PERFORMANCE TABLES - Porto de Lisboa · 2 CONTENTS 1. About this publication 3 2. ... the...

PERFORMANCE TABLES

Performance Tables

2

CONTENTS 1. About this publication 3

2. Engagement with Stakeholders 4 2.1. Social Performance – Employees 4 2.2. Involvement of other stakeholders 9

3. Port-City Relations 10 3.1. Occupancy rates at Recreational Docks 10 3.2. Culture and Training 10 3.3. Quality of Water for Consumption in APL’s area of jurisdiction 10 3.4. Production and Disposal of Urban Waste 10

4. Safe and Pollution-free Sailing 15 4.1. Pollution-free sailing - Movement of Ballast Water 15 4.2. Pollution-free sailing - Collection of ship waste 15

5. Optimization of Tagus Estuary 18 5.1. Dredging conducted 18 5.2. Dismantled ships 18

6. APL in the Present 20 6.1. Movements at the Port of Lisbon 20 6.2. Generated, distributed and accumulated economic value 20 6.3. APL’s environmental performance 20

7. GRI Table 26

3

Performance Tables

PerformanceTables

1. About this publication This publication acts as a supplement to the Sustainability Report from the Administração do Porto de Lisboa (APL) for the year 2008, in order to meet stakeholders’ expectations and their need for information regarding APL’s performance.

Scope

The information contained in this publication refers to the year of 2008; the evaluation of indicators from previous years and the quantification of developments have been included where relevant information was available.

How it was developed

This publication was developed based on indicators associated with the descriptors from APL’s sustainability strategy, including indicators suggested by the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), version 3.0.

Next report

The next report will be published in 2010 and will describe APL’s performance in 2009.

The report is also intended to cover the evaluation of a larger number of indicators from the GRI protocol, as well as include a more extensive evaluation of indirect impacts where APL has influence.

Contacts

For questions about this publication, please contact:

- Commander Eduardo dos Santos: [email protected]

- Célia Barros: [email protected]

4

Performance Tables

Performance Tables 2. Engagement with Stakeholders

APL’s performance evaluation relating to its engagement with stakeholders is conducted taking into account the following descriptors:

2.1. Social Performance – Employees

5

Performance Tables

Performance Tables Table 1 - Description of Employees

2008 2007 Δ 2008/2007

Total number of employees 349 350 -0,3%

Permanent employees 329 323 1,9%

Non-permanent employees 20 27 -25,9

StructureDirectors 3 3 0,0%

Top Management / Staff 161 157 2,5%

Middle Management / Staff 4 6 -33,3%

Intermediate Management / Staff 3 3 0,0%

Qualified and skilled professionals 150 152 -1,3%

Semi-qualified professionals 18 18 0,0%

Unqualified professionals 10 11 -9,1%

Age distribution< 30 years 36 46 -21,7%

30 – 49 years 201 206 -2,4%

> 49 years 112 98 14,3%

Gender distributionMen 227 225 0,9%

Women 122 125 -2,4%

6

PERFORMANCE TABLES

Performance Tables Table 2 - Movements of Personnel and Global Turnover

2008 2007 ∆ 2008/2007

Departures (total) 6 6 0,0%

Entrances (total) 5 7 -28,6%

Turnover index (total) 1,7% 1,7% -

Structure

Gender

Exit of men 3 3 0,0%

Exit of women 3 2 50,0%

Turnover rate of men 0,9% 0,9% -

Turnover rate of women 0,9% 0,3% -

Age group

Exit < 30 anos 0 1 -100,0%

Exit 30-49 anos 2 4 -50,0%

Exit > 49 anos 4 1 300,0%

Turnover rate < 30 anos 0,0% 0,3% -

Turnover rate 30-49 anos 0,6% 0,9% -

Turnover rate > 49 anos 1,1% 0,3% -

Working regime 31 30 3,3%

Shift 138 127 8,7%

Normal 180 193 -6,7%

Unspecified working hours (IHT) 180 193 -6,7%

7

Performance Tables

Performance Tables Table 3 - Working Regime

2008 2007 Δ 2008/2007

Working regimeShift 31 30 3,3%

Normal 138 127 8,7%

Unspecified working hours (IHT) 180 193 -6,7%

Table 4 - Employee Training

Employee Training 2008 2007 Δ 2008/2007

Total number of actions 131 105 24,8%

Number of internal actions 14 22 -36,4%

Number of external actions 117 83 41,0%

Total number of participants 559 562 -0,5%

Number of participants in internal actions 361 383 -5,7%

Number of participants in external actions 198 179 10,6%

Training index 28,4 11,7 -

(average hours of training per employee) 84.629 202.207 -58,1%

Training costs (€)

