PALA HITACHI

75
KO-496-00 Machine Serial No. : Location : Dealer Name : Customer Name :

description

Manual de Inspección por Ultrasonido de excavadora (algunos le dicen Pala) HITACHI

Transcript of PALA HITACHI

Page 1: PALA HITACHI

KO-496-00

Machine Serial No. :

Location :

Dealer Name :

Customer Name :

Page 2: PALA HITACHI
Page 3: PALA HITACHI

1

CONTENTS

● INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 2

● DISTRIBUTION OF THE INSPECTION SHEET .................................................................................. 3

● DEFINITION OF THE DEFECT LENGTH IN ULTRA-SONIC TESTING .............................................. 4

● INSPECTION PROCEDURE ................................................................................................................ 6

● EVALUATION OF DEFECT HEIGHT (H) BY DISTANCE CORRECTION TECHNIQUE AT INTERNAL BULKHEAD .......................................................................................................................................... 8

● ULTRA-SONIC EXAMINATION REPORT FOR THE STRUCTURE ....................................... Sheet 01

Track Frame .................................................................................................................... Sheet 02 - 05

Backhoe Boom ................................................................................................................ Sheet 06 - 23

Backhoe Arm ................................................................................................................... Sheet 24 - 32

Page 4: PALA HITACHI

2

INTRODUCTION

We have already introduced the "EX5600-6 Recommended Preventive Service program" to our customers to

promote good preventive service for the EX5600-6 in the field.

However, to effectively check for various kinds of cracks on welded structures like the Front Attachment Main and

Track Frame etc., periodical examination using an Ultrasonic Flaw Detector is indispensable.

This “Inspection sheet” is provided for easy checking of the condition of these structures on the EX5600-6 by

using our portable ultrasonic instrument series, the “HITACHI UT SERIES”. By executing periodical inspection

with the UT, an appropriate maintenance time can be recommended to your customer before the occurrence of a

lengthy downtime caused by increased cracks.

We believe that you will be able to:

1. Reduce repair costs

2. Prevent trouble

3. Reduce downtimes, and

4. Extend machine life

Prevents trouble

Reduces downtime

Reduces repair costs

Extends machine life

Page 5: PALA HITACHI

3

DISTRIBUTION OF THE INSPECTION SHEET

1. Distribute copies of the inspection sheet onto

which echo data printout is affixed, after

making judgement, as described below.

2. Make two copies of each inspection sheet.

3. Send one of the two copies to Hitachi (L/O,

Representative), and the other to Hitachi

(Tokyo).

One Copy: L/O, Representative

One Copy: Hitachi (Tokyo)

Page 6: PALA HITACHI

4

Backing plate

Fig. 1

Fig. 2 Fig. 3

Detail a Detail b

DEFINITION OF THE DEFECT LENGTH IN ULTRA-SONIC TESTING

NOTE: Defect is here defined as that, although varied slightly with welding technique, to be judged acceptable

from the stand point of welding structure.

H: Defect height

L: Defect length

P: Center-to-center distance between defects

j: Total height of insufficient fusion

A: Specified root face

1. Welding with complete fusion (Fig. 1)

1) H:

2 mm (0.08 in.) or less is acceptable.

2) L:

40 mm (1.6 in.) or less is acceptable.

P:

Although the H and L of defect are acceptable

as stated above, center-to center distance

between defects shall be 200 mm (7.87 in.) or

more.

NOTE: No defect is allowed in the range of

50 mm (2.1 in.) on each side of

butt-weld joint.

3) If defect exceeds the above-mentioned limit, it

shall be rejected.

Page 7: PALA HITACHI

5

Root face A

Fig. 5

Detail c

Fig. 4

Root face A

Fig. 7

Detail d

Fig. 6

h: Total height of insufficient fusion

h: Total height of insufficient fusion

2. Single groove welding with insufficient fusion (Fig. 4)

1) It is acceptable when h is not more than root

face A + 1 mm (0.04 in.) or within A -5 mm (0.2

in.).

2) It is acceptable when h is not more than root

face A + 2 mm (0.08 in.), provided that L is 150

mm (5.9 in.) or less, and P is 200 mm (7.9 in.)

or more.

3) If root face A exceeds 2 mm (0.08 in.), it shall

be rejected.

3. Double groove welding with

insufficient fusion (Fig. 6)

1) It is acceptable when h is not more than root

face A + 2 mm (0.08 in.) or -5 mm (0.2 in.).

2) It is acceptable when h is not more than root

face A + 2.5 mm (0.1 in.), that L is 150 mm (5.9

in.) or less, and P is 200 mm (7.9 in.) or more.

3) If root face A exceeds 2.5 mm (0.1 in.), it shall

be rejected.

4. Other

For welded structures other than the

above-mentioned (1), (2) and (3), it is acceptable

that H is not more than root face A + 1 mm (0.04

in.).

Page 8: PALA HITACHI

6

INSPECTION PROCEDURE

1. Inspect with a probe.

2. Detect flaw on the CRT using echo.

3. Touch the max. value point of echo wave on the

CRT with a touch pen to input echo data.

4. Print out the input echo data.

5. Affix the echo data printout on the inspection

Sheet. (Refer to next page.)

6. Judgement

How to fill out the Judgement Sheets

• Wire Acceptable when it is judged that there is no flaw.

• Write Not Acceptable when there is flaw, and add one of

I to IV according to flaw levels listed in the right table.

Rating Flaw Size

Not

Acc

epta

ble

I Flaw height is 5% or less of plate thickness.

II Flaw height is 5% to 10% of plate thickness.

III Flaw height is 10% to 30% of plate thickness.

IV Flaw height is 30% or more of plate thickness.

Positions for the inspection with a probe are two points on both sides and one point on the center of the welding structure.

Flaw wave

Page 9: PALA HITACHI

7

Use of distance correction method and tip echo method for angle beam ultrasonic testing (How to affix echo data slips to the Inspection Sheet)

1) Check whether any defect (crack) is present or

not at the weld by the distance correction

method. At this time, flow echo in excess of

0% in the CRT graticule, when scanned with

the specified working sensitivity (STB-A3 ø4 x

4 - IS 50%) shall be evaluated. Also, record

the flaw lengths at the same time.

2) For flaw defection portion where the flaw is

detected by the distance correction method,

determine and record the flaw height (H) by

crack tip echo method. If no flaws are

detected by the distance correction method,

then crack tip echo method need not be used.

h: Echo height w (X): Beam distance y (PFD): Probe flaw

distance de: Flaw depth H: Flaw height I: Flaw length

Probe

Page 10: PALA HITACHI

8

EVALUATION OF DEFECT HEIGHT (H) BY DISTANCE CORRECTION TECHNIQUE AT INTERNAL BULKHEAD

Pattern No.

Anticipated crack patter and testing direction Testing procedure and crack evaluation

1 (1) It is acceptable that no flaw echo appears when scanning is made from sides A, B, C and D, using angle probe (2.25Z10 x 18A70).

(2) If flaw echo appears, determine defect height (H) by tip echo technique.

2 (3) Internal defect and open surface crack:

Pattern 1: Sides A & B — Internal 1 defect Sides C & D — Open surface crack When root face is 5 mm or less, All of A, B, C and D show internal defects.

Pattern 2: Sides A & B — Open surface crack Sides C & D — Internal defect

Pattern 3: Sides A & C — Internal defect Sides B & D — Open surface crack When root face is 5 mm or less, All of A, B, C and D are internal defects.

