OREGON PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES › highered › research › Documents › Legislativ… · Day 6,...
Transcript of OREGON PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES › highered › research › Documents › Legislativ… · Day 6,...
OREGON PUBLIC UNIVERSITIESANDREW ROGERS, DIRECTOR, UNIVERSITY BUDGET & FINANCE
XXU WOUOregon TechOSU OSUWOUOregon TechOregon Tech OSU
April 11, 2017Presented to: Joint Ways and Means, Education Subcommittee
2
PRESENTATION SCHEDULE
Day 1-2, March 27-28•Introduction to Higher Education Structure and Students,
Progress toward State Goals, Quick Funding History
Day 3-4, March 29-30•Affordability: Key Factors, State Financial Aid Programs + Intro
to Student Pathways
Day 5, April 3•Student Pathways and Transitions: Precollege, Inter-college,
Private Postsecondary, Workforce
Day 6, April 4 •Public Testimony
Days 7-8, April 5-6•State Support for Community Colleges
•Community College presentations
Day 9, April 10 •Public Testimony
Days 10-11,
April 11-12
•State Support for Public Universities
•University presentations
Day 12, April 13 •Capital Construction, Other Missions of Universities
Day 13, April 17 •Public Testimony
Day 14, April 18 •OHSU Budget and Public Testimony
Day 15, April 19•An Integrated postsecondary agency, HECC Operations,
Conclusion
Start dates for presentation topics are tentative
3
UNIVERSITIES
RELATED KEY PERFORMANCE METRICS
The full 2016 Key Performance Metrics report for the HECC is available at
https://www.oregon.gov/highered/research/Pages/performance.aspx
KPM 15: First year retention rates, Oregon public universities
KPM 16: Six-year graduation rates, Oregon public universities
KPM 17: Number of bachelor's degrees awarded each academic year
KPM 18: Number of advanced degrees and graduate certificates awarded
KPM 19: Bachelor's degrees awarded to community college transfers
KPM 20: Graduation rate for non-traditional students
KPM 21: Earnings of public university bachelor's degree completers
KPM 22: Percentage of resident enrolled students who are incurring unaffordable costs, CCs and universities
KPM 23: Percentage of resident enrolled students who are incurring unaffordable costs adjusted with institutional aid, CCs and universities
KPM 24: University graduate debt
KPM 25: Student loan default rates (CC, universities, and all higher ed)
KPM 26: Average cost of attendance, public universities
KPM 27: Average statewide tuition and fees minus grant aid and net assessed tuition and fees per resident, undergraduate FTE (colleges and universities)
Data will be presented with HECC
Agency Operations, Appendix
4
OVERVIEW
Funding History and Request
• Student Success and Completion Model
• Affordability and Institutional Costs
• University Enrollment
• University Completions
What does the Investment do?
PUBLIC UNIVERSITY SUPPORT FUND (PUSF) FUNDING REQUEST
WOU
HISTORY OF PUBLIC UNIVERSITY INVESTMENT
Sources: HECC Office of University Coordination.
- Legislative funding change during the 2013-15 biennium separated State Programs from the Public University Support Fund.
- 2013-15 State Programs includes ETIC appropriation after transition to OEIB 6
$708.3$760.7
$798.6
$672.4
$772.7
$984.8
$1,062.7$1,102.0
$0.0
$200.0
$400.0
$600.0
$800.0
$1,000.0
$1,200.0
2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13 2013-15 2015-17 2017-19 GRB 2017-19 CSL
State Funding for Universities (in Millions)
Debt Service Public University Support Fund (or Equivalent)
State Programs Statewide Public Service Programs
Sports Lottery
PUBLIC UNIVERSITY STATE FUNDING AND ENROLLMENT OVER TIME
NOTE: Statewide Public Services and Capital Outlays excluded.
Source: HECC analysis of state appropriation and student-level data. 7
$706.4 $706.4
$732.7
-
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
$0.0
$100.0
$200.0
$300.0
$400.0
$500.0
$600.0
$700.0
$800.0
$900.0
$1,000.0
STATE APPROPRIATIONS (IN MILLIONS) AND RESIDENT ENROLLMENT
Debt Service University Support Enrollment (FTE)
STATE APPROPRIATIONS TO UNIVERSITIES PER STUDENT (FTE) ADJUSTED FOR INFLATION
Notes:• Includes Debt Service• University data includes PUSF and State Programs• Enrollment for 2017, 2018, 2019 assumed at 2016 levels• Inflation adjustment based on Portland CPI-U• Excludes non-resident university enrollment
8
$9,315
$7,853
$6,396
$6,727
$7,172
$6,473
$5,013
$5,779 $7,084 $7,446 (GRB)
$7,724 (CSL)
1999-01 2001-03 2003-05 2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13 2013-15 2015-17 2017-19
Source: HECC analysis of state appropriation and student-level data.