8

Performance Tables

Performance Tables Table 5 - Qualifications

QualificationsHomens mulheres Total

2008 2007 2008 2007 2008 2007

< 1st cycle basic education (EB) 0,0% 0,0% 0,8% 0,8% 0,3% 0,3%

1st cycle basic education (EB) 6,2% 5,8% 7,3% 8,1% 6,6% 6,6%

2nd cycle basic education (EB) 16,4% 16,9% 0,0% 0,0% 10,6% 10,9%

3rd cycle basic education (EB) 14,2% 14,2% 16,3% 16,3% 14,9% 14,9%

Secondary education 23,6% 23,1% 22,0% 22,8% 22,9% 22,9%

Polytechnic education 2,7% 2,2% 3,3% 2,4% 2,9% 2,3%

University education 37,8% 37,8% 49,6% 51,2% 41,8% 42,3%

Table 6 - Health and Safety at Work

2008 2007 Δ 2008/2007

Number of accidents at work 14 14 0,0%

Number of accidents leading to temporary disability 7 11 -36,4%

Number of accidents without disability 7 3 133,3%

Incidence rate of accidents 20,0 31,5 -

Claims ratio 4,0% 4,0% -

Frequency index 12,3 19,3 -

Severity index 1,0 0,9 -

Total number of working days lost 554 491 12,8%

9

Performance Tables

Performance Tables 2.2. Involvement of other stakeholders

Table 7 - Forms of involvement with other stakeholders

Involvement with stakeholders Unit 2008 2007 Δ 2008 -2007

Documents created in the document management system

Nº 40.264 - -

Pages visited on APL’s website Nº 1.316.926 676.879 95%

Manifests received on PCOM/SDS Nº 4.016 - -

Manifests received on PCOM/SDS % 64 - -

10

Performance Tables

Performance Tables 3. Port-City Relations

APL’s benchmarking with regards to "Port-City Optimization" is conducted taking into account the following descriptors:

3.1. Occupancy rates at Recreational Docks

3.2. Culture and Training

3.3. Quality of Water for Consumption in APL’s area of jurisdiction

3.4. Production and Disposal of Urban Waste

11

Performance Tables

Performance Tables Table 8 - Recreational Boating

Occupancy rates in 2008 recreational Docks

alcântara belémbom

sucessosanto

amaroVessel length <6m 4 59 23 105

Vessel length> 6 m 888 352 96 261

Occupancy rate - annual average 84,6% 87,4% 91,5% 58,8%

80,6%

Table 9 - Maritime-Tourism

Place no. of Vessels modality

Alcântara Docks6 B

2 D

Santo Amaro Docks 2 E

Belém Docks 1 D

Santo Amaro Beach 6 A

Seixal 1 C

A - Jet ski and small boat rental exempt from registrationB - Services carried out by taxis; rental of boats with / without crew, recreational fishing, and toursC - Catering at piersD - Tours, and catering during the toursE - Tours, and catering during the tours and at piers

12

Performance Tables

Performance Tables Table 10 - Culture and Training

No. Of Visitors 2008 2007 Δ 2008/2007

Almada Negreiros Panels 103 147 -29,9%

Geography course 834 821 1,6%

Primary school pupils 100 75 33,3%

Secondary school pupils 974 831 17,2%

Other institutions and individuals 367 62 491,9% (*)

TOTAL 1.341 968 38,5%

(*) This large increase in visitors is due to the fact that for 2008 the number of visitors welcomed by other services is included [107 (NP / PP), 197 (NP / EC) and 63 (AM) 367] in "visitors from other institutions and individuals", and in 2007 this data were not included in the SR.

