P. Satyavathi*, Vanaja M., Gopala Krishna Reddy A., Vijay Kumar G., Manohar G. Matrusri Engineering...

21
Influence of Environmental Conditions on the Performance of Cluster Bean Genotypes P. Satyavathi * , Vanaja M., Gopala Krishna Reddy A., Vijay Kumar G., Manohar G. Matrusri Engineering College, Saidabad, Hyderabad- 500059 E-mail: [email protected]

Transcript of P. Satyavathi*, Vanaja M., Gopala Krishna Reddy A., Vijay Kumar G., Manohar G. Matrusri Engineering...

Page 1: P. Satyavathi*, Vanaja M., Gopala Krishna Reddy A., Vijay Kumar G., Manohar G. Matrusri Engineering College, Saidabad, Hyderabad- 500059 E-mail: ganisetti.satyavathi@gmail.com.

Influence of Environmental Conditions on the Performance

of Cluster Bean Genotypes

P. Satyavathi*, Vanaja M., Gopala Krishna Reddy A., Vijay Kumar G., Manohar G.Matrusri Engineering College, Saidabad,

Hyderabad- 500059E-mail: [email protected]

Page 2: P. Satyavathi*, Vanaja M., Gopala Krishna Reddy A., Vijay Kumar G., Manohar G. Matrusri Engineering College, Saidabad, Hyderabad- 500059 E-mail: ganisetti.satyavathi@gmail.com.

Cluster Bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L. Taub)

India produces 10.0-12.5 lakh tons of guar and world leader in production of guar with 80% of world productionIt is grown in arid zones of Rajasthan, some parts of Gujarat, Haryana, and Madhya Pradesh

Page 3: P. Satyavathi*, Vanaja M., Gopala Krishna Reddy A., Vijay Kumar G., Manohar G. Matrusri Engineering College, Saidabad, Hyderabad- 500059 E-mail: ganisetti.satyavathi@gmail.com.

Guar gum from guar seeds

Guar gum, also called guaran, is a galactomannan

Guar gum is an extract

of the guar bean

It is used in paper, textile, oil drilling, mining, explosives,

ore flotation, and other various industrial applications

Page 4: P. Satyavathi*, Vanaja M., Gopala Krishna Reddy A., Vijay Kumar G., Manohar G. Matrusri Engineering College, Saidabad, Hyderabad- 500059 E-mail: ganisetti.satyavathi@gmail.com.

Demand Development

The demand of this gum is high in international market as in recent past due to its application in crude oil drilling and shell gas industry, which resulted in hike in price up to Rs. 32,000/quintal of seed

The production zones are expanding to new areas where identification of suitable variety is the need of the hour

Page 5: P. Satyavathi*, Vanaja M., Gopala Krishna Reddy A., Vijay Kumar G., Manohar G. Matrusri Engineering College, Saidabad, Hyderabad- 500059 E-mail: ganisetti.satyavathi@gmail.com.

Growth conditions of GuarGuar basically grown under arid

rain fed conditionsGuar grows well under a wide

range of soil conditions and has good capabilities to fix atmospheric nitrogen.

Guar tolerates high temperatures and dry conditions and is adapted to arid and semi-arid climates

Guar is susceptible to water logging. Guar is considered to be tolerant of both soil salinity and alkalinity

Page 6: P. Satyavathi*, Vanaja M., Gopala Krishna Reddy A., Vijay Kumar G., Manohar G. Matrusri Engineering College, Saidabad, Hyderabad- 500059 E-mail: ganisetti.satyavathi@gmail.com.

Cluster Bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub)

The present research work aimed at addressing the issues to optimize the environmental conditions visa vis identification of suitable varieties for different locations

This will help to expand the areas of cultivation as well as improving the productivity there by enhancing the livelihood opportunities to the poor farmers

Page 7: P. Satyavathi*, Vanaja M., Gopala Krishna Reddy A., Vijay Kumar G., Manohar G. Matrusri Engineering College, Saidabad, Hyderabad- 500059 E-mail: ganisetti.satyavathi@gmail.com.

Five genotypes of cluster bean were obtained from Rajasthan Agricultural University (RAU)

RGC-1017 RGC-1025 RGC-936 RGC-986 HGS- 365Growth conditions:Two seasons- Summer and Kharif (rainy) season to have

variable temperature, RH & photoperiod

Rainy (Kharif) Crop- July to October 2013

Summer Crop- March to June 2014

Page 8: P. Satyavathi*, Vanaja M., Gopala Krishna Reddy A., Vijay Kumar G., Manohar G. Matrusri Engineering College, Saidabad, Hyderabad- 500059 E-mail: ganisetti.satyavathi@gmail.com.

