Page 1 Xabier Goenaga Head of Unit Knowledge for Growth Institute for Prospective Technological...
-
Upload
patrick-holloway -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
1
Transcript of Page 1 Xabier Goenaga Head of Unit Knowledge for Growth Institute for Prospective Technological...
page 1
Xabier GoenagaHead of Unit
Knowledge for GrowthInstitute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS)
Joint Research Centre
Regional Innovation Strategies for Smart Specialisation
How to Develop a RIS3
The current S3 Draft GuideEdited by JRC IPTS in association
with DG REGIO and with contributions from:
D. Foray, J. Goddard, P. McCann, K. Morgan, C. Nauwelars, R. Ortega-Argilés
A number of Commission officials from various DGs
Preliminary version circulated among ST and MG Dec 2011 and will be presented to regions in Jan 2012
To be reviewed in 2012 after feedback from users, MG, …
The contents
Policy rationale
Governance issues
Practical steps to design a RIS3
Peer review and monitoring Examples from case studies
Policy instruments and horizontal dimensions
10 practical steps (non-sequential!) towards a RIS 3 – in a context of entrepreneurial process of discovery
Scope & process
Vision
Analysis
Scenarios
Priorities
Policy mix & pilots & targets
Monitor&Evaluate
Policy intelligenc
e pool
Communication
Review & Update
Step 8: Strategic policy intelligence
Running a RIS3 requires regional authorities to develop new skills and capacities
Policy intelligence units with a qualified staff need to be established within the governance structure, to support the learning process of regional authorities
An important mission of policy intelligence is to access and use knowledge from foreign regions and countries
Step 3 – Analysis of regional potential
Analysing and assessing the potential crucial for prioritisation process
Encourage and observe the outcome of the entrepreneurial process of discovery (EPD)
Different regional typologies Build on advantages Supporting transformation
Step 1:Proposing a vision – “we have a dream”
Shared Vision on the potential of the region and main direction for its international positioning:
political endorsement mobilizing power
ambitious but still credible
A Top Technology Region! Unique cross-boarder region of
Brabant, Limburg, Liège, and North Rhine-Westphalia
The aim is to create a region that can compete internationally and thereby guarantee employment and prosperity for its inhabitants
The focus is to close the gap in the
“Knowledge-to-Skill-to-Till” chains in three specified sectors: Chemicals & Advanced Materials, High-Tech Systems, and Health Sciences
Step 4 – Scenarios
Develop broad scenarios
Discussion with wide regional audience
Realistic view of the region’s position within an international perspective
Step 2: Process and governance – Ensuring participation and ownership
Define its scope and its expected goal
different stakeholders WILL have different expectations and agenda
Encourage a EPD. Participation of the key actors
A wide view of innovation Also services, public sector and
non-technological innovation
Collaborative leadership
Lahti region in Finland
Low level of education Low average household income
No universityLow in most innovation indexes.
Inefficient Cluster policy
New action model and new innovation environment!
collaboration of all strategies, plans and bodies in the region Links to the most relevant R&D institutions outside the regionexpertise serving all industries and clustersamong the most innovative regions in Finland
New action model and new innovation environment!
collaboration of all strategies, plans and bodies in the region Links to the most relevant R&D institutions outside the regionexpertise serving all industries and clustersamong the most innovative regions in Finland
Practise based
innovation
design
environment
Step 5 – Selection of Priorities Decision-making step
Clear criteria for filtering priorities
Good governance is key
Avoid risk of capture by interest groups and of lock in into traditional activities
Outcome of EPD
MODERNA - Navarra's New Economic Regional development model Identified new business
opportunities in following sectors:
Design and creativity
Services to persons: related to active ageing, persons with difficulties, favour family life and work reconciliation
Other: the audiovisual sector and personal safety, heritage and information.
“a self-discovery process¹”
involving entrepreneurial trial and error as well as public policy to create more incentives for those entrepreneurs who are taking the risk of experimenting in new activities
[1] R. Haussmann and D. Rodrik, “Economic development as self-discovery”, Journal of Development Economics, vol.72, December 2003
Entrepreneurs must be understood in a broad
sense
firmshigher education institutions, public research institutes, independent inventors and innovators
Reveals the domains of R&D and innovation in which a region is likely to excel given its existing capabilities and productive assets
WHAT IT IS WHO IS INVOLVED
The result of an entrepreneurial process of discovery (EPD)
Step 6: Definition of policy packages
The broad action lines corresponding to priorities
Action Plan
Pilot projects− Experimentation of new
policies to support good design
− Input for updating priorities
The Action Plan should define:
Programmes, instruments, initiatives to feed the actions
Target groups Actors involved and their
responsibilities Timeframes Funding resources for specific
groups and projects
Step 10: (Peer) Review and update of RIS3
Formulating and implementing a RIS3 is a continuous process
Need to regularly adapt and update the strategy
Information and new insights are gathered during implementation and are incorporated into a new version of RIS3
What to review?1) Being Place Based
2) Achieving Critical Mass
3) Entrepreneurial Discovery
4) Being Outward-Oriented
5) Being Future-Oriented
6) Well performing system (IU self assessment tool)
Step 7: Monitoring and evaluation
Monitoring aims at verifying the correct and efficient implementation of activities
Evaluation aims at verifying whether and how policy goals are met – based on outcome indicators
OUTCOME INDICATORSEach region chooses, according toagreed general principles, thoseindicators that are most suitable totrack the progress of its ownprogrammes towards place-basedpolicy goals A strategy might be aimed at
more than one outcome (i.e. different dimensions of well-being and progress)
The choice of outcomes should be the result of a deliberative process
Outcome targets are established whenever possible, i.e. the values of the outcome indicators which policy action aims to achieve
Step 9: Communication of the RIS3
Good communication is crucial:
To ensure RIS3 endorsement by all stakeholders of the region
To possibly embark new stakeholders, that are not yet part of the project
Informing the public opinion of the necessity to support the development of knowledge-based businesses
Communication is needed all along the process (in all the design steps)
Wha t is mos t needed4 les sons from pa st RIS:
1 ) Pos itioning the RIS3 proje ct in a na tional a nd Eu ropean conte xt
2 ) Iden tifying th e differe nt stak eholde r group s and their differe nt nee ds
3 ) Trad itional to ols (pre ss ca mpaign , web, s emina rs …)
4 ) Activ e tools (targete d visits to stake holde rs, loca l meeting , disc ussio ns …)
Thank you!
Knowledge for Growth Unit: http://ipts.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ataglance/knowledge_for_growth.cfm
The Smart Specialisation Action website: http://ipts.jrc.ec.europa.eu/activities/research-and-innovation/s3platform.cfm
Email: [email protected]