.00
11.00
84.000.03 B0.01 B
21.00
190
PP-2S8S186
0.04 B
0.04 B0.02 P
PP-3S8S187
0.003 B
0.006 B0.003 P
PUMP PITSPU-1
S8S256
0.32
4.60
0.67
0.67
0.08
1.70
0.600.262.00
UASTE255
0.91
0.350.68
0.41
PU-3UASTE257
0.36
1.70 B
0.04 P
0.06
LEGENDSW - Surface Water.UASTE - Waste Sediments/Sludges.SBS - Subsurface Soil Below Waste.B « Compowd was found in saople
and associated blank.J « Indicates an estimated value.P * Possible lab contaminant.(1) Standard Unit (field measurement).(2) umhos/cm (field measurement).(3) Samples for SP-7 I SP-8 composited
with sample 245.
NOTES1. See Figure mat 3-1 for waste
source sample locations.2. Where a concentration is not
shown, the compound was belowthe detection limit.
3. Analysis for indicator parametersperformed for surface samples only:Oil Skimmer Pond No. 1, Slop OilPond No. 1, Sludge Traps, and Sumpnear Phenol Spill..-'
4. Where a concentration is not shownfor EP tox compounds, the compoundwas not analyzed using EP ToxExtraction procedures.
02/08/91
1 TABLE 3-3SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS
WASTE SOURCES
1I11
1I1
WASTE SOURCE TYPESAMPLING LOCATIONSHEDIAOSDH SAMPLE NO.
INDICATOR PARAMETERS. PPMalkalinitychloridehardness, totalnitrite-nitrate as NDH (1)specific conductance (2)sulfate
INORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS. PPMarsenicbar innberylliumcadmiumchromiumcopperep tox arsenicep tox bariumep tox chromiumep tox leadleadmercurynickelzinc
ORGAN I CS I HS.PPMhydrocarbon scanbenzeneethylbenzenen-butyl benzenen-propyt benzenesec-butyl benzenetoluenexvlene
SLOP OIL PtMDSSO-1
SBS162
173
25.0011.00
15.00
6.106.00
308
18.90 J
46.20 J
SBS163
364
13558.00
7.70
20.0041.00
423
23.10 J
UASTE27
28.0039.00
34023.00
0.070.222322.50
48.00
56.70
6.76 J
17.60 J
UASTE161
200334
38202550.34
0.330.0723483.8529.00396
2380103 J163 J
595 J
sw28
453143395
366
1.020.07
0.02
0.009
SO-2SBS150
109
15.0011.00
6.20
9.9021.00
267
3.50 J
6S.90 J
UASTE31
45.00436
0.691613150
0.080.05880
15.00840
206063.80 J256 J
82.30 J
266 J
UASTEH9
25.00226
171283.00
0.05
6540.9012.00187
1920
103 J
201 J
SW32
380123396
7.701490377
0.220.01
-
0.01
0.02
,
SLUDGETRAPSST-1SBS192
143
12.007.60
9.6021.00
44.40
1.94 J
0.52 J8.97 J
II1II1I
LEGENDSU - Surface Water.UASTE - Waste Sediments/Sludges.SBS • Subsurface Soil Below Waste.B • Compound was found in sample
and associated blank.J * Indicates an estimated value.P • Possible lab contaminant.(1) Standard Unit (field measurement).(2) unhos/cm (field measurement).(3) Samples for SP-7 & SP-8 composited
with sanple 245.
I
MOTES1. Se« Figure rat s-i for waste
nource sample locations.2. Where a concentration is not
nhown, the compound was belowithe detection limit.
3. Analysis for indicator parametersperformed for surface samples only:Oil Skinner Pond No. 1, Slop OilPond No. 1, Sludge Traps, and Sumpnear Phenol Spill. -
4. Where a concentration is not shownfor EP tox compounds, the compoundHBS not analyzed using EP ToxExtraction procedures.
02/08/91
TABLE 3-3SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS
WASTE SOURCES
WASTE SOURCE TYPESAMPLING LOCATIONSMEDIAOSDH SAMPLE NO.
JC/NS.PPM1.1.1-trichloroethene2,4-dimethylphenol2,4-dinitrophenol2-methyl phenol2-methyl naphtha I ene4-methyl phenolacenaphtheneacenaphthyleneacetoneanthracenebenzenebenzo<e)anthracenebenzo(a)ovrenebenzo(b)f luoranthenebenzoig,h, i)perylenebenzo(k)f luoranthenebis(Z-ethylhexyl) phthalatebutylbenzylphthaletecarbon disulf idech I orobenzenechrysenedi-n-butylphthalatedi-n-octylohthalatedfbenzo(ah)anthracenedibenzofurandiethylphthalateethylbenzenef luoranthenef luoreneindeno(1,2,3 cd)pyrenemethyl ethyl ketonemethylene chloridenaphthalene
jentechlorophenolphenanthrenephenolpyrenestyrenetoluenetrichloroethylenexylene
SLOP OIL PONDSSO-1
SBS162
100
4.40
0.30 P2.400.49
0.08
5.80
4.20
8.10
0.17 P21.00
36.00
20.00
5.40
39.00
S8S163
75.00
3.20
0.25 P2.50
0.59
43.00 P
2.80
3.20
6.60
2.50 P0.16 P15.00
27.00
11.00
2.30
-29,00.
WASTE27
96.98
13.69
22.870.74182222120258
40.0012.53 P
456
33.87
1.8049.7657.6439.78
26.35 P
19.24
326
787
2.32
13.04
WASTE161
2000
91.00
88.00 P110
17.00300220
17.00
450
10071.00170
18.00950 P
18.00 P350
1100
830
140
880
SU28
SO-2S8S150
14.00
0.72
9.30 P0.22
7.00 B
0.11
1.300.121.20
34.00 P0.79 P
2.40
5.30
1.20
0.72
12.00
WASTE31
571
36.24
1249 P30.93
28.10 J
39.27
36.18 P
136
44.91 J44.20126
122
308
156
29.52 J
346 J
WASTE149
45.00
2.70
2.00 P0.37
1.10
0.51
4.00
5.00 P0.65 P7.80
8.70
2.20
0.54
5.90
sw32
SLUDGETRAPSST-1SBS192
0.13 B
0.15
0.46
1.60 P
0.64
1.90
LEGENDSU • Surface Water.WASTE - Waste Sediments/Sludges.SBS - Subsurface Soil Below Waste.B « Compound was found In sample
and associated blank.J • Indicates an estimated value.P * Possible lab contaminant.(1) Standard Unit (field measurement).(2) umhos/cm (field measurement).(3) Samples for SP-7 t SP-6 composited
with sample 245.
MOTES1. See Figure »w»-lfor waste
source sample locations.2. Where a concentration is not
shown, the compound was belowthe detection limit.
3. Analysis for indicator parametersperformed for surface samples only:Oil Skinner Pond No. 1, Slop OilPond No. 1, Sludge Traps, and Snipnear Phenol Spill.
4. Where a concentration is not shownfor EP tox compounds, the compoundwas not analyzed using EP ToxExtraction procedures.
02/08/91
IIIIIjlilIIIIIIilitilllIil
TABLE 3-3SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS
WASTE SOURCES
WASTE SOURCE TYPESAMPLING LOCATIONSMEDIAOSOH SAMPLE NO.
INDICATOR PARAMETERS. PPMalkalinitychloridehardness, totalnitrite-nitrate as NDM (1)specific conductance (2)sulfate
INORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS. PPMarsenicbariumberylliumcadmiumchromium
. coooerep tox arsenicep tox bariumep tox chromiunep tox leadleadmercurynickelzinc
DRGANICS I HS.PPMhydrocarbon scanbenzeneethylbenzenen-butyl benzenen-propyl benzenesec-butylbenzenetoluenexylene
SLUDGE TRAPSST-1
WASTE5
110
27631.00
1.64
68.002.4612.00170
2600174 J261 J
149 J143 J462 J
WASTE191
146
15816.00
0.48
40.001.059.0073.00
124031.60 J85.80 J
145 J
su4
18850.005350.607.041530492
0.06
0.01
0.15
ST-2WASTE12
110
0.81313
34.00
0.45
85.001.4611.00229
1030
122 J
55.00 J250 J
WASTE174
8.8068.00
37618.00
2.44
37.00
8.50136
183056.40 J
135 J
65.40 J252 J
SU11
16947.004640.506.801450410
0.05
0.06
ST-3WASTE9
101
0.52168
29.00
0.17
64.000.9411.00152
2440363 J214 J
234 J
WASTE175
10.00209
41830.00
0.130.107320.4512.00213
6243.20 J46.30 J
96.40 J
SW8
10130.002370.906.801270176
0.04
0.06
ST-4S8S172
>
28.00
44.005.00
17.00
5.6030.00
4750357 J155 J
413 J893 J
LEGENDSU • Surface Water.WASTE - Waste Sediments/Sludges.SBS • Subsurface Soil Below Waste.B » Compound was found in sample
and associated blank.J * Indicates an estimated value.P • Possible lab contaminant.(1) Standard Unit (field measurement).(2) umhos/cm (field measurement).(3) Samples for SP-7 & SP-8 composited
with sample 245.
NOTES1. See Figure «w >-l for waste
source sample locations.2. Where a concentration is not
shown, the compound was belowthe detection limit.
3. Analysis for indicator parametersperformed for surface samples only:Oil Skinner Pond No. 1, Slop OilPond No. 1, Sludge Traps, and Sumpnear Phenol Spi11. •
4. Where a concentration is not shownfor EP tox compounds, the compoundwas not analyzed using EP ToxExtraction procedures.
02/08/91
3.3
SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTSHASTE SOURCES
WASTE SOURCE TYPESAMPLING LOCATIONSMEDIAOSOH SAMPLE NO.
EC/MS. PPM1.1.1-trichloroethane2.4-dimethvlphenol2.4-dimtroohenol2-methyl phenol2-methy I not* tha I ene4-methyl phenolacenaphtheneacenaphthyleneacetoneanthracenebenzenebenzo( a ) anthracenebenio(B>Dyrenebenzo( b) f I uoranthenebenzo(g.h.i)oerylenebenzo(k)f luoranthenebis(2-ethvlhexvt) phthalatebutylbenzylphthalatecarbon disulfideehlorobenzenechrysenedi-n-butylphthalatedi-n-octvlphthaletedibenzo<:ah>anthracenedibenzofurandiethylphthalateethvVbemen*f luoranthenefluoreneindeno(1,2.3 cd)pyrenemethyl ethyl ketonemethylene chloridenaphthaleneDentachlorophenolphenanthrenephenoloyrenestvrenetoluenetrichloroethylenexvlene
SLUDGE TRAPSST-1
WASTE5
240
11.00
6.60
2.80
18.00
2057 P71.00
53.00
7.20
61.40
281
WASTE191
33.00
4.10
12.00
1.20
24.00 P3.30 P
8.90
24.00
86.00
su4
0.004
0.007 B
0.002
ST-2WASTE«
25.60
5.13
95. 76
77.65
2793 P
253
261
57.01
875
WASTEm
150
7.20
13.00 P
2.40
4.30
17.00
10.00
88.00 P
37.00
43.00
16.00
41.00
120
SU11
0.002
0.002
ST-3WASTE9
300
11.00
808 P3.50
20.00
77.00
64.00
9.50
WASTE175
26.00
1.70
53.00 P
2.80
250 P5.60 P5.90
13.00
4.60
16.00
sw8
ST-4SBS172
120
4.40
58.00 P
25.00
140 P
160
6.50
300 P
50.00
15.00
360
1100
\.
LEGENDSW - Surface Water.WASTE • Waste Sediments/Sludges.SBS - Subsurface Soil Below Waste.B • Compound was found in sample
and associated blank.J • Indicates an estimated value.P • Possible lab contaminant.(1) Standard Unit (field measurement).(2) mhos/cm (field measurement).(3) Samples for SP-7 I SP-8 composited
with sample 245.
NOTES1. See Figure *at 1-1 for waste
source sample locations.2. Where a concentration is not
shown, the compound was belowthe detection limit.
3. Analysis for indicator parametersperformed for surface samples only:Oil Skinner Pond No. 1, Slop OilPond No. 1, Sludge Traps, and Sumpnear Phenol Spill...
4. Where a concentration is not shownfor EP tox compounds, the compoundwas not analyzed using EP ToxExtraction procedures.
02/08/91
IP(I(I(IIll(I(IIllI
TABLE 3-3
SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTSWASTE SOURCES
WASTE SOURCE TYPESAMPLING LOCATIONSMEDIAOSDH SAMPLE NO.
INDICATOR PARAMETERS. PPMelkalchlor
nitvde
hardness, totalnitrite-nitrate as NPH (1) -specific conductance (2)sulfate
INORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS. PPMarsenicbariunberylliumcadmiumchromiuncoooerep tox arsenicep tox bariumeo tox chromiumep tox leadleadmercurynickelzinc
QRGANICS t HS.PPMhydrocarbon scanbenzeneethylbenzenen-butvl benzenen-propyl benzenesec - buty I benzenetoluenexylene
SLUDGE TRAPSST-*
UASTE90
183
79042.00
0.120.101200.9019.00318
125
4.54 J
2.29 J10.10 J
UASTE169
26.00175
0.712402076.00
1.640.111830.6513.00772
193069.20 J
160 J
217 J
SU89
0.07
0.020.02
0.11
0.10
1.36
0.0040.14 J0.009 J0.05 J
0.02 J
ST-4/5UASTE16
264
138985.00
0.04
2060.52
648
165
18.10 J
5.81 J
8.57 J
SU • :
15
95.0021.002290.708.20680166
0.05
0.07
ST-5UASTE173
15.00118
141063.00
2.810.131410.487.60584
243028.60 J238 J
308 J
ST-6SBS167
124
12.008.50
7.50
12.0017.00
53.101
1.85 J
2.71 J
S8S168
184
10.008.10
7.00
9.9015.00
28.30
2.87 J
UASTE19
30.00162
115156.00
0.04
83.000.3020.00349
23.4011.40 J
0.84 J
UASTE166
12.00110
92832.00
0.490.151800.458.80220
38402796 J89.50 J
135 J
1
I
1
Im
I
I
LEGENDSU - Surface Uater.UASTE • Waste Sediments/Sludges.SBS - Subsurface Soil Below Uaste.B * Compound was found in sample
and associated blank.J = indicates an estimated value.P « Possible lab contaminant.(1) Standard Unit (field measurement).(2) umhos/cjn (field measurement).(3) Samples for SP-7 & SP-8 composited
with sample 245.
IIOTES'I. See Figure •"• >-i for waste
source sample locations.Z. Where a concentration is not' shown, the compound was below
the detection limit.3. Analysis for indicator parameters
performed for surface samples only:Oil Skinner Pond No. 1, Slop OilPond No. 1, Sludge Traps, and Sumpnear Phenol Spill.
it. Where a concentration is not shownfor EP tox compounds, the compoundwas not analyzed using EP ToxExtraction procedures.
02/08/91
i; TABLE 3-3SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS
WASTE SOURCES
f: WASTE SOURCE TYPESAMPLING LOCATIONSMEDIAOSDH SAMPLE NO.
GC/MS.PPM1.1.1-trichloroethane2.4-dimethylphenol2.4-dinitroohenol2-methyl phenol2-methylnaDhthalene4-methyl phenolacenaohtheneacenaphthyleneacetoneanthracenebenzenebenzo(a)anthrecenebenzo ( a ) oy renebenzo(b)f luoranthenebenzo(a.h.i)perylenebenzo( k ) f luoranthenebis(2-ethylhexyl) phthelatebutylbenzyluhthalatecarbon disulfidechlorobenzenechrysenedi-n-butylphthalatedi-n-octylohthalatedibenzo(ah)snthracenedibenzofurandiethylphthalateethvlbenzenef luoranthenef luoreneindeno(1,2,3 cd)pyrenemethyl ethyl ketonemethylene chloridenaphthalenepent ach I oropheno Iohenanthrenephenolpyrenesty renetoluenetrichloroethylenexylene
SLUDGE TRAPSsi -*
UASTE90
11.00
13.00 P
9.40
0.36
2.20
34.00 P
5.30
7.00
0.18
2.80
UASTE169
210
12.00
37.00 P
2.60
17.00
17.00
21.00
240 P
44.00
93.00
27.00
37.00
99.00
su89
0.21
0.007
6.200.003
0.0030.002
0.009
0.007
0.0030.01
8.60
0.03
0.03
0.02
ST-4/5UASTE16
8.51
85.42 P
4.67
211 P
17.45
0.51
SU15
ST-5UASTE173
250
4.702.20
2.60
22.00
25.00
230 P
52.00
95.00
17.00
35.00
140
ST-6S8S167
5.50
12.00 P
68.00 P2.20 P
SBS168
3.50
32.00 P
0.57
140 P0.94 P
1.60
UASTE19
UASTE166
53.00
12.00 P
1.10
7.70
4.20
120 P0.65 P9.90
15.00
4.00
10.00
65.00
1IiiiiIiiiiii
LEGENDSU - Surface Water.WASTE - Waste Sediments/Sludges.SBS - Subsurface SoiI Below Waste.B » Compound was found in sample
and associated blank.J • Indicates an estimated value.P * Possible lab contaminant.(1) Standard Unit (field Measurement).(2) untios/cn (field measurement).(3) Samples for SP-7 & SP-8 composited
with sample 245.
NOTES1. See Figure *a* >-i for waste
source sample locations.2. Where a concentration is not
shown, the compound was belowthe detection limit.
3. Analysis for indicator parametersperformed for surface samples only:Oil Skimmer Pond No. 1, Slop OilPond No. 1, Sludge Traps, and Sumpnear Phenol Spill.
4. Where a concentration is not shownfor EP tox compounds, the compoundwas not analyzed using EP ToxExtraction procedures.
02/08/91
IIII1IIIIIII1IIIIII
TABLE 3-3SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS
WASTE SOURCES
WASTE SOURCE TYPESAMPLING LOCATIONSMEDIAOSDH SAMPLE NO.
INDICATOR PARAMETERS. PPMalkalinitychloridehardness, totalnitrite-nitrate as NDH (1)specific conductance (2)sulfate
INORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS. PPMarsenicbar innberylliumcadmiumchromiumcopperep tox arsenicep tox bariumep tox chromiumep tox leadleadmercurynickelzinc
ORGAN I CS I HS.PPMhydrocarbon scanbenzeneethyl benzenen-butyl benzenen-proovl benzenesec-butylbenzenetoluenexylene
SLUDGE TRAPSST-6SU18
77.0013.001560.708.20590
99.00
0.02
0.01
0.05
ST-7S8S165
10.00270
13.0089.00
11.00
12.0033.00
2.47
HASTE23
8.60146
0.54374
19.00
48.000.365.60119
24.20
2.30 J
0.54 J
2.97 J
WASTE164
164
10617.00
0.120.24181
0.3511.0031.00
107
3.69 J
13.30 J
SU22
85.0017.001760.508.10550115
0.03
0.06
sw128
10418.00356
210
0.04
0.03
LEGENDSW • Surface Water.WASTE • Waste Sediments/Sludges.SBS - Subsurface Soil Below Waste.B « Compound was found in sample
and associated blank.J • Indicates an estimated value.P • Possible lab contaminant.(1) Standard Unit (field measurement).(2) umhos/cm (field measurement).(3) Samples for SP-7 & SP-8 composited
with sample 245.
NOTES1. See Figure n* >-l for waste
source sample locations.2. Where a concentration is not
shown, the compound was belowthe detection limit.
3.- Analysis for indicator parametersperformed for surface samples only:Oil Skimmer Pond No. 1, Slop OilPond No. 1, Sludge Traps, end Sumpnear Phenol Spill. ..
4. Where a concentration is not shownfor EP tox compounds, the compoundwas not analyzed using EP ToxExtraction procedures.
02/08/91
ITABLE 3-3
SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTSHASTE SOURCES
WASTE SOURCE TYPESAMPLING LOCATIONSMEDIAOSDH SAMPLE NO.
JC/KS.PPK1.1.1-trichloroethane2,4-dimethylphenol2,4-dinitrophenol2-methyl phenol2-methylnaphthalene4-methyl phenolacenaphtheneacenaphthyleneacetoneanthracenebenzenebenzo( a )anthracenebenzo(e)oyrenebenzo(b)f luorenthenebenzoO.h. i )perylenebenzo(k)f luoranthenebis(2-ethvlhexyl) phthalatebutylbenzvlphthalatecarbon disutfidechlorobenzenechrysenedi -n-buty Iphthalatedi-n-oetvlchthalatedibenzo(ah)anthracenedibenzofurandiethylohthalateethylbenzenef luoranthenef luoreneindeno(1j2.3 cd)pyrenemethvl ethyl ketonemethyl ene chloridenaphthalenepent ach 1 orooheno Iphenanthrenephenolpyrenestyrenetoluenetrichloroethylenexv 1 ene
SUJDGE TRAPSST-6SU18
ST-7SBS165
0.39 P0.03 P
2.50
WASTE23
WASTE164
210
8.302.30
15.00
23.00
220 P
43.00
76.00
43.00
41.00
130
SU22
SU128
*
I.
LEGENDSW - Surface Water.WASTE • Waste Sediments/Sludges.SBS • Subsurface SolI Below Waste.B » Compound was found in sample
and associated blank.J « Indicates an estimated value.P * Possible lab contaminant.(1) Standard Unit (field measurement).(2) umhos/cm (field measurement).(3) Samples for SP-7 & SP-8 composited
with sample 245.
NOTES1. See Figure MM a-ifor waste
source sample locations.2. Where a concentration is not
shown, the compound was belowthe detection limit.
3. Analysis for indicator parametersperformed for surface samples only:Oil Skimmer Pond No. 1, Slop OilPond No. 1, Sludge Traps, and Sumpnear Phenol Spill.
4. Where a concentration is not shownfor EP tox compounds, the compoundwas not analyzed using EP ToxExtraction procedures.
02/08/91
I
IIIIiiiiiiiiiiiii
3.5 GROUNDWATER
Sampling locations for groundwater are shown onFigure SUM 3-2.
To indicate the extent of groundwater contamination beneaththe site, Figure SUM 3-2A was developed, defining areas ofbenzene contamination. In addition, the extent of freeproduct (hydrocarbons) floating on the groundwater table isshown on Figure 3-2B. The floating product was measuredusing the Phase I wells and existing hydrocarbon recoverywells drilled by Stanley Engineering.
The results of the analyses of groundwater samples arediscussed on a well by well basis,, A summary of "hits" forgroundwater analyses is included in Table 3-4.Concentrations are compared to maximum contaminant levels(MCL) for drinking water only.
SBB-l
Metals - The concentrations detected were below the MCL'sfor drinking water. Concentration for lead (0.048 PPM)was just below the lead MCL for drinking water(0.050 PPM).
GC/MS - Analysis detected 0.026 PPM naphthalene and 0.006PPM 2-methylnaphthalene. Benzene (0.006 PPM) and1,2-dichhloroethane (0.036 PPM) were detected abovethe MCL's of 0.005 PPM and 0.005 PPM, respectively.
*. I* . I
0/HS - Analysis detected concentrations (0.126 PPM) of totjalhydrocarbons, toluene (0.015 PPM, estimated), andxylene (0.005 PPM, estimated).
ORC Superfund Site Revision 0SUMMARY PHASE I 3-12 October 1990
SBB-2
Metals - The concentrations detected were below the MCL'sfor drinking water.
GC/MS - Analysis detected low concentrations of naphthalene(0.026 PPM), 2-methylnaphthalene (0.019 PPM), tolueneand xylene (0.003 PPM each). The benzene concentration(0.120 PPM) was above the MCL (0.005 PPM).
O/HS - Analysis detected benzene compounds (butyl,n-propyl) at low concentrations, however benzene wasdetected (0.24 PPM, estimated) above the MCL(.005 PPM). The hydrocarbon scan detected hydrocarbonsat 0.641 PPM.
8BB-3
Metals - Analysis detected chromium (.059 PPM) and lead(.075 PPM) at levels above the MCL's (.05 PPM each).
GC/MS & O/HS - All organics were below the analyticaldetection limits.
SBB-4
Metals - The concentrations detected were below the MCL'sfor drinking water.
GC/MS - Analysis detected concentrations of naphthalenecompounds (0.007 PPM), benzene (0.23 PPM), toluene(0.097 PPM), ethylbenzene (0.004 PPM), and xylene(0.013 PPM).
O/HS - Analysis detected hydrocarbons at concentrations of0.880 PPM.
ORC Superfund Site Revision 0SUMMARY PHASE I 3-13 October 1990
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SBB-5
Metals - The concentrations of the metals were below thedrinking water MCLs.
GC/MS - Analysis detected 0.410 PPM naphthalene, 0.520 PPM2-methylnaphthalene, 0.022 PPM of PAHs, 0.048 PPMtoluene, 0.660 PPM xylene and 0.500 PPM ethylbenzene.Detected benzene (1.0 PPM) above the MCL (.005 PPM).
O/HS - Analysis detected 282.0 PPM of hydrocarbons in thegroundwater. Analysis was also conducted for freeproduct sample obtained from the well. Resultsindicated concentrations of benzene (416 PPM),ethylbenzene (3,310 PPM), toluene (58 PPM), and xylene(1,600 PPM).
SBB-6
Metals - The concentrations detected were below the MCLsfor drinking water.
• GC/MS - Analysis detected naphthalenes at low concentrationsand BTEX at concentrations of 1.6 PPM, 0.013 PPM, 0.270
I PPM, and 0.460 PPM, respectively, were detected. Thebenzene analysis (1.6 PPM) was above the MCL of 0.005PPM.
™ O/HS - Hydrocarbons were detected at concentrations of6.080 PPM.
ORC Superfund Site • Revision 0SUMMARY PHASE I 3-14 October 1990
8BB-7
Metals - Analysis detected elevated concentrations forchromium (.062 PPM) and lead (.064 PPM), both above MCL(.050 PPM each).
GC/MS — Very low concentrations toluene (0.003 PPM),ethylbenzene (0.006 PPM), and xylene (0.012 PPM) weredetected. The benzene concentration detected(0.039 PPM) was above the MCL (0.005 PPM).
O/HS - Hydrocarbons were detected at a concentration of0.158 PPM.
SBB-8
Metals - Analysis detected an elevated concentration ofarsenic (0.121 PPM) above the MCL of 0.05 PPM.
GC/MS - Analysis detected low concentrations ofethylbenzene (0.002 PPM) and xylene (0.003 PPM). Thebenzene concentration detected (0.011 PPM) was abovethe MCL (0.005 PPM).
O/HS - No hydrocarbons were detected in the hydrocarbonscan.
Metals - Analysis detected elevated concentrations forChromium (.055 PPM) and lead (.082 PPM), both above MCL(.050 PPM).
GC/MS & O/HS - No hydrocarbons were detected in thehydrocarbon scan.
ORC Superfund Site Revision 0SUMMARY PHASE I 3-15 October 1990
II SBB-10
• Metals - Analysis detected an elevated concentration of" beryllium (0.070 PPM).
P GC/MS - Analysis detected concentrations of naphthalene-- . • (.074 PPM), 2-methylnaphthalene (.096 PPM), xylene
• (.21 PPM), and 2,4-dimethylphenol (0.076 PPM).
O/HS - Hydrocarbons were detected at concentrations of• 10.6 PPM.
BBB-11
| Metals - Elevated concentration was detected for arsenic(.204 PPM) which was above MCL (.05 PPM).
• GC/MS - Analysis detected low concentrations forethylbenzene (.001 PPM), and xylene (.002 PPM).
• Benzene (.009 PPM) was detected above MCL (.005 PPM).
_ O/HS - Hydrocarbons were detected at a concentration of| 0.057 PPM.
ISBB-12
• Metals - Analysis detected metals at concentrations below_ the drinking water MCL's.
I " . - - ' - ' , 'GC/MS & O/HS - No organic compounds detected. .
- "" i
I
I
I ORC Superfund Site : Revision 0SUMMARY PHASE I 3-16 October 1990
I
SBB-13
Metals - Analysis detected elevated concentrations forbarium (1.119 PPM) above MCL (1.0 PPM); and chromium(.566 PPM) and lead (.234 PPM) both above MCL(.05 PPM).
