PARAMETRIC ANALYSIS OF SPAN TO RISE RATIO OF …adalyajournal.com/gallery/115-jan-2553.pdfthe...
Transcript of PARAMETRIC ANALYSIS OF SPAN TO RISE RATIO OF …adalyajournal.com/gallery/115-jan-2553.pdfthe...
PARAMETRIC ANALYSIS OF SPAN TO RISE RATIO OF SHALLOW FUNICULAR
CONCRETE SHELLS WITH OPENINGS LARGE ENOUGH TO DISTURB GLOBAL
STRESS DISTRIBUTION
A. Leema Rose1, S. Gunaselvi 2, M. Jeganathan3
1Associate Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Valliammai Engineering College, Chennai, 603203.Tamilnadu, India.
2AssistantProfessor, Department of Civil Engineering, Valliammai Engineering College, Chennai, 603203.Tamilnadu, India.
3Associate Professor, Prime Nest College of Architecture and Planning, Siruganur, Thiruchirappalli.
ABSTRACT
Shells of diverse types are used for structural purposes due to their lightweight, swish shape
and excessive load resisting capacity. Those burdened pores and skin structures regularly
consist openings on their floor to necessitate ventilation and connections for in addition
systems. The objective of this project is to have a look at the behavior of Shallow Funicular
Concrete Shells over square floor Plan of various arbitrary rises RI and RII with 0% — 16%
openings. Analysis of Shallow Funicular Concrete Shells over square floor Plan of diverse
rises- RI and RII with 0% most of 16% starting is carried the use of the Finite element
software ANSYS and offered on this report. Fabric properties are defined and assigned
Restraints with all stages of freedom have been furnished at helps. From the analytical end
result the Membrane stresses, Bending pressure and Deflections are in comparison for the
diverse arbitrary rises. From the evaluation results Conclusions are armed for various rises for
the applied load.
KEY WORDS: concrete shell, shallow funicular shell, span to rise ratio.
INTRODUCTION
Systems can be categorized in many methods in keeping with their form, their
characteristic and the materials from which they're made. A form or structural detail can be a
fully 3 dimensional strong object like a monolithic pyramid or it would have a few
dimensions amazing smaller than a ball bearing. Shells belong to the elegance of forced-pores
and skin structures which, because of their geometry and small stress of the pores and skin,
have a tendency to carry loads basically via direct stresses acting in their plane. Shells impart
electricity thru its shape in desire to energy via mass. Concrete shells are systems which
because of their shape offer an terrific load bearing capability.
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/1120
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 1, January 2020
Concrete shells are structures which due to their form offer a first-rate load bearing
functionality. Reinforced concrete shell systems are significantly hired because of the fact
they offer each brilliant performance and architectural beauty. Although a primary form in
nature, a whole lot remains to be learnt about its utility in production enterprise. Ideally a
concrete shell in its membrane state consists of the external masses through way of natural
compression, unaccompanied by means of way of shear stresses in order that no tensile
stresses develop. Its miles advantageous to select the form of shell in any such way that,
below the circumstance of loading, the shell is subjected to pure compression without
bending. This will be completed by shaping the shell in the form of catenaries which the
funicular shape is similar to the dead weight. Shell of square and square ground plans are
very frequent in present day construction and architectural exercise.
Classification of Shells
Shells may be widely labeled as ‘singly-curved’ and ‘doubly-curved’. This is based on Gauss
curvature that is the made from the 2 essential curvatures, 1/R1 and l/R2 at any point at the
floor of the shell. Therefore, evolved doubly curved shells are non-evolved and are
categorized as synclastic or anticlastic in accordance as their Gauss curvature is advantageous
or poor.