OREGON UNIVERSITIES PRODUCE HIGH DEGREE OUTPUT WITH THEIR FUNDING
Source: HECC Office of University Coordination.
22.5
23.0
23.5
24.0
24.5
25.0
25.5
26.0
26.5
27.0
27.5
$0
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
$12,000
$14,000
$16,000
$18,000
$20,000
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
De
gre
es/
10
0 F
TE
S/F
TE
Education & General Revenues vs. Degree Output
(Inflation Adjusted)
PUSF $/FTE Non-PUSF E&G $/FTE including tuition Degrees/100 FTE
9
STUDENT SUCCESS AND COMPLETION MODEL (SSCM) DRIVES INCENTIVES
XXUOSUOregon Tech
Reward public universities for
resident student success
Incentivize progress to degree
Incentivize degree outcomes
Incentivize underrepresented
population completions
Incentivize in-demand degrees
Support valuable public service activity and
regional context
Differential mission support
Regional university support
Research support
Provide transitional and
institutional stability
Data averaging
Phased-in focus on completion
Stop Loss/Stop Gain
INTRODUCTION TO THE SSCM, GROUNDING PRINCIPLES
11
FUNDING FOR COMPLETIONS
Degrees at all levels are funded: Bachelor’s through PhD’s as well as graduate certificates
Cost adjustments are made to reflect program duration, program type, and for transfer students
• Low income, underrepresented minority, rural, and veteran students
Additional weighting is provided for students who complete from traditionally underserved student populations, including:
• STEM, Healthcare and Bilingual Education
Additional weighting is provided for students who complete in areas of critical need for the state, including:
12
PUSF ALLOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE SSCM
SB 860 and SB 5701 provided funding to universities outside of the SSCM that is now part of the PUSF CSL.
• SB 860 provided for a pilot program on mentoring students from low-income or first generation college-attending backgrounds.
• WOU and OSU received the grants and this work for 18 months of the current biennium and this work will continue through the upcoming biennium.
• SB 5701 provided funds for compensation contracts cost increases at PSU, EOU, OIT, SOU and WOU.
13
14
SSCM – INCREASING VALUE OF EACH DEGREE
Source: HECC Office of University Coordination.
$114
$7,963
$79
$45
$30
$40
$50
$60
$70
$80
$90
$-
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
$5,000
$6,000
$7,000
$8,000
$9,000
2014-15 (Pre-
SSCM)
2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 (GRB) 2018-19 (GRB)
Pe
r C
red
it H
ou
r A
lloc
atio
n
Pe
r D
eg
ree
Allo
ca
tio
n
Transitioning to Stronger Completion Incentive
Avg. Degree Completion Avg. Student Credit Hour
Per Credit Hour Allocation
Per Degree Allocation
15
SSCM – INCREASING VALUE OF EACH DEGREE
$526
$2,564
$2,144
$-
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
2014-15 (Pre-SSCM) 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 (GRB) 2018-19 (GRB)
Ave
rag
e D
eg
ree
Co
mp
letio
n In
ce
ntive
by C
ate
go
ry
Transitioning to Stronger Completion Incentive
Avg. Underrepresented Support Avg. In-Demand Degree Support
Source: HECC Office of University Coordination.
18%
33%
49%
Mission
Differentiation
Activity-based
Completions
16
INCREASING FOCUS ON COMPLETIONS
Source: HECC Office of University Coordination.
2014-15
2015-16
2016-17 2018-19 (GRB)
18%
66%
16%
20%
48%
32%
18%
33%
49%
2017-18 (GRB)
14%84%
1% $114
$7,775
$7,963
$2,354
$4,980
THIS BIENNIUM PRESENTS A UNIQUE OPPORTUNITY TO LEVERAGE INCENTIVES
Source: HECC Office of University Coordination.
$9,931
$10,078
$10,225
$10,372
$10,536
1.50%3.01%
4.51%6.02%
7.68%
4.2%
8.4%
12.6%
16.9%
21.5%
$10 $20 $30 $40 $50
Increase from GRB (millions)
FY18: An Opportunity to Leverage Degree Completion
Incentive
Comparison against GRB ($665M)
Projected Degree Incentive ($) Change in PUSF % Change in Degree Incentive (%)
17
AFFORDABILITY AND INSTITUTIONAL COSTS
WOU
UNIVERSITY: SHIFT OF COSTS FROM STATE TO STUDENT
Source: OUS Institutional Research.