GC/MS - Analysis detected concentrations for1,2-dichloroethane (.220 PPM) above MCL (.005 PPM) anddetected 0.002 PPM of 1,2-dichloropropane.
O/HS - Hydrocarbons were detected at a concentration of0.096 PPM.
SBB-14
Metals - Analysis detected elevated concentrations forbarium (2.092 PPM) above MCL (1.0 PPM), and chromium(.251 PPM) and lead (.314 PPM) both above MCL(.05 PPM each).
GC/MS - Analysis detected low concentration for2-methylnaphthalene (.003 PPM) and xylene (.009 PPM).Analysis detected benzene (.210 PPM) above MCL(.005 PPM).
O/HS - Hydrocarbons were detected at a concentration of1.150 PPM.
SBB-15
Metals - Analysis detected elevated concentrations forbarium (1.544 PPM) above MCL (1.0 PPM); and detectedchromium (.071 PPM) and lead (.066 PPM) both above MCL(. 05 PPM). . .
GC/MS - Analysis detected naphthalene (.031 PPM),2-methylnaphthalene (.013 PPM) and xylene (.087 PPM).Analysis detected benzene (.054 PPM) above MCL(.005 PPM).
O/HS - Hydrocarbons were detected at a concentration of2.350 PPM.
ORC Superfund Site Revision 0SUMMARY PHASE I 3-17 October 1990
II SBB-16
O/HS - No hydrocarbons were detected during the hydrocarbonscan.
BBB-17
I Metals - Analysis detected metals at concentrations below* MCL's. Lead (0.048 PPM) was detected just below MCL_ (0.050 PPM).
GC/MS - Analysis detected xylene at a concentration of
1 0.002 PPM. Benzene was detected at a concentration of(0.004 PPM) below the MCL (.005 PPM).
I
I
Metals - Analysis detected arsenic (0.082 PPM) above the MCL. of 0.05 PPM.
GC/MS - Analysis detected 1,2-dichloroethane (.002 PPM) and• benzene (.002 PPM).
0/HS - No hydrocarbons were detected during the scan.
I
I
| chromium (.139 PPM) above MCL (.050 PPM).
I GC/MS & O/HS - No organic compounds were detected... ' -• '/;
* IBB-3
£ Metals - No metals were detected at concentrations above theMCLs.
• GC/MS & O/HS - No organic compounds were detected.
I ORC Superfund Site -Revision 0SUMMARY PHASE I 3-18 October 1990
I
IBB-2
Metals - Analysis detected elevated concentration for
IBB-4
Metals - No metals were detected at concentrations above theMCLs.
GC/MS 6 O/HS - No organic compounds were detected.
IBB-5
Metals - No metals were detected at concentrations above theMCLs.
GC/MS & O/HS - No organic compounds were detected.
MW-1
Metals - No metals were detected at concentrations above theMCLs.
GC.MS & O/HS - No organic compounds were detected.
MW-2
Metals - No metals were detected at concentrations above theMCLs.
GC/MS & O/HS - No organic compounds were detected.
MW-3
Metals - No metals were detected at concentrations above theMCLs.
GC/MS & O/HS - No organic compounds were detected.
ORC Superfund Site Revision 0SUMMARY PHASE I 3-19 October 1990
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
RW-12 (STANLEY WELL)
Metals - Analysis indicated concentrations for arsenic(1.086 PPM), Chromium (0.335 PPM), lead (24.070 PPM),and zinc (0.106 PPM). EP Tox for lead was 24.070 PPM.
GC/MS & O/HS -- Concentrations for PAHs included2-methylnaphthalene (1,200 PPM), acenaphthalene(5.700 PPM), fluorene (8.900 PPM), and naphthalene(910 PPM). Benzene (13,000 PPM), toluene (15,000 PPM),ethylbenzene (96,000 PPM), and xylene (41,000 PPM) weredetected in the product. Styrene (24,000 PPM) was alsodetected. Concentrations for total hydrocarbons was38,500 PPM.
ORC Superfund Site -r Revision 0SUMMARY PHASE I 3-20 October 1990
TABLE 3-4
SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTSGROUNDWATER
SAMPLING LOCATIONSOSOH SAMPLE NO.
INDICATOR PARAMETERS. PPMalkalinitychloridehardness, totalnitrite-nitrate as NPH (1)specific conductance (2)sulfate -
INORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS. PPMarsenicbar innberylliunchromiumcooperep tox leadleadmercurynickelzinc
XGANICS ft HS.PPMhydrocarbon scanbenzeneethyl benzenen-butvl benzenen-propyl benzenesec • butv I benzenetert-butyl benzenetoluene ,xylene
GC/MS.PPM1,2-dichloroethane1.2-dichloropropane2, 4-di methyl phenol2-methylnaphthaleneacenaphtheneacetonebenzenebis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalatecarbon disulf ideethylbenzenefluorenemethyl ethyl ketonemethylene chloridenaphthalenephenanthrenepyrenestyrenetoluenexylene
IBB-2261
66.001848431.7010.501690725
0.06
0.14
0.01
IBB-3268
14410.002411
7.3023901537
0.06
0.01
0.06
IBB-4266
158
1941
8.0023701315
0.03
0.01
0.03
IB8-5263
92.0020510981.607.202270535
0.09
0.04
0.02
0.004 J
MM267
16241.00350
7.0024301290
0.03
0.05
HW-2264
16651.001392
7.101740800
0.05
0.07
0.008 J
0.003 B
MU-3260
112
1520
6.9020001340
0.04
0.02
0.005
RW-12160
1.09
0.34
24.0724.52
0.11
385005430 J1861 J
5546 J12450 J
12005.701100013000
960008.909000035000910
240001500041000
S8B-01272
7768692392
6.404150800
0.31
0.040.08
0.05
0.13
0.13
0.003 J
0.02 J0.005 J
0.04
0.006 J
0.0060.009 J
0.003 B
SBB-02269
69780.001696
6.701930535
0.89
0.030.05
0.030.07
0.640.24 J0.008 J0.003 J0.006 J
0.01 J
0.02
0.120.005 J
0.03
0.003 J0.003 J
LEGENDSBB-1 • Shallow Bechtel Well.IBB-1 - Intermediate Bechtel Well.MU-1 - Mystery WelUInternediate well
by G&G water well construction).B « Compound was found in sample
and associated blank.J » Indicates an estimated value.P - Possible lab contaminant.(1) Standard unit (field measurement).(2) unhos/cn (field measurement).
NOTES1. See Figure tat a-J for groundwater
sample locations.2. Where a concentration is not
shown, the compound was belowthe detection limit.
3. Indicator Parameters not analyzedfor RU-12 and SBB-5 product samples.
4. Where a concentration is not shown,for EP Tox Lead, the compound wasnot analyzed using EP Tox ExtractionProcedures.
02/08/91
IIIIIIIIII11IIililIilIIIIIIII
TABLE 3-4SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS
GRODNDWATER
SAMPLING LOCATIONSOSDH SAMPLE NO.
INDICATOR PARAMETERS, PPMalkalinitychloridehardness, totalnitrite-nitrate as NDH (1)specific conductance (2)sulfate
INORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS, PPMarsenicbar innberyl linnchromiuncoooerep tox leadleadmercurynickelzinc
ORGANICS I HS.PPMhydrocarbon scanbenzeneethylbenzenen- butyl benzenen-propyl benzenesec-butvlbenzenetert-butyl benzenetoluenexylene
GC/MS.PPM1 .2-diehloroethane1 . 2-di ch loropropane2,4-dimethylphenot2-methylnBphthalene .acenaphtheneacetonebenzenebis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalatecarbon disulfideethylbenzenefluorenemethyl ethyl ketonemethylene chloridenaphthalenephenanthrenepyrenestyrenetoluenexylene
S8B-03259
27682.0021774.206.8025901393
0.78
0.060.16
0.08
0.070.15
S8B-04270
56633.001275
6.883180415
0.06
0.01
0.880.18 J0.01 J0.07 J0.01 J
0.02 J0.12 J0.17 J
0.002 J
0.23
0.004 J
0.005 J
0.100.13
SB8-05271
7671001177
6.701590285
0.16
0.01
2821.15 J30.20 J4.09 J20.20 J21.00 J
34.80 J
0.52
1.000.009 J
0.50
0.150.410.02
0.002 J
0.05 J0.66
SBB-05-PRODUCT262
0.64
41633104111420
170 J
3770
220
1200
73.00
58.001600
588-06274
99061.00Z153
6.8031801055
0.12
0.04
6.083.45 J0.35 J0.33 Jo.oe j
0.23 J0.83 J
0.07
1.60
0.27
0.02
0.130.46
888-07275
6021491569
6.902630880
0.61
0.060.06
0.06
0.070.16
0.04
0.006
0.003 J0.01
SBB-08276
36228621573.606.8032801180
0.120.11
0.020.01
0.03
0.01
0.002 J
0.003 J
888-09265
292
1421.308.00890273
0.34
0.060.05
0.08
0.080.16
SBB-10278
5704918744
5.6010160
0.07
0.710.61
10.60
1.41 J
0.19 J
0.22 J
0.080.10
0.07
0.21
S8B-11277
3494861539
7.0056502175
0.200.10
0.020.01
0.02
0.06
0.003 J
0.008 J
0.009
0.001 J
-
0.002 J
LEGENDSBB-1 - Shallow Bechtel Well.IBB-1 - Intermediate Bechtel Well.MM - Mystery WellUnternediate well
by G&G water well construction).B « Compound was found in sample
and associated blank.J • Indicates an estimated value.P » Possible lab contaminant.(1) Standard unit (field measurement).(2) umhos/cm (field Measurement).
NOTES j1. See Figure KM >-J for grourduater
sample locations.2. Where a concentration is not
shown, the compound was belowthe detection limit.
3. Indicator Parameters not analyzedfor RU-12 and SBB-5 product samples.
•4. Where a concentration is not shownfor EP Tox Lead, the compound wasnot analyzed using EP Tox ExtractionProcedures.
02/08/91
TABLE 3-4SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS
GRODNDWATER
SAMPLING LOCATIONSOSOH SAMPLE NO.
INDICATOR PARAMETERS, PPMalkalinitychloridehardness, totalnitrite-nitrate as NDH (1)specific conductance (2)sulfate
INORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS. PPMarsenicbar innberyl 1 ionchromiuncopperCD tox leadleadmercurynickelzinc
XGANICS ft HS.PPMhydrocarbon scanbenzeneethylbenzenen-butvl benzenen-propyl benzenesec-butyl benzenetert-butyl benzenetoluenexylene
GC/MS.PPM1 ,2-dichloroethane1 . 2-di ch I oropropane2,4-dimethylphenol2-methylnaphthaleneacenaphtheneacetonebenzenebis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalatecarbon disulfideethylbenzenef luorenemethyl ethyl ketone.methylene chloridenaphthalenephenanthreneoyrenestyrenetoluenexylene
S8B-1227V
26112.0016900.906.602140155
0.08
0.01
0.03
S8B-13280
71732118771.706.8030401045
1.12
0.570.11
0.230.0008
O.'O0.27
0.100.02 J
0.07 J0.002 J
0.220.002 J
SBB-H281
72933.003201
6.602950985
2.09
0.250.25
0.310.00060.170.37
1.150.53 J0.01 J0.05 J0.01 J0.02 J
0.02 J0.04 J
0.003 J
0.21
0.009
S88-15282
772292909
6.702120263
1.54
0.070.12
0.07
0.080.18
2.350.18 J0.06 J0.06 J0.13 J0.11 J0.08 J
0.21 J
0.01
0.05
0.004
0.03
0.09
888-16283
42012321930.506.8030901195
0.18
0.030.02
0.050.0005
0.10
0.004 J
0.002
0.002 J
S8B-17284
4365892312
7.1050001370
0.080.17
0.030.04
0.030.05
0.002 J
0.002 J
IIIIIIII
LEGENDSBB-1 • Shallow Bechtel Well.IBB-1 • Intermediate Bechtel Well.MV-1 • Mystery Uell(Intermediate well
by C&C water well construction).B • Compound was found in ample
and associated blank.J B indicates on estimated value.P • Possible lab contaminant.(1> Standard Unit (field measurement).(2) umhos/cm (field measurement).
MOTES1. See Figure nu a-z for grounduater
sample locations.2. Where a concentration is not
shown, the compound was be lowthe detection limit.
3. Indicator Parameters not analyzedfor RW-12 and SBB-5 product samples.
4. Where a concentration is not shownfor EP Tox Lead, the compound wasnot analyzed using EP Tox ExtractionProcedures.
02/08/91
IIIIIIIIiIIIIIIIIII
3.6 SURFACE WATER AND SEDIMENT
Sampling locations for surface water and sediments are shownon Figure SUM 3-3. A summary of "hits" for surface waterand sediment analyses is included in Table 3-5.
METALS
Surface water concentrations of barium and zinc are slightlyabove the background concentrations. Background data isfrom the most upgradient sample along Gladys Creek (sampleNo. 40). Barium is the only metal detected in all surfacewater samples.
Acid seep and caustic seeps (surface water) contain elevatedlevels of metals compared to background. Chromium and leadwere above the MCL for drinking water entering into GladysCreek, but were not detected in the creek (dilution ofmetals in solution). Arsenic was detected in the CausticSeep surface water samples, but was not detected ingroundwater samples.
The surface water and sediment samples downgradient of thesite (Sample Nos. 129 and 130 respectively) indicate metalconcentrations similar to background levels.
The Gladys Creek sediment sample show elevatedconcentrations for metals when compared to background.
ORC Superfund Site . Revision 0SUMMARY PHASE I 3-21 October 1990
GO/MS
II
The surface water in Gladys Creek contained phenol(0.015 PPM), 2,4-dimethylphenol (0.001 PPM), 2-methylphenol(0.010 PPM), and 4-methylphenol (0.020 PPM) downgradient ofthe caustic seep (sample No. 60). All other surface watersamples taken in Gladys Creek showed concentrations belowdetection limits. The surface water in the southerntributary of Gladys Creek (sample No. 92) contained2,4-dimethylphenol (0.014 PPM) only.
The sediments in Gladys Creek contained chloroform(0.089 PPM), pyrene (0.180 PPM), fluoranthene (0.170 PPM), •and chrysene (0.120 PPM) just below the Highway 277 bridge |(sample No. 44), 4-methylphenol (0.550 PPM) below thecaustic seep (sample No. 63), and xylene (0.140 PPM) and •2-methylnaphthalene (1.200 PPM) below the acid seep (sample •No. 125).
The surface water sample taken from one of the acid seepscontained 2-methylnaphthalene (0.150 PPM) and naphthalene —(0.077 PPM) (sample No. 98). The sediment sample taken from Ithe acid seep contained 2-methylnaphthalene (3.900 PPM) andnaphthalene (1.100 PPM) (sample No. 99). •
The surface water sample taken from the caustic seepcontained elevated levels of BTEX, phenols, chlorinated •phenols, and PAHs (sample No. 95). The sediment sample ™taken for the caustic seep also contained elevated levelsof BTEX, phenols, and PAHs (sample No. 96). I
I
I
I
IORC Superfund Site Revision 0 ISUMMARY PHASE I 3-22 October 1990 •
I
IIIII
IIilIIIIIIIIIIilII11IIIIIIIIII
TABLE 3-5SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SURFACE WATER/SEDIMENTS
SAMPLING LOCATIONSMEDIAOSDH SAMPLE NO.
INDICATOR PARAMETERS. PPMalkalinitychloridehardness, totalnitrite-nitrate as NPH (1)specific conductance (2)sulfate
INORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS. PPMarsenicbariunberylliumcadmiumchromiumcornerleadmercurynickelzinc
OR GAM I CS 1 HS.PPMhydrocarbon scanbenzeneethyl benzenen-butyl benzenen-propyl benzenesec-butylbenzenetert-butyl benzenetoluenexylene
GC/MS.PPN2.4.5-trichlorophenol2.4-dimethylphenol2-chlorophenol2-methyl phenol2-methylnaDhthalene4-methyJjhenolacetonebenzenechloroformethyl benzenef tuoranthenemethyl ethyl ketonemethylene chloridemethyl isobutylketonenaphthalenephenol :pyrenetoluenexylene
ACIDRECOVERY AREASED125
51.00
5.705.60
5.3011.00
50.60
0.06 J
0.44 J
1.20
0.12 P
0.14
SU126
17731.0017781.207.6021401163
0.04
0.009
1
ACID SEEPSED99
59.00
8.205.608.30
7.0023.00
104
0.71 J
3.90
4.70 P
16.00 P
1.10
0.99
SU98
1.340.160.020.260.320.36
1.902.51
0.160.03 J0.04 J
0.02 J0.02 J
0.15
6.80
0.08
CAUSTIC SEEPSED96
11.0036.00
4.602.809.30
4.508.40
2.16
0.19 J
. 5.00
14.001.9021.00
96.00 P0.06
0.08
25.00 P
0.9817.00
0.280.61
SU95
0.770.25
0.030.030.05
0.040.06
1.28
0.08 J0.48 J0.009 J
0.07 J0.27 J0.37 J
0.0216.000.0751.000.1164.001.900.11
0.06
4.60
0.3132.00
0.370.46
DOUNSTREANGLADYS CREEKSED63
48.001.10
7.006.2012.00
4.2018.00
2.83
0.550.37 P
0.31 P0.12 P
SU60
14239.001600
7.8023401297
0.03
0.04
0.001
0.01
0.02
0.02
DRAINAGE DITCHSED39
205
30.0025.0032.00
14.00154
2.58
SU38
40643.00954
6.3026891229
0.10
0.03
0.05
0.02 J0.004 J0.007 J
0.007 J
0.040.13
0.01
0.050.07
LEGENDSU - Surface Uater.SED • Sediment.8 • Compound was found in sample
and associated blank.J * Indicates an estimated value.P * Possible lab contaminant.(1) Standard Unit (field measurement).(2) umhos/cm (field measurement).
NOTES1. See Figure RBI J-J for surface
; water & sediment locations.2. Where a concentration is not
shown, the compound was belowthe detection limit.
3. Analysis for indicator parametersperformed for surface water samplesonly. Indicator parameters were notanalyzed for the caustic seep andacid seep samples.
02/08/91
SABLE 3-5SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SURFACE WATER/SEDIMENTS
SAMPLING LOCATIONSMEDIAOSDH SAMPLE NO.
INDICATOR PARAMETERS. PPMalkalinitychloridehardness, totalnitrite-nitrate as Nt>H (1)specific conductance (2)sulfate
INORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS. PPMarsenicbariumberyl 1 inncadmiumchromiumcopperleadmercurynickelzinc
ORGANICS t HS.PPMhydrocarbon scanbenzeneethylbenzenen- butyl benzenen-propyl benzenesec-butylbenzenetert-butvl benzenetoluenexylene
GC/MSjPPM2.4.5-trichlorophenol2,4-dimethylphenol2-chlorophenol2-methyl phenol2-methylnaphthalene4-methyl phenolacetonebenzenechloroformethylbenzenef luoranthenemethyl ethyl ketonemethylene chloridemethyl i soouty I ketonenaphthalenephenolpyrenetoluenexylene
GLADYS CREEKCOUNTY ROADSED129
45.00
4.702.40
4.807.80
1.20
0.02 P
0.02 P0.02 P
SU130
19753.0016891.007.7022301207
0.09
0.01
0.007
GLADYSCREEK HWY 277SED44
99.00
11.0014.0017.00
8.7035.00
4.59
0.20 P
0.09
0.17
0.18
SU43
20810.0011890.806.8025051421
0.03
0.006
GLADYS CREEK PONDSED48
84.00
9.5039.0010.00
7.6030.00
5.72
0.26 P
0.30 P
sw47
20117.001162
7.0024591480
0.04
0.06
NU TRIBUTARYSED46
116
13.0027.0013.00
11.0029.00
4.42
0.58 J
0.26 J
0.05 P
0.08
0.02
SU45
22370.0012531.706.8028611445
0.02
SOUTHOF ACID SEEPSED54
115
12.0015.0020.000.418.6030.00
1.96
0.06 P
0.07 P
SU53
17025.001540
6.1021371314
0.05
0.02
LEGENDSU • Surface Water.SED - Sediment.B • Compound Mas found in sample
and associated blank.•1 * Indicates an estimated value.P * Possible lab contaminant.(1) Standard Unit (field measurement).(2) umhos/on (field measurement).
NOTES1. See Figure sot 9-9 for surface
water & sediment locations.2. Where a concentration is not
shown, the compound was belowthe detection limit.
3. Analysis for indicator parametersperformed for surface Mater samplesonly. Indicator parameters Mere notanalyzed for the caustic seep andacid seep samples.
02/08/91
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
TABLE 3-5SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SURFACE WATER/SEDIMENTS
SAMPLING LOCATIONSMEDIAOSOH SAMPLE NO.
INDICATOR PARAMETERS. PPMalkalinitychloridehardness, totalnitrite-nitrate as NPH (1)specific conductance (2)sulfete
INORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS. PPMarsenicbariunberylliumcadmiunchromiuncopperleadmercurynickelzinc
XGANICS t HS.PPMhydrocarbon scanbenzeneethyl benzenen-butyl benzenen-propyl benzenesec • but y I benzenetert-butyl benzenetoluenexylene
GC/MS.PPM2.4.5-trichloroDhenol2,4-dimethylphenol2-ehloroohenol2-methyl phenol2-methylnaphthalene4-methyl phenolacetonebenzenechloroformethyl benzenef luoranthenemethyl ethyl ketonemethylene chloridemethyl i sobuty I ketonenaphthalenephenolpyrenetoluenexylene
SOUTH TRIBUTARYDOWNSTREAMSED93
120
17.009. BO17.000.379.5044.00
0.88
0.05 J
12.00 P
29.00 P0.38 P
SU92
19990.005000.808.601560480
0.04
0.03
0.01
UPSTREAMGLADYS CREEKSED41
49.00
4.7031.00
4.8013.00
2.00
SU40
195
1193
6.6023651426
0.03
AR-9SU100
0.370.77
0.120.060.61
0.150.25
0.13
0.002 J
0.007 J
0.002 J0.004 J0.003 J
0.31
11.00
5.20
0.1 3
LEGENDSU - Surface Water.SED • Sediment.B • Compound was found in sample
and associated blank.J • Indicates an estimated value.P • Possible lab contaminant.(1) Standard unit (field measurement).(2) unhos/cn (field measurement).
NOTES1. See Figure HM »-» for surface
uater i sediment locations.2. Uhere a concentration is not
shown, the compound was belowthe detection limit.
3. Analysis for indicator parametersperformed for surface water samplesonly. Indicator parameters were notanalyzed for the caustic seep andacid seep samples.
02/08/91
3.7 SURFACE SOIL
II
Sampling locations for surface soil are shown on IFigure SUM 3-4. A summary of "hits" for surface soilanalyses is included in Table 3-6. A general discussion of"hot" spots is discussed below. I
IMETALS
Tank Farm Areas - Surface soil samples (sample No. 's 104, I105, 106, 107, 110, and 112) in the tank farm diked areasin general indicated elevated levels for all metals. Lead, •chromium, and arsenic typically had the highest •concentrations. The result of EP Tox tests indicated metalsare not leaching at concentrations considered to be toxic I(>5 PPM). *
Cooling Towers - Surface soil (sample No. 101) from the cooling •towers area had elevated concentrations for all metals.Chromium (241 PPM), arsenic (13 PPM), and mercury (9.5 PPM) _were significantly higher than background concentrations. IEP Tox for chromium (0.016 PPM) was less than the toxiccharacteristic of 5 ppm. •
Old Storage Pits - Two samples (sample No. 's 114 & 117) werecollected in the Old Storage Pits area. Sample No. 114 •showed elevated concentrations for arsenic (13 PPM), barium •(144 PPM), chromium (39 PPM), copper (316 PPM), lead(123 PPM), mercury (2.6 PPM) and zinc (140 PPM). Sample •No. 117 showed elevated concentration for barium (104 PPM), •chromium (72 PPM), lead (31 PPM), and zinc (33 PPM).
I
I
IOP.C Superfund Site ~ Revision 0 ISUMMARY PHASE I 3-23 October 1990 •
I
IIIII1III
I
D
01I1
Leaded Gasoline Tank Storage Area - Surface sample No. 102showed slightly elevated or elevated concentrations for allmetals. The concentrations were arsenic (6.8 PPM), barium(99 PPM), chromium (17 PPM), copper (84 PPM), lead (74 PPM),and zinc (55 PPM). Sample No. 103 showed slightly elevatedor elevated concentrations of arsenic (33 PPM), barium(148 PPM), chromium (39 PPM), lead (226 PPM), mercury(0.59 PPM), and zinc (75. PPM). EP Tox for lead detected aconcentration of 0.051 PPM. Sample No. 104 showed elevatedconcentrations of arsenic (56 PPM), barium (1446 PPM), lead(1028 PPM), mercury (9.9 PPM), and zinc (54 PPM) and EP Toxfor lead (1.028 PPM). Sample No. 108 showed elevated orslightly elevated concentrations of barium (335 PPM) andchromium (18 PPM). Sample No. 109 showed elevated orslightly elevated concentrations of arsenic (18 PPM), barium(237 PPM), and lead (19 PPM).
North of South Pond System - Sample No. 113 showed slightlyelevated concentrations for chromium (15 PPM), lead(22 PPM), and zinc (22 PPM).
South of Land Treatment Unit - Sample No. 120 indicatedslightly elevated concentrations for barium (120 PPM),chromium (24 PPM), lead (17 PPM), and zinc (27 PPM).
Acid Recovery Area - Sample No. 116, taken near Stanley WellAR-3, indicated slightly elevated concentrations for lead(17 PPM) and mercury (0.29 PPM).
Crude Off-Loading Area - Sample No. 127 located just north ofHighway 277 indicated concentrations at background levels.
Old Refinery Process Area - Two samples (sample No. 's 118 &119) were collected. Sample No. 118_indicated elevatedconcentrations for copper (240 PPM), mercury (5 PPM), lead(46 PPM), cadmium (0.50 PPM), and zinc (66 PPM). Sample No.119 indicated elevated concentrations for cadmium(1.3 PPM), chromium (38 PPM), copper (59 PPM), lead(71 PPM), mercury (1.47 PPM), and zinc (61 PPM).
East of Sludge Trap #1 - Sample No. 11 indicated an elevatedconcentration for lead of 55 PPM.
ORC Superfund Site * Revision 0SUMMARY PHASE I 3-24 October 1990
6C/M8 & 0/HS
In general contamination of organics within the surface soilsamples were in very low concentrations at most samplinglocations. "Hot" spots are discussed in the followingparagraphs.
Inside of Tank 177 Diked Area - Sample No. 106 indicated anelevated concentration for phenols. This surface soilsample detected 2-methylphenol at a concentration of 84 ppin.This sample was obtained from soil that appeared to havebeen transported from another area of the site. Sample #107contained elevated concentrations of PAHs and a totalhydrocarbon scan of 192 PPM.
Crude Off-Loading Area North of U.S. Highway 277 - Chlorinatedhydrocarbons were detected in sample No. 127.Concentrations for 1,1-dichloroethylene (0.055 PPM),chlorobenzene (0.073 PPM), and trichloroethylene(0.089 PPM) were found.
