P rostitution o f P ower, P rivilege, P leasure a nd V …...2017/09/24 · S t u d y N o t es The...

Study Notes

The Prostitution of Power, Privilege, Pleasure and Value

September 24, 2017

Revelation 17

The Great Prostitute and the Beast

Then one of the seven angels who had the seven bowls came and said to me, “Come, I will show you the judgment of the great prostitute who is seated on many waters, 2 with whom the kings of the earth have committed sexual immorality, and with the wine of whose sexual immorality the dwellers on earth have become drunk.” 3 And he carried me away in the Spirit into a wilderness, and I saw a woman sitting on a scarlet beast that was full of blasphemous names, and it had seven heads and ten horns. 4 The woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet, and adorned with gold and jewels and pearls, holding in her hand a golden cup full of abominations and the impurities of her sexual immorality. 5 And on her forehead was written a name of mystery: “Babylon the great, mother of prostitutes and of earth's abominations.” 6 And I saw the woman, drunk with the blood of the saints, the blood of the martyrs of Jesus. When I saw her, I marveled greatly. 7 But the angel said to me, “Why do you marvel? I will tell you the mystery of the woman, and of the beast with seven heads and ten horns that carries her. 8 The beast that you saw was, and is not, and is about to rise from the bottomless pit and go to destruction. And the dwellers on earth whose names have not been written in the book of life from the foundation of the world will marvel to see the beast, because it was and is not and is to come. 9 This calls for a mind with wisdom: the seven heads are seven mountains on which the woman is seated; 10 they are also seven kings, five of whom have fallen, one is, the other has not yet come, and when he does come he must remain only a little while. 11 As for the beast that was and is not, it is an eighth but it belongs to the seven, and it goes to destruction. 12 And the ten horns that you saw are ten kings who have not yet received royal power, but they are to receive authority as kings for one hour, together with the beast. 13 These are of one mind, and they hand over their power and authority to the beast. 14 They will make war on the Lamb, and the Lamb will conquer them, for he is Lord of lords and King of kings, and those with him are called and chosen and faithful.” 15 And the angel said to me, “The waters that you saw, where the prostitute is seated, are

1 More study helps at www.daretoventure.org

Study Notes

peoples and multitudes and nations and languages. 16 And the ten horns that you saw, they and the beast will hate the prostitute. They will make her desolate and naked, and devour her flesh and burn her up with fire, 17 for God has put it into their hearts to carry out his purpose by being of one mind and handing over their royal power to the beast, until the words of God are fulfilled. 18 And the woman that you saw is the great city that has dominion over the kings of the earth.”

REVELATION 17:1–8

Babylon the Great

1Then one of the seven angels who had the seven bowls came over and spoke to me. ‘Come with me’, he said, ‘and I will show you the judgment of the great whore who sits on many waters. 2She is the one with whom the kings of the earth committed fornication; she is the one whose fornication has been the wine that has made all the earth-dwellers drunk.’

3So he took me away, in the spirit, to the desert. There I saw a woman sitting on a scarlet monster. It was full of blasphemous names, and had seven heads and ten horns. 4The woman was wearing purple and scarlet, and was decked out with gold, precious stones and pearls. In her hand she was holding a golden goblet, full of abominations and the impurities of her fornications. 5On her forehead was written a name: ‘Mystery! Babylon the Great, Mother of Whores and of Earth’s Abominations!’ 6I saw that the woman was drunk with the blood of God’s holy people, and with the blood of the witnesses of Jesus. When I saw her, I was very greatly astonished.

7‘Why are you so astonished?’ asked the angel. ‘I will explain to you the secret of the woman, and of the monster that is carrying her, the one which has the seven heads and the ten horns. 8The monster you saw was, and is not, and is due to come up from the Abyss and go to destruction. All the inhabitants of the earth will be amazed—all, that is, whose names are not written in the book of life from the foundation of the world—when they see the monster that was and is not and is to come.

They are brought in vans, they are brought in cars with blackened windows, they are brought across the sea, either captured by force or lured with the promise of a better life. They arrive in countries of the West, knowing no one except their captors, possessing nothing except what little they are given. They are beaten, threatened and raped. Then they are sent out onto the streets. They are the new slaves: frightened, shocked, horribly abused, their physical bruises only a pale indication of the mental and emotional bruising building up inside. They are the new prostitutes, today’s new breed of whore.


Study Notes

There were, of course, plenty like them in the ancient world, too: plenty of girls and boys with no other means of livelihood, enslaved whether literally or virtually. The world of vice is like a lobster pot: easy to get in, very difficult to get out, and all you can do is wait for death.

But there were then, and there are today, whores of a different kind, and this is the kind that John sees in his vision. (I say all this because it’s easy for comfortable Western moralists to use words like ‘whore’, ‘harlot’ and the rest, waving a well-dressed hand at such riff-raff, ignoring or even colluding with the social realities which have pushed the majority of such people to this level of despair and degradation.) There were then, and there are now, young men and women who have no need to sell themselves, but who have discovered that it’s a quick way to make quite a lot of money, and that if you play your cards right you can maintain a high social status, with fancy clothes, glittering jewels and the finest pearls. Throughout history, there have been some who have lived very well (in the world’s eyes) by this means, maintaining a discreet clientele among the rich and famous, a business-and-pleasure arrangement of mutual satisfaction …

… and mutual destruction. Everything John now says by way of metaphor—because ‘Babylon the whore’ is a metaphor, as we shall see—depends on his perception, rooted in his Jewish and Christian belief in the goodness and God-givenness of the created order, that men and women are called either to celibacy or to married fidelity, and that this is one of the central motifs within the creator’s purposes for his whole world. That is why, of course, the final great image in the book is the marriage of the lamb and his bride in the garden city, echoing but far transcending the union of Adam and Eve in the original garden. The rich whore who’s in it of her own volition can dress up fine, can put on a great show, and (not least) can hold out a wonderful golden goblet as though she’s inviting you to a rich banquet. But the eye of faith, not merely of cynicism, recognizes that the goblet is full of urine, dung and blood. Sorry about the nasty words; but perhaps I should have used even nastier ones. The phrase ‘abominations and the impurities of her fornications’ (verse 4) doesn’t quite catch, for most of us, the full force of what John is saying. His point is that the outward appearance of the whore is magnificent, but the inner reality is disgusting, stomach-churning filth.

Why, then, does John use the image of the whore to display Babylon in all its horrible reality? First, because his whole book is about the creator and his creation, which reaches its full glory in the coming together of the lamb and the bride, the husband and wife, in loyal and loving faithfulness, and what he sees in Babylon is the deepest and darkest parody, the thing (like the monster’s 666 as opposed to the perfect 777 or the lamb’s 888) which is so near to the truth and yet so far. The best and most successful lies are those that are so like the truth that it only takes a little blink to be deceived.

Second, because one of the great images of Israel and YHWH in the Old Testament is that of Israel as YHWH’s bride, and one of the saddest prophetic images for when that relationship goes wrong is Hosea’s picture, based on his own tragic experience of marriage,


Study Notes

of Israel playing the whore and going off after idols. This is probably the root of John’s particular vision. The point about Babylon is that it has worshipped idols: the quick-fix pseudo-divinities that promise the earth, take all you have to give, and then leave you with nothing. Babylon, in fact, has become such a pseudo-divinity in itself.

Third, because, like all great imperial systems ever recorded, the Roman world which John knew thrived on sexual irregularity. Whoredom was not simply a metaphor for Rome’s idolatry and social and economic oppression, but also metonymy: illicit sex was a further symptom of the problem. When you have power and money, why not? John, like Paul, and like Jesus himself in Mark 7 and 10, sees this behaviour, and the corruption of God’s ideal of male-female marriage, as an accurate telltale sign of the corruption of the human heart which, springing from the worship of idols, can only be cured by the heart-changing operation which results in worshipping the true God.

Fourth, and finally, John uses the image of whoredom as an appropriate metaphor for Babylon’s oppression because there is something uncannily like prostitution going on when the rich empire lures others into its den. Here, says the great empire, is luxury beyond your wildest dreams! Here all your fantasies can be fulfilled! You don’t have to work hard for them, you don’t have to organize your own country wisely, justly or humanely to achieve them; all you have to do is to come to me, and I’ll share them with you. Oh, yes, of course, there’s a price, but you won’t mind paying that, will you? And the rulers of the world, captains, merchant bankers, eminent men of letters, distinguished civil servants, chairmen of many committees, industrial lords and petty contractors, queue up eagerly, not knowing that they are all going into the dark. By the time the folly is exposed for what it is, it is too late. Once you take the golden cup offered by Babylon, you have to drink it.

Babylon, in every sense ancient and modern, gets her power from the monster on which she sits—the monster which we recognize from chapter 13 as the one that has come up out of the sea (verses 3, 7–8). The monster still amazes people with its new life after its apparent demise. John sees that the monster (inhuman, idolatrous empire) sustains and supports the particular system he presently sees in Rome, whose golden goblet of economic and military power hides so much misery, squalor and suffering. The monster, well capable of luring the whole world with its deceits, is for the moment content to have that world running after the whore. That suits its purposes fine. The only thing in the way is those wretched people who will not worship it, and insist instead on worshipping this new, crazy god, the one they know as Jesus. Hence Babylon the whore is drunk with the blood of God’s people. Witness to Jesus, and Babylon knows what to do. The whore can turn violent when necessary. John’s readers knew that well. Some would come to know it better.

This terrifying, multi-layered denunciation of the outwardly delightful and inwardly deceitful city ought to give pause for serious thought to all those of us who live within today’s glossy Western culture—and all others who look on and see our glitzy world from


Study Notes

afar. Where are we in this picture?

REVELATION 17:9–18

The Monster and the Whore

9‘This is a moment for a wise and discerning mind. The seven heads are seven hills, on which the woman sits. And there are seven kings; 10five have fallen, one is still there, and the other has not yet arrived, and when he does come he is destined to remain for only a short time. 11And the monster, which was and is not, he is the eighth king. He is also one of the seven, and he goes to destruction. 12The ten horns that you saw are ten kings who have not yet received their kingdom, but will receive their authority as kings with the monster for a single hour. 13All of these are of one mind: they give their power and authority to the monster. 14They will make war with the lamb, and the lamb will conquer them, because he is Lord of lords and King of kings. Those with him are called and chosen and faithful.

15‘As for the waters you saw’, he continued, ‘where the whore was sitting, these are peoples and multitudes and nations and languages. 16The ten horns you saw, and the monster, will hate the whore and will make her desolate and naked, and will eat her flesh and then burn her in the fire. 17God has put it into their hearts to do his will and, with a single purpose, to give their kingdom to the monster, until God’s words are completed. 18The woman which you saw is the great city that has royal dominion over the kings of the earth.’

I remember my excitement when, as a boy, I learned to read a map. Someone had given me a ‘maps made easy’ sort of book, which explained how all the symbols worked. I remember being especially fascinated by the contour lines. Growing up as I did in a part of the country with plenty of hills to climb, I loved to imagine the gentle slopes with spaced-out contours and the steep or even sheer sides of the hill where the contours were so close together that there seemed no space, and sometimes indeed was no space, between them. And then there were the forests, the churches, the post offices, and so on, all picked out with their own little symbols. Now, of course, you can go online and switch to and fro from a traditional style of map to an aerial photograph, and back again. That makes it easy, though no less fun. But the need for symbolic designs has not gone away. And the need to be able to interpret them remains.

Of course, if someone climbing a hill were to object that there were no contour lines on the hill itself, we would explain that these were merely map-makers’ symbols to tell you something about the reality, not actual representations of what you’d find when you got there. I doubt if anyone actually does make that mistake, but people frequently make the equivalent mistake when faced with a bit of apocalyptic ‘decoding’ such as we find in the present passage. John has already given us a symbolic picture of the monster and the whore. Now he’s going to tell us—unusually for him—what it all means, step by step. But


Study Notes

will it work? Will we be able to see, as it were, the contour lines when we get to them?

Probably not—though many have tried. John’s first clue is straightforward: ‘The seven heads are seven hills, on which the woman sits.’ No problem: there really are seven hills in Rome (I’ve been up them), and everybody in the ancient world who knew anything about Rome knew that this was so. But the seven kings, broken up into five who have come and gone, one who is there, another who is about to arrive but only for a short time, and another who is an eighth and yet one of the five … who are they?

