Prototype of an intertwined secondary- metabolite supercluster
Over the past two weeks, we’ve seen how Specialdeeply intertwined with each other by our motions...
Transcript of Over the past two weeks, we’ve seen how Specialdeeply intertwined with each other by our motions...
1
Over the past two weeks,
we’ve seen how Special
Relativity introduces some
very interesting twists on
our conventional view of
time – from the relative
nature of simultaneity to the
distorted passage of time on
rapidly moving spacecraft.
But we’ve noted already in this class that space and time are
deeply intertwined with each other by our motions through the
universe – motions that are largely driven by gravitational forces.
In 1915, Einstein revolutionized our view of Newtonian gravity
and space with his theory of General Relativity, just as Special
Relativity had changed our view of Newtonian ‘universal’ time.
2
A key concept from the
theory of General Relativity is
the “Equivalence Principle”,
which can be envisioned in
the following way: imagine
you are in a rocket ship freely
floating in deep space, far
away from the gravitational
influences of other objects.
Under these conditions, you
would feel ‘weightless’.
However, if you accelerate
your ship by firing its rockets,
the back of the ship will come
up to meet your feet and press
against them, and you will
feel that force. Further, if you
accelerate at precisely
9.8m/s2, the force of the ship
on you will be exactly the
same as the force of Earth’s
surface gravity, and it will
feel exactly as though you
were standing on the Earth.
3
According to General Relativity, these two situations – falling
under the influence of gravity, and accelerating due to other forces
are completely equivalent for the observers inside these spaceships.
Earth
Now let’s see this in action – suppose your rocket ship has a laser
pointer on one side, and you fire it horizontally across the room
while the rocket is accelerating. Because it takes some time for
light to cross the distance, during which the ship is moving, the
beam strikes the wall on the other side at a lower point.
4
Earth
The Equivalence Principle says that the curved path of the photons in
the accelerating rockets must also be seen if the rocket is just sitting
in a gravitational field on Earth – so light itself is affected by gravity!
…heavy…
But light has no mass, so how
could gravity affect it?
Einstein’s General Relativity
suggests that gravity is really
a distortion of spacetime,
caused by objects with mass.
Because light – like
everything else in our
universe – moves through
spacetime, this means that
light is affected by gravity –
even though photons
themselves have no mass.
5
According to relativity, gravity warps spacetime in a manner analogous to way a person who stands on a trampoline distorts the surface of the trampoline. The person makes a “pit” on the rubber sheet that affects the motion of other objects on the trampoline.
Near a massive object, even the path of light – forced to move on
the surface of the spacetime “trampoline” – will be curved, and
can be made quite distorted if the curvature is sufficiently steep.
6
More massive objects make deeper, more severe distortions in
spacetime – and we often refer to these distortions as
‘gravitational wells’. The Earth’s gravitational well is much
deeper than the Moon’s, but much less deep than that of the Sun.
Large masses like the Sun can bend light powerfully and affect
what you see like a lens does – except this is a gravitational “lens”.
In fact, these sorts of shifts in the positions of background stars,
seen first in the solar eclipse of 1919, were among the earliest
bits of observational evidence supporting Einstein’s theories.
7
Now, given that General
Relativity predicts warping of
spacetime, it should be no
surprise that it predicts some
strange things about time –
so-called Gravitational Time
Dilation. To picture this
simply, imagine you are
falling in your spaceship
under the influence of Earth’s
gravity and you pass two
clocks that are stationary with
respect to the Earth.
As you pass the first clock,
it will seem to be moving
with respect to you, and as
you know from our work
with Special Relativity,
clock 1 will appear to be
moving slow compared to
your clock on the ship –
and of course, an observer
‘stationed’ on the Earth
clock would say it was you
moving, and your clocks
that were running behind.
Clock 1
8
However, because of the
acceleration due to gravity,
as you pass clock 2 you
will be moving even faster,
and so clock 2 will appear
to move more quickly past
you and its clocks will
seem to be running even
slower still! And of course
an observer at that clock
would say the same about
your clocks!
Clock 2
This agreement between observers is key, and makes it
clear that gravitational fields affect time as well as space in
a self-consistent way – the deeper you go into a
‘gravitational well’, the slower time passes for you.
Clocks run
slower
here…
…and
faster here.
