Overview of inversion result for mega-dike d0 (September ...

14
X - 62 GRANDIN ET AL.: SEQUENCE OF RIFTING IN AFAR IN 2005–2009 -10 -15 -5 0 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 Depth (km) Distance along dike plane (km) Opening (m) 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 -10 -15 -5 0 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 Depth (km) Distance along dike plane (km) B C -400 -200 0 200 400 Stress change (bar) Data 051026-040728 Model 051026-040728 Residue 051026-040728 Data 051028-050506 Model 051028-050506 Residue 051028-050506 40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚ 12˚ 12.5˚ 12˚ 12˚ 12˚ 12.5˚ 12˚ 12.5˚ 12.5˚ 12˚ 12.5˚ 12˚ 12.5˚ 40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚ 12.5˚ 12.5˚ 12˚ 12.5˚ 12.5˚ 12˚ 12.5˚ 12˚ 12.5˚ A 0 50.0 –50.0 LOS (cm) LOS (cm) LOS LOS LOS LOS LOS LOS LOS LOS LOS LOS LOS LOS -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 T28 T49 Distance along profile (km) LOS (cm) D Line of cross-section NNW SSE NNW SSE ENE WSW Figure S-0. Overview of inversion result for mega-dike d0 (September 2005). A: InSAR data, model and residues for ascending (top) and descending tracks (bottom). Line of sight (LOS) is shown by a black arrow. Increasingly negative range-change corresponds to increasing distance between the satellite and the ground. The curved red line represents the projection to the vertical surface of the grid used for elastic modeling of dike intrusions. B: Opening distribution. C: Normal stress change on the dike plane. D: Cross-section through LOS data (circles) and model (continuous line), for a profile perpendicular to the dike, roughly at the latitude of maximum opening (location shown in A). The vertical dashed black lines bound a region where the inversion results are potentially unreliable. DRAFT July 5, 2010, 4:13pm DRAFT

Transcript of Overview of inversion result for mega-dike d0 (September ...

Page 1: Overview of inversion result for mega-dike d0 (September ...

X - 62 GRANDIN ET AL.: SEQUENCE OF RIFTING IN AFAR IN 2005–2009

−10

−15

−5

0

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30

Depth(km)

Distance along dike plane (km)

Opening (m)0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0

−10

−15

−5

0

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30

Depth(km)

Distance along dike plane (km)

B

C−400 −200 0 200 400

Stress change (bar)

Data 051026−040728 Model 051026−040728 Residue 051026−040728

Data 051028−050506 Model 051028−050506 Residue 051028−050506

40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚40.5˚ 41˚

40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚40.5˚ 41˚

12˚

12.5˚

12˚

12˚

12˚

12.5˚

12˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12˚

12.5˚

12˚

12.5˚

40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚40.5˚ 41˚

40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚40.5˚ 41˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12˚

12.5˚

12˚

12.5˚

A

0

50.0

–50.0

LOS (cm)LOS (cm)

LOSLOS

LOSLOS

LOSLOS

LOSLOS

LOSLOS

LOSLOS

−40 −30 −20 −10 0 10 20 30 40

−100

−50

0

50

100

150

200

250

300T28

T49

Distance along profile (km)

LO

S (cm

)

D

Line of

cross-section

NNW SSE

NNW SSE

ENEWSW

Figure S-0. Overview of inversion result for mega-dike d0 (September 2005). A: InSAR data,

model and residues for ascending (top) and descending tracks (bottom). Line of sight (LOS) is

shown by a black arrow. Increasingly negative range-change corresponds to increasing distance

between the satellite and the ground. The curved red line represents the projection to the vertical

surface of the grid used for elastic modeling of dike intrusions. B: Opening distribution. C:

Normal stress change on the dike plane. D: Cross-section through LOS data (circles) and model

(continuous line), for a profile perpendicular to the dike, roughly at the latitude of maximum

opening (location shown in A). The vertical dashed black lines bound a region where the inversion

results are potentially unreliable.

D R A F T July 5, 2010, 4:13pm D R A F T

Page 2: Overview of inversion result for mega-dike d0 (September ...