From one point of view we might be able to identify them, though it would mean a much earlier date for the book than most people now reckon. If we start a list of Roman emperors with Augustus, we then add Tiberius, Gaius, Claudius and Nero, to make five. That takes us up to Nero’s death in AD 68—and remember that many people around the empire believed either that Nero didn’t really die or that he did die but would come to life again and lead an army against Rome, perhaps from Parthia, in order to take back his throne. After Nero came Galba, who lasted into 69 but not for long, and then Otho, who snatched the throne but again didn’t keep it for long. That makes seven, and it is just possible that this is the moment when John is writing, speaking about Otho as the seventh, short-lived emperor, who is about to be ousted by the returning Nero, the monster who was and is not and is to come: the eighth, though one of the seven.

If your head is spinning at this point, it may not be because you are slow on the uptake about either ancient history or first-century symbolic writing, but because John wasn’t expecting you to make that sort of identification. The numbers, too, may well be symbolic. The seven kings stand for the apparent perfection of the monstrous kingdom, with the eighth (though one of the seven) a king who will appear to take the kingdom forward into a new day, but who will instead lead it to its destruction. In other words, don’t try to match up the emperors precisely. What matters is that the monster’s kingdom looks perfect and impregnable, but forces from within its own ranks will destroy it.

But then there come ten more kings. This is another clue to indicate that John is not expecting us to work our way through lists of emperors. However late we date Revelation, it cannot be as late as the end of the second century, which is what we would have to say if we were to add another ten emperors to the seven (or eight) already listed. It is far more likely that the ‘ten kings’ who are part of the monstrous system, and who eventually round on the whore herself and destroy her, are different ruling elites within the larger Roman empire—kings and princes from the far-flung corners of the Western world—who will finally tire of Mistress Rome herself, and will use the bestial, monstrous power of Rome’s own empire to attack the city that has for so long scooped up and sucked in all the wealth and glory that was going.

These rebel forces are every bit as much part of the monster’s rule as was the whore herself. They, like the whore, will persecute the followers of Jesus (verse 14); they are bound to, because the monster’s rule depends on being absolute, and allows no space for


Study Notes

any rivals, especially a rival who claims absolute and unique allegiance and worship. But—here it is again, another reference to John’s own readers in their situation—the lamb will conquer them, because he is ‘King of kings and Lord of lords’, and those with him are called, chosen and faithful. The lamb will conquer them, of course, by the same method by which he has always conquered: by his own blood, and by the blood of his own, the martyrs who remain faithful.

Meanwhile, the ten kings, who will receive their authority collectively for a short but vital period (verse 12) will be God’s instruments, it seems, of bringing all the evil of the monster’s domain to its head. Finally, as we have seen before, evil will turn on evil and destroy itself in the process. The brief description of the fall of Babylon, drawn partly from the biblical prescription for the punishment of a whore (Leviticus 21:9), and partly from Isaiah’s description of the fall of the original Babylon (Isaiah 47), anticipates the terrible chapter that is to come, where the judgment of Babylon is spelled out in far more detail.

All this may seem to be complex beyond the point of comprehensibility. But the abiding and overriding lesson for the church, then and now, should nevertheless be clear. The brutal but seductive ‘civilizations’ and national empires, which ensnare the world by promising luxury and delivering slavery, gain their power from the monster, the System of Imperial Power. Some have called this ‘the domination system’, a system which transcends geographical and historical limitations and reappears again and again in every century. John’s readers already know that this system itself gains its power from the dragon, the accuser, the satan. Those who are caught up in the resultant battles need not feel that they are merely part of a dangerous confusion, of ignorant armies clashing by night. They are part of the lamb’s victorious army, who will conquer the monster in the usual way, by his blood and by the word of their faithful testimony. Thus it has been, and thus it will be.

1

a. The judgment of the great whore (17:1–18)

The first act in the final drama of judgment has to do with the fate of one described as ‘the great prostitute’. Plainly this woman is to be identified with great Babylon (the next chapter will make this clear). She stands for civilized man apart from God, man in organized but godless community (see introduction to chapter 11 and notes on 11:8; 14:8). This first section on the judgment has three subdivisions: first John sees the woman, then he receives an explanation of her significance, and finally he is informed of her punishment.

i. The woman seated on the beast (17:1–6)

A preliminary description of the woman makes it clear that she is a being of great earthly

1 Wright, T. (2011). Revelation for Everyone (pp. 149–157). London; Louisville, KY: SPCK; Westminster John Knox.


Study Notes

splendour, but also that she is exceedingly evil and implacably opposed to the people of God. She is plainly to be understood in contrast to the woman of chapter 12, and the bride of chapters 21 and 22.

1. This phase of the revelation is introduced by one of the seven angels who had the bowls, though which is not said. The same description is given later of the angel who showed John ‘the bride, the wife of the Lamb’ (21:9), and it is not unlikely that we are to see a connection. Out of God’s final judgments there emerges a single purpose which means both the destruction of evil and the appearance of the new Jerusalem. God’s purpose is consistent, but the result varies accordingly as it involves the righteous or the wicked.

The angel now calls John to come. He will show him the punishment (‘judgment’) of the great prostitute. There in fact turn out to be some necessary preliminaries and we do not come to the judgment until the next chapter. But this is the beginning of the whole section concerned with judgment. The woman is described as the great prostitute. Outwardly she was all glittering splendour (see note on v. 4). But John sees the glamour as meretricious. It conceals a basic hostility to God combined with a readiness to seduce people from their rightful allegiance.

The figure of sexual looseness is common in the Old Testament where it is used in more ways than one. The people of God is there seen as God’s bride, so that unfaithfulness is likened to adultery (Jer. 3:9; Ezek. 16:32). But the prophets sometimes think of this unfaithfulness as habitual and mercenary. Isaiah, for example, can exclaim, ‘See how the faithful city has become a harlot!’ (Isa. 1:21; cf. also Jer. 2:20; 3:1; Ezek. 16:15–16; Hos. 2:5; etc.). This is a vivid way of describing an unfaithfulness which is horrible. It shows us that sin is first of all a sin against love.

A further way in which the figure is used is to describe insolent and idolatrous world powers as harlots, e.g. Tyre (Isa. 23:16–17) and Nineveh (Nah. 3:4). They are not said to be adulterous for they are not God’s people, his bride. It is significant accordingly that in the present passage the word is prostitute, not ‘adulteress’. John is not speaking of the people of God, but of a secular power. It is a secular power of low standards, one which has both committed horrible evils and seduced others into sharing her guilt.

The prostitute … sits on many waters. As the woman symbolizes a city, this might refer to its location as well watered, or even to wide-ranging seagoing commerce. Babylon in the Old Testament can be addressed as ‘You who live by many waters’ (Jer. 51:13), a description which aptly draws attention to the facts that the Euphrates flowed through that city and that it was the centre of a network of canals. But the Old Testament can also use streams or rivers to refer to peoples (e.g. Isa. 8:7–8; 23:10; Jer. 46:7; 47:2; Ezek. 29:10). This is the meaning here (see v. 15). For his symbolical Babylon John has taken a conventional description of old Babylon and reinterpreted it along the lines of Old Testament symbolism to give a picture of a world empire exercising dominion over many subject nations.


Study Notes

2. The kings of the earth no doubt regarded their dealings with the city as laudable trade and cultural ventures. John saw them as ‘fornication’ (NIV, adultery) committed with this prostitute. They have joined her in her sins against God. Their commerce with her involved them in the same basic attitude to the things of God as she had. John changes his imagery when he speaks of the inhabitants of the earth (see note on 6:10) as intoxicated by her (cf. Jer. 51:7). While the kings of the earth take the lead, the evil infection is not confined to them. It spreads throughout their peoples. The fact that the wine is ‘the wine of her fornication’ (cf. 14:8) shows that sexual impurity is still the basic thought. Earth’s dwellers as a whole are happy enough at being seduced by the prostitute.

3. Up till now the angel has spoken about the whore. Now John sees her. For this to take place he is carried in the Spirit into a desert (better, ‘wilderness’). For in the Spirit as a state of exaltation and special receptivity brought about by the Spirit, see note on 1:10. The spot chosen for John’s standpoint is significant. Throughout this book the wilderness is the place for God’s people over against the great city (cf. 12:6, 14). It is the negation of all that the city stands for, and in the wilderness one is safe from all that the great city can do. It is only here, only in detachment from the great city, that God’s people can see her as she really is. If they identify themselves with her they will be blind to her essential nature.

From his vantage-point John sees a woman seated on a scarlet beast. That she sits on ‘many waters’ (v. 1) and now on a beast should not worry us. John never strives for consistency in his visions (see note on 1:17). He has two truths to bring out about this woman. One is given by her position on many waters. Now we come to the other, that she is borne by the beast. We should identify the beast with that in 13:1. The woman’s posture indicates a close connection and identifies her as one of the forces of evil continually supported by the beast. Underlying the differing manifestations of evil is the continuing reality represented by the beast.

Scarlet is the colour of the ‘enormous red dragon’ (12:3, where see note; a different Greek word is used). The word used here (kokkinon) refers to the dye made from the kokkos, ‘the female of a scale insect (similar to the cochineal) which clings to the leaves of an oak tree; the dried bodies of these insects, known as kermes, were used by the ancients to prepare a purplish-red dye’ (BAGD). It is a colour of splendour, but also in the Bible, of sin (Isa. 1:18). Blasphemy (GNB, ‘insulting to God’) is characteristic of the beast (13:1, 5, 6), but this is the only place where the animal is said to be covered with (‘full of’) it. This will indicate blasphemy in the fullest measure. For the seven heads and ten horns see note on 12:3.

4. The woman was royally robed; purple and scarlet were colours of splendour and magnificence. They were not for the poor since the dyes producing them were very expensive. Purple was made from the murex, a shell-fish; for scarlet see note on verse 3. Both were costly to extract, so that the colours always indicate splendour and magnificence even more than the particular shades denoted by the words. The woman was also lavishly


Study Notes

adorned; ‘gilded’ (kechrysōmenē) points to liberal use of precious metal.

The golden cup (cf. Jer. 51:7) the woman holds leads to the expectation of a specially satisfying drink. Should not only the best come in such a costly container? But in fact the cup is full of abominable things. This word originally meant anything detestable, but in the Old Testament came to be specially linked with idolatry. This will be its significance here. The following and the filth of her adulteries should probably be understood as ‘even the filth …’. The attractive cup is revealed as no more than an enticement to people to join the glittering harlot in her evil ways. It is her method of seducing them from God. The picture is a vivid one, combining regal state with utter moral and religious corruption.

5. Names are written on foreheads quite often in this book. Thus God’s servants were sealed in this way (7:3; 9:4), and the servants of the Lamb were marked similarly (14:1; 22:4). On the other side the same is true of the adherents of the beast (13:16; 14:9; 20:4). So now the character of the harlot is shown by her name, displayed on her forehead for all to see. Charles draws attention to passages in Roman authors informing us that Roman harlots wore on their brows labels inscribed with their names. The whore is thus in character.

Mystery (see note on 1:20) will indicate that the meaning of the harlot’s name is not open and obvious to all. It is a subject for revelation, and indeed the angel proceeds to reveal it (v. 7). NIV takes mystery to be part of the name, but this is very improbable. It is a way of bringing out the significance of what follows. Moffatt renders by way of symbol’, NEB ‘with a secret meaning’ and JB ‘a cryptic name’. Such translations bring out the point that the name has meaning, but obscure the fact that its significance is not discerned other than by revelation. The angel makes it known to John and John to believers. But the worldly would not know it at all.

The first part of the name is Babylon (see note on 14:8). Previously we have come across this city as a great city seducing all mankind, and the object of divine hostility (14:8; 16:19). Now we see her singled out as the mother of prostitutes. She is not only a prostitute herself, but she spawns evils like her own. With this is linked the abominations of the earth. As in verse 4, all kinds of abominable things are ascribed to the great city, and not one particular vice only. Barclay cites some vivid statements from Roman writers such as Juvenal, who describes the way the empress Messalina used to serve as a prostitute in a common brothel, and Seneca, who called Rome ‘a filthy sewer’. Barclay comments, ‘John’s picture of Rome is not in the least exaggerated; it is actually restrained in comparison with some of the pictures which the Romans themselves drew of their own civilisation.’