5-Jul-13 25-Jul-13 14-Aug-13 3-Sep-13 23-Sep-13 13-Oct-13 2-Nov-1315

17

19

21

23

25

27

29

31

33

35Temperatures-Kharif

Max T Min T

Tem

pera

ture

(°C

)

21-Jan-14 10-Feb-14 2-Mar-14 22-Mar-14 11-Apr-14 1-May-14 21-May-14 10-Jun-140

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45Temperatures- Summer

Max T Min T

Tem

pera

ture

(°C

)

Min T Max TMIN 17.3 23.1MAX 23.1 32.2Average 21.32 29.37

Min T Max TMIN 14.2 25.4MAX 28 39.5Average 21.28 34.38

Page 9: P. Satyavathi*, Vanaja M., Gopala Krishna Reddy A., Vijay Kumar G., Manohar G. Matrusri Engineering College, Saidabad, Hyderabad- 500059 E-mail: ganisetti.satyavathi@gmail.com.

5-Jul-13 25-Jul-13 14-Aug-13 3-Sep-13 23-Sep-13 13-Oct-13 2-Nov-1320

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110Relative humidity- Kharif

RH

(%

)

21-Jan-14 10-Feb-14 2-Mar-14 22-Mar-14 11-Apr-14 1-May-14 21-May-14 10-Jun-140

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100Relative humidity- Summer

RH

(%

)

Kharif SummerMIN 43 16MAX 98 86Average 63.87 38.40

Page 10: P. Satyavathi*, Vanaja M., Gopala Krishna Reddy A., Vijay Kumar G., Manohar G. Matrusri Engineering College, Saidabad, Hyderabad- 500059 E-mail: ganisetti.satyavathi@gmail.com.

5-Jul-13 25-Jul-13 14-Aug-13 3-Sep-13 23-Sep-13 13-Oct-13 2-Nov-130

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Rainfall-Kharif

RF (

mm

)

21-Jan-14 10-Feb-14 2-Mar-14 22-Mar-14 11-Apr-14 1-May-14 21-May-14 10-Jun-140

5

10

15

20

25

Rainfall- Summer

RF (

mm

)

No. of Rainy days=28

Total RF= 341.5 mm

No. of Rainy days=11

Total RF= 106.6 mm

Page 11: P. Satyavathi*, Vanaja M., Gopala Krishna Reddy A., Vijay Kumar G., Manohar G. Matrusri Engineering College, Saidabad, Hyderabad- 500059 E-mail: ganisetti.satyavathi@gmail.com.

Results Summer Crop- March to June 2014

Rainy (Kharif) Crop- July to October 2013

Observations recorded on

Days to 50% flowering

Root biomass

Plant height Total biomass

No. of Branches No. of Pods

Leaf area Pod weight

Leaf biomass Seed number

Stem biomass Seed Yield

Root length 100 seed weight

Root volume HI

Page 12: P. Satyavathi*, Vanaja M., Gopala Krishna Reddy A., Vijay Kumar G., Manohar G. Matrusri Engineering College, Saidabad, Hyderabad- 500059 E-mail: ganisetti.satyavathi@gmail.com.

Summer Kharif0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Total Biomass

RGC1017 RGC986 RGC936 RGC1025 HGS365

Tota

l B

iom

ass

(g/p

l)

RGC1017 RGC986 RGC936 RGC1025 HGS3650

10

20

30

40

50

60

Total Biomass SummerKharif

Tota

l B

iom

ass

(g/p

l) The selected genotypes varied in their response to seasons.

Majority of the genotypes produced higher biomass during summer season as compared with kharif except HGS-365

RGC 1017 and RGC 1025 registered less reduction in total biomass during kharif

Reduction was high in RGC 986 and RGC 936 during kharif

Page 13: P. Satyavathi*, Vanaja M., Gopala Krishna Reddy A., Vijay Kumar G., Manohar G. Matrusri Engineering College, Saidabad, Hyderabad- 500059 E-mail: ganisetti.satyavathi@gmail.com.

RGC1017 RGC986 RGC936 RGC1025 HGS3650

5

10

15

20

25

30 Pod Weight Summer

Kharif

Pod w

t. (

g/p

l)

Summer Kharif0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Pod Weight

RGC1017 RGC986 RGC936 RGC1025 HGS365

Pod w

t. (

g/p

l)

Majority of the genotypes produced more pod weight during summer season as compared with kharif.

The genotype HGS 365 produced more pod weight in kharif season than in summer and RGC986 recorded lowest pod weight

In summer season the genotypes RGC936 and RGC1025 recorded highest pod weight

During Kharif there was lot of variation in pod weight

Page 14: P. Satyavathi*, Vanaja M., Gopala Krishna Reddy A., Vijay Kumar G., Manohar G. Matrusri Engineering College, Saidabad, Hyderabad- 500059 E-mail: ganisetti.satyavathi@gmail.com.

