Innovation Takes Off

People, Planet, Profit The Clean Sky 2 PPP

Clean Sky - Good Progress, New Frontiers…

2000

2020

EXAMPLE: Breakdown of 50% CO2 reduction targeted

1. Bridging the gap: FP7 & Clean Sky end well before 2020

Further demonstration required to achieve a full TRL6

Further gains needed to reach the ACARE 2020 Goals,

2. Growing competition

3. . . .new and ambitious goals in ACARE SRIA (2035 / 2050)

Beyond 2020: Renewed ACARE SRIA [2050]

... and the case for Clean Sky 2

a continuation and extension

of the current programme

Providing seamless and resilient air transport system

Maintaining & extending industrial leadership

Protecting the environment & the energy supply

Ensuring safety & security

Prioritising research, testing capabilities & education

ACARE Strategic Research and

Innovation Agenda towards 2050

Latest ACARE Report [2015] - Emissions

Staying the Course: Trendline of CO2 Targets

0

20

40

60

80

100

Ref 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 SRIA 2050

Indexed Emissions/RTK 1

Vis

ion

20

20

Tar

get

1. Taken from SRA Definition 2 Source Forum-AE 2015: ~ -38% “extrapolated” [no new content assumed from H2020 / CS2`] 3 Assuming a trendline exists, original ACARE SRA goal would be achieved in ~2025. Realistic? 4 TRL5/6 @ 2020 + 4% further overall improvement through H2020 R&I, i.e. 42% v 2000 in total

2

3

AC

AR

E R

epo

rt 2

01

5

4

Addressing the H2020 Challenges

• “Smart Green and Integrated Transport”

Resource efficient transport that respects the environment

Ensuring safe and seamless mobility

Building industrial leadership in Europe

Enhancing and leveraging innovation capability across Europe, with a strong emphasis on SME participation

Not legally binding

Leveraging private sector initiatives, and (important!) building on MS national and regional efforts

Clean Sky 2 Programme Set-up

Not legally binding

Large

Systems

ITDs

Vehicle

IADPs

Tech

no

logy

Eva

luat

or

(TE)

Ge

rman

Ae

rosp

ace

Ce

nte

r (D

LR)

Building on Clean Sky, going further into integration at full aircraft level

And developing new technology streams for the next generations of aircraft

Eco

-De

sign

Fr

aun

ho

fer

Ge

sells

chaf

t

Regional Aircraft

Alenia Aermacchi

Fast Rotorcraft

Agusta Westland

Eurocopter

Engines ITD

Safran – Rolls-Royce – MTU

Systems ITD

Thales – Liebherr

Airframe ITD

Dassault – EADS-CASA – Saab

Smal

l Air

Tra

nsp

ort

Ev

ekt

or

– P

iagg

io

1.8b€ Total EU Funding Proposed

Large Passenger

Aircraft Airbus

Not legally binding

EU Funding Decision 1.755bn€

(1.716bn€ “net”)* * After running costs

Scenarios – exploiting the results

New Product Timeline Assumptions for Clean Sky 2 Economic Case: Illustrative only

…. “The Horizon 2020 period will be decisive for delivering the required innovations in the next generation of European aircraft. By maturing the current wave of new technologies towards potential for market adoption within the decade after 2020, research outcomes from Clean Sky 2 will be applicable to 75% of the world fleet needing replacement up to 2050, and Clean Sky 2 technology will be able to address aviation emissions totalling over 70% of the worldwide civil air fleet”.

The Potential for Massive Impact [source: JTP; Impact Assessment prior to Regulation]

…. “The impact of Clean Sky 2 technologies matured into the aircraft of the future is expected to save a minimum of 4bn tonnes of CO2 between 2025 and 2050, all of which on top of Clean Sky [1] benefits”.

Addressing H2020 Transport Challenge Areas

www.cleansky.eu

Energy, Resources & Environment

Industrial Leadership

Safe & Seamless Mobility

Up to 40% of EU funding available for CS2 Leaders

At least 60% of EU funding open to competition:

Up to 30% for Core Partners (becoming Members once selected)

At least 30% for CfP (i.e. Partners as in CS) plus CfTs

Meaning >1bn€ of EU funding in play, via open Calls

CS2 Participation

Industry, SMEs, Academia, and Research Organizations eligible both for participation as Core Partners or Partners. Participation may also take place via suitable Clusters / Consortia.

Up to 1000 Participants across all tiers of the industrial supply chain and “Innovation Chain”, with significant leverage effects

• 16 Leaders 12 Original CS1 Architects SAT Leaders: Piaggio and Evektor MTU DLR

• 75 Core Partner level members via 1st Call only with 3 more Calls to come [!]

• Close to 100 Partners via 1st Call with >10 more Calls to come [!]

CS2: extended and widened Innovation Chain – up to 1000 Academic, RE, SME and Industry participations

Myth Busters

Myth: Clean Sky is a closed shop system

• > 1bn€ in grant funding awarded through open, competitive Calls • Participation and Call results to date demonstrate an “open system” • 1st CS2 CfP largest Call in the JU to date with largest response • Already exciting new entrants bridging the gap from other high-tech

sectors

Busted!

Myth: Clean Sky = high-TRL demonstrators and low-TRL R&I is disadvantaged

• More and more interactions between players • More comprehensive and complex ecosystem • Clean Sky size allows for a wide working-together network • … But the fragmentation between research programmes in Europe

is not fully solved

Peter Hecker, Chairman of Clean Sky Scientific Committee: “”The innovation pipeline has changed”

TRL1 TRL3 TRL6 TRL1 TRL3 TRL6

Academia

Research

Establishments

Industry

Busted! Myth Busters

Myth: Clean Sky = high-TRL demonstrators and low-TRL R&I is disadvantaged

• 2014 review: >80% of key technologies entered CS1 at TRL3 or lower • CS2 Agenda broader and targeting both 2025 and ~2035 entry points

Busted! Myth Busters

Myth: Clean Sky is downstream and only benefits industry

• 1st Core Partner Call: Healthy share of winning proposals are from REs and Academia

All Proposals Winners

Industry [incl SME] m€ REs and Academia m€

Proposed 227 170

Winners 137 96

41%

43%

43%

Busted! Myth Busters

Myth: Clean Sky is downstream and only benefits industry

• No less than 58% of the 1st CfP topics were won by REs / Academia • 53 topics, €48m indicative budget, 220 proposals. Largest CS Call # Participations

% of Funding

Type Success rate Participations IND 28% 87 RES 22% 157 SME 21% 117 UNI 25% 138

Type of action % IND RES SME UNI Total

IA 41% 28% 32% 24% 15% 100% RIA 59% 20% 38% 16% 26% 100%

Total 100% 23% 36% 19% 22% 100%

Industry

REs

Universities

SMEs

Busted! Myth Busters

Myth: Clean Sky is complicated and difficult to apply for and enter A recent quote:

• SMEs consistently and strongly commend CS CfP as far more user- friendly in terms of rules of submission, eligibility and transparency

• Success rates in CS Calls consistently higher than collaborative R&I • Technology Pull ensures unique “disintermediation” between

innovators and end-users, accelerating exposure and take-up • Solid evidence of “cross-over” innovations e.g. from SMEs entering

Aeronautics via the CS CfPs

Busted! Myth Busters

Thank You

19