Pattern 4: Sides A & C — Internal defect Sides B & D — Open surface crack

NOTE: If the position of the defect is not clear or when judgement is impossible, defects are judgement to be internal ones.

3

4

Sheet 01

Crack

Root face

Crack

Crack

Crack

Root face

Root face

Page 11: PALA HITACHI

ULTRA-SONIC EXAMINATION REPORT FOR THE STRUCTURE

EX5600-6

Inspection by :

Specifications

Front att. Front att.

S/N Capacity Hour meter

Date of Inspection

Date of Delivery

Backhoe front

Boom m

Hour

D M Y

, ,

D M Y

, , Arm m

Bucket m3

(Hitachi use)

↑ (Hitachi use)

Type of work Mining ( Coal Coal Overburden Gold Other )

Stone Crushing Quarry

Civic Engineering Work Road Building Land Development

Pipelaying Other

Dredging

Other

INDEX

Track Frame ··············································································································· Sheet 2 - 5

Backhoe Boom ··········································································································· Sheet 6 - 23

Backhoe Arm ············································································································ Sheet 24 - 32

COMMENT (IF NECESSARY)

Sheet 01 Dealer: Original HITACHI (L/O, Representative): 1 Copy Hitachi: 1 Copy

Page 12: PALA HITACHI

Track Frame 1/4

Method

Inspection Reflection Type of Probe

Distance correction method Single transverse techniqueAngle probe 2.25Z10 x 18A70

* When a crack is detected by using the Distance Correction method, use the evaluation of flaw height (H) together with the Tip Echo method for judgement

* Tip echo method Ditto Angle probe 5C10 x 10A45

Detailed Inspection Position

Serial No. 101 -

(8 positions)

Track Frame

Front side

Left Right

Rear side

Upper side

Lower side

Inspection area

Sh

eet 02

Page 13: PALA HITACHI

Track Frame 1/4

Point Flaw position Detail

Mark the location where defect found

Echo data Fill out the following column if

recording paper is not available

Inspection Results (UT2000 Recording Paper)

Judgement

Mark position of the crack (A - C) in the detail column.

Fill in the defect position as the position on a circle.

Upper side View

Flaw position =

h = ............................

w (X) = .....................

y (PFD) = .................

de = ..........................

H = ...........................

I = .............................

h = ............................

w (X) = .....................

y (PFD) = .................

de = ..........................

H = ...........................

I = .............................

Sh

eet 02 D

ealer: Original H

ITAC

HI (L/O

, Representative): 1 C

opy Hitachi: 1 C

opy

h: Echo height w (X): Beam

distance y (PFD): Probe flaw

distance de: Flaw depth H: Flaw height I: Flaw length

Page 14: PALA HITACHI

Track Frame 2/4

Method

Inspection Reflection Type of Probe

Distance correction method Single transverse techniqueAngle probe 2.25Z10 x 18A70 * When a crack is detected by

using the Distance Correction method, use the evaluation of flaw height (H) together with the Tip Echo method for judgement

* Tip echo method Ditto Angle probe 5C10 x 10A60 or 5C10 x 10A45

Detailed Inspection Position

Serial No. 101 -

(4 positions)

Track Frame

Front side

Left Right

Rear side

Upper side

Lower sideInspection area

Sh

eet 03

Perform facing welding or finish-grind within the range of *35 so that no indentation is formed between beads.

Inspection area

Page 15: PALA HITACHI

Track Frame 2/4

Point Flaw position Detail

Mark the location where defect found

Echo data Fill out the following column if

recording paper is not available

Inspection Results (UT2000 Recording Paper)

Judgement

Mark position of the crack (A - C) in the detail column.

Fill in the defect position as the distance (mm) from the top plate or the distance (mm) from the bottom plate.

Flaw position =

h = ............................

w (X) = .....................

y (PFD) = .................

de = ..........................

H = ...........................

I = .............................

Fill in the defect position as the distance (mm) from the top plate or the distance (mm) from the bottom plate.

Flaw position =

h = ............................

w (X) = .....................

y (PFD) = .................

de = ..........................

H = ...........................

I = .............................

Sh

eet 03 D

ealer: Original H

ITAC

HI (L/O

, Representative): 1 C

opy Hitachi: 1 C

opy

h: Echo height w (X): Beam

distance y (PFD): Probe flaw

distance de: Flaw depth H: Flaw height I: Flaw length

Page 16: PALA HITACHI

Track Frame 3/4

Method

Inspection Reflection Type of Probe

Distance correction method Single transverse techniqueAngle probe 2.25Z10 x 18A70

* When a crack is detected by using the Distance Correction method, use the evaluation of flaw height (H) together with the Tip Echo method for judgement

* Tip echo method Ditto Angle probe 5C10 x 10A60

Detailed Inspection Position

Serial No. 101 -

(4 positions)

Track Frame

Front side

Left Right

Rear side

Upper side

Lower side

Inspection area

Sh

eet 04

Inspection area

Area 120 mm only

Page 17: PALA HITACHI

Track Frame 3/4

Point Flaw position Detail

Mark the location where defect found

Echo data Fill out the following column if

recording paper is not available

Inspection Results (UT2000 Recording Paper)

Judgement

Mark position of the crack (A - C) in the detail column.

FRONT

Fill in the defect position as the distance (mm) from left or right side.

Flaw position =

h = ............................

w (X) = .....................

y (PFD) = .................

de = ..........................

H = ...........................

I = .............................

REAR

Fill in the defect position as the distance (mm) from left or right side.

Flaw position =

h = ............................

w (X) = .....................

y (PFD) = .................

de = ..........................

H = ...........................

I = .............................

Sh

eet 04 D

ealer: Original H

ITAC

HI (L/O

, Representative): 1 C

opy Hitachi: 1 C

opy

h: Echo height w (X): Beam

distance y (PFD): Probe flaw

distance de: Flaw depth H: Flaw height I: Flaw length

Page 18: PALA HITACHI

Track Frame 4/4

Method

Inspection Reflection Type of Probe

Distance correction method Single transverse techniqueAngle probe 2.25Z10 x 18A70

* When a crack is detected by using the Distance Correction method, use the evaluation of flaw height (H) together with the Tip Echo method for judgement

* Tip echo method Ditto Angle probe 5C10 x 10A45

Detailed Inspection Position

Serial No. 101 -

(4 positions)

Track Frame

Front side

Left Right

Rear side

Upper side

Lower sideInspection area

Sh

eet 05

Area 120 mm only

Inspection area

Page 19: PALA HITACHI

Track Frame 4/4

Point Flaw position Detail

Mark the location where defect found

Echo data Fill out the following column if

recording paper is not available

Inspection Results (UT2000 Recording Paper)

Judgement

Mark position of the crack (A - C) in the detail column.

FRONT

Fill in the defect position as the distance (mm) from left or right side.

Flaw position =

h = ............................

w (X) = .....................

y (PFD) = .................

de = ..........................

H = ...........................

I = .............................

REAR

Fill in the defect position as the distance (mm) from left or right side.

Flaw position =

h = ............................

w (X) = .....................

y (PFD) = .................

de = ..........................

H = ...........................

I = .............................