9% 8% 7% 7% 8% 8% 8% 8% 8%
49% 46% 45%51%
58% 58% 59%66%
73%
43% 46% 47%41%
34% 35% 33%26%
19%
1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013
Public University Percentage of Total Revenue by Source
State
Appropriations
Tuition and Fees
Other
19
20
PUBLIC UNIVERSITY TUITION AND FEEINCREASES OVER TIME
$5,801
$9,115
$6,718
$9,115
$4,000
$5,000
$6,000
$7,000
$8,000
$9,000
$10,000
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Average Annual Resident University Tuition and Fees unadjusted for inflation
Average Annual Resident University Tuition and Fees adjusted for inflation
Approximate annual increase of
5.15%.
Approximate annual increase of
3.45% after inflation adjustment.
Source: HECC analysis of university and HECC data.
Notes: Tuition and fees based on 15 credits. Inflation adjustment based on Portland CPI-U, 2015 dollars with the
exception of 2016-17 which retains its current value.
21
AVERAGE STUDENT BUDGETS, OREGON PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES, 2016-17
Tuition and Fees
Books and Supplies
Room and Board
Personal Expenses
+Transportation TOTAL
$9,115 $1,280 $11,077 $2,895 $24,367
These are average estimates. Actual student budgets vary widely depending on
student circumstances, from availability of housing options to the variety of
books/supplies costs for different programs of study.
Source: Public tuition and fees: HECC Research & Data. All other figures: HECC-OSAC, 2016 Standard Student
Budgets for Oregon Public Postsecondary Institutions:
http://www.oregonstudentaid.gov/osac-doc/Student_Budgets.pdf
22
CURRENT TUITION AND MANDATORY FEES FOR RESIDENT UNDERGRADUATES
$8,004$8,589
$9,103
$7,960
$10,366
$9,123$8,337 $8,523
$10,762
$8,700
$9,870
$0
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
$12,000
Resident Tuition and Mandatory Enrollment Fees for the
2016-17 Academic Year (Full Time)
*=Entering Cohort Rate
Source: HECC Office of University Coordination
COLLEGE PAYS: OREGON STUDENTS EXCEED THE NATIONAL AVERAGE IN POST GRADUATE INCOME
Source: College Scorecard (US Department of Education).
$37,200
$52,000
$46,000$42,100
$36,800
$41,700$38,700
$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
$60,000
EOU OIT OSU PSU SOU UO WOU
Salary Ten Years After Entering for Federal Aid
Recipients (National Average=$33,500)
National Average
23
INSTITUTIONAL REVENUES SLIGHTLY OUTPACE INFLATION
Source: HECC Office of University Coordination.
$12,634 $13,112 $13,090 $13,099
$13,744 $14,667
$15,545 $16,270
$17,536
$12,356 $12,649
$13,276 $13,464 $13,402 $14,088
$15,021 $15,736
$16,619
$5,901$6,209
$6,842$7,327
$7,898 $8,201 $8,421 $8,718$9,229
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
Education & General Revenues compared to inflation, tuition
Actual CPI Adjusted (2006-07 base) Resident Undergraduate Tuition - Enrollment Weighted
24
6.8%5.7%
68.0%
19.4%
0.1%
TRUs 2013-14
UNIVERSITY COSTS BY CATEGORY HAVE REMAINED CONSISTENT OVER TIME
Source: OUS and institution annual financial reports. Compiled by HECC Office of University Coordination. 25
4.8%5.4%
65.7%
23.6%
0.5%
Oregon’s 7 Public Universities
(former OUS) 2006-07
Scholarships &
Fellowships
Depreciation
Compensation &
Benefits
Services & Supplies
Other Expenses
5.0%5.4%
68.3%
20.8%
0.5%
OSU, PSU, UO 2013-14
26
CHANGE IN EXPENDITURES (BIENNIALIZED)
9.5%
5.1%
9.7%
7.4%6.7% 6.8%
9.5%
16.6%
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
14.0%
16.0%
18.0%
2011-2013 2013-2015
Oregon (Public Post Secondary Institutions)
Far West Region (AK, CA, HI, NV, OR, WA) (Public Post
Secondary Institutions)USA (Public Post Secondary Institutions)
Oregon State Agency General Fund Total
Sources:
Postsecondary: IPEDS
Oregon Fiscal Data based on data from the Legislative Fiscal Office (LFO):
2009-11 Actuals (Budget Highlights 2013-15 LAB, based on 2013 Special Session and 2014 Session, Pages B1-B22):
https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/lfo/Documents/2013-15BudgetHighlightsUpdate.pdf
2011-13 Actuals (2015-17 Budget Highlights Update, Pages B1-B19, far left column):
https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/lfo/Documents/2015-17%20Budget%20Highlights%20Update.pdf
2013-15 Legislatively Approved (2015-17 Budget Highlights Update, Pages B1-B19, 2013-15 Legislatively Approved column (Middle
column)): https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/lfo/Documents/2015-17%20Budget%20Highlights%20Update.pdf