Table 11 – APMWQ vs. Statement of Compliance – Algés/Matinha Network

2008 2007 Δ 2008/2007

Total volume of water consumed at APL (m3) 409.661 467.311 -12,3%

Number of sampling points (taps on APL premises, fixed points and clients)

89 96 -7,3%

Customer taps - entities located in areas under jurisdiction of APL / concessions / ground services

69 69 0,0%

Number of parameters analyzed in laboratory 1.282 1.399 -8,4%

No. values> Parametric value (PV) 7 10 -30,0%

% No. values> PV 0,6 0,7 -

% Conforming values 99,5 99,3 -

13

Performance Tables

Performance Tables The following table summarizes the results obtained from the sampling to monitor the quality of water supplied to ships:

Table 12 – APMWQ vs. Statement of Compliance – Muralha Alcântara / Poço do Bispo Network

2008 2007 Δ 2008/2007

Total volume of water supplied to ships (m3) 90.531 102.698 -11,8%

Number of sampling points (water taps) 41 41 0,0%

Number of determinations 627 658 -4,7%

No. values> Parametric value (PV) 1 6 -83,3%

% No. values> PV 0,2 0,9 -

% Conforming values 99,8 99,1 -

Table1 3 – Production of Urban Waste

RSU urban cleaning – quantity (tons)

2008 2007 Δ 2008/2007

Undifferentiated 3040 4230 -28,1%

Paper and card 44 30 46,7%

Glass 118 61,19 93,4%

Organic 24 24 0,0%

Miscellaneous debris 120 0 -

Waste from maintenance of sewage system 12 0 -

TOTAL 3357 4345 -22,7%

14

Performance Tables

Performance Tables Table 14 - Production of Urban Waste - Destinations

RSU urban cleaning – quantity(tons)

2008 2007 Δ 2008/2007

Landfill 3051 4230 -27,9%

Composting 24 24 0,0%

Other types of storage 281 92 205,4%

15

Performance Tables

Performance Tables 4. Safe and Pollution-free sailing

The performance evaluation by APL with regards to safe and pollution-free sailing takes into account the following descriptors:

4.1. Pollution-free sailing - Movement of Ballast Water

4.2. Pollution-free sailing - Collection of ship waste

16

Performance Tables

Performance Tables Table 15 – Movement of Ballast Waters

Movement of Ballast Waters 2008 2007 Δ 2008/2007

Number of ships 3.467 3.447 0,6%

Questionnaires answered895 615 45,5% 45,5%

26 18 - -

Ships handling ballast water462 296 56,1% 56,1%

9 - -

De-ballasting (ton.) 106.726 28.893 269,4%

Ballasting (ton.) 705.926 526.306 34,1%

Table 16 – Ship Waste

Delivery of Ship Waste 2008 2007 Δ 2008/2007

Ships with port-calls at Lisbon (No.) 3.467 3.458 0,3%

Ships with delivery of waste (No.) 1.915 1.792 6,9%

Waste collection operations (No.) 2.773 2.355 17,7%

17

Performance Tables

Performance Tables Table 17 – Ship Waste – By Category and Method of Disposal

Waste delivered by ships (tons) 2008 2007 Δ 2008/2007

Lead batteries 3,9 1,0 290,0%

Used oil other oils from engines, gear and lubricating oils)

3,6 4,9 -26,5%

Absorbents, filter materials contaminated with dangerous substances

9,0 1,4 542,9%

Slops from pre-wash operations 12,0 0,0 -

Bilge water, oily mixtures in drums 7546,9 6740,02 12,0%

Solid residues contaminated with hydro-carbonates

2,2 0,1 2100,0%

Plastics, glass, paper / cardboard, wood, cans, scrap

465,9 157,0 196,8%

Food scraps and waste unsuitable for recycling 103,7 66,9 55,0%

Food scraps and waste unsuitable for recycling 1382,7 854,8 61,8%

Ink waste, photographic materials and batteries 3,2 3,4 -5,9%

Damaged cargo 3,2 119,7 -97,3%

Hospital waste - Group IV 0,2 0,1 1,0%

Destinations given

Landfill 107,0 186,6 -42,7%

Physical-Chemical treatment not specified 7546,9 6740,02 12,0%-

Incineration 1382,9 854,9 61,8%

Storage while awaiting another operation 11,2 1,5 646,7%

Recycling / reclamation of metals and alloys 3,9 1,0 299,0%

Recycling / reclaiming of other inorganic materials

465,9 -

Oil refining or other re-use of oil 12,0 157,0 -92,4%

Other types of storage 6,8 8,3 -18,1%

18

Performance Tables

Performance Tables 5. Optimization of Tagus Estuary

The performance evaluation by APL with regards to the descriptor "Optimization of the Tagus Estuary” takes into account the following descriptors::