6. John saw this woman drunk with the blood of the saints, further described as ‘the martyrs’ (those who bore testimony) (cf. Isa. 34:5, 7, LXX). The metaphor shows that blood had flowed freely. The harlot had slain not one or two of the saints, but a great number. This figure also implies that she enjoyed the process. When she persecuted the church she did not think of herself as performing a distasteful but necessary duty. She rejoiced in it as


Study Notes

a drunkard rejoices in his wine. Drunk is a present participle in the Greek; John is talking about a continuing state, not merely past history. In this passage there can be no difference between saints and ‘martyrs’, but the placing of the two terms side by side adds solemnity to the indictment. The explicit use of the term ‘martyrs’, which means ‘witnesses’, may also be meant to bring out the guilt of the harlot. She was not ignorant of the issues. Witness had been borne.

John was greatly astonished. This may be because of the contrast between what he saw and what he expected. He had been invited to look at the judgment of the city (v. 1). Instead he sees a harlot magnificently arrayed. It is all very perplexing. It is also possible that some of his astonishment comes because he now sees for the first time the true nature of the Roman Empire, the contemporary representative of the great city.

ii. The significance of the woman and the beast (17:7–14)

Having shown John the harlot and the beast, the angel proceeds to explain their meaning. It turns out that the beast is much more important than the woman.

7. The angel inquired why John had wondered and proceeded to explain the mystery (for this term see note on 1:20) of the woman and of the beast she rides. There is but one mystery for these two. They belong intimately together and to know the one is to know the other. The beast is again characterized by his heads and horns (see notes on 12:3; 13:1).

8. The beast is the more important and is explained first. It is not easy to understand all that we are told, in part at any rate because the symbolism seems to have more than one meaning. Sometimes the beast is the ruler, sometimes he is the kingdom (cf. v. 9). Fundamentally the beast is the principal henchman of Satan (the great red dragon) and Satan’s work is done in different ways at different times.

The beast once was, now is not, which is probably an intentional contrast with 1:4. Again, in 13:3 we saw that the beast suffered a mortal wound but recovered. The evil in mankind may seem to disappear, but only seems. It always returns again. The Nero redidivus myth which many see behind this verse is an excellent illustration of what John means (though it does not exhaust his meaning). Nero lived out his evil life. He died. And in Domitian there appeared one who might be called a second Nero, Nero all over again. That the beast was means that he had put in an appearance on the earth. That he is not signifies that he is no longer in evidence.

But this does not mean that the last has been heard of him. He will come up out of the Abyss (see note on 9:1). This identifies him with the forces of evil and indicates that his final sortie will be the climax of the efforts of the evil one. But it will fail. He will go to his destruction. Not for one moment does John lose sight of the certainty of the overthrow of evil. But this is not the way it seems to the inhabitants of the earth, an expression which means unregenerate mankind (see note on 6:10), as the following whose names have not


Study Notes

been written in the book of life makes clear. That this goes back to the creation of the world is a reminder of God’s eternal purpose. But the unregenerate do not discern this. They will be astonished at the reappearance of the beast after his disappearance. The beast has a fascination for worldly minds.

9. Now comes the clue, the word to the wise (cf. 13:18, where see note). John is not now speaking of some obvious truth which is apparent to all. But the wise can work it out. The seven heads are explained as seven hills on which the woman sits. This identifies her with Rome, for the seven hills of that city are often mentioned in ancient literature. (Ladd sees a reference to seven empires and their rulers, but most agree that Rome is meant.) But Rome does not exhaust the meaning of the symbol. As we have seen, the great city is every city and no city. It is civilized man, mankind organized apart from God. It has its embodiment in every age. ‘Babylon, then, is the world as the centre of seduction at any moment of history, particularly during this entire present dispensation. The harlot, Babylon, always opposes the bride, new Jerusalem (Rev. 21:9ff.)’ (Hendriksen). In the first century, Rome was a striking embodiment of what John means by Babylon. In Rome, as nowhere else, people could see the city of mankind bent on its own blasphemous way, opposing with all its might the things of God. The heads are also seven kings. They symbolize both hills and kings. Attention moves now to the city’s rulers.

10. Five have fallen, i.e. they have died. They are out of the way. At the moment of writing the sixth is in occupation of the throne (one is). The seventh has not yet come; his reign is still future.

What are we to make of all this? Many think we should look to contemporary Rome as the illustration of these realities most prominent in John’s mind. In this case the kings are the Roman emperors. Most agree that we should start with Augustus, not Julius Caesar. The five are then Augustus, Tiberius, Caligula, Claudius and Nero. The identification of the sixth depends on whether we accept Galba, Otho and Vitellius as emperors. If so, he will be Galba. If not, he will be Vespasian, and Titus will be the seventh who is to have a short reign. Most accept the latter view, though without making it clear how John and his readers would agree on eliminating Galba, Otho and Vitellius.

A different point of view is put forward by, for example, Hendriksen. He thinks that the kings symbolize not individual rulers but empires (so Ladd). The five which have fallen are the Old Babylonian, the Assyrian, the New Babylonian, the Medo-Persian and the Graeco-Macedonian. The one that is is the Roman, and the seventh, yet future, may stand for ‘all antichristian governments between the fall of Rome and the final empire of antichrist’. Since the eighth is ‘of the seven’, the final kingdom of antichrist may well arise in one of the ancient seats of empire.

Either view is possible, but perhaps better is the view that we are to take the numbers symbolically. Seven will then stand for ‘the power of the Roman Empire as a historic whole’ (Mounce). It is the number of perfection, pointing to the whole. Five kings have passed


Study Notes

away, which puts John into the time of the sixth, that preceding the climax (cf. the sixth trumpet and the sixth bowl).

11. The symbolism becomes very complicated. The beast himself (characterized again as who once was, and now is not, for which see note on v. 8) is now identified with an eighth, and is also said to be of the seven. If we reject Galba, Otho and Vitellius, the eighth emperor was Domitian, and Swete reminds us that both pagan and Christian writers likened Domitian to Nero. John may mean that Domitian was ‘Nero all over again’ (cf. the identification of John the Baptist with Elijah, Matt. 11:14). A difficulty is how we can apply was, and now is not to Domitian. Perhaps in one sense he was and in another he was not Nero. If we take the symbolic view the eighth implies that the antichrist claims to be someone special, whereas he is in reality no more than one of the seven.

The eighth, be it emperor or empire or symbol, is equated with one of the seven. Now the seven have already been identified with the heads of the beast, so John is telling us that the beast, the basic source of evil, finds a kind of incarnation in each of the seven. In a way he is each of them and he is specially the eighth. But John is not concerned with the beast’s career. Indeed, that is part of our difficulty. He does not say enough for us to make a firm identification. His interest is not in what the beast does, nor in his power. It is in the fact that he is going to his destruction. So ultimately perishes all evil.

12. We move now to the beast’s ten horns which we find are ten kings (cf. Dan. 7:24). These are sometimes taken as ten emperors of Rome, either including Galba, Otho and Vitellius, or taking the line a little further down in history. This is to ignore the angel’s express statement, these have not yet received a kingdom. Their dominion is still future, so that they must be held to differ from the seven, five of whom have already fallen (v. 10). Others draw attention to the Nero redivivus myth, which held that Nero would return at the head of large armies from the east, often identified as Parthians. But whether this was done or not, it was thought that he would not be alone. He would have the support of other rulers.

It is something like this that John has in mind. At the End the beast will give rise not only to the eight already mentioned, but also to ten others. These may be earthly kings like the Parthian satraps who were practically independent rulers. Or they may be demonic figures. They are not the same as ‘the kings of the earth’, for these are pictured as mourning over the destruction of the great city (18:9), whereas these ten ‘will hate the prostitute’ (v. 16). They are antichrist’s helpers, to be raised up in the last days. Ten may be their exact number, but more probably it is symbolical and points to completeness.

Two things are said about their kingly state. The first is that for one hour they receive authority. This may mean that their reigns will be short as we count time. More likely it means short as God counts time. To us they may appear great, but to God they reign but for one unimportant hour. They are associated with antichrist and their day will be as brief as his. The other thing is that they receive authority along with the beast. They do not reign


Study Notes

alone or in their own might. They are not to be understood apart from the beast.

13. This last point is underlined. The ten are not a group of independent thinkers. They have one purpose (gnōmē), and this leads them to give their power and authority to the beast. They are willing collaborators, not men forced into an unwelcome association.

14. John looks ahead to the end of time and sees them making war against the Lamb, but to no avail, for the Lamb will overcome them. He is supreme, which is brought out by saying he is Lord of lords and King of kings (cf. 19:16; Deut. 10:17). Against such a Being the minions of the beast are in a hopeless position. With the Lamb are those who are called, chosen and faithful. These are his retinue, not his resources. They represent no independent source of aid for he needs none. Indeed, the very qualities named show that they depend on him. But they share his triumph.

iii. The punishment of the whore (17:15–18)

This concluding section shows the disunity of the forces of evil, and also the certainty that God’s words will be fulfilled.

15. The angel explains the waters on which the harlot sits (v. 1). They are a multitude of peoples over whom she is set (for peoples, etc. see note on 5:9). She has a great empire.

16. It is easy to think of the forces of evil as one united phalanx. But there is no cohesion in evil; it is always self-destructive. Wicked men are not just one happy band of brothers. Being wicked, they act in jealousy and hatred. At the climax their mutual hatreds will result in mutual destruction. There will be hatred between the ten horns and the prostitute, a hatred which will issue in deeds. They will bring her to ruin and leave her naked, i.e. they will strip her of every resource (cf. the punishment of the harlot Oholibah, Ezek. 23:25–30). They will eat her flesh, i.e. prey on her and consume her. And they will burn her with fire. She will be completely destroyed.

17. The basic reason for all this is the divine will. ‘The beast and his allies remain in the hand of the God they defy, and by the impulse of the Devil they unitedly fulfil the words of God’ (Beasley-Murray). God causes them to agree. They will not quarrel and break up their coalition and thus allow the harlot to escape. Her doom is from God. He sees to it that the kings have the unity they need for their act of destruction. They give the beast their power to rule till God’s words are fulfilled (for the plural words cf. 19:9; 21:5; 22:6; it may indicate a multiplicity in the purposes of God). There is treachery on the part of the beast who sustains the whore (v. 3). But God’s purposes are not overthrown. The beast may defeat his own supporters. He will never defeat God.

18. The woman’s identity is now revealed, albeit in a guarded fashion. John learns two things about her: she is a great city and she rules over the kings of the earth. In John’s own day that meant Rome. But in the end-time it is man in organized community (see note on


Study Notes

11:8). 2

The influence of the world’s economic-religious system and the state, their alliance, and the downfall of both (17:1–18)

Rev. 17:1–19:10 is a large interpretative snapshot of the sixth and seventh bowls, which have foretold the judgment of Babylon (which was first explicitly prophesied in 14:8). This is followed in 19:11–21 by an expanded description of the last battle, in which Christ triumphs over the forces of evil. Although only one verse in ch. 17 describes Babylon’s judgment (v. 16), the larger literary unit commencing at 17:1 is dominated by it. Much space is taken up with the beast in ch. 17 because the woman’s significance and power cannot be fully understood except in her relationship to the beast. Ch. 17 (in development of 16:12–13) emphasizes what leads up to the demise of Babylon, which becomes the full-blown focus in ch. 18.

The introduction to the vision: the angel announces to John that he is to witness a vision about the judgment of the world’s idolatrous economic-religious system (17:1–3a)

1 The angel who reveals the vision of ch. 17 and who interprets it (vv. 7–18) is referred to as one of the seven angels who had the seven bowls. This is the first indication that ch. 17 amplifies the sixth and seventh bowls. The main point of the vision is the judgment of the great harlot who sits on many waters. This judgment is another mention of God’s answer to the prayers of the saints’ plea in 6:10. Symbolizing Babylon as a harlot connotes her alluring and seductive nature in attempting to draw people away from Christ. The angel speaks to John in words taken from God’s judgment on historical Babylon in Jer. 51:13, “O you who dwell by many waters, abundant in treasures, your end has come.” Babylon’s “sitting” on many waters speaks of her sovereignty over the nations, for “sitting” in Revelation (3:21; 4:2, 4; 5:1; 14:14; 18:7, etc.) indicates sovereignty, whether used of God, Christ, the angels, or evil beings. 18:7 confirms this, since there Babylon says “I sit as a queen.” At the least, the sitting implies the woman’s alliance with the world and the beast.

