Painesville City Schools State Report Card 2009

8/14/2019 Painesville City Schools State Report Card 2009

1/8

To meeta test indicatorforgrades3-8 and10 , atleast 7 5%ofstudentstested mustscoreproficientor higher

on that test. Other indicator requirements are:11 th gradeOhio Graduation Tests,85%;AttendanceRate, 93%; Graduation Rate, 90%.

StateIndicators

2008-2009 School Year Report Card

The state requirement is 75 percent








3rd Grade Achievement

1. Reading2. Mathematics 4th Grade Achievement

3. Reading4. Mathematics5. Writing

5th Grade Achievement6. Reading7. Mathematics8. Science9. Social Studies

6th Grade Achievement10. Reading11. Mathematics

7th Grade Achievement12. Reading13. Mathematics14. Writing

8th Grade Achievement15. Reading16. Mathematics17. Science18. Social Studies

Ohio Graduation Tests (10th Grade)19. Reading20. Mathematics21. Writing22. Science23. Social Studies

Ohio Graduation Tests (11th Grade)24. Reading25. Mathematics26. Writing27. Science28. Social Studies

Attendance Rate29. All Grades

2007-08 Graduation Rate30. District



The six designations are Excellent with Distinction Excellent Effective Continuous Improvement Academic Watch Academic Emergency

Value-AddedAdequateYearly Progress

PerformanceIndex

Indicators

The District Report Card for the2008-2009school year showsthe progress districts have madebased on four measures of performance.

The combination of the fourmeasures is the basis forassigning state designationsto districts, buildings andcommunity schools.

Your DistrictsDesignation: Number of StateIndicators

Met out of 30Performance

Index

StateIndicators PerformanceIndex

Value-AddedMeasure

Your District2008-2009

Similar Districts2008-2009

State2008-2009

Percentage of Students at and above the Proficient Lev

On the Web: reportcard.ohio.gov

Value-AddedMeasure

StateIndicators

District Improvement(0-120 points)

AYP

*

**

Any result at or above the state standard is indicated by a .

SimilarDistrictsare basedon comparingdemographic,socioeconomicand geographicfactors. Cumulative resultsfor studentswho tookthe testsas 10th or 11thgraders.***-- =Not Calculated/Not Displayed when there are fewer than 10 in the group.

88.9 %83.2 %93.2 %73.1 %85.7 %

96.0 %

74.7 %

IRN # 044628

ContinuousImprovement 7 82.2

Not Met

Improvement Year 2

Painesville City Local School District58 Jefferson St, Painesville, OH 44077-3114 - Lake County

Current Superintendent: Michael P. Hanlon (440) 392-5060

60.8 %69.8 %

69.8 %66.3 %75.6 %

55.8 %44.6 %51.9 %44.2 %

65.0 %

57.2 %

61.7 %56.8 %68.4 %

67.2 %70.1 %42.5 %23.1 %

71.1 %62.9 %75.0 %59.7 %75.0 %

67.2 %70.9 %

77.4 %81.3 %

72.0 %66.9 %76.1 %

82 %78.4 %84.4 %

53.3 %41.7 %48.4 %38.1 %

72 %62.3 %70.6 %61.6 %

81.3 %

75.2 %

67.8 %

59.8 %

76.6 %74.3 %80.5 %

59.5 %58.3 %64.9 %

72.4 %70.6 %62.8 %51.1 %

54.9 %51.1 %38.9 %28.3 %

84.5 %81.4 %89.7 %76 %

81.6 %

74.6 %68.9 %84.9 %59.4 %69.6 %

92.8 %88.4 %93.2 %84.2 %88.6 %

94.3 %

84.6 %

89.3 %81.3 %90.4 %72.8 %83.5 %

93.6 %

82.1 %

+ = above


2/8


3/8

Overall Composite Scores reflect grade level and overall compositeratings for the 2008-2009 school year.

Value-Added Measure

Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8

Reading

Mathematics

On the Web: reportcard.ohio.gov

Your districts Value-Added rating represents the progress yourdistricthas made with its students since last school year.In contrast, achievementscores representstudents performance at apoint in time. A score of Above indicates greater than one yearof

progress has been achieved; Met indicates one year of progress has beenachieved; Below indicates less than one year of progress has been achieved.