ORC Superfund Site Revision 0SUMMARY PHASE I 3-25 October 1990
III
TABLE 3-6SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SURFACE SOILS
SAMPLING LOCATIONSOSDH SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS, PPMarsenicbar inncadmiumchromiumcoppereo tox arsenicep tox -chromiuneo tox leadep tox mercuryleadmercurvnickelzinc
ORGANICS 1 HS.PPMhydrocarbon scanbenzeneethylbenzenexylene
GC/MS.PPN1.1-diehloroethylene2.4-dimethylphenol2-methyl phenol2-methy I naphthalene4-methyl phenolacenaphtheneacetonebenzenebenzpia)pyrenebis(Z-ethylhexyl) phthalatechlorobenzenechrysenedibenzofurandiethylphthalatedimethylphthalateethylbenzenef luorenemethyl ethyl ketonemethylene chloridenaphthalenephenanthrenephenolpyrenetoluenetrichloroethylenexylene
ACIDRECOVERYAREA116
47.00
5.508.40
17.000.293.709.80
1.24
0.08 P
COOLINGTOUER101
13.00206
24154.00
0.02
52.009.5015.00176
1.26
0.02 P
0.03 P
CRUDEOFF-LOADAREA .127
46.00
9.6013.00
6.70
7.4016.00
46.40
2.34 J5.51 J
0.06
0.81
0.07
0.07
0.03 P0.02 P
0.45
0.070.10
EAST OFSLUDGETRAPS111
8.00109
13.0017.00
55.00
9.6024.00
2.40
0.02 P
0.02 P0.02 P
LEADED GASOLINE TANKS102
6.8099.00
17.0084.00
74.000.2513.0055.00
0.49
0.02 P
0.04 P
103
33.00148
39.0029.00
0.05
2260.5914.0075.00
0.37
0.12 P
3.500.66 P
0.02 P
0.61
104
56.001446
16.0035.00
2.74
10289.9012.0054.00
0.60
0.02 P
0.03 P
108
335
18.0040.00
13.00
11.0030.00
2.83
0.91 J
0.02 P
0.27 B
0.02 P0.02 P
109-.18.00237
12.0020.00
19.00
20.0021.00
15.50
0.11 J
0.02 P
0.10 B
0.02 P0.02 P
N. OFS. PONDSYSTEM113
76.00
15.0024.00
22.00
7.7022.00
1.04
0.02 P
0.03 P
l
iii
LEGENDB • Compound was found in sample
and associated blankJ • Indicates an estimated valueP • Possible lab contaminant
NOTES1. See Figure m S-4 for surface
soil sample locations2. Where • concentration is not
shown, the compound was belowthe detection limit
3. Whe' a concentration is not shownfor EP Tox compounds, the compoundwas not analyzed using EP ToxExtraction procedures.
02/08/91
TABLE 3-6SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SURFACE SOILS
SAMPLING LOCATIONSOSOH SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS. PPMarsenicbariumcaotauumchromiuncoppereo tox arsenicec tox chromiumep tox leadep tox mercuryleadmercurynickelzinc
ORGANICS 1 HS.PPMhydrocarbon scanbenzeneethvl benzenexylene
SC/MS.PPM1,1-dichloroethylene2,4-dimethylphenol2-methyl phenol2-methvln8Dhthalene4-methvl phenolacenaphtheneacetonebenzene :benzo(a)pyrenebis(2-ethvlhexyl) phthalatechlorobenzenechrysenedibenzofurandiethylphthalatedimethylphthalateethylbenzenef luorenemethyl ethyl ketonemethylene chloridenaphthalenejhenanthrenephenolpyrenetoluenetrichloroethylenexylene
NORTHU.S.277124
81.00
12.0013.00
10.00
7.6017.00
2.92
0.02 P
OLDSTORAGE PIT AREA1H
13.00144
39.00316
1232.6018.00140
0.32
0.05 P
0.60 B
0.04 P
117
104
72.0019.00
31.00
10.0033.00
3.57
0.16 J
1.00 P
0.05 P
REFINERY AREA118
18.000.5114.00240
46.005.004.7066.00
9.47
0.65 J1.08 J
0.65 P
0.09
0.490.09
0.05 P
1.40
119
65.001.3038.0059.00
71.001.477.40
61.00
0.44
0.05 P
S. OFIftHP
TREATNHT120
120
24.0019.00
17.00
9.1027.00
1.41
0.04 P
TANK FARM105
21.00200
26.0056.00
3.42
11191.2115.0079.00
0.54
0.02 P
1.10 P
0.008 P
0.43
106
65.00258
149522
0.050.49
2942.5925.00378
0.33
16084.00
930
0.11 P
4.20 P
0.08 P0.03 P
1400
107
185
13.0053.00
15.00
13.0029.00
192137 J137 J275 J
10.00
0.310.05 P0.04
0.420.86
0.111.10
0.04 P
3.401.50
0.15
0.32
110
124
16.0029.00
31.00
9.8026.00
3.02
0.52 B
0.02 P0.02 P
LEGENDB B Compound was found in sample
and associated blankJ * Indicates an estimated valueP • Possible lab contaminant
NOTES1. See Figure sou 1-4 for surface
soil sample locations2. Where a concentration is not
shown, the conpound was belowthe detection limit
3. Where a concentration is not shownfor EP Tox compounds, the compoundwas not analyzed using EP ToxExtraction procedures.
02/08/91
ITABLE 3-6
SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTSSURFACE SOILS
SAMPLING LOCATIONSOSDH SAMPLE NO.
I MOO CAM 1C PRIORITY POLLUTAKTS.PPMarsenicbar inncadmiifi)chromiincoooereo tox arsenicCD tox chromiumCD tox leadep tox mercury -leadmercurynickelzinc
ORGAN I CS t HS.PPNhydrocarbon scanbenzeneethylbenzenexvlene
EC/MS. PPM1 . 1 -dichloroethylene2,4-dimethylohenol2-methyl phenol2-methylnaDhthalene4-methyl phenolacenaphtheneacetonebenzenebenzo(e)pyrenebis(Z-ethylhexvl) phthalatechlorobenzenechrvsenedibenzofurandiethylphthalatedimethylphthalateethylbenzenefluorenemethyl ethyl ketonemethylene chloridenaphthalenephenanthrenephenolpyrenetoluenetrichloroethylenexvlene
TAHKFARM112
236149
20.0015.003.89
32.00
13.0032.00
2.71
0.15 P
0.04 P
AREAHEARSUMPS62
70.003101.60184533
o.oa0.410.0062506.1030.00401
3.57
0.46 J
200160
1800
3200
REDSTAINAREA1
21.00180
10.008.50
45.00
10.0019.00
1601700
5400
33.00 P
95.00 P
4200
[IIIil(IIIililIIIIIIIIIII
LEGENDB » Conpound was found in cample
end associated blankJ « Indicates an estimated valueP • Possible lab contaminant
NOTES1. See Figure HM 1-4 for surface
soil sample locations2. Where a concentration is not
shown, the compound was belowthe detection limit
3. Where a concentration is not shownfor EP Tox compounds, the conpoundwas not analyzed using EP ToxExtraction procedures.
02/08/91
8BB-2
8BB-3
SUMMARY PHASE I 3-26 October 1990
113.8 SUBSURFACE SOILS
Subsurface soil samples were collected during the Jconstruction of monitoring wells. Selected samples wereanalyzed. Table 3-7 summarizes the analytical data obtained •that indicates "hits". (Note: Subsurface soil sampling •associated with the waste sources is summarized in Section3.2). Subsurface soil locations are shown on Figure ISUM 3-2. •
SBB-1
Sample No. 30 from a sandy clay stratum overlying a gypsum |layer contained 261 ppm of total hydrocarbons. Thiscontaminated zone appeared to be "perched" above the gypsumand Rush Springs sandstone.
Two samples (sample Nos. 33 and 34) were collected from anorganic clay layer overlying the Rush Springs sandstone.Sample No. 34 contained slight concentrations for totalhydrocarbons (13.3 PPM) at depth of 21 feet. Slight tracesof PAHs and total hydrocarbons (8 PPM) were detected insample No. 33 at a depth of 6 to 9 feet. I
I
ITwo samples (sample No. 's 36 & 37) of silty clay contained •trace amounts of hydrocarbons of 4.02 and 3.48 PPM |respectively. Concentrations decreased slightly with depth.
ISBB-4
Gypsum outcrop layer overlying sandstone stratum was notsampled. No organic vapors were detected during drilling •operations. |
ORC Superfund Site Revision 0 ICTTMM1TJV TJHaCT? T t-")K. r»r"*-r>Kor- I Q O n •
I
[I(Ill1 1llll1 1ll1 1I
SBB-5
Two samples (sample Nos. 58 & 59) were obtained from aweakly cemented zone of the Rush Springs sandstone betweendepth of 10 to 15 feet. The uppermost sample (No. 55)contained total hydrocarbons concentration of 4,140 PPM andlow concentrations of PAHs. Concentrations decrease withdepth to 3.130 PPM in sample No. 59. (It should be notedthat free product was found in the monitoring well installedin the bore hole.)
8BB-6
Sample No.64, obtained from 0 to 2 feet and sample No. 65,obtained at a depth of 6 to 8 feet from a silty clay layeroverlying gypsum, contained slight traces of totalhydrocarbons (1.68 PPM and 3.27 PPM, respectively).
SBB-7
Sample No. 67, obtained in the uppermost zone of a saturatedsilty sand zone (9 to 11 feet deep), contained very slighttrace of hydrocarbons (0.920 PPM).
ll SBB-8
Four samples (sample Nos. 68, 69, 70, and 71) were obtained* from depths of 0 to 40 feet in alluvial soils overlying the
Rush Springs sandstone. All samples contained slight traces(<2 PPM) of hydrocarbons. . .'
I 8BB-9
1
I
Sample No. 86, obtained from a weathered portion of the RushSprings sandstone (3-5 feet depth), contained slight tracesof total hydrocarbons (0.858 PPM).
ORC Superfund Site Revision 0SUMMARY PHASE I 3-27 October 1990
SBB-10
Five samples (sample Nos. 77, 78, 79, BO, and 81) wereobtained from silty clay/clay alluvial soils overlying theRush Springs sandstone. Concentrations for hydrocarbonswere detected in all five samples. The highestconcentration was detected in sample No. 78 (3-5 foot depth)at 292 PPM and decreased with depth with lowestconcentration (0.360 PPM) in sample No. 81 (35-37 footdepth). Slight traces (<1 PPM) of phenols were detected insample Nos. 79 and 80 between depth of 10 to 20 feet belowthe ground surface.
SBB-ll
Three samples (sample Nos. 82, 83, and 84) were obtainedfrom a clay stratum overlying the Rush Spring sandstone toa depth of 27 feet. Each sample contained slight traces(<4 PPM) of hydrocarbons.
SBB-12
A shallow surfical sample (0-2 feet) indicated trace(0.833 PPM) concentration of hydrocarbons.
8BB-13
Four samples (sample Nos. 132, 133, 134, and 135) wereobtained from alluvial soils (sand/clay) overlying the RushSprings sandstone. The surface soil (sample No. 132)indicated no hydrocarbon contamination. The three deepersamples all contained concentrations of hydrocarbons between2 to 3 PPM.
8BB-14
Two samples (sample Nos. 137 and 138) were obtained from aclay stratum overlying a thick (9.5 feet) gypsum layer.Concentrations for hydrocarbons were <1 PPM for each sample.
ORC Superfund Site 'Revision 0SUMMARY PHASE I 3-28 October 1990
III1111IIII11III
ilI
il1I
SBB-15
Six samples (sample Nos. 139 through 144) were obtained froma 20 foot thick clay layer overlying the Rush Springssandstone. The four deepest samples containedconcentrations for hydrocarbons of 2.81 PPM (No. 141),542 PPM (No. 142), 483 PPM (No. 143), and 990 PPM (No. 144).
SBB-16
Two samples (sample Nos. 170 and 171) were obtained from agravelly sandy clay fill, 9 feet deep, overlying a verythick (31.5 feet) sequence of gypsum. Sample No. 170 showed20.1 PPM hydrocarbons and sample No. 171 showed 6.27 PPM forhydrocarbons. A black oily substance was encountered at adepth of 12 feet within the gypsum. Organic vapor analysiswith HNu read volatile concentrations of 1.5 to 2.0 PPMemanating from the drill fluid pit.
BBS-17
Sample No. 198 from 3-5 foot depth showed traceconcentration (0.027 PPM) for hydrocarbons.
IBB-2 & IBB-3
No subsurface soil samples were taken. (See SBB-3 andSBB-11, respectively, for shallow soil conditions.)
IBB-4
Four samples (sample Nos. 152, 153, 156, and 158) wereobtained from the alluvial soils overlying the Rush Springssandstone. All samples showed trace amounts ofhydrocarbons. The highest concentration was 19 PPM at adepth of 27 feet (sample No. 152) and the lowest was 0.52PPM at a depth of 37 feet (sample No. 158). In additiontrace amounts of phenols and PAHs were detected in samplesNos. 156 and 158.
IBB-S
No concentrations of organic contamination were detected.
ORC Superfund Site • Revision 0SUMMARY PHASE I 3-29 October 1990
TABU: 3-7SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SUBSURFACE SOILS
SAMPLING LOCATIONSOSOH SAMPLE NO.DEPTH. feet
INORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS. PPMarsenicbariumberylliumchromiumcopperep tox -chromiumep tox leadleadmercurynickelzinc
ORGAN I CS ft HS.PPNhydrocarbon scanbenzenechlordanechlordane. cis isomerchlordane, trans isomerethylbenzenesec-butylbenzenetoluenexylene
EC/MS. PPM2,4-dimethylphenol2-hexanone2-methyl phenol2-methvlnaDhthalene4-methyl phenolacenaphthyleneacetoneanthracenebenzenebis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalatecarbon disulfidechloroformethylbenzenefluorene .methyl ethyl ketonemethylene chloridenaphthalenephenanthrenephenolpyrenetoluenexylene
IB8-4-11523-5
67.00
8.408.30
5.70
6.6013.00
19.00
0.02 B
0.03 B
IBB-4-215312-14
107
9.809.90
7.10
9.6016.00
5.90
0.28 P
0.02
IBB-4-315625-27
69.00
6.906.00
6.4012.00
7.82
1
3.40
4.90
6.30
0.26 B
0.01 B
0.06 P
3.10
0.050.09
IB8-4-415835-37
19.00
4.201.50
3.607.60
0.52
1.50
2.40
3.20
0.21 B
1.60 B
0.06 P
2.00
0.010.02
IBB-5-11800-2
135
17.007.20
11.00
10.0026.00
0.02 P
SSB-0130
9-10.5
203
17.0044.00
17.00
'6.0032.00
261
5.20 J16.10 J
9.98 J
17.00
4.72
7.12
67.69 P
9.80
15.03
S8B-02-1336-9
2041.1014.0025.00
15.00
'4.00•5.00
8.00
1.52 J
4.14
0.10
0.46
0.481.37
S8B-02-234
18-21
108
7.6016.00
8.00
6.8014.00
13.30
2.57 J
0.51
S8B-03-1360-2
120
13.0019.00
14.00
9.7026.00
4.02
1.15 J
0.30 J
0.07 P
S8B-03-2379-11
359
16.0053.00
15.00
15.0032.00
3.48
1.11 J
0.05 P
0.04 P
LEGENDB « Compound was found in sample
and associated blank.J • Indicates an estimated value.P • Possible lab contaminant.
NOTES1. See Figure BOH *-> for subsurface
soil sample locations.2. Where a concentration is not
shown, the compound was belowthe detection limit.
3. No sample taken for SBB-4,IBB-2, and IBB-3.
4. Where a concentration is not shownfor EP Tox compounds, the compoundwas not analyzed using EP ToxExtraction procedures.
02/08/91
III1IIIIIIIIIIIIIII
TABLE 3-7
SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTSSUBSURFACE SOILS
SAMPLING LOCATIONSOSDH SAMPLE NO.DEPTH. fe«t
INORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS. PPMarsenicbariumberylliumchromiumcoppereo tox chromium
. eo tox leadleadmercurynickelzinc
ORGAN I CS 1 HS.PPNhydrocarbon scanbenzenechlordanechlordane. cis isomerchtordane, trans isomerethyl benzenesec-butyibenzenetoluenexylene
GC/NS.PPN2,4-dimethylphenol2-hexanone2-methyl phenol2-methylnaphthalene4-tnethyl phenolacenaphthyleneacetoneanthracenebenzenebis(Z-ethylhexyl) phthalatecarbon disulfidechloroformethyl benzenef luorenemethyl ethyl ketonemethylene chloridenaphthalenephenanthrenephenolpyrenetoluenexylene
S88-05-158
10-11
u.oo3.6029.00
6.5013.00
4140279 J
74.20 J
498 J
17.00
0.36 P0.072.20
2.20
0.31 P
14.000.72
0.120.520.67
SBB-05-259
13- H
3.00
3.408.40
6.3011.00
3.13
0.24 P
0.30 P0.13 P
S8B-06-1640-2
101
11.0020.00
10.00
8.3023.00
1.68
0.330.25 P
0.34 P0.14 P
S88-06-2656-8
142
14.0016.00
11.00
13.0029.00
3.27
0.02 P
S88-07-1660-2
117
13.0012.00
9.60
10.0023.00
1.90
0.02 P
0.03 P
S88-07-2679-11
68.00
6.408.40
6.4014.00
0.92
0.02 P
SBB-08-1680-2
105
10.0023.00
0.281700.6511.0041.00
0.90
0.03 P
0.04 P
S88-08-2693-5
107
4.6010.00
7.40
0.64
0.05 P
0.05 P
S8B-08-370
12-H
82.00
7.0054.00
22.00
0.99
0.05 P
0.04 P
SBB-08-471
40-42
96.00
12.0019.00
9.70
9.7021.00
1.94
0.22 P
0.09 P
•>
LEGENDB • Compound was found in •ample
and associated blank.J * Indicates an estimated value.P * Possible lab contaminant.
MOVES1. See Figure •» J-2 for subsurface
•oil sample locations.2. Where a concentration is not
shown, the compound was belowthe detection limit.
3. No sample taken for SBB-4,IBB-2, and IBB-3.
4. Where a concentration is not shownfor EP Tox compounds, the compoundwas not analyzed using EP ToxExtraction procedures.
02/08/91
TABLE 3-7SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SUBSURFACE SOILS
SAMPLING LOCATIONSOSDH SAMPLE NO.DEPTH, feet
INORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS. PPMarsenicbar innberyl 1 innchromiumcoppereo tox-Chramutiep tox leadleadmercurynickelzinc
DRGANICS A HS.PPMhydrocarbon scanbenzenech I ordanechlordane. cis isomerchlordane, trans isomerethv I benzenesec-butylbenzenetoluenexylene
GC/HS.PPN2,4-dimethylphenol2-hexanone2-methyLJ)henol2-methylnaphthalene4-methyl phenolacenaphthyleneacetoneanthracenebenzenebis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalatecarbon disulfidechloroformethylbenzenef luorenemethyl ethyl ketonemethylene chloridenaphthaleneohenanthrenephenolpyrenetoluenexylene
SBB-0986S-5
7.90
3.1015.00
4.709.80
0.86
0.06 P
0.02 P
S8B-10-1770-2
69.00
1.4016.00
6.40
2.80
5.50
0.07 P
S88-10-2783-5
85.00
19.0012.00
5.60
5.4011.00
292
0.02
0.17 P
0.05 P
0.26
S88-10-379
12- 14
66.00
7.407.40
8.5023.00
53.90
0.34 J
0.42 J
0.05
0.46
0.84 P
0.17 P
0.22
SBB-10-480
15-17
132
8.3014.00
6.80
11.0018.00
0.29
0.02
0.18
0.46 P
0.11 P
0.01
S88-10-581
35-37
70.00
8.5015.00
6.40
8.2018.00
0.36
0.25 P
0.07 P
SBB-11-1820-2
85.00
9.009.50
7.50
7.5015.00
3.701.46 J
0.14 J
0.02 P
2.00 P
0.02 P
S8B-11-2839-11
178
8.8070.00
8.70
11.0025.00
0.59
0.06 P
0.04 P0.04 P
S88-11-384
25-27
83.00
7.3017.00
6.50
6.9015.00
1.62
0.03 P
0.03 P0.02 P
S8B-12880-2
142
13.0023.00
10.00
9.6021.00
0.83
0.02 P
LEGENDB • Compound was found in sample
and associated blank.J « Indicates an estimated value.P « Possible lab contaminant.
NOTES1. See Figure tat 9-2 for subsurface
soil sample locations.2. Where a concentration is not
shown, the compound was belowthe detection limit.
3. No sample taken for SBB-4,IBB-2, and IBB-3.
4. Where a concentration is not shownfor EP Tox compounds, the compoundwas not analyzed using EP ToxExtraction procedures.
02/08/91
EIIIIIIIEIEEIEIII
TABLE 3-7SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SUBSURFACE SOILS
SAMPLING LOCATIONSOSDH SAMPLE NO.DEPTH, feet
INORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS. PPMarsenicbar innberyl Hunchrotniune<>ppereo tox chromiumeo tox leadleadmercurynz
ekelnc
DRGANICS I HS.PPNhydrocarbon scanbenzenechlordanechlordane. cfs isomerchlordane. trans \ sanerethyl benzenesec-butylbenzenetoluenexylene
GC/MS.PPM2 4-dimethylphenol2-hexanone2-methyl phenol2- methylnaphthalene4-tnethvl Dhenolacenaphthyleneacetoneanthracene -benzenebis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalatecarbon disulf idechloroformethylbenzenefluorenemethyl ethyl ketonemethylene chloridenaphthaleneDhenanthrenephenolovrenetoluenexylene - . .
S8B-13-11320-2
28.00224
302499.000.370.158063.0514.00512
0.02 P
5.60 P
0.001
0.001 B0.02 P
SBB-13-21339-11
96.00
12.0019.00
6.40
9.0022.00
2.32
0.010.0070.005
0.02 P
0.02 B0.02 B
SBB-13-313415-17
60.00
6.407.70
5.70
6.4014.00
2.57
0.58 P
0.02 B0.02 B
SB8-13-413530-32
90.00
3.904.70
5.8011.00
2.89
0.10 P
0.06 P0.05 P
S8B-14-11373-5
132
16.0017.00
19.00
11.0025.00
0.07
0.44
0.02 B
1.60
S8B-14-21386-8.5
1051.2022.0055.00
18.000.2918.0038.00
0.04
0.01 P
0.01 P0.02 B
SBB-15-11390-2
154
15.0016.00
12.00
9.5020.00
0.04 P
SBB-15-21406-8
63.00
11.0019.00
9.20
12.0021.00
0.04 P
0.03 B
588-15-31419-11
209
13.0018.00
9.50
13.0026.00
2.81
0.59 J
0.02 J0.74 J
0.11 P
0.03 B
SBB-15-414212-14
189
10.0023.00
7.00
13.0023.00
542
140 J
188 J
0.33
8.60 P
2.60
32.00 P0.52 P0.71
6.30
LEGENDB • Compound was found in sanple
and associated blank.J * Indicates an estimated value.P « Possible lab contaminant.
NOTES1. See Figure mat 1-2 for subsurface
soil sample locations.2. Where a concentration is not
shown, the compound was belowthe detection limit.
3. No sample taken for SBB-4,IBB-2, and IBB-3. .
4. where a concentration is not shownfor EP Tox compounds, the compoundwas not analyzed using EP ToxExtraction procedures.
02/08/91
TABLE 3-7SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SUBSURFACE SOILS
SAMPLING LOCATIONSOSDH SAMPLE NO.DEPTH, feet
INORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS. PPMarsenicbariumberyl Hunchromiumeoooereo tox chromiumeo tox leadleadmercurynickelzinc
3RGANICS I HS.PPNhydrocarbon scanbenzenechlordanechlordane. cis isomerchlordane, trans isomerethyl benzenesec - butyl benzenetoluenexylene
GC/MS.PPM2,4-dtmethylphenol2-hexanone2-methyl jhenol2-methylnaphthalene4-methyl phenolacenaphthyleneacetoneanthracenebenzenebis(Z-ethylhexyl) phthalatecarbon disulfidechloroformethyl benzenef luorenemethyl ethyl ketonemethylene chloridenaphthalenephenanthrenephenolpyrenetoluenexylene
S8B-15-5U315-17
2521.0014.0026.00
8.70
17.0029.00
483
95.20 J
180 J
9.00 P
1.20
33.00 P0.52 P
3.30
S88-15-614418-20
189
21.00142
4.80
25.0036.00
990
221 J
326 J
0.38
9.90 P
0.50 P
2.80
33.00 P1.20 P0.83
7.60
S88-16-11700-2
.137
8.8039.00
5.80
9.6023.00
20.10
1.16 J
0.86 J2.52 J
0.08 P0.008 P
S8B-16-21710-2
69.00
9.707.10
5.70
7.8014.00
6.27
0.15 P0.005 P
SBS-17-11983-5
199
13.0038.00
16.000.2513.0025.00
0.03
0.07 P
0.09 B0.02 B
LEGENDB • Compound was found in sample
and associated blank.J • Indicates an estimated value.P » Possible lab contaminant.
NOTES1. See Figure toot s-2 for subsurface
soil sample locations.2. Where a concentration is not
shoun, the compound was belowthe detection limit.
3. No sample taken for SBB-4,IBB-2, and IBB-3.
4. Where a concentration is not shownfor EP Tox compounds, the compoundwas not analyzed using EP ToxExtraction procedures.
02/08/91
ASPHALTDRUM
OLDCAUSTIC «STORAGE X
PITS /
LIME SODASTORAGE
PITS I
SAMPLE UOCATION3
inrOMUTION HCHCOM USCD UPON rHOTOOIU^HTDATKO &•!-•» AS rattflOCO «T TH( OKLAHOMAITHI KMHTUIIT W WALTH.
' ORC SUPERFUNO SITEimtftiVM MVEnNumN / FCAnaiurr amor
OKLAHOMA STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
BfCHTEL INC.NOUITOM. TCIUO
'LINu LOCATIONS rGWASTf SOURCES
i
OLDCAUSTICSTORAGE
PITS /
•"*•• MYSTERY WELL LOCATIONS
.IUI SAMPLE NUMBERSIHTOMUTHN H1MM MSCO UPON FHOTOOIUPHVMICO 5-S-MA1FKWIOCO if THC OBUMOMAtUTI KMHTMtNT Of Mf ALTH.
^MSOIL FARMI II,-. iva,|
|V____/l^Vji ORC SUPERFUND SITE
NCIOOUU. MVESTKUTIOH I FEA8IB1UTY STUDY
CTML.
OLDCAUSTICSTORAGE
PITS /
LIME SODASTORAGE
PITS I. SHALLOW MONITORING WELL-SS8-8 LOCATIONS(O.OII) laOIII-BENZENE CONCENTRATIONS
IN PPM
KETf TO CONCENTRATIONS
L\N < 0.008 PPM
O.O09-O090 PPM
>aoooppMIMTOMaTION KIKON MUOUKN PHOTOORAPMVDAT 10 9-»-«3ASP*OVlCeD »T THC OKUkMQMA•T*Tt KNUlTHCNr Of KtALTH.
OJIVHIC KALI2OO 400
ORC SUPERFUND SITE
HfHfffl^l MVfSTUATION / FCASlBUJn STUDY
Ct»*. OKLAHOMA
OKLAHOMA STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
BECHTEL ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
HOUSTON, 1CIAI
nn*B£NZENE GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION
FIGURE SUM »-2A
wvyo
OLDCAUSTICSTORAGE
PITS /
LIME SODASTORAGE
PITS I
.4
NOTES
AREAS WHERE FREE HYDROCARBONPRODUCT WAS DETECTED, JULY 1900
UtfOHMATIOH HCMOM MSCO UPON 9OAF ID »'»'«3Al*tOVIOeO »V THE OKLAHOMA•TATC OtMHTMNT Of MALTH.
••AtHIC KAIK
«00 «QO
ORC SUPEflFUND SITERCUtOUL MVESTMATIOM / FEAStBIUTY STUDY
CTM, OKLAHOMA
OKLAHOMA STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
BECHTEL ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.HOuaiON. TIKA*
c HYDRJMM. tMamtttn. | •«¥/&*?!
FIGURE SUM 5-20 KVTW
OLDCAUSTIC <STORAGE X
^PITS /I6O.63), ..../
AO2.89I
LIME SOOASTORAGE
PITS '.
\"V
029,13014Al Gtodys Crt«k And Countr Roodin HIM SOMH rc» F
SEDIMENT/SURFACE WATERSAMPLE LOCATIONS
(82,891 SAMPLE NUMBERS
MFORMATKW MMM MSCO UfOH mOTDQAAPMTMHO 5-j-«j»«rnovmeo tr rmo«L«HO««•TATI «nWTMCMT Of MCALTH.