Sh

eet 05 D

ealer: Original H

ITAC

HI (L/O

, Representative): 1 C

opy Hitachi: 1 C

opy

h: Echo height w (X): Beam

distance y (PFD): Probe flaw

distance de: Flaw depth H: Flaw height I: Flaw length

Page 20: PALA HITACHI

(100

0)*300

*300

Inspection area

Inspection areaLeftRight

LeftRight

Rear side Front side

RightLeft

A

Backhoe Boom 1/18

Method

Inspection Reflection Type of Probe

Distance correction method Single transverse technique Angle probe 2.25Z10 x 18A70 * When a crack is detected by

using the Distance Correction method, use the evaluation of flaw height (H) together with the Tip Echo method for judgement

* Tip echo method Ditto Angle probe 5Z10 x 10A45 and 2C10 x 10A45

Detailed Inspection Position

Front No. 001 -

(3 positions)

Detailed Inspection Position

Front No. 001 -

(2 positions)

Backhoe Boom

Sh

eet 06

Within the range of *300

Page 21: PALA HITACHI

Backhoe Boom 1/18

Point Flaw position Detail Mark the location where defect found

Echo data Fill out the following column if

recording paper is not available

Inspection Results (UT2000 Recording Paper) Judgement

Mark position of the crack (A - C) in the detail column.

Fill in the defect position as the distance (mm) from left or right side.

Upper side view

Flaw position =

h = ............................ w (X) = ..................... y (PFD) = ................. de = .......................... H = ........................... I = .............................

h = ............................ w (X) = ..................... y (PFD) = ................. de = .......................... H = ........................... I = .............................

Sh

eet 06 D

ealer: Original H

ITACH

I (L/O, R

epresentative): 1 Copy H

itachi: 1 Copy

h: Echo height w (X): Beam

distance y (PFD): Probe flaw

distance de: Flaw depth H: Flaw height I: Flaw length

Front side

Page 22: PALA HITACHI

Backhoe Boom 2/18

Method

Inspection Reflection Type of Probe

Distance correction method Single transverse technique Angle probe 2.25Z10 x 18A70 * When a crack is detected by

using the Distance Correction method, use the evaluation of flaw height (H) together with the Tip Echo method for judgement

* Tip echo method Ditto Angle probe 5Z10 x 10A45 and 2C10 x 10A45

Detailed Inspection Position

Front No. 001 -

(2 positions)

Detailed Inspection Position

Front No. 001 -

(1 position)

Backhoe Boom

Sh

eet 07

Within the range of *400

Rear side

*400

Inspection area

LeftRight

LeftRight

Front side

RightLeft

B

Page 23: PALA HITACHI

Backhoe Boom 2/18

Point Flaw position Detail Mark the location where defect found

Echo data Fill out the following column if

recording paper is not available

Inspection Results (UT2000 Recording Paper) Judgement

Mark position of the crack (A - C) in the detail column.

Fill in the defect position as the distance (mm) from left or right side.

Upper side view

Flaw position =

h = ............................ w (X) = ..................... y (PFD) = ................. de = .......................... H = ........................... I = .............................

h = ............................ w (X) = ..................... y (PFD) = ................. de = .......................... H = ........................... I = .............................

Sh

eet 07 D

ealer: Original H

ITACH

I (L/O, R

epresentative): 1 Copy H

itachi: 1 Copy

h: Echo height w (X): Beam

distance y (PFD): Probe flaw

distance de: Flaw depth H: Flaw height I: Flaw length

Front side

Page 24: PALA HITACHI

Backhoe Boom 3/18

Method

Inspection Reflection Type of Probe

Distance correction method Single transverse technique Angle probe 2.25Z10 x 18A70 * When a crack is detected by

using the Distance Correction method, use the evaluation of flaw height (H) together with the Tip Echo method for judgement

* Tip echo method Ditto Angle probe 5Z10 x 10A45 and 2C10 x 10A45

Detailed Inspection Position

Front No. 001 -

(2 positions)

Backhoe Boom

Sh

eet 08

Rear side

Inspection area

Inspection area

LeftRight

LeftRight

Front side

RightLeft

C

Page 25: PALA HITACHI

Backhoe Boom 3/18

Point Flaw position Detail Mark the location where defect found

Echo data Fill out the following column if

recording paper is not available

Inspection Results (UT2000 Recording Paper) Judgement

Mark position of the crack (A - C) in the detail column.

Fill in the defect position as the distance (mm) from left or right side.

Upper side view

Flaw position =

h = ............................ w (X) = ..................... y (PFD) = ................. de = .......................... H = ........................... I = .............................

h = ............................ w (X) = ..................... y (PFD) = ................. de = .......................... H = ........................... I = .............................

Sh

eet 08 D

ealer: Original H

ITACH

I (L/O, R

epresentative): 1 Copy H

itachi: 1 Copy

h: Echo height w (X): Beam

distance y (PFD): Probe flaw

distance de: Flaw depth H: Flaw height I: Flaw length

Front side

Page 26: PALA HITACHI

Backhoe Boom 4/18

Method

Inspection Reflection Type of Probe

Distance correction method Single transverse technique Angle probe 2.25Z10 x 18A70 * When a crack is detected by

using the Distance Correction method, use the evaluation of flaw height (H) together with the Tip Echo method for judgement

* Tip echo method Ditto Angle probe 5Z10 x 10A45 and 2C10 x 10A45

Detailed Inspection Position

Front No. 001 -

(2 positions)

Backhoe Boom

Sh

eet 09

Finish the range of *400 with a grinder.

Rear side

*400

500

LeftRight

LeftRight

Front side

RightLeft

Inspection area

D

Page 27: PALA HITACHI

Backhoe Boom 4/18

Point Flaw position Detail Mark the location where defect found

Echo data Fill out the following column if

recording paper is not available

Inspection Results (UT2000 Recording Paper) Judgement

Mark position of the crack (A - C) in the detail column.

R I G H T

Fill in the defect position as the distance (mm) from the top plate or the distance (mm) from the bottom plate.

Flaw position =

h = ............................ w (X) = ..................... y (PFD) = ................. de = .......................... H = ........................... I = .............................

L E F T

Fill in the defect position as the distance (mm) from the top plate or the distance (mm) from the bottom plate.

Flaw position =

h = ............................ w (X) = ..................... y (PFD) = ................. de = .......................... H = ........................... I = .............................

Sh

eet 09 D

ealer: Original H

ITACH

I (L/O, R

epresentative): 1 Copy H

itachi: 1 Copy

h: Echo height w (X): Beam

distance y (PFD): Probe flaw

distance de: Flaw depth H: Flaw height I: Flaw length

Front side

Front side

Page 28: PALA HITACHI

Backhoe Boom 5/18

Method

Inspection Reflection Type of Probe

Distance correction method Single transverse technique Angle probe 2.25Z10 x 18A70 * When a crack is detected by

using the Distance Correction method, use the evaluation of flaw height (H) together with the Tip Echo method for judgement

* Tip echo method Ditto Angle probe 5C10 x 10A60 or 5Z10 x 10A45

Detailed Inspection Position

Front No. 001 -

(2 positions)

Backhoe Boom

Sh

eet 10

After welding the inside, gouge the surface from the outside.

Rear side

LeftRight

LeftRight

Front side

RightLeft

Inspection area

E

Page 29: PALA HITACHI

Backhoe Boom 5/18

Point Flaw position Detail Mark the location where defect found

Echo data Fill out the following column if

recording paper is not available

Inspection Results (UT2000 Recording Paper) Judgement

Mark position of the crack (A - C) in the detail column.

