Organelle genomes Organelle gene expression processes Organelle-to-nucleus signaling
description
Transcript of Organelle genomes Organelle gene expression processes Organelle-to-nucleus signaling
Organelle genomesOrganelle gene expression processesOrganelle-to-nucleus signaling (retrograde regulation)
PCB6528 Plant Cell and Developmental Biology Spring 2013
Organelle genomes, gene expression and signaling
Christine Chase – 2215 Fifield Hall – 352-273-4862
Describe the organization and coding content of plant plastid and mitochondrial genomesDiscuss the similarities and differences between the plastid and plant mitochondrial genomes with respect to organization and evolutionExplain why organelle coding content is not identical between plant speciesDiscuss the possible reasons that plant organelles retain genomes at allDescribe the process of plastid genome transformationDiscuss the utility and applications of plastid transformation and provide some specific examples
Objectives - Organelle genomes:
Organelle genome databases:http://www.hsls.pitt.edu/obrc/index.php?page=organelle
Small but essentialMultiple organelles per cell, multiple genomes per organelle • 20 – 20,000 genomes per cell• depending on cell typeOrganized in nucleo-protein complexes called nucleoidsNon-Mendelian inheritance• usually but not always maternal Necessary but insufficient to elaborate a functional organelle• nuclear gene products required• translated on cytosolic ribosomes• imported into the organelles• plant mitochondria also import
tRNAs
Organelle genomes
Comparative sizes of plant genomes
Genome Size in bpArabidopsis thaliananuclear
1.4 x 10 8
Arabidopsis thalianamitochondria
3.7 x 10 5
Arabidopsis thalianaplastid
1.5 x 10 5
Zea maysnuclear
2.4 x 10 9
Zea maysmitochondria
5.7 x 10 5
Zea maysplastid
1.4 x 10 5
Target P prediction analysis of the complete Arabidopsis nuclear genome sequence (Emanuelsson et al., J Mol Biol 300:1005)says .....
~ 10% of the Arabidopsis nuclear genome (~2,500 genes) encode proteins targeted to the mitochondria
~ 14% of the Arabidopsis nuclear genome (~3,500 genes) encodes proteins targeted to the plastid
So 25% of the Arabidopsis nuclear genome is dedicated to organelle function!
Proteome reflects metabolic diversity of these organelles, both anabolic and catabolic
Organelle genomics & proteomics
*
*
*[Gillham 1994
Organelle Genes & Genomes]
Endosymbiont origin of organelles Original basis in cytologyConfirmation by molecular biology α proteobacteria as closest living relatives to mitochondriaCyanobacteria closest living relatives to plastidsArchaebacteria considered to be related to primitive donor of the nuclear genome
***
Chimeric origin of eukaryotic nuclear genomes
Genes per category among
383 eubacterial- & 111
archeaebacterial- related genes in the
yeast nuclear genomeEsser et al. 2004
Mol Biol & Evol 21:1643
Evolution of mitochondrial genome coding content Genome Protein
coding genes
Rikettsia prowazekii (smallest proteobacterial genome)
832
Reclinomonas americana mitochondria(protozoan; most mitochondrial genes)
62
Marchantia polymorpha mitochondria1.9 x 10 5 bp(liverwort, non-vascular plant )
64
Arabidopsis thaliana mitochondria3.7 x 10 5 bp(vascular plant)
57
Homo sapiens mitochondria 13
Evolution of plastid genome coding content Genome Protein
coding genes
Synechococcus (cyanobacteria) 3,300Paulinella chromatophoraphotosynthetic body(endosymbiont cyanobacteria)
867
Porphyra purpurea plastid(red alga)
209
Chlamydomonas reinhardtii plastid(green alga)
63
Marchantia polymorpha plastid(liverwort, non-vascular plant)
67
Arabidopsis thaliana plastid(vascular plant)
71
Epifagus virginiana plastid (non-photosynthetic parasitic plant)
42
Evolution of the eukaryotic genomes
Reduced coding content of organelle genomes compared to endosymbiont
• Functional gene transfer to nucleus with protein targeted back to organelle
• Functional re-shuffling - organelles replace prokaryotic features with eukaryotic, “hybrid” or novel features
Functional gene transfer from organelle to nuclear genome
• Gene by gene • Evidence for frequent and recent
transfers in plant lineage • Results in coding content
differences among plant organelle genomes
• What is required for a functional gene re-location from organelle to nucleus?