GRANDIN ET AL.: SEQUENCE OF RIFTING IN AFAR IN 2005–2009 X - 63

Data 060628−060419

Data 060624−060415

Model 060628−060419

Model 060624−060415

Residue 060628−060419

Residue 060624−060415

40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚40.5˚ 41˚

40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚40.5˚ 41˚

12˚

12.5˚

12˚

12˚

12˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12˚

12.5˚

12˚

12.5˚

40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚40.5˚ 41˚

40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚40.5˚ 41˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12˚

12.5˚

12˚

12.5˚

A

LOSLOS

LOSLOS

Line of

cross-section

LOSLOS LOSLOS

LOSLOS

−10

−15

−5

0

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30

Depth(km)

Distance along dike plane (km)

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0Opening (m)

−10

−15

−5

0

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30

Depth(km)

Distance along dike plane (km)

B

C−80 −40 0 40 80

Stress change (bar)30 40

−40

−30

−20

−10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

−40 −30 −20 −10 0 10 20

T28

T464

T49

Distance along profile (km)

LO

S (cm

)

D

NNW SSE

NNW SSE

ENEWSW

12˚12˚0

2.82

–2.82

LOS (cm)LOS (cm)

Figure S-1. Same as Figure S-0 for dike d1 (June 2006). Note that color scaling is different

from that of Figure S-0.

D R A F T July 5, 2010, 4:13pm D R A F T

Page 3: Overview of inversion result for mega-dike d0 (September ...

X - 64 GRANDIN ET AL.: SEQUENCE OF RIFTING IN AFAR IN 2005–2009

LO

S (cm

)

Data 20060628−20060802

Data 20060624−20060729

Model 20060628−20060802

Model 20060624−20060729

Residue 20060628−20060802

Residue 20060624−20060729

40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚40.5˚ 41˚

40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚40.5˚ 41˚

12˚

12.5˚

12˚

12˚

12˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12˚

12.5˚

12˚

12.5˚

40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚40.5˚ 41˚

40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚40.5˚ 41˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12˚

12.5˚

12˚

12.5˚

A

LOSLOS

LOSLOS

Line of

cross-section

LOSLOS

LOSLOS

LOSLOS

LOSLOS

−10

−15

−5

0

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30

Depth(km)

Distance along dike plane (km)

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0Opening (m)

−10

−15

−5

0

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30

Depth(km)

Distance along dike plane (km)

B

C−80 −40 0 40 80

Stress change (bar)30 40

−40

−30

−20

−10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

−40 −30 −20 −10 0 10 20

T28

T464

Distance along profile (km)

LO

S (cm

)

D

NNW SSE

NNW SSE

ENEWSW

12˚12˚0

2.82

–2.82

LOS (cm)LOS (cm)

Figure S-2. Same as Figure S-0 for dike d2 (July 2006).

D R A F T July 5, 2010, 4:13pm D R A F T

Page 4: Overview of inversion result for mega-dike d0 (September ...

GRANDIN ET AL.: SEQUENCE OF RIFTING IN AFAR IN 2005–2009 X - 65

−10

−15

−5

0

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30

Depth(km)

Distance along dike plane (km)

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0Opening (m)

−10

−15

−5

0

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30

Depth(km)

Distance along dike plane (km)

B

C−80 −40 0 40 80

Stress change (bar)

Data 20060821−20060925

Data 20060902−20061007

Model 20060821−20060925

Model 20060902−20061007

Residue 20060821−20060925

Residue 20060902−20061007

40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚40.5˚ 41˚

40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚40.5˚ 41˚

12˚

12.5˚

12˚

12˚

12˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12˚

12.5˚

12˚

12.5˚

40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚40.5˚ 41˚

40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚40.5˚ 41˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12˚

12.5˚

12˚

12.5˚

A

LOSLOS

LOSLOS

LOSLOS

LOSLOS

LOSLOS

LOSLOS

30 40−40

−30

−20

−10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

−40 −30 −20 −10 0 10 20

T28

T300

T464

Distance along profile (km)

LO

S (cm

)

D

Line of

cross-section

NNW SSE

NNW SSE

ENEWSW

12˚12˚0

2.82

–2.82

LOS (cm)LOS (cm)

Figure S-3. Same as Figure S-0 for dike d3 (September 2006).