Value-AddedMeasure

-

+ AboveExpected GrowthMetExpected Growth

BelowExpected Growth

=

=

=

Legend

Performance Index

Performance Level Across Grades3-8 and 10 for all Tested Subjects

(Includes every student enrolled inthe district for a full academic year)

X =WeightPercentage Points

Your Districts Performance Index

0.0

0.3

0.6

1.0

1.1

1.2

Untested

Limited

Basic

Proficient

Accelerated

Advanced

X

X

X

X

X

X

=

=

=

=

=

=

The PerformanceIndex reects theachievementof everystudentenrolled for the fullacademic year. The Performance Index

is a weighted average that includesall tested subjects and grades anduntested students.Thegreatestweight is given to advanced scores(1.2); the weights decrease for eachperformance level and a weightof zero is given to untested students.This results in a scale from 0 to120points. The Performance Indexcan becompared across years to showdistrict achievement trends.

PerformanceIndex

2008-2009 2007-2008 2006-2007

Performance Index Over Time

0.8

13.5

26.2

37.5

14.7

7.3

4.1

15.7

37.5

16.1

8.8

82.2 81.8 85.1

82.2

Painesville City Local School District, Lake County

+

+ - + + +

+ - - + +

0.0


4/8

4

Grades 3-8 and 10Reading

and

Mathematics

Adequate YearlyProgress

A l lS t u d e n

t s

P e r c e n

t P r o

f i c

i e n

t

P e r c e n

t T e s

t e d

E c o n o m

i c a l l yD

i s a d v a n

t a g e d

A s i a n / P

a c i f i cI s

l a n d e r

B l a c k ,

n o n - H i s

p a n i c

A m e r i c

a nI n d i a n

/ A l a s k a

N a t i v e

H i s p a n

i c

M u l t i - R

a c i a l

W h i t e ,

n o n - H i s

p a n i c

S t u d e n

t sw i t h

D i s a b i

l i t i e s

L i m i t e d

E n g l i s h

P r o f i c i e

n t

Reading

Mathematics

Reading

Mathematics

Graduation Rate*

Attendance Rate*

Legend

Not applicable.

NR

N/A

Met

Not Met

Not Required This indicator was not evaluated for this subgroup because the subgroup size was smaller than the minimum number needed to achieve a statisticallyreliable result. 30 students is the minimum size for the proficiency and non-test indicators, while 40 is the minimum size for the participation rate indicators.

This subgroup met AYP for this indicator with its current year, two-year combined, Safe Harbor, or growth measure results.

This subgroup did not meet AYP for this indicator.

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

ReadingProficiency:

MathematicsProficiency:

ReadingParticipation:

MathematicsParticipation:

AttendanceRate:

AYP Determinatiby Indicator

GraduationRate:

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a federally required measure. Everyschooland district must meet AYPgoals thataresetforReading and Mathematics

Rate. These goals are applied to ten student groups: All Students,Economically Disadvantaged Students, Asian/Pacic IslanderStudents, Black, non-Hispanic Students, American Indian/AlaskaNative Students, Hispanic Students, Multi-Racial Students, White,

non-Hispanic Students, Students with Disabilities (IEP), and Students withLimited English Prociency (LEP). If any one of these groups does not meet

Rate, or Graduation Rate, then the school or districtdoes not meetAYP.Not meeting AYP for consecutive years will have both federal and stateconsequences. Federal consequences could include a school or districtbeingidentied for improvement. State consequences could include a reductionin the states rating designation.

AYP

AYP Determinationby Subgroup

AYPDetermination

for Your District:

This legend explains terms used in the above chart that describe whether each student group met this years AYP goals.For test indicators, AYP can be met in one of four ways:

1) meeting the AYP targets with current year results;2) meeting the AYP targets with two-year combined results;3) meeting the improvement requirements of Safe Harbor;4) meeting the AYP targets with projected results.

For non-test indicators, AYP can be met in one of three ways:

1) meeting the AYP targets with current year results;2) meeting the AYP targets with two-year combined results;3) making improvement over the previous year.

*The non-test indicators used for overall AYP (Attendance Rate and Graduation Rate)are evaluated only for the All Students subgroup.

Black,non-Hispanic

HispanicWhite,

non-Hispanic

Asian or Pacific Islander

American Indian/ Alaska Native

Econ.Disadvtgd

Limited EnglishProficient Multi-Racial

Federally RequiredGraduation Rate Information

The disaggregated graduation rates ofyourdistrict areprovided forinformational purposes onlyand are not used foryour AYPdetermination.

Students withDisabilities

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met


Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Not Met

Not Met

Met

Met

Not Met

Not Met

Met

Met

Met

Not Met

Not Me

Not Me

Met

Met

Met

Met

Not Me

0% 0% 67.4% 71.9%

65.4% 66.7% 87.5% 69.2% 80.5%


5/8

Under the federalNo Child Left BehindAct, states are

required to reportcertain data aboutschoolsand teachers.Data presented hereare for reportingpurposes only andare not used in thecomputation of thestate designationfor districts andschools.