• Southern blot hybridization of total cellular DNA
• Mitochondrial nad1 and rps10 probes • Shading = taxa with no hybridization to rps10 • Bullets = taxa with confirmed nuclear rps10
gene• Why no hybridization of rps10 probes to DNA
with confirmed nuclear copy? (Hint: How are the relative genome copy numbers exploited in this screen?)
• What is the purpose of the nad1 probe?• What are the implications of these findings for
plant mitochondrial genome coding content? [Adams et al. Nature 408:354]
Functional gene transfer: Recent repeated transfers of the plant mitochondrial rps10 to the nucleus
Non-Functional DNA transfer from organelle to nuclear genome
Frequent
Continual (can detect in “real-time” as well as evolutionary time)
In large pieces
e.g. Arabidopsis 262 kb numtDNA (nuclear-localized mitochondrial DNA)
88,000 years ago
e.g. Rice 131 kb nupDNA (nuclear-localized plastid DNA)
148,000 years ago
Land Plant Plastid Genome Organization120-160 kb depending on species• conserved coding • conserved physical organizationPhysical map • restriction map or DNA sequence • 120-160 kb circular genomeLarge inverted repeat (LIR)• commonly 20-30 kb• large single copy (LSC) region • small single copy (SSC) regionActive recombination within the LIRExpansion and contraction of LIR• primary length polymorphism among
land plant species•10-76 kbSome conifers and legumes have very reduced or no LIRSC region inversion polymorphisms mediated by infrequent recombination between small dispersed repeats
(Maier et al. J Mol Biol 251:614)
Plastid genome organization
Plastid ATP synthase genes in operons
(from Palmer [1991] in Cell Culture and Somatic Cell Genetics of Plants, V 7A. L Bogorad and IK Vasil eds. Academic Press,
NY, pp 5-142)
The plastid genome oversimplified:recombination across inverted repeats
leads to inversions
How can these inversion isomers be detected?
trn N
rps19
rps15
psbA
ndhF
ndhBtrn N
ndhBrps19
rpl22
trn N
rps19
rps15
psbA
ndhF
ndhBtrn N
ndhBrps19
rpl22
[Lilly et al. Plant Cell. 13:245]
Fiber FISH of tobacco plastid DNA
IR probe SSC+IR probe
SC gene probes
Structural complexity of plastid DNA from tobacco, arabidopsis, and pea
[Lilly et al. Plant Cell. 13:245]
IR probe
IR probe
SSC+IR probe
Table 1. Frequency of Different cpDNA Structures across All Experiments in Three Species
No. of Observations
Structurea Arabidopsis Tobacco Pea
Circular 126 (42%) 524 (45%) 59 (25%) Linear 68 (23%) 250 (22%) 85 (36%) Bubble/D-loop 25 (8%) 67 (6%) 5 (2%) Lassolike 34 (11%) 115 (10%) 21 (9%) Unclassifiedb 44 (16%) 203 (17%) 66 (28%) a Each classification represents all molecules of that type regardless of size. b DNA fibers that were coiled or folded and could not be classified
[Lilly et al. Plant Cell. 13:245]
Structural complexity of plastid DNA from tobacco, arabidopsis, and pea
Land plant mitochondrial genome organization
208-2400 kb depending on species
Relatively constant coding but highly variable organization among and even within a species
Physical mapping with overlapping cosmid clones
• Entire complexity maps as a single “master circle”
• All angiosperms except Brassica hirta have one or more recombination repeats
• Repeats not conserved among species
• Direct and/or inverted orientations on the “master”
• Recombination generated inversions (inverted repeats)
• Recombination generated subgenomic molecules (deletions) (direct repeats), some present at very low copy number (sublimons)
• Leads to complex multipartite structures
Recombination across direct repeats leads to deletions (subgenomic molecules)
a’b’
c
d
Pac I
PmeI
a b c d
b’ c’ d’a’
Pac I AscI
abc’
d’
Not I
AscIHow can these deletion (subgenomic) isomers be detected?
a’b’c’d’
a b c d
Pac I
AscI
PmeINot I
b’c’d’ a’
Arabidopsis mitochondrial genome organization> >>>
>>
>
>
>
>>
> >
>>
>
[modified from Backert et al. Trends Plant Sci 2:478]
Two pairs of repeats active in recombination• One direct (orange, top left)• One inverted (blue, top left)
Recombining the inverted (blue pair) creates an inversion
• What has happened to the orientation of the orange repeats (top right)?