The governing equations of membrane theory of singly curved shells are parabolic. It is -
elliptic for synclastic shells and hyperbolic for anticlastic shells. If z = f (x, y) is the equation
to the surface of a shell, the surface will be synclastic, developable or anticlastic according as
s2-rt ≠ 0 where
• r= δ2z/ δx2
• T= δ2z/δ y2
• s= δ2z/ δx δy
There are other special types of doubly curved shells, such as funicular shells, which
are synclastic and anticlastic in parts and corrugated shells which are alternately synclastic
and anticlastic. The gauss curvature for such shells is positive where they are synclastic and
negative where they are anticlastic
Shells are used for lots structural purposes due to its light weight, swish shape and
maximum load resisting capability. Shallow funicular shells usually offer a better ultimate
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/1121
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 1, January 2020
power than the shells of single curvature including cylindrical shells. The data collection of
the funicular shells with openings of various rises. Funicular concrete shells may be hired for
mass creation of roofs and floors subjected to most hundreds. Sustainability is finished
because of the minimal constituent materials used while in comparison to conventional
methods.
The present study at investigates the effect of several probabilities of openings on
shallow funicular concrete shells over rectangular floor plan with openings large sufficient to
disturb globally strain distribution. The concrete funicular shells with two unique spans to
upward push ratio are taken into consideration for this investigation. The analyses of shallow
funicular concrete shells over square floor plan of span to upward thrust ratio (1) of twelve
with rise RI and span to rise ratio (2) of nine with upward thrust RII having 0%, 2%, 4%,
6%, 8%, 12% & 16% openings are carried using the standard program ANSYS by executing
the subsequent steps.
1. The choice of detail – 4 noded quadrilateral shell elements.
2. Joint co-ordinates are taken from investigational specimen with the aid of ordinary station.
3. Discretization of shell – The shell is discretized into twenty element along x-route and
twenty elements along y-direction.
4. Material properties are described and assigned as proven in table 1.
5. Restraints – Given at the boundary nodes.
6. Loading circumstance- Focused load
LITERATURE REVIEW
Josip kacmarcik (2011) widely as compared three design techniques for openings in
cylindrical shells under internal strains. The calculation strategies used in the 3 strategies are
notably one of a kind, so the assessment has been mostly on the most permissible format
pressure for remarkable geometries. sachithanantham et al (2011) concluded that the
deflections of shallow funicular concrete shells lower with growth in upward thrust within
elastic variety and also concluded that the ultimate load wearing capability will increase with
boom in rise.
zhang et al (2006) representated the first-recognized actual solutions for vibration of
open round cylindrical shells with more than one step wise thickness versions based on the
skinny shell concept. An open cylindrical shell is believed to be in reality supported
alongside the two instantly edges and the closing contrary curved edges can also have any
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/1122
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 1, January 2020
aggregate of vicinity help conditions. The shell is subdivided into segments at the locations of
thickness versions. The kingdom-location method is adopted to derive the homogeneous
differential equations for a shell section and the area decomposition method is employed to
impose the equilibrium and compatibility requirements alongside the interfaces of the shell
segments. The correctness of this approach is checked in opposition to present effects and
results generated from finite detail bundle ANSYS and exceptional agreement is finished.
Several open shells with numerous combos of quit boundary conditions are studied.
Ayman et al (2002) investigated the openings in curved-field-girder bridges which are
commonly furnished in the backside flange right now before or after a variety joint. this paper
discussed both of these troubles and proposes procedures that are appropriate for figuring out
appropriate locations for openings. they investigated seven curved-box-girder bridges
positioned in the kingdom of florida. one of the bridges became selected for observe the use
of an in depth finite element version.
Ayman et al (2002) investigated the openings in curved-box-girder bridges which are
usually provided in the bottom flange immediately before or after an expansion joint. This
paper discussed both of these issues and proposes approaches that are suitable for identifying
appropriate locations for openings. They investigated seven curved-box-girder bridges
located in the state of Florida. One of the bridges was chosen for study using a detailed finite
element model. Gus et al (2001) reported the results of stress strain distribution in shells with
curvilinear openings. Numerical results obtained from thin and non-thin shells are analyzed
with regard for the features of deformations in the structures.
Indian Standard Code of Practice for Construction of Reinforced Concrete Shell Roof
(1995) stipulates that openings in shells shall preferably be avoided in zones of critical
stresses. Small openings of size not exceeding five times the thickness in shells may be
treated in the same way as in the case of reinforced concrete structures. For larger openings,
detailed analysis should be carried out to arrive at stresses due to the openings.