UNIVERSITY ENROLLMENT
OSU
28
21,000
22,000
23,000
24,000
25,000
26,000
27,000
28,000
Hig
h s
ch
oo
l gra
du
ate
s
White, non-Hispanic
-
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
Hig
h s
ch
oo
l gra
du
ate
s American Indian/
Alaska Native
Asian American/
Pacific Islander
Black or African
American
Hispanic or
Latino/-a
OREGON YOUTH PIPELINE INCREASINGLY DIVERSEOREGON PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATES BY RACE/ETHNICITY, 2000-01 TO 2014-15 (ACTUAL), 2015-16 TO 2033-34 (PROJECTED)
Actual Projections
Notes: Projections derived from HECC analysis and include progression ratios from kindergarten through high school graduation, use the most recent four years of data, and include students entering or exiting the public school system (typically through migration). Sources: Centers for Disease Control data on Oregon birth rates by race-ethnicity, National Center for Education Statistics data on Oregon public elementary and secondary school enrollment and on private high school graduates, Oregon Department of Education (ODE) data on public high school graduates, and historic ODE data on home school graduates.
ENROLLMENT (HEADCOUNT) BY RESIDENCY
Source: HECC Office of Research and Data.
28,418
57,839
-
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Public University Enrollment, Fall Term Headcount by Fee
Status: Resident and Non-Resident
Non-Resident Resident
29
SERVING A MORE DIVERSE STUDENT BODY: ENROLLMENT BY RACE/ETHNICITY
NOTE: Federal reporting changes in 2010 resulted in some students moving from the unknown to the minority category.
Source: HECC Office of Research and Data 30
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2016201520142013201220112010200920082007
White
Unknown
Two or More Races
Not U.S. Citizens
Native Hawaiian or
Pacific Islander
Hispanic
Black or African
American
American Indian or
Alaska Native
Asian American
RESIDENT FRESHMAN PARTICIPATION
2015-16 Public University Freshman Participation Rate as a
Percentage of Oregon Public High School Graduates,
2014-15
Source: HECC Office of Research and Data; Excludes home school completers and private high school graduates.
Less than 15%
15% – 19.9%
20% – 24.9%
25% or more
Participation Rate
15.0%Rural Counties -
Rural/Urban Participation Rate
Urban
Counties - 21.0%
31
OREGON INSTITUTIONS ARE DOING A BETTER JOB ENROLLING LOW INCOME STUDENTS
Source: HECC Office of Research and Data. 32
19,379 27,075
51,949
59,455
-
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
90,000
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
Undergraduate Student Enrollment by Pell Status
Pell Recipients Non-Pell Recipients
33
MANY UNIVERSITY STUDENTS QUALIFY FOR FEDERAL FINANCIAL AID
Source: HECC Office of Research and Data.
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
-
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
Pell Recipients in Oregon Universities
Pell Recipients Pell %
UNIVERSITY COMPLETIONS
OSU
2016 COMPLETIONS
23,375
Total Degrees/Certificates Earned
at
Oregon Public Universities
35
36
RISING DEGREE COMPLETION AT OREGON PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES
Source: HECC analysis of university student-level data.
12,66816,997
6,332 6,280
27,570
45,022
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
50,000
De
gre
es
Academic YearNumber of bachelor's degrees awarded
Number of advanced degrees & graduate certificates awarded
Total Degrees Awarded
Note: Total Degrees includes undergraduate certificates and associated degrees not
included in the other lines on this chart.
DEGREE PRODUCTION HAS INCREASED WITH ENROLLMENT
Source: HECC Office of University Coordination.
-
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
90,000
100,000
-
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
Degrees Versus Enrollment
BA/BS Grad. Certificate Masters PhD Professional FTE Enrollment
37
59.6%63.0%
55.4%
62.1%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Pe
rce
nt
of
stu
de
nts
gra
du
ate
d w
ith
in 6
ye
ars
Year of Fall Freshmen Cohort
Oregon public university 6-year graduation rate
Resident Nonresident
Source: HECC analysis of student-level data.
EVEN AS ENROLLMENT HAS INCREASED, SO HAVE GRADUATION RATES
38
39
THE MAJORITY OF “ROBUST” TRANSFER STUDENTS COMLETE, BUT NOT AT RATES EQUIVALENT TO PEERS
82.4%
62.4%
0
20
40
60
80
100
Pe
rce
nt
wh
o g
rad
ua
ted
with
B.A
.