(Backert and Börner, Curr Genet 37:304)
Branched rosette and linear molecules from C. album mitochondria
[Backert et al. Trends Plant Sci 2:478]
Structural complexity of plant mitochondrial DNA
Structural complexity of plant organelle genomes
Plastid genomes map as a single circle • Inversion isomers• Indicate recombination through the LIR
Plant mitochondrial genomes map as a single master circle plus
• Many subgenomic circles • Inversion isomers• Imply recombination through multiple
direct& inverted repeat pairs
Direct visualization via EM or FISH • Rosette/knotted/branched structures• Longer-than genome linear molecules• Shorter-than genome linear and circular
molecules• Sigma molecules• Branched linear molecules• Few if any genome-length circular
molecules (mitochondria only)
Circular maps from linear molecules
fixed terminal redundancy (e.g. phage T7)ABCDEF______________XYZABC
circularly permuted monomers ABCDEF______________XYZ BCDEF______________XYZA CDEF _____________ XYZAB
circularly permuted monomers & terminal redundancy (e.g. phage T4) CDEF______________XYZABCDEF DEFG____________ XYZABCDEFG EFGH___________XYZABCDEFGH
linear dimers or higher multimersABCDEF__________XYZABCDEF_________XYZ
A Z B
Y C
X D
In a circular molecule or map, fragment A is linked to B, B to C, C to D, D to X, X to Y, Y to Z and Z to A. But these linkages also hold true for linear molecules
[Freifelder, 1983, Molecular Biology]
Physical structures of DNA obtained via rolling circle DNA replication
Recombination dependent DNA replication[RDR]
[Marechal and Brisson New Phytol 186:299]
Complex rosette/knotted structures• nucleoids
Longer-than genome linear molecules• rolling circle replication• intermolecular recombination of
linear moleculesShorter-than genome linear and circular molecules
• intramolecular recombination between direct repeats
Sigma molecules• rolling circles• recombination of circular & linear
moleculesBranched linear molecules
• recombination-mediated replication
Few genome-length circular molecules (none for mitochondrial)
• What governs the stable inheritance of this mess?
Origins of plant organelle genome complexity
Repair of DNA damage• organelles rich in damaging ROS• low rates of synonymous-substitution
• homologous recombination with gene conversion
repair point mutations repair DNA breaks
• lots of wild-type recombination partners
Genome replication• structures support the recombination dependent replication model
? Does recombination also create a cohesive unit of inheritance
Recombination and plant organelle genome stability
Recombination surveillance• Restricts recombination between short repeats (~100-500 bp) in plant organelle DNAs
Mediated by four protein families• members targeted to plastids &/or mitochondria
• MSH1 - E. coli mismatch repair homologs
• RECA - Recombinase/homology search/strand invasion
• OSB - organelle single-stranded DNA binding proteins
• Whirly - single-stranded DNA binding proteins
Recombination and plant organelle genome (in) stability
Plant organelle recombination surveillance team
[Marechal and Brisson New Phytol 186:299]
Down-regulation of MSH1 alters organelle function and genome
organization
Mitochondrial genome reorganization left, co-segregating with and leaf variegation, right
Organelle recombination is regulated
De-regulation destabilizes organelle genome organization with phenotypic consequences
Some recombination is good; too much is bad!
[Sandhu et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:1766
Plastid genome coding content
Chloroplast Genome Database:http://chloroplast.cbio.psu.edu/ (Cui et al., Nucl Acids Res 34: D692-696)
Generally conserved among land plants, more variable among algae
Genes for plastid gene expression rRNAs, tRNAs ribosomal proteins RNA polymerase
Genes involved in photosynthesis 28 thylakoid proteins
Photosystem I (psa)Photosystem II (psb)ATP synthase subunits (atp)NADH dehydrogenase subunits (nad)Cytochrome b6f subunits (pet)
RUBISCO large subunit (rbcL)(rbcS is nuclear encoded)
Plastid genomes encode integral membrane components of the
photosynthetic complexes
Photosynthetic composition of the thylakoid membraneGreen = plastid-encoded subunitsRed = nuclear-encoded subunits
• What do you notice about the plastid vs nuclear-encoded subunits ?
• What hypotheses does this suggest regarding the reasons for a plastid genome?