Ziya Aktas et al. (1970) outlined a numerical method to determine stress distribution
around arbitrarily shaped openings in shells. In this method, shell governing differential
equations must first be written for an arbitrary orthogonal coordinate system. Later, this
coordinate system is transformed into another coordinate system using a proper
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/1123
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 1, January 2020
transformation function to treat any arbitrary opening shape. Then a numerical method is
used to solve the resulting equations. Using the equations of shallow thin shell theory, the
method is applied to a circular cylindrical shell with a circular hole along perimeter of which
a unit moment is applied. The variations of stress resultants are given and they are compared
with an available solution.
THEORETICAL FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS
Shell Elements
The theoretical Finite Element Analysis and the computation of membrane stresses
and deflections corresponding to the applied loads on shallow funicular shells are carried
using the standard program ANSYS Version 12.Shell elements are a special class of elements
that are designed to efficiently model thin structures. They take advantage of the fact that the
only shear on the free surfaces is in-plane. The element coordinate system for all the shell
elements has the z-axis normal to the plane. Nodes are normally located on the center plane
of the element.
Element Description
SHELL63 has both bending and membrane capabilities. Both in-plane and normal
loads are permitted. The element has six degrees of freedom at each node. Translations in the
nodal x, y, and z directions and rotations about the nodal x, y, and z-axes shown in figure 1.
Stress stiffening and large deflection capabilities are included. A consistent tangent stiffness
matrix option is available for use in large deflection (finite rotation) analyses.
The thickness is assumed to vary smoothly over the area of the element, with the
thickness input at the four nodes. If the element has a constant thickness, only need be input.
If the thickness is not constant, all four thicknesses must be input. The elastic foundation
stiffness (EFS) is defined as the pressure required producing a unit normal deflection of the
foundation. The elastic foundation capability is bypassed if EFS is less than, or equal to, zero.
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/1124
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 1, January 2020
Figure 1. SHELL63
ANALYSIS OF SHALLOW FUNICULAR SHELLS
Modeling of Funicular Concrete Shells
The Shallow Funicular Concrete Shells are analysed to determine the influence of
openings in deflections (w), membrane stresses (SX), (SY) and bending stresses (MX), (MY)
using the Finite Element Software ANSYS. The Shallow Funicular Shells with various rises
are modelled by taking the x,y and z coordinates of the shell specimens prepared
experimentally by the following procedure.Concrete funicular pre-moulds of size 100cm x
100cm in plan are prepared using cement concrete. A form consisting of square steel frame
and polyurethane membrane are used for casting the pre-moulds. The polyurethane
membrane is stretched between the boundaries of the square steel frame of square ground
plan of size 100cm x 100cm and clamped. Fresh concrete with high workability is poured on
the polyurethane membrane which results in sag of the membrane. Funicular shell geometry
is formed by the sag of this membrane. When the concrete is hardened, it is removed from the
clamped membrane. The sag of the concrete becomes rise of the shell geometry when it is
inverted. The maximum sag of the membrane is predetermined and adjusted by clamping the
membrane with the steel frames and therefore the rise of the shell is determined when it is
inverted. The surface of the experimentally prepared shell specimens are painted and the
shells are discritized with twenty elements in X direction and twenty elements in Z direction
as shown in figure 2.
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/1125
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 1, January 2020
Figure 2. Discretized specimen with elements and nodes.
The intersections are taken as coordinates for the theoretical shell models. These x, y and z
coordinates of the shell specimens are determined by using the total station. The shallow
funicular shells are modelled by assigning the values of x, y and z coordinates in the software
program. The discretized model of shallow funicular shells with rise RI and RII are shown in
figure 3.
Rise - RI
Rise – RII
Figure 3. Discretized shallow funicular shell without opening
Material Property
Material properties of the shallow funicular shells are defined and the values are
assigned to the elements. The values of the material properties assigned to the elements are
shown in table 1. Constrains are given for the supports and a concentrated load of 15 kN is
applied at the crown of the shell.