-- =Not Calculated/Not Displayed when there are fewer than 10 in the group.

ReadingWritingMathematicsScienceSocial Studies





Black,non-Hispanic

AmericanIndian/

Alaska Native

Asian or Pacific

Islander Hispanic Multi-Racial

White,non-Hispanic

Non-DisabledStudents

Studentswith

DisabilitiesMigrant

Non-Econ.

DisadvtgdEcon.

DisadvtgdLimitedEnglish

ProficientFemale Male

Your District's Percentage of Students at Each Performance Level

Percentage of Students Scoring Limited

Percentage of Students Scoring Basic

Percentage of Students Scoring Proficient

Percentage of Students Scoring Accelerated

Percentage of Students Scoring Advanced

State and Federally Required District Information

Number of Limited English Proficient StudentsExcluded from Accountability Calculations

Your District State

All Schools inYour District

High-PovertySchools Locatedin Your District*

Low-PovertySchools Locatedin Your District*

Percentage of teachers with at least a Bachelors Degree

Percentage of teachers with at least a Masters Degree

Percentage of core academic subject elementary and secondaryclasses not taught by highly qualified teachers

Percentage of core academic subject elementary and secondaryclasses taught by properly certified teachers

Percentage of core academic subject elementary and secondary classes taught byteachers with temporary, conditional or long-term substitute certification/licensure

*High-povertyschoolsare thoserankedin the topquartile based onthe percentage ofeconomicallydisadvantagedstudents. Low-poverty schoolsare thoserankedin thebottomquartile based onthe perofeconomicallydisadvantagedstudents. Adistrict mayhavebuildingsin both quartiles, in just onequartile orin neither quartile.

Federally Required School Teacher Information

-- =Not Calculated/Not Displayed when there are fewer than 10 in the group.

Average DailyStudent

Enrollment

Black,non-

Hispanic

AmericanIndian or

Alaska Native

Asian orPacific

IslanderHispanic Multi-Racial

White,non-

Hispanic

Studentswith

DisabilitiesMigrantEconomicallyDisadvantaged

LimitedEnglish

Proficient

Your Districts Students 2008-2009

11

2895 19.3% -- 0.6% 34.8% 13.1% 32.3% 72.3% 30.6% 12.9% 0.5%


100.0

61.7

0.6

96.2

99.3

59.3

1.8

98.7

21.526.625.851.945.5

----------

----------

22.711.019.810.017.1

12.90.0

11.96.8

12.5

11.93.3

12.92.07.9

13.73.6

13.65.6

11.0

31.614.839.313.326.5

----------

11.83.2

13.83.17.8

17.66.0

18.47.8

15.0

14.14.8

17.67.2

12.2

24.512.720.910.416.7

18.46.0

17.16.3

14.3

----------

----------

20.328.023.650.043.5

15.818.723.335.233.0

19.211.817.328.938.8

17.516.321.041.640.4

32.150.628.345.844.6

----------

17.114.419.028.933.6

20.523.923.146.343.3

21.230.624.452.845.8

19.516.823.948.944.3

19.926.820.436.138.1

46.656.937.323.021.6

----------

----------

40.451.138.222.924.7

43.150.739.135.229.5

35.557.536.937.524.3

43.860.241.230.927.3

22.621.018.318.1

9.6

----------

37.249.633.131.324.2

41.755.539.328.324.8

40.249.038.821.525.0

41.055.735.826.124.4

40.452.439.731.624.8

11.811.9

8.212.611.2

----------

----------

11.89.3

10.413.512.4

18.326.715.818.214.8

21.823.517.821.715.8

17.818.814.617.414.2

3.74.93.1

10.89.6

----------

24.028.816.724.218.0

13.212.811.814.012.1

10.17.08.7

11.810.4

17.019.412.612.912.2

14.613.613.319.614.7

4.71.85.04.46.0

15.42.8

23.78.1

15.7

----------

----------

4.70.58.03.52.4

9.94.09.94.5

10.2

11.73.9

15.29.9

13.2

7.21.19.64.57.1

10.08.6

11.012.0

9.6

----------

9.94.0

17.412.516.4

7.01.87.53.64.8

4.10.67.33.52.1

8.53.3

10.14.96.9

6.81.29.56.38.0

0.0 0.0 --


6/8

6

Everyschool in SI has to create animprovement plan. If a school in SIreceives federal funds, it may have tooffer Public School Choice and/orSupplemental Educational Services.Being in SI for three or more yearsrequires more extensive correctiveactions and, eventually, restructuring.