5.1. Dredging conducted

5.2. Dismantled ships

19

Performance Tables

Performance Tables Table 18 – Optimization of the Tagus Estuary – Key indicators

Optimization of the Tagus Estuary Unidade 2008 2007 Δ 2008/2007

Dredging campaigns carried out Nº 7 5 40,0%

Volume of dredged sediments m3 2.724.250 926.250 194,1%

Volume of sand reused as contribution to the balance of the bar system and to feed the adjacent beaches*

m3 1.968.900 387.240 408,4%

Characterized sampling points Nº 58 13 346,2%

Dismantled ships Nº 18 0 -

20

Performance Tables

Performance Tables 6. APL in the Present

The performance evaluation by APL regarding the descriptor “APL in the Present” was carried out taking into account the following descriptors::

6.1. Movements at the Port of Lisbon

6.2. Generated, distributed and accumulated economic value

6.3. APL’s environmental performance

21

Performance Tables

Performance Tables Tabele 19 – Nº. Of Vessels, Goods and Passengers

Some numbers 2008 2007 Δ 2008/2007

Vessels

Total (Nº.) 3.455 3.447 0,2%

Total (GT) 43.620.933 38.731.202 12,6%

National 507 521 -2,7%

Foreign 2.948 2.926 0,8%

Goods

Total (tons) 13.580.049 13.979.366 -2,9%

Via maritime 13.030.930 13.200.445 -1,3%

Via fluvial 549.119 778.921 -29,5%

Passengers

Total (Nº.) 28.853.482 28.378.987 1,7%

Maritime navigation 407.504 305.185 33,5%

Fluvial navigation 28.445.978 28.073.802 1,3%

22

Performance Tables

Performance Tables Table 20 – Generated, distributed and accumulated economic value

2008 2007 Δ 2008/2007

Generated economic value(thousands of euros)

51.648 50.433 2,41%

Capital Sales + Services Provided 50.544 49.425 2,3%

Financial Investment 996 971 2,6%

Capital gains on sale of assets 108 37 191,9%

Distributed economic value(thousands of euros)

47.703 46.079 3,5%

Operating Costs 13.403 10.421 28,6%

Payments to suppliers (including royalties) - balance at end of year 2.983 2.237 33,4%

Supplies and services to third parties 13.302 11.167 19,1%

Final balance of current year -2.882 -2.983 -3,4%

Salaries and employee benefits 21.897 25.821 -15,2%

Personnel costs 15.199 19.069 -20,3%

Benefits post-employment (including pensions, early retirement, medical care and medication)

6.698 6.752 -0,8%

Payments to providers of capital 4.937 3.291 50,0%

Financial payments made to banks 4.937 3.291 50,0%

Payments to the State 5.459 4.886 11,7%

IRS, Company Income Tax, Stamp Duty, VAT Payable 5.459 4.886 11,7%

Investments in the Community 2.007 1.661 20,8%

Investments 1.821 1.298 40,3%

Donations 71 66 7,3%

Participation and sponsorship 115 297 -61,2%

Accumulated economic value(thousands of euros)

3.945 4.354 -9,4%

23

PERFORMANCE TABLES

Performance Tables Table 21 – Direct Energy Consumption - Buildings

Source Unity 2008 2007 ∆ 2008/2007

APL BuildingsDiesel litros 7.096 10.097 -29,7%

Natural Gas Nm3 20.270 10.008 102,5%

Electricity kWh 1.409.103 1.655.706 -14,9%

Cruise Terminals kWh 816.390 762.359 7,1%

Recreational Docks kWh 728.052 746.979 -2,5%

Public Lighting kWh 2.218.379 1.734.399 26,5%

Other spaces and equipments kWh 61.336 117.468 -47,8%

Table 22 – Direct Energy Consumption - Fleet

Sorce2008 2007 ∆ 2008/2007

Diesel Petrol Diesel Petrol Diesel Petrol

Automobile fleet 46.196 13.662 66.674 19.688 - 30,7% - 30,6%

Maritime fleet 187.045 16.771 200.669 3.600* -6,8% n.a.

Table 23 – Indirect Energy Consumption

2008 2007 ∆ 2008/2007

Diesel (GJ) 8.703 10.046 -13,4%

Petrol (GJ)* 1.186 757 56,6%

Natural Gas (GJ) 790 390 102,5%

Electricity (GJ) 18.840 18.061 4,3%

* The value of petrol consumption associated with 2007 is incomplete; this is why the variation is so high.