Non-transfer students who persisted to third year
Transfer students
Notes: For this analysis, “transfer students” are defined as those who were admitted based on their college GPA,
which generally requires having earned at least 24-36 credits. Total rate is transfers from Oregon community colleges.
Institutional rates are for all transfer students.
Source: HECC analysis of student-level data.
GRADUATION RATE (6-YEAR) BY TRANSFER STATUS, 2015-16
University Students starting in cohort
Rate
EOU 278 51.8%
Oregon Tech
306 49.7%
OSU 1,198 62.4%
OSU Cascades
48 77.1%
PSU 2,275 60.9%
SOU 409 58.4%
UO 1,202 66.1%
WOU 442 63.6%
GRADUATION RATES BY RACE/ETHNICITY
11995-96 Fall First-Time Freshman Cohort completing by June 200122000-01 Fall First-Time Freshman Cohort completing by June 200632005-06 Fall First-Time Freshman Cohort completing by June 201142007-08 Fall First-Time Freshman Cohort completing by June 2013
Source: HECC Office of Research and Data
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
45.0%
50.0%
55.0%
60.0%
65.0%
70.0%
2003 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2009 Cohort
American Indian/Alaskan Native Asian or Pacific Islander
Black/African American Hispanic/Latino
White
40
RESIDENT DEGREES AWARDED AT OREGON PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES, BY PELL GRANT STATUS
Notes: Degree totals do not include certificates or Associate’s degrees. Collection of Pell data began in 2002-03. A student receiving
a Pell in any year before graduating is included in the Pell category. In 2008 Pell Grant eligibility was expanded significantly.
Source: HECC Office of Research and Data 41
4,855
6,520
5,8385,690
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
35.00%
40.00%
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
Resident Degrees by Pell Status
Pell No Pell % Pell
42
GOVERNOR’S RECOMMENDED BUDGET (GRB):
STATE SUPPORT FOR PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES
Activity Description 2015-17 LAB 2017-19 CSL 2017-19 GRB
Preserve Public University Support Fund
Preserves critical investments made last biennium to public universities to supporteducational and operational expenses
$667.3M $693.1M GF $667.3M GF
Change from 2015-17
0% from LAB-3.75% from CSL*
Support DebtService on Previous University Capital Projects
Supports debt service on previously approved capital projects for the universities
$151.6M($119.7M GF, $31.9M LF
$193.6M
($161.7M GF,
$31.9M LF
$193.8M($161.9M GF,
$31.9M LF)
Change from 2015-17
+21.8% from LAB+0.1% from CSL
NOTE: This slide focuses primarily on General Fund (GF) and Lottery Fund (LF) dollars, not Other Funds. LAB: Legislatively Adopted
Budget, GRB: Governor’s Recommended Budget, CSL: Current Service Level
*The GRB includes approval of the policy decision to implement but does not fund a new Current Service Level valuation method for the Oregon public universities. This method (directed by SB 5701 in 2016) is based partially on the Community College Support Fund (CCSF) methodology.
Making a Future for Oregon Students through Equity and SupportWays and Means Subcommittee on Education April 12, 2017
Overview of Oregon’s Public Universities:
Student Population and Outcomes
44
The State of Oregon’s Public Universities in 2017 • Universities serve more than 30,000 students
today than 20 years ago.
• Campuses are increasingly diverse in student and faculty populations.
• Universities serve more low-income and first-generation students.
• Completion rates and support services are improving with investment.
45
Total FTE Enrollment - Campuses Are Growing
-
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
90,000
Resident Nonresident
54,832
86,529
46Source: Higher Education Coordination Commission, 2017.
Source: Centers for Disease Control data on Oregon birth rates by race-ethnicity, National Center for Education Statistics data on Oregon public elementary and secondary school enrollment and on private high school graduates, Oregon Department of Education (ODE) data on public high school graduates, and historic ODE data on home school graduates.
Increasingly Diverse Student Pipeline
47
21,000
22,000
23,000
24,000
25,000
26,000
27,000
28,000
Hig
h s
ch
oo
l gra
du
ate
s
White, non-Hispanic
-
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000H
igh
sc
ho
ol g
rad
ua
tes American Indian/
Alaska Native
Asian American/
Pacific Islander
Black or African
American
Hispanic or
Latino/-a
Actual Projections
34%
38%
42% 42%
51%52%
50%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
2000-01 2002-03 2005-06 2007-08 2010-11 2013-14 2015-16
% o
f Fr
ee
an
d R
ed
uce
d L
un
ch E
ligib
le
Academic Year
Oregon K-12 Low-Income Studentsas a percent of total K-12 enrollment
48Source: Oregon Department of Education, 2016-17 http://www.oregon.gov/ode/reports-and-data/students/Pages/Student-Enrollment-Reports.aspx.