2 Part of the basis of Babylon’s judgment is the fact that the kings of the earth committed acts of immorality with her and those who dwell on the earth were made drunk with the wine of her immorality. The kings’ and the nations’ acquiescence to immorality refers not to literal immorality, but figuratively to acceptance of the religious and idolatrous demands of the ungodly earthly order. As in 14:8, her immorality is a Greek genitive of association (= “have intercourse with her”), as evident from the parallelism of committed acts of immorality with her (cf. also 18:9) with the wine of her immorality. The same synonymous parallelism occurs in 18:3, though with slight variation

2 Morris, L. (1987). Revelation: an introduction and commentary (Vol. 20, pp. 195–204). Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.


Study Notes

in wording. The nations’ cooperation with Babylon ensures their material security (see on 2:9; 13:16–17). The intoxicating effect of Babylon’s wine removes all desire to resist Babylon’s destructive influence, blinds them to Babylon’s own ultimate insecurity and to God as the source of real security and numbs them against fear of a coming judgment. For the OT roots, see Hos. 4:11–12: “Harlotry, wine and new wine take away the understanding. My people consult their wooden idol … for a spirit of harlotry has led them astray.” Elsewhere in Revelation idolatry and immorality (Greek porneia) are closely linked (2:14, 20–21; 9:21; 14:8). The economic interpretation of the nations’ intoxicating passion and the kings’ immoral passion for Babylon is clear from 18:3, 9–19, where the same phrases for immorality and intoxication of 17:2 are equated with terms for economic prosperity, and the nations’ loyalty to Babylon lies in her ability to provide economic prosperity for them (see also on 14:8). An economic interpretation of the verse is confirmed by the allusion to Isa. 23:17, where Tyre “will play the harlot with all the kingdoms on the face of the earth.” Tyre is called a harlot because she caused destruction and induced uncleanness among the nations by economically dominating them and influencing them by her idolatry. That idolatry is included together with an economic emphasis is clear from Isa. 23:18, where Tyre’s illicit wages “will be set apart to the Lord” in the future instead of to any other false object of dedication as formerly. That Tyre is in mind at least as an analogy to Babylon is clear from the repeated reference in Revelation 18 to the Ezekiel 26–28 pronouncement of Tyre’s judgment and the specific allusion in v. 23 to Isa. 23:8 (see on 18:23).

Therefore, Babylon is the prevailing economic-religious system in alliance with the state and its related authorities, as it exists in various forms throughout the ages. Of course, the generally known fact that harlots in the ancient world (as today) offered their bodies and sexual services for payment only enhances the economic nature of the Babylonian prostitute.

3a The angel carried John away in the Spirit into a wilderness. “In the Spirit” is a formula of prophetic commissioning, based on the similar formulas expressing Ezekiel’s repeated prophetic commissions, e.g., Ezek. 2:2: “the Spirit entered me and set me on my feet”; Ezek. 3:12: “The Spirit lifted me up” (likewise Ezek. 3:14, 24; 11:1; 43:5). Ezekiel is commissioned with prophetic authority to announce judgment to sinful Israel. Similarly, John’s transport into the realm of the Spirit underscores his prophetic commission and authority (see 1:10; 4:2 and especially 21:10, where allusion to the Ezekiel commissions also occurs in the same manner). And as with Ezekiel, John’s inspired message in 17:3ff. is an announcement of judgment.

The seer’s transport into a wilderness alludes to Isa. 21:1–2, where a vision from God (so Isa. 21:10) is revealed to the prophet Isaiah and is described as coming “from the wilderness, from a terrifying land” (21:1). This allusion is confirmed by the fact that Isa. 21:1–10 is a vision of judgment against Babylon and by the fact that the phrase “fallen, fallen is Babylon” of Isa. 21:9 appears in Rev. 18:2 as well as in 14:8, which itself looks ahead to chs. 17–18. In both Isaiah and Revelation, the desert is central to the vision, though in the former the vision has its source in the desert, whereas in the latter the


Study Notes

prophet is taken to the desert to see the vision. Is there significance in the fact that John is taken into the wilderness? After all, he has visionary experiences in various places—earth (1:9–10), sea and earth (10:8ff.), heaven (4:1), on the seashore (13:1), and on a mountain-top (21:9–10). But the allusion to Isaiah 21 is clear. The desert is at the same time a place of protection for God’s people (both following the exodus and in the end time), but also the habitation of fierce animals like serpents and of evil spirits. It is the place of sin, judgment, and persecution of the saints (see on 12:6 for further elaboration of how God protects His people in the desert). It is a “terrifying land” (Isa. 21:1) in which Babylon’s fall is predicted (Isa. 21:9).

This verse affirms that the whole vision of ch. 17 appears in the spiritual dimension of a wilderness or desert. There the harlot dwells, sitting on a scarlet beast … having seven heads and ten horns (v. 3b). The only other occurrence of wilderness (Greek erēmos) in the book outside 17:3 is in 12:6, 14. There also in a wilderness a “red dragon having seven heads and ten horns” (cf. 12:3 with 17:3) persecutes the people of God (12:13–17). Part of Babylon’s judgment in ch. 18 for persecuting the saints in the desert is that she herself is made into a desert-like place (similarly Isa. 13:20–22; Jer. 50:12–13; 51:26, 29, 43) where only demonic spirits dwell (cf. 18:2, which is introduced by the Isa. 21:9 allusion). The harlot of ch. 17 persecutes the saints (v. 6) in the desert and deceives the earth-dwellers (v. 8). The desert is also where John witnesses the judgment both of Babylon (vv. 15–17) and of the beast and his allies (vv. 13–14). Therefore, on the biblical principle of an eye for an eye, the judgment of Babylon is decreed in the very place where she persecuted the saints.

In addition, Isa. 21:1, which undoubtedly lies behind this text, uniquely combines references to the desert and the sea: “The oracle, concerning the wilderness of the sea.” It is not coincidental that vv. 1, 3 here picture Babylon apparently being in a wilderness and at the same time sitting on many waters. This seems geographically contradictory. However, this is symbolic geography. Already in 12:15–16, an overflowing river appears in the desert. There and here, persecutors of the church are associated with water, because water is metaphorical for evil and deception (for the same significance of “sea” see on 4:6; 13:1; 15:2; 16:3; 21:1).

An alternative interpretation of the desert’s significance here is that John is taken there not simply because it is an appropriate setting for Babylon’s sin to be revealed, but also because it is a place of spiritual security and detachment from the world’s dangers. There he can truly see the evils of Babylon and avoid her deception.

Yet perhaps even there, he “wonders” or “marvels” (vv. 6–7, Greek thaumazō) at her appearance, a word used of unbelievers’ worshipful adoration of the beast (13:3; 17:8). Following this line of thought, though he comes close to admiration for the beast and the woman (see on vv. 6–7 below), he is protected from actually worshiping the beast because of his secure place in the desert. On either interpretation, what is undoubtedly true is that, as in 12:6 and 12:13–17, the desert here has both positive and negative connotations. It is in the desert that John both declares God’s judgment on Babylon and understands her true


Study Notes

evil from a place of spiritual security. If John could come close to being attracted to the woman and beast, how easy it must be for his readers to be seduced. Conceivably, he had to paint these characters of evil in such horrid form so that saints would not be too easily attracted (see further on v. 7 below).

SUGGESTIONS FOR REFLECTION ON 17:1–3A

On the significance of the desert in these verses. These verses present us with a nuanced understanding of the significance of the desert. Revelation consistently presents the desert as the place where, in spite of ever-present danger, God provides security for His people. It is in this place of attack upon God’s people that God now declares His judgment of the attackers. John needed to be taken into the desert (understood as the place of God’s security) in order to avoid being mesmerized by the harlot. How easily is it possible for God’s people to be seduced by her attractive appearance and the economic and social advantages she offers to those who cooperate with her? If this is the most materialistic and wealthy society in human history, are these temptations even greater for us today? What would it involve for us to compromise our faith in order to gain material or social advantage from our own Babylon?

The vision and the seer’s response: John is frightened and perplexed by the magnificent appearance of the hostile economic-religious system in its alliance with the state (17:3b–7)

3b We have begun to understand the evil and seductive identity of the woman in the opening verses of ch. 17. Her wicked character continues to be seen in the present section, especially her close identification with the beast, who, we have already seen (e.g., in ch. 13), is a deceiver and persecutor of God’s people. However, enigmatically part of the woman’s appearance in vv. 3b–7 also reflects something apparently good about her (see on vv. 4 and 7 below). What is this apparent benign aspect of her appearance and why is such a wicked character described in this manner?

John now sees a woman sitting on a scarlet beast full of blasphemous names, having seven heads and ten horns (for full discussion of this description see on 12:3; cf. 13:1–2). The portrayal of the beast is almost identical to that in 13:1, so the same beast is pictured here again. There and here the wording alludes to Dan. 7:3–7, 20, 24. The heads and horns represent the fullness of power held by evil kingdoms who persecute God’s people, since this is their figurative meaning in Daniel 7 (e.g., the fourth beast’s ten horns in Dan. 7:7 are explicitly identified as “ten kings” in Dan. 7:24). The beast’s red color associates him with the red dragon of 12:3. The color indicates royal attire and hence kingship, but more particularly the persecuting nature of the dragon in 12:3 and the beast here, who spill the red blood of the saints. The blasphemous names, as in 13:1, refer to the beast’s false claims of universal sovereignty. Though closely associated with the beast, the woman is not to be equated with the beast. That the woman rides the beast connotes her


Study Notes

alliance with it. She represents the ungodly world as it works with the state socially, culturally, and economically to persecute Christians (17:6; 18:24; 19:2). They are also mutually involved in deception of ungodly multitudes throughout the earth (e.g., 14:8; 17:2, 8).

4 The description of the woman confirms that she represents worldly economic forces which are in collusion with the state in persecuting Christians (for the economic focus see also on 14:8; 17:2): And the woman was clothed in purple and scarlet, and adorned with gold and precious stones and pearls. The description of her clothing is repeated in 18:16, where she is described as the “great city” or Babylon. The parts of her attire are listed as products of trade in 18:12. Therefore the woman, draped with these products, is identified with a prosperous trading system. Her clothing is scarlet, representing her persecution of the saints. Both Isaiah and Jeremiah speak of harlots with red attire symbolizing their spilling of the blood of the righteous (Isa. 1:15–23; Jer. 2:34). The woman holds in her hand a gold cup full of abominations and of the unclean things of her immorality, much like Jeremiah’s description of historical Babylon as a golden cup intoxicating the nations and driving them mad (Jer. 51:7). These unclean things also include idolatrous practices, for in 16:13–14 and 18:2 demons are referred to as unclean spirits, and demons stand behind idols (1 Cor. 10:19–20). The abominations in the woman’s cup are also references to idolatry, for that word is used frequently in the OT to refer to idolatry (Deut. 29:17; 2 Kgs. 23:24; 2 Chron. 34:33; Jer. 16:18, etc.). The unclean things are associated with her immorality. “Immorality” (Greek porneia) and the related verb elsewhere in the book are figurative expressions for idolatry (so 2:14, 20–21; cf. 9:21; see on 14:8; 17:2), as they are here. As we saw in the letters, there is a clear connection in Revelation between illicit forms of economic activity (including simply the worship of money) and idolatrous practices, and the woman represents both. That economic factors can incite idolatry is well attested in first-century Asia Minor (e.g., see on 2:14, 20–22). Customarily, each trade guild had patron gods to which members paid homage in a pagan temple, where worship was directed to a bust of Caesar. Christians who abstained from such idolatry risked economic ostracism and loss of their trading privileges. The harlot of ch. 17 represents these and other like religio-economic aspects of society that lure Christians to compromise and trust in the world’s security instead of security in Christ.