24

Performance Tables

Performance Tables Table 24 – Emissions of Greenhouse Gases

2008 2007 Δ 2008/2007

APL Buildings - Fuel consumption (boilers) 63 49 29,4%

Own fleetAutomobile 156 225 -30,4%

Maritime 545 550 -0,9%

Electricity consumption 2.460 2.460 2.367

Buildings 662 778 -14,9%

Cruise Terminals 384 358 7,1%

Recreational Docks 342 351 -2,5%

Public Lighting (Lisbon County) 1.043 824 26,5%

Other spaces and equipments 29 55 -47,8%

Other emissionsMissions in third-party fleet 73 37 94,5%

Waste 315 358 -12,1%

Waste water 55 62 10,5%

Total 3.667 3.647 0,5%

Carbonic intensity (kg CO2/€) 0,071 0,071 0,072

25

PERFORMANCE TABLES

Performance Tables Table 25 – Material Consumption and Waste Generation

Unities 2008 2007 ∆ 2008/2007

Material Consumption 6.026 7.200 -16,3%

A4 Paper Kg 242 242 0,00%

Rolls for plotters Nº 688 - -

Lamps Nº 1.275 - -Oils litros 23

Batteries Nº 345

Kg 409 416 -1,7%

Waste Generation 3.357 4.345 -22,7%

Buildings Ton. 3.357 4.345 -22,7%

Urban cleaning Ton. 315 358 -12,1%

Table 26 – Water and Waste Water Production

2008 2007 ∆ 2008/2007

Water Consumption (m3)

Total consumption (water brought from EPAL)

585.513 500.310 17,0%

Client consumption 254.928 285.567 -10,7%

Global volume of APL: APL buildings, recreational boating, irrigation and loss

224.605 124.212 80,8%

Waste water productionAPL Network (m3) 22.995 22.995 0,0%

26

Performance Tables

Performance Tables 7. GRI Table

Profilelocation or evaluation

Summary Report Performance Tables Best Practices

1 sTraTeGY anD analYsIs

1.1 Statement of the Board 1.1. - -

1.2 Description of key impacts, risks and opportunities 2. 1. V

2 orGanIZaTIonal ProfIle

2.1 Name of organization V V V

2.2 Principal brands, products and/or services V 6.1.

2.3Operational structure of the organization and major divisions, providers, subsidiaries and joint ventures

See also Governance Report, Annex to the Report and Accounts

2.4 Location of organization's headquarters

2.5 Number and name of countries in which the organization operates

2.6 Type and legal nature of ownership

2.7Markets served (including geographic breakdown, sectors served and types of customers / beneficiaries)

2.8 Size of organization

2.9 Significant changes during the reporting period

2.10 Awards received during the reporting period 0 (zero)

3 ParameTers for THe rePorT

rePorT ProfIle

3.1 Reporting period 2008 2008 n.a.

3.2 Date of most recent previous report 2007 - -

3.3 Cycle of production of report annual annual n.d.

3.4 Contact for questions regarding the report or its contents 1. 1. 7.

27

Performance Tables

Performance TablesProfile

location or evaluation


scoPe anD eXTenT of THe rePorT

3.5 Process for defining report content 1.

3.6 Limit of the report 1.

3.7Statement of any specific limitations of the scope or boundary of the report

1.

3.8

Basis for the preparation of the report with regards to joint ventures, subsidiaries, rented facilities, operations assigned to outside agencies and other entities, which could significantly affect the comparison between different periods and / or organizations

1.

3.9

Measurement techniques for data and the basis for calculations, including assumptions and techniques underlying estimates applied to the compilation of indicators and other information contained in the report Throughout the

presentation of data3.10

Explanation of the consequences of any reformulating of information provided in previous reports and the reasons for such reformulation

3.11Significant changes compared with previous years, the scope, boundary or measurement methods applied

sUmmarY of GrI conTenT

3.12 Table identifying the location of information in the report Present table

VerIfIcaTIon

3.13Policy and current practice with regards to seeking external verification for the report

APL chose not to verify the report developed and are developing procedures (index of indicators) for this to occur

28

Performance Tables




4 GOVERNANCE, COMMITMENTS AND INVOLVEMENT

GoVernance

6.3.See also Governance Report, Annex to the Report and Accounts

4.1 Governance structure of the organization

4.2Indication whether the Chairperson of the highest governing body is also an Executive Director

4.3For organizations with a unitary board structure, state the number of independent members or non-executive directors of the highest governing body

4.4Mechanisms for shareholders and employees to provide recommendations or direction to the highest governing body

4.5

Relationship between compensation for members of the highest governing body, executive management and other executives (including severance agreements) and performance of the organization (including social and environmental performance)