9
This effect is very real and
practically important –
because of their orbits far
above the Earth’s surface,
for example, the clocks of
GPS satellites lose almost
38 microseconds a day
compared to Earth clocks.
That may not sound like
much – but if unaccounted
for, the location services
on your phone would be
off by more than 6 miles!
But as we’ve mentioned, the gravitational well of the Earth is
really quite shallow compared to stars – to see truly
impressive spacetime distortions, we need to turn to the
ultimate gravitational pits in nature, Black Holes.
10
These objects are believed to form when very high-mass stars run
out of materials to fuse in their core, and can no longer support
themselves against gravity. Their mass is compressed to an
infinitely small point, with an infinitely deep gravitational well.
We call such an object a black hole, because its gravitational
strength is enough to prevent even light from escaping.
Animation of the formation
of a black hole during a
“High-Mass Star Supernova”.
Animation of an alternate formation model, in which the supernova doesn’t
“blow away” most of the star’s mass – the black hole forms inside the star,
which quickly collapses into it. These “collapsars” may be responsible for
Gamma-Ray bursts, the brightest explosive events we currently know of!
11
The “event horizon” of a
black hole is the location
where the escape velocity
from the black hole is
equal to the speed of light
– so no ‘events’ from
inside that boundary can
be seen by outside
observers. All of the mass,
however, is located at the
singularity at the black
hole’s center – there is no
mass or other material at
the event horizon itself.
© 2004 Pearson
Education Inc.,
publishing as Addison-
Wesley
The geometry is a bit
more complicated for
the interior of a
charged or rotating
black hole – including
multiple ‘event
horizons’ and a ring-
shaped singularity.
Baffling and difficult
to observationally
constrain? You bet!
12
A ‘relatively’ realistic model of an approach to and through a
charged black hole’s interior, courtesy A. Hamilton (UC Boulder)
Near a black hole, time is greatly affected by the warping of
spacetime. If we launched a probe into a black hole, as it
approached the event horizon time would appear to slow for
the probe, as seen from an outside observer – e.g., it might take
50 min of time on the mother ship for 15 min to elapse on a
probe closer to the black hole.
13
But note what this means – if the probe then returns to the
mother ship, the mother ship will have experienced more
time passing than the probe, which is another way of
saying that the probe traveled into the future of the mother
ship! Time travel using black holes is totally doable, you
just need to get really close to the event horizon!
Unfortunately that’s more than
a bit tricky – near the event
horizon, the difference between
the gravitational force felt by
an astronaut’s feet becomes
significantly stronger than that
felt by her head! Radial
differences in the gravitational
field are even worse, and
squeeze the astronaut (or
probe) from the sides, so that
any physical object would be
“spaghettified”! Ouch!
14
But that’s not necessarily
the end of the story – it
turns out to be the case
that the more massive a
black hole is, the less its
tidal forces at its event
horizon. For the most
massive of black holes, the
so-called supermassive
black holes that live in the
hearts of galaxies, these
forces are completely
manageable!
So could such massive black holes be used to travel through
time and space, in the manner suggested by the recent
Interstellar movie? That is very, very unclear – naturally
occurring black holes are almost certainly one-way streets to a
painful death as you encounter the singularity at their centers.
15
However, General Relativity also predicts the possibility of
‘wormholes’ – phenomena similar to black holes in some ways,
but which specifically connect two different regions of spacetime.
However, the “natural” wormholes predicted by physics – if they
exist in nature at all – are extremely small and short-lived, and
therefore not so effective at moving spaceships around!
It may be possible to create larger wormholes, but the ends of
such space-time portals would necessarily be physically close
to each other when they’re formed. You would then have to
physically drag one of the two endpoints to where you wanted
the ‘exit’ to be – meaning you have to fix the long-distance
travel part before you use the wormhole! No shortcuts here!
16
(Unless, of course, you find one already laid here by
some other aliens… Let me know if you find one!)
Such wormholes also suggest at least the possibility of
traveling backwards in time – which is something that
suggests so many bizarre possibilities that most
physicists believe it to be fundamentally impossible,
even if nothing at this point clearly rules it out!
17
Because they link the very
large with the very small,
resolving these questions
about the nature of black
holes, wormholes, and
spacetime travel using them
requires us to understand
how gravity operates on the
very smallest of scales – and
that’s where will turn our
attention next time as we
start to explore time on the
quantum scale!