Financial Aid No Longer Covers Tuition & Fees
Institutional aid that helps fill the gap for
some students
49Source: Higher Education Coordination Commission, 2017.
Institutional Commitment to Closing the Gap Between Financial Aid and Cost of Attendance
50
Western Tuition Promise
Pathway Oregon
Bridge to Success Completer Grants and Finish Line Scholarships
Four Years Free Jackson & Josephine County Pledge
Food Insecurity & Use of Self-Sufficiency Programs Among Oregon College Students
• 60% of WOU students were food insecure during the school year.
• 11,929 students participated in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).
Sources: Prevalence and correlates of food insecurity among students attending a midsize rural university in Oregon. Patton-Lopez, Megan M.; Lopez-Cevallos, Daniel F.; Cancel-Tirado, Doris I.; Vazquez, Letici. Journal of College & Character. VOLUME 15, No. 4, November 2014; Oregon Department of Human Services Data Sheet: www.Oregon.gov/DHS/ASSISTANCE/Pages/data.aspx, 2017. 51
• Food insecurity during college years affects cognitive, academic, and psychosocial development.
• 133 Oregon families use student hours in Employment Related Day Care (ERDC).
High Degree Output Compared to State Funding
$3,539 $3,983 $2,860 $3,277 $2,746 $2,194 $2,220 $2,217 $2,295 $2,818
$10,769 $10,647 $12,306 $11,676 $11,802 $12,725 $13,313 $13,857 $14,323 $14,718
26.639
26.258
24.787 24.522
24.263
25.413
25.934 26.212
26.686 26.871
22.5
23.0
23.5
24.0
24.5
25.0
25.5
26.0
26.5
27.0
27.5
$0
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
$12,000
$14,000
$16,000
$18,000
$20,000
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
Education & General Revenues vs. Degree Output (Inflation Adjusted)
PUSF $/FTE Non-PUSF E&G $/FTE including tuition Degrees/100 FTE
Source: HECC Office of University Coordination52
Tuition
Borrowing, Access, and RiskStudents most at risk of default
• Have debt, no degree (dropped out before graduating).
• Have high debt/low earnings.
68% of public university students borrow
• Average indebtedness about $28,000 for OPU students (lower than avg. car loan in U.S of $28,667.
• Students most at risk have debt exceeding their starting salaries.
Students most at risk of over-borrowing
• Are low income with little to no family help or family borrowing experience.
• Depleted certain types of aid (e.g., Pell grants) before arriving at university.
53Source: LendEDU report: Student Loan Debt by School and State, 2016 Statistics
• Oregon Families are Paying More and Getting Less• Universities have been forced to cut academic advisors and student services• Opportunities for career connections have been lost – internships• Increased reliance on non-tenured faculty• Capital investments have been deferred
• Oregon’s Economy and Workforce is at a Disadvantage • Competitive disadvantage for Oregon businesses • Average household income has stagnated• Oregon is less equipped to deal with changing workforce needs • The talent import problem
The Cost of Disinvestment at Universities
54
The Value of a Degree:
The Rising Cost of Not Going to College
55
• In 2015, individuals with a bachelor’s degree working full-time earned $24,600 per year (67%) more than those without one.
• The unemployment rate for individuals age 25 and older with at least a bachelor’s degree has consistently been about half of the unemployment rate for high school graduates.
• College education is associated with healthier lifestyles, reducing health care costs, better civic involvement, and higher rates of home ownership.
• Public research universities are major engines of entrepreneurship and economic growth, ensuring states meet workforce needs.
The Value of a College Degree
56Sources: The College Board, “Education Pays 2016: The Benefits of Higher Education for Individuals and Society; “College degree completion and home ownership.” Diverse Issues in Higher Education, April 4, 2017; Association of Public & Land-Grant Universities, Public University Values, 2016.
College Pays: Oregon students exceed the national average in post-graduate income
$37,200
$52,000$46,000
$42,100$36,800
$41,700$38,700
$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
$60,000
EOU OIT OSU PSU SOU UO WOU
Salary Ten Years After Entering for Federal Aid Recipients (National Average=$33,500)
National Average57
Source: Higher Education Coordinating Commission, 2017.
It’s More Than Economics…
58Source: Association of Public & Land-Grant Universities, Public University Values, 2016.