4.6Processes in place for the highest governing body to avoid conflicts of interest

4.7Process for determining the qualifications and knowledge of members of the highest governing body to define an organizational strategy for issues related to economic, environmental and social performance

4.8Mission statements and values, codes of conduct and principles relevant to the economic, environmental and social performance as well as the stage of implementation

29

Performance Tables




4.9

Procedures of the highest hierarchical body to oversee how the organization identifies and manages its economic, environmental and social performance, the identification and management of relevant risks and opportunities, as well as the adherence or compliance with internationally accepted standards, codes of conduct and principles

6.3.See also Governance Report, Annex to the Report and Accounts

4.10Procedures for self-evaluation of the performance of the highest governing body, especially with respect to economic, environmental and social performance

commITmenTs To eXTernal InITIaTIVes

4.11Explanation if and how the organization applies the precautionary principle

n.d.

4.12Charters, principles or other initiatives developed outside of an economic, environmental and social nature that the organization subscribes to or endorses

Charter for Sustainable Development of Port Cities – International Association Cities and Ports

4.13Participation in associations (such as industry associations) and/or national/international advocacy bodies, at an organizational level

Lisbon Port Community, International Association Cities and Ports; European Sea Ports Organization; BCSD Portugal

InVolVemenT of sTaKeHolDers

4.14 List of stakeholder groups engaged by the organization 3.1. 2.

4.15 Basis for identification and selection of stakeholders 2.

4.16Approaches to stakeholder involvement, including frequency of engagement by type and by stakeholder group

2.

4.17Key topics and concerns that were raised through the involvement of stakeholders and what steps the organization has adopted to treat them

Presented throughout the document.

2.

30

Performance Tables

Performance TablesPerformance InDIcaTors

essenTIal /accessorY



ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE

EC1

Generated and distributed direct economic value, including revenues, operating costs, employee compensation, donations and other community investments, retained earnings and payments to investors and governments

E 7.2.6.

Tabela 20

EC2Financial implications, other risks and opportunities for the activities of the organization due to climate change

E 4.2.

EC3Extent of obligations derived from the benefit plan of the organization

E6.

Table 20

EC4Significant financial assistance received from the Government

E6.

Table 20

EC5Ratio between the lowest wage and the local minimum wage, in the major operational units

A 1,51

EC6Policies, practices and proportion of costs with local suppliers in the major operational units

E n.a.

EC7Procedures for local hiring and the proportion of top managerial positions occupied by people from the local community, in the most important operational units

EFor positions of top management: only individuals from APL’s local

community are recruited

31

Performance Tables





EC8

Development and impact of investments in infrastructure and services provided primarily for public benefit through commercial engagement, in kind or through pro bono activities

E

In duly substantiated cases, especially given the public interest in these events, their alignment with APL objectives and the nature of

the client, exemption or a reduction of fees is granted, notably for events with a sporting, cultural, academic, or recreational character or

otherwise, provided they are in the interest of the public and non-profit. Events sponsored by non-profit organizations, such as local authorities,

social entities or other organizations representing workers from the port sector are also granted the same conditions. The exemption is 1

day free for covered spaces and 7 days free for open-air spaces.

EC9 Description and analysis of significant indirect economic impacts, including the extent of impacts

A n.d.

enVIronmenTal Performance

EN1 Materials used by weight or volume E 7.3.3.6.

Table 25

EN2 Percentage of materials used that are recycled E0 (zero) Company policy to provide reports in digital format. Technical

problems with the use of recycled paper.

EN3Energy consumption broken down by direct primary energy source

E 7.3.1.6.

Table 21Table 22

EN4 Indirect energy consumption by primary source E 7.3.1.6.

Table 21Table 22

EN5Total energy savings due to improvements in conservation and efficiency

E6.

Table 23

EN5Total de poupança de energia devido a melhorias na conservação e na eficiência

A n.d.

32

Performance Tables





EN6

Initiatives to provide products and services with low power consumption, or that use energy generated by renewable resources, and the reduction in energy needs resulting from these initiatives

E 7.3.1.6.

Table 21Table 22

EN7Initiatives to reduce indirect energy consumption and reductions achieved

E 6.5.1.

EN8 Total water consumption by source E 7.3.4.6.

Table 26

EN9Water sources significantly affected by water consumption

A n.a.