ORC SUPERFUNO SITEnrarniM WYESIIQATIOM / m&etun snnt
CTAa. OKiAHOMA
OKLAHOMA STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
BECHTU. ENVinONHEffTAL, INC.HOMIOH. TUA«
mil
FKURE SUM 9-9
s.
OLDCAUSTICSTORAGE
PITS /
•(120) SURFACE SOIL SAMPLE LOCATIONS
HCMCOW MSCD UPON PHOTOGRAPHYMTKD 8- 1-9S M PMOVIOEO •* THE OKLAHOMA•TATI DtPMflltMr Or WALTH.
ORC SUPERFUND SITEBIt*fn*' MVf9TIOATIOH / FEASIBIUTT STUDY
OKLAHOMA
OKLAHOMA STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
BCCHTEL ENVIRONMENTAL, IMC.
1IiIIIIIII1IIiit
4.0 GROUNDWATER
This section presents a brief summary of existing site wellevaluation, groundwater data, and Rush Springs aquifer dataobtained during Phase I field activities.
Prior to beginning Phase* I field activities, the existing sitewells were evaluated using geophysical borehole logging. Of the 78existing site wells, 50 were geophysically logged. The results andinterpretation of this activity were presented in TechnicalMemorandum I, February 1, 1990. To further evaluate the usefulnessof existing site wells, six wells were video logged during thebeginning of Phase I field activities. The existing wells wereuseful in helping determine site stratigraphy. They are of limiteduse for determining groundwater levels as most are slotted from orabove the ground surface to the bottom of the well.
Seventeen shallow wells and four intermediate wells wereconstructed during Phase I. Geologic logs are attached as AppendixA and monitoring well construction reports are attached as AppendixB. The boreholes of sixteen of the shallow wells and all four ofthe intermediate wells were geophysically logged prior to wellconstruction.
Tests to determine hydraulic conductivity in the Rush Springsaquifer were conducted in eight shallow monitoring wells and fourintermediate monitoring wells. Both slug and pump out tests wereperformed. The results of those tests are presented on Table i4-1. ; " ' • ' • :
The last set of groundwater measurements was made in mid-July 1990.Contour elevations based on these measurements are presented inFigure SUM-5. The general direction of groundwater flow across thesite is to the southeast. Groundwater gradient is 0.012. Based onaverage hydraulic conductivity of 2.0 X 10"'* cm/sec and an effectiveporosity of 0.30, the rate of groundwater flow across the site isapproximately 8 feet per year.
ORC Superfund Site 'Revision 1SUMMARY PHASE I 4-1 February 1, 1991
TABLE 4-1
HYDRAULIC CONDTJCTTVTTY TEST DATA
WELL NUMBER
SBB-1
SBB-2
SBB-3
SBB-6
SBB-11
SBB-15
SBB-16
SBB-17
IBB-2
IBB-3
IBB-4
IBB-5
HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY CM/SEC
5.1 X 10-4
6.7 X 10-4
1.0 X 10-4
6.7 X 10-5
1.6 X 10-4
2.5 X 10
2.5 X 10'
-4
1.4 X 10•4
3.5 X 10-4
3.3 X 10-4
7.6 X 10-5
2.9 X 10-4
ORC Superfund SiteSUMMARY PHASE I
Revision 0October 1990
QUOCAUSTICSTORAGE
PITS /
LIME SODASTORAGE
PITS 1.NOTES
SELECTED STANLEY WELLS INOT SHOWN)WOK ALSO USEO TO PRODUCE CONTOURS.
6ROONOWATEH ELEVATIONMEASURED IN WELL
•"•-• MONITORING WELL LOCATIONS
WATER LEVEL ELEVATIONSIN FEET MSL, JULY I98O
INfMMATMM MCRCON BAUD UPON POATCO 9-S-«9ABMOVtOCO •» THC OKLAHOMA•TATI OlfWITMCHT Of HEALTH.
OUAPHIC SCALEtoo 4OO •<»
ORC SUPERFUNO SITEHEHEC4AL WVESTUATIOH I FEASIBILITY 8TUOT
Ctm. OKLAHOMA
OKLAHOMA STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
BECHTEL ENVIRONMENTAL. INC.
HOUSTON. TEXAS
'"fcROUNDWATER ELEVATION CONTOURS
FKUHE SUM 4-1
5.O QUALITY CONTROL/QUALITY ASSURANCE
Table 5-1 contains a list of the trip, field, and sampling/deconequipment blanks that were collected during the Phase I samplingactivities at the ORC site. The table also contains the laboratoryblanks (instrument and method blanks) that were run during labanalyses of the ORC samples. Each blank was listed by its SELnumber and categorized by the following parameters:
Type of blank- field- trip- laboratory
• Analytical tests run on the blank- priority pollutant volatile organics- priority pollutant base/neutral/acid extractableorganics
• Chemical contaminant concentrations detected in theblanks
• SEL numbers of the ORC samples which were analyzedwith each blank
This information will be used to determine whether the chemicalconstituents detected in the ORC samples represent sitecontaminants, or were introduced during sampling, shipment oranalytical procedures.
ORC Superfund Site Revision 0SUMMARY PHASE I 5-1 October 1990
CHEMICAL CONTAMINANTS FOUND IN BLANKS(LAB, TRIP, EQUIPMENT BLANKS)
ORC11/19/90
SELNUMBER
1799871B0294180295160303180311180312180320180328180329180337180361180362180739180743180886180887181323181345181346181366181367181577181578181579181897
181898
181980181981181982181983181984181993181994182029182033182419182427182434182459182460182568182569
183343183344
TYPEBLANKFIELDFIELDTRIPTRIPFIELDTRIPTRIPFIELDTRIPTRIP
LAB(SED)LAB(LIQ)
TRIPLABTRIPLABTRIPTRIPFIELD
LAB(SED)LAB(LIQ)
TRIPLAB(LIQ)LAB(SED)
EQUIP
EQUIP
TRIPTRIPTRIPTRIPFIELD
LAB(SED)LABJ.IQ)EQUIP
LABTRIPFIELDTRIP
LAB(LIQ)LAB(SED)
TRIPLAB
TRIPEQUIP
vocANALYSIS
YESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES
YES
YESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES
YESYES
BNAANALYSIS
YESNONONONONONONONONOYESYESNOYESNO
YESNONONO
YESYESNOYESYESYES
YES
NONONONONOYESNONOYESNONONO
YESYESNO
YES
NONO
CHEMICAL CONTAMINANTSCONCENTRATION (UG/L)
ND11.0 Methylene chloride9.0 Methylene chloride
NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND
2.0 chloroform4.0 dichlorobromomethane5.0 chlorodibromomelhane
4.0 bromoform57 barium24 copper2130 zinc
NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND
. NDNDNDND
260.0 bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalateNDND
SAMPLE NOS.REFERENCED BY BLANK
179984180287-180302180287-180293180296-180302180304-180919180304-180310180313-180319180321-180336180321-180327180330-180336180287-180336180287-180336
1 80732 & 180735180732-180740
1 80880 & 180883180847-180883181303-181320
181303-181342181303-181342181303-181342181563-181574181563-181574181563-181574
181919-181942181931-181942
1 81 893 & 181 897181906
Gladys Creek Samples181893-181940181893-181940182005-182032182005-182032
182413 & 1824161 82420 & 182424182428-182441182413-182456182413-182456182541-182565182541-182565
183328-183345
• • - -
ITABLE 5-1 Page 1
CHEMICAL CONTAMINANTS FOUND IN BLANKS(LAB, TRIP, EQUIPMENT BLANKS)
ORC11/19/90
SELNUMBER
183345183370183371183372183597
183623183624183625184159
184178184179
184951184952184953184954185669
185670
185671
185672
185638185991
187084187235187248187264187265187266187784187791187801187820187821187822187823187995
TYPEBLANKEQUIPEQUIP
LAB(LIQ)LAB(SED)
EQUIP
TRIPLABLABTRIP
LAB(LIQ)LAB(SED)
TRIPTRIPLABLABTRIP
TRIP
LAB
LAB
EQUIPLAB
LABEQUIPTRIPTRIPLABLAB
EQUIPFIELDTRIPTRIPLABLABLABLAB
vocANALYSIS
YESYESYESYESYES
YESNONO
YES
YESYES
YESYESYESYESYES
YES
YES
YES
YESYES
YESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES
BNAANALYSIS
NONOYESYESNO
NOYESYESNO
YESYES
NONO
YESYESNO
NO
YES
YES
YESYES
YESNONONOYESYESNONONONO
YESYESYESYES
CHEMICAL CONTAMINANTSCONCENTRATION (UG/L)
NDNDNOND
2.0 methylethyl ketone2.0 methylene chloride3.0 methylene chloride
NDND
55.0 methylethyl ketone3.0 methylene chloride
2.0 methyl chloride31.0 acetone
3.0 carbon disulfide6.0 benzene
3.0 methylene chloride250.0 bis(2-ethylhexyl)
phthalate10.0 methylethyl ketone1.0 methylethyl ketone9.0 methylethyl ketone
NDND
14.0 methytethylketone25.0 acetone
27.0 methylethyl ketone3.0 methylene chloride
48.0 acetone10.0 methylethyjketone2.0 methylene chloride3.0 methylethyl ketone3.0 methylene chloride
3.0 acetoneND
21.0 methytethylketone3.0 methylene chloride2.0 methylene chloride3.0 methylene chloride1.0 methylene chloride
ND2.0 methylene chloride
. 3.0 methylene chlorideND
1.0 methylene chlorideNDND
2.0 methylene chloride2.0 methylene chloride
ND480.0 bis(2-ethy!hexyl)
SAMPLE NOS.REFERENCED BY BLANK
183328-183366183328-183366183585-183594
183605-183622183585-183620183605-183620184147-184169
184147-184179184147-184179
184906-184933184936-184948184906-184921184924-184948185617-165666
185617-185666
185617-185639
185642-185666
185976-185988
187062-187080187223-187232187236-167245187249-187261187223-187255187258-187261
187751-187778187781-187817
187980-187992
TABLE 5-1 Page 2
II1IIIIIItII1III
11ItIfI
CHEMICAL CONTAMINANTS FOUND IN BLANKS(LAB, TRIP, EQUIPMENT BLANKS)
ORC11/19/90
SELNUMBER
188300188488188489188608188609188610
TYPEBLANK
LABTRIPLAB
FIELDTRIPLAB
VOCANALYSIS
YESYESYESYESYESYES
BNAANALYSIS
YESNOYESNONOYES
CHEMICAL CONTAMINANTSCONCENTRATION (UG/L)
phthalateNDND
1.0 methylene chlorideND
5.0 methylethyl ketoneND
SAMPLE NOS.REFERENCED BY BLANK
188285-188297188448-188484188448-188484
188604188564-188608188564-188609
TABLE 5-1 Page 3
APPENDIX A
GEOLOGIC LOGS
I
1
I
I
I
I
1
DRILLING/SAMPLINGACTIVITY RECORD
PROJECT NO.20510-060
ORC SUPERFUND SITECYRIL, OKLAHOMA
DATE START:3/13/90
DATE COMPLETE:A/11/90
BORING NO:IBB-1
SHEET NO.1 OF 2
PERSONNEL:ERIC BERGLUND
HOLE SIZE:5 1/2"-4 7/8"
DRILLING CONTRACTOR:POOL DRILLING INC.
DRILLER: UAYNE DRILLING EOUIWCNT/METHOD:G-D 1500 / WATER ROTARY
COORDINATES: )EPTH TO WATER/DATE-T1HE: GROUND ELEVATION: GROUTING: SEE COMMENTS BELOW.
CHRONOLOGICAL RECORD
DATE:3/13/903/14/903/15/903/16/903/22/903/23/904/11/90
ACTIVITY:SETUP; SAMPLED WITH SHELBY TUBE 0-18.7'; CORED 18.7-48'CORED 48-88'; REAMED (7 3/7") 0-86'; REAMED (12 1/4") 0-40'REAMED (12 1/4") 40-80'GROUTED 8" STEEL CASING IN HOLE 0-80'DRILLED OUT FLOAT SHOE; CORED 82-90'AND HIT STEEL OBJECT IN HOLETRIED TO DRILL OUT STEEL OBJECT FROM HOLE WITHOUT SUCCESSUSED VIDEO CAMERA TO TRY TO ID. OBJECT IN HOLE; FISHED FOR OBJECTIN HOLE; GROUTED HOLE SHUT.
SKETCH:
>ECONTAM1KATION: DRILL RIG AND SAMPLING EQUIPMENT DECONED WITHSTEAM CLEANER BEFORE MOVING ON LOCATION.
LOG OF BORING
DEPTHIN
FEET
SAMPLE
TYPE RUN/RECOVERY
TONS/ *SO FT
ASSIGNEDNUMBER
GEOLOGICGRAPHICLOG
DESCRIPTION COMMENTS
5 —
10 —
15 —
20 —
25 —
30 —
35 —
40 —
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
CORE
3.0-2. 0/2.0 (FT)5.0-5.0/1.85 (FT)
S.0-7.5/1.5 (FT)
0.0-1.0' CLAYEY FILL with 1 inchof asphaltic gravel at 11inches.
CORE
1.1 (FT)
12.0-13.5/1.3 (FT)
15.0-17.0/1.9 (FT)
18.0-18.7/3.7 (FT)
18.7-28.0/5.2 (FT)
28.0-38.0/5.9 (FT)
1.0-16.0' CLAY Brown, stiff,silty, very fine ((rained sandyCLAYColor changes to nottled gray andbrown at 3 feet.
Color changes to redish brown at6 feet, also sand contentincreases. Few organic particlesand roots.Silter at 12 feet
1 Color changes to brown at 15 feet555555555
-,16.0-18.0' DECOMPOSED SANDSTONE
• iitt mi••mulliiiiiiniIMIIIIII
• •••••II I
18.0-88.0' SANDSTONE Red brown,friable, silt sized to very finegrained SANDSTONE, weakly '"cemented with iron oxide andcalcite.
Placed bentonite from84 to 77 feet thengrouted 8" steel pipeto surface
COULD NOT ADVANCEHOLE BEYOND 84 FEETAFTER GROUTING 8 INCH:STEEL PROTECTORCASING IN PLACE FROM80 FEET TO SURFACE .DUE TO STEEL OBJECTIN HOLE. GROUTEDHOLE SHUT ON 4/11/90.
NO ORGANIC VAPORSWERE DETECTED DURING 'DRILLING OPERATIONS,WHICH WERE CONSTANTLYMONITORED WITH AN OVAOR H-NU.
• •••••••I
• •••••••I
• •••••••.I
CORE S8.0-48.0/3.6 (FT)
• Illlllll
• ••••••••
• •••••••I• Illlllll
in linniiiiiini• ••••••• i• ••••••I •• ••••in •
36-36 1/2 ' Silt layer
* UNCONFINEDCOMPRESS1VESTRENGTH
SH - SHELBY TUBE
CORE CARBIDE BITCORE BARREL
DRILLING/SAMPLING PROJECT NO.ACTIVITY RECORD 20510-060
DEPTHIN
FEET
40 —
-
45 ——
50 —
-
55 —
60 —
-
65 —
70 —
M
75 —
80 —
85 —•••
••
90 —
95 —•w
«•
100 —
ORC SUPERFUND SITE DATE: BORING NO: IBB-1 SHEET NO.CYRIL, OKLAHOMA SEE SHEET 1 2 OF 2
LOG OF BORING (CONTINUED)
SAMPLE
TYPE
CORE
CORE
CORE
CORE
RUN/RECOVERY
48.0-58.0V9.3 (FT)
S8.0-68.0V?.5 (FT)
S8.0-78.0/?.1 (FT)
78. 8-88. O/?.6 (FT)
TONS/ «SO FT
SSIGNEDNUMBER
JEOLOGICOG
• ••••••0
• 1111110
•••••••0
• ••mi •
• • •• ••• 0
• ••••••1
:.:::::.iinin •
• • •• ••• ••• •• ••• g
• i •• ••• g• • •• ••• g
• •••••• B• • •• ••• g
• i ••••••
lining• i ••••••
::::::::
••>••••••• •• ••• g
DESCRIPTION
65-67' Honeyconfc structure,approximately 1/16"diameter voids
78' One small fracture healed withcalcite.
BOTTOM OF BORING AT 88 FEET
COMMENTS
*
' - --
- •
DRILLING/SAMPLINGACTIVITY RECORD
PROJECT NO.20510-060
ORC SUPERFUND SITECYRIL, OKLAHOMA
DATE START:3/25/90
DATE COMPLETE:4/6/90
BORING NO:IBB-2
SHEET NO.1 OF 3
PERSONNEL:ERIC BERGLUND
HOLE SIZE:5 1/2"-* 7/8"
DRILLING CONTRACTOR:POOL DRILLING INC.
DRILLER: WAYNE DRILLING EQUIPMENT/METHOD:G-D 1500 / WATER ROTARY
COORDINATES:N5709S3.5 E1940867.8
IEPTH TO WATER/DATE-TINE: GROUND ELEVATION:1361.7 FEET
GROUTING: CONSTRUCTED AS MONITORING WELLSEE CONSTRUCTION REPORT FOR DETAILS
CHRONOLOGICAL RECORD
TIME:3/25/901330 HR1430 HR3/26/901100 HR1950 HR
4/5/904/6/90
ACTIVITY:
MOVE TO AND SETUP AT DRILLING LOCATIONREAM TO 35 FEET AND CORED TO 85 FEET
REAMED 0-80 F.FET, 12 1/4 IN. DIA.COMPLETED INSTALLING 8 INCH CASING TO80 FEETCORED 93 TO 141 FEETCOMPLETED MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION
SKETCH:
DECONTAMINATION: DRILL IMG AND SAMPLING EQUIPMENT DECONED WITHSTEAM CLEANER BEFORE MOVING ON LOCATION.
LOG OF BORING
DEPTHIN
FEET
SAMPLE
TYPE RUN/RECOVERY
TONS/ *SO FT
ASSIGNEDNUMBER
GEOLOGICGRAPHICLOG
DESCRIPTION COMMENTS
5 —
10 —
15 —
20 —
25 —
30 —
35 —
40 —
0.0-6.0' CLAY Broun and graymottled with yellow (ironstained), stiff, nilty CLAY.Stiffer with depth. Few piecesof nedium gravel
6.0-20.0' GYPSUM White mottledwith redish pink, phonic andfractured GYPSUM. Many solutionchannels, most filled withsecondary fiberous gypsun and afew filled with clay. Fracturesalso filled with secondarygypsum.
NOTE: This well wasdrilled approximately10 feet from SBB-3.The hole was reamedto 35 feet beforesampling was begun.Cuttings were logged,but the descriptionsare essentially fromSBB-3 for the first35 feet.
••••mil••••••••i
••••mi •
•••••••• i
HIM ••••
20.0-141.0' SANDSTONE Red brown,with yellow iron staining,-verysilty, very fine grained,friable SANDSTONE. Weaklycemented with calcite and ironoxide. Appears sasturatedbelow 22.5 feet ind also moreweakly cemented. Few smallspots (1/4 inch diameter) ofwhite calcite occur throughoutthe core to 35 feet.
core 55.5-4S.5/?.3 (FT)
• •>••••*•
• ••(••••I
• •••••••I
• •••••Ill
• •••• Illl
NO ORGANIC VAPORSWERE DETECTED DURINGDRILLING OPERATIONS,WHICH WERE MONITOREDCONSTANTLY WITH ANOVA OR H-NU.
• UNCONFINEDOPPRESSIVESTRENGTH
SH - SHELBY TUBE
CORE - CARBIDE BITCORE BARREL
DRILLING/SAMPLING PROJECT NO.ACTIVITY RECORD 20510-060
ORC SUPERFUND SITE DATE: BORING NO: IBB-2 SHEET NO.CYRIL, OKLAHOMA SEE SHEET 1 2 OF 3
LOG OF BORING (CONTINUED)
DEPTHIN
FEET
40 —
-—
45 —
^
50 —
60 —
-
65 —
70 —
75 —
80 —••
V
90 —
95 —••
«••
IOO —
SAMPLE
TYPE
CORE
CORE
CORE
CORE
CORE
RUN/RECOVERY
5.0-55.0/9.6 (FT)
55. 0-65 .O/9.5 (FT)
iS.0-75.0/?.7 (FT)
75. 0-85. 0/9.B (FT)
73. 0-111.0f4.9 (FT)
TONS/ *SO. FT
SSIGNEDNUMBER
3RAPHICZOLOGIC-OG
•••••• •
• ••••••
:::::::••••••••••••• ••••in t
,,.,.,,:::::::iiiiini
>•••••••
••••••• ••••••>• ••• •• in •
•••••••i
iiniiiititt««tt• i linn
limn i
• ••• in •
DESCRIPTION
8 52 feet Clay filled fracture 1/4inch thick.
55.0 to 56.5 feet Very weaklycemented and saturated.
At 65 feet color becomes redder.
i
93.0 to 95.5 feet Sandstone becomesclayey.
95.5 to 121.0 feet Sandstonebecomes almost uncemented. Poorcore recovery.
COMMENTS
,'
DRILLING/SAMPLING PROJECT NO.ACTIVITY RECORD 20510-060
ORC SUPERFUND SITE DATE: BORING NO: IBB-2 SHEET NO.CYRIL, OKLAHOMA SEE SHEET 1 3 OF 3
LOG OF BORING (CONTINUED) it
DEPTHIN
FEET
100 —
-••
105 —
-
110 —
115 —
I20 —
I25 —mm
••
I35 —
I40 —
I45 —
ISO —
I55 —
I60 —
SAMPLE
TYPE
CORE
CORE
CORE
RUN/RECOVERY
111.0-121.0/3.0CFT)
121.0-131.0/6.2CFT)
131.0-141.0/9.7CFT)
TONS/ •SO FT
ASSIGNEDNUMBER
iRAPHICiEOLOGIC.OG
• •••••••
• •••••••••••••••••••••••• •••••••• • ••••• •
• •••••••
• •••••••
".'.'. '.'.'.'.
• • ••••••
mi ••••• • ••••• •• •••••• ••• •• ••••• • •• ••••• • ••••• i
•••• ••• •• ••• ••• ••••• ••• ••• ••••••
mi ••• ••••••inmi in •
DESCRIPTION
121.0 TO 131.0 FEET Sandstonecontains clayey end Bandy zones.
BOTTOM OF BORING AT 141 FEET
COMMENTS
DRILLING/SAMPLINGACTIVITY RECORD
PROJECT NO.20510-060
ORC SUPERFUND SITECYRIL, OKLAHOMA
DATE START:5/7/90
DATE COMPLETE:5/19/90
BORING NO:IBB-3
SHEET NO.1 OF 3
PERSONNEL:ERIC BERGLUND
HOLE SIZE:5 1/2"-4 7/8"
DRILLING CONTRACTOR:POOL DRILLING AND MACHINE
DRILLER: WAYNE DRILLING EQUIPMENT/METHOD:G-D 1500 / WATER ROTARY
COORDINATES:N569031.6 E1943390.9
DEPTH TO WATER/DATE-TIME: GROUND ELEVATION:1327.8 FEET
GROUTING: CONSTRUCTED AS MONITORING WELLSEE CONSTRUCTION REPORT FOR DETAILS
CHRONOLOGICAL RECORD
TIME:
5/7/90
5/8/90
5/19/20
ACTIVITY:
MOVED TO AND SETUP AT DRILLINGLOCATION; REAMED HOLE TO 40 FEET;CORED HOLE 40 TO 80 FEET; REAMED HOLETO 12 1/4 INCHES FROM 0 TO 52 FEET.
REAMED 52 TO 82 FEET; TRIED TO INSTALL8 INCH STEEL CASING WITHOUT SUCCESS.
COMPLETED WELL CONSTRUCTION
SKETCH:
DECONTAMINATION: DRILL RIG AND SAMPLING EQUIPMENT DECONED WITHSTEAM CLEANER BEFORE MOVING ON LOCATION.
LOG OF BORING
DEPTHIN
FEET
SAMPLE
TYPE RUN/RECOVERY
TONS/SO FT
ASSIGNEDNUMBER
GEOLOGICGRAPHICLOG
DESCRIPTION COMMENTS
5 —
10 —
15 —
20 —
25 —
30 —
35 —
40 —
SEE LOG FOR SBB-11 FOR DETAILEDDESCRIPTION OF LITHOLOGY FROMSURFACE TO 27 FEET.
HOLE REAMED TO 40FEET. CORING BEGAN AT40 FEET.
NO ORGANIC VAPORSWERE DETECTED DURINGDRILLING OPERATIONS,WHICH WERE MONITOREDCONSTANTLY WITH ANOVA OR H-NU.
101 tt in •• HI 01 III •
• 0101 III I
• OIOIIII >
101 01 III I
• OIOIIII 0
• mill ••• •
27.0-140' SANDSTONE Red brown,friable, silt sized to very finegrained SANDSTONE, weaklycemented with iron oxide andcalcite. Top approximately 2feet is fractured and decomposed.
Four inch thick silt seam at 36feet.
••••••in
* UNCONFINEDCOMPRESS IVESTRENGTH
SH - SHELBY TUBE
CORE - CARBIDE BITCORE BARREL
DRILLING/SAMPLING PROJECT NO.ACTIVITY RECORD 20510-060
DEPTHIN
FEET
40 —
—
45 —
—
50 —
55 —
60 —
65 —
70 —
75 —
80 —
:85 —
90 —
95 —
-
IOO —
ORC SUPERFUND SITE DATE: BORING NO: IBB-3 SHEET NO.CYRIL, OKLAHOMA SEE SHEET 1 2 OF 3
LOG OF BORING (CONTINUED)
SAMPLE
TYPE
CORE
CORE
CORE
CORE
-
CORE
CORE
RUN/RECOVERY
10. 0-50. O/9.0 (FT)
50. 0-60. O/9.7 (FT)
SO.0-70.0/9.9 (FT)
70. 0-80. O/9.7 (FT)
55. 0-95. 0/10.0 (FT)
K.0-100/10.0 (FT)
TONS/ •SO FT
ASSIGNEDNUMBER
ZOLOGIC00
• •••••• •• •••••••••••••••
••••••••• •••••••
::::::::
••••••••
::::::::
::::::::ii linn
ii •• ••• •
!!"!!!!••••••••!!!!!"!•i ••••••
•••••••••• ••••••
•• •• ••• •••••••••
•i ••••• ••••••••••••• in •
DESCRIPTION
49 to 52.3 feet and 54 TO 54.6feet, Very weakly cemented.
60 to 63 feet, Very weaklycemented.
70 to 75 feet. Hard, very wellcemented with calcite. Core, whenfractured by hand, leaves almostconcoidal fractures.
COMMENTS
:
, . '
- - - - - - • :
DRILLING/SAMPLING PROJECT NO.ACTIVITY RECORD 20510-060
DEPTHIN
FEET
IOO ——
™
*
I05 —
—~
no —~••—
115 —
~
I20 —
-
I25 —
I30 —
1C
140 —
145 —
ISO —
155 —
160 —
ORC SUPERFUND SITE DATE: BORING NO: IBB-3 SHEET NO.CYRIL, OKLAHOMA SEE SHEET 1 3 OF 3
LOG OF BORING (CONTINUED)
SAMPLE
TYPE
CORE
CORE
CORE
RUN/RECOVERY
05-110/0.0 (FT)
115-125/10.0 (FT)
125- 135/(FT)
TONS/ •SO FT
ASSIGNED'NUMBER
XAPHICSEOLOGICOG
• •••••• •••••••••• •••••••• •••••••
::::::::• OIOIIII
• ••••••I•0 10 Illl
• Old III I
lOIOIIII
• 0 10 III I
• 0 ••••• IID 10 till
• •••••I I• •••••••It IIIIO I
• •••••1 1
tiling i• ••••••I
• ••••••I
• ill tin
ii ii ••• •• I II Illl
• ••••in
it ii ••• •
DESCRIPTION
AT 125 BEGINS GRADING INTO ASILTSTONE.129-131' Whitish silt layer131-132' Clay layer132-135' Red Siltstone
BOTTOM OF BORING AT 135 FEET
COMMENTS
---•"
DRILLING/SAMPLINGACTIVITY RECORD
PROJECT HO.20510-060
ORC SUPERFUND SITECYRIL, OKLAHOMA
DATE START:5/19/90
DATE COMPLETE:5/23/90
BORING NO:IBB-4
SHEET NO.1 OF 3
PERSONNEL:ERIC BERGLUND
HOLE SIZE:5 1/2»-4 7/8"
DRILLING CONTRACTOR:POOL DRILLING INC.