D R A F T July 5, 2010, 4:13pm D R A F T

Page 5: Overview of inversion result for mega-dike d0 (September ...

X - 66 GRANDIN ET AL.: SEQUENCE OF RIFTING IN AFAR IN 2005–2009

−10

−15

−5

0

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30

Depth(km)

Distance along dike plane (km)

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0Opening (m)

−10

−15

−5

0

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30

Depth(km)

Distance along dike plane (km)

B

C−80 −40 0 40 80

Stress change (bar)

Data 20061204−20070108

Data 20061111−20070120

Model 20061204−20070108

Model 20061111−20070120

Residue 20061204−20070108

Residue 20061111−20070120

40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚40.5˚ 41˚

40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚40.5˚ 41˚

12˚

12.5˚

12˚

12˚

12˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12˚

12.5˚

12˚

12.5˚

40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚40.5˚ 41˚

40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚40.5˚ 41˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12˚

12.5˚

12˚

12.5˚

A

LOSLOS

LOSLOS

Line of

cross-section

NNW SSE

NNW SSE

ENEWSW

LOSLOS

LOSLOS

LOSLOS

LOSLOS

30 40−40

−30

−20

−10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

−40 −30 −20 −10 0 10 20

T300

T464

Distance along profile (km)

LO

S (cm

)

D

12˚12˚0

2.82

–2.82

LOS (cm)LOS (cm)

Figure S-4. Same as Figure S-0 for dike d4 (December 2006).

D R A F T July 5, 2010, 4:13pm D R A F T

Page 6: Overview of inversion result for mega-dike d0 (September ...

GRANDIN ET AL.: SEQUENCE OF RIFTING IN AFAR IN 2005–2009 X - 67

Data 20061220−20070124

Data 20070108−20070212

Model 20061220−20070124

Model 20070108−20070212

Residue 20061220−20070124

Residue 20070108−20070212

40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚40.5˚ 41˚

40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚40.5˚ 41˚

12˚

12.5˚

12˚

12˚

12˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12˚

12.5˚

12˚

12.5˚

40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚40.5˚ 41˚

40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚40.5˚ 41˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12˚

12.5˚

12˚

12.5˚

A

LOSLOS

Line of

cross-section

NNW SSE

NNW SSE

ENEWSW

LOSLOS

LOSLOS

LOSLOS LOSLOS LOSLOS

−10

−15

−5

0

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30

Depth(km)

Distance along dike plane (km)

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0Opening (m)

−10

−15

−5

0

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30

Depth(km)

Distance along dike plane (km)

B

C−80 −40 0 40 80

Stress change (bar)30 40

−40

−30

−20

−10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

−40 −30 −20 −10 0 10 20

T28

T300

Distance along profile (km)

LO

S (cm

)

D

NNW SSE

NNW SSE

12˚12˚0

2.82

–2.82

LOS (cm)LOS (cm)

Figure S-5. Same as Figure S-0 for dike d5 (January 2007).

D R A F T July 5, 2010, 4:13pm D R A F T

Page 7: Overview of inversion result for mega-dike d0 (September ...

X - 68 GRANDIN ET AL.: SEQUENCE OF RIFTING IN AFAR IN 2005–2009

Data 070910−070806

Data 070824−070720

Model 070910−070806

Model 070824−070720

Residue 070910−070806

Residue 070824−070720

40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚40.5˚ 41˚

40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚40.5˚ 41˚

12˚

12.5˚

12˚

12˚

12˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12˚

12.5˚

12˚

12.5˚

40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚40.5˚ 41˚

40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚40.5˚ 41˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12˚

12.5˚

12˚

12.5˚

A

LOSLOS

LOSLOS

LOSLOS

LOSLOS

LOSLOS

LOSLOS

−10

−15

−5

0

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30

Depth(km)