RGC1017 RGC986 RGC936 RGC1025 HGS3650

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16 Seed Yield SummerKharif

Seed w

t. (

g/p

l)

All the genotypes showed improved performance in seed weight in Summer season than Kharif

In summer, RGC 936 recorded highest seed weight (15.11 g/pl) followed by RGC1025 (14.78 g/pl)

In Kharif, RGC 1025 recorded highest seed weight (9.53 g/pl) followed by HGS 365 (7.3 g/pl)

Though HGS365 recorded improved total biomass and pod weight in kharif, its seed yield was reduced in kharif

Summer Kharif0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16Seed Yield

RGC1017 RGC986 RGC936 RGC1025 HGS365

Seed w

t.(g

/pl)

Page 15: P. Satyavathi*, Vanaja M., Gopala Krishna Reddy A., Vijay Kumar G., Manohar G. Matrusri Engineering College, Saidabad, Hyderabad- 500059 E-mail: ganisetti.satyavathi@gmail.com.

RGC1017 RGC986 RGC936 RGC1025 HGS3650.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

Test weightSummerKharif

100 s

eed w

t. (

g)

There was non significant difference for 100 seed weight during summer season

The seeds of RGC936(3.3 g) and RGC1025 (3.4 g) were bold than all the genotypes in summer season

RGC1017 and HGS365 maintained 100 seed weight in both seasons with least reduction

RGC986 and RGC1025 showed lowest test weight than the other genotypes in KharifSummer Kharif

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

Test weight

RGC1017 RGC986 RGC936 RGC1025 HGS365

100 s

eed w

t. (

g)

Page 16: P. Satyavathi*, Vanaja M., Gopala Krishna Reddy A., Vijay Kumar G., Manohar G. Matrusri Engineering College, Saidabad, Hyderabad- 500059 E-mail: ganisetti.satyavathi@gmail.com.

RGC1017 RGC986 RGC936 RGC1025 HGS3650

5

10

15

20

25

30

HISummerKharif

Harv

est

Index (

%)

In summer season, the variation between genotypes was meager for Harvest Index, however it is significant in kharif

RGC1017, RGC936 and RGC1025 recorded better HI in kharif than summer season

RGC1017 recorded highest HI (22%) and RGC986 and HGS 365 (20%) recorded lower HI in summer season

RGC1025 recorded highest HI (25%) and RGC986 (13%) recorded lowest HI in Kharif Summer Kharif

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

HI

RGC1017 RGC986 RGC936 RGC1025 HGS365

Harv

est

Index (

%)

Page 17: P. Satyavathi*, Vanaja M., Gopala Krishna Reddy A., Vijay Kumar G., Manohar G. Matrusri Engineering College, Saidabad, Hyderabad- 500059 E-mail: ganisetti.satyavathi@gmail.com.

RGC1017

RGC986

RGC936

RGC1025

HGS365

-200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100

HI 100 seed wt seed wt Pod.wt

Fodder biomass Veg biomass T.biomass

Reduction (%) in Kharif over Summer

All the genotypes except HGS-365 recorded reduction in majority of the parameters in Kharif season

Kharif season was favoring the improvement in Total biomass, Vegetative biomass, Fodder biomass and pod wt. of HGS 365

All parameters of RGC986 reduced in kharif season

The impact of seasons was minimum on different parameters of RGC 1017 followed by RGC 1025

Page 18: P. Satyavathi*, Vanaja M., Gopala Krishna Reddy A., Vijay Kumar G., Manohar G. Matrusri Engineering College, Saidabad, Hyderabad- 500059 E-mail: ganisetti.satyavathi@gmail.com.

T.biomass

Veg biomass

Fodder biomass

Pod.wt

seed wt

100 seed wt

HI

-200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100

HGS365 RGC1025 RGC936 RGC986 RGC1017Reduction (%) in Kharif over

Summer

Seed weight and Test weight reduced in kharif season in all the genotypes

Total biomass, vegetative biomass, fodder biomass of HGS365 improved from 65 to 167% during Kharif than Summer season. The reduction in pod and seed weight was higher than biomass parameters of all the genotypes except HGS365 in kharif season

The seasonal response of HI differed in different genotypes due to differential response of seed yield and total biomass of individual genotype

Page 19: P. Satyavathi*, Vanaja M., Gopala Krishna Reddy A., Vijay Kumar G., Manohar G. Matrusri Engineering College, Saidabad, Hyderabad- 500059 E-mail: ganisetti.satyavathi@gmail.com.

ConclusionsPerformance of all the selected five cluster

bean genotypes reduced in kharif season as compared with summer season

There is variation in genotype as well as parameter response to different seasons

The reduction in yield and yield parameters was more than biomass parameters in kharif season

The genotypes RGC 1017 and RGC 1025 maintained total biomass with better seed yield during kharif

The genotype HGS365 with improved biomass and moderate seed yield during kharif may serve as dual purpose crop with better fodder biomass

Page 20: P. Satyavathi*, Vanaja M., Gopala Krishna Reddy A., Vijay Kumar G., Manohar G. Matrusri Engineering College, Saidabad, Hyderabad- 500059 E-mail: ganisetti.satyavathi@gmail.com.

Thank You

Page 21: P. Satyavathi*, Vanaja M., Gopala Krishna Reddy A., Vijay Kumar G., Manohar G. Matrusri Engineering College, Saidabad, Hyderabad- 500059 E-mail: ganisetti.satyavathi@gmail.com.

Any Queries are most welcomed!