5 The nature of the woman is revealed by the fact that upon her forehead a name was written, a mystery: “BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND OF THE ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.” In Revelation, a name on a forehead reveals the individual’s character and relationship either to God (7:3; 14:1) or to Satan (13:16; 14:9). The woman’s name reveals clearly her alliance with the beast. The first part of the name, Babylon the great, comes directly from Dan. 4:30, where it expresses the extent of Nebuchadnezzar’s power, about which he boasts. His proud independence from God led to his downfall. The mystery of the name refers to the “mystery” (Dan. 4:9) of the dream Nebuchadnezzar had which warned him of the disaster ahead should he continue in his pride. Revelation connects this mystery with the mystery of the last-days fall of spiritual Babylon (cf. Rev. 1:20; 10:7), which will fall because of pride and evil (“mystery” in the OT


Study Notes

occurs with an eschatological sense only in Dan. 2:28–29, which is partly in the background here). This was a mystery prophesied and (in the days of the seventh trumpet, according to 10:7) shortly to be fulfilled. The mystery refers to what is contained in the hidden counsel of God and now being revealed to His servants. In 1:20 and 10:7, the “mystery” involved the unexpected (though not contradictory) way in which Daniel’s prophecy about the establishment of Israel’s latter-day kingdom and the defeat of evil empires was beginning to be fulfilled. The notion of “mystery” in both those chapters is that the kingdom begins ironically through the suffering of Christ and His people (e.g., cf. 1:5–6, 13–14 with 1:20; see on 1:20). Similarly here, but now in application to the kingdom of evil, it refers to the ironic, mysterious way in which God will fulfill His prophetic words concerning Babylon’s destruction—that kingdom will turn against itself (as the next verses will reveal) and begin to self-destruct even before the return of Christ, who will finally demolish Babylon. This was indeed a mystery not as clearly seen by Isaiah, Jeremiah, and Daniel, but is now made clearer to John. Fulfillment of prophecy always fleshes out details that were not contained in broadly-given OT prophecies.

The woman is given the additional titles, Mother of harlots and of the abominations of the earth, thus indicating her central role in directing idolatrous practices and false religion. Babylon is portrayed as a woman in the desert and also as a city (18:10), thus bringing her into contrast both with the mother of 12:1, who also lives in the desert, and with the bride of 19:7–8; 21:2, 10, who is also described as a city (21:2). That such a contrast is intended is evident from the strikingly identical introductory vision formulas for the harlot and the church in 17:1 and 21:9–10. Such contrasts with the church throughout the ages, both on earth and glorified, make clear that Babylon is not a geographical locality but a demonically-directed economic and spiritual reality present throughout the church age. The woman in ch. 12 gave birth to the church, while the harlot of ch. 17 attempts to destroy the church.

6 Those who do not submit to the economic and religious practices of Babylon will be persecuted and even killed: And I saw the woman drunk with the blood of the saints, and with the blood of the witnesses of Jesus. The “and” is explanatory, yielding the meaning that true saints are those who are witnesses of (or to) Jesus, which is why they are persecuted, in that their witness sparks antagonism from the world (cf. 6:9). This persecution could take the form of ostracism from one’s trade. Revelation gives us actual examples of punishment by exile (1:9), imprisonment (2:10), and death (2:10, 13), so this activity of Babylon and the beast was already beginning to unfold as John wrote. The blood of the saints thus encompasses not just martyrdom (see also on 6:9) but all forms of suffering endured by believers. John’s response to the vision of the woman is great amazement: And when I saw her, I wondered greatly (literally, “I wondered with great wonder”), which we will shortly see (in v. 7) includes both fright and perplexity.

7 John’s great wonder or amazement is repeated three times in vv. 6–7, the last of which is in a question from the angel: “Why do you wonder?” This is not merely a question about the seer’s amazement at the unusual vision. Rather, several ideas are


Study Notes

evoked by the question. The angel is really asking why John should be afraid and troubled by the vision, as he was by earlier visions (e.g., cf. 1:17). It is best taken as a rhetorical question whose implied answer is a rebuke: John should not be fearful and perplexed.

The same language of being amazed or “appalled” in Dan. 4:19 expresses Daniel’s fearful and shocked reaction to the vision of the judgment of the Babylonian king. Likewise, John expresses fear about the nightmarish vision he has just seen concerning the horrible nature of the beast and the Babylonian woman and their persecution. Likely, part of what contributed to his troubled spirit was shock and fear over the blasphemous claims of the beast and the severe persecution envisioned.

Also contributing to the seer’s shock may have been the parabolic portrayal of Babylon in the guise of a religiously faithful figure. She is attired (17:4) almost identically to the bride-city of Christ, who is “adorned with every kind of precious stone,” pearls and gold (21:18–21), and clothed in linen (cf. 18:16 and 19:8). The linen is defined as the “righteous acts of the saints” in 19:8, which may have momentarily led John to think that the Babylonian woman was not all bad but had some attractive spiritual features. Enhancing such an impression may have been the fact that the high priest in the OT is described also as adorned with gold, purple, scarlet, linen, and precious stones (Exod. 25:7; 28:5–9, 15–20; 35:9). Such an appearance may have caused John temporarily to “admire” this aspect of the woman. That “admiration” may be part of how John’s “amazement” is to be understood is pointed to by the same use of the word “wonder” (Greek thaumazō) in 17:8 and 13:3, where people “wonder” or are “amazed” at the beast, which leads them to worship him. This makes it more understandable that the angel’s question contains a rebuke for admiring the woman. This could be apparent also from 19:10 and 22:9, where an angel rebukes the seer (“do not do that”) and redirects actions of worship from a wrong object of reverence to God.

Consequently, John may have been temporarily captivated by what appeared, in part, to be a spiritually attractive figure, and was blinded (at least temporarily) to the full, true ungodly nature of the harlot. The apparent spiritual attractiveness may have been enhanced by the fact that elsewhere in Revelation believers, indeed so-called Christian prophets led by Jezebel (see 2:20–24), were contending that some identification with the world was good. In particular, they were contending that worship of other gods (associated with economic well-being) was not incompatible with being a faithful Christian. John now realizes that these are not merely misguided Christians, but that Jezebel and her followers are none other than Babylon herself in the midst of the church, who eventually will be judged along with persecutors outside the church. This identification of Babylon with Jezebel in Rev. 2:20–24 is enhanced from recognizing that later in ch. 17 John describes the Babylonian harlot by appealing to allusions to the OT figure of Jezebel (on which see below).

That John’s lack of clarity about the vision explains a significant basis for his amazement is evident from the angel’s assertion that he will explain the hidden meaning (the mystery)


Study Notes

of the vision of the beast and woman seen in vv. 3–6. Dan. 7:16 (part of the passage in Daniel 7 which lies behind the portrayal of the beast in ch. 17; see on v. 3b above) also emphasizes the need for clarity. The angel, however, questions John’s fear, perplexity, and astonishment and brings reassurance by saying he will unfold the mystery of the woman and of the beast. That is, he will unfold the judgment about to come upon them in spite of the woman’s apparent magnificence and triumph, enabling John to have divine insight that pierces through the ambiguous appearance of the woman. Thus, one should beware of being attracted and confused by this woman draped in such dazzling, bejeweled attire and clothed in linen (so 18:16), since all her embrace can offer is a full strength draught of abominations and unclean things. Even temporary attraction or confusion about her will cause the believer to be unable to perceive clearly her truly evil and deceptive nature and, thus, to be taken in to some degree by her and to compromise.

SUGGESTIONS FOR REFLECTION ON 17:3B–7

On the relevance of the Babylonian whore for all ages. If the woman represents cultural, economic, and idolatrous religious power united in institutional form throughout the ages, how would that institution be identified or express itself in that particular part of the contemporary world where we live today (government, church, business, school, etc.)?

On temptations to compromise. In what ways can modern-day institutions of the world that are evil appear good and admirable in the eyes of Christians? In what ways are believers tempted to compromise with these institutions?

On the anesthetic effect of Babylon’s influence. The intoxicating effect of Babylon’s wine removes all desire to resist Babylon’s destructive influence, blinds people to Babylon’s own ultimate insecurity and to God as the source of real security, and numbs them from fear of a coming judgment. Reflect on those aspects of the ungodly world’s influence on us that blinds us to the ultimate insecurity of the world and to the reality that true security can be found only in Christ and God. Likewise, what aspects of the ungodly world’s influence on us have the potential of numbing us from reflecting on the reality of God’s coming judgment?

On the sources of persecution. What institutions carry out persecution against Christians today in those countries where believers suffer for their faith? Are there religious institutions that cooperate with political and/or economic institutions in persecuting Christians? If so, which ones? Is anything like this beginning to take shape on the horizon in western Europe or North America?

On discerning what is evil. How can Christians increase their awareness of what institutions around them are evil and so protect themselves from being deceived and consequently compromising in some way? If v. 7 provides the answer for John, how could it provide an answer for Christians today?


Study Notes

The interpretation of the vision of the woman (17:8–18)

The interpretation of the beast: the deceptive career of the Satanic state and its allies will be revealed as a sham when they are judged by Christ at the end of time (17:8–14)

8a The threefold description of God found already in 1:4, 8; 4:8; 11:17; and 16:5 is altered and applied to the beast: The beast that you saw was and is not, and is about to come up out of the abyss and to go to destruction. This is also a parody of Christ’s death and resurrection (1:18; 2:8). That the beast is not refers to the continuing effects of his defeat by Christ at the cross and resurrection (see on 13:3, where “death” is equivalent to “is not”). The conclusion of the third member of the formula (he goes to destruction) is an ironic contrast with the altered form of the third part of the divine formula in 11:17 (“Thou hast taken thy great power and hast begun to reign”). The application of the threefold formula for divine eternity to the beast is intended to ridicule the beast’s vain efforts to defeat the true eternal Being and His forces. The application also suggests that the beast’s existence extends from the beginning of history to its end, but the close of the formula shows a clear contrast with God’s existence: the beast’s former, apparently sovereign form of existence throughout history will cease (though on his everlasting destruction see on 19:19–20; 20:10).

The language of the angel mirrors what Daniel saw in his vision: the beasts came up from the sea (Dan. 7:3—and are likened to kings who come up out of the earth in v. 17) and then went to destruction (7:11, 17–26). The Daniel allusion emphasizes the beast’s demise and the irony of it, since already implicit in Daniel 7 itself is the same kind of ironic parody of the beast in relation to the Son of man (see the concluding comments on ch. 13). The third member of the formula in 17:8a (is about to come up out of the abyss and to go to destruction) is a development of the use of Dan. 7:21 in Rev. 11:7. In 11:7, “the beast that comes up out of the abyss will make war with them, and overcome them and kill them.” That the beast’s origin is from the abyss here and in 11:7 suggests the demonic roots and powers of the beast (as in 9:1–2, 11; cf. 20:1–3, 7). Though the beast appears temporarily to defeat the entire church community in the end time, his victory will be short-lived. He will soon thereafter go to destruction. The threefold formula corresponds to the career of Satan in 20:1–10, so that both refer to the same events from the vantage point respectively of the beast and of Satan. There Satan will be said to have existed in the past (20:1 = “he was,” in that he existed prior to the action of the angel in vv. 2–3). He is locked up in an “abyss” (20:2–3 = “is not”). But then, “after these things he must be released for a short time” (20:3, 7–9 = “is about to come up out of the abyss”; cf. v. 10 below). And finally, he will also go to destruction (20:9–10).

After defeating the saints, the beast and his allies will then “wage war against the Lamb, and the Lamb will overcome them” (v. 14), and all those formerly defeated by the beast will accompany the Lamb in finally defeating the beast for all time. Though during the church age the beast’s continued persecution of the saints (13:3ff.) makes it appear that he was “healed” from his death wound, the persecution he conducts at the last stage of history will


Study Notes

be more severe. He will attempt to stamp out the entire church. The beast’s imitation of Christ will be shown as a sham in the end. Whereas Christ’s resurrection results in Him living for evermore (1:18), the beast’s resurrection results in his destruction. It takes divine wisdom to discern the difference in the destinies of the Lamb and the beast (so v. 9a).