Two Decades of Decreased State Funding: Cuts, Tuition, and Debt
59
Higher Education’s Cost Shifting Problem
60
State Funding for
Public Universities
Tuition Rates for Oregon Families
As state funding falls… …Tuition rates rise
Cost Shifting from the State to the Student
61
9% 8% 7% 7% 8% 8% 8% 9% 9% 9%
47%43% 47%
56% 57% 56%64%
72% 72% 69%
44%49% 46%
37% 35% 36%28%
19% 19% 22%
1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016
State Appropriations
Tuition & Fees
Other
Source: OUS Institutional Research
62
$-
$5,000
$10,000
$15,000
$20,000
$25,000
2001-03Actual
2003-05Actual
2005-07Actual
2007-09Actual
2009-11Actual
2011-13Actual
2013-15LAB
2015-17LAB
2017-19GRB
State Funding: Public UniversitiesCompared to All Other Programs
(General Fund + Lottery Funds, in millions)
All Other Education Human Services Public Safety
All Other State Agencies Public Universities
41.5% Increase for Public Universities - $311.9 Million
Source: 2001-03 Actual (Per LFO 2005-07 Update, May 2006); 2003-05 Actual, (Per LFO 2007-09 Update, March 2008); 2005-07 Actual (Per LFO 2009-11 Update, March 2010); 2007-09 Actual (Per LFO 2011-13 Update, March 2012); 2009-11 Actual (Per LFO 2013-15 Update, April 2014); 2011-13 Actual, 2013 Legislatively Approved, 2015 Legislatively Approved, (Per LFO 2015-17 Update, March 2016); 2017-19 GRB, (2017-19 GRB)
Education & General State Appropriations per Student FTE
$5,335
$6,109
$5,599
$5,160
$4,557
$3,792 $4,049
$4,448 $4,801 $4,894
$-
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
$5,000
$6,000
$7,000
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
63Source: Higher Education Coordinating Commission, 2017.
Source: 2015 State Higher Education Finance - State Higher Education Executive Officers (SHEEO)
2015-17 Reinvestment Has Improved Oregon’s Standing in Funding Per Student
Oregon 2014-15
Oregon 2015-16
(Preview)
64
Cost Efficiencies & Investments in Student Success
• Investments in administrative positions are critical for student success, completion, safety, and compliance:• Title IX Coordinators/Investigators
• Pre-College Coordinators
• Disability Services
• Career Services
• Testing Centers
• Retention Centers
• Financial Aid Counselors
• Academic Support Teams
• Emergency Management and Campus Security
65
Quality
Efficiency
Cost
A public university degree will be less affordable and students will be at higher risk of:
- Graduating with debt they can’t afford to pay back;
- Stopping out with debt prior to graduating; or
- Not even starting college.
66
Result of the Governor’s Recommended Budget
Turning the Tide:
2015-17 Investment and Outcomes
67
2015-17 Investment Led to Student Success
$665 million2015-17 Public University Support Fund
Financial Aid and Affordability Programs
Enhanced Academic Advising
CompletionEarly
Intervention
Student Enrichment for Veterans
Sexual Assault and Violence Prevention
68
69
Benefits of Investments
• Reduced the planned tuition and fees increase from 4.2% to 3.1% for in-state undergraduates during the 2015-16 academic year. A $90/per student savings.
• Hiring additional academic advisors. Ratio of students to advisors at PSU was 650:1, new ratio with additional advisors is 360:1. Standard maximum is usually 300:1.
• PSU has hired a Sexual/Relationship Violence Prevention Coordinator who works with campus partners such as the Women's Resource Center, Campus Public Safety Office, and Title IX Coordinator to ensure best practices for a safe and hostile-free campus climate.
• Expanded the “Pirates to Raiders” program, which strives to ensure every Hispanic student in the Phoenix-Talent school district has the ability to access a college education through SOU. The program improves the college admissions process for Hispanic families; increases the number of Hispanic students who earn a bachelor’s degree and/or advanced degrees; and encourages bi-lingual teaching careers.
• Launched the Jackson/Josephine Pledge (Fall 2016) to help high school students in the two-county area navigate the transition from high school to SOU through dual-credit opportunities, early advising, reduced tuition, and wrap-around student support services.
70
Benefits of Investments
• Increased fee remissions by $1M, targeted toward specific Oregonian populations, including Western Promise students (fixed-rate tuition), first-generation students, rural students, and veterans.
• Increased capacity, including hiring additional staff, for WOU’s successful Student Enrichment Program (SEP) funded in part by the federal TRIO program.
• Increased capacity, including hiring additional staff, for WOU’s innovative early academic risk intervention program in academic advising and providing support for on-line access for student assistance in courses supported through Moodle, Western’s on-line, open source learning platform.
