Parametric Study of Plasma-Assisted Ignition in Combustible ......Moscow Institute of Physics and...

22
Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology Parametric Study of Plasma-Assisted Ignition in Combustible Mixtures N.L. Aleksandrov 1 , S.V. Kindysheva 1 , E. A. Plastinin 1 , A.Yu. Starikovskiy 2 1 Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology 2 Princeton University PRINCETON University

Transcript of Parametric Study of Plasma-Assisted Ignition in Combustible ......Moscow Institute of Physics and...

  • Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology

    Parametric Study

    of Plasma-Assisted Ignition

    in Combustible Mixtures

    N.L. Aleksandrov1, S.V. Kindysheva1,

    E. A. Plastinin1, A.Yu. Starikovskiy2

    1Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology

    2Princeton University PRINCETON

    University

  • Outline of talk

    - Practically important gas parameters

    - Purpose of this work

    - How to estimate the effect of PAI

    - Method of estimation

    - Calculated results and some

    experiments

    - Conclusions

    PRINCETON

    University

  • Gas parameters of ignition/combustion in engines

    SCRAMjet: ~ 0.3-1 atm, ~ 700K, φ ~ 0.8-0.9, H2

    IC engine: ~10-12atm, ~ 800 K, φ ~ 0.7, gas

    GTE: 20-30atm, ~ 800 K, φ ~ 0.5-0.7, aviation kerosene

    Power GTE: 20-30atm, ~ 1000-1100 K, φ ~ 0.3-0.5, methane

    HCCI engine: ~ 30-40atm, ~ 1000-1200 K, φ ~ 0.3-0.5, gas

    High-pressure NG engine: ~80-100atm, ~ 800 K, φ ~ 0.3-0.5, methane

    High-altitude re-light: ~0.2-0.3atm, ~ 250-270К

    Practically important ranges of gas parameters:

    0.2 – 100 atm 250 – 1500 K φ = 0.3 - 1

    PRINCETON

    University

  • P – T diagram for experimental studies of PAI/PAC after nanosecond discharges

    Topical review by Starikovskaia, J. Phys. D (2014)

    PRINCETON

    University

  • Purpose of this work

    To numerically estimate the effect of

    nonequilibrium discharge plasma on

    hydrocarbon ignition in a wide range of gas

    parameters

    Disadvantages of this approach

    - there are no kinetic schemes that could

    describe plasma and ignition processes for all

    parameters under study

    - methods (discharges) of nonequilibrium

    energy input are not considered

    - ...

    PRINCETON

    University

  • How to estimate the effect of PAI

    To compare ignition/combustion characteristics with plasma and

    without it under the same conditions (shock-tube observations

    (Kosarev et al. 2009))

    PRINCETON

    University

    The drawbacks are (i) that the specific deposited energy changes

    with gas temperature, (ii) that additional energy is deposited in PAI,

    as opposed to autoignition, and (ii) that it is impossible to estimate

    the effect below autoignition threshold.

  • Ratio between autoignition and PAI delay times

    Measured data are reduced to

    a specific deposited energy

    of 0.1 eV/particle

    PRINCETON

    University

    Kosarev et al.

    (Comb. Flame 2015)

    tauto/tPAI is higher

    - for lower T

    - for CH4

    (and lower for C2H2)

  • Method to estimate the effect of PAI

    PRINCETON

    University

    Discharge processes: balance equations → [e], …, [O], …, [Ar*], … Boltzmann equation for electrons → kj(E/N(t)) equation for gas temperature → T(t) Ignition processes: balance equations → [O], [OH], … equation for gas temperature → T(t)

    Calculation of ignition delay time and deposited

    energy during thermal and nonequilibrium

    excitations (with fast gas heating)

    Numerical zero-dimensional simulation of active

    species production in discharge and ignition

  • Kinetic schemes for discharge processes and

    ignition

    PRINCETON

    University

    Reactions in discharge and its afterglow

    e + O2 → 2e + O2+ … e + O2 → e + O + O …

    e + C2H2 → e + C2H + H … e + O2

    + → O + O …

    Kinetic schemes for ignition

    CH4 (RAMEC); C2H6 – C5H12 (Westbrook)