[Leister, Trends Genet 19:47]
Plant mitochondrial genome coding content
In organello protein synthesis estimates 30-50 proteins encoded by plant mitochondrial genomes
Complete sequence of A. thaliana mit genome 57 genes respiratory complex componentsrRNAs, tRNAs, ribosomal proteinscytochrome c biogenesis
Plant mit genomes lack a complete set of tRNAs
mit encoded tRNAs of mit originmit encoded tRNAs functional transfer from
the plastid genomenuclear encoded tRNAs imported into
mitochondria to complete the set
42 orfs that might be genes
Gene density (1 gene per 8 kb) lower than the nuclear gene density (1 gene
per 4-5 kb)!
Plant mitochondrial genome coding content
Table 3 General features of mtDNA of angiosperms
Feature Ntaa Ath Bna Bvu OsaMC (bp) 430,597 366,924 221,853 368,799 490,520A+T content (%) 55.0 55.2 54.8 56.1 56.2Long repeated (bp) b 34,532 11,372 2,427 32,489
127,600Uniquec 39,206 37,549 38,065 34,499 40,065Codingd (9.9%) (10.6%) (17.3%) (10.3%) (11.1%)Cis-splicing introns 25,617 28,312 28,332 18,727
26,238 (6.5%) (8.0%) (12.9%) (5.6%) (7.2%)
ORFse 46,773 37,071 20,085 54,288 12,009 (11.8%) (10.4%) (9.2%) (16.1%) (3.3%)
cp-derived (bp) 9,942 3,958 7,950 g 22,593 (2.5%) (1.1%) (3.6%) 2.1% h (6.2%)
Others 274,527 248,662 124,994 262,015 (69.3%) (69.9%) (57%) 65.9% (72.2%)
Gene contentf 60 55 53 52 56
(from Sugiyama et al. Mol Gen Gen 272:603)
Mitochondrial genomes encode integral membrane components of
the respiratory complexes
= one mitochondria-encoded subunit *
IIAOX
intermembrane space
innermembrane
matrix
I
UQH2
UQ
H+
CYC
IV
H+
III
H+
H+
ATPSynthase
II
TCA cycle NADH
NAD+
NAD(P)H DH external
NAD(P)H DH internal
2H2O
O2
2H2O
O2 ADP ATP
******** *******
**
There is some species-to-species variation with respect to the presence or absence of genes encoding respiratory chain subunits. What is the likely explanation for this observation?
(Modified from Rasmusson et al. Annu Rev Plant Biol 55:23)
Plastid genome transformation
DNA delivery by particle bombardment or PEG precipitation
DNA incorporation by homologous recombination
Initial transformants are heteroplasmic, having a mixture of transformed and non-transformed plastids
Selection for resistance to spectinomycin (spec) and streptomycin (strep) antibiotics that inhibit plastid protein synthesis
Spec or strep resistance conferred by individual 16S rRNA mutations
Spec and strep resistance conferred by aadA gene (aminoglycoside adenylyl transferase)
Untransformed callus bleached; transformed callus greens and can be regenerated
Multiple selection cycles may be required to obtain homoplasmy (all plastid genomes of the same type)
Plastid genome transformation
[Bock & Khan, Trends Biotechnol 22:311]
Selection for plastid transformants
[Bock , J Mol Biol 312:425]
A) leaf segments post bombardment with the aadA geneB) leaf segments after selection on spectinomycin C) transfer of transformants to spectinomycin + streptomycin D) recovery of homoplasmic spec + strep resistant transformants
Applications of plastid genome transformation by homologous recombination
[Bock , Curr Opin Biotechnol 18:100]
[Hager et al. EMBO J
18:5834]
Functional analysis of plastid ycf6 in transgenic plastids
Functional analysis of plastid ycf6 in transgenic plastids
[Hager et al. EMBO J 18:5834]
ycf6 knock-out lines:•Homoplasmic for aadA insertion into ycf6•Pale-yellow phenotype•Normal PSI function and subunit accumulation
•Normal PSII function and subunit accumulation
•Abnormal b6f (PET) subunit accumulation •Mass spectrometry demonstrates YCF6 in normal plastid PET complex
Why, if ycf6 is the disrupted gene,does another PET complex subunit (PETA) fail to accumulate ?
Non-functional plastid-to-nucleus DNA transfer
• Transform plastids with:plastid promoter – aadA
linked to nuclear promoter - neo
• Pollinate wild-type plants with transformants
• % seed germination on kanamycin ~ frequency of nuclear promoter - neo
transferred from plastid to nucleus
Why does this experiment primarily estimate the frequency of DNA transfer from plastid to nucleus, rather than the frequency of functional gene transfer from plastid to nucleus?
How would you re-design the experiment to test for features of a functional gene transfer?
[Timmis et al. Nat Rev Genet 5:123]