Performance management ch 1,2,3 ppt copy
-
Upload
najeebhemat-malikzia -
Category
Education
-
view
150 -
download
4
Transcript of Performance management ch 1,2,3 ppt copy
1
Mita Das (11392)
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
2
PM- Definition, concerns and scopeThe management of performanceA short history of performance management
AGENDA:
3
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT-DEFINITION,
CONCERNS AND SCOPE
4
PM is a strategic and integrated approach to delivering sustained success to organisations by improving the performance of the people who work in them and by developing the capabilities of teams and individual contributors.
DEFINITION:
5
Vertical integrationFunctional integrationHuman resource integration Individual needs with the org.
STRATEGIC AND INTEGRATED
6
IT’S ALSO ABOUT
HOW IT IS ACHIEVED
7
Performance is not achieved unless there are effective process of development
PERFORMANCE AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT
8
CONCERNS OF PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
9
Output: achievement of results.Outcome: impact made on performance.Process: required to achieve these
results(competencies) and the inputs in terms of capabilities (knowledge, skill and competence) expected from the teams and individuals involved.
Inputs: Competence assessment – danger if lack validity and reliability.
CONCERN WITH OUTPUT, OUTCOMES, PROCESS AND INPUTS
10
To achieve future success Defining expectations expressed as objectives and in
business plan
CONCERN WITH PLANNING
11
Concerns with measurement and review : If you can’t measure it , you can’t manage it.
Concerns with continuous development and improvement: from the successes and challenges in their day to day activities
Concern for communication: continuous dialogue between managers and members of the team takes place for mutual understanding of what is to be achieved and ensure that it will be achieved.
CONT..
12
Concern for stakeholders: employees as partners, PM should respect the needs of individuals and teams as well as those of organisation.
Ethical concerns: respect for individual, mutual respect, procedural fairness, transparency
13
Managing the organisation
Managing within the context of business(internal and external environment)
Manage context not performance: Jones
Manager and their teams are jointly accountable for results
SCOPE OF PM..
14
THE MANAGEMENT OF PERFORMANCE.
15
Importance of defining objectives and of planning to achieve them
Give every employee a business person’s strong sense of revenue, cost and profi t
Pursue fast paced innovationRelationships and communication are more important
than the formal channelsThe pursuit of high performance by developing
competence
FEATURES OF AN EFFECTIVE ORGANISATION
16
Importance of goals, and measuring and monitoring of performance in relation to goals
Importance of context(structure, process and people) Importance of competence Importance of value chain
IMPLICATIONS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF PERFORMANCE: SEARS MODEL
17
Oxford dictionary: The accomplishment, execution, carrying out, working out of anything ordered or undertaken.
By Brumbrach: Performance means both behavior and results.
PERFORMANCE
18
Pers
onal
fa
ctor
s
Leadersh
ip factors
Team factors System
factors
Contextu
al factorsFACTORS AFFECTING PERFORMANCE
19
Context of org.CultureFunctionality Job designTeam workOrganisational developmentPurpose and value statementStrategic managementHuman resource management
WHAT MAKES PERFORMANCE WELL??
20
A SHORT HISTORY OF PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT.
21
(AD221-265)Wei dynasty in china had an imperial
rater
Ignatius Loyola(1491-1556) introduced formal
rating of the members of the society of Jesus
First formal rating system by Fredrick Taylor before world
war I
ANTECEDENTS
22
Rating for US armed forces in
1920, merit rating in US and UK in 1950s and
1960s.
MBO(1960s)
Critical incident technique and behaviorally
anchored rating scale
Revised form of performance
appraisal
CONT..
23
W D Scott who introduced man to man comparison scale
This scale was modified an used to rate the effi ciency of US army offi cers
Initiated an era of promotion on the basis of meritGraphic rating scaleForced distributionFactorising
MERIT RATING AND PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
24
McGregor said focus should be on the future rather than the past in order to establish realistic targets and seek the most eff ective ways of reaching them.
The superior instead of becoming psychologist or therapist can become a coach.
DRAWBACKS
25
Mainly concerns with the assessment of traitsAssessment of traits are subjective judgments and
prompted by prejudices
26
By Peter Drucker(1955) Integration of individual and corporate goals
MANAGEMENT BY OBJECTIVES
27
1. Development of role & mission statement.2. Establishing strategic goals/strategic plan.3. Defi ning key results areas.4. Establishing indicators or eff ectiveness, goals, or orga
nizational objectives.5. Establishing, or negotiating individual employee object
ives.6. Establishing performance standards for each objective.7. Action planning for each employee.8. Periodic measurement and assessment of status of eac
h objective/standard.9. Coaching/training to remediate defi cits.1O. Some form of evaluation or assessment done formally
and included in an employee's record.
28
Tactical Plans
Unit objectives and improvement plans
Individual
manager’s Key
results and
Improvement plan
Review and
control
Strategic plan
MBO CYCLE:
29
Levinson- A person doing excellent job by objective standards of measurement may fail miserably as a partner, superior, subordinate or colleague.
Quality of performance frequently losses out to quantification
Schaff er-process was over systematized
CRITICISMS OF MBO
30
By FlanaganTo focus on critical behavior rather than trait
assessment(merit rating) and output(MBO).To keep record of incidents and use them as evidence
of actual behavior during review meetings. ‘Black book’More of real informationDiff erentiating competencies
CRITICAL INCIDENT TECHNIQUE
31
They include no. of performance dimension and managers rate each dimension on a scale.
But it focuses on specific work behaviors.
BEHAVIORALLY ANCHORED RATING SCALES
32
Appraisals can help to improve employees’ job performance by identifying strengths and weaknesses and determining how their strength may be best utilised within the org. and weaknesses overcome
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL(1970S VERSION)
33
Emphasis on both development and evaluationUse of profi le defining the individual’s strengths and
development needs Integration of the results achieved with the means by
which they have achieved
ENTER PM: EARLY DAYS
34
Whether performanc
e has achieved
the agreed upon plan
How work is progressing
towards desired results
How it will be
accomplished
What work is to be
accomplished
PM IS COMMUNICATION:
35
Performance planning
Performance review
Performance appraisal
3 ELEMENTS
36
Performance management is not a system or technique, it is the totality of the day to day activities of all managers.
FOWLER’S DEFINITION OF PM