EN10Percentage and total volume of recycled and reused water

A 0 (zero)

EN11Location and size of land owned, leased or managed within the protected areas, or adjacent to them, and in areas of high biodiversity outside the protected areas

E

54% of APL’s area of jurisdiction

possesses the status of environmental protection, in this case, as a Special

Protection Area (SPA).

EN12Description of significant impact caused by activities, products and services on biodiversity in protected areas and in areas of high biodiversity outside protected areas

E6.

Table 185.1.

33

Performance Tables





EN13 Protected or restored habitats A

Plans were developed for:* The contracting of earth movement at Contract earthmoving at

Mexilhoeiro and at Alburrica, in Barreiro* The beaches of Costa da Caparica

Both for the recovery of sediments, in order to combat soil erosion and other losses of biodiversity.

EN14Strategies, current actions and future plans for managing impact on biodiversity

A 5.1.

EN15Number of species on the IUCN Red List and on national conservation lists with habitats in areas affected by operations, by level of risk of extinction

EAPL has various species of interest in its area of jurisdiction.

Comprehensive study available on the site.

EN16Total direct and indirect emissions of greenhouse gases by weight

E 7.3.2.6.

Table 24

EN17Other relevant indirect greenhouse gas emissions by weight

A 7.3.2.6.

Table 24

EN18Initiatives to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases and reductions achieved

E 7.3.2.6.

Table 24

EN19Emissions of substances that destroy the ozone layer, by weight

E n.d.

EN20NOx, SOx and other significant atmospheric emissions by type and weight

E n.d.

EN21 Total water discharge by quality and destination E 7.3.4.6.

Table 26

EN22 Total amount of waste by type and disposal method E 7.3.3.6.

Table 25

34

Performance Tables





EN23 Number and volume of significant spills E 0 (zero)

EN24

Weight of transported, imported, exported, or treated residues considered hazardous under the terms of the Basel Convention - Annexes I, II, III and VIII, and percentage of waste transported by ship internationally

A n.a.

EN25 Identity, size, protection status and biodiversity value of water resources and their habitats significantly affected by discharges of water and runoff

A In development

EN26Initiatives to mitigate environmental impacts of products and services and the extent of the reduction of these impacts

E 4., 5.

EN27Percentage of products and their packaging materials in relation to all products sold by product category

E n.a.

EN28Amount involved in the payment of significant fines and total number of non-monetary sanctions resulting from non-compliance with environmental laws and regulations

E 0 (zero)

EN29Significant environmental impacts of transporting products and other goods and materials used in the operations of the organization, and transport of workers

E n.d.

EN30Total expenditure and investment in environmental protection, by type

A 1.577.206,00 €

35

Performance Tables





LA1Total employees, by employment type, employment contract and region

E 3.2.2.

Table 1

LA2Total number and rate of employee turnover by age, gender and region

E 3.2.2.

Table 2

LA3Benefits offered to full-time employees that are offered to temporary or part-time employees, discriminated by principal operations

AThe allocation of benefits to employees at APL does not depend on

the nature of contract or work schedule

LA4Percentage of employees covered by collective bargaining agreements

EWithout prejudice to the application of current legislation, a Statute

for staff approved by Decree Law 421/99 (EPAP) exists for APL employees.

LA5Minimum notice period regarding operational changes, including if this procedure is specified in collective bargaining agreements

E n.a.

LA6

Percentage of employees represented in formal committees on health and safety, composed of managers and employees, which help to monitor and advise on insurance programs and occupational health

A 3.2. 2.

LA7Rates of injury, occupational diseases, lost days, absenteeism and work-related deaths by region

E 3.2.2.

Table 6

LA8Education, training, counseling, prevention and control of risk programs in place to assist employees, their families or community members with regards to serious diseases

E No training was carried out in this area in 2008.

LA9Topics related to health and safety covered by formal agreements with trade unions

A n.a.

36

Performance Tables





LA10Average number of hours of training per year, per employee by employee category

E 3.2.2.

Table 4

LA11Programs for the management of skills and lifelong learning that support the continued employability of employees and manage the conclusion of careers

A 3.2. 2. 2.1.

LA12Percentage of employees receiving regular performance and career development analysis

AThe majority of workers (85%) are subject to a process of annual

performance evaluation.

LA13Composition of governance bodies and breakdown of employees per category according to gender, age, minorities and other indicators of diversity

E 3.2. 2. 6.