8b Multitudes will marvel at the beast’s resurgence: And those who dwell on the earth will wonder, whose name has not been written in the book of life from the foundation of the world, when they see the beast, that he was and is not and will come. “Wonder” has the idea of admiring in a worshipful sense, as is apparent from 13:3ff., where also marveling (the same Greek word thaumazō) after the beast is developed in the following verses by words denoting worship of the beast. As in 13:8, 14, the earth-dwellers (unbelieving idolaters, as in 6:10; 13:8, 14, etc.) are deceived into worshiping the beast. What precisely will deceive them about the beast will be that though he was defeated (is not) at the end of his former existence (he was), he will be able to appear to recover from the defeat (“he is about to come up out of the abyss,” v. 8a). This is also how the beast deceives the multitudes in 13:3, where the world is amazed at his recovery from the apparently fatal wound inflicted by the cross and resurrection. The beast’s apparent health will lead many to follow him. This situation will continue until Christ’s return, when He will demonstrate the reality of His spiritual victory at the cross by achieving physical victory over Satan’s forces.

The earth-dwellers will not be able to withstand deception by the beast because their name has not been written in the book of life from the foundation of the world (see on 3:5 and 13:8 for the background and relevance of the allusions to Dan. 7:10; 12:1–2). To be written in the book of life refers metaphorically elsewhere to believers whose salvation has been secured, so (negatively) names not written in the book refers to unbelievers who do not benefit from having such security (see on 3:5; 13:8; 20:12; 21:27). As in 13:8, this security began before historical time began, from the foundation of the world. The protection for those written in the book comes from the Lamb (13:8; 21:27). Here the stress is on those who will not receive the salvific protection of the book.

9a Those who are written in the book are protected spiritually by the Lamb and are not deceived by the enemy and his agents: Here is the mind which has wisdom. This verse develops further Daniel’s prophecy that in the end-time tribulation true saints will need spiritual “understanding” and “insight” to avoid being deceived by an evil king who exalts his sovereignty over God and persecutes God’s people who do not acknowledge him (so Dan. 11:33; 12:10; see further on 13:18). Those with wisdom and understanding will also be able to understand the angel’s explanation of the vision outlined in vv. 9b–18, which develops Daniel’s prophecy in order to underscore it in the minds of the “called and chosen and faithful” (v. 14). Part of God’s plan is to save His chosen ones through exhortations to have wisdom, to which they respond positively on the basis of divine protective grace.

The beast John has seen in the vision in v. 3 is none other than the wicked state force prophesied in Daniel. John and his churches are reminded of the OT prophetic warning


Study Notes

from Daniel about temptations to compromise with this evil power. Continued recollection of the prophecy will keep believers alert to the danger so that they will not be deceived like many others in the church, who will remain ignorant of the Scriptures, consequently be taken off guard and led astray by the beast, and thus compromise with the state’s ungodly demands.

9b The angel states the interpretation of the beast’s seven heads: The seven heads are seven mountains on which the woman sits. These have sometimes been identified with Rome’s seven hills and therefore with the Roman Empire. The other seven occurrences of the word “mountain” (Greek oros) in Revelation, however, carry the figurative meaning of “strength.” This usage points beyond a literal reference to Rome’s hills to the figurative meaning of kingdoms, especially in the light of 8:8 and 14:1, where mountains figuratively refer to kingdoms. The identification with kings is confirmed by the next phrase (v. 10) which explicitly equates the mountains with “seven kings.” In the OT, mountains symbolize human or divine kingdoms (Isa. 2:2; Jer. 51:25; Ezek. 35:3; Dan. 2:35, 45; Zech. 4:7), so the reference is not to a specific location featuring seven mountains. The identification is also confirmed by Dan. 7:4–7, where seven is the total number of heads of the four beasts (= kingdoms), which also is the source of the seven heads in 13:1 (on which see; note that Daniel’s beast had four heads). For the interchangeableness of “kings” and “kingdoms,” see Dan. 7:17 (“These great beasts … are four kings”) and 7:23 (“The fourth beast will be a fourth kingdom”). In light of all this, it is no surprise that the angel identifies the heads or mountains as seven kings (or kingdoms). There is a metaphorical shift from the beast with seven heads in 13:1 and 17:3. The beast is now pictured not as possessing heads but as being heads. This is evident from the implicit picture of the woman now sitting on the seven heads instead of on the beast, as in v. 3. This identification is made explicit in v. 11. The equivalence of heads with the beast (vv. 3, 9b) suggests that “heads” connotes authority, and here oppressive authority (cf. the blasphemous names on the heads in 13:1).

The number seven is not a literal number designating the quantity of kings in one period of time, but is figurative for the quality of fullness or completeness, as in the OT, Daniel 7:4–7 (see above), and throughout Revelation (e.g., 1:4, 20; 4:5; 5:6; 12:3; 13:1). “Seven” or “seventh” occurs about forty-five times in the book outside 17:3–11, and all are within figurative expressions. As in 12:3 and 13:1–2, fullness of oppressive power is the emphasis. The seven mountains and kings represent the oppressive power of world government throughout the ages which arrogates to itself divine prerogatives and persecutes God’s people when they do not submit to the evil state’s false claims.

The broader identification of the seven heads is confirmed by Dan. 7:3–7, where the total of seven heads of the four beasts identifies distinct empires which span centuries. This is evident from the following considerations:

Just as the kingdoms with seven heads in Dan. 7:4–7 spanned the time from Babylon all the way at least to Rome (whose dominance lasted several centuries after Christ), so the seven-headed beast in Revelation 17 likewise spans many centuries and likely


Study Notes

all of history, especially since the features of the four Daniel empires are applied in Revelation not to four different animals but to one beastly figure.

The sea-beast image throughout the OT symbolizes different wicked kingdoms which span centuries (Pss. 74:13–14; 89:10; Isa. 27:1; 30:7; 51:9; Ezek. 29:3; 32:2–3; Hab. 3:13–14; see above on 12:3).

The kind of authority the beast has is the direct antithesis of that which the Lamb exercises (17:14), so that the beast exercises not mere earthly sovereignty in any one epoch but the ages-long sovereignty of “the great dragon … the serpent of old” (cf. 12:3, 9 with 13:1–3).

That the NT elsewhere held the same conception is apparent from the Johannine epistles, where the figure of the end-time opponent prophesied in Daniel is a present reality, not only someone to come at the conclusion of history but one who has already manifested himself corporately in the form of false teachers within the church (1 John 2:18, 22; 4:1–4; 2 John 7; so also 2 Thess. 2:3–10).

Thus, the beast is a trans-temporal figure.

In John’s time, the contemporary embodiment of the beast was Rome. Rome’s seven hills may have been part of what influenced John to use the figurative number “seven.”

10 And they are seven kings; five have fallen, one is, the other is yet to come; and when he comes, he must remain a little while confirms the trans-temporal nature of the beast and the figurative understanding of his seven heads argued for above. Fallen likely refers to death, the manner of death being unspecified. The three-part description reflects the ironic threefold expression applied to the beast in v. 8 (and so also in v. 11), which has been seen as a parody of the divine name. Since the threefold name for God refers to His existence throughout history, so the application of the formula to the beast’s heads mirrors and connotes the same trans-temporal existence. Therefore, the seven kings are figurative for kings throughout history through whom the beast acts. Five heads of the age-old beast have been slain. In this sense, the beast “is not” (vv. 8, 11). However, though he is defeated, he lives on (he “is”), because the sixth head is presently alive (v. 10). And a seventh is yet to appear. The latter two heads remain only to be slain as well, the last (representing the end-time manifestation of beastly power in the state: see on 13:1–3 and 17:8a) at the end of history.

As elsewhere in the book, John tells the churches that the end is not far off or could come quickly: the other (= the seventh) is yet to come. John’s primary intent in 17:10 is not to count kings (such as Roman emperors, since if John did begin a count, we cannot even be sure with what emperor he would have begun). Five simply shows many human governments have come and gone. Six is the number of man and serves well to indicate the present activity of the beast in any generation. John’s goal here is mainly to inform his readers how far they stand from the conclusion of the full sequence of seven oppressive


Study Notes

rulers. He is telling them that only one more, seventh, short reign will elapse until the end of the oppressive dominance of (what for them was) Rome, which represents all ungodly oppressive powers. This expectation is to be understood, as elsewhere in Revelation, to express an idea of imminence, yet there is an indeterminate distance between the present and the future culmination (as likewise in 6:11, on which see; see also on 12:12; 22:6–7, 12).

Besides the current manifestation of the ancient beast in Rome, another manifestation will come in the future. It has not yet come but, when it does, it will remain a little while, which phrase refers to the final stage of history. This means that the first six “heads” (= figurative kingdoms) are reigns that, collectively, last a long time, likely throughout history, in contrast to the seventh “head.” When the final earthly incarnation of evil comes, it will be unable to establish an enduring reign. It will remain only a short time. This is the same coming noted in 20:3b, where at the end of the age the dragon “must be released for a short time.” This parallel shows again the solidarity of the dragon with the beast. The many wicked kingdoms of the world can be referred to as “the [one] kingdom of the world” (11:15) because of the one all-pervasive Satanic spirit ruling through all these kingdoms. This has precedent in Dan. 2:44–45, where God’s decisive defeat of the fourth and last evil world kingdom also entails the judgment of the preceding three world kingdoms, so that these three kingdoms are corporately identified as one with the fourth.

Some have argued that seven Roman emperors are referred to here. This ignores the symbolic nature of numbers in Revelation, but also presents us with a further problem, for the sixth Roman emperor was Nero, who died in 68, over twenty years prior to John’s vision. John wrote in the reign of Domitian, who was the twelfth emperor. Others identify the five kings with five literal empires, Egypt, Assyria, Babylon, Persia, and Greece, the sixth being Rome (which would fit historically) and the seventh a kingdom yet to come. However, this does not fit with the historical identification of the empires in Daniel 7 which this vision fulfills (comparing Dan. 7:6; 8:8, 21 yields an identification of the third kingdom as Greece). Further, the sixth and seventh empires are pictured in 18:9 as mourning the downfall of the harlot, prompting the question how Rome, purportedly the sixth empire, could be understood to have survived to see that day. How also could the eighth empire be one of the seven? And how are we to account for the various world empires which have arisen since the days of John? If, however, we keep in mind the figurative nature of numbers in Revelation, we will avoid all such pitfalls.

11 The final stage of the beast’s manifestation will not last long, because he will be destroyed before he can carry out his purposes in deceiving and destroying the church: And the beast which was and is not, is himself also an eighth, and is one of the seven, and he goes to destruction. Repetition of the threefold formula emphasizes again the ironic parody in v. 8, but with a further change: the beast is himself also an eighth, and is one of the seven, and he goes to destruction. This change identifies the beast even more clearly with the seven heads. As in v. 9 (on which see), the metaphor changes again slightly; the beast is not pictured as having heads or being heads, but is said to be one of the seven


Study Notes

heads, and is equated with the eighth head, which may then represent a ruler even more completely identified with the beast himself. The point is that the manifestation of the dragon and beast through one of their authoritative heads or earthly kings at any particular historical epoch is tantamount to the full presence of the dragon or beast himself.

Eighth has a figurative meaning, as with other numbers in Revelation. “Eight” likely had such significance in earliest Christianity. After six days of creative activity, God rested on the seventh day. The day of rest completed the creative process and may have been seen as initiating an eighth day, in which the regular operation of the new creation began. Likewise, Christ died on the sixth day of the week, rested in the tomb on the Sabbath day, and rose from the dead on the eighth day. Therefore, calling the beast an “eighth” may be a way of referring to his future attempted mimicry of Christ’s resurrection (see on 13:3 for the healing of the fatal wound and the beast’s mimicry of Christ’s resurrection in 5:6). On the other hand, the number of the beast, 666, indicates that such mimicry falls short of its intended goal (see on 13:18). In the immediate context of v. 11, eight occurs in parallel with the preceding “he is about to come up out of the abyss” and “he will come” (v. 8), both of which express the Satanic counterpart to the third member of the threefold phrase reflecting the three-part formula for God in His eternal existence (the One “who is to come,” 1:4; see further on v. 8a above). That eighth, with its implication of resurrection, is part of this threefold formula and confirms that it is best taken as some form of mimicry of Christ.