R I G H T

Fill in the defect position as the distance (mm) from the top plate or the distance (mm) from the bottom plate.

Flaw position =

h = ............................ w (X) = ..................... y (PFD) = ................. de = .......................... H = ........................... I = .............................

L E F T

Fill in the defect position as the distance (mm) from the top plate or the distance (mm) from the bottom plate.

Flaw position =

h = ............................ w (X) = ..................... y (PFD) = ................. de = .......................... H = ........................... I = .............................

Sh

eet 10 D

ealer: Original H

ITACH

I (L/O, R

epresentative): 1 Copy H

itachi: 1 Copy

h: Echo height w (X): Beam

distance y (PFD): Probe flaw

distance de: Flaw depth H: Flaw height I: Flaw length

Front side

Front side

Page 30: PALA HITACHI

Backhoe Boom 6/18

Method

Inspection Reflection Type of Probe

Distance correction method Single transverse technique Angle probe 2.25Z10 x 18A70 * When a crack is detected by

using the Distance Correction method, use the evaluation of flaw height (H) together with the Tip Echo method for judgement

* Tip echo method Ditto Angle probe 5C10 x 10A60 or 5Z10 x 10A45

Detailed Inspection Position

Front No. 001 -

(2 positions)

Backhoe Boom

Sh

eet 11

After welding the inside, gouge the surface from the outside.

Rear side

LeftRight

LeftRight

Front side

RightLeft

Inspection area

Inside View F

F

Page 31: PALA HITACHI

Backhoe Boom 6/18

Point Flaw position Detail Mark the location where defect found

Echo data Fill out the following column if

recording paper is not available

Inspection Results (UT2000 Recording Paper) Judgement

Mark position of the crack (A - C) in the detail column.

R I G H T

Fill in the defect position as the distance (mm) from the top plate or the distance (mm) from the bottom plate.

Flaw position =

h = ............................ w (X) = ..................... y (PFD) = ................. de = .......................... H = ........................... I = .............................

L E F T

Fill in the defect position as the distance (mm) from the top plate or the distance (mm) from the bottom plate.

Flaw position =

h = ............................ w (X) = ..................... y (PFD) = ................. de = .......................... H = ........................... I = .............................

Sh

eet 11 D

ealer: Original H

ITACH

I (L/O, R

epresentative): 1 Copy H

itachi: 1 Copy

h: Echo height w (X): Beam

distance y (PFD): Probe flaw

distance de: Flaw depth H: Flaw height I: Flaw length

Front side

Front side

Page 32: PALA HITACHI

Backhoe Boom 7/18

Method

Inspection Reflection Type of Probe

Distance correction method Single transverse technique Angle probe 2.25Z10 x 18A70 * When a crack is detected by

using the Distance Correction method, use the evaluation of flaw height (H) together with the Tip Echo method for judgement

* Tip echo method Ditto Angle probe 5Z10 x 10A45 and 2C10 x 10A45

Detailed Inspection Position

Front No. 001 -

(1 position)

Backhoe Boom

Sh

eet 12

Within the range of *300

Rear side

LeftRight

LeftRight

Front side

RightLeft

Inspection area

*300

*300

(100

0)

C

Page 33: PALA HITACHI

Backhoe Boom 7/18

Point Flaw position Detail Mark the location where defect found

Echo data Fill out the following column if

recording paper is not available

Inspection Results (UT2000 Recording Paper) Judgement

Mark position of the crack (A - C) in the detail column.

Fill in the defect position as the distance (mm) from left or right side.

Under side view

Flaw position =

h = ............................ w (X) = ..................... y (PFD) = ................. de = .......................... H = ........................... I = .............................

h = ............................ w (X) = ..................... y (PFD) = ................. de = .......................... H = ........................... I = .............................

Sh

eet 12 D

ealer: Original H

ITACH

I (L/O, R

epresentative): 1 Copy H

itachi: 1 Copy

h: Echo height w (X): Beam

distance y (PFD): Probe flaw

distance de: Flaw depth H: Flaw height I: Flaw length

Front side

Page 34: PALA HITACHI

Backhoe Boom 8/18

Method

Inspection Reflection Type of Probe

Distance correction method Single transverse technique Angle probe 2.25Z10 x 18A70 * When a crack is detected by

using the Distance Correction method, use the evaluation of flaw height (H) together with the Tip Echo method for judgement

* Tip echo method Ditto Angle probe 5Z10 x 10A45 and 2C10 x 10A45

Detailed Inspection Position

Front No. 001 -

(2 positions)

Backhoe Boom

Sh

eet 13

Rear side

LeftRight

LeftRight

Front side

RightLeft

Inspection area

H

Page 35: PALA HITACHI

Backhoe Boom 8/18

Point Flaw position Detail Mark the location where defect found

Echo data Fill out the following column if

recording paper is not available

Inspection Results (UT2000 Recording Paper) Judgement

Mark position of the crack (A - D) in the detail column.

R I G H T

Fill in the defect position as the distance (mm) from the top plate or the distance (mm) from the bottom plate.

Flaw position =

h = ............................ w (X) = ..................... y (PFD) = ................. de = .......................... H = ........................... I = .............................

L E F T

Fill in the defect position as the distance (mm) from the top plate or the distance (mm) from the bottom plate.

Flaw position =

h = ............................ w (X) = ..................... y (PFD) = ................. de = .......................... H = ........................... I = .............................

Sh

eet 13 D

ealer: Original H

ITACH

I (L/O, R

epresentative): 1 Copy H

itachi: 1 Copy

h: Echo height w (X): Beam

distance y (PFD): Probe flaw

distance de: Flaw depth H: Flaw height I: Flaw length

Front side

Front side

Page 36: PALA HITACHI

Backhoe Boom 9/18

Method

Inspection Reflection Type of Probe

Distance correction method Single transverse technique Angle probe 2.25Z10 x 18A70 * When a crack is detected by

using the Distance Correction method, use the evaluation of flaw height (H) together with the Tip Echo method for judgement

* Tip echo method Ditto Angle probe 5Z10 x 10A45 and 2C10 x 10A45

Detailed Inspection Position

Front No. 001 -

2.5

15

(1 position)

Backhoe Boom

Sh

eet 14

Within the range of *400

Rear side

LeftRight

LeftRight

Front side

RightLeft

Inspection area

C*400

Page 37: PALA HITACHI

Backhoe Boom 9/18

Point Flaw position Detail Mark the location where defect found

Echo data Fill out the following column if

recording paper is not available

Inspection Results (UT2000 Recording Paper) Judgement

Mark position of the crack (A - C) in the detail column.

Fill in the defect position as the distance (mm) from left or right side.

Under side view

Flaw position =

h = ............................ w (X) = ..................... y (PFD) = ................. de = .......................... H = ........................... I = .............................

h = ............................ w (X) = ..................... y (PFD) = ................. de = .......................... H = ........................... I = .............................

Sh

eet 14 D

ealer: Original H

ITACH

I (L/O, R

epresentative): 1 Copy H

itachi: 1 Copy

h: Echo height w (X): Beam

distance y (PFD): Probe flaw

distance de: Flaw depth H: Flaw height I: Flaw length

Front side

Page 38: PALA HITACHI

Backhoe Boom 10/18

Method

Inspection Reflection Type of Probe

Distance correction method Single transverse technique Angle probe 2.25Z10 x 18A70 * When a crack is detected by

using the Distance Correction method, use the evaluation of flaw height (H) together with the Tip Echo method for judgement

* Tip echo method Ditto Angle probe 5Z10 x 10A45 and 2C10 x 10A45

Detailed Inspection Position

Front No. 001 -

(1 position)

Backhoe Boom

Sh

eet 15

Finish the entire length with a grinder.

