Overview of P3M3, Geof Leigh 19th Jan 2016, Bolton
-
Upload
association-for-project-management -
Category
Business
-
view
750 -
download
3
Transcript of Overview of P3M3, Geof Leigh 19th Jan 2016, Bolton
© Slide 1
Overview of P3M3 V3
2015
Rod Sowden Geof Leigh
www.aspireeurope.com
© Slide 2
Aspire Europe
Formed 2004 MSP lead author 2007 P3M3 lead author 2008 MSP lead author 2011 P3M3 lead author 2015 BCM Survival Guide 2014 SRO Survival Guide 2015 Programme Manager Survival Guide 2015 Easy guide to planning 2015
© Slide 3
Maturity models – why bother?
“If anything is certain, it is that change is certain. The world we are planning for today will not exist in this form” Phil Crosby
Forbes Leadership
© Slide 4
Organisational Performance Journey
• Level 1 is characterised by
heroic and ad-hoc behaviours • Level 2 is characterised by
groups and teams setting their own ways of working or a central approach that is partially adopted
• Level 3 is characterised by a consistent approach being used across the organisation.
• Level 4 is characterised by continual improvement and analysis of performance
• Level 5 organisations are optimised for their environment
© Slide 5
About P3M3
2005 – P3M3 v1
2008 – P3M3 v2
2015 – P3M3 v3
• Baselining current capability (for later comparison)
• Benchmarking capability against other organisations (possibly to harvest best practice from a community of organisations)
• Discovering capabilities to determine which areas to concentrate on
• Diagnosing systemic weaknesses to eliminate root causes and non-confirming costs
• Prioritising improvement initiatives (based on any of the above)
• Certifying capability through independent assessment
© Slide 6
P3M3 maturity model
People
Tools Process
Assignment
The P3M3 model looks for balance between processes, tools and people, at level 3 these are normally in balance and at level 4 they are becoming more effective and efficient.
© Slide 7
Using P3M3 to optimise
£ Money Spent
Degree of Process / Formality
Point of Optimum Balance
“Cost of Winging it!” “Cost of Prevention”
£ Money Spent
© Slide 8
What did we learn from P3M3 Version 2
People found the style endearing, but not easy to assess Assessments offered too much flexibility Designed for self delivery organisations Self assessments were misleading and needed to be improved Needed to be widened and deepened for accuracy
© Slide 9
What did we achieve with P3M3 Version 2
Transport for London Main UK public sector Transport sector, NR NDA and Sellafield Ltd Australian government FIFA Gatwick Airport London Olympics Queensland Government New Zealand government Measurement of
Suppliers Partner
We got it right !
© Slide 10
P3M3 has provided evidence of the cost of low maturity
Slow or random decision making Poor requirements Duplication and overlap Poor knowledge management Poor team performance Excessive meetings Using poor frameworks and process Hidden operational costs Excessive reporting and documentation
Transport for London - £1bn saving moving from level 1 to 4 in 5 years
PMI - High maturity organisations within 2% of budget, low maturity
normally 30%+
UKBA saved 40% of training budget as a result of a survey
Estimated 500 assessments of 200 organisations, we have done over half
Mandated in Australia and New Zealand. All UK central government and
the core cities
© Slide 11
What's new in P3M3 Version 3
2 years of design, development and testing Increased alignment with industry bodies of knowledge, notably PMI, IPMA, ISO21500 and APM More breadth – e.g. commercial management
More depth – e.g. behaviours, model integration Easier to use – simple on-line self-assessment Better diagnostics – identification of common weaknesses Thread attributes aligned to show incremental improvement
© Slide 12
P3M3 Cube Threads Common assessment areas across each perspective
Tools and techniques Standards and processes
Information and knowledge Organisation
Assurance Behaviours Plans
Org
anis
atio
nal G
over
nanc
e
Man
agem
ent C
ontro
l
Ben
efits
Man
agem
ent
Ris
k M
anag
emen
t
Fina
nce
Man
agem
ent
Sta
keho
lder
Man
agem
ent
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Perspectives The major process groupings within P3M3
• 3 dimension model • 5 levels (like
CMMI) • 7 perspectives • 3 models; portfolio,
programme & project
• Minimum of 9 threads and up to 13
• Basis for reporting • Threads used for
diagnosis and identification of systemic weaknesses
© Slide 15
Aspire adds value – with rich reporting
Thread BM FM MC OG ResM RM SM Thread AvgAsset 3.00 3.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 4.00 3.00 3.29Assurance 3.50 4.00 3.67 3.50 3.50 4.00 3.50 3.67Behaviours 4.00 4.00 3.50 3.17 3.33 3.67 3.00 3.52Commercial Buy 3.00 3.00 3.40 3.17 3.75 3.00 3.00 3.19Commercial Sell 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Information & Know ledge Management 3.50 3.50 3.67 3.40 3.50 4.00 3.20 3.54Infrastructure & tools 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.00 3.00 3.33 3.00 3.40Model Integration 4.00 3.50 3.80 3.50 3.00 4.00 2.00 3.40Organisation 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.33 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.48Planning 3.50 3.50 3.75 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.25Process 4.00 3.33 3.40 3.50 3.50 3.00 3.00 3.39Standards 3.50 3.50 3.00 3.50 3.00 3.50 3.00 3.29Technique 3.50 3.00 3.75 3.67 2.57 3.40 3.00 3.27
© Slide 16
Aspire adds value – with extensive experience
Been there, done that got the T-shirt
We know what good (and bad) look like because we have experienced both
We have used our experience to provide accurate assessments and practical recommendations which led to real improvement 1. Sellafield 2. Plymouth CC 3. Arcadis 4. Qinetic 5. DECC
© Slide 17
How do successful improvements work?
Attributes Recomendations Reworded into
Prioritised Into a schedule
As improvement is achieved
The new P3M3 score is evidence
Improvement activities
Grouped into
Potential score
Deep diagnosis
Change programme