Eighth may in addition refer to succession or descent. In this sense, that he is one of the seven can easily be translated he is “one from the seven,” which means he is “descended from the seven” (a genitive of relationship). If this is the case, then the expression means that he is of the same evil nature as the preceding kings. As offspring are of the same nature as their progenitors, so the eighth is of the same evil nature as the prior seven. Understanding the phrase as an idiom of descent helps us see that the translation “he is one of the seven” (NASB, NEB) is incorrect, which is a further argument against an exclusively held “return of Nero” theory in which, according to some scholars, the beast is regarded as a reincarnation or resurrected form of the dead emperor Nero. Rather, he is one of the seven with respect to his nature, not his prior individual existence. Therefore, the phraseology cannot support the idea that the eighth has actually already existed as one of the former heads.

Though the eighth head has the same wicked nature as the others, he is different from them in that he is an even fuller embodiment of Satanic power, and is unlike the rest in that his reign concludes history. Though the eighth king will be a new, escalated manifestation of Satanic might, he will still be part of the beast which has been decisively slain through Christ’s redemptive work. Believers can be comforted that the future career of the beast is not some new outbreak of invincible demonic power. The apparently contradictory “is not” in vv. 8a, 8b, and 11, which stands in contrast to the “is” in v. 10 (understanding that the kings are only instruments through whom the beast works), also emphasizes his defeat and inability to mount any decisive opposition to the already established kingdom of Christ. Nonetheless, he is allowed to continue to exist in the present, as though he were in good


Study Notes

health, and to deceive and persecute, which has a very real effect on unbelievers (this is the significance of the “is” of v. 10; see on 17:8).

Though in the future the beast will rise again (vv. 8a, 8b, 11) and appear to be able to conduct insurmountable opposition against the kingdom of the church on an unprecedented scale (11:7; 20:7–9), the fact of his past invisible defeat at the cross ensures that he will go to destruction, an event which all eyes will see. In 13:3ff., the beast’s parody of Christ’s resurrection focuses on his apparent restoration to power, whereas in 17:8–11 the parody focuses on the beast’s final appearance in history, which ultimately leads to his destruction. In this sense, 13:3ff. and 17:8–11, though portraying similar mimicries of Christ, picture different events in the career of the beast.

To enforce the figurative nature of the number of kings in v. 11, Richard Bauckham (The Climax of Prophecy: Studies in the Book of Revelation [Edinburgh: Clark, 1993], 405) rightly suggests the relevance of the Hebrew idiom known as the “graded numerical saying,” which uses two consecutive numbers in parallel to indicate something that is illustrative and representative rather than literally exhaustive. For instance, Prov. 6:16 (“There are six things which the Lord hates, yes, seven which are an abomination to Him”) lists some representative examples of sin, which represent all sins in general and serve as specific illustrations of such sins (cf. also Prov. 30:15, 18, 21, 29). In fact, “seven” followed by “eight” also occurs in the OT as part of this idiom (Eccl. 11:2). Of special notice is Mic. 5:5, which says that “seven shepherds and eight leaders of men” will be raised up in the time of Israel’s prophesied victory over the nations. Likewise, John’s similar enumeration is not a literal counting of how many emperors there will be before Christ’s final coming, but is illustratively representative, symbolizing all the evil, antagonistic rulers of Rome, and probably those preceding Rome, which will exist before their own extreme sin brings on the final climactic destruction of all evil kingdoms at the end of time.

12 Having interpreted the beast’s heads, the angel turns to an interpretation of the horns: And the ten horns which you saw are ten kings, who have not yet received a kingdom. As Dan. 7:4–7 was the source of the seven heads, so Dan. 7:7–8, 20, 24 is the source of the ten horns. Both Daniel and this verse identify the horns as kings. That the prophecy is as yet unfulfilled is clear from the phrase who have not yet received a kingdom. The number ten does not likely refer to ten literal kings, but is figurative for the great power of these kings who will arise in the future (for the figurative sense of the ten horns see on 12:3; 13:1). The fact that the Lamb’s seven horns are clearly figurative for fullness of power and are also a partial allusion to Dan. 7:7–8, 20 further confirms the figurative interpretation here (see on 5:6). Just as the beast is a trans-temporal force opposing the eternal Lamb, so the ten kings span the ages, since they are the direct opposite of the “called and chosen and faithful” (v. 14). This figurative idea of universal plenitude of power suggests that the ten horns are identical to “the kings of the earth” in 17:18 (and in 16:14, 16; 17:2; 18:3, 9; 19:19). This equivalence is demonstrated by the parallel use of “kings of the earth” in 16:14 (cf. 16:16) and 19:19 and the “ten horns … ten kings” in 17:12–14, all of which refer to allies of the beast in fighting against the Lamb and


Study Notes

God in the final battle of history. Furthermore, the OT background of the image of the kings of the earth committing acts of immorality with the harlot (cf. 17:2; 18:3, 9) also has them turning against her and destroying her (cf. Ezekiel 16 and 23, where Jerusalem represents the harlot; see below on v. 16).

The horns are earthly agents through whom the spiritual forces of evil work, which is confirmed by 12:3, which portrays the dragon as having the ten horns (signifying universal power) throughout the centuries of his existence. Yet in ch. 17, the ten horns seem to be located on the seventh head, since both are yet to come. Dan. 7:7–8, 19–20, 23–24 could confirm this, since the ten horns there are located only on the head of the beast who was to come at the end of history. Perhaps this signifies a concentration of universal power in the very last days when the beast and his agents temporarily appear to conquer the church. Thus, in light of the discussion so far on v. 12, the “ten horns” and “ten kings” represent the final phase of the universal plenitude of ungodly kingly power that has spanned the entire interadvent age.

The fulfillment of the prophecy will be marked by the fact that they receive authority as kings with the beast for one hour. The authority is likely given by God, in light of v. 17, and the fact that God is the subject of so many authorization clauses elsewhere in the book (e.g., 6:2, 4, 8; 7:2; 9:1, 3, 5; 13:5, 7; 16:8). The duration of this reign will be one hour. The time reference is taken from Dan. 4:17a in the Greek OT (Old Greek, though not in the Hebrew text), where it refers to the beginning of the period during which God caused King Nebuchadnezzar, the Babylonian king, to become like a beast. Here also God is sovereign, even over the authority of ungodly kings who ally with the beast in order to defeat end-time Babylon and to prepare to oppose the Messiah (cf. vv. 13–14).

The phrase one hour is repeated in 18:10, 17, 19 with reference to the time when Babylon is judged by God. Their “hour” of reigning likely focuses on the final “hour” of Babylon’s destruction in earlier verses of ch. 18, since destroying Babylon in v. 16 is the climactic expression of their time of rule. “Hour” (Greek hōra) is also used in Daniel 8–12, uniquely in all of the OT, to refer to the final eschatological hour of history when the saints are persecuted, the forces of evil are destroyed, and the saints are rewarded (see the OG of Dan. 8:17, 19; 11:35, 40, 45; 12:1; the Hebrew generally refers to the “end time” or “time of the end,” rather than “hour,” though the meaning is the same). Here not only Dan. 4:17 (see above) is in mind, but also the later uses of “hour,” especially that which focuses on the final activities of the end-time opponent and his defeat (Dan. 11:40–45; an “hour” was apparently the shortest period of time that could be named).

13 The ten kings are united in one goal: These have one purpose and they give their power and authority to the beast. That they give their power shows that they do not simply reign along with the beast but rather submit to his authority. But why do they form an alliance to be led by the beast?

14 Their purpose is now revealed: These will wage war against the Lamb (though we


Study Notes

will see in v. 16 that part of their purpose is to destroy Babylon before mounting an attack on the Lamb). However, they will not triumph, for the Lamb will overcome them. The language of the first clause comes from Dan. 7:21: “that horn was waging war with the saints and overpowering them.” There, as in Rev. 17:12, the kings are portrayed as horns. But there is a change in that the last part of Daniel’s wording is reversed: now it is the Lamb who conquers the agents of the enemy. The prediction of the beast’s victory over the saints in Dan. 7:21 and its fulfillment in Revelation (e.g., 11:7) become an ironic type or analogy of his own final defeat. The language by which the beast was described in Dan. 7:21 and Rev. 11:7; 13:7a as defeating the saints is now applied to the portrayal of the Lamb overcoming the forces of the beast and his horned allies. His defeat must fittingly occur according to the same warlike method by which he attempted to oppress. The reversed portrayal shows that he must be punished by means of his own sin, indicating again the application of the OT principle of “an eye for an eye.” This verse is the true answer to the cry of the beast’s followers, “who is able to wage war with him [the beast]?” (13:4).

The basis for the Lamb’s victory lies in the fact that He is Lord of lords and King of kings. The title is taken from the OG of Dan. 4:37. Just as the Babylonian king was addressed by virtually the same title, so the king of latter-day Babylon (Rome) in John’s day was similarly addressed. The title in Daniel 4 refers to God as the One who demonstrated His true, divine sovereignty and revealed Nebuchadnezzar’s claims to the title as empty by judging the (literally) beastly king of “Babylon the great.” Now the title is applied typologically to the Lamb. The Lamb demonstrates His deity on the Last Day by judging the beast which carries “Babylon the great.” And He exposes as false the divine claims of the emperor and all others like him.

The saints fight and conquer along with the Lamb: And those who are with Him are the called and chosen and faithful. They represent the vindication of the persecuted saints of Dan. 7:21 and Rev. 6:9–11; 12:11; and 13:10, 15–17. Strikingly, Dan. 7:22 promises that after the horned beast attempts to conquer the saints, God will give the judgment to “the saints of the Highest One.” This became the basis for the expectation that the saints will judge the wicked in the end time (so 1 Cor. 6:2).

SUGGESTIONS FOR REFLECTION ON 17:8–14

On finding wisdom in the Word. “Here is the mind which has wisdom” (v. 9) is a critical phrase at the heart of this section. God has provided wisdom to those who study and heed His Word. The phrase directs us back to Dan. 11:33 and 12:10, which clearly state that only those with wisdom and insight will have a true understanding of God’s actions in history, especially in the latter days (which have been inaugurated at Christ’s first coming). The commentary sets forth the proposition that careful examination of Scripture yields an accurate interpretation of the career of the beast and the various kings and kingdoms referred to in these verses, some of which are in existence during the church age. Here, as often elsewhere in Revelation, is particularly demonstrated the truth that the meaning of the various visions must be sought first and primarily from Scripture, rather than only from


Study Notes

current events. How should this alert us to the paramount importance of finding wisdom first in the Word of God rather than in the world around us? Many, among even sincere believers, have seriously misunderstood passages like this because they have strayed from this important principle.

The interpretation of the woman in relation to the waters and to the beast: at the end of history God will inspire the state and its allies to turn against the economic-religious system in order to remove its security and to destroy it (17:15–18)

15 The angel now interprets the waters which you saw where the harlot sits (see 17:1) as peoples and multitudes and nations and tongues. The same formula of universality coined from Daniel (Dan. 3:4, 7; 4:1; 5:19; 6:25; 7:14) occurs throughout Revelation (also see on 7:9; 10:11; 11:9; 13:7; 14:6). In both books, the formula refers to subjects under Babylon’s domination. Isa. 17:13 also uses the metaphor of “many waters” for “many nations” (for “waters” linked with or representing nations cf. likewise Isa. 8:7; 23:10; Jer. 46:7–8; 47:2). The “many waters” have already been seen to be an allusion to Jer. 51:13, where they refer to the waters of the Euphrates and the channels and canals which surrounded Babylon (see on v. 1). These waters helped the city to flourish economically and provided security against outside attack. The multitudes of fallen humanity which the waters now represent are the basis for Babylon’s economic trade and economic security.

