Peter S Jenkins Gikiii Presentation Sept

14
Peter S. Jenkins Graduate Research Fellow and PhD Candidate Osgoode Hall Law School York University

Transcript of Peter S Jenkins Gikiii Presentation Sept

Page 1: Peter S Jenkins Gikiii Presentation   Sept

Peter S . JenkinsGraduate Research Fellow and PhD Candidate

Osgoode Hall Law S choolY ork University

Page 2: Peter S Jenkins Gikiii Presentation   Sept

2

Page 3: Peter S Jenkins Gikiii Presentation   Sept

3

COLD WAR

ZERO SUM GAME

NON-COOPERATIVE

NO CENTRAL ENFORCEMENT

NO EXIT OPTIONDESCRIPTIVE, NOT NORMATIVE

INSTRUMENTALIST

Page 4: Peter S Jenkins Gikiii Presentation   Sept

WHAT ABOUT ANTHROPOMORPHISM?

4

Page 5: Peter S Jenkins Gikiii Presentation   Sept

5

Page 6: Peter S Jenkins Gikiii Presentation   Sept

6

Page 7: Peter S Jenkins Gikiii Presentation   Sept

7

NORMATIVE

EXIT OPTION

CONSTRUCTIVIST

ENFORCEABLE MODEL

COOPERATIVE

POST COLD WAR

NOT ZERO SUM

Page 8: Peter S Jenkins Gikiii Presentation   Sept

8

BIT = EULA

Page 9: Peter S Jenkins Gikiii Presentation   Sept

NORMATIVE EFFECTS

Right of exitMid-term renegotiationsScope of arbitrator’s authority

9

Page 10: Peter S Jenkins Gikiii Presentation   Sept

10

CONTRACTS OF ADHESION

LDC CAN’T EXIT FOR TEN YEARS

PLAYER CAN EXIT VW ON ONE MONTH NOTICE

Page 11: Peter S Jenkins Gikiii Presentation   Sept

11

CAN’T RENEGOTIATE BIT

MOBILITY OF CAPITAL

LDCs COMPETING

SECOND LIFE TAX REVOLT

COMMON PLAYER INTERESTS

ELECTRONIC MOBILIZATION

Page 12: Peter S Jenkins Gikiii Presentation   Sept

12

BRAGG v. LINDEN

ARBITRATION CLAUSE VOIDED

BIT ARBITRATOR HAS WIDE AUTHORITY

DAMAGES FOR “INDIRECT EXPROPRIATION”

Page 13: Peter S Jenkins Gikiii Presentation   Sept

13

RW AND VW ROLES

SOME OVERLAP

MAGIC CIRCLE

Page 14: Peter S Jenkins Gikiii Presentation   Sept

14

ARBITRATOR’S JURISDICTION

Environmental Regulation

Reasonable right of exit,

Renegotiation

Expropriation,

Opportunistic Exit,

S abotage

Investment

Terms of Service

EULA