Rear side

LeftRight

LeftRight

Front side

RightLeft

Inspection area

J

Page 39: PALA HITACHI

Backhoe Boom 10/18

Point Flaw position Detail Mark the location where defect found

Echo data Fill out the following column if

recording paper is not available

Inspection Results (UT2000 Recording Paper) Judgement

Mark position of the crack (A - C) in the detail column.

Fill in the defect position as the distance (mm) from left or right side.

Under side view

Flaw position =

h = ............................ w (X) = ..................... y (PFD) = ................. de = .......................... H = ........................... I = .............................

h = ............................ w (X) = ..................... y (PFD) = ................. de = .......................... H = ........................... I = .............................

Sh

eet 15 D

ealer: Original H

ITACH

I (L/O, R

epresentative): 1 Copy H

itachi: 1 Copy

h: Echo height w (X): Beam

distance y (PFD): Probe flaw

distance de: Flaw depth H: Flaw height I: Flaw length

Front side

Page 40: PALA HITACHI

Backhoe Boom 11/18

Method

Inspection Reflection Type of Probe

Distance correction method Single transverse technique Angle probe 2.25Z10 x 18A70 * When a crack is detected by

using the Distance Correction method, use the evaluation of flaw height (H) together with the Tip Echo method for judgement

* Tip echo method Ditto Angle probe 5Z10 x 10A45 and 2C10 x 10A45

Detail f

Detailed Inspection Position Front No. 001 -

K

35

2520

25 15

25

7

40º

G

(2 positions)

Backhoe Boom

Sh

eet 16

Finish the entire length by grinding.

Rear side

LeftRight

LeftRight

Front side

RightLeft

Inspection area

Inspection area

K

Page 41: PALA HITACHI

Backhoe Boom 11/18

Point Flaw position Detail Mark the location where defect found

Echo data Fill out the following column if

recording paper is not available

Inspection Results (UT2000 Recording Paper) Judgement

Mark position of the crack (A - C) in the detail column.

Fill in the defect position as the distance (mm) from left or right side.

Upper side view

Flaw position =

h = ............................ w (X) = ..................... y (PFD) = ................. de = .......................... H = ........................... I = .............................

h = ............................ w (X) = ..................... y (PFD) = ................. de = .......................... H = ........................... I = .............................

Sh

eet 16 D

ealer: Original H

ITACH

I (L/O, R

epresentative): 1 Copy H

itachi: 1 Copy

h: Echo height w (X): Beam

distance y (PFD): Probe flaw

distance de: Flaw depth H: Flaw height I: Flaw length

Front side

Page 42: PALA HITACHI

Rear side

LeftRight

LeftRight

Front side

RightLeft

Inspection area

Inspection area

*40

0

*22

0

*22

0

*40

010

0

100

L

Backhoe Boom 12/18

Method

Inspection Reflection Type of Probe

Distance correction method Single transverse technique Angle probe 2.25Z10 x 18A70 * When a crack is detected by

using the Distance Correction method, use the evaluation of flaw height (H) together with the Tip Echo method for judgement

* Tip echo method Ditto Angle probe 5Z10 x 10A45 and 2C10 x 10A45

Detailed Inspection Position Front No. 001 -

L

7

G

2015

22

35 7

4

65

12

2525º(37º

)

(2 positions)

Backhoe Boom

Sh

eet 17

Within the range of *300

Page 43: PALA HITACHI

Backhoe Boom 12/18

Point Flaw position Detail Mark the location where defect found

Echo data Fill out the following column if

recording paper is not available

Inspection Results (UT2000 Recording Paper) Judgement

Mark position of the crack (A - C) in the detail column.

Fill in the defect position as the distance (mm) from left or right side.

Upper side view

Flaw position =

h = ............................ w (X) = ..................... y (PFD) = ................. de = .......................... H = ........................... I = .............................

h = ............................ w (X) = ..................... y (PFD) = ................. de = .......................... H = ........................... I = .............................

Sh

eet 17 D

ealer: Original H

ITACH

I (L/O, R

epresentative): 1 Copy H

itachi: 1 Copy

h: Echo height w (X): Beam

distance y (PFD): Probe flaw

distance de: Flaw depth H: Flaw height I: Flaw length

Front side

Page 44: PALA HITACHI

Backhoe Boom 13/18

Method

Inspection Reflection Type of Probe

Distance correction method Single transverse technique Angle probe 2.25Z10 x 18A70 * When a crack is detected by

using the Distance Correction method, use the evaluation of flaw height (H) together with the Tip Echo method for judgement

* Tip echo method Ditto Angle probe 5Z10 x 10A45 and 2C10 x 10A45

Detailed Inspection Position

Front No. 001 -

(2 positions)

Backhoe Boom

Sh

eet 18

Within the range of *300

Rear side

LeftRight

LeftRight

Front side

RightLeft

Inspection area

Inspection area

M

* 300

* 300

200

200

Page 45: PALA HITACHI

Backhoe Boom 13/18

Point Flaw position Detail Mark the location where defect found

Echo data Fill out the following column if

recording paper is not available

Inspection Results (UT2000 Recording Paper) Judgement

Mark position of the crack (A - C) in the detail column.

Fill in the defect position as the distance (mm) from left or right side.

Under side view

Flaw position =

h = ............................ w (X) = ..................... y (PFD) = ................. de = .......................... H = ........................... I = .............................

h = ............................ w (X) = ..................... y (PFD) = ................. de = .......................... H = ........................... I = .............................

Sh

eet 18 D

ealer: Original H

ITACH

I (L/O, R

epresentative): 1 Copy H

itachi: 1 Copy

h: Echo height w (X): Beam

distance y (PFD): Probe flaw

distance de: Flaw depth H: Flaw height I: Flaw length

Front side

Page 46: PALA HITACHI

Backhoe Boom 14/18

Method

Inspection Reflection Type of Probe

Distance correction method Single transverse technique Angle probe 2.25Z10 x 18A70 * When a crack is detected by

using the Distance Correction method, use the evaluation of flaw height (H) together with the Tip Echo method for judgement

* Tip echo method Ditto Angle probe 5C10 x 10A60 or 5Z10 x 10A45

Detailed Inspection Position

Front No. 001 -

(2 positions)

Backhoe Boom

Sh

eet 19

After welding the inside gouge the surface from the outside.

Rear side

LeftRight

LeftRight

Front side

RightLeft

Inspection area

N

Page 47: PALA HITACHI

Backhoe Boom 14/18

Point Flaw position Detail Mark the location where defect found

Echo data Fill out the following column if

recording paper is not available

Inspection Results (UT2000 Recording Paper) Judgement

Mark position of the crack (A - C) in the detail column.

R I G H T

Fill in the defect position as the distance (mm) from the top plate or the distance (mm) from the bottom plate.

Flaw position =

h = ............................ w (X) = ..................... y (PFD) = ................. de = .......................... H = ........................... I = .............................

L E F T

Fill in the defect position as the distance (mm) from the top plate or the distance (mm) from the bottom plate.