Distance along dike plane (km)

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0Opening (m)

−10

−15

−5

0

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30

Depth(km)

Distance along dike plane (km)

B

C−80 −40 0 40 80

Stress change (bar)30 40

−40

−30

−20

−10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

−40 −30 −20 −10 0 10 20

T28

T300

T464

T49

Distance along profile (km)

LO

S (cm

)

D

Line of

cross-section

NNW SSE

NNW SSE

ENEWSW

12˚12˚0

2.82

–2.82

LOS (cm)LOS (cm)

Figure S-6. Same as Figure S-0 for dike d6 (August 2007).

D R A F T July 5, 2010, 4:13pm D R A F T

Page 8: Overview of inversion result for mega-dike d0 (September ...

GRANDIN ET AL.: SEQUENCE OF RIFTING IN AFAR IN 2005–2009 X - 69

−10

−15

−5

0

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30

Depth(km)

Distance along dike plane (km)

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0Opening (m)

−10

−15

−5

0

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30

Depth(km)

Distance along dike plane (km)

B

C−80 −40 0 40 80

Stress change (bar)

Data 071119−071015

Data 071207−071102

Model 071119−071015

Model 071207−071102

Residue 071119−071015

Residue 071207−071102

40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚40.5˚ 41˚

40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚40.5˚ 41˚

12˚

12.5˚

12˚

12˚

12˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12˚

12.5˚

12˚

12.5˚

40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚40.5˚ 41˚

40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚40.5˚ 41˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12˚

12.5˚

12˚

12.5˚

A

LOSLOS

LOSLOS

Line of

cross-section

NNW SSE

NNW SSE

ENEWSW

LOSLOS

LOSLOS

LOSLOS

LOSLOS

30 40−40

−30

−20

−10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

−40 −30 −20 −10 0 10 20

T28

T300

T464

T49

Distance along profile (km)

LO

S (cm

)

D

12˚12˚0

2.82

–2.82

LOS (cm)LOS (cm)

Figure S-7. Same as Figure S-0 for dike d7 (November 2007).

D R A F T July 5, 2010, 4:13pm D R A F T

Page 9: Overview of inversion result for mega-dike d0 (September ...

X - 70 GRANDIN ET AL.: SEQUENCE OF RIFTING IN AFAR IN 2005–2009

Data 080407−080128

Data 080425−080215

Model 080407−080128

Model 080425−080215

Residue 080407−080128

Residue 080425−080215

40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚40.5˚ 41˚

40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚40.5˚ 41˚

12˚

12.5˚

12˚

12˚

12˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12˚

12.5˚

12˚

12.5˚

40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚40.5˚ 41˚

40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚40.5˚ 41˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12˚

12.5˚

12˚

12.5˚

A

LOSLOS

LOSLOS

LOSLOS

LOSLOS

LOSLOS

LOSLOS

−10

−15

−5

0

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30

Depth(km)

Distance along dike plane (km)

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0Opening (m)

−10

−15

−5

0

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30

Depth(km)

Distance along dike plane (km)

B

C−80 −40 0 40 80

Stress change (bar)30 40

−40

−30

−20

−10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

−40 −30 −20 −10 0 10 20

T28

T300

T464

T49

Distance along profile (km)

LO

S (cm

)

D

Line of

cross-section

NNW SSE

NNW SSE

ENEWSW

12˚12˚0

2.82

–2.82

LOS (cm)LOS (cm)

Figure S-8. Same as Figure S-0 for dike d8 (March 2008).

D R A F T July 5, 2010, 4:13pm D R A F T

Page 10: Overview of inversion result for mega-dike d0 (September ...