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/1126
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 1, January 2020
Table 1. Material Property
Property Value
Modulus of Elasticity E, N/mm2 2 .17 x 104
Poisson’s ratio, 0.17
Maximum thickness, mm 25
From the results of the analysis, Stress contour, SX of shallow funicular concrete
shells of rise RI and RII without opening (0% opening) is obtained and shown in figure 4.
Rise - RI
Rise - RII
Figure 4. Stress contour, SX- Shell without opening
From the analysis results, a typical stress contour, SX of
shells of rise RI and RII with 16% opening is obtained as shown in figure 5.
Rise - RI
Rise - RII
Figure 5. Stress contour, SX – Shell with opening
Deflection (w) along X,Z directions
From the analysis results, the deflections of the shallow funicular shell along X, Z and
J axis are calculated and a plot is made between the span of the shell and the shallow
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/1127
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 1, January 2020
funicular shell deflections 0%,2%,4%,6%,8%,12%, and 16% as shown in figure 6 and figure
7.
Figure 6. Deflected shape along X,Z directions rise RI
Figure 7. Deflected shape along X,Z directions rise RII
Membrane stress (SX) along X,Z directions
From the analysis results, a plot is made between the distance from the concentrated
load and membrane stress(SX) distribution along the X, Z and J axis for shallow funicular
concrete shell 0%, 2%, 4%, 6%, 8%, 12%, and 16% as shown in figure 8 and figure 9.
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/1128
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 1, January 2020
Figure 8. Membrane stress along X,Z directions, SX rise RI
Figure 9. Membrane stress along X,Z directions, SX rise RII
Bending stress (MX) along X,Z directions
From the analysis results, a plot is made between the distance from the concentrated
load and Bending stress(MX) distribution along the X, Z and J axis for shallow funicular
concrete shell 0%, 2%, 4%, 6%, 8%, 12%, and16% as shown in figure 10 and figure 11.
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/1129
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 1, January 2020
Figure 10. Bending stress along X,Z directions, MX rise RI
Figure 11. Bending stress along X,Z directions, MX rise RII
CONCLUSIONS
From the analysis of shallow funicular concrete shells of span to rise ratio (1) of twelve
and nine the following conclusions are made
The deflection of shallow funicular concrete decreases with increase in rise.
The membrane stress of shallow funicular concrete decreases with increase in rise.
The bending stress of shallow funicular concrete decreases with increase in rise.
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/1130
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 1, January 2020
REFERENCES
1. Andreu,A,. Gil. L and Roca.P.,(2007). “Computational Analysis of Masonry Structures
With a Funicular Model. ” J.Eng.Mech.2007.133:pp473-480.
2. Bernard Maurin and Rene Motro,.(2004). “Concrete shells Form Finding With Surface
Stress Density Method. Journal of structural Engineering ASCE, pp 961-968.
3. Enrico Milani, Gabriele Milani, Antonio Tralli (2008). “Limit analysis of masonry
Vaults by means of curved shell finite elements and homogenization.” International
Journal of solids and structures, 45,pp 5258-5288.
4. Fernando G.flores, Eugenio Onate (2011). “Wrinkling and folding analysis of elastic
membranes using an enhanced rotation free thin shell triangular element.” Finite
Elements in Analysis and Design,47, pp 982-990.
5. Guz,A.N., Chernyshenko,I.S., and Shnerenko,K.I., (2001). “Stress concentration near
openings in composite shells.” International applied Mechanics, vol 37. No.2, pp139-
342.
6. Indian Standard(IS).(1995). “Code of practice for construction of reinforced concrete
shell roof”. IS:2204-1962,New Delhi, India.
7. Indian Standard(IS).(1998). “Criteria for design of Reinforced shell concrete structure
and folded plates”. IS:2210_1988 new Delhi, India.
8. John H. Crews,jr, Hong,C.S., and I.S Raju,I.S., “Stress concentration factors for finite
Orthotropic laminates with a pin loaded Hole ”.NASA Technical Paper, 1862. Pp 1-40.
9. Josip Kacmarcik,.(2011). “Comparison of Design Methods For Openings in Cylindrical
Shells Under Internal Pressure Reinforced by Flush Nozzles”.15th International
Research/Expert Conference Trend in the Development of Machinery and Associated
Technology. TMT2011,Prague,Czech Republic, 12-18 September 2011.