Flaw position =

h = ............................ w (X) = ..................... y (PFD) = ................. de = .......................... H = ........................... I = .............................

Sh

eet 19 D

ealer: Original H

ITACH

I (L/O, R

epresentative): 1 Copy H

itachi: 1 Copy

h: Echo height w (X): Beam

distance y (PFD): Probe flaw

distance de: Flaw depth H: Flaw height I: Flaw length

Front side

Front side

Page 48: PALA HITACHI

Backhoe Boom 15/18

Method

Inspection Reflection Type of Probe

Distance correction method Single transverse technique Angle probe 2.25Z10 x 18A70 * When a crack is detected by

using the Distance Correction method, use the evaluation of flaw height (H) together with the Tip Echo method for judgement

* Tip echo method Ditto Angle probe 5C10 x 10A60 or 5Z10 x 10A45

Detailed Inspection Position

Front No. 001 -

(2 positions)

Backhoe Boom

Sh

eet 20

After welding the inside gouge the surface from the outside.

Rear side

LeftRight

LeftRight

Front side

RightLeft

Inspection area

O

Inside View o

Page 49: PALA HITACHI

Backhoe Boom 15/18

Point Flaw position Detail Mark the location where defect found

Echo data Fill out the following column if

recording paper is not available

Inspection Results (UT2000 Recording Paper) Judgement

Mark position of the crack (A - C) in the detail column.

R I G H T

Fill in the defect position as the distance (mm) from the top plate or the distance (mm) from the bottom plate.

Flaw position =

h = ............................ w (X) = ..................... y (PFD) = ................. de = .......................... H = ........................... I = .............................

L E F T

Fill in the defect position as the distance (mm) from the top plate or the distance (mm) from the bottom plate.

Flaw position =

h = ............................ w (X) = ..................... y (PFD) = ................. de = .......................... H = ........................... I = .............................

Sh

eet 20 D

ealer: Original H

ITACH

I (L/O, R

epresentative): 1 Copy H

itachi: 1 Copy

h: Echo height w (X): Beam

distance y (PFD): Probe flaw

distance de: Flaw depth H: Flaw height I: Flaw length

Front side

Front side

Page 50: PALA HITACHI

Backhoe Boom 16/18

Method

Inspection Reflection Type of Probe

Distance correction method Single transverse technique Angle probe 2.25Z10 x 18A70 * When a crack is detected by

using the Distance Correction method, use the evaluation of flaw height (H) together with the Tip Echo method for judgement

* Tip echo method Ditto Angle probe 5Z10 x 10A45 and 2C10 x 10A45

Detail h’ Detail h

Detailed Inspection Position Front No. 001 -

(2 positions)

Backhoe Boom

Sh

eet 21

Within the range of *200 from the both ends.

Rear side

LeftRight

LeftRight

Front side

RightLeft

Inspection area

Inspection area

200

200

p

P

Section p

Page 51: PALA HITACHI

Backhoe Boom 16/18

Point Flaw position Detail Mark the location where defect found

Echo data Fill out the following column if

recording paper is not available

Inspection Results (UT2000 Recording Paper) Judgement

Mark position of the crack (A - C) in the detail column.

Fill in the defect position as the distance (mm) from left or right side.

Upper side view

Flaw position =

h = ............................ w (X) = ..................... y (PFD) = ................. de = .......................... H = ........................... I = .............................

h = ............................ w (X) = ..................... y (PFD) = ................. de = .......................... H = ........................... I = .............................

Sh

eet 21 D

ealer: Original H

ITACH

I (L/O, R

epresentative): 1 Copy H

itachi: 1 Copy

h: Echo height w (X): Beam

distance y (PFD): Probe flaw

distance de: Flaw depth H: Flaw height I: Flaw length

Front side

Page 52: PALA HITACHI

Backhoe Boom 17/18

Method

Inspection Reflection Type of Probe

Distance correction method Single transverse technique Angle probe 2.25Z10 x 18A70 * When a crack is detected by

using the Distance Correction method, use the evaluation of flaw height (H) together with the Tip Echo method for judgement

* Tip echo method Ditto Angle probe 5Z10 x 10A45 and 2C10 x 10A45

Detailed Inspection Position

Front No. 001 -

(2 positions)

Backhoe Boom

Sh

eet 22

Within the range of *500 from the both ends. Finish the bead toe 20 mm with a grinder.

Rear side

LeftRight

LeftRight

Front side

RightLeft

Inspection area

Inspection area

*500

*500

q

Q

Section q

Page 53: PALA HITACHI

Backhoe Boom 17/18

Point Flaw position Detail Mark the location where defect found

Echo data Fill out the following column if

recording paper is not available

Inspection Results (UT2000 Recording Paper) Judgement

Mark position of the crack (A - B) in the detail column.

Fill in the defect position as the distance (mm) from left or right side.

Upper side view

Flaw position =

h = ............................ w (X) = ..................... y (PFD) = ................. de = .......................... H = ........................... I = .............................

h = ............................ w (X) = ..................... y (PFD) = ................. de = .......................... H = ........................... I = .............................

Sh

eet 22 D

ealer: Original H

ITACH

I (L/O, R

epresentative): 1 Copy H

itachi: 1 Copy

h: Echo height w (X): Beam

distance y (PFD): Probe flaw

distance de: Flaw depth H: Flaw height I: Flaw length

Front side

Page 54: PALA HITACHI

Backhoe Boom 18/18

Method

Inspection Reflection Type of Probe

Distance correction method Single transverse technique Angle probe 2.25Z10 x 18A70 * When a crack is detected by

using the Distance Correction method, use the evaluation of flaw height (H) together with the Tip Echo method for judgement

* Tip echo method Ditto Angle probe 5Z10 x 10A45 and 2C10 x 10A45

Detailed Inspection Position

Front No. 001 -

(1 position)

Backhoe Boom

Sh

eet 23

Finish the entire length with a grinder.

Rear side

LeftRight

LeftRight

Front side

RightLeft

Inspection area

R

Page 55: PALA HITACHI

Backhoe Boom 18/18

Point Flaw position Detail Mark the location where defect found

Echo data Fill out the following column if

recording paper is not available

Inspection Results (UT2000 Recording Paper) Judgement

Mark position of the crack (A - C) in the detail column.

Fill in the defect position as the distance (mm) from left or right side.

Under side view

Flaw position =

h = ............................ w (X) = ..................... y (PFD) = ................. de = .......................... H = ........................... I = .............................

h = ............................ w (X) = ..................... y (PFD) = ................. de = .......................... H = ........................... I = .............................

Sh

eet 23 D

ealer: Original H

ITACH

I (L/O, R

epresentative): 1 Copy H

itachi: 1 Copy

h: Echo height w (X): Beam

distance y (PFD): Probe flaw

distance de: Flaw depth H: Flaw height I: Flaw length

Front side

Page 56: PALA HITACHI

Backhoe Arm 1/9

Method

Inspection Reflection Type of Probe

Distance correction method Single transverse technique Angle probe 2.25Z10 x 18A70 * When a crack is detected by

using the Distance Correction method, use the evaluation of flaw height (H) together with the Tip Echo method for judgement

* Tip echo method Ditto Angle probe 5C10 x 10A45 and 2C10 x 10A45

Detail j

Detailed Inspection Position Front No. 001 -

A A’

G

3522 35

40

22

R35 - R45 40

(2 positions)

Detailed Inspection Position

Front No. 001 -

B

20

45º

30

(40)

G(22)

14

7

(2 positions)

Backhoe arm

Sh

eet 24

Rear side Front side

RightLeft

Inspection area

Inspection area

AA’

B

*25

0*

250

250

250

*520

LeftRight

LeftRight

RightLeft

Page 57: PALA HITACHI

Backhoe Arm 1/9

Point Flaw position Detail Mark the location where defect found

Echo data Fill out the following column if

recording paper is not available

Inspection Results (UT2000 Recording Paper) Judgement

Mark position of the crack (A - C) in the detail column.

