PBS Update Special Education Leadership September 15, 2006.

31
PBS Update Special Education Leadership September 15, 2006

Transcript of PBS Update Special Education Leadership September 15, 2006.

Page 1: PBS Update Special Education Leadership September 15, 2006.

PBS Update

Special Education Leadership September 15, 2006

Page 2: PBS Update Special Education Leadership September 15, 2006.

107 PBS Schools

Page 3: PBS Update Special Education Leadership September 15, 2006.

Schools by Population

K, 1

Elemen. 52

Middle, 19

High, 10

Alt/ Charter/ Special

20

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

K High

Page 4: PBS Update Special Education Leadership September 15, 2006.

Districts Appoquinimink Brandywine Caesar Rodney Cape Henlopen Capital Christina Colonial DSCYF Indian River Lake Forest

Laurel Milford New Castle County

VoTech Red Clay Smyrna Woodbridge Charters Alternatives

Page 5: PBS Update Special Education Leadership September 15, 2006.

Professional Development

Page 6: PBS Update Special Education Leadership September 15, 2006.

School-wide Cluster

School-wide PBS Cultural Competency Family School Collaboration Assessment

Classroom Management

Page 7: PBS Update Special Education Leadership September 15, 2006.

PBS for Individual Students Cluster Person-Centered Planning Functional Behavioral Assessment Behavior Support Plans Targeted Team Intensive Team/Wrap-Around

Services

Page 8: PBS Update Special Education Leadership September 15, 2006.

46 PBS Star

Schools

Page 9: PBS Update Special Education Leadership September 15, 2006.

PBS Star School Criteria SET-D overall mean score 80% or higher SET-D score of 80% or higher for Behavioral

Expectations Taught School Team meets monthly and is

representative of entire school population School team uses data to make decisions and

submits end of year data analysis School team uses more than one data source

to evaluate program effectiveness Family Involvement Character Education implemented in school

Page 10: PBS Update Special Education Leadership September 15, 2006.

PBS Star School Growth

2 2

12

30

46

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

2001-2002 2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-20062001-2002 2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-2006

Page 11: PBS Update Special Education Leadership September 15, 2006.

Alternative Star Schools

Brandywine

Community

Compass

Cobblestone

CommunitySchool

Page 12: PBS Update Special Education Leadership September 15, 2006.

Appoquinimink Star Schools

Silver Lake

Redding

Middle

MHS

Townsend

BrickMill

CedarLane

Olive B.

Loss

MeredithMiddle

Page 13: PBS Update Special Education Leadership September 15, 2006.

Brandywine Star Schools

Carrcroft

DarleyRoad

Harlan

SpringerMiddle

Claymont

PSDuPont

MapleLane

Page 14: PBS Update Special Education Leadership September 15, 2006.

Cape Henlopen Star Schools

Shields Milton

HO

Brittingham

Rehoboth

Page 15: PBS Update Special Education Leadership September 15, 2006.

Capital Star Schools

Fairview Kent ILC

Page 16: PBS Update Special Education Leadership September 15, 2006.

Charter Star Schools

Academy

of

Dover

Page 17: PBS Update Special Education Leadership September 15, 2006.

Christina Star Schools

Keene

STERCK

Shue-MedillMiddle

Wilson

Downes Gallaher

Newark

HS

Smith ES

Stubbs

Page 18: PBS Update Special Education Leadership September 15, 2006.

Colonial Star Schools

Carrie

Downie GeorgeRead

Middle

Eisenberg

Page 19: PBS Update Special Education Leadership September 15, 2006.

Lake Forest Star Schools

Central

ChipmanMiddle

LFHS

Page 20: PBS Update Special Education Leadership September 15, 2006.

LaurelStar Schools

NorthLaurel

Page 21: PBS Update Special Education Leadership September 15, 2006.

Red ClayStar Schools

Shortlidge

Academy

Stanton

Page 22: PBS Update Special Education Leadership September 15, 2006.

SmyrnaStar Schools

ClaytonES

Page 23: PBS Update Special Education Leadership September 15, 2006.

WoodbridgeStar Schools

WoodbridgeES

Page 24: PBS Update Special Education Leadership September 15, 2006.

Assessment

Page 25: PBS Update Special Education Leadership September 15, 2006.

DSTP Assessment Task Force

Summative Assessment Given Later in School Year

“Formative” Assessment 2 – 3 per year

End of Course Assessments Use Technology Anticipated date – Spring 2009 Accommodations Work Group Update Modified Assessment

Page 26: PBS Update Special Education Leadership September 15, 2006.

DAPA Changes 2006-2007 Lists of students coming soon –

UPDATE!! Timeline for new Alternate

Assessment: 2006-2007 DAPA-II 2007-2008 DAPA-II 2008-2009 New Alternate Assessment

North Carolina Alignment Study Recommended Curriculum – Access to

General Ed.

Page 27: PBS Update Special Education Leadership September 15, 2006.

Changes

Original Signatures Performance Indicators – NO ExPIs IEP Objectives no longer required Grade Changes for Science and

Social Studies

Page 28: PBS Update Special Education Leadership September 15, 2006.

Content Area AlignmentGrade as of 9/1/06 # of Content Areas Content Area

2 2 ELA, Math

3 4 ELA, Math, Sci, SS

4 2 ELA, Math

5 4 ELA, Math, Sci, SS

6 2 ELA, Math

7 2 ELA, Math

8 4 ELA, Math, Sci, SS

9 2 ELA, Math

10 2 ELA, Math

*11 2 Sci, SS

*DAPA portfolio required the first year that the student is in 11th grade

6

Page 29: PBS Update Special Education Leadership September 15, 2006.

Portfolio Due Date

All students in grades 2 – 11 (as of September 1, 2006) who meet the participation criteria are required to have a portfolio submitted on…

FEBRUARY 1, 2007

5

Page 30: PBS Update Special Education Leadership September 15, 2006.

Test Security “It is a testing security violation for an individual to fail to follow DSTP test administration procedures... School districts and individuals shall not

Fail to report test scores, number of students tested, or any other data element required to be reported to the Department;

Report incorrect or otherwise inaccurate test scores, number of students tested, or any other data element required to be reported to the Department;

Exclude a student from participation except in accordance with the regulations of the Department;

Refuse to disclose to the Department information concerning a violation of the foregoing data requirements;

Refuse to cooperate in the investigation of a suspected data reporting violation whether such investigation is conducted by a school district or the Department. The investigation shall include a review of mitigating circumstances, if applicable.”

Take a minute to review Tab 7 pages 58 & 59

59

Page 31: PBS Update Special Education Leadership September 15, 2006.

Test Security

Test security and confidentiality is vital to maintain validity, reliability, and fairness of the test results

All DAPA Test Administrators (a.k.a. developers) must read and understand the Test Security Policy

Violations are subject to investigations and consequences as determined by the school district and the Department

60