    Good agreement between calculations and shock-

    tube observations was obtained for ignition of

    these hydrocarbons (Kosarev et al. (2008, 2009))

  • Calculated ignition delay time versus energy input

    PRINCETON

    University

    Bozhenkov et al. (2003)

    1. No excitation

    2. Thermal excitation

    3. Nonequilibrium

    excitation at E/N =

    300 Td

    H2:air φ = 1

    1 atm 1000K

  • Ignition delay time versus specific deposited energy during thermal

    and nonequilibrium excitation

    1000 K 1 atm E/N = 300 Td

    PRINCETON

    University

    10-4

    10-3

    10-2

    10-1

    100

    101

    102

    103

    104

    105

    Nonequilibrium excitation

    Thermal

    excitation

    No excitation

    Ign

    itio

    n d

    ela

    y t

    ime

    , s

    Specific deposited energy, eV/molecule

    10-4

    10-3

    10-2

    10-1

    100

    101

    102

    103

    104

    105

    Nonequilibrium excitation

    Thermal

    excitation

    No excitation

    Ign

    ioti

    on

    de

    lay

    tim

    e, s

    Specific deposited energy, eV/molecule

    C2H6:air CH4:air

  • Ratio between specific deposited energies required to ignite fuel with

    equilibrium and nonequilibrium

    excitation

    Ratio between equilibrium deposited energy and

    nonequilibrium one at which the ignition delay

    time is 100 μs (E/N = 300 Td)

    PRINCETON

    University

    600 800 1000 1200 1400 16001

    2

    3

    4

    0.1

    10

    1

    100 atm

    CH4:air, = 1

    wth/w

    ne

    q

    Temperature, K600 700 800 900 1000 1100 12001

    2

    C5H12:air, 1 atm

    C2H6:air, 1 atm

    C2H6:air, 10 atm

    = 1

    wth

    /wneq

    Temperature, K

    The radical-chain mechanism becomes more important with

    increasing gas temperature!

  • The effect of gas pressure

    0.03 eV/molecule E/N = 300 Td

    PRINCETON

    University

    10-1

    100

    101

    102

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    1400

    1000 K

    C2H

    6:air, = 1

    t th/t

    ne

    q

    Pressure, atm

    tauto

    /tPAI

    , 1000K

    tauto

    /tPAI

    , 1400K

    Pressure dependence of reaction rates can change with pressure.

    The more complicated is hydrocarbon molecule, the lower is the

    critical pressure; for instance, C2H6 (+ M) ↔ C2H5 + H (+ M) .

    10-1

    100

    101

    102

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    1400

    1000 K

    CH4:air, = 1

    t th/t

    ne

    q

    Pressure, atm

  • The effect of high-energy O atoms

    CH4:air φ = 1 1 atm 0.03 eV/particle

    E/N = 300 Td, all O atoms have high

    reactivity (energy barrier is removed)

    PRINCETON

    University

    Chemical reactivity of active species

    (O, H, …) is higher for excited and

    high-energy particles (Starikovskiy

    2014)

    e + O2 → e + O(3P) + O(3P, 1D) + ΔE

    N2(A,B,C,..) + O2 → N2 + O + O + ΔE

    e + CH4 → e + CH3 + H + ΔE

    N2(A,B,C,..) + CH4 → CH3 + H + ΔE

    … 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

    0.8

    1.0

    1.2

    1.4

    1.6

    1.8

    2.0

    t(3P

    ) / t(

    3P

    ,1D

    ,1S

    ,H)

    T, K

  • The effect of vibrationally excited N2 molecules

    CH4:air φ = 1 1 atm 0.03 eV/particle

    E/N = 300 Td Tv(N2) = 3000 K

    PRINCETON

    University

    400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

    102

    103

    104

    105

    106

    107

    108

    109

    PAI with N2(v)

    PAI

    Tim

    e, s

    Temperature, K

    Starikovskiy (2012)

    HO2 + N2(v) → HO2(ν2+ν3) + N2(v-1) HO2(ν2+ν3) → H + O2

    The effect of N2(v) is profound at low T. At high T, HO2 radicals

    are reactive and their removal can eliminate important reactive channels.

