Order - Rehearing Denied - Obsidian Finance Group v. Cox
Click here to load reader
-
Upload
peacockesq -
Category
Documents
-
view
38 -
download
4
description
Transcript of Order - Rehearing Denied - Obsidian Finance Group v. Cox
![Page 1: Order - Rehearing Denied - Obsidian Finance Group v. Cox](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022100501/55cf98b6550346d033993ec7/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
OBSIDIAN FINANCE GROUP, LLC;KEVIN D. PADRICK,
Plaintiffs - Appellees,
v.
CRYSTAL COX,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 12-35238
D.C. No. 3:11-cv-00057-HZDistrict of Oregon, Portland
ORDER
OBSIDIAN FINANCE GROUP, LLC;KEVIN D. PADRICK,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
CRYSTAL COX,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 12-35319
D.C. No. 3:11-cv-00057-HZDistrict of Oregon, Portland
Before: ALARCÓN, M. SMITH, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously voted to deny Crystal Cox’s petition for panel
rehearing. Judges M. Smith and Hurwitz voted to deny the petition for rehearing en
banc filed by Obsidian Finance Group, LLC and Kevin Padrick, and Judge Alarcón
so recommended.
FILEDMAR 5 2014
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERKU.S. COURT OF APPEALS
Case: 12-35238 03/05/2014 ID: 9003449 DktEntry: 60 Page: 1 of 2
![Page 2: Order - Rehearing Denied - Obsidian Finance Group v. Cox](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022100501/55cf98b6550346d033993ec7/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no
judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P.
35.
The petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are
DENIED.
2
Case: 12-35238 03/05/2014 ID: 9003449 DktEntry: 60 Page: 2 of 2