GRANDIN ET AL.: SEQUENCE OF RIFTING IN AFAR IN 2005–2009 X - 71

−10

−15

−5

0

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30

Depth(km)

Distance along dike plane (km)

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0Opening (m)

−10

−15

−5

0

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30

Depth(km)

Distance along dike plane (km)

B

C−80 −40 0 40 80

Stress change (bar)

Data 080806−080702

Data 080808−080704

Model 080806−080702

Model 080808−080704

Residue 080806−080702

Residue 080808−080704

40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚40.5˚ 41˚

40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚40.5˚ 41˚

12˚

12.5˚

12˚

12˚

12˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12˚

12.5˚

12˚

12.5˚

40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚40.5˚ 41˚

40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚40.5˚ 41˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12˚

12.5˚

12˚

12.5˚

A

LOSLOS

LOSLOS

LOSLOS

LOSLOS

LOSLOS

LOSLOS

30 40−40

−30

−20

−10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

−40 −30 −20 −10 0 10 20

T28

T300

T464

T49

Distance along profile (km)

LO

S (cm

)

D

Line of

cross-section

NNW SSE

NNW SSE

ENEWSW

12˚12˚0

2.82

–2.82

LOS (cm)LOS (cm)

Figure S-9. Same as Figure S-0 for dike d9 (July 2008).

D R A F T July 5, 2010, 4:13pm D R A F T

Page 11: Overview of inversion result for mega-dike d0 (September ...

X - 72 GRANDIN ET AL.: SEQUENCE OF RIFTING IN AFAR IN 2005–2009

Data 081103−080929

Data 081121−081017

Model 081103−080929

Model 081121−081017

Residue 081103−080929

Residue 081121−081017

40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚40.5˚ 41˚

40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚40.5˚ 41˚

12˚

12.5˚

12˚

12˚

12˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12˚

12.5˚

12˚

12.5˚

40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚40.5˚ 41˚

40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚40.5˚ 41˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12˚

12.5˚

12˚

12.5˚

A

LOSLOS

LOSLOS

LOSLOS

LOSLOS

LOSLOS

LOSLOS

−10

−15

−5

0

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30

Depth(km)

Distance along dike plane (km)

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0Opening (m)

−10

−15

−5

0

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30

Depth(km)

Distance along dike plane (km)

B

C−80 −40 0 40 80

Stress change (bar)30 40

−40

−30

−20

−10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

−40 −30 −20 −10 0 10 20

T28

T300

T464

T49

Distance along profile (km)

LO

S (cm

)

D

Line of

cross-section

NNW SSE

NNW SSE

ENEWSW

12˚12˚0

2.82

–2.82

LOS (cm)LOS (cm)

Figure S-10. Same as Figure S-0 for dike d10 (October 2008).

D R A F T July 5, 2010, 4:13pm D R A F T

Page 12: Overview of inversion result for mega-dike d0 (September ...

GRANDIN ET AL.: SEQUENCE OF RIFTING IN AFAR IN 2005–2009 X - 73

−10

−15

−5

0

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30

Depth(km)

Distance along dike plane (km)

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0Opening (m)

−10

−15

−5

0

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30

Depth(km)

Distance along dike plane (km)

B

C−80 −40 0 40 80

Stress change (bar)

Data 090304−090128

Data 090306−081226

Model 090304−090128

Model 090306−081226

Residue 090304−090128

Residue 090306−081226

40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚40.5˚ 41˚

40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚40.5˚ 41˚

12˚

12.5˚

12˚

12˚

12˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12˚

12.5˚

12˚

12.5˚

40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚40.5˚ 41˚

40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚40.5˚ 41˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12˚

12.5˚

12˚

12.5˚

A

LOSLOS

LOSLOS

LOSLOS

LOSLOS

LOSLOS

LOSLOS

30 40−40

−30

−20

−10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

−40 −30 −20 −10 0 10 20

T28

T300

T464

T49

Distance along profile (km)

LO

S (cm

)

D

Line of

cross-section

NNW SSE

NNW SSE

ENEWSW

12˚12˚0

2.82

–2.82

LOS (cm)LOS (cm)

Figure S-11. Same as Figure S-0 for dike d11 (February 2009).

D R A F T July 5, 2010, 4:13pm D R A F T

Page 13: Overview of inversion result for mega-dike d0 (September ...