    (HO2 + N2 → H + O2 + N2 for T = 3000 K)

  • The effect of equivalence ratio in fuel:air mixtures

    e + O2 → e + 2O is more efficient than e + CH4 → e + CH3 + H

    PRINCETON

    University

    1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    0.4

    0.7

    = 1

    t th/t

    ne

    q

    Temperature, K1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600

    102

    103

    104

    105

    Noneq. exc.

    Therm. exc. = 1

    = 1

    = 0.7

    = 0.7

    = 0.4

    = 0.4

    t,

    s

    Temperature, K

    CH4:air φ = 1 1 atm 0.03 eV/particle E/N = 300 Td

  • The effect of equivalence ratio in hydrocarbon(C2):O2:Ar mixtures

    PRINCETON

    University

    0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 1,0

    101

    102

    103

    0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 1,0

    101

    102

    103

    PAI

    Auto

    C2H

    6

    =0.5

    Auto

    PAI

    =1.0

    Auto

    PAI

    Ind

    uc

    tio

    n d

    ela

    y,

    s

    1000/T5, [1/K]

    PAI

    Auto

    C2H

    4

    =0.5

    Auto

    PAI

    =1.0

    Auto

    PAI

    Ind

    uc

    tio

    n d

    ela

    y,

    s

    1000/T5, [1/K]

    C2H6 (φ = 1) Kosarev et al. (2008)

    New shock-tube data for C2H6 (φ = 0.5)

    and C2H4 (φ = 0.5 and 1)

  • The effect of specific deposited energy

    PRINCETON

    University

    1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 16000

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    0.01

    0.03

    t th/tneq

    Temperature, K

    0.1 eV/particle

    1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600

    102

    103

    104

    105

    0.1

    0.01 eV/particle

    t,

    s

    Temperature, K

    0.03

    Closed symbols: thermal excitation

    Open symbols: nonequilibrium excitation

    CH4:air φ = 1 1 atm E/N = 300 Td

  • The effect of reduced electric field

    PRINCETON

    University

    1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600

    4

    6

    t th/tneq

    Temperature, K

    E/N = 200 Td

    300

    500

    CH4:air φ = 1 1 atm 0.03 eV/particle

  • Conclusions

    The efficiency of nonequilibrium plasma ignition after a pulsed discharge was estimated with respect to thermal ignition at the same deposited energy.

    The effect of nonequilibrium plasma on ignition in hydrocarbon:air mixtures is more profound

    - for gas temperatures around self-ignition threshold

    - for hydrocarbons with lower rates of thermal production of radicals (lower reactivity)

    - for higher specific deposited energy (in the range 0.01-0.1 eV/molecule)

    - for lean mixtures

    - for not-too-high E/N at which energy is deposited in discharge (in the range 200 – 500 Td)

    PRINCETON

    University

  • Conclusions

    The effect of nonequilibrium plasma on ignition becomes more profound with decreasing pressure in CH4-containing mixtures and with increasing pressure in C2H6-containing mixtures.

    Additional vibrational excitation of N2 can lead to an orders of magnitude decrease in the induction delay time at temperatures below self-ignition threshold

    Formation of high-energy and excited O and H atoms in discharge plasma can affect ignition only below self-ignition threshold; this effect can lead to a decrease in induction time by ~50%.

    PRINCETON

    University

  • Acknowledgments

    This work was partially supported

    - by the Russian Ministry of Education and Science under

    the program “5Top100”,

    - by the Russian Foundation of Basic Research under the

    projects No. 14-03-31449 and No. 14-08-00400 and

    - by the AFOSR MURI program “Fundamental Mechanisms,

    Predictive Modeling, and Novel Aerospace Applications of

    Plasma-Assisted Combustion”.

    PRINCETON

    University