DRILLER: UAYNE DRILLING EQUIPMENT/METHOD:G-D 1500 / WATER ROTARY
COORDINATES:1567104.8 E1942637.0
>EPTH TO WATER/DATE-TIME: GROUND ELEVATION: GROUTING: CONSTRUCTED AS MONITORING WELLSEE CONSTRUCTION REPORT FOR DETAILS
CHRONOLOGICAL RECORD
TIME:5/19
5/20
5/21
5/22
5/23
ACTIVITY:MOVE TO AND SET UP AT LOCATION.DRILL AND SAMPLE TO 80 FEET.E-LOG HOLEREAM HOLE TO 12 1/4 INCH DIAM. TO 84'
SET 8" STEEL CASING TO 83 FEET ANDGROUT IN PLACE.
DRILLED OUT CEMENT SHOE
CORED TO 133' AND COMPLETED WELLCONSTRUCTION.
SKETCH:
DECONTAMINATION: DRILL RIG AND SAMPLING EQUIPMENT DECONED WITHSTEAM CLEANER BEFORE MOVING ON LOCATION.
LOG OF BORING
DEPTHIN
FEET
SAMPLE
TYPE RUN/RECOVERY
TONS/ *SO FT
ASSIGNEDNUMBER
GEOLOGICGRAPHICLOG
DESCRIPTION COMMENTS
5 —
10 —
15 —
20 —
25 —
30 —
35 —
40 —
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
D.0-2.0/(FT)
3.0-5.0/1.0 (FT)
6.0-8.0/2.0 (FT)
9.0-11.O/1.4 (FT)
12.0-14.0/1.7 (FT)
15.0-17.0/2.0 (FT)
18.0-20.0/1.7 (FT)
21.0-23.0/1.4 (FT)
25.0-27.0/2.0 (FT)
50.0-32.0/2.0 (FT)
55.0-37.0/2.0 (FT)
1.50
1.25
1.25
0.50
0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.25
0.25
1.00
152
0.0-2.0'-.stiff.
FILL)
CLAY & GRAVEL Brown,sandy CLAY t GRAVEL (ROAD
2.0-9.0' CLAY Brown, stiff, siltyCLAY with veinlets of gypsum
153
154
155
156
157
158
9.0-14.0* CLAY Dark gray and blackto dark brown and gray withdepth, silty sandy CLAY withgypsun veinlets. Stiff 9-11',
-i soft/median stiff 12-14'. Odorat 9 feet, oil? stain at 12
I feet.
LOST CIRCULATION ATAPPROX 8 FEET. USEDBENTONITE AND HULLSTO RESTORE.
NO ORGANIC VAPORSWERE DETECTED DURINGDRILLING OPERATIONS,WHICH WERE MONITOREDCONSTANTLY WITH ANOVA OR H-NU.
14.0-24.0' CLAY Dark brown, softto medium stiff, silty CLAY
21' Becomes candy, black stained
24.0-39.0' CLAY Dark gray andbrown, very soft, sandy CLAYwith odor.
Silty 32 to 35 feet
Color change at 35 feet to redbrown also becomes sandy.
39.0-133.0' SANDSTONE
* UNCONFINEDCCMPRESSIVESTRENGTH
SH - SHELBY TUBE
ORE - CARBIDE BITCORE BARREL
DRILLING/SAMPLING PROJECT NO.ACTIVITY RECORD 20510-060
ORC SUPERFUND SITE DATE: BORING NO: 188-4 SHEET NO.CYRIL, OKLAHOMA SEE SHEET 1 2 OF 3
LOG OF BORING (CONTINUED)
DEPTHIN
FEET
40 —
45 —~
~
•
50 —
-
55 ——
-
—
65 —~
••
70 —
v
«
75 —
••
M
80 —
w
85 —
•
90 —
^
•
95 —
v
100 —
SAMPLE
TYPE
CORE
CORE
CORE
CORE
CORE
CORE
RUN/RECOVERY
60.0-50.0/0.0 (FT)
50. 0-60. O/B.3 (FT)
SO.0-70.0/>.5 (FT)
TO.0-80.0/P.O (FT)
14. 0-93. 0/f.O (FT)
73.0-103/tO.O (ft)
TONS/ •SO FT
SSIGNEDNUMBER
3RAPHICJEOLOG1COG
• •••••••
••••••• •• •••••• •• ••••••i••••••••• •mm• •••••••• •••••••• ••• ••••• •••••• •• •••••• •
• ••• ••• •• •••••• •••••••• •mummini i• •••••••
• •••••••nmm• • •• ••• i
• ••••••imum• • mm
mi im
mi in •
********
ii •• ••• •• • II ••! I
mumii •• ••••
• •••••• •
ii mm
• • •• ••• •• • •• ••• •• •••••••
it mm• • ••••••
• • ••••••• •••••••
• •••••••
• • mil i• • mn i
DESCRIPTION
39.0-134.0' SANDSTONE Red brown,friable, silt sized to very finegrained SANDSTONE, moderatelycemented with iron oxide andcalcite
93 to 103 feet very weaklycemented.
COMMENTS
f
• - - —
i
DRILLING/SAMPLING PROJECT NO.ACTIVITY RECORD 20510-060
ORC SUPERFUND SITE DATE: BORING NO: IBB-4 SHEET NO.CYRIL, OKLAHOMA SEE SHEET 1 3 OF 3
LOG OF BORING (CONTINUED)
DEPTHIN
FEET
100 —
-
105 —-m *
110 —~
115 —
120 —
125 —••~~
130 —"
140-
150 —
155 —
160 —
SAMPLE
TYPE
CORE
CORE
CORE
REAM
RUN/RECOVERY
103-113/9. 3 (FT)
I13-123/?.S (FT)
123- 133/10.0 (FT)
133-134 FT
TONS/ •SO FT
ASSIGNEDNUMBER
SEOLOGIC.OG
iiiiitii• ••••••I• ••••in• •••mi•••••in
• ••••••••••••in
••••••••
•••••in
• •••••••• ••••••i• •••••••
• • ••••••
Hffi
••••••••••••••• •••••••i •••••••• •••••••• i•>••••••••••••i ••• •••••••••• ••• •
DESCRIPTION
103-134 feet moderatelycemented.
113-123 FEET CROSS-BEDDINGEVIDENT IN CORE.
117.7-120.5' SILTSTONE Lightpurple with dark purple stains,
-i friable, micas four,, slightly finesandy SILTSTONE. Few recementedfractures.
SANDSTONE AS ABOVE 117.7 FEET.
BOTTOM OF BORING AT 134 FEET
COMMENTS
r _- —
DRILLING/SAMPLINGACTIVITY RECORD
PROJECT NO.20510-060
ORC SUPERFUND SITECYRIL. OKLAHOMA
DATE START:5/31/90
DATE COMPLETE:6/3/90
BORING NO:IBB-5
SHEET NO.1 OF 3
PERSONNEL:ERIC BERGLUNO
HOLE SIZE:5 1/2»-4 7/8"
DRILLING CONTRACTOR:POOL DRILLING INC.
DRILLER: UAYNE DRILLING EQUIPMENT/METHOD:G-D 1500 / MATER ROTARY
COORDINATES: >EPTH TO UATER/DATE-TINE: GROUND ELEVATION: GROUTING: CONSTRUCTED AS MONITORING WELLSEE CONSTRUCTION REPORT FOR DETAILS
CHRONOLOGICAL RECORD
TIME:5/31
6/1
6/3
ACTIVITY:Moved to and setup at location, begandrilling and sampling.
Reamed hole, set 63 feet of steelcasing, and grouted inplace thrucement shoe
Drilled out cement shoe and cored to138 feet. Completed wellconstruction.
SKETCH:
DECONTAMINATION: DRILL RIG AND SAMPLING EQUIPMENT OECONED WITHSTEAM CLEANER BEFORE MOVING ON LOCATION.
LOG OF BORING
DEPTHINFEET
SAMPLE
TYPE RUN/RECOVERY
TONS/SO FT
ASSIGNEDNUMBER
GEOLOGICGRAPHICLOG
DESCRIPTION COMMENTS
5 —
10 —
15 —
20 —
25 —
30 —
35 —
SH
SH
SH
SH
CORE
CORE
D.0-2.0/2.0 (FT)J.0-5.0/2.0 (FT)
S.O-B.O/D.O (FT)
0.0 (FT)
12.0-17.0/3.3 (FT)
17.0-26.O/7.0 (FT)
2.50
3.50
180 0.0-2.0' CLAY Brown, slightly-. silty, stiff CLAY
mil in •• ii ii in imil in •mil in •iiiinii •on it m iiiniiii i• •••••••I• •••••••i
CORE 26.0-36.0/?.2 (FT)
CORE 36.0-46.O/10.0 (FT)
iiiiiniiin iniiitine •••»IIIIQIIII• IDIIIIII• iciiiiiiIIEICIIII• m 10 in •• •OIBIIII
IIOIOIIII
IIOIDIII I
• 10 10 III I
IIOIOIIII
IIOIOIIII
• IOIOIII I
IIOIOIII I
IIOIOIIII
IIOIOIIII
no to 111 1• iiiiiiii
2.0-9.0' CLAY Mottled orangebrown, slightly silty, verystiff CLAY with a few pieces oforganic material and roots
NO ORGANIC VAPORSWERE DETECTED DURINGDRILLING OPERATIONS,WHICH WERE MONITOREDCONSTANTLY WITH ANOVA OR H-NU.
9.0-138.0' SANDSTONE Red brown,friable, silt sized to very finegrained SANDSTONE weaklycemented with iron oxide andcalcite
* UNCON FINEDOPPRESSIVESTRENGTH
SH - SHELBY TUBE
CORE - CARBIDE BITCORE BARREL
DRILLING/SAMPLING PROJECT NO.ACTIVITY RECORD 20510-060
ORC SUPERFUND SITECYRIL, OKLAHOMA
DATE:SEE SHEET 1
BORING NO: IBB-5 SHEET NO.2 OF 3
LOG OF BORING (CONTINUED)
DEPTHIN
FEET
40 —
—~' ^
45 —
~
50 —
-—
55 —
60 —•
j ~•
65 —
—
70 —~~—
75 —
~
80 —"
—
~
85 —
90 —~
-
95 —-
100 —
SAMPLE
TYPE
CORE
CORE
CORE
CORE
CORE
CORE
RUN/RECOVERY
46.0-56.0/10.0 (FT)
>6.0-66.0/?.3 (FT)
S6.0-76.0/10.0 (FT)
76. 0-86. O/10.0 (FT)
B.0-98.0/7.0 (FT)
78.0-108/JO.O (FT)
TONS/ •SO FT
ASSIGNEDNUMBER
ZOLOGIC.OG
• •••••••• •••••••• iiiiiii
•••••in• •••••• •• •••••••• •••••••ilium
iiniii i• •••••• i• •••••• i
••••••!!••••••• ••• •• ••• •••••••• i•••••••••• •••••••• ii in ••• •• ••••••••••• i•••••••••• •• ••• ••• •• in ••I •• in •••••••• •••••••I ••• •••••••• •• ••• •• III III!
• •••••I I
• •(•1*11
• ••••••I
• •••••I I
• •••••• I
• •••••• 1
• •••••• I
• •••••••
• III ••••
• ••••••I
• ••••••1
• I •• ••• •
• • •• ••• •
• ••••••I
Illlllll
• Illllll
• ••••••IIlllllll
• •••••••
• •••••I I
• •••••1 I
DESCRIPTION
SANDSTONE (CONTINUED)
59 TO 63 FEET UNO-HENTED ZONE
93-97 FEET UNCEHENTED ZONE
COMMENTS
f
'. i
DRILLING/SAMPLING PROJECT NO.ACTIVITY RECORD 20510-060
ORC SUPERFUND SITE DATE: BORING NO: IBB- 5 SHEET NO.CYRIL, OKLAHOMA SEE SHEET 1 3 OF 3
LOG OF BORING (CONTINUED)
DEPTHIN
FEET
100 —•*•"•
105 —
—
110 —••
——
115 ——
120 —••
125 —
130 —-
_
,J
150 —
155 —
160 —
SAMPLE
TYPE
CORE
CORE
CORE
RUN/RECOVERY
108-118/10.0 (FT)
118-128/7.5 (FT)
128- 138/?.S (FT)
TONS/ *SO FT
ASSIGNEDNUMBER
SRAPHIC5EOLOGICOG
0(0(((((
0(0(((ll
DIOIKI •
0101(111
OIO((II(
0(0((((0
0(0(((IO
01 0((ll •
OIO(((II
mo((((oEIO((((I
OIOI((I •
0( 0( •(( •
01 Ol(((l
01 0((l((
OIOI((IO
OIOI((I •
01. III. I
0101(11 0
HI Ol((((
(• B( ••( (
• • •••(( •
II 91 HI
(•••••(
„„,„,
'
DESCRIPTION
SANDSTONE (CONTINUED)
126-129 FEET COLOR LIGHTER, LESSCEMENT
NOTE: LAST 5 FEET ANGULARBEDDING VISIBLE IN CORE
136-138 FEET HARD, LIGHT BEIGEORANGE, VERY WELL CEMENTED
BOTTOM OF BORING AT 138 FEET
COMMENTS
*
DRILLING/SAMPLINGACTIVITY RECORD
PROJECT NO.20510-060
ORC SUPERFUND SITECYRIL. OKLAHOMA
DATE START:3/12/90
DATE COMPLETE:3/16/90
BORING NO:SBB-1
SHEET NO.1 OF 1
PERSONNEL:ERIC BERGLUND
HOLE SIZE:4-3/4 IN.
DRILLING CONTRACTOR:POOL DRILLING INC.
DRILLER: UAYNE DRILLING EQUIPMENT/METHOD:G D 1500 / WATER ROTARY
COORDINATES:N568686.7 E1940825.4
)EPTH TO UATER/DATE-TIME: GROUND ELEVATION:1360.0 FEET
GROUTING: CONSTRUCTED MONITORING WELL SEECONSTRUCTION REPORT FOR DETAILS
CHRONOLOGICAL RECORD
TIME: ACTIVITY:
820 HR
1430 HR
1530 HR
1705 HR
3/16/90
BEGAN DRILLING AND SAMPLING
COMPLETED SAMPLING
COMPLETED REAMING HOLE TO 6-1/2 IN.
COMPLETED SETTING SCREEN, CASING,FILTER PACK, AND BENTONITE SEAL.
GROUTED TO SURFACE AND INSTALLEDSTEEL SURFACE PROTECTION.
SKETCH:
DECONTAMINATION: DRILL RIG AND SAMPLING EQUIPMENT DECONED WITHSTEAM CLEANER 3/11/90 BEFORE MOVING ONLOCATION.
LOG OF BORING
DEPTHINFEET
SAMPLE
TYPE RUN/RECOVERY
TONS/ •SO FT
ASSIGNEDNUMBER
GRAPHICGEOLOGICLOG
DESCRIPTION COMMENTS
5 —
10 —
15 —
20 —
25 —
30 —
35 —
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
CORE
CORE
CORE
CORE
0.0-0.8/0.8 (FT)
3.0-5.0/2.0 (FT)
6.0-8.5/2.3 (FT)
9.0-10.5/1.2 (FT)
12.0 (FT)REFUSAL
12.0-17.0/4.8 (FT)17.0-22.0/
(FT)
22.0-26.5/2.6 (FT)
26.5-31.5/2.9 (FT)
SS-1
SS-2
SS-3
SS-4
0.0-2.0' SILT Blockish brown
I (oil stained), slighty clayeyand very fine sandy SILT.
HEAD SPACE READINGSUSING PHOTOVAC:
ZSZS3Z
2.0'-10.0' CLAY Mediun gray,slightly very fine sandy,firm CLAY. 8 6.0' becomesstiff and mottled yelloworange, sand content
I increases slightly and a fewpieces of fine gravel areobserved.
SS-1SS-2SS-3SS-4
25 ppm18 ppm46 ppm100 ppm
Only sample SS-4 sentto laboratory foranalysis.
10.0'-12.0' CLAY IDark gray,soft, slightly fine sandy,CLAY.
55555335}335553555••••••••i
12.0'-24.6' GYPSUM Phanic, softGYPSUM; 12.0'-H.O' mottledblack and white (oilstained?), 14.0'-24.6'mottled redish pink andwhite. 12.0'-23.1' somesolution channels, all filledwith secondary fiberousgypsum. 23.1'-24.6' a fewopen solution channelspartically filled with clayand very fine itand.
24.6'-26.5' DECOMPOSED SANDSTONE
26.5'-31.5' SANDSTONE Red brownwith orange cast (ironstained) very fine grained tosilty sized, friableSANDSTONE. Weakly cementedwith calcite and iron oxide.
No core recovery, redfine sand in corebarrel.
* UNCONFINEDCOMPRESSIVESTRENGTH
SH - SHELBY TUBE
CORE - CARBIDE BIT;':: CORE BARREL
BOTTOM OF BORING AT 31.5 FEET
DRILLING/SAMPLINGACTIVITY RECORD
PROJECT NO.20510-060
ORC SUPERFUND SITECYRIL, OKLAHOMA
DATE START:3/17/90
DATE COMPLETE:3/17/90
BORING NO:SBB-2
SHEET NO.1 OF 1
PERSONNEL:ROYE BEENE
HOLE SIZE:5 1/2--4 7/8"
DRILLING CONTRACTOR:POOL DRILLING INC.
DRILLER: WAYNE DRILLING EQUIPMENT/METHOD:G-D 1500 / UATER ROTARY
COORDINATES:N570592.8 E1941020.3
1EPTH TO WATER/DATE-TIME: CROWD ELEVATION:1363.9 FEET
GROUTING: CONSTRUCTED AS MONITORING WELLSEE CONSTRUCTION REPORT FOR DETAILS
CHRONOLOGICAL RECORD
TIME:
800 HR1000 HR1115 HR1545 HR
ACTIVITY:
COMPLETED SETUPCOMPLETED DRILLING AND SAMPLINGCONDUCTED HEAD SPACE READINGSCOMPLETED HELL CONSTRUCTION
SKETCH:
DECONTAMINATION: DRILL RIG AND SAMPLING EQUIPMENT DECONED WITHSTEAM CLEANER BEFORE MOVING ON LOCATION.
LOG OF BORING
DEPTHINFEET
SAMPLE
TYPE RUN/RECOVERY
TONS/SO FT
ASSIGNEDNUMBER
GEOLOGICGRAPHICLOG
DESCRIPTION COMMENTS
5 —
10 —
15 —I
20 —i
25 —
30 —
35 —
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
CORE
J.0-2.0/(FT)
5.0-4.5/1.5 (FT)
i.0-9.0/1.1 (FT)
1.0 (FT)
12. 0-15. O/1.5 (FT)
15.0-18.0/1.5 (FT)
18.0-21. O/2.0 (FT)
21. 0-24. O/2.5 (FT)
24.0-34.0/5.8 (FT)
0.0-2.0' LOAM Red brown, very sandy
3.25
3.5/4.5*
4.5*
4.5*
4.0
4.0
1.5
SS-5
SS-6
SS-7
SS-8
SS-9
SS-10
SS-11
2.0-24.0' CLAY Black, sitty loam,organic, very stiff to hard,with gasoline odor, with tracesof gravel below 15 feet
4-5 inches asphalticgravel at surface
HEAD SPACE READINGSWITH Hnu in pen
SS-5SS-6SS-7SS-8SS-9SS-10SS-11
4.04.5357030
10050
••••••••i•••••mi• Illl III!
24.0-34.0' SANDSTONE Red brown,very silty, very fine grained,weakly cemented near top of zone,occassional fractures
••••••II
BOTTOM OF BORING AT 34.0 FEET
* UNCONFINEDOPPRESSIVESTRENGTH
SH - SHELBY TUBE
CORE - CARBIDE BITCORE BARREL
DRILLING/SAMPLINGACTIVITY RECORD
PROJECT NO.20510-060
ORC SUPERFUND SITECYRIL, OKLAHOMA
DATE START:3/24/90
DATE COMPLETE:3/24/90
BORING'NO:SBB-3
SHEET NO.1 OF 1
PERSONNEL:ERIC 8ERGLUND
HOLE SIZE:4 7/8 IN.
DRILLING CONTRACTOR:POOL DRILLING INC.
DRILLER:WAYNE
DRILLING EQUIPMENT/METHOD:G D 1500 / WASTER ROTARY
COORDINATES:N570981.5 E1940851.3
IEPTH TO WATER/DATE-TIME: GROUND ELEVATION:1362.0 FEET
GROUTING: CONSTRUCTED AS MONITORING WELLSEE CONSTRUCTION REPORT FOR DETAILS
CHRONOLOGICAL RECORD
TIME:
945 MR
1430 HR
1720 HR
ACTIVITY:
COMPLETED SETUP
COMPLETED SAMPLING AND DRILLING
COMPLETED WELL INSTALLATION
SKETCH:
DECONTAMINATION: DRILL RIG AND SAMPLING EQUIPMENTDECONTAMINATED PRIOR TO MOVE TO AND SETUP ATDRILLING LOCATION.
LOG OF BORING
DEPTHIN
FEET
SAMPLE
TYPE RUN/RECOVERY
TONS/*SO FT
ASSIGNEDNUMBER
GRAPHICGEOLOGICLOG
DESCRIPTION COMMENTS
5 —
10 —
15 —
20 —
25 —
30 —
35 —
40 —
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
CORE
0.0-1.0/1.0 (FT)
3.0-5.0/2.0 (FT)
6.0-8.0/2.0 (FT)
9.0-11.O/1.0 (FT)
11.0-12.0/0.0 (FT)
15.0-25.0/9.8 (FT)
3.0
3.0
2.5
0.75
SS-12
SS-13
SS-14
SS-15
I 0.0-1.0' CLAY Brown, very siItyCLAY, with roots.
.0-12.0' CLAY Brown and graymottled with yellow (ironStained), stiff, silty CLAY.Stiffer with'depth. Fewpieces of medium gravel
NO ORGANIC VAPORSWERE DETECTED DURINGDRILLING OPERATIONS,WHICH WERE MONITOREDCONSTANTLY WITH ANOVA OR H-NU.
SSSSSSS
I ••!••••••
• •••••••••I Illlllll I
-I 12.1-20.V GYPSUM White mottledwith redish pink, phanic,and fractured GYPSUM. Manysolution channels, mostfilled with secondaryfiberous gypsim and a fewfilled with clay. Fracturesalso filled with secondarygypsun. Top six inchessomewhat decomposed.
1CORE 25.5-35.5/
9.5 (FT)• ••••••II I
• ••••••III
• •••••••I I
••••••III
• •••••••I I
20.1-35.5' SANDSTONE Red brownwith yellow iron staining,very silty, very finegrained,friable SANDSTONE,weally cemented with calciteand iron oxide. Appearssaturated belou 22.5 feet,end is more weakly cemented.Few small spots (1/4 inchdiameter) of white calciteoccur throughout core. Clayfilled fracture, 0.03'thick, at 31.9 feet; is onlyfracture observed in core.
BOTTOM OF BORING AT 35.5 FEET
* UNCONFINEDCOMPRESSIVESTRENGTH
SH - SHELBY TUBECORE - CARBIDE BIT
CORE BARREL
DRILLING/SAMPLINGACTIVITY RECORD
PROJECT NO.20510-060
ORC SUPERFUND SITECYRIL, OKLAHOMA
DATE START:5/27/90
DATE COMPLETE:3/27/90
BORING NO:SBB-4
SHEET NO.1 OF 1
PERSONNEL:ERIC BERGLUND
HOLE SIZE:5 1/2"-4 7/8"
DRILLING CONTRACTOR:POOL DRILLING INC.
DRILLER: WAYNE DRILLING EQUIPMENT/METHOD:G D 1500 / UATER ROTARY
COORDINATES:N570807.1 E1941488.9
IEPTH TO UATER/DATE-TIME: GROUND ELEVATION:1352.6 FEET
GROUTING: CONSTRUCTED AS MONITORING WELLSEE CONSTRUCTION REPORT FOR DETAILS
CHRONOLOGICAL RECORD
TIME:
1100 HR
1630 HR
ACTIVITY:
BEGAN DRILLING AND SAMPLING
COMPLETED UELL CONSTRUCTION
SKETCH:
DECONTAMINATION: DECONED DRILLNG RIG AND SAMPLING EQUIPMENTWITH STEAMED CLEANER PRIOR TO MOVING TODRILLING LOCATION.
LOG OF BORING
DEPTHINFEET
SAMPLE
TYPE RUN/RECOVERY
TONS/ *SO FT
iSSIGNEDNUMBER
SRAPHICiEOLOGIC.OG
DESCRIPTION COMMENTS
REAMEDTO
15 FEET
5 —
10 —
15 —
20 —I
25 —
30 —
0-13' GYPSUM Pinkish red mottledin white, soft, phanicGYPSUM. Some large solutionchannels and cavities infirst 7 feet
CORE 15-25/9.6 FT
01 Cl III I
01 OHM I
Olllllll
DI min iI I O I I I I I
• I 01 ••• •
• ••••••I11(1111 1
13-25' SANDSTONE Red brown, veryfine grained to silt sized,friable SANDSTONE
LOST CIRCULATION AT5 FEET
Used 4 sacks ofbentonite and 1 sackof hulls to plug hole
NO ORGANIC VAPORSWERE DETECTED DURINGDRILLING OPERATIONSWHICH, WERE MONITOREDCONSTANTLY WITH ANOVA OR H-NU.
• ••••III• ••••••I
BOTTOM OF BORING AT 25 FEET
* UNCONFINEDCOMPRESSIVE.STRENGTH
CORE - CARBIDE BITCORE BARREL
DRILLING/SAMPLINGACTIVITY RECORD
PERSONNEL:ERIC BERGLUND
PROJECT NO.20510-060
HOLE SIZE:5
COORDINATES:N570591.2 E1941958.3
CHRONOLOGICAL RECORD
TIME:
4/6/901600 HR1800 HR1900 HR
4/7/90730 HR845 HRvt& nw
ACTIVITY:
1/2"-4 7/8"
-ORC SUPERFUND SITECYRIL, OKLAHOMA
DRILLING CONTRACTOR:
DATE START:4/6/90
POOL DRILLING AND MACHINEDRILLER:
IEPTH TO MATER/DATE-TIME: GROUND ELEVATION:1352.2 FEET
SKETCH:
DATE COMPLETE:4/7/90
UAYNE
BORING NO:SBB-5
SHEET NO.1 OF 1
DRILLING EOUI PMENT/METHCO :G-D 1500 / WATER ROTARY
GROUTING: CONSTRUCTED AS MONITORING WELLSEE CONSTRUCTION REPORT FOR DETAILS
STARTED DRILLINGCOMPLETEDCOMPLETED
SAMPLING AND CORINGE-LOGGING.
BEGAN WELL CONSTRUCTIONCOMPLETEDM^^rkC 1 ft/
if
DECONTAMINATION: DRILLSTEAM
RIG AND SAMPLING EQUIPMENT DECONED WITHCLEANER BEFORE MOVING ON LOCATION.
LOG OF BORING
nepTHl/Cr 1 n
INFEET
_
-——5 —
——
10 —
-
-
--
9ft
_
——
25 —
—••
30 —
:_35 —
-
^
40 —
SAMPLE
TYPE
CORE
CORE
cORE
RUN/RECOVERY
6.0-12.0/4.0 (FT)
IO.O-15.0/L 9 ttT\4.£ ir l /
15.0-J.>n n/3.3 <FT>
TONS/ •SO FT
ASSIGNEDNUMBER
iEOLOGIC.00
j-.-.-.- -JIT.- .--.-.-.-.- f.-
sxsssstsssssssss~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~yg*~
sxssssssSSSSSSSS
DESCRIPTION
0-8.9' GYPSUM Pinkish white.very weathered phanic GYPSUM,with many thin solutionchannels, some particallyfilled with clay.