Fill in the defect position as the distance (mm) from left or right side.

Upper side view

Flaw position =

h = ............................ w (X) = ..................... y (PFD) = ................. de = .......................... H = ........................... I = .............................

h = ............................ w (X) = ..................... y (PFD) = ................. de = .......................... H = ........................... I = .............................

Sh

eet 24 D

ealer: Original H

ITACH

I (L/O, R

epresentative): 1 Copy H

itachi: 1 Copy

h: Echo height w (X): Beam

distance y (PFD): Probe flaw

distance de: Flaw depth H: Flaw height I: Flaw length

Front side

Page 58: PALA HITACHI

Rear side Front side

RightLeft

Inspection area

B

LeftRight

LeftRight

RightLeft

Backhoe Arm 2/9

Method

Inspection Reflection Type of Probe

Distance correction method Single transverse technique Angle probe 2.25Z10 x 18A70

* When a crack is detected by using the Distance Correction method, use the evaluation of flaw height (H) together with the Tip Echo method for judgement

* Tip echo method Ditto

Angle probe 5C10 x 10A60, 5C10 x 10A45 and 2C10 x 10A45

Detail h

Detailed Inspection Position Front No. 001 -

B

G

G

2022

(22)14

30

8(4

0)

3045º

4

(1 position)

Backhoe arm

Sh

eet 25

Finish all surfaces by grinding.

Page 59: PALA HITACHI

Backhoe Arm 2/9

Point Flaw position Detail Mark the location where defect found

Echo data Fill out the following column if

recording paper is not available

Inspection Results (UT2000 Recording Paper) Judgement

Mark position of the crack (A - C) in the detail column.

Fill in the defect position as the distance (mm) from left or right side.

Upper side view

Flaw position =

h = ............................ w (X) = ..................... y (PFD) = ................. de = .......................... H = ........................... I = .............................

h = ............................ w (X) = ..................... y (PFD) = ................. de = .......................... H = ........................... I = .............................

Sh

eet 25 D

ealer: Original H

ITACH

I (L/O, R

epresentative): 1 Copy H

itachi: 1 Copy

h: Echo height w (X): Beam

distance y (PFD): Probe flaw

distance de: Flaw depth H: Flaw height I: Flaw length

Front side

Page 60: PALA HITACHI

Rear side Front side

RightLeft

Inspection area

C*50

0

LeftRight

LeftRight

RightLeft

Backhoe Arm 3/9

Method

Inspection Reflection Type of Probe

Distance correction method Single transverse technique Angle probe 2.25Z10 x 18A70

* When a crack is detected by using the Distance Correction method, use the evaluation of flaw height (H) together with the Tip Echo method for judgement

* Tip echo method Ditto

Angle probe 5C10 x 10A60, 5C10 x 10A45 and 2C10 x 10A45

Detail g

Detailed Inspection Position Front No. 001 -

C

35ºG

G1515

15 (22)15

10(2

8)

(2 positions)

Backhoe arm

Sh

eet 26

In the range of *500

Page 61: PALA HITACHI

Backhoe Arm 3/9

Point Flaw position Detail Mark the location where defect found

Echo data Fill out the following column if

recording paper is not available

Inspection Results (UT2000 Recording Paper) Judgement

Mark position of the crack (A - D) in the detail column.

R I G H T

Fill in the defect position as the distance (mm) from the top plate or the distance (mm) from the bottom plate.

Flaw position =

h = ............................ w (X) = ..................... y (PFD) = ................. de = .......................... H = ........................... I = .............................

L E F T

Fill in the defect position as the distance (mm) from the top plate or the distance (mm) from the bottom plate.

Flaw position =

h = ............................ w (X) = ..................... y (PFD) = ................. de = .......................... H = ........................... I = .............................

Sh

eet 26 D

ealer: Original H

ITACH

I (L/O, R

epresentative): 1 Copy H

itachi: 1 Copy

h: Echo height w (X): Beam

distance y (PFD): Probe flaw

distance de: Flaw depth H: Flaw height I: Flaw length

Front side

Front side

Page 62: PALA HITACHI

Backhoe Arm 4/9

Method

Inspection Reflection Type of Probe

Distance correction method Single transverse technique Angle probe 2.25Z10 x 18A70

* When a crack is detected by using the Distance Correction method, use the evaluation of flaw height (H) together with the Tip Echo method for judgement

* Tip echo method Ditto

Angle probe 5C10 x 10A60, 5C10 x 10A45 and 2C10 x 10A45

Detail v

Detailed Inspection Position Front No. 001 -

D

G

35º35º20 20 60

15

22

10

(2 positions)

Backhoe arm

Sh

eet 27

Only the *200 range of top view

Rear side Front side

RightLeft

Inspection area

D

*20

024

0

LeftRight

LeftRight

RightLeft

Page 63: PALA HITACHI

Backhoe Arm 4/9

Point Flaw position Detail Mark the location where defect found

Echo data Fill out the following column if

recording paper is not available

Inspection Results (UT2000 Recording Paper) Judgement

Mark position of the crack (A - B) in the detail column.

Fill in the defect position as the distance (mm) from left or right side.

Upper side view

Flaw position =

h = ............................ w (X) = ..................... y (PFD) = ................. de = .......................... H = ........................... I = .............................

h = ............................ w (X) = ..................... y (PFD) = ................. de = .......................... H = ........................... I = .............................

Sh

eet 27 D

ealer: Original H

ITACH

I (L/O, R

epresentative): 1 Copy H

itachi: 1 Copy

h: Echo height w (X): Beam

distance y (PFD): Probe flaw

distance de: Flaw depth H: Flaw height I: Flaw length

Front side

Page 64: PALA HITACHI

Backhoe Arm 5/9

Method

Inspection Reflection Type of Probe

Distance correction method Single transverse technique Angle probe 2.25Z10 x 18A70 * When a crack is detected by

using the Distance Correction method, use the evaluation of flaw height (H) together with the Tip Echo method for judgement

* Tip echo method Ditto Angle probe 5C10 x 10A60

Detail h

Detailed Inspection Position Front No. 001 -

E

(22) 840

R150

20

30º

(1 position)

Backhoe arm

Sh

eet 28

Rear side Front side

RightLeft

Inspection area

E* 520

LeftRight

LeftRight

RightLeft

Page 65: PALA HITACHI

Backhoe Arm 5/9

Point Flaw position Detail Mark the location where defect found

Echo data Fill out the following column if

recording paper is not available

Inspection Results (UT2000 Recording Paper) Judgement

Mark position of the crack (A - B) in the detail column.

Fill in the defect position as the distance (mm) from left or right side.

Under side view

Flaw position =

h = ............................ w (X) = ..................... y (PFD) = ................. de = .......................... H = ........................... I = .............................

h = ............................ w (X) = ..................... y (PFD) = ................. de = .......................... H = ........................... I = .............................