16 The coalition of the ten horns … and the beast forms first to destroy the harlot, before attempting to do the same to the Lamb: And the ten horns which you saw, and the beast, these will hate the harlot and will make her desolate and naked, and will eat her flesh and will burn her up with fire. The images of the harlot’s destruction are borrowed from the pictures of God’s judgment against another harlot—unfaithful Israel. The portrayal of the harlot’s desolation is sketched according to the outlines of the prophesied judgment of apostate Jerusalem by God in Ezek. 23:25–29, 47: “your survivors will be consumed by the fire” (v. 25); “they will also strip you of your clothes” (v. 26); “and they will deal with you in hatred … and leave you naked and bare. And the nakedness of your harlotries shall be uncovered” (v. 29); “they will … burn their houses with fire” (v. 47). Likewise, Ezek. 16:37–41 prophesies against faithless Israel: “I shall gather together all your lovers with whom you took pleasure … they will tear down your shrines … and will leave you naked and bare … they will … burn your houses with fire.” Ezekiel even saw the harlot Israel drinking from a cup (23:31–34), as does the harlot Babylon in v. 4 above. This prophecy was historically fulfilled when Babylon conquered Jerusalem (for other OT references to Israel as a harlot see 2 Chron. 21:11; Ezek. 16:15, 17, 28, 35, 41; 23:1–21, 44; Isa. 1:21; 57:3; Jer. 2:20; 3:1; 13:27; Hos. 2:2–5; 4:12, 15, 18; 5:4; 9:1; Mic. 1:7).

The same imagery is now reapplied to the desolation of the Babylonian harlot. What Babylon did to Israel in the OT epoch is now turned around and applied to the Babylonian world system in the new covenant age. The kings of the earth (cf. v. 2, or “kings from the east,” 16:12) gather together for war and turn against Babylon. Her waters are dried up (16:12), and she is destroyed. These kings represent the political arm of the world system,


Study Notes

which turns against the economic-religious arm in a kind of worldwide civil war. The drying up of the Euphrates in 16:12 is a picture of how the multitudes of Babylon’s religious and economic adherents throughout the world (also pictured as “waters” in v. 15) become disloyal to it (see on 16:12). Later (18:9–11), it appears that these kings, along with the merchants (representing Babylon’s economic component), have occasion to weep over her destruction, perhaps suggesting the kings were duped by the beast to do his will and then regretted the loss of their own security, thus illustrating the fact that Satan causes people to destroy even that which is precious to them.

The Babylonian harlot is also modeled on Jezebel, who represents the spirit of idolatry, a spirit still active in the churches (2:20–24). The object of this destruction includes the apostate church, which has “committed acts of immorality” by cooperating with the idolatrous economic system (see on 2:14, 20–22). Their leader has even been referred to under the image of a harlot (2:20–22). Her followers will have the shame of their nakedness revealed (16:15; the reference to “the shame of your nakedness” in 3:17–18 may indicate the presence of Jezebelic activity in Laodicea). Strikingly, the phrase (they) will eat her flesh is reminiscent of Jezebel’s destiny: “the dogs shall eat the flesh of Jezebel” (2 Kgs. 9:36). Jezebel’s destruction, according to the same verse, likewise happened according to the word of the Lord, just as is the case here.

Note the many other parallels between the OT Jezebel and the Babylonian harlot, which further link the latter to the false prophetess Jezebel active in at least one of the seven churches:

Both were heavily adorned or made up (2 Kgs. 9:30; Rev. 17:4).

Both were queens (1 Kgs. 16:31; Rev. 17:18; 18:7).

Both controlled seductively (1 Kgs. 21:25; Rev. 17:2).

Both were guilty of spiritual fornication or immorality (2 Kgs. 9:22; Rev. 17:1–2).

Both engaged in witchcraft (2 Kgs. 9:22; Rev. 18:23).

Both were greedy for wealth (1 Kgs. 21:7; Rev. 18:11–19).

Both persecuted the saints (1 Kgs. 18:4; Rev. 17:6).

In both cases a righteous remnant opposed her sinful ways (1 Kgs. 19:18; Rev. 17:14).

God avenged on both the blood of His servants (2 Kgs. 9:7; Rev. 19:2).

The destruction of both occurs quickly (2 Kgs. 9:33–37; Rev. 18:10, 17, 19).

God judges the followers of both (1 Kgs. 18:40; 2 Kgs. 10:19; Rev. 2:23; 18:9–10; 20:15).

Thus the false teacher Jezebel in Rev. 2:20–22 is in fact part of “Babylon the great,”


Study Notes

which is raising its head within the church itself through the figure of a purported Christian teacher, who is really a false teacher. The content of her false teachings within the church of Thyatira was probably an expression of the Babylonian system’s worldly ideas communicated with a veneer of Christian-sounding language. The overlap between the apostate segment of the church and the wider, antagonistic pagan system is presupposed in 18:4ff., where those on the verge of compromise are exhorted to “come out of her.” This is an allusion to Isa. 48:20; 52:11; Jer. 50:8; 51:6, where Israel is exhorted to come out of impure Babylon when the time for restoration to Jerusalem comes.

Some commentators have limited the reference of the harlot only to the apostate church, especially because Ezekiel 23 and the other above-mentioned OT references pertain only to apostate Israel’s judgment. Furthermore, apostate Israel is often referred to as a harlot in the OT (e.g., 2 Chron. 21:11; Ezek. 16:15, 17, 28, 35, 41; 23:1–21, 44; Isa. 1:21; 57:3; Jer. 2:20; 3:1; 13:27; Hos. 2:2–5; 4:11–12, 15, 18; 5:4; 9:1; Mic. 1:7). Indeed, the portrait of the harlot throughout Revelation 17 draws also from the similar depiction in Jer. 2:20–4:31: there Judah is a harlot (2:20) who “had a harlot’s forehead” (3:3), who causes sin in others (2:33), on whose “skirts is found the lifeblood of the innocent” (2:34), whose “dress (is) in scarlet,” who decorates herself “with ornaments of gold” (4:30), and whose lovers will despise her and try to kill her (4:30). Israel is called a harlot because, though she is married by faith to Yahweh, she has spiritual intercourse with idols.

However, in the prophets “harlot” can also refer to other ungodly nations: in Nah. 3:4–5 and especially Isa. 23:15–18, Nineveh and Tyre are called harlots because they cause ruin and uncleanness among the nations by economically dominating them and influencing them by their idolatry. Furthermore, the harlot in Revelation 17 is called “Babylon the great,” which is an allusion to the proud, pagan Babylonian city in Dan. 4:30.

Apostate national Israel of the first and following centuries also composes Babylon, but does not exhaust it by itself (against some writers, who see only apostate Israel here). Nevertheless, unbelieving Israel’s partial inclusion in Babylon also accounts for some of the allusions from the OT about Israel as a harlot and her impending judgment. Furthermore, apostate Israel performed her share of persecution together with past and present pagan oppressors of the faithful remnant (Matt. 21:33–42; 23:29–35; Acts 7:51–52; 13:45; 14:2; 1 Thess. 2:14–16; see above on 2:9–10; 3:9).

Therefore, though most past commentators have tended to identify Babylon with only ungodly Roman culture, only the apostate church, or only apostate Israel, it is better to see these identifications as not mutually exclusive. The wicked religious-economic culture of the evil Roman world system (which is trans-temporal) is the focus, and the apostate church and unbelieving Israel are included with it inasmuch as they have become part of the sinful world system.

Consequently, Babylon refers to apostate national Israel, to the pagan world system, and to the apostate church which cooperates with it. That “Babylon the great” is the entire


Study Notes

corrupt economic-religious system and not merely the apostate church is apparent from the references to Babylon in chs. 14, 16, and 18 (see 14:8; 16:18–21; 17:4–6, 18; ch. 18). Nevertheless, John’s overriding concern is to warn the churches about compromise with this system so that they will not be judged with it. John wants to warn them that the false teaching of Jezebel is none other than the ideology of the world.

17 The beast and his allies will overthrow Babylon, for God has put it in their hearts to execute His purpose by having a common purpose, and by giving their kingdom to the beast, until the words of God should be fulfilled. Even though the beast and the kings join together in a common cause, God Himself is the ultimate author of the events. He brought about the devilish alliance, unbeknownst to the kings or to the beast, in order to fulfill (until the words of God should be fulfilled) His deeper purposes, the purposes prophesied concerning the fourth beast and the ten horns in Dan. 7:19–28, which are unfolded in greater and clearer detail in Revelation 17. Likewise, the declaration in 10:7 (on which see) that “the mystery of God is finished” refers to an unexpected form of OT prophetic fulfillment, especially from Daniel (see also on 17:5, 7 for the use of “mystery” in connection with unexpected fulfillment). Here, the unexpected fulfillment is the apparently victorious kingdom of evil unknowingly beginning to self-destruct by battling against itself and destroying its own economic-religious infrastructure (see also on v. 16). Only an initiative from God could cause them to commit such a nearsighted and foolish act. At the end of history God will cause Satan to be divided and fight against himself, so that he will be brought to his final defeat (cf. Mark 3:26).

Civil war occurs throughout the ages and is an anticipation of the final civil war. The OT also predicts that it will happen among the forces of evil at the close of the age (Ezek. 38:21; Hag. 2:22; Zech. 14:13). Vv. 16–17 view the final civil war as happening on an escalated scale, since Babylon represents the universal economic-religious system throughout the earth. Contributing to the picture of war among former allies are the prophecies from Ezek. 16:37–41 and 23:22–29, 47 that harlot Israel’s illicit lovers (the idolatrous nations) will turn against her and destroy her. According to the pattern of vv. 14–16, the Jewish work 4 Ezra 13:30–38 predicts that there will be civil war among wicked nations, and then they will unite to “fight against” God’s Son when he comes. It could be argued on the basis of Ezek. 38:21; Hag. 2:22; and Zech. 14:13 that eschatological civil war was clearly revealed in the OT as part of the demise of evil and therefore should not be considered an unexpected development in Revelation 17. However, these prophecies refer simply to God’s enemies raising their sword (or hand) against one another. The details of the civil war are vague, and this is what ch. 17 elaborates in more clarity. Indeed, the evil kingdom’s destruction of its own economic-religious power bloc is ironic and unforeseen in the OT. This unexpected fulfillment of civil war was perhaps dimly seen already in the OT itself, but is now given more clarity.

18 The woman is interpreted as the great city, which reigns over the kings of the earth. She includes the entire evil economic-religious system of the world throughout history. That she has sovereignty over the world demonstrates that she must be identified


Study Notes

more broadly than simply with unbelieving Israel or the apostate church. Likewise, 18:23 reveals her universal nature by describing her as one who has deceived all the nations. Note the parallels between the two women of Revelation, the bride of Christ and the Babylonian harlot, representing contrasting trans-temporal realities existing during the period between Christ’s first and second comings:

One is a pure bride (21:9) and the other an impure harlot (17:1).

The language introducing each is almost identical (17:1 and 21:9–10).

Both are adorned with costly jewels and linen; the harlot’s outward attire hides her inner corruption (17:4; 18:16), but the bride’s reveals the glory of God (21:2, 9–23).

One woman relies on heaven (12:1), the other on the kings of the earth (17:15).

Each is seen in a desert and referred to as a city (12:14 and 21:2; 17:3 and 17:18).

SUGGESTIONS FOR REFLECTION ON 17:15–18

On the presence of the harlot within the church. The commentary presents a series of detailed parallels between the OT Jezebel and the Babylonian harlot. Rev. 2:20–24 suggests that a spirit of Jezebel is active in at least one of the seven churches. The figure of the harlot here also draws on other OT passages alluding either to unfaithful Israel or to pagan nations. We expect to find false ideology in the world (= the pagan nations), or even in dead or ungodly religious systems (= unfaithful Israel), but it is hard to contemplate such false teaching operating within what professes to be the body of Christ. How are we to identify such idolatrous, Jezebelic activity and false teaching in the church today? How important is it to realize that even in the church we may be confronting supernatural spiritual dynamics of an evil nature? Remember that Jezebel’s teaching in Revelation 2 is called “the deep things of Satan” (2:24). Satan still masquerades an as angel of light. What strategies can we employ to discern false teaching and to defeat the attacks of the enemy in the form of false teaching in the church? How can we discern when the world (that is, the Babylonian world system) exercises influence within our own churches?

3

3 Beale, G. K., & Campbell, D. H. (2015). Revelation: A Shorter Commentary (pp. 353–380). Grand Rapids, MI; Cambridge, U.K.: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.


P rostitution o f P ower, P rivilege, P leasure a nd V …...2017/09/24 · S t u d y N o t es The...

Documents

Transcript of P rostitution o f P ower, P rivilege, P leasure a nd V …...2017/09/24 · S t u d y N o t es The...