J«
In"Illllll 1
II II III 1
II II III!
• I Illll •• III till
ri9.
0-0 0' n *w w • V i»f
CLAYY Peri hard aandvi HIW, nai u onriujr
0-9.3' SILTSTONE Light gray,friable SILTSTOKE
3-20.verv
0' SAfine
HOST fUJF CoH hrn unarained to si It
sized, friable SANDSTONE,weakly-cemented with calciteand iron oxide. 15-20 feet
~i csscntislly not concntcd*
BOTTOM OF BORING AT 20.0 FEET
COMMENTS
NOTE: 10 to 12 feetsaturated withHC product .Core stainedgray- black.
nri 1 l»rc hun i icrb oY^f^p pea i ft
f AB h i rMrcain 1 1^^itr>^^4 B may&UTIC IC^Ia%*«l ^^« w *tm*r\
of 0.8 ppm on h-nu.Mud pit when drillingwater circulating 5'to 6 pom.Core barrel20 ppn when firstextracted from hole.
,
* UNCON FINEDCOMPRESSIVESTRENGTH
SH - SHELBY TUBE
CORE - CARBIDE BITCORE BARREL
I
DRILLING/SAMPLINGACTIVITY RECORD
PROJECT NO.20510-060
ORC SUPERFUND SITECYRIL, OKLAHOMA
DATE START:4/7/90
DATE COMPLETE:4/7/90
BORING NO:SBB-6
SHEET NO.1 OF 1
PERSONNEL:ERIC BERGLUND
HOLE SIZE:5 1/2»-4 7/8"
DRILLING CONTRACTOR:POOL DRILLING INC.
DRILLER: UAYNE DRILLING EQUIPMENT/METHOD:G-D 1500 / UATER ROTARY
COORDINATES:N567364.3 E1940824.5
IEPTH TO UATER/DATE-TIHE: GROUND ELEVATION:1349.2 FEET
GROUTING: CONSTRUCTED AS MONITORING WELLSEE CONSTRUCTION REPORT FOR DETAILS
CHRONOLOGICAL RECORD
TINE:
1000 HR1400 HR
ACTIVITY:
BEGIN DRILLING AND SAMPLINGCOMPLETED UELLL CONSTRUCTION
SKETCH:
DECONTAMINATION: DRILL RIG AND SAMPLING EQUIPMENT DECONED WITHSTEAM CLEANER BEFORE MOVING ON LOCATION.
LOG OF BORING
DEPTHINFEET
SAMPLE
TYPE RUN/RECOVERY
TONS/ •SO FT
ASSIGNEDNUMBER
GRAPHICGEOLOGICLOG
DESCRIPTION COMMENTS
5 —
10 —
15 —
20 —
25 —
30 —
SH
SH
SH
SH
CORE
0-2.0/1.7 (FT)
6.0-8.O/2.0 (FT)
9.0-11.0/2.0 (FT)
12.0-14.0/2.0 (FT)
15.0-25.O/B.4 (FT)
1.2
4.4
4.0
4.5*
SS-18
SS-19
SS-20
0-2.0' SILT Dark brown, soft,I clayey SILT (Topsoil)
2.0-14.7' CLAY Dark brown,hard, silty CLAY, with somemottled iron stained spots.Small black sports of organicmaterial were observed.
NO ORGANIC VAPORSWERE DETECTED DURINGDRILLING OPERATIONS,WHICH WERE MONITOREDCONSTANTLY WITH ANOVA OR H-NU.
-J 14.7-15.0' GYPSUM Pinkish whitegypsum observed in cuttings.
CORE 15.0-25.0/5.85 (FT)
15.0-30.0' SANDSTONE Redbrown, very fine grained tosilt Sized, friable SANDSTONE,weakly cemented with iron oxideand calcite.
BOTTOM OF BORING AT 30.0 FEET
40 —
* UNCON FINEDCOMPRESSIVESTRENGTH
SH - SHELBY TUBE
CORE - CARBIDE BITCORE BARREL
IDRILLING/SAMPLINGACTIVITY RECORD
PROJECT NO.20510-060
ORC SUPERFUND SITECYRIL, OKLAHOMA
DATE START:4/7/90
DATE COMPLETE:4/7/90
BORING NO:SBB-7
SHEET NO.1 OF 1
PERSONNEL:ERIC BERGLUND
HOLE SIZE:5 1/2«-4 7/8"
DRILLING CONTRACTOR:POOL DRILLING INC.
DRILLER: UAYNE DRILLING EQUIPMENT/METHOD:G-D 1500 / WATER ROTARY
COORDINATES:N567317.5 E1941363.2
IEPTH TO UATER/DATE-TIME: GROUND ELEVATION:1344.5 FEET
GROUTING: CONSTRUCTED AS MONITORING WELLSEE CONSTRUCTION REPORT FOR DETAILS
CHRONOLOGICAL RECORD
TIME:
1530 HR1830 HR
ACTIVITY:
BEGAN DRILLING AND SAMPLINGCOMPLETED UELL CONSTRUCTION
SKETCH:
DECONTAMINATION: DRILL RIG AMD SAMPLING EQUIPMENT DECONED WITHSTEAM CLEANER BEFORE MOVING ON LOCATION.
LOG OF BORING
DEPTHINFEET
SAMPLE
TYPE RUN/RECOVERY
TONS/SO FT
ASSIGNEDNUMBER
DESCRIPTION COMMENTS
5 —
10 —
152 —
20 —
25 —
30 —
35 —1
40 —
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
CORE
0.0-2.O/1. (FT)
3.0-5.0/1.8 (FT)
6.0-8.O/2.0 (FT)
9.0-11.0/2.0 (FT)
12.0-14.0/1.7 (FT)
15.0-17.0/1.0 (FT)
18.0-20.O/1.0 (FT)
Z1.0-23.0/).2 (FT)
28.0-32.O/1.1 (FT)
0.25
2.5
2.1
(0.25
SS-21 .0-1.0' SILT Dark brown, clayeySILT
1.0-2.0' CLAY Yellow brown,si Ity CLAY
SS-22IlllllllIlllllllIlllllllIlllllllIlllllllIlllllllIlllllllIlllllllIlllllllIlllllllIlllllllIlllllllIlllllllIlllllllIlllllllIlllllllIlllllllIlllllll
••••••• i111! •>••
III! ••••
2.0-5.5' CLAY Mottled orange-yellow brown and gray, veryfine sandy, silty CLAY. Dairp
NO ORGANIC VAPORSWERE DETECTED DURINGDRILLING OPERATIONS,WHICH WERE MONITOREDCONSTANTLY WITH ANOVA OR H-NU.
5.5-8.0' SILT Yellow brown,slightly very fine sandy SILT.Moist
8.0-27.5' SAND Yellow brown,iron stained, silty, very fineSAND. Saturated
Less iron stained at 18 feet.Also less silt.
27.5-32.0' SANDSTONE Red brown,friable, silt sized to veryfine grained SANDSTONE.
BOTTOM OF BORING AT 32 FEET
* UNCONFINEDCOMPRESSIVESTRENGTH
SH - SHELBY TUBE
CORE'- CARBIDE BITCORE BARREL
DRILLING/SAMPLINGACTIVITY RECORD
PROJECT NO.20510-060
ORC SUPERFUND SITECYRIL, OKLAHOMA
DATE START:4/8/90
DATE COMPLETE:A/8/90
BORING NO:SBB-8
SHEET NO.1 OF 2
PERSONNEL:ERIC BERGLUND
HOLE SIZE:5 1/2"-4 7/8"
DRILLING CONTRACTOR:POOL DRILLING INC.
DRILLER: WAYNE DRILLING EQUIPMENT/METHOD:G-D 1500 / UATER ROTARY
COORDINATES:N567662.0 E1942980.1
)EPTH TO WATER/DATE-TIME: GROUND ELEVATION:1317.6 FEET
GROUTING: CONSTRUCTED AS MONITORING WELLSEE CONSTRUCTION REPORT FOR DETAILS
CHRONOLOGICAL RECORD
TIME:
900 HR1630 HR
ACTIVITY:
SETUP AND BEGIN DRILLING AND SAMPLINGCOMPLETED UELL CONSTRUCTION
SKETCH:
DECONTAMINATION: DRILL RIG AND SAMPLING EQUIPMENT DECONED WITHSTEAM CLEANER BEFORE MOVING ON LOCATION.
LOG OF BORING
DEPTHIN
FEET
SAMPLE
TYPE RUN/RECOVERY
TONS/SO FT
ASSIGNEDNUMBER
•RAPHICXOLOGICOG
DESCRIPTION COMMENTS
5 —
10 —
15 —
20 —
25 —
30 —
35 —
40 —
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
0.0-2.0/1. 3 (FT)
3.0-5.O/1.8 (FT)
6.0-8.0/2.0 (FT)
9.0-11.O/2.0 (FT)
12.0-U.O/2.0 (FT)
I5.0-17.0/2.0 (FT)
18.0-20.0/2.0 (FT)
25.0-27.0/(FT)
SO.0-32.0/2.0 (FT)
55.0-37.0/2.0 (FT)
1.0.0-42.0/2.0 (FT)
4.5
0.75
0.50
0.25
0.25
SS-23
SS-24
0.0-1.0' SILT Very dark brown,II19 III 11 1 slighty clayey, SILT. HC
SS-25
1.0
stained with HC odor.
1.0-3.0' SAND Yellow brown,clayey, silty, very fine SAND;
3.0-25.0' SILT Grayish tan,slightly fine sandy and clayeySILT with veinlets (<1/32«thick) of secondary gypsunthroughout section. Claycontent increases and sandcontent decreases with depth.
NO ORGANIC VAPORSWERE DETECTED DURINGDRILLING OPERATIONS,WHICH WERE MONITOREDCONSTANTLY WITH ANOVA OR H-NU.Top 8 inches ofsample stained withHC.
-125.0-28.0' SAND Gray, slightlyIIII III 11 silty, clayey, very fine SAND.II Hill I|J
cO.25
cO.25 SS-26
28.0-34.0' CLAY Dark gray,soft, slightly sandy CLAY
34.0-60.0' CLAY Greenish black,soft, organic CLAY with smallgastropod shell scatteredthroughout. Color changes toblack below 40 feet.Some decomposed plant materialbelow 45 feet. Also containsisolated clayey sand pockets(<3 inches in diameter) below45 feet.
Organic smell.
* UNCONFINEDCOMPRESSIVESTRENGTH .
SH T SHELBY TUBE
CORE - CARBIDE BITCORE BARREL
DRILLING/SAMPLING PROJECT NO.ACTIVITY RECORD 20510-060
DEPTHIN
FEET
40 —
M_
65 —
75 —
80 —
85 —
90 —
95 —
IOO —
ORC SUPERFUND SITE DATE: BORING NO: SBB-8 SHEET NO.CYRIL, OKLAHOMA 4/8/90 | 2 OF 2
LOG OF BORING (CONTINUED) '
SAMPLE
TYPE
SH
SH
SH
CORE
RUN/RECOVERY
«.0-47.0/2.0 (FT)
55.0-57.0/3.5 (FT)
60.0' NOiECOVERY
SO.0-70.0/1.1 (FT)
TONS/ *SO FT
ASSIGNEDNUMBER
XOLOGIC.00
iniiiii• •••••••• •••••••II It III!
• I ••••••II II III 1
II II III I
II Illll I
Illllll I
DESCRIPTION
SEE PAGE 1
60.0-70.0 SANDSTONE Red brown,friable, silt nized to veryfine grained SANDSTONE.Weakly cemented with calciteand iron oxide,,
BOTTOM OF BORING AT 70.0 FEET
COMMENTS
»•. t
DRILLING/SAMPLINGACTIVITY RECORD
PERSONNEL:ERIC BERGLUND
PROJECT NO. ORC SUPERFUND SITE DATE START.20510-060 CYRIL, OKLAHOMA 4/8/90
HOLE SIZE: DRILLING CONTRACTOR:5
COORDINATES:N567058.2 E1942398.9
1/2"-4 7/8" POOL DRILLING INC.
IEPTH TO WATER/DATE-TIME:
CHRONOLOGICAL RECORD
TIME:
4/8/901700 HR
4/9/90730 HR
1200 HR
ACTIVITY:
MOVED TO AND SETUP AT LOCATION
BEGAN DRILLING AND SAMPLINGCOMPLETED WELL CONSTRUCTION
DRILLER
GROUND ELEVATION:1335.8 FEET
SKETCH:
DATE COMPLETE: BORING NO:4/9/90
: WAYNE
SBB-9SHEET NO.1 OF 1
DRILLING EQUIPMENT/METHOD:G-D 1500 / WATERROTARY
GROUTING: CONSTRUCTED AS MONITORING WELLSEE CONSTRUCTION REPORT FOR DETAILS
DECONTAMINATION: DRILL RIG AND SAMPLING EQUIPMENT DECONED WITHSTEAM CLEANER BEFORE MOVING ON LOCATION.
LOG OF BORING
rtFDTU
INFEET
_
—
—c
—-
_
m-
—-
-15 —
-
—.
20 —-
—-
25 —-*•
—
30 —
—_
35 —
-
^
40 —
SAMPLE
TYPE
SH9n
SH
SH
CORE
CORE
RUN/
RECOVERY
0 0-2 O/V • V f, • V/
1.0 (FT)
3.0-5.0/0.5 (FT)
6.0-7.0/0 5 ftST \. j \ i i g
10.0-20.O/6.0 (FT)
iO.0-28.O/S.O (FT)
TONS/ *SO FT
ASSIGNEDNUMBER
SS-27
ZOLOGICOG
3353I955555355555555
5595595595955 9
55 i
•• ••••••••••••i ••••••in••••••>»•••••••••••••••i••••••••••••••••••••••• •
••••••••••••••••••••••at••••••••••••••• i••••••••
•••••••i•i ••••••
DESCRIPTION
_ 0 0-0 L> SAUn P**l kmm eil*u^ V.v U.*( 9R
very fine SAND.0.4-1.0* SILT Dark brown, clayeySILT.
1.0-8.
Roots present. (TOPSOIL)
0' WEATHERED SANDSTONE Redbrown, very
• fii>£M*4 +A WOP
weathered, silt** 4«»M fi^ainori
— V 1 &K«. l>w .top J 1 1 1 Ito yf «. 1 I .toM
1 SANDSTONE.1
8.0-28.0' SANDSTONE Red brown,silt sized to very finegrained SANDSTONE. Weaklycementedcalcite.
with iron oxide and819 feet 6 inches of
core saturated with black HC.
16 to 19 feet core saturatedwith water.
20 to 28 feet core saturatedwith water and is slightlyclayey.
824 feet core is stained blackwith 6 inches of HC.
BOTTOM OF BORING AT 28.0 FEET
COMMENTS
10 to 16 feet veryweakly cementedresulting in poorcore recovery
HC Oder. H-nuregistered 5 ppm onreturn water,breathing
,•* i
zone clear.
. - .
* UNCON FINEDOPPRESSIVESTRENGTH
SH .- SHELBY TUBE
CORE - CARBIDE BITCORE BARREL
DRILLING/SAMPLINGACTIVITY RECORD
PROJECT NO.20510-060
ORC SUPERFUND SITECYRIL, .OKLAHOMA
DATE START:4/9/90
DATE COMPLETE:4/9/90
BORING NO:SBB-10
SHEET NO.1 OF 2
PERSONNEL:ERIC BERGLUND
HOLE SIZE:5 1/2«-4 7/8"
DRILLING CONTRACTOR:POOL DRILLING INC.
DRILLER: WAYNE DRILLING EQUIPMENT/METHOD:G-D 1500 / UATER ROTARY
COORDINATES:N568327.6 E1943215.9
IEPTN TO UATER/DATE-TIME: GROUND ELEVATION:1321.6 FEET
GROUTING: CONSTRUCTED AS MONITORING WELLSEE CONSTRUCTION REPORT FOR DETAILS
CHRONOLOGICAL RECORD
TIME:
1300 HR1400 HR2000 HR
ACTIVITY:
MOVED TO AND SETUP AT LOCATIONBEGAN DRILLING AND SAMPLINGCOMPLETED CONSTRUCTING WELL
SKETCH:
DECONTAMINATION: DRILL IMG AND SAMPLING EQUIPMENT DECONED WITHSTEAM CLEANER BEFORE MOVING ON LOCATION. '
LOG OF BORING
DEPTHINFEET
SAMPLE
TYPE RUN/RECOVERY
TONS/ •SO FT
ASSIGNEDNUMBER
GRAPHICGEOLOGICLOG
DESCRIPTION COMMENTS
1
5 —
10 —
15 —
20 —
25 —
30 —
35 —
40 —
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
0.0-2.O/1.0 (FT)3.0-5.0/2.0 (FT)
6.0-7.0/0.4 (FT)
9.0-10.0/0.8 (FT)
12.0-14.0/1.0 (FT)
15.0-17.0/2.0 (FT)
18.0-20.0/2.0 (FT)
25.0-27.0/2.0 (FT)
50.0-32.O/2.0 (FT)
35.0-37.0/1.3 (FT)
1.25
>4.0
>4.0
SS-28
SS-29
iiimiii 0.0-2.0' SAND Brown, dry,-i silty. very fine SAND. (FILL)
2.0-5.0' CLAY Dark brown, silty-, CLAY. (FILL)
NO ORGANIC VAPORSWERE DETECTED DURINGDRILLING OPERATIONS,WHICH WERE CONSTANTLYMONITORED WITH ANOVA ORH-NU.
5.0-9.0' SILT Mediun brownslightly clayey, SILT with thin
—i veinlets of gypsum.
SS-30
SS-31
9.0-18.0' CLAY Medium brown,changing to yellow brown at12', silty (no silt below 15'}CLAY. Hard and slightly moistto 15', soft below. Thingypsun veinlets scatteredthroughout.
<0.25
<0.25
18.0-29.0' CLAY Gray brown to•tedium gray, slightly silty tovery fine grained sandy below25', CLAY. A few small piecesof organic eater scatteredthroughout.
SS-32
29.0-36.0' ORGANIC CLAY Black,very fine grained sandy,
. organic CLAY. Few small piecesof wood scattered throughout.
36.0-40.0' CLAY Yellow orangegray, very fine grained sandyCLAY.
* UNCONFINEDOPPRESSIVESTRENGTH
SH - SHELBY TUBE
CORE - CARBIDE BITCORE BARREL
DRILLING/SAMPLING PROJECT NO.ACTIVITY RECORD 20510-060
nppTMIN
FEET
—-
45 —•™_
50 —
_
-•
55 —™
-
••
65 —
•
70 —
mt
«•
mmmm
••
mi
mmmm
mm
mmmm
mm
mm*
mmmm
mm
mmm
ORC SUPERFUND SITE DATE: BORING NO: S8B-10 SHEET NO.CYRIL, OKLAHOMA 4/9/90 2 OF 2
LOG OF BORING (CONTINUED)
SAMPLE
TYPE
fill
CORE
RUN/RECOVERY
in n.L? ft/
2.0 (FT)
iO.0-60.0/>.0 (FT)
TONS/ *SO FT
SSIGNEDNUMBER
XOLOGiCOG
IlllllllIlllllllIlllllllIlllllllIllllllliiieiuiIDIDIIII
• OIOMII
ID 10 III!
loieni iIDIDOI 1
lltOlll 1
III ID 11(1
• IIOI1II
........
DESCRIPTION
40.0-48.0' SAND Gray brownchanging to red brown at 42',clayey, very fine grainedSAND.
48.0-60.0' SANDSTONE Red brown.friable, silt sized to veryfine grained SANDSTONE, weaklycemented with iron oxide andcalcite.
BOTTOM OF BORING AT 60 FEET
COMMENTS
*
DRILLING/SAMPLINGACTIVITY RECORD
PROJECT NO.20510-060
ORC SUPERFUND SITECYRIL, OKLAHOMA
DATE START:4/10/90
DATE COMPLETE:4/10/90
BORING NO:SBB-11
SHEET NO.1 OF 1
PERSONNEL:ERIC BERGLUND
HOLE SIZE:5 1/2"-4 7/8"
DRILLING CONTRACTOR:POOL DRILLING INC.
DRILLER: UAYNE DRILLING EQUIPMENT/METHOD:G-D 1SOO / UATER ROTARY
COORDINATES:N569021.0 E1943398.5
(EPTH TO UATER/DATE-T1ME: GROUND ELEVATION:1327.9 FEET
GROUTING: CONSTRUCTED AS MONITORING WELLSEE CONSTRUCTION REPORT FOR DETAILS
CHRONOLOGICAL RECORD
TIME: ACTIVITY:
800 HR1200 HR
MOVE TO AND SETUP AT LOCATIONCOMPLETED CONSTRUCTION OF WELL
SKETCH:
DECONTAMINATION: DRILL RIG AND SAMPLING EQUIPMENT DECONED WITHSTEAM CLEANER BEFORE MOVING ON LOCATION.
LOG OF BORING
DEPTHINFEET
SAMPLE
TYPE RUN/RECOVERY
TONS/ «SO FT
ASSIGNEDNUMBER
GEOLOGICGRAPHICLOG
DESCRIPTION COMMENTS
5 —
10 —
15 —
20 —
25 —
30 —
35 —
40 —
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
CORE
0.0-2.O/1.4 (FT)3.0-5.O/2.0 (FT)
6.0-8.O/2.0 (FT)
9.0-11.O/2.0 (FT)
12.0-14.0/2.0 (FT)
15.0-17.0/J.O (FT)
18.0-20.O/2.0 (FT)
21.0-23.O/2.0 (FT)
25.0-27.0/2.0 (FT)
SO.0-40.0/}.0 (FT)
SS-33
0.75
1.0
<0.25
O.25
1.25
1.00
<0.25
1.50
0.0-2.0' SILT Brown, slightlyclayey SILT with roots.(TOPSOIL)
2.0-6.0' CLAY Dark brown, very—i fine grained sanoy CLAY.
NO ORGANIC VAPORSWERE DETECTED DURINGDRILLING OPERATIONS,WHICH WERE MONITOREDCONSTANTLY WITH ANOVA OR H-NU.
SS-346.0-17.0' CLAY Orange brown
changing to slightly redishbrown at 15', slightly veryfine sandy CLAY, generallysoft changing to stiff at 15feet. Thin veinlets of gypsunare scattered thourghout.Damp.
17.0-27.0' CLAY Redish brown,very fine grained sandy CLAY.Generally stiff und dairp butsoft and wet between 21 and 23feet.
SS-35
• ••••••I •
• ••••••II
• •••••••I
• ••••••I I
• ••••••I IIlllllll I
• Illl till
• Illlllll
• ••••••I IIII II III I
27.0-40.0' SANDSTONE Red brown,friable, silt sized to veryfine grained SANDSTONE, weaklycemented with iron oxide andcalcite. Top approximately 2feet is fractured anddecomposedFour inch thick silt seam at36'
BOTTOM OF BORING AT 40 FEET
Lost circulationbetween 27 and 30feet. Used bentoniteto return circulation
* UNCONFINEDOPPRESSIVESTRENGTH
SH - SHELBY TUBE
CORE'- CARBIDE BITCORE BARREL
DRILLING/SAMPLINGACTIVITY RECORD
PROJECT NO.20510-060
ORC SUPERFUND SITECYRIL. OKLAHOMA
DATE START:4/10/90
DATE COMPLETE:4/11/90
BORING NO:SBB-12
SHEET NO.1 OF 1
PERSONNEL:ERIC BERCLUND
HOLE SIZE:5 1/2"-4 7/8"
DRILLING CONTRACTOR:POOL DRILLING INC.
DRILLER: UAYNE DRILLING EQUIPMENT/METHOD:G-D 1500 / WATER ROTARY
COORDINATES:N569788.7 E1942780.3
IEPTH TO UATER/DATE-TIME: GROUND ELEVATION:1343.6
GROUTING: CONSTRUCTED AS MONITORING WELLSEE CONSTRUCTION REPORT FOR DETAILS
CHRONOLOGICAL RECORD
TIME: ACTIVITY:
4/10/90
1400 HR1915 HR
4/11/90730 HRS930 HRS
MOVE TO AND SETUP AT LOCATIONCOMPLETE DRILLING AND SAMPLING
REAM HOLE AND BEGIN WELL CONSTRUCTIONCOMPLETE WELL CONSTRUCTION
SKETCH:
DECONTAMINATION: DRILL RIG AND SAMPLING EQUIPMENT DECONED WITHSTEAM CLEANER BEFORE MOVING ON LOCATION.
LOG OF BORING
DEPTHIN
FEET
SAMPLE
TYPE RUN/RECOVERY
TONS/ *SO FT
ASSIGNEDNUMBER
GEOLOGICGRAPHICLOG
DESCRIPTION COMMENTS
5 —
15 —
20 —J
25 —i
SH
SH
CORE
CORE
CORE
0.0-2.0/1.7 (FT)
3.0-4.0/0.3
SS-36 0.0-2.0' CLAY Dark brown, sitty1 CLAY with roots. (TOPSOIL).
stsxs
8.0-13.0/4.5 (FT)
13.0-18.0/5.5 (FT)
18.0-23.O/1.5 (FT)
35 —
40 —
• •••••in
tuning
•••••in
• •••••inin 11 tit t
I 2.0-3.3' DECOMPOSED GYPSUM RedishWMte, decomposed GYPSUM.
NO ORGANIC VAPORSWERE DETECTED DURINGDRILLING OPERATIONS,WHICH WERE MONITOREDCOKSTMtTLY WITH ANOVA OR H-NU.
3.3-23.0' SANDSTONE Red brown,friable, silt sized to veryfine grained SANDSTONE, weaklycemented with iron oxide andcalcite. Approximately topfoot decomposed.
BOTTOM OF BORING AT 23 FEET
* UNCON FINEDOPPRESSIVESTRENGTH
SH - SHELBY TUBE
CORE - CARBIDE BITCORE BARREL
DRILLING/SAMPLINGACTIVITY RECORD
PROJECT NO.20510-060
ORC SUPERFUKD SITECYRIL, OKLAHOMA
DATE START:5/9/90
DATE COMPLETE:5/9/90
BORING NO:SBB-13
SHEET NO.1 OF 1
PERSONNEL:ERIC BERGLUND
HOLE SIZE:5 1/2»-4 7/8"
DRILLING CONTRACTOR:POOL DRILLING INC.
DRILLER: UAYNE DRILLING EQUIPMENT/METHOD:G-D 1500 / WATER ROTARY
COORDINATES:N567553.8 E1941705.6
IEPTH TO UATER/DATE-TIME: GROUND ELEVATION:1349.6 FEET
GROUTING: CONSTRUCTED AS MONITORING WELLSEE CONSTRUCTION REPORT FOR DETAILS
CHRONOLOGICAL RECORD
TIME:
1630 HR
2000 HR
ACTIVITY:
MOVE TO AND SET UP AT LOCATION, BEGINDRILLING AND SAMPLING
COMPLETE WELL CONSTRUCTION
SKETCH:
DECONTAMINATION: DRILL RIG AND SAMPLING EQUIPMENT DECONED WITHSTEAM CLEANER BEFORE MOVING ON LOCATION.
LOG OF BORING
DEPTHINFEET
SAMPLE
TYPE RUN/RECOVERY
TONS/ *SO FT
ASSIGNEDNUMBER
GEOLOGICGRAPHICLOG
DESCRIPTION COMMENTS
5 —
10 —
15 —
20 —
25 —
30 —
35 —
40 —
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
3.0-2.0/1.2 (FT)S.0-5.0/1.5 (FT)
6.0-8.0/2.0 (FT)
2.0 (FT)
12.0-14.0/2.0 (FT)
15.0-17.0/1.4 (FT)
18.0-20.0/2.0 (FT)
25.0-27.0/2.0 (FT)
50.0-32.O/1.2 (FT)
(0 ADVANCE10 REC.
+4.50
3.25
3.25
1.00
1.00
0.50
0.25
SS-132 0.0-2.0' CLAY Dark brown, stiff,
I slightly silty CLAY with rootsand pieces of tar.