• Hired additional staff as a joint Academic Affairs/Student Affairs initiative to advise veterans on academic and financial opportunities and programs.
71
Benefits of Investments
Benefits of Investments• Awarded Graduation Completion Grants: Providing grants to more than 100 juniors or
seniors who had exhausted state and federal financial aid.
• Added academic advisors dedicated to serving Pell-eligible students, targeting advising for low-income, first-generation, and minority students.
• Established the tenure track faculty initiative to increase tenured track faculty with an emphasis on STEM fields. A portion of these new faculty are funded by state investment.
• Improved services key to retention and completion, hiring additional retention specialists who use new analytics to identify academically or financially at-risk students and create a web of support services.
72
• 98% of Oregon Tech graduates employed or in graduate school 6 months after graduation (an 8% increase from the previous year).
• Increased degree completion through “completer” scholarships of $1,200 each for 150 successful students who are close to graduation but at risk of dropping out due to financial hardship.
• Increased success for 120 first-generation and low-income students through targeted, comprehensive advising, and expanded peer consulting and mentoring (a 75% increase).
• Utilized a personalized student texting program that eliminates social and logistical barriers to accessing necessary academic supports.
73
Benefits of Investments
• Grew enrollment of Oregon residents by over 350 students.
• Resident undergraduate tuition increase of 2% for 2016-17, the lowest increase in ten years.
• Increased spending for institutional financial aid by over 10% and grew scholarship funds from private donations.
• Invested in additional advisors and revamped courses with high failure or withdrawal rates.
• Began building analytics needed to maximize student degree completion through progress monitoring and proactive advising, tracking academic productivity, and identifying efficiencies.
• Expanded support services for victims of sexual violence and developed education and prevention programs for all students about sexual violence and the impact of alcohol and drug use on student success.
74
Benefits of Investments
• Provided access and success to rural and underserved students: Providing student support to multicultural and bilingual student recruitment, financial aid and career services for progress towards degree completion and success after college.
• Created models of affordability by increasing student financial aid and housing remissions to enable qualified, low-income students the opportunity of a university education.
• Built pathways for completion with Eastern Promise by leveraging the success of EOU’s program for accelerated learning in high school, and with community colleges by expanding transfer partnerships.
75
Benefits of Investments
2017-19 University Budget Request
76
A Look Back: 2015-17 By the NumbersState Appropriations for
Public University Operations
& Student Support(in millions)
Public
University
Support Fund
State
Programs1
Total
Education and
General
2007-09 Legislatively Adopted $692.3
2013-15 Legislatively Approved $522.0 $40.6 $562.6
2015-17 Legislatively Approved $667.3 $39.1 $706.4
2017-19 Governor's Budget $667.3 $39.1 $706.4
2017-19 Public Universities Request $765.0 $41.3 $806.31 State Programs include distinct institutes and centers across public universities, including engineering technology
sustaining funds; Statewide Public Services at OSU (Ag Experiment Station, Extension Service, Forest Research Lab) are
excluded.
+ $100M
77
78
Biennial Increase$235M
7.9%
$1,580.5 $1,688.0
$314.7 $345.3
$282.0
$341.4 $181.6
$194.3
$625.7
$650.5
$-
$500.0
$1,000.0
$1,500.0
$2,000.0
$2,500.0
$3,000.0
$3,500.0
2015-17$2,985M
2017-19$3,220M
Educational & General Costs
Biennial Increase
$235M7.9%
6.8%
9.7%
21.1%
7.0%
4.0% Supplies & Services/Student Aid( + $24.8 M)
OPE Other( + $12.7 M)
OPE Retirement( + $59.4 M)
OPE Health( + $30.5 M)
Salary & Pay( + $107.5 M)
Biennial % Increases by Cost Driver
Source: Data aggregated from the seven universities
79
$-
$500.0
$1,000.0
$1,500.0
$2,000.0
$2,500.0
$3,000.0
$3,500.0
Costs Who Pays Costs Who Pays
2015-17 2017-19Proposed
State
Students/University
Supplies & Services/Student Aid
OPE Other
OPE Retirement
OPE Health
Salary & Pay
State Support:
$665M > $765M22% Share > 24% Share
Educational & General Costs: Who Pays?
Source: Data aggregated from the seven universities
Public University Support Fund: The +$100M Climb
2015-17: $665M
+ $27.8M (DAS Current Service Level calculation)
+ $7.4M (HECC CSL Policy Option Package)
+$18.6M to cover states’ full share of costs
+$46.2M additional state support to protect students from bearing more of the full costs
+$765 million
80
$100 Million for Oregon Students
81
Thank You! Questions?
82