10. Kai-uweBletzinger, RolandWuchner, FernabDaoud, Natalia Camprubi (2005),
“Computational methods for form finding and optimization of shells and membranes.”
Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 194, pp 3438-3452.
11. Krayterman Boris; Sabnis M. Gajanan (1985). “Large deflected plates and shells with
loading history”, J. Eng. Mech.,111, pp 653-663.
12. Krayterman Boris; Sabnis M. Gajanan(1988). “Membrane behaviour of R/C shell
elements and limits on reinforcement”, J. Struct. Eng.,114 pp 425-444.
13. Claudia Chinosi and Lucia Della Croce (2010). “Mixed interpolated finite element for
functionally graded cylindrical shells.” Composite structure, 92, pp2314-2320.
14. Ramaswamy,G.S,. “Design and construction of concrete shell roofs.” CBS Publishers
and Distributors 11,Daryaganj, New Delhi-110002(India).
15. Sachithanantham.P,Sankaran.S,Elavenil.S.(2015).’’ Experimental Study on the Effect
of Rise on Shallow Funicular Concrete Shells over Square Ground Plan” International
Journal of Applied Engineering Research ISSN 0973-4562 Volume 10, Issue 20, pp
41334-4133
16. Sachithanantham.P,Sankaran.S,Elavenil.S.(2015).” Influence of Rise on Ultimate Load
of Shallow Funicular Concrete Shells over Rectangular Ground Plan Ratio 1: 0.6”
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research ,Volume 6, Issue 7,pp
1467-1471
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/1131
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 1, January 2020
17. Sachithanantham.P,Sankaran.S,Elavenil.S.(2015).” Deflection Characteristics of
Shallow Funicular Concrete Shells over Rectangular Ground Plan Ratio 1:0.5”
International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and
Communication ,Volume 3, Issue 7,pp 4873 – 4879
18. Sachithanantham.P,Sankaran.S,Elavenil.S.(2014).”Study on Shallow Funicular
Concrete Shells over Rectangular Ground Plan Ratio 1:0.9”International Journal of
Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, Volume 4, Spl Issue 4 , pp 102 - 107
19. Sachithanantham,P, Elavenil.S, Sankaran,S.(2011). “Study on shallow funicular
Concrete shells over square ground plan subjected to ultimate load”. International
Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Volume 4, Issue 6 spl, pp 632-637.
20. Shiva Kumar.K.N., .and Newman,Jr.,J.C.,(June 1992). “Stress concentrations for
straight hank and countersunk Holes in plates subjected to tension, bending and pin
Loading”. NASA Technical Paper 3192 pp1-17.
21. SP 34 – “Handbook of Concrete reinforcement and detailing”. Bureau of Indian
standards.
22. Srinivasan Chandrasekaran, Gupta, Federico,S.K., Carannante.(2009). “Design aids for
fixed support reinforced concrete cylindrical shells under uniformly distributed loads”.
International Journal of Engineering, Science and technology Vol.No.1, pp 148-171.
23. T.Y.Wu, Y.Y.Wang, G.R.Liu.(2013). “A generalized differential quadrature rule for
bending analysis of cylindrical barrel shells”. vol.3 No.1,
24. Taira Yamamoto and Frank Vecchio.J.,(2001). “ Analysis of Reinforced Concrete
Shells for Transverse Shear and Torsion ” ACI structural Journal, pp191-199.
25. Wilhelm flugge, Stresses in shells springer Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York 1973.
26. X.Zhao,Y,.Y”ang,K., LiewM (2007). “Geometrically nonlinear analysis of cylindrical
shells using the element_free KP_Ritz method” .Engineering Analysis With Boundary
Elements 31, pp783-792.
27. Zhang,L., and Xiang,Y.,(2006). “Vibration of Open Cylindrical Sheells with Stepped
Thickness Variations”. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, pp.780-784.
28. Ziya,A,. Aktas(1970). “Stress Distribution around Shell Openings.” Journal of the
Structural Division, Vol.96,No.11, pp.2337-2351.
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/1132
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 1, January 2020