X - 74 GRANDIN ET AL.: SEQUENCE OF RIFTING IN AFAR IN 2005–2009

Data 090722−090513

Data 090724−090515

Model 090722−090513

Model 090724−090515

Residue 090722−090513

Residue 090724−090515

40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚40.5˚ 41˚

40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚40.5˚ 41˚

12˚

12.5˚

12˚

12˚

12˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12˚

12.5˚

12˚

12.5˚

40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚40.5˚ 41˚

40.5˚ 41˚ 40.5˚ 41˚40.5˚ 41˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12.5˚

12˚

12.5˚

12˚

12.5˚

A

LOSLOS

LOSLOS

LOSLOS

LOSLOS

LOSLOS

LOSLOS

−10

−15

−5

0

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30

Depth(km)

Distance along dike plane (km)

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0Opening (m)

−10

−15

−5

0

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30

Depth(km)

Distance along dike plane (km)

B

C−80 −40 0 40 80

Stress change (bar)30 40

−40

−30

−20

−10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

−40 −30 −20 −10 0 10 20

T28

T300

T464

T49

Distance along profile (km)

LO

S (cm

)

D

Line of

cross-section

NNW SSE

NNW SSE

ENEWSW

12˚12˚0

2.82

–2.82

LOS (cm)LOS (cm)

Figure S-12. Same as Figure S-0 for dike d12 (June 2009).

D R A F T July 5, 2010, 4:13pm D R A F T

Page 14: Overview of inversion result for mega-dike d0 (September ...

GR

AN

DIN

ET

AL.:

SE

QU

EN

CE

OF

RIF

TIN

GIN

AFA

RIN

2005–2009X

-75

Table S-1. Dates of InSAR master (T*A) and slave (T*B) scenes used for inversion, for the four tracks used in this

study (tracks 28, 300, 464 and 49), and standard deviation of LOS displacement contained in data vector (downsampled

interferogram) and residue vector.

Event T28A T28B T300A T300B T464A T464B T49A T49B

Std dev. of

data vector

(cm)

Std dev. of

residue vector

(cm)

d0 2004-07-28 2005-10-26 2005-05-06 2005-10-28 28.48 7.65

d1 2006-05-24 2006-06-28 2006-05-20 2006-06-24 2006-05-26 2006-06-30 9.24 1.79

d2 2006-06-28 2006-08-02 2006-06-24 2006-07-29 6.30 1.24

d3 2006-09-06 2006-10-11 2006-08-21 2006-09-25 2006-09-02 2006-10-07 6.26 1.34

d4a 2006-12-04 2007-01-08 2006-11-11 2007-01-20 8.47 1.24

d5 2006-12-20 2007-01-24 2007-01-08 2007-02-12 4.42 0.57

d6 2007-07-18 2007-08-22 2007-08-06 2007-09-10 2007-07-14 2007-08-18 2007-07-20 2007-08-24 8.66 1.68

d7 2007-10-31 2008-01-09 2007-10-15 2007-11-19 2007-10-27 2007-12-01 2007-11-02 2007-12-07 8.93 2.11

d8 2008-02-13 2008-04-07 2008-01-28 2008-04-07 2007-12-01 2008-05-24 2008-02-15 2008-04-25 4.89 1.30

d9 2008-07-02 2008-08-06 2008-06-16 2008-07-21 2008-06-28 2008-08-02 2008-07-04 2008-08-08 6.00 1.08

d10 2008-10-15 2008-11-19 2008-09-29 2008-11-03 2008-10-11 2009-01-24 2008-10-17 2008-11-21 13.77 2.16

d11 2009-01-28 2009-03-04 2009-01-12 2009-02-16 2009-01-24 2009-02-28 2009-01-30 2009-03-06 7.19 0.89

d12 2009-06-17 2009-07-22 2009-06-01 2009-07-06 2009-06-13 2009-07-18 2009-06-19 2009-07-24 6.74 1.36

a: because dikes d4 and d5 are mixed in these InSAR images, LOS deformation for dike d4 was recovered after subtraction of synthetic LOS deformationusing inversion results of dike d5.

DR

AF

TJuly

5,

2010,

4:13pm

DRA

FT