Sh

eet 28 D

ealer: Original H

ITACH

I (L/O, R

epresentative): 1 Copy H

itachi: 1 Copy

h: Echo height w (X): Beam

distance y (PFD): Probe flaw

distance de: Flaw depth H: Flaw height I: Flaw length

Front side

Page 66: PALA HITACHI

Backhoe Arm 6/9

Method

Inspection Reflection Type of Probe

Distance correction method Single transverse technique Angle probe 2.25Z10 x 18A70

* When a crack is detected by using the Distance Correction method, use the evaluation of flaw height (H) together with the Tip Echo method for judgement

* Tip echo method Ditto

Angle probe 5C10 x 10A60, 5C10 x 10A45 and 2C10 x 10A45

Detail p

Detailed Inspection Position Front No. 001 -

F

20

(22)

840

20

7

45º

(1 position)

Detailed Inspection Position

Front No. 001 -

F’

G

20

30

(22)8

840

30

(1 position)

Backhoe arm

Sh

eet 29

Rear side Front side

RightLeft

Inspection area

Inspection area

F

F’

380

100

* 200

* 200

LeftRight

LeftRight

RightLeft

Page 67: PALA HITACHI

Backhoe Arm 6/9

Point Flaw position Detail Mark the location where defect found

Echo data Fill out the following column if

recording paper is not available

Inspection Results (UT2000 Recording Paper) Judgement

Mark position of the crack (A - C) in the detail column.

Fill in the defect position as the distance (mm) from left or right side.

Under side view

Flaw position =

h = ............................ w (X) = ..................... y (PFD) = ................. de = .......................... H = ........................... I = .............................

h = ............................ w (X) = ..................... y (PFD) = ................. de = .......................... H = ........................... I = .............................

Sh

eet 29 D

ealer: Original H

ITACH

I (L/O, R

epresentative): 1 Copy H

itachi: 1 Copy

h: Echo height w (X): Beam

distance y (PFD): Probe flaw

distance de: Flaw depth H: Flaw height I: Flaw length

Front side

Page 68: PALA HITACHI

Backhoe Arm 7/9

Method

Inspection Reflection Type of Probe

Distance correction method Single transverse technique Angle probe 2.25Z10 x 18A70

* When a crack is detected by using the Distance Correction method, use the evaluation of flaw height (H) together with the Tip Echo method for judgement

* Tip echo method Ditto

Angle probe 5C10 x 10A60, 5C10 x 10A45 and 2C10 x 10A45

Detailed Inspection Position

Front No. 001 -

H

16 35º27 35º

(45)

(1 position)

Backhoe arm

Sh

eet 30

Rear side Front side

RightLeft

Inspection area

G

View H

LeftRight

LeftRight

RightLeft

Page 69: PALA HITACHI

Backhoe Arm 7/9

Point Flaw position Detail Mark the location where defect found

Echo data Fill out the following column if

recording paper is not available

Inspection Results (UT2000 Recording Paper) Judgement

Mark position of the crack (A - C) in the detail column.

R I G H T

Fill in the defect position as the distance (mm) from the top plate or the distance (mm) from the bottom plate.

Flaw position =

h = ............................ w (X) = ..................... y (PFD) = ................. de = .......................... H = ........................... I = .............................

L E F T

Fill in the defect position as the distance (mm) from the top plate or the distance (mm) from the bottom plate.

Flaw position =

h = ............................ w (X) = ..................... y (PFD) = ................. de = .......................... H = ........................... I = .............................

Sh

eet 30 D

ealer: Original H

ITACH

I (L/O, R

epresentative): 1 Copy H

itachi: 1 Copy

h: Echo height w (X): Beam

distance y (PFD): Probe flaw

distance de: Flaw depth H: Flaw height I: Flaw length

Front side

Front side

Page 70: PALA HITACHI

Backhoe Arm 8/9

Method

Inspection Reflection Type of Probe

Distance correction method Single transverse technique Angle probe 2.25Z10 x 18A70

* When a crack is detected by using the Distance Correction method, use the evaluation of flaw height (H) together with the Tip Echo method for judgement

* Tip echo method Ditto

Angle probe 5C10 x 10A60, 5C10 x 10A45 and 2C10 x 10A45

Detailed Inspection Position

Front No. 001 -

(2 positions)

Backhoe arm

Sh

eet 31

Gouge here.

Rear side Front side

RightLeft

Inspection area

H

LeftRight

LeftRight

RightLeft

Page 71: PALA HITACHI

Backhoe Arm 8/9

Point Flaw position Detail Mark the location where defect found

Echo data Fill out the following column if

recording paper is not available

Inspection Results (UT2000 Recording Paper) Judgement

Mark position of the crack (A - C) in the detail column.

R I G H T

Fill in the defect position as the distance (mm) from the top plate or the distance (mm) from the bottom plate.

Flaw position =

h = ............................ w (X) = ..................... y (PFD) = ................. de = .......................... H = ........................... I = .............................

L E F T

Fill in the defect position as the distance (mm) from the top plate or the distance (mm) from the bottom plate.

Flaw position =

h = ............................ w (X) = ..................... y (PFD) = ................. de = .......................... H = ........................... I = .............................

Sh

eet 31 D

ealer: Original H

ITACH

I (L/O, R

epresentative): 1 Copy H

itachi: 1 Copy

h: Echo height w (X): Beam

distance y (PFD): Probe flaw

distance de: Flaw depth H: Flaw height I: Flaw length

Front side

Front side

Page 72: PALA HITACHI

Backhoe Arm 9/9

Method

Inspection Reflection Type of Probe

Distance correction method Single transverse technique Angle probe 2.25Z10 x 18A70

* When a crack is detected by using the Distance Correction method, use the evaluation of flaw height (H) together with the Tip Echo method for judgement

* Tip echo method Ditto

Angle probe 5C10 x 10A60, 5C10 x 10A45 and 2C10 x 10A45

Detail s

Detailed Inspection Position Front No. 001 -

I

G

720

2015

10

10

4

50

35º

22

(1 position)

Backhoe arm

Sh

eet 32

Rear side Front side

RightLeft

Inspection area

Inspection area

I

240

* 200

* 200

LeftRight

LeftRight

RightLeft

In the range of *200

Page 73: PALA HITACHI

Backhoe Arm 9/9

Point Flaw position Detail Mark the location where defect found

Echo data Fill out the following column if

recording paper is not available

Inspection Results (UT2000 Recording Paper) Judgement

Mark position of the crack (A - C) in the detail column.

Fill in the defect position as the distance (mm) from left or right side.

Under side view

Flaw position =

h = ............................ w (X) = ..................... y (PFD) = ................. de = .......................... H = ........................... I = .............................

h = ............................ w (X) = ..................... y (PFD) = ................. de = .......................... H = ........................... I = .............................

Sh

eet 32 D

ealer: Original H

ITACH

I (L/O, R

epresentative): 1 Copy H

itachi: 1 Copy

h: Echo height w (X): Beam

distance y (PFD): Probe flaw

distance de: Flaw depth H: Flaw height I: Flaw length

Front side

Page 74: PALA HITACHI
Page 75: PALA HITACHI

Head Office: 5-1, Koraku 2-chome, Bunkyo-ku.

Tokyo 112-0004 Japan Telephone: Tokyo (03) 3830-8050 Facsimile: Tokyo (03) 3830-8202