SS-133
SS-134
2.0-11.0' CLAY Brown, stiff, veryslightly silty, slightly moist,CLAY with a few pieces of organicmaterial. Orange iron stainingbelow 8 feet.
NO ORGANIC VAPORSWERE DETECTED DURINGDRILLING OPERATIONS,WHICH WERE MONITOREDCONSTANTLY UITH ANOVA OR H-NU.
0.25
SS-135
lllllllllIlllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
11.0-15.0' CLAY Orange brown,soft, moist, slightly siltyCLAY. Below 12' becomes silty
—i and damp.
15.0-31.5' SAND Orange brown,silty, very fine, wet SAND. Fewpieces of organic materialscattered throughout.
inn in •in mil i• •••Illl I
III II III I
31.5-36.5' SANDSTONE Red brown,friable, silt sized to very finegrained SANDSTONE.
BOTTOM OF BORING AT 36.5 FEET
* UNCONFINEDOPPRESSIVESTRENGTH
SH - SHELBY TUBE
CORE - CARBIDE BITCORE BARREL
DRILLING/SAMPLINGACTIVITY RECORD
PROJECT NO.20510-060
ORC SUPERFUND SITECYRIL, OKLAHOMA
DATE START:5/10/90
DATE COMPLETE:5/10/90
BORING NO:SBB-14
SHEET NO.1 OF 1
PERSONNEL:ERIC BERGLUND
HOLE SIZE:5 1/2»-4 7/8"
DRILLING CONTRACTOR:POOL DRILLING INC.
DRILLER: WAYNE DRILLING EQUIPMENT/METHOD:G-D 1500 / UATER ROTARY
COORDINATES:N568406.6 E1942043.9
)EPTH TO WATER/DATE-TIME: GROUND ELEVATION:1354.6 FEET
GROUTING: CONSTRUCTED AS MONITORING WELLSEE CONSTRUCTION REPORT FOR DETAILS
CHRONOLOGICAL RECORD
TIME:
830 HR
1200 HR
ACTIVITY:
MOVE TO AND SET UP AT LOCATION, BEGINDRILLING AND SAMPLING
COMPLETE WELL CONSTRUCTION
SKETCH:
DECONTAMINATION: DRILL RIG AND SAMPLING EQUIPMENT DECONED WITHSTEAM CLEANER BEFORE MOVING ON LOCATION.
LOG OF BORING
DEPTHINFEET
SAMPLE
TYPE RUN/RECOVERY
TONS/SO FT
ASSIGNEDNUMBER
GEOLOGICGRAPHICLOG
DESCRIPTION COMMENTS
5 —
10 —<
15 —
20 —
25 —
30 —
35 —
40 —
SH
SH
SH
CORE
CORE
D.0-2.0/0.8 (FT)
5.0-5.0/1.6 (FT)
6.0-8.5/2.5 (FT)
5.0 (FT)
14.0-24.0/7.0 (FT)
4.00
2.50
3.50
0.0-2.0' FILL Dark brown, mottled-iwith light brown, clay FILL.
SS-137
SS-138
2.0-8.5' CLAY Medium brown,mottled with yellow brown, stiffto very stiff, slightly siltyCLAY, with a feu veinlete ofgypsun.
NO ORGANIC VAPORSWERE DETECTED DURINGDRILLING OPERATIONS,WHICH WERE MONITOREDCONSTANTLY WITH ANOVA OR H-NU.
SSZSSS
ssss
8.5-18.0' GYPSUM Mottled offwhite, yellowish and pinkish,with areas of black staining(sulfate?), soft GYPSUM, randomfractures healed with fiberoussecondary gypsun. Top 2 inchestranslucent light orange white.
• •••••••I• •••••••I• •••••••I• •••••••I• •••••III• •••••••I
18.0-24.0' SANDSTONE Red brown,friable, silt sized to very finegrained SANDSTONE. Very weaklycemented with calcite and ironoxide. 21.5-22.5 stronglycemented.
BOTTOM OF BORING AT 24.0 FEET
* UNCON FINEDCOMPRESSIVESTRENGTH
SH - SHELBY TUBE
CORE - CARBIDE BITCORE BARREL
DRILLING/SAMPLINGACTIVITY RECORD
PROJECT NO.20510-060
ORC SUPERFUND SITECYRIL, OKLAHOMA
DATE START:5/10/90
DATE COMPLETE:5/10/90
BORING NO:SBB-15
SHEET NO.1 OF 1
PERSONNEL:ERIC BERGLUND
HOLE SIZE:5 1/2"-4 7/8"
DRILLING CONTRACTOR:POOL DRILLING INC.
DRILLER:. UAYNE DRILLING EQUIPMENT/METHOD:G-D 1500 / UATER ROTARY
COORDINATES:N569235.2 El942073.1
IEPTN TO WATER/DATE-TIME: GROUND ELEVATION:1360.3 FEET
GROUTING: CONSTRUCTED AS MONITORING WELLSEE CONSTRUCTION REPORT FOR DETAILS
CHRONOLOGICAL RECORD
TIME:
1400 KR
2000 HR
ACTIVITY:
MOVE TO AND SET UP AT LOCATION, BEGINDRILLING AND SAMPLING.
COMPLETE WELL CONSTRUCTION.
SKETCH:
DECOHTAWHATIOH: DRJU. RIG AND SAMPLING EQUVPHEKT DECOMED U1THSTEAM CLEANER BEFORE MOVING ON LOCATION.
LOG OF BORING
DEPTHINFEET
SAMPLE
TYPE RUN/RECOVERY
TONS/ *SO FT
ASSIGNEDNUMBER
GEOLOGICGRAPHICLOG
DESCRIPTION COMMENTS
I
5 —I
10 —
15 —
20 —
25 —
30 —
35 —
40 —
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
CORE
D.0-2.0/.3 (FT)S.0-5.0/1.6 (FT)
6.0-8.0/2.0 (FT)
9.0-11.O/1.2 (FT)
12.0-14.0/1.1 (FT)
15.0-17.0/1.2 (FT)
18.0-20.O/2.0 (FT)
25.0-30.0/1.1 (FT)
2.00
2.50
2.50
2.001.00
0.25
2.50
0.50
SS-139
SS-140
SS-U1
SS-142
SS-U3
SS-144
0.0-20.0' CLAY Dark brown to grayto mottled orange brown, stiffto soft, very slightly silty tosilty CLAY
Roots and organics to 8 feet.Stiff to 10 feet.Soft 10 to 15 and 18 to 20 feet.Silty 9 to 15 feet.Thin sheets of organic materialto 11 feet.
••••• nit
III II •••!
• •••••II •
20.0-30.0' SANDSTONE Red brown,friable; silt sized to very finegrained SANDSTONE, very weaklycemented with iron oxide andcalcite, firm 29 to 30 feet.
At 9 feet detectedgas odor. Drillingwater read 7 ppm onh-nu. >5 ppm insampling areabreathing zone,sampling team startedusing resperators.Sample read 40 ppm.15 to 17 foot sampleread 170 ppm.18 to 20 foot sampleread 200 ppm.Core sample read17 ppm.
• ••••••I •• ••••III!
BOTTOM OF BORING AT 30 FEET* UNCONFINED
COMPRESSIVESTRENGTH
SH -. SHELBY TUBE
CORE' - CARBIDE BITCORE BARREL
DRILLING/SAMPLINGACTIVITY RECORD
PROJECT NO.20510-060
ORC SUPERFUND SITECYRIL, OKLAHOMA
DATE START:5/21/90
DATE COMPLETE:5/22/90
BORING NO:SBB-16
SHEET NO.1 OF 2
PERSONNEL:ERIC BERGLUND
HOLE SIZE:5 1/2"-4 7/8"
DRILLING CONTRACTOR:POOL DRILLING INC.
DRILLER: UAYNE DRILLING EQUIPMENT/METHOD:G-D 1500 / WATER ROTARY
COORDINATES: DEPTH TO UATER/DATE-TINE: GROUND ELEVATION: GROUTING: CONSTRUCTED AS MONITORING WELLSEE CONSTRUCTION REPORT FOR DETAILS
CHRONOLOGICAL RECORD
TIME:5/21
5/22
ACTIVITY:MOVE TO AND SET UP AT LOCATION, BEGINDRILLING AND SAMPLING, CORED TO 32 FT.
CORED TO 47 FEET. E-LOGGED HOLE ANDCOMPLETED WELL CONSTRUCTION.
SKETCH:
DECONTAMINATION: DRILL RIG AND SAMPLING EQUIPMENT DECONED WITHSTEAM CLEANER BEFORE MOVING ON LOCATION.
LOG OF BORING
DEPTHIN
FEET
SAMPLE
TYPE RUN/RECOVERY
TONS/SO FT
ASSIGNEDNUMBER
GEOLOGICGRAPHICLOG
DESCRIPTION COMMENTS
5 —
10 —i
15 —
20 —
25 —
30 —
35 —
40 —
SH
SH
SH
CORE
CORE
3.0-2.0/1.0 (FT)J.0-5.0/1.3 <FT)
i.0-8.0/1.0 (FT)
12.0-17.0/4.4 (FT)
17.0-27.0/5.0 (FT)
170
171
KBOOOOOwAjy,f**fmr,AWJwWJvr*f*rtf*fiftf*rtftWWWWWVftfiTtf^if^ftftrtCTOWTCVPftftfiftrit*f*r*f*WJWWVV
0.0-9.0' FILL Red brown, siltyclay, sandy clay with gravel, andsandy clay FILL.
thrift f^ftfiftfttt\MIWVMv
9.0-40.5' GYPSUM White with blackstreaks, soft, phanic GYPSUM withfractures healed with secondary,fiberous gypsum.
Black oily substanceon drilling water at12 feet. H-nu read1.5 to 2.0 ppm offdrilling water. 0reading in breathingzone.
zsssstz
CORE
CORE
27.0-32.O/4.7 (FT)
52.0-41.O/6.0 (FT)
27 feet color changes to pinkgrayish white.
ssssss
40.4-40.5' red brown clay
* UNCONFINEDCOMPRESSIVESTRENGTH
SH - SHELBY TUBE
CORE - CARBIDE BITCORE BARREL
DRILLING/SAMPLING PROJECT NO.ACTIVITY RECORD 20510-060
ORC SUPERFUND SITE DATE: BORING NO: SBB-16 SHEET NO.CYRIL, OKLAHOMA SEE SHEET 1 2 OF 2
LOG Of BORING (CONTINUED)
DEPTHIN
FEET
40 —
---
45 —«•
--—50 —™"
-
55 —
60 —
SAMPLE
TYPE
CORE
REAM
RUN/RECOVERY
M.0-47.0/i.O (FT)
,7.0 TO>2.0 (FT)
TONS/ •SO FT
ASSIGNEDNUMBER
•EOLOGIC.OG
• •••••I I
ii tnii •mini •• iiiiiii• linn •• ••••••i• ••••in••••••••• •••••>•II II Illl
Illlllll
DESCRIPTION
40.5-52.0' SANDSTONE Redbrown, friable, silt sized tovery fine grained SANDSTONEweakly cemented with iron oxideand calcite.
BOTTOM OF BORING AT 52 FEET
.
COMMENTS
REAMED HOLE BECAUSEOF CAVING TO 52 FEETTO SET WELL.
*4 .
DRILLING/SAMPLINGACTIVITY RECORD
PROJECT HO.20510-060
ORC SUPERFIMD SITECYRIL, OKLAHOMA
DATE START:6/4/90
DATE COMPLETE:6/4/90
BORING NO:SBB-17
SHEET NO.1 OF 1
PERSONNEL:ERIC BERGLUND
HOLE SIZE:5 1/2"-4 7/8"
DRILLING CONTRACTOR:POOL DRILLING INC.
DRILLER: UAYNE DRILLING EQUIPMENT/METHOD:G-D 1500 / HATER ROTARY
COORDINATES: IEPTH TO UATER/DATE-TIME: GROUND ELEVATION: GROUTING: CONSTRUCTED AS MONITORING WELLSEE CONSTRUCTION REPORT FOR DETAILS
CHRONOLOGICAL RECORD
TIME:
900 HR
1500 HR
ACTIVITY:
MOVED TO AND SETUP AT LOCATION, BEGANDRILLING AND SAMPLING.
COMPLETED MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION
SKETCH:
DECONTAMINATION: DRILL RIG AND SAMPLING EQUIPMENT DECONED WITHSTEAM CLEANER BEFORE MOVING ON LOCATION.
LOG OF BORING
DEPTHINFEET
SAMPLE
TYPE RUN/RECOVERY
TONS/ *SO FT
ASSIGNEDNUMBER
GEOLOGICGRAPHICLOG
DESCRIPTION COMMENTS
5 —
10 —
15 —
20 —
25 —
30 —
35 —
40 —
SH
SH
CORE
CORE
CORE
J.0-2.0/3.4 (FT)J.0-5.0/2.0 (FT)
S.0-11.0/1.9 (FT)
11.0-16.0/.8 (FT)
16.0-26.O/S.7 (FT)
2.50
>4.00
D.0'-1.0' GRAVEL FILL
195 1.0'-5.5' CLAY Mediim gray, verystiff, dry, few scattered sandgrains, slightly silty CLAY
NO ORGANIC VAPORSWERE DETECTED DURINGDRILLING OPERATIONS,WHICH WERE MONITOREDCONSTANTLY WITH ANOVA OR H-NU.
zszz
zsss
5.5'-21.7' GYPSUM Off white,soft, phanic GYPSUM, manyfractures healed with secondaryfiberous gypsun and clay(shale). Top 10 feet very softand easily broken, bottom 5 feetvery dense.
in •••••«in mill• •••••••I
CORE 26.0-31.O/D.O (FT)
21.7'-31.0' SANDSTONE Red brown,friable, silt sized to very finegrained SANDSTONE, very weaklycemented with iron oxide andcalcite to ireemented.
• •••••II •
• Illlllll
• ••*•••••
BOTTOM OF BORING AT 31 FEET* UNCON FINED
OPPRESSIVESTRENGTH
SH - SHELBY TUBE
CORE - CARBIDE BITCORE BARREL
llIIIII
l l1III1IIIIII
APPENDIX B
MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION REPORTS
MONITORING WELLCONSTRUCTION REPORT
PERSONNEL:ERIC BERGLUND
PROJECT NO.20510-060
ORC SUPERFUND SITE DATE OF CONSTRUCTION: MONITORING WELL NO.CYRIL, OKLAHOMA 3/25/90 - 4/6/90 1BB-2
DRILLING CONTRACTOR: COORDINATES: DEPTH TO WATER / DATE-TIME:POOL DRILLING INC. N57D983.6 E1940867.8
DEPTH (FT) ELEVATION (FT)
_
GENERALIZEDGEOLOGIC
LOG
Y f/
1-6' CLAY \ '/' '/f '/' '/' '/
.-20' GYPSUM 1 i/l/' 'III' 'III1 'III1 'III
10-141' 1 'IIISANDSTONE / '///
f 'III
NO SCALE
IT—
••M
T
IIIIIIII'/'1'/IIIIni/
\***^ **» ^**nrru_ii- MTWIHU • b • w
-1.9 1363.6
ftYPE OF SURFACE CASING:TEEL
f /t /> i1 1
i/ 1n in i
III! 1
an
t
i
• !••••Ill •• I
III •• I
III II I
^==
U 1II (
GROUND SURFACE: 0.0 1361.7
TYPE OF PROTECTIVE CASING:STEEL
^___ RfiTTflM fw ciErirp rictiin' L n • n^7 7
DIAMETER OF PROTECTIVE CASING: 8 INCHES
TYPE OF RISER PIPE:PUT CTUPnill F Aft
DIAMETER OF RISER PIPE: 4 INCHES
DIAMETER OF BORE HOLE: 12 INCHES
TYPE OF BACKFILL MATERIAL:CEMENT-BENTONITE GROUT
TYPE OF SEAL:ccuTnutTC PEIICTC* f \lffl n AY\
DIAMETER OF BORE HOLE: 7 7/8 INCHES
Tf¥> HP F1ITFP DAf¥ / DATTPU OF CFAI • 117 A MLL 1
W AF CTPPPIJ- 1?1 0 1?£fl 7
TYPE OF FILTER PACK: . ^10/20 COLORADO SILICA SAND " * '
)IAKETER OF SCREEN: 4 INCHES
TYPE OF SCREEN: PVC SCHEDULE 40,MACHINE SLOTTED, 0.020 INCH SLOTWIDTH 4 SLOTS PER INCH
MONITORING WELLCONSTRUCTION REPORT
PERSONNEL:ROTE BEENE
PROJECT NO.20510-060
ORC SUPERFUND SITE DATE OF CONSTRUCTION: MONITORING WELL NO.CYRIL, OKLAHOMA 5/7-19/90 IBB-3
DRILLING CONTRACTOR: COORDINATES: DEPTH TO WATER / DATE-TIME:POOL DRILLING INC. N569031.6 E 1943340. 9
DEPTH (FT) ELEVATION (FT)
GENERALIZEDGEOLOGIC
LOG
1-27' CLAY / 1 f
1 ' if f f
f ' '1 If/1 HI1 III
!7-135' / HISANDSTONE 1 '//
/ '//f HI1 HI1 HI
'
'
NO SCALE
[J—
—
——
p
/
1
1
r
iii/ii'/u
-2.6 1330.4
fl•YPE OF SURFACE CASING:iTEEL
' ' GROUND SURFACE: 0.0 1327.8
f f
f f
1 '
1 '/ 1
in 'uut
fi
i
i
i
• • •• •• • •• •in ii iin ii i==
1 1
TVDP nc DPOTPrriup rAcitift*
STEEL
DIAMETER OF PROTECTIVE CASING: 8 INCHES
TYPE OF RISER PIPE:^c MPMII p LS\ PUT
DIAMETER OF RISER PIPE: 4 INCHES I D
DIAMETER OF BORE HOLE: 14 7/8 INCHES
TYPE OF BACKFILL MATERIAL:rPMPUT-RpyTnuiTP nfintrr
TYPE OF SEAL: BENTONITE PELLETSMuni ri AVH
DIAMETER OF BORE HOLE: 7 7/8 INCHES
——-TOP OF PtITPP PAf¥ / RnTTnu f\t *5iPAI • 1H^ H 17?^ A
W np creppy- in*i n 1?7? A
TYPE OF FILTER PACK:10/?0 COLDBADO SILICA SAUD ' ' *
)IAMETER OF SCREEN: 4 INCHES I D
TYPE OF SCREEN: SCHEDULE 40 PVC.MACHINE SLOTTED 0.020 INCH SLOTUIDTH L SLOTS PER IUCH
_^_^^_RnTTHM fir spBfFii- 1?1; *< i?n? R
_______ nniTriN nr TIITFB Piipr- 1?*; n i?n? fl
MONITORING WELLCONSTRUCTION REPORT
PERSONNEL:ERIC BERGLUHO
PROJECT NO.20510-060
ORC SUPERFUND SITE DATE OF CONSTRUCTION: MONITORING WELL NO.CYRIL. OKLAHOMA 5/20-23/90 IBB-4
DRILLING CONTRACTOR: COORDINATES: DEPTH TO WATER / DATE-TIME:POOL DRILLING INC. N567104.8 E1942637.0
DEPTH (FT) ELEVATION (FT)
GENERALIZEDGEOLOGIC
LOG
1-39' CLAY V ' '/
' ' '/' ' '/t ' '/1 '///1 'III1 'III' 'III1 'III
S9-140' t '///SANDSTONE ' '///
' 'III1 'III1 'III
p
NO SCALE
fl—
•
•
«^
^^m
••w
1
11IIIIIIiiiv/>IIfit//,II
1
prTPE OF SURFACE CASING:TEEL
f (f f
f fti ' — ,1 1 f L-U '
U 1</ '
Jill 1tlII
t
• •••
ttl ttl
••••••
• •t •• •1
U 1II f
GROUND SURFACE: 0.0
TYPE OF PROTECTIVE CASING:STEEL
DIAMETER OF PROTECTIVE CASING: 8 INCHES
TYPE OF RISER PIPE:SCHEDULE 40 PVC
DIAMETER OF RISER PIPE: 4 INCHES I. D.
DIAMETER OF BORE HOLE: 14 7/8 INCHES
TYPE OF BACKFILL MATERIAL:rFM£UT*fiPlITnU1TF ftDftlT
TYPE OF SEAL: BENTONITE PELLETSm/nt ri AY**
DIAMETER OF BORE HOLE: 7 7/8 INCHES
TOP OF FILTER PACK / BOTTOM OF SEAL* 109 0
TYPE OF FILTER PACK:m/?n rnincAnn SIIICA CAIID ~ .
.-- .T-
>IAKETER OF SCREEN: 4 INCHES I. D.
TYPE OF SCREEN: SCHEDULE 40 PVC,MACHINE SLOTTED, SLOT WIDTH 0.020",FOUR ROWS OF SLOTS FOUR SLOTS PERINCH.
MONITORING UELLCONSTRUCTION REPORT
PERSONNEL:ERIC BERGLUND
LOCKING CAP -
GENERALIZEDGEOLOGICLOG
1.0-9.0' CLAY
'.0-138.0'SANDSTONE
f111111f/1111ff
PROJECT NO.20510-060
ORC SUPER FUND SITE DATE OF CONSTRUCTION: MONITORING UELL NO.CYRIL, OKLAHOMA 5/31/90-6/3/90 IBB-5
DRILLING CONTRACTOR: COORDINATES: DEPTH TO WATER / DATE-TIME:POOL DRILLING INC.
DEPTH (FT) ELEVATION (FT)n
r ff 't tf fif/<ii<iiuiinuiinuiininUI
NO SCALE
q—
•
1
f
7ilfUi/il
1 *^^ w «^w«» n»_il_- «»rM • nw •
1TPE OF SURFACE CASING:TEEL
i tt f
i r1 ' — L/ '/ '/ r
/// '
//II
• ••••• !•••
• •••I I
!•••• •'
/ i
GROUND SURFACE: 0.0
TYPE OF PROTECTIVE CASING:STEEL
DIAMETER OF PROTECTIVE CASING: 8 INCHES
TYPE OF RISER PIPE:SCHEDULE 40 PVC
DIAMETER OF RISER PIPE: 4 INCHES
DIAMETER OF BORE HOLE: U 7/8 INCHES
TYPE OF BACKFILL HATER I AL:CEMENT-BENTONITE GROUT
TYPE OF SEAL:HFUTCUITF PFIIFTC rVHCIAYl
DIAMETER OF BORE HOLE: 7 7/8 INCHES
«»TOP OF FILTEP PA Of / BOTTOM OF ^FAl - 11^ 7
TYPE OF FILTER PACK: ' •10/20 COLORADO SILICA SAND *
IIAMETER OF SCREEN: t INCHES
TYPE OF SCREEN: SCHEDULE 40 PVC,MACHINE SLOTTED, SLOT WIDTH 0.020"FOUR ROWS OF SLOTS FOUR SLOTS PERINCH
MONITORING WELLCONSTRUCTION REPORT
PERSONNEL:ERIC BERGLUND
PROJECT NO.20510-060
ORC SUPER FUND SITE DATE OF CONSTRUCTION: MONITORING UELL NO.CYRIL. OKLAHOMA 3/12/90 SBB-1
DRILLING CONTRACTOR: COORDINATES: DEPTH TO WATER / DATE-TIME:POOL DRILLING INC. N568288.1 El 940825. 4
DEPTH (FT) ELEVATION (FT)
_
GENERALIZEDGEOLOGIC
LOG
VII '/0-12 Ft. CLAY VII '/
\ll '/\ll '/
12-24.6 Ft.GYPSUM
24.6-31.5 Ft.SANDSTONE
NO SCALE
rpi
' t
' ' **i'
f
f
_.
—
—
—
—
•»ii••i ••in ••• •i ••=====
1-2.2' 1362.3
DIAMETER OF SURFACE CASING: 6 1/2 INCHES O.D
T
S
YPE OF SURFACE CASING:
TEEL
GROUND SURFACE: 0.0 1360.0f IIIf I/If IIIf 111
TYPE OF RISER PIPE:
PVC SCHEDULE 40
DIAMETER OF RISER PIPE: 2 INCHES l.D.
.niAUFTPQ np Rdpr unr* c 7/ft tururc
TYPE OF BACKFILL MATERIAL:
CEMENT - BENT ON I TE GROUT
»"» nr <Fti - 17 L 1147 f,
TYPE OF SEAL:
BENTONITE PELLETS (VOLCLAY)
TOP OF rilTFR PACT / BOTTOM DF CF»I • 15 S 1\UL •>
TYPE OF FILTER PACK: . /
10/20 COLORADO SILICA SAND - ••
)IAMETER OF SCREEN: 2 INCHES l.D.
TYPE OF SCREEN: PVC SHEDULE 40,
. UIPUIUF SLOTTED 0 020 IUCH SLOT
WIDTH, 4 SLOTS PER INCH
MONITORING WELLCONSTRUCTION REPORT
PERSONNEL:ROYE BEENE
PROJECT NO.20510-060
ORC SUPER FUND SITECYRIL. OKLAHOMA
DATE OF CONSTRUCTION: MONITORING WELL NO.3/17/90 SBB-2
DRILLING CONTRACTOR: COORDINATES: DEPTH TO UATER / DATE-TIME:POOL DRILLING INC. N570592.8 E1941020.3
GENERALIZEDGEOLOGICLOG
>-2' LOAM VI / II\ll '/
!-24' CLAY y/'l >'/
24-34' SANDSTONE
TT
//ffifff
ffr
—
—
—
—
—
—• • ••• • iiin ••• •• it
DEPTH (FT) ELEVATION (FT)SURFACE CASING: -2.1
-2.0 1365.9r> r,r »<>.t-n »i«r.
— DIAMETER OF SURFACE CASING: 6 1/2 INCHES 6.D.
1
!
nrPE OF SURFACE CASING:
JEEL
/ III1 til1 'II1 'II
TYPE OF RISER PIPE:
PVC SCHEDULE 40
DIAMETER OF RISER PIPE:
. niAHFTFp nP WP wrap.
GROUND SURFACE: 0.0 1363.9
SURFACE CASING: 3.9 1360.0
2 INCHES I.D
6 INCHES
TYPE OF BACKFILL MATERIAL:
CEMENT - BENTONITE GROUT
TYPE OF SEAL:
^ •» TflP HP «;FAI • 1O fl \\LL 0
BENTONITE PELLETS (VOLCLAY)
.
_
TYPE OF FILTER PACK:
BOTTOM OF SEAL: 22.0 1341.9
» Tno OP cr&EEu. ?L n mo o
• '.
10/20 COLORADO SILICA SAND ~/ I
>IAMETER OF SCREEN: 2 INCHES I.D. '^ ^^^ ^ ^ ' *
TYPE OF SCREEN: PVC S
UAruiuc SLOTTED 0 020
WIDTH, 4 SLOTS PER INC
•
NO SCALE
CHEDULE 40,
INCH SLOT
H
OTTOM OF SCREEN: 34.0 1329.9
OF FILTER PACK: 34.0 "-• 1329.9
OTTOM OF BORING: 34.0 1329.9
MONITORING WELLCONSTRUCTION REPORT
PERSONNEL:ERIC BERGLUNO
PROJECT NO.20510-060
ORC SUPER FUND SITE DATE OF CONSTRUCCYRIL, OKLAHOMA 3/24/90
DRILLING CONTRACTOR: COORDINATES:POOL DRILLING INC. N57D891.5 E1940851.3
_
GENERALIZEDGEOLOGIC
LOG
0-12.1' CLAY VII <lIII 'IIII '/HI '/
12. 1-20. V GYPSUM
20.1-35.5'SANDSTONE
T~P
'
*
'
'
f
1
t
1
1
—
™*
••tii••• ••• •• ••••• ••
DIAMETER OF SURFACE CASING: 6 1/2 INCHES O.D.