LA14Proportion of basic salary between men and women by employee category

E No pay discrimination by gender exists.

socIal Performance - Human rights

HR 1Percentage and total number of significant investment agreements that include clauses on human rights or that have undergone evaluations referring to human rights

EWith regard to contracts drawn up by HR, there are no specific clauses relating to human rights. However, APL disclaims any knowledge of the

violation of human rights by any entity it works with

HR 2Percentage of business suppliers and contractors that underwent evaluations regarding human rights and measures taken

E

Assuming that its contractors comply with human rights, no evaluations were carried out with regards to this matter. However,

should any impingement on human rights be detected, by any contractor, APL will immediately terminate their contract.

HR 3

Total hours of training for employees on policies and procedures concerning aspects of human rights relevant to operations, including the percentage of employees trained

A In the reporting year there was no training in this area

37

Performance Tables





HR 4Total number of cases of discrimination and actions taken

EDuring the period under review no cases of discrimination of APL

employees were reported or detected

HR 5

Operations identified where the right to exercise freedom of association and collective bargaining may be at significant risk and measures taken to support these rights

EAPL believes that internally there is no risk to the right of freedom of

association and collective bargaining

HR 6Operations identified as a significant risk for incidents of child labor and measures taken to contribute to the abolition of child labor

EAPL vehemently rejects any kind of child labor, therefore, there are no

records of any occurrences in this area

HR 7

Operations identified as a significant risk for incidents of forced or compulsory labor, and measures taken to contribute to the elimination of forced or compulsory labor

E 0 (zero)

HR 8Percentage of security personnel trained in organizational policies or procedures concerning aspects of human rights

A During the reporting year there was no training in this area.

HR 9Total number of cases of violation of the rights of indigenous people and actions taken

A n.a.

socIal Performance - society

SO1

Nature, scope and effectiveness of any programs and practices to assess and manage the impacts of operations on communities, including the entrance, operation and departure

E n.a.

SO2Percentage and total number of business units analyzed for risks related to corruption

E There was no evidence of corruption during the year under review.

SO3Percentage of employees trained in organizational anti-corruption policies and procedures

E During the reporting year there was no training in this area.

38

Performance Tables





SO4 Actions taken in response to incidents of corruption EThere was no evidence of corruption during the year under review, so it

was not necessary to take measures

SO5Positions with regards to public policy and participation in policy development and lobbying

E 6.3.

SO6Total value of financial contributions and contributions in kind to political parties, politicians and related institutions by country

A 0 (zero)

SO7Total number of legal actions related to unfair competition practices, trust and monopoly practices and their results

A 0 (zero).

SO8Value of significant fines and total number of non-monetary sanctions resulting from non-compliance with laws and regulations

E 0 (zero)

socIal Performance - Product liability

PR1

Stages in the life cycle of products and services where the impact on health and safety is assessed for improvement, and the percentage of products and services subject to these procedures

E n.a.

PR2

Total number of cases of non-compliance with regulations and voluntary codes related to the impacts of products and services on health and safety during the life cycle, by type of result

A 0 (zero)

PR3Type of information about products and services required by labeling procedures, and the percentage of products and services subject to such requirements

E n.a.

PR4

Total number of cases of non-compliance with regulations and voluntary codes related to information and labeling of products and services, broken down by type of result

A 0 (zero)

39

Performance Tables





PR5Practices related to customer satisfaction, including results of surveys measuring customer satisfaction

A

Satisfaction survey for cruise passengers;Survey of clients of recreational docks

Questionnaires to customers after resolution of complaints / suggestions

PR6 Programs for adherence to laws, standards and voluntary codes related to marketing communications, including advertising, promotion and sponsorship

E n.a.

PR7

Total number of cases of non-compliance with regulations and voluntary codes concerning marketing communications, including advertising, promotion and sponsorship by type of result

A n.a.

PR8Total number of substantiated complaints regarding breaches of privacy and loss of customer data

A n.a.

PR9Monetary value of fines (significant) for non-compliance with laws and regulations concerning the provision and use of products and services

E n.a.

Note:• n.a. - Not applicable• n.d. - Not developed

40

Performance Tables

Performance Tables Technical CreditsTitle: APL SR 2008 Performance Tables

Ownership: APL - Administração do Porto de Lisboa, S.A.

Consultants: Sair da Casca (SDC) – Consultoria em Desenvolvimento Sustentável

PERFORMANCE TABLES - Porto de Lisboa · 2 CONTENTS 1. About this publication 3 2. ... the...

Documents

Transcript of PERFORMANCE TABLES - Porto de Lisboa · 2 CONTENTS 1. About this publication 3 2. ... the...