Generally, a school will enter SchoolImprovement (SI) after missing AYPfor two consecutive years, and it canexitSI only after meeting AYP for two

consecutive years.

Name of the School & Years in Improvement

Name of Schools Identified for Improvement and Years in Improvement Status

Schools in School Improvement

Measures of a Rigorous Curriculum for the Class of 2008Measure 2007-08 Graduates Data Source

EMIS- EducationManagement Information Systemof the Ohio Department ofEducati

ACT College Entrance Exam- Nonprofit organization that administerstheACT college entrance test

College Board (SAT)- Nonprofit association that administers the SAT exam

AP- Advanced Placement, a program offering courses/exams that provide

students the opportunity to earn credit or advanced standing at colleges anduniversities

Legend

TheMeasures of a Rigorous Curriculum are intended toreporton thecompletionofa rigorouscurriculum andotherindicatorsofstudentsuccessthatensure students leaveschoolwith theknowledgeand skills needed to succeed in

college, careers and citizenship.These indicators pertain toschools thathave anycombination of grades10, 11 and 12.

The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP),often referred toas TheNations ReportCard, is theonlynationallyrepresentative and continuingassesssubjectareas. Schools and studentswithin each stateare selected randomlytobea partof theassessment. Notallstudentsin the state or in a particularschool takethe assessment.

, and there are no individualstudentoreven schoolsummaryresults.Theassessments are conducted in mathematics, reading, science,writing,thearts, civics, economics, geographyand U.S.history.

To viewOhios most recentNAEP results,

go to:

and search for keyword NAEPgov

74.7


Chestnut Elementary School 2 Harvey High School 1Heritage Middle School 5 Maple Elementary School 1

1132

35

55.7

--

17.1

2.6

20

%

%

%

%


7/8

1. If a district meets AYP in the current year, it can berated no lower than Continuous Improvement.

2. If a district does not meet AYP for three consecutive years and in the current year it does not meet AYP inmore than one student group, it can be rated no

higher than Continuous Improvement.3. In all other cases, AYP has no effect on the

preliminary designation.Thus, thepreliminary designationbecomes the final designation.

Once the preliminary designation is determined, Value-Added the fourth measure in the accountability system, is evaluated to determine the impact (if any) on the districts finaldesignation.

1. If your districts rating is restricted to ContinuousImprovement due to AYP, then Value-Added will have noimpact on the designation and the preliminary designationbecomes the final designation.

2. If your district experiences above expected growth for atleast two consecutive years, your districts finaldesignation will increase by one designation.

3. If your district experiences below expected growth for atleast three consecutive years, your districts finaldesignation will decrease by one designation.

The preliminary designation results from identifying thehigher value between the percentage of indicators met by your district and your districts performance index. AYP then is evaluated to determine its effect on the preliminarydesignation. There are three ways in which AYP can affect the preliminary designation.

Determining Your District's Rating

Indicators Met Performance Index Score AYP Status Preliminary Designation94%-100% 100 to 120or

or

or

or

or

and

and

and

and

and

andand

Met or Not Met Excellent

75%-93.9%

0%-74.9%

50%-74.9%

31%-49.9 %

0%-30.9%

90 to 99.9

80 to 89.9

0 to 89.9

70 to 79.9

0 to 69.9

Met or Not Met

Not Met

Not Met

Not Met

Met

Effective

Academic Watch

Academic Emergency

ContinuousImprovement

=

=

=

=

=

=

Preliminary Designation Value-Added Measure* Final Designation

Excellent

Effective

Continuous Improvement

Academic Watch

Academic Emergency

Above expected growth for at least 2 consecutive yearsand

and

and

and

and

Excellent with Distinction

Effective

Above expected growth for at least 2 consecutive years

Above expected growth for at least 2 consecutive yearsBelow expected growth for at least 3 consecutive years


Below expected growth for at least 3 consecutive years





Excellent


Academic Emergency

Academic Watch

Academic Emergency


Academic Watch

Effective

*In all other cases, including if your districts designation has been restricted to Continuous Improvement, then Value-Added will hano impact on the designation and the preliminary designation becomes the final designation.

or

or

or

or

or

Determiningyour districts reportcard designationis a multi-stepprocess. Thefirst stepis to determinea preliminary designation,whichisbasedonthefollowingcomponents:1) the percentageofindicators met,2) theperformanceindex and 3)AYPdeterminatio



8/8

8

Ohio Department of EducationReport Card Resources on the Web:

reportcard.ohio.govPainesville City Local School District, Lake County

Painesville City Schools State Report Card 2009

Documents

Transcript of Painesville City Schools State Report Card 2009