T
S
YPE OF SURFACE CASING:
TEEL
GROUND SURFACE:f IIIf IIIf IIIf III
TYPE OF RISER PIPE:
PVC SCHEDULE 40
DIAMETER OF RISER PIPE: 2 INCHES I.D
• hfAMFTFP fit RfiBP MDIF* S 7/ft fkirUFC
TYPE OF BACKFILL MATERIAL:
CEMENT * BENTONITE GROUT
TYPE OF SEAL:
BENTONITE PELLETS (VOLCLAY)
rno nr CIITCD B*nr / onTTni nr ecu .
TYPE OF FILTER PACK:
10/20 COLORADO SILICA SAND
JIAMETER OF SCREEN: 2 INCHES I.D.
TYPE OF SCREEN: PVC SCHEDULE 40.
• MACHINE SLOTTED 0 020 INCH SLOT
WIDTH, 4 SLOTS PER INCH
.
NO SCALE NOTE: CONSTRUCTED NEAR MONITORING WELL IBB-2
TION: MONITORING WELL NO.SBB-3
DEPTH TO WATER / DATE -TIME:
DEPTH (FT) ELEVATION (FT)-2.1
-2.0 1364.0
0.0 1362.0
2.97 1358.5
14.0 1348.0
17.9 1344.1
20.4 1341.6
t 0
35.4 1326.6
35.4 ..,. 1326.6
35.5 1326.5
MONITORING UELLCONSTRUCTION REPORT
PERSONNEL:ERIC BERGLUND
PROJECT NO.20510-060
ORC SUPER FUND SITE DATE OF CONSTRUCTION: MONITORING UELL NO.CYRIL. OKLAHOMA 3/27/90 SBB-4
DRILLING CONTRACTOR: COORDINATES: , DEPTH TO WATER / DATE-TIME:POOL DRILLING INC. N570807.1 E1941488.9
DEPTH (FT) ELEVATION (FT)
GENERALIZEDGEOLOGICLOG
0-13' GYPSUM \ll 7\ll '/VII 7\ll \/
13-25' SANDSTONE
NO SCALE
rp
ss
t m
I H
•>•••
•MH
M«I
^ H
1
'/7'/IIf
f
f
1
1
1
r
ifffff/ff
• I •• •
• •• II •
• II II I
III II I
-
1-2.6 1355.2
DIAMETER OF SURFACE CASING: 6 1/2 INCHES O.D.
1
;
•YPE OF SURFACE CASING:
iTEEL
GROUND SURFACE: 0.0 1352.6lll\t//\tintll\
TYPE OF RISER PIPE:
PVC SCHEDULE 40
DIAMETER OF RISER PIPE: 2 INCHES I. D
-DIAMETER OF BORE MQIF*
TYPE OF BACKFILL MATERIAL:
CEMENT - BENTONITE GROUT
TYPE OF SEAL:
BENTONITE PELLETS (VOLCLAY)
TOD OF MITPB DAfY / RflTTfld f\f CPAI . ft H 1TAA A
TYPE OF FILTER PACK:
10/20 COLORADO SILICA SAND . ..
tIAMETER OF SCREEN: 2 INCHES l.D.
TYPE OF SCREEN: PVC SCHEDULE 40,
MACHINE SLOTTED 0 020 INCH SLOT
WIDTH, 4 SLOTS PER INCH
MONITORING WELLCONSTRUCTION REPORT
PERSONNEL:ERIC BERGUMD
PROJECT NO.20510-060
ORC SUPERFUUD SITE DATE OF CONSTRUCTION: MONITORING WELL NO.CYRIL, OKLAHOMA 4/7/90 SBB-5
DRILLING CONTRACTOR: COORDINATES: DEPTH TO WATER / DATE-TIME:POOL DRILLING INC. N57D591.2 E1941958.3
DEPTH (FT) ELEVATION (FT)
_
GENERALIZEDGEOLOGIC
LOG
'// 70-9 Ft. Ill '/
GYSUM '/I '/HI '/
9-20 Ft. SANDSTONE
NO SCALE
rpi
't' ' *Itf
_
—
—
—
—
—
• •• it• •• ••• ii ••in iisssssa
\-2.7 1354.9
DIAMETER OF SURFACE CASING: 6 1/2 INCHES O.D.
T
S
YPE OF SURFACE CASING:
TEEL
GROUND SURFACE: 0.0 1352.2t HIf IIIf IIIf III
TYPE OF RISER PIPE:
PVC SCHEDULE 40
DIAMETER OF RISER PIPE: 2 INCHES t.O
-DtAMFTEB OF nncF imp. A 1/? IUCHFC
TYPE OF BACKFILL MATERIAL:
CEMENT - BEMTONITE GROUT
TYPE OF SEAL:
BENTONITE PELLETS (VOLCLAY)
— TOP OF FILTER PACT / BOTTOM OF SEAL • 8 0' 1344 2
-
TYPE OF FILTER PACK: _ . , .
10/20 COLORADO SILICA SAND
JIAMETER OF SCREEN: 2 INCHES l.D.
TYPE OF SCREEN: PVC SCHEDULE 40,
MACHINE SLOTTED 0 0?0 1UTH SLOT
WIDTH, 4 SLOTS PER INCH
___,^^_ BflTWM flF WBPFM- 10 0' 1T 1 ?
MONITORING WELLCONSTRUCTION REPORT
PERSONNEL:ERIC BERGLUND
PROJECT NO.20510-060
ORC SUPER FUND SITE DATE OF CONSTRUCTION: MONITORING WELL NO.CYRIL, OKLAHOMA 4/7/90 SBB-6
DRILLING CONTRACTOR: COORDINATES: DEPTH TO UATER / DATE-TIME:POOL DRILLING INC. N567364.3 E1940824.5
DEPTH (FT) ELEVATION (FT)
-
GENERALIZEDGEOLOGIC
LOG
0-14.7' CLAY III '/HI '/III '/III '1
14.7-15.0'GYPSUM
15.0-30.0'SANDSTONE
•
NO SCALE
rp
•a
^^
MH
1
f/II
II
t
i
t
I
1
1
I
f'
1
r
/
• I II 1
• 1 II I
=5S5
1-3.2 1352.4
• DIAMETER OF SURFACE CASING: 6 1/2 INCHES I.D.
1
!
YPE OF SURFACE CASING:
iTEEL
GROUND SURFACE: 0.0 1349.2IIIIIIIIIIII
TYPE OF RISER PIPE:
PVC SCHEDULE 40
DIAMETER OF RISER PIPE: 2 INCHES O.D
•.niAMPTPO OP ft DPP imp- A 1 /9 ikiruipc
TYPE OF BACKFILL MATERIAL:
CEMENT - BENTONITE GROUT
TYPE OF SEAL:
BENTONITE PELLETS (VOLCLAY)
ffft nf FitTPQ PAW / RATTflM OF <IFAI • 11 R 1557 L
TYPE OF FILTER PACK:
10/20 COLORADO SILICA SAND • _ . _ - . . j
I
)IAMETER OF SCREEN: 2 INCHES I.D. • ;
TYPE OF SCREEN: PVC SCHEDULE 40, :
MAPMIUF SLOTTED 0 D?0 INCH SLOT
WIDTH, 4 SLOTS PER INCH
r,r,'rri**A f.r r f lTfD D*rr- 1ft fi ' 1119 ?
r*rmr*i nf fOV} \Ur.~ ^fl fl 1117 ?
MONITORING WELLCONSTRUCTION REPORT
PERSONNEL:ERIC BERGUMD
PROJECT NO.20510-060
ORC SUPER FUND SITE DATE OF CONSTRUCTION: MONITORING WELL NO.CYRIL, OKLAHOMA 4/7/90 SBB-7
DRILLING CONTRACTOR: COORDINATES: DEPTH TO WATER / DATE-TIME:POOL DRILLING INC. N567317.5 E 194 1363. 2
DEPTH (FT) ELEVATION (FT)
1
GENERALIZEDGEOLOGIC
LOG
0-8.0' CLAY Hi '/III '/III '/HI '/
fl. 0-27.5' SAND
27.5-32.0'SANDSTONE
NO SCALE
•— p
f
*
'
'
f
••••ii ii•• ii••••=^=
I•2.5 1347.0
DIAMETER OF SURFACE CASING: 6 1/2 INCHES O.D.
T
S
TPE OF SURFACE CASING:
TEEL
GROUND SURFACE: 0.0 1344.5f I//1 III1 Ulf Ul
TYPE OF RISER PIPE:
PVC SCHEDULE 40
DIAMETER OF RISER PIPE: 2 INCHES I.D
• RIAMFTFP OF RflOP UfMP* A 1/9 IUCUPC
TYPE OF BACKFILL MATERIAL:
CEMENT - BENTONITE GROUT
______ TUP r\r *FAI - T n nil *;
TYPE OF SEAL:
BENTONITE PELLETS (VOLCLAY)
— _T(¥> OF FtlTFB PACK / RflTTCM OF SCAl • 5 ? 1339 3
TYPE OF FILTER PACK:• Y
10/20 COLORADO SILICA SAND . - -
HAMETER OF SCREEN: 2 INCHES I.D.
TYPE OF SCREEN: PVC SCHEDULE 40,
MACHINE SLOTTED 0 D20 INCH SLOT
WIDTH, 4 SLOTS PER INCH
MONITORING UELLCONSTRUCTION REPORT
PERSONNEL:ERIC BERGLUND
PROJECT NO.20510-060
ORC SUPERFUND SITE DATE OF CONSTRUCTION: MONITORING UELL NO.CYRIL, OKLAHOMA 4/8/90 SBB-8
DRILLING CONTRACTOR: COORDINATES: DEPTH TO UATER / DATE-TIME:POOL DRILLING INC. N567664.0 E1942980;!
DEPTH <FT) ELEVATION (FT)
.
GENERALIZEDGEOLOGIC
LOG
0-28' SUT \~ll >/AND SAND \ll '/
VII 7\ll \l
28-60' CLAY
60-70' SANDSTONE
NO SCALE
TT
f
f
f
»
f
1
I
1
1
f
f
/
1
f
1
I
f
I
f
f
•••.
—
—
• • ••
• • li
• • ••
• • ••==
I-2.8 1320.4
DIAMETER OF SURFACE CASING: 6 1/2 INCHES O.D.
1
8
rYPE OF SURFACE CASING:
iTEEL
GROUND SURFACE: 0.0 1317.6/ IIIf III1 III1 III
.
TYPE OF RISER PIPE:
PVC SCHEDULE 40
DIAMETER OF RISER PIPE: 2 INCHES l.D
_ntiuFTPB at ROBP unf- ft 1/7 iyr*KFC
TYPE OF BACKFILL MATERIAL:
CEMENT - BEHTONITE GROUT
TYPE OF SEAL:
BENTONITE PELLETS (VOL CLAY)
^^ TflP tit F1ITPP DArr / llflTTnM OF CPAI • ^ft A 1?^O fi
TYPE OF FILTER PACK: . ..
10/20 COLORADO SILICA SAND -. ,...
MAMETER OF SCREEN: 2 INCHES l.D.
TYPE OF SCREEN: PVC SCHEDULE 40,
MICHIUF SLOTTED 0 Q?0 IklCH SLOT
WIDTH, 4 SLOTS PER INCH
________ nnTTfw or "[rBPFiii- 7n n i?47 ft
MONITORING WELLCONSTRUCTION REPORT
PERSONNEL:ERIC BERGLUND
PROJECT NO.20510-060
ORC SUPERFUND SITE DATE OF CONSTRUCTION: MONITORING WELL NO.CYRIL, OKLAHOMA 4/9/90 SBB-9
DRILLING CONTRACTOR: COORDINATES: DEPTH TO UATER / DATE-TIME:POOL DRILLING INC. W567058.2 E1942398.9
DEPTH (FT) ELEVATION (FT)
-~
GENERALIZEDGEOLOGIC
LOG
0-1 ' SAND AND III '/SILT III '/
1-28' /// '/SANDSTONE t=i
NO SCALE
rp1
ft
7'/ft
i
!•••!
• •1 It •
• •• » 1
• •••••
==
I-4.1 1339.9
DIAMETER OF SURFACE CASING: 6 1/2 INCHES O.D.
T
S
YPE OF SURFACE CASING:
TEEL
GROUND SURFACE: 0.0 1335.8IIIIIIIIIIII
TYPE OF RISER PIPE:
PVC SCHEDULE 40
DIAMETER OF RISER PIPE: 2 INCHES 1.0
-DIAMFTFB Of ROPF UCaf- A 1/? ItlCMFS
TYPE OF BACKFILL MATERIAL:
CEMENT - BENTONITE GROUT
TYPE OF SEAL:
BENTONITE PELLETS (VOL CLAY)
_— TflP OF FIITFB PAfY / ROTTQM OF SFAI • 11 n 132& 8
W Ot $TBFFI|. 1T fl 1^?? R
TYPE OF FILTER PACK:
10/20 COLORADO SILICA SAND
1IAMETER OF SCREEN: 2 INCHES I.D.
TYPE OF SCREEN: PVC SCHEDULE 40,
MACHINE SLOTTED 0 020 INCH SLOT
WIDTH, 4 SLOTS PER INCH
______ RnTTHM Of STBFFM- ?R fl HD? R
MONITORING UELLCONSTRUCTION REPORT
*
PERSONNEL:ERIC BERGLUNO
PROJECT NO.20510-060
ORC SUPER FUND SITE DATE OF CONSTRUCTION: MONITORING UELL NO.CYRIL, OKLAHOMA 4/9/90 SBB-10
DRILLING CONTRACTOR: COORDINATES: DEPTH TO WATER / DATE-TIME:POOL DRILLING INC. N568327.6 E1943215.9
DEPTH (FT) ELEVATION (FT)
GENERALIZEDGEOLOGICLOG
0-2' SAND \ll
2-5' CLAY \HIIIt=
5-9' SILT
9-40' CLAY
40-48' SAND
48-60' SANDSTONE
~fr
NO SCALE
r
////
••••ss
"T
ffiIftif
trf
ff
__
—
—
—
—
—
—Illl
II ••
• ••t
• • ••__C!
1-1.9 1323.5
DIAMETER OF SURFACE CASING: 6 1/2 INCHES O.D.
1
!
TPE OF SURFACE CASING:
ETEEL
GROUND SURFACE: 0.0 1321.6f IIIf IIIf III/ III
_
TYPE OF RISER PIPE:
PVC SCHEDULE 40
DIAMETER OF RISER PIPE: 2 INCHES I.D
_niAUPTFB OF nncF unr- A 1/9 ttirurc
TYPE OF BACKFILL MATERIAL:
CEMENT - BENTONITE GROUT
TYPE OF SEAL:
BENTONITE PELLETS (VOLCLAY)
^^ TOP OF F1LTPP PACIf / RflTTQM t\t ^FAI • LA 1 1775 5
TYPE OF FILTER PACK: .*s i
10/20 COLORADO SILICA SAND
UAMETER OF SCREEN: 2 INCHES I.D.
TYPE OF SCREEN: PVC SCHEDULE 40,
MACHINE SLOTTED 0 020 INCH SLOT
WIDTH, 4 SLOTS PER INCH ;
MONITORING WELLCONSTRUCTION REPORT
PERSONNEL:ERIC BERCLUND
PROJECT NO.20510-060
ORC SUPERFUND SITE DATE OF CONSTRUCTION: MONITORING WELL NO.CYRIL, OKLAHOMA 4/10/90 $88*11
DRILLING CONTRACTOR: COORDINATES: DEPTH TO WATER / DATE -TIME:POOL DRILLING INC. N569021.0 E1943392.5
DEPTH (FT) ELEVATION (FT)
_.
GENERALIZEDGEOLOGIC
LOG
0-2' SILT VII '/
2-27' CLAY \'l'l '/\ll \l
27-40' SANDSTONE
NO SCALE
q— p
fi
ft
'
'
,
1
1
1
/
/
__
—
—
—
••• ••• ii •••mi• •• ••=^=
1-2.5 1330.4
DIAMETER OF SURFACE CASING: 6 1/2 INCHES O.D.
T
S
TPE OF SURFACE CASING:
TEEL
GROUND SURFACE: 0.0 1327.91 lll\t >//\f l/l\f llt\
TYPE OF RISER PIPE:
PVC SCHEDULE 40
DIAMETER OF RISER PIPE: 2 INCHES I.D
_niAUPTFB OF ROPE UftC. A 1 /? TtiruPC
TYPE OF BACKFILL MATERIAL:
CEMENT - BENTONITE GROUT
TYPE OF SEAL:
BENTONITE PELLETS (VOLCLAY)
__TfY> OF FUTPfi PART / IMTTflM OF CPAt • ?5 0 1TH? 0
TYPE OF FILTER PACK:I
10/20 COLORADO SILICA SAND. - --
)IAMETER OF SCREEN: 2 INCHES I.D.
TYPE OF SCREEN: PVC SCHEDULE 40,
. MAPUIkJF SLOTTED 0 090 tUCM SLOT
WIDTH, 4 SLOTS PER INCH
MONITORING WELLCONSTRUCTION REPORT
PERSONNEL:ERIC BERGLUND
PROJECT NO.20510-060
ORC SUPERFUND SITE DATE OF CONSTRUCTION: MONITORING WELL NO.CYRIL, OKLAHOMA 4/11/90 SBB-12
DRILLING CONTRACTOR: COORDINATES: DEPTH TO UATER / DATE-TIME:POOL DRILLING INC. N569780.7 E1942780.3
DEPTH (FT) ELEVATION (FT)
GENERALIZEDGEOLOGIC
LOG
0-2' CLAY V//
2-3.3' \llDECOMPOSED \llGYPSUM t=t
3.3-23' SANDSTONE
NO SCALE
r
////firf/fi/iifiiif/tf
••••
-Tl
titfrfff
fff
/it
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
11*11M ••!
• •••I
!• tft 1
J—l±
1
ivr wr «uf\rnuc. uvj*nu- c..
-2.2 1345.8
DIAMETER OF SURFACE CASING: 6 1/2 INCHES O.D.
1
8
HTPE OF SURFACE CASING:
rTEEL
GROUND SURFACE: 0.0 1343.61 lll\f f / / \1 tl/\1 t//\
'
TYPE OF RISER PIPE:
PVC SCHEDULE 40
DIAMETER OF RISER PIPE: 2 INCHES 1.0
• D1AMPTFP OF RflPP MAIF* A 1/9 IfclPUirc
TYPE OF BACKFILL MATERIAL:
CEMENT - BENTONITE GROUT
TYPE OF SEAL:
BENTONITE PELLETS (VOL CLAY)
_^_Tnp nc FttTFD p&fy / WITTIM nt <FAI • A o ITT A 7
TYPE OF FILTER PACK:
10/20 COLORADO SILICA SAND _ _ . . . . ,
IIAMETER OF SCREEN: 2 INCHES I.D.
TYPE OF SCREEN: PVC SCHEDULE 40.
UirMIUF SLOTTFD 0 (Ot\ luru 41 HT
WIDTH, 4 SLOTS PER INCH
•»*"'*~' nv Rntiiin- ?T n n?n ft
MONITORING WELLCONSTRUCTION REPORT
PERSONNEL:ERIC BERGLUNO
PROJECT NO.20510-060
ORC SUPERFUND SITE DATE OF CONSTRUCTION: MONITORING WELL NO.CYRIL, OKLAHOMA 5/9/90 SBB-13
DRILLING CONTRACTOR: COORDINATES: DEPTH TO WATER / DATE-TIME:POOL DRILLING INC. N567553.8 E1941705.6
DEPTH (FT) ELEVATION (FT)
GENERALIZEDGEOLOGIC
LOG
1-15' CLAY VII '/III '/III '/III '/
15-31.5' SAND
(1.5-56.5'SANDSTONE
NO SCALE
T~T
IthItIt
—
•• it•i ii•i ••• ••t=
1-2.7 1352.3
DIAMETER OF SURFACE CASING: 6 1/2 INCHES O.D.
1
S
TPE OF SURFACE CASING:
TEEL
GROUND SURFACE: 0.0 1349.61 III' HI' III1 HI
TYPE OF RISER PIPE:
PVC SCHEDULE 40
DIAMETER OF RISER PIPE: 2 INCHES I.D
— niAUFTFD Rf RfWF HfHF" A tMfUFQ
TYPE OF BACKFILL MATERIAL:
CEMENT - BENTGN1TE GROUT
TYPE OF SEAL:
BENTONITE PELLETS (VOL CLAY)
•"<* ne FIITBB OAnr / BflTTCM Of <F4l • OS 114Q 1
TYPE OF FILTER PACK:
10/20 COLORADO SILICA SAND • . '.-'
)IAMETER OF SCREEN: 2 INCHES I.D.
TYPE OF SCREEN: PVC SCHEDULE 40,
Miruiuc SLOTTED 0 070 IUCM SLOT
WIDTH, 4 SLOTS PER INCH
IMONITORING WELL
CONSTRUCTION REPORT
PERSONNEL:ERIC BERGllMD
PROJECT NO.20510-060
ORC SUPERFUND SITE DATE OF CONSTRUCTION: MONITORING WELL NO.CYRIL. OKLAHOMA 5/10/90 SBB-14
DRILLING CONTRACTOR: COORDINATES: DEPTH TO WATER / DATE-TIHE:POOL DRILLING INC. N568406.6 E1942044.0
DEPTH (FT) ELEVATION (FT)
GENERALIZEDGEOLOGIC
LOG
i-2.0' FILL Hi '/III 7
!. 0-8.5' CLAY III '/
1.5-18' GYPSUM
18-24' SANDSTONE
NO SCALE
TT
t
t
t
1
I
1
§
t
§
1
t
—
—
—
—
—
—
• •tit• •• ••• ••ii••• ••==
I-2.1 1356.7
— ftlAMETER OF SURFACE CASING: 6 1/2 INCHES O.D.
1
!
rYPE OF SURFACE CASING:
ITEEL
GROUND SURFACE: 0.0 1354.6f IIIf IIIf III1 III
p
.
'
TYPE OF RISER PIPE:
PVC SCHEDULE 40
DIAMETER OF RISER PIPE: 2 INCHES I.D
_niAMFTFP OF nnpF HttF* A turuFQ
TYPE OF BACKFILL MATERIAL:
CEMENT - BENTONITE GROUT
»«*»« nc ecii T ^ ^ nio 1
TYPE OF SEAL:
BENTONITE PELLETS (VOLCLAY)
T^» nc C1ITFQ PAClf / RflTTOM OF SFAl • fl 0 13&6 A
TYPE OF FILTER PACK: •'-
10/20 COLORADO SILICA SAND '
JIAMETER OF SCREEN: 2 INCHES I.D.
TYPE OF SCREEN: PVC SCHEDULE 40,
turutyp CHITTED o o?o IUCH SLOT
WIDTH, 4 SLOTS PER INCH
MONITORING WELLCONSTRUCTION REPORT
PERSONNEL:ERIC BERGLUND
PROJECT NO.20510-060
ORC SUPERFUKD SITE DATE OF CONSTRUCTION: MONITORING WELL NO.CYRIL, OKLAHOMA 5/10/90 SBB-15
DRILLING CONTRACTOR: COORDINATES: DEPTH TO WATER / DATE-TIHE:POOL DRILLING INC. N569235.2 E 1942073.1
DEPTH (FT) ELEVATION (FT)
-.-
GENERALIZEDGEOLOGICLOG
i-20' CLAY V// '/VII 7\ll '/\ll\l
:0-30' SANDSTONE
NO SCALE
TT
r
'
'
'
F
f
__
—
—
—
• • ••• •1 ••• fill• •1 ••S=S=
1•2.5 1362.8
BIAMETER OF SURFACE CASING: 6 1/2 INCHES O.D.
T
S
TPE OF SURFACE CASING:
TEEL
GROUND SURFACE: 0.0 1360.3t III1 IIIf IIIf ni
TYPE OF RISER PIPE:
PVC SCHEDULE 40
DIAMETER OF RISER PIPE: 2 INCHES 1.0
-nt-MFTFB Of ROBE HOLE* A IIICHFS
TYPE OF BACKFILL MATERIAL:
CEMENT - BEHTONITE GROUT
TYPE OF SEAL:
BENTONITE PELLETS (VOLCLAY)
*>-> ne CIITCD p»rr / RnTTfM OP «C»I • 10 0 1TA1 7
TYPE OF FILTER PACK: - * .
10/20 COLORADO SILICA SAND
HAMETER OF SCREEN: 2 INCHES l.D.
TYPE OF SCREEN: PVC SCHEDULE 40,
MACMIUE SLOTTED 0 020 IUCH SLOT
WIDTH, 4 SLOTS PER INCH
______ RniTrM nr srwru- in n n~n T
MONITORING WELLCONSTRUCTION REPORT
PERSONNEL:ERIC BERGLUHD
PROJECT NO.20510-060
ORC SUPERFUND SITE DATE OF CONSTRUCTION: MONITORING WELL NO.CYRIL, OKLAHOMA 5/21*22/90 SBB-16
DRILLING CONTRACTOR: COORDINATES: DEPTH TO WATER / DATE-TIME:POOL DRILLING INC.
DEPTH (FT) ELEVATION (FT)
GENERALIZEDGEOLOGICLOG
)-9' FILL III '1Ill 7'// 7III '/
>-40.5' GTPSUN
0.5-52' SANDSTONE
NO SCALE
TT
ffff/f1f
1f1
ffffff/f1
_
——
—
—
—
—"• 1 ••• 1 ••• 1 »«It ••J_—
1— BIAMETER OF SURFACE CASING: 6 1/2 INCHES O.D.
1
S
FTPE OF SURFACE CASING:
ETEEL
GROUND SURFACE: 0.0f III( HI( IIIf III
.
-
'
.
TYPE OF RISER PIPE:
PVC SCHEDULE 40
DIAMETER OF RISER PIPE: 2 INCHES I.I)
-DIAMFTFB Of WF Mm F- 7 7/R tUPUFQ
TYPE OF BACKFILL MATERIAL:
CEMENT - BENTONITE GROUT
TYPE OF SEAL:
BENTONITE PELLETS (VOLCLAY)
___ TOO nt FflTPP DAf¥ / ItflTTflM t\t CPA1 • T5 5
TYPE OF FILTER PACK:
10/20 COLORADO SILICA SAND . . . , . - •
)IAMETER OF SCREEN: 2 INCHES I.D.
TYPE OF SCREEN: PVC SCHEDULE 40,
MACHtllF SLOTTED 0 020 IIICM SLOT
WIDTH, 4 SLOTS PER INCH
ttf*++r** ne ono i un- «;? n
MONITORING UELLCONSTRUCTION REPORT
PERSONNEL:ERIC BERGUMD
PROJECT NO.20510-060
ORC SUPERFUND SITE DATE OF CONSTRUCTION: MONITORING UELL NO.CYRIL, OKLAHOMA 6/4/90 SBB-17
DRILLING CONTRACTOR: COORDINATES: DEPTH TO WATER / DATE-TIME:POOL DRILLING INC.
DEPTH (FT) ELEVATION (FT)
GENERALIZEDGEOLOGIC
LOG
I- V,. FILL ' VII f/
1-5.5' CUT \'l'l ''/
V// '/
i.5-21.7' GYPSUM
11.7-32' SANDSTONE
NO SCALE
rp
SS
•
^M
^^
^^H
1
IIIIIIf/
,
f
f
• •••It
• •••••
• •••••
• •••• 11 '
\*_« » • •»«> K...I--
— - SIAMETER OF SURFACE CASING: 6 1/2 INCHES 0.0.
T
S
YPE OF SURFACE CASING:
TEEL
GROUND SURFACE: 0.0
I/It/ln/'//
TYPE OF RISER PIPE:
PVC SCHEDULE 40
DIAMETER OF RISER PIPE: 2 INCHES I.D
-DIAMETEB OF ROBE MOLE* A INCHES
TYPE OF BACKFILL MATERIAL:
CEMENT • BENTONITE GROUT
TYPE OF SEAL:
BENTONITE PELLETS (VOLCLAY)
_THP Of FltTPD PAfY / BOTTOM Of SF*I * 1B 7 •
TYPE OF FILTER PACK:
10/20 COLORADO SILICA SAND
)IAMETER OF SCREEN: 2 INCHES I.D.
TYPE OF SCREEN: PVC SCHEDULE 40,
MACHINE SLOTTED 0 020 INCH SLOT
WIDTH, 4 SLOTS PER INCH